The Straw That Stirs the Drink taunts the feminist Hivemind.
I wonder how big the impact of women working alongside men during WW2 and the subsequent post war increase in urbanization contributed to unleashing hypergamy and the feminist movement…
How rascally! Push women into the workforce, push women into the arms of alpha men and away from the tepid hugs of ol’ beta reliables. You give a lady an inch (or nine) of romance and she takes a mile of Harlequin entitlement.
The causality arrow is up for debate. The Straw is saying that the necessity of working women during the war years (and the unforeseen *ahem* side benefits that accrued to women), plus the rise of anonymous, atomized urbanization, precipitated the feminist devolution.
Or, the feminism propaganda blitz and government/cultural incentives to get women into the workforce en masse came first, which undermined K-selected America and germinated r-selected America. The foul source in this analysis was the fulfillment of two wishes: The wish of the elite for mo’ money and less social cohesion among the majority culture, and the subconscious wish of women for greater fulfillment of their primal (read: not careerist) desires.
(Just as salient, perhaps, the drive to get all women out of the home and into the working world could be viewed as the temper tantrum of a whinority of butt ugly women who never had a shot at domestic tranquility and therefore felt it necessary to agitate for a sea change in how working women were perceived.)
Female hypergamy was with us long before the working girl devolution, but social shaming (and social extolling) campaigns can have a significant impact in how forcefully and frequently that hypergamy is expressed.
Did pushing women into the work force create jobs for men or increase men’s pay?
LikeLike
No, it nearly doubled the workforce, depressing wages for men on the middle and bottom.
LikeLiked by 1 person
According to all left wing economists, of course it did, hence why we will see the same results with even more immigration.
Logic rape!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The female version of “How Ya Gonna Keep Down on the Farm (After They’ve Seen Paree?)” perhaps…?
http://www.shmoop.com/how-ya-gonna-keep-em-down-on-the-farm/meaning.html
LikeLike
A good deal of modern feminism (from the 50s on, not the suffragette kind) is motivated by the unchecked rage of dusky Jewish women furious at how their men were craving beautiful blonde shiksas. In general, the Jewish impulse is to destroy the host civilization. As Nietzsche noted, Jews use depravity as a weapon, and feminism is merely a fanciful construct of depravity.
At the same time, feminism allowed Jewish women to get into positions of real power and influence, the better to push their agenda. As usual, it was through media, entertainment, academia, the education system. The megaphone. Always the megaphone.
LikeLike
Plenty of good-looking Aryan men go for sultry Jewesses.
LikeLike
How do pro-feminist neckbeards not understand that getting women into the workforce, en masse, wasn’t ever about equality, but was ALWAYS about more tax money for the elites and destruction of families? I suspect they know his, but prefer to cling to the ‘equal opportunity for all’ lies. Old style liberalism of the 1950’s is a separate entity than what is now termed as liberalism. Andy Griffith was a lifelong liberal, but by watching his old show from the ’60s, you could tell he believed in 2nd amendment rights and the importance of family, community, and homogeneity. But even he grasped the modern version of liberalism. People will cling to words even after the definition has morphed into the opposite it’s intended meaning.
LikeLike
JDS, we come at all of this from the point of view of our innate Pathological Altruism, and it has taken us decades [centuries?] to realize the utterly psychopathic evil which we are dealing with here. It’s only after we come to grips with the horror which is The Truth of the matter that we can start dealing with the problem honestly. As always: “The Truth will set you FREE”.
LikeLike
The so-called elite have had phases in their thinking on what they wanted to do to the rest of us to achieve their goals. Best I can tell that was not their aim in the 1940s or they failed miserably. The reason I don’t think it was their aim was because they didn’t back it up with the media messages and school teachings to make it stick. The one’s I’ve seen were the opposite.
The so-called elite manipulate women to manipulate men into signing up to go fight their wars. I learned the suffrage movement was even used to shame men into signing up to die in the trenches in WW1. A war this country (USA) should have never been involved in. And from there I go into why the Wilson administration shaped the present. 1910 to 1920 is what put us on the course to where we are now. But I digress.
In the 1970s however the whole thing changes. It’s backed with media messages and government policies designed to weaken the family, the middle class, etc and so on. The deep state is behind it, the foundations are behind it, that’s where the elite really used it for taxation and busting family loyalties and such.
LikeLike
I suspect the increasing penetration of TV leading up to 1970 would account for the ability to increase more effective messaging. Radio and movies did not have the same hold over their victims, nor the quantity of programming and facility to slip in messages both in the shows and via the paid ads supporting the programming. Now that there combo – well you know who runs that right?
LikeLike
And here I thought they just needed the extra help. What would I do without CH to enlighten me? Idk. A brilliant man he be though.
[CH: it’s all about the externalities. (liberals hate them)]
LikeLike
[…] By CH […]
LikeLike
I’ll say this – that young gal there felt a lot more that day just doing her job than she ever did sitting on the back porch by herself or with her female kin shelling peas for Pa’s dinner…
And it is no different today when your mid level manager wife comes home after being bossed around all day by situational office alphas… let alone her time on that business trip.
The old ways had a lot of sense to them. Keep your wife at home and keep her busy… squelches a lot of mischief. what’s that Greg? Idle hands and all?
LikeLike
> “her time on that business trip” ——— Do we even need to point out that if your wife is “travelling on business”, then there is a 99.9999% certainty that she’s already cheating on you, and that you’d be wise to take some mouthswabs of the kids [and yourself] and send them off the to lab so as to figure out which kids are yours and which kids are the Cuckoo’s Eggs? Might even need to make that Cuckoos’ [plural] Eggs, for the really exceptionally badly cuckolded Betas.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Way off topic, but the Oregon shooter [with a Jihad Muslim friend on MySpace] targeted Alek Skarlatos’s community college [Skarlatos was doing “Dancing with the Stars” and wasn’t there that day] and now Skarlatos’s comrade from the Paris Train Rescue, Spencer Stone, has been brutally stabbed out in Sacramento, CA. That is some bizarre shiznat of coincidence right there.
LikeLike
yup
LikeLike
Sorry, responded out of order, but here’s the story: http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-spencer-stone-stabbed-in-sacramento-20151008-story.html
LikeLike
This comes on the heels of Eskimo Uber-Sandhedrin Barry Diller talking about The Donald taking a “FALL”, which is Eskimo-speak for Meyer Lansky’s Murder Inc assassinating The Donald. I just have this nagging feeling that the noose is being tightened around our throats. Cue Director Tamir Pardo’s various initiatives to respond with “anti-psychotic meds blah blah blah” and “tinfoil hat blah blah blah”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
well, with Donald and el ch@po, you would think that he would be surrounded by SEALS from Blackwater at this point.
LikeLike
PW, I don’t think it’s proper for us to speak in public about our relationship with the Almighty, but I have taken to trying to put in a Good Word for The Donald’s safety, and Rush’s safety, and the safety of L’il Paris Airport Dude, who reverse-engineered a century of Eskimo Psychiatry PsyOps initiatives. I feel like the sh!t is about to get real, and get real ugly. Remember, they assassinated Donald Young and Lt Quarles Harris Jr, in order to elevate Barry Soebarkah Dunham to the throne. We are dealing with genetic psychopaths [in both the Eskimos and the Mohammedeans], the likes of which our pathological altruism is at a loss to understand.
LikeLike
“Spencer Stone, one of three Americans hailed as heroes for stopping a suspected terror attack on a French train in August, was stabbed Wednesday night in the Sacramento area… Officers responded to a report of a stabbing and found a man in his 20s who had been stabbed multiple times in his upper body and was in critical condition… Stone, a 23-year-old U.S. airman from Carmichael, Calif., was the first American to tackle a gunman aboard the Paris-bound train. Stone, who was with his CHILDHOOD FRIENDS Alek Skarlatos and Anthony Sadler, was awoken by the sound of a gunshot in their railway carriage….”
LikeLike
[…] One Studiously Ignored And Invidious Side Effect Of The Working Girl Devolution […]
LikeLike
women judges: jailed women who failed to appear in abuse trial against abusive boyfriend. Yes, let’s jail all the people. These femmies think there’s no friction in life. Life’s not sleeping with the enemy, it’s more like “I’m calling one-time to scare you into loving me, asshole”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3265029/Outrage-female-judge-berates-JAILS-sobbing-domestic-abuse-victim-failing-appear-court-trial-attacker.html
LikeLike
It is astonishing that nearly every influential 20th century feminist leader was Jewish -Gloria Steinem, Bella Abzug, Betty Friedan, Susan Brownmiller, Andrea Dworkin, Susan Faludi, Susan Sontag, Naomi Wolf, Susan Estrich, Shulamith Firestone (extra crazy), etc.
A better list would be which feminist leaders are NOT Jewish.
LikeLike
Mack, serious question here: What’s the lowest IQ necessary to notice that same pattern EVERYWHERE and not put two and two together to get four? And I guess that the cynic would say that that phenomenon also exists on the Right side of the bell curve – that after a certain IQ, White folk on the far Right side of the bell curve fall for the Eskimo propaganda just like folks on the far Left side of the bell curve.
LikeLike
You’re asking too many questions, Goy.
Move along, nothing to see here.
LikeLike
I estimate you need an IQ of 95 to recognize cultural/ethnicity patterns.
The average American has always been smart enough to notice. The “problem” now is the proliferation of the pesky internet which allows Joe to bypass the media and politicians and judge events for himself.
The next time there is a big national racial crime story in the NYT or Washington Post, skip the story and read the comments. People are waking up and it’s reflected in the comments. Truck drivers refer to the FBI crime statistics, that kind of thing. Enjoy the information while it lasts.
LikeLike
it is tempting to posit an IQ sweet spot for alt-rightness, but I’d bet there are other psychometrics at play. Namely, a high intellectual curiosity/openness (which would be different from the common personality profile thingy “openness to experience”), as well a high sense of in-group loyalty and justice. Henry Ford would seem to be the most quintessential example, others just as smart but his intellectual curiousity was second to none.
LikeLike
Shartiste: also a low disgust threshold.
LikeLike
Kill feminism by attacking feminine women’s cherished role models.
The chief one in this day and age I see as being women’s Princess fantasy.
Better to troll the feminists so that they take this sword of Damocles upon themselves, the revulsion and disgust by the silent female beta majority rising up would do the necessary work while the men folk idly watched.
LikeLike
Asked and answered: Mary Wollstonecroft (feminist Zero), Mary Wollstonecroft Shelley, Susan B. Anthony, Susan Pankhurst, Florence Nightengale, Carrie Nation, Elizabeth Cady Stanton. Jews came very late to the party, Feminism and Suffragism and Prohibition were the plaything of upper class, “don’t have to work” WASP ladies. Often of fairly high station, aristocrats. A lot of it was thinly disguised Temperance also.
Most women however DID work. They worked alongside their husbands, fathers, brothers, etc. What changed radically was how they worked, in factories, alone, isolated from family, with more money made. Working in the textile mills as my Irish ancestors did in PA paid more than working as a servant, the railroad even better. You can see that in China — women from villages move to cities and work making Iphones at a pittance but a lot more than at a village. The work was less onerous too.
In the Twentieth Century the leadership passed from Upper Class WASP women who didn’t work in the Prohibition/Temperance movement to Wealthy Jewish women who did not work and came from wealthy families around the 1920s or so. But they spoke to all those rural girls finding good money in factories and removed from family, delaying marriage and enjoying city life. The only competitors for say, the horrible Betty Friedan (who lived in a Mansion in the Hudson) was charlatans like Amy Semple McPherson. But on a personal note Carrie Nation was at least as ugly as Betty Friedan. Maybe uglier. Ugly women do tend to feminism, a shame since plastic surgery, diet, personal trainers can do a LOT to make even an ugly woman into a semblance of an 8.
[CH: that’s a stretch (literally). a horrid fug like carrie nation would never improve more than a single SMV point regardless of the intervention. facial bone substructure matters.]
Feminism does ugly women no favors; and the way to attack it is to show women how to become a LOT prettier. Make a 4 a near 8, and a 7 even into a 9, and they’ll drop feminism for Alphas like a beta male dropping a pr0n collection for a real life hottie.
[one way to kill feminism is to make beta males more alpha. which means getting women out of the workforce, so that the office men are once again perceived as breadwinners instead of domesticated work colleagues. women who are more desirous of their men are less likely to feel the need to strike out on their own.]
LikeLike
“Astonishing”… “Deeply disturbing?” Rhetorical question. It means that Feminism is, either deliberately or subconsciously (and usefully,) a Jewish creation – which begs two questions: [1] Does the group promoting these ideas in the larger society practice those ideas themselves and [2] is that group and its members likely to betray the trust of the majority?
I’ve got some Scots-Irish in my blood (patrilineal), so I really identify with you racist sonsabitches. Even as your distant, half bred kin of dubious allegiance – but kin, nonetheless – I can see that working class white America has allowed itself to be silenced about many issues that are critical to its survival and to the survival of the culture of the United States. Even if one assumes the best intentions on the part of Jewry, it’s obvious that their ambitious attempts at self defense are an intolerable strain on the nation. I don’t think they realize that treating the “goy” as cattle is going to get them stampeded.
Maybe they should be reminded of their minority status by the majority. Politely, of course.
LikeLike
Take off your tinfoil hat, goy. Up your medication. You’ve been reading too many nazi conspiracy sites.
White dispossession is all just a force of nature. To oppose it is just crazy, goy. Just lay back and think of Israel.
LikeLike
As usual its top and bottom vs. the middle
the top – alpha men profit from female consumers, fuck the “liberated” women. celebrity sheryl sandbergs and oprahs push the lie for status and profit.
the bottom – ugly women get a career in lieu of family, omega men think supporting feminism will get them pussy (it won’t)
the middle – average people end up with an eroded pool of marriageable prospects (women sluttier, men lower status), higher labor competition, higher home prices…. but just look at that GDP!
LikeLike
It is also interesting to note we lost the true Catholic Church shortly thereafter in the 60s, and hence the hard line for ‘traditional’ sex roles. (And the bleed off for the can’t find a husband set, in the loss of nunneries and their roles & acceptance.)
LikeLike
Correct!!!!!!! Vatican 2 is SATANIC!!!!!!!
LikeLike
In 1973, I worked with an old guy, who had been a single, healthy virile 23 year old in 1941.
He was the only guy in Chicago trained to repair the coin meters in the subways and buses, so he was exempt from the draft.
He screwed an unbelievable number of working women from 1941-1946. And they gladly paid for his tender ministrations.
His most important piece of advice: “Never screw a married woman in her own home no matter WHERE she says her husband is.”
I have adhered to this rule religiously for the last 40 years.
LikeLike
On this theme. I worked with an old experienced consultant who was at Booz Allen in the early days… He joined the Army and eventually OSS at the end of the war in 1945 when he was 18 or something. In the early years of the war he sold vacuum cleaners in NYC door to door. He would start at the top of an apartment building and wind his way down. He said he knew two things every day… one he would sell a vacuum and two he would fuck a girl… he just needed to get behind her and demonstrate how it worked.
He was an ugly red haired dude.
LikeLike
Heh. I HAVE actually banged a married chick in her own home. Many years ago, I was a total blue pill beta, but I had just taken a Mystery Method course and knew *just* enough Game to not fuck it up when this Asian 6.5 approached me in a bar saying “you’re hot” to me.
I took her home that night, but the following week we ended up at her place (huge) and it turned out she was a 35 year old mail order bride for this old dude who was literally on a ventilator sedated in the next room. We banged in the master bedroom, with me feeling reasonably safe from the angry husband..he may even have got off on it..:)
LikeLike
… but now she begs to toss my salad
LikeLike
I wish I was better than this
I aint
LikeLike
I noticed you used the word whinority. I’m impressed you were able to use the new term so fast.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/chinas-50-lane-traffic-jam-is-every-commuters-worst-nightmare/ar-AAfffKR?li=AAa0dzB&ocid=1PRCDEFE
pretty cool pic from china on trafic jam
thats when ya know ya got lot of people
im really really unconvinced on the 300 mil in us not seeing em at all
LikeLike
On the subject at hand, I’m still going with the explanation that it was the modern conveniences of the mid-twentieth-century and post-war prosperity that allowed the birth of modern feminism. Thanks to the washer, dryer, gas oven, running water, central heating, refrigerator, freezer and of course, the automobile, women who previously were occupied with grinding chores from dawn-to-dusk, found themselves with loads of free time and some education to boot. Before that (think of the mom in Mary Poppins), only upper-crust women, with rich husbands and servants, etc., could afford to indulge.
LikeLike
My grandmother cooked every meal from scratch as they were poor. What an amazing cook she was. She’d put most of today’s women to shame armed with just a spoon, a bowl, and a pan. I’m not even sure she owned a whisk.
I can top her biscuits, but not her pie crust…perhaps if I risked using actual lard.
But the femininity was absent. My husband and I agree: Kansas, where the men are men and the women more so.
Haven’t been back in ages, so maybe that’s changed.
LikeLike
a lot of german, irish, and british ancestry in kansas. german women especially can be very stoic and abrupt in nature. can be quite beautiful of course but they aren’t usually dripping with sweetness and light when it comes to personality.
LikeLike
“The causality arrow is up for debate. The Straw is saying that the necessity of working women during the war years (and the unforeseen *ahem* side benefits that accrued to women), plus the rise of anonymous, atomized urbanization, precipitated the feminist devolution.
Or, the feminism propaganda blitz and government/cultural incentives to get women into the workforce en masse came first, which undermined K-selected America and germinated r-selected America. The foul source in this analysis was the fulfillment of two wishes: The wish of the elite for mo’ money and less social cohesion among the majority culture, and the subconscious wish of women for greater fulfillment of their primal (read: not careerist) desires.”
New Deal instead incentivized nuclear families above else, leading to the baby boom later, so no government incentivized hypergamy didn’t start before the war.
LikeLike
The Straw That Stirs the Drink,
you hit it square on, good sir.
LikeLike
” german women especially can be very stoic and abrupt in nature. can be quite beautiful of course but they aren’t usually dripping with sweetness and light when it comes to personality.”
They gonna make ya werke fur it, but it’s wurf it,Trust me on dis.
LikeLike
I think that women in the workplace en masse did encourage more shameless hypergamous behavior, but I would add something to it.
My hypothesis is that it caused women to redefine who was Alpha, but not by exposure to Alphas (given how much tighter society was back then, she knew who the big dogs were, so she was exposed to them anyway).
The men who did the jobs that women were now doing lost status, they were no longer doing distinctly mans work. Follow that up with a certain amount of humiliation that nearly all men undergo at work that is now being witnessed by a woman (“I’d kick my boss’ ass if he insulted me at work!” some of you are thinking, but no you probably wouldn’t, not with bills to pay, an efficient legal system and a fresh memory of what the Great Depression was like).
Before women witnessed the grind of most men’s lives, it was easier to respect a man who provided for you. He may not be the biggest dog, but he could be a big enough dog for her, so to speak. Once the mystery was dispelled, a LOT of guys dropped a level.
LikeLike