• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Fat, Sloppy Women Are Bad For Morale
Ghost Girl »

Reframing: Anti-SJW Edition

January 15, 2015 by CH

Je suis Charlie Martel (heh) gives an excellent example of reframing, a concept that is one of the pillars of Game but that can apply in almost any social context.

When the “offended” card is played there is a simple reframing:

“You must be really weak and insecure to get offended by something like that. Sucks to be a little pussy like you.”

Works every time.

This is why CH added “White Male Pussy of the Month” as a post category. You gotta hit ’em where it hurts, and the typical SJW is one friendzone away from a sexual identity crisis.

Stop playing by your enemies’ tune. Play your own tune, and crank the volume to ear-splitting. The androgyne SJW secretly wants nothing less than to submit totally to a true master. Womanly, to the end.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Psy Ops | 73 Comments

73 Responses

  1. on January 15, 2015 at 1:43 pm Reframing: Anti-SJW Edition | Manosphere.com

    […] Reframing: Anti-SJW Edition […]

    LikeLike


  2. on January 15, 2015 at 1:59 pm Master Blaster

    Château Gold!

    LikeLike


  3. on January 15, 2015 at 2:00 pm Eric

    Sure, that works against straight men, but I’ve tried it on women and it just doesn’t work. Apparently I don’t understand the patriarchy and stuff.

    LikeLike


    • on January 15, 2015 at 4:30 pm Hilary Clinton

      Nobody understands what PATRIARCHY means. A magic word ugly feminists create to shut up truth tellers. It has no semantic content.

      LikeLike


      • on January 15, 2015 at 5:17 pm ho

        EXACTLY.

        Similar thing COULD be said about misogynist, anti semite, racist, etc. They are weapons.

        Here’s a little experiment: SJWs use the definition of those words instead of using those words. Like, instead of calling somebody a “misogynist”, claim that he hates women. Instead of calling someone a “racist”, call them people that some races are superior to others. Instead of calling someone an anti semite, claim that they hate Jews.

        if they did that, I’d predict that the damaging power of these previous charges would be diminished greatly, even though they putatively mean the same thing. Why?

        It’s something I noticed in Ethics class: we were discussing the ethics of abortion. One classmate mention one anecdote involving abortion, saying “I knew a girl who decided had her child killed[…]”

        You cannot underestimate the difference it make to one’s ears. Technically, it is the same thing: abortion IS the killing of an unborn child. But to have it referred to as such, instead of a sterile word such as “abortion”, it sounded much harsher to the listener.

        The same principle applies with these buzzwords. Use their actual definition and people start thinking about it. Suddenly, it sounds stupid to claim that Donald Sterling considers blacks inferior to other races, just because he doesn’t want his mistress to be seen with them at his games. Suddenly, claiming that every ones who hates that gutterslut Zoe Quinn, hates women as a class makes you look like a retard: most men would punch your face in for speaking about their mohthers’ and Zoe in the same sentence. Suddenly, claiming that those, who say Jews own all of Hollywood and run America hate Jews, will make you seem like a moron. After all, don’t Jewish journalists complain that white males run America? Surely they don’t hate them, do they? (heh)

        These are the kind of tailspins you get into if you use the actual meaning of the words, instead of the words themselves.

        Also, interesting how using the meaning instead of the word itself harms the leftoid, cultural marxist argument. It’s ALMOST like, these words are deliberately being used to obscure the true meaning of the word, in order to impose the view of a small, high verbal IQ elite onto the unwashed masses. HMMMMM….

        LikeLike


    • on January 15, 2015 at 7:22 pm Le Chasseur maudit

      AGREE AND AMPLIFY: “Baby, I’m 50 Shades of Patriarchy, and the 1st Shade is me putting a very naughty little girl over my knee and giving her a nice, hard spanking.”

      LikeLike


      • on January 15, 2015 at 7:32 pm Southern Man

        Best line I’ve read here for a while.

        LikeLike


    • on January 16, 2015 at 12:51 am Joe

      Quote Stephen Fry, he might be a swish but he got I right:

      “It’s now very common to hear people say ‘I’m rather offended by that.’ As if that gives them certain rights; it’s actually nothing more…it’s simply a whine. ‘I find that offensive,’ it has no meaning, it has no purpose, it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. ‘I’m offended by that,’ well so fucking what?”

      Then remind them it’s from a swish (gay guy) who is Jewish by birth, and atheist by choice. Watch their little SJW heads explode.

      LikeLike


    • on January 18, 2015 at 5:22 pm Carlos Danger

      The correct approach is to explain why they need to be thankful for living under a patriarchy. May I suggest H. Roger Devlin’s writings or a nice little work called the Garbage Generation by Daniel Amneus.

      LikeLike


  4. on January 15, 2015 at 2:03 pm Reframing: Anti-SJW Edition | Neoreactive

    […] Reframing: Anti-SJW Edition […]

    LikeLike


  5. on January 15, 2015 at 3:19 pm Sandman

    New to this place. SJW?

    LikeLike


    • on January 15, 2015 at 4:19 pm Holden Caulfield

      SJW = Social Justice Warrior. You’ve probably noticed them “getting offended” when logic prevails or an uncomfortable truth emerges

      LikeLike


      • on January 16, 2015 at 10:15 am aspergeryone

        Wow, just wow.

        LikeLike


      • on January 16, 2015 at 12:32 pm Sandman

        Thanks. This place is the tits 🙂

        LikeLike


    • on January 16, 2015 at 12:42 am Ayy Bola

      Single Jewish Woman

      LikeLike


      • on January 16, 2015 at 10:52 am ho

        Gold.

        LikeLike


      • on January 16, 2015 at 11:03 am PA

        A Brazilian regular commenter here once wrote that if he knows the following about a woman, he can predict her opinion on every subject under the sun with 100% certainty: (1) is she over or under 40?; (2) is she married? (3) is she Jewish?

        [CH: sounds like gig. where’d that rascal go, anyhow?]

        LikeLike


    • on January 16, 2015 at 7:31 am Frank

      LikeLike


  6. on January 15, 2015 at 3:20 pm yeahokcool

    @ch. as of today, google search doesn’t appear to be auto-completing my search for these hallowed halls. i’m not sure if that’s an interesting bit of censorship or merely an indication of my lack of computer savvy.

    LikeLike


    • on January 15, 2015 at 4:45 pm Johnny Salami

      I observed the same the first time I typed it in. But now it auto fills after 3 characters.

      Of course I just use the bookmark, and it is one of many labeling me a bitter clinger rebel with no respect for social justice.

      LikeLike


  7. on January 15, 2015 at 3:22 pm JenkPac Shakur

    http://imgur.com/lipDcOf

    LikeLike


    • on January 15, 2015 at 9:23 pm Goethe

      Your Jesus looks like a Jew 🙂

      LikeLike


    • on January 16, 2015 at 7:37 am earl

      Where’s the chain around the puppet leader’s neck?

      LikeLike


  8. on January 15, 2015 at 3:25 pm JenkPac Shakur

    Ex KGB officer Uri Bezmenov warned America many years ago about the rise of these cucks. As Hitler said “Christianity taken to it’s logical conclusion would result in the systematic cultivation of the human failure” and we have that via todays social justice warrior/hipster/hysterical beta archetype.

    LikeLike


  9. on January 15, 2015 at 3:25 pm Anonymous

    I noticed same today with Google

    LikeLike


  10. on January 15, 2015 at 3:26 pm martin

    Yes, lampooning sjw’s and their political counterparts may be the best way to deal with them. Thinking of sjw’s on twitter calls to mind Dante’s fifth circle where the wrathful rip and tear each other. Engaging them would be counter productive. Instead, they should be made in to parody and mocked. For the record, ‘nanny state’ is a term that can be used quite effectively whenever someone wants to expand government power and it has few rebuttals.

    LikeLike


  11. on January 15, 2015 at 3:32 pm JenkPac Shakur

    The goal of the SJW Communist fetishists is to reduce language to Orwellian “duckspeak” by getting everyone so afraid of criticizing the freaks and monsters of society (trannies, furries, bronies, pedos, downies) that no one can thus make sense any longer when attempting to criticize said freak group since all effective and hilarious terminology which exposes these degenerates via real talk is then outlawed on pain of job loss + societal ostracization. If they win Nostradamus’ most famous prediction will come true:

    May 22, 2022: Zoosexuals protest in Washington for marriage equality between a man and an animal. Famous musician “Pony Boy” and his chart-topping single “Love, not Hate” gave an emotional speech about the issue.

    LikeLike


  12. on January 15, 2015 at 3:49 pm Martel

    “So either you’re a strong independent woman or you’re a little girl who wets her pants whenever she hears something she doesn’t like. Which is it?” works pretty well, too.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on January 15, 2015 at 4:16 pm Holden Caulfield

      Good one. SJWs are all little girls who wet their pants when they hear something they don’t like. In fact, I think “male SJW” should be an oxymoron.

      LikeLike


    • on January 15, 2015 at 5:39 pm Sentient

      Eeeeeek. Spider.

      LikeLike


  13. on January 15, 2015 at 4:25 pm themanofmystery2

    Calling women a “pussy” is a trump card. Usually it’s an insult reserved for men and most def nukes the hamster from orbit.

    LikeLike


    • on January 17, 2015 at 7:38 pm Sprezz

      Insults reserved for men work the best. I called an annoying girl a faggot once, the bewildered look on her face is one of the top 10 funniest things I’ve ever seen

      LikeLike


  14. on January 15, 2015 at 4:31 pm ATC

    SJWs are almost always atheists yet depend on people “feeling sorry” for them in order for their shit tests to work. Go Nietzsche on them; agree and amplify their atheism: “Take your Golden Rule sentimentality and shove it. You have no foundation for your arbitrary morals (actually they do – New Testament Christianity, but they can’t admit that). We are just here to take what we can before we die.”

    LikeLike


    • on January 15, 2015 at 4:41 pm earl

      Their foundation is victimhood…anything that resembles NT Christianity is a cover.

      LikeLike


  15. on January 15, 2015 at 4:54 pm Jimothy

    “Stop playing by your enemies’ tune. Play your own tune, and crank the volume to ear-splitting.”

    Sorry, this doesn’t really work hiding behind anonymity. An anonymous Alt Right can’t be anything other than spitball-throwers, or a minor bankshot influence on the establishment right.

    LikeLike


  16. on January 15, 2015 at 5:58 pm Le Chasseur maudit

    The “Vagina Monologues” was once a yearly tradition at Mount Holyoke College, an all-women’s school in Massachusetts. But not this year. The reason? Apparently the show is no longer feminist enough and actually hurts women because it doesn’t include monologues from trans-women. Suddenly, the most feminist play in America is both transphobic and racist… http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/heres-the-reason-this-all-womens-college-cancelled-its-yearly-vagina-monologues/article/2558710

    LikeLike


    • on January 16, 2015 at 6:26 am Greg Eliot

      Those things can talk?

      LikeLike


      • on January 16, 2015 at 7:36 am Skinner

        They never stfu in my experience.

        LikeLike


    • on January 17, 2015 at 11:53 am RosePhan77

      Interesting.

      As a Right-wing wacko I haven’t been feminist enough for the Vagina Monolgues for 18 years!

      LikeLike


  17. on January 15, 2015 at 6:07 pm realgaryseven

    Reblogged this on ReactionaryThought.

    LikeLike


  18. on January 15, 2015 at 6:40 pm Reframing: Anti-SJW Edition | Reaction Times

    […] Source: Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  19. on January 15, 2015 at 7:00 pm English Dude

    Have a read of this: http://lifeofasinglegirl.weebly.com/

    Amazing how many dinners she gets taken out to, and complains about all the hot guys “leading her on”, while she says ok to go somewhere secluded in their car, then stops them from kissing / feeling her up because she’s “not that kind of girl”. 18 yo English lass btw. (Bet she omits / makes a lot of stuff up from here too).

    Main thing to note though is the type of guys that really got her buzzing, thinking about and chasing. The ones who used lots of kino, practically ignored her afterwards etc. SO much of it rang true to what I’ve seen on here.

    Just shows why a lot of the girls are like they are nowadays.

    LikeLike


    • on January 15, 2015 at 7:02 pm English Dude

      Also funny is how she blames guys for it apparently being bad to kiss on the first date, if they don’t mean anything by it. Because apparently kisses are special. So special she goes out kissing all these random dudes heh.

      Never met her fortunately. Bet she’d never even WANT a proper boyfriend, she’d have no drama to write about. Unless he was a violent meth head of course..

      LikeLike


      • on January 15, 2015 at 9:03 pm The Spirit Within

        Couldn’t open it. The sheer number of exclamation points alone would exceed my ISP’s bandwidth allowance.

        LikeLike


    • on January 15, 2015 at 9:00 pm ballocaust

      its a feedback loop. evaluate the goods, decline to purchase, she sells the only thing in stock harder at a discount price to such a savvy customer.

      get awed with the window dressing of how the product is presented (she’s such a good, sweet, etc. girl!) and get fleeced for everything that can be parted from you.

      i sincerely thank feminism and an unrestricted sexual market for revealing truths about existence that were otherwise swept under the rug.

      my guess is she isn’t much of a looker and she’s not too happy with the tire-kickers only taking the beater for a test drive

      LikeLike


    • on January 15, 2015 at 9:08 pm ballocaust

      Thought I’d have a skim to see about my thoughts..

      “my dad used to be in the army and my mother has always been into guys in the forces, one of my exes (who I still actually talk to) is in the RAF.”

      “that’s when this guy told me on the phone that the guy who I was about to appoach wasn’t him! Great start! Only I could do something like that! Damn! That guy was hot!!! I turned around and there he was… Okay he was a lot shorter than I thought… Hmm no where near as good looking as the guy I was walking towards. Oh this was awkward.”

      “Conversation wasn’t flowing… But the wine, the wine was!!! I was on my second glass of wine before we even ordered food! Oh dear, he was in for a treat! Drunk Charlotte is always fun.”

      “If you want to kiss someone just go for it! If it feels right then just do it! Drunk Charotte’s brain wasn’t thinking and said yes. So he kissed me. Mm wasn’t too bad to be honest. Walked to the bus stop in a not so straight line, we both sat down. Now this sounds so bad I was actually turned away from him. I didn’t care I was drunk and just wanted to go home and get into bed with Sex and The City on tv.”

      Just man up and marry these lovely young ladies faggots what are you scared of commitment how dare you find her spare tire unattractive so what if she’s had a lot of partners and can’t do anything thats so patriarchal … etc.

      LikeLike


  20. on January 15, 2015 at 7:33 pm Anonymous

    Wonder what CH thinks of this drivel: http://herself.com/

    LikeLike


    • on January 16, 2015 at 1:01 am Joe

      Demi: I’m a wild hair animal, fuck me now!
      Chelsea: I sucked the juice out of 40 cocks before I was 20.
      S: I want to be used like a stroker.
      Raechl: I’m a damaged, tattooed, naturalist whore.
      Candice: I’m a fat red-haired freak in between the sheets.
      Casey: I watch porn and use my hand because I’m a nagging cunt.
      Alexis: I project the fact I can’t keep my mouth shut around food or cocks.
      Milena: The cock carousel makes me cum everyday!
      Caitlin: Women are powerful when we let random guys fuck our brains out.

      LikeLike


  21. on January 15, 2015 at 9:17 pm Rick Derris

    Je suis Charlie Martel has a great point. These jihadi rug pilots act like the biggest badasses on the planet but are simultaneously offended by just about everything.

    LikeLike


  22. on January 15, 2015 at 11:38 pm Rum

    Her given name is Candace.
    The newspapers will call her Candy.
    I mean, when they report her suicide.

    LikeLike


  23. on January 16, 2015 at 4:36 am Lurker

    (UK reader here) I’ve just found out that in the UK general election in May we will have what is thought to be the world’s first anti-feminist party running, called Justice for Men and Boys (J4MB).

    Needless to say it’s a small movement, they won’t win shit and the more people are hearing about them the more they are met with dismissive vitriol and classic silence-by-shaming tactics. I haven’t yet read the manifesto and probably won’t agree with everything in it but I am mighty glad this party exists; if nothing else they are raising the profile of the anti-feminist sentiment and they constantly expose feminist bullshit on their website and Youtube channel.

    https://j4mb.wordpress.com/bbc-anti-male-debate-do-we-live-in-a-sexist-country-and-laura-bates-lies-again/

    LikeLike


  24. on January 16, 2015 at 5:06 am Will

    Soooo I visited Alabama about a month ago and I’m from a way distant northern state…….

    Is it me, or are the girls in Alabama somewhat sweeter/nicer more feminine and hotter….I’d never been there before but it just seemed like the ratio seemed better or something.

    Then again I was near a college campus, but still. I was pleasantly surprised. Up north it seems like there’s a lot more “weirdos” or hippies or something? Idk

    LikeLike


    • on January 18, 2015 at 2:36 pm Sentient

      It’s not you. Definitly average more girly and nicer in the south compared to elsewhere .

      Sadly this too is changing.

      LikeLike


    • on January 18, 2015 at 5:40 pm Carlos Danger

      Its not you. Alabama has nice women. Its because we have low tolerance for Yankee BS and generally ignore it. I love the state. They believe in small government and leave you alone here for one. Things are still relatively normal here.

      LikeLike


  25. on January 16, 2015 at 8:08 am Anonymous

    feminist students claiming self-portraits should be taken down because said exhibts had sexual themes.

    http://www.thefreelibrary.com/The+perils+of+pornophobia.-a016898789

    LikeLike


  26. on January 16, 2015 at 8:10 am Le Chasseur maudit

    Sorry, David Beckham you’re not the first hands-on dad! Victorian fathers were the ORIGINAL New Men who spent time and joked with their children http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2911829/Victorian-fathers-ORIGINAL-New-Men-spent-time-joked-children.html

    LikeLike


    • on January 16, 2015 at 8:13 am Le Chasseur maudit

      *** Term ‘Victorian father’ shorthand for someone strict and unaffectionate *** Study also disproves the working class drunk, resentful dad stereotype *** Academics say 19th century fathers brought HUMOUR AND FUN into the home ***

      LikeLike


      • on January 16, 2015 at 8:16 am Le Chasseur maudit

        TRANSLATION: Everything which your college [and grad school] YKWish social sciences professors taught you about the Victorian Era was, predictably enough, a great big pack of lies.

        LikeLike


      • on January 16, 2015 at 10:30 am Greg Eliot

        Speaking of which, I recently had an SJW graduate student start spouting off about how the Puritans were hypocrites and said female sexuality was “evil” and had to be controlled, but those “dirty old men” would then force 12 year olds to marry.

        This, of course, was beyond any history I had ever learned, so I told her that that sounded like some “feminist bullshit, unworthy of any credentialed curricula… let’s just google on that ‘smart’ phone of yours something along the lines of ‘Puritan marriage'”…

        … turns out their average age of marriage was higher than the rest of the colonies, with 26 years old for men and 23 for women during the harsh 17th century, and then as things got more “civilized”, the age went down several generations later to 23 and 20, if memory serves.

        To her credit, since then she’s been all smiles and conspiratorial “it’s smart people like us against the rest of these bozos” sidling up to me.

        LikeLike


  27. on January 16, 2015 at 8:20 am anony

    http://shareverything.com/2015/01/14/im-not-charlie-im-maurice-sine-fired-by-charlie-for-anti-semitism/

    LikeLike


  28. on January 16, 2015 at 9:42 am dirkdiggly

    SJW and internet feminist hypersensitivity to everything must be a backlash to the lack of direction our society provides. We lack predators to fear, we don’t need to hunt for our own food or make our own tools -things are too easy for them, and most media outlets and individuals tolerate their screeching and finger-pointing. They are crying out for challenge and difficulty and struggle because they have none of their own of any gravity.

    LikeLike


    • on January 17, 2015 at 8:10 am Charlie Don't Surf

      ..Or lack of fulfillment. They fill their otherwise empty lives with causes – and CREATE challenge and difficulty where none exists. It’s a form of self-actualization.

      LikeLike


  29. on January 16, 2015 at 9:45 am Stiggs

    Guess it was ca ’84. SJW girlfriend invited me to a happy hour with a pack of libDems, feminists, and manginas. Her dad was CoS to a Dem Gov. While quietly drinking my beer, they pack attacked me because the girlfriend told them I’d “voted for Reagan.” I wish I had a tape of the scorched earth verbal blitzkrieg those assholes received that evening. And later, the girlfriend asked me to fuck her in the ass, something she’d always refused to do.

    You gotta fight. For your right. To not give a fuck.

    LikeLike


    • on January 16, 2015 at 10:22 am Le Chasseur maudit

      > “You gotta fight.”

      Evo-Psych says that the hamster is inevitably drawn to the whole Neanderthal/Vampire/Werewolf vibe because some-damned-body is gonna hafta leave the cave and hunt down that saber-toothed tiger and kill it. And that somebody sure as hell ain’t gonna be her.

      LikeLike


      • on January 16, 2015 at 10:24 am Le Chasseur maudit

        LikeLike


      • on January 16, 2015 at 10:32 am Greg Eliot

        some-damned-body is gonna hafta leave the cave and hunt down that saber-toothed tiger and kill it. And that somebody sure as hell ain’t gonna be her.

        According to recent movies and TV, it’s gonna be a her that not only kills the tiger, but kicks the entire enemy tribe’s collective ass… all by her little lonesome, ’cause she don’t need no man.

        LikeLike


      • on January 16, 2015 at 2:41 pm Le Chasseur maudit

        > “According to recent movies and TV, it’s gonna be a her”

        Right, except that we’re talking Evo-Psych in the real world, rather than Oscar Mayer Wiener Academy propaganda and disinformation to the contrary. Speaking of which, have you seen Michelle “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” Gellar lately? She’s passed through “The YKWess Change” and now she could be an extra in a movie like Secretariat or The Black Stallion.

        LikeLike


      • on January 17, 2015 at 12:04 pm RosePhan77

        ‘Speaking of which, have you seen Michelle “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” Gellar lately?’

        YIKES! She looks like Sarah Jessica Parker now! *sigh* Always liked Michelle Gellar in the purple go-go boots in the live action ‘Scooby Doo’ movie. (BTW when she was on Howard Stern years ago she was ashamed to admit she was YKW! We need more of them to go back into the closet. I think this is a sign that Aryans are making progress.)

        LikeLike


    • on January 17, 2015 at 2:54 pm Capt John Charity Spring MA

      You must give details. Reagan? If you’d voted Le Pen…

      LikeLike


    • on January 18, 2015 at 5:44 pm Carlos Danger

      How’s OC doin? National Lampoon used to be so great. Humor has never recovered from its demise.

      LikeLike


    • on January 20, 2015 at 6:17 pm Tom

      But you did give her a fuck!

      LikeLike


  30. on January 16, 2015 at 10:45 am Hymen Mingesky

    Ramz’s je suis Charlie Martel is great, but Hood of Good inductee and based motherfucker, Dieudonne M’bala M’bala amped things up to 11 with his Je Suis Charlie Coulibaly stunt.

    .
    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/14/dieudonne-arrest-facebook-post-charlie-coulibaly-paris-gunman

    LikeLike


    • on January 16, 2015 at 12:35 pm Greg Eliot

      My, but the French are looking noirish lately.

      LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    oink on Slutty Women Are Unhappier Tha…
    posts only tweets on The Confound Of Silence
    earl on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    earl on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Libertardian on The Confound Of Silence
    Stahp on “Conspiracy Theory…
    Out of Nod on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    William of Orange Co… on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    vfm#7634 on The Confound Of Silence
    Hawk on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • ¡SCIENCE!: The NPC Leftoid Hivemind Is Real
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • Manifest Depravity
    • The Diminishing Returns Of Anti-White Virtue Signaling
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • Revolutionary Spirals To Civil War 2
    • Demography Is Destiny
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: