Drop another social science study on the pile of studies affirming the CH maxim that diversity + proximity = war (by whichever means).
Keep your enemies close? Greater proximity to opponents leads to more polarization.
Encouraging adversaries to have more interpersonal contact to find common ground may work on occasion, but not necessarily in the U.S. Senate, according to new research.
In their study, “Pulling Closer and Moving Apart: Interaction, Identity, and Influence in the U.S. Senate, 1973 to 2009,” which appears in the February issue of the American Sociological Review, Sameer B. Srivastava, assistant professor, Haas Management of Organizations Group at UC Berkeley’s Haas School of Business, and Christopher C. Liu, assistant professor of strategy at University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management, studied the interactions among U.S. senators from the 1970s to the 2000s.
A pattern emerged. Senators either moved closer together or further apart in their voting behavior as a function of their political identities and how much contact they had with each other. This pattern was especially pronounced when contact occurred in Senate committees that were more divided.
“Conventional wisdom says interpersonal contact between people will foster collaboration and consensus,” says Srivastava. “We found that increasing physical contact between people who have opposing and public political identities can instead promote divergence of attitudes or behavior. This tendency is further amplified in environments involving high conflict, which makes political identities more salient.”
“Co-location can induce both positive and negative outcomes. Sometimes keeping some distance is the better option,” says Liu.
A billion white leftoid SWPLs would weep, except they already agreed with the conclusions of this study and others like it when they skedaddled for white hipster enclaves and white suburbs with white majority schools.
This latest result belying the “diversity is our strength” mantra is in line with Putnam’s previous finding that trust within communities decreased as ethnic and racial diversity increased. Just like regular people, politicians don’t want to be around strange, irritating foreigners for long.
Of all the stupid acts of malice elite white leftoids have perpetrated upon America, when the dust settles on District Yankeeland it will be the opening of the borders to the nonwhite world and the shitting in the faces of core middle class whites that will chasten them the most. That is, if there is any integrity left in them.

[…] Study: Diversity + Proximity = Legislative War […]
LikeLike
[…] By CH […]
LikeLike
https://mobile.twitter.com/JamesMacCreator/status/528342987395571712/photos
LikeLike
Quite the looker, given the YKWitude.
LikeLike
Give her ten years, Herschel, and her gefilte fish will smell of its moniker and her nose will have its own zip code.
LikeLike
Yeah, if a cross between a horse and a reptile is your bag.
LikeLike
If you’re of the equestrian bent.
LikeLike
#CharlieIsDead
LikeLike
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c9d_1423493722
Just in time. This time there are only 30. The next their will be 300. Then 3000…
Eventually, they will be bring their crossed shield and spears.
LikeLike
I wonder how many of those British protestors were hauled off to Room 101 in the Ministry of Truth.
Alan Moore really looks like a fool for his predictions in the comic “V for Vendetta.”
LikeLike
Let me try again.
420 cartridges of NATA 5.56 ammo in a lockable metal can is something a lot of us routinely purchase as a matter of deep principle – like as everytime N. Pelosi opens her mouth. . NATO ammo will last effectively forever. And the whole box costs less to buy than the years rental of a central american peasant child as a conscience toy for decades…
LikeLike
I enjoy your posts Rum. Even more when I imagine them coming from an old cat…
LikeLike
The Senate case is special. People are elected to the senate, at least partially to represent specific views. So the stage is set for some people to dig their heels in. But this is a minority of events. Usually, people elected to representative bodies become “socialized” in the sense that they learn to think like the other guy. Sometimes like the Senate consensus (in this case), sometimes like the consensus within their own party.
LikeLike
The left has no intention to cooperate politically, except when it leads to their greater advantage. It doesn’t matter how near or far away they are. These studies presume moral equivalence in politics when one entire, metastasizing class of apparatchiks are not practicing politics at all.
Their only intent is to amass power, and once amassed, to preserve it forever. Politics is a means to their aggrandizement, not to deliberation, compromise, or pragmatism, not for “getting things done in a bipartisan way for the good of the country.”
Studies like the above are amusingly quaint and totally useless. This isn’t federalists and anti-federalists penning eloquent rejoinders to the loyal opposition with everyone interested in the ultimate end of preserving the nation. This is a turf war with alien interlopers and hateful traitors who despise the success of this country and seek to mutilate its future.
Matt
LikeLike
The object of power is power
LikeLike
“no intention to cooperate politically”
Very few appreciate the full implications of this.
LikeLike
C’mon, boys… let’s just vote our way out of the current malaise!
– Zippy The Pinhead
LikeLike
If it isn’t the failure of their misguided noblesse oblige that guts their core philosophy, it will be the whip-crack violent backlash of the middle class whites, lead by a few good (alpha) men, that guts their guts instead.
One can only dream.
LikeLike
Betas dream. Alphas do.
LikeLike
Disagreed. Idea comes before execution – it’s just that betas never get beyond the idea phase.
P.S. you missed the tongue-in-cheek of my final line.
LikeLike
As in “one” can only dream, but multitudes can act upon the dream?
LikeLike
Ah has a dream!
LikeLike
SWPLs are indeed hypocrites on many things, but they are not hypocrites when they apply to elite universities. If SWPLs truly wanted to get away from the Jewish and Asian hordes, they would no longer hold the Ivies/MIT/Stanford/Caltech in high regard. In fact, they would stop applying to those schools entirely and go for the Podunk State U in flyover country.
LikeLike
But it’s a kind of vicious circle in that graduates from the Ivies will always get preference in the jobs market. Usually unfairly. For engineering and technology certainly many of the flyover universities are every bit as good.
LikeLike
Chris Kyle spent an afternoon trying to teach the (then) Govenor of Texas to handle a full-bore sniper rifle. The Governor said,” Can I have a little more padding behind this fiersome gun for when I shoot it? C.P.O. Kyle said, “Your predecessor Ann Richards never needed that.”
Two things grew out of that encounter:
Chris Kyles funeral procession was nearly 200 miles long.
LikeLike
It is strange that Rick Perry would say that. I’d read that he owned firearms.
He was castigated by the Austin SWPLs for shooting a coyote with a .380 pistol when it threatened his dog. In many counties in Texas the sheriffs look the other way when residents shoot coyotes because their population has exploded.
LikeLike
Rick Perry was a democrat most all of his life including Reagan’s 8 years in office. He’s never worked in the private sector. He’s a low IQ finger in the wind drugstore conservative. There is no there there.
LikeLike
Rick Perry. Thats the guy who said that you’re “heartless” if you oppose white disposession.
LikeLike
diversity “the state of being different or unlike.” many types of diversity.
LikeLike
The dilution of the first world is inevitable. The most succinct summary of human history is:
White men sowed, others reaped.
Ipso facto, the end of white men will be the end of human history.
LikeLike
the Asians keep history, everyone else, nope. Didn’t have the written word prior to the white man
LikeLike
Not so much end of human history more an end to enlightenment followed by a new Dark Age.
LikeLike
The fact that the idea that “diversity is our greatest strenght” is imposed on us 24/7 by the government, the media, the entertainment business, the education system and that people have their reputation or career destroyed if they disagree, is enough to indicate diversity is neither normal, natural nor good.
Things that are normal, natural and good happen all by themselves and people welcome them.
They may as well try to convince us that sleeping on a bed of nails is more comfortable than sleeping on something soft like a mattress.
LikeLike
DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH
LikeLike
My stock answer is: “Well, if diversity is good, then we’d better stop mixing.”
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
“A billion white leftoid SWPLs would weep”
Actually … US (300m) + EU (400m) + Russia (200m) = 900m. So I estimate there are less than 900m whites in total, possibly considerably less.
LikeLike
You forgot Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, plus all the elites of the Latin American countries. Some Latin American countries are majority White, like Uruguay and Argentina. Some have a significant percentage of Whites, like Chile. Even in places like Mexico, the ruling class is White.
LikeLike
Right you are.
Argentina + Uruguay + Chile = 65m
Australia + NZ = 25m
Canada = 35m
There are still 5m whites in South Africa too.
Other elites: Yeah, I’ll skip those.
So 130m more, before you subtract any subpopulations that don’t qualify. OK, maybe there are 950m whites net.
LikeLike
900 Million is even probably a high figure.
LikeLike
Show me one member of the media who’s not s Jew. Abrams.
http://m.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/11/study-oxytocin-the-love-hormone-makes-men-in-relationships-want-to-stay-away-from-other-women/265314/
LikeLike
Dear Cheateau
I thought you might appreciate this lol
http://www.mirror.co.uk/lifestyle/dating/man-finds-girlfriends-ex-snapchatting-5132859
LikeLike
beta of the century?
LikeLike
certainly a contender. ill bet she banged the ex.
LikeLike
Goddamn…
What are the odds the ex-boyfriend dumped her ass for some fresh pussy, then she settled for insecure beta loverboy, and now that he’s shown some interest again she’s jumping all over the opportunity to get together and ditch whiny-ass loverboy?
And what are the odds that betaboy hasn’t gotten any for months, and when he approaches his girlfriend tomorrow for some action, she’ll tell him to fuck off because she has a “headache”?
I mean, really, I usually have some measure of sympathy for hapless betas, but I really wish this sappy loser all the crap he will get. He freakin’ deserves it at this point.
LikeLike
funny looking outside on all the same
LikeLike
Put the current elites up against the wall.
LikeLike
Man, do chicks ever dig big-time jerks.
http://m.thespec.com/news-story/5331424-mississauga-woman-allegedly-killed-by-boyfriend-had-just-posted-his-bail/
LikeLike
Interesting about Putnam
Putnam concluded that “diversity” equals LESS civic engagement early on in his research.
In other words, that “diversity” is actually horrible and no one wants it.
Yet Putnam ** sat on his findings for 10 years ** before making them public.
For at least 10 years he sat on it before releasing “Bowling Alone”
Meanwhile – go to elitist enclaves in DC or NYC – “Diversity” is a party joke
Talk to them and broach the subject in a casual way.
The whole world is “racist” – in that everyone favors their own kind. Only white straight gentiles are not allowed to be
LikeLike
> “Yet Putnam ** sat on his findings for 10 years ** before making them public.”
Putnam married into The Tribe and converted to YKWism. He’s the ultimate traitor to the White Race. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Putnam#Background_and_early_work
LikeLike
Exactly. Putnam has been praised in some race realist quarters for his ‘courage’ in publishing this research. In fact as you say he disgracefully sat on it for years and was forced to publish only when word got out via some of his undergrad assistants. Marrying into the Tribe just confirms that he’s an unprincipled careerist.
LikeLike
Ron Unz has interesting results on blacks’ correlation to crime you should read. He also kind of “buried” the results. IQ studies and transracial adoption studies are also hiding in plain sight.
LikeLike
@Heartiste
Diversity is not just about race. It’s also about ideology. Even if you managed to make a homogenous White ethnostate, there would still be tons of infighting between the feminists and the MRAs, and the White supremacists and the liberals.
I also believe that diversity + proximity = polarisation. The MRAs are going to get more into woman-hating and the feminists are going to get even more misandrist. If both movements keep going where they’re going, it’s going to get to the point where feminists want to enslave all men and collect their earnings while MRAs want to treat White women the same way that Saudi men treat Saudi women.
The same can be said for racial ideology. If the anti-White White liberals and the White supremacists keep going where they’re going, it’s going to get to the point where if you say anything remotely pro-White, the anti-White White liberals will shut you down and if you say anything that’s less than 100% pro-White the WNs will shut you down. Anti-White White liberals want to make White people subservient to Blacks and Hispanics and make all marriages interracial. WNs want to expell or destroy all non-Whites and insist that all White people are perfect and have IQs of 160 while all non-Whites have IQs of 40 and are hellbent on murder and mayhem.
Extremism in both directions is going to kill White America.
LikeLike
So much histeria, false premises, and binary thinking in one comment.
LikeLike
Don’t ever go full retard.
LikeLike
Complete rubbish. Can’t be arsed giving a more detailed demolition of your position.
LikeLike
SC, I see your point, but let me give you an anecdote, and become wise therefrom.
The story goes, some young actress (whose name escapes me at the moment) was on a set with Ed Asner, who took a shine to her in an avuncular way and gave her pointers on acting and the business in general.
Then one day during a break in shooting, there was some story on CNN being shown about the Middle East on the TV in the commissary, and she let slip a naive and totally innocent remark along the lines of “those poor Palenstinians”.
From that moment on, she was persona non grata in his eyes, and he never addressed her again. “It was like the turn of a switch” she remarked, quite puzzled a bit hurt.
To the YKWs, the rest of the world is a constant enemy against which vigilance must be keenly maintained. Whether or not their own actions bring about the world’s animosity is a debate for another time, the point right now being:
This mentality is what keeps a folk strong when their existence is at stake.
Sure, you can make a case that this is not fair, logical, nice, whatever.
But you don’t “play nice” with people who are looking to eliminate a future for children of your kind… and you certainly don’t debate them on the issue.
So you can get off this WN = Leftoid crap and realize that WNs are the ones who see the future and the possible demise of all whites at the hands of the Leftoids and their ilk… and binary thinking, when it comes to the enemy, is a sound practice.
Carthego delenda est, said Rome… not “Let’s talk to those chaps and see if we can’t work things out.”
LikeLike
Binary thinking is not a sound practice. It is a way to gain enemies out of people who were previously neutral. I used to be neutral to the feminists and leftists and now I hate them because they screech at anyone who disagrees with them even a little. WNism and MRAism will fail for similar reasons. There are tons of White people who like being White but don’t rabidly hate Coloureds. There are tons of men who want family courts to be less anti-mail without having Western society turn into a White version of Saudi society.
If the Ashkenazi Jews were such ethnonationalists, why do they have high intermarriage rates in the US, and even higher intermarriage rates in Russia?
LikeLike
You keep thinking that in order to be a WN you need to “hate coloureds”…
Wrong.
And you’re obviously set in your thinking, even making excuses for YKW because they “intermarry”… the latter term meaning anything from marrying atheistic or agnostic members of the tribe to mixing with half-gentiles and such.
What this has to do with their control of the media, PACs, and virtually every nook and cranny that has anything to do with getting a host to champion their own causes (and Israel), often at the expense of said host’s own people, I don’t see.
It’s obvious that you’ve either swallowed the blue pill of the Cathedral in all matters racial and political, or you’re merely being (yet another) disingenuous shill therefor.
LikeLike
“”Even if you managed to make a homogenous White ethnostate, there would still be tons of infighting between the feminists and the MRAs, and the White supremacists and the liberals.””
Wrong, if it was a homogeneous white ethnostate there would be no jews in academia, politics and MSM. Simply nobody around to continually promote and fund feminism.
LikeLike
Even leftoid spergs are admitting the power of Testosterone:
http://fusion.net/story/42619/why-testosterone-is-the-drug-of-the-future/
Most of the article is written in an (typically leftist) alarmist tone, and its easy to see why.
LikeLike
The stupid SJW elites and their pet blacks pushing immigration to the USA in an effort to make the country more “diverse and tolerant”, will be in for a rude awakening.
Latins despise blacks, and they aren’t afraid to act on it. Hispanic gangs don’t fool around, they put any black-american thug to shame.
When Juan and Sosa take over and ethnically cleanse the dindus outta Compton, they will all cry for whitey’s loving embrace again. But this time, there will be no one to hear them.
Maybe this is the fate that America deserves, after all.
LikeLike
Same goes for Jews. They might live to regret the fact that they destroyed our countries because blacks, hispanics and Asians do not carry a trace of the pathological altruism that Whites harbour towards Jews. Don’t try pulling the Holocau$t routine with them.
LikeLike
I recently made a breakthrough regarding Africans and those of African genetic ancestry.
It’s common knowledge that sub-Saharan Africans have mean IQ scores of 65-70, compared to 100 for the rest of the world.
However, by definition, other races have sub populations with low IQs. Why do blacks have a disproportionate propensity for violence and criminality?
The answer lies in serum testosterone. Africans have the lowest mean IQ combined with the highest mean testosterone. As the history of Africa and the African diaspora has shown, this is a particularly disastrous combination. This rare and odd combination evolved only to survive the unique environmental pressures of sub-Saharan Africa, and nowhere else.
It is a particularly bad combination for modern society, which requires high IQ combined with massive impulse control and future time orientation, both of which correlate negatively with testosterone.
Low IQ and high testosterone is nature’s biggest practical joke.
LikeLike
What about sub-Canadian Africans?
LikeLike
OK, that was funny.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on ReactionaryThought.
LikeLike
You know, if they had waited a few years or decades until Whites really were a minority to start saying we had to die, they might have had a chance with so many Whites sitting on the fence, but now even these liberal Whites are beginning to see the death camp they want to build for them. The enemy has no self-control. When they think they are going to win they celebrate after passing the thirty yard line. So far, but close enough for them to start celebrating. This free for all at the border is just desperation now. No way they’ll bring enough browns in to dispossess Whites before they collapse. Too bad boys, but that’s what you get for trying to play a Man’s game. No one without self-control is ever going to Rule the World!
LikeLike
[…] Drop another social science study on the pile of studies affirming the CH maxim that diversity + proximity = war (by whichever means). Keep your enemies close? Greater proximity to opponents leads to more polarization. […]
LikeLike
“This latest result belying the “diversity is our strength” mantra is in line with Putnam’s previous finding that trust within communities decreased as ethnic and racial diversity increased. Just like regular people, politicians don’t want to be around strange, irritating foreigners for long.”
Such a simple-minded, myopic conclusion shows your intellectual weakness in interpreting statistics and studies. That people need distance is very basic. Absence makes the heart grow fonder. You are reading way too much into this study. The outside pressure and influence of big money is a major culprit. In the 1970s, the level of polarization was nowhere near what it is today. Nixon was more liberal that Obama – Obamacare ~= Nixoncare that dems rejected, Nixon started the EPA and normalized relations with communists in China, etc.
So you need to learn some history and psychology before you jaunt off on such nonsense ramblings. Or at least take a statistics class and make some revisions after you understand the nuances of a correlation coefficient and the flux of a time-series (how people become more comfortable and even indifferent over time with circumstances).
LikeLike