• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Sex Ratio Is Getting Worse For American Men
Freelance Comment Of The Week: Shiv And Sweet »

Supply And Reprimand

January 7, 2015 by CH

I wonder what gated libertarian foodie Tyler Cowen… excuse me, Cheap Chalupas… thinks about this?

Thanks to the reader who emailed the pic. I like the twist of your shiv, sir.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in The Id Monster | 140 Comments

140 Responses

  1. on January 7, 2015 at 9:27 pm Whomever Wherever

    …the rate of witnessing domestic violence among children living with never-married mothers was 116 children per 1,000, “six times higher than the rate for children in intact families,” said psychologist Nicholas Zill… http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/7/domestic-violence-married-homes-least-likely-to-be/

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2015 at 9:30 pm Whomever Wherever

      Carmay Albano cuts a paper star for the Center for Victims quilt, an event to raise awareness of domestic violence in Pittsburgh.

      LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 10:25 am XVO

      As we know, this is not because their mothers are not married, but because the people who can afford, acquire and maintain a marriage are not emotionally unstable, stupid, violent losers.

      LikeLike


  2. on January 7, 2015 at 9:31 pm Supply And Reprimand | Manosphere.com

    […] Supply And Reprimand […]

    LikeLike


  3. on January 7, 2015 at 9:46 pm white monkey

    Greg, are you familiar with the term “tea bag Barbie?”

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 6:18 am Greg Eliot

      Muh doll.

      LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 7:10 am white monkey

      No seriously; before you could buy one, black people would put Barbie in a glass of water over night with a tea bag and turn her brown.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 8:30 am Greg Eliot

        Now that’s some negro science, right there!

        LikeLike


  4. on January 7, 2015 at 9:52 pm ho

    That is so shivvy…lol

    LikeLike


  5. on January 7, 2015 at 10:29 pm jerkkk

    Damn, this site’s really gone downhill. I read Cheap Chalupas more than this blog now. I guess at some point normal people just get bored of the bitterness. You’ve backed yourself into a dingy corner bro.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2015 at 11:31 pm Arbiter

      Funny how anti-Whites never have any arguments. Just “racism!” and YOU SUCK WTFOMGBBQ!!1!!!

      Meanwhile about twice as many Whites agree with us as with you, with the remainder being indecisive – i.e. afraid to tell a stranger calling for a survey what they think.

      Ah, I won’t bother you with numbers like that. Leftists can’t take numbers. Too real. You need fluid things that can’t be measured.

      LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 6:19 am Greg Eliot

      We’re going to be sorely missing your otherwise scintillating input. :duckface:

      LikeLike


  6. on January 7, 2015 at 10:38 pm PseudoNhymm

    I don’t get it. How does this tie into Libertarianism? That ideology has nothing to say about race. Free-market egalitarians, however, got some ‘splainin to do

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2015 at 11:38 pm Arbiter

      They talk about race, a lot. LewRockwell.com is the only libertarian outlet I have seen that is racialist, though they have to hide it by allowing “both sides” to speak. But they post Pat Buchanan’s articles, for example, and Blacks like Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams who point out holes in the media’s pro-Black stories. Then you’ll get a nutjob like Becky Akers posting once in a while in the LRC blog about the evils of having Immigration stop immigrants. But they wouldn’t post the race realists if they didn’t believe in the truths they bring up, so that’s one libertarian outlet that does okay on race.

      …Other than that it’s an abysmal bunch of denialists in the libertarian corner. That’s what happens with any movement that isn’t explicitly conservative or explicitly nationalist, it turns leftist. Going the same way as liberal (i.e. classical liberal, libertarian) parties in Europe – the egalitarians come to dominate, and equalism and mass immigration in the name of Freedom become more important than freedom. Until they’re just low-tax leftists.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 1:05 am PseudoNhymm

        So… Guilt by association is the game we’re playing. All “Darwinists” are atheist then too, no?

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 6:40 am Mark

        Besides the paleolib Rockwellites, Charles Murray is a libertarian who seems to tackle racial differences. There’s no reason why libertarians have to be race denialists. You could say blacks are not equal to whites in intelligence but still take a libertarian position they have equal political rights just as lower IQ whites have the same political rights as higher IQ whites. There may be a general problem for libertarians, though. You might argue that an appreciation for freedom requires a certain IQ threshold. You could then argue that IQ is genetically based and that blacks will never reach that threshold and we can’t allow a possibility that they ever get political control. You can see what happens in places like Detroit when they do get such control. Therefore, a libertarian might have to be a race denialist or admit that libertarian beliefs about freedom can’t be made universal and applicable for all races.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 10:46 am JironGhrad

        Hard to believe in God if man evolved without God. Just sayin’.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 10:43 pm Arbiter

        So… Guilt by association is the game we’re playing. All “Darwinists” are atheist then too, no?

        “guilt by association”? No, GUILT BY BEING GUILTY. The libertarian movement has failed the American people on mass immigration. It could have talked about country-as-the-people’s-property but didn’t. The libertarian organizations and parties are overwhelmingly in favor of immigration. No “association” needed.

        LikeLike


  7. on January 7, 2015 at 10:47 pm mendozatorres

    That title, man, just literary gold!

    LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2015 at 3:31 pm Anonymous

      You do realize this is old right? http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/04/supply-and-reprimand/

      LikeLike


  8. on January 7, 2015 at 10:48 pm Hair Slicked Back With Swag So Fresh

    “Hey hoodrats, Black Barbie comes with a removable weave, which hides her nappy head! Turn her around to see her neck tatt and tramp stamp! Enjoy countless hours of ghettofabulous fun! All Black Barbie’s carry EBT cards so you can shop on the taxpayer’s dime! Get your Black Barbie today! Now with *body odor!*”

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 10:45 pm Arbiter

      Funny! And the Black Ken box is empty because he’s in jail.

      LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2015 at 12:03 pm white monkey

        Or in the WHITE house.

        LikeLike


  9. on January 7, 2015 at 11:13 pm Supply And Reprimand | Neoreactive

    […] Supply And Reprimand […]

    LikeLike


  10. on January 7, 2015 at 11:21 pm The Other Jim

    The photo above reminds one of the differences between Classical music versus Rap and Classical Western art versus Contemporary art. People intuitively know the differences between quality and crap when they see and hear it no matter how much the Cathedral tries to tell us that Rap/Contemporary Art/Blacks are good while Western art/Classical music/White people are bad.

    Keep your heads up gentlemen, barbarism and dark ages won’t last forever. Truth will win out over the long run.

    LikeLike


  11. on January 7, 2015 at 11:30 pm realgaryseven

    Fucking brilliant title, sir!

    LikeLike


  12. on January 7, 2015 at 11:39 pm Arbiter

    $3.00, $5.93. When the market speaks things can get ugly. It’s beautiful that way.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 8:46 am everybodyhatesscott

      The black female websites complain about the white porn stars getting paid more too. It’s actually hilarious to read the comments and how they completely don’t understand supply and demand. I guess it’s a difficult concept for a 90 IQ brain.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 9:31 am white monkey

        Nonwhite porn actresses destroyed the porn market for white females by using the internet to get around the cartel which artificially limited white female sexual behavior in order to inflate its value.

        Abundance is the enemy of profit.

        White females slapped by the invisible hand.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 12:20 pm corvinus

        *85 IQ brain. Maybe even *80 IQ since we’re dealing with women here.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 1:55 pm Mike Litoris

        Hah I remember that feminist pornstar on the Opie and Anthony show saying the exact same thing about men being paid less. The irony was completely lost on her.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 10:52 pm Arbiter

        Nonwhite porn actresses destroyed the porn market for white females by using the internet to get around the cartel which artificially limited white female sexual behavior in order to inflate its value.

        Abundance is the enemy of profit.

        White females slapped by the invisible hand.

        ??? “artifically limited white female sexual behavior”? If that’s what drives up prices, then why would customers want more NON-WHITE female sexual behavior?

        “by using the internet”? Nope. Porn websites were not set up by Black porn actresses.

        “abundance is the enemy of profit” says the leftist ignoramus. Why then do clothes producers produce massive amounts of clothes? Leftists know only a small, small part of economics and apply that to everything as it fits their hatred. “driving up prices by limiting demand” works for A FEW goods. Two of them being diamonds and oil. These are called “price-elastic” goods. But THE VAST MAJORITY of goods have proportional prices. In other words, decrease output by X percent and prices will rise only proportionally, not more than that, so you don’t actually gain anything. You’ll sell for a higher price but you’ll sell less, and the price is not “elastic”, doesn’t go up more than proportionally.

        Leftists have heard only of “limiting supply” from media talking about oil, and they are too dumb to understand it doesn’t apply to anything. Leftists love thinking everything is limited to drive up prices – it helps make the rubes angry.

        Now you think that porn output was limited (yeah, there’s so little porn produced!) in order to drive up prices. Which would only work if all porn producers had been in a cartel. Hah. Hah hah. Porn as a price-elastic good and limited by a cartel, that’s absolutely hilarious.

        LikeLike


  13. on January 7, 2015 at 11:45 pm Lion

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 5:57 am Weenis

      Why would he call it hate? Marketers have to reduce prices until it hits a price point that the market will accept. Supply and demand.

      Truth hurts, I guess.

      Why isn’t he crying hate because the misogynists failed to also make ‘Fat Barbie’??

      The SMP is every bit as ruthless, but that’s not hate either. People that cry hate like this, well…. ‘hate!’ is the cry of the losers in the market.

      Easier than trying harder or improving the product, or seeking out a more sensible demographic.

      LikeLike


      • on January 10, 2015 at 2:32 pm Anonymous

        Sarcasm buddy, learn to recognise it.

        LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2015 at 12:15 pm white monkey

      Weenis
      Marketers have to reduce prices until it hits a price point that the market will accept.
      ——————————————————————————————–

      Not if they have a cartel, or even better, a monopoly on production or distribution and create artificial scarcity.

      White women in porn must do far more different sexual acts for less money, than they did in the past because the internet and nonwhite females have destroyed the porn cartel which kept white womans value inflated.

      *Abundance is the enemy of profit*

      LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2015 at 12:21 pm Greg Eliot

        The resident lawn-jockey-turned-house-boy keeps repeating these memes of his, hoping they will catch on.

        The fact of the matter is/was/remains that white woman value remains the gold standard… apparently for ALL races of men.

        Now, Sambo, if you wish to merely give a lesson in economics, try to bring something more to the table than well-DUH supply & demand basics.

        LikeLike


  14. on January 8, 2015 at 12:26 am burke

    off topic but if anyone gets a chance, watch ‘labor day’ with some of the women in your life to get a refresher peep into their nature.

    escaped convict (josh brolin) takes mom and son hostage (gently) proceeds to be manly, spout advice, and rail the single mom (kate winslet) while the son lies awake and ponders life to the sounds of his mother’s moans.

    the plot isn’t groundbreaking but the girls’ reactions to it were a cold splash of reality. they (late 20s attractive, some married) were on the verge of soiling the couch cushions. a lot at play in that he is admittedly manly, but then there’s the convict aspect that i know they were liking, and the danger and mental damage to her son the mom (and the women watching) overlooks, based on the girls’ faces it was like the notebook times two.

    LikeLike


  15. on January 8, 2015 at 12:41 am Arbiter

    On another note, trying to find a CH short-story about two guys shooting pool with two girls watching. The beta guy – Dave? – invited the girls because he has been hitting on the hot one for ages, but his alpha friend gets all the attention, teasing the girl in just the right way. He draws the piece of chalk over the unattractive girl’s shirt and says “Sorry, Dave dared me to”, and the hot girl says, “I don’t think Dave’s the one causing trouble here.” When Dave hits a ball right and the girls say it’s a good shot the alpha guy says, “That wasn’t a good shot.” Pause. “That was a great shot.” And so forth. Ring a bell?

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 8:46 am mendozatorres

      Yeah, I remember that one.

      LikeLike


  16. on January 8, 2015 at 1:08 am Anon2

    The funny thing is that the black barbie has white facial features. Straight hair and a narrow nose and lips.

    But in reality, the price difference is more due to the greater number of customers for the white barbie, and the lack of money black people have. I don’t think there is more to it than that.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 7:41 am white monkey

      Anon2
      The funny thing is that the black barbie has white facial features. Straight hair and a narrow nose and lips.
      —————————————————————————————-

      No, the funny thing is your ignorance. There is no such thing as “white features” because black people had them first; if you weren’t such a prole you would know this. Parts of Asia and Africa are full of women who look like that.

      The only real “white feature” is called a sunburn.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 8:50 am Greg Eliot

        And the “black community” spends a fortune nowadays on hair straighteners and skin lighteners so’s they can retain that “black look”.

        lzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzl

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 8:53 am John

        This comment right here. This is why the Internet is worth it. Where else could you read such a thing written in earnest?

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 8:59 am Greg Eliot

        Indeed… try as I might with my jests, thwack/white monkey always comes up with something way funnier… especially when he’s being serious.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 9:16 am white monkey

        Where did white people come from?

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 9:22 am Greg Eliot

        And God saw there was no man to till the earth. I’ve heard that the root etymology of “Adam” has something to do with “ruddy” and “shows blood in the face”.

        Of course, by your reckoning, whatever was allegedly here first gets credit, so I guess we can all go out today and thank an amoeba.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 9:51 am PseudoNhymm

        And black people descended from apes. But I’ve never seen an ape do calculus. Upgrades, bitches! Go drive a model T

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 1:30 pm Sean

        Never seen a black guy do Calculus either….

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 4:58 pm white monkey

        I calculate the white man will disappear because he spends more time polishing his moon rocks than fucking.

        Wake up white man.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 7:31 pm trav777

        is this satire? Parts of Africa have features like that because white people came from the north and mixed with them.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 10:56 pm Arbiter

        No, the funny thing is your ignorance. There is no such thing as “white features” because black people had them first;

        Where do white people come from?

        LOL Dumbass. Whites don’t come from Blacks just because of the “originated in Africa” theory. Do you think humans came from bonobos too? No, they were a completely separate branch of the development of apes.

        It’s undisputable that Negros have Negroid traits. Even if your lie about “blacks had them first” (LOL) would have been true, they obviously don’t have them NOW. But Whites do. So Anon2’s argument still stands, that White Barbie sells more because people like the features Whites have.

        But that’s inconvenient for you to think about, so you take off into a side issue. Nice try.

        LikeLike


  17. on January 8, 2015 at 1:11 am Rum

    Is the price by the pound???

    LikeLike


  18. on January 8, 2015 at 1:12 am Anon2

    I have never heard of a black woman named Barbara (‘Barbie’). I doubt any black girl is ever named that.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 7:20 am white monkey

      Barbara Charline Jordan (February 21, 1936 – January 17, 1996) was an American politician and a leader of the Civil Rights movement. She was the first African American elected to the Texas Senate after Reconstruction, the first southern black female elected to the United States House of Representatives, and the first African-American woman to deliver the keynote address at a Democratic National Convention. She received the Presidential Medal of Freedom, among numerous other honors. On her death, she became the first African-American woman to be buried in the Texas State Cemetery.[1]

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 8:51 am Greg Eliot

        A touching moment in Black History… but wait your turn, it’s still January.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 9:04 am MZ

        Thwack can search google and copy-paste like a boss

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 9:28 am Greg Eliot

        On a side note, I’m not sure “achievements” in “civil rights” call for such celebratory fluff… then again, those days in February have to have the card filled somehow… fortunately it’s a short month.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 11:11 am Anton

        Barbara Jordan looked like a typical west African. On the other hand, go look at the pictures in the National Civil Rights Museum and it’s immediately obvious that a large majority of the ‘black” leaders of the movement had substantial non-African heritage.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2015 at 8:24 am white monkey

        Everybody is typical west African when they get hung from a tree.

        LikeLike


  19. on January 8, 2015 at 1:14 am Anon2

    The black barbie is far too thin to be an accurate representation.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 2:25 am earl

      And far too happy.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 8:29 am Greg Eliot

        And far less nappy.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 12:01 pm Anon2

        The less nappy, the more happy.

        LikeLike


  20. on January 8, 2015 at 1:33 am Libertardian

    screeeeeeeeeech

    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/01/ny_mass_transit_chief_no_more_manspreading.html

    http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2015/01/05/mta-to-launch-campaign-aimed-at-curbing-manspreading-on-public-transit/

    “If you take the subway, bus or train, you’ve probably seen men who take up more than just their seat.”

    How about double-wide lardasses who take up more than just their seat, or more than just their anything? Oh right, criticizing them is rape.

    LikeLike


  21. on January 8, 2015 at 1:46 am Rum

    Dying at the age of 27: – Amy Winehouse, Jimi Hendrix, Kass Elliot, Buddy Hollie, Janis Joplin, Rum, Brian Jones, James Dean, and my own mother…

    LikeLike


  22. on January 8, 2015 at 2:22 am Supply And Reprimand | Reaction Times

    […] Source: Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  23. on January 8, 2015 at 2:50 am crowski

    Just googling why prices differ, I found posts about black barbies that cost more and why that’s a problem. Variation in price makes sense when you consider location of the store and how the barbies are selling there. I thought it was ridiculous to worry about prices.
    Someone well-read like you wouldn’t post something as stupid… who are you pandering to?

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 8:16 am Harland

      It’s a Wal-Mart red tag, it’s half price, it’s a clearance item. IT DIDN’T SELL SO THEY’RE GETTING RID OF IT. It’s all managed by computer, no humans make the decisions.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 8:53 am Greg Eliot

        Computers be rayciss.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 10:45 am Hymen Mingesky

        PCs hate PoCs.

        IBM
        International Bigot Machines

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 3:49 pm Sean Fielding

        Human consumers made the key decision – to buy so many more white Barbies than black that a twofold price difference developed.

        And that’s in spite of the fact that the Wal-Mart would easily have had the foresight to stock way more of the white dolls in the first place.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 4:33 pm crowski

        I agree, prices are based on domestic economics, but only idiots (the pandered) would see this as an example of the failings of “equalizing.”

        There’s a market for both, gentleman.

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 10:58 pm Arbiter

      Someone well-read like you wouldn’t post something as stupid… who are you pandering to?

      Translation: DON’T SHOW PEOPLE THE TRUTH.

      Even in Colombia and Venezuela the Aryan-looking Barbie sells more than the swarthy, ugly ones.

      LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2015 at 8:30 am white monkey

        Then why do you guys complain about Obama?

        He won fair and square; voted into office not once but TWICE.

        You guys are all for the invisible hand except when it slaps the shit out of you.

        LikeLike


  24. on January 8, 2015 at 3:18 am EarlyToRise

    I guess 3/5ths was generous

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 6:00 am Blessent

      Could’ve been a teaching moment.

      LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 8:54 am Greg Eliot

      Droll. But remember, the dollar doesn’t go as far as it used to.

      LikeLike


  25. on January 8, 2015 at 4:38 am Master Beta

    Supply and demand….

    No wait, I meant racism!!

    LikeLike


  26. on January 8, 2015 at 6:22 am Greg Eliot

    Is that what the modern-day Mideast slave auctions look like?

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 7:44 am white monkey

      Yes, and thats your grand daughter on the left.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 8:28 am Greg Eliot

        Which one? All you $3 dolls look alike.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 10:59 pm Arbiter

        Poor black monkey troll struggling to come up with a post that doesn’t make people laugh at him

        LikeLike


  27. on January 8, 2015 at 6:37 am PA

    RR: “If Europe didn’t awaken when Mohammedans raped & pimped out 1000s of their children in Rotherham,they never will…”

    I dismiss these kinds of (sometimes) triumphalistic statements. In order to take action, people need to have a formal or informal leadership and support structure. Absent those things people just grumble and do nothing.

    Kind of like that fictional whigger in Gran Torino. As Eastwood’s character made it amply clear, a white teenager in the ghetto is on his own.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 7:48 am Whomever Wherever

      I thought Gran Torino was about the Hmong?

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 8:27 am Greg Eliot

        It was about noble-but-haunted YT and the aliens he was among.

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 7:53 am PA

      There was a scene in which Eastwood chases off three ghetto blacks who are about to beat up a white whigger and rape his hmong girlfriend.

      It’s on YTube if you look for “gran Torino best scene.” My earlier point was that the otherwise satisfying scene unfortunately ends with Eastwood symbolically dusowning his son, one of mine filicide themes in the movie.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 10:09 am Whomever Wherever

        RIght, but that was the whole idea of the movie – that Eastwood’s character was horrified that his very own flesh and blood had grown up to be spoiled effete SWPL Hipster Mammon-Worshipping Unpersons, and that he disowned them, in favor of Real Persons. I felt like it would have been an infinitely better movie if he had knocked up either the Hmong MILF or the Hmong eldest daughter [or both of them] – the chemistry was certainly there, and it would have made the movie so much less nihilistic if he had left behind some little Eastwoods in his wake.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 10:19 am Whomever Wherever

        Plus Eastwood’s best possession wasn’t the Gran Torino. It was the Garand. The final scene [after the credits] should have been a very pregnant Hmong gal getting a package, containing a Garand, and a note stating, “Give this to our son on his 16th birthday.” And then the final music is a fade-out of “From the Halls of Montezuma…”

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2015 at 12:24 pm Greg Eliot

        That would have been a cuter ending… but it would still have been white genocide.

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 10:31 am ho

      You know, instead of suggesting violence against innocent fellow believers, why don’t you propose violence against the perpatrators’ families? Far less collateral damage and it is BOUND to work. Saudis and the Russians showed it.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 12:23 pm corvinus

        The Breivik strategy.

        LikeLike


  28. on January 8, 2015 at 6:52 am Lichthof

    Just on a totally different front- did anyone hear Eleanor Beardsley on NPR this morning? I don’t listen to NPR but I overheard her talking about the Paris shootings. Basically the city’s motorways are shut, one gunman turned himself in and two other suspects were seen. There : took me 10 seconds to say that -it took Ms. Beardsley about 5 minutes to say this over and over again. She was panting getting very excited and no doubt wetting her panties. Women love violence and drama.

    LikeLike


  29. on January 8, 2015 at 6:57 am anon

    disclaimer : only had sex with hookers (2x), pls don’t get caught up in this and advising me against it, i can take care of my own dirty habits

    @ CH, sentient, yareally etc.

    I’ve noticed that I feel the need to make the woman cum/please her during sex. This happened first in porn (i’d get more excited if the girl seemed to genuinely like the sex and would try to sync my finish with some scene where her eyes would roll or some shit ) and then i couldn’t cum with hookers because I didn’t feel like they enjoyed it and it totally killed my mood.

    What I wanted to ask was if you ( experienced ) guys feel this need or is it just some inner-game issue i have to overcome

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 7:53 am Whomever Wherever

      > “What I wanted to ask was if you ( experienced ) guys feel this need”

      Are you kidding? At the end of the day, it’s all about the Natural Chemistry. If I take a girl out on a date and fuck her afterwards and discover that she’s naturally frigid and can’t cum, then it ruins everything. In fact, I’d go so far as to posit a very strong correlaton between frigidity and spinsterhood.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 8:04 am Whomever Wherever

        Your hooker friends can probably only cum in the presence of a murderer. Get yourself a CCP and a revolver and next time [after you’re convinced that she isn’t a cop with the vice squad] hold it to her temple and say, “If you fake an orgasm I’ll blow your fucking brains out.” Although I don’t know how you’re going to hold her and the revolver and massage her clit all with only two hands – that might be anatomically impossible. You could tell her that you’ll pay her extra if she’ll TEACH you how to make her cum. And then get out the revolver and dare her to fake her orgasms during the lessons. And then pay her doubly extra if she’ll bring in one of her friends and see whether you can get the friend to cum as well. SRSLY, talk to your women about this shiznat. Bitches love to talk. And talk. And talk and talk and talk and talk…

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 8:11 am Whomever Wherever

        Big PUA bonus points though if you can pull this off with a cop on the Vice Squad – get her to cumming and cumming and cumming and begging for more. LOL’ed.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 10:21 am gunslingergregi

        that gun to the head works every freaking time
        but yea seriously
        I don’t fuck most chicks got to be special
        it took about 500 to find the one I got now
        so you got work to do prob
        your not just a piece of meat are you?
        lozlozlzolzolzz

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 8:15 am anonYmous

      There’s a bunch of different things going on here. Women are adrenaline junkies that is why they enjoy tinder sex. It’s dangerous and exciting having a stranger use them which causes adrenaline and dopamine release. It’s why an otherwise frigid woman will knock out a dozen o’s for a stranger but her beta bf can’t get things going. This stranger effect goes away after a few times. Not really a bad thing but if the need to please women comes from being beta then it’s going to come off as odd and try hard to women. Prob a troll post though.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 8:23 am Whomever Wherever

        Also, as I’m saying above about frigidity correlating with spinsterhood [and cummability correlating with fecundity], a huge portion of becoming a PUA, and frankly just growing up and becoming a MAN, is simply in learning to eyeball a chick for physical and behavioral characteristics which will clue you in as to frigidity -vs- cummability. You definitely want to marry a chick who can [and will] cum and cum and cum for you – you don’t want to be stuck in a sexless marriage with a frigid Hitlery Rotten Clitless for a wife.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 8:27 am Whomever Wherever

        Never forget the power of self-selecting statistics. Prostitution is selecting for broken-souled thousand-cock-stare cynics who often have terrible drug and alcohol addictions. Whereas Tinder is selecting for young naive thrill-seeking danger-addicts who don’t yet have the Thousand Cock Stare.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 8:29 am TAnon

        This reminds me of therapist AMA where the guy was talking about some girl that orgasmed during rape even though it never happened with her boyfriend.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 8:56 am Greg Eliot

        I’m sure a few of the doctors shot in their pants upon the hearing as well.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 9:01 am Whomever Wherever

        The obvious Darwinian conclusion is rather bone-chilling: That some [most? all?] women are evolutionarily hard-wired to desire procreation with crooks and thugs and murderers. Hopefully NAWALT. Although as regards the post WWII Baby Boom – the dudes coming home from Germany and the Pacific [and later Korea] were literally killers. Killed millions upon millions of the enemy. Slaughtered them. Maybe that’s why the womynz got so hot and bothered and started pushing out the Baby Boom babies afterwards? To reward the killerz? Dark Thoughts == Dark Enlightenment

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 8:24 am anon

      no troll. i asked about the inner game of experienced players not the nature of women, especially hookers since you guys don’t know which country i’m from and how things are done here and a lot of other variables i gave that information as it might help in understanding where i’m coming from.

      ultimately i want to know if I need to change the frame from “sex pleaser” into “pleasure of sex seeker, if you cum then good for you but most importantly I must get mine regardless of your mood” or something similar.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 9:25 am Whomever Wherever

        Dude, dumping your seed in a frigid chick is almost worse than whacking off to bad porn. If a chick wants to fuck with a dude’s mind, then she tells him that he wasn’t any good in bed. And if she’s really evil then she’ll lie and tell him that she didn’t cum even though she did. Just to fuck with his mind. The “A” in PUA is for “Artist”, and a true Artist is always trying to paint a masterpiece. The total package. And secretly his ego might be fragile as hell – because he’s an Artist – but he fakes the steely exterior, because that’s part of the Art, too. The total package. Make her cum so hard that it’s impossible for her to lie about it afterwards.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 9:27 am Whomever Wherever

        Longer reply in mod. tldr; == her cumming is of paramount importance to the artist. Otherwise the performance was a failure.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 10:29 am gunslingergregi

        a chick you keep should cum when you tell her too
        if not then get another one
        but really if your pounding it out
        kind of hard to realize what the fuck she doin cause your brains about to explode from the effort
        your not giving that 200 percent effort is the problem

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 10:32 am gunslingergregi

        if your worried after sex that she might not of had an orgasm then you did it wrong
        you should be worrying about why you can’t move and worried that you might be becoming a parapalegic and shit

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 10:19 pm anonYmous

        The world is your oyster but a little bit of pragmatism(whatever works is truth) goes a long way. If you want to please strangers or women ur seeing and that gets u going then do it. But if you do not have your shit together it will come off as being needy and try hard. In any odd situation in life the best thing to do is to act like its normal, and act like you belong/deserve to be wherever you want. I think that as your become more experienced the novelty of women orgasming will wear off. If it doesnt wear off then you will have to mask it a little when you are in the beginning phases of seeing chicks or whatever.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2015 at 7:34 am Sentient

        @anaon

        Inner game issue. Overcome this first. You see feeling a need to have your partner come is just validation seeking. You are basing your worth on her reaction to you.

        Only you can validate you. Using sex as validation is a set up for a very unhappy life, and a poor sex life. I infer from your comments you have ONLY had sex 2x. is this correct? You are way to early in your journey to give any thought to what anyone else if feeling (beyond stop now that hurts not sexy pain) but yourself. Focus on you, what you like and then shape your experiences to that end.

        second – any sex where you are paying for it as a transaction is going to give you false readings anyway. The results can’t be trusted. Abandon the prozzies and work on real girls.

        Third – once you get some experience and know what you like (and not you are just copying something from porn or because someone on a website said it, it’s what you really enjoy) you can move on to becoming a sex god. But you will have a frame of being strong, of giving pleasure and receiving pleasure because that is what sex is about, not as a gold star a girl gives you (validation). At this point Sex God Method is very on target, but you will still need to calibrate to every situation, and even just different days and moods with the same girls.

        What turns women on is not having to think about sex, that you can take charge of the situation. This doesn’t mean they have no input or you don’t do what they want in the moment (she says harder etc.) but that the responsibility is with you to get the ball rolling in a dominant way and keep it moving. Women are built for sex, they have thousands more nerves dedicated to this function than men, they multiple orgasm, wave orgasm have little or no refractory period. Women can think themselves to orgasm with NO stimulation. what sets all this up though is her brain. You need to fuck her mind before her body. You are 90% there with just the right frame and a steady gaze. If you spike attraction she will literally be dripping before you touch her. So no need to put much focus on “making” her cum. That will take care of itself.

        and if she doesn’t well just make sure you do. Because you taking what you want and getting it is the right frame, and women find it very sexy all the same.

        Good luck.

        LikeLike


      • on January 10, 2015 at 1:54 pm anon

        Sentient, bless you for taking the time to post here

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 11:33 pm whiteprize

      “What I wanted to ask was if you ( experienced ) guys feel this need or is it just some inner-game issue i have to overcome”

      A lack of desire on a woman’s part makes normal, white men deflate. It makes black men more excited and extra rapey and violent. So, congratulations: you’re white.

      LikeLike


  30. on January 8, 2015 at 8:01 am elmer

    During my dance sensation days I frolicked with many a fine co-ed. One was literally a black Barbie, very lovely and charming. After cutting the rug with all those babes I astonishingly had a nocturnal emission after Black Barbie appeared in a dream. I awoke laughing at the sheer novelty of it. I did not mention it to her though.

    LikeLike


  31. on January 8, 2015 at 9:26 am Corporal Hicks

    It’s not a black Barbie. It’s a black “Barbiqua.” It would be interesting to know how many little black girls want white barbies. Probably most. You know, Wal-mart and crackers, dey all rayciss, but gimme dat skin whitener and white girl wig on my EBT card now, whitey…. Damn, dey so rayciss, know what I’m sayin’?

    LikeLike


  32. on January 8, 2015 at 9:46 am archerwfisher

    I read this on another blog, a year or two ago, except he had two links. One, the white barbie was on sale for less. The other, the black barbie was on sale for less.

    he linked to online articles decrying both cases as racist against blacks, to emphasize how insane such people are.

    LikeLike


  33. on January 8, 2015 at 10:15 am pupton1974

    I had heard that they were once valued at 3/5 of a white person…here’s the proof that valuation was too kind.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 10:45 am white monkey

      That type of valuation ALWAYS end in tears.

      600,000 healthy white men killed in their prime…

      Among them, many of the bravest, noble and most competent.

      here’s the proof that valuation was too stupid.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 11:10 pm Arbiter

        Um, why does a war make the valuation “too stupid”? Who wins or loses a war doesn’t mean truth changes, socialist retard. The corrupt-run North had four or five times more people so of course it would win. But Negros like you still have an average IQ of 70. Negros with 23 percent White blood, the average among Blacks in the U.S., have an IQ average of 85. And stick close to the mean. And suffer from a number of mental flaws, like inflated self-esteem, laziness, aggression, an inability to see facts – like you.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2015 at 8:49 am white monkey

        3/5ths, 5/8ths, 9/16ths… whatever

        The point still stands; a bunch of white men cutting each other to pieces over a bunch of moon rocks is both pointless and retarded.

        They could have been putting white buns in white ovens.

        LikeLike


  34. on January 8, 2015 at 10:40 am gunslingergregi

    sheot 5.93
    wish me luck guys cause if my bitch really make the 5k today she got lined up
    then yea man
    I may have to start lifting or something
    lozlozlozlzolzzolzzolzzozz

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 10:50 am gunslingergregi

      any advice on dealing with that kind of demand
      I mean jesus Christ im in shock

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 11:07 am gunslingergregi

        calm as fuck on the outside though
        he he he

        LikeLike


  35. on January 8, 2015 at 11:13 am A Random Guy

    Sounds like thwack is back under a different name. Same lame troll BS though.

    LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2015 at 8:51 am white monkey

      Thwack was assassinated.

      LikeLike


  36. on January 8, 2015 at 11:58 am Jack H

    Black barbie sold at a loss, white barbie sold at higher margins to subsidize her

    LikeLike


  37. on January 8, 2015 at 1:30 pm Matamoros

    Should be 40% off (I.e. 2/5)

    LikeLike


  38. on January 8, 2015 at 1:35 pm Neecy

    Hmmm.

    Maybe White Barbie sold at higher retail because Walmart knows she’s about as close to an attractive White woman that many of you losers and the rest of your “ilk” on here and in world will get.

    HA! Walmart is smart.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 5:19 pm Polaris

      That sounds like an awful butthurt and projecting response. Saying that as a white man who is quite fond of black (and latina ofcourse) women.

      LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 8:08 pm Anon2

      There is zero logic to what George Foreman in a wig aka Neecy said.

      The white Barbie still looks white.

      The ‘black’ Barbie is still a caucasoid person with black skin. Nowhere is the nappy hair, think lips, and simian nose.

      If even a small number of black women looked like that black barbie, many white men would be quite keen to date them. A 10 is a 10 is a 10. Too bad the black race doesn’t produce 10s (and the few 8s are actually mullatos more than blacks).

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 11:33 pm Neecy

        Hmmm. Completely went over your head.

        Let me rephrase it in red neck trailer park white trash speak so you’ll understand;

        The WHITE DOLLY BUBBA, sales fer hiyer amant because your second home WALMART understands that a brabrie doll is the closest loser omegas like you and yer ilk will get to an attractive White woman. Sooo JETHERO they raised the price because of the amounts of LOSERS (like yourself) who cannot find REAL WOMEN WITH REAL VERGINAS to screw you. So y’all losers will pay top $$$ for a Barbie doll who is about as close to an attractive WW a loser like you will get.

        UNDERSTAND NOW trailer park white trash?

        Now get to your second home (WALMART) and snatch up your future and ONLY Fk buddy – Barbie, before the price gets to $6 which you will no longer be able to afford.

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 8:10 pm Anon2

      Projection from George Foreman in a wig, aka Neecy.

      The more obvious message here is that the ‘black’ barbie was made to have white hair, lips, and a nose, which is the only type of hair, lips and nose that are attractive.

      Just look at any famous black woman today vs. pictures of her before she was famous. She spends all her money to de-negrofy herself.

      LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2015 at 12:03 am Neecy

        YEAH OK

        For every BW that has contoured her nose or got a nose job and who wears straight hair there are 10 more famous WW “negrifying” their lips to making them bigger than the white lips they’re born with (uh yeah big plump juicy lips are something black women naturally have ) and tanning their skin darker (obviously not wanting white or pale skin they naturally have).

        So STFU. If White features were all that was attractive so many of your White women wouldn’t want and screw BLACK MEN and have those black men’s offspring.

        D’oh yep I went there!

        LikeLike


  39. on January 8, 2015 at 3:05 pm Larry Blom

    Someone black has really pissed this guy off lol. Salty salty!

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 11:11 pm Arbiter

      Someone White just pissed you off, and you have no counter-arguments so you’re crying like a little baby. LOL

      LikeLike


  40. on January 8, 2015 at 8:06 pm Anon2

    White per capita income in the US : $58,000

    Black per capital income in the US : $34,000

    Gee, that ratio seems suspiciously familiar…..

    But why did Wal-Mart charge $3.00 instead of $2.99? It will sell a lot faster at $2.99, as most people (especially black people) think $2.99 is a lot less than $3.00.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2015 at 8:33 pm Larry Blom

      oooooooo salty salty salty 🙂

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 11:12 pm Arbiter

        Little nig troll can’t come up with anything to say and only blurbs out inane drool running down the side of his mouth. Poor little boy.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2015 at 11:58 pm Larry Blom

        Nerves have been touched. That ego is oh-so sensitive. You gonna be ok? 😦 Don’t let those nigs get to you

        LikeLike


  41. on January 9, 2015 at 12:12 am Kyle P

    Wow, Arbiter called him a boy. Who could come back from that? Devastating. Will we get to hear more? Stay tuned!

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Jay in DC on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Agent X on Oy, There It Is
    jOHN MOSBY on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    cortesar on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Davy Holmes on Sweden, The Cuck Corner Stool…
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    jOHN MOSBY on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    cortesar on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Alex the Goon on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • The NPC Song: "Feel"
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: