No one knows for certain how the Neanderthals went extinct. There are many theories propounded — climate change, resource competition with newly arriving anatomically modern humans, megafauna population declines, etc — all of which are plausible, and some of which are supported circumstantially by recent genetic evidence.
I’ll suggest another, uncomfortably familiar, extinction mechanism for the Neanderthals: Diversity™ killed off the loveable brutes.
I don’t mean, exclusively, Diversity™ in the usual senses — warfare, rape&pillage, territorial disputes, food shortages. I mean it in the Calhoun rat “behavioral sink” sense. That is, the flood of Vibrant AMH Diversity™ arriving from points south, who may or may not have mingled peaceably with Neanderthals in the latter’s homeland, (and occasionally shared beds), by their mere proximate presence and cultural dissimilarity induced immense psychic pressures on the locals until their native fertility rate plummeted to levels…
…not unlike what we are seeing today among white Westerners living in homelands rapidly populating with millions of alien world migrants.
Diversity™, itself, is what killed the Neanderthals.
Arguing against my speculation: Contraceptives, the Japs.
Neanderthals didn’t have the hedonism aids of condoms and Pills. If they were “secularizing”, relative to their race’s historical norm, and choosing to forfeit childbearing in favor of extracting the last bit of fun from a shrinking playground, they’d have a challenge trying to do all this to the beat of the rhythm method. Not that it couldn’t be done; Neanderthalettes might have stiff-armed a lot of horny men if they felt that conditions weren’t optimal for raising a family.
The Japanese. They have a very low TFR at the moment, and last I checked there wasn’t a ton of Diversity™ in Japan. But, it is an island nation, and there are a lot of Japanese living on it, living a neon-colored and optically-wired version of the Western lifestyle. Here, the mechanism is entirely raw numbers, rather than raw numbers + clash of cultures.
The Neanderthals, it now appears from genetic analysis, have gifted White Europeans with just enough of their DNA to make something of a difference to the trajectory of white history. Did Neanderthals also gift us with a warning for our own race’s future, or lack thereof?

If so, we’ll continue to ignore it.
LikeLike
Funny I had a different theory, not that I studied the subject or anything, but what if the neanderthals were the equivalent of today’s colored people; they were the “demographic group” committing over 80 % of rapes and other violent crimes and the group that is almost nothing but trouble?
There was no police, no jails back then, when someone stole your goat or raped your daughter, you killed him.
Maybe at first we let them live among us ( we already had that “altruism” gene in us ) but they turned out to be way too much trouble and one day we got fed up with them and we killed them all?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Totally backwards.
Asians and Europeans have high doses of Neanderthal genes – Africans have none.
Neanderthals had larger brains and a bunch of the genes that exist in modern Eurasians that are Neanderthal in origin are related to brain development.
Connect the dots.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That would explain the rampant anti-Neanderthalism.
LikeLike
@ Laguna, thread winner. lozlozlzzlzolzzlo
http://johndenugent.com/neanderthals-and-semites/
LikeLike
well… the Nazis tried to exterminate the Jews, so it is not always about skin color or low IQ.
LikeLike
OMG! The “J” word! Paging Captain Obvious (you crazy as fuck cracker!)
LikeLike
Canadian. I always believed that the Germans planned to exterminate the Jews. Until I started looking at the evidence. Or lack of same. No Project Plan from the so-efficient Germans, the Wannsee Conference (where all the details were supposedly worked out) says nothing about extermination. If you read Mein Kampf and Hitler’s Table Talk it becomes perfectly clear that they wanted all Jews out of the Reich and were not too selective about where they went or how they were “encouraged” to go.
Nasty, brutish, unfair…..yes. Plan for extermination? No.
Do your own research. You’ll quickly find that the Official Narrative comes apart at the seams like a cheap suit.
LikeLike
@ Canadian, after 3 years reading here, you are as Baby Boomer clueless as you were on day 1. Come on, dude. Half of what you say is straight up Eskimo public education brainwashing.
“History was written by those who hanged heroes.”
LikeLike
Only after the Eskimos tried to exterminate the White Russians and the Ukrainians, and succeeded in exterminating President McKinley and the Romanov family, and set in motion the events which would lead to the extermination of about 150 million Chinese and Vietnamese and Cambodians.
LikeLike
Sorry t*h*w*a*c*k, the stack ate my reply.
LikeLike
Read that John de Nugent article. There is only ONE group with Neanderthal genes. THe ones that screw with science and history as much as possible to hide this fact.
LikeLike
Neanjewthals
LikeLike
Sorry t*h*w*a*c*k, the stack ate my reply.
—————————————————
try not to get played
LikeLike
“… Come on, dude. Half of what you say is straight up Eskimo public education brainwashing…”
Then you only have read about 2% of my comments.
LikeLike
@Ripp
You’re retarded. Lady Gaga is of 75% Italian ancestry (the rest is mostly French). She was raised in a Roman Catholic family. You’re one of those idiots who thinks that anybody whom you disagree with must be Jewish.
LikeLike
SC:
Cry baby Eskimo alert.
thats an image taken from a link further up in the thread. and it’s funny.
And germenotta is a neanderthal and obviously your favorite singer. Not a jew but a neanjewthal.
so relax there little man and put on ur fav gaga song and pick ur big nose.
LikeLike
[…] Is There A Shared Extinction Path Between Neanderthals And Modern Westerners? […]
LikeLike
A while back I read an article positing that lack of sex-specific work specialization led to their demise. In other words, feminism killed the Neanderthals.
[CH: mmm, juicy. much obliged if you could locate a link to that.]
LikeLike
Remember the Neanderthals
No one knows exactly why Neanderthals became extinct 30,000 years ago, but a new theory recently reported in the Boston Globe suggests that once able-bodied women, the “reproductive core” of their small population, began hunting with the men, it was game over.
http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=aa7f7d22-9cf3-480c-8077-9eb67e7b14f9
LikeLike
Cro-Magnon… bigger, smarter, whiter. End of story.
LikeLike
Quest For Fire
LikeLike
niggie smallz in da house
LikeLike
Mischling negro/yids, such as yourself and Rae Dawn Chong, make for a poor argument, Sambo.
Quest For Relevancy.
LikeLike
But you must admit the theory the movie describes is interesting; they even demonstrates some game principles with the race mixing that occurs?
LikeLike
Not to mention how doggie style evolved into missionary position, amirite?
lzozlzozlozlozlozlozlozlozlozlozlozlozlozl
Between Hollywood and YouTube, your educational background is questionable… I’ll admit that.
LikeLike
don’t dismiss ‘cultural diversity’ as ‘Diversity™’ as a cause of societal collapse…
Japan gave women the vote and equality in 1946…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism_in_Japan
their TFR took a dive…
http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/wp/wp-hw/vol1/p2c5s1.html
feminism kills societies…maybe the Neanderthals gave their women ‘the vote’…
LikeLike
So Truman DID drop a third atomic bomb . . .
LikeLike
in the stack…again…
LikeLike
The anarcho-primitivists are on to something, though there philosophy lacks (and in some cases opposes) any actual art.
“……extracting the last bit of fun from a shrinking playground……”
For some in the West, the shrinking playground is still the actual wilderness, including for people who probably wouldn’t fit in with the pygmies or Neans. Strangely we need real off-the-grid cultural movements on the same continents where the neon grid seems to have won out – in order to save the mystery (legitimacy/authenticity) itself from falling victim to behavioral sink/gentrifying hells
LikeLike
I wonder if Neanderthals ever had hostile elites sending them over the cliff.
LikeLike
I think there is a lot of modern bias that goes into the various hypothesis about their extinction. From some vague memory I have, assuming it is accurate, the neanderthals did not have the same language capabilities humans did and thus were probably not as good at forming relationships, transmitting information, etc. So, whatever allowed the human species that has out bred them to be more successful, likely also contributed to their decline. Changing climate and possibly also direct competition would be my guess.
LikeLike
> “Changing climate” —– There’s nothing like a good Ice Age for wiping out an entire population.
LikeLike
Look at a picture of a reconstructed Neanderthal. Sloping forehead, big nose, receding chin.
Then look at a picture of, say, Carly Simon. Tell me what you think.
LikeLike
You’re So Vain was about the Cro-Magnon that got away.
LikeLike
meanwhile in detroit…
LikeLike
Excuse me, but this current thread is concerned with Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons…
… lesser species are a topic for another day.
LikeLike
Our liberal establishment has been brainwashing people into believing that blacks today misbehave because in the past white used to mistreat them.
I think it is the opposite, knowing what I know now of black dysfunction, I think the kkk, the lynchings and the general idea of segregation were a response to blacks doing things such as in the video above.
Whites did what they could to stop the horror that the authorities could not stop.
If one day another kkk emerges it will be because blacks commit too many barbaric crimes such as the one above and not because whites are evil.
The more lenient we are with blacks ( and other non-whites except maybe the yellow ones) and we are the most lenient race in the history of the world, the more they spit in our face, the more they bite the hand that feeds them.
One day that hand will punish them. The way blacks behave it is as if they are begging for a new kkk.
LikeLike
of course my comment got stuck in the stupid filter again…
LikeLike
I thought it was common knowledge that the original night riders were a reaction to rampant negro crime and carpetbagger political shennanigans during Reconstruction… and when the “official authorities” finally got a handle on things, they voluntarily disbanded.
Hell, they even did a scene about it in Gone With The Wind.
LikeLike
I found a few links backing up the lack of sex-specific task specialization potentially leading to Neanderthal demise.
First, is this brief mention by Matt Ridley in the WSJ that mentions that some archaelogists believe that there was little specialization among Neanderthals. Importantly, the females hunted with men.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703904304575497770688974464
Next, note this more recent report highlighting the fact that there may have been some specialization, but that it was limited. All of the media reports about this new study highlight that there was likely some specialization because the prevailing has been that there was little or none. It is important, however, that even these researchers indicate limited specialization and they also agree females likely participated in hunting.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2015-02/snrc-ngb021815.php
Now check out this long book outtake blogged by Steve Sailer. In particular, note the severe injuries sustained by Neanderthals while hunting because they did not have projectile weapons. They had to get “up close and personal” while killing large beasts. The author characterizes the injuries as similar to those of rodeo bronco riders.
http://www.unz.com/isteve/neanderthals/
It is not hard to see the difficulty in sustaining a society when they regularly put their prized eggs/wombs at risk of death.
LikeLike
When is the evidence from that suggests women hunted? Before or after contact with cro-magnons? Did they die off because their women were hunting or did their women hunt because they were dying off? I.e. Perhaps competition with cro-magnons made them desperate.
LikeLike
Once a 1600cc average cranial capacity type of folk show up in the area, one’s days are pretty much numbered.
LikeLike
First two of my links discuss females hunting.
LikeLike
Lots of hand-wringing about Japan’s low birth rates, but maybe it’s just a rational response to too-high population. It’s not like the population will fall to zero. People there will make more babies when there’s a more reasonable amount of elbow room.
BTW, “Japs” is considered by them to be extremely rude.
[CH: i know. crisis and observation.]
“Japanese” is appropriate.
Got yellow fever from getting my Japan flag. So feminine.
LikeLike
Does this seem like a place that cares about rude?
LikeLike
Not especially, no.
LikeLike
Today’s Japanese men may be getting the short end of the fap, but probably not forever. Their current demographics (like our aging Baby Boomers) may be but a phase in the Japanese master plan. From the one and only Derb:
“…a geezer-heavy population [is] inevitable…When the human race comes to a bridge like this, the first nation to figure out a way across the bridge gets a huge head start on the rest. Britain was the first nation to transition from agricultural to industrial society, and she dominated the world for a century afterwards. Whichever nation can first figure out a way through the Great Demographic Transition will likewise be at an advantage. Japan, with one foot already on the bridge, has an excellent shot at being that nation. Then the 22nd century will be the Japanese Century.
“…the thing we should worry about is not so much demographic decline overall as differential demographic decline, with more-civilized nations aging and dwindling ahead of less-civilized ones. A related problem is the differential demographic decline within civilized nations. Unfortunately these topics are completely out of bounds [H2B: for those blinded by political correctness] under what Bill Buckley called “the prevailing structure of taboos.” Several…readers have already swooned in horror at my suggestion that some nations are more civilized than others. Since we are unable to discuss these issues, we have zero prospect of being able to solve the associated problems. Which may prove highly unfortunate.”
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/184648/gerontocracy-idiocracy-and-coming-japanese-century-john-derbyshire
LikeLike
But is this good for the Jews?
LikeLike
This doesn’t have to be inevitable. If things continue as they are, the old people will just be told to fuck themselves instead of taxing the young. And when they won’t be taken care of like toddlers, their numbers will go down.
LikeLike
is “Brits” rude too?
LikeLike
Is ‘homo’ actually rude? My upbringing involved following the ‘sticks and stones…’ bit. Still can’t figure out when cultmarx changed it. BTW, why can’t the dark ones say ‘caucs’ instead of cracker or honky? Not that I would care. The whole ‘sticks and stones’ thing, after all. Cheers.
LikeLike
No, but “Krauts” certainly is.
LikeLike
Not at all, ya limey.
LikeLike
You krauts, limeys, frogs, and micks can hang around…
… but the squareheads gotta go.
LikeLike
Your elbow room theory has been something I have been pondering myself.
If Japan can continue to resist the temptation & outside pressure to open the immigration floodgates, their decades of low birthrate should make young workers relatively valuable & better paid. As older Japanese move into smaller housing, that should make homes for families more affordable too.
Higher wages plus cheaper housing would equal easier family formation, right? And perhaps a minor baby boom to fill the void? I’m curious if there are any historical examples of demographic imbalances self-correcting over time.
It’s a moot point for White America & Europe, though. The powers that be have opted to fill any native birth gaps with 3rd world invaders.
LikeLike
They have about 190 million people (the actual US pre invasion population circa 1965) in approximately the area of California. They could use a little reduction.
And the proper term is “Nip” as in Nippon.
LikeLike
A darkly-enlighted colleague of mine remarked the other night that Whites are unbeatable in war, but collapse under the pressure of peace. They don’t know how not to give it all away. If that’s so, we need to cultivate a (balanced, not lunatic Roof) war mentality.
Alternatively, along longer range or more defeatist lines, depending on your characterization: Neanderthals didn’t go totally extinct–the linger in our blood inheritance.
LikeLike
If you aren’t already on a personal war-footing, you should be.
LikeLike
“Whites are unbeatable in war”
Muh hubris
LikeLike
Only when they fight other whites.
LikeLike
Didn’t Frenchies get licked by Hmong and various Muslims at some point?i
Seriously, being better at something=/=being unbeatable at it.
But out of interest: what is the cause for this ability at war? Is it the same thing that compels YT to keep a well manicured lawn?
LikeLike
Haiti used to be like Hawaii; then the whites got exterminated.
LikeLike
Satan, in his bifurcated nature, likes to leave little hints around… as to what can happen when the wrong colour of people get an upper hand… for those with an eye to see and an ear to hear.
LikeLike
Seriously, the distinction between Haiti and Dominican Rep. is hilarious.
LikeLike
do your research faggot.
Haiti was 20% of the French GDP before it went up in flames
LikeLike
Seems odd they would let so ripe a plum fall so easily… especially since Napoleon was always pulling his Bonaparte looking for money to finance his armies..
I call bullshit on that 20%.
LikeLike
French not so good at business Greg, Louisiana Purchase and all…
LikeLike
@Eliot
Greg, back in the day sugar was like cocaine.
Today they put sugar in everything because its addictive.; you bought sugar by the “gram” at the apothocary back in the day.
Mr Eliot, you have potential, but in your zest to practice racism you sometime deny things that are true; in order to make white people look good, or black people look bad.
Please stop doing that; its unnecessary.
[CH: jared taylor recently tried to make black people look good. he said that, in his limited experience interacting with the black ghetto class, he found amusing their genial, spontaneous friendliness.
i can tell him that what seems amusing the first twenty, thirty, maybe even a hundred times, quickly becomes annoying after the daily drumbeat of black geniality hits the one year mark.]
LikeLike
T-h-w-a-c-k, you project your own biases onto me… just because I call you on your bullshit doesn’t mean my blinders are on to the same extent.
Haiti was just a small island and not the sole source of sugar… and sugar was NOT 20% of France’s GNP at any time in history.
And Sentient, you’re making my point for me… Napoleon sold off the Louisiana Purchase for some quick and much-needed cash, and at the time, the land was for the most part undeveloped and too distant to be of immediate interest. So even if it was a bad deal, looking at the future, it has nothing to do with t-h-w-a-c-k’s bogus claim of 20% GNP…
And if it were, you can bet the French wouldn’t have let the natives get so restless at that time in their history… especially considering the butchering of French women and children.
LikeLike
Napoleon sold off the Louisiana Purchase for some quick and much-needed cash
——————————
yeah, to pay for the fight against black rebels in Haiti.
you U.S citizens are welcome.
LikeLike
One theory is that Neanderthals got poorer “fuel mileage”.They were built with much greater strength and endurance than Cromagnons but that build meant that they needed about twice as many calories. The natural history museum in Chicago has modern and Neanderthal skeletons side by side and the differences is bone strength and lung capacity are pretty striking. The problem was further exacerbated by the fact that their women were closer in build to the men than is the case for modern humans and therefore also needed more food. The Neanderthals relied mainly on their strength and speed to hunt, but modern humans could hunt at least as well with their more advanced weapons such as bows and atlatl levers for throwing spears, so they out simply out competed the Neanderthals. There is also some more far fetched speculation based on their skeletons that although their brains were larger than ours, possibly the verbal centers in their brains and vocal cord development gave them less sophisticated communication capabilities.
LikeLike
“in the end, all thats left, is the small dark man” — Lothrop Stoddard
LikeLike
Spoken as Mankind’s epitaph, n1gger.
LikeLike
The “small dark man” was everywhere until he was exterminated or forced into the mountains or deep into the jungles…
History may not repeat itself, but it often rhymes.
LikeLike
You jes’ keep that small dark man in yo’ pants, slue-foot.
LikeLike
I never heard that Neanderthal brains were bigger than modern man… Cro-Magnon, yes… some 1600 cc… but not Neanderthal.
I’m starting to wonder whether folks aren’t confusing the simian-looking Neanderthals with Cro-Magnons or some prototype thereof.
LikeLike
Its true and has been known for some time. I first read that when I was a kid in a Time Life book on cave dwellers
LikeLike
Or they simply refused to move to Africa during the last ice age …
It’d take one hell of a natural cataclysm to get me to move to Detroit. Just saying.
LikeLike
Good points. I’ve read similar observations in National Geographic. A Neanderthal needed an average of 5,000 calories a day: that’s a modern hockey player in training. That means you need a lot of meat, which means megafauna hunting, which means a lot of deaths and injuries when the megafauna objects. Modern human women were able to engage in gathering behavior (fruits, roots, berries, etc.) which led to a diversified food supply and less exposure to hunting hazards.
LikeLike
comment on japan and low fertility in general in the west– i don’t know enough historically to know if it’s true, but maybe some populations self regulate when they can’t get the space or quality of life they need. living in an arcade as a japanese adult male because it’s too expensive to live in a house? you might not want kids
the problem is, with socialism (everywhere) you CAN’T allow shrinking populations because social safety nets aside from Singapore’s are a Ponzi scheme. in a society where people are expected to provide for themselves, populations going up and down wouldn’t really matter to individuals, and could possibly improve quality of life
with socialism, the ‘leaders’ CANNOT allow a shrinking populace and start importing the r-selected world (Nigeria in Japan’s case) to fill the funding gaps, the quality of life goes even further down, and the K-selected japanese continue to not reproduce because the world they see continues to get less and less inviting
LikeLike
Porn and the easily sated low sex drives of Jap men is killing Japan.
LikeLike
The Americanisation of Japan is killing the Japanese, which may or may not be the point.
LikeLike
“Americanisation of Japan” American culture was decent and moral for the most part until YKW took control, and then the degradation of everything became the order of the day.
LikeLike
There is too much top-down socio-cultural-psyops aimed at White people to be able to speak of evolution acting upon us. We no longer compete the same way that supspecies of lion compete on the savannah. Medicine is veterinary “care” (like for your car pet or senile grandmother). Food is feed. Entertainment is mind-control.
LikeLike
Makes you wonder what secret mischief the US planted in Japan, from McArthur-on.
LikeLike
Cesium-137
LikeLike
PA – it was what MacArthur did NOT plant – he failed to evangelize the Japanese when he had the chance. After we smashed their Shinto religion, and the Emperor renounced his own divinity, the Japanese were left with… drum roll please… NOTHING AT ALL.
LikeLike
MacArthur failing to call in the evangelicals was the greatest failing of his entire career [well, that and his apparently worthless son, who is still rumored to live in Greenwich Village somewhere, ashamed to assume the family name].
LikeLike
There is another possibilty. It may have been the case that Cro Magnon/Neanderthals hybrids replaced both groups. One can speculate endlessly about disadvantages possessed by “pure” Neanderthals but there is no question that some of their traits added to the fitness of the new mixture.
There are a lot of N. Europeans with 4% of their genome being N. sourced. That is major; especially when considering that it has been 30,000-40,000 years on. There are reasons to think that these are active genes related to brain growth and function and not junk DNA at all. Junk DNA gets diluted to nothing over time.
In other words, it looks like the hybrid replaced both groups in Europe and N. Asia. If Cro Magnon did come from Africa, why were there no Africanoids surviving in these places at any time in recorded history?
LikeLike
they were exterminated.
LikeLike
Inferior species always were. Darwinian Imperative.
LikeLike
The Origin and Evolution
of Primitive Man
Lecture given at the Royal Societies Club
St James’s Street, February 1912
BY
ALBERT CHURCHWARD
M.D., M.R.C.P., F.G.S., etc.
“Here let me say that, as one
would expect to find after all these thousands
of years of their existence, there are lower and
higher types of the Pygmy, although they
have been cut off from the world and from
all intercommunication by being driven into
forests and mountains where the Nilotic
Negro did not follow. Those Pygmies who
have not intermarried with the surrounding
tribes are always the same, except when
climate, etc., has had some effect. But
there is no ” throw-back,” as you some-
times find amongst the later tribes.
There are six distinct tribes well known in
Africa alone.
i. The Akka. Average height of thirty-
eight given by Deniker 1*378 metres; and
thirty measured by Emin Pasha average
1*36 metres.
2. The Balia.
3. The Tikki-Tikki.
4. The Batwa.
5. The Wambutta.
6. The Banzungu.
Outside Africa they still exist — in New
Guinea, New Hebrides, the forest of Bolivia
in South America, the mountains in China,
the Philippine Islands, the Sakais in the
Malay Peninsula, and in Northern India.
They have been exterminated in Europe,
North America, Japan, Australia and Tas-
mania, but I have no doubt they are to be
found in other places not yet explored. “
LikeLike
There is no such thing as junk DNA.
No humans came from Africa, just Homo Erectus.
NEanderthals are YKW.
LikeLike
Another thing: The older the DNA found in Europe, the higher the explicit N. content. “Osti”, the thouands of years old frozen man found in the Alps, was 7% Neanderthal. A sample found recently that was, I think, 10,000plus years older was 11%.
This points in the opposite direction from an early extinction and replacement theory. It is what one would see if a hybrid creature replaced both groups but then SLOWLY lost less adapted Neanderthal genes – for who knows what reasons..
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Neanderthals were likely highly intelligent. Some posit that modern day Basque populations are descended from isolated Neanderthal populations. Basques and Neanderthals are the only two groups to have been the supposed “original” inhabitants of Europe, after all.
Neanderthals were producing adhesive glues that required air-tight chambering to make. These were highly advanced people. I have a strong guess that Neanderthals are where Europeans obtained both the unique capacity for abstract thought… and altruism.
LikeLike
The Steve Sailer blog post I linked above would support your thoughts on altruism. They had a high rate of severe injury and the evidence suggests they not only nursed the injured back to health, but even supported the permanently disabled.
LikeLike
Japan was nuked twice and utterly, humiliatingly, defeated in the war. Then they were forced into a pacifist, ‘democracy’, they’re military disbanded, and they were made a permanent client state of the US.
Japan has ever since lacked purpose. No new lands to conquer, no horizons to sail toward, no glorious victories. They are like fish in a bowl, and this is slomo harakiri.
LikeLike
Sort of like Kurt Cobain, as commenter Suburban Elk put it, a Viking at the end of the Earth. And the what now?
LikeLike
That comment would have to be considered in context, though. Cobain had a great face – but not the shoulders, of a viking. That was a lot of what he sang about, trying to find some reconciliation there; or so i would speculate.
That larger theme is of trying to fill the father’s shoes. The culture in the Pacific NW, somehow lead the way in expressing that. All those kids, whose fathers were scrappy and tough, but they don’t know.
To some extent, that was the context of the referenced comment. In his expressed opinions, Cobain was a predictable liberal; but in his singing he was a Big Man.
LikeLike
It describes all of us here. Vikings at the edge of time, cyber-hoplites scouting along the frontier, pathfinders at the borders of the world. God speed.
LikeLike
Well, Cobain was most likely deliberately murdered by his bitch of a wife, so…
LikeLike
Cobain was certainly no Viking. He was diminutive and effeminate; a miseducated degenerate who was swindled and ultimately murdered by his YKW wife.
The whole brief soap opera is really sort of a microcosm of recent American history.
LikeLike
I’ve said this before, albeit with a different conclusion. That Japan actually won WW2. The destruction of their country was the price they paid to join the modern economy. They maintained near homogeneity, but were stripped of their military. Obviously the victory was short-lived, but victory is never permanent. And I’m sure the Japanese didn’t feel like they won at the time. And the citizens of the west felt like we won. The commie/marxist infiltration of the west is obvious to us here, but the % of the population that is ignorant of that FACT is astonishingly high. Surprised Japan has resisted ‘diversity’ for so long. More to say. Won’t. Cheers.
LikeLike
Strong post.
This is one of the reasons why I am suprised about the talk about the devastation that YT is supposedly capable of inflicting. When I look at the absolute worst western whites have done, what was really bad? They mention Japan, but despite the temporary destruction, Japan didn’t really pay that much of a price. It’s like “if that is what your most savage fury looks like…”
The same thing is also true for West Germany.
Even the Hall of Cost ended up being a huge plus for the Chosenites in the end and they enjoy more power now than they did back in the day.
Compare that to the crippling damage inflicted by Russies or Ottomans/Arabs or Mongols: eastern Europe is shit compared to the West economically, lands conquered by Muslims need no explanation and Mongols turned a fairly intellectually talented civilization into shit. (Siege of Baghdad)
By comparison, in the long term, I cannot think of an example of whites annihilating their enemies and leaving them for the worse. The Indians (feather, not dot) were a bunch of hunters and gatherers who were really thin populationwise and inflicted far more throrough destruction upon each other than whitey ever did.
In summary: it is true that whites have shown good fighting skills. But when I hear the Kipling poem about the Saxon I am starting to roll my eyes. What exactly is going to happen when the Saxon begins to hate? How many examples has he made? Germans? Irish? Boers? Two of them ended up as bustling civilizations after than got the Saxon treatment and the Irish are pretty OK too.
Educate me in case I am ignorant.
LikeLike
The main reason the Japanese surrendered when they did was not because of the A bomb. It was because they feared that they would be occupied by the Russians if the war continued for much longer. They figured that the Americans would leave before long whereas the Russians never would.
It was concern about their gene pool.
LikeLike
@ho
I wouldn’t say that Germany has ended up well. They are now basically America’s/Israel’s bitch, their demographics are going to shit, the war decimated a vast majority of their population, including strong young men who went to war, and are crippled by political correctness.
If anything, Germany is fucked.
Japan is kinda similar, although their demographics are a bit more stable, and they’ve been getting their freedom back, bit by bit.
LikeLike
No different than other NATO countries. It’s hilarious how Americans see themselves as the solution to things when all these problems manifest where they got their shit.
LikeLike
Neanderthals are closer to western Asians(Georgians, Khazars) than Cro-magnons. Look at the facial features. They are probably the trolls of myth and legend.
African DNA has zero Neanderthal DNA. Asians obviously descend from Denisovian populations.
Up to 3% of euro DNA is neanderthal, but they suspiciously never mention Eskimo DNA…
heavy brow ridge, large nose, high pitched voice, protruding maxillae and mandible, stout thorax… Sounds eskimo to me
LikeLike
That’s a good point…
I’ve often said, here at the chateau, that this sudden interest of “Neanderthal” and placing such DNA in the white man’s corner seemed odd to me…
When I was in school, it was pretty much indisputable that Cro-Magnon were our ancestors, and Neanderthals were considered a full step back… especially in physical features and, foremost, cranial capacity.
LikeLike
When we were in school, we were lied to about almost everything.
Neanderthals had 20% greater brain size than moderns. Not that such a thing ever matters.
Their main problem might have been persistently low population numbers. They were not agriculturalists, at least as far as the evidence goes. Apex predators are always thin on the ground no matter how gifted they are as individuals.
LikeLike
Nope… it was Cro-Magnon that had greater cranial capacity. compared to modern man.. 1600cc versus 1450cc if memory serves.
And even that is nowhere near 20%… so quit spreading disinformation… that would make them look like almost Coneheads if their skulls were THAT big.
Neanderthals ran a distant third, with their simian-like skulls.
Have archaelogical discoveries changed THAT much in the past thirty to forty years, in re skeletons found of Neanderthal versus Cro-Magnon?
LikeLike
Or it could be that, back in the day, they predominantly scanned European heads for comparison, but these days, everyone’s in the mix?
I also recall clearly the representations made of N and C-M… the former looked quite a bit simian, though closer to modern man… the latter, well… it was said that if you put a suit on Cro-Mag, he’d walk down any city street today and go unremarked.
After a quick google, now I’m seeing a claim that modern man’s brains, on average, are smaller than BOTH Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon… and that these two, at various times, may have actually been contemporaries of what went on to become modern man.
Sheesh, the mind boggles.
LikeLike
6 100
The fact that this is never discussed gives you a hint.
And don’t say “up to 3% of Euro DNA”. I know folks who tested at 4%. And you can guess just by appearance.
LikeLike
Greater abstract thinking capacity but less verbal fluency definitely parallels the distinctions we see between modern whites & blacks.
LikeLike
BINGO. Eskimo DNA. 40% Neanderthal.
LikeLike
Jack
A first American edition 2005 Lotus Elise. Carbon fiber top and 2 crazy girls piled into the very small other seat/// plus an 11 foot snake, — all of us out just out to have a good time.
Which/who/what is the most Neanderthal?
LikeLike
Population collapse in Western Europe is nothing new. French birthrates collapsed compared to Germany and the UK in the 19th Century. Note France had been the leading populous nation in the 1600s. And even in the 1700s had strong population growth. Both the UK AND Germany experienced population crashes starting around 1900 or so, predating WWI. Yes France in the 19th Century continued to increase in population, but at minuscule rates compared to Germany or the UK. See Eugen Weber’s “Peasants into Frenchmen” for his ideas on the why.
My own view is that when women gain independence from marriage, that is they have financial and social independence, in Western and Asian countries, they go on baby strikes, finding the attributes of Western and Asian men that were positive when women needed them (for a lifetime of duty, really) to be negative when the State becomes the provider. Africans don’t act like this, their fertility just explodes under industrialization and urbanization even under periodic famine and civil wars.
Note that France was the leader in female emancipation in many respects, even after Napoleon rolled back reforms of the Revolution. An unmarried woman in France was not the object of social scorn and did not experience the deep poverty that similar women in the UK and Germany would encounter in the 19th Century.
European and Asian women are optimized for beauty, that is sexual selection acted upon women to produce beauty (and intelligence) to provide for life long pair bonding in difficult environments requiring a lifetime commitment from men. BEFORE the pill and condom came into widespread use in France in the 19th Century, social attitudes and state support allowed women to remain single and thus on baby strikes. Note the recovery of French fertility in the Wiki article, no real info on the demographic recovery being French or just imported North African Muslims and Africans.
LikeLike
All of this population altering reminds me of bees.
Remember the “Killer Bees” of about 25 years ago? The story was some evil African bees had gotten into a freighter from a African country and released these very violent bees in S America. The threat was these violent African bees were destroying the indigenous bees and attacking people as the bees moved North. (Last I recall they had made it up to Mexico).
The scientists came up w/ an idea to breed sterile, tame bees, release them into the wild and the hostile bees would mate and die out; leaving a more docile bee population.
(Yes there is a frightening parallel among humans; I guess Nature is giving us a preview of things to come. It seems diversity, whether forced thru conquest or “yellow fever” will affect a nation.
Positive or negative? Time will tell, look at Mexico or Brazil or Calif.)
And yes it will take generations to sift out the genes.
LikeLike
I have not been to Japan but I have been to places where the majority population, on any given day, was Japanese tourists.
Consider the white-tailed deer. For many many years (decades?) states would give out almost exclusively buck licenses, and a very few doe licenses. After a while, with a new and sudden pressure on the deer population, with smaller antlers suddenly going from selected against to massively selected for, the average size of deer antlers being dropping. If this hunting paradigm had continued indefinitely, male white tail deer would have evolved completely out of their antlers.
Similarly, in Japan, WWII saw the death of a vastly disproportionate amount of any males who had even a tincture of testosterone in their bloodstream. It’s not that porn destroyed the Japanese sex drive; rather, the Japanese sex drive bled out in China and the South Pacific.
That’s my theory.
LikeLike
I’ve lived in Japan. You are exactly right. The majority of the Japanese population have always been peasant farmers. A slim minority were raised as warriors, and were the commanders of the vast peasant army fielded by Japan in WWII.
The warriors all died. Many leaving no progeny. The breeding population after the war consisted of peasant genes only. The post-war leadership retained enough of the old warrior ethos to whip the villagers into an army of salarymen. These men worked like dogs rebuilding their destroyed country, and the women raised their sons in their fathers’ absence.
Fast-forward two generations: Urban-living has obliterated the stolid peasant village, replacing it with an imaginary online community. Globocorp has obliterated the nationalist martial leadership of the post-war power structure, replacing it with the best practices of outsourcing. Two generations of men have been raised by women and television, which owing to the purchasing power of the Japanese housewife, is also aimed at women.
Young men have adopted the values of fashion, shopping, and social media. There are very little surviving strains of anything that could be called masculine. Instead, there are thousands of companies ready to sell the Japanese the consumer products they need to be pretty. And there are no warriors to protect them from the onslaught.
Consumerism: the farmers have become the farmed.
LikeLike
The lack of Japanese sex drive is due to supernormal stimulus, I believe. From the women’s perspective, Height is a sign of health, and average white guys look like optimum Japanese men.
Exhibit A. http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1313060/thumbs/o-ALEXANDER-SKARSGARD-AWE-facebook.jpg
That was from the girls mirin subreddit. The local men aren’t what they fantasize about, in part due to Hollywood.
The men on the other hand are mostly introverted and addicted to porn, which doesn’t involve any risk of publicly shaming yourself.
My theory on the Neanderthals is that they were outfucked by way of not passing on their X chromosome. As it turns out, humans and Neanderthals were not completely biologically compatible.
http://www.hhmi.org/news/when-populations-collide
LikeLike
I think there’s something to the theory that Neanderthals were small-group, K-strategists that got overwhelmed/diluted by r-selected homosapiens.
The remnants of thal DNA may explain why Europeans express both r/K-strategies while pure homosapiens (blacks) are invariably r-selected.
LikeLike
There is the theory that the expulsion from paradise is a metaphorical retelling of a racial memory. The relatively speedy transition from a hunter-gatherer society to an agricultural one due to rapid population growth. The apple in this theory is the metaphor for pairing and subsequently more sex in the formation of permanent communities. It only takes a slight adaptation to fit this to the Neanderthal-Cro-Magnum history if, of course, you consider racial memory and metaphorical verbal tradition viable, and are open to the idea of chronological re-interpreretations.
Good luck with that.
LikeLike
Take it to the next chapter and think of Cain and Abel, with Cain banished to the East after murdering his brother, and expressing fear that “strangers will seek to kill me”, so God marked him in such a way that it would be a warning to others… and where he eventually found wives.
What “strangers” was he talking about? And from what people(s) did he find wives, when thus far all the Bible spoke about was Adam and Eve and their sons?
His progeny (Nimrod, a “mighty hunter”, for one) allegedly founded cities such as Babel.
LikeLike
Nimrod was a decendent of Ham and Ham was black; so Nimrod was atleast an Obama
amirite?
LikeLike
I doubt Ham was a negro, since Noah (his father) was not a negro, and his brother, Japheth, became a founder of maritime nations…
… and you know negros can’t swim because of dat extra bone in dey ankles.
All seriousness aside, Noah cursed Ham’s son Canaan, if memory serves… and though that curse was to be servant to Shem, that still doesn’t turn someone into a completely different race.
But it’s most amusing how all of these theories and speculations arise to somehow, someway account for whatever is found in the woodpile.
LikeLike
Cain found a wife among people in the land of Nod(before it meant sleep) and it is interesting as you say to speculate as to where that was and whom they were. Then there is the question of Lilith, sometimes referred to as Adam’s first wife.
LikeLike
@Eliot
are you trying to write black people out of the biblical record?
you got short arms and deep pockets
LikeLike
I dismiss the whole Lilith nonsense as some Sanhedrin fairy tale… there’s a reason Jehovah let his erstwhile “Chosen” get scattered to the four winds…
… Satan, however, seems to be taking care of his own.
Just trying to keep the record straight… better to stint on one’s desired and spun-from-whole-cloth additions to Scripture than to be caught out, especially at the end, adding to the story.
Rev. 22:18 – I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this scroll.
LikeLike
This is the effect of the economy not growing enough for the young people to afford housing(this is also a function of older people not dying anymore to make room in the economic marjetplace), welfare(particularly retirement benefits and the devaluation of family through them, plus the immense cost shouldered by young people) and individualism(the individual being the fundamental unit of our civilizationinstead of the fwmily).
LikeLike