This post is part of a series quoting history’s great men on various topics of interest to Chateau readers. (See previous entries here and here.)
Today’s Great Man quote comes from H. L. Mencken, demonstrating amazing prescience for the evolution of society into a wasteland of ugly feminists yammering incessantly about rape-culture culture.
The woman who is not pursued sets up the doctrine that pursuit is offensive to her sex, and wants to make it a felony. No genuinely attractive woman has any such desire. ― H.L. Mencken, In Defense Of Women
Burn status: crisp! “The woman who is not pursued” = ugly feminist. This is what it comes down to: Ugly women loathing male desire, resenting their exclusion from the sexual market (and that exclusion is much more painful for women, because in the whole women have an easier time getting laid than do men), and making absurd demands to rearrange society so that their romantic rejection is less obvious to others. Misery loves company.
Bonus Mencken:
A Man forbids his wife to drink too much because, deep in his secret archives, he has records of the behavior of other women who drank too much, and is eager to safeguard his wife’s self-respect, and his own dignity, against what he knows to be certain invasion. In brief, it is a commonplace of observation, familiar to all males beyond the age of twenty-one, that once a woman is drunk the rest is a mere matter of time and place: the girl is already there. ― H.L. Mencken, Prejudices
Women who don’t want to be pumped and dumped have a responsibility to stay off the hooch. If they won’t accept that responsibility, then men will have to make their decisions for them. Unrock the vote!
Of course, despite the deluge of feminist idiocy (and the warnings from the Great Men), feminists continue to win social and political battles. UVA, doubtlessly run and operated by a small army of man-haters, responded to the rape hoax on its campus by… punishing the lying women? Defunding feminist circle diddles? No, by instituting new rules and restrictions for the fraternities that were unfairly accused of fueling a crazy woman’s fantasies.
Oh well, the Chateau will remain a respite from the apocalyptic insanity.
[…] The Great Men On Ugly Feminists […]
LikeLike
heye heratsyietzt!!!
da gbfmz is having fun at da reeducationz campz! there is plenty offz fooodz and nice pepeelz, but a bit more butthext den da gbfm is accomccdated to.
all da best inz 2015!
and rememeberrz, dat dat which setz in da west rises in da east!!Z zlzzzzlozmzzgz
LikeLike
lzozzzzzzlzl
lzozozlzoz
LikeLike
lzozozz
zlzlzzz
LikeLike
lzzozzzzz
zlzzzlzlzlz
LikeLike
lzzzzzl
zlkzzozzlz
LikeLike
GBFM youv been missed around here
LikeLike
lzzzzzmzg zlzlzz
lzzozzomzgz zlzlz
LikeLike
LikeLike
I’d like to see Unbroken re-done with GBFM
LikeLike
Mencken fuarking nailed it !
LikeLike
Normally, [women’s] weakness makes masculine protection necessary to their existence and to the exercise of their overpowering maternal instinct, and so their whole effort is to obtain this protection in the easiest way possible. The net result is that feminine morality is a morality of opportunism and imminent expediency, and that the normal woman has no respect for, and scarcely a conception of abstract truth. Thus is proved a fact noted by Schopenhauer and many other observers: that a woman seldom manifests any true sense of justice or of honor.
~H. L. Mencken
LikeLike
That really is difficult to digest. I wonder if it pertains solely to degenerate industrial revolution humanity (assuming schopenhaur wasn’t pre-industrial). What kind of flies in the face of that statement is that In the past, there were many great female nuns and saints, etc. Are these outliers/special cases? It’s still easy enough to encounter relatively decent women nowadays, to the extent that not all men are exactly shining examples of anything these days. Some women of yore and certainly regarded abstractions of truth. What corroborates it are the many examples we see day to day in this most modern twisted existence.
LikeLike
They weren’t motivated by justice and personal principles. They were motivated by compassion, mercy and obedience to to the prevailing zeitgeist. Succumbing to peer pressure and doing what the Official Ideology TM demanded from them.
LikeLike
i’m old enough to know there was a time people could actually say what they observed, but from where we are now this might as well be from another planet. it’ll take an entirely separate nation i think to allow truth in the public sphere again. too many pussies around, and too many pussies kept alive by modernity in this place. you’d think such a feminized country would at least sprout some feminine women to enjoy as it burns though.
LikeLike
American women are like the spotted hyena. In the absence of dominant males, the alpha female grows an elongated clitoris and run the pack.
LikeLike
Feminine women exist solely for the purpose of attracting the attention of rugged men. Women are followers, with no one to lead, they turn into amorphous blobs of fat with identity issues.
LikeLike
So if you build the men the women will come? Literally.
LikeLike
Quote #1 is full on projection of the scorned women who won’t be noticed anymore.
Quote #2 can be attained just by observing what happens any random weekend in college. Drunk women are by far the worst form of the feminine I’ve ever seen.
LikeLike
Feminism has its strongest hold on the university campus, more so the american universities. I think the university needs to be undone. I used to side with it, but the university no longer consists of Great Men or monks creating works but largely administrators and political theorists who fall in to one of a great number of different departments but who somehow all manage to express the same belief. By this I mean journalism, communication, sociology, psychology, political science, religion, philosophy, linguistics, literature, and I am probably excluding much. All these ‘studies’ somehow publish the same things that advocate feminism, communism, and anti-colonialism. These institutions need a shake-up to stop the bleeding.
LikeLike
Well, hopefully the current state of inanity within “higher education” will lead to an exodus. For most people and most fields of work, going to university is a pointless excursion to a Ponzi scheme fun park. It’s amazing what you can learn from YouTube tutorials these days. Haha. Autodidacts will always be ahead of the pack.
LikeLike
The universities were doomed to fail once grade inflation snuck its way in. Then they were free to pretend to study and pretend to teach. Any rigorous standards whereby 30-40% of today’s students have a reasonable chance of flunking out in all majors would dramatically change the tenor of universities and their stupidity would be lessened.
LikeLike
Grade inflation came in on the back of trillions in easily available student loan debt. Don’t kick the suckers out until they are fully loaded down and marching into slavery.
Who can we thank for this?
LikeLike
The universities will set the agenda for the next generation.
Back in my college days those departments of which you speak were 3 credit general ed electives – and topics like global warming and electronic mail were just amusing asides … and really, I’m not that old.
With Government now giving away 2 years of college for free – We should soon be flooded with skilled liberal artisans and social engineers. The world will be magically transformed like in the Renaissance.
Feminism will succeed in outlawing of the y-chromosome, everyone will live in America and we’ll all speak ebonics.
Future generations will study the works of Michelle Angelo Obama and her LGBT David – and read the literary classics of Oprah.
All will be right in the world. You’ll see. There’s nothing to be worried about.
LikeLike
I read Scott Aaronson’s comment(look it up) and he described all the anti-rape classes he had to take. Essentially I see the university as having a few takeaways now. First, for men, a deep sense of irrational shame placed on them by haters. Second, a large quantity of student debt. Third, a preference to use pseudo-ideology to explain ordinary events in terms of nonsense in order to appear smart as opposed to drawing conclusions from observations. That is all. Academia is a business, profits come first. I don’t see why people care so much about what academics say. It is the rough equivalent of being concerned about what McDonald’s managers think about something. They are both mid management at a large corporation.
LikeLike
If Mencken were around now, no newspaper would publish him and he would be blogging on the internet. Mencken thought that the best journalists learned on the job and never went to college. Looking at the typical college journalism school grad, I’d have to agree.
LikeLike
I wish I could get my hands on some of Sara Haardt’s writing.
LikeLike
try worldcat
LikeLike
What a great resource! Thank you very much 🙂
(ps: good luck with the Green Knight!)
LikeLike
Feminists may be winning battles, but they are losing the war big time.
Committed feminists are the most shrieking, screeching, bitter, unhappy husks of human beings on earth.
I briefly had a professional relationship with a ardent feminist.
She and I met for a drink after work, and she immediately launched into an agitated rant about male privilege, patriarchy, sexual aggression, etc etc.
This went on a while, her getting increasingly worked up, until she finally burst into tears and exclaimed (in all seriousness) ” I guess I’m just not what men are looking for!”
A ha. The truth emerges.
LikeLike
Hahahhahaha!!!!! Brilliant. Just brilliant. Wish I was there to watch.
LikeLike
Fawk! This was good to read! Just more confirmation.
LikeLike
When they whip that out they are looking for a show of dominance, hope you took her home and bedded her immediately and enthusiastically. Only way to treat a left wing hippy chick is to act like an unapologetic cross between John Wayne, Ron Reagan and Archie Bunker. What they say and what they like are two distinctly different things.
LikeLike
Boo-Hoo! These shrieking, screeching, bitter, unhappy husks of human beings have polluted our professions – but, not content with equal opportunity, this careerist spinster cries bitter tears in your beer.
Yours is the shoulder to cry on? You should bear the yoke of her contentment? When my company starts paying for hookers – I’ll start providing emotional support to feminist shrikes.
LikeLike
Would’ve paid 30 bucks to see this. 😆
LikeLike
It should probably be reinforced that the idea of “exclusion from the sexual market” for women is more in the form of “failure to extract commitment”. Even ugly feminists can get a guy to bang them occasionally, but that’s all. So they try and pretend they’re men and that it doesn’t matter, which ultimately only makes things hurt worse.
Which is why, as CH pointed out on Twitter the other day, feminists are trying to make “he didn’t call me the next day” as tantamount to rape.
LikeLike
Right. And at my college, which is actually pretty conservative, the “Women’s Center” feminists weren’t always ugly, either. Many were actually very pretty but had an aggressive anti-male personality that may not have dissuaded desirable guys from hitting on them, but probably hurt their LTR prospects.
LikeLike
Sheryl Sandberg is back with a whole new plan for dicktating corporate meetings and has ignited discussion about the perils of gender bias. There will be new rules for workplace dialogue to promote inclusion of insights and ideas from women who have been traditionally bullied by pushy males.
“This speaking-up double bind harms organizations by depriving them of valuable ideas.”
It’s just another example of Elmer’s Law : When an organization becomes feminized, focus shifts from the efficient production of goods and services to the creation of rules for the comfort and security of women. Ossification and organizational death are inevitable.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/opinion/sunday/speaking-while-female.html
LikeLike
I cannot believe how useless these creatures are. They literally do nothing but bitch.
Picture this: they openly broadcast that they wish to join a company to bitch that there aren’t enough bitchers on the company boards.
And the kickers is: they actually get hired!
Isabel and Ferdinand would say: Matajudios.
LikeLike
They don’t make the observation that women won’t speak up during meetings because they have seen men get kneecapped for doing it. They are terrified of being publicly humiliated. This was the same phenomenon at play years ago when feminists were claiming girls were not being picked for answers in grade school and therfore being “silenced”.
Meetings without anyone taking personal risk are absolutely insufferable and a complete waste of time and resources.
The real victims in this initiative will be the fools who try to enact the new rules of order, which will identify them as useless troublemakers to be sidelined. They will be put in charge of meetings to decide the next pot-luck assignments.
LikeLike
Reminds me of that chick that was all obsessed with The Citadel, but it was an all-boys school. Well, after enough clamoring, they finally admitted her and then she quit just as soon. I don’t think she even gave it a full semester. Granted, she might have just been a ploy to stir the shitstorm; a puppet in the vain of Sandra Fluke.
LikeLike
Have you guys seen Thwacks (aka the white monkey) new video???
Black women have become so bad poor brothers like Thwack have to resort to making videos like the one below….
LikeLike
Jezebel admits that PUA works:
http://jezebel.com/here-are-the-36-questions-that-will-allegedly-make-you-1679062869
…without realizing it. lol The experiment they describe is just smoothly building comfort/rapport and the exercise ends with 4 min of deep eye-contact which is just running standard laser-eyes:
“Catron calls this accelerated intimacy”
Ya, she’d BETTER call it that…because if she called it PUA or Game, Jezebel would shit a brick lol
It’s cute when normal society finally manages to spark a fire with rocks when they actively refuse to use the lighters PUA has offered for years lol
Posting this mainly to link the actual questions they use ’cause there’s a lot of good comfort/rapport building questions in here to swipe:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/fashion/no-37-big-wedding-or-small.html?_r=0
Note that they go from silly/fun/light to deep/personal, just like building comfort/rapport should (really you build rapport and then transition into comfort). The first questions are more rapport based. Also there’s a lot of “us VS them” questions (assuming the two of you are together already and reinforcing that), and future projection (assuming the two of you will be together).
There’s also showing vulnerability but it comes AFTER the rapport stuff. The first Set of questions has no vulnerability but the third set has tons of vulnerability. A lot of this creates an emotional rollercoaster done in order too…like what’s your favorite memory (emotional high), what’s your worst memory (emotional low), and back up again after a few more questions.
Really this is rock solid in terms of the results it should give, though it would be weird to execute it in it’s full design in any way other than as a game/experiment. But you could take a handful of these questions and add them to your cheat sheet of comfort/rapport building questions and drop them into a conversation congruently and to the girl it would fell like, as Jezebel says, “and anyone who has met someone and moved fast knows what this feels like: It’s when you want to know someone so quickly and so thoroughly and so urgently that you wish you could do it via osmosis. You want to give of yourself and be given to, equally.” which in logical man-speak means “PUA fucking works, duh.”
“Which makes it worth noting: The experiment sounds like some kind of trick or shortcut to love, but if both parties are well intentioned and in agreement to try it, who is to say what sort of time it should really take to scale this terrain? We all move at our own speed.”
Will have to quote this the next time some feminist is crying that PUA is an evil trick that doesn’t work. lol
Also the description of laser eyes was interesting as it’s something I’ve been focusing on over the last year:
“After completing the questions, Catron and her date do the four minute unnervingly deep stare that ends the experiment, which at first involved a lot of nervous smiling, but then got a little more comfortable. She writes:
I know the eyes are the windows to the soul or whatever, but the real crux of the moment was not just that I was really seeing someone, but that I was seeing someone really seeing me. Once I embraced the terror of this realization and gave it time to subside, I arrived somewhere unexpected.
I felt brave, and in a state of wonder. Part of that wonder was at my own vulnerability and part was the weird kind of wonder you get from saying a word over and over until it loses its meaning and becomes what it actually is: an assemblage of sounds.”
Again it’s gay woman-fluff speak, but translated into something you can apply it describes why slowing down your speaking and leaving long lingering silences while you hold the laser eye-contact Liam describes in that video works…the first few seconds (I find it’s around 10-20 seconds) the girl is off in la-la land and then her brain realizes “oh wait, we’re really looking at eachother here…” and her words trail off and your conversation switches more to subcommunications instead of surface level communication.
But casual glances or talking so fast you don’t leave tension in the air etc. won’t pass that point where it’s “nervous smiles” and entering that vulnerable “sense of wonder” stage that holding it and leaving silences creates.
Drive with Ryan Gosling is a good movie to check out for laser eye-contact…him and the chick do a lot of sub-communication shit just staring at eachother. It’s exaggerated in that movie, but that’s along the right track.
Biggest key that Drive doesn’t do and this experiment doesn’t add is closing the distance during laser eyes. If you lock eyes and slowly close the distance so you get closer to the girl, it sends butterflies in her stomach into overdrive and you can turn that into attraction/sexual tension.
Gambler demos it here at 33:35:
She doesn’t fully crack until he takes that last step and closes the space.
This really deep rapport/comfort stuff is what Mystery Method was built around and it’s the reason that Mystery was getting girls to “fall in love” with him, not just want to fuck him. Oldschool MM game was more about creating multiple-LTRs where the girl felt like you had a special connection she’s never felt with anyone else before etc. than just getting enough attraction for a one-night stand. There were reports of girls breaking down crying when Mystery/Tyler/etc. wouldn’t take their number, which sounds like bullshit until you’ve run this really deep comfort/rapport game a bunch and seen how earth-shattering it is to girls to experience it (especially hot bar chicks who are used to more shallow interactions with people) and taken it away from them suddenly and seen how they flip out and chase lol
This is also why people I meet feel like they’ve known me for years when we’ve only just met, because I know how to smoothly build comfort/rapport with strangers.
If you’re finding girls don’t stick around for more than one or two lays, or if you want to get into mLTRs, experiment with this stuff. But also be aware that if you want casual relationships, you don’t want to use too much of this or she’ll get too attached and drop the Ultimatum sooner than she would’ve if you hadn’t built so much comfort/rapport.
And seriously, go study Mystery Method. Skip the feather boas and black nails, but study everything else. It’s lengthy and dense but it’s the ultimate foundation of understanding this shit.
LikeLike
@YaReally – LOL. I’m sending this to a Natural friend of mine – 200+ lay count and he knows PUA exists but still doesn’t understand why the stuff he does works.
He’s a funny guy – he’s in his late 30s now and is really not a sociable type at all, but he’s smart, funny and *completely* outcome independent and can escalate well, even though he’s not good in crowds. And he really just doesn’t like playing the game at all – I showed him the Cajun Keys to the VIP and he thought it was incredibly boring and has no interest in understanding social dynamics – he doesn’t even like socializing. I guess you’d call him an extreme Pleasure of Sex guy. He’s pretty much like a social hermit focussing on his work until he gets horny and then he gets his fix and then that’s it for a while.
It’s interesting how as I improve myself from total beta chump, up to being pretty decent – I can look at him and think – I’m actually better than him on some stuff. I don’t have his experience and his total outcome independence but I am much better socially and better rounded skillset and unlike him I actually understand what I’m doing and why I’m doing it.
I guess that’s what Naturals do but it is so strange to me to see a guy who is so good at something but with zero interest in actively improving himself or understanding the dynamics behind what he does..
LikeLike
@Culum
Ya a lot of Naturals are like that. They don’t know why what they do works and they don’t really care that they don’t. Or they have some woo-woo theories on why it works that are like, vague versions of concepts we’ve got fleshed out…but it’s enough for them and they’re Pleasure of Sex types so that’s good enough in their mind. Sometimes they’ll even reject explanations as “dude you’re thinkin’ too much, don’t take it so seriously man you just go up to the girl and smile and she’ll like you bro” and sort of actively stay ignorant because, well, it’s been working for them so why would they fuck with the formula? They have a car that gets from point A to B faster than most other guys’ cars, they don’t necessarily have an interest in fine-tuning every screw and bolt to shave off a few extra seconds around the track.
“It’s interesting how as I improve myself from total beta chump, up to being pretty decent – I can look at him and think – I’m actually better than him on some stuff.”
Ya, with Naturals they tend to find their niche/routine and just excel at that specific method. So you get odd situations like a guy who gets laid like a rockstar from his social circle but can’t do a single cold approach and needs to meet the girl through an acquaintance or immediately find out if they know someone in common, for him to be in his comfort zone and run his game. Or a guy like you friend who’s mostly a loner and doesn’t need or even hates women in general, but goes out to get pussy when he needs it. Or a guy who gets laid like a rockstar but keeps chasing some 6/10 one-itis because she happened to be his first or an ex or something that he’s still hung up on when anyone else would objectively look at her and go “bro, wtf are you doing chasing this girl, she’s not even a good person as a human being!” and he can’t see that. Or they might have specific rituals they need to do to feel attractive, like they have to down half a bottle of vodka before the bar and lose all their confidence if they didn’t get a chance to pre-drink etc. Or they’ll only approach certain types of girls or approach in certain situations because that’s where they’re used to having success. Or they need to wear a specific shirt their success is all mentally anchored to or can’t game if they haven’t had their hair cut lately etc.
I spent a few years winging hardcore with the best Natural I’ve ever seen (he was a Natural plus he was always tightening screws in his game to shave off seconds, and then he met me and we both helped improve eachother’s shit even more), and I had the same kind of thing where at first I was like wow I can’t keep up with this guy this is crazy. But the more time I spent around him and the more I observed his game and his thought processes and mindsets the more I learned that he’s really really good at what he DOES, specifically, but that he doesn’t have a lot of versatility and there are blind spots and gaps in his game that generally don’t affect his outcome because he’s still up in the girl’s face doing his thing so he’s gonna get her…but as a PUA who understands the dynamics I see windows of opportunity where I’m like “I could take that girl off him, he’s leaving this gap wide open for it and has no idea”. Like a good fighter being able to see openings that an average fighter wouldn’t notice or wouldn’t be able to take advantage of, but to him he could knock him out.
So I learned how to adapt to other guys and look for their weak spots in their game and mine so I could get in there and, ideally not TAKE the girls but just bring my value up to where his is in a 2-set. Like my fav example is that at first I ran into the situ where we’d open a 2-set and both girls would focus on him (he was peacocked) and turn their backs to me and I was invisible in the background. At first I was like well shit he’s just that good, I can’t compete with that. But over time I learned that if I step up HARD in those situs, I can not only get attention from them too, but I can take BOTH their attention FROM him if I step hard enough. And he had no idea how to stop it because he’d never seen a guy do that before, he was used to just having the attention so he didn’t have tools to “fight” it out…from his perspective the girls that were into him were just suddenly into his buddy.
But I was specifically executing shit like using a more dominant tonality, using more polarizing/offensive routines, stepping to the side so the girls naturally turn their back to him to talk to me, cutting the space on one of them and putting her arms around my shoulder sending her emotions thru the roof while causing a spectacle for her friend, etc. Meanwhile this would stun him a bit because he didn’t know how to handle it so it threw his game off a bit…end result was my value raising while his lowered, to the point where we were on an even playing field and when I passed one of the girls back to him, they were loving both of us.
So in the end it wasn’t that his game was magical or anything, he had a lot of blind spots that I learned to spot and was able to use to get a foothold so that we both had value to the girls and could pull them together instead of me watching the back of their heads and walking away dejected while he pulls a 3-some lol
This is shit you can’t read online and learn from blogs and articles and shit. You have to be in-field and befriend some Naturals and spend time sarging with them and really experience this shit for yourself and learn it first-hand to REALLY grasp it. Like reading it you can get the jist of it, and other guys who’ve hung with Naturals will go “ya that aligns with my own experiences” (although funnily enough Naturals will often go “lol you just didn’t know a REAL Natural like ME bro, I would just nod at the girl and she’d jump off you onto my dick in the bar and I’d have my buddies kick your ass” which is the reverse problem: a Natural guy who’s never met a GOOD PUA just lame ones lol).
But when you actually experience it all first-hand, for a long period of time, AMOGs in-field become a lot less worrying, even the Naturals. Like when I spot a Natural now my first thought isn’t “oh man this’ll be tough to compete with”, it’s “hmm ok so where are his blind spots? Once I find those this’ll be no problem”
PUAs who practice the whole gamut of skills it teaches, like who are cold-approaching mixed group sets and building social proof and know how to work the room and be a social connecter and getting out of their comfort zone regularly and shit, not just focusing on like single solo girls or online girls or social circle girls etc., end up WAY more well-rounded in general. We’re able to adapt and prosper in a ton of social situations. I know that I could walk into a business meeting for work and charm the room easily, no matter who’s in it, with minimal effort. Or I could meet a girlfriend’s parents or friends and they’ll all love me. Or I can walk into a social event alone and network like crazy. Or I can move to a new city and start new social circles up from scratch quickly. I can game day/night, sober/drunk, wearing whatever, in a good or bad mood, etc.
Naturals are great at what they do and I might not be able to compete directly with them in that very specific category, but often they can’t do much ELSE lol Would way rather sarge with them than with AFC anti-game chodes though.
LikeLike
Also Keys to the VIP is a great show to watch for studying Naturals. They often just show the highlight clips and the Naturals tend to seek out their comfort zones within the club to succeed (the guy who’s used to social proof will build it before approaching, the guy who’s used to approaching lone solo girls will hunt those ones out, etc.) but they have a lot of guys who talk a big Natural game that just fall apart in the club when they can’t find their regular comfort zone.
Like often a Natural will assume that because he slays it with his social circle boning all the hottest girls in it, that he’ll obviously be amazing on Keys, except that when he gets on it they put him in a situ where he has to cold approach and suddenly he’s chickenshit because that’s not his comfort zone that he’s used to dealing with and he chokes. You can watch that happen on Keys a bunch, it’s hilarious when you understand the dynamic of why the guy was so confident in his intro and then fell apart in the club.
You’ll also see how Naturals pump their own state. Some of them do it by throwing a pre-party, some do it by exercising, some do it by meditating or perfectly grooming themselves a certain way etc., but they’ve all figured out their specific “if I do these things I feel good and when I feel good I do good with girls” state-boosters. To them they’re just “having fun bro” but thru the PUA lens they’re performing a specific set of steps to boost their state. Girls do the same thing, that’s why they run out to the dance floor to dance to Miley Cyrus or wear peacocked girls night out sashes and tiaras and shit, it’s their way of boosting their states.
It doesn’t mean that they’re super crazy party guy high energy, like my prime state doesn’t look like Stifler lol esp now that I’m older. It’s just solid low-energy but strong intent confidence now.
Then you see the chodey normal guys who are just always out of state, or the guys who lose their state after a bad blow-out, or the guys who hit their state and are in their comfort zone or can adapt easier and just destroy the episode with their success.
Show is a great learning experience, anyone doing pickup should have watched every episode of it.
LikeLike
I have hung out with an extreme Natural, who happens to be very smart. He was deliberately running “experiments” re: what moves worked vs. what did not – like – way back in the 2000s.
One time, I made a reference to having a “Green eyed cat”.
He laughed.
LikeLike
@yareally – you left of the punch line of the article “You’re probably wondering if he and I fell in love. Well, we did. Although it’s hard to credit the study entirely (it may have happened anyway), the study did give us a way into a relationship that feels deliberate. We spent weeks in the intimate space we created that night, waiting to see what it could become.”
She “fell” in love. This stuff works because “love” is just a serious of chemical reactions that are interpreted by the mind via “emotions”. The chemical reactions can be triggered as surely as the dopamine hit you get from looking at your phone for the 10th time will trigger it.
The “love” stuff works so well on women because the only truth they perceive is via feeling. Whatever they feel is true. Whereas most men perceive truth through logic and don’t trust their feelings. The problem for most guys comes when they first get hit with these feelings and they lack the experience of processing these feelings/reactions to chemical stimulus and logically deduce they are in love. and once deduced logically they are programmed that they are in love regardless of what feelings come next in their lives.
But women will follow their feelings first always, what they feel is true, and so will also fall out of love more quickly. Which helps hypergamy. Which helps her move to the next branch. With solipsim the ego balm that keeps her from going insane. A system.
So young guys, recognize what you are feeling is just a chemical reaction. It will pass. But also realize that when you trigger that chemical reaction in a girl she will believe it as long as she keeps feeling it.
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
http://www.vulture.com/2015/01/girls-sex-scene-marnie-butt-rimjob.html
LikeLike
Isn’t that what dogs do?
LikeLike
Couldn’t she have just made him a sammich instead?
Poor hungry bastid. (((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
“This could be the year of the anus!”
Another one, huh?
LikeLike
Caption: “What will it take for you to do the dishes?”
LikeLike
H.L. Mencken: The woman who is not pursued sets up the doctrine that pursuit is offensive to her sex, and wants to make it a felony. No genuinely attractive woman has any such desire.
Ebon Moss-Bachrach: I hope this is okay to say, but honestly I think this scene comes about by Lena saying, “How can I put Allison through the ringer?” “How can I tighten the screws on Allison?” I think Lena gets a kick out of that, Lena does.
LikeLike
And to think she’d be a 5 if she only lost … um, fifty pounds? If you hide the part to the left of her arm, she almost looks normal.
LikeLike
LOL get a load of them hips.
LikeLike
Re to Dunham
LikeLike
Why no warning??? What is seen cannot be unseen!
Somebody needs to go all Captain Ahab on that land whale.
LikeLike
HLM identified a wife’s contempt for the beta/omega precisely:
“A woman, if she hates her husband (and many of them do), can make life so sour and obnoxious to him that even death upon the gallows seems sweet by comparison. This hatred, of course, is often, and perhaps almost invariably, quite justified.
To be the wife of an ordinary man, indeed, is an experience that must be very hard to bear. The hollowness and vanity of the fellow, his petty meanness and stupidity, his puling sentimentality and credulity, his bombastic air of a cock on a dunghill, his anaesthesia to all whispers and summonings of the spirit, above all, his loathsome clumsiness in amour—all these things must revolt any woman above the lowest.”
LikeLike
+Infinity
LikeLike
“Women who don’t want to be pumped and dumped have a responsibility to stay off the hooch. If they won’t accept that responsibility, then men will have to make their decisions for them.”
You just changed my life, CH. She’s as good as gone. Mencken is one of my heroes. I’ll be reading more of this kickass blog.
LikeLike
Some real talk invaded the “What’s it like to be white” thread on reddit. Some of the good stuff got downvoted so I sorted by controversial.
http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/2satoh/whats_it_like_being_white/?sort=controversial
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
I know I should, as a woman, be all offended, but ch has a point. So I was born “post feminist” and all my life have been told, by women of course, among other pretty little lies, that to be pretty or to care about looking pretty was tantamount to “not being taken seriously” or “selling out.” Huh. Interesting… Feminism is as anti-female as anti-male! If they had their way, all sex would be rape (except I guess lesbian sex? (and not the porn version…btw)
LikeLike
Would like to see a follow-up story about the “rape victim” at Ohio University.
This happened about a year ago -the guy was eating the girl’s pussy in a public square witnessed by many spectators. They go back to his room and have sex and the next day she decides she was raped and reports him to the police. I think the police knew it was a bogus story and no one was arrested -including the girl who lied. The college did everything to conceal the “victim’s” name and there was hysteria on campus, although not quite the magnitude of UVA.
Who was the girl and whatever happened to her?
LikeLike
So I finally got around to watching Taylor Swift’s Blank Space video… after 340,000,000 plays on YouTube.
The song toys with reality. It acknowledges female insanity, but it puts Swift in the role of the alpha. And she projects some female psychology onto men. For example: “Boys only want love if it’s torture.” On the other hand, she’s honest: “Cause you know I love the players”
It looks like the video was shot at the same chateau where Last Year at Marienbad was filmed. Is the whole thing a swipe at the Kennedy guy with whom she was involved? If that’s the case, then it includes a pretty devastating insult: “new money.”
LikeLike
There’s a special place in hell for women who glamorize violence against men.
LikeLike
This reminds me of that Carrie Underwood song about smashing up her boyfriend’s car after she finds out he was cheating. Cheating sucks, but it doesn’t give you the right to destroy someone’s property. Frankly, the song glamorized female psychos which is insulting, not empowering. Flip the genders and imagine if Tim McGraw or Luke Bryan had a song about getting drunk and pissed off and bashing in a girl’s windows with a baseball bat.
LikeLike
This
LikeLike
Since we’re discussing great social commentators take on feminists, here’s Berke Breathed’s observation on things:
http://www.gocomics.com/bloomcounty/1982/06/16
LikeLike
Menken is only partly correct. Attractive women do resent being pursued by low status men. This is why the “street harassment” campaigns get so much attention. In Menken’s defense, even in his day there were still all sorts of social taboos that made it difficult for unwanted beta men to make advances on women above their station, and any immigrant or black person who tried catcalling at a well born white women would be beaten in the best of cases, and possibly lynched. It is probably not a coincidence that feminism started making progress with upper class women around the same time industrialization made the old class and social controls disintegrate.
LikeLike
Related: An early expression of the Red Pill concept.
LikeLike
“Ugly Feminists” – Now there’s a redundant statement.
Every last one of them are ugly in some combination of body, mind and soul.
LikeLike
http://theendofzion.com/2014/03/01/feminism-a-jewish-war-on-women/
LikeLike
Feminism liberated women from the natural dignity of their sex and turned them into inferior men.
— Francis Parker Yockey
LikeLike
Your welcome.
LikeLike
It’s “you’re welcome” moron.
LikeLike