Despite the glib title, this is a serious post.
Men have problems approaching women for makelove and pieceinourtime. Ok, the men from the ice people races, mostly. This is a fact. There are theories why men find it so difficult to cold approach women and chat them up with the goal of bedroom hijinks, some of which might have predictive power. Finding the source of men’s approach anxiety would help motivated and aspiring womanizers figure out plans of attack to overcome the AA psychological hurdle.
(It is plausible that approach anxiety evolved from a reality of the distant EEA past when chatting up a strange woman in your tribe or a neighboring tribe could easily get you killed by her brother, father, lover, or the jealous cavebeta orbiter.)
Most pickup sites recommend immersion therapy: learn to love the crash and burn and the preemptive exit as you small talk your way through hundreds of women in a week’s time.
This is not a horrible strategy compared to the alternative for most men: staring at a cute girl from a distance and later masturbating to the cortically embedded visual of her enticing form. But it suffers from one major drawback. There’s no getting around the perception that you are the pursuer, and she the pursued. Not normally a big deal for more experienced men, but for beginners this heavily biased pre-pickup perception means they face an uphill battle getting girls invested in their spiel. Conversations will wind up being short and curt, and that’s no good for a newbie who needs the face and tongue time to improve his social mechanics.
There’s a better beginner exercise that won’t mentally tax your average frustrated neophyte as much as the immersion strategy does. Do you live in a city with a lot of street hawkers and open air social justice hucksters? You know, Greenpeace granolas, Planned Parenthood slutolas, Black Lives Matter shinolas, constantly soliciting passersby with supremely earnest requests for support and thrusting pamphlets or donation list clipboards at you?
These are the shitlib randos you should approach. They aren’t going anywhere, they won’t reject you, and they are pursuing YOU not the other way around. You should practice your conversational chops on these Merchants of Mewl, especially the cute girls.
It will be much easier to get feedback on your game from them because their instinct to insta-reject you for a clumsy blurt is neutralized by the preexisting social dynamic. Go ahead and neg that Occupy Wombchute girl, tease her, flirt with her. She’s been loitering on that sidewalk corner all day, desperate for a little attention and a little love for her cause. She’ll be more forgiving of your beta bumblings, but she won’t stop being a woman, which means you’ll still get honest feedback from her mannerisms, her smile, her eye gleam, and the direction of her body sway, all of which will betray her arousal, or lack thereof, under the tutelage of your incipiently alpha presence.
An addendum: I would bet 90% of the male readers who are interested in improving their charisma to attract and date cute girls won’t do a damn thing with the knowledge droppage that happens at CH. So, it is with a note of bittersweetness that CH continues to pump out posts like this one. Yet we soldier on. Why? Because 90% isn’t 100%. If someone saved a beta today, it will all be worth it.

Poor dudes need all the help they can get. I think they will probably still fuck this up. Anyway, find the chics pushing puppy and kitty care. The humane society, etc. Lots of young, cute chics. Maybe even go to the humane society and shop for puppies. Not cats. Cat shopping might send the wrong message. Especially if you’re new at this.
LikeLike
That shiznat might also serve as a filter to produce only the loneliest and horniest libtarded chicks. The danger for Pro-Life dudes is that they will also be pro-Murder. Ergo no V@g, just An@l.
LikeLike
Find them? How the fuck can you miss them anymore? They’re everywhere. One of my prerequisites before closing is: Am I gonna have to make your dog sleep on the floor where it belongs?
Seriously, getting laid is great, but I can’t deal with anymore fucking fag-ass breeds of dog trying to slime palms. Or any but THE MOST unobtrusive, mostly non-shedding cats. I refuse to leave one more bed covered with pet hair. “Just no.”
LikeLike
The last 3 girls I slept with at their place had dogs in the bed. It’s absolutely maddening. I’d like to get laid without having some furry animal staring at me. And I like dogs.
LikeLike
If you are at all masculine and direct and better yet right wing, it’s easy to pick up drippy lefty wing politichicks, particularly the hot ones. They probably think we’re evil (which is hot to them, right?), and they can change us or something, and to a hot chick a guy who doesn’t give a shit what she thinks and can laugh about it has to be interesting. Should be an easy approach to make. Stride up, chat about the cause-of-the-day, argue just a little and just a touch dismissively (not scornfully, just a little condescendingly), say something that makes them qualify themselves to you, like, “I really don’t agree with you but I’ll let you try to talk me out of it over a cup of coffee. When do you get off?”
If it doesn’t work, wander off happily, there’ll be a new college aged cutie soliciting for another lefty cause on the same street corner the next day. Doesn’t matter what university they’re in, they all just got off the short bus. You got to hand it to that kapo George Soros for generously funding the non-profit groups that are organizing this buffet on your behalf every single day, rain or shine. And it’s great, because if you haven’t yet bagged a commie for mommy, you aren’t much of an American and George S. Patton could come back from the dead at any moment and slap you for it. And whatever you do, don’t sign her petition or give money to the cause, although you can promise her you’ll sign it if she’s good.
LikeLike
100% true.
LikeLike
“bagged a commie for mommy”
This blog just gets better and better.
LikeLike
I like glib titles.
LikeLike
I read that as “I like glib titties”.
LikeLike
[…] By CH […]
LikeLike
I have never ever ever had a problem approaching women. Within the last year I once approached 16 women within 2 min. (“Wanna dance?”) and got shot down by the 1st 15. The 16th (HB7) was interested and immediately hit me with two 5h1t tests.
ZFG. That should be my handle.
I have seen one 10 in the last two years. I was one of the two men who approached her. Without even realizing it I began gaming her because the attraction was so strong and she responded by upqualifying me. My autistic inhibitions went out the window. Totally surprised me.
If someone wants me to wing for them at a country bar with a dance floor bigger than a postage stamp and will help with my costs to visit you, contact me on my blog in About.
LikeLike
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ZFG
LikeLike
This will increase your pickup rate — instead of “wanna dance”, take her hand and gently pull toward dance floor while saying “let’s dance”. You are making it an order instead of a question.
If she says no, you can tease with how come you hate having fun, or yeah you’d probably embarrass me with your bad dancing.
LikeLike
Betas ask questions, Alphas issue commands. In the broader public, the danger would be in grabbing the hand of a batsh!t crazy femc*nt, but that personality type ought not be in the dance hall [unless it’s on a pilgrimage in search of outrage].
LikeLike
Pulling a broad towards the dance floor is a backup plan for me along with “let’s dance”. Generally I use it if the woman is just shy about dancing but is submissive. Just approaching is plenty masculine and getting rejected but plugging on pings girls’ man-dar heavily. Rejections are a plus.
Best plan is to cultivate the ZFG (Zero Fucks Given) attitude to create a titanium inner frame.
Yul Brynner was arguably more masculine and sexually desirable than Robert Downey, Jr. despite Downey being more likeable. Brynner v. Chuck Norris, who is very personable? Brynner wins hands down.
ZFG is the way to go.
LikeLike
Ha ha funny post CH.. Love the wordsmithing:
“Greenpeace granolas, Planned Parenthood slutolas, Black Lives Matter shinolas..”
LikeLike
[…] This One Weird Trick To Get Over Approach Anxiety […]
LikeLike
Is this your honest assessment that 90% of your readers do not approach women?
Personally I start by asking girls for directions on the street to warm up my brain for real approaches with intent.
I feel the main benefit I’ve gotten from this blog has been the “stick” side of learning game. Most PUA sites/videos tend to offer you “the carrot” with views of them nailing girls. I think the main value this site provides is the sheer pain you will feel without learning the art of charm
Thanks CH
– Your Swarthy reader
LikeLike
That addendum at the end of the post was put there to justify the transitioning of Game blog to white nationalist (heil trump) blog.
LikeLike
Come on, t*h*w*a*c*k, whiteboy, james blonde. This is the best game you’ve got? Avaunt, race-baiting Sambo…
LikeLike
GE, a little off-topic, but “nicole” is a Mossad psy-ops initiative, involving one or more PhDs/MDs in Behavioral Psych/Psychiatry. They’re probing you [personally] to see which lines of attack will work on a TradC0n.
LikeLike
Anal probing? That’s an alien thing, no?
LikeLike
Li’l Mordecai, as you well know, it’s an@l probing of what Uber-Sanhedrin Ziggy Freud called the Id/Ego/Super-Ego. Ol’ Ziggy himself, wit dat whole “An@l Retentive” fixation thing uh hiz.
LikeLike
Guys, pay attention to the avatar!
I appreciate this other guy picking up my light work, but I don’t want to take credit for it.
LikeLike
Well, she’s definitely a shill of some sort, but even her sometimes high-falottin’ rhetoric is just so much n1gger-babble, for those with true discernment and WHAT is being said, rather than the SOUND of it.
So don’t go making shit shine by thinking there’s any high degree of learning there… her babble, and that of those like her, is sophomore-level at best.
And for the record, I don’t view myself as a TradCon… I’m not interested in resurrecting the old, I’m looking forward to the birth of the new.
LikeLike
I wouldn’t say shill Hattie’s n1gger-babble shows at the graduate level… usual mere-sound rhetoric that her ilk often evince, and which is mistaken for being “well-spoken”.
And if the Mossad has a hand in it, well… they seem to be going down the same path as our breast-feeding go grrl Army.
LikeLike
And for the record, I don’t think of myself as a TradCon… that’s more for the ‘Murrican who thinks this is still “the best nation on earth”.
LikeLike
GE, trust me, they’re probing you. “t*h*w*a*c*k” was Version 1.0. “nicole” is Version 2.0. They’re trying to find cover stories and fictional personae which cause you to let down your guard and engage with them as though they were real humans. All the while they’re trying to plant seeds of doubt in your mind.
LikeLike
Doubt has long been the Devil’s trick and most potent weapon.
The only thing they’re making me doubt is their credibility to find their own ass with both hands… although in the negress’s case, just walking along with arms swinging naturally would suffice.
LikeLike
Captain Obvious revealing the batshit-crazy paranoia that separate normal Jew-critics from people like him.
LikeLike
Nicole has been here since around 2008. I liked her as a commenter but the past five years have changed a lot of things. We’ve hardened ourselves after reality slapped us into understanding that other races, ALL other races hate us with an elemental, envy-borne black flame of hate.
As Generation Identitaire said, Khader is not our frere.
While it’s strange that an American black female is living in Israel, as I recall it she said that she had been married to an Israeli and divorced him.
LikeLike
That’s the problem, PA… you let one in and pretty soon there goes the neighborhood…
.I still remember the times in the not-too-distant past when I was about the only one slapping down her nonsense.
And towards the end lifespan of even recent threads, where she always tries to get in her final snipes unchallenged, I was the Lone Ranger.
Like the rest of her ilk, the one or two sentences of rare cogency are not worth the volumes of n1gger-babble… so knock off the “I sometimes enjoy” bizarro-world white knighting of these harpies. 😡
LikeLike
Mr Mitchell
Seriously, do you have enough time between chics to give us a breakdown of the % of game to ‘WN’ posts? The way you see it anyway. Cheers
LikeLike
In other words, Mitchell, perhaps you should frequent sites that are more to your tastes.
LikeLike
I already hang out on the gay S&M sites way too much…
LikeLike
But… muh dick…
LikeLike
…
LikeLike
Though you are being a snarky little cunt, you are exactly correct.
Faster, please. The social observation component of this revolution is complete and very well documented, particularly when it comes to the battle of the sexes. Hell, it is manifest in the frontrunner and the debate stage of one of the two major parties in this country.
CH: Preen and congratulate yourself, but then back to the chess board. How to prepare for five moves ahead? We are transitioning back to the state of nature after the temporary insanity of feminism. How do we heighten the contradictions? How do we immanentize the eschaton? You are resting on laurels nearly a decade old when you are positioned by virtue of your credibility to apply your occult wisdom to great things.
The most pressing tactical issue: how do we transition from anonymity and pseudonymity to unapologetic declaration? How do we pledge our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor?
Matt
LikeLike
* “it is manifest in the frontrunner and the debate stage of one of the two major parties in this country” :
LikeLike
Hey, if it’s good enough for Ann Coulter…
Then again, there doesn’t seem to be enough FU money to go around, and most men still have to work in this town.
LikeLike
We should pool the Fuck You Money. Along the lines of Charles Murray’s Madison Fund.
LikeLike
For some of us more introverted icepeoples, AA never fully goes away. Ive been approaching 10 years and still get it. trying to eliminate it becomes futile.. far better to accept it and just admit you have an emotional cost to approaching. its freeing.. you’ll approach while nervous and feel it melt away.
mystery’s 3 second rule is good fundamental as well.
LikeLike
The 3 second rule is pure gold…but for me the AA or hesitation to approach doesn’t come from “What if she blows me off?” but rather “What if she responds and gives me IOI’s?” Then it becomes anxiety over whether I’m in the “state” to continue. Most girls will open a window for you to crawl through. How you pry open that window is a factor of your game.
If I’m even hesitant for a second, it’s off.
Last week I went out to a dance party. I met a tall, younger HB8 with a sultry voice and big eyes. I gamed her. She got lipstick on my collar and started apologizing profusely. “I’ll send you the bill” I said with amused mastery.
She repeated this–I got this as another IOI. “I’m sure you’ll find a way to make it up to me.”
The dance ended I escorted her back and said “I’ll come back if there’s another song I like…”
She left a short time later and I never did number close. I may or may not see her again. But in retrospect I was nervous because she was sitting with some people I knew and blah blah blah…I rationalized it and played it way too cool and didn’t get the result.
Boldness is crucial…breaking through your own comfort zone it the key.
LikeLike
Keep posting. You have no idea of the great impact you are having. Been reading for years and this is my first post. You have made a great difference in my life…great difference.
More to come. Please keep the Game posts going.
LikeLike
Have you started from the first post and read everything? Including the comments/replies and the links provided therein? The conversations are honest and many embedded links are gateways to like-minded communities. CH is a quality college. Cheers
LikeLike
I found an old guide on Roosh’s site that recommends approaching 100 women and taking notes to start, something I mentioned doing before here. I have approached about 20 women in two months. He says you should be doing 2 per day but this is really unrealistic for various reasons. There aren’t really that many women and they may be rapidly walking away from you for example. Approach anxiety never goes away, I just find ways to deal with it. My belief is it comes from simply not knowing people. We have a very stratified society. It’s easy to talk to friends but not strangers. So I believe social network game is more natural and better but you have to approach people if just for the experience.
LikeLike
pussy
LikeLike
is good
LikeLike
“If someone saved a beta today, it will all be worth it.”
I’m sorry but this itself is beta. That you’re so desperate to balance your ego, you’ll take a concession like that.
People, myself included, and the never-ending search for meaning is highly beta…
LikeLike
My secret to mastering approach anxiety involves checking for police around the corner and setting off a car alarm in the other direction.
rape!
LikeLike
What do you use to clean up the DNA? Clorox? Ammonia?
LikeLike
A barrel full of Hydrochloric acid.
Science nerd rape!
LikeLike
My money is on fire and gasoline.
LikeLike
By helping unmanly beta’s score with chicks you are insuring that they will have offspring and dooming civilization.
LikeLike
civilization needs some betas. Was Isaac Newton spinning plates? Think Tim Berners-Lee doesn’t get approach anxiety?
Anyways, your argument assumes beta is a genetic defect, but for a good number of men the path to lesser alphadom is simply unlearning all the lies they’ve been taught their whole lives and embracing their true masculine instincts.
LikeLike
Learning to seduce women works in the same way as learning a trade or language. At first, you struggle, but after hardwork, it pays off. IOW, men are capable of leaving their beta ways in the past to become the master seducer for the rest of their days.
LikeLike
The wave of betatude nowadays is more nurture than nature, so that argument doesn’t really work.
LikeLike
So it’s Nietzsche versus nurture, then?
LikeLike
That implies that alpha/beta is 100% genetic and that enviorment has nothing to do with it. Do you know why males were far more successful in traditional societies? Let me give you a hint: It involves male role models and Brotherhoods that passed on valuable wisdom. Even the most natural alphas can still learn a thing or two, so how about coming down from that soapbox?
LikeLike
Another blue-pill beta boy all upset about men talking? Run along home, yo’ mama’s calling you to do the dishes, and you’d better get that choreplay done if you want your nightly kiss on the cheek.
LikeLike
Wrong wrong wrong.
Betas are the BACKBONE of civilisation.
That’s one of the fundamental teachings of this blog. We WANT the betas to know game, so that they can win women, bed them, marry them, get them pregnant, and have a reason to produce wealth and build civilisation back up.
LikeLike
I’m personally 1 for 1 with this approach, with a former cover model and a 30+ year age gap. The college student who is being paid not very much to stand on a street corner handing out fliers is bored as hell, especially if she has any kind of brain in her head at all, and not only that is approaching you. Ask her to some kind of sophisticated artistic event that flatters her intelligence. Her self opinion is already low because she is doing menial work well below her.
LikeLike
At least this title didn’t lead to a popup of someone trying to sell you something.
LikeLike
This is really good advice…
I also recommend bored shop girls and cleaning girls.
If you approach them at the right time you can just be a distraction in an otherwise boring day. Security girls, night watch ladies, night desk clerks.. etc all good dry run simulators.
LikeLike
shop girls
LikeLike
This post was good advice
LikeLike
Viktor Frankl used to help his patients get over their anxieties by telling them to amplify their fear to the point of absurdity.
He told one patient who would sweat profusely in social situations to try to sweat as much as he possibly could. By making a game out of his anxiety, the guy got over it completely after a few weeks.
Perhaps you could do the same thing with approach anxiety.
LikeLike
My band played last night, and I made a few interesting observations about approaching. First, being in a band is very useful because of the status it affords; almost everybody wants to talk to you. Moreover, it gives you a reason to open anyone in the venue, mixed set, one girl, five girls–doesn’t matter. “Hey, thanks for coming, guys. Who are you here to see?” etc.
But beyond that, opening so many sets consecutively helped me get into a rhythm and boosted my confidence as a result. I feel like I can do that again in situations where nobody knows me, because the interactions are mostly the same once you start talking.
I don’t like to drink when I play, so I had no crutch to push past any approach anxiety. Plus there was no chance of engaging in any alcohol-fueled stupidity. I was also able to pay attention to subtle social cues I would have missed had I been drunk.
I met two very good prospects. The first I opened as I was bouncing from group to group. It turned out that we knew a lot of the same people from being in the same line of work, which gave me plenty to work with, lots of opportunities to tell DHV stories and build comfort. I was able to split her off from her friends without even trying. Being known probably helped here. The bar was closing and we got kicked off the patio mid-conversation. I lost track of her in the shuffle out to the parking lot. I’ll probably see her again, so there’s a chance I could pick up where I left off.
I got a number from the second one. I’ll comment more on her if this post gets through mod.
LikeLike
The advice here was immediately useful to me, so I threw 100 bucks in the tip jar. It’s the least I could do for showing me how to get a blowjob and nude pics from a really hot woman.
LikeLike
R.Don Steele in his classic “How to Date Young Women for Men Over 35” advises environmental causes and political action groups as being fertile hunting grounds.
LikeLike
So does this start the Scalzi Divorce Countdown Clock?
http://whatever.scalzi.com/2015/09/18/why-is-this-woman-smiling/
LikeLike
Obama nominates first openly gay service secretary to lead Army
http://s2.reutersmedia.net/resources/r/?m=02&d=20150918&t=2&i=1080501307&w=644&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&sq=&r=LYNXNPEB8H17C
LikeLike
Reggie Love ?
LikeLike
What about girls that work in retail?
LikeLike
Take it a step further. Approach *every* female. The aged clerk at the grocery store — she’ll be receptive to a bit of flirt. The the fat barista at Starbucks — ask her to be sure she makes yours with love. The scrawny receptionist at your barber shop — tell her to make a mental note for a before and after comparison. Your sister’s stupid friend. Your mom’s cousin, Shirley. Every female.
Just get used to charming. If you can make these girls you don’t care about giggle, you can do it to the hotties, too. And that giggle is a great step one.
LikeLike
Eh, I believe that approach anxiety is basically driven by the amygdala. One or two rejections, especially nuclear ones, drives a deep pattern of fear into the brain, and the only way to get rid of that bad memory / pattern is to file it down bit by bit with good ones. So yeah, approach and approach and approach. Flirt without shame, with ZFG. Totally agree “get used to charming”. If you get one giggle or knowing smirk from a barrista, that’s success. You don’t get over AA in one day or one encounter, but it can be surprising how fast that wears down under a steady barrage of approaches.
ZFG. Or if you like, What Would Trump Do? Yeah, WWTD.
LikeLike
This is spot-on. I adopted this tactic four years ago and went from introvert moody dark seducer to most charming. I now assume Mr Charming to be part of my base persona around women. Women love charm and lightness after enduring the orbiter’s drudging, doctrinaire equalism (“I really admire feminism” says Beta Bob to the HB7). It’s so easy to get women to light up if you are practicing every day.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Ice people? pieceinourtime? cavebeta? OK, this site is going off the rails when it is no longer comprehensible to ordinary people. This sounds like insider talk taken from a circle-jerk of other websites. It’s really sad because when you look into the archives the older posts are quite sane and to the point. They deliver brutal truths with little rancor and the commenters are all discussing the various points disclosed. But stuff like this? Incomprehensible. Off-putting. What are new users supposed to think?
LikeLike
Horseshit, using the training wheels, bowling lane protectors and arm bands.. throw yourself in the pool and learn to swim.
LikeLike
Pro tip: You’ll have to dig through the CH archives (see why nurses make the easiest lays), but mill around your local high volume city hospital with repute, especially ones equipped to handle trauma care. Park yourself around the SBUX and fire up Wi-Fi and watch-em roll on up, one after another. Careful with the Psych nurses though, high chance you might run into a Cluster B, and you newly educated matrix deniers holding on to the last gasp of the blue pill, won’t be able to see the forest through the bush. Haven’t trained your brain yet..
LikeLike
“Cavebeta orbiter”
This is why ch is my favorite blog.
LikeLike
Solid advice CH.
I also recommend shop assistants, obviously cute ones.
The dynamic is slightly different but still on the continuum of them chasing you(‘re wallet).
Beware the disheartening realisation that most pretty girls are fillet steak wrapped around nothingness.
It’s your job to fill that nothingness. Then leave when the steak goes off.
LikeLike
I was introduced to CH 3 years ago by a super alpha coworker. It changed/saved my life. So proud to be a member of the top ten percentile. Thank you with all my heart.
LikeLike
Xander from BtVS?
LikeLike
CH, what do you think about this approach for newbies? I’m teaching my late-teens cousins this tactic.
Find the hottest women in every situation, and ONLY APPROACH THEM. they are likely to produce the most anxiety, but there is no substitute for logging the time and experience. Every minute spend chatting up a 10 makes you more skilled at chatting up a 10. The conversation itself should be the goal, just to log the hours. Get on the fucking bike and fall off a few times. Skip past the training wheels.
Benefits:
1. If you score, it’s a fucking home run and confidence builder
2. If you get rejected, there’s no shame in getting rejected by a 10. Happens to the best of us.
3. 9s and 10s, for various reasons espoused here and elsewhere in the manosphere, tend to have sweeter dispositions and are approached less than 6s, 7s, and 8s. This results in less Bitch Backturns.
LikeLike
Since i truely did not give a crap I would ask girls out for my friends. That way you really don’t care about rejection since they are rejecting your friends,
LikeLike
A strategy discovered in pre-internet times via the natural selection of hit and miss: WWDRD (What would Don Rickles do?) Why this worked remained mysterious, instigating cynical brooding on female nature. Why on earth would anyone respond to megalomania and sarcastic cruelty? Without the framework of evo bio, explanations remained puddle deep: ’cause I’m funny, Fate, and derp. In retrospect, this involved a Dresden bombing of disqualification, negs, indifference, and an almost sociopathic unfamiliarity with the concept of sorry.
In ancient times, we didn’t have phones. You woke up with numbers scrawled on your palm, on napkins in pockets, often with no accompanying name or memory of the owner. WWDRD usually involved too much booze, which isn’t a reliable solution to AA. (Hell, yes it is. That’s what booze is for.)
LikeLike
Anxiety doesn’t go away because of “practice”. It can go away in the moment once one gets moving and everything is okay but then the next day or even an hour later it starts over again like a computer being rebooted. It’s like the whole successful episode never happened.
LikeLike
Nonsense. Conditioning works on any mammal. A person fraught with anxieties will still be an anxious person but the event triggering the anxiety can be turned into a non-trigger through exposure. Because psychology.
LikeLike
Trigger? That’s something entirely different as far as I am concerned. That’s more of a PTSD type response. Something triggers feelings from the past. Anxiety isn’t triggered, it’s essentially always there and not just for selective things like approaching women. It’s there for everything. Even for things that have 100% gone right that have been done thousands of times. It can be put aside in the moment, it can be fought through, it can become easier to fight through but the next morning there it is again.
LikeLike
This has gotta be an application for virtual reality.
They’ve been using VR for PTSD as well as arachnophobia etc. the thing is- even crude representations of the feared object or situation (think computer graphics from 10 years ago) are sufficient to trigger the subconscious into full panic mode.
Eventually the arachnophobe is wading through vats full of spiders, and the beta through flats full of pussy.
LikeLike
Seems my reply didn’t make it. Anyway if it has a ‘trigger’ it’s not what I was talking about. Sure something that only happens with a specific trigger can be conditioned away, it can be made like everything else. But anxiety the way I see it is always there, it’s the normal condition, it is everything else. It doesn’t go away with “practice” a peak might be ground down close to baseline but it doesn’t go away.
LikeLike
WTF is wrong with being scared of spiders?
LikeLike
For the record, I think that most spiders are pretty dadgum awesome, but gee whiz, you don’t want to get bit by any of them – not even the ostensibly “non-toxic” spiders – because you never know when your immune system might throw a case of anaphylactic shock at you.
LikeLike
In reply to captain Obvious-
Obviously a healthy respect for spiders has been evolutionarily advantageous, but there are people who take it too far, to the detriment of being unable to work or otherwise function due to their compulsive checking for spiders,
LikeLike
You’re right, B. It doesn’t go away. It’s the base state. Mystery once described it as jumping into a cold pool when you’re dry: even though you’ve done it how many times before, the feeling is still there. Same with AA.
LikeLike
Same idea with strip clubs. They will approach you, they will let you talk at them as long as you want. Plus they will laugh at your jokes. Key is to tip as little as humanly possible. Do not look like a meal ticket. Make her work for it, keep it out of reach. This is also the best advice for taking a stripper home if one is so inclined.
I did this to great effect when I was short on time to interact with women and raw, post divorce after 20 years of oneitis.
I was reading privateman’s blog the other day and his friend Boris does the same. Calls it his flight simulator.
LikeLike
Hang around college campuses. These days there are more women than men attending college — it’s like 60:40.
LikeLike
It’s a matter of daily regret that the world of CH was opened to me so late in life. Bitter indeed are my regrets for missed opportunities, never-to-be-forgotten opportunities, that passed me by, all for the want of CH’s insight and guidelines.
I’m deadly serious.
LikeLike
Have you noticed that women especially between the ages 20-28 do not care if you are alpha or not? We live in the age of rapid consumption, they do not care if you are self-confident, handsome or have a game. They just want a man dancing to their tune. In fact, I have witnessed that the more alpha you are, the more unafraid to walk away, the more disadvantage you have, whether you plan to get laid or have a stable long term relationship. Women at these ages just want a controllable man who will entertain them and make her look good in the eyes of her female friends. If you don’t comply, you are out. They do not tolerate an independent man since supply of their suitors is never low. That self-control or aloofness doesn’t attract them either. Men just cannot compete with their smartphones now, or a new dress they buy. All a woman has to do for ego-boost is to show some cleavage and she will turn the heads to her direction. What you prescribe here as the game plan or alphaness is not only ineffective but also signifies the ultimate betaness since you put the burden on men to study opposite sex’s nature, devise a strategy and execute it flawlessly. I have come to the conclusion that a woman has to feel that natural, gut level attraction towards you to begin with, and there is no way to engineer this. It’s jut how the nature designed humans, not an alpha, beta, delta, gamma thing.
LikeLike
Declaring yourself an alpha doesn’t make it so, Ghost of Roger Elliot. Women not responding to you says more about you than modern women. Women are women and always have been.
LikeLike
10/10
The manosphere is so concerned with acting like Stiffler when most these guys aren’t even cool cats to begin with. A feigned alpha comes across like a complete minstrel, regardless of race.
There has to be a baseline interest. Alpha is different to different women. I’ve seen guys in LA wearing knee-high boots and spandex (they weren’t gay) with far better looking women than classic “alpha men” who drink beer & watch football in the midwest with landwhales, but they were classically alpha. Even SWPL guys may be alpha to their SWPL women, although most aren’t.
Alpha for a man is state of mind above all. I’m not a classic alpha, only 5’9 tall, fashionable to the point most people would think its gay (outside of NYC, LA & Miami), but to women I’m very alpha.
Another overlooked aspect, being a “cool guy” trumps (word of the month lol) being “alpha” more often than not. Watch Mickey Rourke in Pope of Greenwich Village, most cool guys have a personality within standard deviation of that. Women always respond well to that.
LikeLike
“Yet we soldier on. Why? Because 90% isn’t 100%. If someone saved a beta today, it will all be worth it.”
Muslim Jihadis, Mormon Missionaries, Hare Krishna’s, Scientologists, Atheism+ Radicals, Vegans, Feminist Shrills, Evangelical Christians, and Catholic Monks & Nuns could learn much about the business of the welfare of fellow men (and women) here at the Chateau.
Alas, were are heretics to THEIR truth.
LikeLike
A further thought on approach anxiety, I think it may well have been devastating socially to be rejected by a woman. I have seen it happen and my opinion of men rejected was lowered after that. It is equivalent to any other awkward social situation. I would like to think we praise people for trying but that isn’t really true unless they are successful. Another thing I will point out having remembered a few examples from various media sources that imply that women do not want to be ‘picked up’ or called attractive, is that it is helpful to know that it is NOT that women aren’t sexual or that they simply don’t want to be called attractive by people, if they react negatively it was a failed attempt at it, not that they simply don’t want male attention. The media has a myth of the pepe lepieu(sic?) sort where women want men to like them for some mysterious platonic reason that does not include beauty.
LikeLike
“I have seen it happen and my opinion of men rejected was lowered after that. It is equivalent to any other awkward social situation. I would like to think we praise people for trying but that isn’t really true unless they are successful.”
It’s all context. If the attempt was cringe and the guy failed then yeah he’s going to be a little bit humiliated. However, if he tried with some skill, only losers are going to gloat and you shouldn’t care about their opinion anyways.
Also, so what if you’re get embarrassed? It will happen and it’s okay. The earth will still turn. With your logic no one besides top tier natural athletes would ever have jacked physiques because almost every normal guy enters the gym and does a pathetic bench of something like 115 pounds on his first attempt. Doesn’t get more biologically emasculating than that. To know that you’re a total weakling runt that would get destroyed in a fight with any member of the other tribe, thus dooming yourself and being a liability to your own group.
Futhermore, I can’t remember ever judging some guy for trying and failing. At least when it was an honest attempt. You’re own thoughts on the subject are more telling about you than the actual reality of the situation.
LikeLike
nope, you said it yourself, the runt doesn’t get any respect. Does that keep people from trying? yes, and that was my point. Embarrassment is not nothing. Do I still try to approach women? Yes, because I have to, but that doesn’t mean I am not losing anything from being turned down, although it can all happen gracefully you can’t always count on that. I am not going to pretend that other people’s opinions of me don’t matter, or that being humiliated doesn’t matter. One just has to weigh the risks and rewards. Just look at this blog, people were judging a man for awkward handshakes. Awkwardness situations exist and they suck. Dying alone sucks worse. I don’t think there is a way around it.
LikeLike
“nope, you said it yourself, the runt doesn’t get any respect.”
I didn’t say that at all. Again it’s a reflection on yourself.
What I was trying to convene to your negative ass is that most people start at the bottom and work their way up whereas very few are naturally born with it and it’s nothing to be ashamed of.
When you go to the gym, do you judge new guys who are trying? I don’t. If you do that’s on you and you should stop having a loser’s mentality. Some guys do look down on new guys but their opinion is pretty much worthless because those type of people are almost never quality. They are most likely a tier below upper crust but above average.
LikeLike
martin: “I don’t think there is a way around it.” ——— Here’s your two-step therapy. 1) STOP THINKING. 2) STOP CARING. Then get back to work getting laid. Quit thinking about this stuff, and, above all, quit caring about it. That’s what distinguishes a Psychopath [who is incapable of caring], and, to a lesser extent, what we in America call a graduate of “The School of Hard Knocks” [who has largely quit worrying about caring].
LikeLike
The ZFG attitude grows in strength and power as you get older, if your life is heading the way that it should. The world’s opinions become worthless, except for the tiny sliver of humanity who’ve actually tried to better themselves.
[CH: maybe. but i think a better explanation why ZFG tends to increase with a man’s age is that the emotions become more muted as the brain calcifies into habits of thinking, and small social slights don’t have as much impact as they used to. plus, older men naturally have, all else equal, a built-up store of social status simply from surviving so long. this automatic bias probably goes back to the earliest times in humanity when death was always around the corner for any male.
fyi ZFG decreases in women with age.]
LikeLike
shut up, loser.
faggot within rape!
LikeLike
If you want to kill your approach anxiety dead run for public office. If you live in a liberal infested city the local Republican Party will basically beg you to be a candidate for whatever office. If you live in suburbia there are tons of random offices for which you can run. Just beware if you do it seriously enough and knock on enough doors you just might win.
If you don’t want to run for public office then try public speaking. Pick a few issues, take a few classes, and offer your services for free to every social group in town. The Rotary Clubs and all of their legacy social groups are clamoring for speakers to address their meetings. The fact that you are a guy in a suit and seem to have a public issue which you can talk about coherently for 20 minutes qualifies you to address them. The bar of entry is really that low.
LikeLike
Apart from the risk of attack when approaching a girl, there is a probably deeply embedded (by evolution) fear of being SEEN when rejected. This can be terrible in a small tribe. But often irrelevant in a big ciry.
One of the necessary atributes of a good salesman is to be oblivious
to rejection. You get laughed at. You flip to the next Rolodex card
and start over, undaunted. Most people find this difficult, especially
after a while. Wooing women is no different.
Thor
LikeLike
> “be oblivious to rejection. You get laughed at. You flip to the next Rolodex card and start over, undaunted.” ——— There it is n00bs. Get rejected. Get laughed at. Flip over to the next rolodex card. Move on. Eventually you’ll strike paydirt. [If and only if YOU DON’T QUIT.]
LikeLike
The logic is so simple: she’s there, cute/hot and not talking to anyone. If I try, I might win or I might lose, if I don’t, I can only lose. So what am I waiting for?
In reality though, it becomes so, so much harder to execute…
LikeLike
> “so, so much harder to execute…” Why? Just walk about the broad and say “Hi!” Your reptilian brainstem will know within a few milliseconds whether there’s any chemistry between the two of you.
LikeLike
Kevin Dutton citing an example about a psychopaths “game” at a club. Its actually very clever:
“One dysfunctional psychopath Dutton worked with used to have a competition when out with his friends: not to see who could get the most phone numbers from women but see who could get the most rejections. “It’s something anyone could learn from,” Dutton says.
“Once you get used to being rejected it doesn’t hurt, you realise it doesn’t matter. Then your confidence gets up and you start approaching everyone – you’re coming across as less confident, less worried and your hit rate starts going up. It’s a great example of how you can turn this fear down if you work on it.” ”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/10788449/Why-psychopaths-are-more-successful.html
LikeLike
Enjoy. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/3lgqb0/ladies_can_i_see_a_picture_of_you_and_your_beau/
LikeLike
I’m woeful at the first five minutes because I don’t like strangers and I hate the general public. It’s the enthusiasm to converse with these people which beats me. Fortunately I’m just about good looking enough to get over the hump. But I’d still like to know how I could be genuinely more interested in other people?
LikeLike
Near Language schools and associated bars were one of my favourites.
LikeLike
LOL
Whenever a man volunteers himself to be judged it is inherently nerve-wracking. Period. That is a perfectly workable theory of foundational wisdom. No need to delve deeper. No need for the fabricated prehistoric backstory.
Now, if you want to explore the origins of the virtues, like courage, great! But turning to imaginary cartoon explanations from The Savannah rather than the rigors of philosophy and dialectic makes you look stupid. Worse: it makes you look stupid while you think you’re being intellectually sophisticated. Meta-stupid.
Only nerds are capable of this kind of grandiose folly, which is why you don’t use these explanations (or the Blade Runner and Dune references) around women. They can smell the geek stink, the fraudulence, the pretend mastery, the thinly veiled weakness.
Matt
LikeLike
This from a guy who not only explains the world in terms of a magic jew pimp in the sky, but thinks this kind of cuck faggotry is appealing to women.
idiot.
LikeLike
Christians invented modern science, you neckbearded, tilted-fedora retard. May the force be with you.
LikeLike
Brasky, knock off the carrying of water for Cathedral by bad-mouthing Christ.
There’s only one other tribe on this earth that does that… whom Christ called out as of their father, the Devil.
Don’t be that tribe.
LikeLike
Christians invented modern science despite Christianity, at least.
Konrad Lorenz somewhere relates a story about watching some gulls in courtship. The male flew up and stood right next to the female, but instead of proceeding to coo, dance, or otherwise pay attention to her, he seemed to get nervous, and looked at his own feet instead. She flew away. He was tracking these birds with leg bands, and he found that the offspring of that male were fewer.
Correlation? Maybe. If so, approach anxiety is older than the savannah and bigger than hominids. It’s weird that you Christians affect to stretch your understanding to the limits of the conceivable (godhead, infinity, the unqualified, resurrection, etc.) but when someone suggests the deep origins of behavior, which are not absolute by definition, you’re like woh, put on the brakes, no need for all that thinking!
But what is jawohl saying. People always prefer extremes: thinking in the absurdest terms (godhead, etc.) is the flipside of not thinking at all. It costs nothing, which you unintentionally acknowledge in noting the social cost (or handicap) of actually thinking about where behavior comes from.
LikeLike
What you call “thinking” in this case is employed for the purposes of fitting observable behavior into a preconstructed mold by any means necessary.
Christianity pioneered the two prerequisites for the modern scientific method: 1) that creation is not sacred and therefore able to be experimented on, and 2) that creation is intelligible and therefore exploring it would be fruitful. The early Greeks also possessed those foundational principles, but they lacked the universalizing element achieved by monotheism.
Only after Christianity did the heavy lifting of demystifying the universe could inane atheists like you even exist. You take for granted the origins of Western presumptions because they are today everywhere dominant. This is epistemology – I am operating at a level deeper than has even so much as occurred to you. You mistake hard-won wisdom for mere credulous assertion because you have a two-dimensional understanding of the problem itself.
That’s proved by your dismissal of the most profound questions of existence as “absurdest [sic].” Well, they are absurd to you because someone told you that they were absurd, and you’ve never met a man like me to announce otherwise (if not demonstrate – who has time for that?).
Your understanding of the origins of faith, science, knowledge, wisdom, and civilization are barely Wikipedian. If it weren’t you’d be asking me questions, rather than engaging in the Sisyphean task of attempting to refute the principles that built the entire environment around you.
Matt
LikeLike
If someone cares to delve deeper into the question of how the study of Nature came about, you might want to read “The Soul of Science”, by Nancy Pearcey.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0891077669?*Version*=1&*entries*=0
LikeLike
Also of interest:
“Science was born of Christianity” by Stanley Jaki
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00H3T59XE?*Version*=1&*entries*=0
LikeLike
Oops, should have said “by Stacy Trasancos”.
LikeLike
Keep telling yourself that, Queen.
Glad to see I hit a nerve, you seriously need to grow up and see the true horror of it all.
There aint gonna be no jebus saving you from the shitskin hordes, silly fella.
LikeLike
Brasky, you’re playing to a weak hand, so cut your losses.
More’s the pity, because aside from your antiChristian snark, you sound like an otherwise ally against the rising tide of colour.
A lot of you would-be beserkers are going to be surprised when, come der Tag, men of faith are shoulder-to-shoulder at your side… and wreaking equal havoc.
LikeLike
“that creation is not sacred and therefore able to be experimented on,”
Sure. No on ever experimented on or with anything, until the Christian story of Genesis came along to show them that creation is vulgar, post-Fall, and therefore ok to fuck with. Social constructionism at its very worst. Please tell me you got one better.
“that creation is intelligible and therefore exploring it would be fruitful.”
Exploring is fruitful to many kinds of species. It is that exploring, and all that pay-off, that built these brains with which you judge ‘that creation is intelligible’. But in your world, other species are not intelligent or anything of the sort; they don’t explore, try things, are punished or rewarded for their behavior, and this has no ramifications over time.
“The early Greeks also possessed those foundational principles, but they lacked the universalizing element achieved by monotheism.”
You mean they lacked the universalizing rhetoric achieved by monotheism. I wish a Christian arguing that Christianity invented science or whatever had something other than high-handedness to rely on. How glibly one passes over all the technological refinements of our species prior to Christianity’s sway over Europe as nothing, as mere groundwork for this wondrous dawn of Christian Enlightenment (huh?).
“Only after Christianity did the heavy lifting of demystifying the universe could inane atheists like you even exist.”
Incorrect: only after men like Baron d’Holbach and Ludwig Feuerbach did the heavy lifting of demystifying Christianity could insane atheists like me even exist. The universe was plenty intelligible to, say, the Buddha and the Pre-Socratics. It isn’t my fault if your perspective is narrow.
I hold up these two quotes as symptomatic of the Christian scientaster’s general mindset:
” This is epistemology – I am operating at a level deeper than has even so much as occurred to you.
” If it weren’t you’d be asking me questions, rather than engaging in the Sisyphean task of attempting to refute the principles that built the entire environment around you. ”
There’s a name for this insidious breed of Christian arrogance: presuppositionalism. Without Christianity, the presups say, you would have no logic or reason at all. In the beginning was λόγος, because God, therefore everything anyone says is “presupposed” by Christian reasoning, thus reason itself is – Christian. Or some such laughable self-serving sophistry. All the presuppositionalist has to do is speak in a haughty tone about Christianity having created everything, and behold, he hath proved it all to himself to his satisfaction.
That isn’t epistemology, of course: it is a rhetorical device using an idea drawn from epistemology (how knowledge came to be what it is, let’s say) to give the appearance of having proved something.
It’s tragic for the Christian that science eroded the grounds from beneath his ideological ancestors’ feet, so that today, he must tacitly acknowledge the massive gains of science (- and atheism) precisely by laying claim to the scientific method as a product of Christian theology.* No evidence, for as with any purely ideological claim, evidence is impossible. Direct lines of evidence are unknown or ignored; so that if one were to say for example that I, the insane atheist, wouldn’t know about the pre-Christian world at all without Gutenberg’s printing method, it would not phase the Christian scientaster that this method arose from the ashes of a failed business venture in glass-polishing, or that Laurens Coster’s method in Holland came from carving letters into wooden blocks for his grandchildren which he found leaving impressions in dirt. This isn’t a “pure” discovery: some devious bit of confirmation bias will find a way to say that, and everything else, is the outgrowth of Christianity itself. Humans would never have found their way up to Holland or Mainz, and nevermind that they were their already.
*No less than Nietzsche made this same error, but from a different angle: he theorized that Christianity produced the love of knowledge, thus science at the cost of faith, through an inculcated imperative of “clean conscience” and a taboo against lying (“before God”). How much easier it is to sweep all of this away and remember that men figure things out with or without ideologies of any sort because they have to, because it feels good, and because it sometimes makes them money, and that technology builds on itself regardless of any ideological encouragement or proscription. But, men need their ideological justifications.
LikeLike
Greg, I sincerely hope so.
LikeLike
theasdgamer-
“If someone cares to delve deeper into the question of how the study of Nature came about,”
Read more than self-serving Christian books?
Sorry friend, your “real physical contingent universe” existed before Christ. Aristarchus of Samos sure found it that way. But without the example of Christ, his model of the universe is meaningless – but wait, isn’t it the claim that only Christianity made the world “intelligible” as “contingent”, etc., thus amenable to scientific study? Without Christianity, no Columbus (forget Hanno and Hamilco, forget Leif Erikson).
It’s like men never put their pants on feet downward before someone built a church. It never occurs to these Christians, even when they’re abusing words like “epistemology”, that their worldview is a holdover “totalizing metanarrative” constantly providing itself with backstory after backstory, which of course is why it’s permissible to excuse Greek and Alexandrian science – nevermind Chinese – as pointless or without foundation: it so happened that significant technological innovations, which led to such discussions as these, occurred while the Church was dominant in Europe, so that Gregor Mendel’s observations of plant variation are without hesitation laid at the door of the good Augustinian brethren who housed him, and nevermind that he studied plant variation beforehand at University – it is done: without Christ, no Mendelian genetics.
LikeLike
I called you an “inane atheist,” not an “insane” one. You give me sarcasm and counterfactuals with an irrelevant name-drop or two. Like I said, we are discussing two very different things, and your tryhard inability to rise to the occasion only further proves it.
Yes, tool, “In the beginning was the logos,” the words of St. John which allowed the belief in Christ to gather all wisdom that had come before him, make it sacred and universal, and thereby give observation a chance to become science. “Every one who is of the truth hears my voice” (also John). That means knowledge was evangelistically spread rather than jealously hoarded by Pythagorean zealots and made occult to ultimately die of inbreeding.
This principle simply did not develop anywhere but Christendom, dipshit. If you need evidence, look around you, dipshit. Where is the Hindu scientific method, the Zulu, the Chinese, the Aztec? The West didn’t skip from Lucretius to Braccionlini without anything happening in 1,400 annis Domini, dipshit.
Internet autodidacts like you fashion just-so fantasy worlds for a history that supports your randomly acquired prejudice — certainly more random than a child baptism. And surprise surprise, like any community-college dropout blogger, you proclaim it possible to understand the West apart from “coincidental” Christian influence. Even Nietzsche, who knew more about Christianity in his hangnail than you ever will from your philosophical survey course on Atheist.net, and who hated Christ with a depth your emo-goth mind couldn’t fathom, didn’t make the mistake of discounting its influence. In fact, he considered the tension created by the paradoxes of the faith to be necessary to achieve new heights of humanity.
Christianity was the Apollonian antithesis to his Dionysian thesis.
No, fifth-raters like you can only upchuck the rumors of the whispers of Marxoid-level, late-modern hacks without the smallest sense of the big picture because you want to make yourself feel good after a beating from a superior.
Now get out of my face. If you insist on being a nihilist dork, at least learn the subject matter so you have a chance to do it well. And shave that patch of carpet under your chin. It isn’t really concealing the pimples.
Matt
LikeLike
This is how I know you’re a terrible student. You can’t even recapitulate a simple idea.
Christianity didn’t make the world intelligible, much less “only” Christianity. Christianity presumed the intelligibility of the universe, which submissive, fatalist Buddhism certainly does not. For the slow kids in the back of the class, let me clarify: that doesn’t mean the universe is intelligent, it means it is able to be understood as a system of reliable laws. You think this is a mundane fact, but it has only occurred to and developed among Western thinkers. The more common and more natural assumption is that all of these big scary phenomena are capricious and irrational like the Olympians. The Greeks (“Presocratics”) indeed innovated the presumption despite the prevailing faith, but it lacked the other two elements which you predictably misrepresent.
Again, mongoloid, plenty of independent cultures did experimentation. But animism, paganism, Mahometism, personified eastern nihilism, and especially pantheism, prohibited the disturbance of nature, which was indistinguishable from the divine. So whoever attempted to devise an intellectual method based on experimentation was seen as a rival to the pantheon and was snuffed out as blasphemous (see: Socrates).
Christianity was the only faith that sublimated these elements and universalized them. That is simple historical fact. Whatever bursts of scientific study occurred in other places were isolated and short-lived, rather than the constantly growing and self-sustaining tidal wave that became modern science in the West, which you, in your preposterous postmodern arrog-ignorance, imagine to have appeared sui-generis in 17th century Europe apropos of nothing.
You are out of your depth, sparky, and I’m sad (not sad) to have to be the deliverer of grim tidings. Worse, you have demonstrated once more that beneath every atheist is a multiculturalist who thinks unique white achievement is actually commonplace among the ant-people and jungle bunnies of the earth.
Matt
LikeLike
“Worse, you have demonstrated once more that beneath every atheist is a multiculturalist who thinks unique white achievement is actually commonplace among the ant-people and jungle bunnies of the earth.
Matt”
holy fucking shit you are a retard.
I try Greg, I really try to meet you guys halfway. How can you defend this disingenuous faggot?
LikeLike
Queen:
Do you understand the fact that YOU are the one clinging to a bronze age sand nigger mythology?
Basic fact there…yes or no?
LikeLike
Yes. I think it was the “holy” in your “holy fucking shit” that finally woke me from my dogmatic slumber.
LikeLike
That’s what happens when I cleave your patriarchal biggotry with my lightsaber of reason
LikeLike
Bend over and meet the base of my cock halfway, you mincing bottom.
You nihilists are worse than useless. You’ll be herded onto the truck with the rest of your leftist brethren. Traitors to your race, traitors to the God of your fathers. The only people who attempt to separate white men from their traditions are those who have wanted to destroy white men from the first — and the ignorant dupes who listen to them. You are part of the latter category, but the winnowing fork will not distinguish you from your masters.
There is no “halfway.” You are lukewarm. You are spit out. You’ve already compromised yourself with the left, you are half a soul.
Your bravado is an act. There is nothing behind it but hot air. This isn’t a LARP game where you build a fantasy character, it isn’t a sci-fi novel where you build a world just so. A man cannot pick and choose what it means to be white, what it has always meant since we began our rise to dominance. Christ is a part of that, and every knee shall bend, every tongue confess. Or you too go on the discard pile.
See, there are plenty of metaphysically confused agnostics on this board who can’t reconcile faith with power, and I have no ill will toward them. It will take all kinds of men to come together, set aside differences, and fight this war.
But mouthy little pukes like you have no discernment, no judgment, no discipline. Like an adolescent, you think the world has to be made aware of your stunted thoughts. You are spastics who think proclaiming your regurgitated feels is a declaration of manhood. Runts like you get the whip until you learn. I would much prefer you make our rebukes unnecessary, shut the fuck up, and put in an oar. But spastics by definition lack the One Thing Needful in this war: self-control.
So how about this? Stop volunteering your atheism in a post on goddamn approach anxiety, and I will ignore your existence until you become useful.
Matt
LikeLike
Oh, forgot you boy fuckers in the funny hats have no sense of humor.
I’d be a lot less nihilistic if nutcases like yourself didn’t menstruate all over what should be our little oases of realtalk.
Well, fuck it.
LikeLike
Damn, man… of all of Matt’s (yet again) delivered epic beatdowns, I would have thought that this paragraph was one upon which we all could agree.
Brasky, if these particular words bothered you, you are far from the ally I mistook you for. Even an antiChristian has to see the truth in this call-out of multi-cultists.
LikeLike
Okay, we’re done here… you’re dead to me, kid.
I can forgive cheesy Star Wars homages… barely.
What I can’t countenance are dweebs who declare victories that have yet to be won.
LikeLike
A joke, you stupid old jew worshipping fool.
He literally said that beneath “every” atheist is a multicultist. I’m an atheist, as far as your kike on a stick goes at least, and I am 100% against multiculturalism, progressivism, etc.
That’s pure kike worshipping projection, and I am no longer sorry it hurts your dumb shit feeewings, old boomer faggot.
You stupid cunts just cant get over your stupidity.
To think, rational people could have even forgiven you, when its demonstrable that you Christian faggots have enabled the eskimo takeover almost single handedly in this country.
Eat shit and die you stupid fucking weak ass cunts.
LikeLike
to jaimadumas
“Read more than self-serving Christian books? ”
Sounds like the creationist refrain of “That’s written by an atheist.”
Brilliant that you only read authors who already agree with you.
LikeLike
“Greek and Alexandrian science – nevermind Chinese”
Don’t cornfuze the study of Nature with technology. Research societies only ever formed beginning with the Royal Society, as far as we are aware. Boyle was one of the founders of the Royal Society. That was a HUGE deal.
Extra Credit:
Read Bacon (Novum Organum), Locke (an Essay Concerning Human Understanding), and Boyle (The Sceptical Chymist).
LikeLike
But I like Blade Runner and Dune references. 😦
LikeLike
All I know is,
Scientists HATE this guy!
LikeLike
I wouldn’t want to be that guy. I might get shot by a particle accelerator.
LikeLike
YaReally, Sentient, HABD, Wala, Kant et al
My FRs keep getting swallowed in mod, but trying again.
Another step in the “going out and talking to girls instead of sugar daddy dating”.
Friend’s birthday party last night at a trendy bar. Slightly different social circle (so less of the married couples with kids than my usual circle) so some pretty girls and a few dweeby guys (except friend who is quite alpha) but I didn’t know too many people.
I had to get up early so didn’t stay long but was fun. One married chick (4.5/10, WNB but massive tits) kept flirting with me and rubbing her tits on my arm RIGHT in front of her husband (who was built like an NFL linebacker but seemed a bit of a grinning idiot). Another HB7 – clearly just making polite chat with me. Another HB7.5 (but slim, pretty brunette, so a personal HB8) was initially making polite chat with me but then this uber beta guy kept boring her and she started to warm up and flirt with me at the bar after I teased her about looking like trouble with some good laser eyes and smirking..
Also, at least 3 girls in their 20s (HB7 and above) who weren’t part of our group gave me strong EC, although wasn’t always possible to open. One was a solid HB8 who was as tall as me (I’m 5’10-11) who smiled and gave me EC at the bar and I teased her about ordering a drink before finishing the first one and she started chatting and telling me it was her birthday etc..then got dragged away by friends.
All of this is pretty amateur stuff of course, but it still feels like I’m slowly going back to cold approaching after all the online stuff. Amazing how many hot girls were in one trendy bar though..effort to reward ratio very high compared to online dating.
Two main surprises: 1) Just how many HB7-8s kept giving me IOIs and EC (3 that I noticed) (2) I need to get back to basics and have a conversation plan. Not a fixed set of routines, but just an idea of where I want to take the conversation so that it doesn’t drift off..just like I do on online dates.. (also need to work on being less performing-monkey and more on connecting and building rapport)
LikeLike
Let me get this straight now… not giving a rat’s ass is a way to overcome approach anxiety?
LikeLike
Reblogged this on MGTOW 2.0.
LikeLike
Interesting how people tend to land on the 90% mark in terms off how many people take rational advice. I don’t see anything wrong with it. It’s a number I landed on when coming up with my working theory for my abundance mentality, maybe it will further help our beta friends seeking help.
The way I see it 90% of people aren’t shit and won’t ever be shit. Of that 10% remainder that is actually worth your time you may get along with 10% of them, meaning there is 1 out of 100 people that you will naturally get along with and will actually be worth your time. Using that ratio and the number of people currently inhabiting the planet, that is 70 million people that you will get along with very well and are worthy of your time. If you spent 1 minute of your life with each of these people, you would die before meeting them all. There is no reason to give a fuck, at all, if you get rejected.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on XWorkx.
LikeLike
there’s a ton of nice girls working in, believe it or not, home depot in S. FL. where I live. approach those with a list of 10 cheap items and insist she shows you where each is located in the store… that’s 15 minutes of practice right there and she has to help you.
don’t start with the 8’s, 9’s, or 10’s. start with 5-6-7’s and work your game up form there.
LikeLike
These are the types of posts that keep me coming back. Too much negativity fucks with my head when all I need is fun game advice to try out later.
LikeLike