The SJW degenerate freak mafia shows its true colors. Grounds for banning now include “a different opinion than my own”.
Reminder: These are the freaks who pull the social media strings. Weep for your nation.
-
Pages
Twitter Updates
Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.
Recent Comments
pupton1974 on Tourette’s Game Carlos Danger on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male… Carlos Danger on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male… Ping Pong Associatio… on Mocking The Globohomo Cor… Lord of the Gulf Str… on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male… Lord of the Gulf Str… on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male… Carlos Danger on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male… Carlos Danger on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male… Carlos Danger on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male… Carlos Danger on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male… Top Posts
- Cesar Sayoc, "White Male" (& Deep State Updates)
- Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
- Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
- Tourette's Game
- When The Jumbotron Test Is Crushed
- The Confound Of Silence
- The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
- "Conspiracy Theory" Conspiracy
- Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
- The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
Categories
what if their name is thwack?
[CH: they sit in the back.]
LikeLike
And out come the Klansmen! Y’all got the rope???
[CH: not yet. all the rope is currently being used to string up your shitlib white apologists.]
LikeLike
nothing wrong with hanging blacks…cheaper than having to warehouse them as we do now
LikeLike
And sadly that’s what it comes down to: A difference of opinion from the [drone] Hive Mind.
LikeLike
I think that option is about managing report-happy individuals. If they don’t have the “disagrees with me” option they’ll choose something incorrect just so the report can go through. If they can click “disagrees with me” the people at Twitter probably won’t even read the complaint – they have tons of other complaints to go through every hour of the day.
LikeLike
Twitter doesn’t seem to mind ISIS though
LikeLike
[…] By CH […]
LikeLike
I’ve heard that option is auto-ignored by Twitter. They can use it to sort out fraudulent reports.
[CH: why is it even an option then? a sorting mechanism only adds a layer of inefficiency. clearly, the place is overrun with faggot freaks who pee their pants hearing a bit of the ol’ ultrarealtalk.]
LikeLike
Supposedly, when the option wasn’t there, butthurt SJWs would use a different option also used by legitimate reports. The new one is like a stress ball, gives them a button to push and make them feel better, doesn’t actually do anything. Assuming that’s true.
[CH: ok i can buy that. which should tell us how depraved shitlib media culture has become.]
LikeLike
Why not try and experiment to see if this is true? Have Mike C. or Roosh put out an opinion, and get a bunch of people to hit that button. See what happens.
LikeLike
Days of Broken Arrows – people probably report Mike and Roosh all the time.
LikeLike
I doubt it. From another company that might be possible (and pretty funny), but Twitter is infested with SJWs
LikeLike
Yeah I was hoping maybe they put that in there as a trick
LikeLike
IHTG is right; it’s a sorting mechanism that distinguishes frivolous complaints from those that warrant further investigation; the ‘different opinion from mine’ option isn’t so much a p.c. bludgeon or threat, but a way to flag time-wasting emotional overreaction from teens and tweens who use social-media to gossip and flirt but who don’t have yet any critical objectivity sensibility whatsoever…..in fact, that option triggers a robo message that explains that Twitter doesn’t condone abusive replies but cannot monitor non-obscene free-speech commentary, etc., blah-blah…….
(this was relayed to me per an associate who works at a national social-media company in the chicago area.)
LikeLike
(this was relayed to me per an associate who works at a national social-media company in the chicago area.)
He works at a National Socialist media company in Chicago? 😀
LikeLike
Why is it so impossible to start our own realtalk version of twitter. Hard to believe that they have an unbreakable monopoly in this sphere. Let’s get together and start a new version with a 142 character limit and call it klaxon or something. Cheers
[CH: a downside to a realtalk twatter is that presumably there wouldn’t be many shitlibs around to happily troll into frothing rages.]
LikeLike
“a downside to a realtalk twatter is that presumably there wouldn’t be many shitlibs around to” happily troll into frothing rages.”
Build it and thry will come.
LikeLike
[CH: a downside to a realtalk twatter is that presumably there wouldn’t be many shitlibs around to happily troll into frothing rages.]
I disagree with this. If there is one thing feminists are good at, it’s invading male spaces. A “realtalk twitter” would be the first place they’d flock to for two reasons. 1). This particular breed of women are masochistic (more so than most) and actually like the street of being harassed, criticizes, and shamed. And 2). Women don’t live for accomplishment like men do, but instead live for drama, which this would provide.
LikeLike
I don’t think Twitter actually makes money. ” In 2014, it earned $1.4 billion but posted a net loss of $577 million.” That is, for every “sale” of $1 they lose about 40 cents. Let the morons lose their money.
[CH: ad blocking may kill social media. *fingers crossed*]
LikeLike
and then next up, could affordable streaming TV neuter broadcast “news”? Here’s hoping.
LikeLike
>[CH: ad blocking may kill social media. *fingers crossed*]
>*fingers crossed*
Damn straight.
LikeLike
Twitter is a joke. About half or more of their accounts are bots/scripts. Followers can be had for about $200 for 2,000. Something like half Lady Gaga’s followers are fake, and were kicked off. Presumably her management paid for them, most celebrities are the same. Their CEO is splitting duties with Square, also a failure. Twitter thought it would make money selling user data, but that is a joke given the pollution/contamination of bots/scripts. I’ve never bothered with Twitter and never will.
LikeLike
So what that celebs buy false followers? The point is that it is a platform for people to share information. It is all about how you use it.
LikeLike
and not that it’s a surprise but the ‘offensive’ image that got @heartiste suspended is still in abundance on twitter
LikeLike
To be precise, it wasn’t the image but writing a comment about wishing violence on people. Which shouldn’t get him banned either, since it obviously wasn’t a real encouragement to violence. But at least you know that you won’t get banned just for posting an image. People can e.g. post racialist messages and images without getting banned, you just have to make sure you don’t write something that sounds like you encourage violence, however far-fetched it would be to take it seriously.
LikeLike
To be fair, that is just the “report” form and in their actual policy document they say:
“Offensive content is tolerated as long as it does not violate the Twitter Rules and Terms of Service.”
And they go on to explain in detail what violates their Rules / ToS, but there is still some gray area in describing “abuse or harassment”.
Read it here:
https://support.twitter.com/articles/20169997
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
dont disriminte based on race or creed but here is this new 5 thousand page list we do discriminate on and it is ok
LikeLike
Discrimination against creed is still fashionable. But seriously, future hipster types will love them ironically, then for real once they make an emotional connection. They have some great songs. Nickelback sadly, they will always be crap.
Twitter is g*y. I only liked it for linking.
LikeLike
ye creed is good he he he
LikeLike
Jesus. It never ever ends with these people. If you don’t agree with them, they don’t just write it off as you being misinformed. They don’t give the benefit of the doubt like most conservatives do. They actually insist something is wrong with you or that you’ve committed some kind of crime if you’re not with them on EVERYTHING.
I’ll never forget my first encounter with radical feminism. I was in the eighth grade, and we had just covered the women’s suffrage movement. My teacher had us watch a movie (surprise, a liberal using a movie as “evidence”) called Iron Jawed Angels. Long story short:
> Women want vote.
> Women go on hunger strike.
> Hunger strike is serious, so authorities try force feeding the women.
> They use apparatus… hence the name “Iron Jawed.”
> People feel bad.
> Women get vote.
We had a “discussion” about the movie afterward. I took the bait like an idiot. I at one point said something to the effect of “I don’t get it. A hunger strike isn’t really an argument. If someone tells me ‘Do X or I’ll kill myself!’, I’ll just say ‘That’s on you babe!’ My little sister holds her breath when she wants something and we just let her do it because it’s childish and she’ll get over it.”
WWIII ensued. I was sent out in the hall. Parents were called in. Principal was brought into the mess. The teacher never forgave me. She actually suggested to my parents that I had a learning disability. She made sure as hell that I knew that thinking those thoughts was not okay. Other female teachers joined in.
I avoided such issues for the rest of high school and all of college… and then I found you guys. 🙂
LikeLike
Wow! What year were you in 8th grade, and where? At my school (UK in the mid-nineties) the teachers were lefties, as they are everywhere, but it was never that bad. We watched films too (Witness, Forrest Gump), but we were allowed to have our own opinions about them.
LikeLike
holy fucktardation
LikeLike
Take it easy boys. Censorship is a sign of desperation. Lets not forget these losers were the ones crying about censorship not long ago. Many of their own kind are horrified these toads are doing what they claimed they hated. What will happen when people see these Tweets are the same party line drivel they get from Dinosaur Media? Why they’ll do what they did to CNN, unplug and free themselves from the Matrix. The more they tighten their fingers, the more users will unplug from their systems…
LikeLike
Censorship is a sign of desperation.
Unfortunately not. All societies have always had censorship, except the U.S. with its First Amendment for a while.
LikeLike
No, we just need to set up our own – where you have to state that you have a thick skin and aren’t going to whine, whine, whine. And if you do, you’re the one who is banned – simple…
LikeLike
I don’t see that option under the twitter report section. The report section has only three options:
I’m not interested in this Tweet
It’s spam
It’s abusive or harmful
Am I missing something?
LikeLike
ROFL STILL MEWLING THRU BUTTHURT TEARS ABOUT YOUR TWITTER HANDLE BANNED SO LONG AGO SUCH A MACHO MAN LOL
LikeLike