Phillyastro hurls the high heat and takes the COTW:
Every civilized person in the West claims they abhor eugenics until their daughter wants to get married.
Parents aren’t the only secret eugenicists. The daughters and sons will find it much easier to fall in love with a person who is high mate value and thus eugenically optimal. God teaches us the power of Love so that we may advance as a species.
Interesting thing about Love. Love can be both a rationalization for a poor mate choice — “oh, but she’s so in love, and that’s all that matters” — and a euphemism for a eugenically pleasing pairing — “it wasn’t his money, it was love that brought them together”. What can’t Love do?
Modern Eugenics:
“What top flight paragon of gentlemanliness and success will have the privilege of marrying my fat slutty people-magazine-reading post-prime daughter with no personality or kitchen talents that still asks me to pay for her to go on cruises?”
LikeLike
Sure, people like good genetics, but there is a lot of context left out. If genes were all that mattered, then game would be undone because only things like the genes for height, physical attractiveness, intelligence would be counted. Plus, the other side of eugenics is things like designer test tube babies or governments getting involved in people’s lives for genetic reasons.
LikeLike
back then: “love conquers allz s let us surrendersz to lovez” –virgilz
Omnia vincit Amor; et nos cedamus Amori.
Love conquers all and we must yield to Love.
Book X, line 69 (Dryden).
Variant translations:
Love conquers all things – let us yield to Love.
Love conquers all; let us, too, yield to love.
Love conquers all things: let us too give in to Love.
Love conquers all things; let us too surrender to love.
today: Omnia vincit buttehxt; et nos cedamus butthexttxzlzlzzlzlzzlzlz.
translation,”we can conquer them all via butthxtettztz, so let us conuer them all by buthextethtxtxhlzoozozo”
LikeLike
> “game would be undone because only things like the genes… intelligence would be counted…”
Dude, I hate to break this to you, but the smarter you are, the higher wll be the ceiling for your ultimate Game apex.
LikeLike
One must reckon with physiognomy. We are not unlimited genetic packages that can be stuffed with every seemingly desirable trait to the maximal degree. We are all genetic trade-offs and our looks, courage, dominance, IQ and a thousand other traits, even cock and ball size, are somewhat linked, through effects like in utero testosteronization.
Very high IQ people may have a theoretical high ceiling for game, but they are very unlikely to climb the ladder anywhere near high enough to reach it, for a huge number of reasons perhaps best summed up by our host as sperg-ness.
Feynman was as high IQ as you can get while retaining an eye for game, and even he quickly gave it up as too distracting and, for him, too shallow.
LikeLike
Don’t kid yourself, man – all other things being equal, the higher IQ PUA will kick the lower IQ PUA’s ass [whatever that means] from here to Sunday [whatever that means].
LikeLike
Best thing is to be one standard deviation above your target female. Not two, not three. One.
Just taller enough, just smarter enough, just richer enough, just cocky enough. If there’s too big a gap, she’ll disqualify herself, feeling that she can’t get a toehold in your life. And she’s right.
LikeLike
TJW is making a good point about your target environment for a quick & easy one night stand [if you can learn to talk down to blue collar chicks (which is a skill unto itself)], but if she’s one SD less than you in IQ, then you’re going to be bored to tears with her by the end of your honeymoon – maybe even by the end of your wedding reception.
LikeLike
aggression, dominance and social skills can be learned but are largely a genetically inherited trait similar to musculature. you can lift alot of weights and eat right but not everyone can become an olympic power lifter.
LikeLike
[…] Comment Of The Week: The Subtext Of Sex […]
LikeLike
[…] Comment Of The Week: The Subtext Of Sex […]
LikeLike
I will only make lots of babies with blonde hair and blue eyes so my children will look like me. When I tell that to women it drives the brunettes insane.
LikeLike
Insane like “fuck off
LikeLike
Eugenics from female hypergamy standpoint are complicated. Every woman wants a king but if she can’t have a king, she wants a thief.
I don’t want to dwell on the oft-discussed female selection for ‘civilizationally-incompatible’ men. One can write that off as prisoner’s dilemma cheating: another woman’s son can be Mr. Beta Bux; hers will be Alpha Fux.
What I interests me is that female hypergamy as expressed by lower class white women’s proclivities in diversitopia, like London, will select for (a) men who are guaranteed to make ugly daughters and (b) men who are the embodiment of disgenia in every way but their most superficial and context-dependent way.
LikeLike
The only explanation I can offer is the relentless cradle-to-grave exalting of blacks and browns and the desparigement of Whites as spergs and nerds.
LikeLike
The only unfortunate aspect is the need for secrecy about it.
LikeLike
Am I the first to comment… I don’t envy married men. By the time you reach your 40s do you even want to f your wife of so many years? Viagra, Cialis is really for the benefit of fat fugly wives. Oh, you say she’s not fat but her personality. I know she’s mad at you for something. Still doesn’t apply? then you truly are a 1 pecenter.
-Lazy Hero
LikeLike
Dude, you marry a woman to have CHILDREN with her. If you’ve taken care of business, then by your forties you will have so many children that viagra will be the least of your worries. PS: Copulating for purposes of procreation is infinitely more intense than anything you have experienced as a bachelor.
LikeLike
It’s doable. Do your diligence young men. Look at the mom. My wife’s mom is late 70s and still has a real good body. When she was I her 40s she looked really good.
My 47 YO wife has the body of a BeBe manniquen and takes reall good care of herself.
Go for the girly girls with hot mom’s. The tell is the part of the arm where the bicep deltoid and tricep meet. If that is skinny when you find her she is apt to stay slender.
LikeLike
Love cannot overcome modern anti-family “family law” or modern mass feminist propaganda. Get married, have kids and get no-fault divorced? If you care about your kids, you’re screwed, as a man.
LikeLike
A form of eugenics I support is castrating violent felons. The immediate benefit is they will lose much of their aggression due to loss of testosterone. This makes it less likely they will be a repeat offender when they are released (and they are usually released far too early).
The longterm benifit for the human race is they will not be able to pass on their primitive, high impulse DNA to the next generation. If women were not attracted to murderers and other violent thugs we wouldn’t have to worry about this. But as we we all know (and have seen many examples of on this blog) chicks dig violent males.
I have read that one of the goals of all the executions that took place in the 19th and early 20th Centuries (think old west hangings) was in fact to make sure primitives did not reproduce. I would say it was a great success. Is it any wonder by the Mid 20th Century America was as safe and civilized as could be?
Finally, it makes no sense for so many single beta males to be leftists. All of the liberal policies work against them in the sexual marketplace whether it be welfare transfer payments or soft on crime policies.
LikeLike
Whatever drugs you are on, I want some of them
I see your problem with peace and anger, but conflict is human nature, and while co-operation is good, you gotta know when to put people in their places.
You propose to castrate all ‘alpha’ offenders so they cannot reproduce, right. By doing this you will take down a significant amount of alphas and therefore increase the tally of beta-males, also increasing the likelihood of an all female supremacy, just think about it.
Women need jerks for good successful reproduction and we need ‘controlled’ jerks to run the country, jerks who co-operate but know when to stand their ground. Betas only co-operate, which also means they’ll co-operate with the enemy
LikeLike
Castrating violent felons (not that it has any chance of happening) is not the same as castrating all alpha males. A small minority of alpha males are criminals (and are not the controlled ones you talk about) and not all criminals are alphas.
LikeLike
On criminals being alpha: experienced prosecutors say that among defendants you have about 10% who are sociopaths (mostly low-functioning: the smart ones dont get arrrested, and that may be your alpha contingent), 10% who are good men who did something stupid, usually while drunk, and 80% who are losers that drift in and out of trouble because thats what their peer group norms are.
LikeLike
This would disproportionately impact Negro inmates. I’m pretty sure that a reduction of the amount of violent alpha males in that population would be a net benefit not only to their own communities but to society at large.
LikeLike
Let’s not make sweeping generalisations about alphas. The vast majority of criminals would have to display alpha qualities in the first place, in order to commit a crime
And if we’re gonna make sweeping statements…
“I don’t like psychopaths, but I respect them.” Said every woman ever
LikeLike
this is why our ancestors limited womens reproductive rights through various means (such as arranged marriages). it was easier to control your daughter than do castrate every grunting thug in the world.
LikeLike
Violent criminals are the low IQ dregs of society. We would be better off without them.
LikeLike
I think you have a Hollywood view of what criminals are, Donohoe. A look at the average prison would show the reality of the matter.
“would have to display alpha qualities in the first place, in order to commit a crime” – Like hell they would. They are mostly junkies and alcoholics who can’t get anywhere in society, so they steal. Go to Google Images and search for “meth faces”. Those aren’t exactly top-of-the-line.
And once again, “alpha” was adopted in the manosphere as a replacement for “PUA”, when manosphere gurus started defining themselves as something separate from the PUAsphere. Alpha thus means only the ability to pick up women. That’s it. Yes, it comes from wolves who are leaders of the pack, but that’s not what it means in game terminology.
LikeLike
this is why our ancestors regulated womens reproduction through methods such as arranged marriages. these days a father cannot run off a daughters poor mating choices without a trip to the government rape camps.
LikeLike
Sinister you raise an interesting point about the reason for arranged marriages.
I can see it as an article in the new york times now: “Girls saved from their true natures in past times”
Then in fine print…
“However, due to liberalism, jerk boys now get a free golden ticket to pussy paradise”
LikeLike
I’m not gonna sit around debating what alpha means, I’ve got pussy to slay
But a passing thought about the prison castration you mentioned: if the prison guys are so non-alpha, loserish and meth headed, then why do so many girls want to fuck them
LikeLike
A form of eugenics I support is castrating violent felons.
That might actually work as a disincentive to some violent people. It is “cruel and unusual” to the extreme but hey so is circumcision.
Finally, it makes no sense for so many single beta males to be leftists. All of the liberal policies work against them in the sexual marketplace whether it be welfare transfer payments or soft on crime policies.
You are right. If you can figure out why people – liberals and leftists for instance – support a social structure that works against their primary interests in the sexual marketplace, let me know. I guess my speculation is that such people as liberals and leftists are those who are unwilling to assert their interests because that is who they are – those who are unwilling to assert their interests.
Is that a tautology? There are those people who are unwilling to assert themselves, unwilling to represent their own interests, in the sexual marketplace and in every other arena which matters (though none matters so much as that first).
Seems obvious actually. The question is how did there come to be so many of those people around in the first place.
LikeLike
> “Finally, it makes no sense for so many single beta males to be leftists. All of the liberal policies work against them in the sexual marketplace whether it be welfare transfer payments or soft on crime policies.”
Except that it makes PERFECT SENSE from the point of view of the YKW who designed and implemented the liberal policies – from their point of view, the effeminization of the Shkotzim is proceeding precisely ACCORDING TO PLAN.
LikeLike
My definition of women: exquisitely evolved eugenic computers.
My definition of eugenicists: spergs trying to use their usual toolbox of bluntness and jealousy to get the pretty girls for themselves.
LikeLike
If women were eugenic computers as you say wouldn’t the human race be evolving instead of devolving?
LikeLike
I have a comment on this subject that was eaten. Women do seem to select men who are guaranteed to give them an ugly daughter. On the other hand, ‘sharking/mudding it is a function of two unnatural conditions: the welfare state, and state suppression of more evolved men, if you will (ie, lynch possies and restrictive covenants are illegal)
LikeLike
“Women do seem to select men who are guaranteed to give them an ugly daughter.”
Even if we could somehow figure out how to do this, why on earth would we want to?
LikeLike
but if they have sons with those men they could hit the genetic lottery. not that unusual to see families with successful, alpha sons and ugly daughters.
you’re right though that the nature of female desire complicates the eugenic certainty of their mate choice decisions. we’ve seen often enough women fall for assorted thugs and layabouts. however, i consider this a vestige of a not-so-ancient sexual market, where those kinds of men would have been the eugenic choice. who knows, maybe those kinds of men will once again be the eugenic choice for women to make? (cf, curbs on pathological white altruism).
LikeLike
You know the study which says beautiful people make more daughters than sons, (and less beautiful more sons), as physical attractiveness is more beneficial to girls than boys. It is fascinating how this happens. My father had only daughters, yet his sister married a big man who had 6 sons (no daughters), all at least 6’3 in height. Maybe because the girls would all have been huge because of the father’s genes, thus making them less reproductivaly succesful?
I dont know if this something some women consciously think of when they asess a mate, but since reading the study and when I look at a couple I often like to guess if they will have more sons or daughters. One of my brother in laws is a short man with a more cute face, and they just had their first daughter. My other brother in law is a tall and big man and sure enough – another son born recently. It could be coincidence, or it could be like the study says.
It makes sense for a more alpha type man to pass that on to a son, and for a more physically beautiful man to have a daughter. I wonder if you can tell more about the character of a man or woman by the gender of their siblings? eg, 1 woman with 5 brothers. That would be interesting.
LikeLike
@Amy
Women are turned on by masculinity. Masculine traits are not desirable in females.
LikeLike
Yes, feminine women are attracted to masculine men. But who says the daughter will have mostly the man’s genes? This is like saying men select women guaranteed to give them an effeminate son because men are attracted to feminine traits.
LikeLike
So there are eugenicists, evil jealous beings, who change genes so they can have attractive women for themselves? Interesting. Where are these? In what country? What genetic changes have they done and on how many? And how would that mean that they get the women whose genes they change?
Because you didn’t just throw that out without any sort of facts, did you?
LikeLike
Until very recently, eugenics was 100% about selective breeding, not molecular genetics. Mostly, it still is.
LikeLike
I work with people from all sorts of backgrounds and ethnicities and, due to the sector, they’re mostly smart and civilised no matter who they are.
But I only would only accept a white one dating or marrying my daughter, and I see no prejudice, hypocrisy or contradiction in this whatsoever.
LikeLike
And everyone’s a liberal until Section 8 Hattie and her brood moves in next door.
LikeLike
Don’t you mean Shaniqua?
LikeLike
The funniest one that I have seen is “La-a”, which is pronounced LaDasha, “cuz the dash ain’t silent”.
LikeLike
Re Hattie:Dude that’s like a Civil War darkie!
LikeLike
Eh, dude… it was a common expression in the seventies in the “black community”… I know because that’s where I first picked it up when I worked with a bail bondsman, back in the day.
Avaunt home to Ethel, you fairy.
LikeLike
It always makes me laugh when pro choice agitators say “my body, my choice”. No, you want to control your right to be a eugenicist. If it was a artificial womb baby, would the lab have the right to abort? Would the dad have just the same right to abort as the mom? I don’t even disagree with abortion. No need to pretend it’s not about an optimal genetic or socioeconomic outcome.
LikeLike
The anti-abortion crowd has always been the most staunchly opposed to genetic improvement, since they imagine there’s some magical creature that says all human beings are really special and “brothers in Christ”. That’s a bribe to gain followers, by stroking their egos. Christians and communists – both are based on the slave morality, where all are equal except that the strong are bad.
I do agree that leftists often talk about abortion for the wrong reasons however, ignore the psychological effects on the weak-minded, and ignore how they have created a broken society where more abortions are needed. And yes, I would like men to have the right to demand an abortion. A woman should not be able to trick a man to make her pregnant through a one-night-stand by lying and saying she’s on the pill, then force him to pay for her kid for eighteen years, where he only gets to see the child two weekends a month. He should be able to demand an abortion, and if not, he should at least be allowed to cut all ties to that kid.
Some will then say, “If he didn’t want a child he shouldn’t have had sex!” But in reality, people have sex. Yes, even before marriage, heinous as it sounds. And the law needs to be adapted to the fact that people will have sex without wanting children.
LikeLike
can you imagine society if such a substantial percentage of black pregnancies weren’t ending in abortion? Black abortions should be and are subsidized, white abortions above a certain IQ punished.
LikeLike
If you bareback on one night stands. you deserve everything you get.
LikeLike
I am against abortion. So that includes screening for down syndromn and such when the woman is pregnant. (Even some of the tests itself are a risk to the baby in the womb).
With that said, do I think it is evil for people to choose carefuly, (gene wise), BEFORE they are pregnant? Is it shallow? Of course not. It is common sense. People want the best for their babies. For example, in our country the gene for Thalassemia is extremely common. Before screening policys were introduced in the 70’s, 1 in 158 babies was born with that condition. Now you get screened. If both mother and father test positive, there is a huge risk to the child’s life. With the screening policy, almost zero babies are born with the condition now.
If people take these precautions prior to getting pregnant, maybe there would be less needless murder of innocent babies. I recall reading last year about gender selective abortion, so if the baby is a boy, to murder him, a girl, to murder her etc. It is terrible.
LikeLike
If you fish in the right stream, you won’t get tainted trout.
LikeLike
Love interferes with poolside time.
LikeLike
love is the grandest infinity pool ever.
LikeLike
Money has nothing to do with eugenics. Social darwinism has been debunked a hundred years ago.
LikeLike
It isn’t easy to make money, so men who are good at it also often have good genes.
LikeLike
Praytell how it was debunked a hundred years ago. Indeed, people claimed to debunk many things at that time, such as debunking the market economy, debunking the existence of race.
LikeLike
It was debunked Franz Boas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Boas
Guess the Religion …1…..2….3….
LikeLike
Interesting thing about Love. Love can be both a rationalization for a poor mate choice — “oh, but she’s so in love, and that’s all that matters” — and a euphemism for a eugenically pleasing pairing — “it wasn’t his money, it was love that brought them together”. What can’t Love do?
Love is an interesting topic. Some say love doesn’t exist, which is incorrect. Love is a chemical reaction brought about by our DNA. This chemical reaction causes happiness and a sense of togetherness. It makes us identify with something other than ourselves. A spouse, a child, a nation, even a pet. Love is when someone else’s happiness becomes our own happiness. The love for a partner stands out however in that it is combined with lust.
Love evolved as a way to keep a family together so that the children would get the best possible start in life. Those who had this inherited gene would therefore have more surviving offspring. This is especially true in cold climates, where you can’t go by the spray-and-pray method, because the children would die. You have to stay and care for the children.
So while men do have the instinct to have offspring with many women, we also have the instinct to have just a few children and stay and care for them with one woman who we love. Women, of course, have only the latter instinct. Men’s romantic instincts are therefore more complicated.
This is what should be mentioned when people say that men are only polygamous. Unfortunately in the manosphere, men’s sexuality was never thus explained, but instead the accusation of polygamy was met with a counter-accusation of “hypergamy”. “Men want many women – but women want the best man they can get!” Well, men also want the best woman they can get, so that goes for both sexes. It is a weak defense that falls flat except when you’re preaching to the choir. (And because both sexes want the best possible partner, to make women seem worse you then hear some make the claim that “women can’t feel love, only men can feel love!” – taking the step to anti-scientific falsehood to prop up the case, thus becoming exactly like the leftist opponents.) Instead the polygamy accusation should be met by explaining evolution. “Yes, men want many women, and that’s natural and not wrong. But also, you ignore the fact that men also want to stay with just one woman – we have both instincts.”
LikeLike
Oxytocin exists. For about five years.
LikeLike
I read about a doctor somewhere in the northwestern U.S. I believe, who specializes in testing for genetic flaws in fetuses. In that story it was revealed that it is possible today to give a child blond hair and blue eyes, and he used to offer that to clients briefly, but massive pressure from media and the Left’s various attack groups forced him to stop.
It is also possible to take fifty eggs from a woman, impregnate them and check for disease after a while, then insert one of the best eggs in the woman. This would cost a bit more, but the money and pain saved in the long run would be enormous. With all the things that are subsidized today, this above all should be paid for, since it benefits all of society. But instead, most people have never even heard of it.
Genetic engineering has been halted because of the ideology that wants people to be weak, ugly, and full of resentment. All mention of the fact that some traits are preferable to others must be banned, even when it comes to birth defects, no matter what the consequences.
LikeLike
Yep.
LikeLike
And I imagine the future cries of “fetal privilege” would be deafening.
lzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlozlozlozl
LikeLike
I know how to give a child blonde hair and blue eyes unequivocally. Ready? have blonde hair and blue eyes and marry someone with blonde hair and blue eyes.
**DISCLAIMER**: This will not work for brown/black hair or brown eyes. I’ll let you junior Mendelians figure out why. An 8″ vibrating dildo to the first lucky vixen that unearths the answer.
LikeLike
The fact is that the term “eugenics” used here is a tinge of a misnomer insomuch as it doesn’t tell the whole story. Intelligence, behavior, career success, creativity are 50% raw genetics, 50% environmental factors. I had a stay at home mother who never worked a day in her life and she poured every ounce she had into teaching me. To say that didn’t have a strong impact on my current success would be inaccurate to say the least.
That said, ignoring nature is foolhardy. Nurture is akin to makeup – it augments what is already present, but the starting point certainly impacts the end result.
LikeLike
Intelligent is 80% genetics.
LikeLike
50/50 is bullshit… genetics is at least 75% of the equation.
And yes, true, 25% is a significant make-or-break proportion of any equation… but it’s also a loss-leader if you keep trying to make a silk purse from a sow’s ear… which is what the Left seems to have been doing for many generation now.
That said, getting most folks to admit that genetics is at least half the equation is a step in the right direction… given there are still too many who think environment remains the dominant factor.
LikeLike
I would certainly never posit that environment > nature. I was remarking on the entirely unquantifiable nature of to what extent either component is dominant while still wanting to recognize that both play a significant role.
LikeLike
Genetics is the potential, and it’s fixed.
Environment, specifically regarding intelligence, can marginally raise performance from its default baseline. It can also non-trivially lower performance through for example injury, malnourishment, lack of stimulation.
But environment will never turn a man with poor VO2 max into a sub-3-hour marathon runner.
LikeLike
Identical twin studies are the best “proof” to look at, if you’re wanting to see the dominant part that genetics plays over environment…
… and you’re the type who demands “studies” before you believe what yo’ lyin’ eyes tells ya!
LikeLike
Normal westerners care deeply about their family’s mating and know genes are very important, but it’s a social taboo and is not something you generally speak about. Similarly, normal westerners want to physically segregate themselves from the dysfunctional poor but don’t want to loudly announce that.
LikeLike
“Similarly, normal westerners want to physically segregate themselves from the dysfunctional poor but don’t want to loudly announce that.”
Everywhere you look you see white flight…Even our ancestors moved to remote islands and mountain regions in europe 1000s of years ago to preserve our daughters
LikeLike
You guys are so delusional on here. Of course women and their parents want the best possible genes for their offspring. This means women want men who are tall, strikingly handsome, athletic, and intelligent. All the angst laden tirades here about “hypergamy” and the importance of “game” won’t change this basic and highly uncomfortable truth.
LikeLike
Of course that’s what they want. But because there are so few of these to go around, even fewer than expected because of physiognomy, almost all women have to settle for less. And because of feminism/decadence, settle repeatedly. Hence, game.
Gisele gets Tom, but almost every other woman in the world can be gamed. Even Gisele when she’s bored.
LikeLike
This is a position I can agree with – game is what you do to snag women the alphas don’t want.
[CH: game is what alphas do naturally. so when a beta does it, he will snag the women that alphas also want to snag.]
But Heartiste doesn’t frame it this way.
[because it’s stupid.]
He consistently talks about game as if that is what makes a man an alpha, which is just not true.
[i don’t say that, but thanks for erecting yet another bitchboy loser strawman in the quest to discredit this hallowed outpost of love.]
Real alphas by and large have no clue what game even is.
[bullshit. do you have any non-dweeb friends? alphas know what game is, even if they know it by other names.]
And I don’t understand the venom towards hypergamy.
[perspicacity isn’t venom.]
I suspect most males would much rather be the bastard child of a red hot alpha male than a son of a dutiful but unremarkable everyman.
[“males”? that term of artlessness is a dead giveaway you are either a mincing manlet or a bitter feminist.
ps most “young men” would rather be raised in a family with their real fathers.]
LikeLike
ermmm….. women of all shades, want men who are dynamic, passionate and authentic. That’s it.
consider dear Carlton… with wife #1
and again here with wife #2.
http://bossip.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/wenn4063870_wenn40638701-e1350225829803.jpg?w=635&h=843
Morality does not matter, race does not matter.
LikeLike
#2
LikeLike
Alfonso’s a TV celebrity. It only indicates that sky-high social status trumps everything, even eugenics.
LikeLike
No wonder all the white men hate Obama
…….sky high social status trumps everything…….
This might also explain why so called ‘ white’
Men have no bankrupting their socieities trying to exercise social control over the Negroe……to prevent Negroe gains in social status…..
Interesting …..
LikeLike
I console myself at night that if Germany won the war our world would have been a highly advanced technological beautiful world. Check out the Infernal video to the song ‘from Paris to Berlin ‘.
LikeLike
Fool… rather than bankrupting to control, the white man has made a cuck-by-proxy of himself by paying kings’ ransoms to negroes merely because they can run and catch so well…
… comes from all dat ‘sperience dey gots steppin’ ‘n fetchin’.
LikeLike
Haven’t we seen quite enough over-made-up, greasy-skinned bottle-blondes mudsharking with celebrities?
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
Sperg Within – it shows you rather that hypergamy trumps everything. Be careful good looking tall guys…
LikeLike
@Sperg Within wrote ” sky-high social status trumps everything…”
Social status is an indicator of power. Ultimate Alpha is the power to TAKE life. Behold Conan’s lesson in power.
LikeLike
Full scene
LikeLike
Three of four of your for criteria are appearance-based and none of them involve income level (i.e. the resources the woman requires to raise her children).
The inconvenient truths are all on the other side, my friend. Hypergamy is a real scientific concept that applies to mammalian mating. Somehow it doesn’t apply to humans, though? How does that work?
LikeLike
Whole Foods… Fresh Market. Trader Joe’s and similar places.
Easy opener. Grab a zucchini. “I don’t cook much. Do you know what to do with this”?
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
When does a Mexican become a Spainiard??
when he is dating your daughter.
LikeLike
Naw… not until the marriage. lozlzolzolzolozl
LikeLike
Heartiste, would you do a post for people who hate bars and clubs more than they love pussy?
[CH: you mean a post on places to pick up girls that aren’t bars or clubs? start with a coffeehouse.]
LikeLike
Church. Church groups. Grocery Stores. Libraries. Every “Big Box Store” which you shop in. Swimming Pools. Farmers’ Markets. Street Fairs. Classical Music Concerts. Art Galleries. The Beach. Hiking Trails. SPECIAL OLYMPICS! [S. O. gets hands down the finest and hawtest poontang as volunteers – bitches have to be at least an HB8 to work in S.O. – I kid you not.]
LikeLike
Whole Foods… Fresh Market. Trader Joe’s and similar places.
Easy opener. Grab a zucchini. “I don’t cook much. Do you know what to do with this”?
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Philosophies of a Disenchanted Scholar and commented:
“You can’t marry a ____!”
LikeLike