A recent cross-cultural study with a large sample size has found… or, rather, re-found… that men and women have radically different mate-preference psychologies, and that these differences are even larger than previously thought. (Parenthetically, the study also found that feminists are still idiots.)
Men’s and women’s ideas of the perfect mate differ significantly due to evolutionary pressures, according to a cross-cultural study on multiple mate preferences by psychologists at The University of Texas at Austin.
The study of 4,764 men and 5,389 women in 33 countries and 37 cultures showed that sex differences in mate preferences are much larger than previously appreciated and stable across cultures.
The sharp reader may ask, “Ah, but does this study suffer from a WEIRD bias?” The answer:
“Many want to believe that women and men are identical in their underlying psychology, but the genders differ strikingly in their evolved mate preferences in some domains,” said co-author of the study and psychology professor David Buss. “The same holds true in highly sexually egalitarian cultures such as Sweden and Norway as in less egalitarian cultures such as Iran.”
No WEIRD bias.
The researchers suggest that these patterns of mate preferences are far more linked to gender than any individual mate preference examined separately would suggest.
Thus confirming the CH ugly truth that attractiveness standards for men and women are universal and sex-based, and that the hope of everyone being a special snowflake having equal sexual market value is a myth.
Researchers found that they could predict a person’s sex with 92.2 percent accuracy if they knew his or her mate preferences.
WOW. Think on that. The implications are far-reaching, and VERY discomfiting to believers in the sex-based blank slate.
According to the study, men favor mates who are younger and physically attractive. Women seek older mates with good financial prospects, higher status and ambition.
Amanda Marcotte’s id just emitted a death wail.
“Because women bear the cost of pregnancy and lactation, they often faced the adaptive problem of acquiring resources to produce and support offspring, while men faced adaptive problems of identifying fertile partners and sought cues to fertility and future reproductive value,” Conroy-Beam said.
These sex-based mate preferences are evolved over millennia and deeply embedded in our hindbrains, so even in a modern environment where women are coddled by the State and pregnancy is easily avoided or terminated by technology interventions, and where women are bloating up into disfigured pigbeasts hiding fertility cues under layers of blubber, we still find that the old evolved preferences continue to exert the primary influence over our desires and preferences.
But, it is possible that some powerful modern sexual market disturbances, such as the Pill, may alter certain preexisting mate preferences which are more flexible in nature, wired for adaptability to changing environmental pressures. Women in a state of nature prefer men with good financial prospects 3/4ths of the time and sexy PUAs during ovulation, but women in a manufactured state of existence where the Pill is widespread and cheap may more frequently, or more intensely, favor the layabout alpha cad over the dependable, resource-rich beta provider, because the cost of pregnancy has been obviated, (a change in their environmental reality which would register subconsciously in women).
Which mate preferences varied the most by sex?
Of the 19 mate preferences that researchers considered, five varied significantly based on gender: good financial prospects, physical attractiveness, chastity, ambition and age.
Chicks dig:
well-off men,
ambitious men,
older men.
Men dig:
beautiful women,
younger women,
and (this is my favorite anti-feminist ugly truth) chaste women who haven’t ridden the cock carousel until the gears fell off.
Four other preferences — pleasing disposition, sociability and shared religious and political views — were not sex-differentiated.
What men and women share in common can be just as interesting as where they diverge. While “pleasing disposition” is a bit vague to get a proper CH-ian handle on — many a charming jerkboy would be asserted by women to have a “pleasing disposition” — it’s not at all surprising that men and women prefer lovers who agree at least in part with their own values and religious views. Sex is great, and love better, but after a few years if you love Jesus and she loves Shiva, or you’re Team Trump and she’s Team Cuck, that’s gonna cause some friction. Unless you’re in the minority of people for whom a conventional value such as religious affiliation doesn’t serve as a personal identifier.
I’d like to know exactly what the study authors were measuring with “Sociability”. Does this mean extroverts, of either sex, tend to prefer extroverted lovers, and introverts likewise? I wonder about that. I could see an extroverted drama queen getting exasperated with an introverted man who hates drama, but I’ve also seen a lot of couples where that combination of extrovert-introvert seemed to produce a balancing force that kept each of their worst instincts in check. And left unspoken, they understood how that dynamic benefited them.
“Few decisions impact reproduction more than mate choice,” Conroy-Beam said. “Mate preferences will therefore be a central target and driver of biological evolution.”
The sexual market is the one market to rule them all.
“According to the study, men favor mates who are younger and physically attractive. Women seek older mates with good financial prospects, higher status and ambition.”
Amazing that the truth has to be rediscovered over and over again through scientific studies. And more amazing that the lie machine works tirelessly to supress it.
LikeLike
I was thinking the same thing. It’s almost as if every generation succumbs to lies and must expend the effort over and over again to reestablish the truth. Constantly questioning, always verifying the eternal truths. What a waste. No wonder we’re in decline.
LikeLike
In a healthy society, progress is linear; in a diseased society, it’s cyclical; in a dying society, it’s bass-fucking-ackward.
LikeLike
Goldbricks prefer the older man who will buy them a sweet car to wreck.
(CH, I hope you got time to watch that. Professional jerk-boy takes no prisoners.)
LikeLike
As they used to say over on FC, we’ve spent the last 50 years proving exactly what men believed about women for the last 5,000 years.
LikeLike
Did you catch the authors’ name? Daniel Conroy-Beam …
In British tradition, a double surname is heritable, and mostly taken to imply upper class origin, reflecting an alliance of a woman of higher class who married below her social status. It was then common for her and her husband to assume a double surname so as not to diminish the social status of the woman and to gain for her husband a higher social status.
Ol’ Ms. Conroy married a low-born alpha cad – and it took science to explain to young Daniel why that was.
Eureka! I’ve discovered the Red Pill!
LikeLike
Alas, this affectation is now rampant in t’ghetto, or hood, or whatever they call their confounded rookeries. Particularly among Af/Cribs, or YT+less thanYT.
Signifies “not even at the Registry Office” style up-shacking, or Heroic Single Strumpet (who lives in a shoe, she has so many childer’ … ).
If you hear a double-barrel surname in for instance, soccer commentary, you can bet the ancestral piles that it’s at best only part-Brit.
The proper poshoes try and hide all that stuff now, to the extent of dropping all but the (richest parent’s) monicker, just in case the Revenue start pondering Georgism, or the serfs decide they can build their own dam’ houses anywhere they like, for tuppence-ha’penny (a.k.a. shanty-towns).
LikeLike
You bloody limey c*nts need to upload some of that gibberish to urbandictionary. And you didn’t even use any words which I already know, like “chav” or “traveller”. Sheesh.
LikeLike
> “Alas, this affectation is now rampant in t’ghetto, or hood, or whatever they call their confounded rookeries. Particularly among Af/Cribs, or YT+less thanYT.
> Signifies “not even at the Registry Office” style up-shacking, or Heroic Single Strumpet (who lives in a shoe, she has so many childer’ … ).
If you hear a double-barrel surname in for instance, soccer commentary, you can bet the ancestral piles that it’s at best only part-Brit.
> The proper poshoes try and hide all that stuff now, to the extent of dropping all but the (richest parent’s) monicker, just in case the Revenue start pondering Georgism, or the serfs decide they can build their own dam’ houses anywhere they like, for tuppence-ha’penny (a.k.a. shanty-towns).”
What language is this?
LikeLike
They keep using the word “mate”, when I am almost 100% certain that they ought to be using the word “spouse” – so that the “spouse” would be “Beta Bucks” from the woman’s point of view, and “younger tighter hotter” from the man’s point of view. But when a wife is about to ovulate, and when adultery [leading to cuckoldry nine months later] really counts, have these researchers ruled out the possibility that she becomes much more interested in the Alpha-est Cad-diest youngest Bad Boy in town to serve as her actual MATE [not her spouse]?
LikeLike
For the man, the question of MATE [not necessarily spouse] ought to be the same, more or less every single day of the year. Whereas for the woman, the question of MATE [not necessarily spouse] could vary wildly, depending on which day of her cycle the researchers were questioning her.
LikeLike
LikeLike
“They keep using the word “mate” “
Perhaps they’re Aussies, hiding out in TX after the “Pomicide” at the Ashes?
LikeLike
> “Four other preferences – pleasing disposition, sociability and shared religious and political views – were not sex-differentiated.” ——— A few years ago, I developed a theory which holds that about 75 or 100 years ago, the rise of mass transit and co-educational colleges and universities allowed e.g. Narcissistic Personality Disorder men to hook up with & marry Borderline Personality Disorder women, and that the result could be the ticking time bomb of a century’s worth of accelerated breeding for outright PSYCHOPATHY.
LikeLike
And it turns out that a woman named Barbara Oakley had already beat me to it:
LikeLike
http://www.amazon.com/dp/1591026652/
LikeLike
Ye shall know the truth, and the truth will set you free.
LikeLike
men favor mates who are younger and physically attractive. Women seek older mates with good financial prospects, higher status and ambition.
Shock.
As for culture, it might be interesting to know that feminine traits in men are even more criticized in northern Europe than in supposedly macho southern Europe. For example, a man crying in public is considered more shameful in Germanic countries than in Med countries. If you think that doesn’t compute, you just don’t know the nations in question. Arabs, for example, with their ultra-macho culture, write love songs that are embarrassing to the extreme to listen to. And when you see Arab teens write in online forums about their problems, especially in dating, it’s like they’re weeping girls. This habit of wailing loudly also holds true for Med countries, though not as much as the Arab/Kurd/Turk immigrants.
Greaseball immigrants are also the ones who will dress up for night clubs in a way that is just painfully embarrassing to watch. Not all, of course, but these are the ones who will dress like caricatures of the disco goer who doesn’t understand how he looks in other people’s eyes. Like a peacock. Even down to the gold chain around the neck, and with slick hair just dripping from gel.
But you’ve heard that peacocking is a good thing, right? Well, having something that makes you stand out may be a good thing, but dressing so that you are actually reminiscent of a peacock – that makes you look like a woman.
And then their pathetic complaints about women. When they trust you, so they’ll open up. Like they are little kids. I guess they never learned to keep a stiff upper lip and be a man, instead got used to get whatever they pointed at as kids. Well, why not, when they benefit from living in a rich society created by their betters.
LikeLike
The children of rich Arab, Persian immigrant families are almost uniformly fat, entitled, and spoiled beyond belief, at least where I live. There is an immaturity that remains with them into adulthood.
LikeLike
That would apply to most of California.
LikeLike
The thing about ‘Mediterranean’ men is that they are uniformly ‘Mummies Boys’ i.e the male equivalent of ‘Daddies Princess’: over indulged brats who worship their mothers and generally despise their fathers.
LikeLike
There is a particular, slightly painful, medical test that forms a significant part of my job. Looking at the ethnicity of the relatively few people who can’t handle it, I’ve noticed an outsized portion hail from the peri-Mediterranean and the middle East. Almost no adult Nords, Blacks, South Asians, East Asians, Southeast Asians or Amerindians have problems with it.
I have also noticed these were the countries sending histrionic ‘divers’ to FIFA events.
Here’s the gist of my theory:
These are the areas that have farmed longer than anywhere else in the world. Farming tends to select for populations consisting of a mass of natural slaves/serfs ruled over by a despotic oligarchy. Not exactly the broderbund warriors off the steppes and plains who found it easy to conquer slaves and despots alike.
I suspect that inside every greasy disco duck and every diver tugging a referee’s jersey is a natural slave trying to come across as a despot, with no inkling at all that conquest, mastery and honor lie in a different behavior altogether, one he cannot fathom.
LikeLike
Just to add another data point, I noticed this as well with a fairly painful medical procedure (bone marrow biopsy).
I’m a Canadian of tough Irish and English stock. Man up, it’s only -40C outside… could be -50! I made it through the procedure with a few deep grunts and groans. I felt pretty good about myself, as I was quite sick at the time and even lying on my stomach was uncomfortable.
Some time later I had a hospital roommate from the Balkans who was being randomly sedated one day. The doctors rolled in to do the same biopsy I had received, and I was excited to see the procedure up close and personal. They began, and the man SCREAMED for the next 5 minutes like some torture scene out of Game of Thrones. Then passed out from the sedation.
I was able to turn it around into some good follow up conversations with the cute young lady medical students, who were quite shocked by the experience.
LikeLike
I like it. Have you submitted this to FIFA for comment yet.
LikeLike
Sometimes I think that the comments section of CH is the biggest gathering of pseudo philosophers to ever exist.
[CH: i’m more of the school of suited up philosophy.]
LikeLike
Standup Philosopher!
LikeLike
Shithouse philosophers, if you please.
We do our best thinking on the can.
LikeLike
Thass Greg “sheetfabranes” Eliot
LikeLike
I wouldn’t shit you… you’re my favorite turd.
LikeLike
As for culture, it might be interesting to know that feminine traits in men are even more criticized in northern Europe than in supposedly macho southern Europe. For example, a man crying in public is considered more shameful in Germanic countries than in Med countries.
And also, Italian and French men are interested in clothes and fashion to an extent that would be considered definitely gay in Germanic cultures.
It does appear to go the other way with women, where masculine women (and feminism) are more tolerated in northern Europe than in southern Europe.
LikeLike
“And also, Italian and French men are interested in clothes and fashion to an extent that would be considered definitely gay in Germanic cultures.”
Ya know, I’ve always self identified as an Italian.
LikeLike
The fashion=gay thing is new though. My opinion is that it is a symptom of the feminine imperative ideology that all women and most men employ. So about 40 years ago, the whole ‘He’s well-dressed so he must be gay’ canard got started. By then feminism was rolling. Feminism requires that men be disappointing and easily criticized. So a man who dresses himself doesn’t fit into that right? A well-dressed man causes some brief cognitive dissonance in women which is easily hamstered away with ‘Well, he must gay because he certainly isn’t mature, decent and self-respecting.’ So the feminist can keep her core intact. That core being; men are disappointing slobs who can be criticized as strangers, upon sight at a 50 yard range. Shitty clothing expedites that. Now, a tall studly well-dressed man is different. Like one of those Thor brothers. Helmsworth. But those guys are attractive as grungy artists, blue collar roughnecks, pinstripe suits, causal, preppy, track suit chav. It doesn’t matter. They’re just attractive. But a normal 5’9″ man with normal looks….”Faggot!” Because criticizing the normal range of men is feminism’s lifeblood. Nothing else could keep such a collection of irrational contradictions functioning. Germanic cultures are more feminized thus a higher level of shaming aimed at fashionable men—Men who are trying to self-improve or who are obnoxious enough to have self-respect even though they are not top 2 percentile alphas. These men are loathsome to feminists (women, iow). I’d say dressing well, reading, working out and eating well are the four principles of self respect. Add grooming as the fifth. Now this is where I think it gets interesting. Every single one of those traits is shamed in our culture (when 0-98 percentile men engage in them).
“Well dressed normal man”….faggot
“He works out a lot”…..faggot. (Chunky, alpha bodybuilders aren’t targeted as much but a fit, lithe man….faggot.)
“He likes to read”….faggot
“He eats well. Lean meats. A lot of fruit and vegetables. Green tea. Avoids beer”….faggot
“He is very well-groomed.” …..faggot.
Every pillar of a self-respecting life gets a man shamed. So men who are so proud of their dad bods, Lakers jersey and cargo shorts (at age 38), bookless machismo, pizza and beer super manliness are really just suckers. They’ve been duped into shitting on themselves for a ‘manly’ merit badge by their feminist overlords when it’s just the opposite. And their ‘manly’ slovenliness is simply feminine imperative fodder—Just more guys to be criticized and hated, keeping the feminist bonfire roaring. If you’re Collin Farrell, have fun wearing three piece suits. If you’re some normal asshole, then watch women scoff at you for wearing a bespoke olive suit with tan monk straps to the library as you pick up your weekly literary fiction, triple set. SCOFF. And muppet manginas (dressed like 8th graders) will be pissing themselves in mockery of you as well.
LikeLike
“He eats well. Lean meats…”
Definitely a faggot then. Saturated Fat is not your enemy.
LikeLike
The above also applies to people from the northwestern regions of the Indian subcontinent. Such as the Pakistanis, Afghanis, and Punjabis.
Those guys have a very tough time with women.
At least SOME Middle Eastern dudes look good. As do most Italian/Greek/Meds. The Pakis/Punjabs/Afghans combine the physical ugliness of Indians with the sleazy greasiness of the Mideasterns/Meds. Very bad combo.
If you ever go a nightclub in Vancouver BC (Western Canada) or the northern regions of England, you’ll see what I meant. These guys have shitty aesthetics, no game, can’t dress, and are mad sleazeballs around girls. Especially around white girls. Very disgusting. In Vancouver, these guys are called Surrey Jacks.
LikeLike
This explains Morrissey’s popularity in Mexico.
LikeLike
[…] Sex Differences In Psychology Are Real, Immutable, Lasting, And Significant […]
LikeLike
The birth control Pill might have competing effects..
On one hand, women on the pill might feel more empowered to go seek out alphas for thrills
However, studies have shown that being on the Pill actually lowers a preference for alphas
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23528282
LikeLike
Pill makes women think they’re preggo, therefore, they need to seek protection from males, hence their “attraction” to beta males. Their olfactory senses are all fucked up, so they go with the guy that will keep them safe since the body doesn’t know what’s going on, it only knows: “we’re with child, we must be careful.”
Worse, by picking the wrong, safe guy, when she does have a kid with him, both parents have a similar MHC (major histocompatibility complex) and junior is born with all sorts of maladies. Then she realizes she despises hubby and she starts with divorce.
LikeLike
Women love to play gatekeeper. From being romantic matchmakers to warding off the would-be suitors of their supposed friends they enjoy wielding power to alter people’s lives. When infused with organizational rectitude they get a big rush of self-satisfaction when they think they are protecting the company by deciding who is in and who is out. Thus HR is a natural feeding ground for many women coming out of our liberal universities. Along with the power to keep people out comes the satisfaction of correcting social justice grievances by purposely excluding the alleged oppressors : white heterosexual males. Appearing before one of these tribunalists means an excruciating dance of correctness to pass their sniff test.
You have paid too many dues to have a gatekeeper filtering your job approach. If you were at a nightclub trying to meet women would you go up to the homeliest one and ask her to hook you up with a hottie?
LikeLike
Women want assignments to process and a pat on the back for a job well done; this follows from early childhood education where females perform better than males in the stifling schoolhouse atmosphere. Women love classroom orderliness and rules, and especially love the chance to tattle on rule-breakers. In adulthood this tendency serves them well as obedient corporate functionaries performing mind-numbing paperwork tasks. A woman can also experience an orgasm if she can alert the authorities and get you fired for rule breaking. While corporations providing women a safe, secure environment to put in their hours it also gives them opportunities to experience tattle-gasms by informing their boss about errant co-worker behavior or perceived personal slights known as “micro-aggressions”. Sensitive companies provide group therapy sessions, motivational posters, and re-education camps to assure traditionally oppressed victims that the corporation takes workplace diversity and bullying seriously. When a miscreant is identified, mass catharsis is realized by driving the offender from the organization in a carefully staged drama of accusation and public flogging.
LikeLike
This truth, of course, is a problem when women are middle managers or mangers of such things as apartment buildings. They will use the misplaced seething hatred of white men that they’ve been taught their entire lives (if shiska) or that they are part of the tribe misdirecting (if Eskimoess) to try to make a white man’s life miserable.
Not one of them is able to make the abstract connection that hurting a white man (such as by having him evicted on false charges for such “violations” as letting his DAUGHTERS play with a boogie board in the swimming pool) actually hurts all the FEMALES who depend on him, such as his ex wife and daughters. Of course, not one woman or feminist is actually on the side of “women” in general (unlike beta men, who are society’s builders and protectors — men are the romantics who care about women, children, families, and their safety, as well as the people who ask “why?” and invent things) — each woman can only be on the side of HERSELF. It’s biological. Relatedly, women always favor form over substance, unless it’s a trumped up “substantive due process” lie to invent a “fundamental right” to kill babies or have gay marriage in direct violation of the Constitution (not that any woman other than a few Eskimoesses on the supreme court) can even understand that level of imagination).
No matter how hard they try, the communists cannot change nature, facts, or natural law. The only thing they can do is bully, censor, and kill.
The job of a white woman is to be as pretty and full of grace as possible, so that she may attract a good man and give him many babies. Contrary to another feminist canard, she’s not a very good natural parent, and she’ll need husbanding (a verb) to properly care for those children, but in a state of nature the good woman knows this fact, so she gives respect and deference to her husband.
LikeLike
If you prefer primary sources like me, here’s a pdf of the actual study.
http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/homepage/Group/BussLAB/pdffiles/How%20Sexually%20Dimorphic%20are%20Human%20Mate%20Preferences.pdf
They should have chosen “same race” as a possible mate preference, but I get that its too incendiary for academia.
LikeLike
Fascinating results with all those negative correlations of trait preferences between the sexes. Notice how ‘similar education’ has one of the strongest negative correlations: -.52 (hyuuuuge!); sorry, ‘women of substance’, we don’t care about your post-post-post grad degrees!
LikeLike
[…] Sex Differences In Psychology Are Real, Immutable, Lasting, And Significant […]
LikeLike
they could predict a person’s sex with 92.2 percent accuracy
Of course – facts are not subject to Feminist non-sense, although they (and the Liberal media) will try to twist and obfuscate such results – but these are what every man and woman already knows, some try to deny it – Feminists – but all that does and show they are wrong, and stupid.
On a completely different note this is why Trump is doing so well (even though the Liberal media hate him) – most men are tired of the PC bull-shit which they cannot call BS on or will be punished in some way. So they vote up the guy that tells it like it is…
LikeLike
“Many want to believe that women and men are identical in their underlying psychology.”
Who are these “many” who want to believe this obvious falsehood? There is not a single woman alive, older than 7, who believes this ridiculous lie, regardless of the brainwashing that certain people have attempted to inflict on her.
LikeLike
Unfortunately, there are at least a few women who do believe this. The very women who, in the march through the institutions, have been given the greatest opportunity to influence the thinking of all our daughters and most of our sons.
LikeLike
As recent US Supreme Court decisions illustrate – The law presumes that every person who has acquired their full age is of sound mind, and consequently competent to make contracts. However, there’s a catch – people who believe the genders are equal are obviously crazy – and therefore not accountable; but anyone recognizing gender differences is sane – and legally obligated to disregard them.
LikeLike
Crucially important here is the definition of “mate.” This is so critical that it’s the one bias I’m surprised they didn’t control for in this study.
Women define “mate” as a long-term prospect [commitment], while men determine “mate” as a short-term prospect [sex].
That said, in no way does that obfuscate the obvious points made by CH here. I’d be VERY interested to see what attributes women chose in a short-term prospect and which men chose in a long-term prospect and how it stacks up to these. The cross-referential diagram would be fascinating and would tell the full tale.
LikeLike
Good catch. Its reasonably safe to assume it is about long term mating due to the inclusion of “chastity” as a strong male mate preference, but the study should have clarified.
[CH: yeah short-term mating preferences for men don’t put as much weight (heh) on a woman’s chastity. if a slut is good to go, she’s all right for the night.]
LikeLike
“yeah short-term mating preferences for men don’t put as much weight (heh) on a woman’s chastity”
Kind of the opposite. Highly chaste women tend to eschew (heh) STM. Heads I win, tails you lose. STM automatically selects unchaste women with heavy weighting on the unchastity
In other words, “Well, duh.”
LikeLike
Great article. I agree with it. I would add, a woman’s lot in life is the mate she chooses to marry. If a pretty woman does not settle, she should be able to find her prince. A believe a good wife should stay sexy looking for her man too.
LikeLike
“Great article. I agree with it. ”
Oh well god damn shit. It must be right then.
“If a pretty woman does not settle, she should be able to find her prince.”
And what exactly does this mean?
Newsflash, the pretty western women of today don’t settle…until their SMV begins its decline. And the prince is a white knight beta they loathe.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not true! I wrote a list to weed through the frogs that really works. Jerks show signs. The list really works. I will not reveal it here. You boys would make mincemeat out of my list. I have been very observant in life about these things. Beta is good if you train them to be great. Alpha not so much, no offense. 🙂
I believe a woman should try to stay as healthy and sexy as they can for their man. What is wrong with that? I agreed with [CH] about women being fat.
Hubby and I stopped at a rest stop on our way to to pick up this cool roof for our 34 Chevy that we are restoring. There were twenty grade school kids having a picnic. I could only spot six students that were normal average sized kids. The rest were super obese. Huge obese sixth graders weighing 200 lbs plus. I pointed it out to hubby. You think girls are fat now, wait until you see the girls I saw in ten years.
What is SMV? If it has to do with vagina, they have operations for that. Hell you can get a whole new one and be a virgin for your man. 🙂
LikeLike
Most droll… ain’t those little hamsters cute?
LikeLike
^^ I’m not sure if the elevator reaches the top floor for the woman commentator above. ^^
LikeLike
Aaaaaaaaaaand that’s all, folks.
This is all you need to disprove feminism, every crappy little bit of it.
Welcome to evolutionary biomechanical empiricism, bitches.
Or, to express the crux with fewer syllables: “I need feminism because… I don’t like reality.”
LikeLike
It’s a good thing we have studies like these to dissuade the feminists from their errant ways, and get them back on the right track…
… I was beginning to get worried there, for awhile.
LikeLike
Logic and science won’t dissuade any gullible individual from their faith. Only living the hard road – in this case, that means hitting the wall and the subsequent catapocalypse – will assist enlightenment.
LikeLike
Alas, yet another jest fallen flat! And for awhile there I was on a roll.
LikeLike
Off-topic but my son has moved to Boulder, Colorado and gained employment.
He says it’s like a hipster theme park. “I can understand why they have mass shootings here.” The public hiking trails are filled with lesbians.
Boulder is like REI, where all the customers are insufferable snobs. In contrast to the Sportsman’s Warehouse across the street, where they sell the same crap for half the price and the customers are all cheerful, polite Mexicans and Rednecks.
LikeLike
REI is full of snobs? On what planet? They’re outdoorspeople. They ain’t afraid of sweat.
LikeLike
Poppycock! My daughter and son shop there all the time. Then again he is a Doctor and she has a plush job helping Doctors with their education and classes. Yep, my daughter listened to her mama’s advice. Man, I need to train more women on how to pick a Prince and not a frog. 🙂
LikeLike
You’re right, it’s a fashion store for outdoor exercisers. If I need a fishing lure I must go to Wallymart or some other downscale outlet.
LikeLike
he’s talking about the posers and granola eating yuppies
LikeLike
Snobbery is a social concept, it doesn’t have anything to do with physical fitness. It means you look down on and treat poorly people you consider below you, whoever they might be.
LikeLike
“I can understand why they have mass shootings here.”
Uh huh. Mark tells me the lesbians were really quite a reality there. And that they actually discriminated when hiring into lesbian dominant companies to keep them that way.
LikeLike
Well, DUH! The folks who cried discrimination the loudest, back in the day, are the ones who, once they get a foot in the door, today unashamedly filter out all but their own kind.
Queers and negroes especially.
Eskimos (Chosen, not frozen) still occasionally let in a gentile when the talent is obvious and/or said goy can be of use.
LikeLike
When Indians (Patel, not Pocohantas) buy a convenience store, they immediately fire all of its staff by temporarily “closing” the store for “renovations.” When it reopens, the employees are all Indians.
[CH: diversity + proximity = system gaming.]
LikeLike
I’m from the Seattle area which is likely similar to Boulder in that crispy, ever so consciously disheveled, outdoorsy version of SUPER arrogance. The food chain of coolness is this, from lowest to highest.
–rural hicks
–“rural suburban” wannabe urbanites. Whiggers and such. Maybe an hour and a half from a city, but too populous to be called rural.
–lower class urbanites
–well off suburbanites
–urban elite
–former urban elites who are so super elite that they can handle the wild ruggedness of rural life after winning the urban game. These people have money and a raspberry patch in their rugged backyard in which they have found bear poop! They sometimes have to watch their hands of dirt even though they made partner early and retired to a salmon smoking home business at age 47. How humble. Made partner but not afraid to get his hands dirty. The love their ratty work boots and think that shoveling stuff is just so REAL. These are the worst kinds of Northwest pricks. The self-satisfaction of one of these a-holes chopping wood in his back yard would make you swear off humanity for all time.
LikeLike
Note that youth and beauty were separate categories in the study. One comes close to summarizing the difference between men and women with the simple observation that they are separate categories only for women’s choices. For men’s choices, youth is an intrinsic part of beauty.
LikeLike
Well I knew there was a reason the strip club dancers have gotten so ugly over the years. Empowerment.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11785628/Prostitution-Legalise-sex-work-for-modern-men-says-think-tank.html
LikeLike
More from the Telegraph.
Teen girls crave older male partners – an uncomfortable truth British society ignores
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11794721/Teen-girls-sexually-crave-older-partners-an-uncomfortable-truth.html
[CH: nice. that’s a realtalk movie that i may have to catch.]
LikeLike
careful; from the review, this seems like a camel’s-nose movie to push Western civ into the middle eastern/gay pedophilia/multiple partners territory. The whole review makes it sound like an attempt to normalize a younger teenage girl’s affair with her mother’ boyfriend….and if it succeeds, we will see this movie remade as the girl gets younger and younger and finally, pre-teen, and the man gets progressively more swarthy and muslim.
and of course any white on white movies will feature boys with men.
beware the rabbit rape!
LikeLike
The Rape Man warns wisely.
LikeLike
I love how abuse is defined by how she feels independent of factual reality. Lmao
LikeLike
There was a movie a few years back that somehow got through the machine… a young Brit girl (actually a 17 year old virgin, I believe) became enamoured of a slick YKW “businessman” (late twenties/early thirties), who of course, deflowered her and then moved on.
The surprising thing was they showed some of those “business practices” used by said slickster to buy real estate on the cheap by moving in large negro families into apartments, which would make all the old white folks abandon ship, and then Yehudi would buy the building at rock-bottom geothermal prices.
It was more of the “arthouse” type release rather than a big tout by the MSM, but I believe there were Academy Award nominations.
LikeLike
GE, sounds like the film An Education, with that homely looking Carey Mulligan. The real estate part is what sounds familiar.
LikeLike
Yes, that’s it… the aptly titled An Education… for both the naive teen AND the audience, with ears to hear and eyes to see.
LikeLike
A decent strip club used to be worthwhile about 15-20 years ago. It used to make my heart pound just driving by a few of the places I used to visit 4-5 times a year. It was a heaven of hot, fat-free ass wiggling by all over the place, long hair and tall tens. You’d wonder where they came from. It used to make me so happy. The last time I went to a strip club, it was just gross. I think all the Asians have moved up in class and no longer have to strip. I didn’t see any Asians and that was just bullshit. So, it’s trashy white girls now and some blacks. Way too much fat on display that just kills the mood. Even a thin girls body is devalued by all the fat surrounding her. Too much naked fat, disgusting tats and terrible attitudes. One girl had a great natural rack but wouldn’t let me get oral on it (which is one of my favorite things in the world, to eat some stranger’s tits). “I’m not going to sit here and be everyone’s mom all day,” she bitched. Huge turnoff. They’re cunts now and pretty much let you know directly that they hate you. Strippers used to be all girly and squeaky, acting like they liked you. Now they feel entitled to 100 bucks just for sitting on your jeans for three songs with their fat asses and those silly little essays tatted on to their hips or on their sides. I’m done with strip clubs.
LikeLike
>women seek older mates with good financial prospects, higher status, and ambition. wonderful news. As far as the chastity thing, I think it is really odd ho w this is such a big issue for leftists. On youtube, someone passed me that john oliver show on hbo in america from this past sunday. He dealt with sex education and combined lack of sex education with rape on campuses. You really should watch it to get a sense. He also said that it is awful that sex education programs, that conservatives approve of, very harshly warn women not to be sluts. I think leftist sex education is bizarre. They act like conservatives are stupid and anti-science and that sex is entirely based on genitals. They completely ignore what goes on in the brain, acting as if male interest in chastity is just ignorant.
LikeLike
Re: measurement of sociability, a suitable description
” “Sociability refers to the motive, strong or weak, of wanting to be with others, whereas shyness refers to behavior when with others, inhibited or uninhibited, as well as feelings of tension and discomfort.” This differentiation between motivation and behavior is consistent with the ability many of us have to behave like extroverts when we choose, whereas shy people cannot turn their shyness off and on.”
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-introverts-corner/200910/introversion-vs-shyness-the-discussion-continues
LikeLike
And in the study, they find an extremely weak (close to 0.00) correlation on the sociability dimension. Since it is separable from the boldness/shyness dimension, I think this could underscore why a man’s display of shyness leads to loss of attractiveness, regardless of his level of desire for sociability.
[CH: interesting. another CH maxim affirmed by SCIENCE: men, you’ve gotta BUSTAMOVE if you want the quality poon.]
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
On a related topic, periodically you’ll see a news item about a waitress, usually a college student but sometimes a single mom — and always a pretty one — gets an outlandishly big tip from an old wealthy man or from a retired Christian couple. The girl, by the gist of the article, seems like a she’s sweet enough to feel good for her.
Still. It’s always a young waitress. Never a young waiter. Basic premise about the relative value of speed and eggs is counterintuitively nonapplicable here. If it’s the larger but still kin-anchored good you want, you help the worthy young man so that he has leverage in securing a woman.
Here is an illustrative example I posted a while ago. A friend and I go out for wings, craft beer, conversation, and music about every other week. So we’re out, and it’s my turn to pay. The waitress was young and pretty. Nothing wrong with her service but nothing special either. The check comes, and it’s $38 and change. I have two twenties and don’t want to use my credit card, so I leave the two Jacksons that are inclusive of a meager tip. (I am a flawed man but normally a good tipper).
My friend protests the small intended tip. So I tell him: think of yourself back in engineering school two decades ago. You could have used a break, with the ladies, couldn’t you. Well, now think about another young engineering student, with dreams and a plan on how to get there. Maybe, just maybe, we are helping him get this girl who is waiting on us today. With my unacceptably low tip, she will not be an entitlrd, overvalued millennial female, and she will seek comfort in that young man’s arms and loins. It may be the start of a beautiful dynasty, and thats good for our people. You’re welcome, young man, wherever you are, and you’re welcome, America.
My friend is one of the most intelligent men I’ve ever known. So he understood. And he added: “and now that we’ve shown ourselves to be total n I g g e r s with that shitty tip, she’ll want to suck our dicks.”
LikeLike
So helping your own kin by keeping the woman’s ego slightly lower relative to all the other ego-inflation she receives everywhere.
Interesting.
But you also may have driven her onto the dick of some big-spending black athlete or rapper with bling. He’ll waste his money before too long, but will mud up a few white girls like her in the meantime.
Or you could have exacerbated her nascent belief in the patriarchy, 77 cents, or other such trope, pushing her further into feminism, and further away from baby production.
You have no idea what ripple effect your action could have.
LikeLike
Competent trollery. I’m not gonna get into a spending war with a rapper. Worrying about ripple effects is an inagentic man’s difficulty. There is a time for analysis and a time for execution.
LikeLike
Geez, keep a lid on the cuck fetish, Strapon2.
LikeLike
Keep a lid on the attention whoring, Dreg Eliot.
No one else butt’s into conversations not involving them more than Dreg over here.
(he got excited from seeing the word ‘Butt’ too). What a fag.
*chortle chortle*
LikeLike
Don’t flatter yourself, S2… bouncing your numbskull around the chateau isn’t attention whoring, it’s a job that has to be done… much like taking out the garbage.
LikeLike
That’s a helluva an approach and one helluva a retort! Good shit.
LikeLike
I dated a girl who served at a restaurant. She said the servers used to hate when blacks were sat at their tables because they don’t tip.
They even had a name for them: Spodas.
Which was shorthand for: I’s spoda tip?
LikeLike
Reminds me of the one about the three African tribes all slaves descended from, the Monbacks, the Wendudas and the Motisahs… Spodas are the lost tribe.
LikeLike
I despise waiters who expect to be tipped. It’s not my place to improve their livelihood nor do most deserve much. If I have to wait more than acceptable for the food, if I’m not asked if I’d like another drink when I finish mine, if I want to ask for something and the waiter isn’t in sight or if the ashtray isn’t routinely changed, I won’t tip anymore.
Same with cab drivers. If they don’t use an efficient route, if their car isn’t clean and if they’re not entertaining, they won’t get shit.
The only people I tip invariably are the employees of the pizza place I order from. They’re always on time, their food is OK and their delivery boys don’t mind going to a supermarket if you want something their employer doesn’t sell such as condoms or cigarettes. Lol
LikeLike
In the US waiters are not paid by the restaurant. They rely on tips. Well, technically they are paid but it’s a fraction of the legal minimum wage. Not tipping or tipping under 15% of the check is considered a major asshole move.
LikeLike
Ashtray? Hahaha
LikeLike
PA, I don’t care about their approval. I tip if the service merits it and their arrangement with their employer isn’t my problem. If anything if more people did this, there’d be less shitty service and less entitled shit heads in the serving industry. I don’t see why I’d even feel guilty or ashamed. They provide a service and I gift them a bit more if I’m pleased(most people I know don’t get any gifts from their clients). Also, they’re not my family or friends, I don’t give a shit about their lives. It’s simply a value exchange: they provide good service, I provide tips. No good service, no tips.
I tip my barber with a third of what it costs to get my hair cut, for example. But he’s a cool, talented guy and deserves my money. In America, I’d be less likely to tip if waiters feel entitled, not more, much like I despise people who feel entitled to anything on this planet.
LikeLike
Throw in your buck like everybody else, you cheap bastard.
LikeLike
Actually an excellent example of RealTalk in the face of social convention and white knightery… Good pic.
LikeLike
I gave a man a twenty dollar tip this summer cause he looked really pissed to be serving Mark and I. He obviously thought I was a gold digger and Mark is my sugar daddy. It happens a lot. I felt sorry for him even though he was totally wrong. Didn’t get to see his reaction thought. I’m selfish that way about liking to see people get what I give them.
LikeLike
I got a tip for ya… stay outta dark town after dark.
LikeLike
I’ve noticed a few sex differences in my line of work, but for the male response, I got it comparing notes with my colleagues:
Women’s typical response on first contact :
“No means no…..noo..nooo…YEEEESSS. I just came twice. Fuck, my boyfriend is such a fag.”
Male’s typical response:
“Yes, Quantivarious, do it like we did in the projects while Jamal banged my mouth. Obama forever!”
Bonus points if you notice the extra-subtle point sprinkled in there, like golddust amongst honey.
Serial rapist rape!
LikeLike
Would like more input on the girl I went out with on Friday. Those of you who weighed in said I did fine, though I could have planned the night better and tried to escalate further.
I called her Sunday night to set up another date. She answers and says she’s finishing a movie, but will call me in 20 minutes. She never called or texted and I haven’t contacted her either. Should I even bother trying to reengage her?
LikeLike
Don’t reengage, just wait for her to try and connect again.
LikeLike
I figured. Do you think she blew me off, or is this one of those newfangled pre-relationship shit tests you and Putin were describing a few months back?
LikeLike
Blew you off – flake – whatever else is going on in her life at the moment. Live and learn right.
She will probably contact you in a week, maybe by the weekend.
LikeLike
What makes you think so?
LikeLike
She’s a 6.5 right? She doesn’t have that much to do or by the weekend she’ll need a little more good feelz and validation, maybe she will be hungry… Your outing was OK enough for her to put YOU as a spinning plate…
LikeLike
in mod… left htis off it though – consider the dynamic as well, she has left an opening to recontact you “oh hey never got back to you, what did you want” See THAT trap?
LikeLike
Like I said to Wala, you should really try cold approach SNL game for a while, just to sharpen your game. Lot’s of blow outs, lots of learning as well.
LikeLike
You see though there is really not much difference between a shit test and a blow off… either way it serves her purpose, provides a hurdle for you to get over, keeps the eggz safe. And if you turn it around, viola, she wins as well! Now she has a higher value guy to get with.
LikeLike
Great list, by the way. My ex checks off between seven and nine of those slut tells, depending on how generous I’m feeling. Gave me some perspective on the oneitis I was nursing.
lol–fuck that, dude. I’m not putting in the work to be some plain girl’s side bitch. I honestly may not reengage even if she breaks the silence.
LikeLike
@Benson didn’t blow you off. She’s a girl, she’s got tattoos, she’s a bit entitled with the shit-tests, this whole attention thing is a big thrill for her and after you contacted her again her self-esteem went through the roof. Then…she got distracted and the mood disappeared.
If you contact her again, based on the description, she’ll start to either feel she can do better or wonder why you’re so interested when she doesn’t feel that great about herself.
I run into this as well. Best move, focus on something else, wait a few weeks for either her to contact you again or until you feel better about the whole interaction and don’t care whether she comes out or not, then send out a ping text and note 1) how quickly she replies 2) the content of the reply.
Take it from there.
LikeLike
I’m getting my ass handed to me on cold approaches. I’m 3-for-30 in terms of number closes this year. But I’ll keep trying.
Sneaky, sneaky. I thought it was odd that she’d answer the phone just to tell me she couldn’t talk.
Ignoring her will be easy enough. I’m not all that attached.
LikeLike
Benson, learn the opening line, “Wanna dance?” It’s great!
LikeLike
For cold approaches?
LikeLike
Try night game cold approach and for snl only. No asking for number, no default back to a number if you cant pull, no taking her number if she is trying to give it to you… Pull or nothing.
It’s very clarifying and will accelerate your game development – strategic logistics, opening (more targets), white knights, boyfriends, coxkblocks, spiking attraction and spotting windows. It’s all good. Focus on the game scenarios and dynamics – it’s about that. Not your stats… There is no boxscore in tomorrow’s paper, that’s just in your head… Holding you back.
Have fun.
LikeLike
Yes, Benson. For cold approaches, YES! [hand pump]
Start at one location where there’s a whale and continue around the dance floor. Don’t worry about being blown off. Just keep asking. Asking after getting blown off is a DHV. It shows confidence. Look for blow-offs as an opportunity to DHV. One dance per girl. Tell her you might dance again with her later if you want to follow up.
Lead-follow only, like salsa, country 2 step, and west coast swing. Fakk hip-hop 5h1t. West coast swing will let you put your hands all over a woman’s body. Waltz and foxtrot will too at the silver level.
“Dance is an excuse for a woman to let a man put his hands all over her body.” theasdgamer
“Women love to be touched.” theasdgamer
LikeLike
You just got blown off the list! Don’t bother. you obviously blew it. You probably did not pass her shit test. Move on Benson!
LikeLike
Don’t break out in hives. There’s nothing to move on from. It was only drinks at a bar.
Unless she has some impossibly high standard for shit testing, I passed nearly all of them, judging by her responses. Either way, I don’t care. She pinged my slut radar from the start and she’s not worth chasing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your “slut radar” pinged? Please explain how this works in technical terms. (I have a scientific mind for these things) Is it digital or analog? Do you have probes that you use? How do you ground it? Are you using it just to check continuity of the situation or not? When you ping the object of your affection, is there any other objects in your line of sight because other objects can affect the signal flow and give you a false reading. Thank you, Benson. I wish you the best in marketing your “slut radar”. Ha ha. 🙂
LikeLike
Don’t be thick (lol), you know exactly what I mean.
[CH:
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2008/12/29/its-easy-to-identify-a-slut/
women really don’t like it when men know how to pick out which of them is a slut. they react… emotionally.]
LikeLike
[CH] I was just giving the lad shit. Beautiful younger women pretty much make the call.
[CH: not with men who know how to answer the call.]
Women have the advantage in Benson’s situation. If a young beautiful woman as in Benson’s case wanted him, she could have had him, so his radar did not mean a thing.
[most men will fuck known sluts for a little while, but refuse to commit to them or spend on them in any meaningful way. this is why men’s slut radar matters to women, and why women recoil at the thought that men can know which of them rides the cock carousel.]
You have even admitted women have the advantage so your radar gun must be broke nine times out of ten. Preventative Maintenance is a killer every time if it’s out of tolerance.
[9/10 times beats random noise.]
A man never wants the contest of “Hey honey, let’s go out and see who can get laid first”. The man would lose.
[true, unless he’s a top 10% alpha male, or she’s a chubster with a potatoface.]
A beautiful woman pretty much can make a man putty in her hands, if she wants.
[only beta males. alphas know better how to play the game.]
That is a fact. Men are weak.
[you misspelled betas.]
They have done studies on this. I disagree with you.
[my studies trump your studies. because i actually have studies while you have empty assertions.]
LikeLike
Slut radar is like attention-whore radar. You know exactly what I mean, donna.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do. I was just toying with Benson. I was always and still am the observant type that smiled and smiles in the background. One must always look, hear, smell, and feel their surroundings.
Women must always have their guard up. (There are weirdos in the world, you know.)
LikeLike
Benson – what’s with the calling? Why not do more with texting? There’s nothing wrong with calling as such (as long as you’re comfortable with it) – both are just different ways to reach the same goal, but I mention it only because texting is another tool in the toolbox and a lot of girls today are actively uncomfortable with calls (personal calls anyway).
LikeLike
I work in sales, so I’m quite good on the phone. In my experience, it’s also easier to move things forward. My text message is competing with dozens of other apps, texts, chats and reddit threads for her attention. But a call can break through all the distractions.
It can also be a way to set yourself apart from other guys, because, as you pointed out, texting is more common.
LikeLike
Good rational Benson, but the call does communicate a lot more interest than an ambiguous pictorial text would… A call is very direct. She can’t play around on a call as much as sitting there going ^_^_^ with clever texts back and forth while watching a movie or whatever BS she was doing. You also can’t use time of response to gauge her reactions OR to signal your waning focus or interest (by delaying responses). and a text thread can play out over a few days.
seduction is the goal i.e. flip those switches!
LikeLike
LikeLike
True enough. I should have added, “if her interest is high enough.” There are costs and benefits to both. Personally, I find texting tedious. You lose important cues like context and vocal tonality, and it’s easier to misunderstand and be misunderstood. The more experience I get, the less either of those happen. But I still don’t like it.
LikeLike
@Benson here’s a text I used the other day with huge response: “At gym. A fat girl’s shorts just ripped. Horror show.”
I sent this out to 4 girls i’m gaming or who haven’t replied in a while.
ALL replied within the hour. Their replies were “hahahahah” or “lol that’s so hilarious” or some such.
My follow up was “Having lunch, surprised I still have an appetite”
Great way to stay in touch, gauge interest or set up a meet up.
LikeLike
I’ll give it a test run soon. I have a dozen or so of those multi-purpose stories. They’re either entirely fabricated or sewn together from unrelated events in my life–and they cause tingles every time. Really surprised no girls has ever called bullshit on one.
LikeLike
OT: Detroiters gather to worship the devil. Literally:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/27/for-one-night-devil-is-in-detroit/
:blink: :blink:
LikeLike
Has CH read McCarthy’s Blood Meridian?
LikeLike
THIS is why you pay attention to your Grandfather and not your father.
Your father has to suck up to his harridan.
Your Grandfather doesn’t give a Sh!t and can sit you down for some Realtalk.
The equality lies are only about 30-40 years in recent history. Two generations back people realized certain truths. Because a hard life made them see it every day.
Just be cause life is easy “now” and gender differences are masked by idyllic ease. Does not mean that gender differences DO NOT exist.
LikeLike
Yeah, in the 1950s and 60s my mom was prohibited from playing sports because a woman wasn’t supposed to sweat.
Maybe that explains her aerobics obsession in the 1980s.
LikeLike
No – women are herd animals… It became fashionable because of a hollywood star so women followed.
Just likes shoes, hemlines, hair color… AND feminism…
If the west was being led by strong men the women would be following.
LikeLike
The lying lie of a lying liar. Your lying posts, dear Eskimo, have done damage that a 1000 neonazi antisemitic posts could not.
I urge you to repent and abandon the prince of lies.
[CH: you just gave tsw a big… head.]
LikeLike
It’s amazing how he/she regurgitates the canards of Womym’s Studies curricula and expects us not to notice the tells.
LikeLike
My grandfather was born in 1870.
LikeLike
Shocking study…
As for the sociability piece, I tend to agree with your assertion. I’m strongly introverted (enneagram 5), but have had my best relationships and flings with very outgoing chicks (enneagram 7s, mostly).
LikeLike
The most prized commodity in the US isn’t even gold at this moment. It’s single, thin, attractive, feminine, non-bitchy women. Any presidential candidate who addresses this ratio and wants to fix it would win the male vote minus the SWPL contingent. Meaning, they’d easily win. Trump should address it if he wants to win (assuming voting is real which it probably isn’t).
LikeLike
I want to apply as a fellow at that university to conduct my groundbreaking revolutionary study:
‘Is water wet?’
LikeLike
Glad to see that you followed up to my link to this story.
On a related matter, see how feminists complain about Target making a special effort to sell Lego building sets to girls. No good deed goes unpunished. Target will probably now sell fewer Lego building sets for girls, if politics prevents marketing them to girls. Also, check out the complainer’s picture, or her blog on fat acceptance.
LikeLike
You know if the science is settled maybe we should just shut it down now. If these poindexters are spending money doing studies to confirm things everyone has known for years this just seems like a job program for beta smalldicked losers now. This sick social cycle where we subsidize beta cucks to push womyn into feminist training camps must be shut down now. These losers are killing us all by turning women frigid with their beta nice guy attitudes. We have to stop this at the source by closing down the money stream that lets these cucks ruin our women by making them frigid with their doormat philosophy.
LikeLike
This one wins the award for buzzword bingo.
LikeLike
I feel like a true female Trump here. Don’t be stupid! You can be Alpha to your hearts content, but you’ll never get the woman if you blow it on the first kiss. The kiss is always the coup de grace test to know if “it’s” there for her or not. If you are a lousy kisser on that first important kiss, you are done for. Benson blew the kiss, I bet!
LikeLike
Fuck off you old sow. Go find that true alpha husband of yours… you know the one you are so smitten by you spend your idle day playing footsie with guys on game boards. Yeah that guy.
And put down that fuckin ice cream already… the camera adds another 10lbs on your already swollen ass.
LikeLike
Exactly how many cameras does she have on her?
LikeLike
Wow. My theory is right. You are living proof. I was just helping you out there grasshopper. You must have been dumped by being a lousy kisser. That is a woman’s test. I thought I was being nice sharing a point of view, you boys just don’t know about. I have girlfriends and daughters and we have discussed this. You don’t have to believe me. I don’t care.
[CH: i think most men know women are turned off by lousy kissing technique. but most men also know that if the lousy kisser is otherwise alpha, women will hastily forgive his poor technique.]
LikeLike
PS. If I ever needed someone, it would only be this, besides the ole sow likes to dance to only what is true, which is not you!!!
https://crappytruth.wordpress.com/2015/08/11/if-i-ever-needed-someone/
LikeLike
Everything you’ve said is wrong.
LikeLike
It sounds like you’re lifting dialogue from some lame ass Jennifer Aniston movie.
LikeLike
No, actually I understand how radar works. I had to get out of a speeding ticket. The cop was being a jerk. I even told him he was being an asshole. He wrote that in his report! (ha ha, the Judge laughed) He was on private property. I felt it was a trap.That’s why I called him an asshole, as I stated to the Judge. He had me, but lucky for me…I understood how transmitters and receivers work. The radar gun is both. Knowing what I know about signal flow and their reaction of bouncing off unknown objects. This can have an affect to the wavelength of the signal causing the signal to return to the receiver at a different rate of speed which could affect the reading or cause a misreading of the alleged speed of the alleged incident. I explained to the Judge that I had requested the preventative maintenance logs of the radar gun, which they failed to produce. I had no idea if it was within tolerance. I took pictures and had witnesses of the alleged incident. I had a female judge and female bailiff and a young male Prosecutor. I had that man shoveling his papers at my presentation of the alleged event. He threw up that my speedometer was out of alignment. I asked him if he understood how the speedometers worked with my transmission since he brought it up.
He said, no he did not. I then explained how the speedometers worked. I had the Judge and Bailiff covering their mouths in laughter. I won, of course. Nope my young Benson…It is from wisdom and intelligence that put a new twist on your radar. Give credit where credit is due! 🙂
LikeLike
Sentient, just remember that there’s a large part of a girl’s brain devoted to chocolate.
LikeLike
Good thing I am a woman and not a girl. That being said, what is a man’s brain made of? Chocolate Double Deluxe?
Men get their intelligence from their moms.
[CH: this is not true. it is a myth perpetrated by dumbcunt feminists. think about it. it defies logic. if a smart man has a son with a dumb woman, the odds are good that their son will be smarter than the son of a dumb man and dumb woman.]
Intelligence is located on the x chromosome. Maybe Sentient had a dumb mom. She failed to teach him to be polite. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/brainy-sons-owe-intelligence-to-their-mothers-1339099.html
[you should stop reading idiotic brit rags.]
LikeLike
men have a large part of their brains devoted to guns, hunting, archery, etc.
LikeLike
And don’t forget men must have their hotrods too. They are chick magnets. You should see my hubbies 64 Falcon that is really mine. (It’s in my name…I’m not stupid)
LikeLike
there’s a general section for “man toys”…includes hotrods, motorcycles, boats, etc.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like men toys. I am not like most women. I have no issues on repairing anything. Hubby and I are restoring our next project. It’s a 1934 Chevy. I find cars very exciting. I am selling my 1971 Mercury Comet to help restore the 34. I call it my Democrat Car (It has a Confederate flag license plate and it was put there before that became PC) Besides, I don’t want to look at my Democrat Car anymore. (Fucking Democrats really upset me!) 🙂
LikeLike
Donna, babe, you need to stop rattling cages. You’re older, so you should have wisdom. You’re a woman in a man’s environment. Your man isn’t here to white knight for you. Prove that you’re sweet even if some young buck is rude. Agree and amplify. Kill Sentient with kindness.
Show us that you’re worthy of our attention.
LikeLike
Intelligence from mom? We’ve deconstructed that canard months ago, here at the chateau.
Anyone who has had children knows that’s bullshit as well.
LikeLike
My mom had above average IQ. Dad was brilliant and I tested out several std. deviations on IQ tests.
LikeLike
And a large part of her ass and thighs…
LikeLike
For most women, it’s a shame…and a waste.
LikeLike
“BLACK LIVES MATTER !!!!”
No, they don’t.
If they did, they would matter most of all to other black people.
It is to laugh.. ..
LikeLike
[…] Sex Differences In Psychology Are Real, Immutable, Lasting, And Significant | Chateau Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Neanderthal at 2:10
LikeLike
I’ve wondered if Brother Nathaniel is GBFM.
LikeLike
Me too. (I want that hat)
LikeLike
Since psychology is the topic, is it just me who observed this:
1)girls between their first blowjob and 19-20 are generally sweet and seek long time relationships.
2)girls between 20 and 24 are major cock carousel riders who just want to have fun
3)girls over 25 are usually bitter girls who want to settle in a relationship.
Sure, there are exceptions and depending on the country, the ratios differ.
LikeLike
About the verts, I think you want to join with someone who is in the same overall category (intro or extro) but who is able to vacation in the other one. So, if you’re both introverts, you can be perfectly happy sitting and reading quietly in the same room most of the time, but, when you go out, it’s easy to be sociable.
LikeLike
For the biomechanics is God files —
See the pictures at the link of Denise Richards and Fran Drescher after hitting the wall.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3194661/Denise-Richards-Fran-Drescher-showcase-toned-legs-drop-Extra-Los-Angeles.html
LikeLike
Damn…the wall crashed into them. HAHA
LikeLike
Daily Mail – at the leading edge of body distortion propaganda…
THE CLAIM – “Meanwhile, the 57-year-old former The Nanny star opted for a long-sleeved dress which hugged her trim figure.”
THE TRUTH –
LikeLike
Fran’s hips would work for a more…diverse…audience.
If they were drunk with ear plugs.
LikeLike
Also, I don’t think someone that defends female chastity is a white knight and that needs to be made clear to the militant pua’s. If a father doesn’t want his daughter to participate in a gang bang, that does not make him a white knight. Biology is a two sided sword that might not sting solely the feminists.
LikeLike
Martin – WK’s are hypocrites who hide their true motives (sex with the women they are WKing for) by engaging in covert contracts with women – I will do X for you and you will do Y for me (companionship, love, sex)…
It’s this hypocrisy that is repugnant. and the lack of game.
No one would begrudge a patriarch looking out for his own.
LikeLike
+1. Totally teaching my daughters how to be “the right kind of girls”. They’re being properly instructed: “how to let Dad pick my boyfriends.”
I derive great satisfaction in the fact that their mother now picks guys who are losers to date and it’s evident to them even at their tender ages.
LikeLike
Trump ridicules Sanders.
Says he would’ve physically fought back against the Dindus.
LikeLike
His hair looks like urine-colored cotton candy.
LikeLike
and you are aroused?
LikeLike
LikeLike
Of course he is aroused. Zhyds can’t see a strong man without the unbearable urge to take a golden shower from him. These are the people who even found a way to felate Adolf Hitler (see Udet, Heydrich).
LikeLike
Strapon just can’t help telling on him/herself… and hitting the start button on the Cyberian spanking machine every time there’s a respite.
LikeLike
You’re straining pretty hard to describe blond hair.
Urine is gold. So is his wedding ring also ‘urine-colored’?
“Aw, the urine-colored sun arises.”
“I love a urine-colored beer after a hard day’s work in the urine-colored sun.”
“Nothing like a urine-colored whiskey on the back porch under the urine-colored moonlight.”
“Remember; All that glitters is not urine-colored gold.”
LikeLike
Trump: “I don’t know if I’ll do the fighting or somebody else will, but that won’t happen when I’m at the microphone.”
I don’t vote, and probably never will, but…
I’d volunteer to be part of his security detail during public speaking engagements…
… it would give me great satisfaction to revisit my prior existence as a Brown Shirt on the streets of Berlin in 1928. lzozlzozlozlozlozlozl 😉
LikeLike
Hey CH how many different ways are you gonna say “men are like this, women be like THIS”?
[CH: as long as there are liars saying the opposite.]
You’re a good writer, you should branch out a little bit.
[“stick to game, your politics/culture/race posts are boring/sucky/hurtful.”]
LikeLike
[“stick to game, your politics/culture/race posts are boring/sucky/hurtful.”]
That’s not what I meant, but fair enough.
LikeLike
“You’re a good writer, you should branch out a little bit.”
Take for example, Senior Black Journalists who write on a plethora of topics.
LikeLike
Ooh, snap!
LikeLike
Nothing like getting damned with faint praise, eh CH? 😉
LikeLike
Snarky reply to John in mod. I retract it, as I now see he did back down, sort of.
LikeLike
Don’t you think it an insult that someone even mentions trying to “set you up” with anyone 30 or older?
Why is there such a cultural aversion to things like a 10 year male-female gap (or more) when it’s been going on for 99% of human history? I get it, women hate younger women but it just proves the point. Reecently I’ve had even guys tell me some girl is “too young”. Just seems nearly everyone is stupid and without valid opinion anymore. Crazy
LikeLike
I just finished a post “A Cure for Oneitis.” Best wishes.
LikeLike
What if any is the end game for egalitarians? First races are the same, now sexes are the same, what is the next lunatic assertion these fools will try to foist upon their now disbelieving and shocked audiences? Will they claim animals are people too? Will bestiality be legalized with animal marriage? Where is the limit to the insanity these leftists will go to make themselves feel better about perversion?
[CH: if you know only one thing about leftoids, it’s this: there is no limit to their insanity.
which means, you know know that there’s only one way to stop them.
THE TRUMPENKREIG.]
LikeLike
Please explain why you believe that men are either Alpha or Beta? Where does the Omega man play in your theories?
The Omega Man must be the big man of them all. Eg…
The old bull and the young bull are standing on a bluff looking down below at the field full of cows.
The young bull says, “Lets run down and fuck one of those cows”.
The old bull says, “Nope Son, lets walk down and fuck them all”.
Trump is like the Old Bull! The Omega Man. 🙂
LikeLike
[…] Another study proving sexual differences in psychology are real. […]
LikeLike