• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Shiv Of The Week: A Pretender Gets Real
Comment Of The Week: The Thousand Yard Shiv »

Open Letter To A Loser In Love

August 30, 2015 by CH

This is an open letter to a loser in love, a beta male who has become bitter about women through repeated romantic failure. You find yourself here, at the Chateau, seeking answers. I am your Prophet and because you are in the Flock I will share with you my field-tested wisdom.

I say this with no malice but you will not like it. But I am going to say it anyway because it is the truth and that’s what you’re looking for. You are projecting all of the characteristic traits of a LOSER. You want to associate with LOSERS for succor, because they don’t threaten the comforting bubble of your whiny persecution complex. You complain about your health, money, job, height, weight, datelessness. You complain that you’re being forced to dance like a monkey for girls. You look in the mirror and complain that you aren’t a Hollywood hunk, and you use this as an excuse for your failure to act with the women you desire. You complain about everything!

This is the key to understanding your problems with women.

Men don’t complain, they ACT. A woman wants to give herself to a man who emanates power and decisiveness and brass balls. A man who says “It’s my way or the highway, baby!” A man with no money, who is fat, who is stupid, who is clueless in every way EXCEPT that he radiates those zero fucks given alpha attitude vibes will get laid all the time.

You bitch about this jerkboy antagonist so you know that this happens. You’ve seen it happen. And the jerk doesn’t just bang out club skanks either. Cute, confident SWPL chicks get horny in the presence of such power. Even a feminist ideologue will beg such a man to fuck her up the ass just to have him pay attention to her for a minute.

Loser in love, your attitude sucks. If you want to start fucking hot girls with sexy bodies, be a MAN. The key to power is not cash or looks or cars or any of that conventional crap you read about in Maxim. Those things are incidental and are only important insofar as they alter your state of mind. The mind is the ultimate weapon. The power is within you. All you have to do is decide to tap it.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Biomechanics is God, Girls, The Id Monster, Ugly Truths | 83 Comments

83 Responses

  1. on August 30, 2015 at 2:30 pm Arbiter

    Tough love, sometimes it’s needed. Those who pedestalize or demonize women (often the same person at different stages in life, or maybe different days of the week) and complain about Game need to get their asses off the couch. I wonder how many who comment in blogs like this one who actually use the teachings found in the manosphere. I started using them years ago, and they work. But it’s a lot of work. You need to get out there.

    Though I don’t agree that factors other than self-confidence would matter so little. I could name examples of guys who had self-confidence and made fools of themselves, and thereby gained a reputation that prevented any woman from ever going near them. The PUAsphere often lists four factors in no particular order: Looks, Personality, Money, Social Status. Game can change the Personality factor. In a post a long time ago, CH listed in descending order: Psychosocial dominance (game). High status/fame. Personality (passion/charisma/humor). Wealth. Good looks/height/muscularity. Cleverness/smarts. Dependability/reliability. Sexual prowess. These sound a lot like the four factors.

    Though none of the factors will be improved by doing nothing. You need to get out there and act. It can be done.

    LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 2:39 pm da GBFM lzzzzzzzlzlz (TM)

      “It’s my way or the highway, baby, and youz oughttz know, the highway is also my way!” –da GBFMZ ebfore cumming on her fcacscezolzoz

      LikeLike


      • on August 30, 2015 at 2:46 pm Arbiter

        Like I say above, ” I could name examples of guys who had self-confidence and made fools of themselves”….

        LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 7:21 pm Sentient

      I’ve broken meta game down to three key characteristics and it gets away from the Alpha Beta Sigma labeling (which is too limiting):

      Dynamic

      Passionate

      Authentic

      If a guy has those three things going for him, looks don’t matter, money doesn’t matter, social status doesn’t matter – he will be swimming in female companionship and attention. Will having the rest of the package enhance a DPA guy (or any other guy) sure it will. But you don’t NEED any of them.

      Now actually becoming a dynamic, passionate and authentic guy – well that takes some work. But the journey is the destination.

      One other thing for sure – the defining characteristic of a beta and beta activity – RAGE. Seething under the surface RAGE. An impotent rage at that.

      LikeLike


      • on August 30, 2015 at 8:12 pm Arbiter

        If a guy has those three things going for him, looks don’t matter, money doesn’t matter, social status doesn’t matter

        I won’t say that game doesn’t work, because it does. But looks matter, money matters, social status matters when it comes to dating. Search Google Images for, say, “obese ugly man” and then tell me the looks of the hideous creatures in those pictures won’t matter as long as they learn game.

        This is a no-brainer. CH has also talked about the many different factors at other times, as have pretty much all PUA/manosphere gurus. In one post CH writes about how game will improve the sex life of an omega, a lower beta, average beta, higher beta, lesser alpha and alpha. For all the situation is improved, but the hideous omega will never have the same success as the rungs above. Is that post wrong? I think it says what everyone knows.

        But it is simply comforting for people to say that “All you need is this-or-this”, not just in dating but in other areas. People are always looking for that One Simple Solution, and if you sweep away everything else from the table and say “This!” you always look like a trail blazer.

        If confidence was ALL that mattered, then none of the other advice in this here blog would matter. I don’t believe that to be the case.

        [CH: the simplest formulation is that looks matter LESS to women than they matter to men. that’s it. any beta who finds this statement objectionable is likely one of those whiny losers who wants to blame his looks for his failure with women, when in actuality his problem is that he has no balls and has never done anything more than watch better men socialize with the cute girls he leers at from his perch against the wall.]

        LikeLike


      • on August 31, 2015 at 1:38 pm mendozatorres

        Looking back, when I would enable all those three components, usually when talking about something I would enjoy, the girls would be held captive. Only problem was, despite my love of coffee, I didn’t know how to close.

        It does take work and if one puts their energy to working on those characteristics, it’s a good way to live.

        LikeLike


  2. on August 30, 2015 at 2:35 pm H2

    I hope to someday and somehow become famous or a celebrity just so I can go on interviews with shitlibs and say how CH helped me.

    LikeLike


  3. on August 30, 2015 at 2:38 pm Simon Corso

    OT But I expect the commentariat will love this video .

    http://renegadetribune.com/black-guy-explains-why-blacks-will-lose-a-race-war/

    LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 2:48 pm Arbiter

      Simon, there are plenty of political CH posts. Today, even. How about posting the political stuff in those, and write about game in game posts? There are visitors who will just be fed up otherwise, and leave, when they could have been kept around and taught more.

      LikeLike


      • on August 30, 2015 at 2:57 pm Simon Corso

        Exposure. More views.

        LikeLike


      • on August 30, 2015 at 3:02 pm King

        Because some of us — most of us — do not need the lesson to be reiterated a dozen times before it sinks in.

        Because most of us pick up on the truth rather quickly, since it has never been far from the reality of our everyday lives — CH is our nature articulated, not something wholly alien.

        Because the most valuable new paths for game means applying it to matters beyond some newbie’s forlorn love life. If you haven’t noticed, manipulating women is a very limited subject easily exhausted, and most Love Doctors are moving on to greater horizons, like Roosh V.

        Because “visitors who will just be fed up” by realtalk is a commentary on the visitor, not the host.

        Because little comment monitors like you are the typical lefty ass-kiss to power, to be ceaselessly mocked like a teacher’s pet.

        And failing all that … because the well adjusted man can walk and chew bubblegum (and kick ass, when the latter runs out) at the same time.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on August 30, 2015 at 4:40 pm Ohiomega

        You couldn’t be more wrong, Matt. Politics is ephemeral; pussy is eternal.

        LikeLike


      • on August 30, 2015 at 4:46 pm Anonymous

        Summer’s Eve should help with your discomfort.

        LikeLike


      • on August 30, 2015 at 8:16 pm Arbiter

        LOL Looks like the little troll Matt/Matt K/Matt King/King Matt/whatever is getting all high and mighty again. Remember, this is the guy who calls CH a “metrosexual” and “faggot” for teaching game.

        Mattyboy, you’re pathetic. You’re just trolling here about your religious fantasies and rejecting all the game advice CH gives, attacking him for giving it, so don’t suddenly pretend you’d have any respect for his blog. Go back to watching FOX and cheering the wars for Israel, that’s all your fat ass is good for. We know you’re a lonely omega who has nothing to do with the manosphere. Your own post here shows that. Zero understanding for CH’s game advice after all this time – you really have an IQ of about 85 or so, that much is clear. Tradcon troll.

        LikeLike


      • on August 30, 2015 at 8:18 pm Arbiter

        You couldn’t be more wrong, Matt. Politics is ephemeral; pussy is eternal.

        That loner hates CH’s posts about game since he never talks to women, hasn’t had a relationship in a long, long time, and probably doesn’t have any friends either. The only time he posts about game is to attack it, and for that he uses religious blabbering to make himself sound important. It would be funny if it didn’t show his situation.

        LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 11:30 pm Carlos Danger

      One of the things the NWO would like to do, is create a pretense for martial law.

      LikeLike


  4. on August 30, 2015 at 2:40 pm Open Letter To A Loser In Love | Neoreactive

    […] By CH […]

    LikeLike


  5. on August 30, 2015 at 2:46 pm Mr. Mitchell

    If only EVERY SINGLE post on this site could be about Game, like today’s article, this site would be PHENOMENAL. Unfortunately, I’ll be reading another article on Donald Trump…and of course see that ever accompanying pic of that little white girl. Game over politics. Always

    LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 2:55 pm Arbiter

      The hour is late. There are things people need to learn, and fast. This is not like earlier decades, when you could walk through your life with blinders on and hope things would be fine in your old age. CH has decided to take responsibility and use his writing skills and great understanding of politics, rather than only write about game. It is a tough but good decision.

      Besides, there are several connections between game and politics.

      LikeLike


      • on August 30, 2015 at 4:45 pm Ohiomega

        Shut the fuck up! No politics poolside.

        LikeLike


      • on August 30, 2015 at 4:58 pm Mr. Mitchell

        This blog has degraded. It would be better if this blog remained a Game blog, and another blog could have been created for the political musings.

        [CH: “this blog has degraded” = “my feelings are degraded by this blog”. hth.]

        LikeLike


      • on August 30, 2015 at 8:19 pm Vagina dominator

        If you go the Comment of the Week you will see that I have posted a comment explaining the process by which this site has developed its particular political slant.

        You would benefit from reading it.

        LikeLike


      • on August 30, 2015 at 8:20 pm Arbiter

        Shut the fuck up! No politics poolside.

        Are you trying to be sarcastic? In that case you missed the fact that I never said no to political posts above. I said let’s not spam CH’s game posts with them. There are many, many political posts where they could be placed instead. But as Simon says above, “Exposure. More views”, he only cares about having people read his all-important post.

        LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 3:07 pm King

      Lose yourself in the archives, tyro, while better men are plotting the future beyond Advanced Flirting Techniques.

      LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 4:06 pm Johannes Balileo Balilei

      You can’t take the Crimson Pill and stay seeing the world equal. There are implications on culture, politics, economics, religion, psychology, philosophy. The Crimson Pill harbors the wisdom of the God of Biomechanics.CH talk about all.

      LikeLike


      • on August 31, 2015 at 1:40 pm mendozatorres

        +1

        LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 4:19 pm corvinus333

      Unfortunately, I’ll be reading another article on Donald Trump…

      Maybe, just maybe, one way to quit being a loser is to try to imitate The Donald.

      Just maybe.

      LikeLike


      • on August 30, 2015 at 5:00 pm Mr. Mitchell

        “Maybe, just maybe, one way to quit being a loser is to try to imitate The Donald.

        Just maybe.”

        So why are you on this blog?

        [CH: spot the irony.]

        LikeLike


      • on August 31, 2015 at 1:42 pm anonymous

        Is Mr. Mitchell a sock puppet of Fag-Spirit Within?

        LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 6:01 pm JohnDSee

      @Mr Mitchell
      You could go and start your own blog with @Ohiomega somewhere in the bitchosphere. Hell, you might even get more readers than CH. In fact, I guarantee that you will. Cheers.

      LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 8:03 pm Lex Corvus

      Game is a gateway drug—Red Weed, if you will. CH mixes in some Red Heroin these days. But they’re just different variants of the same Red Pill. (Once you’ve gotten used to the Red H, and are ready for the really hard stuff, check out Red DMT.)

      LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 10:20 pm Corvo

      Do the “politics” posts make your pussy hurt, Mitchellstein?

      Game is to be found in every CH post. The anti-white male assault that is underway is in many ways the greatest shit-test that has ever been shat.

      LikeLike


    • on August 31, 2015 at 1:42 am Glengarry

      Nobody remember from a couple of days back that this guy is one more troll?

      LikeLike


      • on August 31, 2015 at 1:43 pm anonymous

        Yes, we remember.

        LikeLike


    • on August 31, 2015 at 9:48 am Greg Eliot

      I find it lzozlzozlozlzolzolozlozl that the picture of that beautiful little white girl sticks in the troll’s craw so damn much.

      Nonwhites, especially the mischlinge, can never escape the turmoil of seeing the best of our breed.

      LikeLike


      • on August 31, 2015 at 11:44 am ho

        Maybe he is a pedobear?

        LikeLike


    • on August 31, 2015 at 11:26 am Sean Fielding

      Mrs. Mitchell’s underwear
      Is dancing on the line;
      Yes, tranny Mitchell’s underwear
      Has never looked so fine.

      The tranny Mitchell hates strong Whites
      She says they’re not refined.
      But Mrs. Mitchell’s underwear
      Is prancing on the line.

      With a polk-dotted polka
      And a tangled tango too,
      Mrs. Mitchell’s troll remarks
      Are like a frilly zoo!

      LikeLike


  6. on August 30, 2015 at 2:47 pm tspark156

    Spree shooters in waiting; read this blog and change your lives while you still can.

    LikeLike


  7. on August 30, 2015 at 2:52 pm King

    You have articulated Trump’s strategy as well. (Or a Drill Instructor’s, or an old-school priest’s, or a real father’s.) It is all about our mistranslation of the word “love” in the postmodern era. We think it’s the synonym for “nice.” In this weak piping time of peace, this epoch of femininity, we believe one cannot truly love unless one is soft and retreating.

    Hence our invention of the term “tough love.” But caritas never needed the qualifier. In fact, most genuine caring for the well-being of another has always been registered harshly, bluntly, even violently. Meantime, the mark of superficial affection has always been the womanly sweet nothings that can as easily be spoken to one person as another. Proof of love is in deeds, not words; through action, not speech; strength, not weakness. Women respond to it. Electorates respond to it.

    It beggars reality that Donald J. Trump had to be the first person to apply this ancient principle to the politics of our age. See how baffled the supplicants are at the impotence of their supplication. Watch how a crass billionaire demonstrates the efficacy of the virtue liberals collectively, conveniently, and deliberately forgot. Such is life in a republic on the edge of suicide.

    Matt

    LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 8:25 pm Arbiter

      Matty shows that he doesn’t understand what love is, and no one is surprised. No, loner, it doesn’t mean to behave in whatever way you imagine you would if a woman would come near you. Love is not a particular behavior, it is an emotion.

      Funny how you try to attach yourself to things “ancient”. Why don’t you go back to cheering for the wars on Israel on your teevee, your fave sport? How ancient is it to lick the asses of the media owners and believe in the bullshit they sell? And you still believe in it after well over a decade of facts and counter-arguments piling up online, especially in the manosphere. But then again, you are simply a troll in the manosphere.

      LikeLike


      • on August 31, 2015 at 12:04 am Carlos Danger

        His definition of love is broader than yours and encompasses a father’s love for his children and the need to stand above the desire to be sweet to them for their own good. You’re smart enough to appreciate this difference.

        LikeLike


      • on August 31, 2015 at 9:52 am Greg Eliot

        Arbiter, your attempts to denigrate Matt do you no honor…

        Better you should attempt to steal his money rather than his good name… the former would at least enrich you… the latter, if I may bastardize the Bard, makes you poor, indeed.

        LikeLike


    • on August 31, 2015 at 12:05 am Carlos Danger

      Matt, if you’re a priest, I’d like to go to one of your masses.

      LikeLike


    • on August 31, 2015 at 1:44 pm anonymous

      As I have stated before, I, for one, welcome Matt K’s comments and wish he would comment more often. Just my 2 cents.

      LikeLike


  8. on August 30, 2015 at 2:55 pm Open Letter To A Loser In Love | Manosphere.com

    […] Open Letter To A Loser In Love […]

    LikeLike


  9. on August 30, 2015 at 3:36 pm Peak Finance

    Game is a tough topic to keep fresh. Once the basics are understood, there is really not much more to it. I mean Schopenhauer said pretty much everything that needed to be said about the topic 100 years ago. The only refinement is understanding game in the post-modern world.

    So the additional topics are necessary. I think the way this site mixes in the politics, and shows Game influences on society, and the social commentary, all help keep the topic of Game in society and this site relevant.

    This place is once of my favorite daily reads and I would miss it if it were gone.

    LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 3:51 pm H2

      The series on Trump is a perfect example of Game and the alpha attitude in the real world.

      LikeLike


      • on August 30, 2015 at 6:01 pm chronicalibash

        Watching Trump’s responses to a lot of stupid questions provides great strategies for dealing with shit tests.

        During the interview with F. Chuck Todd on the jet, Trump mentions Chuck’s name a few times while he is explaining his position. While a technique to build familiarity with someone, the way Trump says his name has a condescending ring to it. It’s a great way to establish dominance without being overt.

        Another way to disarm is the use of the “would that make you feel better” technique. As CH has mentioned, he commiserates with the shitlib before letting the shitlib know that he’s not going to comply with the request.
        Game example:
        Her: I wish you wouldn’t use that language.
        You: If I didn’t, would that make you feel more relaxed around me?
        Her: It might.
        You: Tough sh!t.

        Even if Trump flames out, I hope realtalk becomes a way of life while shitlibbery declines. Bonus if WN ideals to come to the fore. Enough of the white guilt and minority worship.

        LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 4:34 pm douchebagdeluxe

      Which one of his (Schopenhauer) books would you recommend?

      LikeLike


      • on August 31, 2015 at 12:09 am Carlos Danger

        There’s really only one, The World as Will and Representation in two volumes. It’s about 800 pages total.

        LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 7:26 pm Sentient

      “Once the basics are understood, there is really not much more to it.”

      But it takes a lifetime to master… if you are trying to master it. Game is psychological dominance. There are very few who can win the game all the time, or even 90% of the time. Seduction of every woman you want, winning every negotiation overcoming every interpersonal obstacle at work and home… There will never be enough game posts or discussion.

      LikeLike


  10. on August 30, 2015 at 4:18 pm FuriousFerret

    My theory about guys that obsess over Looks, Money, Status is that they do to prop up their own ego and to appeal to men. A good many know that women don’t necessarily care about those traits all that much but they care about it to compete with other men.

    The guys at Bodybuilding.com The Misc basically know the score more or less but they want model aesthetics and top tier wealth because that’s what they desire. They wouldn’t want a hot girl if they were a slob, they want to deem themselves worthy based on masculine metrics before they are awarded a hot girl.

    What they are doing kind of makes sense if you view through the long game. Men traditionally compete with other men to reach the top and then society throws them the hot chicks. Historically, women really haven’t had a say about who they fucked unless they did the clandestine way away from the judgmental eyes of the societal norms.

    My main point is that these Western males that want to be male models or millionaires want it for the prestige and soothe their own mental insecurities. They want a girl based on merit despite the fact that girls left to their own devices don’t even give a fuck. They are wired to like the base dark triad attributes that signaled the individual would climb the top of the tribe despite not actually holding that position yet.

    LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 8:32 pm Arbiter

      They want a girl based on merit despite the fact that girls left to their own devices don’t even give a fuck.

      So you do admit that other factors than game can influence the outcome.

      “male models or millionaires” – Strawman argument. CH has in the past written about various factors that are important when men and women are dating and a relationship is on the table. Would you write that CH then talks about being a male model or a millionaire?

      I wonder why the wheel constantly has to be reinvented here. Yes, it’s a great comfort to think that only confidence ever matters. Because it’s easy. Any niggah, any fat failure can have confidence. How strange then that there are many “men”, using the term loosely, who fail with women despite thinking they are the hottest shit ever. So a Jerome from the ghetto can have sex with any woman he wants because he has confidence? If you say no, then think about why. Realize that there must be other factors in play.

      LikeLike


      • on August 31, 2015 at 8:41 am FuriousFerret

        ” Yes, it’s a great comfort to think that only confidence ever matters. ”

        You have your own strawman argument. I didn’t say confidence is all that matters. In fact confidence doesn’t mean anything if you spew rotten game but it’s a key component to it.

        Being ugly will hinder you as in being a slob and/or obese. Those things are easily fixed though. Being fit with decent attainable style is good enough. Going crazy trying to be an Adonis is counter productive. Guys do it to compete with men, most women don’t care if you’re completely jacked or not.

        Non changeable facial aesthetics are the key to be good looks anyways. You either good looking or you’re not. Now you can screw up your looks if you get fat but most guys can’t work themselves into be good looking enough for that to be a draw for girls.

        It’s the same with money and job. If you are relying on those things to be your competitive advantage, then you have to have a lot of money or have a really cool job.

        Most men are clueless on the women which is why PUA works so well because it’s a whole in the market so average men can exploit it.

        LikeLike


  11. on August 30, 2015 at 4:36 pm Ohiomega

    This is the same empty horseshit

    [CH: this post really hit a nerve, eh?]

    of which dating advice for women is composed: “It’s not your body, honey; it’s about radiating feminine energy.”

    [sorry, nancy, don’t you know it’s different for men?
    rest of your comment snipped for carrying the stink of loser.]

    LikeLike


    • on August 31, 2015 at 1:53 am Glengarry

      Pull the plug on the vidya and porn. Lose 100 pounds of fat and start lifting so you look like a normal (but better) human. If possible go join some society where you can practise talking to men and women in a low-pressure setting. If you actually live in your mom’s basement, work towards moving out. Play the guitar badly without caring. Then come back here for the mental game.

      LikeLike


      • on August 31, 2015 at 6:38 am Ohiomega

        Thanks for proving my point. External >>>> internal.

        LikeLike


    • on August 31, 2015 at 7:02 am oink

      So you have not seen the hamster, yet.

      Believe me, a low-self regard obese fellow dweeb just like you, in that it has to be seen to be believed.

      Go forth, look for it, and stoap poasting! until you have seen it.

      LikeLike


    • on August 31, 2015 at 12:59 pm martin

      if it is all empty horseshit, what does it matter? you still are doomed with women. so if you are doomed, then what do you have to lose trying to talk to a large amount of women? you have nothing to lose, you agree yourself you stand no chance with women. what better reason than to completely embarrass yourself by getting rejected? I am doing this thing roosh recommended, approach 100 women and take notes, read a new book every 2 weeks, and so on (look it up). I didn’t go into this expecting to have a 1:1 approach to pickup ratio. It helps to know you have something to offer. so what’s good about you then? must be something you want to share. but don’t call me an expert.

      LikeLike


  12. on August 30, 2015 at 4:56 pm TangPolice

    CH, what’s your take on when a girl asks you what kind of girls you go for?

    [CH: if the asking girl is white, tell her you date asian girls. always good for a negative reaction.]

    Lately i’ve been going “aspirational”. As in, whatever i think the girl *wants* to be, but is not, i always go with that.
    eg. if she’s shy, i go “confident”. Ditzy, i go “intelligent” etc.
    If she’s feminist i say i like a girl who’s not afraid to show her vulnerability.
    If she’s absolutely perfect in every way, then i go with “i cannot resist a girl who can make me laugh” though this is really annoying as she’ll spend the night trying to impress you with her “quirky” (read: not funny) humor.

    [if she’s “perfect” (no girl truly is), tell her you go for girls who have a small flaw because you think that’s charming.]

    Would be interesting to get your take on this? is there ever an instance where you should validate her?

    [i like your tact. you’re basically compelling girls to pre-qualify themselves to you. if she’s already attracted to you, and the mood has shifted to a smooth getting to know you vibe, that’s when you should validate something about her.]

    LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 6:29 pm TangPolice

      [if she’s “perfect” (no girl truly is), tell her you go for girls who have a small flaw because you think that’s charming.]

      Yoink. Stolen.

      Thank you sir.

      Just on the “i’m a sucker for a girl who can make me laugh”..i’ve started using that as a Tinder profiler, and it appears to be working well. It instantly disqualifies ALL girls yet shows them that i’m the kinda guy capable of laughing at their jokes. It has a ‘push’ and a ‘pull’ built into itself. A twofer.

      It also appeals to the feminists (i have a fetish for feminists – i have no idea why). Feminists just want – i feel – to be treated like a guy, but a guy who has to put no effort into actually doing all the responsible guy things like garnering respect and social status among peers. It’s for this reason that “comedienne” would be a predictable aspirational goal for a feminist. Just you have to listen to her trying to be funny which is generally painful.

      “if she’s already attracted to you, and the mood has shifted to a smooth getting to know you vibe, that’s when you should validate something about her.”

      Back to standard push pull game. Gotcha. Cheers CH.

      LikeLike


      • on August 30, 2015 at 6:47 pm TangPolice

        Ohh annd “i’m a sucker for girls who can make me laugh”

        Has been working even better for me. Not only does it have the inbuilt push and pull, qualifier/disqualifier, the plural girls intimates an abundance of them. Like i’ve got a hareem of cute manic pixie dream girls making me laugh constantly.

        I wish. But whatever. They don’t know that.

        LikeLike


  13. on August 30, 2015 at 5:57 pm l82dagame

    CH, how do you reconcile this with Trump’s recent remarks: “I complain and complain and I whine and whine until I win”

    LikeLike


    • on August 30, 2015 at 6:39 pm Curious

      Are you still following the billboard hot 100?

      LikeLike


  14. on August 30, 2015 at 6:19 pm Open Letter To A Loser In Love | Reaction Times

    […] Source: Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  15. on August 30, 2015 at 8:27 pm Tony

    My way; though I’m sure there are many here that prefer the Frank Sinatra version better:

    LikeLike


  16. on August 30, 2015 at 11:18 pm Carlos Danger

    Maxim tells you to buy cool cars and threads because that’s what their sponsor sells.

    LikeLike


  17. on August 31, 2015 at 7:16 am menckenhitchens

    Whenever anyone addresses those who haven’t reached a the standard set by those who consider themselves success’s it always amounts to preaching. When someone has some decent advice which doesn’t essentially boil down to gloating from a perspective of hubris- specifically about why everything’s subsequently shitty for specifically you & nobody else then maybe it’ll be listening to. Until that time comes when those with influence, power & privilege are able to decently, willingly acknowledge that there’s isn’t some genetic factor preprogrammed for success & lording this arrogance over their, “inferiors” then there’s nothing much to listen to. On the other hand I’ll keep my ears tuned for the possibility of decent signalling in-case that that ever changes & happily be on my way.

    LikeLike


  18. on August 31, 2015 at 8:46 am El Doofus

    As a middle aged virgin who’ll be 50 next year, I have a few observations.

    First of all, it’s one item on a personality and life experience profile: If you’re at a stamp collectors club, barber shop quartet, marathoners, car enthusiast club, Mensa meeting or anything else you’ll find a range of people who are successful/unsuccessful, happy/unhappy, left/middle/right, this or that. To say that men are unsuccessful in sex and love for a single reason is unlikely.

    In fact, when people assume there’s one reason, that single reason tells you quite a lot about them.

    In my case, sex and love seemed to be infinitely remote to my experience, having been raised by severely mentally ill adults and alcoholics. True as an adult I am responsible for my life but it never — and you’ll have to believe me — actually occurred to me that women would be interested in me and that I should have a sex life and romantic life until I was in the middle of my third decade.

    Let me help you visualize it: however many women I’ve met, maybe with one exception, there’s never been any next step. Meaning, I can relate to women intellectually, politically, socially but the idea of a step beyond that is as infinitely remote as a Victorian needing to figure out how to install Linux.

    Additionally I’d observe that like extraverts dominate the conversation, the people who are great at casual sex are actually a minority.

    However, I’d like to make an observation that you may find interesting. I obviously don’t go waving it like a flag, what I have noticed is that some people go absolutely incandescent when they figure it out and really take it out on you. I mean, that I’ve fucked up this aspect of my life is one thing, why does it trigger a fight/flight response in others?

    When this specific type of woman figures it out she wonders why she couldn’t see what apparently every other woman has been able to see so she questions her own judgement. And takes it out on you.

    The next thing is that there’s an existential angst that it can suddenly expose in people’s psychologies. To have someone who’s economically successful in front of you who’s never been validated as worthy of affection by anyone really unsettles people deep inside their own personalities. I guess it strums a deep bass note inside their own insecurities.

    In the end, I’ve harmed only myself and I’m the one responsible.

    LikeLike


  19. on August 31, 2015 at 9:10 am KevinV

    I don’t doubt for a second that confidence, manliness and attitude are key, but I also have come to believe through long experience that some physical traits can be debiliating to a man’s sexual market value even if a man has those three.

    Things like red hair (highly valued sexually by men, nearly a deal-breaker for most women), very fair skin or an “open” face (meaning, a friendly look rather than a stern or tough look) can be very damaging and there is nothing the man can do about it.

    [CH: is this comment a put-on? red hair debilitating? ah no. get it cropped close and it will hardly matter. very fair skin is also no big deal. darker-skinned women sometimes prefer fairer skinned men, and you can always get a tan. an “open” look can be changed simply by squinting a little bit.]

    I’m all for tough love, and I’m grateful that there is at least the recogniztion that stature does matter–another unchangeable physical characteristic that some Game writers insist also isn’t decisive when it obviously is–but the girls don’t say tall, dark and handsome for nothing.

    [please, you “only looks matter to women” trolls are defeated. by reality and by science. why keep banging your heads against a wall?]

    LikeLike


  20. on August 31, 2015 at 10:28 am A.B.

    And in further support of the what the Open Letter says….

    “The most inspiring love story you’ll ever read: How a rugby player who was paralysed in a match fought back to ski, complete marathon… and win the woman of his dreams”

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3216363/The-inspiring-story-ll-read-rugby-player-paralysed-match-teenager-fought-ski-complete-marathon-job-law-firm.html

    LikeLike


  21. on August 31, 2015 at 12:24 pm McGonzo

    Speaking of losers, I was perusing the website of Doc Love (basically a pregame vendor) and ran across this bit:

    “Violet is now with me every weekend. She stays over and sleeps in the same bed as me. We cuddle in bed and whenever I attempt a more romantic gesture, she rebuffs me in a firm but friendly way.”

    The author is 28 years old. Are there really very many 28 YOs that are that crazy beta in this day and age of free game material all over the internet? I’m incredulous and wonder if the vendor just creates these letters. . .

    LikeLike


  22. on August 31, 2015 at 2:06 pm Anton

    “All you have to do is decide to tap it.” (Heh).

    LikeLike


  23. on August 31, 2015 at 2:54 pm Gurney Halleck

    In the modern sexual marketplace, a subset of men quite NATURALLY possess an advantage analogous to the advantage most women possess in their teenage years to mid to late 20s. An omega male is as likely to make himself into an alpha as a 40 year old woman is as likely to become as pretty as her younger self at 20. Some pills are too bitter to swallow and sadly the peddling of “Game” and “PUA” is nothing more the sale of false hope to omega males. The only men whom game can especially help are men already advantaged in the SMP become even more successful. The sexual marketplace is becoming Darwinian and ruthless and disadvantageous to many males without the assistance of strict monogamous norms. The only recourse for left-behind men is to argue that the sexual marketplace be deregulated even further by allowing legal prostitution.

    LikeLike


    • on August 31, 2015 at 3:11 pm oink

      cool story, bro

      LikeLike


    • on August 31, 2015 at 3:46 pm martin

      yes, in fact, if you look at the direction the sexual marketplace is heading, all omegas and betas will likely be turned into slaves within a few years where they will be castrated and forced to work by women who will then have sex with the alphas exclusively. the women might be so disgusted with the omegas and betas that they may send them off to Mars. it’s funny how the betas are basically building their own Mars colony they will be forced to live on in the future.

      LikeLike


    • on August 31, 2015 at 5:15 pm Hakim Pepper

      Looks open doors and that’s significant for someone who doesn’t have it, but for the attractive man he still has some steps to go before bustin nuts.

      LikeLike


  24. on August 31, 2015 at 3:46 pm itsjx

    Reblogged this on XWorkx.

    LikeLike


  25. on August 31, 2015 at 5:31 pm DMC

    Looks and money matter to women a lot. Looks are the only thing that matters to men and everything else is gravy. Having looks and/or money and/or charm is what gives you the alpha attitude because they lead to getting pussy and getting pussy is what makes you aloof.

    LikeLike


  26. on August 31, 2015 at 8:12 pm Lichthof

    My thoughts

    Game can lift the lowest man. I have seen it.
    Vibe Protection is important. Too much Mano sphere writings are negative and can ruin 6 our vibe with women. Game should be 90% action, 10% reading.
    Women do look for alpha traits it is that easy. That said I would rather be a sigma. An alpha for me is too dependent on the group he leads. He needs validation by that group which almost makes him subservient in an ironic way. An alpha must perform constantly. A sigma is a snideyes cool dude who can pick and choose when years wants to get alpha and is living in total freedom.

    LikeLike


  27. on September 1, 2015 at 10:28 am swebf

    I suggest to any “loser” who can’t get laid (sometimes a kissless virgin can still be successful in other areas of his life) to use my special technique. I call it “Serial Killer Game”.

    It’s pretty simple, you just murder a bunch of innocent, pretty ladies, make sure to do this with a lot of caution and try to kill as much as you can without getting caught.

    Omce you get caught, which will happen eventually, enjoy the love letters and sex visits on prison, you are welcome.

    Well I might be a murderous psychopath, but at least I am not a “loser”, the things I don’t do for love…

    LikeLike


  28. on September 1, 2015 at 10:34 am swebf

    And another thing, do not allow women to decide who is going to be a “loser” or not, men have died in wars simply to not be considered one by the sluts in his country, don’t be that man.

    LikeLike


  29. on September 5, 2015 at 3:28 am xclampa

    Oh Heartiste. Believe it or not, but I would give a million for a guy who actually can be open about what’s bothering him.
    Also, real badassery? It’s not the I don’t give a fuck attitude imo, it’s the I give a fuck, I genuinely know what I want and how I want to respond to the situation.

    Been reading your blog for a couple of years.

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Recent Comments

    Amon Ra on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    Amon Ra on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    Amon Ra on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    Captain John Charity… on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    Dread Forman on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Captain John Charity… on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    boned on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    jOHN MOSBY on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    Bucky on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    Sentient on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
  • Top Posts

    • Cesar Sayoc, "White Male" (& Deep State Updates)
    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Comment Of The Week: The Left's Cultural Reign Is Over
    • Tourette's Game
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
    • When The Jumbotron Test Is Crushed
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • "Conspiracy Theory" Conspiracy
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: