• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Scientific Consensus Discredits Feminism
The Ephemeral Few »

Regret Rape Foiled By Text Messages

September 24, 2014 by CH

If you want to know what a culture steeped in the toxic feminist stew of kneejerk anti-male hatred looks like, this news clipping will help focus the picture.

A man suspected of raping a woman at knife point after hours on the El Molino High School campus was to be released from jail Thursday after prosecutors said they found evidence that may clear him of the assault.

Sheriff’s officials initially said a masked David J. Kocalis, 24, of Guerneville sneaked up behind the woman Aug. 30, held a knife to her and raped her near the Forestville school’s tennis courts.

He was arrested the next day on charges carrying a possible life sentence after the woman identified a prominent tattoo, and the car he was driving was captured on videotape.

But prosecutor Brian Staebell said Thursday investigators have since uncovered evidence that may point to his innocence. A judge allowed Kocalis, who had been held on $1.2 million bail, to be released on his own recognizance.

His lawyer, Evan Zelig, said a review of cellphone records showed Kocalis and the 18-year-old woman knew each other. Earlier in the day, she sent him a text message inviting Kocalis for sex, Zelig said.

Their tryst began inside his borrowed Porsche SUV but moved to a spot near the tennis courts because the car’s alarm kept going off, Zelig said.

After it was over, Kocalis drove the woman home, the lawyer said. She fabricated a story about being raped because she missed her curfew and Kocalis refused to lend her $20, Zelig said.

“It was determined her story was not credible whatsoever,” Zelig said outside court. “It was completely made up.”

This is a War on Men, whatever else you want to call it. An utterly innocent man was arrested, thrown in jail, and held on $1.2 million bail because this bitch was pissed he didn’t lend her $20 and she needed an excuse to tell her parents why she was out late.

Another false rape accusation leads to a man’s public shaming, and you can lay the blame on a feminist cunt propaganda machine that’s plugged into every apparatus of our tyrannical state. These noxious miscarriages of justice wouldn’t happen with such regularity if the legal system weren’t so prejudicially inclined to assume the best of women’s intentions and the worst of men’s.

Fuck feminism, fuck feminist water carriers like Emma Watson, and fuck the white knights lapping the runny shit of feminist hags for promises of steamy pig snatch.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Culture, Current Events, Goodbye America, Misandry | 153 Comments

153 Responses

  1. on September 24, 2014 at 10:33 am zenith

    does anyone know of an aggregator site for false rape convictions?

    link to heart warming story below:

    http://www.topix.com/city/athens-ga/2014/09/athens-woman-indicted-for-alleged-extortion-plot

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 10:42 am Mr Friendly

      This needs to happen

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 10:47 am rape me

        anyone involved with such a site will be branded a terrorist.

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 11:18 am Anon

        Unfortunately, the betas with the know-how to set up a website to aggregate false rape claims don’t believe in false rape claims.

        On the other hand, betas did invent email, voicemail, cell phones & text messaging, which have saved untold numbers of alphas from women. Who knows how many men have rotted in prison prior to such technology.

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 12:07 pm cryo

        “Unfortunately, the betas with the know-how to set up a website to aggregate false rape claims don’t believe in false rape claims.”

        I could do it pretty easily, but not for free.

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 1:25 pm trav777

        fuck these hoez

        LikeLike


      • on September 25, 2014 at 5:54 am wdodman

        Paul Elam at AVfM has a page called register her. There is also the false rape society which changed its name to CotFA Community of the Falsely Accused or something like that.

        LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 12:05 pm Col Nicholson

      Try this:
      http://www.cotwa.info/

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 4:31 pm zenith

        good source, thanks

        LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 1:10 pm Irish Savant

      “does anyone know of an aggregator site for false rape convictions?”

      If they have it’ll be a small one. I know of several cases where the woman got away with a warning. Another where she had to pay the “rapist” a modest sum in compensation. Totally and utterly outrageous.

      But the same happens with accusations of racism. Frequently one footballer will claim another directed a “racist slur” at him. Typical and most recent is the case of a Glasgow Celtic player accused of “excessive misconduct by the use of offensive, insulting and abusive language of a racist nature” The basis for this serious accusation (he could be banned for 12 weeks and heavily fined)? The UNCORROBORATED word of the ‘victim’. Nobody else heard anything, even Celtic’s opponents.

      There is indeed a war against White men.

      LikeLike


  2. on September 24, 2014 at 10:35 am Regret Rape Foiled By Text Messages | Manosphere.com

    […] Regret Rape Foiled By Text Messages […]

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 10:37 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      DEAR HEARTISTE,
      In some of the delightful conversations with you in the evenings of 2011 on K Street, and which served as an anodyne to the afflictions of the crisis through which our country was then laboring, the Christian religion was sometimes our topic; and I then promised you that one day or other I would give you my views of it. They are the result of a life of inquiry and reflection, and very different from that anti-Christian system imputed to me by those who know nothing of my opinions. To the corruptions of Christianity I am indeed opposed, but not to the genuine precepts of Jesus himself. I am a Christian, in the only sense in which he wished anyone to be: sincerely attached to his doctrines in preference to all others, ascribing to himself every human excellence, and believing he never claimed any other. At the short interval since these conversations, when I could justifiably abstract my mind from public affairs, the subject has been under my contemplation. But the more I considered it, the more it expanded beyond the measure of either my time or information. In the moment of my late departure from Monticello, I received from Dr. Priestley his little treatise of “Socrates and Jesus Compared.” This being a section of the general view I had taken of the field, it became a subject of reflection while on the road and unoccupied otherwise. The result was, to arrange in my mind a syllabus or outline of such an estimate of the comparative merits of Christianity as I wished to see executed by someone of more leisure and information for the task than myself. This I now send you as the only discharge of my promise I can probably ever execute. And in confiding it to you, I know it will not be exposed to the malignant perversions of those who make every word from me a text for new misrepresentations and calumnies. I am moreover averse to the communication of my religious tenets to the public, because it would countenance the presumption of those who have endeavored to draw them before that tribunal, and to seduce public opinion to erect itself into that inquisition over the rights of conscience which the laws have so justly proscribed. It behooves every man who values liberty of conscience for himself, to resist invasions of it in the case of others; or their case may, by change of circumstances, become his own. It behooves him, too, in his own case, to give no example of concession, betraying the common right of independent opinion, by answering questions of faith which the laws have left between God and himself. Accept my affectionate salutations.

      YOURS IN HOMERIC BROTHERHOOD,

      DA GBFM

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 10:54 am vagittarius

        lmao thanks tom lzozlzlzlzlzomglzozzl

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 12:28 pm Heywood Jablome

        Hey, GBFM, cool TJ call back. Are you saying your understanding of Jesus is the same as Jefferson’s?

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 12:30 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozlzlzlozolzozozlozlzo

        TJ copied da GBFM

        truthzziozz
        z
        zlzlzlzlolozloz

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 1:12 pm Lash

        That is good stuff, GBFM.

        And may I add, I would totally watch a documentary involving nothing more then GBFM and Heartiste talking on a corner of K Street.

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 6:41 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        THERE IS A DOCUMENTARY JUST LIKE THTZTZ COMING OUTZ!!

        only instead of talking, da GBFM and HEARTITESTZEZ are pimpin yo!

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 2:17 pm Heywood Jablome

        Are your beliefs about Jesus & Jefferson’s beliefs about Jesus identical?

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 2:45 pm Arbiter

        I am a Christian, in the only sense in which he wished anyone to be

        What every conservative, socialist, nationalist, anti-White, military, pacifist, law-abiding, criminal, Protestant, Catholic Christian says.

        It would help you boys if the book the Catholic monks put together, under great debate and much bitterness, wasn’t so laughably absurd that anyone who believed it all would be a madman. And if it didn’t contradict itself over and over again.

        Of course that’s why the religion is divided into hundreds of pieces, which have fought and killed each other ever since the franchise started. For centuries and centuries and centuries. But I’m sure they’ll all be able to agree on what their religion actually says. Any day now.

        As Friedrich Nietzsche – a much better man than Jew Saul’s fictional “Jesus” character – put it: “No nation has seen as many civil wars as the Kingdom of God.”

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 6:43 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        Dear Heartiste,

        When we are not discussing the exalted tenets of Christianity, i very much enjoy pimping with you:

        lzozollzozlzozozoz

        LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 10:45 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      heartiste,

      thou protesteth too much.

      you write, “Fuck feminism, fuck feminist water carriers like Emma Watson, and fuck the white knights lapping the runny shit of feminist hags for promises of steamy pig snatch.”

      please keep in mind that dalrock is a happily married father and many of his frankfratian followers get their cockas wet via game + feminism. there is no need to reform family law and the corrupt courts, as all that men need is a bit more game, and they too will be happy, even when their assets and children are seized. feminism gives dalrock entertaining things to post about so that we can all go lzozozoozozozozoozo omgz zlzllzozoozooz every day.

      there is no need to reform the culture with da Great Books for Men,

      man/christian up, learn game, and be happy.

      best, da gbfm

      lzozozoolzozolzozo

      http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2014/09/24/a-rebuke-for-yohami/#comments

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 11:10 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        Why must the manosphere remain anonymous? Because of the seething hatred for the Great Books for Men amongst Dalrock and his flock of frankfartian gamey fanboy followers.

        Morpheus: The Dalrockian Gamey Churchian Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you’re inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, Dalrockas Lotsas Coackas, teachers, Voxa Cockas, lawyers, frankfartian atheists Boxers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.

        http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2014/09/24/a-rebuke-for-yohami/

        Yes, Dalrock et al. are so “hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it,” and this is the genius of feminism, that it can convince men that they are being Christ-like when in reality they are hating on the Great Books for Men, hating on Plato, Homer, Socrates, Moses, and Jesus, and teaching and preaching that Christians need game, and that Christ came to abolish the Law of Moses–the very force of nature that could actually save and exalt nature.

        It was while commenting on Dalrock’s blog that I realized why we must remain anonymous, for Dalrock/Boxer/Vox hate the Great Books for Men so much that they are chomping the bit to out you and share it with their feminist friends, all for a bit of Churchian Joy and an Instalanche or two — just for kicks –just to “get a rise out of” the GBFM as one commentator put it.

        Long story short, Dalrock (Cypher) has realized that he likes the taste of juicy, delicious game — he likes the taste of steak — and although the Truth would set him Free, Ignorance is Bliss:

        And thus da GBFM must be castigated, impugned, belittled, condemned, and destroyed so as to maintain the gamey feminist state dalrock is so fond of.

        I lzloozozozlzlzozooz that I may not weep.

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 10:10 pm Randy the Random

        GBFM, I always suspected that you were a mad genius, but I could not decipher your cryptic tomes. Today you have shown me a glimpse of your true mastery.

        All hail GBFM!

        LOOOOOOLLOLZLZLLZLZLZLLZLLZLLZLLZLLZL

        LikeLike


  3. on September 24, 2014 at 10:37 am Adamn

    Hang her

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 12:52 pm browndar

      No. Clitorectomy and chemical burning of her face so that no sane man will ever want sex with her again and, even if some loser tooled her, she couldn’t enjoy it.

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 2:53 pm Arbiter

        But you forget that beauty is a social construct, so that even if she looked like a pig scorched by a blowtorch she would be just as beautiful as, say, Megan Fox when bending over the car hood.

        Men only think that some women are more attractive than others because … because of beauty contests. Which exist so that cosmetics companies and diet businesses can sell their products.

        Unclear why McDonald’s and other corporations in the food business wouldn’t have nurtured the idea, through their commercials, that obesity is beautiful, if our view of beauty is so completely malleable. The fast-food industry alone has far, far more money than the diet industry, which didn’t even exist until a while ago.

        LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 4:14 pm chi-town

      I am fine with a lobotomized sex toy to auctioned off for charity like counseling for being accused of false rape. Or a shelter for men who don’t have any money for defending against false rape charges.

      LikeLike


  4. on September 24, 2014 at 10:38 am Alex Jones SuperFan

    Scheming, numb,
    female scum

    LikeLike


  5. on September 24, 2014 at 10:41 am ghost

    And now she’s facing the same lengthy sentence that she was seeing him up f- hahaha hahaha hahaha hahaha! I almost made it through that with a straight face.

    LikeLike


  6. on September 24, 2014 at 10:43 am Adamn

    fucking bronies

    LikeLike


  7. on September 24, 2014 at 10:51 am Arbiter

    It is indeed a disgusting story. It reminds me of a recent story about a man expelled from a college in California because a girl accused him of sexual harassment, and even though there was no proof whatsoever they threw him out. A feminist psychologist at the college pushed for having him expelled. She writes books about rape on campus, harassment etc and was on a crusade for targets.

    The California senate voted this year to approve Senate Bill 967 about “Student safety: sexual assault” which forces universities and colleges to follow new laws, where a man can be expelled for rape without even being prosecuted in court. If he can’t prove that she gave “affirmative consent” he is a “rapist”. Every step of the way the girl must give express consent, and he must prove this.

    The bill says: “Lack of protest or resistance does not mean consent, nor does silence mean consent.” So if she is simply saying nothing during sex, he is a rapist. Even if the two are a couple: “The existence of a dating relationship between the persons involved, or the fact of past sexual relations between them, should never by itself be assumed to be an indicator of consent.”

    How much will this law be used? This is one of those leftist “rubber laws” that can be bent every which way, so no one can say when it should be applied. For a historical note, Stalin favored this kind of laws as they made sure everyone in the Soviet Union was guilty of a crime if he so wished it.

    This highlights a difference between the Right and Left when it comes to laws and rules. The Right sees them as safeguards for society that must be handled with care. They must be clear and precise so you know exactly what they say. The Left uses them as just another tool, something to attack their political targets with. Once again the difference is clear: the Right is about building, the Left is about attacking.

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 11:12 am thebillyc

      AAA- rachet breaks needed ? fuck me now t-shirts and underwear for the cunts; always on recorders in the gammas shorts-? campus kiosks for the hookup hookers to be? enter your slut willingness for the big banana today- tomorrow – or whenever on a scale of zero to ten, ten meaning naked now and juicy. select from the available gammas pictured below… off campus fuck houses where you sign legal documents prior to entry? lets build it “right” now. maybe the “bush” repubs would finance this… no. forgot – they only do little boys. we need the roosian mafia to break this femslut witchery.

      LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 1:38 pm Hilary Clinton

      Paragraph 4 is genius.

      Bet my life savings the psych is YKW.

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 3:04 pm Arbiter

        I haven’t been able to find that particular story again. But yes, if I remember correctly she was. The whole story was such a perfect example of what is going on.

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 3:31 pm Arbiter

        Ah, here is a story about it, but no mention of the psychologist in this one.

        http://www.businessinsider.com/occidental-sexual-assault-2014-9

        So they were partying, then she was in his dorm room (making out, obviously), and then he was alone in his dorm room texting her to come back there soon, clearly to have sex. She texted back: “Do you have a condom?” He wrote yes, and she wrote “Coming.”

        Then she texted a friend to brag: “I’mgoingtohave sex now”

        She says she doesn’t remember the night.

        The next day a male beta friend told her: “”I think you may have slept with John.”

        She replied: “Yeah, I figure that might’ve happened.”

        She got rid of her virginity that night, or so she claims. Then a week later she filed a complaint with the college, Occidental, claiming she had been raped.

        (That’s the leftist art college most known for Obama’s memoir claim of doing drugs there and hanging out with “Marxist professors and feminist structuralists and punk rock performance poets”.)

        And despite the man not being prosecuted for any crime – since there wasn’t any proof whatsoever of a crime – he was expelled.

        She claims she was too drunk to remember what happened. According to the new California Senate Bill 967 that means the college must treat the matter as if she was raped. If she was too drunk that night, she is not responsible for her actions.

        HOWEVER, the college says the MAN is still responsible for his actions even if he was too drunk:

        An outside lawyer hired by Occidental to adjudicate the sexual-assault hearing found that John was impaired beyond the point where he could have understood Jane’s condition but should nonetheless be held as responsible as if he had been sober.

        One standard for women, another standard for men.

        Occidental was sued in 2013 by a gaggle of women claiming sexual harassment on campus. They were represented by “prominent civil-rights lawyer” Gloria Allred. She gets a percentage of the extorted money and garners publicity for the leftist agenda. How did I know she was of the Tribe even before looking her up in Wikipedia?

        LikeLike


  8. on September 24, 2014 at 10:55 am JohnDSee

    Agree with ‘fuck feminism.’ This guy slipped up his game somewhere though. Didn’t give her plausible deniability or what ever switch she needed flipped. That being said, based on what limited info we have, he did nothing wrong in the legal sense. Hell, she may even regret the regret rape accusation. Maybe she has an unattractive older sister or faggot brother who convinced her to file the report. Again, he may have slipped in his game or reading of this chic.

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 11:08 am everybodyhatesscott

      Of course he did somewhere but slipping up your game shouldn’t give you life in prison. And a women’s word shouldn’t even get you arrested unless you’re a serious flight risk, and probably not even then.

      LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 11:21 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      yes, JohnDSee agrees with Dalrock.

      when a man gets thrown in prison because of a false accusation, it is all his fault, as he did not “game” hard enough, like dalrock the gamey christain would have.

      according to dalrock “christians need game” and his frankfartian flock the following are all caused by a lack of game:

      your wife leaves you: you didn’t game her enough
      the state seizes your children: you didn’t game your wife enough
      the state seizes your assets: you didn’t game your wife enough
      you are incarcerated for a false accusation: you didn’t game her enough

      long story short, dalrock agrees 100% with feminism. 1) a man must always sevre the gina tingzlzlzoo over truth, love, god, and law, and 2) everything that goes wrong is always a man’s fault, because he failed to serve said gina tinzgzlzz.

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 12:13 pm Lex

        Great point man I mean it!!!!!!!!!!

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 12:30 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozlzolz

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 12:35 pm JohnDSee

        Hah. Right. Agree with feminist doctrine/dogma. I was merely shedding (more) light on the fact that feminism has made tight (heh) game necessary in the first place. And the risk of being fucked over like this means you need to screen better. Also, read the limited info in the above article. Not enough to prove anything one way or the other. I’m surprised that da GBFM would draw conclusions so quickly, the nature of women notwithstanding. Maybe he’s a lawyer involved in the case, the relative anonymity of the internet and all. Still a GBFM fan. Cheers.

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 2:57 pm Knowbody

        his game is pretty tight as is, if this is to come of alphas then the betas stand no chance…bish is running out of her house at night, past curfew, most likely lying to her parents, INVITING HIM to bang, in his car…yea, he did alright. She just went full on crazy. If anything he negged her post coitus by denying the $20…bish I ain’t paying you anything. a man who has pretty good game woulda bought her a cab or something, this dude took it to the next level and dropped an abundance mentality neutron bomb not giving a shit if she gave it up again by coddling her feelings with a $20 spot

        LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 12:29 pm Scray

      I have no problem accepting that some things in life are out of my control. Game, while it feels like a superpower sometimes, is not in fact a superpower, and it’s really time to disabuse some of the mythos surrounding game.

      Game is not a panacea for all the stupid or superficial shit women may do. In poker, if a player receives two shitty cards and plays them the best he can, but still loses the hand, do we say “bro you just didn’t play hard enough?” No. People who play the game realize that sometimes the cards are just shitty, no matter how great a player you are.

      Some women are just shitty — they are people, after all. It’s not always “he fucked up his game.” If this chick had just stopped talking to him or told him “yeah, I felt uncomfortable,” then yeah, that’s a problem we can delimit to “his game.” But filing a false rape report in these circumstances? Come on, dude. This chick’s just an extreme liar. The true cause of this situation is her fucked up mental compass, which sits far to the left of your average THOT’s. PUAs aren’t pussy alchemists trying to transmute black hearts into golden hearts.

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 4:53 pm pulsotic

        Excellent point about the cards. Even though your analogy makes complete sense, maybe it’s human nature to believe you can always change your circumstances. The logical conclusion of that false premise is that if you’re hanging at the end of a rope, you had the power to prevent it. Shoulda woulda coulda my Dad used to say.

        LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 2:21 pm trav777

      Dude…game schmame…if the fuckin chick is psycho, you’re gonna get fucked over. What the fk you think happens when you finally dump her?

      Women pull all kinds of crazy shit these days.

      LikeLike


  9. on September 24, 2014 at 11:04 am Concerned

    Apparently the false accuser is 18, so her name should end up public record when she’s charged.

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 11:13 am tteclod

      …IF she’s charged.

      Another reason concealing the name of a purported rape victim is a VERY BAD IDEA.

      LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 11:55 am pupton1974

      Really! When is this whore going to be locked up for her REAL crime???? The man she falsely accused needs to file a criminal complaint, AND sue her. This should shame the bitch, and be a lesson to other bitches with similar ideas.

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 2:18 pm Heywood Jablome

        Never gonna happen.

        LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 2:20 pm zodak

      her name is nowhere, meanwhile this man’s name is dragged through the mud & forever associated with this false accusation every time his name is googled in the future.

      LikeLike


  10. on September 24, 2014 at 11:12 am tteclod

    “Fuck feminism, fuck feminist water carriers like Emma Watson, and fuck the white knights lapping the runny shit of feminist hags for promises of steamy pig snatch.”

    Perhaps this is one of those few occasions where the word “fuck” isn’t applicable to the admonition. Let’s NOT fuck “feminis[ts], …feminist water carriers, …[or] white knights,” especially because they lap “the RUNNY SHIT OF FEMINIST HAGS FOR PROMISES OF STEAMY PIG SNATCH.” [Emphasis mine.]

    LikeLike


  11. on September 24, 2014 at 11:26 am Why must the manosphere remain anonymous? Because of the seething hatred for the Great Books for Men amongst Dalrock and his flock of frankfartian gamey fanboy followers. | Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM(TM) GB4M(TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN(TM) GREATBOOKS

    […] JohnDSee preaches Dalrock’s gospel: https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/09/24/regret-rape-foiled-by-text-messages/#comment-618248 […]

    LikeLike


  12. on September 24, 2014 at 11:26 am friggindoc

    @anon why do you think only betas have Technical skills and intelligence? John McAffe is alpha as fuck and hes a computer scientist that invented one of the first antivirus programs!

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 12:45 pm The Burninator

      Some people buy into the nonsense that to be alpha you have to be a welfare check receiving bum who fucks a lot of low class whores.

      The notion that man can be dominant in more than one realm of life escapes most these days.

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 2:27 pm trav777

        become badass…pilots are alpha; guitar players are alpha. Dudes who know who to do shit and recite Shakespeare are alpha.

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 7:33 pm Nomennovum

        I recited Shakespeare while I shit (shat/shitted). Being alpha wasn’t something that came to mind, truth be told. I just had nothing to read and was bored.

        (Hamlet’s soliloquy.)

        LikeLike


  13. on September 24, 2014 at 11:28 am ‘Reality’ Doug

    Paging Zombie Shane. Your brother is here. Time for the non sequitur deluge.

    Regarding OP, if there is not an abrupt social change in time, it won’t matter if a man is innocent on obvious evidence. The goal is to destroy rival white men not justice. They take what they can get as conditioning to take more aggressively later.

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 2:23 pm Zombie Shane

      > “if there is not an abrupt social change in time” In the long run, none of these Unitardian/Churchian/Jesuitical koolaid-swallowing puppets of the Oscar Mayer Wiener Academy will persist in the Tree of Life. Demographically, they are ghosts already.

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 3:56 pm thwack

        Hey Zombie, I hate to break the nooz to you but the dinosaurs died out when a gigantic asteroid hit the Earth; not from lack of bunz in ovens.

        LikeLike


  14. on September 24, 2014 at 11:30 am Dick Tater

    Well, for the 200th time fellas: Dictatorship can go a long way towards mitigating these problems. Start thinking free.

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 3:41 pm Arbiter

      Yep.

      If the 20th century has taught us anything it is that parliamentary democracy is controlled by the media.

      “But you can still start a party of your own if you don’t like it.” And have your career ruined, have your wife leave you, have friends or would-be friends avoid you out of fear that they will also be targeted. Then be attacked outside your home, have your car burned, have your windows smashed in the middle of the night by communist terrorist groups that are indirectly funded by the government. While the media call you a criminal and hide the crimes committed against you.

      In most dictatorships throughout history, dissenting has been easier than in democracy today. No king had this much control over people’s lives. People out in the villages could live their whole lives without ever seeing a government official. And revolution was always an option – often easier than the chances of a true opposition party making it despite the daily propaganda and thousand mechanisms of oppression today.

      LikeLike


  15. on September 24, 2014 at 11:31 am loveinyamouth

    She’s a hooker-in-training from all indications who failed to negotiate $20 prior to a smash fest so recruited the government to be her pimp. Doughnut hole eating fucks couldn’t file charges fast enough before doing an iota of investigative work because what better way to announce ‘this is what a feminist looks like’ to their hippy sloth busted potato face TRT taking 3-inch clit dangling wives than to punish a guy for getting what they have to jump through a million hoops for – it can’t possibly be that easy – so they think. white knights gonna knight

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 12:20 pm prevailtolegend

      I think you might be on to something. You touched nicely on the whitey tighty knight aspect of uniformed fuck boys. Every creep tard beta Ive come across that’s a cop, especially the ones involved in vice would gladly fuck any and all of their so called victims they’re helping out and the hookers on back page they’re always trying to bust their white pasty bellies all over. And then these fuck faces have their family day picnics in the park looking all like city employees about to get drug tested, sweating so much cause they can’t wait to get their itchy asses back in a position of power over a woman with the threat of incarceration.

      LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 2:58 pm Knowbody

      haha brilliant dude, lost it at TRT taking

      LikeLike


  16. on September 24, 2014 at 11:39 am cloudswrest

    Is it “regret rape” or “stiffing a whore” rape? Although $20 seems kind of cheap.

    LikeLike


  17. on September 24, 2014 at 11:40 am Nathan

    Emma watson = jennifer lawrence. Soon we will all see pics of her *** drenched face

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 3:04 pm Knowbody

      on this Emma Watson thing….where the fuck does she come off being a big shit UN Ambassador to Uraguay…really? Fucking Uraguay? Who in their right mind gave her this responsibility? This girl’s biggest accomplishment in life is landing a role her parents probably lined up for her in fucking harry potter. Now her opinion is a reflection of the general female population? I’m sure she “gets it”…a real, down to earth girl…a rag tag, independent woman who took on the world against all odds. Gimme a fuckin break. Do girls actually think she has any comparable lifestyle to their own? Goodbye America…and world. For worshipping false idols you retards, zero credibility but all the voice and influence. utterly blows my mind

      Fucking celebrities man, they’re out of control

      LikeLike


      • on September 28, 2014 at 1:33 pm haunted trilobite

        You nailed it: it’s a lunatic asylum

        LikeLike


  18. on September 24, 2014 at 11:41 am Amy

    Aggressively prosecuting these women would help. And feminists should get behind it, because not only does it ruin men’s lives, it damages the credibility of real rape victims. It damages the credibility of women generally. I think she should have to go to prison. I think he should sue her civilly, too.

    LikeLike


    • on September 26, 2014 at 7:40 am Reco

      Unfortunately the goal of feminism is not about helping woman. It is not even about catching rapists and punishing them.

      The goal is about hate. Pure visceral hate of normal men for being men. It is hate for their nature and hate of who they are as a gender. Even hate for human nature because they are not selected.

      Don’t look at what women say. Look at what they do.

      If they gave two shits about legitimate women victims of violent rape this bullshit would end tomorrow.

      Hell just look at Bill Clinton. It does not matter if you like him or not. He did everything feminists hate and not a word from them. Crickets. But if some poor schlub happens to fuck a chick and she gets buyers remorse or her boyfriend finds out about it then that schlub is totally fucked.

      I dated this chick she was gorgeous smart sexy, had a lot going for her. One day she tells me this story about how she was raped. I am all concerned she tells me how she woke up at some dudes house naked. Someone she knew had raped her, she gets her clothes and goes home. Tells me she did not go to the police but they must have drugged her. Ruffles right? And of course I believe her. Great girl.

      Then one night when we were out she gets totally shit faced drunk, then the next night again. And again. And when she is really drunk she is super sexually aggressive. So I realize what the fuck? This chick was drugging herself with alcohol when she got raped and I may be next false rape victim. So I did the ass covering morning after text. And slowly eased my way out of there.

      Actual ruffles In Drinks drugging is as rare as date rape and the Yeti.

      Thanks CH for keeping this disgusting depravity up in everyone’s face.

      LikeLike


  19. on September 24, 2014 at 11:59 am Why must the manosphere remain anonymous? Because of the seething hatred for the Great Books for Men amongst Dalrock and his flock of frankfartian gamey fanboy followers. | Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM(TM) GB4M(TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN(TM) GREATBOOKS

    […] JohnDSee preaches Dalrock’s gospel: https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/09/24/regret-rape-foiled-by-text-messages/#comment-618248 […]

    LikeLike


  20. on September 24, 2014 at 12:10 pm elmer

    Feminism has reached high tide. Clinton is making it the center-piece for her presidential bid. Voter response will be flaccid. Were she to succeed, count on her naming Sheryl Sandberg and Kirstin Gillibrand to her cabinet. Early legislation will focus on wealth transfer through minimum wage hikes, curbing sexual harassment in all its forms, and firewalling ForeignBrides. Her campaign success will be in part due to integrating 4chan into her social justice warrior/victim playbook.

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 1:50 pm ALPHAbetacal Order

      Except Clinton is a the bait in the Elizabeth Warren bait n switch strategy

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 4:27 pm elmer

        Probably true. Clinton will stir up the fan base with attack rhetoric which the real candidate can distance herself from.

        LikeLike


  21. on September 24, 2014 at 12:16 pm YaReally

    Should’ve given her an Egg McMuffin (metaphorically speaking).

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 1:01 pm rape me

      mcAnything isn’t food. real HBs wouldn’t be caught dead in that place. even skittles men have to draw the line somewhere.

      LikeLike


  22. on September 24, 2014 at 12:24 pm Col Nicholson

    Here’s an excellent & amazing article from 2008 on campus rape and travelling “road shows” that helped ramp up the hysteria.

    http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_1_campus_rape.html

    LikeLike


    • on September 26, 2014 at 1:05 pm pulsotic

      Wow, that was an amazingly well written shiv to the feminists. Bookmarked for easy citing during arguments. Thanks.

      LikeLike


  23. on September 24, 2014 at 12:26 pm driveallnight

    http://blog.sfgate.com/sfmoms/2014/09/24/mom-irate-when-2nd-grade-teacher-refuses-vagina-cookies/

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 2:17 pm cheesetrader

      This would so awesome if true

      LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 3:44 pm Greg Eliot

      It wasn’t the cookies, per se… it was the cream filling.

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 7:57 pm driveallnight

        One cookie was an octoroon macaroon. She called it a thwackerdoodle.

        LikeLike


      • on September 25, 2014 at 6:19 am Greg Eliot

        Most droll… and more preferable than a bizarro-world Oreo.

        LikeLike


  24. on September 24, 2014 at 12:27 pm elmer

    google(“Drunk Female Guests Are The Gravest Threat To Fraternities”);

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 1:23 pm greyghost

      check out the salon article on it. It looks like the feminine imperative PC crowd is butt hurt over men speaking truthful reality in the open. Forbes’ PC editors sure don’t approve http://www.salon.com/2014/09/24/mit_frat_alumni_president_forget_rapists_drunk_female_guests_are_the_gravest_threat_to_fraternities/

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 3:36 pm elmer

        The president of the Beta Foundation was merely pointing out that intoxicated females are a serious liability who should be barred from entry into a frat party. Of course Salon journalists get unhinged about everything else unrelated to that fact. Off-topic but I still am mulling over a Spearhead essay “Stock Photo Men React to Salon Vaginas”.

        http://www.salon.com/2014/09/10/the_real_story_of_how_women_evaluate_mens_junk/

        LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 2:19 pm Heywood Jablome

      Forbes flushed it down the Memory Hole.

      LikeLike


  25. on September 24, 2014 at 1:04 pm peckerwood

    wow, that’s fucking evil. Ruin the guy’s life just because she missed curfew?

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 1:25 pm Trainspotter

      Come on, it was over more than that. Don’t forget the $20 that Mr. Porsche wouldn’t “lend” to her. Surely that’s enough to tip the scales.

      But come to think of it, there is a certain delicious irony in a Porsche-driving douchebag going down over a Jackson.

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 2:19 pm cheesetrader

        In all fairness, the article says the Porsh was “borrowed”…..(hot wired?)

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 3:06 pm Knowbody

        if you find that “delicious irony” because he banged a dumb co-ed in his porsche strictly because he’s getting ass…in a nice ride then you have some more work to do bro…..let go of the AFC mentality and try to find out what this “dbag” has that you don’t.

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 8:39 pm Trainspotter

        knowbody: “if you find that “delicious irony” because he banged a dumb co-ed in his porsche strictly because he’s getting ass…in a nice ride then you have some more work to do bro…..let go of the AFC mentality and try to find out what this “dbag” has that you don’t.”

        LOL! Lighten up, Francis.

        LikeLike


  26. on September 24, 2014 at 1:04 pm Lash

    There’s something so obvious I’m surprised you didn’t point it out. This man was publicly shamed by whole name. The identity of “the 18-year-old woman” remains protected by the uniformed white knights.

    LikeLike


  27. on September 24, 2014 at 1:05 pm thwack

    Hold on. If I may play blond haired, blue eyed, white devils advocate for a moment;

    what color was this guy?

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 1:27 pm Trainspotter

      “If I may play blond haired, blue eyed, white devils advocate for a moment…”

      Credit where it’s due: nicely done.

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 2:20 pm Heywood Jablome

        Agreed.

        LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 2:43 pm eofahapi

      Kokalis sounds like a Greek name.

      LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 3:40 pm Greg Eliot

      what color was this guy?

      Same as us, thwack… same as us.

      LikeLike


  28. on September 24, 2014 at 1:09 pm Broadsman

    It’s like “To Kill a Mockingbird” only with white guys and educated females.

    Atticus Finch, the world calls for you!

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 3:39 pm Greg Eliot

      They may make a movie of the week for Lifetime or somesuch… but they’ll never allow the white male equivalent of To Kill A Mockingbird mythos to deeply penetrate the psyche of Western school children.

      Even back in my day the turning tide was palpable… the Illiad was being replaced with Catcher In The Rye, and Ivanhoe supplanted by To Kill A Mockingbird.

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 3:47 pm PA

        I too have sat through a few feminist postcolonial lectures on Beowulf.

        It’s interesting, what accident of circumstances or innate quality of the individual keep his psyche unpenetrated by these mutant mythos.

        LikeLike


      • on September 25, 2014 at 12:28 pm Greg Eliot

        It’s interesting, what accident of circumstances or innate quality of the individual keep his psyche unpenetrated by these mutant mythos.

        I’m guessing it’s something along the lines of being called into Jehovah’s service… you’re either born to be chosen or you ain’t. 😉

        LikeLike


  29. on September 24, 2014 at 1:11 pm Bob Wallace

    Golly gee! Everyone keeps telling me tattoo-wearing, Porshe-driving “Alphas” don’t get sexual harassment or rape charges against them and I tell telling them the reality of “Hell has no fury like a woman scorned” trumps fantasy. Even if they cower behind their invulnerable “Shield of Game”!

    [CH: super try-hard.]

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 2:24 pm zodak

      go back to puahate

      LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 7:23 pm Nomennovum

      dafuq? Tattoo wearing and driving a Porsche? Is that like chunk necklace-wearing sailboat racers?

      LikeLike


      • on September 25, 2014 at 8:11 am wolfie65

        While there aren’t many Porsches around here -especially not near campus – virtually everyone under 50 has at least 1 tattoo somewhere.
        Wouldn’t shock me at all to see some shaved-headed, overall-tatted, lip-pierced, eyebrow-pierced, tongue-pierced dude barreling down the road in a Volkswagen-on-crack.

        LikeLike


  30. on September 24, 2014 at 1:14 pm Bango Tango

    The war on men goes on. Honestly I don’t know how much longer the pua community wants to take chances with game. We need to really get behind the sex bot revolution because this is getting ridiculous. The new law in CA is another perfect example of the dystopic future ahead for men.

    LikeLike


  31. on September 24, 2014 at 1:22 pm Just Saying

    “It was determined her story was not credible whatsoever,”

    Until women face the same type of jail-time that men falsely accused of these types of crimes face, it will continue. Why not make that the punishment for false allegations – if you lie, you face the same jail time as the falsely accused. I dare say that women would scream and yell about that, since almost ALL false allegations are women accusing men..

    So when it turned out that it was over money, why wasn’t she charged with being a prostitute? Oh, right… She’s a woman and they are starting to only arrest men for that these days… Can’t arrest women for a crime…. That would be… Sexist…

    LikeLike


  32. on September 24, 2014 at 1:56 pm Scray

    @Hunter

    Reply to this: https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/09/23/the-scientific-consensus-discredits-feminism/#comment-618206

    “But he judges me if I don’t approach correctly or with enough intent (stifling me as a result). And then he’ll lecture me for hours on racism (with sprinkles of game) etc. which yeah, boohoo, it’s bad but not really my concern at the moment. I know he’s trying to help but his perception of me as this guy who needs help is not who I am anymore. I’m not that bad at all.”

    Yeah, I used to get annoyed too when my wing would critique me like that — even when I started getting better results than his. But now, man…it would be great to just go out with him again and get that feedback. There’s really nothing better than another pair of eyes and ears to help you learn and grow.

    We’re all biased in favor of ourselves, and we will always make excuses. “Yeah, I’ll just do it next time” or “I forgot this time but it’s basic, I know it,” etc. etc. When you have someone else call you out, you fucking hate it — it’s like pain. And well, no pain no gain.

    So yeah, I understand it’s stifling…but ultimately, it will be less stifling, because you will just get everything right (or at least reach a level of competence past his ability to spot incompetence).

    The racism stuff is annoying, but I believe it’s good. You have to know the truth about the world. My wing simply -did not- understand that issue. Fortunately, I started becoming more aware of it as time went on.

    ‘But when you’re out with a wing and you’re talking to each other more than girls, there’s a problem’

    For sure. You should take the lead, though. Take the time to cut off conversation and go chat up some chicks. Then come back. I’m not sure if you’re aware yet, but you’re starting to change your role in group settings. You used to be the guy who hung back and just did what every one else was doing. Now, you’re training yourself to be a funmaker. That means, when your group is fagging out talking to each other at a venue full of women….your mission is to unfag your boys: introduce some fresh meat.

    As a disclaimer — they will give you shit for going around and talking to girls, especially when a girl doesn’t immediately suck your dick. But that’s because they need to make fun of you — if they just jerked you off about how much cooler you were than them and thanked you profusely for at least giving them a shot at not going home dick-in-hand…well, they would feel bad about themselves. And when you find and bring a girl back to the group who likes one of your boys — he won’t give you credit. He will act like his James Bond bullshit did the trick.

    So, it may seem like a thankless job…but it isn’t. People show their thanks and gratitude through action — they will always invite you out, they will always try to get in on your shit, they will always include you. The reality is that people just like to complain, and they complain the most about the tightest people, precisely because they entrust the tightest people to lead (which subjects every decision that ‘tight’ person makes to scrutiny).

    Tangential point: this is the same principle behind a lot of interaction. For example, you get six-pack abs and some guy says ‘man you must spend all day in the gym.’ Guys get flustered and fall into a ‘maybe I shouldn’t have six-pack abs, I look like a tryhard’ frame. But why? Why the fuck would a dude comment on your abs if he didn’t feel threatened in one way or another? Even someone who is -trying- to AMOG you like this views you as a threat and is trying to neutralize you. And when you can meta out the interaction this far, you realize that by him even saying anything you have already won — it’s just your frame to lose. You can just straight douche-steamroll their frame at this point, “nah, it’s pretty easy for me to not be a fat fuck, is it hard for you?” you can go uber diplomatic “Ya, I’m into fitness,” or you can settle into deceptive self-deprecation “yeah, but mostly I’m just in there looking at my body in the mirror.”

    You can start tailoring your responses to your “AMOG.” Like, the dickbag response is for the unconscious AMOG who says it because he’s obviously threatened and will react. The diplomatic one is for an AMOG who knows his shit and is doing it on purpose (this is optimal…it’s flat and emotionless…rival, competent AMOGs are like incubuses…the only way I can successfully shut them down — regardless of their skill level — is to just be very humdrum and boring regarding whatever they say). The self-deprecation is for a beta who is unconsciously or consciously trying his hand at AMOGging.

    This is an important life lesson the game has taught me. tl;dr for all that if he’s being boring, make the night more interesting. You said you were going to approach next time, and that’s cool. But honestly, try to make it a fun night for both of you.

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 9:17 pm Hunter

      @Scray

      “The racism stuff is annoying, but I believe it’s good. You have to know the truth about the world. My wing simply -did not- understand that issue. Fortunately, I started becoming more aware of it as time went on.”

      You know, I haven’t even seen any racism while gaming in the last year and a half of going out. Have you witnessed anything super racist? I feel like I get good responses wherever I go.

      This is part of why it annoys me. I feel like most minorities who complain about race just have old baggage that isn’t relevant anymore. I see myself as an individual, first and foremost. Race lol.. I don’t know, I just don’t see it as an issue (although my past of hanging out with multiple races since I was kid is likely a factor in my way of viewing people).

      AlphaWing told me of when he brought two black girls to a club and they turned him away, but they would’ve accepted him in if he brought white girls. It’s probably true. But in my mind I’m like, well, I either don’t go to that club anymore, or I just add in a white chick if I ever feel like going. Never happened to me (never pulled in JUST black chicks) and if I have social proof, does it matter? I’ll have to test it for myself.

      “For sure. You should take the lead, though. Take the time to cut off conversation and go chat up some chicks. Then come back. I’m not sure if you’re aware yet, but you’re starting to change your role in group settings. You used to be the guy who hung back and just did what every one else was doing. Now, you’re training yourself to be a funmaker. That means, when your group is fagging out talking to each other at a venue full of women….your mission is to unfag your boys: introduce some fresh meat.”

      Now that I’ve noticed, for sure. Although, my social circle is still full of puas… I’m going to entrepreneur meetups now, just mingling with a different crowd. But yeah, definitely more proactive in giving value than I was before.

      “Yeah, I used to get annoyed too when my wing would critique me like that — even when I started getting better results than his. But now, man…it would be great to just go out with him again and get that feedback. There’s really nothing better than another pair of eyes and ears to help you learn and grow.”

      How’s game/life man? Who you winging with these days? I’m curious as to what sort of path you’re taking as opposed to YaReally’s hyperfocus.

      “And when you find and bring a girl back to the group who likes one of your boys — he won’t give you credit. He will act like his James Bond bullshit did the trick.”

      Lol wow… thanks for the heads up…

      “So, it may seem like a thankless job…but it isn’t. People show their thanks and gratitude through action — they will always invite you out, they will always try to get in on your shit, they will always include you. The reality is that people just like to complain, and they complain the most about the tightest people, precisely because they entrust the tightest people to lead (which subjects every decision that ‘tight’ person makes to scrutiny).”

      This comes back to Yareally’s epic post on social circles. I don’t (can’t) do the complaining shit anymore, it just drains me. And I’m not sure I want to hangout with people like that either. But I accept this is how people are.

      “This is an important life lesson the game has taught me. tl;dr for all that if he’s being boring, make the night more interesting. You said you were going to approach next time, and that’s cool. But honestly, try to make it a fun night for both of you.”

      I’m definitely going to aim to make it more fun, as opposed to where I’m letting him frame control me into the master and pupil frame. Read it all man, thank you.

      LikeLike


  33. on September 24, 2014 at 2:30 pm eofahapi

    This is sad.

    Yesterday I heared a story, my uncle told me, something that happened 15 years back. A man he knew from the same street as him killed him self because he had been accused of touching two 12 year old girls. The girls accused him, and there was no evidence, he was shamed. By the time the case would have reached court it would have concluded he was innocent, because there was NO evidence, just two girls word against his. But he was so traumatized the poor man hanged himself.

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 2:42 pm eofahapi

      I just checked with my father about that time, and he said yes he also knew the man, it happened and the guy was a good man.
      He has also remembered some other innocent men who were accused of it also. He was accused by a ten year old girl, and the man was a family man 70 years old, well respected and fought two wars.

      And just last year my neice went to a high school party with a group of girls, (she was 14 years old.), and one of the girls in he class was drunk out side the school and accused a 20 year old guy of raping her. He allegedly drive past and took her and raped her in the fields and took her back.
      She went to hospital, there was no sign of forced entry, and when she was sober she said she changed the story.

      This is all sad because some people genuinaly get raped, and it is like the story of boy who cried wolf, if many girls are falsley accusing innocent men, the really abused will suffer. And innocent men will go to prison, or be so socially stigmatized.

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 7:54 pm Marko

        Unless things change I expect this type of thing to happen more often. Grl Pouwer with unlimited entitlement, promotion of rape culture in media and degradation of men’s role in society will create every incentive to falsely accuse men.

        Someone should do a FAQ on what to do if falsely accused. It could same some dudes lives.

        Molon Labe.

        LikeLike


      • on September 25, 2014 at 10:25 am eofahapi

        You are right. It could save someone’s life.

        Men also need to be so careful. Recently I was in my neighbors garden and there was children playing and trying to come in his garden gate. I had been fixing something in his garden and had given some water to some of the children because they were thirsty, and asked me. (They usually play by my garden gate.)

        My neighbor came and shooed them away. I said please, relax they are just children, they just wanted some water. (I thought my neighbor is being grumpy). But he said no, because when you are not here and children just walk in my garden gate, it looks strange and people will talk. (Basically he is afraid he could be accused of something). It clicked that he was right, so I had to send them away.

        I think especially with bad parenting, children are likely to make these stories up, they want attention. You can not be too careful. A accusation against a innocent man can be life destroying. Even if there is no evidence for it to go to court, it is a social stigma that such a claim is even made against a man, because there will always be some people who believe he did it.

        White men are socially stigmatized for a ACCUSATION with out evidence. While the Rotherham men it was covered up, because they are ethnic minorities. (The people high up admitted it). Insanity.

        LikeLike


  34. on September 24, 2014 at 2:31 pm Anon

    And no mention in the story of the prosecutor’s office looking in to charging her with filing a false police report.

    LikeLike


  35. on September 24, 2014 at 2:34 pm Anon

    “Fuck feminism, fuck feminist water carriers like Emma Watson, and fuck the white knights lapping the runny shit of feminist hags for promises of steamy pig snatch.”

    Now can you tell me how you really feel about feminism?

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 4:22 pm JohnDSee

      Anon douchebag drive-by comment that adds nothing. Lacking wit or insight. At least people are free to post here and don’t have to deal with that gay ‘karma’ system that many of the libtard sites utilize. Freedom.

      LikeLike


  36. on September 24, 2014 at 2:46 pm Culum Struan

    YaReally, HABD, reco, walawala and the gang. Any suggestions on reply to this HB8 22 year old girl online?

    She has an unusually strong frame. I haven’t (obv) qualified to her, but not clear to me how to take the pressure off and move in a different direction (Note: my profile is a bit assholish – women either love it or hate it and get offended):

    Me:
    Her (Overnight when she next logged in): So, what are you offering exactly that sets you apart from the other men on here?
    Me: (30 min later): Heh. You read my profile didn’t you?
    Her: (20 min later): Yes I did..hence I’m asking you.
    Me: (3 hrs later): Hmm..you’re not a crazy online dating girl planning our wedding already are you?
    Her: (2 hrs later): If I was, I wouldn’t be on this site..you say in your profile you don’t take girls out on nice dates and do the stuff boyfriends are expected to do…well, what are you offering?

    I’m going to leave it overnight anyway (and let her hamster spin cos she can see I’ve read her message), but any suggestions appreciated.

    I’ve got about 10 online girls in the texting rota – working on practicing sexualization and trying to get nude pics..and I just had another FB come over and had sex today (hence the gap in me replying to her above) so I really don’t need this girl..but this is an intellectual challenge now..how to hold my frame and relieve the pressure in this conversation?

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 5:06 pm Nomennovum

      “what are you offering?”

      Your answer: “My company. You sure ask a lot of questions, but this is a crappy and boring* way to get a dialog going. So give me your number.”

      ____________________
      * God knows I’m bored reading it. I see this a lot. Girls love to suck you into pointless back-and-forth. Get her number or drop her.

      LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 5:24 pm Nomennovum

        BTW, waiting overnight to answer her simple question of “what are you offering” will not get her hamster spinning, if she sees that you read the message. She’ll likely thinking, “He’s just thinking of something clever to say.” And she’ll be right. When you wait too long and she knows you’ve read the message, a good tactic is also to ignore the question and reply with something that sounds like you’ve ignored it and are changing the topic but, in reality you are answering the question while ending the pointless back-and-forth: “Jeez, you need more excitement in your life. Give me your number and get offline.” (She’s 22 years old, so punctuation should be omitted.)

        LOL is not called for as a response to her question, especially with the amount of time that has passed she you n\knew you read her text. Nor is sexualizing things yet, unless you think she is a slut. In which case just do this: 8============D

        LikeLike


      • on September 24, 2014 at 7:13 pm Nomennovum

        Hell, 8==============D is a pretty good response regardless of her slutitude, because she’s 22. Too bad so much time has passed. Better to ignore the question, and get her to qualify herself to you.

        LikeLike


    • on September 25, 2014 at 12:53 am Scray

      All right, so here’s where person-specific reads come in….

      seems like her SMV isn’t sky-high and her self-esteem is middling, at best

      clue 1 — on a dating website
      clue 2 — ‘i’m not a loser’ narrative — “if I was, I wouldn’t be on this site.”
      clue 3 — will not fucking drop it

      You: lol well I don’t give out resumes, lets just meet up and talk. if you like me, great. if you don’t, that’s cool too.

      —–> wordy, ya…but it shows investment, which is really what she wants…some sort of comfort branch to grab, and it also maintains the frame of ‘I’m not answering such a stupid question.’ But careful, there’s a risk of her interpreting the last part as stand-offish.

      You: lol I couldn’t say…this isn’t a transaction to me…life and love are more complicated than that. I just meet people and try to get to know them.

      —-> I always like shit like this because you’re disarming her with chick-crack-lite, but careful, there’s a risk of her interpreting this as ‘this guy is a pussy.’

      You: the funk, mostly/candy/a rapist wit

      —> just something stupid. Fun tension-breaker. Careful here though, this chick is like a dog with a bone and may not back off.

      I’d go with option 2. Seems safest considering that she’s got some self-esteem issues, so going earnest may help you out — or get you to the meet up.

      If she bit, I’d follow it up with some ‘yeah I don’t do those normal things boyfriends do because they’re just empty gestures…what matters is how we feel when we’re with each other, fuck the rest’ bad-boy-romantic narrative shit like that. She’ll probably eat it up.

      If she’s still insistent on being unfun….I say just cut her loose with ‘well, either you’re interested or you’re not…I don’t want to waste your time, later.’ It’s kind of a cunty hail mary….if she’s into you but just a maladroit girl, she’ll pull back. If she wasn’t interested well, then you won’t waste any more time.

      LikeLike


      • on September 25, 2014 at 7:18 am Culum Struan

        @Scray, @nomennovum – thanks guys that’s really useful.

        Yes, it’s not ideal waiting overnight after I read her message but I’ll take that tradeoff if the alternative is a poorly considered reply.

        I think I’ll go with some variation of Scray’s option 1 or 2 – the idea is to not fall into the frame of answering her question and still move the conversation on (pref to meeting up). It may not work, but I have plenty of girls in the rotation..

        Scray dude – the breakdown was really interesting. I’ve been reading a lot of YaReally posts in the archives recently and a lot of them are in response to your FRs and it’s amazing how far you’ve come in a couple of years..

        LikeLike


  37. on September 24, 2014 at 2:52 pm Culum Struan

    Oh and to follow up my comment above re online dating girl HB8 – I can basically see 3 options to reply:

    1. Just “lol”
    2. Sexualize – something about spanking her for impertinence (but the vibe isn’t there)
    3. Total non-sequitur – “the sky is blue today” or some such.
    4. Some form of rating – from an old CH post – something like “C+. Sassy but not sexy”

    I’m leaning towards No.4 – maybe with a “lol” tagged on at the end.

    Just not clear on the path forward with this girl..what comes next in the conversation?

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 3:07 pm Reservoir Tip

      tell her to go fuck herself

      Or to go eat a dick

      Wish I was kidding, but this is something I’ve been doing on tinder lately, and it’s being eaten up. Some girls wants to drive 2 hours to come boink because I called her a degenerate for getting hammered drunk, and then told her to go fuck herself.

      Sad times.

      LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 3:14 pm Sentient

      Try “we’ll see how you play your cards”

      LikeLike


    • on September 25, 2014 at 1:02 am Scray

      I can see these options being more viable if this was the -first- response after she asked you what you were offering, but look at the interaction — you’ve tried some iteration of these moves (except pure non-seq). She has balked at them.

      Every response doesn’t have to be pure game.

      She’s already interested — you’re talking to her online. Online tinder swipes/OKC responses barely even register to me as needing game because the game is like 80% over as soon as she responds, and it’s 99.999999% over if she messages you first. You really don’t need as much C&F or whatever. Just give her enough comfort to get her number and meet up with her.

      LikeLike


    • on September 26, 2014 at 7:46 am Reco

      Sentient has the best so far. This chick is trouble even if she does fuck you. The line “well see” works in many of these situations. Just go fuck your FB and in between bangs when waiting for round two. Then send your reply.

      LikeLike


  38. on September 24, 2014 at 2:52 pm Reservoir Tip

    OT, but somewhat related to the Daily Show post in the Twitter feed:

    You’ll notice that whenever a conservative of any stripe is lobbed through the interview meat grinder with a left-wing lackey journalist, the journalist is quick to include any and all “um’s” that the unfortunate interviewee may have sputtered out.

    The word “um”, despite seeming otherwise petty, has a very strong effect on how others perceive the speaker. Mutter, “um” and you might as well be shouting aloud for everyone to hear, “I have no confidence, and no idea what I’m talking about.”

    Liberal finks and stoolies know this. This is why they include them in their interview transcripts with those that the status-quo deems removed from modern society. Just find an interview to read online and you’ll know exactly what I’m talking about. Never will you see the same treatment given to a liberal being interviewed.

    Two little letters are the separation between confidence and senile blabbery. They separate the predators from those bleeding in the water.

    “Like” is another word you can add to the list.

    Obviously this can be applied to game as well. Unsure of what to say? Gathering your thoughts?

    Resist the urge to let out an “um” or a “like”. It’s better to leave a person hanging, eagerly waiting for your next contribution to the conversation, than it is to sound like an over-eager, or clownish jackass who has no idea what he’s talking about.

    LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 3:52 pm thwack

      “You know” is the worst one.

      LikeLike


      • on September 25, 2014 at 7:38 am bc23point5

        My biggest grammatical pet peve is when someone begins a sentence with “I mean…”

        And by pet peve I mean that in my mind I visualize ripping their spine out through their mouth.

        LikeLike


    • on September 24, 2014 at 4:44 pm PA

      Another journo trick is to stop talking or fail to say anything in response to you, or fail to ask a new question, so that the guest gets uncomfortable with the silence and starts filling it with blather. Don’t be afraid of dead air. It is not your responsibility.

      A media savvy individual goes into a hostile media environment armed with memorized and rehearsed talking points. You know how presidential candidates at a debate acknowledge a moderator’s question (often a question that has a premise he may disagree with) and then just segue into their own talking points?

      Do that. And unless you are very verbally fluid in those situations, and you feel very confident, do not stray from your rehearsed talking points.

      You did catch the fact that I said “rehearse” a number of times, right? Rehearse, rehearse, rehearse.

      LikeLike


    • on September 25, 2014 at 3:27 am Scray

      The Daily Show, The O’Reilly Factor, and Generic Cable News Opinion Program are all agenda-driven entertainment and parts of a propaganda scrum. So it’s unsurprising that these pre-show huddles concentrate on something other than fair play.

      I like PA’s Presidential debate tactics in the context of game, though. I should try that — have a few general talking points for every social situation. Something slightly less ad hoc.

      LikeLike


  39. on September 24, 2014 at 3:50 pm Greg Eliot

    Hmmmm… Machete might have to rethink this whole “don’t text” thing.

    LikeLike


    • on September 25, 2014 at 3:36 am Scray

      Unfortunately, releasing Dexter Douglas’s text records only solidified the prosecution’s case.

      LikeLike


      • on September 25, 2014 at 6:21 am Greg Eliot

        Damned if you do, and if you don’t… okay, you convinced me, old ways are best.

        Machete still don’t text.

        LikeLike


  40. on September 24, 2014 at 4:37 pm Nomennovum

    If you point out false rape claims and the fact that they are very common, you are branded a hater of women. This is feminism.

    LikeLike


  41. on September 24, 2014 at 4:55 pm Nomennovum

    I sometimes send a text to a woman the day after I first fuck her. It’s somewhat beta, but it does the trick and gives me peace of mind: Something along the lines of “Holy shit, that was fun last night.” I do this because I tend to meet up with younger and slightly crazy women (mainly because I am older but I hate the saggy, wrinkly flesh of women that aren’t at least 15 years my junior). Crazy is fun for a while, but it’s dangerous too.

    Usually, I don’t have to send anything, as they text me first, as a rule, but if I don’t hear from them within 24 hours, I text. In my business, better safe than 100% alpha. So far they have all responded positively, and I immediately re-establish the right frame (if I intend to keep seeing her).

    LikeLike


  42. on September 24, 2014 at 5:26 pm Nathan

    Yeah man,

    Celebrities? Emma Watson? GTFO.

    LikeLike


  43. on September 24, 2014 at 8:14 pm Dirty Randy

    CH, prosecutors in the military are trained in understanding “counter-intuitive victim behavior” to help explain away to the jury inconvenient facts like why a rape victim would continue a relationship with her rapist. I’d love to see a CH-patented take-down of this sophistry using the knowledge of how the hamster works.

    LikeLike


  44. on September 24, 2014 at 8:34 pm Mad Max

    LikeLike


  45. on September 25, 2014 at 2:35 am North coast con

    I’m from that area of sonoma county where the “alleged” rape took place. No surprise the poor fellow was accused as that area might be one of the largest area of leftists in the whole fucking country. Some of the grateful dead have homes in that area.

    LikeLike


  46. on September 25, 2014 at 6:23 am Eliezer Ben-Yehuda

    >> I could do it pretty easily, but not for free

    No need. Somewhere, someplace, somehow, a junk-yard-dog attorney will comprehend that false-rape allegations are a gold mine waiting to happen, with respect to finding a set of deep pockets.

    The SJW’s thought they were being ===so=== clever with inventing “waiting periods” for purchase of a firearm…. and then eventually, were not able to argue against “waiting periods” for abortion.

    So it will be with false-rape charges. They actually do cause a tort. Torts can ALWAYS be addressed in the courts.

    LikeLike


    • on September 25, 2014 at 7:16 am socks

      Firearms and abortions are not comparable though. Your body won’t be forced to go through an uncomfortable, publicly visible, body-altering process that culminates in your genitals and whole body going through extreme, torturous, flesh-rending, incontinence-inducing pain for several hours, after which you’ll be forced to being a parent in case you fail to purchase a firearm within a certain timeframe.

      The gun won’t change, your life or body won’t change in any way no matter how long you wait. It’s different.

      Granted, I’m not from the US and don’t know exactly what the deal with the waiting periods are, just wanted to point out that a physical object and a medical procedure are different things

      LikeLike


  47. on September 25, 2014 at 7:08 am socks

    So are you actually telling me that in cases like this, the US justice system does nothing? When someone lies to the police or the law officials with malicious intent to harm an innocent person, taking up public resources, making a fool of the law and also tries to destroy someone else through libel, which is also illegal in my understanding? No consequences? Ridiculing the law and blatantly, intentionally lying to the officials, lol nothing?

    I don’t understand how your legal system could allow that shit to go on, it’s dangerous and sets a dangerous example of how you can easily lie and manipulate the legal system for your own ends.

    LikeLike


  48. on September 25, 2014 at 10:41 am Transparent Society

    Reblogged this on Transparent Society.

    LikeLike


  49. on September 25, 2014 at 12:40 pm Live n Learn

    http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/sep/25/court-rejects-solicitor-general-rhiannon-brooker-jail-term-false-rape-claims

    At least they sentenced her to 3 odd years… in the US and many other countries would this even be possible? We’d have ‘paternal’ judges and psycho feminists raising hell about her fragile state blah blah…

    hey motherfuckers, did any of u ever think abt the damage done to innocent men? course not, the expendables right?

    When the time comes, those in power be it politics, the judiciary or the media, they all need to pay the price for this shyt!

    LikeLike


  50. on September 26, 2014 at 3:37 am Regret Rape Foiled By Text Messages | Truth and...

    […] If you want to know what a culture steeped in the toxic feminist stew of kneejerk anti-male hatred looks like, this news clipping will help focus the picture.  […]

    LikeLike


  51. on September 26, 2014 at 10:06 am Dr. Giggles

    What needs to happen is for the man to file a civil lawsuit against the girl and make it publicly known so other women don’t dare to file false rape charges.

    Young girls in their teens and early twenties are more entitled in certain ways than their older sisters. They’re still in that princess phase where they will summon an older white knight/parental figure type to bring the hammer down on whoever fucked and discarded them.

    This is especially the case if they are younger and the girl feels afterward the man is beneath him. This is what happened to Jameis Winston. A pretty white southern princess summoned the dogs against a negro interloper who pumped and dumped her.

    LikeLike


  52. on September 27, 2014 at 12:18 pm bo jangles

    How mucho do you want to bet they don’t prosecute her? After all shes been through sooo much (eye rolls).

    LikeLike


  53. on September 27, 2014 at 8:05 pm bicklerain

    “She fabricated a story about being raped because she missed her curfew and Kocalis refused to lend her $20, Zelig said.”

    Wow, that’s just not prudent. Women don’t want men to be providers as much now because careers! But fuck, man, that’s wasn’t a good move to pull right after sex. It probably made her feel like shit.

    LikeLike


  54. on September 27, 2014 at 8:07 pm bicklerain

    Dr. Giggles,
    Way to be PC. Black men are by far the most likely to actually commit rape. When somebody accuses a black man of rape there’s actually a decent chance it really was rape.

    LikeLike


  55. on October 1, 2014 at 7:22 am Master Beta

    Don’t get a tattoo.

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    gunslingergregi on Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat C…
    Dread Forman on “Conspiracy Theory…
    swimologist on “Conspiracy Theory…
    long dong silver on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Lichthof on The Confound Of Silence
    Thor on The Confound Of Silence
    gunslingergregi on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    long dong silver on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Tobin72 on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Amon Ra on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • ¡SCIENCE!: The NPC Leftoid Hivemind Is Real
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • Manifest Depravity
    • The Diminishing Returns Of Anti-White Virtue Signaling
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • Revolutionary Spirals To Civil War 2
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: