• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Thirsty Slut
Study: Diversity + Proximity = Legislative War »

The Profit-Propaganda Curve

February 9, 2015 by CH

The 2015 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue (swolefeed) will feature a fatty fat as one of its “””models”””. (Granted, she’s only in an ad, which should tell you something about the difficulty of wedging fat chicks into what is essentially masturbation material for men.) This kowtowing to the fatty fat acceptance movement is a first for a major glossy that primarily serves the tastes of normal straight men.

Given the obvious fact that almost no normal straight men are interested in looking at the near-naked bodies of ugly or “big-boned” women, it’s a strange editorial choice by SI. Why would SI risk losing customers?

SI, like most contemporary media organs, is likely staffed floor to rafters with leftoids. The Hivemind Narrative — read: equalist, multikult, anti-normal white man — is so entrancing to leftoids that they’ll leave money on the table to proselytize it.

Homo economicus is dead, long live homo hamstericus! Now that the myth of a purely economically rational man is rapidly getting discredited by realtalkers, we can better analyze the seeming counterproductive behavior of megaphones like SI.

The patented CH Profit-Propaganda curve explains SI’s actions.

As you can see, at very low profit margin, most business will engage in no propaganda beyond that which is required to sell their product. Struggling entrepreneurs simply can’t risk a loss of revenue on a quixotic quest to ideologically reeducate their customers.

As we climb the P-P curve, we see that the worst propaganda is streamed with unmatched intensity and devotion by businesses with profit margins sufficiently robust to absorb losses of antagonized customers put off by its anti-human message. Here we find the media, government, and academia.

At the very highest profitability — finance, medicine, etc — we find the propaganda machine winding down. Once a business reaches the level of Fuck You money, its interest in abiding prevailing Hivmind norms wanes. But not totally. Although the very richest don’t spend a lot of the energy on *direct* propaganda, they do spend a lot on *indirect* Hivemind propaganda, such as contributing to charities and lobbying government on their No Non-White Boy Left Behind policy ideas.

The P-P curve is explained in part by the fact that leftoids congregate in fields that are naturally efficient at brainwashing, and most of these fields are — scratch that, have been — comfortably profitable.

Another reason for the shape of the curve is the mentality of people working for businesses that have come into non-struggle money; that is, they work for companies that have “made it”. Once a business has “made it”, the pent-up ideological energy of the apparatchiks working there is released in a bukkake of hope and change. Give a leftoid a little bit of stripper cash, and she can’t help but blow the wad on clothes and cocaine. A little bit of Hivemind-enabling money can be a dangerous thing.

At the extremes of profit are the captains of industry who are far more interested in turning a buck or a billion than in chipping away at their rotund bottom line with Party propaganda.

Finally, the obscenely rich are fairly well-insulated from the clownshirt SJW and race huckster shakedowns. And the striver businesses — the mom and pops — aren’t rich enough to catch the interest of Hivemind zealots. But middling profitable companies are ripe targets, with pockets just deep enough to justify paying the Danegelding instead of telling the diversity whores to fuck off and thereby assuming the risk of a public or, worse, legal lynching by a loudly one-sided megaphone.

Related: How to fight the propaganda machine.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Culture, Psy Ops, The Id Monster | 231 Comments

231 Responses

  1. on February 9, 2015 at 12:52 pm burke

    i also enjoyed that women were upset that the ‘plus size’ model robyn lawley isn’t really plus size enough for their fat-acceptance goals.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 12:56 pm burke

      and you’re right re: propaganda. no girls are buying the swimsuit issue and going and buying swimsuits for all after seeing the immense ashley graham. it’s not for sales.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:14 pm Ninjadata

        Curvy To Fat, really useful.

        https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/curvy-to-fat/djfiplfmndogeagnelpbjjnglflialbg?hl=en

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 4:11 pm corvinus

        Robin Lawley is plus-sized in the height department, not (really) in the weight one. She’s not the right kind of plus-sized for fat acceptance activists.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 11:14 pm Eliezer Ben Yehuda

        >>>> It’s definitely a YKW thing. They dominate media and the ad agencies. Hence every second person on an ad is black or a minority of some sort. Whites, especially men, are portrayed as dorks, rescued by cool impeccably attired black men.

        spend all your weekly income as quickly as females and africans do…. we’ll feature you in adverts and in storylines, also.

        we make so much money catering to those two categories of mental retards, why should we stress out to make white guys feel better?

        don’t blame us if you’re too cheap to pay for entertainment. You want free entertainment, you’ll take what the advertisers are willing to pay for.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 11:08 am Captain Obvious

        Is there some angle from which the above-pictured chick is supposed to look bad? Because if the tits are real, then that chick is a solid 9.0, and would be pushing a 9.5 to a 9.9 after I’d had a few glasses of wine [== beer goggles for you losers who drink fermented hops].

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 1:15 pm trav777

      One problem is that the YKW can, via control of the monetary system and banking, effectively fund nonprofitable endeavors like a magazine full of fatties, in order to enforce a social engineering initiative.

      This show Empire on Fox..all negroed out, basically the rap video version of business, as if blacks actually run hiphop instead of more YKWs. And they show it with “limited commercial interruption.” Who you think pays for that? You think Fox cares that much? You think the advertisers are overpaying for time on a negro show when the negro bakkabaww association is in financial trouble because they alienated the (paying) white audience? The money is coming from somewhere…

      I cannot see this show having any success but the push it is receiving is insane…it’s all very simple to figure once you know who controls money and media.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:51 pm irishsavant

        It’s definitely a YKW thing. They dominate media and the ad agencies. Hence every second person on an ad is black or a minority of some sort. Whites, especially men, are portrayed as dorks, rescued by cool impeccably attired black men.

        But what really blows my mind is that a company in a competitive business like hospitality would blatantly shoot themselves in the foot by choosing to portray a black fambly chimping out in their room FOR AN IRISH AUDIENCE? Like these people.http://irishsavant.blogspot.ie/2011/05/genuine-question.html

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:52 pm Carlos Danger

        I have concluded they see the entire media as a cost center for maintaining the message.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:00 pm Greg Eliot

        Empire?

        Hell, I’m still trying to recover my investments in Glory and Red Tails.

        LZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOLZOLZOL

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 4:09 pm mendozatorres

        Red Tails! Nice. . .

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 1:23 pm Heywood Jablome

      Betcha the SI editors airbrush & PhotoShop the ever-blubbin’ hell out of this girl, too … to avoid obvious cellulite & sagginess.

      LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 1:34 pm The Man Who Was . . .

      I lurve me some Robin Lawley thickness, but she’s actually very toned.

      The other girl, Ashley Graham, has a genuinely pretty face, but she’s just plain fat. Put that together and we’re talking a 6 to 6.5, being generous.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:13 pm Joe

        Yeah, I like some freaky thickness but it’s really about tone and whether a girl has the right shape to carry it off. A fair number of women can carry an extra 20 and still look hot… they’d be hotter still 20 pounds lighter. Occasionally a woman needs a few extra pounds. Renee Zelwegger looks better at something just a little shy of her Bridget Jones weight rather than her current Calista Flockhart bonyness… Most women who carry an extra 20 and convince themselves they are pulling it off, however, are probably being a little dishonest with themselves and all that “I am fatass woman hear me roar” stuff just reeks of people who are trying to convince themselves of something they know is not quite true.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 2:00 pm Greg Eliot

      Lawley is plus-sized? I consider that just right.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:12 pm Canadian Friend

        In this crazy day and age it seems any girl curvier than Miley Cirus is considered fat.

        I was not made for these times…

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:20 pm Arbiter

        Just right? Note how her arms are placed to hide the waist.

        That head sure looks small in proportion to the body. Weird.

        But she is not as “plus-sized” as the really “plus-sized” women out there. So by choosing her they show the lie in their own talk about how appearances don’t matter.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:20 pm Amy

        She’s heavily photoshopped in that photo. Which begs the question…. what’s the point of using her at all?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:31 pm Greg Eliot

        Just right? Note how her arms are placed to hide the waist.

        Hell, brother… as long as there are no tats and she doesn’t smoke, I’ll put up with them pointy elbows.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 4:12 pm corvinus

        She’s plus-sized height-wise, not weight-wise.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 4:23 pm Canadian Friend

        Maybe some of you guys have small dicks so a lot of women look big in comparison?

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 7:35 pm Dennis

        That photo is done so as to show her in the most flattering light. Check some of her other photos without the benefit of a proper set-up. I’m also pretty sure her tits are photo-shopped, since the size seems to vary from photograph to photograph.

        @Canadian Friend

        Nah, I just prefer not to stick my dick in chubby 6’s. If you wanna go dumpster diving, though, be my guest.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 2:36 pm The Spirit Within

      would bang

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 4:52 pm blart

        yep, absolutely would bang.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 5:58 pm Realtalker

      Robin Lawley is also a genetic freak in many ways.

      she is 6’2″ for starters – in contrast, “the last supermodel” Gisele is 5’11”. Female models rarely get over 6’1″, they tend to be 5’9-5’11 and wear

      Robin fits more of an Amazon fetish, not the bbw one required for the fat acceptance agenda. Her face is also more attractive than many of the other SI models who tend to be dolled up 7s and 8s compared to hard 9 VS Angels. Especially considering keeping her looks despite being a giant.

      you can tell on this new pig the extent of photoshopping required which is rivaled by few (Kardashian and trust fund babies who are too ugly to model).

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 7:18 pm Anonymous

        Amazon fetish? Death by snu-snu!

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 11:30 pm Eliezer Ben Yehuda

        >> Female models rarely get over 6’1″, they tend to be 5’9-5’11 and wear

        they are chosen for the convenience of the ragtrade prototype pattern-cutters. thus, besides having a young, beautiful face – they need to be the correct bodysize. If you don’t believe me, read some trade textbooks and some trade magazines. The library of Fashion Institute of Technology is open to the public.

        Models aren’t paid to push a social agenda. They are paid to assist in moving inventory. Their payroll-expense is part of the fashion-parade show the same way the invoice from the caterer is.

        I am really starting to wonder if any of these anti-YKW whiners has ever run a business.

        PS: the garment business is ===exceptionally=== competitive. There is very little room for making mistakes.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 7:47 pm Will

      That girls frame is a little big for me. But I’d still bang

      LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 8:47 pm King A

      These fotoshopped fatties are repulsive because they represent passivity and sloth. They are mass capitulation to the lie that “Big is Beautiful” rather than fighting it everywhere.

      Never give up, not an inch, not an ounce, not a calorie. Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never—in nothing, great or small, large or petty—never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense.

      Fat is ugly, and ugly is evil. In young women? A mortal sin. It is the satanic perversion of nature. We should rather be convincing them to be the jealous stewardesses of their endowment for a decade or two during their eight on earth.

      If it were a matter of fat-bodies seeking to justify the outward signs of gluttony and sickness, that would be psychologically understandable. But no. They want to glorify repulsiveness and unhealth, as these high-gloss, mass-distributed photos attempt to do. Utter scandal.

      Women with posture and poise can wear their weight well — albeit only to a certain point. These girls, who would otherwise be proudly in place at the apex of beauty in all of nature, are instead encouraged to give in to gravity, to let their hearts turn into pork. It trains would-be angels to embrace the subcutaneous greasiness that lards their soul.

      You want fries with that?

      Matt

      LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 10:06 pm Putin

      Good looking.

      LikeLike


  2. on February 9, 2015 at 12:53 pm The Profit-Propaganda Curve | Manosphere.com

    […] The Profit-Propaganda Curve […]

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 8:04 pm King A

      The propaganda doesn’t follow profit so much as size (heh). Bigness is the enemy of freedom. Liberty thrives where authority is devolved and held within throttling distance of the individual.

      Aristotle considered the ideal polity to be comprised of no more than 500-1000 households — roughly the number of people the individual can be personally acquainted with. Any more and networks would strain past human relation.

      Large organizations grow to impersonal and unwieldy size and therefore rely on universalized ideas more than the judgments of men. Companies, bureaucracies, unions, churches, charities, schools, endowments, public sector, private sector — all susceptible. Outsized institutions list to the left because leftist ideology is designed to be 1) impersonal enough to be uniform, and 2) simple enough to be standard. (Consider O’Sullivan’s First Law.) Its only aim is power for power’s sake. All ascendant organizations, no matter how conservative their founders, eventually become slaves to the One Big Idea. Each individual actor finds it less troublesome to mouth the party line rather than “make precepts against the Leviathan.”

      Hence crony capitalism’s sordid relationship with the left — politician-businessmen cozying up to the state’s swampy ballsack. A third generation functionary and outside hire (hardly ever an entrepreneur) seeking to preserve his industrial position through the source of all political power — which further explains the vomitous capitulation of large advertisers to the ethos during the Super Bowl’s long, unbroken, voluntary homage to political correctness, as if anyone actually believes any of it save a few earnest campus freshmen, as if a mystery-meat propaganda reel would help peddle automobiles and syrup-water.

      The size of Ashley Graham is more symbolically indicative of the source of our decline than the chubbophiles realize. A specter is haunting Western civilization — the specter of avoirdupois. Bloat in thought, bloat in enterprise, bloat in flesh.

      Matt

      LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 3:55 pm The Spirit Within

        Sociologists say that the average person can manage up to 150 personal connections. Not 500 to 1000. Aristotle had it wrong.

        LikeLike


      • on February 11, 2015 at 4:01 pm VRW

        @DildoWithin: how silly are you? you wouldn’t need to know everyone, but as long as you knew someone who knew someone, it would work. too many degrees of separation and it becomes untenable

        LikeLike


  3. on February 9, 2015 at 1:04 pm whiskeysplace

    Brilliant analysis. Perhaps CH’s best ever. Saying something. Related: Bill Gates never cared about Diversity until his wife wanted to sit next to Bono at Davos.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 1:19 pm trav777

      and now Gates is trying to cure Africa of diseases to which the legendary rabbit-like reproduction habits of Africans are an evolutionary response. How much fucking stupider could ANYONE get? $10 watch wearing fuckin geek that needs to be punched in the face and he made $60B? Just…wtf.

      Population models show Nigeria exceeding a billion people in 50 years; and they will continue to live in squalor. Western society has engineered its own destruction.

      Crystal Methodism is the enemy. It really is coming to the point where wide-scale Breivikism is the last train out.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:16 pm Arbiter

        Speaking of Africa, there was a time when I thought the EU would start including African countries as members. “Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco and Egypt were European colonies for so long, it would be unfair not to include them. They have so many historical ties to France, Spain and Britain. It’s … a historical inevitability!”

        Hell, if the Medieval Hungary and Romania are included, with laws, economic situation and other conditions that are incompatible with Western countries, just so northern Europe will be swarmed by more mass immigration, then anything goes. George W. Bush leaned on the EU to include Turkey as a member, and there are still negotiations going on, although they now seem permanently stalled.

        But the EU has so much to clear up that it seems impossible to include African countries. And the powers that be know that they get the mass immigration anyway, which is all that matters.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:01 pm irishsavant

        When Sarkozy was in power he made strenuous efforts to ‘unite the Med.’ whereby North African and Levantine countries would become part of the EU. He also enjoined the French to embrace race mixing and the debasement of their genetic inheritance.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:14 pm Joe

        A billion Nigerians? Wow. We’re gonna need better spam filters.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:58 pm Greg Eliot

        And more basketballs.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 4:13 pm corvinus

        The mooselimb factor has prevented that, thank goodness.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 7:39 pm Anonymous

        This

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 8:01 pm Canadian Friend

        What people like Gates are doing is extremely bizarre.

        The white race is slowly dissapearing yet they do nothing to help it.

        while blacks are reproducing like mosquitoes and those stupid rich liberals are devoting their lives to help more black babies survive.

        What rich leftists are doing is helping the wrong side. They are contributing to accelerating not only the demise of the white race but the demise of the entire planet; once there are too many billions of starving blacks they will use every resource until the planet is bare and dead.

        A sane person would help the race that is dying not the race that is over populating the planet and that will destroy the planet.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 6:28 am james Blonde

        Canadian Friend, why do you assume white people are supposed to be a huge percentage of the worlds population?

        You never have been.

        You have always been a minority population.

        How many white people do you think the world needs?

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 2:37 pm The Spirit Within

      I don’t think Gates cares about diversity. He’s a sperg. He only knows problem solving.

      FYI, Africa’s economic growth rate last year exceeded the economic growth rates of both the US and the EU. That’s a fact. One big reason: foreign agribusiness firms scooping up millions of hectares of land from Ethiopia to Mozambique.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:02 pm irishsavant

        Whatever the reason for African economic growth you can rest assured it hasn’t derived from anything the Africans did themselves.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:06 pm KP

        Well, as a former Africa hand I’ll tell you the bigger reason: they’re starting from such a low baseline, there’s pretty much no where to to but UP.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:12 pm The Spirit Within

        Very true.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 12:46 pm EMP

        I pondered long and hard about Billy Boy’s motivations and in the end I came to the same conclusion…autism.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 3:12 pm JohnDSee

      I’ve always suspected that pushing the narrative trumps profit. Amazed that shareholders let it continue unabated. If CNN msnbc et al are in the red, I guess the loss of profit is just a tax writeoff. Not my field but I believe I’m on the right track. Cheers

      LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 3:57 pm elmer

      Is Gates the imbecile that is giving away mosquito nets to Africans who then proceed to use them to devastate the ecosystem through dredge-fishing?

      Why yes, yes he is :

      http://www.gatesfoundation.org/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2005/10/Gates-Foundation-Commits-2583-Million-for-Malaria-Research

      http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/25/world/africa/mosquito-nets-for-malaria-spawn-new-epidemic-overfishing.html

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 10:28 pm not too late

        Go to Africa. You won’t find mosquito nets. The Africans may be dim bulbs, but even they know that those nets are a joke.

        http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/25/world/africa/mosquito-nets-for-malaria-spawn-new-epidemic-overfishing.html?_r=0

        LikeLike


  4. on February 9, 2015 at 1:06 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

    I watched with amusement this past Saturday night as a little beta attempted to assuage his fat wife’s frantic hamster by telling her the plus-sized models in the Swimsuit issue indicated greater social acceptance of “larger” women. I wanted to hit him.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 2:19 pm Rick Derris

      Most likely the poor, whipped bastard didn’t even get any after the compliment.

      LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 3:15 pm Joe

      I read that as he was trying to “a sausage his fat wife’s frantic hamster.” It scans better that way and makes sense.

      LikeLike


  5. on February 9, 2015 at 1:06 pm X

    socialist cost shifting from the favored to the unfavored allowing things to exist that cannot otherwise.

    how many people would subscribe to HBO for Fat GIrls if Game of Thrones, Boardwalk, and Sopranos weren’t there?

    How many would buy CNN, MSNBC and Lifetime if you could just buy ESPN? How many would tolerate ESPN’s recent political bullshit if the NFL wasn’t there?

    Who would voluntarily share health costs with gays if Obamacare didn’t force people to?

    Who would tolerate college’s political bs if they didn’t have a monopoly on credentials?

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 1:55 pm mendozatorres

      Well, HBO is going to OTT (over-the-top…heh) programming, whereby people that don’t have cable can buy a subscription via the web. If ESPN ever did that, it’d have one helluva effect on the cable industry that could then lead to its demise. I believe CBS has done this as well…way to keep track of all their CSI’s.

      LikeLike


  6. on February 9, 2015 at 1:07 pm martin

    I would have guessed something differently actually. I imagine the more money a company has, the more likely it is to turn leftist. You see, lefty ideals are the ultimate in privilege. Turning aside an interest in mere profits because of things like enormous cash piles and trust funds, pure status whoring can begin whereas that wasn’t possible before when profits were a motivating factor. Which up-and-coming pornographic rag is going to willingly provide an inferior product in exchange for status when they have competition to beat? Proof? Well Goldman is essentially a government contractor, but look at Microsoft and Apple, and Google for companies with huge reserves and no immediate threats from competition. All of them have taken on a leftward bias as time has gone on. Google is probably the most notorious for this.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 1:21 pm Arbiter

      Now that the top media, after generations of effort, have become dominated by Tribe members in the boardroom, a business is best served by adjusting to their unrelenting, unforgiving propaganda drive. I have personally heard how wealthy board members talk. They are not political experts. They are focused on their product, and they don’t want to take up the struggle against an unrelenting enemy. They simply adapt. They also know that the other board members have gone through universities where the propaganda is everywhere, and that they watch the movies and TV shows with the usual propaganda. So you can’t trust the other people in the board room.

      And if you would fight the propasphere, what would you gain? You’d be a drop in the ocean. You’d make yourself and your product a target for nothing. After a series of headlines screaming that you are making “racist” and “non-inclusive” ads for your company, the shareholders will react. And other businesses will target you.

      Look at the head of Lululemon. He said the obvious – that their tight yoga pants are not for everyone (not for those who are too fat for them). Everyone knows that. But he was attacked by the media and forced to leave.

      Look at the CEO (I think it was) of Firefox. He had donated money to an anti-homo-wedding cause. The owners of OkCupid made sure that anyone who used Firefox to visit their site was met with a page denouncing the “homophobic” Firefox CEO, urging them to change their browser.

      Was that enough to take away all Firefox users? No. But some. And that is enough. He was forced to leave.

      It all comes back to who control the very few top media corporations. In a democracy, they rule by tipping the scales.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 1:58 pm mendozatorres

        The situation with the Firefox CEO was outrageous. If ever there was more proof of the Hivemind at work, it was that. So much for privacy in today’s day and age, let alone one sticking to their guns if it goes against the narrative.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:07 pm Arbiter

        Indeed. If the media had attacked OkCupid for targeting the Firefox CEO, then it would be OkCupid’s CEO who was forced to leave instead. And actually OkCupid would never have done it in the first place, even if someone in the board of directors wanted to. But it’s all about who the top media corporations back.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 6:21 pm JohnDSee

        That situation made me think that Mr Firefox should’ve started his own dating service. Those who say ‘if you don’t like it, then start your own [business],’ usually direct their remarks at those who don’t have the resources to do so. He was in an unique situation. A situation that will become less unique if ykwsjws are allowed to continue pushing, seemingly without consequence. Cheers

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 11:43 pm Eliezer Ben Yehuda

        >>> The onus is on them to speak up and break the system monopoly of their anti-white kinsmen, not condemn white truth tellers.

        Nothing wrong with Idaho, but it’s not our repsonsibility to turn the Kardashians into Idaho-ans.

        You want a White Zion? So, build it with your own hands. Don’t be a negro-like gimmedat.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 1:22 pm james Blonde

      Martin makes a good point which segues with mine; to what extent is the PP curve simply a function of demographics?

      In an increasingly non healthy white male dominated world, shouldn’t commerce reflect the new dominant demographics?

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 1:25 pm trav777

        look- Hennessey and LV have suffered mightily due to the niggerization of their brands. They fight now to keep their products AWAY from association with blacks because the real money won’t buy their products anymore as a result of the negative social connection.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 1:43 pm Arbiter

        Hollywood corporations made race-mixing movies even before WWII, movies they knew would not bring in a profit. It is not about demographics. It is about changing demographics.

        Why did Frozen become the best-selling animated movie of all time? Because of the beautiful blonde princess and the Nordic atmosphere. Even though the brown-haired sister has a lot more screen time, it is the blonde sister who gets all the attention. It was obvious this would sell, but it took this long for Disney to make such a main character. Look at the other Disney princesses – Belle, Mulan, Pocahontas, Ariel etc, no blonde Disney princess since Sleeping Beauty generations ago. They could have done it at any time but they didn’t. Until Frozen and Tangled just recently (and the hair in Tangled is too long and supernatural to really be seen as hair, it is more like a magical factor). Likewise, a lot of women would like to see blond men as main characters, but that has virtually disappeared. There is Thor today, and women drooling over him show that it sells, it has a market. Yet they put swarthy Jews as main characters in movies far, far more often than blond men, who are usually only seen as cold, inhuman killers.

        Likewise, there would definitely be a market for showing crime the way it really is. Show the Black gangs as the main crime problem. Show White heroes fighting the gangs. Instead, the majority of murderers are White – even in NYPD Blues, in a city where Whites are the minority! In fact, there were more White murderers in that show than there were in New York City in real life.

        When interracial rape is shown, it is almost always White men raping Black women. This was shown in the propaganda series Oz, for example. Absurdly, a noble Black leader in the prison was convicted for having beaten a White man who tried to rape a Black woman. Almost never is a Black seen raping a White woman on screen – even though 90 percent of all interracial rape is Blacks raping White women, and some years there are zero White-on-Black rapes. There would be a market for showing interracial rape the way it really is – but the media bosses don’t show that. Profit takes a backseat to propaganda.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:07 pm mendozatorres

        Didn’t Tommy Hilfiger go out of business because he was tired of who was wearing his eponymous clothing?

        The film Bamboozled had a great riff on this.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:08 pm Greg Eliot

        Yep… and yet there are still those shills who attempt to deride all of this as paranoia and antisemitic babbling… go figger.

        I’m curious to see how much longer Walking Dead gets away with its negro worship and Aryan beast memes and still remains “the number one show on TV”, as it’s touted.

        I still get a laugh when I mention this to other folks and their response is “well, Rick is white!” lzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlzolzozlzolzolzolzolozl

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:22 pm james Blonde

        trav777
        real money won’t buy their products anymore as a result of the negative social connection
        ————————————————————————————

        Look- “real money” is meaningless to the programs and algorithms that make the split second buying and selling decisions white men USED to make. You can blame joos and nonwhites all you want; but the white man has been hung by his own digital petard.

        He gets rich fucking himself and he can’t stop cause it feels good.

        Auto erotic annihilation FTW.

        am I rite?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:34 pm Arbiter

        I still get a laugh when I mention this to other folks and their response is “well, Rick is white!”

        This is the typical leftist “proof” that a show or movie is “racist” against Blacks: that the main character is White. Always, always, always this is lifted up as proof of movies being “racist”.

        But the propaganda is in the confrontation. When pro-Black and pro-White interests confront each other, the pro-Black side is always good and the pro-White side is ALWAYS evil. And the White main character ALWAYS approves of non-Whites, and opposes “racists”. The propaganda is also in the mix – no group of more than five people must be all-White. Usually not even that. Even if the characters are White, the actors must be Jewish, for the fans to discover when they discuss the show online. “Hey, that must mean they are just like us!”

        So why is the main character in movies usually a White man? Because the majority of the domestic audience are Whites, and despite generations of brainwashing Whites still identify most with someone of their own race. Which is a positive thing. Making the main character White is not pro-White propaganda, but a grudging concession.

        But then, after giving the audience a protagonist they can identify with, that protagonist is turned into an adherent of race mixing. Typically with a Black friend.

        There is another reason why the main character is usually White: because even non-White audiences prefer it. Blacks prefer watching a White hero instead of an Asian one. Asians prefer watching a White hero instead of a Black one. Latinos prefer watching a White hero instead of a Black one. People in India very definitely prefer White heroes. It is the default that all can accept. I’m quite certain that Asian women, Turkish women etc even prefer watching White heroes instead of heroes from their own people.

        As for the hero’s love interest, men from all races prefer to watch a White woman. What porn actresses do Blacks (40% of consumers even though they’re only 12% of U.S. citizens), Asians, Latinos, Indians etc prefer? White women, of course. I heard from a Taiwanese girl that Taiwanese men mainly watch porn with White women, and in second place come Japanese women, not Chinese women.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:09 pm Carlos Danger

        I watched a great documentary on Oliver Cromwell and several on the Roman Army recently free on Youtube. Why waste time with TV?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:10 pm irishsavant

        Arbiter. There was a surreal ad in South Africa showing a WHITE burglar breaking in to the fambly home of a law-abiding Black couple. Fortunately – I’m told – the utter improbability of this made it a laughing stock. A bridge (window?) too far on this occasion.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 1:24 pm trav777

      Jewgle? WTF, look at who their founders and Board of Directors are. It’s no accident that YKW wins in silicon valley too, they CONTROL MONEY itself! Look at the FRB if you don’t know. 90% or so of them.

      NAACP, SPLC…all of it. Heck one of them wrote a victory lap article for LAT (also YKW as is WaPo and NYT) talking about how difficult it is to find a gentile in Hollywood.

      Larry Ellison is YKW and so is Bezos. When the Wash Pest needed sold, they kept it in the family. Graham was YKW and Bezos is too.

      Look at Amazon’s PE…it’s been the most overvalued company on the planet, barely producing any profit at all, for a decade now. A joke. But like Facefuckbook owned by Zuckerturd, when your clan runs the stock market, they can set the marginal price of your shares by keystroke. And the exaggerated market value of Fuckbook enables Zuckerturd to buy up all these other companies that have real value using nothing other than his share price. The entire edifice is a scam from the bottom up

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 1:52 pm Arbiter

        It’s funny about the Federal Reserve. Alan Greenspan, Ben Shalom Bernanke, and now Janet Yellen – being the head of the Fed seems to be a Tribe-only job these days. Gotta make sure the money goes to the right businesses. When Bernanke was stepping down there was a list of six top names to replace him, and five were Tribe.

        The sixth was a White man who was working for a Tribe-run bank, and if I remember correctly he also had a Tribe wife. (That’s the way to get ahead. Or, you can adopt a non-White kid, like Sandra Bullock and John McCain, to prove your loyalty.)

        Related: curious how the stock portfolios of congress critters consistently make a profit, even in the most dire of times when the average portfolio loses money. They must be financial geniuses, those senators. Or. They all get illegal inside information for being part of the establishment. Just one way the game is rigged to make sure the top players remain the top players.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:10 pm martin

        ok so you are saying Jewish people have a leftist bend, did you see Sergey Brin donating to gay marriage before or after he had a ton of cash? Google couldn’t afford to spend money on garbage before they thoroughly beat their rival yahoo. It wasn’t until they had an excess of cash that the legalise love campaign began. For those that don’t know, it was gay marriage propaganda targeted at eastern european countries and western catholic nations that opposed gay marriage. It did NOT go anywhere near Muslim nations that did things like executing gays. My point is that no one can afford to be a status whoring leftist, incorporation or not, until you have a stockpile of reserves. Only when you are safely shielded from the world is denouncing capitalism and spending money on nonsense feasible.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:16 pm irishsavant

        I did a stint advising a technology VC firm. It was in the open. You got Jews on board as a kind of protection. They usually got a significant share of the action for little or no contribution. If you didn’t play along you’d find that funding dried up, bad product reviews started appearing in the technology media etc.

        I often wonder whether there will be an explosion of resentment a la Eastern Europe of the 19th century or will they get away with it this time….

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 4:50 pm Glengarry

        Until recently, the insider trading laws did not apply to members of Congress. The House and Senate were exempt from insider trading restrictions and were free to profit without limit from their insider knowledge and trades.

        (from 2012)

        http://finance.yahoo.com/news/no-more-insider-trading-congress-151429849.html

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 3:14 pm martin

      I accept that there is a jewish left but I know plenty of jews on the right whom I have great respect for. I can only agree to disagree here on the jewish theories. The Left statistically is half the population and Jews 1% so I would prefer to focus my attacks on the ideology.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:18 pm irishsavant

        Don’t be naive Martin.Or is it disingenuous? The whole Project for White male emasculation and disempowerment has been Jewish ab initio. And remains so.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:31 pm Greg Eliot

        Cathedral say:

        You can complain about disease, but don’t you DARE say a thing about germs!

        Dude, it’s already been acknowledged that there are plenty of SWPL SJW naive dweebs and outright traitor fellow travelers to go around… and yes, they are part of the problem that needs to be handled.

        But damn, man… when the percentages of the puppetmasters are so damn out of proportion to that alleged 1 to 3% of the population, well…

        Let’s just say it would behoove the “good Jews” to step up and corral their fellow tribesmen.

        But you and I and everyone else here… and especially they themselves… know that that’s not going to happen.

        So pity those who have to reap the whirlwind of winds sown by their ilk.

        What was that spiel they like to quote so often? Something about saying nothing when “they” came for “x”?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:44 pm martin

        It becomes a tautology. Either you believe in a Jewish world domination conspiracy or you are an evil enabler of the Jewish world domination if you don’t acknowledge it. I am not scared of or convinced there exists a Jewish world domination conspiracy. There is more evidence of a Muslim world domination conspiracy, there is also solid evidence of a Chinese world domination conspiracy. There are more Chinese in all the west’s top universities than there are Jews and the population of East Asians in the same countries is comparable to the Jewish 1%. These people ARE outwardly racist too. They also spent close to a trillion to get closer to human genetic engineering, it’s at BGI Shenzhen. Muslims just killed a bunch of Jews in France. You would think that if there was a Jewish conspiracy, that sort of thing wouldn’t happen. The Muslim threat should be a top priority.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:53 pm Greg Eliot

        It’s not so binary… there obviously isn’t an overt conspiracy amongst tens of thousands of Jews…

        … but there doesn’t have to be an overt conspiracy if the results are such that folks learn quickly which side of the bread the butter is spread… and what’s expected if one is to “live long and prosper”, such as it is.

        Indeed, there is solid evidence that much of the media is, in fact, SELF-censoring, because the message has been sent in no uncertain terms as to who/what/when/where/why reporting and language passes muster, and what is considered (ahem) “bad form”… if not outright taboo.

        So, my friend, it’s not a matter of “you have to believe in the conspiracy”… all that is demanded is the integrity to call a spade a spade, as it were, and don’t let the owner off the hook just because it was his dogs that did the pooping on your lawn… that is, when they weren’t outright biting your ass.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 4:21 pm Arbiter

        Jewish “theories”? When even prominent Tribe members themselves admit their vast influence? Kennedy’s devastating immigration law, for example, was written and promoted by Jews. They invented feminism. They invented Marxism and were the ones who spread it. The NAACP’s first six presidents were not Blacks but Jews, and that Tribe is where the NAACP got its main financial backing in the first years. And its media promotion. Anyone can find out about their media control by searching for “who rules the media”, and see how the top names in the pro-immigration media corporations all are of the same kind. Your opinion in the matter is worth nothing unless you first study this basic fact.

        You should also read The Occidental Observer, go through the archive to read their documentation.

        Only about 10-15 percent of the Tribe vote right-wing. And when they do, their “conservatism” is neoconservatism, which pushes mass immigration for the West – and racial supremacism for Israel. Some “conservatism”. John Derbyshire has shown, for example, how John Podhoretz in the National Review has pushed repeatedly for mass immigration, aggressively attacking those who oppose it. He names American “anti-Semitism” as a main reason for why he favors immigration, naturally. To pacify the host population. As usual.

        Bush’s speechwriter David Frum (inventor of the “axis of evil” B.S., like putting the IRA and Downing Street in the same category) was brought on board even though he said he didn’t approve of conservative policies. That doesn’t matter! said his recruiter and fellow Jew Paul Wolfowitz. All that matters is that you are on board with our plans for the Middle East! David Frum then became a prominent neocon writer in the Weekly Standard and National Review – promoting mass immigration along with the rest. And attacking real conservatives, like Pat Buchanan. These people approve of the Left’s domestic agenda, since it is their agenda. When did Bush and his neocons ever oppose Affirmative Discrimination? They even wanted the EU to bring in Turkey as a member, to flood Europe with tens of millions of Turks. Bush wanted mass amnesty for illegal aliens. These are the right-wing Jews.

        There are very few right-wing Jews who oppose mass immigration. And practically none who will mention their brethren’s overwhelming involvement. When they join nationalist parties in Europe – but always only after other people have worked hard to finally get them off the ground – they instantly start attacking “extremists”, and threaten to go to the media unless the “extremists” who know too much are excluded. Always.

        William F. Buckley started the modern conservative movement in the U.S. after WWII, by founding the National Review. That’s where conservative debate took place. In his retirement he said he regretted allowing the neocons take over the National Review. The neocons threw out those who opposed their twin agenda – immigration to pacify the West, and White money and blood to attack Israel’s targets – such as long-time editor Joe Sobran. Even for very mild criticism.

        “Theories” indeed. I could show a long, long list of quotes by prominent people about Jews, and by prominent Jews about themselves – bragging about what they are doing. And quotes by the few in the Tribe who oppose what the rest are up to.

        Let’s see what’s in the news. Viatcheslav Moshe Kantor, head of the European Jewish Congress, just happens to also head an anti-White think tank called the European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation. The ECTR has now written a law to ban “anti-Semitic” and “racist” speech in the EU, which Kantor is pushing for the EU to accept to ban all truth about his kind. This is typical for Jewish organizations, to push for legislation by think tanks targeting law makers directly, bypassing the democratic process.

        Viatcheslav Moshe Kantor is also the president of the “Museum of Avant-Garde Mastery” in Russia, which promotes sick, degenerate “art” by his brethren: Valentin Serov, Léon Bakst, Marc Chagall, El Lissitzky, Chaim Soutine, Amedeo Modigliani, Erik Bulatov and Ilya Kabakov. These names are from MAGMA’s Wikipedia page. Every single one of them a leftist Jew. Communist ties for most. The Jewish Post writes about MAGMA: “Almost all of the works on display are by Jewish artists”. Yet other media only present it as an “avant-garde” museum.

        This is the kind of people who National Review, the New York Times and other controlled “right-wing” publications praise. What a great leader Kantor is, proudly standing up for his people! And let’s not mention that the same people run those publications these days.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 4:37 pm Arbiter

        I am not scared of or convinced there exists a Jewish world domination conspiracy. There is more evidence of a Muslim world domination conspiracy,

        Bullshit. You know nothing about Jewish media control and you refuse to learn. A Muslim “conspiracy”? Amazing how dumb neocon lovers can be. Completely ignorant of the fact that almost every Middle Eastern government is a U.S. ally, on condition that they turn a blind eye to the Palestinian genocide and Israel’s taking of the last 22 percent of Palestinian land.

        A Muslim conspiracy – when all over the Middle East Muslims are actively collaborating with the U.S. and Israel. The ignorance of the Jew lovers never ceases to amaze.

        And how is there a “Muslim world domination conspiracy” when Saddam Hussein was a secularist who jailed Islamists, until the U.S. invaded? When most Muslim governments jail Islamists in collaboration with the CIA? When Sunni Muslims attack Shia Muslims with U.S. backing? Yet ignoramuses in the U.S. know zero about any of this and talk about “Muslims” as one group. Just like the London government and the IRA, Merkel and Putin, west Ukrainians and East Ukrainians, African Christian tribes, church-going Democrats in Massachusetts and church-going Texan Republicans are all “Christians” and the same?

        Something else you don’t know: Arabs used to LOVE America. America was anti-imperialist, and the Middle East had been invaded by the Turks and the European empires. But then, incredibly, the U.S. supported, funded and armed the Zionist invasion of Palestine, and supported the razing of hundreds of villages and the murder of many thousands. The Arabs couldn’t understand why.

        Yet they “hate us for our freedom”, right?

        Even so, in 2000 and later more than 60 percent of Gulf residents were positive toward the U.S. in surveys. Then the Jew Paul Wolfowitz organized Capitol Hill support for an invasion of Iraq based completely on lies. (Funny how neocon loverrs “forget” those lies.) The U.S: killed tens of thousands of people and finally destroyed Iraq completely after imposing starvation sanctions for twelve years, with bombings of Iraq’s infrastructure on average once a week throughout those twelve years. Only then, with the illegal invasion and mass death, did the majority of Gulf residents finally view the U.S. negatively in surveys. And yet much fewer than one percent of Muslims have actively opposed the U.S. and its pro-Israeli tyrants in the Middle East.

        But “Muslim conspiracy!” “They hate us for our freedom!”

        Fucking learn a little, Martin.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 5:16 pm martin

        Arbiter- Firstly, I am not an American but I have no issue with what they are doing in the middle east. Second, it was not the US that fought for and gave Israel their land, it was England! Third, here are proofs of a Muslim threat of world domination as follows. Native Christians in Egypt, Syria, and Iraq as well as Yazidi’s have been in these countries for longer than Islam has even existed. Islamists have attacked these people and drove them out yet none of them have anything to do with the US or the West. Muslims have a long history of invading and conquering non-Muslim lands in Africa and Europe, hence the Reconquista, look it up. Not only ISIS preachers but imams associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Al Qaeda, the Taliban, Boko Haram, etc have called for a caliphate which is explicitly a political construct in which sharia law is enforced and those that do not abide by these laws are infidels who must be killed. The koran calls for the conquer of non-Islamic lands in order that they abide by the will of allah. In Europe, the muslim birth rate is much higher than the native birth rate and it is expected that muslims will be the larger group within the next 50 years. Muslim ghettos or ‘no-go’ zones exist in france and the UK. Of the muslims living in Europe, I would estimate most of them hate the west, hate europeans, hate americans, and think that any military operations in the middle east are done because the west is ‘islamophobic’ or racist. How do I know this? evidence from reading and it is not hard to extend this to the rest of the middle east. Did foreign policy cause this hatred of the West? No, they simply just hate the west. Jordan is a relatively new country that was created by England was well, so they are friendly to the West as is UAE but it is difficult to tell if Saudi Arabia with its Wahhabism is or not, note that the Sept. 11 bombers were Saudis and Iran of course is extremely hostile to the west and directly sanctions terror. Of course not all Muslims are aligned with an interest in world domination but to underestimate the threat Muslims pose to the west is very dangerous.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 6:15 pm Trainspotter

        Greg Eliot: “What was that spiel they like to quote so often? Something about saying nothing when “they” came for “x”?”

        Superb point, Greg. The “good” Jews, if indeed there be any, need to spend their energy policing the anti-whites amongst them, not trying to ride herd on whites who speak the truth.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 6:39 pm Trainspotter

        martin: “I am not scared of or convinced there exists a Jewish world domination conspiracy.”

        You’re trying to paint this as tin foil hat material. It’s not. If what is going on is a “conspiracy,” then it is one operating in plain sight. Follow the money. It’s not difficult to see what gets funded and what doesn’t get a dime of system money. (hint: anti-white causes are massively funded, pro-white causes don’t get a single red cent).

        It’s not difficult to see the agenda pushed by ALL of the significant institutions in society. It’s not difficult to see what gets people fired, and what gets them promoted. It’s not difficult to see who you can criticize, and who you can’t.

        There is something called a party line, and any sentient person knows what it is. I don’t know about you, but whenever I see someone whisper the truth, and look over their shoulder to make certain the wrong person doesn’t overhear, it’s not because they are spouting the party line. It’s because they are violating it.

        The massively disproportionate Jewish role in controlling and shaping that party line is obvious, to anyone willing to see.

        If there is a significant portion of the Jewish community that opposes this, they are being mighty quiet about it. The onus is on them to speak up and break the system monopoly of their anti-white kinsmen, not condemn white truth tellers. If and when they do this, they will get full credit. But they aren’t…and so they don’t.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 6:47 pm Bill

        Is your name really Alex “Arabs run Hollywood” Jones?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 7:16 pm Bill

        Muslim Conspiracy?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 7:46 pm Anonymous

        Lol most retarded comment here in 3 years. Fuck off.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 7:52 pm Bill

        Hey Martin is Rev Billy Graham and President Nixon part of the MRA-RedPill-White Nationalist Hive mind too???

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 7:55 pm Anonymous

        Trainspotter nailed it as always.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 8:02 pm Bill

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 9:24 pm ho

        “Firstly, I am not an American but I have no issue with what they are doing in the middle east.”

        We could reasonably just stop replying to anything you say, after this.

        “Second, it was not the US that fought for and gave Israel their land, it was England!”

        So what? Are the US and the UK not, essentially conjoined twins? Are the USA not, essentially, an Israeli satrapy?

        ” Native Christians in Egypt, Syria, and Iraq as well as Yazidi’s have been in these countries for longer than Islam has even existed. Islamists have attacked these people and drove them out yet none of them have anything to do with the US or the West.”

        ……

        I cannot believe this asshole.

        Compare Muslim attitudes towards the west prior to western meddling in the Middle East and then after it. There have always been people who went the “infidels hurr” route and there always will be. But the current situation is a result of American policy.

        You’re pretty much claiming that going from 1 billion $ to 10$ on your bank account isn’t significant because you still have money.

        “Muslims have a long history of invading and conquering non-Muslim lands in Africa and Europe, hence the Reconquista, look it up.”

        Who gives a fuck?

        “The koran calls for the conquer of non-Islamic lands in order that they abide by the will of allah. ”

        I have heard multiple non muslims say that the Koran is a suprisingly libertarian book and that most of the stuff you’re talking about can only be traced to other causes.

        “In Europe, the muslim birth rate is much higher than the native birth rate and it is expected that muslims will be the larger group within the next 50 years. Muslim ghettos or ‘no-go’ zones exist in france and the UK.”

        That might be true. It is also irrelevant.

        “Of the muslims living in Europe, I would estimate most of them hate the west, hate europeans, hate americans, and think that any military operations in the middle east are done because the west is ‘islamophobic’ or racist.”

        You couldn’t even estimate the number of testicles you have. Then again, neither could I.

        ” Did foreign policy cause this hatred of the West? No, they simply just hate the west.”

        Maybe, actually talk with muzzies, retard, and you would learn something.

        “Iran of course is extremely hostile to the west and directly sanctions terror.”

        More like the west is extremely hostile to Iran. Adelson and Saban openly talked about bombing Iran for…nobody knows. America also blocked condemnations of Iraq using chemical weapons against Iran in a war of aggression IRAQ started.

        They may support Hezbollah against Israel, but then, Israel isn’t the west anyhow. Nobody claimed that Iran DOESN’T hate Israel.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 12:29 am Carlos Danger

        There are very few right-wing Jews who oppose mass immigration.

        Michael Savage and Mark Levin both come to mind. They are at least prominent voices.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 8:28 am martin

        Bill- Your graphic states that Rupert Murdoch, Roger Ailes, Steve Jobs, amd George Lucas are all Jews. That is completely wrong, those people couldn’t be further from Jewish and in some cases have been accused of anti semitism. I can’t fact check that entire thing. Warner Bros CEO is currently an Asian. Bill, I don’t care who controlled the media in 1972, this is 2015. The biggest news sources are things like the daily mail, news corp, fox news and they are controlled by non jews. Further, people like Michael Moore, Seth MacFarlane are large voices in the media and they are not jewish. Then there are more conservative media people like matt drudge who are jewish. The point is that this jewish media conspiracy theory is vastly overrated.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 8:37 am martin

        I will state it again. I clearly said above there is a Jewish Left but you are all overrating their importance. You must use prudent judgement when looking at facts. I imagine all of you were outraged when you found out that in Roterham, there were young girls being raped by muslim men and the police covered it up. Similarly, in Sweden, we saw the number of rapes go up with immigration from muslim countries and it turned out that muslim men were the majority of perpetrators despite being a minority. Demographics are shifting in Europe, it is entirely possible that natives of a country will be a minority in a muslim country. Despite all this, people here rant about some Jews behind closed doors who have some bizarre conspiracy to dominate goyim. We even saw recently in france that jews were killed. Anti-semitism is on the rise in the UK and France and it isn’t from the native Christian population, it is the toxic muslim environment. But you completely ignore all these attacks and you ignore all the evidence there is in the islamic religion calling for conquering of non-muslims and talk about jewish domination. Then there is feminism that you blame on the jews. Look it up, the most popular advocates of it are not jewish. They are swpls. Even the pope, who is an argentine italian, is pushing a feminist agenda and he has an audience of 1 billion. That is a far bigger threat than whatever the jewish left is pushing. The more clear threats to our societies and to men are coming from muslims looking to dominate, and swpl’s who make up the majority of the left. As I said above, 50% of the population is leftist, 1% is Jewish.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 8:46 am martin

        US and UK citizens literally get their heads hacked off by muslims and all it gets in return from the manosphere is a shrug.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 7:11 pm Trainspotter

        martin: “I will state it again. I clearly said above there is a Jewish Left but you are all overrating their importance.”

        Just for the sake of argument, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you are operating in good faith. If this is so, you are making a big, big mistake by underplaying the jewish role.

        The reality that the system is anti-white is observable and provable, and increasingly obvious even to dullards. But it also matters a great deal exactly WHO runs the anti-white system. But why is this? Anti-white is anti-white, right? That’s all we need to know, right? Well, not exactly.

        If the anti-white system were run by our fellow whites, if our fellow whites really controlled the party line and jews were of little consequence, then that would have tremendous implications. For example, we could better infiltrate such a system, and perhaps do our own version of the “long march through the institutions.” We could also have some hope that our elites would come to their senses, as the destructiveness of their nutty ideology became more and more apparent. Not a guarantee, mind you, but some plausible expectation of meaningful reform, beyond a mere scrap thrown here and there.

        But what if this is not the case? What if there will be no long march through the institutions? What if the system elite will never come to its senses, for the very simple reason that it never left its senses in the first place?

        Vastly disproportionate jewish power has tremendous implications for whites. The destruction of our schools, communities, culture, economy, and our very DNA? Jews are fine with this. They aren’t “mistaken,” or “in error.” These outcomes aren’t bugs, they are features. The system elites aren’t going to just snap out of it – they are perfectly fine with it. They want us reduced and displaced – again, a feature and not a bug. Our decline is their success.

        In other words, because of disproportionate jewish power, we cannot hope to reform the system. Because it is dominated by an ethnic group that is hostile to whites, people with long historical grudges against us who do not see our interests and their interests as being aligned, people who believe that if we retain our identity then we will become naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews, the normal avenues of reform are largely closed to us. They don’t want us to do well, they want us gone, replaced by non-whites. What seems awful to us is all roses to them.

        So it’s not just that we have a mistaken elite, or an incompetent one. It’s that we are ruled by a hostile and alien elite that feels no kinship to us and, fundamentally, hates our guts.

        If jews didn’t possess such vastly disproportionate power, then this wouldn’t necessarily be the case. But they do, and so it is. Our only chance is to separate from the system, which is why I so often say that separation is the only solution. Underplaying jewish power is an attempt to obscure reality, in order to encourage a belief in fairness and reform that simply isn’t going to happen. It’s an attempt to send us down blind alleys and into dead ends, to get us to impotently flail about. To chase a reform that isn’t going to happen, and to ignore the necessary path of separation.

        So, Martin, I’ll end on this: if indeed you are operating in good faith, if you really are just in error as opposed to maliciously promoting a dishonest party line, then you need to do your homework – because what you are claiming is not only wrong and inaccurate, but also destructive. And if that’s not the case, if for example you are jewish yourself, then work on your fellow tribesmen instead of trying to ride herd on the goy. There are plenty of jews who righteously advocate a homeland for their own people – but those same jews would deny us the same thing.

        Identity and continuity for me, but not for thee. A homeland for me, but not for thee. That’s hypocrisy at a grotesque scale, but par for the course under the anti-white system. That is what must be challenged, and defeated.

        LikeLike


  7. on February 9, 2015 at 1:10 pm The Profit-Propaganda Curve | Neoreactive

    […] The Profit-Propaganda Curve […]

    LikeLike


  8. on February 9, 2015 at 1:10 pm anon

    Wendy’s (not that I go there unless I’ve eaten really well for a week straight) now features a giant (10 feet by 8 feet) HD propaganda poster telling customers to support adoption. The photo is of a white family with a very dark African. Making it funnier, the kid is about 17 years old in the photo. It’s gross.

    Wanted to take a pic and send to CH. CH, how can we send you photos as attachments to private messages to you, which you could potentially use for material?

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 1:54 pm Arbiter

      Upload the image, for example to tinypic, and send CH the URL. That way he doesn’t have to open any attachments.

      LikeLike


  9. on February 9, 2015 at 1:28 pm mack

    Ah, the fatty is a hero and SI is staffed with heroes. And last night at the Grammys, we saw another heroic woman decry sex trafficking…but is this another rape hoax story?

    Before Katy Perry sang and after President Obama spoke about ending sexual violence, a domestic violence survivor and advocate from Austin, Brooke Axtell, gave an inspiring speech about authentic love.

    Ms. Axtell claims she was a child sex trafficking victim at age 7.

    From the Washington Post : “When Brooke Axtell was a child, her nanny took her to the basement of a strange house and sold her to men who raped her… Axtell’s experience with sexual abuse began when she was 7 years old. Her mother was hospitalized and her father traveled for his job, so she was cared for by a succession of nannies, among them a young seminarian she calls “Jim.”
    In a piece titled “What I Know of Silence,” written for an anthology of women’s writing in 2012, Axtell recounts in graphic detail how Jim abused and threatened her.

    “Jim tied me up and called me a whore. He gave me to other men who pay to rape little girls and film it for their private pornography collections,” she wrote.
    The essay goes on to describes the basement where she was trafficked, furnished with a cot, a cage, chains and a camera, and the shame she felt for what happened there. Even after Jim left, that shame kept her from reporting him.

    Axtell carried the secret of her abuse into adulthood, when she again became a victim of sexual violence — this time at the hands of her boyfriend.”

    Brooke Axtell claims she was repeatedly raped as a 7-year-old by multiple men. Are we to assume no medical or legal records or criminal convictions exist? This woman has made a career out of this story and there seems to be zero substantiation.

    Here is our hero posing in duckface and cleavage for Salon:

    http://www.salon.com/2015/02/09/the_grammys_meet_the_domestic_violence_activist_performing_with_katy_perry_tonight/

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 1:59 pm Arbiter

      domestic violence survivor

      Note: she is a rape victim, not a rape “survivor”. The media – following leftist cues – have started pushing the “survivor” word because it sounds like an achievement, while being a victim is a defeat. But people are only survivors if they risked death, and as terrible as rape is, it is not in itself attempted murder. They are by definition victims, not “survivors”.

      This is yet another example of how the leftists distort the language, aided by their media allies. One of the less destructive cases, but nonetheless. It shows how facts have no meaning to them, how in every case lies on behalf of political aims are more important than reality.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 8:08 pm haunted trilobite

        Feminist (communist) distortion of right and wrong. Morals have no meaning (relatavism). http://www.salon.com/2015/02/06/a_father_keeps_his_down_syndrome_baby_but_does_that_make_him_a_hero/ Women have practically zero concept of abstractions like right and wrong anyway, and are willingly led by feminist groupthink.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 2:27 pm Amy

      These extreme stories always make me wonder. Did her father never go in the basement? Wouldn’t he wonder why there was a cage, chains, and a tripod? Didn’t her teachers notice at school? Who the hell hires a male nanny to watch kids? It just all seems implausible.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 8:39 pm themanofmystery2

        This. So many logical inconsistencies in one story.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 4:24 pm Loyalist

      Speaking of the Grammys, what a propaganda spectacle for the elite that show has become (or always was, and perhaps I just realised it).

      -The Black royal family in their tuxedos (Jay-Z, B. Knowles, Kanye West, etc.) appearing on the balcony, looking down on their infatuated their white subjects

      -Madonna and her downright Satanic ritual (Matadors, yeah right)

      -Sam Smith scoring more victories towards normalisation of LGBTQ, etc.

      Did I miss anything?

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 6:00 pm llllooooolllzzzzzlllolll

        At least Beck won.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 6:05 pm james Blonde

        Its no conspiracy. People are bored with the white man. We’ve had half a century of white everything… thats all old, played out and boring.

        Get that white shit outta here.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 12:33 am Carlos Danger

        The Grammys are normally loaded with Luciferian symbology, care of the Illuminati.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 7:05 pm Eric

      Who the hell has a male nanny?
      That sets off a bullshit alarm right off the bat.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 7:23 pm mendozatorres

        Dunno how to embed images, but, here we are:

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 8:20 pm Canadian Friend

      The fact most of those women once they escape or “survive” abuse end up in another relationship where they are abused again indicates they are partly to blame.

      I have no memory for names but there is a British “feminist” who was hated by feminists because she studied this phenomena and discovered that most women in abusive relationship end up in a second and third abusive relationship because those women are themselves fucked up , well of course she did not use the word fucked up , those women either are attracted to violent abusive men or those women were themselves violent.

      There is also the possibility that that particular woman – Axtell – is making the whole thing up, she is a paid actor hired to try and do some damage control now that all those fake rape stories have been exposed and have damaged the cause of stupid lying feminists.

      LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 8:37 am Hugh Mann

        You mean Erin Pizzey, who founded one of the first women’s refuges in the UK.

        “Pizzey has been the subject of death threats and boycotts because of her research into the claim that most domestic violence is reciprocal, and that women are equally capable of violence as men. Pizzey has said that the threats were from militant feminists.”

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Pizzey

        LikeLike


  10. on February 9, 2015 at 1:30 pm Arbiter

    I watched an interview with a Sports Illustrated honcho when this was announced. I think it was on the Washington Post website. A female interviewer pounced on him with glee, not even pretending to be an unbiased reporter, a “mirror reflecting the news”. No. She declared that SI “finally included Real Women”. She repeated this about Real Women several times.

    Typical feminist line: that models (and therefore any slim, attractive woman) are not REAL women. And this is never opposed. Ever heard a man say athletic men are not REAL men?

    The SI boss was an Italian-looking guy who did not seem to believe the propaganda one bit. None of the woman’s enthusiasm. (I can imagine him vacationing at the riviera, sipping expensive drinks in the company of hopeful models paid to keep him entertained.) Instead he produced the expected platitudes like a teleprompter. It was obvious that this was just business for him. A decision in the Time Inc. corporation. Throwing a bone to the propasphere – every other Time publication does it, SI has to do its part!

    He said things like, “It is not about looking slim but about appreciating good quality clothes”. Yes, I’m sure people are reading carefully about the wear-and-tear properties of the bikinis.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 2:16 pm Greg Eliot

      How hard would it be for one of these alleged moguls to just reply:

      “How insulting and arrogant it sounds when you refer to pretty models as not being “real women. I imagine they’d have something to say about it, so I’ll say it for them: Shame on you.”

      LikeLike


  11. on February 9, 2015 at 1:30 pm anon

    pure filth: http://www.cnn.com/

    LikeLike


  12. on February 9, 2015 at 1:32 pm anon

    All magazines are irrelevant. There’s this new thing called the “internet.”

    LikeLike


  13. on February 9, 2015 at 1:37 pm kuchak

    Ashley Graham’s not really that fat. No gut, hips are a bit wide, but not an obscene fatty. This is a real fatty model:

    http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/plus-size-model-tess-holliday-busts-stereotype-article-1.2090500

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 2:02 pm Arbiter

      WAR IS PEACE
      FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
      IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
      FAT IS BEAUTIFUL

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:18 pm Anonymous

        LOL oh goddd

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:09 pm themanofmystery2

        My dad taught me growing up the value of recognizing propagandist bullshit at an early age.

        Dad of mystery: Son, what color is that shirt?
        Young man of mystery: Purple.
        Dad of mystery: no, it’s blue.
        Young man of mystery: No dad, it’s purple.
        Dad of mystery: Yes, it is, but remember this: if enough people say it’s blue, it’s blue.

        Salient.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 2:28 pm Greg Eliot

      She busts the stereotype? :confused:

      Sheeeet… if anything she confirms it! :ugh:

      And of course, she has to take it one step further into the Abyss by that horrendous leg tattoo.

      Gag reflex: activated.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:37 pm mendozatorres

        Busts in the sense she’s so friggin’ heavy, she broke the mold. She’s too big to fail.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:40 pm Greg Eliot

        You mean too big to fall.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 2:41 pm The Spirit Within

      She says she works out four times a week. Doubtful.

      It’s very telling that she didn’t mention her diet.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:46 pm Greg Eliot

        She swallows a lot of aggression.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 4:28 pm Canadian Friend

        Getting out of bed and walking to the fridge when one carries that much weight is a workout!

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 5:12 pm Pyjama Wearing Ninja

      There’s anorexic -> skinny -> fit -> curvy -> chubby -> overweight -> fat -> obese -> bipedal walrus. You can replace skinny, fit and curvy with fuckable in my case.


      That’s neither of the three. What’s awkward is that while I’m not some great womanizer, she’d have the worst body of the girls I’ve been with by far. lol

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 6:50 pm SC

        Well, it’s obvious that she is fatter than most men’s ideal but she’s also not a landwhale either. I think that most men want a woman whose BMI is between 19-23, so I think it’s hilarious when manospherians say that Robyn Lawley and Ashley Graham are bipedal walruses. Both women are chubby. Neither of them are morbidly obese. June Shannon is morbidly obese, as are many women you’d see in the ghetto. For everyone’s information, Ms. Lawley’s BMI is 23.1 and Ashley Graham’s BMI is 25.1. Exaggeration doesn’t win you any allies, in fact it makes you look less credible.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 7:21 pm Canadian Friend

        I think a lot, if not most, guys here actually get a hardon looking at Ashley Graham but would never admit it, because they are too proud or whatever.

        I understand such a woman could gain weight over time and then become ugly, she may not be a good long term investment but as she is now she is very attractive, her proportions are almost perfect – not size – proportions, and she is definitely hourglass unlike Miley Cirus or those Victoria secret model who have young boys hips and asses.

        and SC is right a BMI of 25 is nothing to sneeze at.

        Any man who tells me Miley Cirus has a better figure than Ashley Graham is a gay pedophile because women such as Cirus have the exact same ass and hips as the average skinny 11 year old boy.

        LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2015 at 4:31 am Mean Mr. Mustard

      Looks like a 7 (face) that ate three 4’s

      LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2015 at 4:33 am Mean Mr. Mustard

      Is this woman capable of reaching to wipe her own ass?

      LikeLike


  14. on February 9, 2015 at 1:54 pm Barf Simson

    This anti-straight men propaganda wants us to either start banging landwhales, or turn gay. Now it made me wonder which would be better if I were forced to chose: a BJ from a dude in decent shape, or sticking my Mini Me into one of the many fat-folds on a landwhale.
    Too horrible to comtemplate it for more than a few nanoseconds, I am off to resetting my brain with a six-pack or three.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 3:06 pm themanofmystery2

      I believe this is where men would choose to “go their own way.” Lol

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:45 pm Greg Eliot

        Men going “GANG WAY!!!”

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 3:44 pm Greg Eliot

      Who says the alternative the commissars are going to offer is a dude in decent shape?

      Too horrible indeed… it’s clobberin’ time!

      LikeLike


  15. on February 9, 2015 at 2:01 pm Canadian Friend

    I’m not going to make friends here by saying this but Ashley Graham, because she is very well proportioned, is quite sexy.

    But I am 55 thus less “finicky” than a 25 year old man would be.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 2:14 pm Greg Eliot

      I already praised her on an earlier thread as being at the top of my limit, but still within my limit, and would definitely bang.

      Fuck what these other guys think… the bone wants what the bone wants.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 4:04 pm burke

        there’s a difference between pleasurable sex and an aesthetic photo shoot, i am sure she’d be fun. i’ve been with far worse i’m sure. i just wouldn’t choose to look at her given the alternatives in those pages.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 2:30 pm james Blonde

      Canadian Friend, take a deep breathe and relax; it takes a strong white man to embrace his inner negro.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 2:34 pm Greg Eliot

        We leave the embracing of negros to plus-sized mudsharks and your fellow down-lowers.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 4:42 pm Canadian Friend

        By “negro” standards, Ashley Graham is thin.

        No “inner negro” here, and if there ever was, my strong white man DNA killed it while I was still an embryo.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 6:20 pm james Blonde

        If you only knew the power of the Dark Side. Obi-Wan never told you what happened to your father.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 9:44 am driveallnight

        Fuck off thwack

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 3:35 pm SC

      The fact that you felt like saying “I’m not going to make friends here by saying this but…” proves my theory that MRAs, Red-pillers, and WNs are just as hiveminded and orthodox as feminists, socialists, liberals, and anti-White racists. It doesn’t matter what side you’re on; every ideology out there wants people to adhere to it verbatim. It’s amazing how I have been praised by WNs and MRAs in the past for not listening to my feminist and liberal professors yet they shriek in surprise when I tell them that I don’t buy their ideologies word for word either.

      If you’re a straight man, you can like whichever women you wanna like. Common sense and science will dictate that most men prefer women who are age 19-23 whose BMI’s are also between 19-23, but if you would like a woman who is fatter/thinner/older/younger/shorter/taller, you can do that too.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:38 pm Greg Eliot

        A fair point, and I myself have long-railed against the self-styled red-pillers here who are alleged independents in all matters of poonery, but can be the staunchest Cathedral SJWs in all the other pretty lies that the chateau is in the business of perishing.

        Point taken… human nature is what it is, and feels is feels.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 5:02 pm Arbiter

        The fact that you felt like saying “I’m not going to make friends here by saying this but…” proves my theory that MRAs, Red-pillers, and WNs are just as hiveminded and orthodox as feminists, socialists, liberals, and anti-White racists

        Ridiculous. No, that he (one person) says that doesn’t “prove” anything. There is far more variation in the manosphere than among left-wing extremists.

        It doesn’t matter what side you’re on; every ideology out there wants people to adhere to it verbatim.

        Funny how you think like a leftist. Nowhere in your post does the truth have a place. You’re all busy attacking the manosphere for not believing what its opponents say, which supposedly makes the manosphere just as bad as its opponents. Brilliant logic there.

        –“The fact that you felt like saying” – Thinking of opinions as what someone “feels” like is typical leftist-speak

        –Ignoring whether opinions are true or not, and simply attacking them for not being inclusive, another leftist tactic

        –“If you’re a straight man” – Making sure to always name heterosexuals, as if it was just one category among many … and using the leftist word “straight”

        –“but if you would like a woman who is fatter/thinner/older/younger/shorter/taller, you can do that too” – Bending over backward to be inclusive and oppose dogma, declaring that it’s time for a right-wing movement to stop being so mean against opponents, as if those opponents wouldn’t be the ones who overwhelmingly control the media. As soon as a small opposition shows up, the cry is raised for that opposition to be inclusive in order to force it on the defensive.

        Yes, I can see you have learned your cues from the leftist media. Oh, cultish manosphere, when are you going to allow your opponents to have a voice? Shouldn’t others be allowed to speak too? Stop excluding others from the media and academia, manosphere!

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 5:40 pm SC

        @arbiter

        This is why you and your MRA/red pill/WN cronies will fail just as much as the feminists and liberals will fail. You peg anyone who doesn’t conform 100% to your ideology as the enemy. You will end up turning most neutral people into enemies instead of winning them over.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 7:23 pm Bill

        What specifically are you talking about?

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 1:49 pm EMP

        “Religion must remain an outlet for people who say to themselves, ‘I am not the kind of person I want to be.’ It must never sink into an assemblage of the self-satisfied.”

        – Frank Herbert

        LikeLike


  16. on February 9, 2015 at 2:43 pm heythatsmycar

    Victor Havel has something to say about this….

    http://history.hanover.edu/courses/excerpts/165havel.html

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 2:53 pm PA

      We’re living through Communism’s new reincarnation. All of this already happened, just change the place and the specifics of the the theatrics. There is a ton of knowledge that’s relevant to our times in the prose writings of Vaclav Havel, Milan Kundera, Czeslaw Milosz, Alexander Solzhenitsyn and many others. I lived through the first version of the plague and all of what we’re dealing with now rings eerily famiar.

      LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 4:55 pm Glengarry

      Vaclav.

      LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 9:46 am driveallnight

        Gesundheit

        LikeLike


  17. on February 9, 2015 at 3:00 pm high test brah

    I agree with Greg Eliot here. She also falls within my limits of banging. I get a visceral response to a properly curvy girl. While I may like a thin, athletic type of girl with a cute face and all, my boner gets way more excited to women with a few extra pounds in the “right” places. I think Heartiste has his own tastes but I’m sure a majority of men don’t follow them. Either that or most men have never banged or met a woman who exudes their curvy ideal:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BrMheA6CMAAqk1k.jpg:large

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 8:46 pm Canadian Friend

      I’ve banged skinny ones and comfortably plump ones.

      Although skinny ones look better, especially with clothes on, there is nothing to grab and you keep hitting bones as you are banging them

      a comfortably plump one may not look as good, at least not at the bar in front of your friend, but in bed there is something to grab, to squeeze, to caress, to bite, and when you bang her like a screen door in a hurricane, the plump ass makes the whole experience far more pleasant than banging a bony ass.

      LikeLike


  18. on February 9, 2015 at 3:01 pm PA

    The system, it’s a truism by now, is losing control of the narrative. As is known, they use paid commmenters on the internet to counter RealTalk. And what do those trolls do? Well, just disagreeing with us and promoting the standard leftoid view doesn’t work. Neither do any attempts at dialectic, because lie-based arguments fall apart. Disrupting and trolling just gets them banned.

    I think that the psychops method they might find effective is to act like they agree with us but see things as hopeless. Demoralization campaign. Good to keep that in mind whenever someone writes too bleakly or exaggerates how bad things are.

    LikeLike


    • on February 11, 2015 at 3:29 am Trainspotter

      PA: “I think that the psychops method they might find effective is to act like they agree with us but see things as hopeless. Demoralization campaign. Good to keep that in mind whenever someone writes too bleakly or exaggerates how bad things are.”

      Yes, we’ll see more of that. Another tactic is to “agree” with us, but then promote ideas and associations designed to discredit us. I see some of that on this very thread. Intentional, or just foolishness? Not always easy to say.

      But the essential point is that the anti-whites are losing control of the narrative with the most important segment of the population – those that have a brain. The only people that spout system nonsense these days are either conscious liars or complete dullards, or simply those that have a vested interest in perpetuating the anti-white status quo. System pabulum that went more or less unchallenged just a few years ago is now laughed at as obviously false and ridiculous.

      A great deal of progress is being made, the enemy senses it, and will seek to misdirect. I don’t think it will work, though. Too many people are onto their slimy tactics. The one thing that might work, for a few years anyway, is to start another war, which the system shows some signs of contemplating. Then again, such a war may well end up being the straw that breaks the camel’s back. A very risky move that may even result in accelerating the system’s destruction.

      We need a clear goal for the long game: the ethnostate. Sovereignty in a land of our own, with a new elite. That is the only goal that the enemy can’t misdirect or subvert into pathetic efforts at reform, such as the Tea Party or other failed movements. Any movement that leaves us under the control of the present anti-white system is inherently doomed to failure, and will amount to nothing more than getting a few hucksters power and/or riches, while fundamentally buying time for the anti-whites.

      LikeLike


  19. on February 9, 2015 at 3:04 pm themanofmystery2

    I own one company outright in the “striver” class that is doing very well financially, and 50% of an insurance brokerage that is a rapidly growing startup (1 year old). Goal is 6 figures saved by 30 (accomplished), 7 figures by 40 (TBD) and 8 figures by 50 (LOL).

    As a 32 year old immersed in the cesspool that is my generation, I have the “fuck you” attitude and meanness toward untoward bullshit, but not the “fuck you” money. Just yet. When I do, you bet that I will be an invisible financier to organizations that protect white men from extinction, whether they be grass roots (organized militia) or national lobbyists. It shocks me how unaware men my age are to what’s happening…specifically white men who feel they need to apologize for existing.

    I am a fast, strong, charismatic, highly intelligent white male and I will not fucking let myself be subordinate to anyone. Fuck you. No, really… Fuck. You. You hate my kind, Left, because I am everything you aren’t and will never be. I wonder how many more of me there are of similar mindset out there?

    The right needs political support but, even more, it needs financial support. Organizations that fight for men’s rights and not hens’ rights in family court, for example.

    I like pussy, guns, living my life the way I want, swearing, playing my guitar as loud as I want, and pussified egalitarian societies full of milquetoast apologists and their feminist overlords. Just kidding about the last part. If you assault the things I love, I will attack you without mercy until you concede.

    Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to eat a corn dog wrapped in an American flag, riding a rocket shirtless shaped like a huge Phallus while I shit all over a painting of Mohammed.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 5:40 pm Mark Edwards

      Awesome, had to +1 this.

      LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 6:02 pm Captain Obvious

      tmm2, there is outer beauty, and then there’s True Inner Beauty, and in my book, on a scale of 1 to 10, this chick is roughly an 11: http://westernshootingjournal.com/bridging-the-gap-between-a-sniper-and-olympic-shooter/

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 6:03 pm Captain Obvious

        BIO: http://www.usashooting.org/12-the-team/usashootingteam/nationalteam/nationalrifleteam/furrer

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 8:37 pm themanofmystery2

        What on earth does that have to do with my post, let alone heartiste’s post? Help me bridge the relevance because im not seeing it

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 7:20 pm liqdmetal

      +1
      good on you. that attitude is the only thing that keeps the lights on

      LikeLike


  20. on February 9, 2015 at 3:13 pm themanofmystery2

    Do these fat bitches realize that “social acceptance” has no correlation with boner tumescence, but obesity carries (heh) a negative one?

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 3:21 pm Greg Eliot

      That’s the chateau’s new fightin’ motto:

      NO ACCEPTANCE WITHOUT TUMESCENCE!

      lzlzozlzozlzozlzolzol Well-done, MM2.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 3:29 pm themanofmystery2

        Dude, you succinctly boiled it down to its essential oil, “shivenene”

        No acceptance without tumescence! *battle horn blows*

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 4:14 pm mendozatorres

        Well, didn’t get dressed up for nuthin’

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 10:29 pm Ripp

        can’t call it an ‘essential oil’ though …too LGBT-jewesque sounding.

        Refined down to it’s core element; the battle cry of great white kings of men:

        “NO ACCEPTANCE WITHOUT TUMESCENCE!”

        que apocolyose now Charlie dont surf scene…

        Love the smell of napalm fat burning in the morning….smells like victory

        LikeLike


  21. on February 9, 2015 at 3:42 pm Arbiter

    Because of the Flab

    I see fat cheeks inflating
    The crowd crown her cow which the media would ban
    I see blubbery shaming
    An abomination nauseating each man

    Fat jowls and arm flab that no man could stand
    That no, that no, that no man could stand
    A seething rebellion, retaking the land
    Retaking the, taking the, taking the land

    What then to do with this blubbery mania
    Oh, how do we deal with the slobbering boar
    Where do we start with a woman who’s bigger
    Than Rosie O’Donnell with pork sweat galore

    Men! You see the connection
    The burgers she’s eating are covered in grease
    We must shame her completely
    Just hold up a mirror, the job done with ease

    Wrecking the pig sty, because of the flab
    Because, because, because of the flab
    The fat camps arising, because of the flab
    Because of the, cause of the, cause of the flab

    (Melody: This Jesus Must Die, JC Superstar)

    LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2015 at 1:55 pm EMP

      Lolzozlzzz!!!

      LikeLike


  22. on February 9, 2015 at 3:50 pm Anonymous

    It is profitable. How many women and how much PR will the magazine get from this? How many women will buy it? This is a smart business move, not a dumb one.

    Ideological exercises can be profitable within the marketplace unless they are rare vanity projects (like “Red Tails”). These projects are often PR to curry favor with politicians. It is naïve to tell a bunch of Fortune 500 companies how to turn a profit. They are throwing squid ink that you a missing. They are laughing all the way to the bank while you think that they are being ideological when it is just a money making scheme.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 7:32 pm mendozatorres

      Couldn’t find the right article, but I remember one where Lucas was pitching a fit because no one would finance his film, which eventually was worth forgetting.

      http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/george-lucas-tuskegee-airmen-red-tails-280638

      LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 6:48 am james Blonde

        If you want to know about the Tuskegee airmen, the interviews with German fighter pilots who fought them are much better than any movie ;funny too because at first black fighter pilots were a myth they jokingly described as “spookwaffe”

        LikeLike


  23. on February 9, 2015 at 3:53 pm TAnon

    Fuck this shitty “curvy” thing. Any woman I’ve ever heard using that word was fat or on her way to becoming fat.

    LikeLike


  24. on February 9, 2015 at 3:56 pm Skinner

    All my plates are coming down with acute baby hunger. Other than completely restocking the roster, has anyone any tips for managing multiple excessive pregnancy expectations?

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 3:59 pm Greg Eliot

      How attached are you to your current location?

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 4:27 pm Skinner

        Here for work for approx another three years. And it’s not so big a town. Would conceivably (heh) consider it with number one but she’s currently misbehaving (self-entitled attitude) so I decided to dread her a little and redirect attention to the roster. But now numbers two and three are bringing up babies all the time too.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 5:05 pm Arbiter

      Have they formed a Skinner’s Plates Union?

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 5:19 pm Skinner

        It wouldn’t surprise me if they actually had. Like I said, not that big a town. They all at least know of each other’s existence, if not necessarily of their mutual interest.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 5:21 pm Captain Obvious

      > “any tips for managing multiple excessive pregnancy expectations?”

      Polygamy.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 5:38 pm Skinner

        Not sure how achievable that is (or indeed how personally desirable). But primarily, I don’t see how that would stop the baby-hankering at all.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 5:46 pm Captain Obvious

        > “I don’t see how that would stop the baby-hankering at all.”

        Because now they’re busy changing diapers. Moar Whyte Babiez FTW.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 5:50 pm Skinner

        Seriously, there’s no one here has ever faced this before? Other than nixing an entire roster, how does one go about putting the babyhunger (rather than the baby) to bed?

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 10:56 am Captain Obvious

        Dude – we do Real Talk and Truth Speak chez Le Chateau. Bitches want your seed because they perceive it to be of high quality, and because they sense that you would be a Good Father and a Strong Patriarch. Why not reward their good taste in men? Moar Whyte Babiez FTW.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 8:22 pm haunted trilobite

      A comment like this just looks pretty forlorn without a ‘put some buns in their ovens!’ appended to it. Was there some sort of internal power struggle where ZS got ousted?

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 8:36 pm Anonymous

        https://mobile.twitter.com/JamesMacCreator/status/528342987395571712/photos

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 3:57 pm The Spirit Within

        Captain Obvious is Zombie Shane.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 10:32 pm Ripp

      Anal only moving forward. [SOLVED Ticket closed] please rate your support.

      LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 2:57 am Skinner

        Support poor to middling.
        Anal is not a suitable solution. I want pussy. Really, has NO ONE had to address this before?

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 10:59 am Captain Obvious

        LOL’ed, Playah wants PIV intimacy with no natural consequences. Have you ever considered whacking off into the palm of your own hand? http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=PIV

        LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2015 at 11:03 am Captain Obvious

      Above all the other men whom they could have in this life, they want YOU as the FATHER of their children? These girls shouldn’t be punished – they should be rewarded for their devotion and insightfulness and prescience. Give them Moar Whyte Babiez FTW.

      LikeLike


      • on February 11, 2015 at 2:54 am Skinner

        Like I said, I’d maybe give one of em some whyte babeez, but she’s misbehaving. The others get shrink-wrapped Skinner sausage. In the fuggen pussy. No homo. So, how do I get to keep the rubber on when the roster are clucky? Any thoughts?

        LikeLike


  25. on February 9, 2015 at 4:05 pm Just Saying

    Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue (swolefeed) will feature a fatty fat

    Commonly referred to as a “tub o’ lard”… RIP Sports Illustrated… I find it interesting that the more they try to “hide” the truth the more obvious it is to any man. I have stopped even trying to be “nice” – I call it like I see it – lard belly… If you don’t like it, then lose the tonnage… Of course American women are almost a lost cause over the age of 22 or so… Fortunately, the young ones make up for it in being easy to nail and pump a load into. The fact that they crave older male attention, coupled to how easy they are to bed is their one saving grace… Of course, if you are looking for any decent number of hotties – you have to be willing to travel. Asia is pretty much the place to be these days…

    It’s interesting that the women mirror the health of a society – the places where women are hot and feminine, is thriving – the places where they are fat and disgusting, is going down the tubes…

    LikeLike


  26. on February 9, 2015 at 4:12 pm X

    and the biggest lie of all is that it’s not their fault they are fat. the hard truth is you cannot be fat without working at it.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 8:56 pm Cortesar

      Indeed if you ever see land-whales attacking free food and choking themselves with deserts you start to get some ideas where those enormous layers of redundant protoplasm come from
      Yet we have to consider another essential ingredient absolutely necessary to create such abysmal shapes unknown to sane nature- stupidity and low IQ

      LikeLike


  27. on February 9, 2015 at 4:13 pm Aspie Nerd

    She’s not fat…by American standards.

    LikeLike


  28. on February 9, 2015 at 4:15 pm Putin

    It seems that the George Costanza philosophy of “do the opposite” has some truth. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cu4tsF91r84

    The marriage Counselor culture along with the media tells you to placate and serve your women better…….. then just be mean, pay less attention and flirt with other women.

    The media tells you to eat more whole grains, above ground vegetables and PUFA……… then you drop PUFA, above ground vegetables and whole grains while eating more saturated fat, roots, real dairy, coffee, etc

    The media tells you that our tax funded army is fighting to support your freedom and that is why you should cheer for them at half time……… Really we have lost all kinds of freedoms over the last 15 years and the U.S. has been supporting the bad guys such as the Muslim Rebels in Syria and Libya, Nazi’s in Ukraine, Muslim brotherhood in Egypt, etc..

    The media and health care system tell you we have great healthcare and that drugs are good for you…..then you go to alternative types of healthcare, stay out of hospitals and eat better.

    LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2015 at 2:03 pm EMP

      Just finished a quart of freshly squeezed OJ. All hail Dr. Peat.

      LikeLike


  29. on February 9, 2015 at 4:43 pm Dave

    CH,

    A meme I like:

    The shitlibs hate it 🙂
    ..

    LikeLike


  30. on February 9, 2015 at 4:43 pm Dave

    Left a message…think it went to spam folder

    LikeLike


  31. on February 9, 2015 at 5:04 pm Pyjama Wearing Ninja

    I think you underestimate the importance of feels in finance. After all, people in finance merely play with other people’s money.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 5:09 pm Arbiter

      A whole lot of people in finance create wealth. The computer you type on exists thanks to finance. So do your clothes, your home and everything else around you. Of course, there are some bad individuals in finance, same as everywhere. The Left will use them to denounce all businessmen as a group – while of course never using the same logic for workers when it turns out that practically all street crime is committed by working-class individuals.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2015 at 8:06 pm Anonymous

        Oops you slipped up here

        It is the true right who is against finance. Finance is now Jewish.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 4:46 pm Bill Brasky

        Wow, Arbiter, and you were really on a roll. Not a just wow, either, theres more.

        The only reason businesses need “finance” is that industrial civilization has evolved alongside the “finance” parasites without anyone getting the balls to clean house.

        It sounds like its time to take a hard look at this (your…?) “profession”

        LikeLike


  32. on February 9, 2015 at 5:22 pm Anonymous

    #hitlerwasright is trending on twitter

    msm is having a shitfit

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 7:32 pm Bill

      I just saw this great video on #hitlerwasright

      LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2015 at 8:16 pm james Blonde

        LikeLike


  33. on February 9, 2015 at 5:23 pm little spoon

    Ashley graham is fat but her face is pretty. Robin Lawley is barely bigger than kate upton, who is supposedly not a plus size model.

    I dont quite understand how it can be common to find ashley and Robin unattractive. I think Robin is a 9 and Ashley is an 8.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 8:23 pm Cortesar

      Perhaps but how old you were on that picture, the one on which your liberated boobs defy the gravity?
      Defy time they cannot

      LikeLike


  34. on February 9, 2015 at 5:23 pm Rum

    On the other hand, SI did not waste a lot of time figuring out that getting Michelle Jenneke in front of their cameras mostly naked was a wise business move.
    If there ever were genes deserving mass-production… I think every Y chromosome on planet earth agrees.

    LikeLike


  35. on February 9, 2015 at 5:47 pm The Profit-Propaganda Curve | Reaction Times

    […] Source: Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  36. on February 9, 2015 at 6:14 pm Joshua Sinistar

    The enemy has lost. They are running out of money. These ridiculous money losing propaganda pieces are what you usually see when they lose. YKW is an arrogant but compulsive gambler. When they lose they keep doubling down to try to get back in the black. But you see they are now literally betting on black like that ridiculous “Empire” on Fox! When you go black, you go broke.
    You know Hitler killed them. When they lost in Germany in 1933, they went full retard, Anti-White. When you think about it, they could have after the war, took all the European Empires and put them together with the EU and have pretty much ruled the World right there.
    They went Anti-White because Hitler beat them, and instead of putting all those European Empires together they tore them apart. They will never be put together by them again. No one will do it for them.
    Can you imagine China sending Millions of Chinese troops to invade Iran? Nope. Sorry, rat boys you lost. White people were the only ones that didn’t hate you, but that ship has sailed.
    They have nowhere to run now. Muslims in Europe want to kill them, and Meskins from Taco Hell hate their guts too. Too bad. They lost.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 6:36 pm Rum

      Smile when you say that, pardner.

      LikeLike


  37. on February 9, 2015 at 6:21 pm Sam

    50’s Red Pill musical counter-propaganda (to include Plutarch references for GBFM) “They acted angry and annoyed, but secretly they was overjoyed…:

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2015 at 11:26 pm Lumpy

      If y’all need more inspiration: http://www.reddit.com/r/StruggleFucking/top/?sort=top&t=all

      LikeLike


  38. on February 9, 2015 at 7:11 pm artistoftheslightlyshadydeal

    As an aussie who is familiar with this bint, I say yuck as this fruit is rotten on the inside.

    They put her in it because…

    She’s an Australian, a proud feminist, an environmentalist, a food lover, and she was preggers in the photo as well.

    “I knew using my body would attract attention. I was worried as a feminist, that using my body would attract the wrong type of attention and people might take the wrong idea from it, but I’m a model, my body is my work.”

    A professional rationalist as well.

    The plus size crap is a smoke screen. She’s a poster bitch for slavering SJW to aspire to.

    LikeLike


  39. on February 9, 2015 at 7:35 pm Anonymous

    The consummate Jew:

    http://nypost.com/2015/02/08/james-dolan-calls-knicks-fan-alcoholic-hateful-in-raging-email/

    LikeLike


  40. on February 10, 2015 at 12:47 am Neecy

    I honestly believe men who obsess over skinny women and calling everyone fat have small penises.

    [CH: i honestly believe women who accuse men of obsession for desiring slender women are themselves fat.]

    And the skinnier the woman, the more they feel “bigger” because of less flesh.

    [the skinnier the woman, the less it feels like wrestling a walrus.]

    If a woman has meat on her bones,

    [euphemism for obesity]

    obviously men with small penises will be intimidated.

    [if a woman has fat on her bones, obviously men with working penises will look elsewhere.]

    LikeLike


    • on February 11, 2015 at 7:10 am Greg Eliot

      Ah, the small penis Cathedral shaming gambit!

      Thanks for the novelty, NeNe… that one’s never been played before, here at the chateau.

      :duckface:

      LikeLike


    • on February 11, 2015 at 8:10 am james Blonde

      Actually Neecy, its not their fault. As white men, they may be genetically predisposed to respond to what is essentially an African (tropical) body plan. The crural index is the ratio of thigh length to leg length. The Brachial index is the ratio of upper arm and lower arm. Those Europeans who have maintained these African proportions may be considered more attractive because of what tall, long limbed body plans represent in terms of energy consumption; or in the words of the Chateau, “vibrancy.”

      Short arms, short legs, short height = cold weather adaption = peasant stock = non elite white people.

      LikeLike


    • on February 11, 2015 at 8:36 am Neecy

      I’m not talking about OBESITY. I don’t support obesity or being overweight. But can’t deny the feeling that men who call anything over a size 2 fat def have penis issues.

      [CH: so your beef is that you just don’t like men with standards. i wonder why…]

      But it makes sense! I think it’s a great strategy for men with small penises to stick with very skinny women! 😘😘😘😘

      [skinny women have more sex market options than fatter women and will be in a better position to choose men with large cocks.]

      LikeLike


    • on February 11, 2015 at 11:59 am SC

      Well those women are just making false accusations. Anybody who takes a look at the wives of alpha males, and the highest paid strippers and escorts will see that the skinniest women are just as absent as the fattest. Most (but not all) men want a women whose BMI is as close to 21 as possible. A lot of women also mistakenly think that the haute couture models are the alpha females. Truth is, while they are prettier than most other females, the most alpha of men tend not to marry those women because those women were chosen for their attractiveness to women and gay men, not their attractiveness to straight men.

      LikeLike


    • on February 11, 2015 at 12:03 pm SC

      Also, heartiste, while “meat on her bones” is often a euphemism for an overweight woman, it is not always used as such. I have seen a legitimately underweight female celebrity go from BMI 17 to BMI 21 and people said “now she’s got meat on her bones”. Even by your standards she was not fat after gaining weight. She did however, gain boobs/butt.

      LikeLike


    • on February 11, 2015 at 1:23 pm Anonymous

      No you don’t (honestly believe).

      Black men might be held in low esteem around here, but I honestly believe that you WERE taught that lying is from Satan?

      oink

      LikeLike


  41. on February 10, 2015 at 8:00 am Bucho

    Ironically, I just saw an add about building muscles and lifting weights in my FB feed and all the people in the picture were women….

    LikeLike


  42. on February 11, 2015 at 1:48 am Hd Hammer

    “…..is released in a bukkake of hope and change”
    You Sir, are a true poet.

    LikeLike


  43. on February 11, 2015 at 3:27 pm Ron Mexico

    Speaking of propaganda, see this Telegraph article cheerleading the death of the presumption of innocence for ‘rapists’ (i.e., men).

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11375667/Men-must-prove-a-woman-said-Yes-under-tough-new-rape-rules.html

    LikeLike


  44. on February 12, 2015 at 3:21 am Daily Linkage – February 12, 2015 | The Dark Enlightenment

    […] The Profit-Propaganda Curve | Chateau Heartiste […]

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Recent Comments

    Ironsides on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Carlos Danger on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Jay in DC on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Agent X on Oy, There It Is
    jOHN MOSBY on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    cortesar on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Davy Holmes on Sweden, The Cuck Corner Stool…
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    jOHN MOSBY on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • The NPC Song: "Feel"
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: