• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Why Is Randi Lee Harper, Fat, Drug-Addicted, Mentally Unhinged Liar, Still Working At Twitter?
Sexist Men Are Quite Literally Winners, Common Sense (And ♂SCIENCE♂) Finds »

Literal Cuckservatives

July 23, 2015 by CH

The Dissidenti™™ and their frazzled hall monitors buzzsaw with talk about “cuckservatives.” It’s the shiv du jour, you see. As shivs go, it is in this ‘umble narrator’s opinion one of the more lethal of the semantic shanks employed by dark realists.

Lovers and haters of the Cuck Shiv gird for battle (well, the haters girdle for battle). The wielders love the twist of their shiny new toy. The haters brace defensively, shielding vitals. As well they should. CH commenters wonder, not without historical wonderment precedent for questions of Realtalk™ provenance aligned with Chateau themes, was it Heartiste who coined the “cuckservative” scarlet C? Answer: I don’t know. The first mention of it here is dated 24 Jun 2015. I suspect Poasting Whytes were first in the field with their version. Perhaps the term was independently formulated by multiple parties, inspired to simultaneous Phoenixian birth by the polluted cascade of daily poz.

I can tell you this for certain: The term “cuckold”, and its related emotional resonance, was thrust rudely into the public consciousness and popularized right here, at Chateau Heartiste, long before the current fascination with the pregnant (heh) weight of the slur. Kneejerk anti-truthers and perplexed alt-rightists scoffed at first contact with Le Chateau’s musings on the metadeath genetic threat cuckoldry poses to men, but in time even they began to see the value of the concept as a right and proper fitting metaphor for supplicants and sycophants and self-sodomizers of various stripes, which of course means they understood on a sub-discourse level the biomechanic sexual market truth implied by the insult.

To the gristle: What is a cuckservative?

Occam’s Razor ably decodes.

Very basically, the cuckservative is a white gentile conservative (or libertarian) who thinks he’s promoting his own interests but really isn’t.  In fact, the cuckservative is an extreme universalist and seems often to suffer from ethnomasochism & pathological altruism. In short, a cuckservative is a white (non-Jewish) conservative who isn’t racially aware.

That’s a serviceable academic description. I prefer something a leetle more… pungent.

CH definition: A cuckservative is a cowardly pussy who sucks up to leftoid equalists for mercy and pisses himself when he gets accused of racism, sexism, or anti-semitism.

Corollary to the above CH definition: The cuckservative will throw his brother and his nation under the bus if it means he keeps his token status as cog in the Hivemind machine. Those cocktail parties aren’t going to attend themselves!

So what’s the difference between a cuckservative and a garden variety shitlib? Delayed reaction. The cuckservative may or may not be a true believer in reality-denying feminism or anti-white antiracism, but he sure as hell knows to stick his crabbed finger in the air to see which cheek he should spread for his equalist overlord’s strap-on.

Some common traits of the species homo homo cuckservative:

– is quick to jump down the throat of any Realtalker.
– distances himself immediately from any ostensible ally who lets slip a jarring sin against the Narrative.
– will never once, not once, do or say something brave in his life.
– is at heart the rear-end of a lemming herd. won’t take a stand (or a plunge) until the numbers safely allow him to do so.
– is ignorant of or afraid to confront racial, ethnic, tribal truths.
– would rather bear witness to national decline and dissolution and preside over gross injustice than be on record that there are consequential race and sex differences beyond skin color and genitalia.
– thinks the only difference between the sexes that is acceptable to utter in public is the male penchant for gags and buttplugs. (he also projects wildly)
– dreadfully fears social ostracism, rendering him politically impotent.
– will force himself to clap loudly for pre-op Bruce Jenner, to coo falsely over mystery meat infants, to nod soberly in agreement when the pay gap lie is mentioned yet again as gospel truth, to pretend that Michelle Obama is attractive, and to insist women’s soccer is just as thrilling to watch as men’s soccer (which is not much thrilling to begin with).
– Will give every shrieking leftoid the benefit of the doubt while reflexively questioning the motives of every ballsy Realtalker.
– will preface every feeble tiptoe into his own Realtalk wading pool with an ass-covering “To be sure…” or a spastic impromptu paean to Martin Luther King, Jr.
– backs down with a quickness at roundtable debates with aggressive liberals.
– the only topics on which he won’t back down are taxes on the oligarchs and fighting terrorists over there so we don’t have to fight them here (while insisting open borders are American as apple pie and that muslim dude who shot dead a platoon of Christian soldiers was really a victim of discrimination and now, now, let’s not get crazy and question our shared enthusiasm for increasing Diversity™ in the military).
– will intone “diversity is our strength” while commuting home to an upscale gated community that is 98% White and 2% East Asian.
– exclaims “content of our character”, “fighting for freedom”, “blacks kill other blacks more than any other race”, and “hispanics are natural conservatives” without a hint of ironic detachment.
– has probably sexually molested a young boy sometime before his political career took off.

Cuckservatives are even more loathsome than true blue leftoid believers in the antiwhite progrom, because at least you can say the latter are loyal to a personal, if mortally twisted, ethos. The cuckservative is loyal to nothing but personal aggrandizement. The cuckservative so easily betrays his stated principles because, in fact, he has no principles. He is a globocorporate transnational post-american striver SWPL just as much as any of his ultraliberal co-evals, minus the overt eagerness for estate taxes and nationalized healthcare, and he’ll be damned if he’ll let some flyover smart-ass with an eye for both the big picture and the demonic detail to destabilize his easy-livin’ sinecure.

Given this list of characteristics, the “cuckold” root of the cuckservative metaphor is exceedingly apt. The cuckservative is, in habit of mind and sometimes in practice, that pathetic white man with noodle arms and crusted tear tracks sitting hunched on a stool in the corner of his bedroom watching, with willing fervor, his ecstatic white wife get pounded into post-white release by a buck nigra who eats his food and kicks his ass when the fridge needs refilling.

Yes, he’ll sit there nicely and putter with his pud while his wife (nation) gets banged out by another man (nonwhites, third world immigrants), as long as no one mistakes him for a small town prole who can’t tell the nose difference between a merlot and a pinot noir.

The cuckservative is cucked by antagonistic races, by antagonistic ideologies, by antagonistic corporate masters, by antagonistic talk show hosts, by antagonistic fat losers editorializing on the internet equivalent of teen beat gossip rags.

All he wants is their approval. A pat on the head from his sworn and intractable enemies. He swears he’ll keep his hands to himself and won’t cum until instructed to do so!

He is a low self-esteem, approval-seeking, whimpering cumlapper.

He is dog shit.

But there is hope.

Amazingly, some cuckservatives are LITERAL CUCKSERVATIVES. Commenter james1 peruses a few famous biographies,

It’s interesting that even though the Boehner family and the Bush family are Republicans, they are bigger race mixers than the Kennedy family and the Clinton family are Democrats. Jeb Bush married a Mestiza who looks like the maid at your local Motel 6 or Days Inn and John Boehner’a daughter married a Jamaican pothead who is a wannabe Bob Marley.

Also the Republican John McCain adopted a very dark skin girl from Sri Lanka while JFK/Jackie O and Bill/Hillary who are Democrats never adopted any Nonwhite children.

Literal cuckservatives take their prostrate mewling before the antiwhite mob a little too seriously. But with a familial C.V. like, for example, Boehner’s or ¡Jabe!’s, is it a surprise that these self-abnegating genetic dead ends can’t think clearly on the subject of race, borders, nation?

As Occam’s Razor puts it,

On the other hand, the idea of whites acting as a group to secure their own interests terrifies the cuckservative. If you ever want to troll a cuckservative, just repeatedly use the word “white,”  such as “this isn’t beneficial for the white community.”  The cuckservative will be triggered immediately.

Nobody gets triggered like a nancygoy cuckservative gets triggered. Truly pathetic specimens of manhood. Wasn’t Boehner the puffboy who blubbered like a baby on stage recollecting his time in the bathhouses of the Castro District? With “leaders” and “representatives” like him, who needs an opposition party? If Boehner wants a real reason to cry, he should reflect on his daughter’s coal burning, doing her part to destroy an aesthetic, cultural, and genetic heritage 20,000 years in the making.

The Cuckservative: Re-raising equalist leftoids, because, hey, he’s got something to disprove.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Goodbye America, Self-aggrandizement, Status Is King, The Id Monster, Tool Time, Ugly Truths, Vanity | 353 Comments

353 Responses

  1. on July 23, 2015 at 3:47 pm Canadian Friend

    “…insist women’s soccer is just as thrilling to watch as men’s soccer (which is not much thrilling to begin with)…”

    Soccer is a sort of sado-masochism without the sex part

    The goal is too wide and too high thus pretty much impossible to guard, your natural instinct would be to use your hands but your hands are tied behind your back, the field is too large, it is an extremely frustrating game.

    If you like to play it you are bit masochistic, and if you like to watch it your a bit sadistic.

    I have hated soccer ever since I was introduced to it as a kid back in the late 1960s.

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 3:50 pm The Spirit Within

      American football is much more frustrating. The goal is the entire width of the field, almost none of the players are allowed to touch the damn ball, and improvisation is banned.

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 4:01 pm Arbiter

        I have to agree with TSW here – I’m not a fan of either sport, and never a fan of lardasses watching sports as a way to have something to talk about with the other ignoramuses at work. But American football is definitely sewed together with a tighter sack of rules than soccer.

        One sport I enjoy watching is mixed martial arts like in the Ultimate Fighting Championship. Funny how, when you allow the fighters to get up close and personal without being broken up by an umpire, so that the longer arms of Blacks are no longer an advantage, Whites easily dominate. Hell, I have even seen a short Asian guy take down a large rastafari who could only swing his arms but had no technique. Wrestling is a good thing to know – wrestlers do very well in MMA.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 4:31 pm Canadian Friend

        Having to use your forehead instead of your hands to pass the ball is beyond unnatural and frustrating.

        It is like trying to give cunnilingus with your chin instead of your tongue.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 6:04 pm Greg Eliot

        It is like trying to give cunnilingus with your chin instead of your tongue.

        Wha, you’re stealing my move now?

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 6:57 pm Steve Johnson

        Arbiter –

        True MMA favors grapplers even more than UFC rules which are built to discourage grappling – because mass audiences find it boring.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 8:51 pm ho

        I don’t mind normal healthy self interest but the contrived muh muh white sin sports is amusing.

        Nigs do fairly well in MMA. They just don’t dominate your asses like in apehoop and boxing.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 9:05 pm corvinus

        They just don’t dominate your asses like in apehoop and boxing.

        Only in sprinting. Apehoop is a groid ghetto here in the States, since it’s not a reliable career path. Even though white kids would do just fine in it — Italians and Lithuanians seem to do just fine against our nogs in international tournaments — groids have no marketable skills otherwise, so those with the right height and athleticism go into apehoop.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 2:15 am ole rusty cock

        Really shld not hijak this wonderful work by Heartiste, with g3y American sports talk, but I have to respondz lulz…

        American football sucks..5 seconds of play time followed by roughly 5 minutes of race mixing pizza and beer ads. American football is incredibly boring. At least European soccer has hooligans and politics associated with certain cities and teams.

        But back to something that matters. If you’re a white parent get your sons into wrestling in school early.. its free. If they dont want to, at least make them do it for one season. Even the most basic wrestling skills put an avg kid, a step ahead of the blunt smoking simian who will hit on his Gf. If you have the money get them into Boxing, muay Thai, Russian Sambo, and or BJJ when they’re not wrestling. Any one of these cpld with wrestling is great, and if you have time/money for more then go for it.
        Whites can and do excell at wrestling and MMA, but again even at the basic levels it instills alphaness, physical fitness/prowess, work hard & succeed mind set all minus the mouth breathing dick scratching simian behaviour of baksetball (blacks play bball in winter while most whites wrestle) More importantly look around you, war is coming…get your sons prepared.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 12:09 pm James Blonde

        corvinus

        Only in sprinting.
        ———————————————————————-

        Slow your roll pinkface; the dark people have you in distance running too, male or female.

        These races may start with a buncha icebergs; but they always end up just a few Kenyans, Etiopians, Ugandans… with names like “Eflip Dollop”

        “in the end all thats left is the small dark man” — Lothrop Stoddard

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 12:16 pm Greg Eliot

        +1 on the wrestling…

        LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 4:51 pm Irish Savant

      As with much of professional team sports football (soccer) has lost all of its original significance. Teams used to reflect their cities and regions. For example every single member of the Celtic team that won the European Cup in 1967 came from Glasgow. Now there are just a handful of white players on the team.

      Even “national” sides have lost meaning. The majority of players for France and Belgium (to name but two) are black or Arabic.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 12:32 am Dude

        “The challenge of football is to use your feet to achieve a goal that is difficult. It’s precisely BECAUSE it#s hard to do that shit with your feet that so many people like it.”

        You Eurotards are kidding, right? Soccer (only one of the six code of football) is so popular because it is a very simple game with few rules that can be understood by simpletons. In addition, it does not cost much, and so can be enjoyed by you sad plebian-types. As for the American games, the idea that you have any understanding of any of them is laughable.

        Soccer also suits your silly continental temperament. Rather than simply look at the score, you actually look at how many “chances” each side had, and argue (ad naseum) regarding whether the winning side “deserved” to win. What an onanistic endeavor. In America, here’s how we decide which team “deserved” to win: we look at the scoreboard when the buzzer sounds. As I say, arguing over who “deserves” (rather than actually doing something) really does fit you continentals much better than a real sport with actual scoring.

        As for the way ties are settled, . . . wow, just, wow, I can’t even (since pasty-faced upper-middle class millenials in America seem to love this ridiculous prole game, it seemed appropriate). That would be like deciding an American football game by running (competitive) passing drills. Who thinks that’s a good way to decide a game (of anything).

        And, yes, it is absurd that the most popular human game makes a point of preventing humans from using that which notably distinguishes primates from other animals. But, hey, you kids have at it.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 5:06 am Sol Lewinski

        REKT

        LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 5:13 pm Jack Rackam

      Our hands with opposable thumbs and our big brains are what set us apart from the beasts.
      Most human games use your amazing hands with their opposable thumbs. Usually your amazing big brain is protected with a helmet. There is only one game where you cannot use your amazing hands, and are encouraged to bash your big brain against the ball.

      The perfect player would be a mule: Thick skull, no hands, four feet.

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 5:27 pm The Spirit Within

        There are plenty of jackasses in soccer.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 5:52 pm Arbiter

        It isn’t often the ball is hit by a player’s forehead. The point of the game is to use the much stronger limbs, the legs, and to do so you can’t have people pick up the ball. Again, I don’t enjoy watching soccer, but players not using their hands to pick up the ball – come on. By the way, they do use their hands and arms, as they are running. No one can watch a soccer game and say they don’t move their arms.

        “our hands with opposable thumbs and our big brains are what set us apart from the beasts.”

        Well, everything can be demonized, and everything can be paraded, it seems. You could also write about how baseball and American football chain otherwise free men with burdensome rules, preventing them from moving freely as Men of the West should. Etc.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 8:49 pm ho

        Please, do yourselves a favor and stfu. You are continuously embarrassing yourselves.

        The challenge of football is to use your feet to achieve a goal that is difficult. It’s precisely BECAUSE it#s hard to do that shit with your feet that so many people like it.

        Blowing past some guy with the ball on your feet is more thrilling than doing so while grabbing it.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 12:34 am Dude

        “The challenge of football is to use your feet to achieve a goal that is difficult. It’s precisely BECAUSE it#s hard to do that shit with your feet that so many people like it.”

        You Eurotards are kidding, right? Soccer (only one of the six code of football) is so popular because it is a very simple game with few rules that can be understood by simpletons. In addition, it does not cost much, and so can be enjoyed by you sad plebian-types. As for the American games, the idea that you have any understanding of any of them is laughable.

        Soccer also suits your silly continental temperament. Rather than simply look at the score, you actually look at how many “chances” each side had, and argue (ad naseum) regarding whether the winning side “deserved” to win. What an onanistic endeavor. In America, here’s how we decide which team “deserved” to win: we look at the scoreboard when the buzzer sounds. As I say, arguing over who “deserves” (rather than actually doing something) really does fit you continentals much better than a real sport with actual scoring.

        As for the way ties are settled, . . . wow, just, wow, I can’t even (since pasty-faced upper-middle class millenials in America seem to love this ridiculous prole game, it seemed appropriate). That would be like deciding an American football game by running (competitive) passing drills. Who thinks that’s a good way to decide a game (of anything).

        And, yes, it is absurd that the most popular human game makes a point of preventing humans from using that which notably distinguishes primates from other animals. But, hey, you kids have at it.

        (Ha! Yeah, hit wrong reply the first time. Sorry about that IS.)

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 6:49 am tspark156

        Dude
        The only code of football that isn’t for pussies is Rugby and you Ameritards really suck at it. You should watch The Six Nations it’s like the Superbowl but not as gay as fuck.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 10:50 am ho

        “You Eurotards are kidding, right? Soccer (only one of the six code of football) is so popular because it is a very simple game with few rules that can be understood by simpletons. In addition, it does not cost much, and so can be enjoyed by you sad plebian-types. As for the American games, the idea that you have any understanding of any of them is laughable.”

        I understand American games just fine, thank you very much.

        Yeah I know that “soccer” is cheap, so what? It is not the only reason why it’s popular. It sucks for a variety of reasons but the fact that you have to use your feet is not one of them. In fact, just the opposite.

        “Soccer also suits your silly continental temperament. Rather than simply look at the score, you actually look at how many “chances” each side had, and argue (ad naseum) regarding whether the winning side “deserved” to win. What an onanistic endeavor. In America, here’s how we decide which team “deserved” to win: we look at the scoreboard when the buzzer sounds. As I say, arguing over who “deserves” (rather than actually doing something) really does fit you continentals much better than a real sport with actual scoring.”

        Bullshit. I’ve seen the superior team giving away the win several times, in Basketball.

        You are right about the faggotry of having to count chances to point out who is playing better though.

        “As for the way ties are settled, . . . wow, just, wow, I can’t even (since pasty-faced upper-middle class millenials in America seem to love this ridiculous prole game, it seemed appropriate). That would be like deciding an American football game by running (competitive) passing drills. Who thinks that’s a good way to decide a game (of anything).”

        Idiot doesn’t even know it’s only used in knocout games, which is not how the majority of the sport is played.

        LikeLike


      • on July 25, 2015 at 4:01 am avenroad

        American football is all about oversize people running around bashing into each other.

        You might as well watch fat girls play soccer blindfold.

        LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 5:56 pm PA

      I like soccer but I only watch it once every four years, and it’s mainly about cheering for countries I like.

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 5:58 pm PA

        Last time around I liked Germany. Before that it was Uruguay, the blondest team in the tournament.

        The francophile in me always wants the African All-Stars, aka France, to lose.

        LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 8:45 pm ho

      Lol at the OOGA BOOGA, CANT USE HANDS rants by Americlaps.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 5:49 am carlos danger

        Say what you want but soccer players are in excellent shape. Try running sprints for 90 minutes. I’m not a huge fan either, but my American comrades are indeed embarrassing themselves. Soccer players have much greater longevity than football players, far fewer serious injuries, and most pros make better money too. Soccer is a fluid game, like Rugby and it is that fuidity and how well it is executed in out maneuvering your opponent that is the real art to it.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 6:58 am PA

        Well put Carlos. One important reform soccer needs is disincentivising the faking of pain or injury.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 7:05 am Greg Eliot

        I always liked soccer… but even at a young age, I had the attention span to sit through entire baseball games.

        That said, I think they should eliminate the offside nonsense… that would liven things up a bit.

        And say what you want about the game in general, that German goal in the World Cup was a piece of athletic poetry.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 9:57 am mendozatorres

        Agreed, GE. Watching that play happen live was thrilling. The slow mo displayed the beauty.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 10:53 am ho

        Removing the offside rule would destroy the game 😆

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 12:14 pm James Blonde

        @Eliot

        People like to play/watch soccer because it reminds them of dancing?

        In addition, you can be a normal sized guy and still become a superstar if you train and work hard?

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 12:21 pm Greg Eliot

        I don’t know if it would destroy the game… but I can see your point if the goal area looked like a jail break before the ball was delivered… maybe a compromise and say, one player would be allowed to pass the fullbacks.

        Dancing? I dunno ’bout that. I think a good soccer team carrying out a precision strategy and coordinated tactical moves is more like faux warfare… chess writ large, maybe.

        LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 3:39 am Yosef

      It’s funny when an American manboob fatso lectures everyone about sports

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 7:42 am O

        Male hamstering at it’s finest. I don’t have the agility, balance and coordination to control the ball with my feet: this sport fucking sucks, I never liked it anyway. The sport that my country has a hard time being globally dominant at: the sport fucking sucks. Let me instead participate in the “world series” even though it is only played in my country.

        Coming from a canadian, it is funny also because hockey has many similarities with soccer. You could say that passing the puck with a hockey stick is like fucking your girl with a dildo.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 9:48 am Canadian Friend

        “…You could say that passing the puck with a hockey stick is like fucking your girl with a dildo….”

        Nope

        hockey is like eating food with a fork, which is more sophisticated than eating with your face only – like an animal – because soccer forbids you use your hands.

        Forks and hockey sticks are technological advancements while kicking a ball is caveman stuff.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 10:04 am O

        “Forks and hockey sticks are technological advancements while kicking a ball is caveman stuff.”

        We can argue about this all day, and anyone could find rationalizations either way. A soccer ball is also a technological advancement.
        Controlling things with your hand is easy. Controlling things with your feet is harder. Hitting rock-like objects with a stick is also cavemen stuff.

        LikeLike


  2. on July 23, 2015 at 3:48 pm Experienced Father

    The Shiv of Darkness is strong in this one.

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 5:27 pm Captain Obvious

      On Fuchs News, they’re all cuckservatives, with the exception of Tucker Carlson [a Chateau lurker], Brian Kilmeade, Bill O’Reilly, and O’Reilly’s sidekicks, like Jesse Watters. I used to think that O’Reilly himself was a cuck, but something has changed in O’Reilly recently – something has lit a fire under O’Reilly’s posterior. And O’Reilly’s guests, like Dennis Miller, and of course Adam “You’ll Never Work Again in Eskimo Town” Carolla. Whereas Sean Hannititty got his balls cut off by someone, and now Hannititty is just another nauseating cuck.

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 5:30 pm Captain Obvious

        Adam Carolla was an early pioneer in Truth Talk. He turned his back on literally tens of millions of dollars [maybe hundreds of millions lifetime] when he refused to sell out, like his old partner, Jimmy “Sarah Silverslut” Kimmel. That takes some serious gonads to walk away from dough like that.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 5:55 pm Arbiter

        So one has to wonder what the NSA has on Sean Hannity.

        “Nooo, the establishment would never use the information gathering from the NSA that way! They will only use it for the good of all of us! Suspicions like this one are never validated years down the road.”

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 5:59 pm Skunk

        I don’t like O’Reilly’s style. His style of debating is to concede all of the leftists major points right up front and then stubbornly hold fast on the minor stuff.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 6:04 pm PA

        I’ll never forgive O’Reilly for going after an all-white private venue prom in 2002.

        He was also a huge advocate for the Iraq invasion. As far as I know, he never recanted, unlike Derb.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 6:12 pm Greg Eliot

        You fucks put any credence in the allowed opposition?

        Sheesh… t-h-w-a-c-k never made me (((shake mah haid))) that much.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 6:44 pm Captain Obvious

        As recently as a year or two ago, O’Reilly was still lobbing softball non-questions at Obama in their interviews. But something changed recently. O’Reilly is really, really pissed about something. I’d love to know what exactly was the straw that broke the camel’s back.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 6:46 pm Captain Obvious

        Got a longer reply in mod about Adam Carolla, who walked away from GAZILLIONS of dollars in order to pursue a career in Truth Talk, and O’Reilly has been sponsoring Carolla since forever.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 6:48 pm Captain Obvious

        GE, when Tucker Carlson is filling in on the early morning show [often on the weekends], he is throwing out 100% Heartistian Dark Enlightenment TRUTH TALK.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 6:59 pm Greg Eliot

        Oh, really? Does he say Eskimo or YKW when he names the Jew?

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 7:01 pm Steve Johnson

        Being totally out of touch with tv and seeing a youtube video of Bill O’Reilly interviewing Trume I was stunned.

        People think O’Reilly is on the right? The guy is a perfect cuckservative. The only things he got excited about were that Donald might not bestow sufficient education on the negro youth in Harlem or protect Israel vigorously enough.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 7:37 pm Captain Obvious

        GE: Tucker Carlson recently talking about the state of college professoriate today: “THEY HATE YOU!!!” Recently talking about the state of immigration: “WHY ARE WE LETTING IN ALL OF THESE PEOPLE [immigrants] WHO WANT TO MURDER US?” Etc etc etc. If you’re a morning person, then try to catch TC, often subbing on the weekends.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 7:54 pm Ripp

        Check this out:

        http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/07/on-trump-murdoch-has-lost-control-of-ailes-fox.html

        Rupert resigned as CEO for Fux News recent on July 1. New CEO roger ales appears tO support Trump however Rupert don’t like it…and apparently told new CEO to stop having fox support him. Lolz…

        Rupert is THE cuckservative. And fux news is cuckservative extraordinaire.

        In any regard these “news” corporations are controlled. And if the minions get out of line they get whacked.

        I love that Trump is stirring the pot and pissing everyone off. He’s bulldozing right through the bullshit and it’s great.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 8:41 pm Captain Obvious

        SJ, I’m telling you, man, something has changed in O’Reilly recently. I dunno – it could be as simple as Trump telling O’Reilly that he wants him in a Trump White House – maybe O’Reilly as press secretary? Whatever it is, O’Reilly’s tone has changed. But to my eye [and ear], I feel like O’Reilly has finally realized what MK is talking about below: THIS IS WAR.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 9:32 pm FUBSY

        O’Lielly is such a hack. He was against gay marriage until he was for it. He criticizes illegal immigration yet he’s for these comprehensive immigration reform bills. Well played Billy Boy….NOT!

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 9:51 pm Cortesar

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 11:12 pm Amasius

        I think a certain percentage of Irish Americans have a “fellow traveler” thing going on with the Eskimos and the anti-White agenda in general. Chris Matthews, Lawrence O’Donnell, Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity.

        Pat Buchanan’s cool though. I like the Irish just fine, but sometimes I worry about them.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 7:56 am Captain Obvious

        Amasius, that’s what I feel like is suddenly changing. Even Chris Matthews [who studied under Uber-Leprechaun Tip O’Neill] blew up at Evil Psychiatry/Gramsci after the 2014 midterms – using the word “TRIBAL”: http://www.westernjournalism.com/boom-diehard-liberal-democrat-flips-obama-sounds-just-like-conservative-republican/

        LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 1:47 pm Damncrackers

      When did the White Nationalists become Zionists?

      http://www.delcotimes.com/general-news/20150723/lincoln-university-professor-makes-incendiary-remarks-about-jews-women-gays

      LikeLike


  3. on July 23, 2015 at 3:49 pm Haven M.

    “All he wants is their approval.”

    they want you dead, so earning it can only be done through…um…self-abnegation.

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 7:17 pm King

      Conservatives thought they could placate their opponents by an act of good faith. “Hey, guys, we are willing to scrutinize the sins of the white man if you come halfway in our direction and let us keep our traditions.” It was a misplaced, gratuitous, and unreciprocated faith that our enemies (rightly) read as a weakness to exploit, which they did.

      That was then. There is no connection between 20th century conservatism and 21st. The ultimate sacrifice to white guilt — giving the negro the presidency to expiate our sins — severed that connection. We have gone from a political landscape where compromise was theoretically possible to a war-footing where the total surrender of one side must be unconditional.

      In other words, the cold civil war is going hot. The left, rejecting not just compromise but the very legitimacy of the right, forced the situation when we largely would just rather be left alone.

      The many well-meaning conservatives we are talking about here are not dumb or perversely attracted to their own humiliation (cuckoldry). They simply have not caught up with the news that this isn’t their father’s republic anymore. This is war.

      Matt

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 7:43 pm Captain Obvious

        > “this isn’t their father’s republic anymore. This is war.” —– It is so difficult to talk to older septuagenarian/octogenarian GOP Conservatives who came of age during e.g. the Eisenhower Administration – who possibly cast their first vote for Ike. It takes conversation upon conversation upon conversation to try to convince them that things are REALLY BAD out there now.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 9:22 pm Tilikum

        Shit hot and right on .

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 9:58 pm Moses

        “Hey, guys, we are willing to scrutinize the sins of the white man if you come halfway in our direction and let us keep our traditions.”

        Nailed it.

        As I age (45 now) I have concluded that the overriding human motivation is will to power. It’s like a Grand Unified Theory that explains human behavior remarkably well. Humans will cloak their actions in different guises, but when you strip it all away they are solely motivated by will to power. It applies to everyone.

        Weak groups ALWAYS use “moral” suasion against the strong. Exhibit A the weak Europeans and the USA. They are always talking about international law, feckless UN, legal this and legal that. The reality is they are seeking power to control American action through the only means available to them. (Our idiot president gives our power away to them when he says America won’t act without their approval, but that’s another story.)

        Lefties and minorities are following exactly the same playbook.

        “Oh, I’m discriminated against. I’m paid 78 cents on the dollar, [insert bitching here], I need legal quotas and ability to sue!”

        This is just about power. And we have given it to them. It’s a loss of frame on a monumental scale. When they get full control there will be boots on all our necks. Non-whites do not carry the altruistic gene.

        No matter how “equal” (irony) things get rest assured the grievance industry will find new ways to manufacture problems. It’s always the white man’s fault. It will never stop.

        The correct response to all of this would have been to maintain frame. “Shut up and stop bitching. Work hard and you’ll get yours.”

        [CH: game can save civilizations.]

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 11:11 pm King

        We have to acknowledge something … disturbing: the fact that from the highest biological standpoint, conditions of justice must always be only exceptional conditions, partial restrictions on the basic will to live, which is set on power; they are subordinate to the total purpose of this will as individual means, that is, as means to create larger units of power. A legal system conceived of as sovereign and universal, not as a means in the struggle of power complexes, but as a means against all struggles in general, something along the lines of … communist cliché in which each will must be considered as equal to every will, that would be a principle hostile to life, a destroyer and dissolver of human beings, an assassination attempt on the future of human beings, a sign of exhaustion, a secret path to nothingness.

        — Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morals

        The will to power is not megalomania (or “might makes right”) as it is often misinterpreted as. Will to power is the urge to see your will made real outside yourself. It’s why we like to skip rocks or play catch or slap our little brother just for fun.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 11:12 pm King

        Take away the social compact and within minutes you have the war of all against all.

        In such condition there is no place for industry, because the fruit thereof is uncertain, and consequently, not culture of the earth, no navigation, nor the use of commodities that may be imported by sea, no commodious building, no instruments of moving and removing such things as require much force, no knowledge of the face of the earth, no account of time, no arts, no letters, no society, and which is worst of all, continual fear and danger of violent death, and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.

        — Hobbes, Leviathan

        Whites and Asians have largely internalized the social compact, and they’re more surprised than other races when men go feral. They dismiss the degeneracy as less real than the artifice that seemed to effortlessly keep the degeneracy at bay. But, but, we have always been civil with each other!

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 11:15 pm King

        Take heart, brother, because the delusion is only momentary. Abstractions can thrive in the distance, but the taste of blood in one’s mouth; the sight of loved-ones being victimized; being made to witness men making out with each other; these visceral experiences reconnect men with their capacity for violence long long before “there will be boots on all our necks.”

        Neither do whites carry “the altruistic gene.” There is nothing genetic about altruism, it is rather the most refined artifice meant for similarly gentled men, not for frenzied half-human jackals at feeding time. Whites invented and perfected total war. But we also invented the social compact — out of reason, not kindness; out of the suspicion of our fellow man, not naivete.

        In peace there’s nothing so becomes a man
        As modest stillness and humility:
        But when the blast of war blows in our ears,
        Then imitate the action of the tiger;
        Stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood,
        Disguise fair nature with hard-favour’d rage;
        Then lend the eye a terrible aspect;
        Let pry through the portage of the head
        Like the brass cannon; let the brow o’erwhelm it
        As fearfully as doth a galled rock
        O’erhang and jutty his confounded base,
        Swill’d with the wild and wasteful ocean.
        Now set the teeth and stretch the nostril wide,
        Hold hard the breath and bend up every spirit
        To his full height. …
        Be copy now to men of grosser blood,
        And teach them how to war.

        — Shakespeare, Henry V

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 11:18 pm DamnCrackers

        Only here can we get a Moses who’s read his Nietzsche. It was Moldbug who said, “Cthulhu swims slow, but he always swims left.” I always called the Republicans (at least the cuckservative RINOs) the Jester Wing of the Democrat/Socialists.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 12:08 am Greg Eliot

        No matter how “equal” (irony) things get rest assured the grievance industry will find new ways to manufacture problems. It’s always the white man’s fault. It will never stop.

        Exactly… the foremost example being, when the slavery-guilting well ran dry, they dug another one and called it “white privilege”.
        .

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 8:46 am Simon Corso

        ” …when the slavery-guilting well ran dry, they dug another one and called it “white privilege”.

        If it ran dry someone forgot to tell the liberals. They’ve also added disparate impact, cultural appropriations, and everyone’s favorite, Micro-aggressions.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 9:36 am Greg Eliot

        The slavery-guilt thing (mentioning slavery alone) ran dry because more and more younger generation whites, even left-leaning ones, were yawning or saying things along the lines of:

        “That was well over 100 years ago, and neither you, your parents, or your grandparents were slaves.”

        “My (grand)parents came to this country in the 20th century… we never owned slaves.”

        “Only a small percentage of rich plantation owners had slaves.”

        “Whites died in great numbers to free the slaves.”

        Etc, etc. etc.

        So something new had to be coined to rope in the collective guilt of all white people anyway, whether or not their ancestors owned slaves…

        Hence, “white privilege”… and all those other shibboleths you so apty mentioned.

        LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 11:29 am peckerwood

      Guy above mentions his age which is gen x-ish. I guess gen X was last real American generation to be raised in the old America. I can’t imagine how ppl older than Gen X can handle the shit show USA has become.

      The left’s at war with everything stable and civilized. They are feral entropy and they found that our Christian mindset (even if you are atheists, you grew up with our values) is the biggest chink in our armor. We feel your pain when you cry out and step aside. It has to stop.

      But it won;t

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 12:19 pm Kyo

        The definition of Generation X is itself part of the problem. Two 1947-born Baby Boomers decided to create dividing lines in 1961 and 1982, meaning that one “generation” is bisected right down the middle into people who experienced the Old America and the New Order. Nobody born in 1980 or 1975 has any experience living in a world where feminism, in particular, wasn’t ravaging society. Yet such people are supposed to be in the same group with people who remember LBJ and Woodstock. Divide and conquer.

        LikeLike


  4. on July 23, 2015 at 3:50 pm Literal Cuckservatives | Neoreactive

    […] By CH […]

    LikeLike


  5. on July 23, 2015 at 3:56 pm Arbiter

    Hear, hear. It is fun to see how “cuckservative” has taken off on Twitter. There is an effort to make it trending (show up as “Trending right now” to Twitter users) just for laughs. The first time I heard it I thought right away that it was typical of CH wordsmithing, but probably it emerged as a group effort on Twitter after tweeking the “cuckold” theme, which as CH notes is definitely his. The fact that no one can say for sure where cuckservative was posted first points to it being a Twitter thing. The alt-Right is very active on that platform.

    The neocon lovers are now claiming on Twitter that “Remember, when white supremacists say cuckservative it is a slur against Christians”. Religion is never mentioned in relation to this word, but that’s their typical lying modus operandi. The only reason for that claim, I suppose, is that the churches are slavishly devoted to Israel and to attacking Israel’s targets, the few Middle Eastern nations that have supported the Palestinians. Added to that is the other media-Zio agenda, to fill the West with immigrants. So “cuckservative is a slur against Christians” – okay, I see it now.

    will intone “diversity is our strength” while commuting home to an upscale gated community that is 98% White and 2% East Asian.

    Very true.

    Just a while ago I talked to a woman who is “right-wing” in the cuckservative fashion: in favor of lower taxes, and that’s it. Other than that, promoting every leftoid strategy. She lives in an expensive neighborhood since two years back, but on the other side of a forest is an immigrant-thick neighborhood where there were a couple of days of riots a few years ago. Why didn’t she move there if “everyone is the same”? Cuckservatives are immense hypocrites. McCain, Jeb Bush, all the rest – they would rather see a third Obama presidency than Donald Trump in the White House, all the while sealing themselves off from the hell everyone else has to live in.

    At any rate, it’s fun to see a meme take off. Words, expressions, symbols – they are all part of what you call a “corporate identity” in rhetoric. Corporate here meaning corpus, body, the group. It is essential that the neo-reaction has a corporate identity. I’m just waiting for the theme song.

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 4:04 pm Arbiter

      A thing to add to the list of cuckservative traits:

      –Declaring that “Liberals are the REAL racists!”

      Way to stand up for yourself, buddy. Promoting the enemy’s paradigm, where racism is the one thing to guard against. Why then would anyone vote for “Anti-Racism Light” instead of “Anti-Racism All The Way”?

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 4:28 pm Hilary Clinton

        Hilarious COTY. Or their pathetic attempt to seek approval by citing the “conservative” MLK!

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 4:31 pm Philomathean

        Yes, the cuckservative thinks himself brilliant by calling the lib the “real racist”. The cuck doesn’t understand the liberal has already won because the left annexed that territory long ago. He’s playing on their field. It’s a rigged game.

        This is why politics drifts leftward. The cuckservative defense mechanism’s been disabled.

        Right wing ideas are spiritually about inequality, because inequality is the truth. Equality exists no place in nature, from microorganisms to megafauna it can’t be observed.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 4:48 pm VRW

        liberals are the real racists and cuckservatives are the real liberals amirite

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 6:02 pm Arbiter

        Right wing ideas are spiritually about inequality, because inequality is the truth. Equality exists no place in nature, from microorganisms to megafauna it can’t be observed.

        How true. Which is why I say the entire Left comes from Marxism. Social Democrats, Labour, and U.S. Democrats. Even if leftoids do not call themselves Marxist, that’s the worldview – the paradigm. And that is also why I say there is no “third way”, libertarians are not “another ideology”, and neither are environmentalists or whatever. There are only two ideologies: the one that observes nature, including inequality, and adapts to that. And the one that claims all are equal, so that any differences in success between groups and individuals are the result of oppression.

        (As for libertarians they are either leftists or right-wing. These two groups are so different that it is meaningless to classify them with the same word. The right-wing libertarians are typically conservatives who want a fresher flag to rally under as they criticize the neocons, or who hide behind no-state talk as a way to criticize Affirmative Action and similar policies without being called racist. The leftist libertarians are only focused on homosexuality, feminism, drugs and mass immigration, and happily use the government to attack those who oppose these things. They go the same way as (classic) liberal parties in Europe, which are now only “right-wing” in that they want slightly lower taxes than the Social Democrats.)

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 8:19 am PWN

        Marxists isn’t the right word. Enlightenment romantics, maybe. Everything about the modern left has more to do with traditional Enlightenment ideals than with Marxism.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 12:34 pm greginaurora

        @PWN
        –Marxists is the right word, but Cultural Marxism would be better, maybe. Everything about the modern left has everything to do with traditional Marxism ideals than with the Enlightenment.–

        You made some minor grammatical errors, but I fixed them for you.

        LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 4:12 pm Philomathean

      The first I read the slur was the other day at Occidental Dissent after, I assumed, Hunter Wallece coined the term “cuckfederate” to describe the rainbow confederate.

      In any event it’s a beautiful adamantium shiv whose semantic service is long overdue.

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 6:03 pm Skunk

        I always thought the rainbow confederates were just being sarcastic.

        LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 4:34 pm corvinus

      “Remember, when white supremacists say cuckservative it is a slur against Christians”.

      If they mean “Churchians” and/or “Zionists”, then guilty as charged.

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 7:00 pm Arbiter

        Seems the first to apply this “white supremacist” label to those who name cuckservatives is one Matt K. Lewis, writing at The Daily Caller:

        http://therightstuff.biz/2015/07/23/the-daily-cuckservatives/

        From his Wikipedia page: In March 2007, Lewis was one of two bloggers invited on John McCain’s campaign tour bus on a visit to New Hampshire for an interview with the candidate. That September, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich acknowledged in an interview with Lewis that he was considering a presidential run. Lewis is the editor of The Quotable Rogue: The Ideals of Sarah Palin in Her Own Words, published in 2011.

        John McCain, Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin – you go, Matt!

        Just showing the thousandth example of journalists and politicians being part of the same establishment. John McCain’s campaign tour bus – for F’s sake.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 7:01 am Greg Eliot

        “Would it be wrong to assume this Lewis fellow is of the Judaic-Hebraic persuasion?”

        “You mean a Jew?”

        “Hey, I’m not one for name-calling!”

        LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 7:03 pm Steve Johnson

      “Cuckservatives are immense hypocrites. McCain, Jeb Bush, all the rest – they would rather see a third Obama presidency than Donald Trump in the White House, all the while sealing themselves off from the hell everyone else has to live in.”

      McCain is even worse – he’d rather see an Obama presidency than lose his status as the media’s favorite Republican.

      He 100% threw the election – luckily for America.

      LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 9:21 pm Anonymous

      Cuckservatives are reduced to saying “if you like Trump, you’re gay”:

      http://mpcdot.com/forums/topic/8496-the-donald-trump-presidential-archive/page__st__140#entry211528

      And the NYT is giggling with Queeg-esque triumph at the discovery that a bench was improperly removed from the lobby of Trump Tower back during the Smirk Administration. I guess this must have triggered some poor oppressed minority who was hoping to become the next Rosa Parks by refusing to leave when asked by building security (or maybe just to stop shitting there).

      http://mpcdot.com/forums/topic/8496-the-donald-trump-presidential-archive/page__st__180#entry211586

      LikeLike


  6. on July 23, 2015 at 3:57 pm Literal Cuckservatives | Manosphere.com

    […] Literal Cuckservatives […]

    LikeLike


  7. on July 23, 2015 at 3:58 pm The Other Jim

    FYI, John McCain’s son Jack, married a mulatto; Link: http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20705632,00.html

    The ironic thing is that the more these RINO-Cuckservative “elites” try to shed themselves of their “Whiteness” by marrying non-Whites, the more they become morally, intellectually, and spiritually inbred. They’ve taken up virtually every vice of aristocracy and are hell-bent on subjecting the rest of us under the regressiveness of feudalism.

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 4:15 pm Arbiter

      John McCain, the “hero” (for being captured? That’s what makes you a hero?), also sucked up to the prison guards in Vietnam by preaching their radio propaganda. Other prisoners have firmly stated that it was his voice.

      In 2001 he was going to switch to the Democrats, but he eventually stayed in the GOP probably because he took a look at the field and decided he had a better chance to retain his senator seat in the GOP. Google “John McCain switch parties”:

      What Mr. McCain almost never mentions are two extraordinary moments in his political past that are at odds with the candidate of the present: His discussions in 2001 with Democrats about leaving the Republican Party, and his conversations in 2004 with Senator John Kerry about becoming Mr. Kerry’s running mate on the Democratic presidential ticket.

      …….

      In the spring of 2001, Mr. McCain was by most accounts still angry about the smear campaign that had been run against him when he was campaigning for the Republican presidential nomination in the South Carolina primary the previous year. He had long blamed the Bush campaign for spreading rumors in the state that he had fathered a black child out of wedlock, which Bush aides denied. Mr. McCain was also upset that the new White House had shut the door on hiring so many of his aides.

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 4:17 pm Arbiter

        And let’s not forget McCain trying to show off as a pilot and almost sinking a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier, killing more than a hundred people in the ensuing fire. He got away because both his daddy and granddaddy were four-star admirals.

        https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/07/no_author/john-mccain-is-no-hero/

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 4:22 pm mendozatorres

        Damn, I didn’t know that about him in 2004.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 4:38 pm The Other Jim

        Whatever ahem, “Honorable” thing McCain did as a POW as been completely overshadowed by his very “dishonorable” service as a senator. From the Charles Keating S&L scandal to McCain BFF’ing jihadists in Syria. The guy isn’t just a senile old git, he’s a fucking menace to America. In fact, I can confirm what you stated about the accounts of McCain’s fellow prisoners. My father was career Navy and worked with many of the POW’s while McCain was a guest at the Hanoi Hilton. All of them, including men like John Stockdale clearly stated to my father that McCain was treated with kid gloves in comparison to the beatings and torture the rest of them received. They all hated McCain and his subsequent piss-poor behavior as a senator confirmed why that contempt is justified.

        Also, looking at the wedding picks of McCain Sr, his son Jack and his mulatto wife raises an interesting question; If McCain Sr. is 5’7″ tall, then his son looks like he’s about 5’5″ tall. Talk about a family of hobbits.

        LikeLike


  8. on July 23, 2015 at 4:02 pm Ras al Ghul

    Most conservatives don’t stand for anything definitive other than the status quo. Its a defensive behavior and to take inspiration from General Patton, if you’re defending, you’re losing.

    And while there indeed may be things worth preserving, one has to understand why in order to defend them, not “this is the way its always done.

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 4:09 pm Arbiter

      Yes. There was an effort to base the Right on scientific thinking in the early 20th century, rather than “it’s always been that way” or “my religion says so”. To explain where traditions and group loyalty come from and why that unchangeable basis must be taken into account. Unfortunately the U.S. and its allies did everything it could to stamp out this kind of thinking, and so the only ones who try to explain things are the leftoids. They offer up a scientific-sounding worldview that connects the dots. Falsely connects them, but they are the only ones who seem to make an effort in that direction.

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 7:38 pm King

        Your fuckwitted guesses about history, politics, and philosophy get dumber with every post.

        There is no possibility of creating a politics of human behavior based on the scientific method. Human behavior is not reliably consistent like the laws of thermodynamics or photosynthesis or mitosis. You cannot set up a control, you cannot observe disparities, you cannot duplicate results. The very idea that one can reduce human dynamics to a science is a leftist presumption, you gullible ignorant goon.

        Demonstrate how the scholastic thinking that invented the modern scientific method is nothing more than “my religion says so.”

        And you think it’s the conservatives getting cuckolded? The leftist J ew has been raping your mind for so long you’ve convinced yourself he’s in love with you. He doesn’t care that you name him; he only wants you to spread his lies, as you so eagerly do.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 8:11 pm Ripp

        Queen B:

        Scientific method observation tells us that your behavior as consistently exhibited by erratic, argumentative and reactionary replies overwhelmingly supports the hypothesis that you rarely get laid suffer from gender identity between a gay hermit and gollum from Lord of the Rings.

        Further observation of your commentary also confirms severe social retardation and a life threatening lack of exposure to other humans in the physical world.

        Queen B you’re so deluded beyond your own capacity to even realize that you’re no authority to anything, and merely serve as entertainment fodder.

        When is the last time you have ever had a “discussion” with another,
        ms. Queen Sperg matt?

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 8:57 pm corvinus

        Human behavior is not reliably consistent like the laws of thermodynamics or photosynthesis or mitosis. You cannot set up a control, you cannot observe disparities, you cannot duplicate results. The very idea that one can reduce human dynamics to a science is a leftist presumption, you gullible ignorant goon.

        Not as individuals, since we all have free will, but at the societal level, there are tendencies, as with anything else. Such as, “the average white American woman will have 1.8 children.”

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 9:34 pm King

        Not in a way that is predictive with anything close to “scientific” precision. That is the asinine conceit of the social “sciences” and scientism, i.e., that the only legitimate knowledge is that which can be controlled for and reproduced.

        One can make broad generalizations about anything, but the power of the physical sciences is proved in the particular, or, like you say, “as individuals.” We know that this probe going X speed at Y trajectory will encounter the comet at Z time. But you can’t similarly say that this woman at X age will have Y children at Z time.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 9:38 pm King

        You can posit broad generalizations about anything, but the power of the physical sciences is proved in the particular, or, like you say, “as individuals.” We know that this probe going X speed at Y trajectory will encounter the comet at Z time. But you can’t similarly say that this woman at X age will have Y children at Z time.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 9:39 pm King

        Not in a way that is predictive with anything close to “scientific” precision. The asinine conceit of the social “sciences” and scientism is that only knowledge that can be controlled for and reproduced is legitimate.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 9:40 pm King

        The power of the physical sciences is proved in the particular, or, like you say, “as individuals.” We know that this probe going X speed at Y trajectory will encounter the comet at Z time. But you can’t similarly say that this woman at X age will have Y children at Z time.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 9:45 pm PA

        It’s concluded every century that art and religion are as close as you’ll get to understanding the human.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 1:11 pm Bill

        I know that if you walk down a vibrant street in Detroit at night you will get raped, robbed, or murdered. I also know if you do business with a Heeb you are very likely to get ripped off. I am not using the scientific method to prove my statement about human behavior, but a scientific analysis will show that my statement is absolutely true.

        LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 6:05 pm Skunk

      How about “because it works”.

      LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 6:04 am carlos danger

      Which is why forums like this are important. The philosophical defenses of conservative principles are no longer taught, on purpose, so conservatives have no tools with which to go on the offensive.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 10:07 am mendozatorres

        Here, here. You get a motley array of info, history, science, stats, etc. It’s a one stop shop. But, you gotta be like Hemingway and apply your bullshit filter to weed out the nonsense.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 12:02 pm Greg Eliot

        Important indeed…

        Reading my posts is pretty much the only shot some of these Millennials have at getting an education.

        LikeLike


  9. on July 23, 2015 at 4:03 pm mendozatorres

    “well, the haters girdle for battle”…this one had me rolling, but nancygoy, stole the show.

    LikeLike


  10. on July 23, 2015 at 4:22 pm Johannes Balileo Balilei

    Cuckservativism is a world wide (West wide) secondary consequence. Cuckservatives are marxists. They believe in the creed and they know mainstream have the monopoly of morality. And the only thing that they can do are imploring for the forgiveness of their supreme lords by being between the real right and Hivemind.
    Cuckservativism is like take morphine to reduce the general metastasis in which the cells have loss their genetic directive and attack their body that serve a major cause.
    What can we do? Institute our own country. Where? I know a place where gays aren’t allowed, where women are hot, were people can be racist. And is a place with white people this country is not China, Japan or whatever nonwhite healthy country which ban subhumans.

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 4:29 pm Johannes Balileo Balilei

      I write from Spain, where are tons of leftist and cuckservatives. They keep down Spain with a insane welfare state in which you don’t need to work to have most of things, someone will pay for you!! This is not the country of any straight man. Europe is no longer a place for anw straight man.

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 5:38 pm Glengarry

        What’s the view on Franco over there?

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 6:02 pm Anonymous

        Franco has reached the Hitler status despite the fact that he granted the independence to the Sahara and Equatorial Guinea two obviously nonwhite countries. And blacks from Guinea suffered zero discrimination by the state, they could come to study here. Moreover he stopped the communist genocide in Spain. Now leftist say he is a genocide because he killed a lot of them despite war crimes of Franco are closer to poloticide and communist murders are closer to the genocide definition provided by UN which includes those killed for “lineage, status or social group” but no political ideology like communist genocide thoughts.

        LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 4:35 pm corvinus

      Cuckservatives are marxists.

      They’re essentially Mensheviks.

      LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 5:18 pm Jack Rackam

      Where is this place?

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 5:23 pm corvinus

        Russia is my guess.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 11:25 pm Rick

        Putin: “New American term ‘cuckservative’? I jump eeen it..”

        LikeLike


  11. on July 23, 2015 at 4:23 pm Shiv Bators

    “The cuckservative, although never Jewish, often seems vicariously to live through Israel. Since the cuckservative feels that he cannot defend his own ethnic interests, he’ll defend Israel’s. The cuckservative cares more about Israel’s borders than his own.” – Alfred W. Clark

    http://www.radixjournal.com/blog/2015/7/16/cuckservative-a-definition

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 8:00 pm Bobby Cuddlefuck aka The Hamster Whisperer

      This. The central tenant to cuckservative. Have them google the USS Liberty. Israel is a fucking plague.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 3:53 am Scanman

        This, indeed, nails it.

        The touchstone for both the anti-truth left and right is Israel/Zionism.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 4:21 am James1

        Yes sir. Recently at a rather expensive hotel sitting out on the deck doing some paperwork. Very pleasent until two ki kes show up and start blabbering away. No surprise thy were talking about ethnic networking but all finance topics tied back to their support for the headquaters of their criminal enterprises – Israel. It nevers ceases to amaze how foreign these sh its are. Eskimo first is all they know.

        Now that dirty spy pollard is expected to be released to satisfy the same pepele who chase down the last 90 year old prison guard.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 4:22 am James1

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 6:59 am Greg Eliot

        Now that dirty spy pollard is expected to be released to satisfy the same pepele who chase down the last 90 year old prison guard.

        They did take a moment or two from Nazi hunting to produce a few TV movies of the week about how the Rosenbergs dindu nuffin.

        LikeLike


  12. on July 23, 2015 at 4:26 pm corvinus

    Very interesting…

    Are Liberal or Conservative Americans More Likely to Support Restrictions on Racist and Anti-Religious Speech?

    This highlight:

    “Or consider a person who believes that Blacks are genetically inferior. a. If such a person wanted to make a speech in your community claiming that Blacks are inferior, should he be allowed to speak, or not?”
    •Liberals—67-33% yes.
    •Moderates—58-42% yes.
    •Conservatives—62-38% yes.

    LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 8:28 am PWN

      I don’t find this surprising. American Republicans have the most idiotic view on race because they believe everything the left does, but constantly feel the need to show how they’re not racist. Lol

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 10:09 am mendozatorres

        COTW! So true.

        LikeLike


  13. on July 23, 2015 at 4:29 pm newlyaloof

    cuckservative hasn’t yet reached the conservative radio show circuit yet, but I’ve noticed that even Mark Levin is talking about the invasion and how our culture is under attack. Of course he has to use safe terms like “American culture” and such, but the shiv is spreading like embers to a fire. I’d suggest people flood Mr. Levin’s Twitter until he sees this term.

    LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 10:19 am uppity redneck

      Funny how Glenn Beck is banning all Trump talk on his radio show. Cuckservatives always talk about how they are fair to all sides of debate.

      LikeLike


  14. on July 23, 2015 at 4:30 pm YIH

    What’s Behind The ‘Cuckservative’ Slur? (NSFW)
    Matt K. Lewis
    Oy vey! The goyim know!

    LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 6:53 am Greg Eliot

      I don’t seem to recall him writing about any ‘Teabagger’ Slur… go figger.

      LikeLike


  15. on July 23, 2015 at 4:33 pm Travis Bickle

    Somebody *is* pissed. Fantastic rant. One nit pick:

    “Cuckservatives are even more loathsome than true blue leftoid believers in the antiwhite [ progrom ]…”

    LikeLike


  16. on July 23, 2015 at 4:38 pm Hilary Clinton

    “to pretend that Michelle Obama is attractive”. A biggy for the PC crowd. I knew BO was a psychopath when at the inauguration dance. “How beautiful does my wife look?” I studied his face – not a blink, no sweat, no body jerking, or any unease whatsoever. A just astonishing display of clinical doublespeak.

    LikeLike


  17. on July 23, 2015 at 4:44 pm Irish Savant

    There’s also what might be termed the Beta or Recessive Cuckservative. One who doesn’t really believe all the Cathedral bullshit but never ever ever voices an opinion either for or against, except to maybe its safest friends. A lot of them around.

    LikeLike


  18. on July 23, 2015 at 4:46 pm VRW

    the term has been floating around MPC and 8chan aristoi for at least the past 6-8 months i bet

    LikeLike


  19. on July 23, 2015 at 4:52 pm TLM

    CH
    Your common trait list was brilliant. And with a few tweaks it aptly applies to the churchians of this country.

    – is quick to jump down the throat of any person that teaches what the Bible actually says.

    – will preface every feeble tiptoe into his own version of the Scriptural wading pool with an ass-covering “To be sure…” or a spastic impromptu paean to Rick Warren, America’s Pastor.

    You get the point.

    LikeLike


  20. on July 23, 2015 at 4:54 pm elmer

    “will never once, not once, do or say something brave in his life”

    I am enjoying unemployment after having said something imprudent to my patron. I am working on an “ebook” to be released in a month and to be quickly followed by another blockbuster. I am going to sell my house and go live in vietnam with ForeignBride.

    Have you considered penning a topical interest book CH? You are just giving it away. With today’s technology you can put one together easily and provide a “click-pay” link on you website.

    LikeLike


  21. on July 23, 2015 at 5:01 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

    Awesome.

    But it would also be helpful to analyze Christianity’s role in this, which I would aver is probably considerable.

    Christard Cuckservatives…this is what we’re dealing with.

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 5:50 pm PA

      I like how Matt put it recently: God will make all races come together in his own time and in spirit. Men who hasten that are working for Satan, not for God.

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 6:22 pm Arbiter

        Do they work for Satan? They would say the same about their opponents. Turn the other cheek, the first shall be the last and the last the first, there are no races because we are all “brothers in Christ”, etc. Odd how many contradictory political opinions can rest on a single book. How many opposing factions does that religion have by now? How many different opinions about it through the ages? I’m thinking of Kathars, Kopts, etc. Which one is right?

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 8:58 pm corvinus

        I’ve heard a tradition once that all human races will last to the end of the world.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 6:51 am Greg Eliot

        How many different opinions about it through the ages? I’m thinking of Kathars, Kopts, etc. Which one is right?

        In turn, they’re all right… and all wrong.

        Man has shown an infinite capacity to both make shit shine and fuck up a wet dream.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 8:30 am PWN

        And in the meantime, even in orthodox Christianity, which is more conservative than the Catholic third world lobby and the let’s adopt black babies protestant churches, you get excommunicated if you think black Christians aren’t your Bros.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 8:41 am Greg Eliot

        You seem to be making my point for me.

        And I wish you non-believers would learn the difference between spiritual equality of each individual in the eyes of God versus meat-world realities of what’s been going on since Satan corrupted it all and Man went along with him.

        Come to think of it, I wish many of the alleged believers themselves would learn the difference.

        LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 7:00 pm King

      But it would also be helpful to analyze Christianity’s role in this, which I would aver is probably considerable.

      Christianity’s role is considerable in every strand of thinking in the west, so you’re not saying much. Christendom = The West. The West is the fusion of Jerusalem, Athens, and Rome.

      This particular strain of thought — self-hatred — began in explicit anti-Christianity, in Rousseau’s rejection of original sin and the idea of the noble savage. Thereafter it hitched itself to popularity/credibility of duplicatable, observable experimentation and called itself a “science” despite being neither duplicatable nor observable, as though the consistencies of physics could be applied to human behavior, history, and politics. See Hegel, Marx.

      Race, as the great Steve Sailer defines it, is one’s extended family: kin, tribe, community, nation, ethnicity, race. Christianity unified the particular to the universal through this expanding family under the fatherhood of God. Modernity is patricide, and outside of his order, the nations scatter like Babel.

      Matt

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 7:16 pm PA

        “The West is the fusion of Jerusalem, Athens, and Rome.”

        And the pagan North.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 7:49 pm King

        Not really. I see what you’re getting at, but there’s no evidence of it. Greece and Rome sufficed for the pagan contribution.

        On the other hand, it was the sons of the pagan north that would embrace the fusion most effectively, albeit a millennium later. Our blood brought forth the fusion’s most complete manifestation, both in the Protestant corrective and in the British (English/Scottish) balance between aristocracy and republicanism, liberty and law, sacred and profane.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 3:01 am Amasius

        What about the names of the days of the week? Alliterative and stress-based poetry? The Nibelungenlied? The works of Richard Wagner? Saints’ legends? The mythology and folklore that led to Tolkien? The Faustian temperament Spengler wrote about?

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 6:34 am carlos danger

        I would submit it was the pagan north that provided the necessary physical stock as well as numbers that made it successful.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 6:48 am Greg Eliot

        Wagner gave us Parsifal as well as The Ring, don’t forget.

        And even The Ring is replete with symbolism that, in my mind, proves there’s an ur-myth that was remembered in different ways and came to us through different channels.

        Gifts from the High God, Life in the form of multifarious creatures, Provisos about how certain gifts are to be used or avoided, Envy & Treachery, Falls from Grace due to Pride or Insecurity, Sacrifice unto Death, Redemption, A New World, cleansed of the weakness and evil of the Old…

        It’s all there in both The Ring and Scripture… greatest stories told, indeed.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 6:53 am PA

        The very ways of folklife of Celts, Germanics, and Slavs fare back to their pagan heritage. Romanticism itself is a Northern ideal.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 11:02 am ho

        Was Ancient Greece really “western”? I thought the west/east thing didn’t really exist before Christianity/Islam.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 12:00 pm Greg Eliot

        Are you kidding, ho? It’s long been a staple of Western Civ classes to begin with Greece, go on to Rome, and then into the Middle Ages.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 1:18 pm ho

        I know that they’re doing this, but do they have a stronger right to appropriate Ancient Greece culture than, say muzzies?

        I intuitively get that they are western, but rationally speaking it makes no sense. Plato and Aristoteles were pagans. The only thing western about them, is that westerners later on liked them very much. When you consider that ragheads also respected the ancient philosophers very much, it starts to become pretty muddy.

        I mean, I know that they were different from Persians and that the relationship between Greeks and Persians is similar to that between Christians and Muslims, but….I dunno.

        Romans at least I get, i mean, half of Europe speaks a kind of vulgar Latin these days. Romans also ended up turning to Christianity. But Greeks were pagans that spoke a completely different language.

        Again, I intuitively get why Greeks would be western civ but rationally I don’t. What is so western about them other than the fact that they were white?.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 1:21 pm Greg Eliot

        Racially they were Indo-European… everything else is icing on the cake.

        The golden-haired Apollo, the grey-eyed Athena.. etc., etc., etc.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 2:56 pm Amasius

        It depends on where you want to draw the lines. I tend to follow Spengler in dividing the White civilizations into Western (Post-Rome Germanic West), Classical (Greece and Rome), and Orthodox (Russian). Charles Murray in his book Human Accomplishment just lumps them all together as Western. It makes our score look better, but I’m not sure how fair it is.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 3:07 pm ho

        Weren’t Persians back in the day also white?

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 6:03 pm Greg Eliot

        Not sure, to tell the truth… maybe the Trojans and the Etruscans were white as well… point seems immaterial.

        Not one to depend upon movies for my history, but 300 made it seem like the Persians were the original diversifiers looking to swallow all peoples into their mixed multitude.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 11:29 pm ho

        Well, empires and diversity go hand in hand, so…

        LikeLike


      • on July 25, 2015 at 2:54 am Greg Eliot

        Which is why they become abominations… and why they fall… and why God and true lovers of their own folk hate them, so…

        LikeLike


  22. on July 23, 2015 at 5:02 pm Greg Eliot

    I’m guessing those who are now gnashing their teeth and wringing their hands over this RealTalk term are the same hypocritical fucks who gleefully coined and used the far-more impudent “teabaggers”.

    Those fairies.

    LikeLike


  23. on July 23, 2015 at 5:08 pm Beefy Levinson

    Trump/Dibiase 2016! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 5:17 pm The Spirit Within

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 6:35 am carlos danger

        LOL

        LikeLike


  24. on July 23, 2015 at 5:19 pm Mark Citadel

    Voting remains absolutely useless. No election ever changed anything. Until you Ceausescu the Left, they remain in power.

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 6:31 pm Arbiter

      The Romanian revolution is an interesting case, since it is one of the few times that a revolution actually was domestic.

      Of course, most of the criminals stayed in place. The officers who turned on Ceaucescu saw to that. The police who tortured and maimed protesters were never prosecuted, not a single one of them.

      Nevertheless, the way the revolution took off is a valuable lesson. The preacher who started it had worked within the system when doing otherwise was impossible. Neither he nor the other critics chose to take a stand by open rebellion at a time when they would just have been cut down. Better to network and gain followers by coded speech until the time when external circumstances allowed them to speak more freely. Two other truly domestic rebellions acted the same way: the Freemasons when they took over in France, and the Nationalists in Germany. Both took part in parliamentary activity and obeyed by the laws – mostly – when they could not do otherwise, slowly moving their positions forward, spreading their message and gaining followers. Until they could take advantage of their positions thanks to external factors.

      The lesson being that you can’t always run headlong across the battlefield, as hot-headed teenagers advocate when they first get involved in politics. Taking cover is not cowardly, it is an acceptance of the reality we have to deal with..

      However, there is a huge difference between advancing sensibly, and running far away from the trenches while loudly denouncing those who fight, as cuckservatives do.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 3:46 am Mark Citadel

        Arbiter, you nailed it

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 8:00 am pants factory

        Yep, cucks make a handsome living as the kept opposition. They are truly worse than liberals. Their job is to prevent any real solutions to the issues they pretend to care about (except when it comes to Alaska of course). Note how the Eskimo writer at Daily Caller has tried to spin the term cuckservative into a “let’s you and him fight” between race realists and Christians. This system is ripe for some nuanced black knight monkey wrenching. Samiz dat shit.

        LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 9:05 pm ho

      STFU

      LikeLike


  25. on July 23, 2015 at 5:24 pm PA

    The word “cuckservative” is like ‘mudshark” in that it shines a spotlight on the essence of the offender’s error, and it is too hoary to appropriate defiantly.

    LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 6:37 am Random Black Guy

      Lol, get some help, PA.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 8:27 am Greg Eliot

        Who asked you to chime in and sass your betters, Sambo II?

        Get back out on the front lawn and hold up that lantern.

        LikeLike


  26. on July 23, 2015 at 5:34 pm Putin

    HELP ME, IVE FALLEN AND CAN’T GET UP

    From July 20th post…….

    “Field Report

    At the HP and finally am able to settle in and focus. Gal(8) walks in who I introduced myself to a couple weeks ago. Saw her a couple times since and we just exchanged glances. This time I waited until she got her drink and then looked at her when she was about to pass. She looked at me and I said hi and then I got up and said I was going to sit with her. She said “alright but I don’t know if there will be room”. I kind of laughed, we found a spot even though I had to move a kids computer. So I started qualifying. Asked why she was bringing strange men into the place all the time. She said they were her brother and business partner and that is it. She was a little worried about me calling them strange and I said I was just kidding. Asked if she was Arabic as I had originally thought but she said she was half Arabic and half Spanish. Apparently she was schooled at a British school in Spain and went to college at Princeton. She basically owns an impressive business with another partner. She said she does not live here and is leaving at the end of the week. I asked for her number to input my phone and she gave me her phone because she did not know the number. I had a hell of a time reading it since the font was so small. Did a failed text to her, then finally a good text. We talked some more and I mentioned about her leaving to Spain at the end of this week. She responded with something about unless something keeps me here. I found myself having to calibrate things as it seemed things were on the verge of fast tracking. I said that we will see each other again before she leaves and she said she will be there everyday. I closed it out by saying give me a hug. She did and liked it.”

    It continues…….the next day she did not show at the HP so I decided to send a text which said missed you at coffee. In fact I sent texts to two other contacts in my address book probably for emotional reasons. Did not get replies from any of them.

    Next day was sitting out front of the HP and see her walking with a little stroller suitcase from a distance just as another gal stops at the entrance way and makes a playful remark at me. Perfect timing as she may have noted the situation. She gets to the entrance way and I say that I texted her and she says she had to fly out. I ask where and she says California. So she asks about me sitting outside and I say that I will be coming back in and will see her in a while. I come back in and she gets her drink then sits it on a table and I set my stuff down and sit down with her. I open up a little about my business and how it is very cyclical and going through a rough patch right now. She opens up some about herself. She notices my roving eye and looks at the women I look at whenever my eyes are roving. She sees a table open in a more secluded area of the place and says lets move. I grab her little suitcase and bring it over and she thanks me for doing so. She opens up a little more and says she hates people who lie. She hates white lies. She is pissed at her business partner and starts taking calls from him. She is absolutely tearing into the guy. Calling him a liar saying she won’t tolerate a business partner like that. It was a business issue but she seemed over the top pissed. She would hang up on him and he would call back. I had seen him in the place with her before and he seemed kind of beta but who knows. I say to her that she must like him. She says no and that her last boyfriend was a guy she broke it off with a couple years ago because he told her she needs to get over her mothers death. I say that she should not get married. She admits that maybe she should not because she likes things a set way. I tell her that she needs a good beta that will do what she commands and she says she does not like that. She likes a real man. So the calls go on and I take myself outside to do my thing and come back, We talk some more and she said that her Dad used to read her Palms and asked me to. I took her hand a gently glided my finger over her life line and said “wow you have a long life line”. She liked it. I handed her hand back and she said is that it? I said that I don’t want to tell any white lies. She took another call and it was her business partner and she started ripping him again. I left to go to the bathroom. I came back and she was still on the phone so I sat down and put my hand. She looked at me then hesitantly handed me her hand. I held it and said that I have to go. She tole her business partner to hold a second. So I said I will text you. Then I got up and pulled her arm while saying give me a hug. She got up and went for the hug while saying “you are tall”. Then she said “text me”. That night I sent a text which said Hey ____, I brushed up on my palm reading and will see you tomorrow.

    Today I went to the HP with great expectations. By the way she had previously told me that she had a corporate a apartment here. Anyways I waited and never saw her then my 70 year old wing man shows up and he gets his drink and we go outside to sit at a table. I am starting to get a little down given the feelings which have developed. I eventually tell him about her and as I pull up the text I sent and say when I sent it and what I said my wing man says oh here comes one. I just take it in stride when all of a sudden I see who he is talking about as SHE is passing me with her business partner. She turns to me and says in a happy go lucky way “we are just taking a walk”. I kind of just look at her and say nothing. I just maintain eye contact and say nothing. As she walks away I feel my heart being ripped from me. A feeling i have not had in a long time. My wing man is looking at me saying wow, she seems happy. I keep staring in shock. Then the unintended sucker punch comes from the wing man when he states she looked like a 9, don’t you think, validating my conservative rating of women. But the fact he brought up she was a 9 almost put me down for the count. I finally am able to tell him that she was the one I was telling h9m about. He says really! She may have seen my text to her as she passed me when I was talking about her.

    Mario, you out there.

    Fire away…..

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 10:22 pm Putin

      Let me add that she is supposed to be going back to Spain at the end of this week for SIX months. Also grabbed her arm when we were sitting together at the last meeting and she kind of looked at me. I asked if it was alright. She said it is normal. lol.
      Anyway I am thinking there could be some testing going on so my go to strategy in these cases is to shut it down. In fact skip the HP all together tomorrow. Go on Monday and see if she is still here.

      LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 11:34 pm Greg Eliot

      Putin, are you purposely trying to upend every political thread with your Rooney Rifle poon patrol logs?

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 4:32 am Putin

        Lol, alright I will give you that one.

        LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 7:57 am Sentient

      Oneitis, neediness, validation seeking, ego boosting… You’ll need to excise all of that to progress.

      But progress to what? Your “empire” building consists of having platonic relationships with women at a single venue? what more do you expect to get then, you are LJBF yourself in the moment and not moving anything towards a conclusion. And after the fact you have other ideas.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 8:29 am Putin

        Sentient, you have no track record. Your field reports are few and far between. Your rhetoric is usually pie in the sky philosophy based on a trailer trash clown and the past sexual interludes you experienced which can be counted on one hand. You own no one. In at least one case you admitted you were used. Granted you are good at marketing yourself which gives the illusion of success. The difference between you and me is that I am authentic and willing to be transparent about my approaches, warts and all. My number close percentage on cold approaches is higher than you could ever wish for. Hell, you and “Mystery” could not even touch the high level women I am gaming. Mystery would just be laughed at and you would become a friend of theirs.

        You have never had an empire so please do not even lecture me on something you know nothing about.

        Here is another thing you might want to consider, when someone is asking for advice you probably should show the humility of giving it instead of trying to tear them down. I hope you don’t have son because that kind of guidance comes back to bite you.

        Sorry bud but the insecurity is obvious.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 8:42 am Sentient

        LOL man… every time you don’t hear what you want you bite the hand… every time… which reinforces the initial analysis. Reminds me of your neocon rant…

        If you read more carefully you would see this wasn’t an attempt to tear you down but point out your blind spots… Your retort though does an exceptionally good job of that. The “insecurity is obvious” indeed.

        In order to get better you’ll need to deinvest in your ego.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 9:22 am having a bad day

        @putin

        this concept has helped me a lot…

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoshin

        good luck!

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 1:18 pm Putin

        Thanks HABD. Look guys, I will be the first to admit that I still have work to do. Don’t we all. But I am just asking for a quick observation of the situation. Something like…she seems to be into you or she does not like you because of this or she was into you but when you did this it may have backfired,,,, Just looking for a clear headed opinion on the situation. What I am not asking for is a “lets pshycho-analyze Putin” thread. We can do that another time. I believe we are all emotional creatures but the key is recognizing this so that we do not let our emotions cause us to make unwise decisions. Manage them don’t deny them. So yes I recognize there is some feelings and thus want to proceed with good judgement.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 4:23 pm Putin

        Post in mod guys. Just needed an opinion on if this gal likes me or not. Am I still in the game or did I make a particular mistake which took me out. Because of my acknowledged state, would just like a non emotional opinion.

        We can do a psychoanalysis or evaluation of Putin later.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 11:35 pm having a bad day

        @putin

        “Just needed an opinion on if this gal likes me or not.”

        short answer = no…long answer = nooooooooo…lol…BUT, it is a great opportunity for growth/self analysis/learning game…should you choose to pursue that route…and i try to encourage all men to that end…but it’s not easy, and takes lots of work…

        “Am I still in the game or did I make a particular mistake which took me out.”

        you were blown out through beta chasing (she lead, you followed)…although to your credit you did know enough to not stick around/sit there while she talked on the phone…

        since this is a common interaction, i’ll do a breakdown for you…here are some of your beta ‘tells’ (you can look all of these up in the archives if you want more info…)

        “Gal(8) walks in who I introduced myself to a couple weeks ago. Saw her a couple times since and we just exchanged glances.”

        alphas pursue immediately, betas wait and think…your lack of immediate pursuit killed you…both immediately and as an on-going beta tell…

        “This time I waited until she got her drink”

        see above…you ‘waited’ on her = beta…

        “and then looked at her when she was about to pass. She looked at me and I said hi and then I got up”

        you are chasing her at this point…and you never recovered…

        “and said I was going to sit with her. [this is good] She said “alright but I don’t know if there will be room”.” = shit test

        ” I kind of laughed, [failed shit test bc you let the comment slide without redress…]

        “we found a spot even though I had to move a kids computer.”

        = chasing her/she’s leading you…and she lead you to an inconvenient location for you and you didn’t respond to this shit test = fail…

        “So I started qualifying. Asked [beta] why she was bringing strange men into the place all the time.”

        = beta…never focus her attention on other men. if you are alpha, other men don’t exist in your world, and if you let her into your world, they won’t exist to her being in your world, so no need to concern yourself with them…

        “She said they were her brother and business partner and that is it. She was a little worried about me calling them strange”

        = shit test

        ” and I said I was just kidding.”

        = fail shit test

        “Asked”

        = beta

        “if she was Arabic as I had originally thought but she said she was half Arabic and half Spanish. Apparently she was schooled at a British school in Spain and went to college at Princeton. She basically owns an impressive business with another partner.”

        = beta…an alpha would say that she has a little side thing going…lol…bc servicing your needs are/will be more important to her than her business…to be ‘impressed’ by her is to put her on the pedestal…

        “She said she does not live here and is leaving at the end of the week. I asked [beta] for her number to input my phone and she gave me her phone because she did not know the number. [ = shit test/blow off] I had a hell of a time reading it since the font was so small. [fail shit test] Did a failed text to her [fail shit test again…lol], then finally a good text.”

        this overall exchange with the phone was a meta shit test, not including the individual tests. bc you are sooo desperately trying to get her number, you are chasing her harder as the interaction continues…doing ALL the work = beta…

        “We talked some more and I mentioned about her leaving to Spain at the end of this week. She responded with something about unless something keeps me here.”

        = beta bait…she is throwing this out bc it’s straight up beta bait

        ‘I found myself having to calibrate things as it seemed things were on the verge of fast tracking.”

        not sure what this means in your context, but ‘fast tracking’ to an instadate SDL is the gold standard of pua…

        “I said that we will see each other again before she leaves and she said she will be there everyday. I closed it out by saying give me a hug. She did and liked it.”

        good kino…although this is the typical beta ‘end of interaction’ ‘wrap-up’…as opposed to an alpha ‘start of interaction’ way point…did you break contact first, or did she? if you did = beta…

        “It continues…….the next day she did not show at the HP so I decided to send a text which said missed you at coffee.”

        = beta chasing…

        “In fact I sent texts to two other contacts in my address book probably for emotional reasons. Did not get replies from any of them.

        Next day was sitting out front of the HP and see her walking with a little stroller suitcase from a distance just as another gal stops at the entrance way and makes a playful remark at me. Perfect timing as she may have noted the situation.”

        = oneitis = beta…why would you care what this girl saw, you should have been focused on/gaming the girl in front of you (that opened you…lol)…

        ” She gets to the entrance way and I say that I texted her [beta chasing] and she says she had to fly out. I ask where [beta = interview question] and she says California. So she asks about me sitting outside and I say that I will be coming back in and will see her in a while. [beta chasing…] I come back in and she gets her drink then sits it on a table and I set my stuff down and sit down with her.”

        her picking the table = her leading = beta chasing

        “I open up a little about my business and how it is very cyclical and going through a rough patch right now.”

        this is you qualifying to her = beta = DLV story…

        “She opens up some about herself. She notices my roving eye and looks at the women I look at whenever my eyes are roving.”

        looking around at other girls until she earns your attention is usually good, but in this case, it’s the wrong move bc she has just opened up to you about herself and you start to ignore her…lol…this is the opposite of her ‘earning’ your attention…

        “She sees a table open in a more secluded area of the place and says lets move. ”

        she is leading you again…lol…

        “I grab her little suitcase and bring it over and she thanks me for doing so. ”

        this is beta white knightery…you did something for her without her even asking first…

        “She opens up a little more and says she hates people who lie. She hates white lies. ”

        did you feel the emotional dump when it started?…or did it creep up on you?…at this point she is turning you into a beta orbiter/emotional tampon…

        “She is pissed at her business partner and starts taking calls from him. ”

        = shit test…

        “She is absolutely tearing into the guy. Calling him a liar saying she won’t tolerate a business partner like that. It was a business issue but she seemed over the top pissed. She would hang up on him and he would call back.”

        she’s got that ‘chase me’ rolodex page down…lol…

        “I had seen him in the place with her before and he seemed kind of beta but who knows. I say to her that she must like him.”

        she does…the opposite of love is not hate…it’s indifference…watch the hamster wheel rev up here…lol…

        “She says no [lol…spin hamster…spin…]and that her last boyfriend [so, she’s thinking about the business partner in the same conceptual thought as a bf/sex partner…] he’s a guy she broke it off with a couple years ago because he told her she needs to get over her mothers death.”

        ‘last bf…mother’s death…those are really heavy emotional topics…you are falling into beta orbiter/emotional tampon bff role even more here…the alpha response would be ‘go to counseling’…now show me your tits…lol…

        “I say that she should not get married.”

        getting involved in her emotional drama = beta orbiter…or gay bff…lol…

        “She admits that maybe she should not because she likes things a set way. I tell her that she needs a good beta [= beta…never talk to girls about alpha/beta…they can’t process it and it just slots you farther into the gay bff role…] that will do what she commands and she says she does not like that. She likes a real man.”

        i’m betting she didn’t say ‘just like you’ at this point…amirite?…

        “So the calls go on and I take myself outside to do my thing and come back,”

        this is probably the best thing you did in the whole interaction…sitting there ‘waiting’ for her to be done would have been the worst thing…

        “We talk some more and she said that her Dad used to read her Palms and asked me to.”

        = beta bait…this is a form of ‘incongruent sex talk’…she’s throwing out the possibility of physical interaction to see if you jump on it…lol…

        “I took her hand a gently glided my finger over her life line and said “wow you have a long life line”. She liked it. I handed her hand back and she said is that it?”

        = shit test…also, to your credit, you didn’t jump on the bait…lol…

        “I said that I don’t want to tell any white lies.”

        not sure what this means in context, but nice recall comment…

        “She took another call and it was her business partner and she started ripping him again. I left to go to the bathroom. [good not waiting] I came back and she was still on the phone so I sat down and put my hand. She looked at me then hesitantly handed me her hand.”

        this is good, but i think it’s too little, too late…

        “I held it and said that I have to go. She tole her business partner to hold a second. So I said I will text you. Then I got up and pulled her arm while saying give me a hug. She got up and went for the hug while saying “you are tall”. Then she said “text me”. That night I sent a text which said Hey ____, I brushed up on my palm reading and will see you tomorrow.”

        this part of the interaction wasn’t too bad (although she is still leading you)…it got you out of there, so you didn’t have to ‘wait’ for her to get off the phone (which she wouldn’t have even answered if she had been into you in the first place…)

        “Today I went to the HP with great expectations.”

        = oneitis…

        “By the way she had previously told me that she had a corporate a apartment here. Anyways I waited [beta] and never saw her then my 70 year old wing man shows up and he gets his drink and we go outside to sit at a table. I am starting to get a little down given the feelings which have developed.[oneitis = beta] I eventually tell him about her and as I pull up the text I sent and say when I sent it and what I said my wing man says oh here comes one. I just take it in stride when all of a sudden I see who he is talking about as SHE is passing me with her business partner. [my bet would be that she used you to make him jealous/create drama to get attention…] She turns to me and says in a happy go lucky way “we are just taking a walk”. [shit test = she’s getting validation from your response to her being with this other guy] I kind of just look at her and say nothing. I just maintain eye contact and say nothing. [fail shit test…unless you were smirking…but i’m betting not…] As she walks away I feel my heart being ripped from me. [oneitis…] A feeling i have not had in a long time. My wing man is looking at me saying wow, she seems happy. I keep staring in shock. Then the unintended sucker punch comes from the wing man when he states she looked like a 9, don’t you think, validating my conservative rating of women. But the fact he brought up she was a 9 almost put me down for the count. I finally am able to tell him that she was the one I was telling h9m about. He says really! She may have seen my text to her as she passed me when I was talking about her.”

        her seeing your text that was out when you were talking about her is the least of your problems with her…lol…

        chalk it up to a learning experience and move on…

        i will note that you might think that she is the hottest girl you have ever met…and even if that is true, it still doesn’t change the fact that in order to get a girl like that, you’ll need to have much better game than you currently have…BUT improving your game is doable and within reach of any man willing to put in the work…but it’s not easy. it takes a toll on your self image bc you WILL fail…you have to in order to push boundaries enough to get better and learn what you need to learn…but when you build your better game, girls like that will be common…

        good luck!

        LikeLike


      • on July 26, 2015 at 5:11 pm having a bad day

        @putin

        still in the stack…

        LikeLike


      • on July 26, 2015 at 8:50 pm Putin

        HABD- Holy shit dude. I have to give you credit on the detail with that answer. Thanks.

        Looks like you saw lot of beta there which gave you the impression it is over for sure.

        I would agree there was a tremendous amount of push, some of which came off as beta. Also would say that if she does like her business partner, which you seem confident of, then it was never going to happen anyway.

        Now let me say that I am not surprised you missed 1 or 2 key positives given they tend to be overlooked at places like this.

        So with your synopsis complete and your judgement of it being a definite “no like” I have my work cut out for me. Oh, and yes oneitis had began that last interaction

        Let’s see what happens. If you are correct then the best that can happen is a draw given no contact which would at least surprise her a little given how strong I came on.

        LikeLike


      • on July 26, 2015 at 8:57 pm Putin

        HABD, Why nothing said about the business partners beta behavior? I mean if I was a beta then what the hell was he? Getting verbally emasculated by a women and hung up on then you keep calling back to get emasculated? Dude, seriously a big miss there….

        LikeLike


      • on July 26, 2015 at 10:43 pm theasdgamer

        Putin: “She sees a table open in a more secluded area of the place and says lets move. ”

        HABD: she is leading you again…lol…

        Otoh, she is also investing in Putin. He likely has some sexy subcomms going in his favor. Mixed signals. For sure, Putin needs to work on eliminating his beta tendencies.

        LikeLike


      • on July 27, 2015 at 8:23 am Putin

        “Otoh, she is also investing in Putin. He likely has some sexy subcomms going in his favor. Mixed signals. For sure”-

        Nice call gamer. This is what separates the average player from the elite. “The reason PUAs often say, ‘It doesn’t matter what you say as your pickup line’ is because of sub-communication.” I have talked about non-verbal ad nauseam on this site. I believe CH knows the importance of non-verbal.

        By the way before this gal asked me to read her palms I had reached out and grabbed her arm while talking. She kind of looked at me doing it and I asked if it was alright. She kind of nodded and said that it is normal.

        Point is that touch is absolutely essential along with how you carry yourself. Unfortunately most men focus on the wordage and thus will never improve.
        If you are extremely confident in your non-verbal then there is no way in hell you come at a gal with strong Alpha verbal all the time. You actually need so called beta verbiage sometimes to move things along.

        Alpha is a mindset not a word game.

        LikeLike


      • on July 27, 2015 at 9:27 am having a bad day

        @putin

        your situ is not uncommon…but in order to get better, you have to let those old views of the world go…especially those FI based behavior patterns (see Rational Male for more on that, if you don’t know about it yet.)

        “HABD, Why nothing said about the business partners beta behavior? I mean if I was a beta then what the hell was he? Getting verbally emasculated by a women and hung up on then you keep calling back to get emasculated? Dude, seriously a big miss there….”

        i don’t know anything about the business partner, but what might have been happening is that he needed a joint decision made about some business crisis/opportunity and she was creating drama (and not agreeing on a plan of action bc she’s a girl and just wants the benefits but not the responsibility of making decisions)…not possible to know without context and not really relevant to your situ…

        note – you comparing yourself to business partner is beta…it’s a form of ‘negotiating desire’ (based on logic) bc you think that if she likes him, and you are more ‘alpha’ than that guy, then why wouldn’t she go for you over him…it doesn’t work that way. if it did, every beta good guy engineer would be swimming in pussy…lol…

        @theasdgamer

        “Otoh, she is also investing in Putin. ”

        her following him to a table (which he picked) is her ‘investing’ in him…her picking a new table to lead him to (to throw him a shit test)… is not…i actually didn’t see any investing on her part in this whole interaction. all i saw was her giving him minimal (and reluctant) compliance (which she then shit tested to regain any progress he made)…not ‘voluntary’ investment…she was shit testing him and beta baiting him (which looks like investing but it’s not)…

        good luck!

        LikeLike


      • on July 27, 2015 at 11:54 am theasdgamer

        Yeah, HABD, every now and then I’ll bite on some beta bait, then go aloof immediately and go for other options. I think that that passes the test eventually. Better to be able to recognize it and not bite. I need to work on figuring out what a woman is thinking. I think that beta bait comes from the cortex rather than the amygdala. “Girl game” crap.

        LikeLike


      • on July 27, 2015 at 5:48 pm Putin

        “i don’t know anything about the business partner, but what might have been happening is that he needed a joint decision made about some business crisis/opportunity and she was creating drama (and not agreeing on a plan of action bc she’s a girl and just wants the benefits but not the responsibility of making decisions)…not possible to know without context and not really relevant to your situ…”

        Sorry HABD but that sounds like it came straight from the Imagination Station and is one hell of a way to justify beta behavior which frankly puts a question mark on all your response to my situation. Maybe I am wrong and I will be ready to admit it if she shows disgust, indifference or no interest. One thing I learned a long time ago is to admit when you are wrong because if you don’t then you will never improve yourself. The problem for most people is that they are still controlled by their subconscious defenses. I would recommend the movie “Inception” to better understand this.

        LikeLike


      • on July 28, 2015 at 8:27 am Putin

        “it takes a toll on your self image bc you WILL fail…you have to in order to push boundaries enough to get better and learn what you need to learn…but when you build your better game, girls like that will be common…”

        Don’t know if you have seen my posts before but I cold approach all the time so yes I know about failure.

        HABD, you say that “girls like that will be common” as if they are for you. Care to explain as it would add color to the situation if you shared about your harem of 8-9’s……

        LikeLike


  27. on July 23, 2015 at 5:44 pm Putin

    Awaiting mod

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 5:53 pm Putin

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 7:49 pm Putin

        Damn the mod to hell.

        LikeLike


  28. on July 23, 2015 at 5:44 pm BigAl

    “Calling Dr. Cuxtable”

    LikeLike


  29. on July 23, 2015 at 5:52 pm politicaljudo

    Just found this. The rise of the term “cuckservative” is appropriate.

    LikeLike


  30. on July 23, 2015 at 5:55 pm YMCA

    God dammit. You’ve convinced me. Going republican now for sure… I too cry over fond memories of the bath houses in the Castro…

    rub a dub dub…

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 6:08 pm Greg Eliot

      It’s about time a queer chimed in, here at the chateau.

      :large duckface

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 9:29 pm Tilikum

        What do you mean?? Arbiter has been all over this thread twinksplainin’.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 10:14 pm James Blonde

        I thought y’all were gonna say something about me being on the down-low…

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 6:36 am Greg Eliot

        The only thing wrong with Arbiter is his stance on Christ…

        YOU, however…

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 8:12 am James Blonde

        you just got cucked Greg

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 8:24 am Greg Eliot

        Doesn’t grok, t-h-w-a-c-k…

        Then again, you have been known to rewrite the dictionary.

        LikeLike


  31. on July 23, 2015 at 6:12 pm What is a Cuckservative? | Occam's Razor

    […] provides a must-read tour de force on […]

    LikeLike


  32. on July 23, 2015 at 6:15 pm ewanmacerc

    In college (I graduated in ’08) I bought into the conservative-movement-has-failed mindset completely.

    A year ago, I started law school, and thought, ok, I’m not wrong in my beliefs, but I’ve got to put effort into this investment I’ve made, into the establishment and the system. I’ve got to show that I’m trying to take it seriously. I’ve got to give them a chance.

    So, I worked the polls for some local GOP candidates, on behalf of a classmate acquaintance who is a veritable Mr. Republican.

    Then Trump rolled in, and Mr. Republican was dumping on him from the moment the Donald opened his mouth. “Sign this petition to show you stand against trump!”

    I noted to him on social media that the GOP, at the very least, could manage to say something like, “Trump is reckless, but he’s identified a real issue and we need to be more solid.”

    Zero response.

    Hey, I worked the polls for this fucking guy. Haven’t I demonstrated enough commitment and intelligence to merit a response? I guess not.

    If anything, maybe the conservative-movement-has-failed, GOP-has-sold-us-out material I bought into wasn’t pessimistic enough. They have more loyalty to social justice warriors.

    Fuck them. War on.

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 6:36 pm Arbiter

      Very telling. As you say, they are more loyal to the SJWs. They pretend they are cursing Obama, but it’s all a show. They are generally in agreement with him.

      Here’s a lesson people need to learn: don’t think the neocon-loyal cuckservatives will give you anything for your work and allegiance. They are part of the Left, and the Left is extremely ungrateful. They’ll drop you immediately when you go against their core message, and they will not feel any obligation to show you respect, the way you think people should feel toward someone who has worked side by side with them. You think like a normal person, but these people in the political establishment are not normal people. They are psychopaths.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on July 23, 2015 at 8:11 pm King

      They have a name for this moment in the cycle: the silly season. There are seventeen Republicans “running for president.”

      The celebutainment complex is not going to give you the real story because they profit so much on keeping the silliness stirring. But the real news is this: presidents are not selected two years before election day. Rather, parties are circumscribed and campaigns are shaped during this time — which is almost as important as the actual election.

      It matters so much more that Trump is demonstrating the effectiveness of a strategy than any temporary bump in the fake polls (which are worshiped like Delphi and used as ideological weapons more than they discern a truth about the electorate, but that’s another story).

      The same thing happened with Gingrich last cycle and Palin the cycle before. Somebody finally, finally stood up and just started punching media faggots in the mouth. It doesn’t even matter if they’re truthful, they are just proving their strength. If the dude can’t fight, we will nominate someone who can even if he was a lefty blowhard the day before yesterday. Before The Donald started swinging his dick around, Carly Fiorina was looking like our best bet in that regard!

      The queer Republican candidates who lost their shit about the McCain putdown did nothing so much as reveal they have no plausible plan to get to the White House. There is plenty of time to acquire one, however, and the most important thing Trump has done is to expose them as unready shills who will once again bend over for the media to pleasure themselves inside their quivering colons.

      Unlike the GOP contests going back for thirty years, the next president will not be able to passively coast to the nomination. He will have to learn to fight or get flattened by the big bully with the combover hair helmet.

      Matt

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 8:23 pm Ripp

        Queen B you were just trash talking Trump and now you’re giving him support. senial retard.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 9:24 pm Philomathean

        Ripp,

        It’s fresh air to hear sombody–ANYBODY–speak a degree of truth. As Greg said, it makes blood sing!

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 9:46 pm King

        Where and when did I “trash … Trump,” you uppity sped?

        Senial?

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 9:48 pm PA

        MK, this was a good and clear comment.

        LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 11:21 pm Greg Eliot

        Ripp, get on the right side of things or just shut the fuck up when men are talking.

        You have a bad habit of interjecting snark at the wrong time and place… and more importantly, person.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 4:50 am Putin

        I was never a big fan of Trump but the fact of the matter is most Americans should be supporting him as he fights against the entrenched and evil neocons. When the Democrats, Republicans and media hate someone you know there must be a reason. Here is a guy, although not perfect, challenging the evil status quo.
        All the people who complain about Washington need to get their shit together because as I have said before there will not be revolution in America. America=highest medicated, most monitored and most propagandized people on earth.

        LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 9:33 pm Anonymous

      Yep. It’s telling that you hear cuckservatives mewling about how the GOP needs to “rehabilitate its image”, as if it and not the shitlibs had the poz beaten out of it last November. Not just cowardice, but treason.

      LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 11:29 pm Greg Eliot

      ewanmacerc, you’re going to find that your so-called friends and allies… even family… will invariably let you down the moment you do or say something that doesn’t scratch them where they itch…

      … no matter how many times in the past you’ve been there for them.

      So harden your heart, but remain open to finding those one or two people in this world who will stand by you beyond the times of fair weather.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 5:04 am Putin

        Hmm, some wise words I can attest to.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 10:28 am mendozatorres

        Damn good advice.

        LikeLike


  33. on July 23, 2015 at 6:30 pm Cortesar

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 11:31 pm Greg Eliot

      Damn! My fortress of solitude has been uncovered. 😡

      LikeLike


  34. on July 23, 2015 at 6:33 pm Cortesar

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 11:47 pm whorefinder

      That….that seems too real.

      I cannot tell the difference anymore between leftist nonsense and parody of leftist nonsense…

      help me rape!

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 10:29 am mendozatorres

        It’s like the Uncanny Valley of social justice!

        LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 10:03 am corvinus

      A big fat “heh”. +1 if you made it yourself.

      LikeLike


  35. on July 23, 2015 at 6:37 pm Anonymous

    CH at its finest. This seriously cuts to the bone. And is hilarious as well.

    LikeLike


  36. on July 23, 2015 at 6:38 pm Sentient

    @Culum ” I’ll still use sugar sites when travelling and I will go back to strip clubs (default option for solo game for me) so will definitely be practicing on pros!”

    Posting here so maybe you will see it. NO NON NO… Dude just DO cold approach. Especially when you are travelling. You can be anyone you want to be. Hotel lobby is solid gold. Any one set there after 9PM is flashing a neon sign for you. And logistics are great.

    You shouldn’t discount the HUGE advantage you have in having game AND making the approach. It’s much more visceral than after setting up meeting logistics emails etc. It’s IN THE MOMENT.

    Strippers and part time whores… man that is like pushing for Everest on your first climbs… Plenty of great ops out there with cold approach.

    Try it.

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 8:19 pm Ripp

      +1

      Internet game is a secondary market. Useful but only as a supplement.

      Cold approach.

      LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 7:05 pm Culum Struan

      Sentient/Ripp – Lol, okay I get your point.

      I guess cmopletely giving up sugar sites just feels like losing my security blanket. It’s bad enough that I can’t game or bang women at all for several months of the year because of my work schedule, but on top of that, giving up sugar sites after I’ve finally become good at the system and pipelining new girls to bang is hard.

      But you’re right. The time has come and I need to get good at cold approach, even if it means a period of some enforced celibacy while I’m improving.

      No more sugar sites until at least spring 2016, and maybe never. And I don’t really do online dating outside sugar sites anyway.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 7:55 pm Sentient

        Don’t sell yourself short. On the road travel = massive opps for ONS. You have game, use it. See the windows and go through the windows.

        Seriously this is a huge mind shift… if a girl will fuck you on the second or third date, she will fuck you on the first meet. You just need to run your game – well. Sure you will have misses, but you will have a lot of success as well. Don’t let your mindset hold you back.

        Have fun.

        LikeLike


      • on July 25, 2015 at 2:12 pm theasdgamer

        Being on the road is a comfort-inducer/ASD-mollifier if you have other stuff going on. Her friends need never know.

        LikeLike


  37. on July 23, 2015 at 6:41 pm UMADDOEBRUH

    ROFL STILL BANNED IN TWITTER

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 10:18 pm Travis Bickle

      “ROFL STILL BANNED IN TWITTER”

      Read Milo’s 3 part series on that crazy, disgusting, walrus – bodied junkie, randi something. I bet this is her.

      LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 8:21 am Greg Eliot

      Although it’s been hot and humid, here in the Northeast, your douche-chill inducing glee provides no relief.

      Avaunt, you embarrassment to Cheetoh crumbs.

      LikeLike


  38. on July 23, 2015 at 6:45 pm Samadhi

    I can’t bring myself to hate ‘cuckservatives’. Many seem genuinely lost in the equalist/blank slate matrix and should serve as motivation to get Alt Right ideas into the mainstream.

    LikeLike


  39. on July 23, 2015 at 7:15 pm Putin

    Mario, you out there bro? Got one in mod need some help on.

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 8:52 pm Putin

      Still in mod.

      When in doubt drop all contact. Screw it if she is leaving this week. My wing man said to text her when she passed me but knew that was a beta trap. What a trip. Could not imagine feeling this way

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 7:35 am theasdgamer

        oneitis

        LikeLike


  40. on July 23, 2015 at 7:21 pm SC

    A lot of WNs overestimate the homogeneity of the places where elite Whites live. You gotta remember that the census counts Jews as White, and Jews have significant representation in America’s most desirable zip codes. None of the elite zip codes in my state are anywhere near “98% White, 2% Asian.” They are mostly like 85% White, 10% Jewish, 5% Asian, with one notable exception (that town is like 65% White, 12% Asian, and 33% Jewish).

    [CH: stop deliberately missing the point.]

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 11:08 pm Greg Eliot

      Lenny Bruce: “I was up in Oyster Bay the other day and…”

      Heckler: “What were YOU doing in Oyster Bay?”

      Lenny Bruce: “I was passing… what the fuck do you THINK I was doing?”

      LikeLike


  41. on July 23, 2015 at 7:25 pm Putin

    Oh forgot to mention at the HP today asked a couple college gals what percentage of women do they think use Tinder or other online service for dating. They said at least 50-70% WTF!!!!! Is it all going that way. I think most guys I see in the wild are scared to death of approaching a women. I saw a 8-9 walk in and watched a guy act like he was looking at his computer while staring at her. Seen this kind of thing before but it still amazes me. The guy would never have got up and talked to her.

    My wing man admitted he would never have the balls to approach a women so he enjoys watching me. Worth the price of admission.

    LikeLike


  42. on July 23, 2015 at 7:29 pm Literal Cuckservatives | Reaction Times

    […] Source: Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  43. on July 23, 2015 at 8:20 pm zillanation

    You have openly credited /pol/ for material before. But you claim you don’t know where cuck got big.

    Cumskin please. Fuck was the go to insult on /pol/ back in 2013. Cuckservative had been around almost as long. This comment will not make it past moderation but what matters is that in your heart you will know at least one person knows you’re a meme stealer.

    There’s no shame in propagation of a good meme. And you’re clearly a genius when it comes to game.

    But goddamn boy, stop pretending you invented evo pysch and /pol/ memes. It’s fucking embarrassing.

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 9:04 pm COHOMOLOGIQUE

      crude “meme”-source controversy. This is where the West is right now. It’s hail-mary time, mos def.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 6:33 am Greg Eliot

        +1

        This zillanation clown is the type of guy who would argue deck chair placement on the Titanic.

        LikeLike


  44. on July 23, 2015 at 8:26 pm RambleAround

    “Does the mainstream media feel in charge?” -D Trump, as Bane.

    LikeLike


  45. on July 23, 2015 at 8:43 pm Robert What?

    We all know that Trump won’t be the next President. The fix is already in for Hillary. But we should all thank him for the entertainment, for outing the cuckservatives, and for raising issues no other candidate dares.

    LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 6:30 am Greg Eliot

      Stranger things have happened… but you’re probably right.

      LikeLike


  46. on July 23, 2015 at 9:20 pm Moses

    “– will intone “diversity is our strength” while commuting home to an upscale gated community that is 98% White and 2% East Asian.”

    This.

    A few years ago I connected the dots and realized that rich white libs who say this “diversity is strength” crap are THE MOST racist in deed. ALL of them live in lily white communities like Newton MA or Mill Valley CA.

    If you haven’t noticed this by now you aren’t paying attention.

    LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 6:02 am SC

      Newton is less than 55% White at this point. It’s 33% Jewish. You’re forgetting that Jews are counted as White on the census.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 11:56 am Greg Eliot

        Well, I know it’s a slippery slope, but if’n theys them GOOD Jews, we’ll let ’em count as white. 😉

        LikeLike


  47. on July 23, 2015 at 9:27 pm FUBSY

    Never liked the Trumpster, but I have to admit, he’s speaking truth to power.

    LikeLike


  48. on July 23, 2015 at 9:31 pm Moses

    I figure a good way to kill this diversity crap is to jump on the bandwagon. Every time some white leader (biz, non-profit, social workers, university president, whatever) laments the lack of diversity in his/her institution, be vocal about how their white asses are taking up valuable Diversity(tm) space.

    The best thing they can do is resign to make way for more vibrancy. After all, their white skin renders them with no value so why are they still there? It’s fun to watch them squirm and come up with reasons why “other white people” should be denied opportunity instead of them.

    When I was in biz school I met the retired chairman of AT&T, Henry Schacht, at a brown bag lunch with some other students. He waxed poetic and brimmed with feelgoodness as he told us now women and minorities suffered so much and there should be set-asides and quotas for them (i.e. suppressive quotas on capable white men).

    Even then before I was red pill I realized “What an asshole. He got his, retired, and now he wants polish his cuck credentials on my back. He didn’t step down to ensure a minority took his job. Hypocrite. Fucker.”

    These white knights, cuckservatives racial masochists are our biggest enemy.

    LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 8:42 am PWN

      Lol, I like calling people out on their hypocrisy and I don’t know a single diversity is strength people who live in a diverse area. Even those who ramble about helping the poor or minorities – I always ask them what exactly have they done for things they allegedly care for except trying to aggrandize their image at the expense of others.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 2:31 pm SC aka The Chinaman Troll

        I like calling both sides out on their hypocrisy.

        [CH: the feeble battle mewl of the fence-sitting “moderate”. you’re so spergy you can’t even tell how lame it makes you sound to strike this tired pose of the unbiased third party speaking faggot to power.]

        In my area, the SWPLs do live around significant numbers of Jews/Asians

        [what is it with you and your yellow/heeb fever? are you the hapa product of a jewish man and a chinawoman? man, nothing worse than a self-pitying borg machine.]

        so I can’t tell the SWPLs they live in a 100% White area.

        [your evasion duly noted. fact: most swpls live in areas that are 90+% gentile white. there are of course jewish and asian strongholds, but the number of them is far exceeded by the number of gentile white SWPLvilles. jews are a white ethnicity, so you can’t count them against the % of whites in a given SWPLville. asians aren’t white, but northeast asians are (superficially) low impact foreigners, so they are better tolerated by whites living near them. nonetheless, the asian demo is still small and comprises typically single digit %s of the neighborhoods they live in (outside of chinatowns). when those asian numbers start creeping up to 25%, expect to see some really passive-aggressive backlash by SWPLs as their culture is altered to one more resembling the ant hives of beijing or seoul.]

        I do like to call out so-called “feminists,” because around where I live, all self proclaimed feminists are stay at home wives and mothers.

        [a lot of self-proclaimed feminists are also careerist shrikes and ugly purple haired fatties with no chance of getting married. oh, and eskimos.]

        If most women were really superhuman they’d be able to raise children without a man or the government.

        [when the government becomes the husband, the husband becomes expendable. this is a big reason why the west is set for a major decline and collapse.]

        SWPL “feminists” use the help of their husbands.

        [when SWPL feminists take maternal leave from their lawyercunt jobs, they are using the help of the government.]

        Black/Hispanic/prole White feminists use the help of the government.

        [prole whites are a branch of my tribe, so it is natural, normal, and healthy that i advocate for a system that looks out for their interests, rather than disowning them like some spergatroid HBDer to the ravages of black and hispnaic underclass predations.]

        As for calling out right wingnuts, the main issue is interracial marriage. There’s a site full of WNs that I browse occasionally and it’s full of people who say they are against interracial marriage.

        [on an individual level, i have little to argue against an interracial marriage that is truly motivated by love and loyalty and shared outlook. on a culture-wide scale, my problem with miscegenation is its use as an anti-white propaganda tool. there’s a strong rational case to be made that the media, entertainment industry, and ruling classes should not proselytize for miscegenation as an acceptable alternative to staying withing the White race. the reason is simple: tens of thousands of years of evolved aesthetic, mental, and psychological uniqueness would be flushed down the toilet in a few generations if miscegenation with non-whites became anything more than a quirky deviation from the norm.]

        When I ask some questions about their life histories, I soon find that many of them are either married to an Asian/Latina, or they used to have an Asian/Latina girlfriend.

        [coolstorybro.txt]

        LikeLike


  49. on July 23, 2015 at 9:42 pm PA

    The cuckservative unveiling was Bob Dole’s nomination acceptance speech in 1996. “For those who hate, the exits are clearly marked” (paraphrase).

    For all of GHWB’s faults, he nominated Clarence Thomas, let the imperfect Dan Quayle run free with social conservatism and stood by him, and had Pat Buchanan speak at his 1992 convention.

    LikeLike


  50. on July 23, 2015 at 10:13 pm Putin

    Came through mod!!!

    LikeLike


  51. on July 23, 2015 at 10:19 pm PA

    Cultural cuckoldry includes the system’s co-option of artists. A case study in this is U2.

    The artist, almost by definition, is a passive, suggestible creature in that he is a conduit to higher inscrutible truths. But this can make him vulnerable to propagandists with jangling coins.

    I see U2 as great channelers and interpreters of the Northern pagan acceptance of Christ. You can feel it in their peak albums “Achtung Baby” and “Zooropa.” A bit earlier they recorded “One ” the perfect prayer except for the overlay of Moloch-globalism in the lyrics. Still, a lot of gold there, if you can sift away the lies.

    Their earlier stuff is young man’s search for the truth. “Wild Horses” “So cruel” and and “End of the World” off Achtung Baby are his search for love. Zooropa has good songs, not in the least a prophecy with Johnny Cash, “The Wanderer.”

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 10:34 pm King

      I would go back further, to Eisenhower. He sealed the New Deal in a way no Democrat could, and he not only built the Warren court, he made a big show of enforcing the lawless social engineering of Brown v Board at literal gunpoint.

      Nixon co-opted the left to engineer his second-term landslide. Yes, it would be a long, slow, developing degeneration.

      We rebounded with Reagan for a moment, but on election night 1988, GHWB was already walking it back with his fagtastic announcement of a “kinder, gentler” regime. Dole was a bemused and bewildered loser. Then came Bush’s son and “compassionate conservatism.”

      Rockefeller Republicans thought they were being clever, neutralizing the issues that got them bad press. It might even have been an effective strategy if the left were honest opponents rather than power-rabid saboteurs drunk on an alien ideology, hellbent on murdering their father, burning his legacy, spending his money, and shitting on his exposed corpse. “It’s called progress, DAD.”

      LikeLike


      • on July 23, 2015 at 10:37 pm King

        The mid-2000s shift from loyal-opposition Democrats to a hardened, anti-American fifth-column came as a surprise even to the apparatchiks themselves. Harry Reid used to be a moderate Western Democrat and anti-abortion. The Clintons were triangulating southerners in the DLC mode.

        But the orgasmic white-guilt poz load that was triggered by the possibility of electing a brown, pure ideologue turned them all into saps. The otherwise reliable anchors at Fox News broke down into tears the night the returns came in, shortly before the infiltrating operative announced the fundamental transformation of the country he hates.

        If the perfidious ni g ger had been ousted four years later, 2008 wouldn’t have been the turning point. But the confirmation of our mistake, and repeating it soberly this time, erased all doubt who was poised to win the cold civil war without so much as a stand-up fight. And like with any devastating loss, some men get radicalized and rally, but most lose morale, to the point of voluntarily bending over for their punishment, which they convinced themselves to regard as unfortunate but sadly appropriate.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 1:57 pm Bill

        “We rebounded with Reagan for a moment”

        Reagan gave us Amnesty and No Fault Divorce. Those may be the two most disastrous anti-white policy changes to happen in America. Reagan was a piece of shit and I hope his sorry Alzheimer having ass is burning in hell. Reagan is the perfect role model for the cuckservative….

        LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 11:01 pm COHOMOLOGIQUE

      As for artists, the realm of rawness in music and the visual, and even literary arts has somehow been raped/humiliated by the technosphere. That’s where the real cultural cuckoldry is as far as I’m concerned. Lots of you guys have an inferiority complex that makes the negroes’ one look suddenly trivial. The net just *perceptually* amplifies total absurdities, and guys are total pawns to it.

      “As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny “failed to take into account man’s almost infinite appetite for distractions.” -N. Postman

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 6:42 am BigAl

        Aldous Cucksley

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 8:16 am Greg Eliot

        He studied at Coxford.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 11:48 am BigAl

        “Grave New World”

        LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 10:08 am corvinus

      For the lulz:

      http://www.changesinlongitude.com/order-black-and-tan-irish-pub-ireland-dublin/

      Like a slick politician on election eve I even tried pandering. “I really like U2″ I blurted out. One of the pool players, who was wielding an inordinately large cue stick, came right back with “Bono should go save Africa already and leave us the feck alone.” Wow, tough crowd I thought. They don’t even kneel at the altar of St. Bono.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 10:22 am PA

        This reminds me of a joke. At a Irish stadium capacity-crowd U2 concert, Bono stops singing. His bandmates put down their instruments. Bono stands before the fans as though in deep meditation.

        And then he claps his hands once. And pauses. And a few seconds layer, again, “clap.” And “clap.” Again, “clasp.”

        And then he leans to the microphone and says “every time I clap, a child in Africa dies.”

        Someone in the dead-silent crowd yells “well then bloody well stop clapping!”

        [CH: haha. shiv, meet bone.]

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 10:52 am Anonymous

        im irish, this pretty much sums up what we think when some stupid yankee liberal comes into one of our pubs and makes a big deal out of ordering and drinking a pint of guiness with a big goofy smile on his face that you just want to punch

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 11:52 am Greg Eliot

        How about if he buys a round for the house?

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 11:54 am Greg Eliot

        Or asks the way to Innishfree?

        LikeLike


  52. on July 23, 2015 at 10:21 pm theasdgamer

    I was recently involved in a shouting match with a rabid anti-racism bully (scribblerg) over on Rollo’s site.

    LikeLike


  53. on July 23, 2015 at 10:47 pm Cortesar

    Gardening is a creative activity. It absorbs a lover of gardening in the same way as poetry absorbs a poet or painting absorbs a painter. It is more concrete than poetry and painting and has a more universal appeal. Even children and the unlettered, who cannot enjoy poetry and painting without developing the skill of interpreting symbols represented by words or colors, derive immense aesthetic pleasure from the shape, color and smell of plants, grass and flowers that abound in the well laid out garden.
    Moreover, garden provides an inexhaustible source of poems and paintings all over the world. Gardening keeps the body fit while it refreshes the mind.

    Garden is nature made to order. It is the box where sweets compacted lie there is no end to the refinement which can be brought about in a garden through the myriad shades of colour of plants and flowers and the fragrance associated with them. Keats has captured the excess of a garden’s charm in his famous ‘Ode to a nightingal

    LikeLike


    • on July 23, 2015 at 11:14 pm PA

      “Ode to a Nightingale” is a great English language poem. I just re-read it. Thanks for reminding me of it. Check out Milton’s “Lycidas” for another (much longer) poem with descriptions of gardens.

      LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 10:37 am mendozatorres

      It’s also a good metaphor for parenting.

      Neglect the garden and it withers. Over-protect it and it can’t fight on its own.

      My grandmother would always garden…mildly…but more so for the reasons you stated. She would always encourage me to be outside. Thankfully, after many moons, the lesson finally sunk in.

      Just need some land!

      LikeLike


  54. on July 24, 2015 at 12:49 am Capper

    Hi CH (and readers);

    I’d like to share this cut and paste with you guys from the CBC (Canadian national news site). The following is in response to this latest shooting in Lafayette in the comments section under the main story. This is the exact type of guy who is so often mocked on CH’s site.

    —————————————

    alchemy (<— ed: poster's name)

    Time to start "profiling" white males.

    They are responsible for the vast majority of mass and multiple shootings, especially in the U.S. but also here in Canada and I can recall one particularly bad case in Norway.

    Speaking as a white male myself, I think if we are really serious about being "Tough on Crime™" and focusing on the biggest threats and if people have been suggesting "profiling" middle-eastern types and "carding" young black males surely we can start routine spot checks on white males, especially the "loner" and "loser" types.

    Make special note of the ones that are obsessed with guns as the ones advocating for gun *control* are responsible for only 0.0000000001 per cent of these shootings.

    You could start by asking CSIS to keep files on all the angry, anti-government, anti-feminist, anti-progressive, anti-gun-control white male haters that regularly vent their spleen right here on the CBC site.

    ————————————–

    ^^^^ the last paragraph is the best of all. CSIS is the Canadian intelligence service. " Cuck on Crime " is more like it…

    LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 6:28 am Greg Eliot

      There’s a neck that needs stretching.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 6:44 am BigAl

        So he can see over our socially constructed walls of hatred and privilege?!

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 7:12 am Greg Eliot

        Droll.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 7:30 am carlos danger

        Canada has too many of them.

        LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 10:21 am Canadian Friend

      “…You could start by asking CSIS to keep files on all the angry, anti-government, anti-feminist, anti-progressive, anti-gun-control white male haters that regularly vent their spleen …”

      The NSA is already doing that.

      Not agreeing with the left is enough to have the NSA red flag us.

      We are being watched, this is a certainty.

      And Obama has put the NSA on steroids.

      LikeLike


  55. on July 24, 2015 at 2:30 am Anonymous

    kinda off topic, what is the evolutionary reason for altruism in whites?

    if i put a charity donation box in a store in the middle of an asian city and came back a period later, would i come back to find a near empty box compared to if i had put it in a white country? (safe to say if i left it in a black city the empty box would be stolen after 5 mins lol)

    LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 3:56 am Amasius

      It’s how we evolved. Small groups of Northern ice-age hunter-gatherers who had to take care of one another or perish. Populations were small and sparse because of the harsh environment which led to individualism as opposed to everywhere else where food was comparatively abundant and supported big groups which led to collectivism– in-group and out-group tribal thinking.

      Dr. Kevin MacDonald is the best guru on these issues, so I recommend looking up his writings.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 7:20 am menaquinone4

        this is wrong, go read hbdchick if you want to read an informed opinion on this matter

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 8:22 am James Blonde

        I love these Just So Stories.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 8:37 am Greg Eliot

        In t-h-w-a-c-k’s Fractured Fairy Tales Of History, the white man stole the negro’s altruism, largesse and sense of fair play back in Egypt…

        … and po’ ol’ Uncle Ben and Aunt Jemima been trying to get ’em back all these long-suff’rin’ years.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 9:51 am Anonymous

        its a daaamn shame

        LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 10:30 am Canadian Friend

      I hate the word press filter…

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 10:33 am Canadian Friend

        Primitive life forms = less altruism

        from low to high; fungus, insects, animals, humans

        Wh*tes have the most advanced civilization because of their high level of altruism.

        more evolved = higher level of altruism.

        LikeLike


      • on July 25, 2015 at 10:22 am James Blonde

        altruism is a myth; you guys need to stop trying to suck your own dicks.

        LikeLike


  56. on July 24, 2015 at 3:21 am Daily Linkage – July 24, 2015 | The Dark Enlightenment

    […] Literal Cuckservatives | Chateau Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  57. on July 24, 2015 at 4:29 am duderino

    Here’s how Trump wins against Hillary: He chooses a black woman (Oprah?, Mia Love?) as his running mate. VPs don’t determine policy, so I don’t care. The democrats fate rests almost entirely on the turn out of blacks against Republicans. This move turns the whole narrative of a woman fighting to break the glass ceiling upside down. Now, this privileged white bitch is talking down to a b girl, and creates a circular firing squad on the left.
    It reminds me of South Africa, where the blacks are implementing strong immigration restrictions. They know where their bread and butter is, and don’t really want any competition. Republicans are wasting their time appealing to Hispanics. Anything short of full amnesty will be to little for them. Full amnesty creates an ungodly amount of welfare dependents and thus democrats. Taking a chunk of the black vote is a more logical path to victory for Trump.

    LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 6:26 am Greg Eliot

      And yet, by playing that game, even if mere lip service, the Cathedral’s foundation remains solid.

      I guess being clever and trying to beat the enemy at it’s own game is one strategy… but you’re implicitly giving their game credence, then.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 2:12 pm duderino

        If it stops the immigrant bleeding, I’m willing to make compromises. Cathedral culture isn’t going away as long as people take sociology classes in American universities. Academics have been the ones pushing this stuff for years, it only came to the mainstream when everybody and their sister starting getting “educated”

        LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 8:49 am PWN

      You’re missing the point. Romney would have lost even with winning the Amerindian/mestizo vote because of the poor white turnout. The strategy of the gop should be to increase turnout among white people by not catering towards marginal voters.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 10:41 am mendozatorres

        Exactly. It’s the point no one is making. Each time they bring out the “Latino” (hate that fucking word) stats, they make it seems like they’re the darling, when closer inspection reveals not many vote.

        LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 8:53 am PA

      Candidates whose female running-mates contributed nothing in the way of female vote:

      Walter Mondale – 1984
      Pat Buchanan – 2000 (black female)
      John McCain – 2008

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 9:39 am Greg Eliot

        Yeah, that Buchanan gambit was an embarrassment… and even though he sometimes seems like he’s ready to cross the Rubicon and name names, he invariably falls back into the “allowed opposition” corner.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 2:20 pm duderino

        I think an intelligent black woman would be very awkward to criticize compared to Sarah Palin. Changing the black vote by even a few percentage points, or even just discouraging turnout would doom democrats in Florida and Ohio. Their eggs really are in one basket.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 2:26 pm PA

        Intelligent conservative candidates are savaged by the lib establishmeant: Clarence Thomas.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 3:06 pm duderino

        It’s true that Clarence Thomas has been criticized. But, Black Voters don’t really pay attention to the supreme court. If you pit a black woman against Hillary on a national stage, tribalism will kick in and she’ll lose support. It was only 8 years ago they turned out against her for Obama.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 8:35 pm Canadian Friend

        “…I think an intelligent black woman would be very awkward to criticize…”

        She was not vice President but Condoleeza Rice who is black and intelligent got criticized and mocked a lot by the left.

        Just sayin’

        LikeLike


      • on July 25, 2015 at 10:27 am James Blonde

        Condi was a wonk; she was clueless for making the case for conservative principles; you never saw her doing that.

        She was the female Mitt Romney; stiff and passionless…

        LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 9:27 am The Straw That Stirs the Drink

      Romney was DOA with the Mormon thing… He was never going to get a sizable portion of the white vote with that hanging over him. Whenever a “religion” element enters the election it means less white votes for GOPs. Like when Perot siphoned off the Jewish “white” voters from GHWB, who voted Perot out of protest for GHWB blocking Israeli strikes on Iraq.

      LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 9:55 am PA

      Romney got the GOP base’s attention when he picked Ryan for running mate (there was anticipation of a diversity or female pick), then Eastwood did the “empty chair” act, and then when Romney gave Obama a dressing-down in the first debate.

      His second debate performance failed to meet the expectations set by the first one and the base’s enthusiasm ebbed.

      LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 10:44 am mendozatorres

      Romney wasn’t personable. He tried to “force” being relatable, but he’s too elite to try to “come down” to a regular Joe level. Trump’s got way more style. Pizzaz!

      LikeLike


  58. on July 24, 2015 at 5:36 am Corvo

    “What an asshole. He got his, retired, and now he wants polish his cuck credentials on my back. He didn’t step down to ensure a minority took his job. Hypocrite. Fucker.”

    Yeah – this sums it up precisely. Whites in positions of power (retired or not) who buy into the SJW propaganda on racial benefits for the “diversities” has betrayed his own people. There aren’t enough lamp posts …

    LikeLike


  59. on July 24, 2015 at 6:33 am druithin

    When we want to disprove the words of the one expressing “disapproval” towards us, falsely, we have already accepted the false guilt which was the intended purpose of the false accusation in the first place! This creates false action and is a false solution.

    Everything false the Enemy controls, because it is of him – he is the father *of* it.

    It is in this way, debating with the devil, that we are conquered. Instead we must be like the archangel Michael who, when contending with the devil, did not dare to argue against him but stated forcefully with power, “The Lord rebuke thee!”

    LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 8:13 am Greg Eliot

      +111… and let’s not forget, Michael was the one who gave Old Scratch that limp. 😉

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 10:45 am mendozatorres

        haha….nice!

        LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 8:37 am PA

      This great point was also well covered at Vox Popoli. You don’t fight liberal Rhetoric (emotion-based, bad-faith arguments) with conservative Dialectic (rational, good-faith arguments). You hit them with even harder rhetoric instead. Shaming, mocking, accusations.

      The Mantra is a good example of deploying Rhetoric against the enemy. The Mantra doesn’t dwell on pointless statistics about crime or economy. It instead paints libs as “anti-Whites” and makes use of memorable slogans (“… White countries fo everyone”, “…just a code word for anti-White.”)

      LikeLike


  60. on July 24, 2015 at 8:36 am Cydonia 19.5

    In other News: BBQ’s be Sexist ……………………..

    http://www.infowars.com/male-feminist-men-who-enjoy-bbqs-are-oppressing-women/

    LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 10:11 am corvinus

      But of course. It’s one of the best ways for men to prepare the meat we need. Women, OTOH, can be vegan without morphing into a malnourished hipster.

      LikeLike


  61. on July 24, 2015 at 9:42 am uppity redneck

    Yep pretty much. If you are unapologetic for being white they will act like you are that guy who wants to lynch nogs just because they sleep with white women.

    LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 11:45 am Greg Eliot

      Well, okay, then, if it will make you feel better…

      …we’ll lynch the women too.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 1:43 pm James Blonde

        what about pandas and penguins?

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 1:46 pm Greg Eliot

        … and cabbages and kings?

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 1:48 pm Greg Eliot

        I doubt the pandas would lust after the penguins… they gots more sense than women…

        … but at least the offspring, if it were possible, would have greater resemblance to BOTH parents.

        LikeLike


  62. on July 24, 2015 at 11:08 am ‘Cuckservative’ Trending | More Right

    […] is a “cuckservative”? Ask Heartiste. I don’t endorse anything else he says, but his explanation of cuckservative is […]

    LikeLike


  63. on July 24, 2015 at 11:11 am Anonymous

    hulk hogan sacked by the wwe after being caught on tape complaining about his daughters mud sharking

    LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 11:17 am Anonymous

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3173493/Hulk-Hogan-scrubbed-WWE-websites-amid-reports-audio-tape-launching-racist-tirade.html

      whoops wrong link

      the video is funny too tho lol

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 11:52 am James Blonde

        Was Hogan having trouble staying relevant?

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 12:08 pm Greg Eliot

        Staying?

        LikeLike


  64. on July 24, 2015 at 11:12 am Anonymous

    Funny, I just noticed how different Jeb looks than the rest of his siblings.

    LikeLike


  65. on July 24, 2015 at 11:43 am Theropod

    How can I, as a concerned older brother, help to convince my cuckservative sister to stop dating b – l – a – q – c – z (admittedly, they are at least church-going guys and they don’t seem to be out-and-out bad dudes, but still) for the sake of my family unity? It practically drove my parents to the brink of divorce a year or so ago because my dad made life miserable for everyone due to his very understandable anger over the whole thing when it happened the first time. Granted, sis is 26, has a master’s degree and works on the administration side of higher education, so this may be a lost cause. Advice is welcome.

    LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 11:49 am Greg Eliot

      If she doesn’t care about ruining her chances with a white Mr. Right down the road, who may spot her with her current blackamour…

      … and if she doesn’t care about giving birth to children that at least resemble her…

      There’s really nothing you can do.

      Ten thousand years of evolution thrown away in one generation… more’s the pity.

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 12:34 pm Theropod

        Our cries of “once you go bl@kk we don’ wanchew b@ck” fall on deaf ears, given that her friends are all bl@kk churchians (who, inexplicably, all married bl@kk men), but unfortunately that’s kind of the way she has gone since her very alpha college boyfriend wanted to, you know, wait until he could provide for her before wife-ing her up straight out of university. God forbid he try to get a decent job before taking on her entitled, sassy self. Mom and Pops were simply too good to her, made life too easy for her, leading her to the current situation where she can, in her mind, do no wrong; meanwhile, we’re all raycisssss, including me. And this is despite my choosing a bride-to-be from SE Asia…could it be because white chicks like my sis reject white guys for the dumbest reasons?

        LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 11:57 am James Blonde

      I suggest you stop making such a big deal and expressing all the butthurt about it….

      She is feeding off your concern and all the attention it is getting her.

      Do I hafta explain everything to you guys?

      Geez

      (((shakin my head)))

      BTW, are you introducing her to any cool white guys?

      Do you know any cool white guys?

      Do you even lift?

      LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 12:06 pm Greg Eliot

        She is feeding off your concern and all the attention it is getting her.

        This is a 26 year old woman, not a teenager…

        … and certainly not one of your ilk, so try not to project negro motives onto whites.

        That said, if there’s even a scintilla of this sort of thought in her head, at her age with the bio clock ticking and the window for landing a quality husband closing more each day, well… then she’s too far gone already, and I wouldn’t wish her on a white man.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 1:28 pm James Blonde

        How big are her tits?

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 1:36 pm Greg Eliot

        Yes, there’s that.

        There’s always that.

        Touche’

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 3:48 pm Scanman

        Hahaha

        I don’t care what anyone says, JB is a net positive.

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 4:21 pm Regular John

        “I don’t care what anyone says, JB is a net positive”

        I gotta second this. Who doesn’t love some world class coonin’?

        LikeLike


      • on July 24, 2015 at 6:05 pm Greg Eliot

        N1gger though he be, he’s still OUR n1gger.

        LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 11:59 am PA

      1. NEVER bail her out financially or otherwise when she inevitably runs aground. Tell her this now.

      2. Tell her now that you will not accept any children she makes with a black as your family. Enlist your father here. He will not be their grandfather.

      3. Tool her black boyfriend in front of her.

      4. Use the word “mudshark” liberally in front of her.

      5. Talk about how ugly and unnatural, and white trash it is for a white woman to ave a mystery meat child. Use those words.

      All of the above may feel cruel but it is a necessary intervention. If it comes to worst, at least you’ll have a clear conscience that you warned her.

      LikeLike


    • on July 24, 2015 at 2:08 pm Bill

      Get her out of your life and don’t look back or you will turn into a pillar of salt…

      LikeLike


    • on July 25, 2015 at 11:36 am Putin

      The policy makers have pushed this type of thing for years now through government training shows like “What would you do”, commercials and education. It would not bother me as much if it wasn’t a situation created by the neocons.

      Not to offend but maybe she wants a big cock.

      Have a so called friend who made a bitter remark about my son’s girlfriend who happens to be half German and half Filipino. She is hot so I think he was just being passive aggressive. Anyway his feminine son later ended up getting an entitled black girlfriend who just changed her hair to Afro. I think the dad and Grandfather are in passive shock. He was the kind of guy who would always try to show how hip he was because he would go to all the racial movies they put out these days which depict white people as evil and black people as good.

      LikeLike


  66. on July 24, 2015 at 1:59 pm Anonymous

    That last comment is interesting. You almost never hear mention of the “white community”. It took reading that for me to realize that they want us to feel alienated and alone so we don’t act. They want us to look at other whites as enemies or at least rivals. As a mid 20s man I’ve never once thought about a “White community”, I’ve realized I’ve been conditioned to see other white men as competition in a zero sum game.

    LikeLike


  67. on July 24, 2015 at 3:08 pm Experienced Father

    Donald Trump has a very good issue with border/illegal immigrant criminality

    see:

    ‘Rape Tree’ Found Near Texas-Mexico Border
    by Bryan Preston
    December 18, 2013
    http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2013/12/18/rape-tree-found-near-texas-mexico-border/

    LikeLike


  68. on July 24, 2015 at 3:09 pm Experienced Father

    Donald Trump has a very good issue with border/illegal immigrant criminality

    See part 2:

    Border: More rape trees found in S. Texas
    January 15, 2014
    http://fishgame.com/2014/01/border-more-rape-trees-found-in-s-texas/

    LikeLike


  69. on July 24, 2015 at 3:10 pm Experienced Father

    Donald Trump has a very good issue with border/illegal immigrant criminality

    See part 3:

    ‘Rape Trees’ Common Along Immigrant Smuggling Route
    Trees marking where smugglers raped migrants so common, locals have a name for them
    by Adan Salazar | Infowars.com | August 11, 2014

    http://www.infowars.com/rape-trees-common-along-immigrant-smuggling-route/

    LikeLike


  70. on July 24, 2015 at 3:11 pm Experienced Father

    And finally, Donald Trump has a very good issue with border/illegal immigrant criminality, from an unhappy July 4th post from the Gateway Pundit blog.

    See part 4:

    Donald Trump Was Right… Rape Trees Found Along US Southern Border
    Jim Hoft
    Jul 4th, 2015

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/07/donald-trump-was-right-rape-trees-found-along-us-southern-border/

    LikeLike


  71. on July 24, 2015 at 4:16 pm corvinus

    Hah. An article about “cuckservative” just showed up on American Renaissance (amren.com)… and is today’s only feature. Meaning they consider it an important concept.

    LikeLike


  72. on July 24, 2015 at 6:56 pm Just Saying

    One of the reasons I like Trump is that he doesn’t apologize for stuff that the lib-tards make up. He says what he believes, and the lib-tard media twists it and try to get him to apologize and he doesn’t – I like that. I am so sick of the lib-tards and the lying media that anything they hate – I like. It really is that simple – so the more they pour their vitriol on Trump the more I like him. The Republican party is too cowardly – I HATE cowards. Be a frickin’ man and stand by what you believe – that is why I would vote for Trump and cannot stand the lib-tards – they lie, and will do it to your face when you can show they are lying. Of course, I am a firm believer that the lib-tards hate and want to destroy this country – so I will vote for whomever is against them.

    Personally, I want to see the next real President use all the powers that the lib-tards got Obama. Make it so that every adult man, and woman in the US MUST own several guns, and make it a “tax” is they don’t. Subsidize gun ownership under the auspices of protecting Americans and “helping” the police – make it that open-carry is a Federal law, or just circumvent Congress and tell the DoJ to ignore it as a “crime” – use the powers they usurped… Rub their faces in it…

    LikeLike


  73. on July 24, 2015 at 9:48 pm homomaniac

    I read this and also the earlier article about that article with the guy whose wife is fucking Paulo lol. I wanted to clear up something for the posters here. I think the reason most cuckolds like their fetish is because they’re gay or close to. I’m a big homo myself and I like this fetish because it’s another way to submit to another man, and also because I sometimes manage to get a girl to help me seduce a guy I like by pretending she’s my girlfriend. I know that many, or most cucks, won’t admit this, but it’s some homo impulse that makes them like it.

    I should say though that despite my fetish (which does not involve blacks btw) I am politically like most of the posters here. I don’t know why I like what I like, and don’t defend it, but you shouldn’t assume that a certain political view will change your sexual tastes or vice versa. In fact these Republicans you guys are talking about are far more loathsome than a perv like me because they actually don’t enjoy their submission, either in real life or on any level, but they put up with it for the reason this article explains. It would be one thing if these guys were masochistic homos and doing it for sexually twisted reasons, but they’re just doing it for a nice meal and a pat on the head, which is far less interesting and far worse.

    LikeLike


  74. on July 25, 2015 at 2:29 am Outside in - Involvements with reality » Blog Archive » What’s in a word?

    […] ruinous for the soul. It is recommended that you scrupulously avoid following these links (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, […]

    LikeLike


  75. on July 25, 2015 at 12:01 pm Winston

    Yea, I finally understand what they meant when they used to say, “We’re fighting the terrorists there so we don’t have to fight them here.”

    It was actually a veiled cuckservative threat. “We’re fighting Israel’s enemies in the Middle East so they don’t flood our countries with Muslim terrorists.”

    Once we stopped supporting perpetual war for Israel the floodgates really opened. Their “prophecy” came true.

    I think we all know who these cuckservatives are. We went to school with them. They were the tattle-tales, the teacher’s pets, the hall monitors, the model UN faggots. They were the ones none of us really liked (well, I was also loved by few and hated by many but for entirely different reasons.) and now these faggot cuckservatives are having their revenge.

    LikeLike


  76. on July 25, 2015 at 10:30 pm Cuckservatives | Evan Peters Gossip

    […] Excerpted from Chateau Heartiste https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2015/07/23/literal-cuckservatives/ […]

    LikeLike


  77. on July 25, 2015 at 10:31 pm Cuckservatives | I Love GMG

    […] Excerpted from Chateau Heartiste https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2015/07/23/literal-cuckservatives/ […]

    LikeLike


  78. on July 25, 2015 at 10:32 pm Cuckservatives | Gossip Forum – General Discussion

    […] Excerpted from Chateau Heartiste https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2015/07/23/literal-cuckservatives/ […]

    LikeLike


  79. on July 26, 2015 at 11:01 am Important: Roundup of #Cuckservative articles and memes | Occam's Razor

    […] provides a must-read tour de force on […]

    LikeLike


  80. on July 26, 2015 at 6:54 pm Taco

    Bravo, sir, bravo! Possibly your best piece.

    LikeLike


  81. on July 26, 2015 at 8:10 pm Cuckservative articles and memes | Addendum

    […] CH’s definition: A cuckservative is a cowardly pussy who sucks up to leftoid equalists for mercy and pisses himself when he gets accused of racism, sexism, or anti-semitism. […]

    LikeLike


  82. on July 27, 2015 at 3:11 am #Cuckservative | Nekompetentna reakcija

    […] Heartiste je, po običaju, daleko sočniji: […]

    LikeLike


  83. on July 27, 2015 at 6:02 pm Of Cuckservatives, Racial In-grouping, and the Civil War Cube -

    […] Heartiste talks about the new term of art, Cuckservative: […]

    LikeLike


  84. on July 27, 2015 at 6:30 pm Of Cuckservatives, Racial In-grouping, and the Civil War Cube | Neoreactive

    […] Heartiste talks about the new term of art, Cuckservative: […]

    LikeLike


  85. on August 5, 2015 at 11:03 pm Complete Cuckservative Compendium | B'Man's Revolt

    […] provides a must-read tour de force on […]

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Peak Finance on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Tam the Bam on Tourette’s Game
    Tam the Bam on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    luisman on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Tam the Bam on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    jeangray07 on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Nads on Tourette’s Game
    oink on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    jb on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Suburban_elk on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Cesar Sayoc, "White Male" (& Deep State Updates)
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • "Conspiracy Theory" Conspiracy
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • Tourette's Game
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • When The Jumbotron Test Is Crushed
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: