Damn, this site’s really gone downhill. I read Cheap Chalupas more than this blog now. I guess at some point normal people just get bored of the bitterness. You’ve backed yourself into a dingy corner bro.
They talk about race, a lot. LewRockwell.com is the only libertarian outlet I have seen that is racialist, though they have to hide it by allowing “both sides” to speak. But they post Pat Buchanan’s articles, for example, and Blacks like Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams who point out holes in the media’s pro-Black stories. Then you’ll get a nutjob like Becky Akers posting once in a while in the LRC blog about the evils of having Immigration stop immigrants. But they wouldn’t post the race realists if they didn’t believe in the truths they bring up, so that’s one libertarian outlet that does okay on race.
…Other than that it’s an abysmal bunch of denialists in the libertarian corner. That’s what happens with any movement that isn’t explicitly conservative or explicitly nationalist, it turns leftist. Going the same way as liberal (i.e. classical liberal, libertarian) parties in Europe – the egalitarians come to dominate, and equalism and mass immigration in the name of Freedom become more important than freedom. Until they’re just low-tax leftists.
Besides the paleolib Rockwellites, Charles Murray is a libertarian who seems to tackle racial differences. There’s no reason why libertarians have to be race denialists. You could say blacks are not equal to whites in intelligence but still take a libertarian position they have equal political rights just as lower IQ whites have the same political rights as higher IQ whites. There may be a general problem for libertarians, though. You might argue that an appreciation for freedom requires a certain IQ threshold. You could then argue that IQ is genetically based and that blacks will never reach that threshold and we can’t allow a possibility that they ever get political control. You can see what happens in places like Detroit when they do get such control. Therefore, a libertarian might have to be a race denialist or admit that libertarian beliefs about freedom can’t be made universal and applicable for all races.
So… Guilt by association is the game we’re playing. All “Darwinists” are atheist then too, no?
“guilt by association”? No, GUILT BY BEING GUILTY. The libertarian movement has failed the American people on mass immigration. It could have talked about country-as-the-people’s-property but didn’t. The libertarian organizations and parties are overwhelmingly in favor of immigration. No “association” needed.
“Hey hoodrats, Black Barbie comes with a removable weave, which hides her nappy head! Turn her around to see her neck tatt and tramp stamp! Enjoy countless hours of ghettofabulous fun! All Black Barbie’s carry EBT cards so you can shop on the taxpayer’s dime! Get your Black Barbie today! Now with *body odor!*”
The photo above reminds one of the differences between Classical music versus Rap and Classical Western art versus Contemporary art. People intuitively know the differences between quality and crap when they see and hear it no matter how much the Cathedral tries to tell us that Rap/Contemporary Art/Blacks are good while Western art/Classical music/White people are bad.
Keep your heads up gentlemen, barbarism and dark ages won’t last forever. Truth will win out over the long run.
The black female websites complain about the white porn stars getting paid more too. It’s actually hilarious to read the comments and how they completely don’t understand supply and demand. I guess it’s a difficult concept for a 90 IQ brain.
Nonwhite porn actresses destroyed the porn market for white females by using the internet to get around the cartel which artificially limited white female sexual behavior in order to inflate its value.
Nonwhite porn actresses destroyed the porn market for white females by using the internet to get around the cartel which artificially limited white female sexual behavior in order to inflate its value.
Abundance is the enemy of profit.
White females slapped by the invisible hand.
??? “artifically limited white female sexual behavior”? If that’s what drives up prices, then why would customers want more NON-WHITE female sexual behavior?
“by using the internet”? Nope. Porn websites were not set up by Black porn actresses.
“abundance is the enemy of profit” says the leftist ignoramus. Why then do clothes producers produce massive amounts of clothes? Leftists know only a small, small part of economics and apply that to everything as it fits their hatred. “driving up prices by limiting demand” works for A FEW goods. Two of them being diamonds and oil. These are called “price-elastic” goods. But THE VAST MAJORITY of goods have proportional prices. In other words, decrease output by X percent and prices will rise only proportionally, not more than that, so you don’t actually gain anything. You’ll sell for a higher price but you’ll sell less, and the price is not “elastic”, doesn’t go up more than proportionally.
Leftists have heard only of “limiting supply” from media talking about oil, and they are too dumb to understand it doesn’t apply to anything. Leftists love thinking everything is limited to drive up prices – it helps make the rubes angry.
Now you think that porn output was limited (yeah, there’s so little porn produced!) in order to drive up prices. Which would only work if all porn producers had been in a cartel. Hah. Hah hah. Porn as a price-elastic good and limited by a cartel, that’s absolutely hilarious.
Marketers have to reduce prices until it hits a price point that the market will accept.
Not if they have a cartel, or even better, a monopoly on production or distribution and create artificial scarcity.
White women in porn must do far more different sexual acts for less money, than they did in the past because the internet and nonwhite females have destroyed the porn cartel which kept white womans value inflated.
off topic but if anyone gets a chance, watch ‘labor day’ with some of the women in your life to get a refresher peep into their nature.
escaped convict (josh brolin) takes mom and son hostage (gently) proceeds to be manly, spout advice, and rail the single mom (kate winslet) while the son lies awake and ponders life to the sounds of his mother’s moans.
the plot isn’t groundbreaking but the girls’ reactions to it were a cold splash of reality. they (late 20s attractive, some married) were on the verge of soiling the couch cushions. a lot at play in that he is admittedly manly, but then there’s the convict aspect that i know they were liking, and the danger and mental damage to her son the mom (and the women watching) overlooks, based on the girls’ faces it was like the notebook times two.
On another note, trying to find a CH short-story about two guys shooting pool with two girls watching. The beta guy – Dave? – invited the girls because he has been hitting on the hot one for ages, but his alpha friend gets all the attention, teasing the girl in just the right way. He draws the piece of chalk over the unattractive girl’s shirt and says “Sorry, Dave dared me to”, and the hot girl says, “I don’t think Dave’s the one causing trouble here.” When Dave hits a ball right and the girls say it’s a good shot the alpha guy says, “That wasn’t a good shot.” Pause. “That was a great shot.” And so forth. Ring a bell?
The funny thing is that the black barbie has white facial features. Straight hair and a narrow nose and lips.
No, the funny thing is your ignorance. There is no such thing as “white features” because black people had them first; if you weren’t such a prole you would know this. Parts of Asia and Africa are full of women who look like that.
The only real “white feature” is called a sunburn.
No, the funny thing is your ignorance. There is no such thing as “white features” because black people had them first;
Where do white people come from?
LOL Dumbass. Whites don’t come from Blacks just because of the “originated in Africa” theory. Do you think humans came from bonobos too? No, they were a completely separate branch of the development of apes.
It’s undisputable that Negros have Negroid traits. Even if your lie about “blacks had them first” (LOL) would have been true, they obviously don’t have them NOW. But Whites do. So Anon2’s argument still stands, that White Barbie sells more because people like the features Whites have.
But that’s inconvenient for you to think about, so you take off into a side issue. Nice try.
Barbara Charline Jordan (February 21, 1936 – January 17, 1996) was an American politician and a leader of the Civil Rights movement. She was the first African American elected to the Texas Senate after Reconstruction, the first southern black female elected to the United States House of Representatives, and the first African-American woman to deliver the keynote address at a Democratic National Convention. She received the Presidential Medal of Freedom, among numerous other honors. On her death, she became the first African-American woman to be buried in the Texas State Cemetery.
Barbara Jordan looked like a typical west African. On the other hand, go look at the pictures in the National Civil Rights Museum and it’s immediately obvious that a large majority of the ‘black” leaders of the movement had substantial non-African heritage.
Just googling why prices differ, I found posts about black barbies that cost more and why that’s a problem. Variation in price makes sense when you consider location of the store and how the barbies are selling there. I thought it was ridiculous to worry about prices.
Someone well-read like you wouldn’t post something as stupid… who are you pandering to?
RR: “If Europe didn’t awaken when Mohammedans raped & pimped out 1000s of their children in Rotherham,they never will…”
I dismiss these kinds of (sometimes) triumphalistic statements. In order to take action, people need to have a formal or informal leadership and support structure. Absent those things people just grumble and do nothing.
Kind of like that fictional whigger in Gran Torino. As Eastwood’s character made it amply clear, a white teenager in the ghetto is on his own.
There was a scene in which Eastwood chases off three ghetto blacks who are about to beat up a white whigger and rape his hmong girlfriend.
It’s on YTube if you look for “gran Torino best scene.” My earlier point was that the otherwise satisfying scene unfortunately ends with Eastwood symbolically dusowning his son, one of mine filicide themes in the movie.
RIght, but that was the whole idea of the movie – that Eastwood’s character was horrified that his very own flesh and blood had grown up to be spoiled effete SWPL Hipster Mammon-Worshipping Unpersons, and that he disowned them, in favor of Real Persons. I felt like it would have been an infinitely better movie if he had knocked up either the Hmong MILF or the Hmong eldest daughter [or both of them] – the chemistry was certainly there, and it would have made the movie so much less nihilistic if he had left behind some little Eastwoods in his wake.
Plus Eastwood’s best possession wasn’t the Gran Torino. It was the Garand. The final scene [after the credits] should have been a very pregnant Hmong gal getting a package, containing a Garand, and a note stating, “Give this to our son on his 16th birthday.” And then the final music is a fade-out of “From the Halls of Montezuma…”
You know, instead of suggesting violence against innocent fellow believers, why don’t you propose violence against the perpatrators’ families? Far less collateral damage and it is BOUND to work. Saudis and the Russians showed it.
Just on a totally different front- did anyone hear Eleanor Beardsley on NPR this morning? I don’t listen to NPR but I overheard her talking about the Paris shootings. Basically the city’s motorways are shut, one gunman turned himself in and two other suspects were seen. There : took me 10 seconds to say that -it took Ms. Beardsley about 5 minutes to say this over and over again. She was panting getting very excited and no doubt wetting her panties. Women love violence and drama.
disclaimer : only had sex with hookers (2x), pls don’t get caught up in this and advising me against it, i can take care of my own dirty habits
@ CH, sentient, yareally etc.
I’ve noticed that I feel the need to make the woman cum/please her during sex. This happened first in porn (i’d get more excited if the girl seemed to genuinely like the sex and would try to sync my finish with some scene where her eyes would roll or some shit ) and then i couldn’t cum with hookers because I didn’t feel like they enjoyed it and it totally killed my mood.
What I wanted to ask was if you ( experienced ) guys feel this need or is it just some inner-game issue i have to overcome
> “What I wanted to ask was if you ( experienced ) guys feel this need”
Are you kidding? At the end of the day, it’s all about the Natural Chemistry. If I take a girl out on a date and fuck her afterwards and discover that she’s naturally frigid and can’t cum, then it ruins everything. In fact, I’d go so far as to posit a very strong correlaton between frigidity and spinsterhood.
Your hooker friends can probably only cum in the presence of a murderer. Get yourself a CCP and a revolver and next time [after you’re convinced that she isn’t a cop with the vice squad] hold it to her temple and say, “If you fake an orgasm I’ll blow your fucking brains out.” Although I don’t know how you’re going to hold her and the revolver and massage her clit all with only two hands – that might be anatomically impossible. You could tell her that you’ll pay her extra if she’ll TEACH you how to make her cum. And then get out the revolver and dare her to fake her orgasms during the lessons. And then pay her doubly extra if she’ll bring in one of her friends and see whether you can get the friend to cum as well. SRSLY, talk to your women about this shiznat. Bitches love to talk. And talk. And talk and talk and talk and talk…
that gun to the head works every freaking time
but yea seriously
I don’t fuck most chicks got to be special
it took about 500 to find the one I got now
so you got work to do prob
your not just a piece of meat are you?
There’s a bunch of different things going on here. Women are adrenaline junkies that is why they enjoy tinder sex. It’s dangerous and exciting having a stranger use them which causes adrenaline and dopamine release. It’s why an otherwise frigid woman will knock out a dozen o’s for a stranger but her beta bf can’t get things going. This stranger effect goes away after a few times. Not really a bad thing but if the need to please women comes from being beta then it’s going to come off as odd and try hard to women. Prob a troll post though.
Also, as I’m saying above about frigidity correlating with spinsterhood [and cummability correlating with fecundity], a huge portion of becoming a PUA, and frankly just growing up and becoming a MAN, is simply in learning to eyeball a chick for physical and behavioral characteristics which will clue you in as to frigidity -vs- cummability. You definitely want to marry a chick who can [and will] cum and cum and cum for you – you don’t want to be stuck in a sexless marriage with a frigid Hitlery Rotten Clitless for a wife.
Never forget the power of self-selecting statistics. Prostitution is selecting for broken-souled thousand-cock-stare cynics who often have terrible drug and alcohol addictions. Whereas Tinder is selecting for young naive thrill-seeking danger-addicts who don’t yet have the Thousand Cock Stare.
The obvious Darwinian conclusion is rather bone-chilling: That some [most? all?] women are evolutionarily hard-wired to desire procreation with crooks and thugs and murderers. Hopefully NAWALT. Although as regards the post WWII Baby Boom – the dudes coming home from Germany and the Pacific [and later Korea] were literally killers. Killed millions upon millions of the enemy. Slaughtered them. Maybe that’s why the womynz got so hot and bothered and started pushing out the Baby Boom babies afterwards? To reward the killerz? Dark Thoughts == Dark Enlightenment
no troll. i asked about the inner game of experienced players not the nature of women, especially hookers since you guys don’t know which country i’m from and how things are done here and a lot of other variables i gave that information as it might help in understanding where i’m coming from.
ultimately i want to know if I need to change the frame from “sex pleaser” into “pleasure of sex seeker, if you cum then good for you but most importantly I must get mine regardless of your mood” or something similar.
Dude, dumping your seed in a frigid chick is almost worse than whacking off to bad porn. If a chick wants to fuck with a dude’s mind, then she tells him that he wasn’t any good in bed. And if she’s really evil then she’ll lie and tell him that she didn’t cum even though she did. Just to fuck with his mind. The “A” in PUA is for “Artist”, and a true Artist is always trying to paint a masterpiece. The total package. And secretly his ego might be fragile as hell – because he’s an Artist – but he fakes the steely exterior, because that’s part of the Art, too. The total package. Make her cum so hard that it’s impossible for her to lie about it afterwards.
a chick you keep should cum when you tell her too
if not then get another one
but really if your pounding it out
kind of hard to realize what the fuck she doin cause your brains about to explode from the effort
your not giving that 200 percent effort is the problem
The world is your oyster but a little bit of pragmatism(whatever works is truth) goes a long way. If you want to please strangers or women ur seeing and that gets u going then do it. But if you do not have your shit together it will come off as being needy and try hard. In any odd situation in life the best thing to do is to act like its normal, and act like you belong/deserve to be wherever you want. I think that as your become more experienced the novelty of women orgasming will wear off. If it doesnt wear off then you will have to mask it a little when you are in the beginning phases of seeing chicks or whatever.
Inner game issue. Overcome this first. You see feeling a need to have your partner come is just validation seeking. You are basing your worth on her reaction to you.
Only you can validate you. Using sex as validation is a set up for a very unhappy life, and a poor sex life. I infer from your comments you have ONLY had sex 2x. is this correct? You are way to early in your journey to give any thought to what anyone else if feeling (beyond stop now that hurts not sexy pain) but yourself. Focus on you, what you like and then shape your experiences to that end.
second – any sex where you are paying for it as a transaction is going to give you false readings anyway. The results can’t be trusted. Abandon the prozzies and work on real girls.
Third – once you get some experience and know what you like (and not you are just copying something from porn or because someone on a website said it, it’s what you really enjoy) you can move on to becoming a sex god. But you will have a frame of being strong, of giving pleasure and receiving pleasure because that is what sex is about, not as a gold star a girl gives you (validation). At this point Sex God Method is very on target, but you will still need to calibrate to every situation, and even just different days and moods with the same girls.
What turns women on is not having to think about sex, that you can take charge of the situation. This doesn’t mean they have no input or you don’t do what they want in the moment (she says harder etc.) but that the responsibility is with you to get the ball rolling in a dominant way and keep it moving. Women are built for sex, they have thousands more nerves dedicated to this function than men, they multiple orgasm, wave orgasm have little or no refractory period. Women can think themselves to orgasm with NO stimulation. what sets all this up though is her brain. You need to fuck her mind before her body. You are 90% there with just the right frame and a steady gaze. If you spike attraction she will literally be dripping before you touch her. So no need to put much focus on “making” her cum. That will take care of itself.
and if she doesn’t well just make sure you do. Because you taking what you want and getting it is the right frame, and women find it very sexy all the same.
During my dance sensation days I frolicked with many a fine co-ed. One was literally a black Barbie, very lovely and charming. After cutting the rug with all those babes I astonishingly had a nocturnal emission after Black Barbie appeared in a dream. I awoke laughing at the sheer novelty of it. I did not mention it to her though.
It’s not a black Barbie. It’s a black “Barbiqua.” It would be interesting to know how many little black girls want white barbies. Probably most. You know, Wal-mart and crackers, dey all rayciss, but gimme dat skin whitener and white girl wig on my EBT card now, whitey…. Damn, dey so rayciss, know what I’m sayin’?
Um, why does a war make the valuation “too stupid”? Who wins or loses a war doesn’t mean truth changes, socialist retard. The corrupt-run North had four or five times more people so of course it would win. But Negros like you still have an average IQ of 70. Negros with 23 percent White blood, the average among Blacks in the U.S., have an IQ average of 85. And stick close to the mean. And suffer from a number of mental flaws, like inflated self-esteem, laziness, aggression, an inability to see facts – like you.
There is zero logic to what George Foreman in a wig aka Neecy said.
The white Barbie still looks white.
The ‘black’ Barbie is still a caucasoid person with black skin. Nowhere is the nappy hair, think lips, and simian nose.
If even a small number of black women looked like that black barbie, many white men would be quite keen to date them. A 10 is a 10 is a 10. Too bad the black race doesn’t produce 10s (and the few 8s are actually mullatos more than blacks).
Let me rephrase it in red neck trailer park white trash speak so you’ll understand;
The WHITE DOLLY BUBBA, sales fer hiyer amant because your second home WALMART understands that a brabrie doll is the closest loser omegas like you and yer ilk will get to an attractive White woman. Sooo JETHERO they raised the price because of the amounts of LOSERS (like yourself) who cannot find REAL WOMEN WITH REAL VERGINAS to screw you. So y’all losers will pay top $$$ for a Barbie doll who is about as close to an attractive WW a loser like you will get.
UNDERSTAND NOW trailer park white trash?
Now get to your second home (WALMART) and snatch up your future and ONLY Fk buddy – Barbie, before the price gets to $6 which you will no longer be able to afford.
For every BW that has contoured her nose or got a nose job and who wears straight hair there are 10 more famous WW “negrifying” their lips to making them bigger than the white lips they’re born with (uh yeah big plump juicy lips are something black women naturally have ) and tanning their skin darker (obviously not wanting white or pale skin they naturally have).
So STFU. If White features were all that was attractive so many of your White women wouldn’t want and screw BLACK MEN and have those black men’s offspring.