• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Council of Realtalkers Vindicated? Andreas Lubitz Was A Recent Convert To Islam And A Lovelorn Beta Male
Comment Of The Week: These Butts And Boobies Were Made For Gawking »

Heartiste Grand Unifying Theory Of Infantilization In Western Societies

March 28, 2015 by CH

In London, epicenter of European poz, there are adult baby parties. In Poland, sex change freaks run for office. And in New York, there is preschool for adults.

I have a grand unifying theory explaining the infantilization (and its cousin, androgynization) of late-stage secular Western societies.

In the not-terribly-distant past, 4K-8K years ago, at the dawn of agriculture, geneticists discovered that only 1 in 17 men got to reproduce. (Female hyperdrivegamy alert.)

17 men did it all for the nookie; only 1 in 17 men got the nookie. Now that’s a tough dating scene. Your negs had better be thermonuclear. Imagine a pickup convo from 5,000BC.

Man #16: You have nice eyes. Especially the left one.
Fertile Crescent Cutie: Where are your two bags of grain?
Man #16: I got your two grain bags right here, bish. Hoo-ah!

Agriculture allowed for the massive accumulation of material possessions by a few (lucky? gifted? both?) alpha males, which resulted in a lot of inequality among men and a lot of women deciding that fucking and bearing the children as a shared concubine of one bling-plastered alpha male was preferable to being the only wife of a doting beta male. But I’m sure somehow today’s feminists can twist this punishing reality into evidence that those 16 sexless ancestral men oppressed all those women sleeping with the town big man.

This tremendous reproductive skew caused a genetic bottleneck. Many men did not pass on their genes. We today are the product of a few male winners and their armies of adoring female fans from the fertile crescent long ago.

So what does this all have to do with modern Western infantilization? Hang tight. For the past few hundred years, maybe more, maybe less, the dating and reproductive scenes in white Western Europe and socially similar satellites have been mostly egalitarian. The age of the 1-in-17 Poonmaster was over. Many beta males got sex and a chance to leave a genetic legacy. Yeah, there was still cuckoldry, and plenty of betas likely had to endure the very special torments of the friendzone, but by and large humans had entered a new epoch marked by the inclusion of many more beta males into the sexytime folds.

So, for a long time after the close of the era of the big man, a lot of “lesser” men who would’ve failed in the 1-in-17 dating scene flourished in the 1-in-1 or 1-in-2 dating scenes, enough to change the water quality of future generations of the gene pool. Civilization arose with the rise of the beta male invested in a family and in a community of like-minded men who did not, for the most part, present a poaching threat to the individual beta family man. This was the Golden Age. Its blessings did not visit all parts of the world (*cough* congo *cough*).

Fast forward to 2015. Beta males aren’t just ascendent, they’re established. The charming jerkboy is the odd man out in advanced Western societies. The few “big men” who amass ungodly wealth are socially constrained from accumulating an equally ungodly number of loving legal concubines. Or they themselves are psychologically beta, and so despite their large fortunes accrued by leveraging mental talents particularly suited to modern economies, continue having trouble seducing women.

We have, succinctly, a beta male surplus. Beta males have been so successful that they have literally enriched not just themselves, like the big men of yore, but have taught women, who otherwise would be their rewards for fulfilling their male Darwinian directive, how to fish for themselves. Modern women benefit so greatly from beta male cleverness and largesse that they are self-supporting providers — Woman, Inc. — and accumulate their own stash of materialist goodies. The modern dating market, consequently, has ruptured. Self-sufficiency has freed women to more hotly pursue the dark side of their sex’s reproductive dichotomy — to pursue and fall in love with the charming cad with charming cad genes who makes them tingle even as they’re footing the full dinner bill for his company.

Generations of breeding for beta males with supercharged beta male characteristics has resulted in something akin to overbreeding among some breeds of dogs. What once was a useful animal, like the bulldog, has turned into a cartoon simulacrum of a dog. Now the breed can hardly run or breathe without splattering the walls in drool.

So it is with Western beta males, splattering the walls with their sperg sputum. They are overbred. Now the breed can hardly function in the dating scene. It needs help talking to women. It welcomes the leash. As a reflexive response to the stress of navigating a modern, mass secular society, some members of the beta male breed regress into the prenatal comforts of adult infantilization. If they personally haven’t regressed, they condone those who have and oppose those who would shame them into acting more masculine.

Some women regress, too. Modern women, after all, possess some of those super beta male genes as well.

Now times are starting to get tough. Diversity and globalization stress fractures are showing. That beta male surplus has become a liability, like an albatross hanging around the necks of suicidal Western nations. Reproductively culling some of these beta males used to be good for business during down times, from a culture-wide perspective. When all of them breed into an environment in flux, weird behavioral anomalies begin to manifest. Bronies. Trannies. Autists. The total societal embrace of gay marriage. Adult preschools. Diaper parties. Comic Con. New atheists. Manboobs. Male feminists. Amanjaw Marcuntte. SJWs. Bryan Caplan. Juggalos. Miscegenation cheerleading. Cuckold fetishists. Fat Walmartians.

Women have an instinct which influences their competing hindbrain desires for betas or alphas. This instinct, acting on the subconscious, pushes them away from beta males when beta males have outlived their usefulness, as I believe is currently the operating paradigm in decrepit first world open borders self-flagellating elite-infighting capitalist bazaars.

Psychological infantilization, essentially, is one of the processes by which the excess beta males in modern secular societies subconsciously “self-cull”. War and religious fanaticism are other methods of beta male self-culling, but the former has fallen into disrepute, and the latter, while on the upswing, isn’t yet the unconquerable force that will change the face of the West forever. (But it’s getting there.) Turning gay, in practice or in habit, is another way marginal beta males remove the worst pain of the sting of sexual rejection.

All this is to say….

Game can save lives civilizations.

PS A society overrun with too many breeding beta males can also produce men who go the opposite way and try to maximize signals of masculinity.

The busier and more crowded with males a society becomes, the more competition there is and the more flamboyant the badges are [i.e., hipster beards].

The modern male not only has to vie with hundreds of fellow males in the real world but has to stand out from potentially thousands of rivals online, so clean-shaven men [may] well be turning off women drawn to seemingly powerful men.

“When you live in a small group where everyone knows everyone because of repeated interactions, there is no need to signal quality and competitiveness via ornaments,” he said.

“In large groups where individuals are surrounded by strangers, we need a quick reliable tool to evaluate someone’s strength and quality, and that’s where these elaborate ornaments come in.

Bronies or try-hard hipsters. We truly live in a Gelded Age.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Culture, Globalization, Goodbye America, Ridiculousness, The Id Monster | 155 Comments

155 Responses

  1. on March 28, 2015 at 2:14 pm Heartiste Grand Unifying Theory Of Infantilization In Western Societies | Manosphere.com

    […] Heartiste Grand Unifying Theory Of Infantilization In Western Societies […]

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 3:04 pm da GBFM lzzzzzzzlzlz (TM)

      the fallacy in all this reasoning
      is that heartiste’s socalled “beta” civilizations
      where each man had the right to his wife
      and property
      kicked the shit out of and dominated those
      civilizations
      which didn’t.

      the GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN
      exalt the NATURAL RIGHTS
      above and beyond
      the gina a nd butt tinzgzlzlzozozozo
      above
      game

      Sir Isaac Newton and Jesus Christ and George Washington had no children.

      The greatest tragedy of the manosphere is that Sir Isaac Newton and Jesus Christ and George Washington, and the GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN, are considered betas.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 5:48 pm Heywood Jablome

        The greatest tragedy of the manosphere is that … Jesus Christ … and the GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN, are considered betas.

        Those who call Him a beta have the luxury of making such errors only until He returns.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 6:35 am Captain Obvious

        1-Man/1-Woman squares off against Big Man Rulez in cage match fight 2 da def:

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 6:51 am Captain Obvious

        Perverts like Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz and Joe Biden and Bill Clinton would like for Big Man Rulez to emerge from the ashes of what had been Western Civilization – Epstein & Dershowitz explicitly and consciously and intentionally, Biden & Clinton more implicitly and viscerally. The only purposeful and legitimate and noble use of Game, within the greater Dark Enlightenment, is to rekindle the fire of liberty in the hearts of the Betas and inspire them to relive the glory of their ancestors. At least as many Betas as we can recruit to The Cause.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 7:07 am David Flory

        Agree with GBFM. Monogamy was THE most powerful system ever devised for motivating the entire male population. Even a low status man had a stake in society when he could be the lord of his own household with his own women and children.

        “For the past few hundred years?” More like the past couple thousand at least. The Romans were monogamous, and so was medieval Europe. From what we know the Scandinavians were as well. The warrior nobility had better opportunities to reproduce, but it they were still restrained by the Church’s prohibition of divorce & the fact that only children born under wedlock could be legitimate heirs.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 29, 2015 at 7:28 am anon dudebro

        Another logical fallacy which comes to my mind is this:
        How can someone ascend from beta to alpha through learning game when alpha is supposed to be “genetic” instead of learned behavior? It’s not just a beta faking it, in the end he’ll make it to a “real” alpha (whatever that is).
        I’m not expecting a discussion over neuronal plasticity. there might be some rewiring and gene activation/supression going on, but that can’t be the whole truth.
        A bunch of beatas have clearly proved that it’s possible to ascend to the olymp of alphatude.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 1:43 pm earl

        ‘Those who call Him a beta have the luxury of making such errors only until He returns.’

        You’d think as many people who talk about them that they might just read what He did while on this Earth. There was nothing ‘beta’ about Jesus other than He followed the will of his Father. And as such he was greatly rewarded as the King of the Universe. What kingdom do these ‘alphas’ have today?

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 3:43 pm Suburban_elk

      The idea of scale from MPC was referenced in your last thread. I skimmed it and the takeaway is a bunch of useless rats sitting in the middle of their overcrowded living arrangements and not knowing their place.

      They never became the rats they mighta coulda shoulda been.

      Now to be obvious. Being men in this world. Basically the adults who never became the men they were wanted to be, are still with us, and for generations.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 4:19 pm Suburban_elk

        I did not mean to imply that anyone was a rat.

        But rats were the model for that idea of scale, or at least some its problems.

        Alrighty then the internet sux life sux. The River flows even now as you look at this.

        LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 8:08 am Ann Kellett

      The blog at anonymousconservative.com has lots of posts about this. Very interesting phenomenon.

      LikeLike


  2. on March 28, 2015 at 2:19 pm fredmertz

    pantyhose turns me on

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 2:50 pm Philomathean

      When you wear them?

      LikeLike


  3. on March 28, 2015 at 2:32 pm earl

    Taking God out of society reduces us all to infants.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 2:58 pm Arbiter

      You’re talking about the religion that demands that adult men cry their eyes out asking for forgiveness for “sins” from priests and imagined magical creatures? The religion that says the strong are bad and the weak are good? “The first shall be the last and the last shall be the first”, as if being “the first” is evil in itself? The religion that soothed the slaves and servants in the Roman Empire, winning their loyalty, by saying that it is good to not fight back? “Turn the other cheek!” “If a man wants your coat, give him your shirt too!”

      Hah. Hah. Socialism is built on the Christian slave morality. Europe was already in a proto-Marxist state thanks to the priesthood filth. (And yes, they were filthy; they refused to wash themselves as they declared that “the material world is evil!”) Whites conquered despite Xtianity, not because of it. The priests only agreed to conquest for as long as they could use it to spread their lies to new host populations. Once that was done they betrayed Whites, declaring that, as the bibble says, conquering is “evil” and Whites were evil therefore. That’s exactly how the church in South Africa worked, to pick one example. That’s the Xtian way of ingratiating itself with the new host populations. Disgusting. Churches and socialists worked together to destroy the West, and still do. Churches are not just passive in this, they very actively work for mass immigration.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 5:43 pm Greg Eliot

        And yet, when America was arguably at her “most Christian”… with the Bible being an integral part of everyone’s education, from toddler to scholar… and church being the absolute center of community… we conquered the North American continent from the proverbial “sea to shining sea”.

        Nowadays, wherein God has been driven out of society, ridiculed, challenged, scoffed at, and Mickey-Mouse warm-fuzzied into spew-inducing luke warmness, well… we have what you’re talking about.

        What’s wrong with this picture? Christianity… or the false “Christians” that the Bible itself predicts and warns us about as being one of the signs of the coming Apocalypse?

        You worship whatever gods or man-made isms you wish… me and my house are preparing the trumpets that will bring down the walls of Jericho.

        Glory to Jehovah and His will… glory to the Saviour, His son, Christ Jesus.

        The rest of you impious fairies can go hang.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 6:43 pm earl

        Oh Arbiter how I do enjoy your retorts.

        ‘You’re talking about the religion that demands that adult men cry their eyes out asking for forgiveness for “sins” from priests and imagined magical creatures?’

        They don’t demand you do it. They suggest you should go…but they don’t force you. And they don’t demand you cry your eyes out.

        ‘The religion that says the strong are bad and the weak are good?’

        It’s those who exalt themselves will be humbled and those who humble themselves will be exalted.

        “The first shall be the last and the last shall be the first”, as if being “the first” is evil in itself?’

        It is if you place yourself over God.

        ‘The religion that soothed the slaves and servants in the Roman Empire, winning their loyalty, by saying that it is good to not fight back? “Turn the other cheek!” “If a man wants your coat, give him your shirt too!”’

        Roman Empire turned Christian. Amazing the power that a good influence has.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 8:50 pm James Blonde

        athiest can only practice their craft among believers; they could never survive among their own kind.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 9:23 pm Mike

        Yes

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 9:24 pm Mike

        As in I agree with Arbiter.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 7:38 am Lichthof

        I am with Himmler and the SS on this. Christianity is a middle eastern religion which has been forced upon the West. It breeds weakness and is an early form of communism.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 7:55 am irishsavant

        ” they refused to wash themselves as they declared that “the material world is evil!”

        Well, only the Jansenists went that far, at least in post-Enlightenment times.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 12:42 pm Greg Eliot

        I am with Himmler and the SS on this. Christianity is a middle eastern religion which has been forced upon the West. It breeds weakness and is an early form of communism.

        And yet the communists called religion an opiate of the masses… something to be eradicated, which they tried their damnedest to do.

        Well, you’ve got Himmler and Marx on your side… now if the Devil would just get on board, the issue’s settled!

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 10:46 pm Bill Brasky

        Agree with Arbiter.

        Thought experiment: what could happen to a given european population after 2k years of worshipping magic jewish sky pimps?

        Wouldn’t they be a hopelessely infighting, demoralized bunch of infantile, materialistic, brainwashed mercantile cunts?

        Is the current situation in any way out of line with that basic framework?

        LikeLike


      • on March 30, 2015 at 9:40 am Greg Eliot

        Thought experiment: what could happen to a given european population after 2k years of worshipping magic jewish sky pimps?

        Avaunt, thou impious pseudo-intellect… get back to us when there’s actually any “thought” in your alleged thought experiments.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 8:57 pm chemtrails

      Well said, earl.

      Man has traded God for empty materialism and the pursuit of his own lusts that God did not condone. This has resulted in a negative feedback loop of dissatisfaction and disappointment, indulgent life perspectives, and indisputable moral decay. You cannot replace God with man-made creations and activities – they are not remotely up to the task.

      LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2015 at 12:22 am Squeal for me, gaytheists

      I love it when the neckbearded, gender-fluid, Fedora types can’t help themselves from pissing blood all over the internet when someone mentions God. And then they proceed to instruct us about the true origins and nature of our faith, as though they have anything beyond a passing familiarity with it. And what they think they know has been vomited directly into their mouth by soft-Marxist pedophiles trying to impress boys about how cool they are with evil, while the rest of the “masses” are so scared that they need the “opium” of religion. But we’re not like the others, Biter. Now take off your short-pants for me…

      And yes, they were filthy; they refused to wash themselves as they declared that “the material world is evil!”

      This neoplatonic gnosticism was declared a heresy from the earliest days of the church, you lightly-educated simpleton. Read the Bible, you won’t have to go past the first page to increase your knowledge a thousandfold of this most important primary source of western civilization: “And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good.”

      Thought experiment: what could happen to a given european population after 2k years of worshipping magic jewish sky pimps?

      It’s not just an experiment in thought. It’s the reality of your life today. Which also happens to correspond with the most productive, innovative, and powerful millennia of civilization in human history. And we happen to have a control group to compare against: Islam, who received all of the advantages of pagan Greek wisdom before middle-ages Europe, fed off the capital, and dissolved into the permanent barren shithole we still know them for, now 900 years and counting.

      Even if you think the ur-Europeans were destined to carry the ancient genius of Greece and Rome to its most fruitful manifestation, it was Christianity that forged and sustained the connection with our barbarian ancestors. Even Nietzsche, the patron of your borrowed thinking, was not so arrogant to the point of stupidity that he dismissed the power of the One God. He rather considered Christ the only adversary worthy of confronting. He knew how inextricable the church was to our unparalleled developed culture and identity, despite the fundamental flaws he saw.

      You know nothing beyond cereal-box summations penned by enemies of your race and culture. The knowledge of your origins would fit into a thimble.

      Matt

      LikeLike


  4. on March 28, 2015 at 2:34 pm noone

    http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2015/03/27/caught-on-camera-woman-brutally-attacked-with-skateboard-in-venice/

    #WhiteLivesMatter

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 8:34 pm Corvo

      #girlsdonthangoutwithblackmonkeysandbetacuckwiggers

      LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 12:28 am Anonymous

      “It’s hard to believe that no one stepped in,” said Lee. “It’s haunting. It’s really, really disturbing.”

      Since white people can only be the perpetrators of racial violence, never the victims, I guess the witnesses all figured they were just hallucinating.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 7:43 am The Tasteful Thickness

        Brilliant!

        LikeLike


  5. on March 28, 2015 at 2:34 pm corvinus

    I’m not sure beta male “genes” are at fault here, but upbringing. I have a lot of lesser betas / greater omegas in my own extended family, and some managed to get and stay married. Oddly enough, while their first sons almost always share their father’s low SMV, the second sons often end up quite alpha for some strange reason. I wonder if anybody else has noticed the “lesser-alpha second son of a lesser beta” phenomenon, because it appears to be an ironclad rule in my family. It’s ridiculous.

    The women in my extended family seem to gravitate toward regular betas. Possibly due to lack of opportunity in meeting an alpha, but none of them has dipped into lesser-beta territory.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 5:44 pm Robyd82

      My family, I’m fourth of five and second of the 3 boys, and yes, as second son I am the Alpha, while oldest boy is so beta its sickening. He is literally the family clown, his wife is the biggest shrew on the planet, just like my two oldest sisters, impossible children who, every time they open their mouth, prove why the are , truly, beneath man. Older beta brother, is so simpering its sad, one husband of a sister has be one same, other sisters husband won’t break but his wife, my sister, is DEFIANT and she is my dads favorite, my dad is as blue pill as they come !!!! All the woman in my family need one good pop in the mouth and then to be ordreed around for a while, it really is a simple fix. Then there is my little brother, my mom so babied him, as my dad had already retreated to the cult of Blessed Mommy mom was de facto in charge, and little brother, who is naturally weak is the “doctor” of physical therapy, the do goober, can do no wrong (in their eyes) but he is the stupid one who was simply babied. So yes beta men beget beta oldest sons and more impossible women. Im the natural alpha and the smartest, and was the whipping boy ?!?! You see the PERVERSION when woman don’t know their place and a beta, ( I despise beta men) can’t do the simplest task of putting a woman in her place. Imagine children that think they are equal to adults, a man who can’t quickly and simply handle that is to be scoured.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 12:06 am corvinus

        yes, as second son I am the Alpha, while oldest boy is so beta its sickening. He is literally the family clown, his wife is the biggest shrew on the planet, …

        Interesting.

        ne husband of a sister has be one same, other sisters husband won’t break but his wife, my sister, is DEFIANT and she is my dads favorite, my dad is as blue pill as they come !!!! All the woman in my family need one good pop in the mouth and then to be ordreed around for a while, it really is a simple fix.

        Unfortunately, my extended family has relatively few women, so I don’t have too many data points on female behavior based on the father’s or brothers’ SMV.

        Then there is my little brother, my mom so babied him,

        Yeah, sons after the first and second seem to end up either being just as beta as the first, or somewhere in between the first and second, but they are never as alpha as the second.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 6:12 pm Modern Primitive

      Now that you mention it I’ve seen the second alpha son thing in action with my own circle of friends as well.

      LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 1:38 pm Highwasp

      hmmm… I also see the ‘second son alpha’ tendency. I have (1) aunt and (4) uncles all of whom have 2 – 4 children each. (1) aunt and (2) uncles had two to three sons each – come to think of it – in each of these occasions the second son is the alpha. In the aunt’s case both the first AND second son are alpha.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 3:55 pm corvinus

        In the aunt’s case both the first AND second son are alpha.

        So, is the aunt’s husband an alpha?

        LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 1:55 pm WillBest

      A successful family leader will be beta. The patriarch is there to protect and provide for the family. This duty falls primarily to the first male born. The second son suffers no such constraints

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 3:54 pm corvinus

        A successful family leader will be beta.

        I don’t think that word means what you think it means.

        LikeLike


  6. on March 28, 2015 at 2:40 pm Heartiste Grand Unifying Theory Of Infantilization In Western Societies | Neoreactive

    […] By CH […]

    LikeLike


  7. on March 28, 2015 at 2:46 pm Jokah Macpherson

    Greg Cochran isn’t buying the 1 in 17 thing.

    [CH: jokah is referring to this cochran objection:
    https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2015/03/21/y-chromosome-crash/

    now that i’ve read it, it sounds like a valid counterargument. but, as cochran also wrote, the unlikelihood of 1-in-17 does not mean there were never times in history when there existed skewed reproductive ratios between men and women. so my theory is still in play, even if a bit attenuated by the revised numbers.]

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 3:42 pm Sean Fielding

      Definitely something was lost in translation from the original article to popular media. My guess is the mistake is thinking ‘only 1 in 17 males left Y-chromosome lineages that still exist today’ is the same as ‘only 1 in 17 males reproduced at all.’

      That’s not the same thing. You only have to go back about 250,000 years to get to Y-chromosome Adam, who left his Y-chromosome, somewhat altered, in every man alive today.

      Does that mean he was the only hunter in Africa at the time who had kids? No, it just means he was the only one whose Y-chromosome line didn’t eventually come to an end through an all-daughter family. Odds are some of his fellows had more offspring than he did. And their offspring, etc.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 7:21 am Captain Obvious

        > “the only hunter in Africa” Actually, Adam and Eve MIGHT have been in Galilee: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2015/01/29/skull-discovery-human-neanderthal/

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 3:45 pm Suburban_elk

      If the genetic evidence points to 1 in 17 males reproducing – i would guess that that is the long-term success rate of a genetic line from an individual of that age; as opposed to that an individual’s success rate toward the next generation.

      There is no way that small bands of people are going to allow for a 1 in 17 ratio. But again, perhaps the genetic line of 1 of 17 males from that age has survived.

      That question is real science and difficult math, and i am speaking out my ass! but the difference between long term genetic survival and short term, might be confusing.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 4:14 pm Sean Fielding

        Basically, you got it. Even speaking out of your ass, you know more than Demanda Morecunt.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 5:38 pm KP

        “There is no way that small bands of people are going to allow for a 1 in 17 ratio. ”

        Indeed there isn’t! That’s why CH referred that ratio to “the dawn of agriculture”… i.e. that time when our species moved beyond the “small band” as the largest unit of social organization.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 4:22 pm Sean Fielding

      CH: quite right – it doesn’t change your basic argument. The main point is that whatever the exact numbers, it’s likely that there’s a fairly early, despotic phase in agriculture when access of LSMV males to females for reproduction is significantly lower than it is among hunters, or within later-stage, more egalitarian, agriculture. Call it the birth of mass slavery.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 10:01 pm Anonymous

        In the early days of farming – there wasn’t enough hoes to go around.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 10:45 am Greg Eliot

        But up until around 1865, plenty o’ spades!

        LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 6:13 am Hugh Mann

      More like 1 in 2 ?

      http://denisdutton.com/baumeister.htm

      “Today’s human population is descended from twice as many women as men. I think this difference is the single most underappreciated fact about gender. To get that kind of difference, you had to have something like, throughout the entire history of the human race, maybe 80% of women but only 40% of men reproduced. “

      LikeLike


  8. on March 28, 2015 at 2:50 pm Anonymous

    i call bs on 1 in 17, it could be true if at least half of them died before scoring any.

    and way back then id guess an average male was way more alpha than today

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 3:33 pm corvinus

      Yeah, the 1 in 17 figure was most likely due to atrocious levels of child mortality.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 3:48 pm Sean Fielding

        No, it’s due to atrocious scientific literacy at Slate and WaPo.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 5:03 pm Days of Broken Arrows

        Yep. Along with that there was men dying young in battle. Also, a lot of men simply died young because there weren’t anti-biotics back then and if you were working outdoors and got an ear infection or deep wound that didn’t heal right (let’s say) you could really be screwed.

        Then there is the issue of women dying in childbirth, a major thing back then. That might mean men whose wives died birthing their first child are under-represented because their had a single genetic legacy as opposed to men whose wives birthed lots of kids.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 3:47 pm Wasted Days

      The other factor is that there was no such thing as rape. You took what you could get. Slippin’ one in while the master is out or asleep isn’t far fetched.

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 7:56 pm earl

      Yeah we don’t know if they mean 1 in 17 as far as all males or males that made it to adulthood…there are plenty of factors that could drive up the number.

      Women wouldn’t have as big a problem dying young because they don’t take the risks men do…so as such more of them could make it to adulthood and reproduce.

      LikeLike


  9. on March 28, 2015 at 3:01 pm Arbiter

    and a lot of women deciding that fucking and bearing the children as a shared concubine of one bling-plastered alpha male was preferable to being the only wife of a doting beta male

    More precisely, the strongest leader got the women. No pickup lines involved, women did not do the choosing.

    As for why homosexuality and other perversions are pushed today, that is entirely the work of the U.S. media owners and Hollywood. The Hollywood bosses have been working on this every single day for decades. Way back in the early 20th century they started by making race-mixing movies which they knew would lose money, but they made them any way to hammer in the message that Resistance Is Futile, slowly spreading the propaganda to a larger audience. It was not inevitable, it was not a function of our society, it was by design, done by a small cabal.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 3:03 pm Arbiter

      The strongest leader took the women, is what I meant. But I would say this is not difficult to see. No “live and let live” morality with “rights” had spread yet.

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 4:26 pm SimonWolfe

      Exactly. There was no game. The paleolithic analogue of the thermonuclear neg is the breaking of the skulls of your rivals. Encroaching on a dominant male’s territory and women was risky business in an era without medicine and antibiotics – even a scratch could turn septic and kill. A lot of ancient humans, as smart as us, would have considered the odds and would have preferred a life of celibate survival than to challenge the established order and risk a premature death.

      If there was game back then, it was the low value men colluding amongst themselves and the greediest of the females to work together to exchange food and resources in exchange for access to low rent cervixes.

      We’d call it beta provider game now, but it was game in the sense that it was a short cut/cheat code to game the system as it existed back then, by men who could not out muscle the big dogs of the pack.

      LikeLike


  10. on March 28, 2015 at 3:08 pm John

    I also question the 1 in 17 figure, but the point is made. The alpha back then couldn’t keep his eye on all of the women all of the time, so lesser males would “steal” sex whenever he wasn’t around (forcibly if necessary – the woman had no say in the matter). If the alpha tried to monopolize too many of the women, the other males, getting no sex, would become VERY angry and violent, despite their beta natures. (Hence modern day marriage/monogamy laws, which benefit men by allowing them to keep their wealth by letting lesser men have a mate). I suspect that as life expectancy increased and libido decreased, some men valued their wealth more than new young fresh poon.

    If the 1 in 17 figure is accurate, it’s important to remember that it’s a stat of actual reproduction, not sex. The alpha was having much more sex than the others. It’s also possible that the alpha had many of them pregnant and the underlings were having sex without impregnating the female.

    LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 9:19 am greginaurora

      Silverback gorillas, today, will exhibit behavior in which the beta males will fuck females not-in-heat, but only the Alpha fucks the females in heat.

      It’s not necessary that betas have no access to sex whatsoever for the theory to hold. It’s only necessary that ovulating women be unwilling to fuck losers during their monthly “heat”.

      Everyone can be fucking everyone all the time. If the ladies only get pregnant by the Alpha, then only the Alpha will be passing on his genes.

      LikeLike


    • on March 30, 2015 at 10:55 am Georgia Boy

      This one in 17 study is an excellent example of why polygamy should never be made legal again. Once you take the lid off and allow these creeps the incentive, they will make a serious try to bring back those days again. It’s happened before, and this time, there is a huge powerful spy surveillance state to give the men behind the controls all the tools they need to bully the betas into compliance. The polygamy lobby is starting now that the gay marriage battle is finishing up. We men need to fight it with all our strength … no to polygamy. I don’t care if it makes us beta to care about this, by definition most of us will be losers at this game, it’s best just not to go there. Most people will be made less happy, men and women.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


  11. on March 28, 2015 at 3:24 pm theasdgamer

    The article’s bs is in the population assumptions prior to 8K years ago.

    LikeLike


  12. on March 28, 2015 at 3:30 pm philip marblow

    Ubiquitous, free, unlimited access to terabytes of pr9n have made men choosier about girls, while welfare and work have made girls choosier about men.

    Given a choice between banging a plain-Jane 5 or spanking it while gazing at a hard 9, I’ll almost always take the virtual 9.

    When a girl is given a choice between an okay-looking man who makes the same money she does versus a great-looking man who excites her but who she thinks will not stick around after the bang, she knows Uncle Samantha FedGov has got her back in case she gets pregnant and can’t afford her child, so then she gets access to betabux without the daily horror of betafux.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 4:37 pm Ohiomega

      “Given a choice between banging a plain-Jane 5 or spanking it while gazing at a hard 9, I’ll almost always take the virtual 9.”

      Preach on, brother! I’m fat, unemployed for over a year, have little work experience, live in my mom’s basement at 28, and have never had sex for free. Even considering all that, I would never, ever deign to fuck a sub-7 even if she were begging to give it up with no strings attached. Our experience of value and status is relative, not absolute. I and every other pathetic omega with an Internet connection has seen vistas of peak-fertility feminine splendor that no king of a century, let alone a millennium, ago could even imagine, yet my status could not be lower, and said king’s could not have been higher.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


  13. on March 28, 2015 at 3:40 pm JayMan

    In the not-terribly-distant past, 4K-8K years ago, at the dawn of agriculture, geneticists discovered that only 1 in 17 men got to reproduce. (Female hyperdrivegamy alert.)

    17 men did it all for the nookie; only 1 in 17 men got the nookie. Now that’s a tough dating scene. Your negs had better be thermonuclear. Imagine a pickup convo from 5,000BC.

    No. That never happened:

    Y-chromosome crash | West Hunter

    Always check West Hunter. You never know if Cochran & Harpending have commented on some new crazy study.

    Civilization arose with the rise of the beta male invested in a family and in a community of like-minded men who did not, for the most part, present a poaching threat to the individual beta family man. This was the Golden Age. Its blessings did not visit all parts of the world (*cough* congo *cough*).

    Even in most of your modern “alpha” societies today, paternal investment is and has been high (i.e., most of the world outside the deep tropics – and by that, I mean mostly outside sub-Saharan Africa).

    And societies with pacified men aren’t always non-patriarchal (East Asia).

    LikeLike


  14. on March 28, 2015 at 3:56 pm James Blonde

    tl;dr

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 5:42 pm FuriousFerret

      What exactly does that comment prove?

      Why would you specifically go to someone’s blog to give tl;dr proclaiming your own idiocy as some sort badge of honor.

      tl;dr is usually reserved for forums when you click on a title and it’s a wall of text.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 5:52 pm Greg Eliot

        I don’t know about the rest of you, but I, for one, am shocked… shocked to learn… that our resident negro has a short attention span.

        The fact that the last few South Park generations display these sorts of things as your aptly-derided “badge of honor” merits less surprise and more (((shakin’ o’ de haid))).

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 6:16 pm Anonymous

        he’s a blonde

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 9:07 pm James Blonde

        if your theory takes that many words to reveal it, its not a good one.

        with enough epicycles and deferents i too can prove anything.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 11:50 pm corvinus

      tnb

      LikeLike


  15. on March 28, 2015 at 4:36 pm Col Nicholson

    O/T but anyone following the story of “rock star” librarian (don’t laugh) Joseph Murphy? Seems this guy got fucked with by a couple of SJWs but he counterattacked like a true fuckin’ boss, sued, won, and got a monetary judgement plus a sweet published apology. Of course he’ll never see a dime.

    http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2015/03/litigation/librarians-embroiled-in-lawsuit-alleging-sexual-harassment/#_

    Be sure and scroll down to the comment left by his step-father, it’s one of the best take-downs of all this harassment nonsense you’ll ever read and ought to be spread all over the m-sphere.

    Even Tom Leykis (!) jumped on the thread but they deleted his stuff in a hurry.

    LikeLike


  16. on March 28, 2015 at 4:45 pm martin

    So I think the hypothesis that the men who did breed back then were rich is suspect because it has an undertone of marxism, but women should look at that 1 to 17 ratio and know that their complaints about wage equality or whatever are silly compared to dying alone as most men have(in the past). But alternatively, a very high death ratio of men could do the same thing to cause that ratio, ie, lots of murdering. Another thing is I never liked the fully genetic explanations of all beliefs. It is plainly obvious that the invention of things like the television have changed the way people behave. I think the correlation between sjw’s and the twitter timeline does a lot to explain sjw’s, they are attention whores, as basically everyone is, but they were never taught to be civil. Ideas can go a long way to create new attitudes. We have never been rid of the idea of marxism since it was invented, it sinks in to everything, so once the idea was invented, the way people behaved changed. Not necessary to say that some genetic mutation caused a new sub population of people that took over.

    LikeLike


  17. on March 28, 2015 at 5:05 pm flies

    My biggest newbie problem right now about learning game is that: I fear of kissing the girl. I’m seriously convinced in my head (outside of the logical nothing bad can happen) that if I try to kiss a girl and she rejects me, she will start hating me and I won’t be able to continue.

    I’ve started to kino escalate to erogenous zones lately, like the thighs, but in my head, the kiss is way above that, even if I know it’s logically just a small step higher.

    I’ve missed some hard opportunities by escalating on her, but freezing, waiting, “hoping it will magically happen” when I had to make that move and lost the girl (like an “act now or never”).

    Anyone have any suggestions for improving about that escalation? That would help me a lot.

    LikeLike


  18. on March 28, 2015 at 5:13 pm Whence

    The ratio of alpha-to-beta males hasn’t changed nor are there more betas now. It’s a difference in quality between the modern beta male and those men of pas generations.

    I was leafing through the old photographs in our family genaology book. Picture after picture showed wirey, upright, stern-looking men with a mental toughness you could see in their eyes. Most had full heads of hair and mustaches, not just the young guys, but the older patriarches, too. Church-going. Hardworking. No nonense. Unapologetic.

    Contrast that with todays freaks masquerading as men.

    Great grandpa, I miss you.

    LikeLike


  19. on March 28, 2015 at 5:42 pm charles darwin

    Horrific land warfare, quasi genocide, was the reason for the astounding ratio.

    LikeLike


  20. on March 28, 2015 at 6:03 pm tomek77

    I would question the assumption that women are instinctively choosing the “best” genes. When I look around they seem to be choosing men who are TALL first and foremost, and have DARK TRIAD personality traits. Those are not indicators of “good genes”, unless you are living in a cave, and being chased by dinosaurs.

    To test the assumption that women choose the “best genes”, let’s look at Italy and Greece, as those two countries descend from the ancient Greek and Roman Empires, which are probably the only times in recorded history where advanced civilizations flourished and allowed women’s HYPERGAMY to express itself unconstrained, 2000 years ago.

    What do we see? Both Italy and Greece are completely dysfunctional shith0les, and they are the weakest countries in the European Union. Even more interesting, how would one describe Italian / Greek men? They are promiscuous, sweet talking but untrustworthy, loud, well-dressed and great in bed: does it sound like the stereotypical PUA description?

    Could it be that women’s unconstrained hypergamy, leads to a gene pool slanted towards typical PUA characteristics, and also slanted towards incompetence and inability to maintain a civilization? You decide, but it seems civilized countries exist where women have historically not been allowed to breed without adult (i.e. fatherly) supervision.

    LikeLike


  21. on March 28, 2015 at 6:05 pm NothingMan00

    Now I want to start a band called Stone Age Friend Zone

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 6:34 pm Suburban_elk

      Sign me up. It is all ok btw. Greg Brown.

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 6:37 pm Suburban_elk

      missed sorry again

      LikeLike


  22. on March 28, 2015 at 6:11 pm Heartiste Grand Unifying Theory Of Infantilization In Western Societies | Reaction Times

    […] Source: Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  23. on March 28, 2015 at 6:22 pm Fowler

    PART 1

    Having some …issues.. with a couple of my girlfriend’s “friends.” Could use some advice on how to proceed.

    The leader of her girl pack is a cold-hearted bitch, “reformed party girl” type who is now hanging out with a very beta orbiter (he’s a young doctor) who she calls her boyfriend. He’s moving out of state to live with her next year. Enough said.

    -The first time I went out to hang out with them, she said something to the extent like: “Successful night – everyone contributed” she went around the group and made jokes, finally when she got to me gave me an underhanded compliment “and you Fowler, for driving us home.” I just reverted to a half-smile followed by a halfhearted “charming….”

    Needless to say, I made it a mental point to avoid her from that point on, and not make a big deal out of her with my girlfriend but once every couple or months or so, there’s an almost inevitable meet up.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 6:24 pm Fowler

      PART 2

      – Most recently she asked me if I have instagram. She’s been trying to get my girlfriend to join instagram so she can “display her different angles.” My girlfriend’s kind of a nicegirl and isn’t really into that stuff. Well at least not yet but I don’t like the influence she has on my girl.

      I went thermo nuclear

      I gave her a squinty stare, paused.. paused…. paaauuused then said: “Do I LOOK like I have instagram.” She looked a bit off-put and confused, and I added “it’s kind of a chick thing.” Another chick in the group giggled nervously and agreed with me. I then said: “I’m not really thirsty for validation from online strangers, but when I get that itch, I’ll be sure to set up an account.”

      She put her hand to my face and didn’t talk to me the rest of the night. I think my girlfriend kind of liked it. I just need to know if I should continue going thermonuclear everytime she gets out of line or tone it down a bit, I don’t want to come off as defensive.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 8:03 pm Ronin

        paging Sgt. Whorefinder…

        paging Sgt. Whorefinder…

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 8:23 pm da GBFM lzzzzzzzlzlz (TM)

        instagram was invented
        to capitalize
        on the free butts and boobieszizi
        women were
        programmed
        to share with
        the world

        once upon a time
        civilization saw that
        a womenz buttz and boobz
        were for husband
        and that a girlz could not
        share her buttz and boobz
        with teh worldz
        as her father owuld not
        let her

        dat was long agaoznz

        lzozoo

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2015 at 8:57 pm Col Nicholson

        Put her hand to your face? No. If you don’t like this woman then she keeps her fucking hands to herself or at least away from your face.

        If you don’t want to come off as defensive then you’re going to have to start playing offense but in a non butt-hurt not angry way. Sounds like the pause + squinty stare worked but that signals annoyance which is not the way to go.
        Strike first but lightly. I suggest you begin to show amusement at her silliness. Next time she asks something like that just smile (a big one) and say “you are SUCH a ding-bat,” or some other harmless epithet.

        Like all advice given here everything depends on your personality, what you’re capable of and calibrating it right. You feel justified hostility to her passive-aggressive bullshit but this must be flipped to amusement. She’s being a brat-let her know.

        And just to underscore, you’d be amazed at the shit you can get away with saying if it’s done with the 1000-watt smile. You got one of those don’t you?

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 9:23 am Tam the Bam

        Congrats Fowler, you’ve just made an eternal foe of the worst kind; a (barely) closet lezzer, complete with betabucks beard.
        Ordered you to act chauffeur? In front of your GF? Boyfriend destroyed lol.
        Drive her to the fuckin woods.
        Put her hand to your face? Dafuq?
        Snap her middle finger back parallel to the carpals.
        “Your” girl has, regrettably, to be put to the extraordinary question.
        “Choose. Me, or the dyke?”

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 2:01 pm John Hostetler

        Mix it up. You’re instagram speech was excellent, so going forward you don’t nned to blow this bitch up every time you see her, any more than any player needs to neg a chick every chance he gets.

        My strategy is to always start with a neg, with every new chick I meet. In my opinion, the immediate and tangible benefits of a proper neg, ie an aggressive tease with the put-down as only one element in a more humorous whole, is THE best proof that game works. I have yet to neg a woman who hasn’t been more open with me and more interested in me from that moment on.

        After that first neg or two though, one should mix it up. Don’t let yourself be caught flat-footed trying to hit the perfect neg every time.

        Same with this pack leader, even if she’s not a target. Unpredictability is the essence of leading a hearty life. And women love it.

        LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 10:43 am Greg Eliot

      In all my own interactions and those I’ve witnessed, I can’t say that I’ve ever see anything good come out of a gathering of friends of whatever lady I was seeing at the time… wifey included.

      Women being what they are, seems like there are always far, far, FAR more opportunities for aggravation and conflict than any chance of karma-credits or making the kinds of impressions than redound favorably to one’s reputation.

      LikeLike


  24. on March 28, 2015 at 6:35 pm Suburban_elk

    Epic and good work.

    LikeLike


  25. on March 28, 2015 at 6:42 pm Bob Wallace

    Society got rid of these so-called Alphas through extensive executions.

    LikeLike


  26. on March 28, 2015 at 6:59 pm Mr Bigglesworth

    What is happening now – the full scale importation of physical alpha males from sub Saharan Africa – will unleash the best forces of Darwinism on Western populations. The “Western” male (aka “white”) must immediately up his game considerably, or he will not beat the competition. That means getting fit and becoming all-round alpha, or being totally out-competed..

    Regardless, even if “Western” men do get their act together, it is merely a rearguard action in a demographic battle that is already lost. Whites have no future. The future looks like Beyonce Knowles. As a white man, obviously it makes me feel saddened to think that 150 years from now, there will be very, very few people left who closely resemble me. But I also know that natural selection couldn’t give a sh*t about my hurt feelings.

    Anyway, none of us will be around to care – just as the Neanderthals never got to witness their own extinction. This article really hits the nail on the head. We have far too many beta and downright omega males in the West (I, pathetically, am one of them). We have become weak and ripe for replacement. The legions pale, flabby man-children must shape up now, to delay the innevitable for a few more generations.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 7:37 pm PA

      Whites have no future. The future looks like Beyonce Knowles.

      This is the troll adaptation to Real Talk I talked about earlier. The leftoids have no facts or argument, and they have no moral or coolness cachet, so any frontal rhetorical assaults or lecturing gets them laughed out of any comment thread. So they adapted by pretending they agree with us on race-realism and then they squirt their demoralization poison from under that cover.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 12:56 pm Mr Bigglesworth

        PA – I’m not actually a troll (life is way too short for that BS).

        I was making a genuine and totally irrefutable point about demographic shift. What I said about whites/Causasians is true – from Russia, to Australia, to Canada, the UK, Europe, USA. If what I’m saying is so obviously wrong, can you please provide an example of ONE nation on this planet, with an increasingly white population? Just one…

        [CH: Amish, if you consider a nation can exist within a “nation”.]

        I don’t know what you mean by “race realism”. I’m talking about “population realism” – and the numbers don’t lie. I am not a white nationalist – I don’t dilsike anyone based on their skin colour. But I’m sure as hell not a leftoid open borders nut job either.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 8:41 pm wow

      We need mandatory military service. Though probably half of the pop wouldnt get in because of medical issues and or background.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 10:16 am Ooga Booga

        Yeah, we need to fight for this awesome, diverse nation.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2015 at 11:06 pm Regular John

      You mean the black alpha males who depend on whitey for cradle to grave care? Get over your media induced cuckold fetish. White women won’t tolerate mud huts for long.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 8:51 am Skinner

        White girl bleed a lot. Then Darwinism reboots to the natural order. We need to breed out the altruism which has developed in caucasian circles.

        LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 5:14 am PA

      Comment was eaten, short version: leftoids adapt by agreeing with race-realism and then propagating fatalism from under that cover.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 10:30 am Greg Eliot

        Good catch… it’s a subtle tactic by the usual suspects… admittedly, a marked improvement over the tired ol’ overt Cathedral shaming language.

        LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 9:30 am Tam the Bam

      “males from sub Saharan Africa – will unleash the best forces of Darwinism” .. not round here it won’t Wiggers old boy. Just turn the dole and the heating off, and wait for next February. Swedes should do the same.
      ‘Ghans will probably make it, they’re a bit tougher. Although seven months of winter might push them over the edge, start eating bacon and necking the booze while swearing at God for being such a bastard, dumping them in this freezing shithole.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 1:15 pm Mr Bigglesworth

        There could be a financial disaster tomorrow that dwarves 1929. No welfare, no heating, state bankruptcy etc. It matters not. Whites are irreversibly fkd at this point. We are getting old and we aren’t having NEARLY enough children. That is not merely an argument… it’s a FACT – one that anyone with an IQ in triple digits finds abundantly obvious. This demograpic shift could have been stopped 30 years ago… maybe even 20 years ago. But now? The game’s over.

        LikeLike


      • on March 30, 2015 at 1:57 pm Jim South

        In a collapse scenario they are finished.

        5 guys with AKs would spell the end of them in my town.

        So much for demographics.

        LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 11:14 am patrickg

      What it really means, is that whites will automatically be the elite in every country they are in. And, when all the money printing finally ends … feminism and race-cuckolding will end also.

      LikeLike


  27. on March 28, 2015 at 7:25 pm Bear

    This article now explains why when I went to buy a new pair of Carhart Winter Bibs ,this past January ,at my local feed store – they had none in stock . I asked the girl when they would have them in. She said “good luck – they’re on back order and we won’t be able to have them until July” I was like” what the fuck a lot of good that does me” . She responds ‘ they’re very popular right now” . So I had to settle for a knock off brand – that pretty much suck.
    Thanks fag hipster – your taking away the gear from guys who actually work in the woods for a living. Well – o matter how long the beard and how authentic the gear you still remain a queer in your heart.

    LikeLike


  28. on March 28, 2015 at 8:10 pm Ronin

    2 Questions for Heartiste:
    1. Can modern Liberalism in all its facets & lifestyle-endorsements be considered a form of Plague? that weeds out the nutters from reproducing, thus having an ultimately positive effect via the most mentally-healthy who resist the idiocy of it?
    -Even though it’s a psychological virus and not a biological one.

    2. What percentage of girls out there do you think are actual real sluts, with notably high notch counts?
    (yes, I know the standard CH advice is when in-doubt assume they all are)

    LikeLike


  29. on March 28, 2015 at 8:29 pm Corvo

    Without even bothering to look for it (just hit the MSN splash screen after logging out of my email) you can see the decline of the West everywhere:

    http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/video/beating-on-train-linked-to-ferguson/vi-AAa8xt7

    This manboobed sorry excuse for a white man got beat down on the train by some black Ferguson thugs, and he’s “disgusted” that no one came to his aid (as he sat there with his hands over his head playing the role of a human punching bag).

    He should be disgusted for being a sorry excuse for a man. Setting aside for a moment the fact that any man should be able to physically fight back and not sit on his ass like a b!tch while getting repeatedly punched in the head . . . Missouri is a state where you can get a license to concealed carry. No excuse for not carrying and putting holes in these fugging jungle bunnies.

    LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 11:12 am Hosswire

      Why would anyone defend a pathetic weakling without the self-respect to defend himself?

      LikeLike


  30. on March 28, 2015 at 8:52 pm Manchild

    I’m one of those omega manchildren. Late 20’s, still live with my parents, work a part time slacker job, enjoy my loserish hobbies, and have given up on dating entirely. Why try to impress some chubby 4’s who think they’re too good for me when I can just go ask mama san at the local massage parlour if she’s brought in any new hard bodied 19 year olds?

    LikeLike


  31. on March 28, 2015 at 9:07 pm David

    This theory reminds me of the people who blame the USA obesity and diabetes pandemics on “evolution”. In the span of 1.5 generations, the average man gained about 20 BMI points through evolution. Right.

    Invariably, these people (usually atheists) have zero clue what actual evolution entails, and how syrupy slow it works. Even the most aggressive theories of fast-tracked group evolution take dozens of generations, and have biologically modest things attributed to them, such as a few IQ points or a tweaked digestive enzyme.

    Thus, the notion that, in 1970, American breeding habits suddenly became completely reversed and that is the explanation for these mass shifts is simply asinine. There is no feasible way that women could have spontaneously reversed their mating choices in such a short span, nor is there any conceivable mechanism whereby they would have wanted to in the first place.

    It isn’t merely the silly infantilism and androgenization noted in this article that has emerged within the past 30 to 40 years, there are more concrete, demonstrated pandemics which show that there definitely has been a change. Among them:

    -Obesity
    -Diabetes (esp. Type 2, which used to just be called “adult onset diabetes” because it never occurred in youths)
    -Infertility
    -Sperm count reduction/sperm quality reduction (substantially)
    -Testosterone reduction (substantially)
    -Premature Ovarian Failure (i.e., early-onset menopause)
    -Autism

    I could list several others, all documented. The increase in all of these afflictions is well known and established in numerous legitimate medical studies. It is ludicrous to claim that these things were caused by “evolution”, meaning a sudden shift in American breeding (and doubly absurd because these things have occurred, to various degrees, in all white, industrialized nations). And similarly, attributing the cultural changes of infantilism to evolution is ludicrous.

    The far more logical theories lie in environmental causes. Among them:
    -The diet (the USA began it’s fantastically successful campaign against meat and saturated fat and in favor of grains and seed oils with the McGovern Report in 1968).
    -Vaccines
    -Phthalates (including but not exclusively BPA) in medicine, food, and household products

    Looking to evolution to explain these sudden, seismic changes is a dead end. It’s like theorizing that the reason the Japanese in Hiroshima all died in 1945 was because of a sudden evolutionary shift favoring self-combustion. It’s absurd.

    I suspect that the reason so many people like to cite evolution rather than environmental causes is because they don’t want to believe that their food, their Axe Bodywash, their flu shots, their three prescriptions, their Coke, their Budweiser, the soy baby formula they were given as an infant….they don’t want to believe that these everyday parts of their lives could possibly harmful, because that would mean they’d have to totally change not only their consumer spending habits, but also their whole worldview.

    Regardless of the reason people don’t want to attribute these things to environmental causes, the bottom line is that attributing them to evolution is prima facie false and absurd.

    LikeLike


  32. on March 28, 2015 at 11:05 pm Marko

    The WSJ really really hates men:

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/book-review-women-after-all-by-melvin-konner-1427483355?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLE_Video_Third

    LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 2:22 am FrTedCrilly

      That article is a disgrace. If similar generalisations were made about any other group, would it be published in a major paper?

      LikeLike


  33. on March 29, 2015 at 12:57 am Stationarity

    I’ve been telling people for years that leftists are just in extended adolescence, but you’ve gone a step further.

    LikeLike


  34. on March 29, 2015 at 2:18 am FrTedCrilly

    CH,

    Agree that we’re in a gelded age, disagree about problem being due to excessive beta breeding.

    Genetically at least, we’re no different from the city-nuking, okinawa-storming betas of 70 years ago. And the average beta then pissed alpha by today’s standards- thin, respectful wives and utter contempt for socialist demagogues.

    We’re dealing with pathological cultural trends. The west has a dysgenics problem all right, but too many betas is not it.

    LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 6:27 am Anonymous

      chickn meet egg

      egg meet chickn

      liberte, fraternite, ou MORT 1848 bitchez!

      oink

      LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 8:13 am irishsavant

      Betas are the outcome/symptom, not the cause.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 12:17 pm FrTedCrilly

        Trouble dates back to the crazy 19th century radicals- not just Marx but the paris commune crowd, Emma Goldman the free-love anarchist and the yankee and russian nihilists. Their followers played the long game- but by 1970 they won.

        LikeLike


  35. on March 29, 2015 at 3:19 am Amasius

    I wouldn’t be surprised if, after the coming collapse, we went back to having successful guys with huge harems. Like Soylent Green and the “furniture girls.”

    LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 6:45 am Regular John

      Without high speed internet porn, video games and full fat bellies, sexless lesser males get restless. Restless to the point of joining the successful guy’s lieutenant in open rebellion; easily pressed into military service by the prospect of sexual access to the conquered women.

      There are enough contemporary big man societies to have a pretty good idea of what life would really be like. Like they say in the DRC, “Rape makes us feel free!”

      LikeLike


  36. on March 29, 2015 at 6:06 am Hudson701

    I’m in near tears laughing over the stuff GBFM writes, his comments used to irritate me, but I look forward to them now as they’re so funny.

    “Rollo ‘90% of men are betas’ Tomassi”

    Jesus Christ and George Washington being beta lol the sheer absurdity of it!

    Lolzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlz

    LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 9:24 am Putin

      “George Washington being beta lol”

      Yes that is pretty absurd. My personal fav is calling Bill Clinton an Alpha which is basically going full circle. NO alpha would put up with Hillary for a minute. Not only that but Bill is the biggest blue pill pusher in the world.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 10:34 am Ooga Booga

        Bill doesn’t give a shit about Hillary. Never did, never will…

        LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 10:35 am Greg Eliot

      His point was that, by today’s muh-dik standards of “alphadom”, guys like Washington (married an older woman that he with children from a prior marriage) and Christ (“turn the other cheek”) would be called betas (and worse) by the PUA crowd.

      Let’s not be dense, guys.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 5:10 pm bear

        When society goes into full blown collapse we will see quickly who among the PUA clown crowd is truly the swinging dick in the room. My hunch is very few, especially when they are forced to knock on the door of the “beta ” farmers house, begging for food.

        [CH: most PUAs would not do well in the post-apocalypse, even as they clean up with women in the pre-apocalypse. which should tell you more about the women PUAs romance than about the PUAs themselves.]

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2015 at 5:17 am Putin

        “(married an older woman that he with children from a prior marriage) and Christ (“turn the other cheek”) would be called betas (and worse) by the PUA crowd”

        Yes, that makes sense although Jesus and Washington were red pill in many ways also.

        LikeLike


  37. on March 29, 2015 at 7:34 am amog

    I once worked in a small firm with some hot women who rarely gave me the time of day. So I decided to play a game, and on one business trip with forced socialization I pretended to let slip that I was financially wealthy by the age of 32 and that this job was my retirement gig and I was non plussed about what was happening in the office. Well the women obviously gossiped and suddenly I went from zero to hero with these office women all of whom were attached, whoring themselves out to me, laughing at my every joke, inviting me to their boyfriends birthday party to show me off to friends and try and fuck me. One girl even use to stop by my desk in gym shorts when no one else was around. I knew I would only stay in this job for a short while and I leased a fancy car and dressed for the part. It was disgusting at first but then fun and my whole confidence grew. I would encourage anybody to play this game just to see the effects.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  38. on March 29, 2015 at 10:15 am Gil

    This begs of the question of “if society went back to the ancient times – what’s you think you’ll be the one of seventeen to become a father?” It’s similar to romanticising about going back to a Medieval period in which the wishful thinker assumes they’ll be someone of notable worth and not a peasant eking out a miserable existence.

    The present, instead, should be welcomed – how many here have argued self-styled Western Alphas would be a pyjama boy in real cutthroat Alpha societies? How many self-styled kickass martial artists would dare live in an actual violent society where life is cheap and murder is a regular occurrence? In reality in this society weaklings can find a comfort bubble of sorts whereas in a traditional society only the leanest, meanest thrived.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  39. on March 29, 2015 at 10:52 am Big Jim

    So, if the result and necessary correlate of Western civilization is this massive overabundance of lesser betas is it even worth saving then? Isn’t this crusade you’re on to teach game to lots of betas just likely to result in even more future generations of weaklings as they pass on their low SMV genetics?

    [CH: i’m not that cold-hearted.]

    Better to just let things fall apart and hopefully self-correct; let female hypergamy run wild, and let the betas weed themselves out of the gene pool.

    [this could already be happening but for the novel thwarting mechanism of modern prophylactics.]

    LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 11:24 am Big Jim

      [CH: i’m not that cold-hearted.]

      Understood. My comment here is obviously pretty cynical/fatalistic. I can sympathize with you desire to help others.

      Point taken on the effects of contraception. At the least it slows the process that I am getting at down substantially.

      LikeLike


  40. on March 29, 2015 at 12:28 pm Anonymous

    @FTC

    … (spergily tugs on coat)

    Sir, don’t forget 1848, SIr!

    oink

    LikeLike


  41. on March 29, 2015 at 1:14 pm justdoit

    Look, when the ratio of men:women reproducing is 1:17, it is the women that are dragging down the quality of the product, both by being much lower quality than the men (both on average and as a tail of the distribution) and by reducing the diversity of the Y-chromosome.

    If you want to argue genetics, I’d say the product of a beta male and a beta female is much better than the product of an alpha male and an omega (or whatever) female.

    So the argument that our present-day crop of men is no good because they are too beta I think is more of a cultural one than a genetic one.

    Corrolary: Women are strongly against genetic diversity, especially genetic diversity among males, not so much among themselves.

    LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 1:24 pm Darius Dread

      The Y Chromosome has shed so many unfavorable genes so rapidly because of the “only the best may pass” social system man.

      This is the whole reason mankind advanced to begin with, make no mistake about it, everything, and i really mean everything about our society is skewed to produce a small handful of geniuses who will spearhead mankind into the future.

      Religion never suppressed the enlightenment … beta males did.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2015 at 1:44 pm justdoit

        The era of enlightenment was the product of Alpha males? I don’t think so. Rather the opposite. Unless you have strangely re-defined the likes of Isaac Newton and Leaonrado da VInci as an alpha males. The enlightment was exactly the opposite of “might makes right”, which is the domain of alpha males.

        LikeLike


  42. on March 29, 2015 at 1:20 pm Darius Dread

    Have you been hacking my brain CH ?

    For a large part i agree with this.

    My take on things is slightly different however, i believe that since we’ve been constructing our own environments (towns/cities) we felt out of place and in need of change, a general sense of inadequacy opened mankind up for editing, once you crack that can of worms open, anyone can crawl behind the wheel and steer the ship in their preferred direction.

    As did the beta males, as numbers grew, alpha’s became more and more swamped in beta males, making it impossible for them to prevent all the women from mating with them. The Beta males, impotent with rage at the alpha’s who hoarded as they see it, their prizes, reeducated women to reforms their nature, they forced young girls to marry men, so that they would never get any comparative experience with men (as study’s here on CH have showed) legal bonds subsequently kept women in the beta males’ cage of sexual seclusion forced to breed offspring they were never ment to spawn.

    Remember how many women shacked up to beta males (to be clear this is sailing in calm waters relationship, no DV or anything) suddenly one day leave their hubby to “find themselves” ?

    While the vast largesse of men think that’s just a textbook excuse, that sentiment is real in women, and her reason for leaving is actually 100% legit. “finding herself” translates to “find alpha cock and spawn HIS children instead”

    Frank Sinatra is the one who awoke the sleeping giant, and when he entered the public eye what did women scream at him ??? … “i’m ovulating”

    is what they screamed, (and CH posted study’s that show women crave alpha cock more when ovulating) Thus, the beta males had made themselves obsolete, now that “working” no longer meant dying from black lung in a cole mine, or loosing your foot in a lumberjack accident, but instead meant sitting on a chair in an airconditioned building pressing buttons on machines and answering phones, women were free to scour the earth in search of those precious few highly competent ones, those men who inherited the best of both their male and female halves, so that they (women) may champion them as their leaders, this is why women choose partners mostly by peer review, highly reminiscent of cops combing through a field and one yelling “i found something” prompting more officers to the scene.

    This reawakening, and the subsequent sexual revolution and more importantly the rise of pornography is what motivates men to make themselves into the best men they can become all in pursuit of the alpha dream.

    What do you think nerds like Zuckerberg lived off while creating things like Facebook etc, undoubtedly the technological boom of the last 2 decades is the result of large swaths of men striving for alpha-tude.

    The beta males, seeing their carefully crafted anti-sex society crumble are merely importing muslims as an attempt to remedy western society’s return to alpha male-meritocracy.

    Religion… All religion, is the result of the beta male world, where beta males pray to as Dawkins puts it “the Alpha in the sky” ironic since they felt that they could rule and preside over society (which they can’t)

    Islamic society in particular is the most completed form of Beta Male rule found in the world.

    They cloak their women … te prevent men from being stimulated
    They circumcise men to make them numb below … to prevent stimulation of men
    And the real clinger is that Islam tells it’s adherents that they can all live the man’s alpha male dream in the after life is they become the ultimate beta males in this world. Islamic suicide bombers are nothing more than beta males coaxed to do the ultimate beta male thing, sacrifice of their own life for the cause.

    Thus western society, now reverting back to alpha male meritocracy venerates all that is weak, bad, degenerative, and feeble to try and convince all others that they (the beta’s) possess desirable quality’s.

    The basic gist of it all is that there’s two kinds of people in the world.

    Those who were handed a good hand of card by nature, and those handed bad cards.

    Those handed bad cards finish last in the real world, thus for the last say 6 to 8 thousand years or so they tried reversing reality.

    Because in a reversed reality they finish first, instead of last.

    That’s why now, being weak means being strong, and being timid means being brave, women are believed to be chaste by nature, and promiscuity to be a deviancy, in reality however promiscuity is the norm and chasteness is the reeducated woman.

    Beta’s got fucked by reality, and impotent with rage, they rebel against it…

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2015 at 10:01 am Anonymous

      LOL.

      http://therationalmale.com/2015/03/06/women-behaving-badly/

      LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2015 at 12:53 pm anon

      great comment. Very thoughtful and it fits with what we see every damn day.

      LikeLike


  43. on March 29, 2015 at 1:39 pm justdoit

    By the way, I do not know how the 1:17 number came about. It is not mentioned it the abstract of the original publication. It does appear in the article in some pop-science report. Where did the number come from?

    I don’t see how we can, from 456 present-day DNA samples, tell what happened 8000 years ago. The abstract of the paper uses the term

    “Y-chromosomal most recent common ancestor”.

    I don’t know what the paper actually says (anyone have a download to post?), but I am somewhat skeptical. DNA does not come with timestamps. I think the pruning could just has easily have happened gradually over the 8000 years than suddenly 8000 years ago? What analysis indicates that the change was sudden? And if it was, could it have been due to other reasons, for example one large branch dying out except a few females that survived by being acquired by another tribe/branch?

    I do not pretend to know the answers, not even having read the paper, but I think there is a real danger of pop-science being way off the rails in some of the referred articles.

    LikeLike


  44. on March 29, 2015 at 3:02 pm tteclod

    You’re mistaken about the bottleneck, & your mistake has forecasting effect.

    Let’s say a woman dependent upon men for hunter-gatherer assistance suddenly finds herself able to tend a small garden and a field of wheat. She needs a little meat, but some thoughtful animal husbandry manages that, too. She needs shelter, but a mud hut is sufficient, and she builds one. Her thoughts, such as they are, turn to offspring. What man does she need? A man to bring fruit and grain? No, she has fruit and grain. A man to bring meat? No, she has meat. A man who can build shelter? No, she has shelter.

    All she needs is a big guy who won’t kill her, playful, and strong enough to beat the shit out of any men she’d prefer to reject. So she picks that guy – as do 18 other women.

    I submit that we are headed the same direction right now. If you want grandchildren, teach your son Game and murder, and he’ll do just fine.

    LikeLike


  45. on March 29, 2015 at 3:21 pm justdoit

    LInk to free pdf of the paper that is the foundation of this thread,.

    http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mark_Thomas8/publication/273631580_A_recent_bottleneck_of_Y_chromosome_diversity_coincides_with_a_global_change_in_culture/links/55081cfd0cf27e990e09079d.pdf

    LikeLike


  46. on March 29, 2015 at 3:30 pm consociationalism

    The alpha vs. beta thing is a really good model for the contemporary sexual marketplace where violence has mostly been removed from the equation, but doesn’t explain history very well. Consider your statement “war and religious fanaticism are other methods of beta male self-culling”. Wars are more likely alpha male self-culling because for most of history, “alphas” fought and died in wars while “betas” did not. Gregory Clark has documented this convincingly in “A Farewell to Arms”. From the Norman Conquest onward, the literate English middle class (who didn’t fight in wars) reproduced more successfully than both the landed warrior aristocracy (who fought in wars) and the peasantry (with higher rates of disease and infant mortality). Civilization is essentially a product of “beta” characteristics such as submission to laws and high future time orientation.

    LikeLike


  47. on March 29, 2015 at 4:06 pm Anonymous

    I think there’s a big misunderstanding somewhere and not taking boys, and later men’s higher mortality in account. There’s never been a society where 1 in 17 men got pussy, I dare to say. In fact, back in the early days basically all the men alive got pussy as opposed to 2015 when only a minority of men it seems, get regular sex. Pussy has never been higher priced than now, 2015. Then again, busting a nut in your 17 year old wife was the only form of entertainment back then, except warfare and hunting… as opposed to 2015 where the standard male brain’s reward circuits are seemingly horribly out-of-fashion

    LikeLike


  48. on March 29, 2015 at 4:51 pm henry himbeere

    betas are good things to be. They are second in command under the alpha. If 1000 people are in a group, 500 are women, 200 are children, 100 old men, of the remaining 200 eligible men, maybe there are 5 alphas (leaders) but the spectrum is various. there maybe 30 betas or first followers/secondary leaders.That’s the top 17.5 percent. not bad. You talk like betas are dumb dullard followers. They are sharp. They can have good genes too because much of success and failure in life is due to conditions and circumstances, but you can’t keep your place if you are weak genetically but just because you are strong doesn’t mean you win. It has to do also with birth and all. Of course beta/alpha/gamma is a spectrum but we’re talking about reproductive rates, which is an objective measure. I also agree with the electrical theory of success and growth- and porn can sometimes help us but other times it can ground us, ground our ambition and energy, along with masturbation, and rewire our expectations also. Same with sweets. I heard that the more sugar rats are given, the less territory they end up possessing. It depends on how much ambition you have, and discipline, to do what helps. And being stuck is the symptom of the modern era. Remember city darkies avoid school, whereas white male are over-schooled, that is learning life sitting down- which is unhealthy causes hemmorhoids and heart disease – man is born to move. And all this sitting and imitating, when he could be plying construction trade or working on an oil field or a farmstead, or even selling autos- anything better than school, l sitting being stuck, being a genetic groupie to the high status beautiful woman. If he is in school, he could play sports, hockey, be a kind of athlete- I almost said jock but I don’t want to stereotype. But grades matter in life for certain paths so everything is a balance. I consider myself a bad getter but a good lover/keeper, but I rarely get. I don’t consider myself low and I’m working on being a leader, taking action, gaining skills and life, but now I am forced to delay gratification and learn all about bonds and debt and equity and premium amortization, so it takes away from my time I could work out or go out. It puts me in my head, but it’s for a good purpose so at least it’s not mental masturbation. Get unstuck. Being stuck leads to depression and a warped worldview, an evil eye. All the wise men say get in the flow. Avoid the poison tongue of the writers and critics and even the so called enlighteners and leading thinkers. I just finished a long session of study. This too shall pass.

    LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2015 at 6:23 pm Anonymous

      no

      not good enough

      u fail

      oink

      LikeLike


  49. on March 29, 2015 at 5:35 pm Kyfho Myoba

    SimonWolfe says:
    If there was game back then, it was the low value men colluding amongst themselves and the greediest [or most needy, i.e., lowest SMV] of the females to work together to exchange food and resources in exchange for access to low rent cervixes.

    This is exactly it. This is a great example of a Tullock Contest [or Competition] Success Function, well known in game theory. (Mathematical game theory, not PUA game theory.) Marriage evolved from the bottom up. The elites (high SMV) have never respected the marriage contract, the plebes and prole have, until recently, always had to.

    LikeLike


  50. on March 29, 2015 at 6:22 pm Anonymous

    Re: Original article

    If that was mankinds’ first encounter with mumps,.. Infertility rates even now can approach 90% in some cases. Add cuckoldry, and 1 in 17 got to propagate their genes is not that outrageous.

    May explain preselection, though …

    oink

    LikeLike


  51. on March 29, 2015 at 8:05 pm Broooce

    NY Times hires Indian journalist Razib Khan as a monthly columnist, then fires him promptly for being a real-talker on race & IQ – http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2015/03/20/new-york-times-signs-contract-writer-razib-khan-then-dumps-him/

    [CH: i can smell the NYBTimes fear. change is a blowin in the wind…]

    LikeLike


  52. on March 30, 2015 at 5:23 am Heartiste Grand Unifying Theory Of Infantilizat...

    […] In London, epicenter of European poz, there are adult baby parties. In Poland, sex change freaks run for office. And in New York, there is preschool for adults.  […]

    LikeLike


  53. on March 30, 2015 at 6:34 am Only 1 in 17 men reproduced at the dawn of agriculture? Not quite… | The Cydonian Signal

    […] “In the not-terribly-distant past, 4K-8K years ago, at the dawn of agriculture, geneticists discov… […]

    LikeLike


  54. on March 30, 2015 at 6:46 am johnnight

    Say what you want about Black men, but they got one thing right: signalling masculinity, signalling the capability to do violence, which is the #1 survival skill.

    LikeLike


    • on March 30, 2015 at 6:55 am Anonymous

      roflmao … muhdik held up as somesort of exemplary virility symbol …

      snort …

      oink

      LikeLike


      • on March 30, 2015 at 10:50 am Anonymous

        Thank God you said it already. It just looks like more not so vieled negroid worship. Glad you responded so soon.

        If blacks are so damn alpha, in addition, then why is their society such a damn matriarchy of sorts? Their blaming the “blue eyed devil” thing is the same thing is fugly feminists blaming the patriarchy.

        It’s just more little shots at Caucasians to demolize them. Just like the commercials that make white guys the incompetent goofy weak male. It’s social engineering.

        And not, it’s not the black men running this ruthless anti-white male campaign. Hint: those who are anti-European males like a book called the Talmud.

        LikeLike


  55. on March 30, 2015 at 10:48 am doctor

    Everyone should read this book.

    He is written a number of very intelligent predictions and thesis is regarding Isis mess too;

    http://www.amazon.ca/Consumed-Markets-Corrupt-Children-Infantilize/dp/0393330893

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  56. on March 30, 2015 at 11:27 am B.J. Worthy (@bjworthy69)

    Re: the 1-in-17 bottleneck.

    SJWs, desperate to shield their eyes from the female Id at all costs, are blaming,,, wait for it…

    Capitalism!

    LikeLike


  57. on March 31, 2015 at 12:41 am B

    The infantilization of the society comes out of a deliberate plan that first manifests in government schools. It is by design. It allows for the scientific management of the population. When people are made into permanent children they need a parent, that parent is the state. Who controls the state? The very wealthy families that control the foundations, the corporations, the banks, and ultimately the governments.

    That’s what happened. Alphas decided to take out other would be alphas in their childhood by making their childhood permanent.

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    D-FENS on The Backup Country
    guest on The Race To Self-Disgrace
    Aristarchus on The Race To Self-Disgrace
    GE Fan on The Backup Country
    Captain Obvious on The Race To Self-Disgrace
    Aristarchus on Killing A Mountain Lion With B…
    Amon Ra on The Race To Self-Disgrace
    Captain Obvious on The Race To Self-Disgrace
    Libertarian_Pill on The Backup Country
    Ironsides on The Race To Self-Disgrace
  • Top Posts

    • Killing A Mountain Lion With Bare Hands Game
    • Is The Tankgrrl Era Finally Ending?
    • The Backup Country
    • Is Gimp Dog The New Birthday Cat?
    • Based&Christpilled Hungarians
    • The Race To Self-Disgrace
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • Paris, Then And Now
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
    • Will AOC/Omar Destroy The Dems Before They Destroy Heritage America?
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: