1. A gene for brain size is discovered and it’s only found in humans… and in Neanderthals. If you think we’re getting very close to a total refutation of the 20th Century liberal equalist faith, you’re right.
2. More evidence (in a roundabout way) that the Game concept of “faking it till you create it” is a potent seduction-improvement strategy.
3. Another CH principle is affirmed by ¡SCIENCE!: Playfulness is twat crack. (this rhyming dyad works best if you pronounce “twat” with a brit clip.)
4. This is a legitimate fear conservatives have about the risk of neuroscience being used to absolve violent criminals of any responsibility for their crimes. (“He dindu nuffin yerhonor, because he’s a slave to his neural wiring.”) The CH take: If genes are found which dispose to violent criminality, nothing should change in the realm of jurisprudence. The balance of faaaaaaaiiirness favors removing dangerous animals from public circulation.
5. If all it takes are small DNA changes to separate chimps from humans, how much smaller is the degree of DNA change necessary to separate the human races? Preemptive heh.
6. Are paleo eaters prepared to go all the way?
7. Processed agribusiness foods are really fucking bad for you, news at 11.
8. Feminists like to crow about older fathers passing on more DNA mutations to their children (an overblown concern troll and a reproductive “hit” that pales in comparison to the Wall-smashing fertility terminus that affects all women). Apropos the impotent ragepouting of feminists against older fathers, here’s a study which found that there were DNA mutations in the children of *teenage* fathers.
9. Beta male manlets trapped in feminist-friendly egalitarian marriages are unhappy with the extra household chores they are browbeaten into doing in exchange for once-a-year birthday blowjobs.
10. House of Cards, Season 3: Who Bitch This Is? (h/t furiousferrett) (meme source)
11. How many of these warnings have come true?
12. “More likely America will be finished as a single nation.” A constitutional crisis, and a resulting collapse, loom.
Bonus link:
13. Women don’t care about your job. What women care about is an emotional connection. (Score another one for game.)
Do more homework get more sex as the beta spins on the hamster wheel lol
LikeLike
[…] The Wickedest Links […]
LikeLike
Lengthy article, but for folks who’ve been reading elsewhere about the ongoing Neural Network/Artificial Intelligence/Deep Learning/Big Data disruption and what that’s gonna mean for women’s cahreeeeers, there’s a great piece in the chronicle of higher ed on the dude who pioneered it.
http://chronicle.com/article/The-Believers/190147/
tl;dr version — Neural Nets/AI have been hyped in the past, twice over, only to fail–in the ’60s they did some good replacing gals in the check-sorting department, but research was largely abandoned in the ’70s; early ’90s, Deep Blue beats Gary Kasporov at chess, but limited ROI otherwise; today, well, Dr. Andrew Ng of Stanford trained 10,000 servers to identify cat videos on YouTube. So, more hype, except…
This one old guy, Geoff Hinton, age 67, who’s been working on Neural Nets since the ’60s, has emerged as Google’s goto person ever since one of the many algorithms he had farting around in his head was used to, overnight, increase the effectiveness of Android’s Voice Recognition software spectacularly.
Anyway, the hype around Neural Nets and disruption is, if anything, understated (and on a personal level, as a guy who just completed grad coursework in the field because of some crap I learned in the early ’90s that’s forgotten today, great to see none of that discrimination against old farts so common elsewhere in tech.)
As for what it means to CH matters: half of all women’s jobs are in three sectors–education, healthcare, and gubmint. Also, about 80% of their wages, as the only other high-dollar thing women do involves a pole or a backpage ad. Those are the three sectors most likely to be affected by machine learning-based automation.
We talk about this a lot on Dalrock’s site, but it’s link day, and besides I can’t quite handle God this early in the afternoon.
LikeLike
The best jobs out there with the lowest unemployment are graduate degrees in math and science such as biology chemistry engineering etc….
LikeLike
True but still a lot of them find it difficult to get good secure jobs. Think HB1s and bogus feelgood economic data,
LikeLike
Petsmart urges young White women to have DOGS rather than children:
LikeLike
More young women choosing dogs over motherhood http://nypost.com/2014/04/10/more-young-women-choosing-dogs-over-motherhood/
LikeLike
Yep. Sir fyi I’m with you on all your posts about the cultural war on whites. I’m not a sock puppet.
Dudes, pay attention.
LikeLike
Yep. Dudes they’re winning.
Met 25 yo law student last week. Great genes she should be passing on. 5’7″, good body, pretty, blue eyes, intelligent (for a woman).
She’s moderately self aware and aware of red pill themes and told me the following;
Fucks a new asshole every week and is not ashamed of it
Sent me 20 naked pics within an hour of meeting her that I did not ask for
Doesn’t want kids. “Only in never out” referring to her vagina
Admits she’s a cum receptacle for alphas
Is massively tatted up with nose ring and jewelry in face by cheek too (don’t even know how to describe that)
Her Parents are still married and her dad told her to never send a naked pic to a boy
She’s a law student and I know her name. She has no idea who I know or if I’m psycho stalker chode. No sense at all. There must be 409 guys with these naked pics of her. She has no idea who I know. I might know some of her classmates.
It’s really a sad state of affairs.
If gen x was the first generation of women who will have a large percentage grow old as cat women spinsters, gen y is just INSANE.
None of this is their fault. It was done to them on purpose. Women are women and men have failed to lead.
LikeLike
That reads like a horror novel.
LikeLike
If she were my daughter, I would disown her. She wants to screw the planet, she needs to do it on her own dime.
LikeLike
Scientists: Hormonal contraceptives may alter behavior… ‘significant consequences for society’ http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3263614/posts
LikeLike
50 years of hormonal contraception – time to find out, what it does to our brain http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2014.00256/full
LikeLike
“half of all women’s jobs are in three sectors–education, healthcare, and gubmint.”
Three sectors- gubmint, gubmint, and gubmint.
LikeLike
I once calculated that in Sweden about 30% of the population supports the rest. Guess what sex that 30% is.
LikeLike
[…] The Wickedest Links […]
LikeLike
How can the Republics win more white voters from both parties in order to win the POTUS? The current strategy is to win the Latino vote. Would Rand Paul be a better VP choice for Scott Walker in this context rather than Susan Martinez or Rubio?
LikeLike
VDare wrote about Steve Sailer’s analysis, showing that even if Mitt Romney had won an absurdly high percentage of the Mestizo vote, 50 percent, he still would have lost. He would have had to win 60 percent. That’s not ever gonna happen. On the other hand, the analysis showed that just a few percent more of the White vote – a level obtained in earlier elections – would have given him a handsome lead.
Mitt Romney could have easily done this by promising to actually enforce the immigration laws instead of being a criminal. But he refused to give that promise. So he lost.
The neocons who have hijacked the GOP have excluded all conservative voices that stand up for Americans instead of the neocons’ Israel. From the National Review (the founder William Buckley said he deeply regretted allowing the neocons to take control of the magazine, the founder of the modern conservative movement) to the party itself. They don’t care one bit about winning elections if to do so the GOP would have to be conservative. They are much closer to the Democrat leadership, the likes of David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel, than conservatives, who they see as enemies.
Can a conservative presidential candidate break through this? No. Paul Craig Roberts, the architect of Reagan’s economic strategy, has described how the party establishment forced Reagan to accept their guy CIA-George Bush as his vice president, or they would throw the election like they did when Barry Goldwater unexpectedly became the GOP candidate. Even back then Reagan had to cave in. Today a conservative wouldn’t even get as far as Reagan without having neocons in his campaign team.
LikeLike
What you say is of course true. If Romney had promised that winning formula he’d never have won the Republican nomination…..may not even have been allowed into the primaries. Think Ron Paul – different program I know but it’s one not acceptable to the ZioCon PTB hence he was disappeared.
LikeLike
When you say “neocons,” do you mean “Da Jooooooooz” instead?
LikeLike
Interesting. That is pretty much the conclusion I had without looking at the data. I do know that Hispanics vote consistently at an 8 percent stripe nationally and of that Republicans garner between 30-35 percent of that voting block. It is ridiculous that the Jeb Bush types think they need to sacrifice their base for such paltry return on investment.
LikeLike
Neocons starting taking hold once The Matrix came out.
LikeLike
“the party establishment forced Reagan to accept their guy CIA-George Bush as his vice president, or they would throw the election like they did when Barry Goldwater ”
What is the source? Roberts, of course. But where can I “read more about it”?
LikeLike
You’re not keeping up. Repukes have found their election winning candidate.
http://irishsavant.blogspot.ie/2015/02/and-loudest-cheer-of-evening-was.html
LikeLike
I respect Ben Carson and would vote for him. He has made a great deal out of very little and has kept his head too.
LikeLike
Yes the Repubs had to have their own Magic Negro. Rolling my eyes.
LikeLike
As Steve Sailer has repeatedly pointed out, Latinos vote in parallel to the white vote, only further to the left. IOW, appealing to the white base will also drive up support among Latinos.
LikeLike
Would not surprise me. My theory is that the reason why conservatives in states like Texas and Florida get about 50 percent of the Latino vote is due to the fact that Hispanics care much more about the economy than immigration.
LikeLike
Haha, I should study http://postimg.org/image/8q58l9vlh/
LikeLike
BTW can you explain what does the chimp link have to do with race (in)equality? I get the article (and your point about the small required difference in genes) but there’s nothing about inferiority or superiority (e.g. different brain size gene for races). That’s the kind of stuff I expected from the article after reading your line about the total refutation from equalism, but I haven’t found it.
LikeLike
Humans left Africa about 150,000 years earlier than did Nogs. Post-African humans then interbred with Neanderthals [who had larger brains] and to this day, Post-African Humans retain a large portion of Neanderthal DNA in their genomes, whereas pure-blood Nogs [as opposed to Mulatto/Melungeon products of bestiality] have no such Neanderthal DNA. Finally, it is widely hypothesized in the Dark Enlightenment that Neanderthals might have been the first K-Selected race, and that modern humans received their ability to practice K-Selection [as opposed to Noggish R-Selection] from their Neanderthal ancestors.
LikeLike
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2610571/How-man-left-Africa-130-000-years-ago-Humans-arrived-Europe-multiple-waves-earlier-previously-thought-researchers-claim.html
LikeLike
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2213219/Neanderthals-bred-modern-humans-Europe-recently-37-000-years-ago.html
LikeLike
It is so fucked up that you are simply correct, yet narrative control means almost nobody knows this information and a man will lose his livelihood and friends if he dare even mention it.
LikeLike
I thought it just required smarter brains to survive Ice Age winters than to walk around naked and pick food up off the ground.
LikeLike
Yeah, but ya gots ta outrun cheetahs ‘n sheet… and keeps yo’ haid nappy, so’s ya don’t get tangled up in dem trees.
LikeLike
On a lighter note…
I hear a lot about Neaderthals here at the chateau, but when I went to school, the emphasis was more on our Cro-Magnon roots…
… those paleo guys who actually looked like us pale folk… even had bigger brain cases on average (1600cc, if memory serves), and who pretty much made the more simian-visaged Neaderthals extinct.
What did I miss, yon, these past few decades, that there’s this sudden love for the Neaderthal?
LikeLike
GE, I seriously doubt that they have strong and reliable Real-Science-y markers for determining the difference between e.g. Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons and semi-modern Humans. They got really, really lucky with that Neanderthal corpse which had some recoverable DNA in it. Having said that, are you familiar with Gerald Crabtree? http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-11/are-people-getting-dumber-one-geneticist-thinks-so
LikeLike
If YKW can be believed [granted, a huge IF], then the idea of the first {Neanderthal} x {Post-African Nog} mating having transpired in Galilee would bear an eery resemblance to the story of the Garden of Eden and Adam & Eve. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jan/28/ancient-skull-found-israel-sheds-light-human-migration-sex-neanderthals
LikeLike
And if hairless hominids did indeed arise from {Monkey} x {Pig} bestiality, then it would go a long way towards explaining the Mosaic proscription against eating the flesh of the swine [which would literally be a form of cannibalism]: http://phys.org/news/2013-07-chimp-pig-hybrid-humans.html
LikeLike
This is a fascinating rabbit hole. To my knowledge, neither the conventional out-of-Africa nor the new Neanderthal theory account for the European look evolving from the earlier African look. Sexual selection and random mutations seem inadequate as explanations.
This reminds me of a seemingly trollish comment I once read that Africans evolved from the great African apes, Asians evolved from the great Asian apes (I just happened to read that Orangutans are less social that African apes, analogous to asian introversion!) and the European was created in the image of God.
LikeLike
http://www.trussel.com/prehist/news255.htm
LikeLike
“They got really, really lucky with that Neanderthal corpse which had some recoverable DNA in it.”
Captain obvious, you are spot on.
The problem with many of these scientist who are interpreting the data is that they also have a strong agenda they are trying to push. Yes, the blue pill exists even with scientists.
LikeLike
Actually the whole “out of Africa” thing is a myth promoted by evolutionists. Genetics show that humans originated (or at least survived) in the high areas of Turkey and spread from there.
The whole theory of “out of Africa” and Lucy came from a few bones scattered miles apart. Typical evolutionist disinformation.
For real info on Neanderthals read “Buried Alive: The Startling Truth about Neanderthal Man” by Jack Cuozzo who has proven that they are fully human, and simply humans who lived for hundreds of years. Also they were not prognathous, that is caused by evolutionists deliberately misaligning their jaws.
LikeLike
Followed a link from the Onion to a list of 10 Things That Men Find Unattractive, in a magazine called WMNlife. They are:
Intricate hairstyle, heavy foundation (makeup smoothing out the skin), glitter on the eyelids, gummed-up lashes, badly shaved body, dry skin, bad breath and yellowish teeth, wrong lip liner, too much fragrance, public grooming.
Gee, it almost seems like something is missing. But surely a women’s magazine wouldn’t leave out something glaringly obvious and of great concern to men in 21st century America. Something like being fat.
LikeLike
Wrong lip liner? Seriously?
LikeLike
Makes it seem like she ate oreos and didn’t wipe her mouth. Or worse!
LikeLike
GasButtox say: I got your lip liner right here.
LikeLike
….And the link: http://wmnlife.com/beauty-fashion/10-things-men-find-unattractive
LikeLike
Can’t offend 50% of your readers and hope to sell magazines.
LikeLike
They left a few things out:
-obesity
-BPD
-body odor of any kind
-pubes. Shave that shit.
-feminists
-AF/BB mating strategy
-bitches that act like dudes
Actually I could have saved myself time if I had just typed “feminists.”
LikeLike
“5. If all it takes are small DNA changes to separate chimps from humans, how much smaller is the degree of DNA change necessary to separate the human races? Preemptive heh.”
Verbatim here, but it’s something I always thought to be interesting.
NdGT once asked us to consider that if humans and chimps match 98% DNA and we know how much smarter we are than them, then imagine a species 2% beyond us, in the same scale that we are 2% beyond chimps, and wonder how superior they would be?
LikeLike
11. How many of these warnings have come true?
The woman smoking by the table, annoyed when her children want her attention.
“Husbands for old maids!” – should also be “for fat maids”.
Some men becoming toadies.
Suffragettes attacking a policeman. (Feminists today are involved in the extreme Left’s political terrorism against immigration critics, far worse violence than people could imagine then, and worse than most people today know)
House of (un)Commons: ” ‘Man’ & How To Treat It”.
“My wife’s joined the Suffrage Movement, I’ve suffered ever since”.
Suffragette vote-getting, the easiest way (using sex to lead men around by the nose).
Origin and development of a suffragette. At 15 a little pet. At 20 a little coquette. At 40 not married yet! At 50 a suffragette. (Should also include other undesirable things, besides old age, as reasons for a woman becoming a feminist.)
The posters were too mild. They didn’t foresee homosexuals and other elements becoming leading feminists to turn Western women against Western men. Or feminists suppressing news of women suffering attacks by immigrants. Or supporting a serial rapist, William Clinton, because he promoted mass immigration and laws giving the feminist movement make-believe jobs to cash in from.
LikeLike
Phokin hate that uppity prig emma watson & that ugly chav monotone donkeyslut katie price
LikeLike
Not for the first time, a man (or woman) confuses gorgeous with snobby.
Snobbishness is a hook. It’s a weakness to exploit, and almost always for a great reward given that haughty is companion to the haughty. You should be rejoicing, not complaining.
Don’t worry, she’ll hit the wall like all others. Just not yet.
LikeLike
I don”t consider Emma to be very pretty. She’s a 7 at best in my book.
LikeLike
She’s not my type either… especially with that look on her face… guess I just can’t handle a strong womyn. lzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlozlozlzol
LikeLike
4. This is a legitimate fear conservatives have about the risk of neuroscience being used to absolve violent criminals of any responsibility for their crimes. (“He dindu nuffin yerhonor, because he’s a slave to his neural wiring.”) The CH take: If genes are found which dispose to violent criminality, nothing should change in the realm of jurisprudence. The balance of faaaaaaaiiirness favors removing dangerous animals from public circulation.
Once again an example of the difference between the two basic moralities: the goal-based (the normal morality through the ages) and the rights-based (an improvised morality when goals are denied and people ask, “what then is to stop people from just doing whatever they like since there is nothing for us to accomplish anyway?”).
The goal-based morality wants a strong, healthy people in a strong, healthy society that is moving forward. Building more, inventing more – ultimately this is the instinct of life itself to move to greater heights. But the Left wins votes by denying this morality, as it declares the deviants, the stupid, the lazy, and lesser peoples to be of lesser worth. So instead they introduce Rights. By this morality you can’t exclude a destructive people from your nation, since there will be “innocent children” and other innocents in that people. You can’t restrict any group, like homosexuals, because of the harm they cause to society if allowed to spread their crap, as long as they don’t cause repeated and direct harm like smashing windows and burning buildings.
And so an individual that causes harm to society can’t be imprisoned if he isn’t “responsible for his own actions”. Rights. No matter what his presence in the street does to society.
By contrast, a goal-based morality puts away the harmful individual, no matter what some claim caused his crimes. It wasn’t his fault, it was society? Unemployment? Oppression? Insanity? Genes? Irrelevant – his presence in the street is harmful, so he should be removed from the streets. Whether his harm comes from malice and greed or not.
And here’s the interesting thing: facing the harmful individual with certain punishment, and removing other harmful individuals around him, will often make him improve himself, regardless of the causes for his actions.
LikeLike
Your dichotomy between goals and rights-based moralities is contrived. “Goals based morality” is a nonsense term. You have to flesh it out.
Further, the nearest real-world application of your fantastical concept would be the progressive idea — which wants “a strong healthy, people in a strong healthy, society that is moving forward.” (Obama 2012 campaign slogan: “Forward.” MSNBC tag line: “Lean Forward.”) You beg the question by presuming what “moving forward” means is obvious to all — just like the Left does.
You cannot simply assert without explanation what the summum bonum of the polity is. You have to demonstrate it. You have to explain why that way of life is better than all others, or at very least explain why it is the best of all available options.
The negative rights to life, liberty, and property are justified to all men universally if only because it assures the rights of the ten percent that can do something noble with them.
Matt
LikeLike
Matt,
thanks for interjecting philosophical vigor and consistency into the debates here. This is no longer taught in school and few people grasp it in the first place.
LikeLike
Weighty, as usual.
Makes me recall some other fellow who once said (and I paraphrase) that the whole purpose of a folk is to produce a few remarkable individuals every few generations.
LikeLike
Homosexuals are allowed to “spread their crap”
Not sure if that pun was intended but I about fell off my chair
LikeLike
FYI Arbiter is getting at deontological versus consequentialist morality.
The whole “we only have these rights so that the top X% can do noble things” sounds like a just-so. The top X%, objectively, in any society, will do noble things. Those who are able have always prospered in one way or another.
When individuals view their government as fair, they are more likely to participate in its attendant society and develop themselves to the fullest extent. And government which recognizes and treats every man as equally endowed with natural rights — regardless of actual ability — is an acceptable means to that end.
LikeLike
Good post Scray. You get a cookie and a smiley sticker.
LikeLike
1. Yes, everyone gets it but I don’t want to live in a world where government becomes completely involved in reproduction and begins regulating genes which is inevitable as we head towards genetic definitions of man. 3. totally believe it, have seen it, hard to actually implement. 8. haha stupid whining women take that. 13. I think that is wrong, I read somewhere that graduate students get the least dates on online dating sites. I bring this up because my own experience says that women don’t care about esoteric topics, in fact they flee from anything marginal and studious like it was the plague.
LikeLike
where government becomes completely involved in reproduction and begins regulating genes which is inevitable as we head towards genetic definitions of man
“The fascists are coming! The fascists are coming!” It’s always 1938 in the neocon-lovers’ heads. Because that’s what Weekly Standard and National Review Online say.
LikeLike
Thank you for providing the quickest proof of Godwin’s Law yet.
LikeLike
Government regulation of reproduction can also come from the Left: genetic communism.
LikeLike
If it weren’t for our valiant efforts in WWII, we’d all be speaking Ebonics and pidgin Spanish…
… uh, wait a minute… what?
LikeLike
Adopt a niglet. Show you care.
LikeLike
Any system of government that gives equal weight to the votes of LaQueeshia, who’s on the dole with 9 kids sired by 8 different fathers, and a Nobel Laureate, is tragically flawed.
LikeLike
There will come hard rains don’t worry.
LikeLike
This plus 1,000
LikeLike
That’s the 800 pound gorilla in the room (no pun intended) in re “democracy”…
… yet naive folks and Cathedral kool-aides still glibly remark that it’s the best form of gummint. (((shakin’ it)))
LikeLike
I believe that when anyone registers to vote, they should be given a basic IQ test. Take the results, move the decimal place over 2 spaces, and that’s how much their vote counts. So, the vote of a person with an average IQ of 100 counts as 1 vote; the vote of person with an IQ of 80 counts as .8 votes; and the vote of a person with an IQ of 140 counts as 1.4 votes.
LikeLike
I read somewhere that there’s nothing more common than an educated idiot. This quip aligns with my studied real word observation. IQ can’t be the lone measurement to weight the vote. Think about the credentialed liberal piss ants who actively seek their own demise.
LikeLike
That’s also my criticism of Fred Reed’s recent column on that issue. I think one should have a job, be a tax payer, own some property and pass a difficullt citizenship test. Common sense is much harder to find than credentials. I also like the idea of serving in the military as a prerequisite. No franchise for women either.
LikeLike
Fuck that IQ bullshit… “smart” SWPL folks are a major part of the current malaise.
One of the areas in which the founding fathers DID have wisdom… right to vote = 25 years old, male, must own at least 2 acres of land, if memory serves.
LikeLike
The Founders created a nation for themselves and others like them to succeed in life free from The Man. They knew it wouldn’t last. Ol Ben even said so in his brilliant Philadelphia Convention speech. They laid the groundwork and hoped for the best for future generations but what they knew would happen is exactly what has happened. And when this nation falls apart and another just like it rises some place else, the same events will take place there. If Dixie rises, it will happen there. Not even Sharia can stop technological advancements and the natural desire for luxury.
LikeLike
“All men” are in fact “created equal” — When you sufficiently restrict the definition of “man.”
A very small number of aristos can handle their own liberty. Most of you will destroy yourselves upon the freedom of indiscipline. Look at how lustily, how easily, a site like this is taken in by the false promise of the Sexual Revolution, for example.
Your passions forge your fetters. Not exactly a popular opinion in these parts.
And given that liberal republican democracy “is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time,” the choice reduces to the binary. Tyranny for all or liberty for all. Any attempt at a compromise produces some form of totalitarianism — in a rule of the best men, who decides, and by what standard do they decide, what the best is? It must reduce to relativism and therefore to despotism by utterly random people, like, say, Hillary Rodham — the fucking wifey of a dissolute priapic hillbilly, now poised to be the next royal executive of this former republic.
Rule of the best quickly becomes rule of the worst.
Matt
LikeLike
The choice for mankind lies between freedom and happiness and for the great bulk of mankind, happiness is better.”
― George Orwell, 1984
LikeLike
Heh, heh… wifey of a dissolute priapic hillbilly…
… that’s gold, Jerry… gold!
LikeLike
“Not even Sharia can stop technological advancements”
That is exactly what Mohammedism/Islam is all about. Why do you think the people in all these “countries” are impoverished, and never rise up in any technology than maybe 7th centure? Because of the stone age ideals of Islam.
Joke: Have you heard the Arabs have developed a time machine that will take any country back to the 7th Century? It is called Islam.
LikeLike
Here’s another great link from Phys.org, that guys who earn high incomes do less housework than guys with low income.
Well- of course that’s the case!!!
Only an academic idiot has to do a study to determine that guys who keep their eye on the ball, commit to their careers and investments and do high value work instead of low-value housework . . . make more money . . .
http://phys.org/news/2015-02-wealthier-men-partners-housework.html
and of course, they’ll get more sex and respect from their wives.
LikeLike
They spend more time at work, so the reason is obvious. Also, higher incomes mean you can afford cleaning maids.
LikeLike
+1.
arguing over household chores is pointless. hire a maid. the house will look better and no one’s pissy and resentful. maids are dirt cheap.
LikeLike
> “maids are dirt cheap”
Alien Invasion FTW! What could possibly go wrong?
LikeLike
I can afford a maid. I insist my wife do housework. Idle hands are the devil’s work shop and women who work outside of the home don’t f*ck as much. Women who can’t do simple things to maintain their end of the bargain like cook and clean a couple of hours a day and that’s all it takes to keep a spotless house are just spoiled children and not worth spending your life with. Besides, I don’t want strangers in my house. Be a man.
LikeLike
This… and this.
LikeLike
The best solution to the housework conundrum is simply to live in a home that doesn’t generate housework, such as a convenient city apartment from which you can walk (or take a short subway ride) to all your work, shopping, and amusement needs.
Such a lifestyle was commonplace until the Powers That Be discovered the bonanza they could reap by forcing most of white America to move to the suburbs and spend all their money on automobiles and big houses; the latter require more upkeep than an apartment does, and also require masculine-oriented upkeep such as mowing lawns and clearing gutters.
Now Dad is driving his car an hour each way to get to work and Mom has 2000 square feet to clean and dust instead of 500 — and is being told by society that this is Dad’s fault and that he should be doing “his half” while she shouldn’t even notice that Dad’s work day is essentially two hours longer because of where they, and their peers, have moved to.
But Mom has her picket fence and her nice school district, which is what matters.
The “slaughter of the inner city” was the best thing the home construction industry, the oil industry, and the automobile industry — and also feminism, government, and the race hustlers — could have asked for. And America has been paying the price for over 50 years.
I’m very happy to live in a society (a major Japanese city) where the law-abiding middle class, and even the law-abiding lower class, can still live in apartment buildings right in the middle of the city with all daily essentials within walking distance and in total safety. There is literally no place in the US where this can be done any longer. And we have no housework fights because a 500-SF apartment just doesn’t create any housework. My wife is always in a good mood, as am I. America’s never getting this back, is it?
LikeLike
I agree with your premise but I could not go back to apartment living with its no washer/dryer, can’t have a car because there’s no place to park it, and zero storage.
LikeLike
I have lived in cities many times. The suburbs are nicer and much better for raising children in. See my comment above about housework. Demand good character from women and you will get it.
LikeLike
@Kuchak – The no washer/dryer thing is an artifact of turn of late 1800s construction in which there wouldn’t be enough water pressure to run today’s showers and washing machines on high floors. Modern pipes can handle these things just fine; here in Japan everyone has a washer, typically out on the balcony. (Dryers are rarer, for some reason; people just like the fresh feeling of air-dried laundry.)
@Carlos – I think we’re making a similar point from different angles; the suburbs are nicer because government policies *made* them nicer, and in the inner cities basically gave the criminal class the run of the place. I don’t disagree that it helps if your wife is willing to put some work into your home: mine is; she does all the laundry and cleaning, and insists on doing that, but she also fully understands that it isn’t *that* much work, and that suburban housewives who demand to live in huge houses and then complain about housework have themselves to blame.
LikeLike
Speaking of fascism, Fred Reed argues for the excellent idea that voting should be restricted. He suggests raising the voting age to 25 and demanding that voters pass a test in literacy and basic knowledge.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/03/fred-reed/to-vote-you-should-have-a-145-iq/
“A voting age of twenty-five would ensure some degree of maturity, or might, even in an age of mall rats. It is ludicrous to think that teenagers can vote sensibly. They haven’t lived long enough. Like so much of American life, the adolescent vote sprang from the unrealistic idea that we are all equal in everything. Girls can be SEALs, everyone should go to college, that sort of thing. During Vietnam, the argument was that if the young were old enough to die in Asia, they were old enough to vote. And if six-year-olds are old enough to die in car accidents, they are old enough to drive.”
He also suggests that candidates for federal office at a minimum should score in the 90th percentile on the GREs and have an IQ of 145 or better. Sure, you can argue that they could still be malicious, but such men are at least harder to con. And more likely to at least know which country they are in. Reed tells a story of an acquintance in congress who went to visit Thailand, and his colleague on the trip repeatedly referred to the country as “Taiwan”. That’s the state of congress critters today.
As for the voters (links in the original) :
The necessity cannot be denied. Consider the following:
Forty-three percent of Americans think Saddam Hussein was personally involved in 9/11.
Sixty-four percent cannot name the three branches of the federal government.
Fourteen percent are illiterate.
Twenty-six percent think the sun goes around the earth.
You could add that last year, even after four months of daily news coverage, most Americans were still unable to find Ukraine on a map. They placed it in Britain, France, Africa, the Middle East, India, China, Southeast Asia, South America, Alaska, and smack in the middle of the U.S. And the more wrong they were about the country’s location, the more eagerly they supported the worst neocon ravings about American “military intervention” to support the Washington-funded coupsters in Kiev.
“Objectors to my splendid idea will assert that a government and electorate of the highly intelligent will exploit the rest. The franchise is said to protect the majority from the unscrupulous. But it does not. IQs on Wall Street are said to begin at 145. Has the franchise protected anyone from them? Allowing the dim and untutored to vote simply provides the bright and unscrupulous with gullible vote-fodder. It does not prevent but makes possible the exploitation.”
LikeLike
When the revolution comes, I hope I’m part of the firing squad that shoots Yglesias dead. After the torture, of course.
LikeLike
Me too. Throw Ezra Klein into that mix as well.
LikeLike
Shooting people is too easy. I say bring back the Gallows or the Guillotine.
LikeLike
Scientists are looking at genetics ass-backwards. They’re studying the relatively huge genetic differences between chimps and humans and trying to extrapolate from there that the human race is one big fn rainbow family.
What they should be doing is trying to explain how can there can be so MUCH difference in intelligence, disposition, and appearance even between two FULL-BLOOD SIBLINGS (twins even), who share the SAME DNA.
That’s where you’ll find the real answers to understanding the “diversity” of human behavior. But of course that would lead to some very uncomfortable questions about bloodlines and race.
LikeLike
I want them to isolate the african “stink gene”.
LikeLike
That’s that coconut oil shit they smear on themselves.
LikeLike
No, it’s not coconut oil. Blacks have a peculiar smell which becomes pronounced when they sweat, particularly in large groups. Thomas Jefferson observed that blacks release fluids more from the glands than the bladder.
LikeLike
I know. It was supposed to be a joke.
LikeLike
(((Shakin’ mah haid all ovah da place)))
LikeLike
Exactly so – it is all evolutionary b.s. for which there is nothing but mad theorizing.
DNA shows that Africans are genetically related to Bonobos and not European Humans – http://www.nature.com/articles/nature11128
LikeLike
If french fries are “highly processed” then virtually all cooked food is.
LikeLike
It has more to do with the fact they’re soaked in boiling oil and they’re usually paired with highly processed burgers.
LikeLike
French fries are one of the worst things you could possibly eat. It’s not just potatoes cut into slices. Fries are one of the top reasons Americans are so fat, along with Coke and the stuff in fast-food hamburgers. People wonder why Americans are so fat, but mention factors that also exist in Europe. No, it’s the fast food that started it.
The explosion of cheap fast food overtook America and changed the people. “Grab a burger” on the way to work. (Easy to stop with the car, while many Europeans go by bus or train.) Take the kids to McDonald’s several times a week. “Bring home some food” after work. When fast-food restaurants moved to Europe they were not as cheap, and health warnings had started to crop up about such food, so the consumption was not as high. Americans had already been fattened, and as we know children with fat parents are far more likely to be fat themselves.
Though honorary mention should also be given to the sugar-covered breakfast cereals. Tony the Tiger says die of a heart attack.
I include a summary of an article about Fat fries below, but you should really read the whole article to see just how every factor affects you body. And note: in France, French fries are made at home by simply cutting potatoes into slices and frying them. Nothing at all like the McD product.
http://www.healthambition.com/french-fries-most-unhealthy-foods/
French fries served in American restaurants often come dipped in corn oil even before they are fried. Processed corn oil is considered one of the worst kinds of oils for the human body. Aside from the saturated fat, corn oil has 60 times more inflammatory omega-6 fatty acids than Omega-3s.
Foods that have been fried in hydrogenated vegetable oils like corn, canola and soybean oil are especially damaging to our health. The polyunsaturated fats they contain become rancid with the constant heating and reheating that degrades their structure. These unnatural and heat damaged fats are strongly implicated in promoting inflammation within your body that is the starting point of many common health problems and diseases.
…….
As bad as all this hydrogenated fat is, french fries are perhaps more likely to make you fat with their high glycemic carbohydrates. In sufficient quantities high glycemic carbs will spike the hormone insulin in your bloodstream which is responsible for shuttling nutrients into cells.
Unfortunately, when you scoff down those greasy fries, insulin isn’t shuttling nutrients into your cells (french fries are about as devoid of nutrition as a desert is of rain), it’s shuttling in fat.
These quickly digested carbohydrates themselves are convert into glycogen, which, if you don’t use with a lot of exercise, is stored very easily in your body as fat, so you’re getting double the weight gain potential with every ‘happy’ meal.
There is another even more insidious substance that can be found in the most unhealthy foods cooked in or made with hydrogenated vegetable oil – trans fats. Partially hydrogenated vegetable oil or trans fat is probably the worst kind of fat you can consume.
…….
French fries are very high in sodium chloride and a small serving at the average fast food outlet contains around 160 mg to 740 mg of salt. A large serve of french fries has roughly between 330 and a very salty 1530 grams.
While these are estimates from online resources, they are also probably a gross under exaggeration of the sodium chloride intake many people derive from french fries since so many of us add extra salt to them.
…….
In recent years french fries, particularly those from fast food chains cooked at the highest temperatures, have been shown to contain significant levels of a potentially dangerous substance called acrylamide.
…….
French fries and potato crisps are recognized as the two biggest sources of acrylamide in the average American diet. Potato crisps also contain very high levels when tested, but since french fries are eaten so often by so many people, they are thought to be the biggest source of this damaging chemical in our diets.
An EFSA statement said that acrylamide is both carcinogenic (potentially cancer-causing) and genotoxic (can cause damage to the genetic material of our cells).
LikeLike
To avoid potatoes absorbing oil, soak them in water first for about 15 minutes.
LikeLike
Depends on what you cook them in. McDonald’s fries where really not that bad when they were cooked in animal lard many years ago given the medium chain fatty acid profile. Now they are synthetic and very toxic. That could go for almost everything at restaurants days which correlates with the epidemic of disease today etc…..
LikeLike
If french fries are “highly processed” then virtually all cooked food is as well.
LikeLike
A bit off topic: I remembered a fantastic nag I heard years ago, but was too young to fully appreciate it’s power.
I come from a country with 3 different religious/ethnic groups, and people generally like to marry one of their own. So, there was this worker in our house, the smoking-drinking-son-of-a-bitch type, and he was giving me all types of life advices, among which was how he gives a compliment to his wife:
-You ain’t much, but you’re one of ours.
She’s really not something, but she looks at him with respect many men can only dream of.
LikeLike
Would like to see a detailed deconstruction of the Agro-EBT complex. Many corporations derive the bulk of their profits servicing the EBT market. For a slice of the money, Asian and Arab foot-soldiers act as Agro-EBT collectors through EBT-processing convenience stores. Shareholders and Chinese front operations (WalMart) thrive on the obscene markups, resulting in the taxpayer-funded $0.53 Cheerio. Parent corporations distract the public with diversity false-flag outrages. Additional public handouts such as Section 8 ensure black matriarchy dysfunction and economic emasculation of black gentlemen. Their lament is true! Corporate America (aka “Encorpera” : Encorpera Empowers America) has a vested interest in proliferating black poverty as a means to feed at the public assistance trough.
It’s the circular flow of money in the EBT market.
LikeLike
A case study on the decay of Ferguson would be a great micro-economic example. A town once nearlly all white in the 70s erroded by federal government experimental politics and now nearly all black and worthless.
What actual GDP comes from Ferguson now that whites have fled?
A town subsidized by section 8 and EBT cards. And I agree, those EBT cards aren’t buying farmers market vegies and grass fed steak. They’re buying AgriCorp mass produced excess junk.
Its time for soilent black. Wall off these disgusting places, feed them to themselves, put cameras everywhere and broadcast on internet; sell ad space to pay for the operation and the proceeds go to the waste removal and rehabilitation of the land once they anhilate themselves.
LikeLike
Regarding Ferguson, according to the DOJ, it’s all the fault of the cops and judges.
LikeLike
It’s worse out here in LA as some fast food joints happily accept EBT. Hell, just the other day, had a coupon for a pizza from Pizza Hut so I ordered and went to pick it up. (Friggin’ $3 surcharge for delivery is bullshit!) On the door, they say they accept EBT for carryout orders only.
LikeLike
Are paleo eaters prepared to go all the way?
I’m guessing not.
LikeLike
I can’t eat that… it looks too much like uncle Irving.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Lol http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/03/01/opinion/sunday/medicating-womens-feelings.html
Read the comments. What you need to know is that modern women absolutely hate us and have everything completely backwards in their cute little brains.
LikeLike
Women at Encorpera track their competitor’s menstrual cycles. It’s women’s inhumanity to women.
LikeLike
Re: Link #6.
Cockchafer Butter?!?
No thanks, I’ll pass.
LikeLike
@ch #13 is a huge huge huge generalization about that article.
Girls don’t like guys ‘venting’ about there jobs, or trying to logistically/blatantly impress with a good job.
You know. The ‘try hard’ is bad game
LikeLike
I guess since foseti went dark you have to do link roundups now.
LikeLike
Even odds that the USA will splinter in the next 30 years. “Multicultural” only works if there is a ~70% majority culture and ~30% minority culture. When the majority culture dips below 50% balkanization will ensue.
In the USA, majority means “white/european” culture. It was what our nation was founded on and produced our governing institutions. It put a man on the moon. There’s are reasons non-european cultures have been unable to achieve modern greatness without importing western technology and know-how.
The race wars and “gimme dat” politician pandering will rip us apart.
Singapore is a multiracial society — ethnic Chinese, Malay, Indian. There were race riots there in the 60s. Part of the reason that the Singapore govt is authoritarian is to use a strong hand to keep a lid on friction between races.
From a Lee Kuan Yew interview:
Mr. Lee: Why should I be against democracy? The British came here, never gave me democracy, except when they were about to leave. But I cannot run my system based on their rules. I have to amend it to fit my people’s position. In multiracial societies, you don’t vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion. Supposing I’d run their system here, Malays would vote for Muslims, Indians would vote for Indians, Chinese would vote for Chinese. I would have a constant clash in my Parliament which cannot be resolved because the Chinese majority would always overrule them. So I found a formula that changes that…
SPIEGEL: … and that turned Singapore de facto into a one party state.
Full interview here: http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/spiegel-interview-with-singapore-s-lee-kuan-yew-it-s-stupid-to-be-afraid-a-369128.html
White western nations will go down in history as the first successful cultures to dilute and ultimately immolate themselves through mass immigration of lesser cultures.
It can’t be stopped.
LikeLike
3. Playfulness is twat crack.
Told a girl I am reeling in that, for our next date, she should “wear pretty underwear for me.”
She has been lighting up my phone with everything from mock offense (at first) to asking what I might like….
Sometimes, the Hamster is your friend….
LikeLike
Most droll… and as meme worthy a phrase as there ever was.
Well-played, sir.
LikeLike
Was just watching the local Detroit news (about 1 and 1/2 hour drive from City) and saw this.
http://www.wxyz.com/news/region/detroit/flickering-flashing-blinking-new-detroit-lights-arent-working-right-lighting-authority-to-fix
The vibrancy is so intense its overloading the street lights.
LikeLike
“13. Women don’t care about your job. What women care about is an emotional connection. (Score another one for game.)”
All things being equal, women DO care about your job, particularly how much your job enables you to earn and provide for them.
What they don’t care about is you talking about your job when you should be talking about them or creating an “emotional connection”.
It sound like another bullshit survey with bullshit responses.
LikeLike
“All things being equal, women DO care about your job, particularly how much your job enables you to earn and provide for them.”
This can be circumvented by disqualifying yourself as a potential Provider so they classify you as only a Lover and disregard your ability to earn and provide for them.
I have fuckbuddies from years back that I’m still in touch with who still have no idea what I do for work lol If I get cornered into job talk, I just make up a fake vague boring sounding job and change conversation threads ASAP.
LikeLike
YR, outstanding advice here. Also, the less they know about you, the more you retain that whole Count-Dracula/Incubus/Dark-Lord mysterious stranger night visitor vibe, which means TINGLES! Whereas the more they know about you, the more you become BORING!, which in turn means friend-zoned Dry Vag. Always remember that chicks loathe and despise BORING! uber alles.
LikeLike
@ya really i know you hate me lol.
But I agree. The thing is what if you have a good paying career and get serious with a girl there seems to be know way around getting boxed into that job “label” and therefore provider almost. I guess it’s not necessarily a bad thing but do you know what I’m saying
LikeLike
Typos everyone my b
LikeLike
Even if you are wealthy, you don’t want her to get that hook into you. If she sees you as an atm, the jig is up.
LikeLike
All things being equal women care about any little quirk you can think of. All things are NEVER, EVER equal, which is why having a hypothetical thought process like this is counter-productive.
That being said….women only care about your job in the same way YOU care about your job. If YOU treat it like a way to make money, then SHE will think of it as a way you (and then she) can get money. If YOU treat it like some badass ‘I’m a goddamned hero saving the world’ situation (even if it’s WOW or whatever) she’ll get into it like that too.
And then I just set a frame of ‘ya I don’t want a sponge, I want someone who can add to my life, etc.’ which has them pre-emptively saying shit like ‘I’ll pay for…’ or ‘my treat,’ etc. It’s all about the frame. If she wants your approval and you set out the terms, it’s easy.
LikeLike
“That being said….women only care about your job in the same way YOU care about your job. If YOU treat it like a way to make money, then SHE will think of it as a way you (and then she) can get money. If YOU treat it like some badass ‘I’m a goddamned hero saving the world’ situation (even if it’s WOW or whatever) she’ll get into it like that too.”
well said, if you’ve handled yourself properly…with the right kind of woman, she can actually be a great asset to your career.
the saying…behind every great man, is a great woman is around for a reason.
having the love and support of a women who essentially acts like an every day personal cheerleader can make a huge difference in your life. and many women are eager to find a man who they admire and respect enough to be that kind of cheerleader for. it’s part of their nature.
obviously, there are still the gold digging, needy types who only want a man for what he can give her but there are women who can be just as excited about your career and your successes as you are. they are truly an asset if you can play it right.
LikeLike
“The CH take: If genes are found which dispose to violent criminality, nothing should change in the realm of jurisprudence.” They’ve already been found. Those with the dread xy chromosome malady commit most of the crimes. Wait till the liberals push that excuse, and the feminists figure out that males will wind up with a get out of jail free card. No, the politicians would never advocate it, but smart defense lawyers surely would.
LikeLike
[…] The Wickedest Links | Chateau Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Honest to God, one of the reasons I became a serial entrepreneur is so I could afford to never have to do Charlie Work around the house again. Why do I want to waste my life scrubbing toilets when I can pay someone else to do it?
I can see why men would feel dissatisfied with it even over and above the “gender role expectations” aka natural order. It’s a waste of fucking time. My girlfriend happily does the household chores and I bust my ass in the yard because I happen to like working outside and with my hands. Stop living your life for other people’s expectations and especially stop living for society’s.
LikeLike
As a kid, I was forced to do the chores of a woman, e.g., wash dishes, vacuum ect… When I have a son I won’t subject him to the embarrassment. It’s yard work for him.
LikeLike
I challenge you to find one woman under 30 who’s not massively tatted up.
LikeLike
Come to Asia. This isn’t even mildly difficult here.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Had a bizarre dream the other night. I applied some ointment to my one stupid-ass tattoo. Later realized it had disappeared! But then later enlarged fragments of it would emerge on different parts of my body, finally a big one on my forehead. Maybe because I have been doing a lot of graphics processing at my Encorpera gig. I awoke in a cold sweat and got up to urinate. Reminded me of that old Gahan Wilson cartoon of the guy in the doctor’s office with an outbreak of “smiley faces” all over his body.
LikeLike
Holy shit.
LikeLike
Hello!
LikeLike
Hey!
LikeLike
Post a full body pic and surrender yourself to the readership’s ruthless appraisal.
LikeLike
There are plenty. What you should have said is “I challenge you to find even one woman under 30 who had zero tattoos.” Now there’s a challenge
LikeLike
Hello!
LikeLike
You can say that (1) you’re a woman, (2) you’re under 30, and (3) you have zero tattoos, but none of those are testable hypotheses unless…
amyisreallyatattedupdudeover30@gmail.com
And yes, I did create that email account just now.
LikeLike
CH should opine on The League online dating app. Hamsters be spinnin
LikeLike
Random question but how should I respond to women I know who badmouth slim/short guys etc, considering I’m slim and 5’8″ myself. It seems a bit disrespectful. I tend not to react in any way.
LikeLike
Have you seen the new HBO show Togetherness? I tuned in cautiously, expecting the same kind of bland, suburban tripe you might find on network TV. I was wrong. Through a red pill lens, this show is amazingly honest. This week’s episode had wall victim Tina (played by Amanda Peet) crying SOBBING tears as she decided she had to settle for betaboy provider Larry. On the shoulder of former orbiter, Alex, no less. Seeing Alex wise up to Tina’s hypergamy early on in the season was crucial to his character development. Head of the house, Brett, started out causing his wife’s vaginal dryness with his predictable beta ways and had her fantasizing about some neighborhood dude until he unintentionally kicked in some dread game this week. It’s worth watching.
LikeLike
SPOILERS:
Claire spends entire life acting like a man, winds up unhappy, then blames the man that got her to the White House because “she’s been under his thumb” for too long. Then storms out seeking happiness to act even more like a man. Absurd.
My hope for next season is less man-jawed Zach morris lookalike, more hot young interns from South Carolina.
LikeLike
You better hope those interns are not young guys.
LikeLike
Fincher has ‘Fight Club’, ‘Gone Girl’ and ‘House of Cards’ to his resume. All films that have are very interesting portraits of American psycho chicks or a reaction to these psycho chicks.
‘Gone Girl’ was a great film. Shows all the white knighting of society by an extreme BDD woman. How they are out for blood for some guy without knowing the all of the full circumstances surrounding her disappearance and how they gloss over his inconsistences when she suddenly reappears.
‘Fight Club’, movie speaks for itself.
‘House of Cards’. All the women in the show are basically self absorbed ball busting femicunts that are a liability due to their inevitable emotional outbursts with Claire being the worst of the bunch. She is basically the source of all of Frank’s issues. Also it shows how even THE apex alpha can be undone by acting like a beta in his relationship concerning women. Think about how he played Zoe Barnes vs. how Claire pretty much ruins his ambitions. Think about the different frames that he has in those respective relationships.
LikeLike
Claire royally fucks up every political situation barring campaigning the whole season.
Also, if you read the fan feedback, they consider it the worst season and the reasons are all over the place. I think the reason why is that they are being shoved red pill dynamics of the femicunt that grows ever increasing upset by her should be ultra alpha because he behaves in uber beta fashion to her.
I thought the season as awesome. David Fincher has really redeemed himself from the horrible feminist revenge fantasy of the ‘Girl with Dragon Tattoo’ with ‘Gone Girl’ and ‘House of Cards’.
LikeLike
They’re all feminist garbage. Fincher has a daughter, and he has tickets to sell. Dads with daughters are weak. He just likes to get off on filming actresses play sadistic women. He likes sadism in general. What a waste of talent. He could’ve achieved more during a decent time. Instead, he’s filming about grotesque subjects. The older I get, the more I’m disappointed by his toe-dipping in the red pill well when he’s one of the few in position to dive right in.
LikeLike
Anon’s right… no woman left the theatre after seeing Gone Girl without feeling guilty pleasure… and maybe I exaggerate by throwing in the “guilty”.
And no white man left the theatre any better off intellectually or spiritually.
And of course, the only smart man in the whole movie was the negro hotshot lawyer.
Red pill? No fucking way… Cathedral through and through, especially on the antiwhite male memes.
Those kind of feminist porn movies don’t wake up men to the sociopathy of women… they glorify it, much like the gals use to smile at Joan Collins of Dynasty and gush: “She is SUCH a bitch!”, all the while wanting to be that way themselves.
And don’t get me started on the nihilistic and homosexual-laden sublimity of Fight Club… we men of the West are so starved of true masculine metaphysics in popular culture that we grasp like grim death onto anything that sprinkles a bit of it atop the usual suspect garbage.
LikeLike
@OleGregShakingHisHeadEliot
That has to be your best post yet.
LikeLike
I relish the compliment… but I think I’ve done better. 😉
LikeLike
This just in:
https://thechive.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/daily-afternoon-randomness-49-photos-410.jpg?quality=94&strip=all
LikeLike
Re: DNA – mutation concern trolling
OTOH men in tight pants sitting at deskjobs with testicles baking at 2-3-4 degrees higher than they should be at CANNOT be good for DNA replication accuracy.
oink
LikeLike
Has nothing to do with DNA replication accuracy or mutation frequency. Has everything, though, to do with sperm maturation and health. It’s bad but for a different reason than DNA damage.
LikeLike
‘Merica… why pussified left/libtards want to ban M855 Ball for civilians.
LikeLike
I really thought this article was going to be about SAPE…
LikeLike
CH,
_SCIENCE_ on why men like curvy women —
“Why Kim Kardashian’s booty is so attractive: Men prefer women with curved spines as it suggests they are better at FORAGING for food”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2979043/Why-Kim-Kardashian-s-booty-attractive-Men-prefer-women-curved-spines-suggests-better-FORAGING-food.html
And more feminists cried.
LikeLike
I dunno if the curved spine makes her better at foraging for food…
… I say it just gives us a better angle to sneak up behind and give her the business WHILE she’s bending over picking berries.
LikeLike
And on that subject, Ms. K seems quite adept at foraging for more than food.
LikeLike
CH,
Men are not looking for fat/big booty’s, they are looking for curved spines that reflect better female hunter-gather survival traits while pregnant.
This a _Universal and Objective_ bio-mechanical marker of female attractiveness to men.
See —
Evolution and Human Behavior
Available online 7 February 2015
“Lumbar curvature: a previously undiscovered standard of attractiveness”
David M.G. Lewisa, , ,
Eric M. Russellb, 1,
Laith Al-Shawafc, d, 1,
David M. Bussd
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513815000185
Abstract
This paper reports independent studies supporting the proposal that human standards of attractiveness reflect the output of psychological adaptations to detect fitness-relevant traits. We tested novel a priori hypotheses based on an adaptive problem uniquely faced by ancestral hominin females: a forward-shifted center of mass during pregnancy. The hominin female spine possesses evolved morphology to deal with this adaptive challenge: wedging in the third-to-last lumbar vertebra.
Among ancestral women, vertebral wedging would have minimized the net fitness threats posed by hypolordosis and hyperlordosis, thereby creating selective pressures on men to prefer such women as mates.
On this basis, we hypothesized that men possess evolved mate preferences for women with this theoretically optimal angle of lumbar curvature.
In Study 1, as hypothesized, men’s attraction toward women increased as women’s lumbar curvature approached this angle. However, vertebral wedging and buttock mass can both influence lumbar curvature.
Study 2 thus employed a forced-choice paradigm in which men selected the most attractive woman among models exhibiting the same lumbar curvature, but for different morphological reasons.
Men again tended to prefer women exhibiting cues to a degree of vertebral wedging closer to optimum. This included preferring women whose lumbar curvature specifically reflected vertebral wedging rather than buttock mass.
These findings reveal novel, theoretically anchored, and previously undiscovered standards of attractiveness.
LikeLike
[…] 1. A gene for brain size is discovered and it’s only found in humans… and in Neanderthals. If you think we’re getting very close to a total refutation of the 20th Century liberal equalist faith, you’re right. […]
LikeLike