• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« America, Then And Now
Comment Of The Week: Nexus Of The Sexes »

A Theory For Where It All Went Wrong

December 26, 2015 by CH

Reader electricangel, inspired by the story of Pajamaboy (born in the year of president Butt Naked, in pajamas, cradling a mug of hot cocoa, winner of the 2015 Most Punchable Shitlib Face contest), offers a theory for where it all went wrong.

“dear God, Where did we go wrong?”

Maybe sending our 27-year-old men in 1943 out to kill to make Eastern Europe safe for Stalinism, and to make China safe for Maoism had something to do with it? At a time when Europeans had begun to allow contraception (1930, Church of England), they still elected to kill off what Scrooge called “surplus population” and each other, and withdraw from the conquered planet that they had subdued.

PajamaBoy is what results when generation after generation you take the men whose high testosterone would have them reject a bad split in the ultimatum game and send them into a charnel pit. The men left behind literally lack the balls to take unreasonable stands in favor of injustice being punished that may, nonetheless, damage themselves.

I know computational geneticists tend to scoff at theories of wartime culling to explain postmodern European man’s effeminacy and race cucking, but thinking about it I can’t see why it’s so implausible. In 1918, France’s total male population was ~20 million. World War I inflicted ~1.4 total military deaths on the French male population (we can safely assume the vast majority of military dead were men). That’s a pretty significant 7% reduction in total Frenchmen, and an even greater proportionate reduction in the number of prime age Frenchmen who would be most likely to marry and have kids. (Back of envelope calculation, figure Frenchmen aged 20-40 in 1918 numbered around 5 million. WWI would have thus exacted a toll of a 28% reduction in the number of prime age Frenchmen! A poosy paradise for any men still alive at the end of the war!)

Assuming (and it’s a big assumption based on the notion that masculine men make riskier choices, especially in war) that the bulk of military men who died in the WWI flesh ripping machine had on average higher testosterone levels than the military men who laid low and survived, it’s not a huge leap to infer that 28% of prime age, post-WWI Frenchwomen had to go it alone or settle for one of the surviving low T betas. They would have kids with these beta males and, multiplied millions of conceptions later and then again as the process repeated itself through the meat grinder of WWII, bequeath White Europe the founding population of über betas who would, ninety years later, become bronies and race cucks and open borders nutjobs and Matt Yglesias.

Not a sermon, just a thought.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Culture, Goodbye America, Ugly Truths | 244 Comments

244 Responses

  1. on December 26, 2015 at 9:15 am TGP

    Decent theory. Merry Christmas CH and thank you for a great 2015 of reading when I should be working.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 10:32 am Captain Obvious

      Don’t kid yourself – pondering the horrific Nihilism of modernity is a full-time job. Yesterday [Christmas], I opened up a little, to a chick whom I know pretty well, about some of the sh!znat which is lurking just beyond the horizon, and she called this morning to tell me that she had a Night Terror about it last night – she woke up screaming bloody murder.

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 2:39 pm trav777

        CH is onto something.

        Juxtapose this with the female vote and you have yourself the grand prize

        LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 11:47 am Kobe Beef

      J3w Culture has sanctified the victim above all. After two generations of J3wish cultural dominance in The West, we see the effects of striving toward ever greater weakness.

      Reject J3w morality, embrace Master Morality. Serve as an example to those who would be great again.

      LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 4:36 am Mean Mr. Mustard

        Their masterstroke as a culture is simultaneously being able to play the victim while also being in a position of influence and power; economically, politically and culturally.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 1:05 pm Joe

        Dumb people admire the jews,middling people envy the jews,but people who have a clue hate the sons of bitches!

        LikeLike


  2. on December 26, 2015 at 9:22 am Drive Them Before You

    Lots of devastating wars with high casualities have been fought throughout history without a consequent pussiness death spiral. For instance, if your theory is correct, the American War of Northern Aggression would have created a much stronger pussiness spiral here.

    We have to look at what was different in the 20th century. Contraception and IQ-fertility inverse correlation, the welfare-state induced relaxation of darwinian selection pressures, xenoestrogens in the water supply, simple fattening leading to low T, or some other unique feature of the 20th century are the only causes we can plausibly blame.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 9:24 am whorefinder

      I agree. My comment in mods basically argues its the welfare-state and overall ease of living. R v. K.

      Moderation rape!

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on December 26, 2015 at 9:27 am Humans are animals

      Yes, and the Soviet Union lost the most soldiers in WW2. They should have it the worst.

      LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 4:37 am Mean Mr. Mustard

        Yeah but;

        #JewLivesMatterMore

        LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 9:58 am Greg Eliot

      Well, America lost relatively few during both WWI and WWII, and pretty much all of those supposed he-men returned from the war.

      So from a genetics standpoint, the USA should be chockful of T and have several generations advantage over our European brethren…

      … yet we’ve become as pussified as any European nation.

      Hell, to the point that, during the height of our so-called Golden Age, the president sent Airborne troops to force White folks to allow their children to become victimized by negroes starting at an early school-age, and no shot was heard ’round the corner, let alone the world.

      It’s not about who died on the battlefield… it’s all about how soft you have it back home.

      Give him a bee…, a “super” market… a couch… and a TV to watch somebody, somewhere throwing, kicking, or hitting a ball… and yesterday’s Lochivar of the trenches gives birth to a gaggle of pajama boyz.

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 10:00 am Greg Eliot

        That should read “give him a beer…”

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 12:30 pm plumpjack

        the shift of male bodies from farming type work towards industry, and eventually towards the key-punching jobs of today undoubtedly impacted their T levels.

        there’s a good chance your average male in 1943 started working when he was 5, grew up branding cattle, carrying bricks up 6 flights of stairs for his pops, chopping down trees (with an axe) compared to the prolific pajama boy-type of today who’s still bottle feeding (formula, not even real breast milk) at age 27, and is basically only physically adapted for keypunching:

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 1:33 pm Colonel Hogan

        Audie Murphy was one of these hard working farm guys. Yet, early on, he was too young and too small to be taken seriously. He took care of his mother and siblings before the war by hunting, farming, odd jobs, etc. Pajamaboi and those he represents undoubtedly lack the fortitude and drive to take care of themselves on a farm, much less produce enough for a family. Especially when they are 15 years old. It makes me sick. I wonder what Murphs testosterone levels were like. Also, would love to see a remake of ‘To Hell and Back’. If it were done honestly and without any magical negroes. I’m rambling and enjoying Christmastime Piper Heidsieck. Merry Christmas.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 2:17 pm Johnny Redux

        The so-called ‘best generation’ went off eagerly to fight the ‘evil’ Nazis and Japs, but came back home, and within a relatively short period (a span of 10-15 years later) sat by while the government passed laws against their race and allowed the Basketball-Americans to start running riot. Although they fought bravely, I will be glad when the last ‘Nazi killer’ is in the grave. A generation of intelligent suckers, who held up the lie in order to make their stupid battle not seem so meaningless.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 3:37 pm plumpjack

        had a college professor who fought in ww2. i’d ask him questions about his experiences over there and all he ever responded with was what an incredible waste of time his war years were, and the war in general. i was shocked to hear this at the time because it contradicted everything I’d been taught about the war. now i know better. he was a known anti-semite and JADL was non too relieved when he passed on and stopped poisoning young minds like mine

        he was such a savvy bastard though. he would invite delegates from Israel and the Jewish lobby to come speak to our class, shills for the zionist cause basically, making them fair game to the students

        but, being all thoroughly indoctrinated at that point none of us American students knew enough to challenge these guys. but there was this one dude, Boris, a fat Russian exchange student with thick coke bottle glasses. he would just lay into the Israeli guys, calling out their bullshit lies and hypocrisy, and he was thoroughly pissed off while doing it. it was great

        back then I thought “how come this guy knows so much more than we do?” now I know. it was really eye-opening

        LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 12:15 pm Earl of Duke

      You forget that the bulk of the deaths in the WoNA, were from disease, not combat and that due to the inefficiencies of the weapons at the time, the death rates for combat was relatively low, with the wounded pretty much precluded from returning to combat units; unlike WWs I & II where the wounded were patched up and re-sent back to the front lines.

      Thus a lot of restless, high testosterone survivors got very adventurous and went West to conquer the “Great American Desert”, either as cattlemen or farmers.

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 2:20 pm Johnny Redux

        It is my recollection that due to the terrible conditions unique to trench warfare, just as many men died from disease in WWI as from bullets and shrapnel.

        LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 12:06 am Pwn

      Not to mention that usually the people drafted to stay in trenches aren’t exactly the bravest and smartest people and due to regression towards the mean, even if they were the bravest, the impact on the bravery of the next generation would be trivial anyway. Genetic change explanations over a century or two seem silly to me. I mean, I suppose if you killed a third of black people, the rest would become as smart as white people. If the rationale applies to bravery, it works for this too.

      LikeLike


    • on January 6, 2016 at 2:17 am Anonymous

      This is why I don’t buy this theory at all. Seems to me we would have been estrogen filled men a lot sooner with the amount of wars we had over the years.

      LikeLike


  3. on December 26, 2015 at 9:29 am Laguna Beach Fogey

    I suspect there are remnant European populations of high-T men in the colonies (and former colonies) that did not experience such a culling.

    Maybe an immigration / breeding program could be set up to help re-populate Europe with more virile European men from abroad?

    Just a thought.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 10:37 am Captain Obvious

      CH: “Assuming… the bulk of military men who died… in… WWI… had on average higher testosterone levels…” ——— In WWII, they definitely had higher IQs: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16297-intelligent-soldiers-most-likely-to-die-in-battle/

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 10:53 am Captain Obvious

        Obviously Darwinian Nihilism says that being a snivelling coward [or finding some bullsh!t excuse not to serve – flat feet, asthma, stuttering, WTFE] is the best survival strategy for male of the species. But the more your most noble & virtuous men are killed in war, the more what’s left behind becomes an R-Selected cesspool, with a handful of Big Men hoarding all the p00ntang and the great swath of Little Men giving one another bl0w j0bs.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 10:57 am Captain Obvious

        K-Selection – which has only ever occurred in the White Race, and which tends to denote a strong and robust “Middle Class” – is exceptionally rare and precious in human history, and we need to ponder the very real possibility that the Eskimos & the Bohemian Grove traitors are motivated by an ancient biological Evil which seeks to eradicate K-Selection and the “Middle Class” once and for all.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 12:21 pm Earl of Duke

        Lots of fallacious assumptions in that article: as war got more technical, the technicians were in the rear preparing and repairing the machines.

        The grunts upfront who were the “tip of the spear” and did the bulk of the actual fighting, needed to know no more than how to fire a rifle and keep it clean, as well as how to close and win a hand-to-hand fight.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 12:35 pm Cap't Tautological

        NO!!! The USA DOD has required a minimum IQ of 93 since forever [it’s about the only USA institution which wasn’t Griggs-v-Duke-Power’ed]. Increasingly warfare is only for the High IQ, and there is no purpose for cannon fodder anymore. PS: Arguably, these drone strikes against the Mohammedeans are selectively removing the SMARTEST amongst them – the engineers and lawyers and doctors and whatnot [which is yet another huge WIN-WIN-WIN for the Israe1i Eskimos].

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 12:43 pm Cap't Tautological

        What our Elites seem to want is a Brazilian form of the Hindu caste system – a tiny handful of High IQ Brahmin [the “Top 1%”] and a swarming seething stinking cesspool droid army of Low IQ Untouchables [the 0bama voters], with just enough of a White middle class to make the trains run on time [but no more than is absolutely necessary].

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 6:06 pm trav777

        Tautological is right…brazil is the future and always will be

        LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 1:31 pm irishsavant

      To preempt that very possibility is why Western governments make it virtually impossible for such men to immigrate while encouraging every turd world parasite to set up here. Virile racially-aware White men are our overlords’ worst nightmare.

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 1:42 pm Captain Obvious

        > “Virile racially-aware White men are our overlords’ worst nightmare.” ——— THIS.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 12:17 am Ripp

        +1

        picked up a chic the other night who just moved from canada. A hot white chic got a job transfer. She was talking about how hard it was to get the transfer approved and he hard it is to get financing for a car and apartment. I was honestly shocked.

        it’s no joke. The system is rigged against whites. White collar dot Indians and asians flow in much easier than white people.

        Unbelievable.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 7:06 am Captain Obvious

        > “Unbelievable.” ——— BELIEVE IT.

        LikeLike


    • on December 30, 2015 at 12:03 am mts

      I’d love for someone to explain Argentina then to me. It’s a 97% European country that hasn’t had a major war for ages, but went from being one of the richest nations 100 years ago to becoming a third world banana republic with food riots, kidnapping for profit, runaway inflation, and sociopathic strong man dictators in tall brimmed saucer caps frowning upon the peasantry from the Presidential balcony as their rivals mysteriously disappear. It’s like an all white ghetto. By all this HBD science, it should be the economic and social North Star of the Western Hemisphere, rule by law and contract, not the whim of men, a European Hong Kong. Socialism? Than at least it should be another 1970s era Sweden. Europe burned through its political fanboi of strong men phase 60 years and 50 million dead ago; our Argentine DNA cousins can’t seem to function without a boot on their European heads (witness the Hilary clone they just finished having run the joint, amazing a general didn’t take over when she finished). How come their immigrant wave, seemingly identical to ours at a time when it was our economic equal and someone getting on the boat would toss a coin to decide where to go, didn’t do the job down there like it had up here? I am truly, honestly, curious.

      LikeLike


      • on December 30, 2015 at 8:08 pm J.M.

        Socialism spoils anything. Btw Sweden and the rest of the Scandinavian systems are unsustainable in the long run even if they were all white, let alone with the current invasion. You can just do your research and see how stagnant those countries are. Socialism plus no rule of law and your get Argentina.

        LikeLike


  4. on December 26, 2015 at 9:29 am Ironpusher

    My grandpappy survived WWII fighting against the Japs. He had 4 children with my grandmother and 9 grandchildren. He now has 24 great grandchildren and 2 great-great grandchildren. He his 90 and still living on his own with my grandmother. Hail Victory!! All is not lost!!

    P.S. he still flirts shamelessly with my wife at any oportunity.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 2:14 pm Dan

      All is not lost? What, your “grandpappy” is gonna save the white West in
      the two remaining years he’s still alive?

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 9:30 pm ironpusher

        No, you stupid fuck. My “grandpappy” wasn’t the only one to survive the war. We didn’t all descend from bitch tit pajama boy draft dodgers like you.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 1:19 pm Joe

        Granpappy gots a GUN bitch!

        LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 4:09 pm Corvo

      Cheers to your grandfather. That family is what I want to see if I make it to 90. But I’m definitely keeping my trigger finger in good shape …

      LikeLike


  5. on December 26, 2015 at 9:31 am plumpjack

    this is an excellent theory. I would add to the list of impacts of ww1&2 two other items:

    – drafted fathers returning from the horrors of a foreign war had a tougher time adjusting to family life and bonding with their children

    – didn’t the lowering of the voting age from 21 to 18 come about as a result of soldiers returning from ww1 and demanding more representation in govt? a younger, less established voter demographic would theoretically lead to more liberal policies, a trend which had only accelerated since

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 10:04 am Greg Eliot

      I think you meant Vietnam… Nixon lowered the voting age to 18, if memory serves, to try and curry favor with the Cathedral by making the crusty ol’ GOP seem progressive… because of the great leftist hue-and-cry meme about, “We’re allowed to die for our country, but not vote.”

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 10:45 am plumpjack

        didn’t exactly hit that one outta the park, did I?

        but still… that’s a huge change isn’t it? lowering the voting age to 18 would’ve immediately shifted policy towards more handouts, amiright?

        (sorry of this double posts)

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 10:50 am Greg Eliot

        You’re absolutely right…

        It’s a textbook example of how the alleged “conservatives” of the nation always shoot themselves in the foot…

        … and take our toes off as well.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 12:25 pm Earl of Duke

        “… the alleged “conservatives” of the nation always shoot themselves in the foot…”

        But it gets them temporary, semi-favorable reviews in the liberal propaganda media machine and invites to all the right cocktail parties!

        So they got that goin’ for ’em!

        LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 1:13 pm Greg Eliot

      It’s going to get them invited to the imminent necktie parties, so they better enjoy those cocktails while they can.

      LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 12:09 am Pwn

      Not just the lowering, but universal male suffrage, which paved the way for the female vote too, was a consequence too.

      LikeLike


  6. on December 26, 2015 at 9:37 am Humans are animals

    Notice how wherever feminism is most rampant, mass immigration is pushed the hardest. I know why.

    When feminists attack Western men, they’re pushing us while hoping deep down that we’ll push back. Until we do, they’ll hate us and seek to replace us. That’s the real reason feminists support Islamic (and Mexican) immigration.

    This is why many white nationalists have it all wrong when they say “we need to appeal to women” but want to do so by being PC on everything but race.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 10:13 am Greg Eliot

      You’re right about how appealing to women by being PC is a fool’s errand.

      But I think the red-pillers overplay the “feminism is a shit test” meme… true, there’s SOME aspect of that…

      … but I think for the most part it’s just that women think they’re more refined and “human” than men, and when mere survival is no longer a full-time endeavor… requiring actual blood, sweat, and tears… men no longer can OVERTLY show how much they’re needed… and many of the tasks of “civilization” can be done competently enough by either sex.

      The ones that still require men are well-insulated from the sensibilities of most women… and so, in times of plenty, that ol’ “milk of human kindness” runs rampant, in both men and women…

      … though in the case of men, I think our sense of over-charity in those cases, deep down, stems from the fact that we ourselves feel a bit guilty when our good fortune and surplus wealth didn’t require the shedding of blood or herculean-level effort.

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 11:17 am Humans are animals

        Explain why white feminists are full of racial self-hatred despite white men being the most feminized. The answer is clear to me.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 1:11 pm Greg Eliot

        Well, first of all, the majority of those “White” feminists full of racial self-hatred are actually yentas who fall into two categories:

        1) Yeah, they hate Whites… but it ain’t self-hatred, Schlomo.

        2) Selbst hass has long been acknowledged as a trait which seems to disproportionately affect our tribal friends… and the resentment of THEIR women stems from the fact that they were always treated as second-class by their own men, up to and including segregation in the congregation.

        Secondly, I don’t think White men are the “most” feminized… that’s merely the MSM and the political system shoving that sort down our throats.

        And any look at meat world actualities will see that, if any, the negro is the most ‘feminized’ in that matriarchy rules the majority of personal situations within the family, with a few strutting peacocks having their various harems amidst the hoi polloi.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 12:12 am Pwn

        Nice straw man argument Greg. You and the shitlibs. Lol

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 7:26 am Greg Eliot

        I have no idea what ‘strawman’ you’re talking about, but you’re another of those that come ’round here and make the right noises at times, but always reveal a cohencidental penchant for pay-no-attention-to-those-men-behind-the-curtain type of shilling.

        Meh.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 10:03 am Pwn

        You stupid fuck, the man was talking about white feminists and you had to go about your idiotic obsession with the Jews. I guess that’s not a straw man argument, if it’s about the Jews it’s ok. This idiocy is as tiresome as shitlibs bringing up racism when it’s totally irrelevant.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 10:28 am Greg Eliot

        Okay, asshole, let me ‘splain it to ya:

        When he made the blanket statement “white feminists”, that’s often a misnomer because the most virulent “white” feminists are actually yentas, and claiming that White women are full of “racial self-hatred”, and White men are the “most feminized” is simply not true.

        It’s the vanguard of those “white feminists”, the you-know-who machers, that evince said “self-hatred” to the extent where it tar brushes the whole group of those who fancy themselves “feminists”, but are not really the hard-core cadre of those who push the agenda like grim death.

        Got it, shmuck?

        And I was further gainsaying his claim that White men are the “most feminized”, because that’s another canard pushed by the Cathedral in the MSM bombardment of those types, and the fact that in the real world, the “black community” evinces the most overt signs of true matriarchy.

        Now, you wanna dispute any of THOSE precepts?

        Don’t make me call you stupid again. 😡

        LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 10:29 am mendo

      “we need to appeal to women”

      We need to a-peel their clothes off, ravish them, and send them into the kitchen for some hearty grub.

      We need to immigrate our mass inside them…

      (I just woke and liked what you had to say whilst waiting for me coffee.)

      LikeLike


  7. on December 26, 2015 at 9:38 am paddy

    I seem to recall Patton looking for especially brave men who had distinguished themselves – and sending them back to the USA, so that they would survive the war intact. He said that since they showed their bravery, they were the kind that needed to have kids to pass that on to future generations.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 1:44 pm Captain Obvious

      Which, if true, would be yet another reason that he had to be ass@ssinated.

      LikeLike


  8. on December 26, 2015 at 9:41 am IHTG

    Swedes haven’t done much fighting in the 20th century.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 9:45 am ironpusher

      ……Some people are just to busy sucking dick.

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 10:54 am whorefinder

        Threadwinner.

        LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 9:51 am Laguna Beach Fogey

      And yet they were a superpower under Gustavus Adolphus. What happened?

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 10:15 am Greg Eliot

        They did pretty good for themselves well-before Adolphus as well…

        Kiev, “People of Rus”, Varangian Guard, etc.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 10:54 am whorefinder

        End of the Little Ice Age.

        LikeLike


  9. on December 26, 2015 at 9:47 am The Straw

    Clearly women voting has irreversibly fucked things…

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 9:49 am The Straw

      1920

      LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 9:50 am ironpusher

      Too bad their grandaughters would have thought that second picture was RAAACIST!!!

      LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 2:32 pm Johnny Redux

      This photo of the brief Christmas peace of 1914 always sticks in my mind, for a couple of reasons: (1) The men definitely look distinctively German on the one hand, and English on the other. Classic racial features of each culture. (2) I was always interested in how much stronger the German lad looks. For instance, look at their hands, and how much bigger and stronger the German’s hand is compared to the adjacent Englishman’s hands. The T is strong in the German boy. I am guessing that he died, and never passed it on.

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 3:52 pm Diversity Heretic

        I’m not sure that’s the truce of 1914. I don’t think that the Reichswehr adopted that style of helmet until later in the war. Some observers in World War II remarked on how much healthier German troops looked than did British.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 4:18 pm Amasius

        The American “dough boys” who came in and administered the last head stomp for the sake of Anglo-Israel were almost too healthy.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 1:02 am Carlos Danger

        If you read Storms of Steel, Ernst Juenger says the British were lavishly supplied compared to the Germans, who ate a lot of pickles and called them Blockade Wurst. When they went on trench raids the tins of Bully Beef were a prized trophy.

        LikeLike


  10. on December 26, 2015 at 9:52 am Hugo Stiglitz

    George Orwell said as much in the book “The Road To Wigan Pier.”

    “Of course one ought not to imagine that the prevailing bad physique is
    due solely to unemployment, for it is probable that the physical average
    has been declining all over England for a long time past, and not merely
    among the unemployed in the industrial areas[…].
    On the day when King George V’s body passed through London on its way to
    Westminster, I happened to be caught for an hour or two in the crowd in
    Trafalgar Square. It was impossible, looking about one then, not to be
    struck by the physical degeneracy of modern England. The people surrounding
    me were not working-class people for the most part; they were the
    shopkeeper–commercial-traveller type, with a sprinkling of the well-to-
    do. But what a set they looked! Puny limbs, sickly faces, under the weeping
    London sky! Hardly a well-built man or a decent-looking woman, and not a
    fresh complexion anywhere. […]Even the Guards, it seemed to me–there was a squad of
    guardsmen marching beside the coffin–were not what they used to be.
    Where are the monstrous men with chests like barrels and moustaches like
    the wings of eagles who strode across my child-hood’s gaze twenty or thirty
    years ago? Buried, I suppose, in the Flanders mud. In their place there are
    these pale-faced boys who have been picked for their height and
    consequently look like hop-poles in overcoats[…] this is no doubt partly
    due to the fact that the Great War carefully selected the million best men
    in England and slaughtered them, largely before they had had time to breed.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 9:54 am Tarl

      Germany suffered even worse in WW1 than did Britain. Yet they had plenty of “monstrous men” in the 1940s.

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 11:37 am Hugo Stiglitz

        Tarl :In his book, Orwell places most of the blame for the appalling health of the average Englishman on poverty and malnutrition.

        Germany had an effective healthcare system since Von Bismark. They also didn’t spend hundreds of years sending their best and brightest to the most backwards shitholes on the planet to plunder them for their resources.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 12:30 pm Tarl

        Eh. Germany had more poverty and malnutrition in the 1920s than Britain. Took strong and imaginative leadership to turn that problem around…

        LikeLike


  11. on December 26, 2015 at 9:52 am Tarl

    Eh, American casualties in WW1 and WW2 were trivial. Didn’t kill enough to kill the high-T cream of the crop.

    Meanwhile, Russia suffered far, far worse in both wars, and Russia isn’t overrun with pajama-boy pussies today.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on December 26, 2015 at 10:20 am Mobutu

      An interesting, fascinating and amazing land and people. High tech with some awesome ideas and then some utterly insane phuc-ups and horrid mistakes. God love them though. Never met a Russian I didn’t like.

      LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 1:09 am Carlos Danger

        Tolstoy too believed that Russia would be the salvation of Western Civilization.

        25 years ago I laughed out loud at the notion. Now… I’m starting to come around.

        This is a central theme in Russian literature- the prediction of the Revolution and the destruction of Christianity and its saving. It is the theme in Doestoevsky’s the Idiot and the Demons. This is also a long standing prophecy of the Russian Orthodox Church going back to Vassily III, Ivan the Terrible’s Grandfather in the 16th Century that Russia will be the savior of Christianity in the End Times. It is central to Russian Orthodox theology. Tolstoy and Doestoevsky were both Christian mystics.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 7:22 am Greg Eliot

        In Russia, the novels read YOU.

        😉

        LikeLike


      • on December 28, 2015 at 4:25 am Scanman

        Carlos,

        Thank you for your post. I was aware of Dostoyevsky also but not aware that this is actually a long known prophecy of the Orthodox Church.

        As an American child of the ’80s, I was taught that Russian = Bolshevik and believing this lie for years has naturally been detrimental to my education.

        There’s a reason why Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together (2002) has still not been translated to English…

        LikeLike


      • on December 28, 2015 at 6:30 am carlos danger

        Thanks for your kind words. It helps when your wife teaches Russian literature. I read about the prophecy in a biography on Ivan the Terrible. I was always fascinated by him ever since seeing the Sergei Eisenstein film as a child. The prophecy came about as a result of the fall of Constantinople. It is why the main Cathedral in Moscow has its Orthodox crosses sitting atop crescent moons on their back on its seven domes. Another prediction for you: Russia will invade Turkey and partition it. They will offer Ionian Greece, Turkish Cyprus and Constantinople (Istanbul) back to Greece in exchange for a navy base in Cyprus and a Greek alliance with Russia and an exit from NATO. We will do nothing about it because the dirty little secret in the ME right now is the Russians can shut down our avionics and command and control systems with a little football sized device.

        LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 10:43 am Hitfan

      Look up Francis Parker Yockey. He was an American rightist in te 1950s who was prescient in declaring that the Soviet Union was far preferable to preserving Weatern Civilization than the decadent US.

      Who would you rather live under: Putin or Obama?

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 10:51 am Mobutu

        The USSR was just another name for the Russian Empire. Kinda like the PRC is the latest name for the Han Empire. Just my view.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 10:54 am Greg Eliot

        Imperium can take it’s place alongside any pillar of Western socio-political work of note. Should be required reading in any institution of higher learning worthy of the name…

        … yet, like so many GBFM, it remains an obscure footnote, known only to those who have taken the pains to extend their educations beyond the erstwhile “hallowed halls” of what passes for academia over the past two generations.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 11:40 am Scanman

        Tolstoy too believed that Russia would be the salvation of Western Civilization.

        25 years ago I laughed out loud at the notion. Now… I’m starting to come around.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 12:27 pm Tarl

        Who could have predicted in the 1950s that today Russia would be the Christian nation and America would swap with her as the land of Communist zealotry, economic failure, and moral degeneracy? Indeed, this was not even predictable as late as 1988.

        Wonder what Yockey was railing against back then. Can we have that “evil” 1950s America back please?

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 1:04 pm Greg Eliot

        Just goes to show how prescient Yockey was…

        … if America in the 1950’s was such a Golden Age, why did the so-called “Greatest Generation” already start giving in to the We-Need-Diversity crowd?

        Yockey saw what several others did, but where quashed: FDR opened the floodgates for Leftist traitors and other assorted scoundrels… and behind the scenes, the full support of all those men behind the curtain we’re not supposed to notice.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 2:38 pm Johnny Redux

        And Yockey was murdered too. The same old plot for those with vision and speak out.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 2:46 pm freddie

        Thanks ftor telling me bout Imperium. Will try and tackle this. But 568 pages?? Gotta get my T up for that!

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 3:41 pm Greg Eliot

        Imperium is not for the faint of attention span…

        … and of course, not everything he says is golden… much like his virtual mentor, Spengler.

        But like Decline Of The West, it is required reading… leastwise, for those who would fancy themselves educated.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 3:45 pm Greg Eliot

        Although Yockey’s death in jail smells bad, a reasonable explanation could be that he did carry that cyanide pill around with him, and didn’t want to be tortured to give up the names of his various contacts…

        … he was, after all, known to travel in many circles (multiple passports, remember… that’s what they busted him on), and was allegedly trying to set up some sort of cooperative network among Communists and Pan-European Nationalists against World Zionism.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 12:20 am Pwn

        There are plenty of signs for proto multiculturalism and political correctness in the US since at least ww1. Off the top of my head after a night of drinking: birth of a nation and Agatha Christie having to publish ten little naggers with another title in the US. It’s not surprising that a bourgeoisie country is ravaged by political correctness. Pretending that things that can’t be talked about in polite society don’t exist is a typical bourgeoisie feature.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 1:13 am Carlos Danger

        http://home.alphalink.com.au/~radnat/fpyockey/

        Best site I could find on Yockey with a quick search. Thanks for the tip.

        LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 12:26 pm The Other Jim

      Agreed, Russia is disproves the above theory despite immolating their population in WWI, Stalin’s Purges, and WWII. I suspect the reason why Russia(& even Eastern Europe) is still a bastion of Western Civilization and masculinity is that the Russians may have embraced Communism in its political and economic forms, they never embraced it in its Eskimo-enabled Cultural form. Thus, Russia never had eskimo-enabled Feminism, LGBT, male pussification, etc. All the while for the past 20 or so years Putin and Russia have been embracing Russian Nationalism, Orthodox Christianity, and masculinity.

      If I ever wanted to fuck up a rival nation like China or India for the long term, I’d send them America’s Eskimo’s, then the Black Orc Hordes, and Mexican Goblinoid masses. Throw in the Feminazi’s and Sodomites too. No nation could survive that.

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 12:37 pm The Other Jim

        Also, post-WWII, Russia saw much of its Eskimo population leave for Israel.

        “Between 1989 and 2002 – the year of the most recent census survey — some 40 percent of the Jewish population left Russia in a mass emigration, some of whom moved to Israel. However, according to Russian Chief Rabbi and Chabad emissary Rabbi Berel Lazar, many are now returning to Russia, in particular those Jews who had moved to Germany in the 1990s.

        Nevertheless, by the 2002 census, there were only 233,000 Jews left in Russia, compared with 875,000 Jews who lived in the country in 1959, when the first census was taken following World War II….”
        Link: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/140268#.Vn7qulKMxzI

        Hopefully, when the US collapses, one of the few benefits will be the emptying of America if its corrosive Eskimo population.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 1:00 pm Greg Eliot

        Russia also never had to put up with 15% dindu population (in meat world, 70% in MSM-land) and the distractions which THAT diversity entails…

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 1:41 pm irishsavant

        Problem with that solution is that the Asians wouldn’t allow them to run everything from behind the curtain. They’re not adherents of Holochristianity.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 1:44 pm irishsavant

        “by the 2002 census, there were only 233,000 Jews left in Russia”. And amazingly eight of of the ten oligarchs were/are Eskimos. Pure cohencidence.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 2:46 pm Johnny Redux

        Yes, it’s against the law (yes, against the law) to teach any pro-homo messages in schools in Russia. So, we see who is winning the POZ wars of the 21st Centrury. (Hint: It ain’t the USA, Canada or Western Europe)

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 2:58 pm The Other Jim

        @Irishsavant. It was also pure coincidence that Eskimo Larry Summers and the Eskimo’s from Harvard appeared in post-Soviet Russia to ahem, “rebuild” Russia into a “Capitalist” economy. It’s also pure coincidence that Harvard is sitting upon a $36 billion endowment…

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 12:24 am Pwn

        It’s because Russia was never a made up prepositional nation during whose history for the most part anybody off the planet could go there and so on. The 1960s mean NOTHING in the grand scheme of things. Did the Jews give citizenship to millions of illiterate naggers who quite obviously hated you by courtesy of being your former slaves and whom would have inevitably became equal to white people because the type of glaring hypocrisy needed to do otherwise?

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 12:49 pm Canadian Friend

        …And amazingly eight of of the ten oligarchs were/are Eskimos. Pure cohencidence…

        cohencidence as in Leonard Cohen the jewish song writer?

        or was that simply a typo?

        either way it is funny.

        LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 3:43 pm slumlord

      Russia was never Protestant. The disease of the West is a mental condition, not a genetic one.

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 4:22 pm Amasius

        Russia never had a Renaissance or a Reformation, and their Enlightenment was an ephemeral phenomenon restricted to the top 1%. They are spiritually Medieval people to this day– and I don’t mean that as a put-down.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 5:46 pm slumlord

        @ Amasius

        Good reply.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 6:16 pm Diversity Is Good

        France was never Protestant either, dumbass, until the greed of the Church-approved kings led to a revolution.

        The disease of the West is a mental condition, not a genetic one.

        It’s all about resources and r/K. Genetics and epigentics. Maybe you should learn some 21st century science, dude, if you aren’t too old to learn new things?

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 6:53 pm Diversity Is Good

        Russia never had a Renaissance or a Reformation, and their Enlightenment was an ephemeral phenomenon restricted to the top 1%. They are spiritually Medieval people to this day– and I don’t mean that as a put-down

        Another dumbass heard from. There’s nothing Medieval about the Russians in 2015, a lot of them are agnostics.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 11:08 pm slumlord

        @DIG

        Google is your friend. Apporximately 20% of Russian are either atheists or undecided. Guess that makes them majority according to your math. Stop masturbating to Dawkins and get an education.

        It’s all about resources and r/K. Genetics and epigentics.

        Better societies through better breeding is a dumb fucking idea that keeps getting repeated because of its appeal to cognitive misers. Inbreeding at the Ozarks did not produce the master race. The chinks are much smarter than the whites on IQ tests and were ethnically homogeneous, yet until recently were going no-fucking-where.

        When we loved the baby Jesus we kicked arse, advanced science and produced decent art. Once we ditched religion it all went downhill.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 11:43 am Diversity Is Good

        “A lot” and “majority” are not the same thing, dumbass. Learn to read.

        It’s all about resources and r/K. Genetics and epigentics.

        Stumplord
        Better societies through better breeding is a dumb fucking idea that keeps getting repeated because of its appeal to cognitive misers.
        Inbreeding at the Ozarks did not produce the master race.

        So? You are clearly too stupid and too old to learn anything. If 40% of behavior is inherited, if 50+% of intelligence is inherited, what does that mean dumbass? “Inherited” means “obtained via genetic / epigenetic means”, let me know if I’m using too many big words.

        When we loved the baby Jesus we kicked arse, advanced science and produced decent art. Once we ditched religion it all went downhill.

        This “Rome or Die” shit is going nowhere. Your church is all about destroying what’s left of the West. Your church wants the US flooded with Mexicans, Central Americans, Somalis and other geniuses. Your church wants Germany to be overrun with Syrians. Your church wants to destroy Sweden in one generation. Your church wants Italy to be filled with Africans excepting of course Vatican City which takes in no “refugees” because it’s special, can’t have the Vatican bank paying for something that’s the job of Italian taxpayers, now can we?

        Your church wants to bankrupt the west via colonization. Immigration culture is rape culture. Your church demands unlimited immigration. We know what means, it means Syrians raping German women, Afghanis raping Swedish women, Pakistanis shopping out English girls for year after year. That’s what your church wants.

        Your church wants MOAR RAPES of Swedish, German, Norwegian, Finnish, French, Austrian, Danish, Dutch, English, Spanish, Italian, American and yes, Australian women, slutlord.

        If immigration culture is rape culture your church culture is rape culture, and your church is at war with every single white nation. Every. Single. One.

        And your solution is more of the same, MOAR CHURCH, right? More priests buttfucking little boys, too? Or is that something even you have finally figured out isn’t a good idea?

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 1:16 pm Joe

        Is D.I.G. really Arbiter?

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 1:30 pm slumlord

        @DIGHead

        So? You are clearly too stupid and too old to learn anything. If 40% of behavior is inherited, if 50+% of intelligence is inherited, what does that mean dumbass?

        It means that the other 50% is just as important as the genetic component and its not just r/k selection. The software matters. You just cant wish it away if it doesn’t fit the narrative. Your Ozark breeding program is going to fail. Both logic and cognitive bias seem to be your weakpoint. Stick with the crayons.

        This “Rome or Die” shit is going nowhere. Your church is all about destroying what’s left of the West

        My Church IS the West you knucklehead. Start with some history instead of Sam Harris. Your shit, entering my Church, has poisoned it. Seige of Vienna, and Battle of Lepanto weren’t fought by fucking neckbearded atheists singing Kumbaya to the Muslims. Sweeden and Germany? When were the last times they took any advice from a Pope? You’re not Avro Manhattan or Jack Chick by any chance?

        “A lot” and “majority” are not the same thing, dumbass. Learn to read.

        Typical slimy “frameshift”. Do you work at the NYT?

        LikeLike


      • on December 28, 2015 at 2:53 pm Diversity Is Good

        @DIGHead

        So? You are clearly too stupid and too old to learn anything. If 40% of behavior is inherited, if 50+% of intelligence is inherited, what does that mean dumbass?

        It means that the other 50% is just as important as the genetic component and its not just r/k selection.

        NO, dumbass, it means that your blank slate, magic dirt, open borders cargo cult thinking is wrong, scientifically wrong. It means that taking a 80 IQ Somali gunman and parking him in public housing in Minnesota or Maine won’t magically change him into a Lutefisk eating DFL liberal. It means that your open borders, magic dirt, blank slate cargo cult thinking can only kill civilization. That’s what it means, dumbass.

        Immigration culture is rape culture. Churches that support open borders are pro-rape. Your church supports open borders. Your church supports rape.

        Open borders means the death of the West. Churches that support open borders are enemies of the West. Your church supports open borders. Your church is an enemy of the West.

        These syllogisms are so simple, even a dumbass should be able to understand them.

        The software matters. You just cant wish it away if it doesn’t fit the narrative.

        No, dumbass, the genes matter, and you can’t wish fact away with your blank slate, magic dirt, cargo cult “invite the world” treason. You can’t make a borderline retarded Somali into Bienvenuto Cellini no matter how much welfare you give him, dumbass.

        Your Ozark breeding program is going to fail.

        Your strawman fails, dumbass. Your Pakistani importation program is killing the west, both directly and indirectly.

        Open borders means the death of the West. Your church supports open borders. Your church is part of what’s killing the West.

        Both logic and cognitive bias seem to be your weakpoint. Stick with the crayons.

        LOL at the dumbass whose idea of “logic” is the strawman fallacy.
        Open borders means the death of the west. Your church supports open borders. Your church wants the West destroyed.

        This “Rome or Die” shit is going nowhere. Your church is all about destroying what’s left of the West

        My Church IS the West you knucklehead.

        What pigshit, dumbass, your church is Africa and Latin America, that’s where the growth is. And your Pope, “Che'” Francis is all about inviting Africa into Europe, the whole world saw that at Lampadusa.

        Immigration culture is rape culture. Your church and a bunch of other churches are all about unlimited, open border, magic dirt migration. Therefore your church is all about destroying the West via unlimited migration of sub-normal IQ barbarians into the bankrupt welfare states.

        Your church is part of the problem, it is not part of any solution.

        Start with some history instead of Sam Harris. Your shit, entering my Church, has poisoned it.

        Your church and every other open borders church is killing my civilization, dumbass. You want history, dumbass? No problem for me, you might not be so happy.

        Seige of Vienna, and Battle of Lepanto weren’t fought by fucking neckbearded atheists singing Kumbaya to the Muslims.

        Oh, LOL, Muh Lepanto, huh? Seriously, Slutlord? Muh Vienna, too?
        Don’t you mean sieges, as in plural, of Vienna? Which siege, dumbass? If you knew anything about the history you are waving around like your toy dick, you’d know there were two.

        Well, dumbass, those battles weren’t fought by boy-fucking, pencil-necked Communists either. What’s your church stuffed full of now, dumbass, men or boyfuckers? You’ve got a Communist for a Pope for a start, and probably still plenty of boyfuckers in black robes scattered across the world.

        SO Muh Lepanto? LOL! Muh Vienna? LOL and LOL. Which side would your church be on now, dumbass? Would Pope Che’ Francis be ready to send men and supplies to Vienna to defend it, or would he send greetings to the Turks and present his hindquarters? We know the answer, already, because of his invitation to all of Africa to migrate into Europe. Dumbass.

        See, Slutlord, the point of Lepanto and both sieges of Vienna was keeping Muslims out of Europe, not inviting them in.
        Your church and the Lutheran churches of Germany, Sweden, Norway and FInland are all about MOAR MUSLIMS. Your church and those other churches piss on the graves of the men, the genuine men, who fought to keep Islam out of Europe. And your church is helping to kill Europe.

        Your magic dirt, blank slate, open borders church pisses on the real men of history. You piss on their graves too, with your open borders, blank slate, magic dirt cago cult fantasy.

        Sweeden and Germany? When were the last times they took any advice from a Pope?

        Catholic Charities and resettlement has a lot of connections, Slutlord, and thanks for showing how ignorant you are of Europe, too. There’s plenty of Catholics in Germany, shithead. Do a search on “Bavaria” for a start, if you want I’ll Google it for you.

        You’re not Avro Manhattan or Jack Chick by any chance?

        You’re not a boyfucking priest who worships Che Guevara and is inviting ISIS into Europe, by any chance?

        “A lot” and “majority” are not the same thing, dumbass. Learn to read.

        Typical slimy “frameshift”. Do you work at the NYT?

        Typical whining from a pedestalizing mangina, Shithead. Your ignorance and inability to read is not my problem.

        Your church working on the destruction of the West by inviting Africa and the MIddle East, most espeically including ISIS into Europe, that is my problem.

        If you weren’t a traitor to civilization, it would be your problem too.

        LikeLike


      • on December 28, 2015 at 4:37 pm Diversity Is Good

        Catholic church position on migration

        http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/immigration/churchteachingonimmigrationreform.cfm

        “[w]hen persons cannot find employment in their country of origin to support themselves and their families, they have a right to find work elsewhere in order to survive. Sovereign nations should provide ways to accommodate this right.”

        Got that, Slutlord? Paco the cartel hitman decides he wants to move out of Mexico, he has a right to find work elsewhere like in, say, Los Angeles, and your church will support him in that effort. Abdul the ISIS killer finds Syria too hot, decides he wants some R&R (Rape & Recreation) in Munich or Koln or Berlin, your church will support him as a “refugee”. Some Somali gunman wants out of Mogadishu, your church will work with the Lutherans to get him a nice taxpayer paid apartment in Minneapolis and an EBT card to get groceries with. Ditto Afghans into Malmo. Ditto Pakistanis into England, where they can rape white girls for a few years as in Rotherham. And on and on. Because Jesus loves open borders, open doors, raped white girls and free stuff for Muslim rapists on the taxpayer’s back.

        This open border migration means the death of the West. Any church or other organization that supports open borders wants death of the West.

        The Catholic church supports open borders. Therefore that church wants the West dead. So that church is an enemy of the West.

        Yeah, there are other churches that are enemies of the West but nobody is pushing “Lutheranism or Die”, “Methodism or Die”, etc. here, so far, just cucks like Slutlord with their “Rome or Die” shit.

        Any open borders group is all about murdering the West. Period.

        LikeLike


    • on December 29, 2015 at 12:31 pm pavetack

      Indeed, Russia lost 36% of men between 15-34 (almost 25 million) and 33% of men 35-49 (18.5 million); many of the deaths in this age group were military related, as opposed to famine and disease.

      It isn’t genetics; it’s attitude.

      LikeLike


  12. on December 26, 2015 at 10:01 am everlastingphelps

    Evolution is the belief that small, tiny mutations in a small, tiny minority of the genetic pool get magnified by natural selection until they result in complete speciation of new forms of life.

    The exact same people who are militant in their belief of evolution claim that killing millions of your best genetic stock has no effect on our gene pool, because that’s just a small, tiny minority.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 10:15 am Drive Them Before You

      Do you want me to explain the math, or have you already made up your mind?

      LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 12:36 am Pwn

        Eh, discussing evolution or genetics with people whose entire understanding of it comes from reading blogs is stupid. It’s like discussing the implications of the ZFT axioms with someone who just knows some algebra. I pretty much tune out the genetic theories and arguments about genetics made by people who wouldn’t even know the difference between gwas and snp(there are exceptions of people who understand the mechanics without that, but they’re a minority; during the stupid iq and race debates on YouTube in 2011 and 2012, pretty much everyone on the race influences iq side knew the difference). It’s quite a good indicator of an actual interest in genetics.

        LikeLike


  13. on December 26, 2015 at 10:08 am Passer by

    I will just copy a comment i saw at the Occidental Observer:

    “I suspect that another reason for the rise of all kinds of sexual perversions, specifically regarding white males, is the opting out of the natural man-woman pettern by weak pathetic ‘men’ who feel inadequate or insufficiently confident in getting with a (desirable) woman.

    A couple of weeks ago I’ve spent a week in Louvain, a (still) beautiful Belgian student town where I’ve lived and studied for a couple of years some 6 years prior. I was horrified at how this once 99% White town has been flooded by all kinds of Arabs and Blacks, majority of them young men, in the span of just a few years. Even more horrifying is the amount of race-mixing I’ve witnessed. Without exaggerating, the prettiest girls between 14-20 years were shockingly often accompanied by some Black or Arab of similar age or slightly older, something which was virtually unheard of not even a decade ago when I studied there. I’m confident that back then such intermixing wouldn’t have taken place even if the invaders were already there, as ‘my generation’ of male students was still quite confident, manly (and therefore often good looking) etc. Generally, ‘we’ went to the gym, were willing and able to fight if necessary, were confident (and active) with girls etc. Not many girls would’ve gone for some invader with what was available of Belgian boys back then which, again, was not even a full decade ago.

    On the other hand, the boys who are app. 14-20 years old now, that I’ve observed in Louvain, are shockingly meek, weak, passive, insecure, geeky etc. As a result they’re often to be seen without any girl in sight. Seeing so many attractive young girls strolling with groups of non-Whites, often with some pathetic wigger thrown in there, and so many weak, geeky White Belgian boys strolling by themselves, I remember wondering just how the latter released their sexual tensions, which are obviously at their peak at that age. Porn is one answer of course, but I suspect some of them will also develop some kinds of alternative perversions as they’re virtually locked out of the sexual market.

    Needless to say this visit, which should’ve been very pleasant, made me sick to my stomach. It can’t be stressed enough how important it is for young White boys to start working out and preferably learning some (effective) martial art already at a young age, as it raises a boy’s confidence, his testosterone, improves his looks a.s., and doing so, I suspect, insures healthy, natural sexual tendencies later on.”

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 10:12 am Laguna Beach Fogey

      These young Belgian men are perfect recruits for the coming war.

      LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 3:03 pm Johnny Redux

      That whole article is defeatist propaganda nonsense. 99% of the girls with non-Whites? Bullshit! Go online and look at photos of street scenes in the town, and you will not see that. Yes, Leftist fools will mate with the savages, but most White women will not do so (voluntarily, that is).

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 3:50 pm Greg Eliot

        That’s the latest pull from the Cathedral’s bag o’ tricks… the shill sound like he’s making the right noises, so far as his own personal loyalties go…

        … but invariably he turns out to be like the agitprop cartoonists in the various wars who try to demoralize the troops by showing how their wives and girls back home are being seduced by “Jody” and succumbing to the advances of strange men.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 4:57 pm Regular John

        Yawn. another tokyo rose troll. Hey GI! You’re woman sleeps with tyrone power!

        cheer up, eeyore. 50,000 nationalists marched in poland and burned the gay rainbow sculpture

        LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 8:45 pm Vagina dominator

      @morejewishgaslighting

      Jew says “I’m a white man and we’re all washed up! We’re finished! Why even try?!”

      I’d choke the life out of you with my bare hands, kike.

      LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 8:52 pm PA

      This comment is written very similarly to the same shill’s recent description of mudsharking in London. Same lurid detail, same narrative structure.

      LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 1:20 am Carlos Danger

        Also the same guy who wrote the good cop response to the militant Hasbara kid a few weeks ago.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 7:56 am wolfie65

        How much he exaggerates, I’m not sure, but this problem is neither new nor limited to Belgium. I remember the 1980’s quite well, and every Arab, African, Latino or other non-White guy in Europe had but one goal: Fuck White girls, the blonder and more blue-eyed, the better.
        What made it worse was that the collective post-WW II knee-jerk reaction everyone had to anything even remotely resembling ‘racism’ made it practically illegal for White girls to say no to those men, almost requiring them to reject White guys.
        Today, you have Pakistanis and Indians all over Britain, Arabs and North African Blacks all over France, Belgium, Holland and Italy, Albanians, Somalis, Ethiopians all over Scandinavia (the very well of Blondieland is being poisoned royally), add Frau Merkel’s raising of global temperatures by further increasing Middle Europe’s overpopulation with the addition of a few million Syrians, Iraqis and Afghans, fast forward a couple of generations, Australian farmland and Utah may be the only remaining repositories of natural Blondes, all else will be one giant favela surviving on the proceeds of jihad.

        LikeLike


  14. on December 26, 2015 at 10:10 am Laguna Beach Fogey

    To explain the decline, you really have to go back to the Enlightenment, Reformation, 1832 Reform Act, WWI, universal suffrage, etc., tbh.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 11:31 am Diversity Is Good

      r/K explains it much more simply. Occam’s razor…

      LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 12:39 am Pwn

        The god-cat did it is even simpler.

        LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 8:55 pm Vagina dominator

      To explain the decline go back to…

      1694. Creation of the Bank of England and the establishment of the National Debt in Britain.

      The Dutch jews had financed Cromwell’s war against the hereditary kings in order to establish a bureaucratic (parliamentary) state in which money was no longer raised by kings as a personal debt from already existant capital, but rather was created through various baking frauds to become a permanent and inescapable national debt borne on the backs of the people.

      Endless debt allowing endless war was the financial innovation (in a world that globally was far from its limits to growth) which created the British empire and even the industrial revolution.

      It is also the basis of the jewish money power which finances the poz that is at war with all of us today.

      LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 11:52 am Diversity Is Good

      god-cat has no predictive power, but with r/K predictions can be made.
      “Jooze dun it” doesn’t predict much either.

      The Soviets couldn’t run an economy. Russians have never had life as easy as the average Western European, look at who is acting more r-selected vs. more k-selected. Look at Japan or Taiwan, low birth rate, grass eaters, and NO JOOZE to blame either, how hard is it to figure out that r / K explains things better than Muh Jooze or Muh Church?

      LikeLike


  15. on December 26, 2015 at 10:20 am martin

    From the title and picture, I surmised that this would be a theory about ‘alphas’ being culled leaving European populations with low testosterone men. I think these types of theories are more aesthetic than anything else. Pyjama boy represents no one but himself. Also, don’t forget that the war poster is propaganda. they are both propaganda pieces really. it reflects leadership more than it does the average man.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 8:59 pm Vagina dominator

      Great comment. It is very important that we recognize their propaganda as exactly that.

      It’s purpose is to discourage, humiliate and indoctrinate. Our responses must be keyed to defusing these goals.

      Mockery and white triumphalism raise our spirits and deflate theirs. Reject defeatism.

      LikeLike


  16. on December 26, 2015 at 10:23 am Pete

    I’ve heard the same argument as regards Scandinavia. The brave and bold went aViking and settled new lands, or emigrated to the U.S. The Swedes, Danes, and Norwegians were the bottom of the bucket that couldn’t make it otherwise, and that is the reason for being ruined by their women, and such pussies.

    LikeLike


  17. on December 26, 2015 at 10:31 am chris

    Wouldn’t the same reasoning apply to WWI as well?

    It only took 1 generation to recover enough masculine for WWII.

    It has been 2.3 generations since WWII. Enough time for a similar recovery?

    LikeLike


  18. on December 26, 2015 at 10:33 am tombreck2

    Birth control is a main cause of the decline in the West.

    Smart, rich people (who should have kids) will use birth control while dumb, poor people (who should not have kids) will not use birth control.

    Suddenly there are fatherless families, single mothers, high demand for welfare, increase in crime, and skyrocketing unemployment rates.

    The smart, rich people who have been using condoms and the pill get footed with the bill that results from the incompetence of the lower class.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 12:04 pm mendo

      The smart, rich people who have been using condoms and the pill get footed with the bill that results from the incompetence of the lower class.

      Guess they’re not so smart after all.

      Great comment and just reminds me of the great brainwashing of the 20th century.

      LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 9:47 am gkruz

        No one is dumber than smart people. Only smart people can be seduced by ideas that are textbook perfect but streetwise stupid.

        LikeLike


  19. on December 26, 2015 at 10:34 am hosswire

    I read an article years back about a troop of chimps living next to a garbage dump somewhere in Africa. The most adventurous, aggressive male chimps would be the only ones with the courage to venture into that busy & intimidating dump and scavenge for food. Their more timid peers would skulk around on the periphery. Probably wearing flannel pajamas & cradling a cup of cocoa.

    One day these scavenging chimps got into some poison that had been dumped there & died. The behavior of the entire troop changed afterwards, as the timid chimps became the leaders and reproduced. If I recall correctly, other more aggressive chimp troops began harassing them & eventually conquered them.

    My first thought was that scenario sounded a lot like WW1 & 2s for Europe.

    Another possible related explanation is the “use it or lose it” phenomenon.

    Aggressiveness & masculinity is costly in terms of energy & resources both individually & societally. For both individuals & nations, it’s a pain to physically, mentally & psychologically prepare for conflict & to engage in it. So if we can avoid it, we will, and immediately start to atrophy.

    It’s a vicious cycle, too. The more we atrophy into softness, the harder it gets to start toughening up up again. If you’ve culled out the high-T specimens on top of that, the softening happens even faster.

    SOMETHING has to explain how White nations thrived during thousands of years of hardship & war, then utterly collapsed after 60 years of peace and plenty.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 11:33 am Each Pond Gone

      Loss of substantial hardship, ultimately = Loss of meaning/purpose

      LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 10:24 am Sean Fielding

      Thanks – those chimps are a nice example of evolutionary stable strategies in action: risk-taking/aggression and caution are both stable strategies, in the sense that neither dies out completely, but the balance shifts with shifting conditions.

      LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 1:26 pm Joe

      “A troop of chimps”. Dude that is so racist. Come on you’re better than that!

      LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 6:38 pm Canadian Friend

      …SOMETHING has to explain how White nations thrived during thousands of years of hardship & war, then utterly collapsed after 60 years of peace and plenty…

      It seems to be a combination of many factors…Some of them totally new such as the pill which has changed drastically Western Civilization in too many ways to list, but one we should not ignore is that the pill ends up leaving female hormones in our drinking water …this has never happened before to any people… and other new things that no humans have ever encountered before such as plastic containers/wrappings that leach into what we eat and drink chemicals that are similar to female hormones….And all the chemicals in everything around us from the carpet in your room ( that new smell is actually bad for you ) to all those chemicals added to processed food.

      Those are only a few out of many things that humans have never been exposed to before.

      The use of anti-depressants and all those “magic ” pills that we white people consume much more than any other race are probably another contributing factor.

      The most feminized societies are also those that are the more “immersed” in all those modern things from chemicals to hormones to food additives and other modern Western things.

      It is not easy to figure out why this is happening, of course feminism, and the media becoming pro-left propaganda machines are important factors, but there has to be more than that.

      The present mix of contributing factors has never been seen before.

      I know this will sound ” tin foil hat crazy” but what about our heavy use of things that emit electro magnetic field or radio frequency waves?

      What if having a lap top on your lap – inches from your balls – many hours a day emitting wifi is affecting your male hormones?

      That is not silly, the human body was not made to be bombarded almost 24/7 by cell phone waves, wifi and such things.

      Those things are all fairly new, so we don’t know for sure what the long term effects are, those new things have never been used in combination before…white people were the first to use them and thus have been exposed for longer than any other race, and we use such things ( from cell phones to chemicals and hormones) more than anyone else…

      There are other contributing factors of course…but is it really simply a coincidence that the people more exposed to those modern things are also the ones more “pussyfied”? they are also the ones who are committing suicide by handing their civilization to hordes of savages?

      I think not.

      And the more feminized our men are and the softer they are, the easier it is to brainwash them into hating their own race, culture and history…that could well be why the left’s propaganda is so successful; our modern “things” have made us soft, way too soft.

      But of course there is more to this, I do not pretend to have the complete answer.

      LikeLike


      • on December 30, 2015 at 8:58 pm J.M.

        I think you are closer than most. I’ve been thinking about this and you might be right. At least your hypothesis fares a lot better than our host’s.

        LikeLike


      • on December 30, 2015 at 9:05 pm J.M.

        I think you are closer than most in regards to the real causes of our malaise.

        LikeLike


  20. on December 26, 2015 at 10:35 am Beautiful Truths Ignored

    The Whites of the southern USA had a higher death rate in the Civil War than the French had during WW1, and yet Alabama is the spiritually healthiest region of the modern West.

    Sweden, on the other hand, stayed out of both world wars and had an active eugenics program for decades, and yet they are the most spiritually degenerate nation in the modern West.

    A small number of media barons, big donors, influential academics and Hollywood moguls are dragging us all down.

    Hungary shows what can be accomplished when the power of the media is diminished, even slightly.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 10:55 am whorefinder

      Comfort breeds degeneracy.

      Men were not made for softness.

      Hard life rape!

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 11:33 am Diversity is Good

        r/K in other words. Abundance of resources leads to r.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 12:57 am Ripp

        @DIG

        “Abundance of resources leads to r.”

        This can be a contributing factor for an already K selected civilization, but most r selected people’s are scarce on resources and low IQ. The resources are contained at the very top 1%.

        Whites are predisposed to K selection. What is driving the shift to r selection isn’t an abundance of resources but the endless tolerance of r selected peoples and their r selected values, and the forced giving of those resources to the r selected.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 12:58 am Ripp

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 5:02 am Mean Mr. Mustard

        “Men were designed for short, nasty, brutal lives. Women were designed for long miserable ones.”

        from; The Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition Into the Forces of History by Howard Bloom.

        LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 11:51 am Scanman

      This is an excellent post. Thanks.

      LikeLike


  21. on December 26, 2015 at 10:55 am Mobutu

    But some good news here:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/dr-gridlock/wp/2015/12/22/man-assaulted-on-metros-red-line-during-rush-hour-attack/?tid=hybrid_collaborative_3_na

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 1:53 pm irishsavant

      Well that certainly helped Kaplan with his audience insight! ROTFL!

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 2:52 pm freddie

        Kaplan was the wife.She didn’t want to ID her battered hubby.Wonder who he is.Eskimo.hopefully.

        LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 3:55 pm Greg Eliot

      I find no joy in “yutes” terrorizing passengers on a train…

      … in their eyes, they were just mau-mauing some “cracker”, not striking a blow against the Sanhedrin.

      Guard against too much schadenfreude… after all, that was the sin of the Wandering Jew, and not something to be emulated by men of good will.

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 6:45 pm trav777

        says his wife works for NPR on a reality-denial show

        Next time I hope they beat and rape her too

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 9:48 am Mobutu

        He’s an enemy agent, along with his wife. And I’m running out of good will.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 6:50 pm Canadian Friend

        “…says his wife works for NPR on a reality-denial show…”

        One huge symptom the West is suffering from a serious reality-denial mental disease is that our media calls them “youths” when we all know they mean black or brown teenagers.

        LikeLike


      • on December 28, 2015 at 9:13 am Greg Eliot

        He’s an enemy agent, along with his wife. And I’m running out of good will.

        That’s a fair enough sentiment, I grant you…

        … one which I myself might share, had these “yutes” been some sort of neo-SA men whose stated purpose was to “settle accounts” with our traitors and fifth columnists.

        But they were merely your jungle-variety n1ggers terrorizing what they thought was just some cracker.

        LikeLike


  22. on December 26, 2015 at 11:14 am Sean Fielding

    It’s an appealing idea with a heritage that goes back to those Lost Generation thinkers who were quick to realize that WW1 was the true signal of the approaching end of the West. Even Kipling, so representative of the prior era, bought the notion when his son was killed. It`s an appealing idea, but it`s wrong. To understand why, look for an upcoming article at therightstuff.biz

    LikeLike


    • on December 28, 2015 at 9:21 am Greg Eliot

      I’m not sure that so-called Lost Generation was based upon mourning the beginning of the end of the West…

      … it always struck me more as a sort of nihilism-lite pseudo-intellectual posturing with strong Leftist sympathies…

      … and whose reputation waxed (rather than rightfully waned) due to being darlings of those who came to dominate the culture and MSM afterwards.

      Upper-class ennui and a smidgen of White guilt, coupled the occasional big game rifle and battlefield ambulance for street cred. Meh.

      LikeLike


  23. on December 26, 2015 at 11:15 am Hackett To Bits

    -Poverty and hardship build character, prosperity and security destroy it.

    http://takimag.com/article/girly_nation/print#axzz3vS3myX34

    That’s as pithy as it gets…

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 11:43 am theasdgamer

      To build character, there must be a future time orientation along with the hardship. Poverty is irrelevant. Hardship encourages good judgment, and good judgment encourages good character.

      LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 11:54 am Scanman

      One need only look at 3d generation trust fund douchebags (like Taki himself) to see some truth in this.

      LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 12:04 pm Beautiful Truths Ignored

      Nationalism and Christianity build character, Jewish controlled media and education destroy it.

      For three years I worked construction and landscaping, and I never once encountered a Hispanic on any job site who worked harder than me. I moved on to other things because higher wages were available elsewhere, something Hispanics are less likely to do. That is why employers love Hispanic immigrants – they are *content* with low wages, and payment under the table avoids payroll taxes. The alleged “softness” of Americans has nothing to do with it.

      Derbyshire’s column equates manliness with carpet bombing while making yet another attempt to shield the Jewish elite from blame for their misdeeds. I’ve given up hoping he will ever recover from his neocon indoctrination.

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 12:42 pm Mobutu

        Maybe you could take that up with his asian wifey.

        LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 4:56 pm DH

      Is that Derbyshire the same cuck who hand in hand with rabbis sang songs celebrating the killings of irish catholics?

      LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 1:31 pm Joe

        Uhm…what?

        LikeLike


  24. on December 26, 2015 at 11:51 am Tasker

    Lothrop Stoddard came to the same conclusion in the 1920’s in “The Rising Tide of Color and the End of White World Supremacy.” Specifically, Chapter VIII, “The Modern Pelloponesian War.” https://archive.org/stream/risingtideofcolo00stoduoft/risingtideofcolo00stoduoft_djvu.txt

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 3:17 pm Johnny Redux

      Tasker, I am embarrassed to say that I have never heard of his book but, my God, after just reading the preface, this man was a visionary! He knew the score back in 1920! I plan on reading it (glad that it is free, online).

      “late war may be merely the first stage in a cycle of
      ruin.

      In fact, so absorbed is the white world with its do-
      mestic dissensions that it pays scant heed to racial
      problems whose importance for the future of man-
      kind far transcends the questions which engross its
      attention to-day.

      This relative indifference to the larger racial issues
      has determined the writing of the present book. So
      fundamental are these issues that a candid discussion
      of them would seem to be timely and helpful.”

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 3:50 pm Johnny Redux

        Jezuz-H-Christ! That fellow really was seeing into the future. He made all the right statements about race. Spot on. But, for someone like him in 1920, to come out and say this, blew me away:

        “First and foremost, the wretched Versailles business will have to be thoroughly revised. As it stands, dragon’s teeth have been sown over both Europe and Asia, and unless they be plucked up they will presently grow a crop of cataclysms which will seal the white world’s doom.”

        He called it! And he we are. I often say that the ills we face today are the direct result of our race fighting in, and then losing, WWII.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 11:20 am Carlos Danger

        Not really.. Back then everyone saw China and the Yellow Menace as the latent threat.

        LikeLike


  25. on December 26, 2015 at 12:25 pm TLM

    I concur with giving chicks the right to vote was/is catastrophic, the voting franchise should be much more restrictive even if we did strip women from it again.

    Some other contributors;

    Christianity’s transformation into churchianity & cuckianity. Put a cross tattoo on Pajama Boy’s shoulder, a copy of any Rob Bell book under his arm, and you have today’s ‘youth’ pastors that are coming into their own. They have traded the Gospel of Christ for the gospel of self-help narcissistic navel gazing. A church doesn’t need to be fire & brimstone every week, but it must preach the truth which it stopped doing a long time ago.

    The credentialing craze that has ultimately led to the extinction of male teachers. And by male teachers I do not mean the modern beta boys with education degrees or the old 60’s hippies hiding out in the parochial school systems close to retirement. Growing up I remember many many more male teachers, good teachers. They taught and rewarded via a meritocracy vs. this feeling BS. And they wouldn’t hesitate to discipline if necessary. Today schools are run by women and they are a mess! Watch on YouTube how these teachers let these little fuckers run wild with no consequences or ass beatings. It’s like watching the Bizarro world version of school from when I grew up.

    LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 10:38 am gkruz

      TVLand has a new show called “Teachers”. I haven’t seen anything but the trailers, but it would seem to encapsulate your comment. Needless, to say, it is an all female cast, and is supposed to be funny. And of course, it isn’t, except in a gallows humor way. Look up the trailers for it on JewTube and you will see what I mean…

      LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 10:52 am Greg Eliot

        I think I saw that the other day and found it even more appalling than usual… which is saying something.

        The only thing they didn’t broach was showing the faculty boffing students on their desks in the middle of class…

        … yet.

        LikeLike


  26. on December 26, 2015 at 12:38 pm martin

    I am not so sure that WWII had such a dysgenic effect as WWI. In world war one there were many instances of highly gifted individuals losing their lives on the front line. Moseley a 25 year old Nobel Prize winner. Wilfred Owen the poet. Also, officers died in disproportionate numbers.
    But the British, at least, learned from their dreadful mistakes and in WWII the infantry generally did not include the most intelligent fighting men. For instance my father, a conscript, was given an IQ test of sorts and ended up as a member of the ground crew in the RAF, where as I understand it his life was. never in any danger. Indeed, WWII might even have had a eugenic effect

    LikeLike


  27. on December 26, 2015 at 1:17 pm irishsavant

    The theory rests on the somewhat tenuous assumption that the highest casualties were incurred by the highest testosterone males. If this was not the case the theory falls.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 1:39 pm Sean Fielding

      There are other problems with the theory but this one is important. It’s axiomatic that war has long been arranged not to disportionately kill off high-T males precisely because of their high value in war. Exceptions may occasionally occur as war technology changes, but they must, by definition, be fleeting.

      LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 4:27 pm Beautiful Truths Ignored

      It depends if the army in question is raised by draft or volunteering.

      Volunteer armies are almost certainly disgenic – the bravest, most idealistic men are more likely to volunteer and die.

      Britain in WW1 had an all volunteer army at first, so I would suspect that any disgenic effects would be felt stronger in Britain than in France, Germany, and Russia with their universal service.

      LikeLike


  28. on December 26, 2015 at 1:44 pm betamaxx

    How about the rise of technology making society lazy/weak in general.

    LikeLike


  29. on December 26, 2015 at 1:55 pm Axismundi

    IF GOD

    THEN WIAWW IS

    PRIDE

    LikeLike


  30. on December 26, 2015 at 2:16 pm Ben Gunn

    Re-reading Ian Fleming’s Bond books, I came across a reference to Anatomy of Courage, an account by a front line British doctor during WWI. There are a number of quiet tidbits of wisdom in the Bond series. AOC is a good read. He mentions the cowardly ended up in non fighting battalions, the good, brave, and intelligent literally did die in going over the top. That cursed war selected for cowardice. There were a good number in those battalions.
    As an aside, in one story, he was operating with men waiting in line for medical help, a large shell hit nearby, the men weren’t apparently hurt, but all were dead where they stood, killed by the concussion. More died in WW2, but 1 took the gut out of Europe.
    In another WWI story, the fighter ace with the most kills was a Frenchman, who simply took a scoped hunting rifle with him…!

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 3:31 pm Greg Eliot

      I heard that the von Ricktoffen (sp?) was brought down by ground fire, not by the plane he was combating at the time. Allegedly he was chasing the plane which drew him in low to the ground, and there men with rifles were waiting.

      LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 11:13 am gkruz

        Yeah, a bunch of Aussie infantry shot him down although the Canuck pilot he was battling usually gets the credit.

        LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 4:11 pm Diversity Heretic

      The leading World War I ace was Manfred von Richthofen with 80 confirmed shoot-downs of Allied aircraft. Although he was an enthusiastic hunter, he used machine guns in his aircraft. The most reliable evidence indicates that he was shot down by Australian ground fire while evading a British Sopwith Camel flown by Canadian Roy Brown.

      The leading French ace was René Fonck, who shot down 75 German aircraft. He was an excellent rifle shot (he could reportedly hit the French equivalent of quarters tossed into the air) and had phenomenol eyesight. He was also cold-blooded and aimed, when he could, for the cockpit of his adversary. He could often down a plane with only a few shots and sometimes returned with several victories and unexpended ammunition. The French do not, however, celebrate him very much because he did work with the Vichy government in World War II, although no charges of collaboration were ever proved and he retained his French Air Force reserve commissiion.

      The leading British ace was a one-eyed Irishman named Edward Mannock, who had (I believe) 64 victories. Like von Richthofen he did not survive the war, although I don’t know the circumstances of his loss.

      LikeLike


  31. on December 26, 2015 at 3:50 pm George

    Hitler and the Nazis should have focused on empire building and colonizing the third world, especially Africa, I instead of fighting an unwinnable war on all fronts with European neighbors.

    I think there actually was a plan to send the jews to Madagascar.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 3:57 pm Greg Eliot

      The lemurs balked.

      LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 3:59 pm Johnny Redux

      There was such a plan; however, are you aware that the Eskimos would NEVER leave Hitler and Germany alone? Churchill stated, in 1936, “Germany must be destroyed. She is becoming too strong.” Do you think ignoring Britain would prevent a war? Do you think building more colonies and competing even more with Great Britain (which was sinking, due to the depression and its own moral weakness), would help Germany prevent a war? No, we must realize that, give or take a year or two, that war was going to happen, because France and England hated Germany (out of jealousy), and even more so after the rise of Hitler and the elimination of corporate and banking theft/corruption/usury which eliminated German unemployment in 2 years, and threatened (if fascism teachings spread to England and the USA) the corrupt 1% elite’s stranglehold over the national economies. No, friend, that had to be stopped, and so war was going to happen. Which is why instead of pushing for peace, Poland was given a war guaranty. When Germany invaded Poland and refused to back out, war was declared on it. When the Soviets invaded and took the Eastern half of Poland, (((mysteriously)))) war was NEVER declared on it by any Allied nation, as if it never happened.

      LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 4:38 pm George

        Probably true. Facists in Spain, Italy and Japan were on a collision course with socialists. However, sending the socialists to colonize Africa instead of having a war resulting in 85 million dead Europeans would have worked out much better. Could you imagine if there were a strong European majority in South Africa with all its natural resources? It would have been one of the most desirable places to live. Just compare Cape Town to Johannesburg.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 5:09 pm DH

        +1

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 5:44 pm Rum

        If Britain intended war with Germany, they would have prepared for war. The opposite happened.
        The USSR entered Poland after Poland had collapsed. There was no reason at all at that point to make Germany and the USSR into allies.
        The reason that British elites came to see AH as unsafe to be around was because they had learned what he was already doing in occupied Austria and Czechland.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 5:53 pm Rum

        The German economic plan was to borrow money/print money, employ everyone building armaments and then starting a war to steal others people stuff before the bubble burst. Or before their window of technological advantage closed – which is exactly what happened in most of the things that mattered as the war went on..

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 6:25 pm Greg Eliot

        Ah, Rum chimes in again with his fanciful shilling…

        … funny how his usual rambling and somewhat incoherent style suddenly sounds positively rational.

        And what, pray tell, was that man with the funny little moustache doing in Austria and Czechland that the Brits decided NOT to broadcast it to the world, rather… to cajole the Poles into not backing down while John Bull and PePe Le Pew have time to take off their wainscoats and roll up their sleeves?

        Really, Schlomo… try again. (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 6:48 pm Rum

        Hitlers suppression of perceived “enemies” in those occupied countries had turned lethal almost from the beginning. Elite Brits began to conclude that losing to AH was incompatible with survival for most of them. Indeed, German plans for a post-invasion Britain were thoroughly brutal.
        Telling the world what was happening in occupied countries was a non-starter because the Germans would just deny it and no one wanted to reveal the sources of information. Also, there was no visual images of what was going on. That is normally what makes the greatest impact.
        Germany had been blamed for many things in WW1 that had turned out to be untrue. That fact made it very difficuklt for the Allies to get much traction in regard to convincing the world of Nazi atrocity. Few really believed it anyway until they saw the evidence with their own eyes.
        The mass killing of unpopular minorities had been announced and described in the Allied countries almost as soon as it began. But without a visual component, the announcements themselves made little impact, even if they were believed.

        LikeLike


      • on December 26, 2015 at 9:47 pm Johnny Redux

        @Rum: Are you aware of the many thousands of ethic Germans who were being killed in Poland, and many more thousands raped, beaten and/or removed from their homes, in state-sponsored ethnic cleansing, all whilst the (to be) Allied nations sat around and did nothing to stop it? Are you aware of the many (at least 3-4) attempts by Hitler to reach a peaceful resolution with Poland by swapping lands, so that the ethnic Germans in northwest Poland could be reunited with the Reich? Instead, the war guaranty from England just gave Poland more hubris, and they actually believed that they could fight off the German army. That war was a staged event by Roosevelt and Churchill from the beginning. Them and their Eskimo masters who declared war on Germany as early as 1933 with economic boycotts. And Hitler even made several attempts in the beginning of the war, after thoroughly crushing the British force that landed in France, and bombing the bejezuz out of England, to allow the English to cease the fighting without a surrender. Just end it. But, Churchill refused. Oh what bravery? No, not at all. The Eskimos, fully in power in the UK, with their Freemason brothers, would have fought to the last White British soldier to save their titles and wealth, and usurious way of life. What is a few hundred thousand more British lives to them, or French, or any other nationality? None.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 7:12 am Greg Eliot

        Indeed, German plans for a post-invasion Britain were thoroughly brutal.

        Heh, heh… when it comes to NAH-ZEEs, Rum becomes cogent and prolific, rather than his rambling and semi-incoherent self… go figger.

        Or should I say cohen-rent?

        Tell it to the marines, Schlomo… Hitler purposely let Britain off the hook at Dunkirk as a gesture of hoped-for future solidarity. If he planned to conquer England, he would have thrown everything at them at that time and really put a hurting on them.

        And then there’s muh Hess, who they still try to pass off as a renegade nut, but we all know how much water THAT spin carries.

        You’re quick to talk about how Germany planned to “steal other peoples stuff” and conveniently forget the ass-raping THEY took in the twenties, thanks to Versailles.

        And as far as “brutality” goes, don’t even try to cart out the old canards about V-2 rockets and Coventry or whatever that town was… and act like what later happened, when the war was pretty much over, to Dresden, Hamburg, et. al. was justified because “muh -they-started-it” bullshit.

        Of course, all of this interminable babble over WWII is a fool’s errand anyway… but since it’s been used as a cudgel against Whites all these long years, sometimes the agitprop has to be called out.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 7:14 am Greg Eliot

        Johnny Redux nails it, for you of the peanut gallery unsure of events at the time.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 8:48 am Rum

        A lot of my posts get lost in the wordpress wilderness, for some reason. They never even get a chance to be moderated.
        Those were posts so cogent and reasonable that this discussion would have been shut down for all time and my ideological competitors would have apologized for taking so long to finally see the light.

        Here is the ultra-brief version: Could AH be trusted to allow the “long island story of the British people” to continue if the British people ever again did anything to displease him? After turning over the Fleet to the Nazis and being effectively without any allies, would any resistance be remotely feasible – forever?
        With the sea routes to essential food sources in the hands the Nazis – starvation of that over-populated island could have been inflicted on a whim – what would “relations” be like with them going forward?

        So, ask yourself, if you were a proud Brit in the summer of 1940, would you take that deal or climb back in your Spitfire?

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 9:01 am tteclod

        “Germany had been blamed for many things in WW1 that had turned out to be untrue. ”

        So when WW2 ended, we naturally believed every story told.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 9:36 am Greg Eliot

        Rum, it’s obvious that the proud British nation was going to fight, come hell or high water, in order not to be “dwarfed” by a German superpower in the future.

        But don’t even TRY to make it out that they, from the start, were fighting for their survival and acting in good will towards the perceived NAH-ZEE menace for the sake of the Western world.

        And by the way, how did it all work out for them?

        I’d bet it’s safer for an English lady to have walked late at night in the city of Berlin in 1939 than today in broad daylight in many districts of London.

        LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 10:13 am Pwn

        Anybody can do what Hitler did economically. Borrow money, spend it on public works and guns and then invade and kill your creditors. You must be an intellectual midget when it comes to economics to think this was somehow a miracle.

        LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 10:57 am George

      WWII could have been avoided if Germany chose imperialism and colonialism of the third world like England, France, Spain and the Netherlands. Boggles my mind why Germany chose a suicide mission fighting European nations on two fronts.

      LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 11:03 am Greg Eliot

        Rightly or wrongly, I think the perception was that the Red Menace and general decadence/YKW influence had already gained too strong a foothold in the West, and the first order of business would be to “restore order to Europe” and make immediate Continental lebensraum for a future strong Germanic realm.

        Galavanting around the world and annoying darkies didn’t seem to have done much for England… as subsequent history has proven beyond any shadow of a doubt, even with alleged “victories” in the Great Wars.

        LikeLike


  32. on December 26, 2015 at 4:14 pm Southern WASP

    I think there may be some validity to this hypothesis. I also believe that in the next great war, White Men, from across North America, Europe, and Australia will be united in their fight.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 6:29 pm Greg Eliot

      They had better be…

      … then again, it’s all in the hands of the Most High… and may He renew our faith and strength for the sake of the Remnant.

      LikeLike


  33. on December 26, 2015 at 4:21 pm Trance Syndicate

    http://conservative-headlines.com/2015/04/another-fourteen-black-on-white-murders/

    LikeLike


  34. on December 26, 2015 at 4:30 pm Dave

    Perhaps the next great empire will take advantage of artificial insemination and, after winning a major war, require every fertile woman to bear the baby of a war hero killed in action. Each hero shall father children in proportion to the number of enemy he is judged to have killed.

    You may not be totally thrilled that your wife is bearing the child of a dead man (unless he was your best buddy), but then you have the pleasure of being alive in an unconquered land.

    LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 2:11 pm tteclod

      A nation of cucked men. Jew.

      LikeLike


  35. on December 26, 2015 at 5:03 pm whiskeysplace

    Wrong theory. Not only did wars like the Thirty Years War (30-40% death rate of entire population) produce far bigger declines in men, but you are making a big mistake in assuming death rates of “Alpha” men wrt women were related to aggression and testosterone.

    First, most war deaths in WWI and WWII were a function of luck (direct hit by shell on your position or not), officer leadership (your officers would send you into a frontal attack against entrenched forces or not), and training (combat vets imposed discipline and combat skills before combat). [You can read “With the Old Breed” and “Helmet for My Pillow” both first-hand accounts of WWII Pacific Combat vets for this.]

    Second, the Western Way of War back to the Spartans has NOT been that of the Alpha male. Not as relates to women: showy, charismatic, changeable, etc. THOSE qualities were derided as far back as the Spartans as being to fairly effeminate (in their view) barbarian warriors, fearsome when advantaged, panicked when pressed, prone to wild advances and panicking flights.

    Western fighting men you could argue are SELECTED for beta maleness, not the Pajama Boy kind, but dutiful, stay in the line with mates, killing and being killed as an awful, strenous harvest of men. In apocalyptic shock battles of annihilation, not drip-drip-drip Middle Eastern ambush and counter-ambush. Salamis, Thermopylea, Platea, Lepanto, Tours, Agincourt, Midway, Kursk, Cannae, it goes on and on and on. That’s how Western men fight. Together, in battles of unbelievable ferocity where not individual warrior prowess but fighting as a giant killing machine wins the day.

    IF you read what E.B. Sledge and Robert Leckie and Pappy Boyington (“Show me a hero and I’ll show you a bum.”) wrote in their own words, the most effective and dangerous fighters were generally calm, non-charismatic, highly skilled men who would be classed with women as greater or medium beta males. Those who were showy and charismatic were generally ineffective and disliked by those in combat (where survival was the only goal).

    There IS a reason White men are markedly different from non-White men: smarter, more able to endure hardship for **YEARS**, more cohesive, less likely to panic even when facing death (compare/contrast the Alamo and Thermopylae with say, Megido and the Highway of Death — non-Whites flee in total panic).

    I offer a counter-thesis: lack of serious threat from military powers in the West led to a complete de-emphasis of greater male beta-ism in the entire society, post WWII, and general male and female degeneracy as fear of conquerors and death receded. You can see this in Japan (with no Jewish presence or influence) and in Israel where Open Borders nutjobs and Third World lovers flourish — but only in the hothouse of Tel Aviv and not the stabbing emporium of Jerusalem or rocket targets in Southern Israel.

    Men in the West are Beta Male because ONLY beta males get you a Roman Legion, Greek Phalanx, or Carrier group at Midway. And Western men being always fewer, had to be more deadly than non-Whites who used fertility not killing power to compete.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 6:34 pm Greg Eliot

      I won’t argue most of what you say, but as far as the Thirty Years War goes, the numbers are great enough (20% to 30%, depending upon who you read) not to be exaggerated, and the reason Germany still had more than enough high T afterwards is because most of that war occurred on German soil, and between the fighting itself, famine, and pestilence… the population that did survive were Darwinian-worthy stock in the extreme.

      Totally different ball of wax compared to one’s best and brightest jaunting off to a foreign land to die.

      LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 8:22 pm Rum

      Short answer to the question of the day: I vote for r conditions. It is all that is needed. It is all in the Book.
      K behavior does not thrive in r conditions anymore than r prevails in a K environment. Depressing, but apparently absolutely true.

      LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 8:20 am Avenroad

      I disagree with your assertion that white men are more capable of enduring hardship for years. Look at African bush wars. They may be low-intensity, but they endure for many years.

      It is the western demand for quick results that leads them to withdraw from a war before it is properly won, ever since the Korean war.

      LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 10:50 am Greg Eliot

        An excellent observation…

        Relatively recent history has shown than, when not on his own turf, the White man doesn’t have the stomach for prolonged conflict, nor doing what it takes, militarily, to end things quickly.

        We’ll see what the future holds when said battle IS taken to his neighborhood… prospects don’t look so good right now.

        LikeLike


  36. on December 26, 2015 at 5:36 pm DW

    Watch this video. It mentions that sending a country to war can change it….Maybe along the lines of CH theory:

    LikeLike


  37. on December 26, 2015 at 5:37 pm DW

    It maybe in Norman Dodds part 2

    LikeLike


  38. on December 26, 2015 at 6:14 pm Niall

    The Soviets (i.e. the Russians) lost the most and I don’t see much poz there nowadays. The theory is alluring but facile.

    LikeLike


  39. on December 26, 2015 at 6:29 pm Rusvolga

    In hunter-gatherer times, when two tribes went to war, sometimes one side would be completely wiped out. The winners took the women from the losing side and fucked them, willingly or otherwise, and where there were once two tribes there was now one.

    In this way, it would always be high-T men who produced the most offspring, and it explains why most women have rape fantasies. War (and rape) was good for humanity.

    In modern wars, we kill off high-T men on both sides and let women fight over the betas. If we had completely wiped out the germans, raped their women and inhabited their lands, maybe things would be a little different.

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 6:36 pm Greg Eliot

      Whad’dya mean “if”?

      LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 12:53 am Pwn

      How things would be different given that Americans are the first and biggest exporters of poz? Lol

      LikeLike


  40. on December 26, 2015 at 7:57 pm Eikos

    The American deathtoll was too miniscule to affect the character of American men significantly and yet today they’re at least as lame as their European counterparts. They’re also way behind the Europeans in the fightback against 3rd world invasion.

    LikeLike


    • on December 28, 2015 at 12:33 pm Caramba

      Good point.Also, I happen to know a lot of South Africans,both English and Boers- they all are masculine on the outside, amazing clueless beta losers on inside. You wont find a better specimens of betas anywhere in the world thn in South Africa.

      LikeLike


  41. on December 26, 2015 at 9:46 pm burke

    was thinking mudsharking is inversely proportional to male feminism

    can almost hardly blame them, they’ll take any man over a half-man

    LikeLike


    • on December 26, 2015 at 11:11 pm Humans are animals

      Inversely?

      LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 9:20 am Johnny Redux

      You meant directly proportional, but you are correct. Why go out to McGarbage for hamburger when you have a sirloin steak marinating in your frig.

      LikeLike


  42. on December 27, 2015 at 12:00 am Nasty

    CH, if you are not teaching guys to make money besides game this blog is obsolete.

    The truth cuts quick

    LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 9:40 am Greg Eliot

      Ah, a new twist to the muh-dik gambit… muh bling n’ muh dik.

      If the West falls, all the bling in the world ain’t gonna wet yo’ dik.

      /muh haid… shakin’ it.

      LikeLike


  43. on December 27, 2015 at 4:35 am wlobster

    I just saw this video on Leftit, the hive of Marxist freaks and nancies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ReI9s9Lzpdk

    A mid-20s-early-30s man CRIES when he gets a fucking vidya game and hardware for his computer. What. Happened. To. White. Men? This is just incredible. I cannot fathom the emasculation. What the actual FUCK?

    LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 4:31 pm MZ

      And why the fuck would you put it on YT

      LikeLike


  44. on December 27, 2015 at 6:36 am Azn

    Gotta say I don’t buy this. The Romans fought lots and lots of wars; IIRC, after the battle of Cannae they lost 50% of their manpower. Kinda like the USA losing 50m. But they went on the build an empire.

    Check out anonymous conservative. I’m not sure if the rabbit-wolf analogy entirely holds, but I buy the general principle that as societies get richer, and as they face less competition, they get stupider, simply because they are insulated from the consequences of their mistakes.

    China used to lead the West but they fucked it all away. Europe had to stay sharp because all the ones who lost their edge got eaten by their neighbors who kept it. So in that sense, the EU is possibly one of the worst things that could happen to Europe.

    The US was at its best during WW2 and the Cold War. Manhattan Project, Apollo Project. Now there is nothing to to motivate the US because you guys are top dog. So its actually good that China is coming along. Good for both the US and China. If there is ever a one world government, we are all fucked, just as China was when they finally united themselves and had no one else to prod them along.

    Anyway CH, I wanted to add that this is the best goddamn site on the Internet. The stuff you dispense here is fucking gold. Every guy who internalizes what you give out here, for free, helps to hold back the tide of bullshit engulfing us all. You ain’t sitting poolside, CH, you are right in the thick of action. good on you.

    Wishing you a great 2016, and from a longtime reader, may you find the golden ticket this year. You deserve it.

    LikeLike


  45. on December 27, 2015 at 8:10 am Hopfrog

    this is sickening. note how the whole article reads like some noble exercise of good will and tender feelings towards the common goal of uniting humanity, oblivious to the fact that said refugees won’t ever be able to return the favour. Nor are they willing to. The one comment is by someone who has lived more than a day in meat world.

    http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/12/24/refugee-phrasebook/

    LikeLike


  46. on December 27, 2015 at 8:24 am Avenroad

    Prosperity is the problem. Look at a lion in a zoo. He gets a couple of carcasses a week; he’s not interested in chewing through iron bars to hunt gazelles; he’s got it too easy. It’s the same for us.

    I’m a boomer. My dad fought in WWII. When the Beatles came out and young people started growing long hair, my dad and his friends used to grumble, “What they need is a good war.”

    But sex and drugs and rock ‘n roll are far more attractive than wars and saying Yes Sir to The Man, so boomers turned on, tuned in, and dropped out. Because they could. Because there was so much prosperity you could indulge yourself and still live.

    And so it has continued in the West to the present day. And we will continue to be indolent lotus-eaters until the hard times come again (which they will, quite soon).

    Corollary: If you want to defeat ISIS, air drop power stations, refrigerators, TVs, and Coca-Cola over the caliphate. They will lose the incentive to fight.

    LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 9:28 am Greg Eliot

      Lotus-eaters is the apt analogy… well-said.

      LikeLike


    • on December 27, 2015 at 9:38 am Mobutu

      My beef is with the “good war” thing. A good war against who, the krauts, the nips, the VC? The only wars that should be fought are to keep whites safe prosperous and safe. I know, I’m living in a fantasy world and I’m drunk already…

      LikeLike


      • on December 27, 2015 at 9:41 am Greg Eliot

        The first casualty in most modern wars is the Truth.

        LikeLike


  47. on December 27, 2015 at 8:45 am cptnemo2013

    Reblogged this on MGTOW 2.0 and commented:
    Great Fucking post!!! Thank God for you.

    LikeLike


  48. on December 27, 2015 at 9:11 am Anonymous

    “The real Germans are all dead.”

    LikeLike


  49. on December 27, 2015 at 11:10 am elmertjones

    Off-topic but I posted a status update and free book download link on my blog.

    Banned by LinkedIn : http://wp.me/p6QFjS-5u

    LikeLike


  50. on December 28, 2015 at 12:30 pm Caramba

    Wars in Europe certainly had an impact on psyche of modern male-female relationships. But I disagree that it was that simplistic as alphas-died,beta-survived.Machine guns were indiscriminate.In fact the age of wars where alphas excelled ended with the introduction of guns.

    LikeLike


  51. on December 29, 2015 at 1:51 pm Robert

    And now it’s time for poetry corner. This somewhat overworked poem by our boy Ruddy explains it all. Ironic that it’s about Danes isn’t it? The new version would have to be called Dane-gelded.

    http://www.poetryloverspage.com/poets/kipling/dane_geld.html

    LikeLike


  52. on December 30, 2015 at 9:19 am disenchantedscholar

    Reblogged this on Philosophies of a Disenchanted Scholar and commented:
    The military takes the most fertile men.
    Pacifists out themselves as would be mother-cuckers.

    LikeLike


  53. on December 31, 2015 at 2:01 am Will S.

    Reblogged this on Patriactionary.

    LikeLike


  54. on January 1, 2016 at 3:37 pm A.B Prosper

    I suspect its a combination of prosperity and the lack of physical exercise most men get that leads to Pajama Boy.

    However assuming they isn’t too far gone, people like him are repairable if you can put them through enough exercise to increase T levels and repair the weakened amygdala.

    Gladiator pits or 5 years hard labor should do it. 😉

    LikeLike


    • on January 6, 2016 at 3:48 pm Steve

      weren’t there pajama boy equivalents back then? I see plenty of masculine young white guys these days too. This doesn’t tell me about average changes, if there have been any.

      LikeLike


  55. on January 6, 2016 at 3:45 pm Steve

    Don’t NE Asian men have lower t levels on average than European men? I think they do but I’m not sure.

    Yet Japan is not as pro-immigration as the west and hasn’t had mass immigration. So it can’t just be a matter of t levels, can it?

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Recent Comments

    TLM on President Trump Razes Ise…
    TLM on President Trump Razes Ise…
    Captain John Charity… on President Trump Razes Ise…
    whiteguardunite on President Trump Razes Ise…
    Captain John Charity… on President Trump Razes Ise…
    greginaurora on President Trump Razes Ise…
    Rant Casey - BR on State Of The State Depart…
    P.K. Griswold on The Mountain And The Moll…
    Captain John Charity… on President Trump Razes Ise…
    P.K. Griswold on The Mountain And The Moll…
  • Top Posts

    • Exploiting The Lunatic Fringe To Silence Legitimate Dissent
    • Comment Of The Week: The Left's Cultural Reign Is Over
    • State Of The State Department
    • Measuring The Health Of Nationhood
    • Sigh Ops
    • Keyser Sayoc Update
    • Cesar Sayoc, "White Male" (& Deep State Updates)
    • The Mountain And The Moll Hill
    • Portents Of Civil War II
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: