• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« More Alpha, Better Sex
The Profit-Propaganda Curve »

The Thirsty Slut

February 6, 2015 by CH

Conventional wisdom has it that raw sluts aren’t the prettiest girls in school. The conventional wisdom is mostly right about sluts. CH has noted (archive hunt alert) that the sluttiest sluts tend to fall within the mediocre to cute range of female looks. Most sluts are 5s, 6s, and 7s. Proportionate to their demographic ratio, there are not as many slutty 8s, 9s or 10s. Likewise, but for a different reason, neither are there many slutty sub-5s.

(I’m using the term slut in its common parlance: A promiscuous girl. This doesn’t necessarily mean she has a lot of sex partners; it could mean she’s impulsive and will sleep with a man on a whim, or jump from boyfriend to boyfriend on flimsy pretexts.)

The disproportionate representation of moderately attractive girls among sluts is a function of being just cute enough to get banged out by alpha males* but not hot enough to get commitment from them. These cute-ish girls are in the gray zone between the uglies who can’t slut it up because desirable men don’t want to fuck them, and the hotties who won’t slut it up because men are willing to give them want they want.**

*Reminder: Sluts haven’t lost their powers of female hypergamous discrimination. They may be quicker to fall into bed, but they’re still not giving beta males the time of night.

**There is a class (a minority) of hot babes — eternal ingenues — who cash in on their looks by acquiring the seed and resources of multiple lovers. Their numbers are few, but their danger to unwary men is considerable.

Some sluts are discreet about their nighttime activities, although they seem to be decreasing of late to make way for what I call the Thirsty Slut, a Declining Empire breed of bed hopper who takes strange pleasure from proclaiming her sluttitude to the world.

As commenter shartiste (nice, bro) writes,

Surely the dark Lord has seen the “I fucked Edelman” photo by now. Further photos revealed her to be a gentleman’s 7. I’d bet it follows some Heartistian law that its always the less hot girls who trumpet to high heavens when they get an alpha dick inside them while the hot ones are more discreet?

Edelman is a Patriots football player. A hot babe who was accustomed to the company of high value men wouldn’t feel a compulsion to publicly announce her role as a passive sexual conquest of a footballer. She has nothing to prove, because her beauty is all the social proof she needs.

But the marginal gentleman’s 7 feels like she has a LOT to prove. Sexy alpha males aren’t a part of her daily life like they are for hotter women. When one of those alphas gravitates into her orbit (or, more typically, she lurches into his orbit) her hindbrain neurons fire a 21 hamster salute and her vagina pops off like a bottle of champagne sitting in the sun all day.

Who knows for certain what’s going through the thirsty slut’s head? Nevertheless, we have clues based on environmental inputs.

– Our attention whore enabling society emboldens her. The “slut” sting still penetrates, but now that the internet is filled with girls hoisting their pummeled pussies aloft like trophies after a big win, the individual slut doesn’t feel so alone and ostracized. Sluttery loves company.

– She thinks (mistakenly) that demonstrating the speediness of her labial parting for sports stars will bring all the other boys to her yard. (It won’t. Preselection doesn’t work for women. It only grosses out relationship-ready men subject to her pubic displays of coition.)

– Maybe she wants to lord it over her equally mediocre female friends in one of those esoteric femme status rituals that make no sense to men. If so, the temporary ego-stroked reward she earns from envious BFFs will be more than paid for by the permanent stain on her SMV record.

– Or it could be as banal a reason as inciting a beloved ex-boyfriend to jealousy. (Note to ladies: This never works on men with options.)

Like her male equivalent — the rejected try-hard beta who loudly insists he “never wanted the bitch” — the thirsty slut is a transparent cartoon of a woman, impressing no one but the mirror and her delusions of social acceptance.

No class, battered ass, take a pass.

As shartiste (two-fer) commented at Goodbye America, the thirsty slut is

…like a dude posting “just bought dinner for Emma Stone” and posting an $800 receipt.

Slut girl = beta guy

Doubleplusheh.

As any man who wasn’t a feeb male feminist or a stepnfetchit white knight would say to the oddly prideful thirsty slut, “Well, OK, that’s great. Now tell us again… what did you get out of it?”

“Edelman!”

Really?

“Sure! He’ll text me any minute.”

Not holding breath.

Why do I call the loud, proud, and indiscreet cock hound a “thirsty” slut? She is thirsty for SOCIAL STATUS. She is thirsty for VALIDATION of her worth as a woman to love. Most conspicuously, she is thirsty for LOVE itself.

This is all female nature 101, but I bring it up because the bigger picture interests me. It seems that in the past few years the frequency of thirsty sluts demeaning themselves in public for a dong hit of attention, and the bravado with which these sluts crow about the achievement of spreading their legs, have increased a hundredFOLD. Not coincidentally, the term of art “slut” has rocketed into the cultural consciousness of late.

Are there simply more sluts now as a percentage of the female population? The available evidence is inconclusive. The population share of sluts appears to be in a holding pattern.

So, again, why the sudden surge in thirsty sluts? I have a theory: It’s attention whore enabling technology plus the EFFECTIVE sex ratio influencing the dating lives of 15-30 year old women that’s provoking mass public sluttery.

Women are natural LOOKATME exhibitionists. It’s in their nature as the sex with the most to gain from displaying their bodies and faces for male judgment. So it’s no wonder high bandwidth social media provides an irresistible platform upon which women may strut and slut.

Now, combine this incredible environmental shock with another: The retreat from the sexual market by millions of men into video gaming and hardcore internet porn. This is what I mean by an effective sex ratio skew. On the one hand, you have obesities effectively shrinking the pool of attractive women available to men, and on the other you have the de facto disappearance of video gaming and wi-fi fapping men from the dating market.

These kinds of mass convulsions in the human courtship mechanism can cause untold downstream consequences that most people are either incapable of grasping or unwilling to contemplate. The inglorious rise of the Thirsty Slut can best be understood as a visceral ragepout by marginally attractive women to a painful contraction in the availability of the greater beta and alpha males with whom women most desire to form long-term relationships.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Biomechanics is God, Culture, Current Events, Goodbye America, Sluts | 391 Comments

391 Responses

  1. on February 6, 2015 at 6:54 am The Thirsty Slut | Manosphere.com

    […] The Thirsty Slut […]

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 7:31 pm anonYmous

      Isnt this kind of missing the point… I get it, this woman is low class and displayed her sluttery to the whole world. She is on par with chicks who bang guys in front of their children and whatnot. But what does it say to guys who use tinder and any other dating apps when they are competing with movie stars, professional athletes and other celebrities. The average guy who does not know game is screwed. or not screwed. whatever. Your average status whoring women who get their jollies off of being sought after by average guys now gets her jollies off of seducing high status men. Part of me thinks this is all some kind of tragic fad that will resolve itself in a decade or less. But what if this problem progresses. The average loser will have to resort to aweful femcunts and land whales to get some trim. Its almost like they are being triangulated out of existence.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 7:52 am EMP

        It’s just a return to the savagery of the r-selected jungle. In the past, the majority of homo sapiens males did not reproduce, the ‘average loser’ has always been, well, average and a loser.

        K-selected homo neanderthalensis was a different story, due to smaller numbers of males and social adaptation to a frequently frozen environment, but that was all ended in a bloody tide of homo sapiens northward migration. I digress.

        TL/DR: Nothing has changed. Prepare for the next freeze.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 10:25 am Captain Obvious

        > “Its almost like they are being triangulated out of existence.”

        The people who are being triangulated out of existence are the ones who aren’t having any children. Twenty years from now, as this cohort of females approaches menopause, look back and compare the Total Fertility Rates [TFRs] of the Saturday Night Tinder Sluts versus the Sunday Morning Evangelical Nice Girls – see who had more children [and who the children’s biological fathers were].

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2015 at 8:51 am Captain Obvious

        President Me: Adam Carolla Vs. the Scourge of Narcissism… Carolla sees an insidious minority that has turned out to be “assholes.” Predictably, the trait has infiltrated what is now known anachronistically as “the fabric of society”… http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2015/02/06/president-me-adam-carolla-vs-the-scourge-of-narcissism/

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2015 at 8:57 am Captain Obvious

        Jimmy Kimmel dates tribe-ette Sarah SilverSluttingStein for eight years, sticks to the Politically Correct script, and becomes one of the wealthiest men in Hollyweird. Adam Carolla stays true to his conscience, writes about e.g. the INTENTIONALLY ORCHESTRATED unleashing of Cluster B insanity upon Western Civilization, and gets banished to Outer Shitholeistan. You do the math.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2015 at 9:40 pm trav777

        I got some tinder ho asking me as an early question “how tall are you?” and she asked it twice.

        So I’m gonna ask in response “how much do you weigh?” This chick looks decent but I might just next her purely because having a ho ask me a superficial question when such a thing is TOTALLY off-limits for a guy to ask (even tho it is equally important) irks me and I don’t have patience for BS.

        LOL…I did it and she said “so un gentleman like” to ask HER her weight…but she feels no problem asking ME for my height…twice. I told her she was too fat for me, bc her response was “165ish”…seriously bitch…31, 5’9 and 170?!?! And she has the gall to ask my height? Surely if I was 5’6 she would say “sorry, not my type.”

        What in the holy hell is wrong with hoez these days?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 6:16 am Captain Obvious

        Q: “What in the holy hell is wrong with hoez these days?”

        A: “the INTENTIONALLY ORCHESTRATED unleashing of Cluster B insanity upon Western Civilization”

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 1:03 pm Diddlydangerous

      Say, what exactly is the defensive crouch, said to be the birthplace of all tingles?

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2015 at 8:47 am BarryBarryStupid

      If he was drunk, he couldn’t give consent. If he couldn’t give consent, you know… she’s a rapist.

      For those using this thread to trash talk the Seattle coach for his play calls, the words “fixed game” don’t come up often enough.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 10:47 am Greg Eliot

        I always had a strong feeling NFL teams shaved points in regular season games, but if it’s gotten to the point where even the Biggest Game can be fixed outright, well… this system of things is even more candidate for the pit than I had imagined.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 10:52 am PA

        Vegas.

        LikeLike


  2. on February 6, 2015 at 7:09 am The Thirsty Slut | Neoreactive

    […] The Thirsty Slut […]

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 10:32 am RosieOnMaChest

      The Thirsty Slut

      LOL… Thought this post was going to be about chicks trying to get me to buy them a drink before they’ve put out. Was going to mention my “thirsty slut defence” but I guess that will have to wait.

      LikeLike


  3. on February 6, 2015 at 7:12 am Waffles

    http://newsfeed.gawker.com/have-you-hooked-up-with-your-college-professor-1683998290/+tcberman

    Interesting comments over at Gawker asking readers if they ever hooked up with a teacher/professor. Not surprising at all a lot of the women can’t understand WHY they hooked up with some of these older, out of shape, men. Heh heh. CH truths abound.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 12:19 am Junior

      Goldmine! Entrapment, college professor edition http://ow.ly/IE7aV – young slut sleeps with professor in hopes of coaxing an ‘A’ mark from him in a class she’s failing, he gives her an A-, she feels cheated so she leaves his wife a fucking note detailing the affair, costs him his marriage & kids etc.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:35 pm The Spirit Within

        lol

        LikeLike


  4. on February 6, 2015 at 7:16 am Red texas

    “Just fucked Edelman no lie” is a phrase that is a sign of the “you gogurl power” times we live in. A girl cannot fuck a guy anymore than a target can shoot holes in a gun. Men are the actors…women the actees. Maybe she will realized that she “got fucked” since he has no doubt broken all ties with her.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 9:55 am Captain Obvious

      > “Just fucked Edelman no lie” You know, there is another very subtly corrosive effect of Feminaziism at work here – technically she GOT fucked BY Edelman [unless she wore a strapon and sodomized him]. It’s akin to Hollyweird actresses wanting to be called “actORs”, or college sorority sisters calling one another “DUDE”. Never misunderestimate the omnipotent power which comes from corruption of the language.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 9:56 am Captain Obvious

        Fuck me, you beat me to it. I get the Dunce Cap for today. Carry on.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2015 at 12:08 pm esc

        “[unless she wore a strapon and sodomized him]”

        Listen, this is Boston so . . .

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 10:21 am Captain Obvious

        Man, you can’t hardly go to xHamster or RedTube anymore without being inundated by: A) Bitches with dildos sodomizing men, and B) White bitches mudsharking with nogs. Page after page after page [on your search results] – it simply cannot be coincidence – I am convinced that the Evil Psychiatrists have infiltrated the porn industry and are pushing these sodomy & bestiality angles as a means of demoralizing the White Man and breaking his Spirit.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 10:27 am Greg Eliot

        I am convinced that the Evil Psychiatrists have infiltrated the porn industry

        Infiltrate?

        It was easy access… all they had to do was knock on the door, and their cousin Irving greeted them with a gleeful “Mensch!”

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 11:01 am Captain Obvious

        GE – I feel like shit today – but that made me LOL.

        LikeLike


  5. on February 6, 2015 at 7:18 am Sentient

    And……….. SCENE!

    “Edelman has not made a public comment about Dudish. Instead, he tweeted a picture from the Boston parade where he celebrated his team’s Super Bowl XLIX win.”

    Looks like no Paris Hilton, KK sex tape fame and fortune waiting for Ms. Dudish.

    http://www.ibtimes.com/who-sabrina-dudish-meet-julian-edelmans-tinder-girl-1806030

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 9:29 am mendozatorres

      Dudish, sounds like “poo platter.”

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 12:47 pm corvinus

      “Dudish”… appropriate name.

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 6:52 pm Tom White

      He probably can’t even remember who she is.

      LikeLike


  6. on February 6, 2015 at 7:23 am Laguna Beach Fogey

    In order to attract and maintain the commitment of high-status males, the 5s, 6s, and 7s used to cultivate various domestic skills and artistic pursuits. Now they cultivate blow-job techniques. Fuck the modern world.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 7:38 am Greg Eliot

      I almost laughed-out-loud at the scathing truth of this statement…

      … because more than once I… yes, even I… have heard an “I have skills” (nudge, nudge, wink, wink) boast from an otherwise unprepossessing designing female, attempting to lure me from the straight-and-narrow path of righteousness. 😉

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 12:16 pm Hosswire

        In my experience, every chick who has bragged about how good she sucks cock actually sucks cock at sucking cock. Like not just mediocre, but truly terrible.

        My theory is that she thinks she is good because she is getting a lot of reactions from the guys. What she doesn’t realize is that those reactions are in fact flinches & squirms of discomfort.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 2:34 pm Captain Obvious

        > “actually sucks cock at sucking cock”

        FeministX, Kate, Amy, eoshopi [sp?]: No teeth! Not even the slightest contact of any part of your teeth. And constant tongueing on the underside of the head [it’s our clitoris]. Finally: NO TEETH!!!

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 9:36 pm Joe

        I was minding my own business and had a girl do that to bragging thing to me in a bar a couple years ago. The she grabbed my index finger and started sucking it in an oscillatory sort of way and said she gave the most awesome blowjobs, let’s go. I had reason to believe she was telling the truth. I turned her down, married & shit, right? Plus she was sort of a land yacht and if there’s anything that helps a man stay faithful, it’s a woman with a bigger gut than his… If she’d had been an 8 my head would have been spinning and that might have been tough despite my good intentions, but she was a chunky 5.

        Girl previewed some mad skillz. I suspect my index finger was about to get a chubby when I told her to hit the brakes.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 9:33 am Captain Obvious

      > “Fuck the modern world.” Fuck the Psychiatrists who had seen this Histrionic Personality Disorder nymphomania in their female patients, and who gathered together to plot how they would unleash this insatiable insanity upon Western Civilization.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 7:15 pm anonYmous

        learn to swim…

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 8:34 pm Diogenes the Cynic

        Yep. Praying for tidal wave.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 10:26 am Harland

      A woman with blow-job skills has sucked too many dicks. I prefer women who have no idea what they’re doing, I can teach them to do it the right way.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 1:43 pm Greg Eliot

        Ding, ding, ding! You are correct, sir!

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 12:31 pm Bill

      I used to work with a mudshark who was trying to get back on the white wagon. She used to tell me the most vulgar things about how she wanted to do things to me I have not even dreamed of. My response was “ugh NO THANKS” Vulgar women are an extreme turn off especially if they are mudsharks.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 1:44 pm Greg Eliot

        +111…

        I tell ’em: “I don’t need to be kissing Nat King Cole, here.”

        The reference goes over they haids more often than not. LZLZOZLZOZLZOLZOL

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 2:05 pm anon

        last night was 4th night in a row that I’ve gone out (last 4 times, not 4 days in a row) that I saw a true blue eyed HB8 white girl out with a VERY thugged out very dark African, *****on a one on one date***. the one last night looked like old dirty bastard or young jeezy or whoever — fake gold teeth, long dreds, tats everywhere, looked angry.

        Africans even get to get away with beta dates due to the bombardment of propaganda white women have received about the coolness of black men the past 6 years in particular. They can act beta and still be with an HB8 who would blow off a beta white guy.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 3:34 pm James Blonde

        Its Bills fault Ms mudshark fell off the white wagon in the first place.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 4:33 pm Greg Eliot

        And thwack’s fault she wanted to get back on… after she found out all those stereotypes weren’t always true.

        LZLZOZOZLZOZLZOZLZOLZOZLOZLOZLOZL

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 3:58 pm Bill

        That would be her absent daddy and single slut mommy’s fault not mine…

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 12:01 am Carlos Danger

        Time for you chumps to start manning up and kicking some Sambo ass.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2015 at 9:06 am Captain Obvious

      > “5s, 6s, and 7s used to cultivate various domestic skills and artistic pursuits”

      LikeLike


  7. on February 6, 2015 at 7:24 am Booch Paradise

    I’ve been hashing out an idea in my head about the differences between men and women, and how each have different yardsticks when measuring what is good and what is shameful in life. The rational male stated a while ago that for men it’s to produce more than they consume that makes them men. I’ve been thinking that the female equivalent is to be valued more than what she consumes.

    I think this makes sense for 2 reasons. One is that it does fit with women’s role in society, which is to be valued not for what they do, but for what they are (potential mothers). And it also explains a lot of behavior such their lust for thousand dollar hand bags, which don’t particularly do anything to raise their SMV.

    I bring it up because within this model, the behavior of the thirsty slut wouldn’t be a misfiring sexual strategy based on female projection. It’d be much more like a man bragging about a job promotion, or how many books he sold, or something like that.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 7:34 am Greg Eliot

      The only problem with your analogy is that, when the man brags about job status, resources gathered, etc., it makes the opposite sex WANT him MORE… all other factors of attraction being equal.

      When a girl brags about cocks she’s taken, well… not so much.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 7:48 am Booch Paradise

        Perhaps, but I believe that it is a mistake to assume that the elation a man feels after conquering a goal is primarily linked to sex.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 8:08 am Greg Eliot

        I don’t recall saying it was primarily linked to sex. :confused:

        The reaction of the opposite sex to a man’s status can easily be explained as a nice side benefit… but (as has long been acknowledged, here at the chateau) not the raison d’etre of a man’s endeavors for occupational success and/or satisfaction in the world.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 8:31 am Booch Paradise

        No worries, I specifically avoided saying “you assume” for that very reason. But my whole point is that some of the behavior observed is taking place for reasons not motivated by sex. So your original objection to my original statement is something of a non sequitur.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 8:37 am Greg Eliot

        Either my reading comprehension is failing me, or my reply to your original final paragraph was anything BUT a non sequitur…

        Exhibit A:

        I bring it up because within this model, the behavior of the thirsty slut wouldn’t be a misfiring sexual strategy based on female projection. It’d be much more like a man bragging about a job promotion, or how many books he sold, or something like that.

        Exhibit B:

        The only problem with your analogy is that, when the man brags about job status, resources gathered, etc., it makes the opposite sex WANT him MORE… all other factors of attraction being equal.

        When a girl brags about cocks she’s taken, well… not so much.

        I’ll abide by the jury’s decision 😉

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 8:51 am Booch Paradise

        My point is that the man bragging or otherwise preening about being a man doesn’t do so (at least not always) because he is seeking sex. And the fact that it brings him sex is aside from the point. So the fact that men bragging about being men brings them sex and women bragging about being women doesn’t is not relevant to my point.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 8:57 am Greg Eliot

        Assuming the motivations for said bragging were not sexually motivated by either man or woman…

        … an assumption I implicitly agreed with, if only for the sake of debate…

        My point is/was/remains that the analogy was nonetheless strained… especially on the part of the woman… because of the resultant 180 degree effect of said bragging on their given audiences.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 10:03 am JironGhrad

        The error I see Booch (and what I think GE is alluding to) is that she’s NOT a woman bragging about being a woman. She’s a woman acting like a man.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 11:24 am Booch Paradise

        @JironGhrad When I first started learning about game and the red pill, I’d always be amazed when sharing it with people that they’d come back with things like “Well, what your not taking into account is that women don’t want to be treated like objects”, which is insane because I’d presented game as the competing model to that very way of thought.

        In essence I was saying “I know we were all taught model A, but I was just reading about model B, and it has way more explanatory power.” And they’d come back with “But what you haven’t considered is that model A is true.”

        You sir, have similarly amazed me just now.

        Now if you have a reason to believe that the articles model of saying that thirsty sluts are acting in a misguided attempt to raise their SMV has better explanatory power than my model which says that it’s her showing off her achievement of womanhood, please, go on. That’s why I commented. But please, no more dimwitted repeating of what we all already read in the blog post.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 12:48 pm corvinus

        When a girl brags about cocks she’s taken, well… not so much.

        The male equivalent would be a gamma male boasting about all the different girls he’s written love poems for and written about in his diary.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 2:09 pm Booch Paradise

        Geeze people. Was the line “within this model, the behavior of the thirsty slut wouldn’t be a misfiring sexual strategy based on female projection” really so hard to grasp?

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 2:17 pm Greg Eliot

        Look, pal… we’re all convinced already that you knew perfectly well what you meant.

        We’re just saying the model presented rang false.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 2:45 pm Booch Paradise

        If that were true you wouldn’t have kept trying to tell me about the current model that I’d already demonstrated understanding of in my very first comment.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 2:54 pm Greg Eliot

        Huh?

        How does me saying the model ringing false to me (and apparently some others) equate to a lie… merely because YOU understood it from the get-go?

        After all, it was your model to begin… one would hope YOU understood it. :duckface

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 3:16 pm Booch Paradise

        You didn’t start by saying that you thought the model rings false.

        You started by saying that women bragging about sleeping with celebrities isn’t sexy, which was entirely unrelated to my point, showing you didn’t get what I was saying. All of your arguments are about as relevant as if I said that for men passing a kidney stone is as or more painful than child birth and you came back and said that I’m wrong because passing a kidney stone doesn’t result in a child.

        Regardless of whether I’m right or not about this particular act being the result of a woman feeling a sense of fulfillment of womanhood, in general women achieving womanhood makes them less sexy and men doing things that make them achieve a sense of manliness makes them more sexy. For example, getting pregnant doesn’t make a woman more sexy. Getting married doesn’t make a woman more sexy. Having a slew of children doesn’t make a woman more sexy.

        But the fact that you keep trying to shoe horn your stupid objection back in, just shows that you didn’t get what I meant at first, and now are trying to salvage your bruised ego, which has turned you into an unbelievably obtuse moron. And I’m done responding to you.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 8:16 am Greg Eliot

        Bruised ego? Physician, heal thyself! lzlzozlzozlzozlzolzozlozlozlozlozl

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 8:21 am Greg Eliot

        You didn’t start by saying that you thought the model rings false.

        And yet my very first sentence in my first response was…

        The only problem with your analogy is that…

        And yet I’m the “obtuse moron”… go figger… lzozlzolzolzolzolzol.

        Judging by this latest odd logic of yours, you’re either a woman or a homosexual, aren’t you?

        LikeLike


  8. on February 6, 2015 at 7:26 am James Blonde

    Seahawks coach made typical white man game mistake of “unnecessary overthinking”

    1st and goal with 1 minute left and he tries to get cute with a short pass over the middle; WTF

    So many guys fail because they think complexity = best.

    Logic says given 3 attempts, “the beast” will never be denied a 1 yard gain.

    Don’t get cute, get er done.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 7:31 am Greg Eliot

      We’re all still shakin’ our haids over that one…

      Then again, I don’t think Brady deserved to lose two Superbowls to receivers who would make the spirit of Lou Gehrig rethink that whole “luckiest man on the face of the earth” thing.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 7:50 am Olay Dave

        No, we’re not shakin’ our heads nor was the call “cute”.

        Lynch was 1 for 5 on scoring chances in that situation, whereas Wilson was successful more often than not on that simple pick play. WR was open , Wilson was sloppy, allowing good recognition by the DB to prevail.

        Why was there good recognition? Because that pass play worked well before, therefore Bellichek had his team practice against it. If it hadn’t worked, no reason to practice against it. Carroll went for the percentages on second down. THAT was the simple call. Good call, poor execution. Excellent recognition.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 8:10 am James Blonde

        Sorry Dave, but that was a stupid fucking call.

        Why?

        Because whenever you call a pass play inside the 5 yard line, every defensive back instinctively knows he can basically knock the receiver down to intercept the ball without it being pass interference;

        and thats exactly what happened.

        Butler read the play and KNEW it would NOT be pass interference if he knocked his man down and stole the pass; and thats exactly what the fuck he did.

        I would have tried a fake hand off to Lynch and let the QB run it in. It would have worked because everybody was expecting the beast mode.

        That cute shit should have been saved for 4th and goal.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 8:13 am Greg Eliot

        Point taken on the extended analysis, but most sports writers and commentators, along with the man in the street, were in the vast majority of the “WTF?” camp.

        As has been mentioned, three shots at a 1 to 2 yd gain by one of the premier running backs, versus taking a chance in a crowded area of an interception?

        Making that short pass play work in an open field, versus on top of the end zone, is a hearse of a different colour.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 9:12 am everybodyhatesscott

        That safety should have swatted the ball away or picked it off. Balls in the air and he just hops over the guy?

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 1:31 pm Greg Eliot

        That safety should have swatted the ball away or picked it off. Balls in the air and he just hops over the guy?

        Good point, I had forgotten about that one… but my son and I immediately said the same thing when seeing the replay.

        Funny, I didn’t watch any of the game until the last 10 minutes… looks like I got a lot of bang for the buck for my time. lzzozozlzlzozlzozlzolzolozozl

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 2:07 pm A Random Guy

        Easy to say that watching in slo-mo – this all happens in a couple of seconds and the ball is scooting every which way. I gave him huge props for thinking to tackle the receiver since the play was not dead.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 2:22 pm Greg Eliot

        Point taken, and the Monday Morning QB’ing was already admitted.

        Still, as a defensive player, the instinct is supposed to be going after any sort of loose, live ball… whether to grasp or knock away.

        It just seemed odd that he chose to hurdle at that point.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 8:16 am Greg Eliot

      My initial reply got eaten, but basically it said the same thing as Blonde.

      Namely, a short pass play that works well in an open field, versus on top of the end zone, is a hearse of a different colour.

      And the vast majority of sports writers, commentators, and man-in-the-street were solidly in the “WTF?!!!” camp, because three shots at a 2 yd gain by a premier running back is pretty much money in the bank.

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 11:46 am Meet Isolate Escalate

      You guys are forgetting about a little thing called evidence here, mostly just to make yourself feel good (why is everyone shouting about someone else’s failure from the rooftops?).

      1. Lynch was 1/5 from goal to go at the 1 this year. Not a good percentage. Remember, he was stopped on the run that led to their previous FG on 3rd down too. Logic actually says while he may succeed, the odds are against it, and if he fails, do you run again on 3rd down risking the game on a stop (vs. clock stop with a pass?)

      2. 107 pass attempts this year at the 1 in the NFL. It’s a staple play. 66 were TDs. This was the ONLY interception all year. Fact.

      I’m not saying I wouldn’t have given the ball to Lynch there, but what I am saying is that there are plenty of reasons NOT to. Evidence is above. Read it and take it in, again.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 1:39 pm Greg Eliot

        Well, I don’t know who’s “shouting from the rooftops” to make themselves feel good. Dissection and “Monday Morning Q-Bing” has long been a staple of NFL games… how much more so the biggest game of the year?

        And if that’s what we’re doing here, well… looks like we have plenty of company, especially in the press… I saw no less than three major papers just in my city alone decrying the decision.

        So, your attempt at shaming language aside…

        First of all, the Lynch was 1/5 point was already made, and acknowledged.

        Second, how many of those 107 pass attempts at the one were made by a team that had THREE tries left, and a premier running back, against a premier defense?

        Third, are you sock-puppeting your previous OlayDave post, to make it seem like there’s some sort of consensus here? (((SMH)))

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 6:16 pm Mofo

        Yup. Most people go with feelz over facts. You’d think red pill types would be immune but apparently not.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 1:18 pm mendozatorres

      If Hightower doesn’t get off his man on 1st down and tackle Lynch before reaching the end zone, it’s all irrelevant. Helluva play and one that gets overlooked.

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 8:08 pm trav777

      and you simply do not know how professional sports work. The gameplan called for that play at that down and distance.

      There is no fucking thinking in pro sports; everything is gameplanned. They saw favorable matchups on tape from that set and had exploited them from that point all night.

      Lynch was not good from the 1 to begin with all year. The professionals knew their players’ tendencies and the oppositions’, from watching tape.

      The dude who said the DB could knock over the receiver, wtf…you can make contact if you are going for the ball, moron. It’s not PI if you are going for the ball and contact ensues. The DB has as much right to the position as the offensive player.

      LikeLike


  9. on February 6, 2015 at 7:27 am Greg Eliot

    I was going to congratulate CH on an exceeding droll collection of prose and analogies in this post… replete with citations of my especial favorite lines….

    … but then I realized I would have had to blockquote the entire article.

    Well-played, sir…. well-played, indeed!

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 7:34 am Laguna Beach Fogey

      “No class, battered ass, take a pass” is sure to become a classic.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 7:41 am Greg Eliot

        … and hit the gas.

        LikeLike


  10. on February 6, 2015 at 7:37 am Olay Dave

    “…..she is thirsty for LOVE itself.”

    One major correction here: She is NOT “thirsty for LOVE itself “. Rather, she is thirsty for the feeling of “being in LOVE”, not love itself.

    Love has no charge, no vag tingles…..

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 11:08 am FredMertz

      The sick thing is she was most likely inspired by some white slut/pig name of Stephanie,who claims-pic of them kissing–that she ‘fucked’ some nigger footballer.(I am vomiting) The nigger Odell something,denied it,but that may be just keeping his baby momma in a non-violent mode. Stephanie said,in effect,match this,”cunts”. Unusual for a bitch to use the C word. This could be some lowlevel underground slut game. (BTW Edelman is 1/2 YKW)

      LikeLike


  11. on February 6, 2015 at 8:04 am newlyaloof

    Thirsty sluts crave shot glasses filled with game juice. Be the bartender. (speaking of bartenders Heartiste, can you check your mod? I have a fr about a redheaded bartender in limbo. wish you could whitelist some of the regulars’ IPs)

    LikeLike


  12. on February 6, 2015 at 8:15 am pupton1974

    Brilliantly written, as always. You make your points with an amazing combination of sharp logic and juvenile comedy that is irresistible. I almost pissed myself when I read, “wi-fi fapping”…

    Keep up the good work man!

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 8:18 am Sentient

      This here “with girls hoisting their pummeled pussies aloft like trophies after a big win” is a line worthy of a trophy.

      LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 8:08 am EMP

      Yeah, heartiste’s pen is still sharp.

      LikeLike


  13. on February 6, 2015 at 8:20 am pupton1974

    By the way, if I understand it correctly, this slut is posting this as her “Tinder Ice Breaker” – meaning, she is attempting to attract male suitors for a relationship by advertising her status as a girl who has ridden a Superbowl champs cock, and bragged about it to the world. What a fucking dunce…Does she think guys are going to line up to bang her and post “I just fucked the girl who fucked Edelman” pics?

    http://www.totalprosports.com/2015/02/04/tinder-girl-sabrina-julian-edelman/

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 8:55 am FuriousFerret

      It’s just projection. Chicks like men that can sleep around, therefore her hamster concluded attractive guys also prefer this trait in their women.

      LOL at hamsters

      https://imgflip.com/i/has39

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 9:30 am Captain Obvious

        > “It’s just projection.”

        It’s HPD: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histrionic_Personality_Disorder

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 8:57 am FuriousFerret

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 9:04 am Caramba

        hahaha…I like this hamster mem.

        LikeLike


  14. on February 6, 2015 at 8:30 am Caramba

    Offtopic: a turkish beta so desperate to bang an ancient british 2-4, that he froze to death in a plane’s chassis.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2942581/Turkish-stowaway-froze-death-temperatures-low-60C-sneaking-landing-gear-BA-plane-attempt-visit-girlfriend-Britain.html

    I keep saying: blacks and sand-niggas (including one well known self crowned “pua”) are so desperate for pussy that they will do anything to get access to it, travel far, and even die.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 8:38 am llllooooolllzzzzzlllolll

      Roosh??

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 8:41 am John Dark

        Cruel…..

        LikeLike


  15. on February 6, 2015 at 8:34 am SuperFucker!

    Slutty girls have always done this… in private. Except now their sense of what’s private and what’s public has been short-circuited by social media.

    Oh my do I see a lot of angry, lonely spinsters in the future. Hide your cash in a mattress because if you think the chunk of your paycheck that goes to social welfare is big now, wait until this regretful generation of outed sluts hits 50. Or maybe 40. Hehe!

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 9:25 am John

      Women generally have it made no matter how slutty their past.

      [CH: no. sluts do pay a price, and the toll is usually exacted in the quality of man willing to settle down with their battered pussies.]

      Yes, the Wall is real, but I don’t really buy the whole “lonely spinstress” meme,

      [butthurt female commenter impersonating a man. it’s so obvious.]

      unless we’re talking about a true warhog. A mid 30’s 6 can always marry a 5’5″ AZN dentist and ride alpha on the side.

      [the asn dentist won’t be close to her first choice, she’ll have settled, and she’ll know it. as for riding on the side, nope, sorry. the older the woman, the fewer opportunities she’ll have to enjoy her alpha male cake too. what? you really think men with options don’t exercise them?]

      In fact that seems to be the goal for most UMC shrews these days, give or take an AZN husband. I just saw an article the other day about a fucking porn star that swindled a priest into marriage. lol

      [priest. come on lady. what kind of man is irretrievably beta, unsexy, and sexually inexperienced? a priest.]

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 12:44 pm John

        Not female, not trolling. Just saying, women rarely get what they want these days but they will never have a moment of introspection where they admit they should have settled for that nice Peter back in 1st year grad. They will always find a way to make it not their fault, and for every shriveled shrew with dead ovaries there’s a thirsty young jockstrap ready for a lol sportfuck to make her feel “wild”.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 12:54 pm corvinus

        [priest. come on lady. what kind of man is irretrievably beta, unsexy, and sexually inexperienced? a priest.]

        Oddly enough, the elderly pre-Vatican II priests I know don’t come off as beta/low value, but those ordained after Vatican II most certainly do. It would be consistent with the faggotification of the Church that happened with Vatican II.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 3:48 pm James Blonde

        John
        Just saying, women rarely get what they want these days but they will never have a moment of introspection where they admit they should have settled for that nice Peter back in 1st year grad.
        ———————————————————————————————-

        Hey John, their moments of introspection come one pint of Haggen Daz at a time.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 10:22 am RosieOnMaChest

        Women generally have it made no matter how slutty their past”

        There’s a large body of evidence which suggests – modern women have never been more unhappy…

        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1218372/Why-women-miserable.html

        “A mid 30’s 6 can always marry a 5’5”

        The reason H and others here (including myself) suspected your handle of camouflaging a dried up old gash, is because you seem to have missed the innately “hypergamous” nature of the female mating strategy…. A F6 marrying a M 5.5 is a loss for her – and every cell in her body knows it.

        I just saw an article the other day about a fucking porn star that swindled a priest into marriage”

        History is littered with “fallen women” obsessing over righteous men. Alas for some Men (as in the case you mention) the spirit is strong but the flesh is week.

        In fact nothing seems to sticks in the craw of a slut more than a righteous man strong enough to resist her. Or as I like to call it, the…. Bring me the head of John the Baptist, syndrome.

        Anyway can’t chat, got a Vicars & Tarts party to organise.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 11:19 am Randy the Random

        Heartiste this dude is bang on, and he’s most definitely a dude. I see this all the time in areas with high asian density. Asians are unstoppable workhorses, what they lack in alpha they are designed to make up for in resources. A buddy growing up is a 5″3, fat ugly asian dude that is so beta it hurts. He’s cried in public (with HBs present) many times, and this was only the times I was present.

        The dude is a relentless drone, has been working since he could walk, and is always saving and scheming on how to make the most risk adjusted cash within his extremely limited set of talents. He’s not smart, sociable or funny. He is just a workhorse.

        The guy is enganged to a FOB 4, but he’s always crushed on white girls who didn’t give him the time of day in high school. I absolutely see him getting more desperate as he ages for that white puss, and cashing out some dude’s used up white ride for a chance at high school redemption.

        This sh!t is everywhere man. You’d think with you blogging about this since like 1999, these dumb beta mofos would’ve caught on, but no dice.

        LikeLike


  16. on February 6, 2015 at 8:37 am martin

    Something about celebrities makes people, particularly women, act crazy. I don’t know who Edelman is but I think it is shameful to take a picture of him in a private moment like that and then broadcast it. Why does Edelman get no privacy rights? I guess men are expected to not care if their privacy is invaded. I have seen too many instances of women doing dumb things with phones, and in every case, it has something to do with a selfie. So here is yet another unjust thing done. As far as Edelman, if he is such a desired man, what’s he doing going on Tinder? This is what you should expect from a slut on Tinder and at this point how can anyone think women on it aren’t sluts.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 8:45 am Captain Obvious

      > “Something about celebrities makes people, particularly women, act crazy”

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histrionic_Personality_Disorder

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 8:58 am Captain Obvious

        HPD conditioning in the 2000s:

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 8:51 am Caramba

      If I was famous and some mediocre slut sent a picture of me sleeping to the internets, I would sue her.Capital letters SUE.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 3:55 pm Anonymous

        If I was famous & engaged in potentially embarrassing activity with smartphone-addicted sluts, I’d have a simple rule: upon entry to my home, all sluts’ smartphones go into a shielded & locked metal box sitting just inside the front door. Sluts who can’t part with their smartphones can catch a cab from the front step, because they aren’t coming inside. Only old phones w/o cameras allowed inside.

        Simple.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 9:04 am Laguna Beach Fogey

      Chalk it up to what I call the Beard Effect.

      LikeLike


  17. on February 6, 2015 at 8:43 am Captain Obvious

    > “Who knows for certain what’s going through the thirsty slut’s head?”

    Histrionic Personality Disorder – HPD – within the larger Cluster B framework.

    > “I have a theory: It’s attention whore enabling technology plus the EFFECTIVE sex ratio influencing the dating lives of 15-30 year old women that’s provoking mass public sluttery.”

    Don’t overlook the power of the culture. The Frankfurt School would have seen these pathologies in their jewess patients – back then they would have called it “Nymphomania”, rather than HPD – and they knew damned well that this hunger was lurking [to one degree or another] in almost all women, and could be fully unleashed in large numbers of women if only the right buttons were pushed. Fast forward to the 21st Century, and everywhere you look, you see Frankfurt School disciples who are poisoning the culture with this button pushing. Little girls now are growing up on a 24×7 diet of this HPD filth.

    LikeLike


  18. on February 6, 2015 at 8:48 am Captain Obvious

    HPD conditioning for toddler-ettes:

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 8:51 am Captain Obvious

      HPD conditioning in the 1990s:

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 9:03 am Captain Obvious

        Natural consequence of all that HPD conditioning: http://popbytes.com/britney_spears_crotch_pussy_no_panties_shot_picture_wrap_up/

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 8:59 am Captain Obvious

      HPD conditioning in the 2000s :

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 9:04 am Captain Obvious

        Natural consequence of all that HPD conditioning: https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=twerking+miley+cyrus

        LikeLike


  19. on February 6, 2015 at 8:52 am Prof. Woland

    From an evolutionary standpoint, it makes perfect sense for women to try and mate with highest SMV men possible. The problem is that rather than using the brief sexual encounter to improve her offspring’s genes she is using it to try and improve her mediocre status and ends up doing neither. She is too stupid to know that she missed her only opportunity to rise above 7 and it looks like Kahoutek will not be coming back any time soon.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 8:55 am Caramba

      Prof Woland?wtf…Nice ,Master and Margarita is known in states?

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 10:12 am Prof. Woland

        Never talk to strangers!

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 11:01 am Carlos Danger

        Yes because of Sympathy for the Devil by the Rolling Stones.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 9:17 am everybodyhatesscott

      Raising a child without a father is evolutionary suicide. That our stupid state subsidizes it doesn’t mean it’s great for evolution. That baby from that high status guy? Yeah, it’s going to starve to death before it hits puberty, or if it’s slut mother can figure out how to keep it alive till puberty can be a future stripper or prostitute.

      If she has a son, maybe he’ll get daddies genes and manage to make it big and knock up a few sluts of his own.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 4:33 pm corvinus

        AFAIK people with the name “Fitzroy” don’t do any better than other people.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 5:47 pm SC

        It’s not evolutionary suicide in equatorial Africa, Papua New Guinea, Australia, and parts of South America.

        I think the whole reason why some women want to have kids with cads is so that their sons will also grow into cads.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 9:30 am EMP

        Exactly…r-selection works great at the equators…from a sheer reproduction standpoint. But in the end it will be a K-selected and extremely xenophobic group with access to extreme force multipliers, that inherits the earth, or what’s left of it.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 10:33 am Harland

      Kahoutek…wow, that’s a bit of a dated reference, don’t you think? That was old when I was a kid and wondering what it meant in books of old Charlie Brown and Snoopy cartoons.

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 3:54 pm Hugh Mann

      “it looks like Kahoutek will not be coming back any time soon”

      You mean that Edelman is unlikely to “comet” his genes or resources to her in the future ?

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 8:09 pm Prof. Woland

        yes

        LikeLike


  20. on February 6, 2015 at 9:08 am askjoe

    I was going to say that this chick looks like she was duped into bang with hipster with heavy beard who lied about being edelman. But that link…it’s funny…Boston’s “industry” people are pissed. She’s been banned from some bars and called a 5.

    Another point is Hanna D, Jeter’s current girlfriend, may be a jock sniffer or not but she got the relationship. And compare her to this thing. that’s how u do it, eh?

    LikeLike


  21. on February 6, 2015 at 9:15 am Via Dolorosa

    Q: Are sluts redeemable? Can they ever be worth the investment of an LTR? Beta males are redeemable – what dispensations for the slut?

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 9:27 am Captain Obvious

      Ask some dudes who have dated female porn stars. Can they ever fully forget the vaginal slamming which they received, back in the day? In theory, everyone can experience a “Come to Jesus” moment, but for sluts, I’d guess that they’re in danger of relapsing into a “Cum with Jesse” mode. On the other hand, a certain kind of reformed slut can be a good mother, since they know what to warn their daughters about. E.g. Madonna seems to watch Lourdes like a hawk. I do know that Katy Perry and Taylor Swift and Lady GaGa all came from extremely conservative families – will they grow up some day and become good mothers?

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 9:44 am Bill Brasky

        it is to laugh…every time I hear about somebody I know marrying some slut who already spent her prime years cheating on him, I want to punch the idiot in the face.

        Enablers. It feels like they’re breaking the most justified workers’ strike ever.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 1:23 pm Greg Eliot

        Enablers. It feels like they’re breaking the most justified workers’ strike ever.

        Good analogy.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 9:10 am EMP

        great analorgy bill

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 1:25 pm having a bad day

      @via dolorosa

      “Q: Are sluts redeemable?”

      yes…but not for LTRs…they make great cat rescue managers…lol…

      “Can they ever be worth the investment of an LTR?”

      no…

      “Beta males are redeemable – what dispensations for the slut?”

      none…the basic issue is that ‘beta’ is wired in, but in this case, you CAN fix a hardware problem with software…and then bc of the wondrous nature of brain chemistry, that software change helps change the hardware (over time…) to allow former betas to become ‘natural’ alphas…

      for sluts, the issue isn’t something that CAN be changed. every time a girl gets exposed to a different male’s ‘chemical cocktail’ (whether in vag, mouth, on skin, etc.) it has a permanent effect on that girl’s chemical makeup (limbic system, which can not be changed…only ‘added to’) and that is independent of pregnancy…

      regarding ‘fidelity’ (more partners = less bond develops with each new partner)…that’s why ‘virgin’ is the ideal (and is the gold standard of ‘marriageability’ throughout history, across the world and forever and always…) condition of a bride. she’ll ‘bond’ with her husband…

      sluts…not so much…

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 3:28 pm Via Dolorosa

      Some Beta that strolls up with a porn star or Madonna on his arm has instant Alpha cred. Just as if some worker crossed a picket line, walked inside and bought the company…. But those are shit analogies… There was good post that mathematically showed how a woman could accrue a higher N count than a beta male by rolling from LTR to LTR … So beta male learns game and goes on a sex spree … What does the slut do? Abstain?

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 6:26 pm llllooooolllzzzzzlllolll

      A beta turning alpha is nothing like a slut turning ltr material.

      For one thing, the alphas value goes up with age and experience. The slut hits the wall and all she has is good bj skills and a desperate willingness to do anythibg asked of her.

      The slut is unwanted by men of value. You look at her and see other mens cum. The desperation and loneliness behind her eyes. A slut truly is a beta male in this way. But sges iredeemable. The damage is done.

      In short, a beta can only get better, while a slut is damaged for life. Being the creature of vslue, she was already the “alpha”, in a way. She squandered her gifts. The beta has ywt to The slut can only grab hold of a married man, grow her own food, sew her own clothes, and beg to be called by his name, in hopes it will take away ger reproach.

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 7:00 pm Tom White

      > Are sluts redeemable?

      You can’t unfuck a pussy

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 7:09 pm Shortest_Straw

        Intuitively we all know this is true. But why?

        Is it because a certain kind of woman becomes a slut?

        Or is it because the act of being a slut changes a woman in some profound way?

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 8:20 pm Heywood Jablome

        Do you pay new tire prices for used tires?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 8:06 am Amy

        “Is it because a certain kind of woman becomes a slut?

        Or is it because the act of being a slut changes a woman in some profound way?”

        It’s both. I have said before, I observe two types of promiscuous girls. Some girls are just “hard”… they like sex and variety like men do, they find it easy to avoid attachments. They are the “certain kind of woman” who becomes a slut. The other kind, which I think is more common, is the low self-esteem girl with sensitivity, who substitutes sex for affection and attention and is sleeping around to validate herself. She’s the one who could be redeemable if she catches herself early enough, but if not she’ll damage herself, lose her ability to bond, avoid attachments, become numb to sex, etc.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 11:54 am Randy the Random

        > I observe two types of promiscuous girls.

        Aw cute girl logic. It’s called serum Testosterone. Females have it too. More Test = more confidence, hornier and can have sex without attachment.

        But also: high waist-hip ratio (close to 1), broader shoulders, strong facial features and pronounced mandibles, deeper voice. To summarize for the girly girls and no so smarts: not attractive.

        The only type of sluts we like are young and insecure, good for a wild ride and then dumped to be another man’s problem. Rich men buy cars new and sell when they’re bored. Poor men save up to buy used.

        Women have always been cars, even before cars were invented. They increasing maintenance and upkeep as they age for less reliability and performance. No rich (alpha) man would keep an old car as soon as it starts showing symptoms of age. Easier and cheaper to buy another new.

        Only idiots get emotionally attached to a vehicle whose purpose is utility and pleasure. It is not your child, its a workhorse.

        This being said, there used to be a gentleman’s agreement to preserve the environment and minimize waste by buying brand new and maintaining till old age. Turns out, the auto marketers wanted you to new and more often and dump your used cars, and dealers loved it. So here we are sweetie.

        Enjoy the wall…of increasingly unaffordable maintenance.

        LikeLike


  22. on February 6, 2015 at 9:43 am mendozatorres

    “She is thirsty for SOCIAL STATUS. She is thirsty for VALIDATION of her worth as a woman to love.”

    Reminds me of my buddies wife. She was recanting a story about driving in her convertible sports car (Pontiac Solstice) and had pulled up next to a bus, waiting at a red light. A balled up piece of paper fell into the passenger seat. She picked it up and it was the bus driver’s phone number. She was disgusted by this given that he was an overweight black guy.

    Then she added, “I have this car and that’s who hits on me?!” In short, she bought a sports car to attract guys not realizing that it doesn’t work that way.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 9:50 am Captain Obvious

      Sounds like your buddy married a chick with a reasonably good head on her shoulders. Tell him that Le Chateau says that he should consider himself lucky.

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 10:04 am James Blonde

      +1 for the black guys creativity and metal a-hole-ness.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 1:21 pm Greg Eliot

        Says the resident lawn jockey…

        This is why negroes be disdained by white folks… get a clue.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 3:59 pm James Blonde

        And Greg Eliot brings the hater game; that train is never late.

        Believe it or not, a-hole game like that bus driver played works. Greg is just mad it don’t work for him.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 4:34 pm Greg Eliot

        Just doing my job as the bouncer around here when you snarky darkies pat yourselves on the back too hard. lzlzozlzozlzozlozlozlozl

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 5:25 pm James Blonde

        Keep laughing Casper:

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 8:25 pm Heywood Jablome

        You forget: non-elite Europeans have a deeply concealed cultural propensity for genocide. When the current invasion gets bad enough, there will be a bloody pushback.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 6:41 am James Blonde

        The penis mightier than the sword.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 9:26 am Greg Eliot

        Keep posting those type of pictures, Sambo…

        They do more to stir a sense of unease and eventual awakening in the sleeping white giant than ten thousand words of rhetoric ever could.

        And enjoy the irony of how your ilk’s attempts at neener-neener just might be what turns back into the seas the rising tide of colour.

        Habt acht.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 9:33 am everybodyhatesscott

        Keep laughing Casper:

        That one kid could grow up and kill all of them.

        People always seem to forget it’s easier to kill people than make new ones

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 10:32 am James Blonde

        That one kid could grow up and kill all of them.
        ————————————————————————–

        I suspect it will grow up to kill its mom and dad; after all, who tha fuck you think took the picture?

        wake up white man.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 6:29 pm Skunk

        The white kid in that picture is the only one wearing shoes.

        LikeLike


      • on February 11, 2015 at 4:41 pm FredMertz

        The girl on the right with her hand clapped over her mouth…nice set o tits…

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 10:14 am Karl

      “I have this car”

      who paid for the car?

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 11:17 am mendozatorres

        She bought it and that just now triggers the memory that she made mention that she bought it in her.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 4:36 pm Greg Eliot

        Who ride this is?

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 3:11 pm KP

      Nice typo!

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 4:40 pm mendozatorres

        Heh

        LikeLike


  23. on February 6, 2015 at 10:00 am OhioStater

    You can chase 8s, 9s, 10s but you can’t chase 5s, 6s, or 7s. Likewise, you’ll have to be indirect and aloof with thirsty sluts whereas direct will work better with hotter girls. I’m just thinking that you’d have more success with the thirsty slut if you act the way Edelman likely acted.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2015 at 2:51 am driveallnight

      Aye.

      LikeLike


  24. on February 6, 2015 at 10:04 am Mel Gibson

    What (not really) surprised me about this was that she apparently posted this on her Tinder profile. What exactly does she gain from this? She’s not going to make other women jealous, because they’re not viewing her profile. Does she expect the thirsty betas who view it to react in jealousy? In admiration? Any attention is good attention, I guess.

    Furthermore, think of the schlub who will marry this slut after her carousel-riding days are over. All of the snickers on their wedding day, which he’s been ingrained to believe is the best day of his life. He can never have sex with her without knowing she so easily gave away her prized pussession to a drunken fling.

    Now go even further into the future – their children. In 20 years when those kids are in middle or high school, they’ll be teased and taunted by classmates – “Dude, your mom is a whore!” “I heard about your mom! Do you ever ask your dad how Edelman’s dick tastes?!” Etc. etc.

    She’s ruined her life. All for a few minutes of attention.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 5:50 pm SC

      I think that she may be one of the few women who actually enjoy casual sex for the sake of casual sex. If she advertises herself as already having it with a man, then men looking for it know that she’s really DTF,

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 6:00 pm Shortest_Straw

        I doubt it. She doesn’t do it to advertise her sexual availability. She does it out of projection: She knows that if she sees a man with a desirable woman, she sees him as more desirable. She assumes that the dynamic works the other way around.

        How many times have girls tried to get their boyfriends jealous by getting with other guys? It’s insane if you think about it. By and large it will make the boyfriend go away.

        If she sees a guy surrounded by girls, she will happily throw herself into the fray. If a guy sees a girl surrounded by guys, he’ll go off in search of easier prey.

        She knows full well that if she wants casual sex, all she has to do is post a remotely provocative picture on Tinder.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 7:02 pm Tom White

      I don’t know what she wants but I know what she’ll get – more guys messaging her because they know she is an easy lay but none of them will want to put in any more than token effort to get her in the sack.

      Think back to how everyone treated the girl in highschool with a rep as a whore.

      LikeLike


  25. on February 6, 2015 at 10:10 am Karl

    Well, she needs a new guy now. Apply for the opening! Ms Sabrina [REDACTED]. Hey, she wanted her 15 minutes of fame.

    [CH: no doxxing folks. the tools of the SJWs are corrupt. the dox-free shiv cuts a much prettier wound.

    not only that, but one can never be sure if the details are correct. CH is many things but we are not in the business of fucking over innocents.]

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 10:40 am Harland

      Doxxing people in public is not cool, at all.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 12:42 pm anonymous

        Who gives a shit. There’s a war on, motherfucker.

        Let the enemy have it and let ’em have it hard.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 1:52 pm anon

        Women have “doxxed” our fucking civilization for 40 years and especially the last 15, bro. More precisely, YKW has led them to “doxx” pretty white shiksa from giving us pretty, smart, productive children.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 3:59 pm Heywood Jablome

        How is giving such attention to an attention whore a bad thing?

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 5:52 pm SC

        @anonymous if you think there’s a war between men and women, you have already lost. Only in Western Civ do you get hordes of raging feminists plus hordes of raging MRAs. Both sides are fighting fire with fire.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 1:11 am Karl

        you know, Harland, you’re right.

        By the way, I checked on Google Map, there’s a jeweler store in the mall about 3/4 mile away.

        Spend a lot on your engagement ring for her; it will make her loyal to you for a lifetime.

        Get the one that resembles a SuperBowl ring, why don’t you. So she can show it off to all her besties on her Girls Nights Out!

        Do ===not=== ask for a pre-nup; that would be insulting.

        Anyway, I gave you her contact info. Name the first kid after me, will you?

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 9:51 pm anonYmous

        there be a war between men and womenz. men be like, “i just wanna build things and get laid” women be like, “lets replace men with robotz.” hehe.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 10:40 am ho

      Hehe, cruel.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 10:38 am Olay Dave

        White knights be white-knighting!

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 9:35 am EMP

      LOzlolz every girl I’ve met from natick was a total turbo slut

      LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 11:24 am Fearless

      @anonymous Even in war there’s something called measured response, This isn’t a war, if you think you’re fighting in one you’re an idiot at best. Doxxing is a tactic used by faux-outraged feminists and SJW’s.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 10:53 pm Karl

        >> Doxxing is a tactic used by faux-outraged feminists and SJW’s

        doxxing is a tactic used to ensure that, 7 years from now, no man gets deceived into putting a ring onto a washed-up slut who slings some “pretty lie”.

        This website ===exist=== for (among other things) that purpose.

        If you’re not comfortable seeing these truths, there’s plenty of bandwidth available for you to participate in – over at jezebel.com

        LikeLike


  26. on February 6, 2015 at 10:41 am Edelweiss

    There are so many comments (here and elsewhere on the internetz) about the slut, but nobody seems to appreciate the other side of the story. This Edelman dude worked so hard for the championship, and then his reward is a mediocre slut. He could have done so much better, even a mid level gamer (CH type, not video) can bang sluts like that.

    On a different note, it would have been very symbolic to organize a slut walk to follow the champions parade, and then show the images of the slimy snail like trail the overheated vaginas leave on the asphalt. Hypergamy in a picture.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 11:36 am Laguna Beach Fogey

      I think the problem is he’s only 5’10”.

      Even a cool playoff beard can’t compensate for being below 6′.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 1:32 pm having a bad day

        ya, i hear that…but that dude has BANK…he could have easily bought that hotter girl some flowers…lol…

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 1:56 pm Lumpy

        Julian Edelman’s Girlfriend Olivia Frischer:

        http://www.playerwives.com/nfl/new-england-patriots/julian-edelmans-girlfriend-olivia-frischer/

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 2:10 pm anon

        dude, he’s jacked and a total badass. total badass. he goes over the middle to purposely get hit helmet to helmet by 250 lb african linebackers, gets a concussion, and keeps gaining yards ON THAT PLAY.

        he uses roids, obviously, but still…

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 12:06 pm Randy the Random

        > Even a cool playoff beard can’t compensate for being below 6′.

        HAHAHAHAH betas are funny. Dawg, don’t project your insecurities onto apex alphas. That shit just doesn’t work. Check the pics linked below of the dude’s GF. If that aint a 10, I don’t know what is.

        GSP is 5’10. There are hundreds of Apex Alphas that are well below 5’10. Don’t be mad cause your height doesn’t equate to immediate 10s. That’s not how it works homes.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 12:10 pm Randy the Random

        BTW I bring up GSP cause I know him and his trainer. His trainer was averaging around 8 HB10s a week in Montreal, said he didn’t have time for more.

        GSP stopped talking to non-celebrity girls cause it was too easy. Being a competitor, he felt like he was cheating.

        Apex alpha is a whole other world dawg. You can’t even fathom it. Don’t bring that beta stat sheet shit into the discussion.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 2:10 pm A Random Guy

      You’re missing the point. Even the biggest lover of gourmet food occasionally likes to scarf down a burger and shake, and never even think about it again (especially if drunk). She was a pump and dump, nothing more…

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 2:54 pm Anonymous

        fuck the height.

        im 5’8″ and pull 8+ that make you stare across the street.

        what flaccid penis remark was that?

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 7:04 pm Tom White

        Precisely. Sometimes you take what is easy and available because its easy and available. Remember Arnie banging his maid or BJ Bill doing his secretary.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 10:40 am Olay Dave

        Remember too, Edelman had a concussion from the Super Bowl. It wasn’t as if he could see straight or anything and turned upside down, women all pretty much look the same!

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 7:21 pm Anonymous

      I bet he did some seriously nasty shit to her. Like stuff he wouldn’t do to LTR material. – Sometimes a dude needs hardcore pump and dump.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 10:33 am anonYmous

        She looks like someone who’s been well traveled sexually. Decent face 30 lbs overweight. On the downswing of the wall. I bet she could tell some stories but she has a body black men love.

        With all the knocks to the head i bet edls hormones are out of whack leading to sexual deviance. The pic was hamsterized as retaliation for something weird he did to her.

        LikeLike


  27. on February 6, 2015 at 10:41 am ho

    “…like a dude posting “just bought dinner for Emma Stone” and posting an $800 receipt.

    Slut girl = beta guy”

    I read this and chuckled myself. Perfect analogy.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 11:20 am chi-town

      I am not sure if we deal in nouns or verbs but being slutty and acting beta are probably the worst things the respective sexes can do for their implied goals.

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 12:56 pm Shortest_Straw

      I get your point but it’s a little more subtle. You have to invert the situation a little more. The true beta corollary is a guy wifing up a slut.

      He’s giving up his single status for something he should have been able to get for free.

      She’s giving up her virginal status for something she should have been able to get to commit.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 4:36 pm corvinus

        Well, to be fair, I wouldn’t expect this sloot to have been a virgin when she got with Edelman.

        LikeLike


  28. on February 6, 2015 at 11:06 am Mark Minter

    If anyone knows of where this article exists, perhaps in some archive, please post it. I doubt you’ll find it because when Mentu shut down UMan the general consensus was that he had a good reason and to respect his choice. Perhaps the dogs were too close.

    But back in the day Mentu from UMan posted this piece about slut fuel. It basically was this same idea as this post.

    He stated that a girl has only so much “slut fuel” to use to remain in orbit around alphas. He actually gave a formula that showed that the higher SMV a girl had, the less “slut fuel” she had to use to remain in orbit.

    But in his formula, “payload” or weight was a serious factor in achieving lift-offs and orbit. So a chubby 7 would require as much fuel as a thin 6 to achieve orbit.

    And the higher the payload, (the fatter the girl) the more fuel was burned and at some level of payload, orbit was never achieved.

    The funny observation was in the formula, personality was considered by a factor of subtracting (P/10) from total slut units of fuel burned. So at best, a great personality (and no woman has better than a 9) was some value that approached 1. So a 6 with an excellent personality was about the same as a total bitch 7.

    Simon Shepard, calls the behavior of the “I fucked Edelman” woman “Proclamation of Enhancement”. It’s pretty instinctive behavior. It’s even coded into to Facebook so any “relationship status” change triggers a message out into the world so women can broadcast. Facebook should add an “I fucked a celeb” status.

    But do not underestimate the power of fucking higher SMV men can have on beta males.

    Stacy Keibler was dumped by Clooney back in March 2013 prior to him meeting this woman he married. She picked up “tech entrepreneur” Jared Pobre rather quickly. She had said “she wanted a family” and Clooney wanted something else(or someone else obviously). She put up an ultimatum and Clooney showed her the door in March 2013. By July she had picked up this Pobre guy, a developer-made-good in software that does “results-focused” online advertising and is worth about 50 million today. Apparently dating Clooney leftovers works for the guy as some form of gaining Celebrity. He’s probably a contextual alpha, a least at work, but you can take a geek out of geekdom, but its really hard to take the geekdom out of the geek. So he has 50 million reasons that he passed her “beta testing” and she lead him straight down the aisle post haste.

    And she is what she is today, gaining some notoriety, as a Clooney castoff. She has her own site now and was interviewed by something called “Origin” magazine, all on the basis of being Clooney’s ex. No woman would give two shits about some former WWE fake wrestler and former star of SuperMarket Superstar, whatever the fuck that is. But a Clooney reject, at least she was able to get in the game with the guy for a minute, and all women sympathize with an alpha widow. The quote from the Origin interview was:
    “My biggest lesson is that the judgement of others is never a good thing.”

    So despite what Strong and Independent women say, the key Sheppard Maxim holds true:

    “Women get their power from men. And then they use it against them.”

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 5:55 pm SC

      Yes, being the ex of a powerful man does have benefits. Liz Hurley had her entire acting and modelling career simply by being the long term girlfriend of Hugh Grant. However, it seems to only work if the relationship was long term. A one night stand doesn’t give the girl any long term career advantages.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 6:01 pm Shortest_Straw

        This helped Liz Hurley’s career, but didn’t so shit for her mating prospects.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 7:05 pm Tom White

        I’m sure Liz Hurley’s career was also helped by the fact she was hot

        LikeLike


  29. on February 6, 2015 at 11:07 am Sean Fielding

    ‘Undying fame’ or ‘eternal glory’ are English formulations of the Homeric epithet ‘kleos aphthiton,’ derived from ‘klevos andgitom’ in the original Aryan language. This epic diction is literally a poetic gift of our ancestors to parallel their visual love for the realistic human form.

    Fast forward 5,000 years, hand the culture over to feminism and insto-tech, and ‘eternal glory’ becomes 15 minutes long, after which the slut begins to experience remorse.

    She just couldn’t resist the lure of her quarter hour.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 10:38 am Captain Obvious

      > “hand the culture over to feminism”

      SF, now consider the possibility that feminism was INTENTIONALLY DESIGNED by a particularly evil group of psychiatrists who had seen “Nymphomania” and Hystrionic Personality DIsorder [within the greater sphere of Cluster B] in their female patients and who came to realize that this hypergamous social-ladder-climbing insanity existed [to one degree or another] in all women, and that if only they could undermine the ancient cultural mores which held this insanity at bay, then they could wipe out entire civilizations. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School

      LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 10:45 am Captain Obvious

      Somebody here – PA? GE? MK? – once opined that Vatican II was a filter which would separate out the faithful wheat from the predestined chaff.

      Social Media [and Narcissistic/Histrionic outlets everywhere from YouTube to xHamster] could very well serve the same role for any girls with an IQ high enough to upload a photograph or a video to the internet [IQ >= 90?]. And this technology will certainly be a monumental test of the fortitude & will power of the families which try to protect their little girls from this madness.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 1:08 pm Greg Eliot

        Wasn’t me… I’m not Catholic and don’t presume to understand Papal decrees.

        And I’m not so sure that intermediate IQ is needed for today’s technology… I’m sure there are a bunch of gals and guys in the 70 range that can finagle getting a selfie up to their Facebook pages. 😉

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2015 at 10:59 am Captain Obvious

        How the fuck do IQ-70 nogs grasp the concept of a password? They’re completely illiterate. I’d also ask how the fuck do they pay the phone bill, but Carlos Slim Helu and the Obamaphone to the rescue. Wanna take bets on whether Bitch McConnell or Race Cuckhold Boehner will try to end that program?

        LikeLike


  30. on February 6, 2015 at 11:09 am little spoon

    I have a few outwardly promiscuous female friends. They claim they have no qualms with how many men they have slept with. I feel this attitude is encouraged by society. I am guessing that I don’t have any female friends that are clandestine sluts. Either they put out a lot because they believe in feminist sexual library or they don’t and have nothing to hide. If I have slut friends who are not of the thirsty variety, I can’t place them.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 1:45 pm heyjay

      I, too, believe in the holy feminist sexual library!

      LikeLike


  31. on February 6, 2015 at 11:10 am chi-town

    Commercial female pulchritude follows the same dynamic. Very attractive models can stay in main stream glamor dabbling in Maxim or Swimsuit issues. Then enter Playboy as entry level glamor porn. We still tend to have very attractive women all the way to Penthouse style. However one can see a slight decent away from anyone in the male audience declaring 10s and 9s to 9s and 8s. If one is expecting to get a good look at a vulva, its going to be no more than an 8 typically.

    Hard core porn is full of 7s and with the occasional 8. When one gets to bestiality , and S&M, a 6 is as baby faced as one can expect.

    LikeLike


  32. on February 6, 2015 at 11:37 am Mel Gibson

    It appears she posted this picture onto her Tinder profile. Women won’t get jealous because they’re not swiping right on other women, so cross the catiness BS off. Is she trying to make the men who view her profile jealous? Envious? “You fucked Edelman! That’s sooo cool!” Men, even most beta schlubs, aren’t programmed like that. This is 100 percent for attention.

    Furthermore, one day a schlub will wife up this slut. On what is supposed to be the greatest day of his life (as so he’s been ingrained to believe since childhood), will feature snickers and sneers from wedding guests. Every time he has sex with her, he will know (no matter how much he rationalizes) that she gave away herself to another man on a one-night drunken fling.

    Next, they will have children. Imagine the insults and taunts they will face while in middle or high school. “Your mom is a slut!” “Hey, I heard your mom fucked Edelman and posted it online! Have you ever asked your dad how Edelman’s dick tastes?!”

    She’s ruined her life. All for a few minutes of attention.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 12:38 pm Hook or Crook

      I wholeheartedly recommend to any man who is on the fence about the true nature of women to get a Tinder account. In addition to realizing that they are all the same.fucking.girl (picture of their back as they raise their arms triumphantly in some foreign locale? Check. Holding a dog up to their face in an attempt to be cute by association? Check. Comment about being ‘fluent’ in sarcasm? DOUBLE CHECK.), you will see squat 4’s demanding men that are over 6 feet tall, status whores unabashedly using their account solely to get more orbiters for their instagram accounts, and some of the most bizarre displays of misappropriated masculinity you have ever seen. Girls are crass, short-sighted and retarded, and Tinder amplifies this by giving you a crash course into what they view as their ‘best foot forward’. My Tinder rates are fucking abysmal compared to my real life pulls (Tinder is also great for dispelling you of any myths you may hold about your looks, lol), but just a few swipes on my phone before I approach an actual, physical girl puts me in the proper frame of mind every time.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 1:49 pm anon dudebro

        Well said!
        A few swipes on my phone will usually make me wanna spend the night at home though, it’s demeaning…

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 2:01 pm anon

        and the outdated sites like POF are even worse, because there they still often write longer profiles, in which they (riddled with grammar and spelling and punctuation errors) brag about being “educated,” having “traveled the world,” now ready to settle down at age 38 (finally!!!) or if they are still younger than 30 that’s like 19 in their cute little brains– “not looking for anything serious”, have no accomplishments, most of them with an AA degree or “some college” in their 30s, same generic photos like you said… I could go on. I’ve put longer comments on this issue here in the past. You will not find one profile that does not put their extreme stupidity and brainwashing on full display. They thing 38 is the new 28. They think 28 is the new 18. YKW taught them that their entire lives. Any woman who gets pregnant before 30 nowadays, it was a mistake and they view it as stealing from their party years too early.

        alpha fux beta bux that is well known to most us by now…. on full display, but they truly don’t understand their own selves.

        You’ll find thousands of 37 year olds who “want a relationship” and kids “some day” and also “want what their mom had with their dad.” They are completely oblivious to the idea that they don’t offer what their mom offered, because their mom got married at age 21 (or 19) and gave her good hot years from age 19-35 to her dad. They totally are ANGRILY vehemently bought in to the YKW feminist idea that their career or traveling or “confidence” is attractive to a man. If you point out to them that 38 to 28 is like a guy who is 6’2″ vs 5’7″ to them, they will literally go ballistic, stomp their feet, and storm off. (I made one ugly HB0 rat faced jew do that just last night for fun…toying with her by purposely challenging all the YKW leftist bullshit. lzozlzozlzozol

        Like the left they created, they cannot even have a civil conversation if you challenge their beliefs with simple, incontrovertible facts.

        They literally think that a woman who is 38 should have the same shot with a 38 year old man as one who is 28, even if that man wants children. Her Jew answer was “you could adopt.” lzozozozlzl what in the everliving fuck!! I tried to explain to her that a man has a right to want to create his own children and pass on his genes. This literally blew her jew mind.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 4:31 pm JironGhrad

        Tinder is also highly context dependent. In the online world, most females auto-edit certain things that they are fine with face to face. 10 years ago, it was easy to pull a different girl every night online. Now? Most females put a 5-7 year age range on things and the internet conveniently lets them block anything outside their pre-set range. For shits, I tried setting my age block back 5 years (no other changes) and it tripled my connections. If nothing else, that just goes to prove that females (generally speaking) are the ultimate uninformed voter.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 4:37 pm corvinus

        To be fair, I tried Tinder once, and even had it when I went to a major city, and never saw a broad on there higher than a 7.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 4:42 pm mendozatorres

        “In addition to realizing that they are all the same.fucking.girl (picture of their back as they raise their arms triumphantly in some foreign locale? Check. Holding a dog up to their face in an attempt to be cute by association? Check. Comment about being ‘fluent’ in sarcasm? DOUBLE CHECK.)”

        ^This!

        I like how they think this is them being original and creative.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 8:26 pm trav777

        Hook FTW. Absolutely, the same cookie cutter shit.

        They post adventure crap, them on top of some big rock or climbing a wall or skyfuckindiving. Women have NO CLUE how to attract a man. They do a bunch of risky male gonzo shit and think that’s supposed to be attractive?

        Every chick lists fat as average and average as athletic, everyone is super into their career. Why do I just not give a shit?

        There are a million simply better women in a pure sense in other countries.

        I have never succeeded in meeting a chick on Tinder and chicks frequently rate me a 9. If you play around with your age, you see that chicks have an ideal spread and that’s that. On some other online sites, you cross 36 and your response rate PLUMMETS. Put 40-something in there and nobody will respond.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 10:49 am trav777

        agree with anon 100% on POF.

        If I see another bitch on top of a rock or kissing a dog or skydiving…I may go postal. Had a 39 tell me she wasn’t into kids. Wow. And a 41 say she was “ready to settle down and have a family” and all of that.

        I seriously LAUGH at them. They are pathetic. It’s not even MGTOW at this point, it’s one MAN who is 50/50 thinking it should be my mission to mock and ridicule American women and nothing else. It’s more fun to castigate these bitches than date or even bang them.

        Every chick over 30 i meet online wants a relationship from me…ok, pretty much every woman period. I’m just really too far out of their leagues…can’t they figure this shit out? I rate myself 8.5, my Brazilian aupair FWB among others rates me a 9. I have money, a sports car, fuckin swiss watches i don’t even wear that costs more than a car, i wear $1000 sweaters for fuck’s sake and prada shoes…what in the fuck would I want with ANY of these hoes?!!? I suppose i see now why most guys in my cohort are fuckin gay lol

        And I gotta suffer the lefty delusions of these idiots…it’s asinine.

        EVERYONE on POF says “super ambitious.” They all brag on their careers. Careers of what? Some useless liberal shit helping negroes reproduce or something? Some kind of dipshit paper degree in nothing? They work and they drink and they get sportfucked. Then they hit 30 and start raking every guy over the coals with their hoops. Good luck with your dogs, bitch. Like I want these stinky ass mutts clawing my clothes and jumping on me? All because they are too peter pan to be able to take care of an actual child? Don’t get me started on people who spend thousands keeping a fuckin crippled DOG alive. Put it down for fuck’s sake, learn to MOVE ON and cope with loss…wtf.

        And soon as you check them, yeah, they throw a fit. Good luck convincing them they can’t have kids at 40. Or that they’re not SUPER attractive because of their awesome job despite the 20+ lbs they’ve gained since teenage years.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 3:19 pm Frank Wunder

      If Edelman does not marry this girl (heh) should the future beta schlub who does put a ring on her finger be pitied?

      I work with men and women who would congratulate such a beta schlub on “being mature” and “looking beyond past mistakes” and “valuing the person, not the behavior”.

      Does the future beta schlub’s happiness and well-being matter?

      Or is it more effective to simply light a cigar and blow a puff of smoke and remark to the universe “it’s not my problem…”.

      LikeLike


  33. on February 6, 2015 at 11:46 am The Thirsty Slut | Reaction Times

    […] Source: Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  34. on February 6, 2015 at 11:54 am JP

    I’ve never commented here, but I have to say, I feel identified. I’m probably a 4, maybe 5 on a good day, and a few years ago I had sex twice with an athletic, sexy guy. Blond, blue eyes, snowboarder, super fit. Way out of my league. The first time was because we slept over at a friend’s house (too late and snowy to go back home) and had to share a bed. The second time, because I basically got drunk and followed him to his house. So yes, even though he obviously was not into me, I still remember feeling very proud and telling my friends and showing them pictures of him.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 12:27 pm anon

      In which city did this occur?

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 1:04 pm JP

        In a small ski town in Montana. I’d rather not say the name (though I guess you can find it, there are probably not than many ski resorts there). This must have been… 5 years ago, I think.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 1:27 pm JP

        No… More like 7 actually.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 12:44 pm Shortest_Straw

      I hope this isn’t a troll. I don’t think it is, because I have heard this story in private from many, many women. And I remember being on the opposite side of the fence; it was hugely ego boosting to have a girl show me off before we departed for the night.

      Good for you, sharing it.

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 1:05 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

      Why would you feel proud? Given the right circumstances (i.e. no vaginas around) and they’re horny enough, men will fuck just about anything, including goats, other men, couch creases, and saran-wrapped ham-and-cheese sandwiches. To that guy, you were probably the most convenient receptacle in his immediate vicinity. You go grrrl!

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 1:17 pm Shortest_Straw

        Stop, listen, think. Why wouldn’t she feel proud? She got a hot guy to fuck her; it validated her, and she does like sex. Casual sex is better than no sex.

        The problem arises in trying to reconcile the urge for animalistic sex with the urge to pair bond.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 1:18 pm JP

        I know that. I knew it at some level back then, and more now that I’ve reading Manosphere blogs. He had sex with me because I was the only female available at the time, lying next to him, and willing. I was proud because he was much hotter than me. Now it really doesn’t matter that much anymore, I was just sharing.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 3:17 pm KP

      “had to share a bed”

      Umm, no.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 3:27 pm JP

        This was actually very common. It was a small resort, full of young temporary employees (18-25) (like this guy and me, we worked there), and some of us lived pretty far away from the main area. There were no night buses and not everyone had a car. So many people stayed over at friend’s houses after staying late to party, since they couldn’t return home, and had to share beds or sofa beds. It was that or the floor. Of course, sometimes this resulted in sex, it happened to many people I know as well. There was a lot of casual sex going on there between the employees.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2015 at 6:38 am heyjay

        Nothing wrong with a little love making, is it? Some act like it’s such a big deal, it ain’t.
        I’d feel proud as well getting some supreme ass, btw

        LikeLike


  35. on February 6, 2015 at 11:57 am Experienced Father

    >Face Palm<

    This is true Chick logic destroying a man's life.

    It is also why you don't do 'pay for play' Thirsty Sluts, the academic edition —

    http://newsfeed.gawker.com/have-you-hooked-up-with-your-college-professor-1683998290/+tcberman

    MsPlentiful
    I went to an elite school on the east coast. Yes, an Ivy. I was majoring in Political Science and minoring in History [at the time]. The issue was that I had a bit of a social life as well and with the history minor could not keep up with the reading. What to do. Well, I started sitting in the front row of the auditorium and making sure that he noticed me. Use your imagination. I began leaving my name and number written on a little torn off piece of paper on my chair after class. It took a while but he finally called. I wanted to email him but thought it too, shall we say, student-like. I wanted him to know that I was not his “student.”

    He invited me to extended office hours and I made sure to wear something revealing. He had to know right away what I wanted. I made sure he did by the outfit, and by telling him that I had not read a single book for his class but was hoping for an A+. Anyway, I will not go into the details but there were several visits like this over the course of the semester. He gave me an A-, which was a little disappointing and not what we had silently agreed to. I felt used and, of course, angry, so I left his wife a note and he is now divorced. I feel bad for his kids, but he should not have taken advantage of a young woman.

    jackomadigan

    You’re a terrible person

    MsPlentiful –
    You’re a man, and you have no idea what you’re talking about.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 4:43 pm mendozatorres

      I bet she works in HR and conducts sexual harassment seminars while boning the CEO on the side.

      LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 4:52 am heyjay

      I don’t know wtf she’s talking about, other than her being a stupid whore and not getting the expected amount of “payment”. She obviously wasn’t good enough for A+, heh

      LikeLike


  36. on February 6, 2015 at 12:12 pm anon

    Need YaReally et al advice: after you do the “who’s this?” response to punish a woman for going cold the night before or playing game, and she responds IMMEDIATELY, what is the next response?

    FR:

    (met HB9 at function last night, was on my game, was really determined to fake it til I make it, was in good mood and was super funny all event long, AMOGed her from old beta “boss” she was with, got her number, was meeting a cool buddy later that night, texted her cool message right after leaving the event (while her boss was driving her back to her car), tried to get her to come out that night to join my friend and me (he’s charming & would have helped me) (last night–from now I’m I’m going for same night close), she was flirty but ended up not coming out. because I’m beta I feared I was actually coming off as too much of a player — she’s 35… I sent last message last night saying “ok. sleep tight.” then I feared that might come off as butthurt, which it wasn’t, so I then said “btw that’s not being curt. didn’t expect you to come out tonight. another time” (she had offered “another time” earlier). then she said “let’s do hh” and I generally did not know what that meant and I said “what’s hh? hook up in your house?” then she said “wow” and that was her last message.

    so I feared I actually pissed her off.

    I said (beta’d out here): “lol I’m just pretending to be a player. obviously I’m not very good at it”

    heard nothing rest of night.

    she’s a 35 yo old lawyer who seems smart (for a girl) and yes she is a stunning 9. she was generally sweet and not shit testing too much, until the end last night)

    now this afternoon:

    Her: But not with that guy. I thought about it, lol
    Her: Oops, wrong number (Ed: is that even possible with an iphone today???? I think it’s her playing games)
    Her: how was the rest of your night?

    Me: Who’s this? (I’m trying to show her “I get it” — her “oops wrong number” is a stupid old fashioned game move, and my response is too, right?)

    Her: (immediately, like less than half a second later): Lol. [her name]. Lawyer. Wait, who is this?

    Now what should I do?

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 1:12 pm YaReally

      @anon
      Send back “Jesus how many guys do you give your # out to lol player.” Then game as normal.

      Quit doing this:
      “I said (beta’d out here): “lol I’m just pretending to be a player. obviously I’m not very good at it””

      ““btw that’s not being curt. didn’t expect you to come out tonight. another time””

      Quit apologizing for the shit you say. It’s ok for her to be offended. If she’s hot she’s gone most of her life with everyone terrified to offend her walking on eggshells around her holding back what they think/feel and apologizing when she isn’t even offended.

      This:
      “Me: Who’s this? (I’m trying to show her “I get it” — her “oops wrong number” is a stupid old fashioned game move, and my response is too, right?)”

      Was perfect. This was exactly what to do. She was fucking with you, like you say it’s not even really possible to do that these days. Oh I didn’t notice my BFFs photo wasn’t in the corner of my txt? Come on lol. So you dismiss her attempt to treat you like you’re insignificant by doubling down on it in reverse. She probably knows you’re fucking around too but you gain more respect than if you said “this is YaReally from the party last night remember we met near the staircase and you said that funny thing about Obama”

      If you lose this one it’ll likely be because you keep going back and forth between badass alpha “you mean hookup at your place?” and apologetic beta “Sorry I’m bad at this did I offend you my bad” and she won’t trust who you are and assume you’re a beta in alpha clothing.

      Because she’s 35 she’ll probably give you a little leeway but will probably try to force you into the BB role because of your incongruency. Try to keep the mindset of treating her like a bratty 5yo you lol at for getting mad, not some gorgeous high value 9 you apologize to.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 1:29 pm mendozatorres

        “BB role?” What’s this mean?

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 1:42 pm anon

        awesome thanks. I’m doing good. she then said “who’s this?” and I said “I’m ‘that guy’ ” and she said “you really are ‘that guy’ “

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 1:30 pm ballocaust

      i’d cut this one loose dude you shat the bed too hard with the neurotic behavior for it to be really worth it

      she’s pegged you for a beta and you’re in the reserves at best unless you do a 180

      you can pull that type of shit after banging (beta bait: sleep tight, etc) for that misdirection game (IE: “He’s such an asshole but he seems to have a ‘good heart'”)

      she’s making you qualify back demonstrating she’s either smart enough or have been fucked enough to not take 101 game (the amateur “who’s this” play is not revolutionary)

      if you still want to fuck crank the dickish up to 11 and go with cockyFUNNY (key) to try to cover your bitch nigga tracks. cocky alone will just seem assblasted that your pussy groveling was whack

      “the man of your dreams obviously”, “the guy who’s going to XYZ sexual bravado flourish after we ABC plan”, “EFD cultural zeitgeist or inside reference persona, didn’t you know”

      not grade A shit but its for the free

      in the future stop overthinking so much, don’t explain yourself, keep text game curt and humorous, stop looking for YaRealz/CH/whoever to pilot the ship for you

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 6:39 pm llllooooolllzzzzzlllolll

      The correct and proper response is to kill yourself, because reading your teenage girl level writing hurts my fucking eyes, asshole.

      FUCKIN KILL YOURSELF

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 6:42 pm Shortest_Straw

        FOOOOOOOOOOOD FIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 7:46 pm walawala

      @anon One thing that was crucial for me this past year with YaReally and other’s help was to get past the over-thinking of each text.

      Send this stuff out, if it works great, if it doesn’t take note and move on. The thing is if a girl is interested in ANY way, she’ll make it easy for you.

      IF she’s not interested for whatever reason, she won’t.

      Girls don’t think logically like guys. They don’t have a sense of time. You can pretty much assess with accuracy what’s going on if you know the signs.

      If a girl sits down beside you…it’s on. If a girl responds to a text it’s on.

      Here’s how I would have recovered:

      Her: But not with that guy. I thought about it, lol
      Her: Oops, wrong number (Ed: is that even possible with an iphone today???? I think it’s her playing games)
      Her: how was the rest of your night?

      Me: Who’s this? (I’m trying to show her “I get it” — her “oops wrong number” is a stupid old fashioned game move, and my response is too, right?)

      Her: (immediately, like less than half a second later): Lol. [her name]. Lawyer. Wait, who is this?

      Here’s how I’d pick it up:

      Me: Lawyer? I’m not in trouble…yet. But I could be if we go for drinks….

      Then you’ll get the recovery. She’ll either go for it or not. Then you can recover OR drop it.

      There’s a girl I’ve been gaming for a while. She’s always responsive and loves banter but so far have not been able to convert. This is how the exchange went last night.

      I ask her to dance. She declines. I sit down beside her. She motions to invite me to sit.

      Her qualifying herself. “My knees have been bothering me lately

      Me: you’ve been on them too much?

      Her laughing: no no, I somehow over-used them

      Me: Smiling uh huh…

      Her: I’m wearing a brace on them, that’s why I’m wearing stockings

      Me: I thought you were wearing stockings for me.

      Her: Yes, right of course.

      Me: So there’s a lot of hardware under there?

      Her: Yes, you can see.

      Me: Moving my hand towards her knee: “Can I see?”

      Her: yes, go ahead

      I touch the bandage, squeeze it lightly, the slowly start moving my hand up her thigh while looking at her. Her eyes light up and she starts laughing.

      Her: Ohhhhh nice try!

      Me: Yes, like how I did that?

      Her: You’re gooooood

      Then we switch topics and she left a short time later after saying goodbye.

      If I can’t bang these girls, then I constantly game or practice gaming them because they love the interaction.

      I watch these girls interact with other guys and it’s just so blah…nice, polite…boring.

      I’ve also found that if you keep these interactions going with several different girls, eventually something comes through…or she’ll have a hot friend and when I start talking to the hot friend, the first girl will suddenly start talking…

      The knee girl has a lot of hot friends which she brings out and always introduces me to. So far nothing’s panned out but these introductions are in some ways a DHV to the hot friend.

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 11:59 pm Walky Talky

      Yareally

      I just finished reading tyler digest. His insights on social dynamics and infield insights are remarkable.
      I know you link his videos but Any other similar tyler articles you can recommend in which he dissects the underlying principles of social interactions and how to leverage them..

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2015 at 9:59 am Culum Struan

        @Walky Talky

        I didn’t even know the Tyler Digest existed. Just downloaded it and started reading – it seems like great stuff, thanks.

        LikeLike


  37. on February 6, 2015 at 12:53 pm SoSayWeAll

    There is a maxim that bears repeating early and often that sums up gender value differences nicely:

    “A key that opens many locks is a master key. A lock that opens to many keys is a shitty lock.”

    LikeLike


  38. on February 6, 2015 at 12:57 pm The Straw That Stirs the Drink

    Wow. Unbelievable lie from Brian Williams

    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeffrey-meyer/2015/02/05/flashback-brian-williams-pushes-iraq-lie-david-letterman-2013

    How can he not be fired?

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 1:31 pm mendozatorres

      He won’t get the axe. It’ll be surprising if he IS fired versus them keeping him.

      I wonder if Vegas is taking odds on this. That might skew the results though. Ah, quantum betting is here to stay!

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 2:20 pm Via Dolorosa

      Williams & NBC showed their character by airing Seung-Hui Cho’s manifesto. Should Brian ‘If it Bleeds It Leads’ Williams gets fired – it’ll be just more of the same hypocritical horseshit. Wager he does a few sexual assault PSAs at worst.

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 3:04 pm mendozatorres

      It’s been a helluva year for the Williams’ family. First, his daughter getting her ass eaten out. Now he’s lying out of his ass.

      LikeLike


  39. on February 6, 2015 at 1:14 pm Will

    Something that has always confused me (can’t find a reasonable answer for it) is how girls girls are able to fuck a guy as a fuck buddy or maybe just 2 or 3 times (if she’s in a social group you know of or something), and then just be cool with you disappearing or you two not following up or not moving forward.

    I’ve seen it happen sooo many times especially in college. And I know it is hard for the girl (usually if the girl is decent) but it’s like she has outside support or pressure telling her to be better and be more independent? Idk now I’m just ranting but still, the general topic is odd

    LikeLike


  40. on February 6, 2015 at 1:41 pm Hunter

    Okay so my Tinder text game sucks, looking for tips. Both girls are below average, but need to start somewhere. Chubby fat 5s, lets go:

    Me: What’s cookin good lookin
    Her: Nada mucho (emoticon) what about you?
    Me: Was just thinkin you look like trouble. You would be the cause of much debauchery 🙂
    Her: I love trouble! I’m down for mischief !!!
    Me: Whoa slow down girls 😉 you can’t just jump right into doing dirty deeds. What you up to right now
    Her: I’m on a bike right now – and I was talking about adventure in general (some emoticon, can’t see it, my phone sucks)
    Her: What about you – how do you kill time during the winters
    Me: You probably shouldn’t bike in this weather, while Tindering with me especially. Might not be able to control urself and stay on
    Me: Oh the usual… watch a web series or read. Gotta stay witty ya know (where I started getting bored (yawn))
    Her: While that ride would be super radical, I’m inside at a gym with heat (emoticon)
    Me: Can’t wait to see the results. Just got done working out too. Hope ur working on ur glutes ,I’m kind of into em
    Her: Noted – not sure I’m qualified to rate them myself though
    Me: Np, I’ll give em a once over when we chill. Free tomorrow?
    Her (next morning): I’m out of time this week

    And it just goes downhill from here. I think I escalate too hard without calibrating back. The other one:

    Me: Wtf is with your pics
    Her: What do you mean?
    Her: You don’t like my skeleton date
    Me: You had like 10 pics going on on repeat. Ur dates fine, I’m good with boning
    Her: Oh! I have no idea.. It doesn’t show me that I have repeat pictures
    Me: Hey whyd you swipe right with me
    Her: You’re cute! And I like how you protect our country from terrorists with your charm (my bio is I disarm terrorists with my charisma). Why’d you swipe right on me?
    Me: Aw thanks. Cuz you look sexy. As long as your not crazy (and a good cook), i’d definitely take you for a ride
    Her: Haha well I can’t cook…
    Her: I can make eggs pretty well
    Her: That’s about it
    Me: Aw seriously? whats the world coming to where a man can’t get a good meal around here
    Me: What do you for work

    Sigh, I don’t get it, I’m escalating, but I feel like if I randomly insert comfort questions I’ll veer the interaction sideways.

    I also know I’m not really qualifying them so they just feel like I’m some horny dude on Tinder.

    Any experts willing to take a stab at it, feel free! #YaReally #Culum #walawala

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 2:45 pm having a bad day

      @hunter

      “Okay so my Tinder text game sucks, looking for tips. Both girls are below average, but need to start somewhere. Chubby fat 5s, lets go:

      Me: What’s cookin good lookin
      Her: Nada mucho (emoticon) what about you?
      Me: Was just thinkin you look like trouble. You would be the cause of much debauchery 🙂
      Her: I love trouble! I’m down for mischief !!!”

      good open…BUT…how much more of an invitation do you need?…lol…if a girl you want to bang (and if a chubby fat 5 is not on the menu, you should be gaming 6+…) says this = go for meet up…asap…

      “Me: Whoa slow down girls 😉 you can’t just jump right into doing dirty deeds. What you up to right now”

      = beta (subtext = ‘i really want to get to know you as a person…bc i LOVE me some personality…”…lol…”can I be your orbiter?”…lol…)
      …why wouldn’t you just jump right in?…serious question…for a chubby 5, you should at least get to bj/hj with minimal effort…like one more text and some in-person qualification…unless you’re a squat troll…then it’s like just some extra qualification…lol…

      “Her: I’m on a bike right now – and I was talking about adventure in general (some emoticon, can’t see it, my phone sucks)
      Her: What about you – how do you kill time during the winters”

      this is beta orbiter algorithm in play (branch point)…do you see why? and it’s a shit test (shit tests are always branch points…leading to alpha or beta results…)…do you see what the test is?…if you want a lesson, you can work for it…lol…

      “Me: You probably shouldn’t bike in this weather, while Tindering with me especially. Might not be able to control urself and stay on
      Me: Oh the usual… watch a web series or read. Gotta stay witty ya know (where I started getting bored (yawn))
      Her: While that ride would be super radical, I’m inside at a gym with heat (emoticon)
      Me: Can’t wait to see the results. Just got done working out too. Hope ur working on ur glutes ,I’m kind of into em
      Her: Noted – not sure I’m qualified to rate them myself though
      Me: Np, I’ll give em a once over when we chill. Free tomorrow? [asking = beta…also no assuming the sale…]
      Her (next morning): I’m out of time this week”

      …and shot down by a chubby fat 5…lol…this is a great lesson!…ALL girls (even chubby fat 5s) HATE betas…and KNOW they can do better…this exchange is an example of the boring interview questions…not enough fun…or sexualizing…stay focused on the poon…that’s what all the alphas do…

      “And it just goes downhill from here. I think I escalate too hard without calibrating back.”

      no…it’s the other way…

      “The other one:

      Me: Wtf is with your pics
      Her: What do you mean?
      Her: You don’t like my skeleton date
      Me: You had like 10 pics going on on repeat. Ur dates fine, I’m good with boning”

      good open…

      “Her: Oh! I have no idea.. It doesn’t show me that I have repeat pictures
      Me: Hey whyd you swipe right with me”

      good change of subject to focus on you…but beta question (as opposed to alpha statement)…of course you should know that she swiped right bc she wants to bone = assume the sale = no need for a question…this is the place for some cocky/funny…

      you: i hope your thumb is ok…
      her: why?
      you: from swiping right so hard…(and don’t ‘walk it back’ with an ‘lol’ = own it like an alpha…)

      “Her: You’re cute! And I like how you protect our country from terrorists with your charm (my bio is I disarm terrorists with my charisma). Why’d you swipe right on me?”

      this again is a beta orbiter algorithm branch point shit test…alpha = evade/tease/cocky-funny…

      evade = change subject (back to yourself…some random shit) ‘i love turtles…’
      tease = ‘pocket dial syndrome…’
      cocky-funny = ‘nsa protocol prevents this answer – delete…’

      “Me: Aw thanks. Cuz you look sexy. As long as your not crazy (and a good cook), i’d definitely take you for a ride”

      = beta…where’s the fun in that answer?…serious question…but nice attempt at qualification…

      “Her: Haha well I can’t cook…
      Her: I can make eggs pretty well [and she even tries to qualify herself…lol…chubby fat 5 indeed…]
      Her: That’s about it
      Me: Aw seriously? whats the world coming to where a man can’t get a good meal around here”

      response = not personal enough to her…tease HER, evade HER, cocky-funny response to HER…

      “Me: What do you for work”

      = boring interview tingle-killing questions…

      https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/01/23/why-ask-why-shun-the-stale-seven-questions/

      “Sigh, I don’t get it, I’m escalating, but I feel like if I randomly insert comfort questions I’ll veer the interaction sideways.”

      that’s exactly what’s going on…good self-analysis…you are trying for comfort before you get attraction/arousal locked down…which leads to beta orbiter/bf status…

      “I also know I’m not really qualifying them so they just feel like I’m some horny dude on Tinder.”

      …some horny BETA dude on Tinder…ftfy…lol…

      props for putting in the work and trying to get better…this shit ain’t easy…

      try this for some actionable advice…NO comfort building until you at LEAST touch her…in person…

      until that point, ONLY teasing/cocky-funny/evasive texting…and NO stale seven questions…test it and see what happens…including how you feel about doing that…and what the results are…

      good luck!

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 2:54 pm having a bad day

      @hunter

      stack has constipation again…

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 3:03 pm Lumpy

        Fuck the stack.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 3:12 pm Lumpy

      Dude your banter is solid. I’m sure habd is going to say the same, but move faster.

      Your single most important goal is to get the girl in front of you to run game in person. It’s not to make her like you. It’s not to get her to say dirty shit (doing this will hurt your meetup chances tbh).

      Kant wrote up a tiny little post on his tinder game that has been my rosetta stone to tinder. Will post the link in a followup so I don’t get stack fucked. My comments are in braces:

      Me: You look like trouble [the most metal opener on tinder ever. Every single girl will respond to it]
      Her: Only on days that end with y 😀
      Me: I bet you say that to all the guys [one line of banter]
      Her: You caught me! Where are you from?
      Me: Heh youre cute.. what are you up to [find out her logistical situation for meeting up ASAP. Ignore any shit from her that doesn’t help that goal like “where are you from?”]
      Her: At work, you?
      Me: When do you get off? come for a drink [push for meetup, along with any logistical work you need to do based upon the previous message]
      Her: Okay, where?
      Me: I know a cool lounge at ___. Text me your name xxx xxx xxxx

      Keep in mind what Kant posted is an archetypal convo. Typical ones will be a more lengthy.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 3:15 pm Lumpy

        This is Kant’s post: http://www.pua-zone.com/showthread.php?12576-Kan-t-method-to-getting-laid-on-Tinder&p=129945&viewfull=1#post129945

        Here’s a conversation with one girl I fucked, pretty in depth breakdown: http://i.imgur.com/NDrdP3F.png

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 3:29 pm kant

        @Lumpy

        Thanks! I’m happy to hear my Tinder post on sedfast has helped people

        Your comments are spot on. Everything I say pushes the interaction forward, and I’ll ignore anything she says that doesn’t. That way I avoid timewasters as much as possible. I’d rather spend my time ‘gaming’ girls in real life — trying to ‘game’ Tinder girls over text on my phone is a waste of time to me.

        You’re right, it is an archetypal convo, but a lot of the time they really are that short. That basic script has gotten me laid dozens of times.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 3:48 pm Lumpy

      Your biggest issue is not pushing for the meetup. You should ignore shit she says that obscures this.

      Me: What’s cookin good lookin
      Her: Nada mucho (emoticon) what about you?
      Me: Was just thinkin you look like trouble. You would be the cause of much debauchery 🙂
      Her: I love trouble! I’m down for mischief !!!
      Me: Whoa slow down girls 😉 you can’t just jump right into doing dirty deeds. What you up to right now [good work with logistics]
      Her: I’m on a bike right now – and I was talking about adventure in general (some emoticon, can’t see it, my phone sucks)
      Her: What about you – how do you kill time during the winters

      This is a good spot to ignore her. “Glad you’re on your way over already. Grab a bottle of wine. My address is 123 xyz” or more low key but effective “You’re already on your bike, ride over 2 blocks and meet me for a drink”

      Me: You probably shouldn’t bike in this weather, while Tindering with me especially. Might not be able to control urself and stay on

      Not bad, but doesn’t get you anywhere.

      Me: Can’t wait to see the results. Just got done working out too. Hope ur working on ur glutes ,I’m kind of into em
      Her: Noted – not sure I’m qualified to rate them myself though
      Me: Np, I’ll give em a once over when we chill. Free tomorrow?
      Her (next morning): I’m out of time this week

      Your compliment, while better than “u r hot”, puts you down as slightly chasing. Then instead of telling her to meet, you ask her if she’s free. If she’s chasing you a bit “Free tomorrow?” will work, but even then it’s nice to put a time out there then let her tell you her logistics.

      —

      Me: Wtf is with your pics
      Her: What do you mean?
      Her: You don’t like my skeleton date
      Me: You had like 10 pics going on on repeat. Ur dates fine, I’m good with boning
      Her: Oh! I have no idea.. It doesn’t show me that I have repeat pictures
      Me: Hey whyd you swipe right with me
      Her: You’re cute! And I like how you protect our country from terrorists with your charm (my bio is I disarm terrorists with my charisma). Why’d you swipe right on me?

      Boom, great spot to ask her out right here.

      Me: Aw thanks. Cuz you look sexy. As long as your not crazy (and a good cook), i’d definitely take you for a ride [nice qualification]
      Her: Haha well I can’t cook…
      Her: I can make eggs pretty well
      Her: That’s about it

      That’s the open-est fucking window I’ve ever seen! “Cool, you’re on eggs. Hit the grocery store with me at 8. We’ll do wine and sweet potato fries on the side”

      Now you’re going to take a girl directly to your house from the grocery store and get her boozed up. 😉

      Me: Aw seriously? whats the world coming to where a man can’t get a good meal around here [dude, she just told you that she did cook. listen to her ;)]
      Me: What do you for work

      Never ask that lol. If you ever are in a position where you need to, cold read it. “I bet you’re a graphic designer. Redoing my website would be great way to get in my pants *wink wink, nudge nudge*”

      —

      “I also know I’m not really qualifying them so they just feel like I’m some horny dude on Tinder.”

      Everyone is horny on tinder. Yes there’s a long game you can play with qualifying, but with 7s and below that just want to get banged out, making the opportunity for that without a lot of fuss is the best way to go.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 6:40 pm YaReally

        @Lumpy
        @Hunter

        Lumpy nailed this one: “Your biggest issue is not pushing for the meetup. You should ignore shit she says that obscures this.”

        Your actual txting/banter was solid as fuck. I was nodding my head as I read it. It’s not as bad as you might think it is so don’t second guess it.

        But always be pushing the interaction forward, like Lumpy is talking about. “Free tomorrow?” and “Show me tomorrow, BarX 8pm. Wear your finest glute-jeans.” both result in “I can’t sorry” but one comes off as “can I maybe fit into your schedule sometime?” while the other assumes the sale with specifics. Throw in a classic DavidD “cancel it, I’m more fun.” to her plans and you’re demoing a bunch of assume the sale vibes.

        Same with the cooking girl. Instead if pushing forward like Lumpy says with the cooking for you, you back up and go sideways with the interaction instead of forwards.

        Two things to remember:

        1) the window can happen much faster than your brain is prepared to expect it to happen. Your brain will think “no it couldn’t be on THIS fast, I’d better joke around some more and ask about her job” but the key is only doing as much as is necessary and spotting those open windows to escalate thru. I had an amazing natural buddy who got laid like crazy but hanging out with him a lot I noticed that the main thing he was doing was just that he learned to spot those windows and never missed jumping thru them whether they took multiple interactions to appear or whether they appeared in 10 seconds. Unfortubately the way to learn to spot this is to miss them and lose a lay and then you remember for next time lol so this’ll come in time and frustration lol

        1) it doesn’t matter if she rejects the offer. That’s fine. Often my first pitch will be something I KNOW she’ll reject like something I couldn’t do even if she said yes lol like “ya I’m at BarX. Throw on your dancing shoes and come join me for a drink”. I know she’s not likely to do that and I’m not necessarily even AT BarX lol if she says yes then I’ll get my ass to BarX but I know if in pitching it that soon she’ll probably reject it and need comfort etc.

        Or I’ll pitch something outlandish like “sounds good. So my place, 8pm then. You don’t have to get all done up, lingerie under a long coat is fine.” It’s highly unlikely she’s going to agree to that. But I’m pitching it when I pass the hook point like you did with these two where they’re curious about you, I’ll throw an invite as soon as I see a window to even if they won’t take it.

        Why? Cause I’m just showing my intent. I’m showing that I take action and go for what I want and am not afraid to make my move. She’ll often shit-test like “lol woah who said I was coming over” or “lol I’m not that easy” but that just tells me “ok calibrate, back off and offer what she needs…she doesn’t want to seem slutty so make her feel special beyond sex” So I’ll throw something back like “well I suppose instead of crazy monkey sex we could go have a drink in a well lit public place with witnesses and “get to know eachother” instead ughhh you’re so high maintenance lol” where I’m letting her know I’m not just a horndog I do legit want to get to know her. Or if she plays along but clearly doesn’t intend to do it like to the lingerie long coat she replies “oh okay I’ll make sure to bring my handcuffs too” I’ll pull it back with “Hmm you might be trouble. Let’s try a public place with witnesses first. BarX, 8pm.”

        But like thru all of that I’m attempting to make specific plans, and I’m unfazed if she rejects my offer because I don’t really expect her to accept it anyway. She MIGHT accept it and that’s always a nice surprise, but like I would rather say “ooh a girl who can cook. I’m impressed. Ok drinks at BarX Thursday, 8pm. You’re cooking us these amazing eggs in the morning.” than “ooh a girl who can cook. I’m impressed. So what do you do for work?” because the former is moving things forward and forcing her to react. She’ll probably say “oh you think I’m staying over do you lol I’m not that easy” and I’ll just drop a “fine fine I suppose we can just “talk” and “get to know eachother” at BarX but wear a low cut shirt so I can stare while I nod my head pretending to listen.”

        Aside from all the flowery verbals all I’m really doing is:

        1) be awesome

        2) look for window, usually an ioi like asking you about yourself or just a high emotional point where she’s lol’ing

        3) attempt to push directly to my goal by ordering her to meet up with a specific time/place/requirements (path A)

        4) she either accepts and we bone or she tests/rejects

        5) calibrate/joke and diffuse her reason for rejecting it and attempt to push slightly less direct (path B)

        Rinse and repeat until a date is set.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 12:19 am Lumpy

        @Hunter

        Things can move psychotic fast when it’s on. I catfished a 7 in early December… (I’m trying to do it again lol, my pics aren’t great)

        At midnight started texting her on my buddy’s tinder account. He was laid out on painkillers after surgery, giggling at me.

        At 2:30, took a 25 minute cab ride to her house with a bottle of wine. “Hey I’m not Mike, I’m Lumpy. It was me texting the entire time but I couldn’t say that without being weird. I saw you on my friend’s tinder. He’s messed up and I thought you were gorgeous. I kept the taxi here, so I’ll leave if you’re uncomfortable…” lol

        Fucked her at 5:30 or 6. Mad comfort game, escalating by providing bullshit excuses at every stop, and dealing with religious issues.

        The escalation window thing yareally talks about is huge. I have a fuckton fuckton of work to do on my game (groups, texting, approach anxiety… jesus fuck me) but I’m a closing machine because I’ve gotten pretty good at creating escalation windows and jumping through them. Not a natural like yareally’s buddy, totally learned.

        I’ve had sex on my last 6 or 7 first dates, except for a virgin until marriage. She blew me but I couldn’t get a finger in her. 😛 YaR’s stuff on assuming the sale and sexualizing an interaction without kicking off her ASD is money as fuck (thanks man). The girl will involuntarily start giving you escalation windows. You recognize them and step through them and it’s done. Two of those girls didn’t even really like me (I’m not at all their type) and no real chemistry, but they were alone in my bedroom making out with me, two drinks in and kinda horny from talking about sex all night… so why not fuck? Afterward, they texted back halfhearted to my crappy texts before not responding. I’m trying to focus more energy on girls who really like me back to avoid pickup validation-seeking bullshit, but it’s interesting to see that girls will fuck guys they don’t even like under certain circumstances. And also sex is fun!

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 8:44 am Hunter

        @Lumpy @YaReally @Walawala

        Thanks guys for the advice. Funnily enough, this is the same problem I’m having with game in real life. I tend to miss windows and assume she needs more comfort or whatever in order to be more of a SURE THING. My verbals have gotten better, but I don’t lead it anywhere or I expect the girl to move it forward.

        I just need to spot those windows and push for the close.

        Goals (in person): sexual innuendo (I CONSTANTLY forget to do this because I don’t normally do this), lead to close, spot windows.

        Text-game goals: Push for meetup upon first IOI/emotional spike point. Pass any resulting shit tests + “calibrate/joke and diffuse her reason for rejecting it and attempt to push slightly less direct (path B)

        Rinse and repeat until a date is set.”

        Need to work on mixed sets/bigger groups as well. Hottest girls are in those sets and I’ve just been focusing on singular chicks/two sets. Off to study MM.

        Thanks again guys.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 5:06 pm YaReally

        @Hunter
        If it’s any consolation I know experienced guys who’ve been gaming almost as long as me and good-looking objectively high-value guys who still don’t “believe their worth” (which is what missing windows and overgaming stems from, not believing she could be into you that fast, etc it comes down to entitlement) or only do when they’re in a good state etc so it’s a common sticking point.

        Society conditioned us to think we have no value or negative value and that girls don’t like sex etc so it’s a lot of bullshit wiring to overcome. That’s why you see a lot of high-value dudes with average/ugly girlfriends or 6-pack dudes taking fatties home at last call. Subconsciously they don’t believe better girls would want them so they miss windows and don’t take the convo anywhere with those girls but do with the average/ugly girls because they feel entitled to them.

        It’s not that you don’t think you deserve these tinder 5s but that the notion of ANY girl being into you so fast is a mindfuck for your brain at this stage lol

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2015 at 8:43 pm Ripp

        @hunter:

        All of the coaching and advice you’re getting from YaR, wala, lumpy…golden.

        The one spin I’m going to add as your next milestone is to use these lays and experience, and the confidence you’re gaining to step off of internet game altogether- or reach a competency where internet game becomes ‘slower’ and more annoying because your field approaching is more efficient and yields better results.

        Tinder, match, pof etc etc really do all the same: provide a detached source to Txt game, then to meetup. Tinder is probably the most efficient. However none of this will beat solid cold approaching and field social referral game.

        Internet sourcing, Its a great stepping stone. The interesting part is all of the txt/phone game you learn still applies. The difference in cold approach you can move the ball down the field faster, and be able to assess flaky behavior and green light opps and sharpen Txt/phone game by comparing with face to face congruency.

        And for the most obvious, u can pull same night lays with cold approaching.

        Of course you can with internet sources however, but the point is doing it cold approach is harder, and more likely than not the subject is higher smv.

        I always smh when choads try and tell me how they bang all these hot women from tinder….and they’re telling me this while they’re at a bar and not approaching any women.

        Anyways, keep driving. And strive to bust the cold approach barrier to where it leaves internet game as an amusing activity to do while you’re taking a dump.

        A # pulled from cold approach better than # pulled from internet. Some small exceptions of course.

        Keep it up…

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 4:41 pm JironGhrad

      You might try cutting down the volume of words, Hunter. You’re almost 1 to 1 with her, and as CH has pointed out more than once, you want the ratio to be 1 from you to 3 from her (not just messages, but also word count).

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 7:55 pm walawala

      @Hunter

      Great opener. But the problem here is it’s just banter, it’s not going anywhere.

      Me: What’s cookin good lookin
      Her: Nada mucho (emoticon) what about you?
      Me: Was just thinkin you look like trouble. You would be the cause of much debauchery 🙂
      Her: I love trouble! I’m down for mischief !!!
      Me: Whoa slow down girls 😉 you can’t just jump right into doing dirty deeds.

      SO FAR SO GOOD…now…

      THIS: What you up to right now?

      This is where you kind of fucked up. You’re chit-chatting. It goes no where….this is your pivot point.

      Next time try this:

      Me: Well, if you promise to behave let’s go for that cocktail/coffee/whatever activity you chose

      She will then figure this out…and either accept or not.

      Here’s how I closed I closed a Tinder girl I was gaming. She was sending sexy selfies, then pulling back, then on then off…but was constantly responding.

      I’ll pick it up where I closed:

      Me: drinks tonite

      Her: Yeah but not with me (SHIT TEST)

      Me: you’re assuming a lot (PASSED)

      Her: wh tym u ready? (IN MY FRAME, SHE GETS IT)

      Her: anyway too rush today (CHICK FLAKE)

      Me: Free after 7pm or Thursday (ME CONTINUING, IGNORING HER NUTTINESS)

      Her: Already got booked by fds (FLAKE)

      Me: k (DONT CARE

      Her: I’ll book u for nxt Tue night (TRYING TO LEAD)

      Me: Am away on business all next week. (ME REFRAMING)

      Me: I can book you for Sunday (ME ASSUMING THE LEAD USING HER LANGUAGE)

      Her: ok sun evening (IT”S ON)

      LOGISTICS

      Move it forward somehow. Also, if the girl is chatting but flaking, drop it for a while. Re-open after a few days or wait for her to re-open.

      IF you get no where…move on.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 10:21 pm Sentient

        God damn @wala… Amazing to see so much growth over the last year. Cheers mate!

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 5:11 pm YaReally

        @wala
        Beautiful txt plow. I clapped as I read it. Most guys would never make it thru that gauntlet of shit-tests she threw at you. @Hunter this is what it looks like when you feel entitled. Like not word for word but the attitude of “I’m giving you a check for $1 mill, don’t be silly of COURSE you want it”

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2015 at 11:21 am Truman

        @yareally @walawala threesome question for you here if you have some time:
        https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2015/02/02/why-leftoids-are-like-women/#comment-646335

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 2:32 am walawala

        As an update….this Sunday girl turned out to be a complete bitch. She had a shit attitude. I gamed her and let her just babble on but it didn’t go anywhere. Sometimes it’s like that. I should have known from all her shit-testing she’d be like that.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 10:25 pm Sentient

      Did you see the posts by some guy who was just all about getting her number on Tinder, and moving it outside? I can’t recall the link but it was epic, he just hel frame all the time and went with # # # #, over and over. It broke them, once you got the number you had some hand.

      FWIW – Not on tinder, too high risk… I wish though. You young guys and your tech god damn man. In 1988 like 5 people had a cell phone,

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 6:27 pm Sentient

        This is the guy. Pretty hysterical.

        https://fullofthot.wordpress.com/category/tinder-game/

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 9:57 am Culum Struan

      @hunter – you’ve had everyone give you advice and I agree with it. When I’m not posting from my phone I will post a couple of my online exchanges to show just how fast you can go for the number.

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2015 at 6:31 pm walawala

      @Hunter, here’s an example of my online text game….how to sexualize early and establish your intentions.

      The opener is solid, girl is 28. Exchange picks, she’s type I like, fit, petite, living on her own, from Mainland China, works as an English teacher.

      Me: “Have you ever had a foreign lover?” THIS IS MY STANDARD QUESTION TO THESE GIRLS TO ESTABLISH THIS IS NOT A “FRIENDLY” DRINKS MEETING. YOU CAN USE WHATEVER ADJECTIVE YOU LIKE: OLDER< FRENCH< WHATEVER FITS YOU

      Her: Define lover (NOTE SHIT TEST)

      Me; You're the English teacher (PASSED)

      Her: But then am Chinese in the first place (ANOTHER SHIT TEST)(

      Me: We'll see. (STANDARD PIVOT…THEN:

      Me: Some things are better left undefined and left to the imagination (NOTE THE 50 SHADES REFERENCE)

      Her: Too good with words (IN MY FRAME NOW)

      Me: I'm like that

      Her: We can speak Chinese when we meet. I might have some slight advantage. (THIS IS MY TYPE OF GIRL, LOVES BANTER)

      Me: We'll see. I can be a good listener.

      We're meeting up in a week or so but she's pinging me regularly to keep the interaction alive.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 11:09 pm Hunter

        Honestly guys the outpouring of support here is really humbling. Thanks for all the advice @Ripp, @habd, @Sentient and others.

        I’m reading through all the comments. Thanks!

        LikeLike


  41. on February 6, 2015 at 2:43 pm henry himbeere

    “– She thinks (mistakenly) that demonstrating the speediness of her labial parting for sports stars will bring all the other boys to her yard. (It won’t. Preselection doesn’t work for women. It only grosses out relationship-ready men subject to her pubic displays of coition.)”

    This and other writings, the end of the post, make me feel you should be nominated for the nobel prize in literature. Not trying to suck your nuts or anything.

    Also, two things. Maybe they are as cheesy as this sounds just seeking love. In the local coffeeshop, I”d say an attractive 8.5/9 is with not an outstanding man but a nice good guy here, studying Occ Therapy. I feel here in the midwest, with all its religious nonsense, and where the laws of biology still apply, there’s still a throwback normal courtship or marriage happening and long term serious bf/gf. So maybe these ‘hot women’ are just seeking love, doesn’t have to be super alpha male man. And also my second point, I don’t see why everyone can’t be alpha- in the sense that the are manly and competent- at leadership, providorship and sexual ability. A whole race of manly men. Of course some are going to be superior to others, but none need be lame desperate losers.

    That’s not what’s going on in our land I know. I don’t get it, despite following your blogs. I don’t get why we can’t be a healthy land, without becoming a kind of zio-conspiracy theorist or whatever.

    So confused, I know one thing- the surface hides the reality. Beautiful women not necessarily happy, healthy inside.

    LikeLike


  42. on February 6, 2015 at 4:03 pm mendozatorres

    Then there’s this shite:

    http://www.people.com/article/history-of-sluts-art-book-chelsea-dom

    “I wanted to reinterpret what it means to be a ‘slut’ … redefining the word in a positive way,” she says.

    Redefine for her own slutty ways, no doubt!

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 4:11 pm Lumpy

      The comments are great.

      19 ups – “If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it’s likely a duck. If women behave like sluts, they have earned themselves the label.” – Jenny

      17 ups – “I agree! I’m a 19-year old girl, and I don’t think calling something like it is, makes me a prude!” – Nina

      21 ups – “None of my friends have ever been slut-shamed. Nor have I, for that matter. Seriously, if someone’s calling you a slut, there’s usually (not always, but usually) a reason for it. Come on. If you’re going to be out there and advertise yourself as something (whether it’s reality or not), be prepared to own up to it.” – Melissa

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 4:33 pm mendozatorres

        Agreed. There’s some gems in there.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2015 at 6:41 pm llllooooolllzzzzzlllolll

        Jesus, she goes to an art school and c’t capture likeness for shit.

        LikeLike


  43. on February 6, 2015 at 4:27 pm mas00

    and this.. just look at that photo. I might’ve just threw up in my mouth.

    http://www.mtv.com/news/2068594/mick-foley-unslut-project/

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 4:56 pm Shortest_Straw

      What kills me about this is women are the ones doing slut shaming. For women it’s part of the great triad of insults: Fat ugly slut!

      For men, it only means “I won’t make a relationship with you.”

      But of course you get men groveling before the altar of womanhood, in all its nauseating glory, apologizing for doing slut shaming they don’t even do.

      LikeLike


  44. on February 6, 2015 at 5:51 pm Mr Meaner

    Tinder is absolutely awash with the slutty 7s CH describes. It’s truly amazing – it’s an endless parade of them.

    I had quite a candid and honest post-bang discussion with one last night. She knows nothing serious is going to happen with us, so she seeks out my advice on guys she’s trying to get relationships out of. She’s pretty introspective and honest, as honest as someone with a hamster can be. She basically said that most girls, other than the 9s and 10s (which she knows she isn’t), know deep down that getting an alpha male to commit in the current climate is just too good to be true. If a guy is good looking or has alpha traits she just knows he’s going to pump and dump her.

    Then we went through out Tinder matches for a laugh (I frequently do this post Tinder-bangs, it actually is quite a DHV and also shows the girl you’re not into a relationship) and it’s obvious she’s only swiping the hottest of hot guys and trying to get commitment out of them. So while she knows the odds are heavily stacked against her, the hamster just wants what it wants.

    I told her the genie’s well and truly out of the bottle now and alphas have it too good for it to go back in. She agreed.

    I think these types of chicks have been the slowest of any sexual market category to respond to what’s going on. The 7 that gets to 32 and has had a parade of alpha male pump and dumps without ever having done the cost-benefit analysis to find out why, is indeed the saddest case out there.

    Feminism has royally fucked this category of women.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 12:59 pm trav777

      god, what a toxic intersection of technology and feminism. The tinderization of relations has led women to limit themselves solely to uber-alpha looks, age, etc., eschewing all others, in an attempt to get a commitment that they have no shot at. And the alphas are just sportfucking them. Talk about bellcurve skew on partner counts. Sub-elite women are using their pussies as a lottery ticket purchase.

      These women would have had no access to these guys previously. Now, they basically are a pizza delivering themselves. No wonder so many guys are MGTOWing. They don’t have a choice. And I don’t see much action on Tinder with a stated age of 33, which i can pass for IRL. The typical “interested” girls are all 31, 32, 33…clearly past-prime but were hotties a few years ago. And they are primarily looking for…you guessed it, commitment. As if there’s any chance in hell i would commit to some big city American girl who is past 30…NFW.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 4:07 am Mr Meaner

        ^^^
        Contender for post of the year

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2015 at 3:08 am Heywood Jablome

      Feminism is no more to blame for these sluts’ decisions than heroin is to blame for a starlet’s demise. They chose to indulge. The blame lies squarly with individual sluts, not with the ideology.

      We’re responsible for our own ideological decisions. You don’t see me preaching communism, after all.

      LikeLike


  45. on February 6, 2015 at 6:15 pm Sentient

    Heartistians,

    Mick Fucking Jagger was telling your parents in 1966 what was up. why did no one listen?

    “Under My Thumb”

    Under my thumb
    The girl who once had me down
    Under my thumb
    The girl who once pushed me around
    It’s down to me
    The difference in the clothes she wears
    Down to me, the change has come,
    She’s under my thumb
    Ain’t it the truth babe?
    Under my thumb
    The squirmin’ dog who’s just had her day
    Under my thumb
    A girl who has just changed her ways
    It’s down to me, yes it is
    The way she does just what she’s told
    Down to me, the change has come
    She’s under my thumb
    Ah, ah, say it’s alright
    Under my thumb
    A siamese cat of a girl
    Under my thumb
    She’s the sweetest, hmmm, pet in the world
    It’s down to me
    The way she talks when she’s spoken to
    Down to me, the change has come,
    She’s under my thumb
    Ah, take it easy babe
    Yeah
    It’s down to me, oh yeah
    The way she talks when she’s spoken to
    Down to me, the change has come,
    She’s under my thumb
    Yeah, it feels alright
    Under my thumb
    Her eyes are just kept to herself
    Under my thumb, well I
    I can still look at someone else
    It’s down to me, oh that’s what I said
    The way she talks when she’s spoken to
    Down to me, the change has come,
    She’s under my thumb
    Say, it’s alright.
    Say it’s all…
    Say it’s all…
    Take it easy babe
    Take it easy babe
    Feels alright
    Take it, take it easy babe.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 8:57 pm mendozatorres

      Never paid much attention to the lyrics. Damn solid tune.

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 10:57 pm Carlos Danger

      The Stones know women well. Some Girls comes to mind.

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 11:09 pm Carlos Danger

      LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 4:32 am James Blonde

      Jagger is a serial coal burner with poor racial hygiene.

      LikeLike


  46. on February 6, 2015 at 6:51 pm @mangina

    @heartiste let’s all wear red today

    LikeLike


  47. on February 6, 2015 at 7:14 pm Putin

    My wife is crazy. Made the mistake of telling her the some things(feelings, college issues with son) she went on the attack, Lol. Just started in on me, demeaning etc.. I told her that I will be doing my shit without her tomorrow and she can do her own stuff without me. She is acting nice again.

    WTH, are all women this messed up. She had never been dumped by a guy before and she can really be a pistol. I can be pretty mean but have really become a lot more functional over the years. Unfortunately me becoming more functional has brought about great stress in the marriage. So now I just don’t talk to her and she acts a lot better. Throwing in a late night from work and a few questionable texts to certain someones make her act even better..

    Seems so F-d up. Guess I can never really express myself to wife or reveal my feelings?

    Anyone want to comment….

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 7:02 am Ripp

      Your name is Putin. Start beating her comrade…

      LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 7:05 am Sentient

      @Putin “Made the mistake of telling her the some things(feelings, college issues with son) she went on the attack, Lol. Just started in on me, demeaning etc.. I told her that I will be doing my shit without her tomorrow and she can do her own stuff without me. She is acting nice again.”

      LOL you know everything you need to know from your statement… In spite of the mass propagandizing and mass female hallucination women are NOT attracted to a man who shares his feelings and emotions, especially negative ones (fear, doubt, anxiety, any kind of neediness). Instantly brings out a primal response in them that you are NOT mate quality. Vagina dry as the Sahara.

      Keep your thoughts and feelings to yourself, if you need to share anything share only with male friends who won’t ever talk to your wife. Or get a dog.

      And just like in pick up, watch what she DOES not what she SAYS…

      “Guess I can never really express myself to wife or reveal my feelings?”

      ^^^ This is a Red Pill Truth. It is what it is. Also remember cats are not dogs, too many guys still view their woman through a guys lens of logic and thought. This habit will never give you a true picture or lead to success.

      LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 7:20 am PA

      “Guess I can never really express myself to wife or reveal my feelings?”

      Like Sentient said, that is a tough red pill mental hurdle. When I was blue pill I had a model in mind where an amorous man declares his feelings like a cheesy trubadour outside a lady’s window. “In your eyes…”

      But yeah, you keep your feelings to yourself. Expressing yourself directly is self indulgence. It’s infantile. It’s womanish.

      That said, if you value her she will know it anyway. No need to blab. And yes, there is a time for vulnerability game and ILU.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 8:31 am trav777

        yes, only express fear/anxiety and whatnot over an impending battle where you may fail to do sufficiently heroic shit. It’s not courage if you aren’t scared first.

        And do it more in the form of a soliloquy.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 7:26 am PA

      “Expressing yourself directly is self indulgence”

      To the literal-minded or newbs, I mean expressing soft or vulnerable or anxious feelings directly. Other things yes of course, you express as directly or indirectly as you want to.

      LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 7:56 am Lara

      @Putin
      Your wife does not want to be your mother. If your wife is understanding when your son is feeling insecure/anxious/depressed then she is a good mother. Don’t expect the same treatment for yourself.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 8:30 am Greg Eliot

        If your wife is understanding when your son is feeling insecure/anxious/depressed then she is a good mother.

        Yeah, babying the COLLEGE-AGED son is going to help make a man of him. :duckface

        This is one of the main problems of the West… the days of mom’s telling their sons “Come back carrying your shield or being carried on it” are as long gone as the glory of that ilk which enabled the West to become what it did, before the knee-deep decline we now find ourselves in.

        Where’s GasButtox when you need him?

        LikeLike


  48. on February 6, 2015 at 7:27 pm Rum

    The Rolling Stones:
    Stray Cat Blues…

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2015 at 11:10 pm Carlos Danger

      I can see that you’re just 15 years old but I don’t want your ID.

      LikeLike


  49. on February 6, 2015 at 7:41 pm Rum

    Sam Kinniston + Terminal Psychosis + a 15 inch Bowie Knife = The bare beginnings of justice.

    LikeLike


  50. on February 6, 2015 at 8:11 pm Rum

    Hey, Heather. I always knew that the difference between having sex and committing a sex crime was actually a pretty serious matter. And so did you , some of the time, sorta, at least.
    Maybe that zone of uncertainty was the entire basis of our intimate connection. Before the arrest, etc, I mean.
    Babe, you are in all the bad tapes and I am not.

    LikeLike


  51. on February 6, 2015 at 8:35 pm Rum

    Getting thrown out of respectable Bars when I was with Heather took more time. She did not carry snakes and she usually looked like a normal-isch American 11. Candy, however, was the real deal– scary cute, with a large toothy snake at all times.
    Bartenders are easily broken.

    LikeLike


  52. on February 7, 2015 at 1:12 am Sean Fielding

    Question: does anyone suppose Edelman took Commandment XIV to heart and fucked her like it was his last fuck? Somehow I doubt it.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 3:54 pm shartiste

      The lost commandment: Be so alpha that you can fuck her like you’re masturbating before an afternoon nap and its still the greatest moment of her life

      LikeLike


  53. on February 7, 2015 at 7:26 am Lucky White Male

    Gentlemen I give you Gene Simmons:

    http://www.salon.com/2014/11/22/gene_simmons_i_don’t_really_care_about_your_culture/

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 10:34 am Meet Isolate Escalate

      But his whole theory is one based on materialism. Don’t get married til your 30s, OK, not bad advice. But his advice to women is make money and get education like men do. That’s not working … dude, it’s also the reason why we import people that “Don’t speak English”

      LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 1:13 pm Greg Eliot

      When you’re one of the tribe, you can say stuff like that and still work in this town.

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2015 at 11:53 am Cortesar

      So you are offering us Chaim as a gift to humanity
      What fascinates you so much about his contempt for ordinary man and
      for anybody that does not belong to his sociopath YKW club
      He does not really care about your culture he supported all wars that you waged for his culture.
      His “love” for America and rant against “non-assimilating” cultures (coming from a full fledged member of tribe that never assimilated anywhere through history) is the barely disguised rant of a cheap joo for the shekels that have not finished in his pockets
      His America is the one that gave Bibi 30 minutes of standing ovation, an enslaved sate which wages wars for tribes benefits, the one in which he and his tribe prospers to the detriment of everybody else

      LikeLike


  54. on February 7, 2015 at 10:15 am Anonymous

    That Google tool is great. By the way, ‘holocaust’:

    https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=holocaust&case_insensitive=on&year_start=1900&year_end=2008&corpus=17&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t4%3B%2Cholocaust%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3BHolocaust%3B%2Cc0%3B%3Bholocaust%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BHOLOCAUST%3B%2Cc0

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 2:59 pm Lichthof

      1978 saw a US tv series called the Holocaust which launched the modern media campaign

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2015 at 10:15 am James Blonde

        1964 saw the final destruction of the motion picture “production codes” designed to prevent pornography and other vice in movie theaters. The joos accomplished this by mixing frontal nudity (black female Thelma Oliver’s breasts) with hollowcost imagery in a movie called “The Pawn Broker”; that way the goy could not challenge it without risking the charge of “anti semitism.”

        Up to that point, Catholic political power kept a lid on jooish filth and degeneracy even though Protestants folded years earlier.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2015 at 11:29 am Greg Eliot

        Blonde (are erstwhile t-h-w-a-c-k… I spell it that way so the post doesn’t go to automatic moderation) sometimes comes up with a good point.

        The sixties was also the decade that saw become mainstream anti-hero messaging and glorification by the Academy, e.g., They Shoot Horses Don’t They, Midnight Cowboy, Bonnie & Clyde, The Graduate, et. al.

        LikeLike


      • on February 11, 2015 at 4:51 pm FredMertz

        No it began well before. Revcall the idiot movies “Jusgement At Nuremburg” which allowed a drugged-out and anally smashed Monty Clift to engage in the favorite sport of white actors/actresses:Hamming it up for the JOOOOOZE!!!! Whether blubbering holoco$t victim,prancing Nazi,evil slaveowner etc,these actors LOVE to show their stuff for their Boss! Also a play–later a TV broadcast–the weird “Man In The Glass Boothj”,about the trial of Eichmann.But no doubt the fag Speilberg really got the train rolling–forgive the pun!

        LikeLike


  55. on February 7, 2015 at 11:24 am Putin

    WTH? Does CS filter posts? Been trying to post a paragraph size post and it won’t show….

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 10:48 pm Benson

      “As to the mutual friends even your demeanor will probably be passed onto the old girlfriend.”

      I can’t worry about that. Since they know she broke it off, they’ll assume I’m frustrated. Two other guys have already made “hope you’re doing OK, man” comments. All I can do is act unfazed.

      “One can be seen as a ploy where as the other is something you are trying to down play/hide……”

      That’s good. But unless someone broaches the subject, I’ll keep my plans to myself.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2015 at 8:51 am Putin

        “Two other guys have already made “hope you’re doing OK, man”- The most important thing for you is to get your confidence back and stay away from her people.
        If her people can start to see a demeanor in you which displays a right back at you, happy, cocky then that will get back to her. But until then stay away. You going out/dating other people is a good thing.

        Benson, I am still holding the chance of some kind of reach out at 50%. I am vested in this and will follow it through to the end.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2015 at 8:53 am Putin

        CS won’t let me post anything longer than a couple sentences. I am still holding at 50% at some type of reach out. Going out with other women is a good thing.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2015 at 9:23 am Benson

        I’ve played it cool when I have to be around. It’s getting easier as time goes. I’ll keep you in the loop.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2015 at 9:28 am Putin

        “hope you’re doing OK, man” Next time you encounter that just look them in the face and start laughing.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2015 at 10:13 am Benson

        Different phrasing, but I think I captured the nonchalance that I needed to. I’ll keep that response handy, though.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 11:55 pm Benson

      ” I am still holding at 50% at some type of reach out.”

      What makes you settle on that percentage?

      LikeLike


  56. on February 7, 2015 at 12:42 pm Skinner

    Another nail through the heart of egalitarianism – http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11397999/Are-marriages-stronger-when-one-spouse-is-dominant.html

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 4:28 pm Glengarry

      I think I can guess which spouse should be dominant for best effect.

      LikeLike


  57. on February 7, 2015 at 1:24 pm Matamoros

    Heartiste, do you have a photo gallery showing girls by their number, at least 5-10?

    LikeLike


  58. on February 7, 2015 at 2:58 pm Robert What?

    Edelman better watch out. Once she realizes that she is not getting anything out of this other than the photo op (“I fucked Edelman and all I got was this lousy photo”), she’ll probably decide she was raped.

    LikeLike


  59. on February 7, 2015 at 3:00 pm Lichthof

    Anyways in other news – just fucked an African student hottie. No bullshit, no games, makes me feel like a King. Why do we bother with Western women? Don’t think I will ever go back now.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2015 at 8:30 pm Flip

      When I went off to college many years ago, my upper middle class white mother told me no black girls. I told her she didn’t have to worry about that and she hasn’t.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 9:25 am Greg Eliot

        Well, God bless yo’ momma! And good on you.

        Unlike some of the coal-burning, muh-dik-centric would-be Lotharios here who seem to celebrate diving, hence disappearing, into the rising tide of colour…

        … the reason we “bother” with Western women is because they’re still the gold standard of beauty and intelligence…

        … more importantly, the ONLY SOURCE and potential thereof for FUTURE Western women and men… leastwise, if there are to be any.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2015 at 8:38 pm Putin

      Why do we bother with Western women? Exactly. The only answer is because American men love being beta.

      LikeLike


  60. on February 7, 2015 at 3:59 pm PA

    A veritably Heartistian sendoff here:

    https://hipsterracist.wordpress.com/2015/02/07/a-baby-daddys-letter-to-his-little-boy-about-his-future-hookups/

    LikeLike


  61. on February 7, 2015 at 8:13 pm walawala

    Ok, sidebar question: A girl I’m banging…and hot…was getting clingy at a party the other night. I was jet-lagged and tired. I turned down a bang. As I was leaving, she came up to me and said: “I was thinking I’d come with you.”

    I smiled in amused mastery and said: “You were thinking that huh?” I left.

    She texted that she was so horny and wanting a bang.

    Me: Jet lagged, otherwise I would have dragged you into that closet and fucked you against the wall….then danced.

    I also turned down a second girl I’m banging. They’re not happy about this.

    Finally, around 8 months ago, I turned down another 23 year old who blew me down for meeting up for banging. She was not happy. I lost contact with her. Then suddenly out of the blue she contacted me recently to bang, started sending nude selfies.

    I’ve found generally that once I’ve banged them and turn them down, it doesn’t hurt….but if I haven’t banged them and turn them down, they never contact me again.

    Thoughts?

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 8:38 pm JironGhrad

      It’s actually pretty simple wala. If you pass on a girl who you’ve already banged, the hamster rationalizes it as a woman playing hard-to-get. She tries harder.

      If you pass on one you haven’t banged, generally the hamster gets butt-hurt and rationalizes your value lower to preserve her sense of self. “He didn’t take me, so I didn’t really want him to take me.” Women are notorious for repeating things (often at increasing volume per repetition) until brainwashed.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2015 at 10:11 pm walawala

        @JironGhrad Thanks…with the girl in question here, I’ve passed on her offers to bang several times, then when I initiated she’s always banged me…except once when she had some type of “Should I really be doing this” and said “Next time” to which I replied: “There may never be a ‘next time'”.

        I think it leads women to question: 1) is he banging someone else? 2) Am I not hot enough for him anymore? 3) What’s up?

        The fact in this case I was truly jet-lagged but then said, “I would have banged you…” messaging I think only got her thinking more…

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2015 at 10:31 pm Marko

      This is the way of the world. You can mistreat a chick 1000 different ways as long as you bang her, but if you reject her sexually they can’t take the ego hit and disappear forever out of some sort of shame or pride thing.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 8:23 am Amy

        We’re also not invested in you pre-sex.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 10:36 am trav777

        I have rejected chicks just for kicks sometimes because the spectacle of watching them go apoplectic is oftentimes more entertaining than the bang would have been. lol

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2015 at 5:08 am Caramba

      Yeah..my experience too.Also, when you miss an invitation to bang for whatever reason. A week ago I ended up in a house of a girl I know but did not bang her, there were logistics reasons, but also I did not feel like it being honest.Last night she dragged some nigga and danced with him(twerking, ass dropping etc) in front of me. I simply disappeared. She is taken off the register.

      LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 8:57 am Walky Talky

      @walawala , yareally, having a bad day, sentient, culum

      As a rule one should not go back in the seduction. But if there is too much comfort (after initial attraction of course) and there is risk of being LJBF’d or becoming a beta orbiter. What should be the proper course of action? Start attraction material again? That sounds a lot of wasted time and all the comfort going down the drain.

      And how do you differentiate b/w beta orbiter or just being in the comfort phase?
      Like she acts coy, doesnt initiate, doesnt isolate, not asks personal questions but goes out of her way to make her approachable, welcomes the approach, open body language, smiles, maintains eye contact, reveals personal info. (In context of social circle game)

      Comments? Thoughts?

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 9:10 am Walky Talky

        I have tried push pull, giving a rest to the plate and re.initiating. its Not catching the spark. Infact when i stop paying attention to her she starts finding ways to encourage me to approach (proximity and eye contact iois) and it goes stale again. This has been going for sometime now.

        Plus any tips on how to give a flirty/sexual touch to the convo without sounding desperate like walawala is a master at it i think. And please no ‘you will learn with time’ ‘calibration comes with experience’ type shit. I want some solid practical advice that i can implement.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 9:14 am Walky Talky

        You think she sounds confused? Maybe not sure if this guy is alpha or beta kind of thing? Due to my game fluctuating b/w good and bad?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 9:15 am ER

        “And please no ‘you will learn with time’ ‘calibration comes with experience’ type shit. I want some solid practical advice that i can implement.

        Or your money back – am I right bro!!! F’ing PUA sites man and their shitty advice.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 9:19 am Walky Talky

        Fucking awesome pua sites and some shitty commentors. Corrected that for you.

        Plus shit tests have stopped despite passing them. 😦

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 9:20 am Lumpy

        What should be the proper course of action?

        Put your penis inside her.

        Start attraction material again? That sounds a lot of wasted time and all the comfort going down the drain.

        Yep. Why would comfort go down the drain? You do comfort so she’s cool with more intense attraction shit.

        And how do you differentiate b/w beta orbiter or just being in the comfort phase?

        Being a sexual threat.

        If you’re with other people, you stand just a little closer than is usual. Eye contact just a little more laser-beam electric than with a typical friend.

        If you’re alone with her, she’s sitting on your lap to tell you stories. You try to kiss her, even if she turns it down a couple times. You move her hands into your hair to play with it while you’re playing with her hair.

        Like she acts coy, doesnt initiate, doesnt isolate, not asks personal question

        Dude that’s every girl ever. You’re the boy. She’s the girl. You gotta make the moves. She’s not going to pull out your dick and place it in her vagina for you. Even though she likes you, she doesn’t want to seem like a slut.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 9:24 am Lumpy

        How long have you known this girl? In all honesty it’s unlikely you’ll get her. PUA is not magic.

        Learn the lessons from this girl (be more sexual faster, escalate), go get others, and the next time you’re in this situation you’ll get the girl.

        This situation has happened to all of us man.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 9:39 am having a bad day

        @walky talky

        “As a rule one should not go back in the seduction. But if there is too much comfort (after initial attraction of course) and there is risk of being LJBF’d or becoming a beta orbiter. What should be the proper course of action?”

        go dark for a couple of weeks to allow her to reset…spin your other plates/do other stuff (exercise your other options…) and ping her in [2x the time you have been interacting with her] weeks…and the initial attraction needs to be sexualized, not just ‘hey, let’s hang out bc you’re fun’ attraction…

        “Start attraction material again?”

        yes…and no comfort until she is willing to isolate with you…

        ” That sounds a lot of wasted time and all the comfort going down the drain.”

        yes…but you want to flush all that beta orbiter vibe away…

        “And how do you differentiate b/w beta orbiter or just being in the comfort phase?”

        beta orbiter = she won’t isolate with you…or let you touch her…or sexualize with her…she doesn’t ‘chase’ you…

        “Like she acts coy, doesnt initiate, doesnt isolate, not asks personal questions but goes out of her way to make her approachable, welcomes the approach, open body language, smiles, maintains eye contact, reveals personal info. (In context of social circle game)”

        = beta orbiter/ljbf status…bc she sees you as a resource provider/potential provider, so she doesn’t have to pursue you…but she wants those resources to continue to be ‘available’…whenever she needs them…

        so, reset and try again (which i always recommend…)…or take the lesson and move on…

        good luck!

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 10:16 am having a bad day

        @walky talky

        just saw your other posts…

        “Plus shit tests have stopped despite passing them.”

        no…they haven’t…but that doesn’t mean that you can see them…

        “I have tried push pull, giving a rest to the plate and re.initiating. its Not catching the spark. Infact when i stop paying attention to her she starts finding ways to encourage me to approach (proximity and eye contact iois) and it goes stale again. This has been going for sometime now.”

        you need to let that plate rest ‘long enough’ for a reset…then, try again like you JUST met her…including not remembering her name…lol…or anything else about her. if you can’t do that, it hasn’t been ‘long enough’…and a couple of days isn’t really a rest…lol…2x the amount of time you have been interacting with her is probably ‘enough’ but it might not be…spend that time interacting with other girls and doing other things (like reading here and at Rational Male…or working on other parts of YOU – work,school, start a business, lift weights, etc…)

        “Plus any tips on how to give a flirty/sexual touch to the convo without sounding desperate like walawala is a master at it i think. And please no ‘you will learn with time’ ‘calibration comes with experience’ type shit. I want some solid practical advice that i can implement.”

        unfortunately, ‘you will learn with time’ and ‘calibration comes with experience’ type shit is exactly what’s going on…lol…that is exactly the best solid practical advice you will ever get…lol…you can believe or not, but reality doesn’t change…lol…

        experience = interacting with other girls (which you should be doing even if THIS girl was sexing you up EVERY night…lol)

        ER is busting on you bc of your attitude of being ‘above’ pua…this shit ain’t easy, and if you are not willing to put in the time and work to gain experience, you will never get anywhere…trust me, if i could bottle and sell it as a pill, i’d be doing that…but that isn’t going to happen…it takes HARD work, that is well outside your comfort zone to accomplish getting experience…that’s why i have tons of respect for guys like @Hunter for posting his situs. he’s willing to put in the work and get better…and get shot down… and come back and try again…

        YOU can get better too…anybody willing to put in the work can do it (i’m proof of that…lol) but you have to accept that it’s going to be hard work and that you WILL fail…that’s a given…lol…some eggs have to fail before that omelet magically appears in the pan…lol…

        it sounds like you have oneitis for this girl…so, while i usually recommend getting back in there to try to turn things around (bc that’s the best place to learn)…in this case, i think you will learn a more valuable lesson (that there are LOTS of girls in the world…) by walking away from this girl…at least sexually…she might make a good ‘pivot’ to help you get other girls, but that’s more advanced pua shit…you still seem to need to get the basics down first…

        also, @Lumpy brought up a good point about isolation…my assumption was that YOU were trying to isolate her, but she was refusing to do that…if you are waiting for HER to make the move to isolate, that is NOT going to happen…lol…it’s up to YOU to lead the interaction…

        good luck!

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 11:29 am Lumpy

        @habd

        Fuck yes. Experience and hard work.

        I’m 3 years in and only starting to get solid. I got a new phone a month ago and it’s already full of fuckups that hurt (along with some pretty awesome success).

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 1:02 pm having a bad day

        @Lumpy

        “Fuck yes. Experience and hard work.”

        that’s the sticking point for most people…on anything that is worthwhile – playing an instrument, lifting weights, pua, college level sports, starting a business, etc – is GOING to be hard work (10,000 hours to mastery…)…otherwise, anybody could do it…lol…and it’s worse in the feminized world… where that effort is dismissed as irrelevant (bc ‘equality’…lol)…

        “I’m 3 years in and only starting to get solid. I got a new phone a month ago and it’s already full of fuckups that hurt (along with some pretty awesome success).”

        props for putting in the work…this shit ain’t easy…but it CAN be really fun!…talking to cute girls…ya, what a drag…lol…

        pick a ‘f*up’ and post it up…along with your self-analysis…examples are always good…and we learn more from our failures (and the subsequent successes) than just the success…that’s why i always recommend trying to turn things around…and style points count…lol…

        good luck!

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 8:26 pm Walky Talky

        @Lumpy @Having a bad day

        You guys are awesome. Few points. Im from india so it really is scarcity here not just scarcity mentality. I try my best to keep in mind that all girls are replaceable. Will be moving out soon. So when you come across a cute one you really want to turn it in ur favor. Its not some london or nyc where you come across hotties at every turn.

        Put your penis inside her.

        Trying for that.

        Yep. Why would comfort go down the drain? You do comfort so she’s cool with more intense attraction shit.

        So its like we are going back n forth b/w the two? We attract so she starts asking for comfort to digest attraction and when comfort becomes excessive and boring we go to attraction again? Its like we are spending one currency to get the other and vice-versa?

        Dude that’s every girl ever. You’re the boy. She’s the girl. You gotta make the moves. She’s not going to pull out your dick and place it in her vagina for you. Even though she likes you, she doesn’t want to seem like a slut.

        Sure but not with the conflicting signals of iois and iods i mentioned.

        @HABD
        I understand ur point. I am willing to put in the work and fail.
        Sometimes i get into this headspace where i think i have already crashed and burned a lot and with game it will be all success. Like i start thinking whats the point of game if u are gonna fail anyway. I was failing before. But i guess thats how you learn.

        Yep. Well said. You wanna make an omelette you gotta break some eggs #fightclub

        while i usually recommend getting back in there to try to turn things around (bc that’s the best place to learn)

        I wanna try this option

        Lol no not waiting for her. I lead for isolation and she resists

        but that’s more advanced pua shit…you still seem to need to get the basics down first

        I am already trying to use pivots to turn this around. I talk to her little sister and she gets all jealous and doesnt like the attention diversion. Started talking to some uggos in the circle and do they like it. Giving all sort of iois. Any idea how to use them effectively and friendzone them? Whats the point of talking to uggos anyway if u cant use them to ur advantage. Hate doing it but sometimes u gotta do the unlikeable things to get the likeable things in life lol. Just realizing putting someone in fz in an art too and girls are damn good at it while getting fz just takes a little bad game.
        One of my sticking points with using pivots is i come across as too direct like she senses i am intentionally trying to make her jealous since i openly do it im front of him and it blunts the impact. Any idea how to convey the point across subtly? Or to hell with subtlety?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 9:42 pm Walky Talky

        got a reply for you guyS. Its in moderation. And how do you quote and copy paste in wordpress?

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 8:40 am Walky Talky

        @Lumpy @Having a bad day

        You guys are awesome. Few points. Im from india so it really is scarcity here not just scarcity mentality. I try my best to keep in mind that all girls are replaceable. Will be moving out soon. So when you come across a cute one you really want to turn it in ur favor. Its not some london or nyc where you come across hotties at every turn.

        Put your penis inside her.

        Trying for that.

        Yep. Why would comfort go down the drain? You do comfort so she’s cool with more intense attraction shit.

        So its like we are going back n forth b/w the two? We attract so she starts asking for comfort to digest attraction and when comfort becomes excessive and boring we go to attraction again? Its like we are spending one currency to get the other and vice-versa?

        Dude that’s every girl ever. You’re the boy. She’s the girl. You gotta make the moves. She’s not going to pull out your dick and place it in her vagina for you. Even though she likes you, she doesn’t want to seem like a slut.

        Sure but not with the conflicting signals of iois and iods i mentioned.

        @HABD
        I understand ur point. I am willing to put in the work and fail.
        Sometimes i get into this headspace where i think i have already crashed and burned a lot and with game it will be all success. Like i start thinking whats the point of game if u are gonna fail anyway. I was failing before. But i guess thats how you learn.

        Yep. Well said. You wanna make an omelette you gotta break some eggs #fightclub

        while i usually recommend getting back in there to try to turn things around (bc that’s the best place to learn)

        I wanna try this option

        Lol no not waiting for her. I lead for isolation and she resists

        but that’s more advanced pua shit…you still seem to need to get the basics down first

        I am already trying to use pivots to turn this around. I talk to her little sister and she gets all jealous and doesnt like the attention diversion. Started talking to some uggos in the circle and do they like it. Giving all sort of iois. Any idea how to use them effectively and friendzone them? Whats the point of talking to uggos anyway if u cant use them to ur advantage. Hate doing it but sometimes u gotta do the unlikeable things to get the likeable things in life lol. Just realizing putting someone in fz in an art too and girls are damn good at it while getting fz just takes a little bad game.
        One of my sticking points with using pivots is i come across as too direct like she senses i am intentionally trying to make her jealous since i openly do it im front of him and it blunts the impact. Any idea how to convey the point across subtly? Or to hell with subtlety?

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 12:13 pm having a bad day

        @walky talky

        “Im from india so it really is scarcity here not just scarcity mentality. I try my best to keep in mind that all girls are replaceable. Will be moving out soon. So when you come across a cute one you really want to turn it in ur favor. Its not some london or nyc where you come across hotties at every turn.”

        just bc there are hotties ‘everywhere’ doesn’t mean they are sexually available to beta guys…lol…and they really aren’t ‘everywhere’…the ratio of girls to men is the same anywhere about 50/50 (even india) but i’m not sure how the culture changes the actual availability…those ‘hotties’ are relatively rare…even here in US…regardless of the media images…

        “Yep. Why would comfort go down the drain? You do comfort so she’s cool with more intense attraction shit.

        So its like we are going back n forth b/w the two? We attract so she starts asking for comfort to digest attraction and when comfort becomes excessive and boring we go to attraction again? Its like we are spending one currency to get the other and vice-versa?”

        you build attraction until you bang…that’s it…lol…the only time comfort/rapport comes into play is when you are ‘flipping switches’ (getting past societal expectations) to get her into bed/isolated…then post-bang to manage the interaction…

        “Sure but not with the conflicting signals of iois and iods i mentioned.”

        those mixed IOIs are probably her beta orbiter/provider cues that you are picking up on…if she will not isolate with you, you don’t have enough attraction built up…

        “@HABD
        I understand ur point. I am willing to put in the work and fail.”

        good…but we want to put in the work and succeed, so failure is just part of that process…if you fail enough times to develop a pattern of something that doesn’t work, you make a change and try it out…then, if that works, figure out your next step…

        “Sometimes i get into this headspace where i think i have already crashed and burned a lot and with game it will be all success. Like i start thinking whats the point of game if u are gonna fail anyway. I was failing before. But i guess thats how you learn.”

        it IS how you learn…crash and burn = success…lol…so, you’ve been very successful…lol… bc then you have the opportunity to make a change and try out that change to see if it works…and even gaming those ugly girls counts bc AWALT…but if things don’t work, you have to make changes and try out those changes on a large enough sample to see if it works…

        “while i usually recommend getting back in there to try to turn things around (bc that’s the best place to learn)

        I wanna try this option”

        ok…you have to spin more plates…and give her a rest…that rest has to be ‘long enough’ to reset your interaction to neutral (non-beta)…2x the length of time you have been interacting might be enough…

        “Lol no not waiting for her. I lead for isolation and she resists”

        = likely she has you as beta provider/orbiter…

        “I am already trying to use pivots to turn this around. I talk to her little sister and she gets all jealous and doesnt like the attention diversion.”

        that’s still consistent with beta orbiter status…also, why don’t you game the sister?…

        “Started talking to some uggos in the circle and do they like it. Giving all sort of iois. Any idea how to use them effectively and friendzone them?”

        why don’t you bang them?…serious question…until you’ve been successful at that (getting real live experience with girls) don’t let the easy availability of high quality pr0n lead you to over-estimate your SMV…until you can consistently bang at a certain level, you don’t really know…

        “Whats the point of talking to uggos anyway if u cant use them to ur advantage.”

        bc AWALT…lol…and you get experience talking to girls…and practicing game…you don’t have to bang every girl you talk to…lol

        “One of my sticking points with using pivots is i come across as too direct like she senses i am intentionally trying to make her jealous since i openly do it im front of him and it blunts the impact. Any idea how to convey the point across subtly? Or to hell with subtlety?”

        this is consistent with oneitis…lol…and beta orbiter status…which go together…

        your options wrt your oneitis are go dark to reset and try again fresh, accept that you are a beta orbiter and just game other girls, or to not game other girls and work on yourself (work, school, lift weights, etc….which you should be doing anyway…)

        good luck!

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 12:16 pm having a bad day

        @walky talky

        stuck in the stack again…

        LikeLike


      • on February 11, 2015 at 6:22 am walawala

        @Walky Talky One thing I learned in the last 6 months (after reading and internalizing Krauser’s “Daygame Mastery” is the need to sexualize early.

        My recent practice is if I reach out to a girl I’m gaming by text and don’t receive any response…I drop it.

        I re-open, then if I don’t hear anything, I drop it.

        Women who are interested will make time and make the effort.

        Beta orbiter: guy who chases.

        “Comfort Phase” is a temporary interlude in the seduction that you shift to once you’ve established attraction and she wants to know more about you….so in this situation, she’s chasing and you’re dropping hints about your philosophy of life.

        Attraction without comfort can lead to a bang…

        Comfort without attraction=LJBF

        you have to find the balance….this is again about learning to read the situation.

        I met a 36 year old sexy Korean girl on my holiday. I escalated, k-closed, then established comfort. She lives in another country so I send her a text every few days and she replies or “likes” my FB posts—comfort.

        Then I send a sexualized text: “have you ever had a foreign lover?” “I imagine walking on the beach together…”

        etc.

        But you have to start building up a little mini harem of girls you bang.

        That way if one drops out….like one of mine has…you just leave it because you’ve got another one on the go.

        I have another girl I banged chasing me…I turned her down for a bang this past weekend because I was tired. She just sent me a selfie in lingiere.

        Girl one meantime has fallen off the planet. I sent two ping texts and got no response so I’ll leave it.

        I’m getting re-opened by girls I gamed a year ago.

        LikeLike


      • on February 11, 2015 at 8:33 am Walky Talky

        @walawala @habd

        Thanks. Still waiting for habd’s stuck reply 😦
        i was just reading ‘gaming type a girls’ in ch’s archives way back. And this one seems like a classic case. Ambitious and career oriented, unshakeable frame, strong personality, straight posture, confident to the extent of cocky, testosteronized body.
        I have been burned by this kind before. And dont judge me for being attracted to this type lol attraction is not a choice as they say.
        Thing is nothing gets to her. She seems happy when i dont give her attention and goes in chase mode. I give her tiny attention and she loses all attraction. Went the asshole route and negged her in intial stages but she reacts negatively to negs too as in hypersensitive kind of way.
        Only thing breaking thru her defenses is jealousy i guess.
        Thoughts?

        LikeLike


      • on February 11, 2015 at 8:52 am Sentient

        @Walky Talky – you need to neg and tease her more, combined with the takeaway (non pursuing) and your vibe needs to be “pssssh girl, please…. you know you want this (me)”… Get her qualifying and jumping through your hoops by using her Type A personality against her. she is used to success and accolades, not negs, teasing and walking away. This is what will flip her attraction switches.

        LikeLike


  62. on February 8, 2015 at 4:45 am Kyo

    The SJWs are out in force, under their real names, answering this question on Quora:

    http://www.quora.com/My-wife-is-infertile-Should-I-divorce-her-to-marry-someone-else

    The questioner has a tough decision to face, but nobody should ever feel guilt at the entirely-natural desire to have one’s own progeny. Even the lowest form of protozoa feels it.

    And yet, at the very top of the animal kingdom…

    The top-voted answer as I write this comes from “Rebecca Billy, Card-carrying Feminazi and great dame”, who answers with:

    “No, but perhaps she should divorce you for valuing her as nothing more than a breeder.

    Your attitude shows that you aren’t ready to have children, anyway.”

    She in turn gets high-fives by the dozen.

    Why, humankind, why? We’re making people feel guilty for not wanting to raise other people’s children? Not wanting to abandon their genetic legacy?

    This has to be the line in the sand. I literally can’t think of anything more important than this.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 10:08 am james Blonde

      He should not divorce her. He should convert to Islam and start lifting; then go out and get another younger, hotter, fertile wife.

      LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 4:35 pm Glengarry

      The obvious reply is that people get divorced for far less. “It’s not you, it’s me, I need to discover who I am, etc.”

      LikeLike


    • on February 11, 2015 at 12:50 pm anon

      yeah women are flat out crazy today

      LikeLike


  63. on February 8, 2015 at 5:01 am Caramba

    This last tweet of heartiste.About anti player shaming movement.Great idea! I can see just now a parade of dapper, confident dudes, giving polite yet witty interviews on cameras etc. Everyone wearing fucking suits.No tattoes. Nice hair.White teeth.Everyone is calm as shit, while deranged pink haired feminists are screaming and beating in hysterics.

    Where do I sign in?

    LikeLike


  64. on February 8, 2015 at 4:58 pm Ronin

    Feminist Manboob, Emmit Rensin’s lightly-executed smear-piece on MRAs & PUAs at Vox.com: http://www.vox.com/2015/2/5/7942623/mens-rights-movement

    Apparently SJWs are fine in complaining. But when ‘rightly-disposed Normative Men’ do it, it’s playing the ‘Victim-Card’.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 8:18 am Carlos Danger

      Does anyone even read Vox?

      LikeLike


  65. on February 8, 2015 at 7:27 pm Moses

    OT – MSM picking up “Cads & Dads” Meme

    From the Economist: http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21642000-promiscuity-and-fidelity-seem-be-specific-biological-adaptations-their

    A glaring omission from the story is the “Alpha Fux & Beta Bux” cuckold strategy. The story sets it up beautifully, then chickens out from the plain-as-day realtalk conclusion.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 7:54 am Major Styles

      Doesn’t look like I can comment on that. Apparently, the author did not want to open himself up to critique.
      This is a sign of victory. They know we are here, and we have valid points. Their response of silencing dissent is typical.

      LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 4:39 pm Glengarry

      To Nigel SWPL of the Economist, do sit down, have a drink, and let’s hear what’s on your mind. No need to carefully ration the truth, we’re here to help.

      LikeLike


  66. on February 8, 2015 at 8:04 pm Putin

    I was in Walmart today and saw a few commercials on T.V. It is not hard to see that this country has gone full betatard.

    Hell the French look manly compered to fem/beta America. Never seen so much fear and placating of women.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2015 at 8:42 pm Benson

      I have a friend who regularly brags that his marriage is a partnership and makes fun of people who embrace traditional gender roles. His wife fucking hates him.

      It’s weird to watch people embrace ideas that are toxic to their romantic interests.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 7:12 am Ripp

        Denial, projection. Symptoms of the failed ideals of pathological altruism.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 9:38 am Benson

        Yeah, but you’d think he’d make the connection at some point. Isn’t that what led most of us to game in the first place?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:28 pm Putin

        “His wife fucking hates him.” It is simply amazing when I finally opened my eyes to the beta’s I know who are in marriages. For the most part their wives really despise them. They have really placed the marriage in harms way.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 8:59 pm Benson

        ” It is simply amazing when I finally opened my eyes to the beta’s I know who are in marriages. For the most part their wives really despise them.”

        The strangest part is that many of them have attractive qualities; they’re interesting, successful dudes, and they often have status in their circles. But they don’t know how to use those qualities to keep their wives pleasant.

        Makes me grateful that I’m taking my lumps before I put a ring on a girl’s finger.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 4:22 pm Putin

        You are correct Benson.

        LikeLike


  67. on February 8, 2015 at 8:11 pm Putin

    Had a fun day of gaming women while shopping at the plaza with my wife. I think she enjoys being a spectator watching the flirting back and fourth. Told one women that she was not being very flexible. My wife was laughing. When we are in different parts of the store I enjoy flirting with the women who work in the clothing store then I go show my wife what I tried on. It really freaks the clerks out given they assumed I was single. My wife is getting bored of this act though.

    LikeLike


  68. on February 9, 2015 at 2:29 am The Thirsty Slut | Truth and contradictions | ...

    […] Conventional wisdom has it that raw sluts aren’t the prettiest girls in school. The conventional wisdom is mostly right about sluts.  […]

    LikeLike


  69. on February 9, 2015 at 7:29 am Waffles

    Female Nature, Game of Thrones style

    LikeLike


  70. on February 9, 2015 at 7:32 am Major Styles

    This same girl will then later boast about how she doesn’t need men.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 10:23 am Greg Eliot

      That’s when you offer to buy her fish a bicycle. lzlzozlzozlzolzozlozozlozozl

      LikeLike


  71. on February 9, 2015 at 8:43 am Karl

    Imagine a tribe of men who have ===publicly pledged== that they will not defend their womenfolk against attack, should it occur.

    Are we surprised that there arose many “targets of opportunity” for an alert Alpha Male?

    http://www.canadianmennonite.org/articles/experiment-sexuality-gone-wrong#comment-1703

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 8:55 am Greg Eliot

      I’m not sure this minister’s alleged predations against his own flock (said flock of a majority of devout churchmen, such as the Mennonites are) can be considered the equivalent of “not defending one’s womenfolk against attack”… leastwise, not the connotation of what that phrase usually entails.

      One wonders if the females’ fathers/uncles/husbands/sons were made aware of these alleged wrong-doings while the minister was alive.

      As it stands, I have to take this report, written by a woman of course, after the minister is no longer around to answer for himself, with a grain of salt.

      Granted, I don’t doubt he took liberties (Animal House wink)… but forward men, especially in leadership positions, seducing women (more or less willing at the time, since no rape arrests occurred) is not exactly news… ESPECIALLY in the churches.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 10:43 am Karl

        Mennonites are pacifists who refuse to take up arms, even if their country or village is attacked. Actually, it is their defining characteristic, as they are rather unremarkably plain-vanilla in all their other beliefs.

        I am not here to discuss the morality of pacifism, because Red Pill thinking is not based on any moral “premise”.

        I am here to talk about what goes on in the limbic brain of a Mennonite woman, knowing as she does, that her husband would not raise his finger to to prevent her from being raped or slaughtered.

        Apparently, this Yoder fellow understood what goes on in these women’s limbic brain…..

        Read deeper, you will see that most of the whining about Yoder is made by “out” Gravy, Lettuce Bacon Tomato Mennonitesses.

        They are rather pissed that a ===man=== stole a bunch of vaginas from their own potential use.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 10:52 am Greg Eliot

        I’m not sure you’re capturing what Christian pacifism is all about… not wanting to partake in wars and remaining aloof from “English” society in general doesn’t mean you stand around and watch somebody burn your barn and rape your daughter.

        That said, small wonder that what’s getting published is from the GBLT side of things.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 4:45 pm Sean Fielding

        Greg, Anabaptist pacifism takes ‘Christian pacifism’ and turning the other cheek to a whole other level. Their doctrine is literally that violence in self-defense is never justified, under any circumstances. Naturally, this doctrine led to their virtual annihilation in Europe, and when TSHTF, the same will happen in the New World, despite their reproductive success here for the last 300 years. The history of folk who won’t defend themselves is not pretty.

        LikeLike


  72. on February 9, 2015 at 12:49 pm FredMertz

    You guys recommend RSD’s Foundations? Or is Transformation a better place to start?

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 3:04 pm Lumpy

      Going and talking to girls and trying to get their phone numbers or dates (you might get rejected, and it will surprise you how much you don’t) is the best place to start.

      Since I’m a pickup material junkie too, I know you won’t listen to that. 🙂 I’d say RSD’s Blueprint Decoded is good old fashioned shit. Some of the best of the new wave is Simple Pickup’s “Project Go” videos. Lots of infield videos with good breakdowns.

      LikeLike


  73. on February 9, 2015 at 6:07 pm Anonymous

    This article is disgusting. I had to venture into the “manosphere” for a class, and what I have found is sickening. All of you that participate in this vile and depraved discussion should be utterly ashamed of yourselves. You’re all pathetic. What worthless lives you lead chasing after meaningless hookups with people that don’t care about you. I hope that one day you realize the triviality and insignificance of your existence and try to pursue something that will actually be worth something to the world.

    LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2015 at 9:11 am Anonymous

      you sound hawt

      LikeLike


    • on February 11, 2015 at 1:29 pm Anonymous

      If this is a beginner’s attempt to insult-comedy, fine, we all started somewhere (keep plugging, you will get better).

      If not
      oink

      LikeLike


  74. on February 9, 2015 at 6:11 pm Bedrich

    “**There is a class (a minority) of hot babes — eternal ingenues — who cash in on their looks by acquiring the seed and resources of multiple lovers. Their numbers are few, but their danger to unwary men is considerable.”

    Not necessarily ingenues. It’s the Ava Gardner syndrome.
    It put super-alpha Frank off his game.

    LikeLike


  75. on February 15, 2015 at 5:06 pm TheTruthAboutClouds

    When you use fun gifs in your posts and housewives like me share them on pinterest it gets shared more often. Personally I am very amused by this and invite you to join me in that amusement.
    Of course they may not even click the article. Even if they do …well…

    You can lead a horse to knowledge but you can’t make it think.

    LikeLike


  76. on February 21, 2015 at 3:28 am Trolletariat

    “Dong hit”

    Ahahahaha!

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Recent Comments

    roberthagedorn1 on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
    Thor on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
    CMC on Don’t Help The Leftoid M…
    PontiusG on NPC Culture, In One Meme
    stg58animalmother on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
    Peter Jackson on NPC Culture, In One Meme
    chris on Sweden Vs Norway
    jOHN MOSBY on Don’t Help The Leftoid M…
    ‘Reality’ Doug on Sweden Vs Norway
    Captain John Charity… on Sweden Vs Norway
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Betrayal Is A Woman's Heart
    • The Three Abrahamic Religions, Abbreviated
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • NPC Culture, In One Meme
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Don't Help The Leftoid Media Sway Elections
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: