Chateau Heartiste was the first warning about consequences from the coming sexbot revolution, and how it will radically distort the sexual market and push the West into chaos.
Today, a chorus of voices from various scientific fields are echoing what CH wrote long ago. “Sex with robots will be the norm in 50 years”, expert claims. 3D printed models can make a sexbot face that looks exactly like your favorite hottie.
(The reader who supplied the links comments: “This will blow up the world. It will make crack cocaine look like decaffeinated coffee.”)
Soon, sexbots will be animated and be able to talk (programmable with your preferred phrases of sexy come-ons).
Once the uncanny valley is ascended, all bets are off. As men are, above all else, visually stimulated to reproductive ardor, sexbots present a real challenge to flesh and blood women and, ultimately, to the sustaining of civilization.
***
I foresee a massive groundswell of support for polygamy & polyamory coinciding with the widespread introduction of affordable sexbots to the consumer (male) market. It’s hard to predict if this outcome — that is, the complete removal from the dating market of omega and lesser beta males — will be dysgenic or eugenic, because women could just as plausibly want to share callous, undependable jerkboys as to share morally sterling, credentialed alpha male captains of industry. Then, in a sexbot saturated world, the pressure on women to look their very best for the few men left in the dating market who are still suitable mates will be immense.
***
MT avers,
Loyal companionship, his cheerleader, heart of the home, a submissive nature to compliment his naturally dominate one, soft heartedness and in the words of the comedian Sinbad, his nurse when he is elderly. Attributes a fembot cannot give.
True (well, mostly true, but things change). However, female beauty is necessary if not sufficient to men’s romantic happiness, especially to men with sexual market options (and sexbots would add a lot more options). Female beauty is not just necessary to men’s happiness, it is dominating, over every other consideration a man would make when evaluating women for both short- and long-term mate worth. Stone cold truth: A typical American fatty with attitude to spare has no chance against a sexbot with a pretty face, a slender BMI, and a perfect hourglass shape.
***
latchkey kid asks,
what if women also take to acquiring male bots to satisfy their womanly wants? After all, it’s not uncommon for them to say that all the good men have gone, they might as well start having a bit of artificial action like men do with them bots.
Male sexbots for women will never happen, at least not to the degree that female sexbots for men fly out of the factories. For a simple reason: Women’s sexual and romantic desire is not nearly as visually-oriented as it is for men. Just one of those uncomfortable truths about immutable differences between the sexes that market disruptors like sexbots help clarify for the masses.
***
Prediction: The vast majority of sexbots produced for worldwide male consumption will be White women with a diverse palette of hair colors. Asian women sexbots will compete with Latin women sexbots for second place. I’ll leave it as an exercise for the reader which race of women will be least represented among the ranks of assembly-line sexbots. Hint: Black male sexbots will probably outsell this last category.
If beta males are removed from the SMV then women will probably start dating and marrying their gay bffs. “I know what you are thinking dad but he just is passionate about picking out the wedding flowers“
LikeLike
who cares?
LikeLike
Modern women are sexbots.
they have been reprogrammed as fembots.
not so long ago, women were taught to develop their chief virtues: “Loyal companionship, his cheerleader, heart of the home, a submissive nature to compliment his naturally dominate one, soft heartedness and in the words of the comedian Sinbad, his nurse when he is elderly. Attributes a fembot cannot give.”
the bernankfieriez erased this operating system
lolzozooz
LikeLike
My guess is that the lesbian population will EXPLODE.
“We don’t need no man anyhow!”
LikeLike
“My guess is that the lesbian population domestic violence will EXPLODE.”
FIFY! Oh wait…..it already has.
LikeLike
OR…
LikeLike
Explode? They might think they got more to play with less man intervention.
LikeLike
If those gay candidates are not interested in gay marriage…
LikeLike
[…] Sexbot Update […]
LikeLike
Only the Luddites have any hope of surviving this technological insanity: “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.”
LikeLike
Just another industry that fails to account for the needs of all individuals. NO WHERE did I see where they were making male, lesbian, bi, or transgender sexbots. This is unfair! What of those in the LGBT community? Have we forgotten the needs of these people? Have we allowed our bigotry and hatred to overcome us?
Enough!
It’s time to make a stand! No longer will our lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, and transgender brothers and sisters be forgotten! No longer will this inequality be tolerated! Something must be done! I challenge you all to contact your local congressperson and demand that this outrage be stopped!
I shall get a sexbot! I shall call her Bruce!
Anyway,
I bet the sexbots will have a better personality than the average bitch anyhow.
LikeLike
True: If sexbots are ever made for sale, the cries of injustice will be heard far and wide. Some people (you know what I mean) will do their damnedest to find fault in men’s choices of ‘bots.
The media will be shocked – shocked! – by which bots sell. “Sexism!” With no mention of the fact that Blacks buy exclusively White bots, maybe a few Asian ones.
LikeLike
Nah. If it makes money, it will sell.
LikeLike
When realistic sexbots are available, guys not interested in having kids will need girls for what again?
LikeLike
Loyal companionship, his cheerleader, heart of the home, a submissive nature to compliment his naturally dominate one, soft heartedness and in the words of the comedian Sinbad, his nurse when he is elderly. Attributes a fembot cannot give.
[CH: true (well, mostly true, but things change). however, female beauty is necessary if not sufficient to men’s romantic happiness, especially to men with sexual market options (and sexbots would add a lot more options). female beauty is not just necessary to men’s happiness, it is dominating, over every other consideration a man would make when evaluating women for both short- and long-term mate worth. a typical american fatty with attitude to spare has no chance against a sexbot with a pretty face, an attractive BMI, and a perfect hourglass shape.]
However, a woman who has not betrayed her true feminine nature, usually discovers, fine tunes and perfects those wonderfully feminine attributes when she is married and a mother.
LikeLike
A Labrador retriever.
LikeLike
What’s that quote from Richard Feynman (in a different context, but applicable), “You must strive never to fool yourself, and you are the easiest one to fool?” He was talking about taking scientific results as true when they are not, but the second part of the sentence shows where you are off. Men will fool themselves into thinking they are getting these things. After a while, it will become second nature.
Or, if that’s a little too abstract, remember the scene in “Shallow Hal”, after Hal’s friend breaks the Tony Robbins spell and Hal complains. His friend says, “That wasn’t real” and Hal responds “It was real to me” and his friend just goes “Oh” and gives him a look like “Sorry, man. I kinda screwed you over.”
As for your last point about nursing a man when he’s elderly, I read that nursing your dying spouse is one of the most stressful things a person experiences. Taking away that stress would seem to be an improvement for the recipient. At least you know the robot is doing it without feeling any anxiety about its own impending death.
LikeLike
Oh I don’t deny the allure of female beauty and it’s utmost significance in a man’s life. One would have to be blind or willfully ignorant to miss it.
But a robot? Perhaps this will entice American women to step up their game. On the other hand, it may disgust them. Either way, I don’t think it’s a positive. A symptom of a weak culture. The old saying holds true, “where women go, society goes”. Thank you, feminism.
LikeLike
Attributes which the modern woman refuses to give.
And whether it’s cannot or will not, the result is the same.
LikeLike
> “Men will fool themselves into thinking…” ——— Try talking to YaReally about his paramount duty to re-seed the White Race so that it doesn’t vanish into extinction. See how far you get. Then try to imagine a 55yo childless YaReally whose two choices were fornicating with a fat low-IQ Beluga cow, or with a sexbot made to look like Monica Belluci/Charlize Theron/Megan Fox in their primes. And ask yourself: “What would YaReally do?”
LikeLike
Ghost of YaReally’s Christmas Future: “I’d just corrupt and destroy the hawtest Amish babes FTW!!!!!”
LikeLike
Memo to YaReally’s Christmas Future: Amish chicks aren’t on the pill, and they don’t head off to Planned Murderhood when you knock them up.
LikeLike
Try talking to YaReally about his paramount duty to re-seed the White Race so that it doesn’t vanish into extinction. See how far you get.
This again? It has been explained over and over again what is wrong with the Moar Whyte Babies talk. YaReally has good comments on game, why are you picking on him? You want politics, you should understand the brilliance of combining game – with its observations, its ability to catch people’s interest, and its call to improvement – with politics.
If you STILL don’t understand this, then why do you visit CH’s blog, which clearly isn’t in line with what you believe? Is it for the purpose of audience poaching?
LikeLike
I have heard rumors that young boys now are so into online pr0n that young girls are actually having a hard time getting dates. [Cue WhoreFinder: “Carpe Diem, old man!”]
LikeLike
Okay, if you want to play that Game: “Then try to imagine a 55yo childless ARBITER whose two choices were fornicating with a fat low-IQ Beluga cow, or with a sexbot made to look like Monica Belluci/Charlize Theron/Megan Fox in their primes. And ask yourself: “What would ARBITER do?”
LikeLike
Memo to ARBITER’s Christmas Future: Amish chicks aren’t on the pill, and they don’t head off to Planned Murderhood when you knock them up.
LikeLike
There’d be a whole lot more of these “moar whyte babies” you all want to save us if people on blogs discussed game and went out and posted field reports and shit instead of 50 page circlejerks of old bitter dudes ranting about race/politics/jews.
I’ll pop out babies as soon as you volunteer to pay for them and any divorce-rape that comes along with them.
LikeLike
Nice try, scheisser… but those so-called field reports resemble more the 50 page circle jerks about which you speak.
LikeLike
Oh an anti-game reply from Greg. Shocking. Tell me more about how we need moar whyte babies while making fun of guys learning and teaching game that could lead to the moar whyte babies you want.
Funny, I thought it was just women and feminists who spend their day bitching & moaning about shit without offering solutions.
Now if Captain Obvious could reply with some condescending snark my day would be complete!
LikeLike
@Greg Eliot
“Attributes which the modern woman refuses to give.
And whether it’s cannot or will not, the result is the same.”
Sadly, I cannot argue that point.
LikeLike
Typical binary thought process from The Shit Whisperer.
You’ve never heard me badmouth game… not the game that’s useful for solidifying relationships and grabbing the few gals left worthy of our efforts…
The only anti- you’ve gotten from me is merely in re the dancing monkeys, such as yourself, with their inane “sets” and “field reports” and orchestrated videos… trying to make up for all the lost time in their teens and early twenties when they couldn’t get laid in a woman’s prison with a fistful of pardons, and now try to make up time by chasing poon-uber-alles from girls men with self-respect and an eye on the future barely give the time of day to.
You work your side of the street and I’ll work mine… but don’t try to toss your insipid snark about bitter old men over to the other side and not get back a canful o’ whoopass.
LikeLike
@Greg
“You’ve never heard me badmouth game… not the game that’s useful for solidifying relationships and grabbing the few gals left worthy of our efforts…”
lol do tell. I’m all ears. You want to help men out, don’t you?
LikeLike
Take your faggy lol and hit the road, boy… I’ve given tips and hints all along, in between the barbs, jests, and Scripture… for those with ears to hear.
And even I had said nothing beyond the political-sociological realm, I’ve still come up in better odor to the Most High than your scatalogical antics.
LikeLike
Who has tighter Game?
The guy who can attract an HB10 and pull a lay in the same night…
…or
The guy who can attract an HB10 and crap on her chest 5 hours after he meets her?
Ya?
LikeLike
Find me an HB10 that lets some of these douche-chills anywhere NEAR her, let along defecate on her chest, and I’ll treat you and her to the next unicorn race ’round the rings of Saturn.
LikeLike
My two cents here on the YaReally/Greg Eliot spat:
Modern game, such as the “field reports” that tradcons find so despicable, is nothing new. It’s what seducers have always done. Now we’re just using the modern tools of data to describe it. No, it’s not romantic, Greg, but seducers never really are.
Look at romance as engineering. Kinda like this guy (:00 to :26):
LikeLike
We already have one Captain Obvious on the board, Strapon. I’m well aware that the Lotharios of old are today’s PUAs… the difference being that the erstwhile Casanovas and Don Juans had a lot more panache and a lot fewer tatted floozies to choose from. 😉
And ‘tradcon’ isn’t a fair lable to pin on those of us who don’t care about resurrecting the dead, but are looking towards the birth of something new in re the socio-political realm.
That said, your input is duly noted.
LikeLike
[…] Sexbot Update […]
LikeLike
Or a third possibility: societal collapse before the uncanny valley can be ascended. And my bet is on that.
LikeLike
My first thought. Fifty years? Way too late. No one will be able to afford sexbots fifty years from now.
Still, the discussion about sexbots is interesting, as it is one of those things that highlight human behavior. Like war and wedding celebrations.
[CH: sexbots are… clarifying. they wonderfully focus the mind.]
LikeLike
Completely agree. 50 years? At the current rate America will be total anarchy Mad Max by then.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Need to find the GIF where he downloads her at the malt shop.
LikeLike
You can watch the whole episode here:
http://kisscartoon.me/Cartoon/Futurama-Season-03/Episode-015-I-Dated-A-Robot
Futurama did another episode where Amy falls in love with a robot and campaigns to legalize human-robot marriage:
http://watchcartoononline.eu/futurama-season-06-episode-004-proposition-infinity
Either moral standards changed between 3001 and 3010, or it’s only acceptable for *women* to date robots.
LikeLike
I wonder how long it would be till the truly monstrous deviants begin building giant, anthropomorphic sex dolls. Eight foot tall, mutli-wanged charizards, four armed mortal combat type sheeva outworlders and armored centaur trannies walking down main street, arm in claw with beaming human wretches.
I feel as though the groundwork has already been laid to accept this type of scenario.
LikeLike
It’s already been done for women. New models become available every year on NFL draft day.
LikeLike
Rather than a sexbot, I would rather have a butler.
LikeLike
Don’t you mean a french maid?
All the benefits of the butler, whilst bringing the hoover suction when it’s time to clean the naughty bits.
LikeLike
Stephen Fry raises hand and says: “Ooooh… pick me!”
LikeLike
Wow. Why would I want a doll that talks back? Will the doll try to convince me to let my friend fuck it while I sit in a corner and masturbate to the whole affair?
LikeLike
They’ll probably make an app for that.
LikeLike
The cuckbot will be popular in certain circles.
Kinda OT but have you watched Ex Machina? Similar scenario
LikeLike
I remain sceptical about sexbots becoming anything more than an expensive novelty but I’ll remain open-minded on the subject IF they’re designed got hassle-free jizz-cleanup.
There is a saying: show me the most beautiful woman in the world and I’ll show you a man who is tired of fucking her. Going by that, I forsee Craigslist swapping of models, provided, again, the cleaning thing.
LikeLike
Cleaning? Have we learned nothing from the business model that built King Gillette’s empire? “I’ll give you the razor and sell you the blades.”
They’ll give us the bots and sell us the use-and-dispose orifices.
LikeLike
Ideally, sperm will power the bot.
LikeLike
Don’t go gettin’ all Buck Rogers about this now.
LikeLike
They’ll be powered by ‘thrusters” !
(I’ll get my coat)
LikeLike
Hopefully, you can just trade them in for a new one every so often. Infinite upgrades.
LikeLike
Or, better yet: you get to mix and match components to design your own optimum body, and then perpetually get to just swap heads and skins forever.
LikeLike
Facsimiles may become physically indistinguishable from a human body, but they never will be alive. Based on that inescapable and irreducible fact, even sexbots that transcend the uncanny valley will have all the social cachet that pornography and masturbation has today.
It is a shameful, last resort that will remain inconceivable to most men who, by nature, will prefer failing in a genuine contest than consoling himself with fakery.
[CH: i’m not so sure about that. internet porn is practically a rite of passage for men these days.]
That alone will marginalize the technology. Videogamers don’t imagine themselves the equal of combat veterans, even if they satisfy themselves with simulacra. And while many of them ironically embrace their loserish escapism, few are proud of having to resort to fantasy to “experience” “courage.”
[video gamers devote incredible amounts of time and energy to their habit. simulacra of real world pleasure pursuits can indeed spoof our hindbrain machinery well enough to waste years of life on, whatever ironic pose is taken with the simulacra.]
LikeLike
Yes, internet porn and video gaming are all the rage in our cuckold culture, but the point is they still (and always will) cause shame because they are intrinsic cop-outs by their very nature. No man is ever ashamed for having landed a beautiful woman or demonstrated his courage beyond reproach.
And that is an irreducible fact about manliness. If it weren’t you would have no converts seeking the secret of game. Every porn consumer prefers the real thing — if only because of the shame factor. Surely you’ve noticed that not all ejaculations are equal.
[CH: presumably sexbots will be enjoyed in the privacy of the home, obviating much of the sting of shame. yes, sexbot users will yearn for the real thing, but only if the real thing can compete physically with their katherine heigl mock-ups. the margins matter in the realm of sexual market perturbations. if 20% of men “drop out” of the dating scene to blow nightly wads in a fake woman that is leagues more arousing than the fleshy land whales that are their lot in the world god created, then shame and appeals to manliness will fall on deaf ids.
i do agree though that the demand for game won’t flag in a post-sexbot culture. if nothing else, the men remaining in the biblical arena will want to hone their plate-spinning skills.]
LikeLike
All sexbots need to do is take a relatively small percentage of men off of the market(and I believe that to be likely) and the change to the mating culture will be major.
LikeLike
If physical hungers ever come close to being satisfied by machines, nature will adjust. Men and women will change their behavior.
Vibrators have existed for generations, and yet women still arrange their lives around non-vibrating dick! How can that be?
[CH: don’t you know it’s different for girls?]
Prostitutes are available everywhere, and yet men overwhelmingly prefer an unremunerated date (that ultimately costs him just as much, if not more). Why?
[whores aren’t exactly that easy to come by, and most of them are riddled with disease. the ones who are clean and attractive will cost an arm and a leg. sexbots get around all those problems.
but yeah, a man prefers a woman who loves him without requiring an up front cash transaction. however, there’s a gap between what men prefer and how many men can satisfy their preferences. in that gap, sexbots fill the incel void.]
LikeLike
This exchange is descending into casuistry. Suffice it to note that what you see as wide-ranging cultural shifts, I see as being limited to the margins. If the desperate and lonely ever grow beyond the margins, the culture — based on millions of human transactions a day — changes to fix that imbalance far quicker than technology can.
My point about vibrators and hookers is that they would suffice if sex was merely about the feelies. If they adequately substituted for the real thing across a large swath of the population, wouldn’t something so powerful as the sexual urge demand a new attitude regarding these efficient services? Whores would be legal, supply would meet demand, and there would be a federal department insuring their cleanliness.
We like the fight and the imperfection and the humanity of sexual complementarity. We like the unpredictability, we love the pain (“The Sweet Sting”). The climactic physical act, while representing the peak, is just a fraction of the entire equation.
If women somehow found themselves unable to get laid due to Massive Nerd Technology, they would adjust. They always do. They change continuously depending on male preference. As the “gap” grows, it is constantly being filled in by competitors. And they would have something even Elon Musk cannot impart to a machine: the capacity to love someone back.
Men aren’t the only ones who do strange and extreme things to attract the opposite sex. It just so happens that, in this era, women have a reduced need to compete because men have emasculated themselves (ironically, in an attempt to please women). That dance — which is the source of all human life — will never be upstaged by plastic pussy.
Matt
LikeLike
You are very ignorant of the prostitution scene, well excusable if you are located in the US. I know the SE asian scene, and the German scene. Probably eastern countries, madagascar and spain are similar….
Based on my knowledge, CH prediction of sexbot disruptive nature are spot on, if probably conservative.
Given the current behavior and SMV of western women, sexbots on the right side of the uncanny valley (it would be a tremendous achievement, partial IA would be needed, but more difficult imho, great motor control and actuators, well outside to what is currently possible) will remove a large percentage of men from classic relationship very quickly, especially if sexbots are sold at a reasonable price (less than a car), and can be customized.
It will be very fast, touch probably a little it less than half of the males of correct age (18->60) and no social shaming will slow down things much. Even regulation would be inneffective…
The other half will not be removed from biological sex market, but they will still be interrested by sexbots, just not use it exclusively. Those ones will be much less interested in classical mariage.
The only one left for a “traditional” role will be those interrested in old style family, really interested. Maybe 10-20%, but due to darwinian selection this will increase fast.
LikeLike
Man engages in sex to see his will made manifest on a female body. Woman engages in sex to be the cause of his deep satisfaction, the vessel for his will. If you are fucking/getting fucked by a toaster, you may get superficial release, but it isn’t the profound satiety of causing flesh to transcend its biological strictures.
[CH: no, but for men who can’t get or won’t try getting real women, sexbots beat fapping to 2D images. let’s just say sexbots raise the biomechanical stakes over the threshold of darwinian understanding, into uncharted sexual market territory. i predict the consequences will be spectacular… and short-lived.]
LikeLike
Considering you’ve never even *had* sex — and admitted it — what, exactly, gives you the right to opine on why human beings engage in sex?
Or do you endow your masturbatory sessions with some sort of transcendent meaning?
Be quiet, you Jesuit freak.
LikeLike
Sex is unitive. A soul cannot unite with an inanimate artifice, and the very attempt is grotesque. Our primary urge is to connect with another soul, while bad philosophy imagines that urge can be broken down to only one of its constituent parts — physical stimulation. Sex isn’t about momentarily fooling ourselves into thinking the stimulation of a couple of nerve endings could ever complete our eros or longing.
The sociological point that artificial sex will alter the culture is based on a faulty understanding of the universe, that we are simply an aggregation of atoms, billiard balls colliding randomly with no ineffable spirit, no true will. It is an error that begets many smaller errors.
Matt
[CH: have you seen the movie “Her”? you should watch it.]
LikeLike
Heh. That movie is literally a joke:
http://takimag.com/article/her_a_two_hour_put_on_steve_sailer/print
Also — its vision is complete fiction, SWPL techno-nerdporn based on the very error I’m talking about above.
Love is powerful because it is irreducible. Vivisecting it into discrete sentiments and stimulations kills it, and the sum of its parts never quite adds up to the whole. (This a priori fact that we all naturally intuit helped Romanticism put the Enlightenment in its place.)
Whatever you do or don’t understand about the true nature of love, you do intuit that an anime body pillow can never love you back no matter how hard you squeeze it, right?
Matt
LikeLike
You are overating “soul” (let’s say human personality), both regarding importance and uniqueness….Especially for girls.
If the sex is great, most man do not care, and intelligent, absract oriented men invent and create for a large part the so-special-personality of their lover du jour. It can be considered to be (one of) the force behind oneitis, and probably the main temporary monogamy formation mechanism in humans.
Good players which have quickly access to sex with different attractive girls should know. I am not one of them, but i have access to good whores. This teach you the same lesson, and is not protective of the process because it is fundamental human behvior, probably hardcoded. Good sexbots will trigger exactly the same mechanism, “soul” or not.
LikeLike
The surest test of how sexbots will revolutionize the sexual marketplace… mention this coming dawn to any woman (of course in most cases they won’t grasp the full impact initially so you’ll have to explain to them). Once they grasp the impact, they will be horrified. Why? Because it lays bare the fact that men really do care about primarily one thing. And if we can get it from robots, we won’t need it from real women rendering real women utterly ignorable… their worst fear realized.
LikeLike
Yep. By contrast, I doubt men would feel that threatened by the idea of sexbots for women.
It’s like how men don’t care that women use vibrators, but for a man to use a batteried vagina is the ultimate shame, ’cause women say so.
LikeLike
A fair point… I immediately thought about the women attempts at shame regarding this sexbot thing, but didn’t think about how there’s no compunction about the ol’ Plastic Fantastic Lover on their end.
Would be a funny one to throw back at the next gal who whines about double standards.
LikeLike
I actually did mention that to my wife a few days ago. I’ve been watching AMC’s “Humans.” It’s basically set in our present except humanlike robots are available for industry and for home use, including prostitution. The husband in the show activates the “adult options” of their robot maid and bangs her, and ends up getting caught when a diagnostic shows those options were accessed.
This show really covers the ground of robots stealing jobs and stealing human affection. Anyway, I was telling my wife that if robots got that good, where they could clean up, fix me a sandwich, and bang me, she was out.
She was surprisingly fine with that. She would just get a bunch of robot cats.
LikeLike
The NYT sexbot came with the thousandcok stare.
Cohen-cidence?
LikeLike
The Jewish Princess Sexbot, only 1,000 shekels! Get yours today, before they whine the sellers ears off! Anyone? Anyone at all? How about one shekel? Just get them out of here!
LikeLike
After the honeymoon period they start complaining about being bored and want to open a boutique.
LikeLike
I’m hereby writing a Science Fiction short story where the last vestiges of “Western Culture,” are fighting off hordes of Muslim invaders with robots whose original template was sexbots. Lots of John Galt type lectures about blaming the Cathedral for negative Caucasian birth rates. The robots resemble orcs because muzzles hate pigs. Templar Orcs… yeah, that works!
LikeLike
Some women would love orc bots. Not Tolkien-style but Warcraft style orcs.
LikeLike
dinosaur-rape porn. It exists.
The man still blind to the female nature almost deserves his fate.
LikeLike
I don’t care how realistic they may be, I don’t see robots ever replacing real-life women. Maybe it’s just me, but isn’t the psychological gratification of a woman wanting to have sex with you one of the primary things that makes sex worthwhile? I don’t think I could even get myself aroused to have sex with a prostitute — it would be like hunting over a baited field.
I’m sure there are a lot of guys who don’t feel this way. But, for those guys, a sexbot would just be an upgrade from their hand or whatever device they are already using, and those guys have pretty much already dropped out of the game anyway. I don’t see this revolutionizing anything.
LikeLike
LOL I just typed a nearly identical comment (having not seen this one). Yep.
LikeLike
“but isn’t the psychological gratification of a woman wanting to have sex with you one of the primary things that makes sex worthwhile?”
yes, but in the absence of (or being self aware enough to know your SMV is hopeless and unable to ever attain) a real hottie, a fantasy hottie that will fulfill all your wishes without giving you any headaches and serves only your needs and pleasure can become as addictive as any opiate.
Most guys who don’t have options and can only stick it in ugly would rather have fake sex with a hot whore, just so it means their bodies can be near highly fertile looking women their piss poor SMV has no business being next to.
But you’re probably right about sexbots not being the catalyst for any social upheaval.
That’s why i’ve posited that the real revolution lies within interactive VR software.
LikeLike
Most guys who don’t have options and can only stick it in ugly would rather have fake sex with a hot whore, just so it means their bodies can be near highly fertile looking women their piss poor SMV has no business being next to.
Yes, this is similar to how people always say they prefer real breasts to boob jobs. When they say that, they are thinking of attractive real breasts. Of course those are preferable. But they aren’t considering the sagging, hanging breasts that women get boob jobs to fix.
While we’re at it, the breast thing is similar to how women tell a man to “just be yourself”. When they say that, they are picturing a man they are already attracted to. Of course the man who already has looks and natural game will be more attractive. But if the alternative is a guy who retains bad habits like turning dates into interviews and asking for another date the next day, isn’t it better that a man learns game? Helps in a relationship too.
LikeLike
@arbiter
I don’t know what planet you’re on, but as far as I know, most women who get boob jobs don’t do it cause they have sagging and wrinkly breasts. they do it cause they have small breasts.
Like this: https://www.google.com/search?q=breast+implant+before+and+after&es_sm=122&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAWoVChMI5rygz_mQxwIVR3o-Ch3OWA-Z&biw=1054&bih=576
Judging by these photos, these aren’t sagging/wrinkly/atrocious boobs; they’re just small boobs that got augmented to be bigger.
LikeLike
You’re confusing sexbots with blowup dolls. Sexbots will be programmed to make you feel that you’re “special”. See the recent movie, Ex Machina.
LikeLike
No, I’m not confusing sexbots with anything. Like I said, I couldn’t even get it up for a prostitute (unless she was a great actor) because I would know there was no desire there. That would apply x100 with a robot — even if it programmed to “talk” to me.
LikeLike
The premise of Ex Machina is based on the boring-recurring sci-fi conceit that machines will evolve wills and souls as we more precisely engineer them to appear human. It’s like drawing a bonfire more and more intricately and expecting the picture to eventually start throwing off heat.
The will and the soul are not products of the mechanical. They aren’t even material. The “uncanny valley” is such a bitch because we are all finely-tuned to recognize even the smallest hints of the anima (and the lack thereof).
As astonishing as our facsimiles are, I don’t think we will ever be completely fooled by human-imitating artifice any more than we are currently fooled that animals have souls. Maybe in a fleeting glance we will be momentarily persuaded, but never after an honest, probing search.
No doubt, some cat-ladies are fooled, but that’s more about their willful dysfunction than it is about human detection per se.
Matt
LikeLike
Well, if they can also cook and clean the house…..think about it.
LikeLike
Animals don’t have souls? Well, they are not machines. What are they?
LikeLike
Part of the joy a man experiences when having sex is the knowledge that the beautiful woman has submitted to him and is enjoying it or enjoying the man’s joy. I understood that CH agrees with me on that point rather strongly.
[CH: yes. that’s why i don’t foresee high value alpha men opting for sexbots exclusively. the revolution will be an omega and lesser beta male driven one.]
I don’t think any sexbot revolution can happen to any extent much greater than modern internet porn already exists.
[sexbots — visually and tactilely life-like sexy women — are categorically more potent a stimulus on the male hindbrain than internet porn.]
Internet porn is already preferably to a fatty, and any man who can will have real sex with a real woman.
[the margins will change, which will have profound ripple effects on the entire sexual market. sexbots will move the “chicken chokerton window”.]
LikeLike
There is simply no way that, at anytime in the near future, a robot could be made that will closely enough resemble a woman that it would be preferable to HD porn. Even in porn, there are still real women involved and a guy can use his imagination to put himself in the scene. You can’t do that with a robot. No matter how realistic a robot may be, it will still just be a machine. Life-like sex dolls have existed for a while now and no one but extreme omegas and guys with mental problems use them.
[CH: you’re greatly underestimating the tactile and 3D sensations that life-like sexbots will offer which porn can’t offer.]
LikeLike
CH: Let’s be honest. From a purely tactile perspective, a lubed up hand or fleshlight already competes with a vagina (particularly if you’re wearing a condom). And, from a purely visual perspective, HP porn already beats out real life in most cases.
[CH: not at all. a crabbed hand can’t come close to competing with a life-sized attractive female body. there’s nothing a hand can do that a pert round ass, shapely hips, small waist, and firm tits can’t do a thousand times better.]
The only thing that keeps men going back to women is a deeply-rooted evolutionary desire to have sex which, I believe, has to do with the desire to have a woman submit to you physically. I have no doubt that life-like sexbots will up the ante in terms of tactile experience and visual stimulus, but nothing could ever be invented that will satisfy the psychological desire to “mate” with an actual, willing female.
Sexbots will make life more pleasurable for men who are already resorting to the available, non-real life options. And, I’m sure they may cause a few men on the margins to drop out. I just don’t see them revolutionizing anything.
LikeLike
Basically a fancy masturbation accessory? Cows in the pasture will live with more dignity than males reduced to such a state of degradation.
LikeLike
Are you saying modern American girls are a fancy masturbation accessory?
LikeLike
I’m saying this culture is pathological and dehumanizing — a view I don’t think is controversial here — and that when the first choice of large numbers of men is jerking off with glorified fleshlights rather than aspiring to real women it’s not a positive development but another swirl toward the drain.
[CH: it’s a swirl toward the drain that most men don’t have natural defenses against. sexbots may be the final swirl, in fact.]
LikeLike
Cows in the pasture will live with more dignity than males
They already do.
LikeLike
This will be like porn, amplified. Nobody besides omegas will fully check out of the game to bang dolls exclusively, but it will be a large demotivator and satiator for the frustrated. But anyone thinking this will make girls shape up better check themselves though. The entitlement complex is ridiculous, they will just whine and continue eating. Only if alpha males start using these things will girls take notice, but if they could make a sex doll that can take a mans attention away from a flesh and blood PYT, the human race is doomed to extinction anyhow.
I’ve always thought a reversible chemical male contraceptive would have a far greater impact than any masturbation enhancement, because alphas would use it. The catch is it would have to be a pill, males aren’t going to go en masse to get their vas deferens injected with like RISUG requires.
LikeLike
Oddly, dropping a few million perfect robotesses in Africa and inner cities could stymie starvation, disease and growth of violent populations better than any amount of 50 cents a day commercials ever could.
LikeLike
Always did have an affinity for this post that i wrote
https://whoism3.wordpress.com/2013/07/04/youll-need-more-than-just-your-vagina-to-compete-with-the-future-nsfw/
You allude to the following:
“A typical American fatty with attitude to spare has no chance against a sexbot with a pretty face, a slender BMI, and a perfect hourglass shape.”
I think my section regarding Jessica Valenti / Lindsey Landwhale West underscore that comment very well.
LikeLike
Compl E ment his dominant nature, not Compl i ment
LikeLike
Let the rest of the goy be dehumanized and debased while I repopulate the world and clean the mud from my shoes.
LikeLike
Any chance they’ll send sexbots from the future into the past, so guys like Strapon will have a chance to live?
LikeLike
“Live with me if you want to come.”
LikeLike
Excellent. The best I could come up with is “Cum with me if you want to live.”
LikeLike
what if women also take to acquiring male bots to satisfy their womanly wants? After all, it’s not uncommon for them to say that all the good men have gone, they might as well start having a bit of artificial action like men do with them bots
[CH: it will never happen, at least not to the degree that sexbots for men fly out of the factories. for a simple reason: women’s sexual and romantic desire is not nearly as visually-oriented as it is for men.]
LikeLike
That’s what vibrators and dogs with peanut butter jars are for.
LikeLike
Reminds me of a story my sister once told me: a lady comes home from work, unbeknownst to her that friends and family are there to surprise her. If memory serves, they were in the basement or hiding some other part of the house. They hear the lady calling for the dog and when they see her and she sees them, she’s in the buff, sporting a PB patch right on her honeypot.
Not sure how true this is, but I never did doubt it.
LikeLike
One big difference between sex dolls and porn, prostitution and strip clubs that will make women take notice: There is zero benefit to women that comes from this. The current avenues of relief that frustrated men engage in, women can benefit from, financially. strippers, whores, porn stars, cam whores. You don’t get tons of streamlined female outcry against sexualized industry because they employ women. Attention is a currency to women as well. instagram models, or regular old Sally Pigtails who enjoys beta orbiters will see some of that attention dry up. That thirsty beta clicks “like” on a few less photos, maybe won’t watch some ditz’s cat while she’s on vacation when he’s satiated with sweet robot labia. With sexbots you will have male engineers creating and selling to male consumers for the benefit of male stockholders. “Here’s why that’s a problem.”
LikeLike
If there ever would be a sexbot industry, would it be allowed to make tween bots?
Would there be bots looking sixteen? How interesting if those came to dominate the market.
How interesting when the hoodrats get only White, and a few Asian, sexbots. Paid by the taxpayers no doubt. With the media ignoring this.
How interesting when the sexbot revolution makes rape rates plummet. Feminists will of course ignore that completely and still demand that sexbots be banned.
LikeLike
yup, it is interesting. Market statistics would prove which women are the most attractive. You’d have race, age, hair color, measurements, everything. I know which way I’d bet.
LikeLike
That comment was not supposed to be a reply by the way, WordPress placed it as that for some reason. Nevertheless:
One big difference between sex dolls and porn, prostitution and strip clubs that will make women take notice: There is zero benefit to women that comes from this. The current avenues of relief that frustrated men engage in, women can benefit from, financially. strippers, whores, porn stars, cam whores.
Very few women benefit from that. Note that feminists don’t see the sex industry as something positive because it provides an income for those few women, but as a threat because it gives men what they want.
So yes, I agree there would be opposition for sexbots, though I imagine the reason to be different than what you suggest. The reason will be the same as for the opposition to pornography. But it will not be any more successful. And I suspect more than a few politicians will see sexbots as a great way to please frustrated men who might otherwise be trouble.
LikeLike
I’m sure its been talked about or debated somewhere but well-engineered bots could help control the pedo population. Is there an argument against? I can’t think of a good one.
[CH: a very dark truth. similarly, i’ve read studies that found internet porn helped reduce the rape rate.]
LikeLike
yup, it is interesting. Market statistics would prove which women are the most attractive. You’d have race, age, hair color, measurements, everything. I know which way I’d bet.
You’d bet for … hardcore African features with swollen lips, nappy hair, spotty skin, steatopygic buttocks and lotsa body fat because beauty comes from the inside anyway? It should be a random dice roll which looks people get in their doll. If certain media elements are to be believed. Heh.
LikeLike
I’m sure its been talked about or debated somewhere but well-engineered bots could help control the pedo population. Is there an argument against? I can’t think of a good one.
The argument against would be that it prevents them from locking their desire onto something else. I am sure there are pedophiles who can never be changed, but many people can have their desires altered. Those who have bizarre fetishes have them because they have locked onto them after some factor in their lives, and they are too weak to modify their own desire. Those people could be changed back to normalcy.
There was someone who wrote in another CH post that a friend of his had watched only fatty porn for a while, as an experiment. He became aroused when he saw fatties in the street. An interesting experiment.
LikeLike
Sounds like a good way to cure them. “The Clockwork Orange” run backwards.
LikeLike
“Would there be bots looking sixteen? ”
One cautionary foretaste: there’s already very strong forces promoting the banning of GCI “child porn” as if it involved actual child actors (iirc from the article I saw, on the basis that it increases the demand for the real product.)
LikeLike
You can’t think of a good reason against it because you’ve been conditioned to reject the idea of intrinsic evil.
“Harm = bad” or “As long as it doesn’t hurt anybody, how could it be wrong?” is what the slave says because his entire world is circumscribed by punishment and reward. The slave’s top priority is to avoid pain, even at the expense of his dignity and his liberty.
The foundation of our law has been perverted by the installation of this faggot assumption, its effects are everywhere. Libertardianism at its essence.
A man who privately fantasizes about mutilating children to get his dick hard is an affront to The Good itself. It is a reduction in the quotient of righteousness in the universe. Ugliness increases. Yes, the harm is limited to himself, but harm is beside the point. We were given life to bring beauty to the world, which creates both pleasure and pain.
Matt
LikeLike
I’m so lazy that I will probably buy a male sexbot to fuck my female sexbot, and he can listen to her robotic nagging and her honey-do list BS.
“Here’s ten bucks, take her out for an oil change. I’m going fishing.”
LikeLike
+1! Lovely.
LikeLike
The lack of diversity in sexbot products is concerning.
https://www.realdoll.com
LikeLike
VR will have more of an immediate impact; it’s on the whoreizon. Looks like the future will be a buyer’s market. Maintain your health and expenses and don’t forget to check your privilege.
LikeLike
Couldn’t we just mess with the brains of real women a bit and flip a few neurons into Stepford mode?
LikeLike
Get her “chipped” for better performance! Kind of like the chip you can buy to soup up your car.
LikeLike
From soup to nuts!
LikeLike
Better yet if we handy men can just order the chip online… DIY fun and save a few bucks. lzozlzlzolzolzolzolozlozoz
LikeLike
ForeignBrides work right out of the box. No need to reinstall the operating system.
LikeLike
Some do. A coworker is married to a Chinese girl (1st generation immigrant). She is SO high maintenance it’s ridiculous.
LikeLike
Their warranty is atrocious though. And no return policy.
LikeLike
Yeah, but they’s yella n’ brown… with no tits.
LikeLike
But they do fit nicely in your carry-on luggage. Let’s be fair, now.
LikeLike
Most droll… and touche’
LikeLike
A male sexbot or companion bot for women would be easier to make than a sex bot that men would endorse. You wouldn’t even need the body. That movie “Her” was not accurate because the bot lacked a body. Whereas I could see a woman falling in love with her OS if it talked to her correctly.
LikeLike
>http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/humanoids/the-uncanny-valley
I once did a presentation on the Uncanny Valley using that as a source. Good times.
LikeLike
“Loyal companionship, his cheerleader, heart of the home, a submissive nature to compliment his naturally dominate one, soft heartedness and in the words of the comedian Sinbad, his nurse when he is elderly. Attributes a fembot cannot give.”
By “fembot” I thought me meant “modern (i.e. feminazism-indoctrinated) woman”. In which case that comment makes perfect sense.
LikeLike
These bots were made for boffing
That’s just what they do
One of these days these bots are gonnna
Boff all over you.
LikeLike
Sexbots will hit the mainstream as ostensible “personal assistants” who also have working vaginas (but don’t tell the kids).
Yeah, this is coming. Unless the savages at the gates (the human ones) tear down the West first.
LikeLike
at least the savages may let you keep multiple wives, end divorce financial rape.
LikeLike
Oh, man. If they could design a sexbot that can also cook, clean the house, AND act as a secretary and personal assistant? Daaaayaaaaaam.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Cant’ believe this movie hasn’t been mentioned; Cherry 2000:
Dude shorts out his sex doll, and refuses to buy other model. Travels to the “forbidden zone” and risks almost certain death for his oneitis bot. Hooks up with a young Melanie Griffith to assist him, ignores her the whole time.
Prescient?
LikeLike
There was another movie around that time with the late Dorothy Stratton in it… if I recall, they were looking for parts for her, and she was very adamant about the fact that her vagina “comes with a guarantee”.
LikeLike
A guarantee? That it works or that it gets stuffed? HAHAHA…
LikeLike
Actually, I think it will be clones/replicants like Blade Runner. Much easier to engineer than a robot. Now the moral questions it brings up…
LikeLike
“The fourth skin job is Pris…a basic pleasure model. The standard item for military clubs in the outer colonies.”
LikeLike
Extreme action is justified to prevent the development of sexbots.
Sexbots will cause the genocide of White people, Japanese people, and maybe even Chinese people.
LikeLike
Er.. ah, NO. They will teach men how to game and fuck. Women might even use them as a stunt double. Too weed out the ones with no stamina and test them for STD’s. Or just to train a man how they like it.
Some – like with porn – will be lost, but overall it will improve things.
LikeLike
I can’t wait, I can’t wait, I can’t wait. I just hope the good ones show up before I need Viagra to enjoy them. As it stands, it could be pretty close.
LikeLike
I believe virtual reality porn via technologies such as Oculus Rift will disrupt the sexual market in a way catastrophically damaging to women long before life-like female sexbots appear. I’m thinking within the next 5-10 years.
LikeLike
If the current economic, racial and demographic trends continue, only men who don’t need sexbots will be able to afford sexbots.
LikeLike
We already have sexbots – thanks to Feminists – that is all that women are to any man that enjoys them. Something to be used, abused, enjoyed, then traded in for a newer model. The thing is that they aren’t available to all men, just the ones that turn them on. That is what will change – now the Betas have to wait till they are older and the tingles take a back-seat to paying the bills and wanting a family. Right now the Alphas have our fill of sexbots… They are called women – but that is what they are. The only thing that will change is the Betas will pay for them upfront – and they will probably look better eventually.
LikeLike
The real question is what happens when they sexbots with fully integrated and viable artificial wombs.
LikeLike
Fifty years? This society ain’t gonna last no fifty years.
LikeLike
True AI is a long time away, if it ever happens. Even a powerful supercomputer of today (the size of a building) takes like 40 minutes to simulate one second of the activity of 1% of the human brain. If it’s going to be some obviously robotic thing with a few scripted phrases… BFD. Use porn while you save up for escorts.
LikeLike
I think human-parity robots are still maybe 20 years off, but realistic VR simulations with optional “stimulation” will hit within the next 5 years with similarly devastating effects.
Regarding sex bots for women, it’s not just the visual or sexual aspects for them. A male sex bot wouldn’t have any kind of social status or resources that could be conferred to the woman, so there are of less use.
LikeLike
Women didn’t want to clean, men invented the vacuum cleaner. Women didn’t want to cook, men invented the microwave. Women didn’t want to make themselves up to look good, and men already invented porn.
Sex is the next great invention. Imagine the Future. A machine that can give a blowjob. A robopussy with the pull and feel of a virgin everytime. A sexbot who does whatever you want, but has a mute button and an off switch. Fuck her in the afternoon, turn her off and start the clean cycle and you can get together with the boys to smoke and scarf pizzas.
The Sexual Revolution is Over. The War between the sexes has been won. Women have reached planned obsolescence. What about the children? We can grow them in a vat, we have the technology.
These womyn better face it, we’re just smarter. Their vibrator doesn’t have a credit rating that can buy them a house. We WON. They better bring something better to the table, because they are now LAST YEARS MODEL that is hopelessly OUTDATED!
Mwahhahahahahaha!
LikeLike
Superb!
LikeLike
When sexbots really start making inroads to the marketplace, I fully expect feminists will go on the warpath to have these devices banned.
I also have no doubt that they will get a lot of clueless socons and other white knights to foolishly join with them in their effort.
LikeLike
i-slam shall inherit and despoil the earth. their alpha goes so far rape, pedophilia, sex slavery, and female genital mutilation go hardly remarked upon by feminists. i have seen christian grey and he has a beard and a copy of the koran…..
LikeLike
I-slam will inherit yu-rop and maybe selected areas of North Amurikka
…
maybe.
Also methinks you took the wrong lessons from vejji-tailz.
LikeLike
Two trains of thought.
Increased exposure to artificial sexual stimuli:
1) Increases the value of human stimulation,
or
2) Reduces the value of human stimulation.
I’m pretty certain some insecticides work on saturating the environment with artificial pheromones that causes the little critters to go bonkers and stop reproducing.
LikeLike
This would a boon for women in dating. Namely all the losers and creeps will be fooling around with their extra fancy sex dolls instead of trying to be her “friend” or outright stalking her. It’s also a boon for the Alpha males as the female to Alpha male ratio surges to the point they don’t have to do any work at all laid to get actually laid.
LikeLike
“There’s something wrong with this sexbot. It just lies here like a dead fish when I try to bang it.”
“That’s not a sexbot, it’s a real woman.”
LikeLike
“I think me wife’s dead”.
“What makes you say that?”
“The sex is pretty much the same, but the dishes are starting to pile up.”
LikeLike
Here is a link to a BBC series called Humans:
http://putlocker.is/watch-humans-tvshow-season-1-online-free-putlocker.html
It is British television which is often about as good as American movies. The storyline in the series is about a family that buys a “synth”, a humanoid female robot to work as a maid in the home. But it shows these synth things in many other roles other than in the home. It raises many ideas that have probably been tossed around separately but combines many of them in a single treatment.
There were three of them that I took away (I have only seen 1 episode so far).
The mother in the show is a post wall drab English woman and the robot girl is attractive. The mum is mumsy yet also a “career woman. The husband buys the synth after frustration that the wife is always gone for work, the house is trashed, and the children are neglected. The mumsy is very against the purchase of the bot girl and for the first part of the show, constantly has her face rubbed in how inadequate she was in the maternal role. There is a scene where all of the family comes down to breakfast the first morning after the bot joins the household and they are amazed at the buffer of food the bot has set out. The mom shows teeth to the bot girl when she finds the bot checking on the sleeping daughter, “That’s my job.” The husband ends up having sex with the bot girl but I haven’t gotten that far. So the bot offers a better solution in the domestic role than a woman because the women have abdicated that role and do such a shitty job at it given the half ass effort they currently put at it.
The second was the existential threat the bots offer to the “mission” of humans. The family has a high school age daughter. In one of the early scenes, she and some mystery meat neighbor beta boy, a Hindu or Paki, take pock shots with a pellet gun at a male synth doing gardening work. They do so out of disrespect and hostility. In a later scene, she shoots the thing at the family bot point blank but the thing is able to sort of sense the shot and easily evade it. The daughter gets confronted by her parents over a grade in a computer class that falls from an A to D. Here justification is “why bother? I can go to medical school and be a doctor and then they make a synth that does brain surgery in 9 seconds.” So the young people in the show have this hostility to the bots because of the threat they pose. I kind of got that it was women that seemed to be more threatened by the bots then the men. Not only is the young girl annoyed over the challenge bots presented to work and career, but also in the sexual threat to posed to the primacy that women enjoy. There is also a teen brother who appears wholehearted to support and enjoy the idea of the botgirl in the home. The sister snarls, “It’s easy to see why you support this.”
The last one was the “attachment” that can be formed to the things by humans yet they are machines and do break and do become obsolete. William Hurt plays an old man who lives alone. He has had a “health assistant” given to him by the National Health Service for the past six years and it is time to upgrade. The one he currently has is a male that is sort of goofy quirky. The one the NHS wants to give him is a mannish dykey looking post wall cliche of a nurse. (Of course that would be sort they would issue). Hurt resists the upgrade. So the issue is because they appear human then real humans can get attached to them, yet they don’t last in the way humans do. Just like that great laptop you bought a few years ago that was so good and shiny when new, then it slowly turned into a piece of crap, these robots do also. But it’s different when the thing resembles a human and you get tricked into interacting with it as a human. And you have to see the thing “die”, start to fall apart.
LikeLike
“Women’s sexual and romantic desire is not nearly as visually-oriented as it is for men.”
Yep, as evidenced by the virtual (heh) non-existence of skin mags for women (Playgirl’s readership is queer men).
“Like I said, I couldn’t even get it up for a prostitute (unless she was a great actor) because I would know there was no desire there.”
Lack of desire? How about contempt, pity, disgust? I wouldn’t have missionary with a whore in a million years, Can theoretically envision getting head from one, but that’s in my imagination; IRL even that would be beyond sad. A sexbot’s inanimacy, for a guy willing to go that route, would be a feature, not a bug. Though I can’t imagine ever getting with a sexbot, either.
BTW, in the few times I’ve been to tittie bars, I enjoyed it only when the girls were young and innocent-looking (19 year-old newbies…O Canada!).
“As astonishing as our facsimiles are, I don’t think we will ever be completely fooled by human-imitating artifice”
Yes, not completely, in the sense that you know it’s a bot you’re looking into the eyes of…but highly advanced sexbots will exactly reproduce the muscle movements of girls that were photographed (medically monitored) undergoing genuine emotions. The spark (“soul”) won’t be there, but if the physical manifestations are perfectly replicated, it will be very easy for the owner of the sexbot to suspend disbelief. There are involuntary muscle movements that betray what an actor is actually thinking (which is why a whore cannot truly appear to love the farting fatso she’s looking into the eyes of), but such tells won’t exist in well-designed/programmed bots.
“[CH: yes. that’s why i don’t foresee high value alpha men opting for sexbots exclusively. the revolution will be an omega and lesser beta male driven one.]”
True of course, but good luck in ever getting the spergs to understand that distinction. Just like they can’t understand that game doesn’t promise a low beta can bag a 10, it only lets him upgrade a point or two.
“[sexbots — visually and tactilely life-like sexy women — are categorically more potent a stimulus on the male hindbrain than internet porn]”
The most convincing bots (and, after the tech advances enough, cheapest to make) would be actual human bodies with the upper parts of the brain replaced by software, but it’s hard to imagine that ever being tolerated from a legal standpoint. Program it to cry and whimper about being a slave, and most people would viscerally object to its manufacture, like Haley Joel Osment’s character at the Flesh Fair in A.I.
“chicken chokerton window”
you, Heartise, are an artiste
“Oddly, dropping a few million perfect robotesses in Africa and inner cities could stymie starvation…”
“a few million white perfect robotesses”
fixed it for ya
“Would there be bots looking sixteen? How interesting if those came to dominate the market.”
Revealed preferences.
How about a 20 year-old Jessica Alba clone proportionally scaled down to 80 lbs? “Hey, it takes less energy to manufacture and run!” Heh.
“yup, it is interesting. Market statistics would prove which women are the most attractive.”
Already been done with the film industry (mainstream as well as porn).
“I’m sure its been talked about or debated somewhere but well-engineered bots could help control the pedo population. Is there an argument against? I can’t think of a good one.”
You’re thinking logically, and politics isn’t logical. Mere possession on a hard drive of sexualized cartoons of minors is already legal grounds for hard prison time in many jurisdictions.
“Er.. ah, NO. They will teach men how to game and fuck”
Like porn teaches men how to game? Like World of Warcraft teaches men how to deal with AMOGing?
Non-addictive drugs like Ketamine and MDMA are not legally available anywhere on Earth. Sexbots might be banned just as vigorously. Not a prediction, just saying.
LikeLike
“Loyal companionship, his cheerleader, heart of the home, a submissive nature to compliment his naturally dominate one, soft heartedness and in the words of the comedian Sinbad, his nurse when he is elderly. Attributes a fembot cannot give.”
That actually sounds more like what a fembot will be once the technology is perfected. It seems to me that most older women don’t fulfill even half of what’s mentioned above. That description sounds more like either a super advanced fembot or a younger Ana Nicole Smith taking care of her octogenarian.
LikeLike
More girls left for me then. Fine.
LikeLike
I see future women becoming divided into three classes:
Class 1 = Already exists today. The top women who are young, gregarious, socially connected and hot enough to compete with idealistic robots. Will live as WAGs and harems, again, as they often do today.
Class 2 = Also already exists today, but will become more extreme. The career women who have to earn their own keep and can’t hold down a man. Will become more extreme as not even the worst of Betas and Deltas will want them. Perhaps an Omega white knight may marry them out of pity, but I’m betting even Omegas will aim for a Class 3 or nothing at all.
Class 3 = Used to exist, but is now a dying breed. Wives. Keep themselves attractive, but don’t have top-tier looks or social connections or even the desire to join Class 1. Accept and appreciate the role of robots in their husband’s lives and strive to add more by keeping house and caring for their men. Basically become the main partner as the robots become his plates.
Class 1s and Class 3s will provide plenty of children by both the wealthy players and the everyday men. Class 2s will be forced to contribute economically as there is nobody to “save” them any more. If anything, this will improve society.
LikeLike
“Like porn teaches men how to game? Like World of Warcraft teaches men how to deal with AMOGing?”
You could program a sex bot to teach game, and how to fuck. Porn isn’t interactive, so it’s apples and oranges comparison.
LikeLike
[…] https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2015/08/04/sexbot-update-3/ […]
LikeLike
The feminist counter move to sexbots is the guaranteed wage, i.e. federal unemployment benefits, sans time limit, large enough for a single mom to afford a mcmansion, a car payment and a(nother) boob job.
Sexbots become a powerful new motivation for betas to withhold provision from epiphany girls past their freshness date. “The Voters” will see to it that the gravy train keeps flowing, but this time she won’t have to pretend to have a headache every damn night. A preemptive alimony benefit. A slew of new feminist social conventions (and Disney movies) will need to be deployed, but who’s going to fight that, the pre-whipped western boys?
Sexbots will outrage and disgust them. So they will be quite smug when they gain the power to turn their own backs on marriage and leave those losers to their battery operated girlfriends. What happens to the dual mating strategy when uncle sam secures the provisioning side for her, without her having to pay her dues to the divorce-industrial complex? Will she even need an epiphany phase? Who would she have to act pure for?
Now the carousel never need stop.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Philosophies of a Disenchanted Scholar and commented:
Hahaha you are wrong. Women totally care about looks, just as much as men, as PUA emphasis on it proves. Look at the popularity of the sex toys among women vs. men.
But this bodes well for K-selection, so it hardly matters. The ugly and other genetic dregs, including those who only seek sex in a ‘partner’ (r-types including PUAs) won’t bother the rest of us, I welcome it. Although I doubt the best models will come cheap, so it might be like the market for sports cars.
LikeLike
Male sexbots for females will be security bots with a vulcan canon.
LikeLike
[…] “This will blow up the world. It will make crack cocaine look like decaffeinated coffee.” — Anonymous (source here). […]
LikeLike