Hosswire unsheaths (by proxy). The COTW is his reward (or his buddy’s):
A buddy of mine put it so well:
“I kind of feel sorry for women. Imagine if you could only get a hard-on when someone was mean to you.”
A nimble tongue tinged with acid awakens a woman’s libido in the same manner pert tits and a firm ass awakens a man’s.
***
COTW runner-up is trav777:
Whoever said culture matters is an idiot.
Race is not a social construct.
Society is a racial construct.
Beautiful. That last line — “society is a racial construct” — is worth inclusion in the COPROP insurgent field guide.
[…] Comment Of The Week: The Pith Of It […]
LikeLike
As Dalorck alluded to, yet another reason that Driscoll fears to teach the Word of Jesus to his congregation is that Jesus warns of the dangers of riding the cock carousel:
JOHN 4:
16 Jesus said to her, ‘Go, call your husband, and come back.’ 17 The woman answered him, ‘I have no husband.’ Jesus said to her, ‘You are right in saying, “I have no husband”; 18 for you have had five husbands, and the one you have now is not your husband. What you have said is true!’ 19 The woman said to him, ‘Sir, I see that you are a prophet.
Today the translation (da GBFM BIBLEZ) would read:
16 Jesus said to her, ‘Go, call your husband, and come back.’ 17 The woman answered him, ‘I have no husband.’ Jesus said to her, ‘You are right in saying, “I have no husband”; 18 for you have had five hundred lostasosococoakccoaslzozzllzzlzl, and the one you have now is not your husband’s. What you have said is true!’ 19 The woman said to him, ‘Sir, I see that you are a prophet, and I am calling the police, as Mark Driscoll told us to appeal to higher authority should we ever be abused!
lzozzlzzlzoznzgzzlzo
LikeLike
lzzollozzzlzol indeed!
LikeLike
You take the bitter Red Pill. You learn the truth about female psychology & behavior. You feel disillusioned, then angry, then pessimistic. You decide to focus on more productive things.
You become more interesting as you stop living for the pursuit of pudenda. Women detect that you neither care what they think nor do you build your life around them. They feel tingles. You become more successful with them as this feedback loop runs. Eventually you learn to enjoy women again, this time as mere savory seasoning on a sweet, well-lived life of higher pursuits.
Be glad you’re a Red Pill man. The bitterness is a necessary first step.
LikeLike
I was never personally angry or disillusioned, only pessimistic as the uniform sexual nature of womanhood entered my ken. There is an aged CH post with the archives, one with a short story feel to it, that beautifully articulates that pessimism.
I believe the story’s denouement is manufactured by the protagonist when he bestows a gift to his object, delivered with sharp tease, before the gift giver elegiacally reflects on his lover’s predictable response.
If I could find it I’d post the link. Perhaps CH can link it.
LikeLike
I went through a spell of despair and anger when the race/politics thing became clear to me, mostly through reading AmRen.
But I never had any kind of disillusion when the reality of female nature became clear to me. In fact, it was more like relief. Even though I was once as blue-pill as anyone, my own conceptual framework never relied on female goodness or rationality. In my past I’ve seen women’s darker side and in fact, finally understanding hypergamy made me more benevolent toward women, where there earlier was anger or frustration.
Picture a seventies French movie in which the struggling protagonist has an epiphany and then stands there on the rugged hill, the sun drowning in the sea, and he then laughs and laughs as the credits roll. That was me.
Female nature is like a wild landscape. Without its caprices and twisted laws and flashes of sublimity, it would be uninspiring, like an orderly cubicle farm. Who wants an insurance assessor, who measures you in terms of vulgar materialism and nothing else? If you strike a woman’s hypergamous strings the right way, she really does love you for who you are.
The woman’s nature makes romance and love possible; the flip side to her infuriatingly childlike whimsy and capacity for cruelty is that when you play her right, she will be yours and devoted to you to the end, no matter if you’re a poor man or a prince.
LikeLike
“The woman’s nature makes romance and love possible; the flip side to her infuriatingly childlike whimsy and capacity for cruelty is that when you play her right, she will be yours and devoted to you to the end, no matter if you’re a poor man or a prince.”
Beautiful! Having read CH and other manosphere blogs, this right here encapsulates everything I’ve been discovering.
LikeLike
i agree with mendozatorres wholeheartedly.beautifully written.
LikeLike
Awesome comment.
LikeLike
Flawless victory.
LikeLike
PA, good stuff as usual.
LikeLike
I have swallowed the red pill recently, and I’m still in the process of digesting it. Although I have moments of bitterness, most of the time I’m just glad I’ve seen the truth and can now act upon it. I feel like I can’t really love a woman right now because of this, but also that as time goes by and my new persona settles down, and I do learn how to play them right, I’ll be ready for love again (probably not marriage though, even if divorce-rape isn’t really settled in my country yet).
LikeLike
Very nice point PA
LikeLike
LikeLike
The Red Pill realization I have is that despite their constant emotional outbursts and mercurial mood swings, if you understand that deep down inside women want you to “get it” and win them over…the rest of what they do is a smokescreen you have to wade through.
I re-opened a girl I banged mid last year. “Let’s meet up for drinks” I said.
“Seduce me” she replied.
“We’ll see” I said.
The Blue Pill guy would say “OK”….where’s the fun for her in that?
LikeLike
The danger is developing a cold heart and learning to disregard women altogether, except perhaps as occasional fuck-toys.
LikeLike
That’s the obvious problem with the “No Moar Whyte Babiez” philosophy which now seems to be the official position chez Le Chateau – once you decouple the intercourse from the baby birthing [nine months later], women are necessarly nothing more than fuck-toys. It’s having children with them which makes the relationship real [rather than fake].
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yup.
LikeLike
The real danger is disregarding life altogether.
LikeLike
Well, the red pill for women is realizing your value to men, and their love for you, is based on your physical beauty. And the danger in that realization is developing a mercenary heart toward men.
Then you get past it. Beauty, like game, gets your foot in the door with the superficially desirable. Within that group there are quality men and women capable of love. You can seek them out, or bounce around with shallow people who reinforce your negative feelings about the opposite sex.
LikeLike
This is the problem I have right now. Even in my blue pill days I was quite successful with women mainly due to my charm. Taking the red pill has made me so cynical and I don’t bother with charming bitches anymore. I need to get my charm back. Question is how do you enjoy women when you realize they are all boring manipulatI’ve whores?
LikeLike
you enjoy them by enjoying them! Sounds like you are all in your head. What put you there? Get back in your heart some.
LikeLike
If it is true that “they are all boring manipulative whores” then you can’t enjoy them – it would be impossible. So you had better hope that NAWALT. Or else somehow learn to inspire your women to become something other than boring manipulative whores, i.e. inspire your women to become NAWALTs.
LikeLike
eventually, to those who really understand the nature of things (even most guys here don’t truly get it), life itself sours, and you have to work really hard to enjoy anything, tricking yourself along the way that “this time will be different” when you know full well it will be more of the same
LikeLike
“Higher pursuits” – the human race just will not stop with the delusions
LikeLiked by 1 person
Totally
LikeLike
[…] By CH […]
LikeLike
Women prefer to work with men because men cannot fight back like women.
It’s women’s inhumanity to women.
LikeLike
We prefer to live with men also.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Gray temples on the dude there…chicks love older jerks
LikeLike
Hot for Teacher…
LikeLike
He starts to shake and cough.
(heh, heh… rhymes with Nabokov… heh, heh)
LikeLike
He looks vaguely alarmed, as if he wants to back away.
LikeLike
Whatever she’s wearing under her blouse makes the Wonder Bra look like child’s play. Or maybe she’s just happy to see him? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wonder_Bra
LikeLike
He’s afraid that if he bends over a bit, he could put an eye out.
LikeLike
“Gray temples on the dude there…chicks love older jerks”
According to R.Don Steele in his classic “How to Date Young Women for Men Over 35”, gray hair is a chick magnet.
And look, R.Don’s got a Twitter account in which he savages men’s fashion blunders : https://twitter.com/rdonsteele
LikeLike
what is the evolutionary reasoning for women preferring assholes? its clear why men like beautiful, youthful women. they are more likely to yield healthy children who will carry on the same genetics. but an asshole would have been a drain on society in the old days and therefore more likely to suffer a violent death or tragic life alone in the wilderness.
so I ask again, why do women get especially wet for assholes? this seems like a faulty feature (like homosexuality) not beneficial to the species in any obvious way.
LikeLike
Lloollzzzolloozzzx lllololll someone hasn’t read the Greatestzz of the Greatstzzzst Bookz for Menzzzz
Lloollzzolllllllooool
LikeLike
GBFM impersonator?
LikeLike
sexy son hypothesis, assholes from their behavior signify good genes because they are confident enough to attract attention to themselves in a negative way
also there has been alot of successful assholes all through human history. these people would have been very dominant and would have acquired power by any means necessary including immoral behavior
LikeLike
I remember that theory now. it makes sense although it seems more r-selected than anything and therefore detrimental to the groups success and advancement.
just reinforces the fact that females sexuality must be regulated or we will all be living in squalor and at each others throats over food and water.
LikeLike
You must be new. But good question.
Don’t think of it as “an asshole”. Think of it as the alpha male. Women view the alpha male (leader of the covilization) as we view the 18 year old blonde girl. The alpha arouses her.
Now what are alpha characteristics? Not a pussy, has a backbone, and directs people and doesn’t care much for the people below him b/c they are replaceable. That’s kinda asshole behavior.
LikeLike
I wrote something similar in a comment that disappeared – let’s see how long it takes for it to appear. It’s like roulette.
LikeLike
the urge for alpha seed is detrimental when unchecked. it currently leads to single momhood and the birthing of future criminals/layabouts. grass huts await.
LikeLike
They prefer men who can survive. The aggressive man can defeat other men.
However, it isn’t only assholes. It is strong men. The asshole projects an air of invincibility, but it gets old. Most women like it for a while, but not for anything long-term. Those women you see marrying asshole men are usually on the same level. Better game is to be strong, successful, have friends and charm and be exciting (the latter being a sign of intelligence).
As someone put it, “women don’t have a problem with nice, they have a problem with boring”.
LikeLike
Being an asshole is of negative survival value. Being an asshole WHO HAS SURVIVED to adulthood, indicates that you have considerable compensating values.
It’s the the peacock and that absurd decorative tail. The females pick the one with the biggest tail, because that peacock had to have been exceptionally strong and fast to have survived with that handicap — tendencies which will be passed along to the female offspring as well, thus increasing their ability to survive.
LikeLike
> “Being an asshole is of negative survival value. Being an asshole WHO HAS SURVIVED to adulthood, indicates that you have considerable compensating values.”
The problem is that we now have so much excess wealth and so much fake money and so many gibsmedat freebies that survival is no longer a problem. But women’s DNA is still hardwired to associate assholeishness with survivability, and it could take at least a few centuries [or a few millenia] for women’s DNA to start getting rewired to some better metric of survivability. Unfortunately, we don’t have that much time left to keep dicking around with this societal decay.
LikeLike
Women are insecure and need constant reassurance and attention. Nice guys give them that ass holes do not. Also in times of war it is the ass hole who has a greater chance of surviving and naturally women would cling to that. Remember mankind has been at war for thousands of years. In the West there has been peace since 1945 which is unnatural.
LikeLike
Men who were more aggressive and bold got more women, sired more offspring. Women who liked it got sired more.
They do chimp studies…aggression causes the female chimps to give up the pussy to settle the male down. The scientists reckon it is a self-protection angle. An angry, hostile, aggressive male is a dangerous thing and could injure you but if you straighten him out, he’s pacified. And you have more offspring, both who can pacify and who are aggressive.
Traits are mostly innate.
Women *don’t* like assholes; they like alphas. If you landed on Mars tomorrow and came home, you would be one of the highest-status men on the planet. You could be a straight shooter, decent fellow, Chris Kyle kind of ramrod salt-of-the-earth believer and you’d be awash in pussy.
Assholes are just portraying an aspect of alpha, that of DGAFedness. And then there is also that women love to be degraded because they basically seem to hate themselves.
LikeLike
> “You could… Chris Kyle”
Except that Chris Kyle did NOT SURVIVE. Instead, Chris Kyle foolishly got involved in a “shooting ranges for PTSD nutjobs” and got himself murdered. And now YKW are working overtime to destroy his memory. Chris Kyle is the archetypal Nice Guy Who Always Finished Last. It’s assholes like YKW and YKW puppets like Jesse Ventura who SURVIVE.
LikeLike
BTW, speaking of YKW workiing overtime to destroy the memory of Chris Kyle, here is an excellent example of why I keep telling you people that there isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between Karl Marx’s anti-Western nihilism and Alisa “Ayn Rand” Rosenbaum’s anti-Western nihilism. It’s all designed to destroy White People and their Jesus – just two different Pharisees [and their Phariseeical followers] launching exactly the same assault but from slightly different angles: http://reason.com/archives/2015/01/29/the-american-sniper-was-no-hero
LikeLike
The guy who said he’d like to kill everyone who holds a Quran? (hint: I have one in my living room)
Sorry, that guy is many things, but nice guy it isn’t. Unless these stories are lies.
LikeLike
Sorry, we don’t do al Taqiyah [lying to infidels] in the Dark Enlightenment. Axelrod & Sunstein have plenty of astroturfing sock puppets to handle that duty. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Takiyah
LikeLike
Taqqiya doesn’t what you think it means you ignoramus. Only people from a sect I don’t belong to practice it and it’s about pretending to have converted when not doing so risks your life.
LikeLike
Chris Kyle had people lined up for 200 miles for his funeral.
THAT is alpha, bitch. IDGAF if you disagree with him. He was a killer, and a good one, landed hot pussy, passed on his genes, and there were no shortage of women who wanted a ride.
Fuck the Koran. The white man has gotten nothing but anguish from not annihilating everyone who opposes our way. All we get is bitching and agitation.
LikeLike
Chris Kyle’s Dad in the movie says in life there are sheep, and sheep dogs. Kyle probably believed he was a sheep dog but he was in reality a sheep – giving up his life to fight a foreign war for the rich empiralists.
[CH: Technically, he gave up his life to a crazy-eyed PTSD vet he was trying to help stateside.]
LikeLike
“Chris Kyle had people lined up for 200 miles for his funeral.”
Osama would’ve had even more.
LikeLike
Anyhow, it’s about being a “nice guy”. A killer is not a nice guy. He, at least, wasn’t a nice guy.
LikeLike
Assholes fought and survived wars for thousands of years – hence women would cling onto them for survival. Wars are not won by niceness.
I feel ‘niceness’ is not a natural instinct but is forced on guys either by a domineering mother or a matriarchal society which the West has become.
Men are strong, women the weaker sex and ‘nice’.
Also psychologists such as Wilhelm Reich believe that infants want to have sex with the parent of the opposite sex. Thus puberty is when a child sexually rejects their parent and continue to do so for years – hence a girl rebelling against her strong father with an asshole (who can challenge her father) .
LikeLike
Most assholes/blowhards are abject pussies when you call them out.
LikeLike
Women can smell testosterone without realizing it consciously.
LikeLike
This is a very insightful comment from Tickleick, left on ROK:
“That’s a relative term. Are Mormons alpha? Are Hasidic Jews alpha? Nerdy Beta types from both these groups walk around with super hot wives.
A society of men that acts with brotherhood is superior in effectiveness on every level than a society of individually superior men that have no loyalty to one another.
The more men stab each other in the back, the more necessary it is for a woman from that society to filter out for a man who is tough and ruthless. Pleasantness and a good convo will not make up for a weakling who will get her and her children killed or ruined.
The first betrayal of this brotherhood is when white knights place the well being of women, because they are women, above the well being of other men. The well being of women is important, but the reason why is ESSENTIAL. And that reason must be, that we want to preserve women as a resource for our brother men. Any other view warps the endeavor in much the same way that environmental worship has warped any good environmental movements attempt to do. We preserve nature for the sake of our brother, not because we care about the happiness of the tree sloth.
When the men decided to lift all the bounds on slut shaming, 90% of the women went for the top 10% of attractive men. The other 90% of men were left to orbit the bottom 10% of women. Making even that group of women utterly intolerable to be around. The women then start filtering for more and more aggressive traits, as aggressive mates have a higher survival potential in an uncivilized culture, hence douchebag culture, which feeds the imperative to choose a douche. Those men not selected for highly aggressive behavior must either adopt a “sneaker fucker” strategy, heavy indirect game, or beta orbiter/hyena matriarchy game. Which means the men sort out into three groups
1. The intolerable. (The aggressive)
2. The untrustworthy (sneaky)
3. The worthless. (Beta orbiters)
The women will now start to display highly aggressive characteristics, both as warning coloration (tats, skrilex haircuts, mannish body language, shitty clothing) to scare off predators (other females), to attract highly aggressive males for breeding, and to offer promise of both protection and potential breeding opportunity to second tier makes if they serve (orbit).
The manosphere has to begin to face an important truth, the only way to escape that hell is to refocus the minds of men on the importance of brotherhood.”
LikeLike
Yes, being “mean” i.e. calling her out on her bs and teasing her. Oh how awful that the poor little doves should be so mistreated.
LikeLike
I have one who uses that…i take it as a sign she’s liking me. Also we were hanging out and she’s whining “you’re so annoying”…perfect.
LikeLike
question for ch and the commenters
what is the latest thinking from the hbd community on the homosexual issue?
you have the sperm wars evo psych theory that bisexuality is a positive evolutionary adaption because it allows the individual to gain more sexual experience and thus increase their reproduction potential. under this theory gays are merely a less favourable mutation of bisexuality
however iv been reading stuff lately that homosexuality may be a hormonal issue. under this theory, a baby developing in the womb gets exposed to large amounts of estrogen thus causing the baby to adopt more feminine behaviors and thus being more likely to engage in homo activities.
as an offshoot of this you als have the childhood trauma theory where kids of suffer terrible abuse at a young age can grow up to have a confused sexual identity and we can see this in the case of child sex abuse victims growing up all fucked up
so what is the verdict, are gays born or made? or a combo of both?
[CH: the jury is still out, but the evidence points to a biological cause, perhaps a parasite. this doesn’t mean homosexuality should be socially embraced.]
LikeLike
Many homos look a certain way. It’s doubtful that it is primarily about trauma.
LikeLike
could you elaborate on ‘parasite’ ch?
my interpretation of this is that you mean something like a bacterium or a virus manipulates the host and causes it to become gay?? seems like a strange theory to me
LikeLike
Cochran is all over this… https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/depths-of-madness/
LikeLike
Combo of both. I read “The Fatal Shore”, an accounting of Australia’s beginnings exploring how the convict past affected the development of Australia and so-on. One thing to note before moving to the main point: only about 10% of the beginning colonists were actually convicts – Australia was a major British emigration point due to Industrial Revolution overcrowding (not unlike America), and the majority of the convicts were given 7-year or 14-year sentences, finished their sentences and became share-croppers, not unlike how the Homestead Act in the US was used directly by new immigrants. Anyway, the main point here is that during the convict years, males and females were kept fairly separate (not surprising), and a survey of tendencies showed that homosexualism ran at about 10% and was more or less open. Genetic? Somehow, I doubt it. Was it “real” homosexuality? Well, that depends on your definition, I think. Can genetic homosexuality be distinguished from situational/cultural homosexuality? That’s a question I’ve never seen explored. Also, does taking part in homosexuality impart physical/chemical changes to the person taking part in them, like doing drugs, or like brainwashing? This seems to be the way things are interpreted today, like a one-drop rule for homosexuality: once gay, always gay.
LikeLike
Sperm Wars notes that male homosexual % is higher earlier in life and lower later on. Like 9% in teens and twenties, lowering to under 3% by full maturity.
Which means, 6% of young guys are either 1) just bicurious or 2) so freaking horny that they’ll jam it up anyone that looks interested. English boarding schools were famous for this type of behavior.
[CH: that number sounds dubious.]
LikeLike
Ordinarily I would automatically doubt whatever StraponWithin says…
…but when it comes to fag facts, I will defer to his superior experience on the subject.
LikeLike
lollozzol!
LikeLike
In early matrilocal societies (where men left their village to live in their mate’s village), there may have been an advantage to having men who would not leave, but stick around and help feed and protect their nieces and nephews
LikeLike
A couple of examples of actual prehistoric (not recent and excessively foreign ones from Nat Geo, with their tits out for the lads) would help enormously.
Not doubting you, but absent that, we rapidly descend into ole Margie Gimbutas’ batty ‘Mother Goddesses of Old Europe’, and similar theories I mean made-up crap.
Seriously never happened. At least not in Europe. At any date since at least the Allerød. Like divining the social structure of the Mad Men era from old Playboy mags (obviously icons..) found in the stinking post-collapse rubble of the West. Hopefully by a Chinese Lara Croft.
LikeLike
problem is that the general population dont know of the shocking sexual degeneracy thats in the homosexual community
LikeLike
Hell, one newreel of a Gay Pride parade says everything you need to know about the so-called “gay” community.
Feh.
LikeLike
I’ve seen a refutation of that, that proves all of these but one wrong.
LikeLike
ho it happens
LikeLike
I thought I was hard to shock. Seems I was wrong. That is…indescribable
LikeLike
Society is a racial construct.
Nonsense. Society is a construct of the belief system. The people who have honored the Judeo Christian worldview have prospered. Those who haven’t, namely Africa and Asia, suffer. Those who’ve rejected it, the communists, have regressed. God didn’t pick the Jews, he created the Jews. He picked Abraham. Jews in the West are Jews in race only, having rejected God, and embraced leftism.
When I was in college I knew many Africans. They hated American blacks, calling them lazy, crazy, ignorant and niggers. Sound familiar? They could join the ranks of Southerners in the Antebellum South.
Culture matters.
LikeLike
“The people who have honored the Judeo Christian worldview have prospered.”
There is no such thing you imbecilic moron. Jews have probably less in common with Christians than they have with Muslims.It is pure neo-con cant.
LikeLike
I didn’t come to abolish the law and prophets, but fulfill it.
– Jesus Christ.
Now admit you’re wrong, moron.
LikeLike
#femsuperbowl. Same two minutes ad for 50 shades of gray and the ridiculous anti-domestic violence series
Also fuck the Rat faced Jew comedians Sarah silver Jew man and Chelsea handler with their “sorry it’s a boy” commercial
Fuck the Jewish rat faced “women” who destroyed my white women on purpose.
LikeLike
Jesus very clearly and unequivocally described a radical breach in first century judaism, between the Pharisees and the Saducees, he clearly declared that the Pharisees were the children of the Father of Lies, and it is understood that it was the Pharisees who demanded that he be murdered by Pontius Pilate [who could find no fault in him].
If, in the 21st Century, there are stil any surviving jews who are Saducees, rather than Pharisees, then I don’t know who they are.
LikeLike
Ignant dumbazz sez wut?
LikeLike
ho is right. “Judeo-Christian” is a term invented by ostensibly-Christian suckups to the YKWs. You might as well say “Talmudo-Christian”.
LikeLike
“Now admit you’re wrong, moron.”
But that doesn’t mean Jews don’t reject Christ and Christianity.
http://www.jewornotjew.com/profile.jsp?ID=20
That is a website by a couple of Jews to determine who is a Jew and who isn’t Celebrities historical persons etc.
The left most score is how much Jewish ancestry a person has, the middle score is about how Jewish the look and act and the right most score is how much they value and appreciate that person.
This is how much ordinary Jews look down on Jesus.
If you’re going down that road, you could also say that there is Judeo-Christian-Islamic culture, since Muslims recognize Moses as a prophet and Jesus as a/the messiah. Muslims also follow the Mosaic law, more or less. We circumsize and abstain from pork, unlike Christians. Is there a Judeo-Islamic culture?
LikeLike
“And further than that, was he even real? Where does the truth end and the myth begin? Was Judas made up, an allegory for the creation of Christianity? Was he designed to represent all Jews as greedy traitors? We wouldn’t put it past Christians to do something like that. In fact, we expect them to.”
http://www.jewornotjew.com/profile.jsp?ID=136
Dat Judeo-Christian culture.
LikeLike
“Was he designed to represent all Jews as greedy traitors? We wouldn’t put it past Christians to do something like that. In fact, we expect them to.” == http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freudian_projection
LikeLike
“the Judeo Christian worldiew” is like saying “the communist-capitalist worldview”.
The Talmud says Jesus was the son of a prostitute and a Roman soldier. It says he was not crucified. He was instead a rabbi student, learning Judaism, but he was thrown off the school roof by his teacher for his radical ideas. He is currently immersed in a pit of boiling excrement in hell.
But you’ll never hear the media mention that.
The Talmud says Jews are God’s “Chosen”, which means they are chosen to rule the earth. It says that when the Messiah comes a king of David’s line will rule the earth, and all the gold of the earth will be gathered under his throne. The Talmud says all non-Jews are “goyim”, cattle – it says they are animals given human form to serve the Jews. The Talmud says having sex with a “goy” girl is not rape, but rather akin to bestiality. It says that a White woman is a “shiksa”, which means a blemish, abomination. This word that is now thrown around as a cutesy joke among those who don’t know what it really means. The Talmud says that while you shouldn’t kill a Gentile (non-Jew) directly, you can kill him indirectly by denying him what he needs to survive. It gives the example of a Gentile having climbed down in a well and a Jew pulling up the ladder so he starves to death.
The Talmud also says that it is not wrong to fool a Gentile in order to steal his money. Remember, they are the rightful rulers, and therefore owners, of the world – the Chosen. That’s what their tribal god Yahweh said. They used to believe that the other tribal gods in the area also existed, like Baal, but later they turned Baal into the devil (“Belzebub”).
By contrast, Christianity takes the Jewish tribal god Yahweh and claims it is the god for all the peoples/races of the world. That all people are sinners and have “inherital sin”, but if you confess your “sins” and are loyal to the church organization you will be saved and go to heaven. It says all people are loved by this Yahweh, not just one race, which is blasphemy to Jews. Christianity says “there is neither Greek nor Jew, neither slave nor free, for we are all brothers in Christ”. Judaism is racialist with Jews on top, Christianity is for race deniers. (Which is not to say there haven’t been race-aware Christians, I know there have been, but they are so despite their religion, not because of it.)
These two are opposed. Of course, both were created by Jews and are alien to the European mentality, which is best expressed by our European religions, adapted to us and our relationship to nature. Of course, all supernatural creatures exist only in fantasy, but religions are an expression of the people they stem from.
LikeLike
I think there is a lot of misunderstanding about Christianity. Arbiter, I always enjoy your comments and appreciate them, but do not agree with you on this. (unless I am misunderstanding your point).
How is Christianity alien to European mentality? Christianity made Europe great. Countries like mine, which have been abused very much by people of you know what religion, it was Christianity that give us the strength to make us great again. And considering it has been the last recent years that our country is rebuilding itself, we are not doing so bad.
Christianity makes us work harder, be happier, puts family first, stay slim (you stated about Greek Orthodox fasting in one of your previous comments), less divorce, less drug addiction, more intact traditional families, less feminism, less crime. That is just to name a few. The secular European countries are crumbling to pieces. We have something like 25% Muslims on a small country, yet we are still able to uphold our values because even in a small group of people, there is a love for Christ and a love for the country.
Look to any other country that was not made great by Christianity, and you will see war, beheadings, child marriage, and generaly dirty backwards places. Yet, until recently, Europe has prospered, as did USA. As Christian nations.
If those other religions are invited to live among us, and we do not still stand firmly by our foundation of Christianity, we do not have legs to stand on anymore.
LikeLike
“He is currently immersed in a pit of boiling excrement in hell.”
“always look on the bri-ight side of life, te-do, te-do, te-doody-doody-do”
LikeLike
No stupid. The Tractate Sanhedrin (43a) of the babylonian talmud says Jesus was hung on a tree just like Saint Peter says.
LikeLike
“He is currently immersed in a pit of boiling excrement in hell.”
This is what the Judeo side of “Judeo-Christian” thinks of Jesus Christ.
LikeLike
You have confused commentary with covenant. God’s law with men’s traditions. This is the very thing for which Jesus rebuked the Pharisees.
I have many New Testament commentaries on my shelf, none of which are binding on me. Neither are the Talmud, or the imprimaturs of some Pope.
Saying there is no Judeo Christian culture is like saying that you can have a roof, without a foundation. The Apostle Paul states the law was the tutor, until Christ should come.
There are some that reject Christ, wishing to follow laws. That was tried under the old covenant and was demonstrated to be a failure in bringing man to perfection.
There are some that reject laws, wishing to have a personal, face to face relationship with God. That was tried in the Patriarchal age and shown to be a failure as well.
So God, through history, falsifies our objections in advance.
LikeLike
Saying there is no Judeo Christian culture is like saying that you can have a roof, without a foundation. The Apostle Paul states the law was the tutor, until Christ should come.
And Christ has come, meaning no need for “Judeo-“/Talmudo-. Thanks for playing.
LikeLike
The “Judeo-Christian” thing got big in the eighties, when conservatives surrendered to libs on national identity and became too timid to call America a Christian country.
LikeLike
I’m with Heinrich Himmler and the SS on this. Religion in this case Christianity breads a culture of submissiveness (bowing to a ‘god’), weakness and niceness. It caters to the lowest common denominator and drags an entire society down to that level. Not a strong race for fighting wars.
Provide the masses with welfare, a safety net – and they will take it.
In the US today there should be compulsory fitness classes and tests you have to take before getting healthcare access. That will stop your Auntie from sitting on her fat ass and eating that fourth slice of bread she does not need – then getting fat and unhealthy, then having to be rushed to hospital and wasting the time of family, friends and medical staff alike.
If I did not have Christianity thrust upon me in my youth I would have been far more successful in my career and with women. Life is amoral – morals and religion bring social control – as Napoleon once said ‘religion stop the poor from killing the rich’
LikeLike
How is Christianity alien to European mentality? Christianity made Europe great.
So you are saying it’s not White genes that make us great but a religion? So Africans can also be great if they only have that religion? But they aren’t. And Christian Kurd and Arab immigrants act exactly like Muslim Kurds and Arab immigrants. Are Mexicans great when they have Christianity?
Are Yugoslavs great because of Christianity? With Kroats and Serbs murdering and raping each other for years, and living like parasites in the West. Are Gypsies great for Christianity? They are the worst scum on the earth.
Most Japanese and Chinese are not Christians, but they do far better than Christian Africans and many other peoples.
As for Whites, ancient Greeks invented European philosophy – without Christianity. Rome was built by non-Christians, and destroyed under we-are-all-brothers Christians.
The conservative values you mention do not come from that religion, they exist outside it. And many, many Christians don’t follow them.
LikeLike
No stupid. The Tractate Sanhedrin (43a) of the babylonian talmud says Jesus was hung on a tree just like Saint Peter says.
“No, stupid”, I am fully aware that there are contradictory versions in the Talmud. I also know of how Jews encouraged the persecution of Christians in Rome, and how in the Middle Ages the rabbis instructed them to spit every time they passed by a church, and hide this by pretending to cough in their hands. This information comes from a Jew, by the way, Israel Shahak, who has revealed a lot of things that go on among Jewry.
Martin Luther learned Hebrew so he could read the Talmud and the Torah, believing that he would find wisdom there. But then he found what they write about “goyim”, cattle, non-Jews. He found that they declare a Jew cannot eat from a plate that has been used by a Jew, or drink from the same bottle, because the “cattle” are “unclean”. And so on.
And you don’t say anything about the Talmud’s claim that Jesus was the son of a prostitute and a Roman soldier. Interesting.
LikeLike
are you fuckin serious? Japan is Judeo Christian? Korea is? China?
You know Brazil is Christian, right? ALL of latin America is. Great success stories of prosperity there. Here’s a tip: don’t argue with me.
WTF are you smoking? Much of Africa is Christian too.
Culture is a racial construct- it doesn’t fall out of the sky and it isn’t bestowed on people by a Culture Fairy. Culture is an expression of the aggregate attributes of a population, their values, their rights and wrongs, their temperaments, and on and on.
Culture does not create people, people create culture.
Who gives a fuck what Africans you knew in school, a statistically insignificant AND nonrepresentative population of anecdotes? The average African IQ is 70. Christian or not, they suck. Detroit is Christian. New Orleans, Bodymore…Christian. Ferguson was chock full of highly religious Christians. You find churches all throughout the ‘hood.
Religion is a racial construct as well. The dominant morals are framed by the beliefs of a people. Christianity among blacks is MARKEDLY different from that among Scandinavians because the two populations are different. Their expression of right and wrong and religious morals is so different, they may as well be worshipping in different religions.
Basically, you don’t know shit.
LikeLike
Japan was made by the United States after WW2. We imposed our culture of doing things on them. The other SE Asia countries simply saw it, and copied it. As for inner cities. Blacks in the inner cities abandoned God, and embraced government. Period. Full Stop. The Christian message is for personal charity, personal responsibility. Big Government is for neither. Hence, Detroit et al.
I would wager a statistical analysis of the world’s populations would show a strong correlation between whiteness and Christianity, and a strong correlation between blackness and Islam.
Remember, most of Africa was polytheistic and tribalistic before the Saudi Muslims crossed over and started enslaving and converting by violence. Christianity is new to Africa in the last 50-100 years.
So basically, you don’t know shit.
LikeLike
Bravo trav.
LikeLike
Sometimes a shiv is what it takes. At other times, nothing does the job better than a sledgehammer, like above. Well done.
LikeLike
> “You know Brazil is Christian, right? ALL of latin America is.”
Actually, the Sephardim run much of Central and South America, and have been running it ever since they ran the chattel slave trade throughout the Atlantic Ocean.
LikeLike
“Japan was made by the United States after WW2. We imposed our culture of doing things on them. The other SE Asia countries simply saw it, and copied it.”
*snicker* HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
LikeLike
The average African IQ is 70. Christian or not, they suck. Detroit is Christian. New Orleans, Bodymore…Christian. Ferguson was chock full of highly religious Christians. You find churches all throughout the ‘hood.
True, true. And Christian Africans, Arabs and Kurds that move to Europe commit crimes and go on welfare to the same extent as the Muslims or others. While Muslim Indonesians and Persians do far better in school. Persians are the only immigrants from that part of the world who go to college to the same extent as Westerners.
LikeLike
Japan was made by the United States after WW2. We imposed our culture of doing things on them. The other SE Asia countries simply saw it, and copied it.
Ridiculous. Japanese, Koreans and Chinese have a high IQ, that’s why they are doing well. “our culture”? East Asians were successful before Whites came, though not as successful as Whites. But far more successful than Christian Kopts and other non-White Christian groups of that time.
As for inner cities. Blacks in the inner cities abandoned God, and embraced government.
Wow, only an American would make the case that “embrace government” means to “abandon God”. So you’re saying the Prussians, the Britons, the Franks … pretty much everyone – “abandoned God” by being loyal to their governments?
This is typical – to claim that your particular political opinions are the “real Christianity”. Christians play this game all the time.
I would wager a statistical analysis of the world’s populations would show a strong correlation between whiteness and Christianity, and a strong correlation between blackness and Islam.
I would wager Catholicism is majority non-White and actively imports Whites to the West by having people in Africa who gather Africans for shipping to the U.S. as immigrants. Care to comment?
Remember, most of Africa was polytheistic and tribalistic before the Saudi Muslims crossed over and started enslaving and converting by violence. Christianity is new to Africa in the last 50-100 years.
So basically, you don’t know shit.
Christianity has existed in Africa SINCE THE BEGINNING. Look up the “Kopts”, every bit as much of a failure as non-Christian swarthies. You should know the history of the religion you worship, at least.
“enslaving and converting by violence” — you mean just like Christians did for more than a thousand years? In Europe. In Africa. In South America. Christians invaded the Middle East and the rest of the world.
Now, I don’t consider empires to be wrong (that’s what Christians think, the hypocrites), but I’m saying that what you accuse Muslims of, Christians have done many times more. Just recently Christian armies invaded two Muslim countries, Iraq and Pakistan. And prop up tyrants in other Muslim countries on condition that they ignore the Palestinian genocide. Christians used starvation sanctions against Iraq for twelve years, causing HALF A MILLION dead children, which Zionist Madeleine Albright said was “worth it”. In those twelve years, Christians bombed Iraqi infrastructure on average once a week.
So if you’re going to claim Muslims are bad for invading in the past – how about you take a look at Christian history. George Bush said that “God told me to liberate Iraq – so I did.”
In other words, he is crazy. He thinks an invisible, magic creature told him to do something. Well, just like some Muslims.
LikeLike
Japan was made by the United States after WW2. We imposed our culture of doing things on them. The other SE Asia countries simply saw it, and copied it.
Many American Christians know as little about the world as leftists do. These are the ones who thought that secular Saddam Hussein was in league with al-Qaeda, his enemy, and was behind 9/11. Yes, the majority of those who supported the invasion of Iraq thought so.
You know so very little about other cultures and world history. You refuse to look at anything other than your own religion – and only a whitewashed history of it. You’re like a communist.
Japan is great for acting like Christians? Hah. How could they create a great empire in Asia then? Which was only crushed because the even better Whites in the U.S. were fooled by the Jew-loyal Christian Roosevelt, who even told his cabinet that he was looking for an excuse to start a war against Japan. (So he froze their assets, cut off their oil which would ruin their industry, and ignored the message from the code breakers who informed the White House that an attack was coming against Pearl Harbor.)
And while we’re at it – name a single piece of proof for Christianity’s claims. After 2,000 years there should be one. Something other than “because the world exists!” which the other religions can also claim. Also, tell us why YOUR version of Christianity is the right one, and not the hundreds of others that contradict your claims.
LikeLike
Society is a racial construct.
Nonsense. Society is a construct of the belief system.
Explain Detroit. I believe that something changed there in the last 40 years, guess what it is?
LikeLike
The American auto industry collapsed. There are also about forty other factors that are too boring to list here. I could write a book.
Any more dumb questions?
LikeLike
Riiiiiiight… the ever-popular “t’was economics” gambit by our resident Cathedral lackey.
Explain Camden, then… or any other “black” section of the many metropolises of this nation and others. Dig deep into those macro- and microeconomics textbooks of your community college days, SchlomoWithin.
Explain the fact that, anywhere the negro holds sway… up to and including lands where the white man seldom set foot… that area becomes no-man’s-land.
“White Flight” isn’t a phenomenon caused by anything other that the social realities of race and the behavioral (ahem) deficiencies of certain (cough) darker elements in society.
Sure, sure… “whites commit crimes too!” Let me save you your next breath.
The biggest difference being that, whites are the first to police miscreants of their own hue.
LikeLike
to The Spirit Within:
And WHY did the automotive industry collapse?
1. Japan and China started making steel at comparable quality to US steel so much more cheaply that we actually shifted from net exporters to net importers of it for the first time in our country’s history.
2. The first point lead to Japan realizing they could manufacture their own cars much cheaper than we could.
3. Simple economics dictated that a drop in the price of foreign cars while American car prices held fast would cause a shift in the demand for cars toward Japanese, which it did.
4. THIS IS THE KICKER – faced with lowered demand, the only way for US Auto manufacturers to level the playing field was to lower prices. This was *impossible* because of the stranglehold of the UAW and exorbitant wages and benefits packages to all employees that came with it. The UAW took a “not our problem” approach to car companies going into the red and their staunch refusal to cut wages / benefits / dues lead directly to the GM buyout and a ton of layoffs and fallout in Detroit.
Unions are voted in by guess which party? Guess what percentage of negroes and Jews vote for this party? Even if it were purely economically related issues in the D, they would still be politically caused and reinforced by who the blacks continuously vote for. GIMMEDAT.
LikeLike
The suburbs around Detroit, where all the whites moved to (that didn’t leave the state entirely) is economically robust. Ford and GM and tons of other tech and industrial companies are thriving in the mitten state. Rural and suburban Michigan is as white as any place in the good ol USA. Drive two hours from the most dangerous city (Detroit) and you’ll find yourself in pristine farmland as safe as any place in Europe, if not more so.
Sure there are some dark spots surrounding (heh) like Dearborne-istan, but it is no coincidence that as the population got more vibrant, the economy got much less vibrant. Same with Flint – if Michigan is a hand, Flint is the fungus on the pinky nail.
LikeLike
The auto industry collapsed because of the Great Migration 2. The workforce they were forced to hold…jeezus. You think Ford/GM/Chrysler WANTED to produce shitty cars?
Their workforce was composed of who is IN Detroit…blacks. They would maybe show up 3 days a week, they constantly fought with each other, didn’t give a shit, and stole anything that wasn’t tied down.
How the hell do Toyota and Honda produce high quality vehicles with the same union labor and regulations? Different workforce. Mostly white.
Affirmative Action inevitably cripples anything it is attached to because the people it promotes are inferior by definition to the people passed over. Blacks are more like a WMD than a race.
Given that Detroit was possessed of infrastructure of the highest quality, being one of the richest cities on earth, it’s AMAZING that the blacks left didn’t just go create their own jobs…why is it jobs only seem to correlate with whites? Where blacks are there is a “food desert” always, a “blighted neighborhood” always, crime always, and “no jobs or opportunity” always.
Blacks must always move to wastelands of commerce and civilization…or maybe just maybe blacks CREATE those where once other things existed?
Or perhaps:
crime causes blacks.
poor schools cause blacks.
poverty causes blacks.
low property values cause blacks.
Just do yourself a favor and don’t look at Tennessee’s longitudinal study with Section 8 and crime.
LikeLike
StraponWithin had the gall to ask “Any more dumb questions?” whilst giving the dumbest of responses… one which, true to form, gives him yet another ass-whuppin’ from more than one corner.
Geez, the mind boggles… apparently he enjoys the abuse. (((SMH)))
LikeLike
Nice job going off topic, fellas, but I was arguing Detroit. There are enough straw men here to fill a small African country (heh).
There are literally a hundred factors that contributed to the city’s decline. Yes, sharecropping culture and the abysmally educated Great Migrators was one of them. But so were a complicated interlocking system of municipal, state, and federal grants that basically screwed over Detroit for investment money for two generations. So was a city without a tradition of entrepreneurship, since everybody had been workin’ for da man for over seventy years. So was the auto companies’ murder of public transportation, which doomed anybody without a car to continued life in the city shithole. It was an upward spiral (suburbs) and downward spiral (city), and the longer it went on, the harder it was to hop from one spiral to the other. Basically the story of America today.
@trav777: As far as your ludicrous “black people ruined the auto industry”, you should remove your head from your ass before you make any more comments. They were part of the auto industry nearly from the beginning, at first in the foundry, and as time went on, in lower and then upper management. Quality of US cars doesn’t correlate with that, at all. You could’ve replaced the entire US auto workforce with Eskimos and the outcome would’ve been the same.
LikeLike
There are literally a hundred factors that contributed to the city’s decline. Yes, sharecropping culture and the abysmally educated Great Migrators was one of them. But so were a complicated interlocking system of municipal, state, and federal grants that basically screwed over Detroit for investment money for two generations. So was a city without a tradition of entrepreneurship, since everybody had been workin’ for da man for over seventy years. So was the auto companies’ murder of public transportation, which doomed anybody without a car to continued life in the city shithole.
Oh yes, “hundreds of factors” that didn’t exist in other cities. It just so happened that they existed in the Black-dominated city and ruined it, through no fault of Blacks.
Grants? No investment money? You can’t be serious. There was enormous wealth in the city because of the auto industry.
“without a tradition of entrepreneurship” – funny, non-Whites are always said to be such innovative entrepreneurs otherwise. Hmm, yes, you need so much of a tradition to open a store. However would you know what to do otherwise? And I’m sure there were no stores in Detroit to learn from.
“murder of public transportation” – Yeah, I’ve seen pictures from the old Detroit. Same as other American cities. How odd that Whites could survive despite this “murder of public transportation”.
If those who had come to Detroit had been Whites instead of Blacks, the city would not have been destroyed. Period. Yes, even if they had been, say, Japanese or Chinese, Detroit would not have been destroyed. But they were 85-IQ Blacks.
LikeLike
Arbiter, you’re flatout wrong, on every count.
Your perceptual bias is showing. Try addressing facts.
LikeLike
Sperg: “There are literally a hundred factors that contributed to the city’s decline.”
Feel free to explain why these “factors” magically spare non-black cities. The reality is that lots of cities experience hard times, but if the demographics are sound, they typically rebound. Detroit’s problem is simple: the people who inhabit it. If better people inhabited it, better results would be forthcoming. It must suck being in your position, and having to deny the obvious.
Sperg: “Arbiter, you’re flatout wrong, on every count.”
No, he’s right on every count. Then again, he doesn’t inhabit Sperg’s Bizarro World. A world in which Detroit would have collapsed had it been inhabited by a million Swiss. You know, those magical “hundred factors” would have done ’em in! Had the Swiss inhabited Detroit, even now they would be roaming around in gangs, raping and murdering one another between yodels, and tearing the place apart. Lots of weird stuff happens in Sperg World.
Sperg: “Try addressing facts.”
He did. The connection between racial demographics and societal success has been well established, and is obvious to any sentient observer. The idea that a million blacks are going to produce the same results as a million Japanese/Swiss/etc. is utterly insane – but this is what the anti-white demands that we believe.
Primitive savages didn’t believe stuff as crazy, as obviously false, as what you routinely claim to be true. Are you really that nuts? Or just that dishonest?
As I say: anti-whites lie because they HAVE to.
LikeLike
Jew faggot within, you are a loser. your tribe is the enemy of truth.
LikeLike
Stationarity: “Society is a construct of the belief system. The people who have honored the Judeo Christian worldview have prospered. Those who haven’t, namely Africa and Asia, suffer.”
Ridiculously untrue. There are plenty of black and brown populations throughout Africa and Latin America that are Christian, and yet remain dysfunctional disasters. They are disasters because of the low quality of the black and brown populations which inhabit them. Religion does not change this, which is why we see the same/similar results from particular racial populations, regardless of what their religion is.
Conversely, there are non-Christian populations, such as the Japanese, who prosper. Demographic quality matters. Race matters. Tell me the race of the place, and I can pretty accurately predict the level of the society. But tell me the religion of the place, and I cannot. A population is Christian? That could be Austria…or Angola. It could be Quebec, or Bolivia. Similarly, tell me only that a given city is not Christian, and it could be Mogadishu – or Tokyo.
Race is a pretty accurate predictor. Religion is not.
Right now, as we speak, Christianity is rapidly spreading throughout the Third World. Does this mean that those countries become like white Christian nations? Of course not. Instead, they continue to perform much like their fellow racial kinsmen who did not convert. Race remains the key factor. Why isn’t Catholic Peru on the same level as Catholic Austria? If religion were so decisive, it should be – but it isn’t.
Much to the befuddlement of some in the nutty age in which we live, it turns out that a white Christian is not the same thing as a non-white Christian. Who’da thunk it?
[as an aside to readers, my point here is not to attack Christianity, or religion in general. I also don’t see anything necessarily wrong with Christians of different races wishing one another well – so long as that well wishing does not result in the de facto genocide of whites under the “race doesn’t matter” rubbish. My point is simply to call out someone who is using religion – whether he is conscious of it or not – to promote a functionally anti-white worldview. That is a repulsive way to employ religion. Christians should go back to saving souls, which is their proper purpose, not being cheerleaders for white genocide, which is to promote evil.]
Stationarity: “When I was in college I knew many Africans. They hated American blacks, calling them lazy, crazy, ignorant and niggers. Sound familiar? They could join the ranks of Southerners in the Antebellum South.”
No, they couldn’t. These sorts of comments are just silly. Two radically different peoples with radically different biology and culture don’t become the same people simply because they dislike American blacks. American blacks irritate almost everyone, including one another. People all over the world hate American blacks. It’s probably fair to say that most American blacks hate American blacks. Most people don’t like to be bit by mosquitoes either. It’s just one of those things, no need to make much of it.
Stationarity: “Culture matters.”
Sure it does, it’s just that race matters more. Race provides the foundation upon which culture is built – different races create different cultures. We see this all over the world, hence the accurate statement that society is a racial construct. It is.
LikeLike
Poppycock. Men certainly don’t have to be mean to be desirable. Dominance can be sexy, but it by no means has to be nasty.
LikeLike
Does that mean it isn’t desirable? Please think logically.
LikeLike
Did you have a problem understanding that sentence, “great books for men” religionut? You call CH a “hypocrite” for … not using the bibble as a basis for his posts but relying on facts instead. You attack Rollo Tomassi and Vox Day for the same thing. And this post of yours doesn’t make sense other than as a knee-jerk response of the typical woman hater, a kind who often worms his way into the manosphere hoping to get an audience. When a woman shows up you rush to attack, getting an outlet for your pent-up bitterness in a safe environment.
LikeLike
Lololzlolzlolz
You guys, don’t be jealous that Arbiter has been chatting online with babes all day.
LikeLike
Poor Tilikum is too dumb to think of lies, so he just copies and pastes the same one over and over. And he is too chickenshit to write under his real name. Pathetic little fatty. How funny that I have driven you away from the forum.
LikeLike
This asshole = alpha I think ignores that asshole has different flavors, between mean and overconfident. What we’re calling being an asshole is more like, not giving into a woman’s reality or demands and calling attention to that fact, which can be done in many ways – the easiest and most obvious way is by being a straight up hard jerk asshole. No misinterpretation there – which is probably what draws women to assholes – no ambiguity on the male’s part of his jerk-boy/man confidence!
LikeLike
asshole has different flavors
Well, St. Augustine of Hippo was a priest, forbidden from touching women, so I guess he’d be intimately familiar with the rear end of things. I hear monasteries used up a lot of candle wax.
LikeLike
BUTT, jokes aside, it’s true that the “jerk” or “asshole” is attractive for going his own way and not trying to gain anyone’s approval. And it’s true that the same self-confidence can also be displayed by others, without being a jerk. The jerk has discovered a signal that women respond to, but if what’s behind it is empty and penniless it won’t last long with most women.
LikeLike
St Augustine was quite the womaniser in his day. Before he become a religious man, he kept a concubine for many years.
To quote him, and his struggle, he said,
“Oh Lord, give me chastity, but do not give it yet.”
LikeLike
“The jerk has discovered a signal that women respond to, but if what’s behind it is empty and penniless it won’t last long with most women.”
i think this is a key point that many miss. asshole behavior signals to a woman that a man has strength of character and dominance so she will naturally be drawn to that but all assholes are not the same.
there are men who are strong alpha males who act like assholes when they need to. they don’t do it just to be assholes though. their behavior stems from their strength of character and convictions and their unwillingness to kowtow to anyone. that’s what most women are hoping for when they find a man who displays asshole behavior.
but sometimes a man’s asshole behavior has nothing to do with strength of character or being an alpha male. when asshole-ishness is rooted in insecurity, instability, and weakness it’s a far cry from the alpha behavior that most women want.
girls will usually lose interest in these men quickly and move on to find better prospects because the strength of character that they are yearning for just isn’t there. some will stick around anyway of course but usually those are the girls who are just as damaged as the men.
LikeLike
Let’s not be slandering my good name here – Augustine of Hippo was pretty red-pill as well. And although you are correct on Roman Catholic celibacy becoming a thing around the time of Ambrose and Augustine (4th century), most of the Eastern Catholic/Orthodox sects allow marriage, although subject to some limitations. But don’t you know St. Augustine’s prayer? “Lord, make me chaste! But, not yet..” Anyway, it’s pretty well known that Augustine had a mistress and a son and was engaged, but that all broke up by his converting to Christianity and getting baptized [finally – sins after baptism are more serious than those before; those know know the truth, etc etc], and then living a life of a Christian philosopher. As far as being red-pill, I’ll just steal from wikipedia: “Augustine’s view of sexual feelings as sinful affected his view of women. For example he considered a man’s erection to be sinful, though involuntary, because it did not take place under his conscious control. His solution was to place controls on women to limit their ability to influence men.” “He believed that the serpent approached Eve because she was less rational and lacked self-control, while Adam’s choice to eat was viewed as an act of kindness so that Eve would not be left alone.” “The laws and traditions founded upon St. Augustine’s views of sexuality and women continue to exercise considerable influence over church doctrinal positions regarding the role of women in the church.” And that’s enough apology from me – the rest is silence.
LikeLike
Beautiful. That last line — “society is a racial construct” — is worth inclusion in the COPROP insurgent field guide.
To which I would like to add:
“Racism” is an ideological construct.
LikeLike
It is. Xenophobia, tribalism etc are far better terms.
LikeLike
Yep. So true.
LikeLike
“Racism” is a construct invented by a gay, Marxist jew…Magnus Herschfeld. Leon “Lev Bronstein” Trotsky was also credited with popularizing it as a term. It is defined as something only white people can do.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on ReactionaryThought and commented:
“Race is not a social construct.
Society is a racial construct.”
LikeLike
To learn more about how your skin color doesn’t determine your behavior, read
http://www.amazon.com/Black-Rednecks-Liberals-Thomas-Sowell/dp/1594031436
LikeLike
Race is more than skin color.
LikeLike
some of those people would be eaten in W. Africa. Yes, hunted down, chopped up and put in a stew for witchcraft purposes.
LikeLike
My ancestry is Scottish, French, English and Cherokee. My grandfathers and father picked cotton growing up. Which race am I?
LikeLike
I’m sure your bloviations continue to have your family picking cotton… out of the top of the aspirin bottle, mutt.
LikeLike
So does an albino Chinese behave like a European or Asian, and why or why not?
LikeLike
My ancestry is Scottish, French, English and Cherokee. My grandfathers and father picked cotton growing up. Which race am I?
Nice try. Anti-Whites always want to take some border cases and ask “Is this a German? Is this a Frenchman? If you can’t say exactly, then no races exist!”
By the same logic COUNTRIES wouldn’t exist because no one can draw the borders between them exactly. But we still know that Strasbourg is in France and Frankfurt is in Germany.
By the way, you have revealed that you are an anti-White non-White. Thanks. That will be remembered. And you’re a Christian fanatic too, how funny.
LikeLike
Nobody ever said it merely “skin color”… nice try, Sambo.
LikeLike
“Society is a racial construct” is not a new statement, it has been around in nationalist circles for a long time.
Anyway. In the spirit of harsh truths, there’s a comment by one Sigrid in CH’s post White Women Are Getting Fatter Too. Sigrid writes: “so many excuses for fat men on this site, it’s disgusting”.
I have been occupied elsewhere this weekend, but here’s my reply to that, which I think people should be aware of by now. I’d include links, but I’m afraid WordPress wouldn’t let the post show up in that case.
——————————–
Not excuses for fat men. What CH writes is that overweight in a man matters less to women than overweight in a woman matters to men. This is true. It should be obvious from personal experience, and it is shown by research.
How attracted a woman is to a man is more dependent of a mix of the Big Four: Looks, Personality, Money and Status. This is because a woman needs a man who can survive and survive well, thereby helping her to do the same. If he has friends and a stable job weigh in.
How attracted a man is to a woman depends mostly on looks, followed by personality (which becomes more important as a long-term relationship is contemplated). This is because he needs a woman who is healthy, young and has the right proportions for producing good offspring. The hip-to-waist ratio plays a role here, as women with an ideal such ratio have an easier time having children and have fewer still-born children.
Research also shows that a wife gaining weight causes more unhappiness for her spouse than a husband gaining weight causes unhappiness for his spouse.
For another interesting study, women at OkCupid describe their ideal man’s ideal age as just a few years younger or older than their own. Men on OkCupid describe their ideal woman’s ideal age as 20-22. Regardless of their own age. The study doesn’t say why, but it’s obviously because of looks, where weight is a heavy factor.
LikeLike
About the OkCupid study, the fun graphs showing what age women prefer in men, versus the age men prefer in women:
http://www.break.com/article/men-of-all-ages-prefer-young-women-says-okcupid-data-2757565
In relation to that, here’s Times (I’d post another link, but, WordPress) :
The survey out Friday, financed by the government-backed research funding group Academy of Finland, gathered data on 12,000 Finns and found that women, on average, are looking for partners who are about their age or slightly older. But men across the age spectrum have a sexual preference for women in their mid-20s. This remains true for men of all ages—men in their early-20s or younger are attracted to women older than themselves and older men are attracted to younger women.
Mid twenties? Methinks they didn’t dare say “twenty”.
LikeLike
http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=2013-35735-001
In all 4 studies, both partners’ physical attractiveness was objectively rated at baseline, and both partners reported their marital satisfaction up to 8 times over the first 4 years of marriage. Whereas husbands were more satisfied at the beginning of the marriage and remained more satisfied over the next 4 years to the extent that they had an attractive wife, wives were no more or less satisfied initially or over the next 4 years to the extent that they had an attractive husband. Most importantly, a direct test indicated that partner physical attractiveness played a larger role in predicting husbands’ satisfaction than predicting wives’ satisfaction.
LikeLike
OKCupid has actually done some very interesting research on their own site. For me the most telling metric was the severe left-shift of men’s perceived physical attractiveness vs. “average.” Most women think most men on the site come in about 3/10.
In reality, I think what they were really describing was how much a given man’s looks turn them on…not how good looking a man is relative to the average chap. In other words, it takes far more physical attractiveness (build, coloring, facial symmetry, etc) for a man to induce arousal in a woman via looks alone than the reverse. I was somewhat disappointed that the researchers didn’t pick up on this distinction.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
I can’t think of a more appropriate song to describe what Western society has self-inflicted via entitlements, feminism, liberalism, cultural diversity, redistribution of wealth, affirmanig blacktion, and SJWs than this.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-_qMagfZtv8
LikeLike
I understand your sentiment. But we didn’t do it to ourselves. There were many who spoke up, but they have had their careers destroyed by the media. People still don’t understand how the media, and especially television, create a false reality and thereby control elections. People don’t understand how extremely hard it is for a nationalist party to do anything in the West today. Their membership numbers could easily be ten, twenty times higher, but the members who are public with their names are attacked, their homes are vandalized, their cars are burned, they are beaten. They are demonized by the media, they lose their jobs after threats to the employers, and the labor courts and unions side with the employers. Those who are members without being public are exposed by illegal hackers working for groups funded by tax money. They are also attacked, they also have their lives destroyed. Not even people who read this blog have the slightest idea.
The media go after the voters too. After an election they will hold up and demonize voters who they managed to get some comment from as they exited the voting places. They post maps showing “look how many voted for that party in your neighborhood”. This makes people afraid as it is an obvious threat. They are afraid that the media will be able to come even closer, with all the hacking technology and other tricks, and find them somehow, and then they too will be attacked. Attacks that the media cover up, so that they can go on.
Look at CH’s Twitter feed. A gang of rapists, and the media showed only a picture of the White-looking one – not of the three Blacks. This is brainwashing. But also it is a threat against the readers. “You see that we propagandize. You see that we target Whites. You’re damn right about that, reader. And YOU will be our next target if you don’t keep your mouth shut. Understand?” They don’t want the propaganda to go by entirely unnoticed. They want the sheep to swallow it blindly, but they know that the more intelligent will see it, and they welcome that.
In a democracy, the media are in control. Especially in a political system without proportional representation, a system specifically designed to hold down all parties except two, who will then move toward the middle to get votes from the other side, with the media tipping the scales any time they please. Any time an upstart comes along. And with an executive branch not with members voted for by a parliament with many parties, so that smaller parties could gain influence over its composition and be part of the real power, the legislative power. But an above-the-law executive office led by one person voted for by the voters – an office that can therefore only be won by someone mainstream, ensuring even more power for the mainstream. A mainstream defined by the media.
Hell, Hollywood bosses even said back in the early 20th century that they made race-mixed movies they knew would lose money, but they made them anyway – “for the message”. In other words, for the propaganda. Even when people saw that it was propaganda, it didn’t matter – that the propaganda could be plastered on posters on the walls and run in the movie theaters year after year, decade after decade, was a show of force. It showed people that those in power wanted race-mixing and would never, ever stop until they got what they wanted. And that made you a target if you spoke up.
LikeLike
Yep horrible faggot band.
LikeLike
Definitely a pretentious, self important weirdo band, but certainly not “horrible.”
LikeLike
” I read “The Fatal Shore”, an accounting of Australia’s beginnings” ..
It would be apposite to mention the soothing balm of British Naval Practices in this context. Rum, sodomy and the lash. The cornerstone of Empire, huzzah huzzah.
Not unreasonable to assume that, combined with the elementary school of years on the prison hulks of Blighty, such tastes might be imposed on the less thuggish ingenues of the Antipodes by the chaingang daddies. C.f. the 1986 Bill Douglas historical film “Comrades” (himself a noted shirtlifter).
In Hughes’s book (above), he notes that f. ex. transported Irish rebels were not merely appalled, but utterly bewildered by the uphill gardening frenzies of the sassenach convicts. It was simply beyond comprehension to them, the simple savages. Lack of a Classical education, no doubt.
LikeLike
Sarah Silverjew “sorry it’s a boy” commercial.
Fucking rat face cunt.
LikeLike
#femsuperbowl. Same two minutes ad for 50 shades of gray and the ridiculous anti-domestic violence series
Also fuck the Rat faced Jew comedians Sarah silver Jew man and Chelsea handler with their “sorry it’s a boy” commercial
Fuck the Jewish rat faced “women” who destroyed my white women on purpose.
LikeLike
CH please destroy Sarah Silverman
There has to be something in her closer.
LikeLike
LikeLike
“Way of the Gun” is a fantastic movie.
One of my favorites. The last thirty minutes is one of the best action sequences in cinema.
LikeLike
lol that movie scene — that’s exactly what that disgusting foul mouthed civilization-destroyer is asking for.
LikeLike
but notice even in that scene, after the loud mouthed rat gets what she deserves, white knights pummel the male victim of her filth and disrespect
LikeLike
but notice even in that scene, after the loud mouthed rat gets what she deserves, white knights pummel the male victim of her filth and disrespect
One of the two badboys was laughing on the ground, as if he was enjoying every moment of it. And lol at Frizzy Red running after her protesting that she was “more beautiful than ever”… heh.
LikeLike
God sent us Sarah Silverman because too many people stopped asking The Jewish Question.
lzlzlzlzzozlzozlzozlozlozlzolzolzo
LikeLike
Henry Ford warned us 100 years ago in a very fair, well reasoned book (or series of articles in his magazine), “The International Jew”. His book, even if controversial, should at least be taught or acknowledged in college-level social science classes. Of course, nobody mainstream has even heard of his book or his thoughts.
LikeLike
the thing is that is her real persona in real life. YKW dictionary definition. She plays herself. She’s vile. Yes CH, that’s who are comedians today — always YKW.
LikeLike
Those fucking commercials were so awful. Whatever happened to talking babies and hot girls eating doritos??
[CH: the puppy one was cute, but of course it doesn’t require much skill or creativity to make an adorable ad featuring a lost puppy.]
LikeLike
I cannot deny, that talking baby campaign cracked me up every time.
“Try reading the rule book, Shankapotamus!”
LikeLike
For those with experience I cant decide when to give up on a girl. I think I gave up on someone easily. She said she was confused about me although we talked and responded to my tests immidiately. But then again all I did was texting and occasional meets.
But last night I pulled the trigger and I said no but she was adamant that we ‘atleast’ be friends. I also replied in negative. Looking back I cant help but wonder if I fell into her frame and gave up easily.
When should you decide to give up on a particular girl. I think I missed an opportunity here by letting my ego get in the way.
LikeLike
remember, you have to escalate. You didn’t.
Girls talk while guys do stuff! I’m afraid you lost that one by giving mixed signals. Texting IMO is only useful to set up a date if you’re not a proficient charmer. “Confused” meant you set up a date but didn’t follow up = mixed signals.
Don’t ever get LJBFd. Cut all ties with her. Either she’ll text you some day then you might still have a chance but only by sexualizing. Don’t initiate convo.
Good luck to you, bro!
LikeLike
Right now I think the best thing to do in such situations in the future would be to not disengage and work on other girls simultaneously. The thing is though I took her interest/disinterest personally and tried to define the relationship and reacted instead of keeping her stringing around and not giving too much fucks.
LikeLike
@Remember this is the key. I now have several girls on the go.
One girl flaked on me yesterday. Just didn’t show up like we had arranged. She then texted me later to say “I just woke up”.
I left it for the day then replied: “Oh…”
Her: “I thought you didn’t want to talk to me anymore”
Me: 12 hours later ” …”
Then while all this is going on, another girl I’m banging texts to invite me over.
“I’m wrecked. Am free Monday or Tuesday”
She replies with “What????” as though turning her down for an easy bang is unheard of.
Today I get a text: “Tonight”
And I set it up. It’s hard to get upset with these girls when they’re interchangeable and you enjoy the interaction for what it is…not what you hope it could be.
LikeLike
I don’t really see this as humorous or satirical, so much as an accurate depiction of current reality: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2935830/Got-bag-Oregon-couple-s-engagement-photo-showing-groom-hunting-trophy-viral-sensation.html
LikeLike
Apparently the engagement is more a source of pride for her than him.
LikeLike
@walawala,
I agree but my dilemma is that you are letting her define the relationship and that can be problematic when the needs are not mutual.
LikeLike
heyjay,
Thanks bro. I think she tried to hold onto me without providing any definitive answer. I realized the use of her word ‘atleast’ the next day.
LikeLike
Yeah, she tries to make you an orbiter, a plan b. There is nothing for you to gain out of such a relationship with a woman.
I’m in a similar situ actually right now. I’d say if you don’t define the friendship between the both of you where you gain something of value to you, you’re f*ed. I’m talking from experience, but don’t ask me about that…
LikeLike
I feel sorry for them too, at least the ones that have bought into radical feminism.
They keep wondering why men aren’t interested in them and therefore blame men for the lack of interest. It begins this nasty cycle where men continue to become less attracted to them and they get more upset, nastier, and bitter about it.
It really is sad.
LikeLike
Now allow yourself to consider the possibility that a really profoundly evil YKW and his Psychiatrist followers intentionally created this anti-intellectual movement precisely as the means by which to destroy first the White family and then the White civilization – the possibility that “radical feminism” is a cultural thermonuclear device which is functioning precisely as it was intended to function.
LikeLike
Women Who Humiliate Their Husbands
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3253133/posts
LikeLike
Superbowl commercials: grudging respect to Budweiser for their “fuck you” to me — er… to independent craft beer makers. Agree & amplify: alpha.
LikeLike
LikeLike
I think more and more the problem is systemic. The system responds to its programmers and lobbyists and pressure groups and input, organization, communication. We have to learn to ‘game’ the system- like Putin, like HItler, like these guys, like we game women. We love them, and we yet game them. If only our organized enemy minorities game the system, tell the system how to be, we will fail. If we are divided and disorganized, it will be hard to communicate to the system. An alternate approach is to break away and start a new system- but the south tried that, and they weren’t left alone. Plus there is no more spare land. Australia and South Africa were wide open lands when whites settled, but no longer. Systems don’t hear what people don’t say. The problem is systemic. I thought and still think, when our numbers get small, and those altruistic fuckheads who live in the isolated Midwest come into contact with more minorities, they’ll wake up. It will go faster if they reject Christianity and substitute it for a better value system- race and paganism. When our race is small we might wake up, and white man and woman organized and conscious and banded together is 10x as strong as everyone else even when organized. We are strong when awake and united. Germany was the size of texas and held off the rest of the world (and whites were the main fighters of it). Germany versus the nonwhite world- would win. All we need is a wake up. SO I felt when our numbers get small, with technology, we would wake up. Yet I am a bit dismayed- I don’t see whites only dating sites yet. I see one app starting up, but nothing major. I see great videos on youtube but they don’t get many views. This video should get so many views, and it only has 538. We can’t just preach to the choir. We have to convert and missionize (and MORE WHITE BABIES!!) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TQQyI2Qfls
I try to lead by example
LikeLike
Looking forward to the first intercommunal skirmishing between Bostonian terrorists worshiping the Dagda or the Morrigan, and Minnesotan berserkers yelling about Thor, Odin and Frey(a).
Could make for a good war.
Does Manitou get a look-in? Tag-style.
LikeLike
“Germany was the size of texas and held off the rest of the world”
.. apart from those engaged in the minor distraction of fighting the Japs. And the missus’ dad spent the war looking after 1000s of Italian PoWs in Kenya, instead of artillery-captaining at the pointy end, like wot ‘e orter dun. One of many.
LikeLike
Ronald Reagan: Pimp
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2935230/The-Playboy-President-young-Ronald-Reagan-charmed-50-Hollywood-s-leading-ladies-including-Marilyn-Monroe-luxury-LA-bungalow.html
LikeLike
My response to Trav777 keeps getting shit canned, so…
I posted a long response to this last night and it disappeared for some strange reason…
Basically Japan was created by the US after WW2. We instituted our legal structure. The other Asian countries saw the success and copied it.
” their values, their rights and wrongs, their temperaments”
None of which is racial…thanks for proving my point. quod erat demonstrandum?
Europe adopted Christianity over 1500 years ago….South America, Africa, Asia began to be proselytized about 300 years ago maybe? You do understand compounding right? You understand Boston was founded before St. Louis too, right? I don’t have to explain it to you hopefully.
I wager a statistical analysis would show that the whiter you are the more likely to be Christian, and the blacker you are, the more likely to be Muslim. After all, Africa was polytheistic and tribal when the Muslims crossed over and began to enslave and convert.
The reason the big cities went to shit is because blacks abandoned God for government. One message of Christianity is personal charity and personal responsibility. Big government doesn’t believe in either of those. You destroy the family, you destroy civilization.
The average African IQ is 70 Pull some more shit out of thin air please.
“Their expression of right and wrong and religious morals is so different, they may as well be worshipping in different religions”
There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. -Galatians 3:28
So you see, you don’t know shit. And the only shiv being applied here is my cock in your pasty, neoconfederate, klan ass. Bite the pillow bitch.
And suck on this afterwards.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/CHIN-01-100114.html
LikeLike
listen, moron, you can look up the average African IQ. It’s been tested a zillion times. That YOU do not know it already simply exposes you as ignorant.
I don’t want to hear your sky wizard bullshit explanation for the reason why whites PRE CHRISTIANITY were STILL markedly different from blacks in a BAZILLION ways.
You think the USA created Japan? You’re fuckin stupid. Japan as an industrial power FAR PREDATES their defeat in WW2, moron.
And they’re STILL NOT CHRISTIAN. Christianity is an EFFECT, not a cause.
Africa? Christianity in TONS of places- DEVOUT. You heard of Bishop Tutu? I can rattle off SEVERAL African bishops who were even considered candidates for the Papacy, you fuckin moron. NEVERMIND latin America…Honduras, Mexico, Guatemala- HELLHOLES full of devout Christians.
You simply do not know what the fuck you are talking about in any way, shape, or form. The EVIDENCE does not support your assertions.
Blacks abandoned God…wow…just fucking wow. Take your superstitious BULLSHIT somewhere else, fuckin maniac bible thumper.
Blacks were fucked up before they took over Detroit. Their maladies were well-known pre-emancipation. Why the eff do you think whites insisted on Jim Crow?
Crystal Methodist universalist idiots like you only subsidize the birth rate of dysfunctional people.
LikeLike
You keep using that word average…average?….I don’t think you understand what that word means
“I don’t want to hear your sky wizard bullshit explanation for the reason why whites PRE CHRISTIANITY were STILL markedly different from blacks in a BAZILLION ways.”
You mean like 2000 years ago? Ever heard of the Scots, the German tribes, etc. Again….Rome imposed Christianity more than 1500 years before these other continents….yet you ignore it.
My mother grew up in Flint, Michigan in the 1950s. Her and her brother would take the bus downtown to go ice skating and walk back AFTER DARK. Think about that…nobody thought twice about it. She has told me that if a black man approached you on the street, it was to ask if you were lost and needed help.
The problem is when Redneck blacks from the South moved North in the 50s, 60s….bringing their culture with them. And then they all bought into LBJ and his Great Society.
LikeLike
Stationary you’re a gd moron, talking about what the ROMANS did, a NON CHRISTIAN people. Rome reached its zenith under PAGANISM, you retarded oaf.
Just please STFU. I know what a statistical mean is…do you?
The problem is that blacks have always had different temperaments and different behaviors and only white law and white power kept them from behaving as savages. You remove that, and they revert to African norms rapidly.
LikeLike
You mean like 2000 years ago? Ever heard of the Scots, the German tribes, etc. Again….Rome imposed Christianity more than 1500 years before these other continents….yet you ignore it.
Um, yes, those tribes who ALSO had a civilization before Xtianity far better than Blacks. Far better than Xtian Blacks.
But you don’t hear of that, because Rome wanted everyone else to look “barbaric”. In fact there was trade and law and civilization in Celtic and Germanic lands. Also, you don’t hear of that because Christians prefer to cover their ears and shout loudly rather than hear about how Whites succeed without Christianity. And how non-Whites fail despite being Christians.
The average African IQ is 70 Pull some more shit out of thin air please.
Ignorant idiot. That number is well documented. Though for Blacks with 23 percent White blood the average IQ is 85.
South America, Africa, Asia began to be proselytized about 300 years ago maybe? You do understand compounding right?
And they are VERY Christian, and STILL act far worse than Whites. They act far worse than non-Christian Whites. Sucks to be you. “compounding” Hah. Did Jewsus say “this stuff will make you better, BUT it has to be COMPOUNDED for a thousand years first!”? First time I heard that feeble argument.
There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. -Galatians 3:28
Thank you for exposing Christianity’s universalist position. It is a poison. We have succeeded despite of that religion, not because of it. Rome and Greece grew without Xtianity and were destroyed under it. Because its universalist creed said everyone should be treated as an equal, destroying the Roman people’s sense of nationalist purpose. They became hedonists who allowed non-Romans to dominate the army and get pieces of the political pie, and Rome fell.
LikeLike
This gambit has been thoroughly slapped down at the chateau, and sigh, yet another shill, full of bite-the-pillow-bitch Christian knowledge and spirit, deigns to run the canard by us again.
Go back over the archives and become wise, fool.
Short version: spiritual nature and standing is not meat world equality… unless of course you’d care to make a case that there’s no such thing as differences between a man and woman… or a pygmy and a Swede.
LikeLike
I wasn’t saying everyone is the same. I was refuting his claim that Christians in Norway and Kenya are two different religions. The beauty of Christianity is that its supposed to be a decentralized, localized personal religion that allows for differences in matters of opinion. Not a top down, command structure run by the religious elites. Unfortunately, that’s what most people want.
LikeLike
lzozlzozlzozlzolzol… what they abandoned was the restraints of Jim Crow, under which they had to at least behave to a reasonable degree and were kept in line by the threat of immediate white justice.
LikeLike
There was no Jim Crow in the North.
[CH: no, just property taxes and zoning laws to accomplish the same ends.]
LikeLike
CH: no, just property taxes and zoning laws to accomplish the same ends.]
If taxes and zoning kept poor blacks from the inner cities, then they also kept poor whites from there as well.
And yet, my very white grandfather was a dirt poor farmer from the Mississippi delta, who retired from GM after 28 years and lived a very nice life.
[CH: cleansing the cities of ethnic whites was an accidental side benefit for the SWPL liberal white elite. but poorer northern whites also traditionally had ways to keep their communities relatively schwartzefreie: cars and (prison) bars.]
LikeLike
Detroit – 1942
LikeLike
There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. -Galatians 3:28
That would demand that they be in Christ Jesus in the first place… which Judeo-Talmudists most decidedly aren’t.
LikeLike
An excellent point… alas, one that seems to be missed by most of my Christian brethren.
Recently, the wife of a friend of mine made a radio broadcast for the local church about declining spirituality in the End Times, and in the midst of it, she mentioned something about how the Jews won’t even fully spell out the name of God.
“What reverence!” she gushed.
Afterwards she eagerly asked if I heard the broadcast, to which I replied that I indeed had, but was puzzled about her deeming “reverent” those who not only don’t believe in Christ, but actually sully His name.
From the look on her face you would have thought she had been pole-axed.
Bless her, though… she took my rebuke to heart. Yet another example of why women should be silent in matters of adult Christian instruction from a pulpit of any sort.
LikeLike
Hosswire unsheaths (by proxy). The COTW is his reward (or his buddy’s):
A buddy of mine put it so well:
,b>“I kind of feel sorry for women. Imagine if you could only get a hard-on when someone was mean to you.”
Lot’s of comments on the other COTW but not too much on this one. Imagine a world however where this statement was taught to every 13 YO boy and drilled into his brain, an Alpha catechism. I suspect the other problems would get sorted out as a result in a generation.
LikeLike
Yeah, when I first read that on the other thread, it savored of COTW a league off.
LikeLike
Naw, I was beta and spergy enough not to like it then, and I still don’t: the ‘only’ and the ‘mean’ greatly exaggerate the actual situation with chicks.
“Imagine if you got your best hard-on when you were teased and dominated” is a lot closer to the truth.
Still, even this truism: “Imagine if you got a hard-on when someone was mean to you but not when they were nice,” is sad enough. Especially to us recovering betas.
LikeLike
“Imagine if you got your best hard-on when you were teased and dominated” is a lot closer to the truth.”
Yea, I was going to say “when someone dominates you” vs. “when someone is mean to you”.
LikeLike
Girl I’ve been gaming: You were really mean on Friday.
Yours truly: oh you’re not into that anymore?
Her: Lol I am :p
Bitches are interesting creatures
LikeLike
Imagine if you could only get a hard-on when someone was mean to you
I am reminded of James Woods in John Carpenter’s Vampires:
Padre, can l ask you something?
Yeah.
When l was kicking your ass back there, did that give you wood?
What?
Did you get a mahogany from that? Tell the truth.
l`m just fucking with you. Forget about it.
LikeLike
“Western cultural and political elites should make the effort to understand people who are uncomfortable with Islam, too. Dismissing them as benighted bigots is itself an act of bigotry.”
http://counterjihadreport.com/2015/02/02/the-great-awakening-has-begun/
LikeLike