• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Spot The Beta Male
Is Your Father Smarter Than Your Mother? »

The Exile Of White Men, As Seen Through A Courthouse Waiting Room

March 25, 2015 by CH

Reader Mel Gibson remarks on one of those subtle changes in white homelands that herald the inglorious end,

I recently spent some time in the waiting area of the state clerk of court. Hung on the walls were 10 pictures of the classes of the local bar association, dating back to 1900. Each class member had his own picture – essentially in mugshot format with a name caption.

The photo of the 1900 class was obviously all white males, many of whom had well-kept beards and healthy, thin faces. I saw one fat guy out of the ~100. Each had a determined look on his face, looking off into the distance. [ed: APLHA] There wasn’t a single smile. [SUPERALPHA]

The first woman showed up in the 1920-ish class. Two more appeared in the 40s and 50s. Most of the men kept the distracted look, while some looked directly into the camera. I saw a few smirks and upward-curled lips, but no teeth-bearing grins.

I didn’t see classes from the 60s or 70s, but by the 1980s picture I noticed some major changes. There were more women and some blacks. (Aside: Look, if these women and blacks earned their way into their profession and this association, then props to them.). The larger trend I noticed was that the white males were losing their beards, losing their hair, getting fatter, and not only smiling more, but larger like chimps who just earned a banana from the zookeeper. By the class of 2000, well, you know where this is going… all of the above-mentioned traits, and they were looking directly into the camera. I shudder to think what the class of 2015 looks like.

Basically, in 10 pictures over 100 years, I saw the decline of the white male.

Ugliness in all forms is ascendent in America and the broader West. Beauty will return, though. Her restorative fire can’t be snuffed for long.

In the meantime, the class of 2015 photo will be a phalanx of ugly bulldykes and mystery meats glaring triumphantly, BradyBunchily, over the literal mugshots of one physically amorphic white manboob quisling crouched into the defensive pose, head buried in chest, smiling like an idiot through three pube-pocked chins, and one shell-shocked semi-discernable white man gritting his teeth, amicably trying at once to fit in with the wretched Shrikegeist and to project a tiny bit of whatever shred of pride he has left fermenting in his nads.

(You thought the title of this post would refer to some other social phenomenon related to courtrooms, didn’t you? Give yourself a ‘heh’.)

PS If you’re ever having your photo taken for a group picture, and especially if you’re a white man in this acrid culture, think of the illustrative CH Jumbotron Test. This test applies equally to the ebbs of courtship as well as the legacies left behind in courtrooms. Just ask yourself, before the picture is taken or the text is sent, “How will my pose or my words be perceived by women, by men I admire, and by future generations, including possibly my children and grandchildren?” If you can ask yourself this honestly, and you still pose like a beta chimp grinning for approval from your trashworld masters, you are a lost cause and best left in the remainder bin of discarded genes.

******

Commenter lllooooolllzzzzzllloooolll writes,

Hipster faggots are often seen imitating old photographs, even the “looking in the distance” pose. This is ironic faggotry, along with their faggot beards they use to store cum from their boyfriends,  for a mid morning snack.

Irony is the modern SWPL white man’s plausibly deniable safe space to play around with racial self-pride. It’s nauseating, yes, but also a sign of progress. Complete prostration is giving way to ironic detachment, and finally, if the CH oracles are right, the irony will become that most feared and fearsome white man state of mind…

Sincerity of self-belief.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Culture, Goodbye America, Misandry | 127 Comments

127 Responses

  1. on March 25, 2015 at 11:33 am The Exile Of White Men, As Seen Through A Courthouse Waiting Room | Manosphere.com

    […] The Exile Of White Men, As Seen Through A Courthouse Waiting Room […]

    LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 8:51 pm The Once and Future

      “APLHA”? The standards of this place have really gone downhill. Are you in the middle of a transition? (It’s about time.)

      And now this sissy attempt to censor me? I am disappoint. Very disappoint.

      LikeLike


  2. on March 25, 2015 at 11:35 am BigAl

    A collective exile and decline of the white male. Why does everyone seem like such a chump these days? Maybe it’s always been this way to an extent

    LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 12:19 pm Captain Obvious

      I was in a wedding party, in the 1990s, and for the big group photo, the photographer singled me out for not smiling: “Hey, you in the back row – SMILE!” In front of the entire dadgum wedding party. Already in the 1990s, the War Against Boys [who would become Men] had entered scorched-earth mode.

      LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 1:27 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

        When I was 9 my parents hired a professional photographer for a family portrait somewhere in rural CT. I thought the whole thing was gay, and, befitting my stubborn, contemptuous nature, refused to smile for it. The photographer kept cajoling and teasing me to get me to smile, but I refused. I quickly came to hate that prick. He ended up taking a bunch of pictures in which I could only manage an awkward smirk. Needless to say, I ruined the day for everyone, they informed me. Certainly the incident contributed to the growing rift and estrangement between me and my relatives which persists to this day. Just because I didn’t want to look like a grinning little idiot. Mofos.

        LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 1:27 pm JironGhrad

        I wore jeans and had a toothpick in my mouth when I went to my cousin’s wedding about 3 years ago. My dad commented, “if your goal was to prove you don’t give a shit, you’ve succeeded.” I kept it in for the family photo following. I should point out that my dad never swears, and skillfully taught me the art of the neg… without ever outright saying a word on the subject. Coming from him, that comment was like a diploma from alpha school.

        LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 8:03 pm WillBest

        I will smile for the wedding photographers out of respect for the hosts.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 5:14 am Anonymous

        I got married once. The photographer kept asking me to smile but I wouldn’t. Big shot photographer hired by my mother-in-law. After refusing to smile he asked my wife, “What’s up with him, he won’t smile?” Pissed off and even more determined not to smile, I walked away. I have a thin leatherbound book of beautiful photos with me not smiling. Must say i was a handsome devil. My then young and pretty wife beaming with pride with me looking bored with at best a slight smirk on my face. Hopefully my descendants will get it.

        LikeLike


  3. on March 25, 2015 at 11:50 am The Exile Of White Men, As Seen Through A Courthouse Waiting Room | Neoreactive

    […] The Exile Of White Men, As Seen Through A Courthouse Waiting Room […]

    LikeLike


  4. on March 25, 2015 at 11:50 am SuperFucker!

    Could also just mean that nowadays alpha males prefer to leave the boring, tedious civil housekeeping jobs to those who want them, namely up-and-comers, and head into more interesting, lucrative fields.

    LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 11:56 am llllooooolllzzzzzlllolll

      No. All old pictures feature men such as those described.

      LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 11:58 am SuperFucker!

        It is true. Most of them were raised on farms and served time in the military.

        LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 12:04 pm Greg Eliot

        The business of Life and making one’s way in the world was a lot more serious back then.

        LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 1:15 pm Sean Fielding

        The change from tight lips to toothy grin has long been attributed to the vastly improved state of public dentition compared to the daguerreotype era. Moderns want to show off their teeth.

        But I agree there’s much more to the big picture, eg that far-away look. Life was indeed more serious then, but opportunities abounded and risks were embraced. Especially for the striving classes, like lawyers. We are more likely to see their pictures, because for every one early photo of ditch-diggers, there were dozens of photos of the more affluent. Photography used to be complicated and expensive. Now it is essentially free – any land whale can broadcast her slut-walk selfie to her FB BFF’s instantly.

        But, perhaps in part from their relative rarity, it’s the pictures of ‘ditch-diggers’ that are most memorable. A woman just done breast-feeding her kid in a tent-home, eleven iron-workers on a beam, and best of all, bean-harvest Alpha man.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 4:22 am Hackett To Bits

        Look also at the gallery of US presidential portraits; these men are hard and without affect all the way through Truman in 1947 when the expressions start to creep in (Hoover has an expression but he gets an asterisk; he served 1929-1933, but his official portrait was painted years later in 1956; I doubt he was smiling much while his presidency was swirling down the tubes…).

        https://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/photogallery/official-portraits-us-presidents

        LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 12:03 pm greginaurora

      I think you could argue that Men are willing to fight for and uphold the Law, and what we have now in the West is less-than-Law. If a sniveling weasel can make an argument that lets a Judge FEEL good about robbing a Man of his wealth, or letting a criminal go free because JUSTICE, then there’s no point in standing up to fight for and defend the Law. What you would see in those photos would be the difference between Men who would fight for what was right, and the sniveling weasels who will argue for what they want.

      LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 1:15 pm Joe

        Where we went wrong was letting the Irish into the country, though you could make a decent case that everything south of, say, New Bedford, was pretty much a drastic error.

        LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 6:32 pm Glenbert

        Can’t entirely disagree with you Joe… although I wouldn’t exist, but that’s beside the point. The Irish have spent most of their time in this country as a force of socialist agitation. They were straight up SJWs in the 20s opposing everything native to the country. But now because they’ve finally managed to out bigot the English, no one seems to remember.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 12:19 pm Danindc

        The Irish were the fuckin Cops in all the big cities- they respected law and order. Still are to this day. And if you want to take it further but who fights all our stupid wars? scotch-Irish tough guys from the South. Not same exact demo but close. Yes, drunk and disorderly I’ll grant you that but it’s mostly been filtered out. Have to go a long way down list when assigning blame before you reach the Irish.

        LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 9:27 am Anonymous

      “civil housekeeping jobs” – nice

      LikeLike


  5. on March 25, 2015 at 11:56 am Anton Chigurh

    Cultural Marxist (Moral Relativist/post-modern/anti-white patriarchal) culture has dominated academia, from lower school through college, for so long–since the 1960s–that we are now in the 3rd or 5th generation of anti-white brainwashing culture. Academia forms the media. The media defines the vocabulary in which YOU can have the conversation. The entire vocabulary–the frame, to use a Red Pill term–is Liberal-Progressive/SJW.

    I came from that and I’m in my 40s. I took many years, many books, a lot of thinking and a lot of luck for me to break free, take the Red Pill, see the Matrix, and find Dark Enlightenment. I have very intelligent friends who will never lose their blindness–they will remain hopelessly Blue and will lose in the end. Most people don’t want to see it and will become enraged, and socially ostracize and shame you, for even mentioning it.

    It’ll take 2 or 3 more generations IF the Alt Right can start infiltrating academia NOW and planting the seeds of Traditional straight white culture pride. Don’t anybody get excited. The historical nation is gone. The white male faces on the walls, the stoic, proud patriarchs who built this country (and all of Western Civ), are the ghosts of a gone place.

    Speak out in praise of the Dead White Men, our forefathers, who created Western Civ, the Best Civ, at every chance. Build libraries with books by them (classics and modern). Use examples only from their frame when conversing about history and current events. Watch movies made by, about, and for, red-blooded straight white males. There aren’t many, but they are out there (good ones recently: “Mud”, “Joe”, “Interstellar”, “Rush”) which is why you have to seek them out. It all comes down to being someone who only promotes one type of culture: the one that is about you and for you and yours.

    If you don’t do it, no one will, because no one else is, and you can take that to the bank.

    [CH: GBFM tingled.

    but seriously, pro comment.]

    LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 12:11 pm PA

      “Don’t anybody get excited. The historical nation is gone.”

      Red pill knowledge takes you through stages similar to Kubler-Ross’s. Anger is one of your first responses, which you feel when you see that this has all berm a lie. I went through that after discovering Derb, AmRen, Sailer and Auster around 2003. You later go through despair when you understand how much has been destroyed and see little hope in the damage ever being repaired.

      You finally go through Acceptance stage. This is not resignation. It’s the exact opposite of it. You accept reality as it is and understand that there is no returning to the past — solution lies ahead; we get out by going through.

      LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 1:43 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

        For some men the final stage is the glorious Poolside stage, in which you lounge by the pool, cocktails in hand, working on your tan, making some money, telling the modern world to fuck off, a bevy of cuties always within cock’s reach.

        LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 2:44 pm Philomathean

        You finally go through Acceptance stage. This is not resignation. It’s the exact opposite of it.

        Indeed.

        Most of us Right minded White Men are introverted pessimists. We see an ugly world around us and some–as the late J. Bowden noted–hate the world they were born into.

        This is an ugly tendency to nurture as it gives way to unproductive buffoonery, e.g., nazi hobbyism, doom and gloom porn, Jew monomanias, ect.

        Acceptance buttressed by optimism provides a healthy frame In which to interpret the world we were born into.

        Matt King is a great example of this frame.

        LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 3:48 pm Anton Chigurh

        I’ve just started into the Acceptance phase actually–the Despair phase lasted a while for me as I had to rationally fight it out with every single argument playing Devil’s Advocate with myself.
        Wanted to respond because just like you, my Dark Enlightenment also began about 3 years ago with Derb and Sailer, but instead of Auster (never read, heard great things) for me it was Jim Goad. Shortly after I found Rollo and that, as they say, was that.

        LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 5:06 pm Shropshire Slasher

        The solutions that lie ahead are the same solutions that created Western Civilization in the first place.

        Crush your enemies.
        See them driven before you.
        Hear the lamentations of their women.

        We all know where we are in the cycle. As men no one is coming to do it for us. How long or how short the cycle is depends on the choices we make today, moment by moment, choice by choice.

        LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 8:04 pm King A

        It has never been about “returning to the past.” That is a product of the left or the “progressive” way of thinking, derived from the opposite of what they claim to stand for; i.e., We are for the future, therefore our conservative enemies must be for the past! This brand of simplistic sloganeering emphasizes how much they depend on crude historicism to make sense of their world. The left uses this phrase a lot: “The wrong side of history” — as though we are on an inexorable path to their utopia that no human being can stop. (Which derives from a bowdlerized Christian eschatology minus the Christ.)

        Read your Edmund Burke and his decisive interpretation of the French Revolution. Conservative doesn’t mean reconstructing the past, as if that were possible. Conservative means slowing the rate of upheaval so that we might better digest variable factors as a polity, which often takes longer than any single lifetime to see innovations stabilized.

        But a key to the left’s manner of thinking is impatience. “What do we want? JUSTICE! When do we want it? NOW!” or Marx’s comment on Feuerbach: “The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it” (emphasis original).

        Please, God, everyone just brush up your history. We haven’t taught history in our schools for half-a-century. We have taught narrative. We predetermine the story and then only analyze the past to praise or condemn figures for their congruity or incongruity with the party line.

        Conservatives return to the past for its wisdom. Ignoramuses regard history and philosophy as something akin to the cumulative knowledge project of, say, physics, where one “stands on the shoulders of giants.” To be born in a later age is by definition to be born wiser than those who came before.

        It’s such childish, ahistorical nonsense, though. Even the natural sciences do not speak such a clear narrative of progress. Conservatives understand the cycle of political cause and effect, best explained in Plato’s Republic. (cf. The “Kyklos” of the Five Regimes)

        If you are a proper student of history, you can see where we are on the wheel, turning ever so slowly, from precivil beginnings to ancient power politics to the invention of liberalism to the putrefaction of postmodern anomie to the return to barbarism. The ancients had it right, from the start. Politics should be the art of balancing the social humors, freedom vs security, unity vs diversity, upheaval vs stability, liberty vs authority.

        The conservative stands athwart the rush to speed the wheel, advocating whichever counterbalance being neglected. And for that reason we often look to the past for resources, for information on their trial-and-error, for lost ways that might correct present excesses. It is pragmatic above all, not a utopian nostalgia for what is gone and can never be recovered.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 8:07 pm Matt K

        It has never been about “returning to the past.” That is a product of the left or the “progressive” way of thinking, derived from the opposite of what they claim to stand for; i.e., We are for the future, therefore our conservative enemies must be for the past! This brand of simplistic sloganeering emphasizes how much they depend on crude historicism to make sense of their world. The left uses this phrase a lot: “The wrong side of history” — as though we are on an inexorable path to their utopia that no human being can stop. (Which derives from a bowdlerized Christian eschatology minus the Christ.)

        Read your Edmund Burke and his decisive interpretation of the French Revolution. Conservative doesn’t mean reconstructing the past, as if that were possible. Conservative means slowing the rate of upheaval so that we might better digest variable factors as a polity, which often takes longer than any single lifetime to see innovations stabilized.

        But a key to the left’s manner of thinking is impatience. “What do we want? JUSTICE! When do we want it? NOW!” or Marx’s comment on Feuerbach: “The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it” (emphasis original).

        Please, God, everyone just brush up your history. We haven’t taught history in our schools for half-a-century. We have taught narrative. We predetermine the story and then only analyze the past to praise or condemn figures for their congruity or incongruity with the party line.

        Conservatives return to the past for its wisdom. Ignoramuses regard history and philosophy as something akin to the cumulative knowledge project of, say, physics, where one “stands on the shoulders of giants.” To be born in a later age is by definition to be born wiser than those who came before.

        It’s such childish, ahistorical nonsense, though. Even the natural sciences do not speak such a clear narrative of progress. Conservatives understand the cycle of political cause and effect, best explained in Plato’s Republic. (cf. The “Kyklos” of the Five Regimes)

        If you are a proper student of history, you can see where we are on the wheel, turning ever so slowly, from precivil beginnings to ancient power politics to the invention of liberalism to the putrefaction of postmodern anomie to the return to barbarism. The ancients had it right, from the start. Politics should be the art of balancing the social humors, freedom vs security, unity vs diversity, upheaval vs stability, liberty vs authority.

        The conservative stands athwart the rush to speed the wheel, advocating whichever counterbalance being neglected. And for that reason we often look to the past for resources, for information on their trial-and-error, for lost ways that might correct present excesses. It is pragmatic above all, not a utopian nostalgia for what is gone and can never be recovered.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 8:47 pm The Once and Future

        Read your Edmund Burke and his decisive interpretation of the French Revolution. Conservative doesn’t mean reconstructing the past, as if that were possible. Conservative means slowing the rate of upheaval so that we might better digest variable factors as a polity, which often takes longer than any single lifetime to see innovations stabilized.

        But a key to the left’s manner of thinking is impatience. “What do we want? JUSTICE! When do we want it? NOW!” or Marx’s comment on Feuerbach: “The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it” (emphasis original).

        It has never been about “returning to the past.” That is a product of the left or the “progressive” way of thinking, derived from the opposite of what they claim to stand for; i.e., We are for the future, therefore our conservative enemies must be for the past! This brand of simplistic sloganeering emphasizes how much they depend on crude historicism to make sense of their world. The left uses this phrase a lot: “The wrong side of history” — as though we are on an inexorable path to their utopia that no human being can stop. (Which derives from a bowdlerized Christian eschatology minus the Christ.)

        Please, God, everyone just brush up your disinterested knowledge of the past. We haven’t taught history proper in our schools for half-a-century. We have taught narrative. We predetermine the story and then only analyze the past to praise or condemn figures for their congruity or incongruity with the party line.

        Conservatives return to the past for its wisdom. Ignoramuses regard history and philosophy as something akin to the cumulative knowledge project of, say, physics, where one “stands on the shoulders of giants.” To be born in a later age is by definition to be born wiser than those who came before.

        It’s such childish, ahistorical nonsense, though. Even the natural sciences do not speak such a clear narrative of progress. Conservatives understand the cycle of political cause and effect, best explained in Plato’s Republic. (cf. The “Kyklos” of the Five Regimes)

        If you are a proper student of history, you can see where we are on the wheel, turning ever so slowly, from precivil beginnings to ancient power politics to the invention of liberalism to the putrefaction of postmodern anomie to the return to barbarism. The ancients had it right, from the start. Politics should be the art of balancing the social humors, freedom vs security, unity vs diversity, upheaval vs stability, liberty vs authority.

        The conservative stands athwart the rush to speed the wheel, advocating whichever counterbalance being neglected. And for that reason we often look to the past for resources, for information on their trial-and-error, for lost ways that might correct present excesses. It is pragmatic above all, not a utopian nostalgia for what is gone and can never be recovered.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 8:58 pm The Once and Future

        I’d respond to your thoughtful but dreary outlook, but CH is trying out his manly “Moderation Game” on me.

        Suffice it to say, conservatives return to the past for its wisdom, not nostalgia or the absurd idea we can recreate a bygone ethos.

        Matt

        LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 12:17 pm Anonymous

      no

      The “best civ” ingloriously committed suicide in 1848. There is no one to redeem. we’ll (be) pull(ed) through, yet so as through fire.

      oink

      LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 12:28 pm greginaurora

        Could you elaborate? 1848 saw a vast array of revolutions, but I don’t see anything specific I would regard as the “best civ” coming to an end.

        LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 12:42 pm Captain Obvious

        1848 = ??? Emancipation of YKW in Russia? Emancipation of YKW in Germany? USA-Mexico war? Missouri-Maine Compromise? Charge of the Light Brigade?

        LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 1:45 pm Lichthof

        The best civ lost on the streets of Stalingrad

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 9:43 am Greg Eliot

        If memory serves, that’s when the Communist Manifesto was published… is that what you’re referencing?

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 1:16 pm CarpeOro

        Could place it earlier than 1848. Say 1832 or so when the idea of “positive government action” crept in to the US congress. Before that, there was a mindset of government as a necessary evil, not a “force for good”. It all goes downhill from there.

        LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 12:18 pm greginaurora

      I had a coworker recommend a TV series to me; can’t recall the name, but it was ancient Rome, near the frontier, fighting the “barbarians”.

      10 minutes in and they introduce one of the lead characters: a woman. A widely known and respected warrior woman assassin. The toughest, hardest, asskickingest special forces soldier in all of ancient Rome.

      So I turned it off. That was enough to tell me I had no interest in it.

      I’d like to see a list of good stuff. I don’t have time to screen everything out there, nor would I want to suffer through it all.

      I watched “Three Days of the Condor” last week, first time. Some of the assumptions made within were Lefty, others were more common sense. But the interaction with the Lead and the Woman was perfect. He stormed into her life, gave her tingles, she gave herself to him and helped him, then she went back to her safe Beta having finally had a little “fun”. She cheated without the slightest hesitation. His danger aroused her, and that was enough.

      Modern movies are mostly unwatchable.

      LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 1:44 pm Ayy Bola

        A few people over the past few months have recommended I watch Blacklist, as apparently it’s soooo great. Turns out I had already given in a shot during a late night Netflix run and couldn’t make it through even one episode. The domineering protag and her wimpy husband were too much for me. How are people not rejecting this garbage outright?

        LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 7:33 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

        @ Ayy Bola ~ Go on Netflix and check out the series ‘Peaky Blinders‘. Plenty of Alpha in this show. Plus, the blonde English actress Annabelle Wallis is fucking gorgeous.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 11:27 am Danindc

        You can always read. I’m working my way through Australian author Alan Moorehead- White Nile, Blue Nile etc. phenomenal. The English used to be such badasses

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 1:20 pm CarpeOro

        You need to dig into Chuck Heston’s oeuvre. “El Cid”, “Ben Hur”, “Agony and the Ecstasy”. A man being a man, women recognizing and appreciating it.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 5:01 pm Greg Eliot

        Ben Hur is easily one of the top five movies of all time…

        … almost anything Heston was in is worth watching, even the obscure stuff like The Warlord and Touch Of Evil.

        I’d also recommend a serious look at Once Upon A Time In The West as well, if we’re talking about all-time movies… to combat the cultural malaise. Much, much more than a mere “spaghetti” Western.

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2015 at 12:22 am Mean Mr. Mustard

        The British television series, Black Mirror has good portions of Red Pill goodness.
        Worth a look.

        LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 1:00 pm corvinus

      IF the Alt Right can start infiltrating academia NOW and planting the seeds of Traditional straight white culture pride.

      Leftoid dysgenia practically guarantees it happening.

      LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 1:04 pm corvinus

        “What is actually happening is that fertility is highly dysgenic by IQ for liberal men (for whom indeed, the smartest category of such men here – roughly IQ 115+ – about 50% leave no descendants); is slightly dysgenic for moderate men; and is slightly eugenic for conservative men.”

        LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 1:33 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

      Well said.

      My Viking beard and hussar mustache salute you.

      LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 3:43 pm Fugue

      Great speech. The kind that brings men to tears at a Toastmasters event for men. i know all conservative white men long for me the times of the past. Unfortunately for those that despair for it, things will never be the same. I do not agree that one has to be white to love and appreciate western civilization. Since many in the WASP world did not consider Greeks, Italians to be a part of that fabric. Most of what Western whites have for culture is a derivative of the former as far as government, law, society is concerned. Based on the teachings of Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates, just to name a few. Since I am not white perhaps I will never understand the genetic affinity. It is like being adopted, loved and given the best of care but not biological. I love things created by whites more than the whites love them themselves. As an American I felt compelled to learn everything I could about whites and western civilization. Some things were difficult to digest but ultimately the world would not be what it is if the Western Civilization never existed.

      To listen to your forefathers and relics of the past is wise but can be regressive if taken too literally and by not respecting time. Time is relative. Time has changed many a thing. You are really going to ignore 150 years because the last 150 years you don’t agree with it? So petty and vindictive. I would not ignore the past, never but I would not take it too literally. It is fair to say that perhaps some people back then had it wrong which time has proven but some things they had right. I think for someone in their mid 40’s you are quite naive. Not because of your apparent lack of vision but your stubbornness. To proclaim that those films you mentioned were made by and for whites is non sense. You have no idea of the film makers intentions so to say such a things is offensive not only to the film makers but to the non whites who enjoy their work/art. To assume the Nolan brothers, Matthew Mcconaughey, or Chris Hemsworth is pro-white is just completely misguided and an unfair assumption. You are blinded by whiteness corrupted by the mores of the past and no longer value the present. Your speech sounds like it is from the heart so I wont hold that against you.

      You are are free speak as you wish. I just got done reading “Thus spoke Zarathustra” and studying Beethoven’s Grosse Fuge op 133 score. I will be damned if someone tells me that I cannot love and appreciate these works because I am not white. Who are you are you tell me that? When I went to Vienna Austria, 3 years ago to visit the Beethoven and Mozart Museum as well as Zentralfriedhof where Beethoven, Brahms, Shubert, etc were buried. When I saw Beethoven’s grave I became overwhelmed with emotion and broke down. The man that inspired me my whole life to be the best musician I can be, was here, I was finally with him. It must have been a site to see. A black man crying tears at the sight of his musical fathers grave.

      All I am saying is don’t be stupid, don’t think that because someone is not white that they don’t love and appreciate western culture and civilization as much as you do, if not more. I mean if you want to debate Nietzsche, just drop the gloves..

      LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 9:20 am Erudite Knight

      Your 2nd paragraph is right on target man. It takes a lot of luck to be able to break free, and you need a lot of condition like to be free thinking to even have a chance.

      It indeed is painful some of my ‘smart’ friends are so hopelessly lost.

      LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 11:40 am Carlos Danger

      You know, the wierdness is mostly concentrated on the coasts. The old Confederacy is pretty much as it always was. And it’s less that the wierdness exists for me, but that it has become the ideal to be striven towards, the example to follow. This and the fact that the left cannot tell the truth are what disgust me about it the most.

      LikeLike


  6. on March 25, 2015 at 11:57 am llllooooolllzzzzzlllolll

    Btw, a man sshould only smile like a cunt in a picture to appease his horrible nagging mother and only so she doesnt have a nervous breakdown and feel like she failed in life because her children sont smile in pictures. Everyone else can get fucked.

    LikeLike


  7. on March 25, 2015 at 11:57 am PA

    Similar transition in fiction, Shawshank Redemption. From around the 1950s onward, Morgan Freeman’s character regularly appears before a parole board composed of stern white men. He shucks and jives and they repeatedly deny him parole. Then fast forward to modern times: Freeman dresses-down a weak-looking white parole board leader, calls him ‘boy’ and gets his parole.

    LikeLike


  8. on March 25, 2015 at 12:00 pm llllooooolllzzzzzlllolll

    Hipster faggots are often seen imitating old photographs, even the “looking in the distance” pose. This is ironic faggotry, along with their faggot beards they use to store cum from their boyfriends, for a mid morning snack.

    LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 12:04 pm greginaurora

      Ew.

      LikeLike


  9. on March 25, 2015 at 12:20 pm burke

    agree mostly, but a lot of the old formal poses came from painting and slow shutters necessary to gather the light to make a photo. not to say it doesn’t look more manly, and not to say today’s society isn’t a complete toilet.

    but i also think there’s a difference between a natural good humor and a contemporary dumbass

    LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 12:53 pm corvinus

      but i also think there’s a difference between a natural good humor and a contemporary dumbass

      For women: the difference between a pout and duckface.

      LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 1:26 pm Dan in ATL

      HAHAHAHA fuck, look at that

      LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 3:01 pm 88

      nicely said burke

      LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 5:10 pm Anonymous

      Gayface or ironic gayface? Its so hard to tell anymore.

      LikeLike


      • on March 25, 2015 at 11:19 pm VRW

        how about just flat out gay

        LikeLike


  10. on March 25, 2015 at 12:21 pm LondonCalling

    The British Lawyer, David Osbourne Q.C. has come under a tremendous amount of hostility from the Gyno-mob recently, for speaking out against the political pressure courts are coming under to secure more date-rape convictions, in a piece he entitled “She Was Gagging For It”…

    “For the past ten years or more, a politically driven agenda has been thrust down the throats of court users about the deplorably low percentage of rape allegations that lead to conviction, and successive governments have sought to do something about it. My considerable experience tells me that most of those accused of rape are acquitted, not simply as a result of the brilliance of my advocacy, but because the jury did not believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim did not consent, and that, at the end of the day, is the proper and only test to be applied.
    “.

    This kind of bravery from a member of the legal profession is all too rare and needs to be encouraged at every opportunity. So if any of you guys have a spare minute, check out his blog and leave a message of support in the comments.

    http://www.david-osborne.com/blog/?p=275#comment-3875

    LikeLike


  11. on March 25, 2015 at 12:34 pm elmer

    My dad was in the CIA in the early 1950s, on loan from the Air Force since he was fluent in Spanish and was able to pose as a Spaniard in postwar Germany. His official CIA portrait is priceless. Now career ladies are sporting the same serious horn-rims that he wore at that time. Also have a photo of him exiting a plane in Madrid with several other officers in natty civilian attire around 1957. Now Pops is distantly related to George C. Marshall, and looking at Marshall’s photo am compelled to say “Dad?” and expecting a lecture on how I am not getting any younger and need to get serious about finding a good job with a good company and staying there!

    LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 12:52 pm elmer

      LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 1:54 pm Joe

      I always thought of my dad and his war & business buddies as sort of untouchable, just totally together. I saw old photos and had the same sort of reaction.

      Only after I had been a professional soldier with some interesting experiences, and launched into my career, did he and a few of his buddies share that they were actually very impressed with me. My soldiering crap went beyond what they did (not entirely true in all senses, a couple of the WWII vets in the group saw the most horrendous shit there is in the Pacific, those guys didn’t talk much and my godfather only ever could cry when the subject came up) and they liked the looks of my then young civilian career. I was unsure but they also confessed that post-Korea, they were notorious boozehounds and skirt chasers, until they settled down into good jobs and marriages. We subsequently boozed a little and told lies and laughed a lot and I got to see the side of my dad that was still a kid even in his 60’s. Say what you will about war, guys who’ve been, if they’re willing to talk, can talk to each other about things they’d share with nobody else, even if they weren’t in adjacent foxholes or even the same war.

      It’s taken 15 years to digest that but what I take away from it is that very few people are really The Grownups You See in the Picture. Maybe some preternaturally mature people are born that way, the rest of us sort of grow into it. There’s no grownups, just us, so act like a fucking grownup, willya?

      The other thing (and this is a recent revelation thanks to some red pill thought) is that what the loss of manners and propriety and the stiff upper lip has done is it has removed a road map for the rest of us to become adults. My dad and his generation were coming up from blue collar roots mostly, but they had a path and knew every respectable man wore a suit, every lady worth marrying was reticent, and that once in that arrangement, a man settled down, provided, and only let his guard down with friends he respected.

      The loss of that framework makes it tougher for men to find their way, and it has absolutely destroyed women.

      You can be the Man in the Picture. In a way maybe you can be better than him because you’re having to choose it and work for it rather than just falling into it. Not saying it’s better this way; most of us would be better off if we didn’t have to think about the metaphysics of our life before living it and if we could just fall into a successful pattern. Just saying that the current situation does present an opportunity for tremendous growth. [He said, polishing the turd…]

      LikeLike


  12. on March 25, 2015 at 12:51 pm Bill

    Well at least men are now celebrating facial hair instead of everyone waxing their faces and nuts.

    LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 1:18 pm Tim

      No. These pricks have turned it into a lifestyle/sub-culture, and then attention-whore their face follicles.

      The exact opposite of manly behaviour.

      LikeLike


  13. on March 25, 2015 at 1:03 pm Stationarity

    I had 3 grand parents that all but refused to be photographed. And if they were, they gave the fuck you face.

    LikeLike


  14. on March 25, 2015 at 1:06 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

    Smiling for photos is way overrated. Don’t do it.

    Ever notice that hipster beards look odd, out-of-place, and pubic? Men who are under 6′ and who don’t lift should not be allowed to grow a beard.

    Manly Viking beard > hipster facial pubic mask

    LikeLike


  15. on March 25, 2015 at 1:21 pm Phillyastro

    Never before has a society had more young men with beards raised without the ability to change a tire or chop some firewood. I guess they’re too busy sipping their artisanal beer while listening to NPR.

    LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 4:51 pm 88

      speaking of chopping firewood. it apparently boosts testosterone more than sports or working out. not really surprised.

      http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2013/08/22/3830928.htm

      LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 9:49 am Erudite Knight

        Not more than working out, the test was soccer vs chopping wood. That’s essentially light cardio vs light weights.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 11:39 am Earl

        Go ambidextrous on that splitting maul.

        LikeLike


  16. on March 25, 2015 at 1:24 pm Dan in ATL

    I think we all are aware that there are alpha and beta ways to smile. Most men and all women know the difference between “I’m smiling because I’m having a great time striding through life, leaving a trail of excited vaginas in my wake” and “I’m smiling because I want everyone to know I’m a friendly non judgmental swell man who won’t force my masculinity on anyone!”

    LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 4:52 pm 88

      exactly

      LikeLike


  17. on March 25, 2015 at 1:28 pm Lazy Hero

    Emasculate enough White men society collapses. When enough White men have nothing left to lose society changes. From time immortal…

    LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 10:16 am James Blonde

      yo daddy was a bad ass but you be weak.

      LikeLike


  18. on March 25, 2015 at 1:39 pm Ronery No Mo

    From “Ratchet Mess Returns,” the vibrant version of “Goodbye America (in a photo)” we have…

    http://ratchetmessreturns.tumblr.com/post/113471498647/at-least-you-got-a-man-bitch-miss-me-with-that

    “He might beat me until I vomit blood n pass out, but at least I got a man! Unlike you hoes!”

    Or as Ragnar Redbeard put it in “Might is Right” all the fuck way back in 1890…

    “The best bid a man can make for the admiration of any woman (even the most pious) is a display of undaunted physical prowess… Even to be carried-off by force, is not repugnant to her feelings, if the “bold bad man” is in other respects acceptable. She pines to be “wooed and won” (or as it were) she likes to feel that she has been mastered, conquered, taken possession of – that the man who has stormed her heart is in all respects, a man among men.”

    LikeLike


  19. on March 25, 2015 at 1:54 pm Arbiter

    This reminds me of how judges in TV shows and movies are ALMOST ALWAYS non-Whites and women these days.

    In Boston Legal (with William Shatner), guess what judge was known as grumpy, angry, always obstructing the forces of good? The old White man.

    Anyone think this is a coincidence? Of course not. There is an episode of The Simpsons where Homer is arrested for showing downloaded movies in his own makeshift movie theater. The judge is a White man. In the end he holds a rousing speech in court, is freed, and the whole thing turns into a movie. In the movie version the judge is a Black woman.

    That is a subtle nod, a joke for those who understand it. Just like Krusty’s and the news anchor’s Jewishness.

    And while we’re on the subject:

    Ordinarily of course, the judge in the Simpsons is a Black man, who is one of the few sensible characters. Just like:

    –The Black doctor, often frowning at some stupidity said by a White character. He will only sometimes be shown in a slightly negative way, like making a cheerful comment about how much money he makes. But he is shown as being refined upper class, in contrast to various slobs like Homer and Lennie. He will frown at their stupidity at various social events but be too polite to say anything.

    –Homer’s Black co-worker Carl, always more intelligent than both Homer and the other co-worker, Lennie. Lennie is shown as practically being in love with Carl (sighing while looking at his picture that he carries around, etc). Carl is not shown humiliating himself in the same way.

    –The Black police officer. The White police chief Wiggum is an idiot, and the Black is constantly asking him “Um, chief, shouldn’t we be doing so-and-so?”, being the voice of reason, causing Wiggum to snap at him.

    –The homosexual Mr. Smithers, often the voice of reason in contrast to his capitalist boss. (An intelligent White man? But he is homosexual, so of course.)

    –Lisa Simpson, like her mother more intelligent than the two men in the family. Lisa is far more intelligent than her mother though, since Lisa is a leftist. This has been turned into more and more obvious propaganda in later seasons. Homer will say some stupid conservative comment (never providing the real conservative arguments), Lisa will correct him with leftist talking points, and he will ignore and belittle her while making an ass of himself. The viewer sees how the poor, intelligent leftist is mistreated by the conservative. Jokes at Lisa’s or other leftists’ expense are fewer and fewer, and always about how they are too boring, too intellectual, for the dumb White Americans to understand, so that’s why they lose to the evil conservatives. This is always the case with the “equal-opportunity hater” comedy: the Right is attacked for its views and evil intentions, while the Left is only attacked for personality, while its views are presented as being right.

    LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 3:50 pm Anton Chigurh

      This is Cultural Marxism 101. It infects every single level of mass popular culture.

      LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 5:01 pm elmer

      I am looking forward to the new TV drama featuring the “Special Forces Mom” who is trapped behind enemy lines and her harrowing journey to escape getting rogured by bands of Dindu warriors so she can make it back home to her kids and husband, who dutifully waits on the couch for her.

      LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 10:49 am Anton Chigurh

        Lol’ed, then puked, then lol’ed some more

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 11:45 am Danindc

        She’s tougher than any Navy SEAL. And the Dindus help her get back home- didn’t see that coming you racist. Turns out it was an evil corporation who set her up!! Corbin Bernsen plays the CEO. Sadly for her stay-at-home husband, she takes up with the tribal chieftain and they move to Georgetown to lobby for immigration amnesty. Starring Kristin Bell as “CJ” and Ice Cube as Chief Mbunga.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 4:56 pm Greg Eliot

        Droll… and don’t forget the side plot involving her mom, played by Cate Blanchard (or perhaps Kyra Sedgwick) who runs a soup kitchen for Holocaust survivors.

        LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 1:20 am Carlos Danger

      Stop watching this crap. I could never deconstruct the long term development of a TV show’s politics as you have here. Choose great books from the Western Canon as your forefathers did.

      LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 11:49 am Arbiter

        I have read a whole lot of classic literature, easily more than anyone else that I have ever known. There is still funny humor in the Simpsons, and I am immune to the propaganda.

        But when I watch something with my gf, it is always movies that I have downloaded or own on DVD, never anything on television. She doesn’t even own a TV, so it’s always at my place that we watch things. I have told her a great deal about propaganda in TV shows and movies by now, so I have done my part. The movies we watch are ones I have collected over the years, with an eye to having propaganda-free or mostly propaganda-free entertainment to provide.

        LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 11:32 am Danindc

      You shouldn’t watch any Simpsons episode made after 1999. This is known. Seasons 3-9 are the peak of comedy never to be equaled.

      LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 11:57 am Arbiter

        True, there were episodes written by Conan O’Brien for example that were funny. He was fond of “Americana”, classic things like the snake-oil salesman with his wide-brimmed hat. It was nice to see. Sometimes you get a glimpse of what Western movies and TV shows could have been like. I consider the Simpsons a good example of the degeneration, as they started out with some propaganda (intelligent Black characters, White slobs), but still with a lot of warmth, but it turns increasingly plastic in the last years. That is all of television.

        Truly, the 1990s was the last decade when you could find some sanity. I pity the kids who grow up after that decade, and I honestly believe that they must almost all be slightly insane. Like those growing up during the Cultural Revolution in China. They simply have nothing to compare with.

        They can read about politics online, of course. But culturally? Even those who read the right political websites often have … damaged spirits, for lack of a better word. I guess the antidote is to read classics, watch carefully vetted movies, and spend a lot of time in nature. In nature you see how certain laws are unchanging, can’t be turned on and off like neon lights.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 12:06 pm Danindc

        Yep Conan, Schwartzwelder, Jon Vitti, George Meyer all the best. I stopped watching in 2004 because it made me sick what they did to Homer. All new, unfunny writers with an agenda. You can’t let women in the writer’s room. Just ruins the vibe. Like listening to a woman play by play analyst. Does not compute…

        LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 12:07 pm corvinus

      Never underestimate the power of teevee in brainwashing people into vehemently denying that blacks and females could possibly be less intelligent than white men. Or even that the USA is 30-40% black.

      LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 12:23 pm Danindc

        It is always fun to ask people what % of the population is black? Jewish?

        East coast you’ll here 35 for blacks and 25 for Jewish. Results vary. But people are freakin clueless.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 4:51 pm Greg Eliot

        By TV alone, I would have guessed the US is at least 60% negro.

        The fact that it’s only about 13%, if we’re being told the truth, should serve to wake up a lot of the Dispossessed.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 4:52 pm Greg Eliot

        As far as the US being 3% Jewish, well… I’m with Mark Twain on that one.

        If memory serves, he said something along the lines of “Hogwash! I know that many myself.”

        LikeLike


  20. on March 25, 2015 at 2:41 pm Mork

    The reason men (and women) in early photos are never smiling is because early photographic media required very long exposure times. As a result, subjects needed to assume a pose they would be able to hold without movement for 10, 20, 30 seconds. Hence, unsmiling, staring off to the middle distance.

    [CH: yes, i’ve heard this before. what about post-modern photography trends? are men smiling more now than in, say, 1960?]

    LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 3:14 pm SC

      The other thing is that dentistry has gotten better. Neither of my parents ever had braces. It wasn’t a common thing to do back then whereas 50%-80% of my same-age peers got braces when they were teens.

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 2:48 am whatNEWS

      Long exposures and better dentistry explain a lot of the fixed pose in the past, but it was indeed also a case that a “hieratical”/”priestly” pose being considered more prestigious, when people of wealth usually inherited it and did not give a damn about being popular.

      The prevalence of grins and look-in-the-eye in photos is not due to betafication, but to the spread of confidence trickster attitudes: lawyers and other professions are all taught that the money is in being popular and thus salesmanship, and salesmanship is thought to require smiling a lot at the marks and making eye contact with them as an essential step to play the marks into confidence and then trick them.

      That is, the attitude has switched from “I don’t give a damn about my customers because they got to pay me tribute or rent or fees regardless” to “there is more competition among professionals and to shake down customers the most the best way is to confidence trick them”.

      The attitude is widespread enough that in other countries USA managers and professionals come across as obvious fake-grinners and fake-friendly and people marvel that such obvious fakeness seems to work on marks in the USA itself.

      LikeLike


  21. on March 25, 2015 at 3:14 pm peterike

    Men.

    http://www.shorpy.com/node/16927

    Men.

    http://www.shorpy.com/node/222

    Even boys.

    http://www.shorpy.com/node/5473

    [CH: i love that shorpy site. great historical photos.]

    LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 12:00 pm Arbiter

      Dignity.

      LikeLike


  22. on March 25, 2015 at 3:26 pm themanofmystery2

    I have found that the most productive attitude in today’s society is “I am who I am and fucking FUCK YOU.” Hostile glances and grit teeth that meet bullshit result in a swift backing down of the leftoid pussies, the hidden subtext being “If you confront me with that bullshit again, I’ll find you in the hospital and feed you your own shit through a tube.”

    Fearless refusal to kowtow to the hivemind influences and clever expose’ of their lies via realtime reductio ad absurdium in every situation where they come up is the only acceptable solution

    Total inexorable thought war, every day, every second, with quietly unshakable frame every moment to counter their own neverending drone of bullshit.

    LikeLike


  23. on March 25, 2015 at 3:29 pm The Exile Of White Men, As Seen Through A Courthouse Waiting Room | Reaction Times

    […] Source: Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  24. on March 25, 2015 at 4:00 pm martin

    It isn’t just the lawyers that this happened to. My experience has been that scientific or philosophical types have become absolutely repugnant people. You would be surprised what you can get used to and begin to think is normal. Only after see people for what they are do you notice that in the past were these proud, masculine, types that were working on issues in all the graduate departments and then now you see that they are either absurd Chinese or incredibly depressing “nerd” types.

    LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 1:43 pm CarpeOro

      Much of the scientific community has ceased to have meaningful connection with what they are supposed to do. That and the fact that engineers have always been a source of actual advances but are looked down on by the “credentialed” scientists today. Engineers have proof of their tests, scientists these days have stacks of “peer reviewed” bs, and quickly shout down “deniers of truth”. See anthropomorphic global warming as an example.

      LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 4:29 pm martin

        That is true, it has become political to some extent and as well it is tied to the interests of the university administrators. But that wasn’t what I meant, I will post two videos of examples of scientists in the past and presently. note the differences. The departments are completely taken over by people in the latter example, as you shall see. I find these people incredibly depressing to be around. I can only speculate why this has occurred. The first is Claude Shannon, a famous computer scientist and inventor of information theory.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 4:30 pm martin

        The second example is a presently famous computer scientist who, you might say, works in quantum information theory.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 4:31 pm martin

        note the differences in character, dress, and attitude.

        LikeLike


  25. on March 25, 2015 at 4:08 pm Loyalist

    In the vast bureaucracy where I work, I have become a rapidly disappearing article, as a white, English-speaking male.

    A new directory was just published for my division. Just under 200 people. It is:

    -72% female
    -about 33% non-white
    -white, English speaking men: 13.6% (I even included men who’ve immigrated from Europe)
    -remove the known gay males and normal “Canadian” men would be about 10% of the workforce.
    -management is overwhelmingly female

    That’s the future folks. Just like they want it.

    [CH: that’s the future, but not for long. collapse is written into the code.]

    LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 12:14 pm Arbiter

      That reminds me of Bahrain. The king/tyrant is a Sunni, lording it over a Shia majority, so he has imported Indians, Pakistanis, Sri Lankese to fill the police and military. The people live as if under an occupying force. They have “elections” but it’s meaningless. When they demonstrated for real democracy the police and military attacked them, and Saudi Arabia rolled in over the bridge with their tanks.

      This is the home of the U.S. ninth fleet. The U.S. said nothing when the pro-democracy demonstrators were crushed, beaten, jailed, with many losing their jobs, their careers destroyed. There was a wealthy Sunni man who joined the demonstrators, and he had everything taken from him, bankrupted. The U.S. once again showed it is not pro-democracy, just like in the propping up of dictators in Algeria (coup, abolished democracy), Tunisia, Egypt, etc etc.

      Well, it’s the same in the West, but people in Bahrain are surprised when they hear that. Imported voters to take away our right to vote for our own future. A bureaucratic, technical class of Indians and Asians. The Tribe at the top of the media, the Fed, “Homeland Security” and the like. Sure, Whites at every level too, but with no representation, keeping quiet because every room, every workplace is filled with hostiles, like Soviet political commissars keeping tabs on the officers.

      When the economy inevitably tanks, there will be armed gangs ready to attack middle-class demonstrators, just like the communists did in Allende’s Chile, and they will never be held accountable. That’s the lesson from Ferguson, from Black riots in London, from Black-Arab riots in Paris, Stockholm, etc. No wonder the establishment figures want to disarm the middle class while saying nothing about 1.4 million armed gang members. It fits perfectly into the whole.

      Too often people equate tyranny with dictatorship. Of course, the establishment heads want us to make that connection. But this is a refined, new type of tyranny that we have, not the crude historical kind that was easy to see, easy to point out. Most people fail to see a tyranny that has a thousand components instead of just one.

      LikeLike


  26. on March 25, 2015 at 4:35 pm ng85

    “Hipster faggots are often seen imitating old photographs, even the “looking in the distance” pose.”

    I live in Brooklyn, ironic hipster capitol of the world, and I see this shit all the time – Guys who were born in the 80’s or early 90’s dressing like their grandparents. The main “old-timey” things they utilize are fedoras, bowties, suspenders, and some type of facial hair. There are also the standard hipsters who dress like lumberjacks. It’s like they’re trying to regain the masculinity that they lack/has been shamed out of them by playing dress-up without doing any actual legwork to not be pansies.

    In NYC I also see a lot of “Mad Men” types. These are usually 20-somethings who dress up in vintage styles like those on the aforementioned show. Many of them also have Mad Men viewing and costume parties. But much like the bowtied lumberjacks I mentioned above, these guys are more Abe Drexler than Roger Sterling. They’re dressing the part without the alcoholism, smoking habits, and womanizing that happens on the show. At best they vape, drink a glass of scotch on Friday night to “unwind” (Remember, alcohol is scary to beta wimps), and they “womanize” with a fat slob girlfriend. Don Draper would be disappointed.

    LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 11:16 am Kyo

      True about the hipsters. I really admire my two grandfathers and bought a fedora about 10-15 years ago to go with the original ’50s one my 1927-born, Navy-serving, FBI-agent grandpa gave me. Used to wear them until the hipsters took over ad now I hardly ever do.

      LikeLike


  27. on March 25, 2015 at 4:54 pm Rider'sGhost

    This right here
    was pretty much the greatest photo of 2014.

    LikeLike


  28. on March 25, 2015 at 4:59 pm Rick250

    Key game.

    I have a friend whos late father used to own a logging company. He was quite the character and as an entrepreneur had his share of good times and bad.
    One time on a ferry boat, the crew advised him of some more new transport rules..handed down from the typical leftoid authorities in charge..more ridiculous nanny-state changes that would further hinder his business and time. After receiving the news in lecture form, he casually took his keys out of his pocket and tossed them overboard into the ocean and replied, “Fuck you too”. (Most of the cars were positioned behind him and his semi-truck fully loaded with old growth fir). He made the local newspaper among other things.lol.

    So, in keeping with his spirit ive collected a bunch of my old keys that are garbage and one of the next times i go out with one of the women im seeing ill create some drama for self-amusement.
    You know, like handing her the keys on a bridge and making sure she doesnt grab them right, “Here hold these for me while i take off my jacket.” FAIL
    “Oh great..you just screwed us..why did you drop them!?”
    Or, on a ferryboat ride, “That’s it..im going green..fuck this paying for gas and car insurance..im done.”
    (Toss them off into the water in front of her bugged out eyes).
    “Lets walk off..you coming?”

    LikeLike


  29. on March 25, 2015 at 6:04 pm PA

    Is there NOBODY in that young man’s life who told him that it was just a fucking song and that you NEVER grovel, especially if it’s before your implacable enemies?

    http://news.yahoo.com/disgraced-oklahoma-student-meet-rights-leaders-over-racist-180437674.html

    LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 10:57 am Anton Chigurh

      One by one, they all apologize, like pathetic worms. And every single time, the “offended” tear him up like sharks. The blacks don’t accept the apology, it is useless, and each and every time, the Bad Straight White Male debases and degrades himself for nothing. Little useless faggot.

      LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2015 at 12:02 pm corvinus

        One by one, they all apologize, like pathetic worms. And every single time, the “offended” tear him up like sharks.

        You’d think that people would figure out that apologizing just makes things worse.

        (shakin’ mah haid)

        LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 12:00 pm Danindc

      Agree for the most part. Thinking this could be a play- any publicity is good publicity. I’ll give speeches and prostrate myself but I’ll be well known and may get laid more often. It may even lead to a career as racial apologist poster boy for evil etc. either that or the kid just may be a faggot.

      LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 2:52 pm Zed, Lord of the Brutals

      I’m so very very very sssss….Aggghhhhh ….FUCK YOU!!!!”

      LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 4:49 pm Greg Eliot

      “Whoever doesn’t like my singing can see me outside.”

      LikeLike


  30. on March 25, 2015 at 6:25 pm Glenbert

    Holding all things equal (e.g. looking at the white males) I’d say this is more of a commentary on the decline of a sad profession. Lawyers used to be the pioneers and leaders in america. Today they are nothing more than risk averse hall monitors; nerds who suck at math.

    You want to see men with balls? Go to the sales floor.

    LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 1:53 pm CarpeOro

      The fact that “winning” has become the sole purpose of lawyers in court and that truth and justice have been subordinated to it tells you all you need to know. That a large portion of our ruling class comes from that profession merely seals the deal.

      LikeLike


  31. on March 25, 2015 at 7:09 pm no

    Notice how white racism is quasi-illegal in America but all other forms are ignored? See how in Oklahoma some immature frat boys, acting the way any frat would, are facing the wrath of the entire country? The effort is ridiculously overwhelming.

    LikeLike


  32. on March 25, 2015 at 7:11 pm Anonymous

    Which state was it?

    Remember America was 90% white back then

    How many people have become Multimillionaires and Billionaires in America since 1900? I’d wager a bet most of them are white(or of the tribe). No affirmative action quotas for the big money.

    Of The people who do make a LOT of money out of a career in law, how many are white? Are you representing corporations and rich dudes or are you state/court appointed to defend or prosecte teenage gangmembers with no money, or trivial civil cases?

    It’s like medicine here in the UK, sure there are plenty of women dentists and GPs and sure they get fairly good compensation for their work, and many of them perform to a fairly decent standard, but most of them work for the NHS. It’s the private surgeons, consultants, cardiologists etc who drive Ferrari’s and have the highest standards.

    In many respects they are both two or three tier professions, And men, particularly those of European origin, tend to still dominate where the stakes are highest. Partly due to greater competence, partly due to the fact that the highest bidders for healthcare and legal services are white or smart, and so prefer males of the higher races.

    LikeLike


  33. on March 25, 2015 at 8:57 pm trbowman

    Timely post for me, CH. We took our team photos a week ago and I made sure my chin was up and I didn’t smile. Power posture all fucking day.

    LikeLike


  34. on March 25, 2015 at 9:23 pm Anonymous

    So much for evolution.

    LikeLike


    • on March 25, 2015 at 9:36 pm Greg Eliot

      Evolution only occurs under natural conditions.

      LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2015 at 12:18 pm Arbiter

      “Survival of the fittest works when all races are fighting for their survival. Our race isn’t fighting; it is lying down and dying.”

      A virus can kill even the strongest man.

      LikeLike


  35. on March 26, 2015 at 3:18 am Daily Linkage – March 26, 2015 | The Dark Enlightenment

    […] The Exile Of White Men, As Seen Through A Courthouse Waiting Room | Chateau Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  36. on March 26, 2015 at 9:04 am Anonymous

    1848, bitchez!

    oink

    LikeLike


  37. on March 26, 2015 at 2:23 pm nevarD

    as if it wasnt enough, they are already one uping the smiling pose by doing open mouth smiles

    LikeLike


  38. on March 26, 2015 at 3:59 pm Experienced Father

    Don’t count white men as down and out quite yet.

    See the pics at the link below the headline:

    Good Samaritan grabs his gun and holds bank robber at gunpoint until police arrive

    The man stopped the robber outside of a Wells Fargo in Marietta, Georgia
    Man saw alleged robber present a ‘demand note’ to teller and followed him out
    Grabbed gun from his car and kept suspect on the ground until police came
    Robbery suspect Mark Katchem, 25, was charged with robbery by intimidation

    By Evan Bleier For Dailymail.com
    Published: 12:10 EST, 26 March 2015

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3013027/Man-uses-gun-stop-Georgia-bank-robber-Marietta-Wells-Fargo.html

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Lichthof on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    Amon Ra on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    Amon Ra on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    Amon Ra on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    Captain John Charity… on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    Dread Forman on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Captain John Charity… on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    boned on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    jOHN MOSBY on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    Bucky on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
  • Top Posts

    • Cesar Sayoc, "White Male" (& Deep State Updates)
    • Comment Of The Week: The Left's Cultural Reign Is Over
    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Tourette's Game
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
    • When The Jumbotron Test Is Crushed
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • "Conspiracy Theory" Conspiracy
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: