• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Third Beta Bait Type: The “Bad Boyfriend” Ploy
Comment Of The Week: Games Women Play »

The MOAR WHYTE BAYBIES Troll

January 24, 2015 by CH

There’s a certain kind of hater/troll who loves to poison sensible, race-aware discourse concerning mass immigration with tendentious exhortations to “make more white babies” as the only feasible solution.

A relevant comment by dastardlyrake had me thinking about this numbingly tedious variety of troll.

If we want to put reproduction as a primary goal in the arena, doesn’t that mean we need to reduce the importance we place on the virginity of a wife? Why shame men who marry women with high N counts? Shouldn’t we be lauding them?

Shaming has got nothing to do with it. Men, all else equal and all options available, would prefer to marry and bear children with virgins than with road-worn sluts. Chalk it up to the paternity assurance protocol. However, if MOAR WHYTE BAYBIES NOW!! is your only goal then, sure, impregnating ALL THE WOMEN will get you closer to that goal.

That goal, of course, is bullshit. Sure, a sub-replacement fertility rate will become a problem if it’s prolonged and the threat of self-extinction looms. But fertility rate isn’t the only concern. Quality matters. Demographic ratios matter. Living space matters. The environment matters. Social cohesion matters. And, yes, a little freedom to enjoy life without the hungry mouths of twenty kids taking bites of your soul matters.

The anti-game and anti-white haters — and that’s who these MOAR WHYTE BAYBIES trolls are once you scratch their surface bleatings — like to deploy the “””argument”””, such as it is, that white men who aren’t impregnating scads of white women have no right to complain about mass nonwhite immigration or white women with shitty feministing attitudes and blubbery hides. This notion is preposterous on its face.

One, as a matter of policy it’s a lot simpler to close the borders than it is to raise the birth rate of an entire race. Hell, it’s easier to create incentives for self-deportation than it is for Flukey femmes to get off the birth control.

Two, getting into a birthing war with the trash world’s wretched refuse is no way to build a city on a hill. However, it is a great way to despoil any remaining natural lands, exacerbate the animus generated by diversity to all-out war, and bankrupt social safety nets.

Three, we have fairly recent history to prove that America did just fine when she was 90% white and half the population she is today.

Four, as a philosophical point, reproduction is not the goal of human courtship. Sex is the goal. Children are an after-effect.

And five, most pointedly, there isn’t an exclusionary principle that prevents a man from lamenting the quality of his women and the wide-openness of his nation’s borders while simultaneously pursuing a hedonistic kinderfreie life. It’s as stupid as those dullards who demand that someone who doesn’t vote has no right to express an opinion about political matters or the direction of his country.

Finally, what do population growth whores think will happen if their prescription to bear lots of fruit and multiply unto the end of days is taken to heart by everyone? At some point, there will be too many people. Is there anyone who seriously believes the earth will be a livable planet at 50 billion people? I suppose Matty “Who polar bear this is?!” Yglesias thinks all will be fine with billions stuffed like sardines into 1,000 story, rent-controlled skyscrapers.

There’s sometimes necessity for population retraction and rebalancing. Population declines, land frees up, family formation costs go down, and population rises again. Naturally, all this is a lot more manageable when your elites aren’t flooding your country with the spillover of 100 shittier countries.

It may not please population growth GDP FOREVER libertardian theorists, but a period of slow or no growth caused in part by a shrinking population base isn’t a surefire recipe for a declining standard of living. Goatse’d borders, on the other hand….

…well, let’s say that the spirit of procreation would be enlivened when the world to be inherited by one’s children isn’t a socially disconnected, racially haphazard, overcrowded, low trust tooth-and-claw mad dash for value transference supremacy.

Share this:

  • Click to email (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Tool Time, Ugly Truths | 304 Comments

304 Responses

  1. on January 24, 2015 at 9:22 am theactiveskeptic

    Quality, not quantity, and keep the trash out.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 12:50 pm Erudite Knight

      Exactly, r vs K selection, we can only hope that the K’s get a chance to show their superior genes in society’s ruin before we get bred out before the system collapses.

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 3:11 am burke

        even aside from the quality of the citizens and the integrity of the culture– on economic grounds, a static or declining population is NOT A PROBLEM IF YOU’RE NOT RUNNING A PONZIE SCHEME SOCIAL SAFETY NET.

        when people take care of themselves and produce something north of what they’re paid and what they consume, the economy will be fine. you only need moar moar moar when you’ve written checks to a population that you just can’t cover.

        so you import workers by the bushel, and you get the chamber of commerce and the politicians on board by making sure your imports are generally hard-working, fast-reproducing, predictable-voting souls from banana republics.

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 1:14 pm Anonymous

      “It may not please population growth GDP FOREVER libertardian theorists, but a period of slow or no growth caused in part by a shrinking population base isn’t a surefire recipe for a declining standard of living. Goatse’d borders, on the other hand….”

      Given the choice between:

      A. Japan, fucked in 50 years or so because the population is aging and they refuse to import hordes of third world savages to replace it

      B. This, coming soon to a neighborhood near you thanks to Obama: http://gatesofvienna.net/2013/05/everything-you-have-learned-in-school-is-wrong/

      I’ll have to go with A.

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 1:38 pm Greg Eliot

        It’s the environment of B that produced Anders Breivik… until 1000 more like him arise, Norway is doomed.

        And by the way, the description given is not too different than what many Americans white kids have gone through and still go through… such an environment produced Harold Covington, of the Northwest novels fame.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 2:16 pm The Judge

        That article os way too fucking long and boring.
        Im sick of these journslists writing “stories”. Factual lists and charts are all i want .

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 5:27 pm Rick Derris

        (B) is a frightening scenario.

        Of course CAIR and Reza Aslan will just scream “Islamophobia” and “raaaaacisss” until they are blue in the face.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 3:18 am burke

        A. Japan, fucked in 50 years or so because the population is aging and they refuse to import hordes of third world savages to replace it

        other than the fact that they’ve promised what they can’t pay to that aging population, what would be the problem with an aging population of self-reliant people? nothing, that’s what. in and of itself, an aging population isn’t a problem. socialism just forces you to grow your working class to pay for shitty promises.

        i can’t think of too many examples of declining homogeneous and bordered areas like japan, but i’d be willing to bet they’d begin reproducing again if they really did have a shrinking population over some long period of time. unfortunately they can’t afford to let that happen because they’ve created too many old dependents.

        oh and i think japan _is_ importing some level of third-world savages unfortunately.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 11:54 am irishsavant

        The point is that Japan can always reverse the current trend if they really put their minds to it and little or no harm has been done. However once a country has been swamped by Third World immigrants and the population debased there’s no going back. America’s on the way to becoming another Brazil.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 5:48 pm Anonymous

        @Greg Eliot

        Reading this article really pissed me off because it is 100% accurate. The cultural weakness of the west is disgusting. I’ll leave the country and go live in a culture I still respect.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 6:38 pm trav777

        Japan fucked? WTF do you think those fucking 3rd world orcs are gonna do!?!?!?!

        Who the EFF was STUPID enough to believe the 3rd world orc leeches were going to HAPPILY and DUTIFULLY participate and contribute to the entitlements ponzis? ONLY idiot Marxist geographical magical thinker Crystal Methodists were this idiotic.

        The orcs hasten the system’s demise because they ALWAYS HAVE BEEN takers. If they were LIKE japs, they would have countries like Japan! There is no social safety net in fkin Mexico, so bringing Mexicans in to support a Ponzi is utterly retarded. They will not become white by virtue of a new address.

        LikeLike


  2. on January 24, 2015 at 9:23 am The MOAR WHYTE BAYBIES Troll | Manosphere.com

    […] The MOAR WHYTE BAYBIES Troll […]

    LikeLike


  3. on January 24, 2015 at 9:24 am Stg58/Animal Mother

    Have as many as kids as you can handle. We’ve got three, other people have more. If your wife can do it, go for it. If not, be satisfied with the kiddos God blessed you with. And for all that is good and holy, please give them decent names.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 6:58 pm Broadsman

      I’ve produced and reared five so far (with two of my three wives). Most satisfying thing a man can do. I’d love to start another family – got my eye on a great Korean girl at the moment.

      However, they will be born and raised in America as Americans but with an Asian mama to drive them.

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 3:28 pm Flip

        A Korean girl wouldn’t create “MOAR WHYTE BAYBIES.”

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 11:20 pm bookooball

        Broadsmen, your inability to maintain a relationship speaks volumes of your parental values. This post is condemning r-selection behavior, not encouraging it, you twit.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 2:49 am Broadsman

        The power of hybridization is strong.

        As to Mr. bookooball, he can make his life choices, and I’ll make mine. i’ll stand by the fruit of my loin.

        LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 8:50 pm wow

      I have seen names of kids that were not even spelled correctly by their parent. What idiots. Janifer, Edwerd WTF.

      LikeLike


  4. on January 24, 2015 at 9:30 am journeyman

    You’re getting to the crux of the matter: our economy & poltical system is captive to real estate developers and all the related hustlers whose goal is to make a quick buck in the never ending project of suburban sprawl. More people=$ ….& the system is as happy with 3rd worlders, negative externalities & civilizational rot will be ignored as long as the middle class can be pacified &/or intimidated.

    LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 11:59 am irishsavant

      ….and the prison/industrial complex.

      LikeLike


  5. on January 24, 2015 at 9:32 am Sham

    > It may not please population growth GDP FOREVER libertardian theorists, but a period of slow or no growth caused in part by a shrinking population base isn’t a surefire recipe for a declining standard of living.

    I don’t disagree.

    But throughout history, plummeting birthrates are almost always a harbinger of the decline and fall of a civilization – the reason being that it is a sign that women have gained more control in that society. Consider the Roman Empire.

    In the beginning, Roman women were relegated to the home, where they had lots of children. In the end, Roman women were politically ascendant, running much of the business of the Empire, and the Romans had consumed silphium (an abortofacient or contraceptive) in such vast numbers they drove it extinct. The resulting population decline forced the emperors – instead of creating Roman colonies – to establish barbarian settlements within the Empire, both to appease them (the barbarians) and to replenish the dwindling tax base and supply of military recruits. Eventually, of course, barbarians ruled the empire.

    Rome is not the only example. It’s true for almost every civilization that prospers long enough.

    The only way I see of recovering our civilization is to reassert healthy gender dynamics, which will naturally increase the birthrate. This will never happen. The other solution ancient cultures we have is to extirpate our enemies. I’m doubtful that will ever happen.

    I suspect our only real hope is for interstellar travel to become feasible so we can establish planetary colonies run the way we’d like.

    And that’s a long, long shot.

    LikeLike


  6. on January 24, 2015 at 9:35 am ho

    “Matty “Who polar bear this is?!” Yglesias”

    😆 😆 😆

    LikeLike


  7. on January 24, 2015 at 9:39 am PA

    An overlooked part of the “quality, not quantity” proposition is that a healthy society is a social pyramid. If you drive K selection too hard in the aggregate, you become a top-heavy people. If you eradicate your own prole class with quasi-criminal elements, then you create a vacuum that low-lifes of darker races are more than happy to fill — and you lose freedom because when you lose your streets, you lose your habitat.

    In the European race, there already is a built-in baseline quality: barring injury or some outlier event, even the least among us will look like us. You won’t find many borderline-animal imbeciles coming out of white lower classes.

    Some degree of r-selection is chaos. And you lose your creativity when you snuff out or outsource chaos. Our genetic pool is unfatomably rich and our genius or beauty can come from the most unexpected places.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on January 24, 2015 at 9:46 am Arbiter

      I doubt going for quality would lead to a top-heavy people. When has a White people ever lost its working class? The only people who have done so were the Tribe, living among foreign host populations – very special circumstances.

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 11:58 am Trainspotter

      Excellent points, PA.

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 12:49 pm Erudite Knight

      You could have summed up that guy’s argument with: NAWALT!!!

      LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2015 at 2:08 am John Cool

      I am curious though. Does race mixing help gene pool in the fact that you have more genetic diversity or does it make it worse?

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2015 at 8:30 pm Pirx the Pirate

        It makes it worse, jew, as you well know.

        LikeLike


  8. on January 24, 2015 at 9:40 am The MOAR WHYTE BAYBIES Troll | Neoreactive

    […] The MOAR WHYTE BAYBIES Troll […]

    LikeLike


  9. on January 24, 2015 at 9:41 am Oaktree

    Poor folks of all colors have more in common with one another than do people of the same color from different levels of society. Poverty and ignorance have their own culture, and anyone who’s spent any time with poor idiots will tell you that they’re the ones who are least likely to follow advice that would lead to better decisions that would lead to a better life. Ignorant people are more likely to overestimate their abilities than educated people.

    The only social policy that could fix this is one which pushes its citizens out of their comfort zone, with actual dire consequences for failure. All these soft policies like welfare, integration, sensitivity training, etc., just breed complacency and a false sense of competence.

    There does exist a cure-all social policy of this sort, and it’s called the draft. The draft used to have a tempering effect on peoples’ sense of entitlement. Traditionally, the most politically palatable way to keep an ignorant, disruptive, self-important, government-teat-suckling non-producing class from causing too much trouble on the home front was to send them off to get butchered in some third world country. Now we have a volunteer army, heavy on the tech. Hence the expansion of prisons to take the place of a national repository for pussies.

    A little friendly fire would take care of the “_____ Lives Matter” mentality real fast. Lol!

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 9:46 am PA

      Poor folks of all colors have more in common with one another than do people of the same color from different levels of society

      Nonsense.

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 9:22 pm nikcrit

        that is a statement that can only be subjectively confirmed or negated. How would you quantify an empirical answer to that question? Of course, you don’t need to here, where you have a partisan blog.

        RE. your earlier comment about ‘euro genius can emanate from any and all levels of our collective gene pool,” or words to that effect: that same formulation has been used to tout the afro-american ethnic ingenuity embodied by artists such as Louis Armstrong and Duke Ellington to Dizzy Gillespie, who all drawed upon primitive expression at times that was widely lauded by European intellectual classes of all political stripes.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 9:56 pm trav777

        fuckin horn players? That’s genius? Bitch, genius is the transistor or powered flight. Fuck horn players and jazz. Just STFU

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 7:35 am Greg Eliot

        Heh, heh… musicians as “geniuses” only get that way when a society has been built to support and sustain such niceties.

        Louis Armstrong? Dizzy Gillespie? Oh… when I say “genius”, I usually think of the likes of a Mozart or a Wagner… someone who actually composes music that other (ahem) geniuses can then play… hundreds of years later, at that.

        Trav777 is correct… nikcrit is a dumbass SWPL Cathedral man… a fairy.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 7:04 pm nikcrit

        Louis Armstrong? Dizzy Gillespie? Oh… when I say “genius”, I usually think of the likes of a Mozart or a Wagner… someone who actually composes music that other (ahem) geniuses can then play

        I bet there exist more white conservative music critics, from the 1950s onward who’ve extolled the ‘genius,’ however subjectively defined, of Armstrong and Ellington over that of Mozart and Wagner — Wagner! —-and even over that of Mahler, hands down, though I myself would never get sucked into such a ridiculous dichtomous critical frame.

        Furthermore, though it would be hard to get solidly accurate symphony repertoire records, i’d bet those jazz artists have had their compositions performed by other musicians at a greater or comparable level.

        Eliot, there’s a single word for those who indulge overly eager attempts at verbal cleverness: buffoonery..,.. But then that would just be one Cathedral-indoctrinated SWPL’s opinion.

        LikeLike


      • on January 27, 2015 at 3:26 pm Greg Eliot

        It’s long been admitted, here at the chateau, that debate with you Cathedral SWPL/shills is pointless, and merits naught but disdain and drive-by mockery.

        And your oh-so-recent appearance at the chateau and interjection of negro “genius” into this conversation is just so much folderol that it reeks of the aforementioned shillery.

        And now you’re going to dismiss Mozart and Wagner in favor of your jazz pets? Now THAT’S buffoonery!

        And oh-so-telling about that “Wagner!” attempted barb… you’ve outed yourself, Schlomo.

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 9:54 am Arbiter

      Poor folks of all colors have more in common with one another than do people of the same color from different levels of society

      I think it’s a mix. The poor from People A have some things in common with the poor from People B, but they also have some things in common with the middle class from People A. For example, as we have seen, poor Whites commit less crimes than poor Africans and Middle Easterners living in the West.

      And in a country with a mostly White population, and with no Hollywood propaganda and a music industry pushing trash, the workers will have more in common with the educated.

      Yes, there were “class” conflicts when industrialization started and there was a whole new situation, with masses of illiterate farmers moving to the cities. We would have figured things out however and come up with satisfying, peaceful solutions if the situation hadn’t been exploited by communist leaders. When you read about the labor unions a hundred years ago, as soon as the factory owners agreed to compromise the Marxists who took over the labor unions immediately raised their demands to levels that couldn’t be met. Then declared that the factory owners were enemies who musts be killed, or at least robbed.

      Had these mostly Jewish agitators not been there, the workers and the rest of society would have had a smoother transition to industrialization, and the uneducated would have been uplifted by the cultural efforts of the higher classes, just as it had always been.

      LikeLike


      • on January 27, 2015 at 11:36 am nikcrit

        TRAV777: Bitch, genius is the transistor or powered flight. Fuck horn players and jazz.

        Trav, here’s a newsflash: there’s long been agreement that such a thing as ‘musical genius’ exists.
        BTW/FWIW, your bluster is skin deep and, come to think of it, little more than a rash, tough boy.

        LikeLike


      • on January 27, 2015 at 12:38 pm Canadian Friend

        “…there’s long been agreement that such a thing as ‘musical genius’ exists…”

        It took white man’s genius to create the musical instruments.

        When we found blacks in africa, despite their having “evolved” there for 150,000 years, they had not yet come up with a guitar, a trombone or a piano, nor a way to write music.

        We also created all the recording equipment and technology that make it possible for you to know some black guy 50 years ago was a musical “genius”

        You’re welcome.

        LikeLike


      • on January 27, 2015 at 1:54 pm nikcrit

        “You’re welcome.”

        Well, I’m grateful for the recording technology as well as the musical innovations, my Canadian Friend.

        I wasn’t pitting one against the other, as I have neither the ability nor need to.

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 10:23 am Greg Eliot

      At least from the poor white pool you’d get a chance of another Isaac Newton, Henry Ford, Edith Wharton or Jackie Evancho arising.

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 12:46 pm Trainspotter

      “Poor folks of all colors have more in common with one another than do people of the same color from different levels of society.”

      The reality is that the white trailer park or Appalachian holler is quite different from the black hood, which in turn is distinct from the mestizo barrio. All of these communities are poor (by modern standards), but they are also very different. Race matters, leading to all sorts of observable differences in culture and behavior. A poor white and a poor black are, at the end of the day, two very different sorts of critter.

      The *poor folks are all the same* type of argument is generally used to provide cover for the destruction of the white working class. It is the white working class that is currently experiencing massive economic, cultural, and demographic/biological destruction. The anti-whites love to feign concern for “the poor,” but it’s just a ruse. You don’t have to dig very deep for them to start foaming at the mouth about rednecks and toothless hillbillies. They hate these people, purely for the fact that they exist at all.

      Because of their hatred of whites, they want the process of destruction to continue until the job is done. Therefore, they attempt to obfuscate reality and muddy the waters, as best they can. How do you know an anti-white is lying? His lips are moving.

      Separation is the only solution.

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 7:13 pm Anonymous

        Happy thought. Let’s get fired up. In “Snatch,” a big bully thought he was beating down Brad Pitt’s character. But Mickey was bluffing. When the bulky thought it was over, you see, Mickey was just getting fired up.

        “You stay until the job is done.”

        Bam. One punch. Lights out.

        Dig?

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 12:06 pm irishsavant

        “The *poor folks are all the same* type of argument is generally used to provide cover for the destruction of the white working class. ”

        Not for the first time trainspotter you’ve cut to the core of the issue.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 9:05 pm wow

        The poor white class is no more. It has been replaced by the meth and weed using wigger class.

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 1:04 pm Fred

      So tiring to hear this garbage. Prole whites have little in common with blacks and mestizos. Not sure why there this almost manic need to claim otherwise

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 2:20 pm nikcrit

        If this is the ‘fred’ i believe it is, then i recall you saying that you were originally a southerner.

        Now, for the record, I beileve there are racial and economic-class differences among people. But as a northern, upper-midwestern born-and-bred citizen, I clearly see similarities between poor white and black southerners; it would be very easy for me to makes that assessment nad various times in my life —– namely, before I developed and real racial consciousness and opinion, and after such consciousness was developed, in which case I could imagine one could claim that my opinion is political rather than a empirically objective attempt and assessment.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 2:46 pm PA

        I clearly see similarities between poor white and black southerners

        They both have two arms, two legs, and one head?

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 2:51 pm Greg Eliot

        Harper Lee saw only the differences… and THAT became gospel ever thereafter to generations of SWPLs.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 2:57 pm PA

        all the redneck guys are totally wiggerfied

        I noticed that starting in the 90s. Poor whites in the mid-Atlantic in the eighties used to look like THIS. Any similarity between poor blacks and poor whites is a function of black uplift or white degradation.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 5:01 pm Pluviophile

        “Country Music is totally wiggerfied as well.”

        Not totally.

        But a BIG push is being made to destroy it. There’s major genuflections towards “rap music” in many songs. It’s a shame because country music is one of the last bastions of mass White creative expression … which is why it’s under a vibrant assault.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 5:13 pm Trainspotter

        PA: “They both have two arms, two legs, and one head?”

        And don’t forget, they both breath oxygen.

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 1:37 pm Sean Fielding

      Flag-waver living 50 years in the past, tooled by Jeocons.

      Even oaken roots eventually rot.

      And ‘all men are created equal’ was rotten from the start.

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 1:47 pm Greg Eliot

      It does my heart good to hear MULTIPLE voices slapping down the inane Cathedralese of this tepid, warmed-over Marxist-lite bullshit.

      “Anyone who’s spent any time with poor ‘idiots'” will tell you, first, of your insufferable SWPL arrogance, assuming your not yet another Sunstein shill…

      … while ALSO putting you wise to the fact that poor whites are the FIRST to call bullshit on any “we’re all brothers in poverty” folderol, because they have firsthand experience living with other races and know them for the “others” that they truly are.

      Avaunt, thou thimble… thou thread… thou Cathedral company man…

      Thou fairy.

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 8:28 pm Anonymous

        This is absolutely true. I grew up in a predominantly “minority” neighborhood, and I’ve also lived among other poor whites. Race matters, a lot. I was in a lot more danger and was constantly stressed growing up around Mexicans. I had to adapt or be beaten, basically, and I got into a lot of trouble. I ended up dropping out of school.

        The most hilarious thing is that when my mom moved us into an upper middle class white town, my entire life improved rapidly. Within 5 years I’d gone from being a thug to a productive employee, saved up money for a car, and received an academic scholarship to a top tier school. I know for a fact that most of this was due to the fact that the white kids had a much better culture and innate disposition, and the transition felt almost effortless.

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 3:30 pm martin

      I do not agree that poor people of different races/ethnicities “have more in common”. I work in a very proletarian industry, (cleaning) and am often out late in the evening in the town centre where I live, in the vicinity of rough and frequently inebriated working class whites. But I know that they would never hassle me in any way shape or form since clearly I am “one of them” and it would be very dishonourable for them to bother a working man no different from them going about his business. On the other hand when there are blacks about I am a little on my guard, since I know that to them I am a white man, and whether I appear to have the same socio economic status to them is irrelevant. My co-workers have agreed they feel the same way.
      So there.

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 5:38 pm Greg Eliot

        Around the blacks, never relax.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 5:08 pm Pluviophile

        “PUAs are wanna be blacks.”

        YaReally is not a whigger. He’s useless beyond the boundaries of Game shamanism, but a whigger he is not.

        I can say with 100 percent certainty you have no real experience with blacks or their simulacra.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 6:59 pm Captain Obvious

        An 11-year-old South Carolina boy is facing an arson charge after allegedly setting a fire inside a Walmart that caused millions of dollars in damages to the business, police report. The boy’s 13-year-old cousin has also been charged in connection with the December 31 blaze. http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/arson/kids-arrested-for-walmart-arson-890751

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 7:00 pm Captain Obvious

        LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 9:07 am TAnon

      This is complete bullshit and I’ve experienced the difference myself as I’ve stayed in a zone that was inhabited by poor whites and one that was inhabited by poor gypsies. There was nothing special about the first zone (well apart from being poor). But in the second one? I almost got ganged up on and assaulted by some gypsy teens because I refused to give some kid a cigar (also he was so persistent about it you could almost call it harassment).

      Blaming everything on poverty is just an attempt to cover up the truth about things and a pretty good one at that because it can never really be eliminated completely so it can always be used as an excuse for the behavior of some groups.

      LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 10:59 pm Dat_Truth_Hurts

      Compare Detroit with rural Kentucky. Rural Kentucky is actually poorer, but since its almost entirely white, it’s much safer.

      LikeLike


  10. on January 24, 2015 at 9:42 am EvilDictatorGuy

    Gentlemen, dictatorship is the way forward. Cancel freedom and pair up 1 man to 1 woman, 2-3 kids per couple and repatriating foreigners while busting up the college-career foolishness is the way. Party time will be ended of course, but so what. You are miserable because you are free.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 10:13 am Arbiter

      We need freedom within a racial context. There are certain laws that are necessary for restricting behavior, as the lowest in society will never learn. But that kind of society would still be a lot freer than what we have today.

      I read about Franco’s Spain, how people left home in the morning without locking the door, because no one would break in anyway. Because the laws made sure that criminals were severely punished, and that no crime-loving sub-culture could exist. Thus, the “oppressive” laws made sure decent people were safer and freer.

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 10:26 am PA

        Tyranny is arguably better than anarcho-tyranny but what’s best is freedom: ie, man’s ownership of his community and the right to police his own streets.

        A police state may severely punish a criminal, but it may also punish a citizen for defending himself.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 10:35 am Arbiter

        A police state may severely punish a criminal, but it may also punish a citizen for defending himself.

        A conservative dictatorship applauds citizens who fight back against criminals. Whereas a communist dictatorship does not, and instead punishes those who defend themselves. In most Black African countries you go to jail if you shoot at a gang who break into your home to kill you and rape your wife. Even though the police refuse to answer calls after dark. This is in democracies. Whereas White, conservative dictatorships have always allowed citizens to defend themselves – contrary to the falsehoods Americans are told today.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 10:40 am PA

        “A conservative dictatorship applauds citizens who fight back against criminals”

        True, but that’s academic. Of course I’ll take Franco over The Fed.

        A conservative dictatorship may become hungry for more people to push around once criminals (including the ever-expanding definition of criminal) are eradicated. We chafe under too much regulation.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 10:43 am Arbiter

        I bookmarked this map from CH’s twitter, it’s very telling. A “free”, democratic Britain:

        In 1919, a boy eight years old could walk six miles alone to go fishing.
        In 1950, a boy eight years old could walk one mile on his own to the woods.
        In 1979, a girl eight years old was allowed to walk alone to the swimming pool half a mile away.
        Her son today, eight years old, is only allowed to walk on his own to the end of his street (300 yards).

        Imagine a Britain in an alternate history, that never became a democracy. Those who used illiterate peasants when they moved to the factory towns, and later used feminists, homosexuals and mass immigration as their support base, could never use that strategy to take power in elections. There would be no Labour memo about a plan to win elections through mass immigration. There would be no mass rapes in Rotherham.

        Some philosophers would still extol the virtues of theoretical democracy, of course. Without having to live in the real thing themselves.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 10:43 am PA

        I’ll agree though that a so called conservative dictatorship is a necessary emergency measure. A provisional government for national restoration, if you will. Franco came on after the nasty Spanish civil war. Putin stepped up after the Harvard Rape of Russia.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 10:45 am PA

        PS: a few weeks ago Trainspotter laid out an outstanding explanation of goodgovernment. Key search words include “fetishising liberty” or something like that.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 11:10 am PA

        “Imagine a Britain in an alternate history, that never became a democracy”

        A good practical definition of democracy is “rule by those who control information-transmission choke points.” Or more elegantly, it’s the rule by those who control the press.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 12:52 pm Erudite Knight

        I think this is a huge point, the height of single-race empires were SAFE. Once the undesirables got in, then suspicion and locking doors becomes rampart.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 2:20 pm Anonymous

        “I bookmarked this map from CH’s twitter, it’s very telling. A “free”, democratic Britain:”

        It’s still normal for children as young as kindergarten age to wallk to school alone(usually with other neighborhood kids) in Japan.

        It’s a puzzeling phenomenon because Japan is starved of the the kind of vibrancy we take for granted in the west.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 3:04 pm Greg Eliot

        It’s a puzzeling phenomenon because Japan is starved of the the kind of vibrancy we take for granted in the west.

        A nation can grow fat, starved of that sort of vibrancy.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 5:51 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

        A provisional government for national restoration, if you will.

        PGNR.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 7:28 pm Alec Leamas

        Generalísimo es muy bueno. Along with keeping Spain out of the Communist/Soviet orbit, he understood intuitively that politics alone was insufficient to keep cultural Marxism at bay. He made a priority of preserving traditional and Catholic Spanish culture as a bulwark against the Reds.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 4:25 am Carlos Danger

        I had an American friend who grew up there. He said it was a great place to live.

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 2:32 pm Heywood Jablome

      Piss off. You try to tell me what to do and you’ll get a chestful of buckshot.

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 3:05 pm Greg Eliot

        Keep your pants on, Spartacus. Original sin was born of that attitude.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 3:13 pm Heywood Jablome

        Original sin was born of that attitude.

        There’s just a wee bit of difference between the rulership of a holy God and the arbitrary decrees of a mere human who wishes to impose some kind of benevolent tyranny. I’ll yield to the former but not the latter. Ever.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 3:17 pm Greg Eliot

        Fair enough, and touche!

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 4:26 am Carlos Danger

        That’s why I support what we have now but with a restricted franchise.

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 5:23 pm Ed the Department Head

      “Cancel freedom and pair up 1 man to 1 woman, 2-3 kids per couple and repatriating foreigners while busting up the college-career foolishness is the way.”
      This is why the White masses will not support a right wing dictatorship. While I do agree that democracy caused pretty much all of the West’s problems, would CH even want to live in country where men were forced to pair up with one woman? (Counter-Currents has a good book review up about Guillaume Faye’s Sex and Deviance which discusses sexual realities on the ground versus what tradcon types wish was true: http://www.counter-currents.com/2015/01/guillaume-fayes-sex-deviance/ )
      A right wing dictatorship should not intervene in peoples’ bedrooms and should consider decriminalizing prostitution like the West had before the 1890-1950 period. It should also do little to interfere in the freely chosen lives of its white citizenry and work to eradicate leftists and either keep in line or evict non-whites.

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 7:31 pm Alec Leamas

        I don’t see the contradiction between marrying/”pairing up with” one woman and still getting side action, which would inevitably be tolerated if not tacitly condoned for the right sort of man.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 12:16 pm irishsavant

        Not interfere in people’s bedrooms but ban prostitution? Not being very consistent there. And what if the prostitution is consummated in ‘people’s bedrooms’?

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 7:39 am Greg Eliot

        And what if the prostitution is consummated in ‘people’s bedrooms’?

        Hell, when ISN’T it?

        lzlzozlzozlzozlozlozlozlozlozlozl

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 9:26 am Ed the Department Head

        “Not interfere in people’s bedrooms but ban prostitution?”
        I favor decriminalizing prostitution like we had before the 1890-1950 period. No where did I advocate banning prostitution.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 9:31 am Ed the Department Head

        Legalization of prostitution is where a license is required for legal services (like in Nevada). Decriminalization is where all forms of consensual adult sex services are legal (like in Modern New Zealand). Prior to 1890, there were no laws on the books throughout most of the world against prostitution. An alliance of feminists and Christian busybodies got prostitution criminalized piecemeal in various countries during the 1890-1950 period.

        LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 5:11 pm Siberian Subway Masturbator

      Dictatorship. Yeah coming real soon to a sci-fi novel near you. I’d be pissed if I was a white loser too.

      You really have yourself to blame, and who can accept that.

      Adapt migrate or die. Or just whine, like you’re doing now.

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 5:27 pm turner&cooch

        ” I’d be pissed if I was a white loser too.”

        Just as well you’re an anti-white heeb then.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 5:47 pm Greg Eliot

        Always worth a (((shake o’ da haid))) when a yid has the chutzpah to talk about whining.

        Take a ride on the shoah railroad, pud-puller… your act closed at the chateau months ago.

        LikeLike


      • on January 27, 2015 at 10:50 am Jim South

        I woke up, opened my browser to google and what does it say at the bottom?

        “Remembering the liberation of Auschwitz”

        You guys are the ultimate whiners.

        LikeLike


  11. on January 24, 2015 at 9:53 am PA

    It may not please population growth GDP FOREVER libertardian theorists

    jeb bush just slapped Whorefinder for slacking on his pro-GOP shilling. And yes, henceforth I shall write that name in lowercase. Even when it’s the first word in a sentence such as here.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 2:36 pm Heywood Jablome

      Jeb Bushney 2016: Because Electability™!

      Or something.

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 3:31 pm Diversity Is Good

      George H.W. Bush 1988, “because it’s his turn, now” lost to Clinton in 1992.
      Bob Dole, 1996, “Because it’s his turn, now” lost to Clinton.
      George W. Bush, 2000, “because it’s his turn, now” nearly lost to Gore.

      John McCain, 2008, “Because it’s his turn, now” lost to Obama.
      Mittens 2012, “Because it’s his turn, now” also lost to Obama.

      jeb ‘it’s my turn, now!” bush…future loser?

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 3:46 pm PA

      It gladdens my heart to see someone already writing “jeb” in lowercase. I want that to catch on. Not for my vanity, but for the love of America.

      LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 8:28 am nikcrit

        I want that to catch on. Not for my vanity, but for the love of America.

        Hey, if one does a rational assessment and prediction based on whose prime in terms of political money, networks and support systems, “jeb” is a very, very strong possibility to be taking the oath two years from now. So keep your fingers crossed.

        LikeLike


  12. on January 24, 2015 at 9:58 am martin

    When I hear people say we need more white babies, although I do think children would be wonderful, it reminds me of a secular version of certain natural moral law theorists who believe marriage is solely about procreation. I think first and foremost marriage/relationships are about companionship and sex is a way to express that. I would want my wife to, you know, love me in some sense and I doubt that is possible for a woman who has had too many men in her. As far as libertarians, it seems they basically believe: “if someone wants to do something, then it is good and it is bad for government to stop them”. Come on libertarians. You people love to bash on police and military, but let me ask them: is it moral to stop someone from murdering?

    LikeLike


    • on January 26, 2015 at 1:07 am Glengarry

      For a man, marriage is primarily about building a family, which includes procreation. For a woman, it appears to increasingly be about the expensively garish wedding, the social approval, the beta bucks. But it’s still pretty accepted to break up or divorce quickly if no progeny is forthcoming.

      Do consider that marriage is, for a man, a very expensive way to get ‘companionship and sex’ (and you might not get either, at that). If you’re not interested in children, you’d do better with just a girlfriend. On the other hand, if you’re elevating the “pair bond” beyond all else, well … Modern society doesn’t mind grinding the nuts of guys like you. Be careful.

      LikeLike


  13. on January 24, 2015 at 10:09 am Arbiter

    Excellent post by CH. It bears repeating: you can’t out-compete mass immigration by baby production, when those in power can turn on a tap to a supply of billions of people. And you can’t make people have more children on a large scale, which is a decision that depends on one’s economy and future prospects. We need land of our own, not more people. America could do just fine with 100 million people, Europe could do fine with 200 million. There would be no risk of military invasion as long as you have nukes. And you wouldn’t have any enemies if you stop carrying out the globalists’ wars. And if fewer people live in Western lands, then fewer people will live in non-Western lands, as they are dependent on trade and aid from the West.

    Sub-Saharan Africa had 100 million people before Whites came there and gave them roads, hospitals, math, medicine, agriculture etc, raising their numbers to close to a billion. If the trade and aid would be shut off they would soon be back down closer to 100 million again. For one thing there would be wars breaking out all over the Africa, in countries that have held back from too much tyranny because there is the threat that the West would cut off money and possibly attack those who start killing off other tribes.

    No, the solution is not to try to have more children than large-family Third Worlders. The solution is to change the minds of Whites living today. If we can do that, then we win no matter how many other people are in our lands. If we can’t do that, then it doesn’t matter how many more brainwashed kids are born as they’ll just keep paying for their own destruction. We are living in a turning point today, and people should get active like many others have done.

    As for the trolling about prominent race realists not having many children – activism makes a man and his family a target. He risks losing his career, his job, and he risks being attacked by communist terrorist groups that carry out more than a thousand attacks in the West every year, which the media cover up. Many in nationalist parties are abandoned by their girlfriends and wives. As for doing anonymous nationalist work in your free time, for example being a prominent writer online, is something only those who have no or few children have time for. And a wife or girlfriend will almost never approve even to anonymous work, as there is still the risk that you become a target. So the ones who do the work on behalf of the rest of the people will usually be men without children.

    Trolls know this of course, but they are socialists, and socialists always lie. Otherwise they wouldn’t be socialists.

    LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 11:11 am TAnon

      >it doesn’t matter how many more brainwashed kids are born as they’ll just keep paying for their own destruction

      This. It doesn’t matter how many white kids are born if they are brainwashed liberals who will cheer for their own destruction. In fact if you can’t make sure you’re kids are going to be red pilled it’s better to not have any at all.

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 5:44 pm quorasdesignatedasshole

        I fully plan to start with homeschooling my kids when I get around to making some.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 6:25 pm HereticPhi

        You have a point, but I am going to come out of lurking to counter the Host on this one.

        In BUGS, Bob tells us not to use this as a talking point because it can be used as justification for open borders. But…

        Whites are reproducing at below replacement level, in Europe, North America, Oceania, EVERYWHERE. Our bloodline is (i)dying(/i).

        There are two sides to the genocidal population replacement program – and the suppression of our birthrates is as important as the hordes we are being swallowed up by.

        So the “moar whyte babies troll” has a point you can’t ignore. Count me on that team. But, most WN are beta in that it (i)feels(/i) brave to call out men and defend women, so they misallocate the source of the problem in tune with the yenta Kim Hymowitz. White men need to “man up”.

        However, the problem is not being caused by mens behavior. Most white men want to get married and have children but can’t find wives who haven’t used up most of their fertile life on the carousel. Marriage 2.0 has become a unidirectional contract of servitude to women by men; there no benefits left in it for us to give up.

        A system where brilliant, healthy, high value women with talent and potential waste their lives as sterile high powered career sluts, so they can pay exorbitant taxes for dumb and ugly women to crap out inferior thug spawn on welfare, does not bode well for the future. It is tragic beyond expression.

        A little Hypergamy is healthy for the nation – it keeps men on their toes and forces them to produce and perform to compete for access to vag. That’s why it exists, but this $h!+ is death.

        Yes, we need to close the borders to stop White Genocide. But what WN don’t want to talk about is that it’s all for naught unless we get hypergamy under control, one way or another. Otherwise we have to go with the cloning option and… leave that conversation off the table for now.

        The solution is not to go around impregnating any bulbous trailer park sow with white skin you can yet your schlong in to breed more emasculated white neckbeards. That won’t work. The solution is to kill Captain Save-a-Ho and assign women reproductive and sexual responsibility proportional to the tremendous amount of sheer power their bodies give them. And to hold them accountable for the outcomes.

        Because the alternatives aren’t pretty.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 7:24 pm HereticPhi

        I have to counter the host here in saying that suppression of our birthrates to sub-replacement levels is a critical component to the geNOcidal population replacement program.

        But, there is a major error in assigning blame for this from beta WN. It feels brave to call out men and defend women, so they misallocate the source of the problem in tune with the yenta Kim Hymowitz. White men need to “man up”. HAC is guilty of this.

        Practitioners of Game can’t be blamed for giving women the behavior that they reward. Most western men want to get married and have children but can’t find wives who haven’t used up most of their fertile life on the carousel. Marriage 2.0 has become a “contract” of servitude to women by men; there no benefits left in it for us to give up.

        White women control the reproduction of our people, it is they who bear responsibility for the outcome. The solution is to assign accountability for the outcome. It is not to go around impregnating any bulbous trailer park sow with white skin you can yet your schlong in to breed more emasculated white neckbeards.

        . And you can’t make people have more children on a large scale, which is a decision that depends on one’s economy and future prospects.

        I disagree. Demographic engineering is happening to us. If we get in power, we can do it too.

        A system where brilliant, healthy, high value women with talent and potential waste their lives as sterile high powered career sluts, so they can pay exorbitant taxes for dumb and ugly women to crap out inferior thug spawn on welfare, is not one we should allow. It is tragic beyond expression.

        Yes, we need to close the borders, but it’s all for naught unless we get hypergamy under control, one way or another. Otherwise we have to go with the cloning option…

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 7:41 am Greg Eliot

        Nice comment, HereticPhi. Tip o’ the ten gallon on that one.

        LikeLike


    • on January 26, 2015 at 12:31 am Carlos Danger

      A system where brilliant, healthy, high value women with talent and potential waste their lives as sterile high powered career sluts, so they can pay exorbitant taxes for dumb and ugly women to crap out inferior thug spawn on welfare, is not one we should allow. It is tragic beyond expression.

      That is an excellent problem statement. Bravo. As someone who just fathered a child I have to agree with your entire comment. We need to get quality men and women breeding again.

      LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 10:22 pm Anonymous

        This

        LikeLike


  14. on January 24, 2015 at 10:14 am fnn

    Plus, as long as the hegemonic ideology is secular hedonism plus anti-white cultural marxism, a certain percentage of the increased crop of white chilluns will become SJW’s or otherwise a net loss.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 3:35 pm Mr.magNIFicent1

      compulsory license is the United States of Freedom

      LikeLike


  15. on January 24, 2015 at 10:32 am Captain Obvious

    > “It may not please population growth GDP FOREVER libertardian theorists, but a period of slow or no growth caused in part by a shrinking population base isn’t a surefire recipe for a declining standard of living.”

    The problem is the fiat currency and these asinine future-oriented contracts, such as home mortgages and insurance policies and “guaranteed” pensions. Fiat-economics is built upon a foundational assumption of ever-increasing asset values, and is utterly incapable of withstanding even the slightest emergence of deflation. But declining demographics necessarily imply declining demand which necessarily implies structural deflation, and once contract-bound assets go underwater due to deflation, people suddenly wake up to the insanity of being bound by those future-oriented contracts, and simply walk away from them.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 10:47 am Captain Obvious

      Example: Due to declining demographics, and insufficiently many young white families looking to buy new houses, the 4000 sq ft McMansions, which were originally built to sell at $500,000, are “sold” to CRA’ed illegal alien families who abandon the mortgages as soon as the balloon payments come due. But allowing the $500,000 pricetag to fall to its deflated [yet economically-correct] value of $250,000 would force the fiat shekel mongers on Wahl Street straight into bankruptcy, ergo the fiat shekel creators instead choose to pump trillions of new fiat shekels into the economy, so as to save the hides of their cousins on Wahl Street. Now the young white couple, who are recently graduated from college, and who are juggling some student loan debt, but who could afford to start a family if they could find a $250,000 home in a neighborhood with good schools, will instead be forced to save their money for another decade or so, in order to afford the home at its artificially inflated value of $500,000. And before you know it, that 25-year-old college sweetheart with the fertile womb and the doe-eyed hopes of starting a family is now a 35-year-old thousand-cock-start cat lady with shit for eggs and a really bad attitude.

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 10:49 am Captain Obvious

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 11:01 am Captain Obvious

        And in Europe and Japan, you see these old people who will literally tax their grandchildren right out of existence in order to keep their “guaranteed” pension salaries properly funded. All future-oriented contracts are insane to begin with [since no one knows what the future holds], and a system which allows both fiat currency and future-oriented contracts is doomed to implode and vanish into extinction.

        tldr; == Price STABILITY in the face of population decline is actually invisible HYPERINFLATION, and the entire economy is quietly self-destructing even though no one realizes it.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 2:10 pm Libertardian

        Yep. Economic growth itself tends to be price deflationary, because it means the supply of goods and services increases faster than the money supply. That’s how the Fed blew a financial bubble in the 1920s and no one saw it because it created artificial price stability when there should have been deflation.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 7:20 pm Anonymous

        Yep

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 11:49 am cointelproagent

      Peak oil anybody?

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 3:38 pm Mr.magNIFicent1

        No. Prudhoe and ANWR and the Dakotas and Colorado. It’s everywhere and abundant.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 4:07 pm Bobby Cuddlefuck aka The Hamster Whisperer

        I think the bigger problem is peak water. It never ceases to amaze me that some people can’t seem to grasp that we live in a world of finite resources.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 5:37 pm Greg Eliot

        Whad’daya mean? I wuz at Wal-mart da udder day and the shelves wuz fully stocked!

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 12:28 pm irishsavant

        There’s no shortage of water due to desalination and recycling capabilities. Cost is the issue.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 10:08 pm trav777

        Prudhoe? Did that mfer say Prudhoe? Prudhoe peaked 20 years ago, idiot. It’s in 13% YoY decline, about double what the predictions were, due to the application of secondary and tertiary extraction methods in the primary production phase. ANWR…lol.

        Look, do not speak if you don’t have a fucking clue. It’s just embarrassing. Primary worldwide C&C production peaked in 2005.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 4:22 pm fredmertz

        Peak pussy?

        LikeLike


    • on January 26, 2015 at 1:15 am Glengarry

      In due time, economists will realize you also get reduced demand and structural deflation (among other things, like Rotherham) if you persist in importing vast numbers of unproductive welfare wankers. They won’t work hard to uphold your precious pensions and benefits either, geniuses.

      LikeLike


  16. on January 24, 2015 at 10:37 am Hepp

    “Finally, what do population growth whores think will happen if their prescription to bear lots of fruit and multiply unto the end of days is taken to heart by everyone? At some point, there will be too many people. Is there anyone who seriously believes the earth will be a livable planet at 50 billion people? ”

    We have no idea of knowing how life would be would 50 billion people. Back when there was a few million, I’m sure some people were saying could you imagine seven billion people? Yet humans are living healthier lives than ever. If there were advocates for population control who succeeded in past generations, the vast majority of us would never have been here.

    We should encourage higher birth rates for the simple fact that life is pretty cool. At some time we might get to the point where we need to control our numbers, but there’s nothing to indicate we’re anywhere close to there.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 10:48 am Arbiter

      We should encourage higher birth rates for the simple fact that life is pretty cool. At some time we might get to the point where we need to control our numbers, but there’s nothing to indicate we’re anywhere close to there.

      So there ARE nutcases who think there can be fifty billion people on the planet and it’s no problem. Evidence: seven billion works without mass death!

      Yes, if 7 billion survive, clearly 50 billion will survive. The logic, it’s fantastic!

      But wait, I forgot the main argument: there should be 50 billion because … “life is pretty cool”.

      Your post sounds like a parody of itself. You don’t have to live in a suburb filled up by Arabs, Turks and Blacks, where the forests are cut down, the old buildings are razed to the ground, to make room for more, more, more, more socialist voters, more crime, more welfare parasites, more filthy streets. You don’t have to see the suffering that more and more grow up with today. You should shut the fuck up, idiot.

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 11:42 am Hepp

        Why is fifty billion the magic number? There’s probably some absolute limit, but why do you assume it’s between 7 billion and 50 billion, when life continues to improve across every measure studied?

        Fans of population control are some of the angriest people around, and don’t have many facts to back up their assertion. We certainly don’t need people with IQs of 80, as they’re a net drain on society. But we need more people with decent IQs, values, and work ethics.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 2:40 pm Heywood Jablome

        A little bit of perspective is in order.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 2:53 pm Greg Eliot

        Heywood needs to read more, and from his own cited source, if he would speak of “perspective”:

        http://persquaremile.com/2012/08/08/if-the-worlds-population-lived-like/

        :an ever-growing duckface

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 6:00 pm Heywood Jablome

        I read it, Greg. I linked to the page I chose with that additional link in mind. The method of calculating a city’s necessary geographical footprint is inherently complex and is not at all a matter of settled science.

        Read all, consider all, be dogmatic about almost nothing.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 6:28 pm Greg Eliot

        It appeared that you merely linked to the first page in order to gainsay the side that was saying we have to worry about overpopulation.

        If that was not your intent, well… I think mine was a reasonable initial impression.

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 10:53 am Rum

      Hepp
      I seriously doubt that you have spent much time in a real wilderness area, like Alaska.

      “Sometimes you dont know what you got till its gone.”

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 11:30 am retrophoebia

      Actually, the best argument for continued high levels of breeding are not – as you say – that we don’t know what the livable capacity of the world is. I’m sure that number is in the hundreds of billions, realistically (recalling the Simon-Ehrlich wager and having driven through the deserts of, say, Nevada).

      The best argument for continued high levels of breeding are that we will reap the benefits of having more people from the long-right-tails the IQ curve, and have more (on an absolute basis) of the people around who can actually create good things, and we’ll have them closer to each other. Population density matters immensely in creating that quality of life you’re talking about, and you need a critical mass of brainpower to make technological advances happen.

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 11:41 am retrophoebia

        This is also somewhat derivative of Kurzweil’s law of accelerating returns, where he says that technological change has been accelerating, culminating eventually in a tech singularity. It has, but a main driver of that has been population growth and resulting application of available brainpower to specific problems, not technology itself as in a vacuum.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 1:40 am Glengarry

        It seems fairly obvious that carrying capacity depends to a great deal on technology and the ability to absorb shocks. In essence, the world today relies on the West to bail out the feckless from starving and to figure out ever more clever ways to continue to do so. One of the assumptions is that people will stop breeding everywhere as they grow more educated etc. But what if they don’t? The UN projects global population with a peak at some point in time, but for every update, the peak somehow gets higher. So maybe they’re wrong. Any technological advancement will then just see another Malthusian population increase, at which point we’re back in trouble again.

        (And, as an aside, what happens if, on the other hand, the UN is right and global population peaks and starts shrinking? Dear economists, what do you predict happens then? From where do we then import those who will guarantee our pensions and benefits?)

        (Maybe Japan is right to tackle that problem head on rather than relying on magic and the kindness of strangers.)

        ***

        Regarding breeding, note that the IQ curve in some populations has a mean that is shifted to the left. So you might have to breed, say, 100x more of one population to get the same absolute number of big brains as in another. (Or maybe you just … won’t get them in time no matter how many you breed. We don’t really know, do we.)

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 3:08 pm John

      “Back when there was a few million, I’m sure some people were saying could you imagine seven billion people?”

      And the reality is worse than they could’ve ever imagined.

      “If there were advocates for population control who succeeded in past generations, the vast majority of us would never have been here.”

      Waiting for the bad news…

      “We should encourage higher birth rates for the simple fact that life is pretty cool. At some time we might get to the point where we need to control our numbers, but there’s nothing to indicate we’re anywhere close to there.”

      Man, you are like my archenemy. When is enough enough? When it takes 3 hours to drive 20 miles due to traffic? It’s exactly this kind of happy go lucky faggot mindset that created this world of shit we live in.
      LIFES PRETTY COOL MAN

      Fuck off

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 3:16 pm Greg Eliot

        It’s known as Lebowski syndrome.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 3:59 pm Bobby Cuddlefuck aka The Hamster Whisperer

        +1000

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 4:59 pm jez

      “We should encourage higher birth rates for the simple fact that life is pretty cool.”

      Dazzling logic.

      Can I see your proof of this “fact”?

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 5:11 pm Hepp

        Well, anyone who doesn’t like life is free to kill himself. So why are you here talking to me if you’d rather be dead? Either you really do think life is worth living, or you’re too big of a coward to end it.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 5:48 pm John

        There you go. Everybody just keep breeding and consuming until we all live like insect people in a utilitarian dystopia. And if you don’t like it then kill yourself, you negative Nancy!

        SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 4:16 pm turner&cooch

        Is this Hepp character for real?

        LikeLike


  17. on January 24, 2015 at 10:37 am Anonymous

    If anyone says “put buns in ovens” one more time….

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 10:57 am The Spirit Within

      Yeah, this is a bullet square between Zombie Shane’s eyes. Or Captain Obvious, or whatever he’s calling himself now.

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 12:07 pm Greg Eliot

        Forsooth and verily… whose bitches these be?

        LikeLike


  18. on January 24, 2015 at 11:19 am Anonymous

    It’s about quality, not quantity.

    In particular it’s about making sure that whites are not expected to work themselves into an early, childless grave in order to pay the taxes that feed Jarqueevius and Naseer’s latest litters.

    LikeLike


  19. on January 24, 2015 at 11:36 am henry himbeere

    I say more white babies. I say this as much as advice to myself.I’m childless but I would like to change it. After I finish my studies, soon, I want a woman. I want a german woman but a white american will do I suppose. I’m madly in love with german women. They drive me crazy. But so when I think we need more white babies, it’s as much advice and exhortation to myself. I know I’m delinquent.

    Additionally, lebensraum and freedom from immigration and good economics are good but we don’t have that. Money is nice but children are free to have and then you’ll find a way, society will find a way to carry them. They are true riches because they can go on and on and on. Your grandson, if you were dirt poor, could grow up wealthy. And if he had no kids, ends the line. If he does, they may be poor, but then may be wealthy again. Wealth is arbitrary, genes and lines are real. Just as any creature in the animal kingdom, that doesn’t use money.

    But the system we need is racial socialism. Socialism just means solidarity or social organization, nothing more. All governments are somewhat socialist or they wouldn’t be government. Communism is bad. democracy is ok, sometimes. National socialism is good. Racial socialism is better, the best.

    As to quality over quantity, why not both? Don’t impregnate an obvious dullard low level white delinquent, but the more the merrier. Let nature determine who is fit. What limits me is my sense of responsibility- i.e. I think I can only have kids with one wife- even though I see others having them with multiple. Also if I want to get into a respectable profession. I have to re-think my views and stop living in fear. It will be hard to find a good woman, intelligent though not necessarily educated, as my main mate, my partner, to have 3 or more kids with- esp german and I don’t even live there. I need a miracle, but I know what I want. Quantity produces quality and then nature thins. that’s my view. Race socialism, leadership principle. Which is really just overt leader. We have the leadership principle today. They are just behind the scenes culture leaders. If we can make the leader-dictator visible, he’ll have to put his face out there and take responsibility. In exchange, we’ll grant him powers that modern leaders don’t have. Sometimes an authoritarian regime distinguishes itself from a democracy, in that it has the will of the people behind it.

    LikeLike


    • on January 26, 2015 at 12:38 am Carlos Danger

      Beware the Kriegswut of German women.

      LikeLike


  20. on January 24, 2015 at 11:40 am Warrior

    Most people incorrectly think that we are hardwired to desire children. As CH correctly notes, we’re hardwired for sex, not children, which is societally programmed. Think about it: are animals copulating with the hope of offspring? I think not.

    LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 12:00 pm Greg Eliot

      He who put that urge in animals put it in humans as well… for the purpose of proliferation of the species.

      Just because the animal, or the human, doesn’t consciously realize it at the time doesn’t mean bo diddley.

      LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 11:07 pm Dat_Truth_Hurts

      Most normal women are hardwired to care for children. Hence their bizarre desire to collect pets and iphones.

      And after chasing tail, men’s testosterone drops once they’re around infants for some time.

      We are hardwired to reproduce. Too bad intelligence is genetic, because stupid people have a more difficult time controlling impulses.

      LikeLike


    • on January 26, 2015 at 12:42 am Carlos Danger

      Animals generally don’t copulate for pleasure. Humans and dolphins, I believe, are unique that way.

      LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 1:06 am bookooball

        Clearly…

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 7:48 am Greg Eliot

        Isn’t that the “tossed salad” guy from that prison documentary?

        LikeLike


  21. on January 24, 2015 at 12:03 pm Dave

    The Nazis had a MOAR WHYTE BAYBIES policy, much as they pretended to be right-wing traditionalists. They conscripted Aryan teenagers into the Hitler Youth, sent them on camp-outs with lots of exciting co-ed activities far away from parental supervision, and pitched the girls’ tents not far from the boys’ tents. Not surprisingly, lots of girls got pregnant, and if they didn’t get married, there was a network of well-funded state orphanages to take these babies and raise them as loyal Nazis.

    LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 12:05 pm Greg Eliot

      I’m not sure they ever “pretended to be right-wing traditionalists”, ‘though it’s easy for antagonistic media to try to paint them into that corner, both then and now.

      The key words are NATIONAL SOCIALISTS… all the benefits of a welfare state, but only for one’s own kind…

      … you don’t resent carrying your brother, so long as you know your brother will carry you, if the time comes.

      LikeLike


  22. on January 24, 2015 at 12:13 pm Joseph Coces

    Perfect, Heartiste, just perfect. Now, please, go tell the likes of Laura Wood and the widows of the late Lawrence Auster. See if they finally get it.
    Best wishes,
    Joseph

    LikeLike


  23. on January 24, 2015 at 12:15 pm earl

    ‘Four, as a philosophical point, reproduction is not the goal of human courtship. Sex is the goal. Children are an after-effect.’

    Says you. Sex and reproduction have always gone together…until contraceptives gave us the illusion they don’t.

    And as such you should pick a woman who would make a good mother of your children first before you actually make that a reality.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 12:35 pm Greg Eliot

      Yeah, I been meaning to get around to that “sex is the goal” canard… although I think he meant that, throughout the ages, men wanted to have sex with the women that caught their eye, as a first thought.

      But true courtship, whether supervised or not, was always about marriage… and marriage was about children, not sex.

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 2:41 pm Heywood Jablome

      Seconded.

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 8:04 pm Tilikum

        third. motion carries. I gotta disagree with the shiv lord here. sex is the what and how, reproduction is the why.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 11:50 pm John

        We are biologically driven to sex, but without consciousness we wouldn’t be aware that reproduction is the goal. It is true that the entire purpose of sex is to create children, but we as humans are alien to nature in this respect. The pursuit of pleasure is what compels us to fornicate. I agree with CH.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 2:54 am Greg Eliot

        I keep trying to put an oar in on the side of children, but the forum keeps eatin’ mah stuff.

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 6:45 pm Eh

      Wrong earl. Do you think cows fuck because they’re looking to produce offspring? I think not. It’s about a sex drive; offspring are just the result, not the driver. There is no biological urge to have children (that urge was socially programmed), but there is a bio urge to have sex

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 11:56 am Greg Eliot

        Holy cow! And WHY do you think there’s that bio urge to have sex?

        DUH! (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 12:38 pm irishsavant

        “There is no biological urge to have children (that urge was socially programmed), but there is a bio urge to have sex.”

        So the cows you refer to were socially programmed to look after their calves? I’d love to understand how society managed that.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 5:27 pm Pluviophile

        Nature made sex pleasurable as an incentive to reproduce, so you might consider the instinct Her ultimatum.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 1:44 am Glengarry

        Why do people (and pair bonded animals too for that matter) not infrequently break up if they fail to procreate? The sex is still the same and no squalling brats.

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 7:42 pm Alec Leamas

      I agree in part. The clear skin, ample, perky bosom, and full but taught rear end is a trap to draw you into making those babies. Anyone who’s had sex with a pregnant woman will tell you there’s a design to the whole affair – they’re insatiable and the purpose is clearly to keep the inseminator happy and close by. It’s not much different than the time share pitch in the Caribbean.

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 11:55 am Greg Eliot

        Sex with a pregnant women… hopefully one’s loved one carrying one’s own seed (you fairies)… believe it or not, it’s some of the best sex you’ll ever have…

        … definitely by design, and praise Jah!

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 7:52 pm Broadsman

      You can pick your philosophy but biology is reality. Earl is right – the primary goal of sex is reproduction and the continuation of the species.
      Certainly, there are side effects to sex – bonding for one. But knocking up a woman is Job One.

      Just pick your woman and pick your time – two advances of our technological civilization.

      LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 8:43 pm Canadian Friend

      You are both right, sex is tied to reproduction and the pill made things “blurry”, that is true, but what gives men an erection is not the thought of the baby that will pop out in 9 months but the shapely woman and the thought of how great it will feel to come inside her.

      I think that is what CH meant by sex is the goal.

      LikeLike


    • on January 26, 2015 at 10:10 pm King A

      Four, as a philosophical point, nutrition is not the goal of food consumption. Mastication is the goal. Nourishment is an after-effect.

      “Life can little more supply / Than just a few good Fucks, and then we die.” — John Wilkes, “Essay on Woman” 1755

      Tarted-up nihilism. When are you going to break free from your beta-orbit circling this metaphysical nullity? I know you want to ….

      “Every man who knocks on the door of a brothel is looking for God.”

      Gloria Dei homo vivens.

      Matt

      LikeLike


  24. on January 24, 2015 at 12:16 pm duderino

    If you believe demography is destiny, you have a moral duty to donate to sperm banks. Bryan Caplan even advocated for libertarians to donate as an agent of social change. It makes me wonder if someone like Jeff Bezos could pay poor women 25 grand
    to take his sperm.

    LikeLike


    • on January 26, 2015 at 12:46 am Carlos Danger

      I don’t want my kids raised by lesbians.

      LikeLike


  25. on January 24, 2015 at 12:48 pm Cauthon

    “Who polar bear this is?”

    Fucking classic. Oh, how I hope he reads that.

    LikeLike


  26. on January 24, 2015 at 1:01 pm themanofmystery2

    For once after 6 years of lurking your blog, CH, I finally ideologically disagree diametrically with a singular point.

    Idiots who refuse to vote do have the RIGHT to complain, but I have the right to think they’re the worst kind of useless whiner: the kind that bitches and then doesn’t do the most obvious, free way to enact changes.

    As to the rest of the post: bravo. The reason for white fertility probs are femcunts ruining family values and stay at home motherhood.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 2:07 pm Sean Fielding

      If voting could change anything, they’d outlaw it. And in effect, some Western states recently have, eg outlawing Vlams Blok.

      You have no idea how fully we are pwned.

      Real political change is elite change, by violence, cunning or both.

      Looks to be violence then, since our pwners have bred for cunning.

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 2:47 pm Greg Eliot

        +111… more true than true.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 3:33 pm retrophoebia

        Voting used to change things, until the franchise was diluted by populist inclusion of the masses instead of restricting it to those who have “skin in the game.” Thanks, progs.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 4:20 pm Bobby Cuddlefuck aka The Hamster Whisperer

        Democracy, in this country especially, is like pro wrestling. The contestants huff and puff on stage, inciting the audience to pick a side, but behind closed doors the contestants are chumming it up at parties and having a laugh at how gullible the audience is. Democracy is a brilliant tool for hegemony, especially in the era of unlimited financing. It lets people defuse their angst into an organized, sterile release mechanism and diffuses any real thrust for change. Look at the left today compared to the bush w years. During bush the left was up in arms about illegal wars, occupation, patriot act, drone killings, and Wall Street cronyism. But once the party put a black face on its leader, the left did a 180 and forgot about everything that was SO important. Same thing will happen again and again. I give up. Reinstate Marcus Aurelius!!!!

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 5:55 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

        Violence works.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 8:06 pm Tilikum

        stellar.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 12:42 pm irishsavant

        Absolutely correct. They’ve also gutted Golden Dawn in Greece. ‘Legally’ of course.

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 2:42 pm Heywood Jablome

      I discourage people from voting; it dilutes my influence.

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 2:48 pm Greg Eliot

        Use that much-heralded influence of yours to come up with a choice of candidates that actually means anything will change and we’ll stand in awe of said “influence”.

        :very large duckface

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 3:15 pm Heywood Jablome

        I don’t devote much attention to political candidates who want to go to Washington, DC. Google “Article V convention,” Greg.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 3:21 pm Greg Eliot

        Heh, heh… as long as there’s a Supreme Court, we never have to fear the an anti-Cathedral Constitutional amendment being declared “Constitutional”.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 6:07 pm Heywood Jablome

        As long as there’s an Article V, we don’t have to resort to violence to overrule 9 unelected lawyers.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 6:32 pm Greg Eliot

        I don’t understand your reasoning.

        The states can pass all the “constitutional amendments” they wish… until somebody (YKW) decides they don’t like it and takes it to the Supreme Court… who will duly “unconstitutionalize” it, if I may coin a nonce term.

        You may think the Constitution remains a mighty fortress of sorts… but future men of good will are going to need shields of stronger stuff than paper, my friend.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 12:47 pm irishsavant

        It’s not just the states that the SCOTUS has by the balls. They can declare anything proposed by the House or Senate as ‘unconstitutional’ as they wish. That’s why YKW focus so closely on it, directly or indirectly. (Currently 4 out of 9. Not bad when you’re 3% of the population).

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 7:51 pm Alec Leamas

      In effect, our higher culture is – together with world events – the cause of low white fertility. We teach our young people that it is irresponsible to bear children before one can fully support them and give them various pointless luxuries. When the economy sucks or white youngsters have student loan debt, they wait rather than act. This is generally a positive adaptive trait, but not so in an environment where literally no one starves to death. The brown underclass plays chicken – they spit babies out with no care or concern for feeding them let alone housing and educating them and dares the taxpayer to let them die. It’s an appeal to our greater, more generous nature that winds up killing us.

      LikeLike


  27. on January 24, 2015 at 1:12 pm DD

    Simply do away with welfare, WIC, food stands, SSDI, Section 8, prison for nonviolent drug offenses, etc and there’s no need to increase the white birth rate. At least, not much. Without the support of redistributed wealth and the intermittent adult daycare of prison, many of the less motivated folks will either not have kids or those kids will not make it to adulthood. Problem solved.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 2:44 pm Heywood Jablome

      How’re you proposing we do that? At the moment, we’d have to get elected politicians to do that, and all their incentives point in exactly the opposite direction.

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 3:52 pm PA

      Tangentially related. I was out with a friend Ace last night and as usual, we got to talking about a number of interesting things. The subject of sociopaths came up. He said that society has a reliable control mechanism for identifying and punishing them. “Animal cruelty laws,” he said. He convinced me that it’s not about the welfare of animals. It’s about nabbing a sociopath before he advances to hurting people.

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2015 at 5:16 pm anonYmous

        That’s a decent theory, except that sociopaths are smart enough to not get caught torturing animals. Well most of them are. On top of that, we are talking about inconveniencing everyone just to catch a few sociopaths while they are young so they can be taken from their families and put in state homes or foster homes so they can be drugged, raped, and tortured. sounds like a good idea. Sociopaths are smart enough to know what they do is bad, or wrong, they understand the difference but don’t care. They learn how to lie and manipulate people at a young age and stay out of trouble. The only hope for them is that they grow out of it. Some do, some dont. A person can rationalize just about any law to be used for some minute percentage of the population from doing x,y, or z. For instance, postpartum depression. Now almost every state in the Union has laws in the book that enable CPS or DSS to harass people just because they might suffer some mental illness just because some mom drove a minivan into the ocean. after about 1000 or so of these little laws then nobody will be able to do anything.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 6:16 pm LP

        This is akin to the “broken windows” idea of crime control, and shown to be effective. It’s cheaper and easier to nab people involved in repugnant practices earlier rather than later.

        LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 11:08 pm LP

      Yeah, because that works so well in the third world, especially Africa. Since when did the denial of resources halt reproduction?

      LikeLike


      • on January 27, 2015 at 11:06 am Jim South

        These libertarians.

        They also never explain how mass turd world immigration will result in voting for libertardian policies.

        And most of them are joowish including Ayn Rand. Shocking.

        Here’s an idea, kick out all the non europeans and keep your safety net.

        You won’t need it much anyway.

        LikeLike


  28. on January 24, 2015 at 1:32 pm eyeslevel

    When did going from white to non-white ever improve the economy?

    LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 11:08 pm Dat_Truth_Hurts

      Winning post.

      LikeLike


  29. on January 24, 2015 at 2:00 pm Putin

    9’S AND 10’S

    It has been my observation that these types of women cannot handle/manage their beauty and thus would be dangerous to marry.

    LikeLike


  30. on January 24, 2015 at 2:07 pm Tim

    “Goatse’d borders”

    Brilliant

    LikeLike


  31. on January 24, 2015 at 2:11 pm The MOAR WHYTE BAYBIES Troll | Reaction Times

    […] Source: Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  32. on January 24, 2015 at 3:17 pm IHTG

    Did you just say “value transference”?

    A veritable collage of references.

    LikeLike


  33. on January 24, 2015 at 3:26 pm Anon2

    One white baby that grows up with both parents is better than having three born to a single mother slut.

    It is best to have quality AND quantity, but given the choice, quality wins.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 7:56 pm Alec Leamas

      That one white baby is going to have one hell of a time supporting the kids of his peers. Numbers and culture count for one hell of a lot. Three white babies that grow up to support themselves is a good thing. And I’m not necessarily advocating knocking up sluts, just that what’s good for one man might not be best for the whole.

      LikeLike


  34. on January 24, 2015 at 3:38 pm Diversity Is Good

    It’s just goalpost shifting, to change the subject away from unapproved topics.

    Like this, simplified:
    “You wanna close the border? MOAR WHYTE BABEEZ INSTEAD!”

    Reduce any discussion of the genetic side of IQ, the ongoing destruction of environment by illegal alien convoys in the US, the ongoing race to the bottom in wages for the blue collar worker, etc. to MOAR WHYTE BABEEZ.

    Makes me wonder who these people are, and what they really want.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 7:59 pm Alec Leamas

      Theoretically, if there were MOAR WHYTE BABEEZ we wouldn’t “need” to have open borders. But they’d move on to one of several other justifications for open borders. Even if white fertility rate was 5 per woman, they’d still open the borders and encourage immigration.

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 11:33 am TAnon

        That’s the catch. You can’t outbreed the immigration thus it will always be “needed”.

        LikeLike


  35. on January 24, 2015 at 3:47 pm Mr.magNIFicent1

    http://www.vdare.com/posts/sierra-club-sellout-not-forgotten

    How Philanthropist David Gelbaum used his swindlebucks to get the Sierra Club to remain forever silent on the matter of immigration.

    I hope you all enjoyed Abolition at Gunpoint of Free Association day last Monday. SuperDuperBowl! om-nom-nom

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 4:19 pm Just Asking

      I hope you all enjoyed Abolition at Gunpoint of Free Association day last Monday.

      You referring to Robert E. Lee’s birthday?

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 11:44 am Greg Eliot

        Nope… Roscoe E. Lee.

        LikeLike


  36. on January 24, 2015 at 4:04 pm anon

    Of course more babies from high quality parents would benefit society, and particularly in a democracy where the establishment is engaging in a form of soft genocide to overwhelm the native population with hostile migrants. One of the worst posts in the history of the blog.

    LikeLike


  37. on January 24, 2015 at 4:57 pm anonYmous

    I agree, the idea should be to figure out how to have the highest quality babies, then make more of them. It does no good to breed women who destroy their uterus with high n counts and std’s and wait till their 30’s to get knocked up. The message to those women should be to wait. heh. you can still get knocked up in ur 40’s lol.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 5:04 pm Anon2

      I assume you meant ‘men’ rather than it being a typo for ‘women’.

      If you meant men, that is stupid. This is a GAME blog, ya know. Are you going to disown Heartiste? Does he care about whether you disown him?

      The few men who don’t care about your shaming can still impregnate all white women.

      Your inability to hold slutty women accountable is the reason for white downfall. Shaming MEN as a solution to female promiscuity is dumb.

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 5:22 pm anonYmous

      Yes a pill that changes white men into say purple men will fix everything. Seriously though, making it known who the promiscuous men are will only make the problem worse because then the woman will try to “change them” heh

      LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 1:00 am Anon2

      So this is a Game blog, but you come here and act like a mangina? You think the answer to stopping female sluttiness is to punish men?

      Are you disowning Heartiste too, as a promiscuous man?

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 6:29 pm CH

        the stark moron has been banned for humorless trolling, witlessness, and full spectrum stupidity.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 9:45 am Ed the Department Head

        Thank you CH. I would have asked you to ban this heterosex hating freak but I thought it not my place as a commenter.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 10:20 am Greg Eliot

        It’s our duty, as cisgendered fucks, to keep the chateau free from such infestation.

        LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 1:29 pm John

      You seem like a very stupid person.

      LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 1:36 pm John

      Oh well I stand corrected. Why didn’t you say so? God bless the Internet.

      LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 1:40 pm John

      I don’t know what to say. Get help, man. You’re vain like a woman.

      LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 5:44 pm Greg Eliot

      The ultimate meshuggah, more like it.

      LikeLike


  38. on January 24, 2015 at 5:20 pm PA

    LikeLike


  39. on January 24, 2015 at 6:50 pm Oaktree

    Personally, I’d like to see a society similar to the Spartans’, where each person gets pushed to the breaking point to see whether he/she is worthy of citizenship. Maybe only one person in ten has what it takes. That would eliminate all of this prissy entitlement.

    You want in?!? Earn it motherfckers!!!

    LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 7:56 am Anonymous

      It occurred to me while filling out the EEOC portion of a job application that the only group who must actually earn “preference” are white men. White men may only be considered according to veteren status. All other classes are eligible for participation in the diversity spoils system by virute of inhertied postion.

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 12:55 pm irishsavant

        And this in a country founded and built by white men.

        LikeLike


    • on January 26, 2015 at 1:01 am Carlos Danger

      Sparta succumbed to its women.

      LikeLike


  40. on January 24, 2015 at 6:52 pm UMFJ

    LOL. No selection is required nowadays. Your ancestors often needed children to survive in the past. Children worked from an early age and were altogether capable of taking care of their parents into late age. Nowadays, an intelligent person should be able to provide all the resources they need until their death. The world is also connected, so finding any needed companionship is much easier as well.

    Keep your resources to yourself. You’re not a monkey that has to keep it’s DNA’s interests ahead of itself. Try taking some of these available introductory online courses from Harvard or MIT, similar to the ones the children of the 1% take. See if you can pass them handily. If not, keep your DNA to yourself. It’s no good in the future. Your descendants will be categorized as low IQ (bottom 99%) humans that aren’t capable of utilizing the tools of tomorrow.

    No need to invest in offspring that’ll spend it’s time, forever seeking instant gratification that the new world will provide, because their sub 135 IQ brains really can’t do much more.

    Seeing the behavior of these types of whites who crank out 5 kids, because of the white-black IQ gap, thinking he’s doing America a favor, when he should be considering the IQ necessary in a globalized and automated world in 30 years. White prole behavior at it’s finest, as if elite liberals (anti-white collectivists) or libertarians (individualists) will ultimately extend support for them. These morons’ kids will too often end up living off the government, while hating blacks for doing the same thing.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 8:36 pm Alec Leamas

      Bullshit. One can easily do both. Name Masters of the Universe who don’t have children. And in the past, the imperative to spread DNA trumped any and all of the practical benefits. Niall of the Nine Hostages’ Y chromosome runs in the veins of at least 3 million men, including mine. That, my friend, is immortality. He is my Great Father and I his true son. My sons will carry his blood into eternity.

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 1:30 pm Bel Riose

        Huh?

        LikeLike


  41. on January 24, 2015 at 7:15 pm Prof. Woland

    Two things that separate the PUA and MRA ‘communities’ are children and money and they are both game changers. It is really hard to be a playa if you have children and give a hoot about them. Money complicates relationships because if one side has it, the other wants it. I think the European Royalty had it right by never marrying out of their class.

    LikeLike


  42. on January 24, 2015 at 7:45 pm tang3zang

    But if you’re going to let all kinds of third worlders into the country, then you’re already IN a birthing war. It’s just a matter of whether or not you realize it.

    Ideally all countries in the world should limit prevent diversity by limiting immigration AND output a positive birth rate, but so far only the former seems possible.

    LikeLike


  43. on January 24, 2015 at 9:26 pm Rum

    Why are the Scandi countries importing Pakis and Yemimi thugs? I mean, what is the deep reason for this. The spoken explanations are all absurd and insult ones intelligence.
    In the UK there are strong reasons to think that, for them,
    it was a Labor/Socialist plot to shift demographics and dilute the self governing instincts present in the Native Folk.
    But in the Scandi places, their version of the left was already in power and not too worried about losing it with or without inviting in the WOGs.
    Iceland and Finland seem to be holding out. They apparently have money problems though.
    The only conclusion I gave come to is that the brain rotting notions of feminism and equalism have enough years to finish the job of brain-rotting for the folks most exposed to it — the elite (now for 2 generations)

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2015 at 11:17 pm corvinus

      Ironically enough, Scandi support for the Socialists has been sinking like a rock since they started bringing in vibrants. The socialists were in charge in all of them, especially Sweden — and gleefully cut their own throats.

      LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 6:21 am odys

      In Sweden, the biggest promoter of immigration in the media are the various outlets owned by the Bonnier family. Look up how Swedish they are.

      In the UK, it is true that Labour leadership decided that increasing immigration would be a good way to stick it to the normal, fairly conservative British man. Look up how British Labour leadership is.

      In Ireland, immigration was increased tenfold under the tender cares of one Alan Shatter, and Irish he is not.

      In Poland, where luckily the madness has not yet spread, but where about 2 million young Poles had to leave the country to find work, there are certain people in the media and politics, not ethnically Polish themselves, who call for increased immigration to “do the jobs that Poles won’t do”.

      In the US, even the “Republican” Sheldon Adelson can’t be against immigration, because his poor parents were immigrants…

      The sleeper must awaken…

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 10:53 am ho

        “a good way to stick it to the normal, fairly conservative British man. ”

        I am always suprised to learn how conservative people I considered to be liberal ended up being. The Brits made Sir John Gielgud a legend despite the fact that he sodomized younger boys in public lavatories. Classic degeneracy. Not only didn’t they deprive him of his knighthood, he was applauded once he came to the stage after being caught.

        If they were that conservative, wouldn’t their women act a little more, I dunno, classy?

        Similar with Canada. I didn’t know that it was fairly traditionalist and conservative in many parts.

        LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 12:58 pm irishsavant

      “Why are the Scandi countries importing Pakis and Yemimi thugs?”

      Google Barbara Lerner Specter/Youtube. She explains it all in three minutes,

      LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 10:31 pm Anonymous

        You mean it. It explains it.

        LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 1:01 pm irishsavant

      Iceland is NOT safe. Think how many litters this couple will spawn and their impact on the Icelandic gene pool. There are quite a few vibrants there and the country has a population of just a quarter of a million.
      http://irishsavant.blogspot.ie/2011/11/is-anywhere-safe.html

      LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 5:41 pm Anonymous

      LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 10:32 pm Anonymous

        There it is.

        LikeLike


  44. on January 24, 2015 at 9:32 pm Rum

    WOGS = Worthy Oriental Gentlemen s

    LikeLike


  45. on January 25, 2015 at 12:58 am Danindc

    You know who doesn’t have any kids? Homosexuals.

    LikeLike


  46. on January 25, 2015 at 2:01 am frederick anderson

    We should all begin eating one another NOW… Because my wife had been married before it never occurred to me to ask if she was a virgin: on reflection I should have… I never met this particular breed of troll, but I imagine the Child Support Agency would have a field day if they did.

    LikeLike


  47. on January 25, 2015 at 2:54 am John Cool

    I don’t understand heartise point here. The more white kids you have the chances are you will produce one high quality baby. If you only have one white son or daughter then they could be worst of your sperm for all you know. Mexicans in the usa by outbreeding everyone will gain political domination by voting.

    LikeLike


  48. on January 25, 2015 at 5:01 am backchecking

    Israel has ALREADY achieved the miracle: desalinated ocean water cheap enough for high tech agriculture — and industry — and what not.

    http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/imm.htm

    Open Borders ^^^ MUST cause an IQ decline.

    This DIRECTLY leads to a drop in per capita GDP.

    The newbies are overwhelmingly destined to be PERPETUAL dependents teething on the Whites. And bitterly, resentfully, so!

    The cash shift per Black citizen, via Uncle Sugar, approximates $10,000 per capita, per annum.

    This massive drag has ONLY been avoided because the Red Chinese are working like slaves to rack up US Treasury debt.

    In a loopy, round about way, our government has tapped/ taxed foreigners to pay for the Black’s largesse. ( And the other vibrant newbies.)

    My own kin ‘imported’ Hmong decades ago. They are SO proud of their (Hmong’s) success as Americans. The fly in the brew: they’re entirely supported by Uncle Sugar or massive drug dealing/ cooking.

    cf Walter White.

    As for Medicare fraud — it’s 99% associated with imported medical ‘talent.’

    Consequently this connection is politically taboo. You don’t see articles ANYWHERE about it.

    The same frightful lawlessness occurs with immigrant tax returns.

    Which also are REVERSE tax returns for immigrants with children. They don’t PAY taxes when they file. They get massive, one-shot, CASH from the IRS. (Typically $ 5,000 per tyke!) No WONDER they breed like crazy.

    LikeLike


  49. on January 25, 2015 at 7:11 am Festus

    A shame that Yglesias never learned anything from his little interaction with People of Color.

    LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 7:20 am PA

      It is not surprising. He’s the “high” member of the high-low alliance against the middle. If the incident were meant to teach him anything, it’s to be less careless around your troops, who can get rowdy at times.

      A rough analogy: if an American WN traveled to Greece and ended up getting roughed-up in a Golden Dawn hangout, it’s unlikely he’d suddenly become a SJW globalist. He’d probably just berate himself for being insufficiently savvy around the tough guys.

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 10:00 am meh

        It’s not a good analogy. If the Golden Dawn guys learned they’d inadvertently roughed up a foreign WN sympathizer, they’d almost certainly apologize for the mistake and buy the unfortunate a beer or something, circumstances permitting. Whereas, the vibrants wouldn’t be able to figure out how Yglasias was “on their side” no matter how many times you explained it to them. They’d just laugh at the stupid cracker, and beat him up again if the opportunity presented itself. Yglasias has to lie to himself about the nature of his allies; your typical WN does not, at least not in the same way and not nearly so blatantly.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 10:04 am PA

        By definition, no analogy is perfect. The point of my analogy was to illustrate Yglesias’ worldview with regards to blacks.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 10:14 am meh

        Yes but Matthew Yglesias worldview in regard to blacks goes a bit beyond a WN forgiving an accidental incident with some Golden Dawn toughs. Yglesias isn’t just rationalizing a random incident; he’s willfully ignorant and in denial about the nature of vibrants. The level of self-delusion goes way beyond anything like your theoretical WN. You are giving Yglesias way too much benefit of the doubt here. He’s almost in Amy Biehl parental territory.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 10:26 am PA

        I don’t know how self-deluded or idealistic Yglesias. If he is an anti-white libertarian, then he is a stone-cold realist with regards to the utility of blacks: when protected by the state, they really do damage white communities and cause real estate churn. After getting pummeled, he may possibly like them less (assuming he liked them to begin with), but it doesn’t follow that he will stop writing equalist nonsense about them or that that he will stop seeing them as useful tools of FIRE industries.

        Peter Biehl, on the other hand, seems to have been a true-believer idealist.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 1:14 pm irishsavant

        Yglesias is not delusional. He knows full well the nature of the vibrants. And he’s prepared to put up with it until such time as the main goal – White destruction – is achieved.

        LikeLike


  50. on January 25, 2015 at 10:28 am Anonymous

    $40M no prenup

    http://m.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/patrick-dempseys-wife-jillian-fink-files-for-divorce-2015231

    7 and 15 year old kids.

    LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 3:22 pm Anonymous

      Do never marry. Clooney will end up regretting it as well, no doubt.

      LikeLike


  51. on January 25, 2015 at 11:01 am Joshua Sinistar

    This economy is already dead. These bubbles are nothing but play money. The idea that you can reduce wages without destroying the consumer and tax base is now obviously untrue. Its game theory in action. One player moving factories to China to increase profit makes huge money, but all the jobs in China and then you have no one who can buy anything. No matter how low the cost, unless you sell it you make zero. The fact that all remaining jobs went to Mexicans for White Genocide crashed the economy past redemption. They can’t walk it back. Increasing wages for Mexicans will just mean more money for Mexico and still not enough for them.
    These cretins are not geniuses, they’re not even smart. Anyone who has basic math skills should realize that you can’t have an economy without a consumer and tax base. The idea that this is all part of a Master Plan requires an explanation for why this would be necessary or how this is leading to anything. States are about to declare bankruptcy. The Federal Government is already broke. Almost the entire budget now is slated to go to interest payments leaving nothing for anything else. This at a time when Baby Boomers are retiring costing an already bankrupt SSA to go further into the red.
    The Cloward Piven Plan that Glenn Beck’s followers talk about is to crash the economy so a Bolshevik Revolution can take over. OK. Who are the Bolsheviks? Are they the geriatric hippies who are now members of the AARP? Are they the Mexicans who don’t care about the United States at all and won’t even overthrow their own government? How about those lazy negros, who wake up after noon and make it to the convenience store for rolling papers to smoke pot and the liquor store for a forty just before going back to bed?
    You wanna know how this ends? Read Starship Troopers by Heinlein. Fuck the movie, its a cartoon. In the book, they are fighting spiders who outnumber them and reproduce at a far greater rate. Dig the Fascism, and get used to it. Fascism is the only remedy for Communism. Anything the System Lords HATE MUST be GOOD!

    LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 11:47 am Greg Eliot

      +1 on Starship Troopers… should be required reading in middle school.

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 4:11 pm Captain Obvious

        I guess I’m the minority of 1 who actually preferred the movie over the book – it’s the only war film I’ve ever seen which rendered a realistic portrayal of that supremely urgent sense of horror which is “Oh f*ck we might actually lose this thing!” Plus nekkid titties FTW. And ridicule of peace activists, too. I thought the book was pretty boring – it’s hard to imagine how it could ever have been controversial – of course you should have to serve in the military before you get to vote – DUH! And Verhoeven’s Our Tribe versus the Bug Tribe? How can the Dark Enlightenment not love that theme?

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 5:42 pm Greg Eliot

        I didn’t hate the movie… loved the casting (nothing but Aryans with Hispanic surnames for the lllozozlzozlzozlozlozlozl)… but you could tell the director had a huge tongue in cheek… when it wasn’t in his masters’ behinds.

        LikeLike


  52. on January 25, 2015 at 12:41 pm Just Saying

    The simple fact is that mixed race women are hot – and that is my only criteria when it comes to women. Is she hot? If yes – then I’ll pump a load in her – if not, I’ll pass. So all her race matters is to add flavoring to the mix. After that, I really couldn’t care less. Of course, the fact that I don’t plan on seeing her after I’m done factors into that – since I know that some women deteriorate as they age. Fortunately, I don’t have to worry about that since all I care about is the packaging tonight. 🙂

    LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 1:21 pm irishsavant

      What an utterly stupid thing to say, mixed race women are hot. And you’re not the first to say it. So a cross between Whoopi Goldberg and Michael Moore would be hot? Jeez….

      LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 2:19 pm Greg Eliot

      Next time just save the bandwidth and type “Muh Dik”.

      (((shakin’ mah haid)))

      LikeLike


  53. on January 25, 2015 at 12:43 pm Walky Talky

    How to avoid being put in the friend zone during comfort stage since you have to tone down attraction and CF?
    Push pull can be tried but it is a comfort killer as is all other attraction material

    LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2015 at 2:01 pm Culum Struan

      @Walky Talky

      If you are in comfort (that is, you have already established attraction), then doing comfort will not reduce attraction – it will deepen and solidify it (as long as you still maintain an alpha/attractive frame) – you don’t have to do cocky funny or anything.

      Having said that, this just smells like keyboard jockeying to me – go try it on ten girls tonight and let us know if the attraction tanked (it’s Sunday – there’ll be fewer girls out, but I find the ones who are out REALLY want to have a good time and are ready for cock)

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2015 at 6:08 pm Walky Talky

        Thanks CS.
        I live in a conservatuve culture so i have fewer targets to practice on.

        The girl im talking to currently is already attracted. She revealed some personal problem(could be an ioi). But i dont want to be put into fz. So my main concern is to strike a balance between listening and getting LJBF. I complimented her later on revealing personal info tho.

        Is it ok to return an ioi with my own ioi at comfort stage?

        LikeLike


  54. on January 25, 2015 at 1:23 pm dastardlyrake

    If you’re a young man, wait until you are 45 to start a family. Youll have more of a role in their lives than 99.99% of your forefathers due to your longer lifespan. Perhaps the next crop of women will be raised more traditionally. Perhaps not. But time is on your side.

    I would have no problem with men who wanted to start large families marrying multiple women. I enjoy being a bachelor. Women, no matter how firm your hand and game, are a restricting influence. It is of no concern to me if a well to do man has 20 children by four women. All the best.

    I simply wishes to point out a contradiction. The “moar babiez” crowd is also vehemently anti slut-wifery…which is understandable, but negates the cause of “moar babiez.”

    LikeLike


  55. on January 25, 2015 at 2:12 pm nikcrit

    You won’t find many borderline-animal imbeciles coming out of white lower classes.

    that is an eminently subjective statement; how could one quantify such an assertion into empirical fact?

    Our genetic pool is unfatomably rich and our genius or beauty can come from the most unexpected places.

    I’ve read coutless highbrow music and arts criticism, mostly by white European writers of all political stripes, use very similar langauge to yours to explain black American musical genius by the likes of Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington and Dizzy Gillespie; e.g., heartfelt ‘highbrow’ acclaim directed at a genius driven by primitive, non-industrialized cultures.

    LikeLike


    • on January 26, 2015 at 8:03 am Greg Eliot

      Wha, again with the “black genius” shilling?

      Avaunt, thou pusillanimous pismire! Thou knuckle-headed knave!

      Thou fairy!

      LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 8:35 am nikcrit

        Eliot,
        Your ambition exceeds your arsenal when it comes to exhibiting your literary ‘wit.’

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 9:30 am Greg Eliot

        And because you say it, that makes it so… keep you warm.

        lzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlzolzolzolzozlozl

        LikeLike


    • on January 26, 2015 at 8:06 am PA

      I wasn’t writing about blacks’ talent for the rhythmy-clappy thing. Just like I wasn’t writing about Indians’ talent for yoga. So why are you bringing it up?

      LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 8:20 am nikcrit

        You were making the point that raw originality and genius can spawn from any hierarchical rank of the white (Euro) gene pool; I was saying likewise can and has been cited about the black gene pool, cited and vouch-proofed by ream-upon-ream of critical consensus.

        And many conservative white music critics would accord transcending genius and talent upon mid-20th-century American Jazz (henceforth known as that ‘jiggy, clappy thing.’ lolzz.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 8:23 am Greg Eliot

        Because he’s yet another fucking Sunstein shill sent to irk the chateau with his neener-neener inanity…

        OR…

        He’s an SWPL of that most odious vein who has contributed to the current malaise of the West and must be eradicated from our presence if there is to be a future for white children.

        Then again, maybe he’s just another smarmy negro.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 8:34 am PA

        Nikcrit, you persistent black apologist. I wasn’t writing about the black gene pool’s potential for jazz. I was writing about the potential of the white gene pool.

        Whenever you want to spray some blackitty-black where it isn’t apropos, pause and consider not spraying it.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 9:29 am Greg Eliot

        How else will he earn his shekels, then?

        LikeLike


  56. on January 25, 2015 at 3:36 pm whiskeysplace

    As Steve Sailer notes, Whites have had an approach limiting fertility to avoid Malthusian traps in a place with limited agricultural resources and relatively little disease mortality. Marriage and childbirth were delayed, delayed fertility is reduced fertility. Nor is it clear that simply more Whites will be effective in battling for possession of places like Europe or North America or Australia and New Zealand.

    Eugen Weber in “Peasants into Frenchmen” notes that besides industrialization, urbanization, standardization of Parisian French from Breton, Basque, Gascon, Catalan, Flemish, Alsatian, and Corsican, etc. birth rates fell dramatically. Late 19th Century France was obsessed with its falling birth rates versus rising Germany (which fell later, as industrialization and urbanization hit Germany later than France and the UK). Note this was in the 19th Century, long before the pill and condom. Even places like Tunisia and Iran, not exactly liberal hotbeds, have below replacement (~ 1.7 or so) TFR as they have become urbanized.

    You could argue for increased fertility among higher IQ Whites, but that means as fertility is not magic, the higher IQ having kids when women are younger. I suppose political judo like, you could argue for it as gays/lesbians push for lowering the age of consent.

    But higher White fertility implies a bet on the ability of the Welfare State to deliver goodies forever. And a plentiful supply of food and energy. Not a bet likely to pan out.

    LikeLike


  57. on January 25, 2015 at 4:27 pm JWRebel

    “wide-openness of the nation’s borders”
    wide-opennes of the slut’s legs

    LikeLike


  58. on January 25, 2015 at 5:08 pm Rum

    Taya Kyle.
    The ultimate Alpha Widow.

    LikeLike


  59. on January 25, 2015 at 5:19 pm turner&cooch

    If I didn’t take him seriously I probably wouldn’t return to read his blog you shitskinned concern troll faggot.

    LikeLike


  60. on January 25, 2015 at 6:23 pm Rum

    Teach your children, all about the safe and effective use of firearms, the use of chopsticks, and how to give a woman a proper orgasm.
    That is it for now… Chris Kyle, from the afterlife,

    LikeLike


  61. on January 25, 2015 at 6:28 pm JHypers

    In the past, having large families was required due to the amount of physical labor and manual tasks required to operate various social systems, notably farming and warfare. Certain people lament the fact that less than 1% of Americans are farmers now…but it’s no longer necessary to have that many. And war? It’s becoming more automated by the day; the U.S. dominates with a fraction of the manpower they had during WWII. Even if all the men in China were sent for a west coast invasion in disguised shipping containers, A) the U.S. would know it was happening through its spy/surveillance apparatus, and B) every ship could be taken out at sea via drone strike. It’s takes fewer people these days to kill on a mass scale than ever before.

    Where does this leave us?

    As technology develops, fewer and fewer ditch-diggers are needed in most trades and professions, which means we don’t need to have as many offspring to maintain the operating systems. Unfortunately, our forward-thinking potential has yet to surpass our genetic hind-brain predisposition to breed heavily for the sake of continuing the species. Thus, as time advances, children have a greater chance of being socially evaluated as useless eaters, simply because there are more of them while things for them to do as they reach the age of productivity (adulthood) decrease. In short (and biologically speaking) we are a K-selection species behaving more and more like an r-selection species.

    LikeLike


    • on January 26, 2015 at 12:58 am ho

      “every ship could be taken out at sea via drone strike.”

      No it couldn’t. Drones aren’t all they are cracked up to be. Forget your fantasy.

      LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2015 at 12:25 pm KP

        Drones don’t carry big bomb loads, but B-52’s and B-1’s sure do. Plus I’m sure we have a few Tomohawk’s and Harpoons in inventory.

        LikeLike


    • on January 26, 2015 at 1:19 am Carlos Danger

      We breed as a form of competition as well as ego gratification.

      LikeLike


  62. on January 25, 2015 at 7:39 pm Lester Prairie

    The late Julian Simon had a lot to say about population growth and wealth. He set out to prove that population growth would lead to an ecological and economic disaster. He had to reconsider when his data showed the opposite.

    His simple calculus was that an average individual produces more in his life than he consumes. This surplus is cumulative and therefore larger populations are richer. Even at the family the level the reason third worlders pop out so many babies is because larger families produce more of that surplus and therefore are richer smaller families.

    Does this mean we should import ignorant anti-civilization third worlders here? Of course not. However, it does mean that the shrinking Americanized portion of the population is not a good thing. Anyone who adopts the American ideal of civilized individuals should be encouraged to produce more children.

    I don’t know if that will save the world, but it isn’t going to hurt it.

    LikeLike


  63. on January 25, 2015 at 10:04 pm bookooball

    LikeLike


  64. on January 25, 2015 at 10:12 pm henry himbeere

    Hitler was probably one of the biggest alpha males of all time, probably also our century. He lost. We all lost as whites with his loss, though we know it not. To rise like he did- alpha. To sustain himself and build up his nation like he did- well like the Germans did under his auspices, alpha. Oh he had faults to be sure. One- he was too trusting. he took the wrong gambles- on america, on peace, etc. I understand, he didn’t always have luxury of choice. I wasn’t in his shoes, so I don’t know. I can’t idealize him. It’s sometimes tempting to idealize people- or to demonize them. But I can say he was alpha. He saved europe- well western europe, from communism, likely. By the way, he also had his woman! Eva. And he could enjoy her with his foreskin intact, which means sensually, which is more than we all can say- and he kept her under control, and loving him, while he wasn’t distracted from his mission. Alpha. So despite his loss, he remains a good role model. but he’s highly stigmatized along with the swastika. Stigmas perish!

    He was alpha extraordinare! He was more alpha than Churchill, that word-twister, and Roosevelt, that cripple old man (actually I give Roosevelt props, for knowing how to charm and guide- but he couldn’t keep his woman), and well Stalin was alpha in his way too, but badboy alpha. Stalin was the badboy of world war II. Some people even still love Stalin. You can see their comments on his youtube tributes.

    Hitler shows us what can be done, and how. It doesn’t take many people, when there is the leadership principle..

    His life was like a fairy tale dream. Too many people mistakenly attribute his success to cold hard desire to be leader and his power of propaganda. In fact it was not that, and if we want to learn to be alpha, there are few other men we can follow with as much profit. Yet we have to like him in secret, because of the stigma. And the stigma wouldn’t even exist hardly without the myth of the 6 million. But there is much we can learn. He knew how to make decisions, and stick to them. He knew how to work. And how to feel. And how to speak. And how to fight in battle. And I daresay, how to love. Let us all find our own leaders, and men who inspire us, and exceed them if we can, but learn what they have to teach and pay them our respects, our forefathers. Let the outside crude culture snicker and sneer. Maybe we can win them, as Hitler won most of his (domestic) enemies. Who knows, if a global Hitler comes, uniting all the nations in this age of globalization and mass communication, it’s game over for those who have it in for us.

    LikeLike


    • on January 26, 2015 at 1:22 am Carlos Danger

      You need to lay off the weed.

      LikeLike


  65. on January 25, 2015 at 11:09 pm Daniel

    Rebelling against nature got us into this mess, pumping and impregnating the low quality would be more of that policy.

    LikeLike


  66. on January 26, 2015 at 6:41 am Kim Pop

    “But fertility rate isn’t the only concern. Quality matters. Demographic ratios matter.”

    ” Living space matters.”

    lebensraum huh? Mr. Heartiste…

    Have You been reading Mein Kempf again?

    “Three, we have fairly recent history to prove that America did just fine when she was 90% white and half the population she is today.”

    America did just fine? If we consider Genocide against the Native Americans to be just fine. I wonder how different things would have been if the Cherokee and Iroquois and Lakota and Cheyenne and all Native Americans had stuck together and closed their borders to the Europeans before they came and raped and pillaged their land and then THOUGHT they had the right to keep other people off of land that was stolen in the first place.

    Maybe white folks should have stayed in Europe, (which they say is so superior any way, so why not just stay there) instead of murdering countless Native Americans and then forcing Africans over into a new land that they didn’t ask to come from, then complaining when they THINK “their land,” is being overrun by minorities…hmm…

    LikeLike


    • on January 26, 2015 at 2:10 pm Jim South

      Every other land in history was taken by force but you bufoons draw the line when it comes to America.

      And all these loser minorities would all be better off back in Africa wearing loin cloths, chucking spears and eating each other.

      Aw man we ruined their awesome civilization, they had tents and everything.

      Losers

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2015 at 3:37 pm black man=alpha

        all lands in history where inhabeted BY BLACK PEOPLE until u albino lepers crawled out of the eurasian caves AND STOLE BLACK EUROPE u leperous mutated dogs…your own “science’shows u demons did not originate in europe,u where caveman dogs from the beggining..

        LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2015 at 3:30 pm black man=alpha

      amen and amen,the hypocrisy of whites is mind boggling…which is y they shall be wiped off the earth very soon…only 2 blame it on their white so called jewish brothers…

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2015 at 7:21 pm bookooball

        “they shall be wiped off the earth very soon”

        Then who will laugh at you while you kill each other?

        http://therightstuff.biz/2015/02/01/you-will-suffer-humiliation-when-the-pack-of-wild-negroes-from-my-area-smashes-into-the-pack-of-wild-negroes-from-your-area/

        LikeLike


  67. on January 26, 2015 at 9:05 am nikcrit

    Whenever you want to spray some blackitty-black where it isn’t apropos, pause and consider not spraying it.

    I felt it was appropriate because you were the one who initially set up the remark re. racial gene pool as a dichotomy to its ‘other’, e.g., white gene pool-vs-black gene pool.

    LikeLike


  68. on January 26, 2015 at 9:09 am sweetpea

    I’m not sure about the “moar whyte baybies” thingy,I’ve never heard it before. But it got me thinking. If you’ve ever visited major cities in third world countries before you can’t help but feel anxious to safely get back to the Western culture. Ath what point does a society and government become third world by choice? Well to understand that you need to look at the makeup of first world countries; overwhelmingly white. Every country in the world today that would be choosen as the “best place” to immigrate to is overwhelmingly white! It could be as simple as the rule of law being a tradition in the west or a higher general IQ or their religion and work ethic but whatever it is you cannot avoid the observation. Is there a country in Africa that you yearn to move to and raise a family in? Is there any third world country that calls to you as being so uch better then a modern Western country? So why would you want to make a Western country a third world country?

    LikeLike


    • on January 26, 2015 at 9:27 am Greg Eliot

      Why did Satan want to corrupt God’s creation?

      There’s no accounting for the depths that Evil will delve down into…

      …. and those who themselves can’t create often seek to undermine creators.

      Think of the Cathedralesque “you’re just jealous” snark… but this time, it’s actually true… and several megatons more explosive.

      You can always tell the ultimate Evil by its actions… taken to their logical conclusion, it will even destroy Evil itself… but that’s satisfaction enough, so long as everything else gets taken down with it.

      By their fruits shall ye know them.

      LikeLike


  69. on January 26, 2015 at 11:27 am Joshua Sinistar

    Feminism has definitely reduced fertility. Japan has little in the way of aliens, but with women going to work and men not being needed financially, their reproduction has dropped drastically. Islam may be our enemy, but we can learn something from them. There women are property. First of their fathers and then of their husbands. No divorce epidemic, no feminism and no bullshit about helping the unfortunate allowed. Mohammed was a fucking genius when it came to structuring society. They are immune from grrrl power and feminism. Its manland as far as the eye can see. Face it, what the Hell do women do with freedom? Make bad choices. Leave good men who love them and want to marry them so they can be used like tissue paper by bad boys who pump them full of welfare babies and venereal diseases. Learn from your enemies. Women’s lib has destroyed our society, and men in Japan are giving up sex to porn all day because of that fat fuck with her diseased tome about Feminist Mystique or some other lunatic delusion.

    LikeLike


  70. on January 26, 2015 at 1:45 pm dastardlyrake

    https://goodbyeamericainaphoto.wordpress.com/2015/01/26/hypergamous-slut-level-unlocked/

    mudsharked or not, she’s still of prime genetic stock. enjoy.

    LikeLike


  71. on January 26, 2015 at 2:05 pm Jim South

    As I’ve said before, the problem is not too few white people, it’s too many of the other kind.

    And that implies things most people are not comfortable with.

    But if you want to win this thing I think a lot of white people are going to have to get comfortable with those thoughts.

    Real fast.

    LikeLike


  72. on January 28, 2015 at 10:18 am yournordicgod

    I agree with this article. The most important thing in the world, that has ALWAYS been the conventional wisdom taught & practiced by our families for 6,000-10,000 years+ has been this one thing.. leave your sons each a FARM! A farm = an asset that produces lots of money their entire lives, that is large enough that can be split up and still be economically viable for each of that sons own sons(multiple generations). (BTW a farm could also be a large enough business that family could inherit for multiple generations). Obviously you will have multiple sons, so you must own multiple farms and you give them each one. Your daughter will OBVIOUSLY only marry a man who owns a “farm”(or they are so retarded that they deserve what’s coming) and must remain a virgin so they will be attractive to the potential husband. This has always been the practice throughout history. Only the last 2 generations(WW2 generation & Boomer Generation who are still in power BTW) have forgotten this and are so stupid and cruel as to damn their children to generational poverty and a horrible life & death. In fact they are so stupid that their goal is to do exactly this.

    Men of our generation! It is up to us to fix this. NEVER leave your sons nothing! Historically you would ALWAYS leave them a farm or a business they can walk right into when they become a man.

    In order to do so…your goal MUST BE TO BECOME WEALTHY. It must NOT be to get a comfortable “job” and damn our future generations to the horrors of generational poverty.

    Men..if you want to defeat feminism and want women to fall in line..you must secure this wealth. They WILL fall in line, they will stay virgins, let the N count women become lifelong prostitutes, that’s all they are. If us men capable of supporting multiple generations & passing generational wealth only marry virgins this WILL all come to fruition. Without a purpose men go nowhere. Let this be our purpose! If your goals are anything less, stop what you’re doing and get to it now

    LikeLike


  73. on January 30, 2015 at 7:32 pm coldwind

    Wanting more white babies to be made is secretly anti-white ?
    That deluded thinking is on a libtard moonbat scale of nuttiness.

    Guess the murmurs are true.

    Jewy pua site created to subtly thwart whites from procreating more.

    No, blasting semen and knocking a lot more white women up is INFINITELY simpler than dealing with the present insanity of illegals and dead voters voting and influencing policy.

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2017. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Recent Comments

    Johnny Redux on Grope-rah
    Vagina dominator on It’s Time To Mock Creden…
    Lichthof on The Two Stages Of Female …
    strongwhitecock on Peak Hug
    Rick on Grope-rah
    Tarl on Grope-rah
    Lichthof on The Pumpkin Theory Of Female…
    elmertjones on Grope-rah
    Rick on Grope-rah
    Johnny Redux on Grope-rah
  • Top Posts

    • Money And Chicks, The Executive Summary
    • It's Time To Mock Credentialism As Foolish And Womanly
    • The Two Stages Of Female Treachery
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
    • The Pumpkin Theory Of Female Choosiness
    • Is Male Hypergamy Real? (No)
    • Grope-rah
    • Peak Hug
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • Technology And Female Hypergamy, And The Inegalitarian Consequences
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: