Charles Darwin – yes, that guy – once drew up a pro and con list for getting married. His list is reprinted here, in readable format.
The standard Chateau view of marriage is that it is a raw deal for individual American men, as currently constituted, (it wasn’t always thus). However, there are good reasons for monogamous, heterosexual marriage to continue as a cultural norm and societal buttress. Ol’ Charlie hit on a number of the pros. It’s really not a good idea to have children outside of marriage, particularly over the long term (single mommyhood erodes civilizational capital). Over the short term, it’s still a bad idea unless you belong to one of the few human races in the world (think: Swedes) who can handle having children within an unmarried, cohabitational context. (The verdict is out on how sustainable the Swedish method is, considering how quickly their evolved suite of mental characteristics compels them to hand their country over to the kebab crush.)
fr tho, Darwin’s other marriage pros could nearly as easily be gotten with a live-in long-term girlfriend, but to give him credit that was most certainly not the case back in his day. Also, 😆 at “Better than a dog, anyhow”.
A lot of Darwin’s marriage cons are inarguable; men must betray their masculine urge to wander and explore once they are hitched to home and wife. Most men aren’t keen about keeping themselves in good graces with relatives; women have much more affinity for nurturing family ties. It is absolutely true that wives, and to a lesser extent husbands, get fat and lazy after marriage. A wife and family are a responsibility that will cut into a man’s free time, (many men are ok with trading in their free time for the comforts of domestication). Less money? Sure. (Don’t be fooled by the lure of a double income. Wives – and long-time cohabitating girlfriends – will just spend twice as fast and twice as much what they spent when they were single.)
Darwin was very concerned about an increase in his “anxiety” from marriage, as he wrote it twice. Potential marital money problems vexed him, too. The provider beta was a real catch in Darwin’s day that isn’t as true today. Women didn’t HATE HATE HATE betas back then with the same bubbling spite. But the ability of a provider beta in the Darwin era to leverage his provisioning skill for prime poon meant that he couldn’t slack off and give his date a bag of Skittles for her birthday, and recline smugly knowing a blowjob was coming his way regardless. Jerkboy Game in Darwin’s time probably had more limited appeal to women than it does today.
This whole thread will be consored because of the Word Pest filter for the M word.
LikeLike
I actually think that the “M” question is vastly more difficult for womynzes today, especially if they come from INSULA-EMOTING families and they fall for the Eskimo cultural poisoning about “Yes, you can have it all, you can ride the 1000 c0ck carousel until you’re 39.5yo, and then ‘m’ Mr Big and have three children in your 40s, you go grrlll!”
LikeLike
Whereas for dudes, on the other hand, all you have to do is “m” a young fertile chick from an AMYGDALA-THINKING family and if you maintain a solid Alpha Sh!tlord reign of terror over the domicile, then all should be fine.
LikeLike
PRO-TIP: Chicks really dig it if you lose your temper and go nukular every once in a while [but not too often; dole out the Beast Game only very sparingly], and of course the makeup sex afterwards is teh greatest. But day to day, your job is to be her Rock of Gibraltar, which weathers her relentless Category 5 Sh!tstorms without flinching. AND NEVER BACK DOWN IN A FIGHT!!!!!
LikeLike
one of you guys posted this excellent video the other day about the economics of sex. I’ll repost because it does a good job explaining how m@rriage changed in the post-birth control era, in terms a layperson like me can easily digest.
no doubt Darwin’s “con” list would be exponentially longer if written today:
LikeLike
let’s see if this makes it through the spy filters this time…
one of you guys posted this excellent video the other day about the economics of sex. I’ll repost because it does a good job explaining how m@rri@ge changed in the post-birth control era, in terms a layperson like me can easily digest.
no doubt Darwin’s “con” list would be exponentially longer if written today:
LikeLike
PJ, setting aside the libertardian blue-pill tone of voice, the fundamental premise of the movie is indeed correct. Semantically, though, they keep using the word “sex” incorrectly – it’s only “sex” if a viable live birth occurs nine months later. Technically speaking, even a mare mudsharking herself with a donkey isn’t “sex”, because the resulting mule is infertile.
LikeLike
Actually the video is awful. This video doesn’t consider anything but traditional stereotypes and only one technological factor and not any of the political factors. The risk of sex has also greatly diminished for women because of the welfare state and the amount of male attention a woman can get (at least in her youth) has increased dramatically with the internet. Combine this with the pill and this means women can indulge in far more exciting, dangerous men, the so-called ‘bad-boys’ than they could ever in the past. The sort of men that appeal to many women but were never practical. The amount of attention available, at least for awhile, can allow women to look for that mythical guy who meets all three hundred line items of requirements and makes her feel just the right way.
So yes, the dating market is better than ever for some men but worse than ever for all the others. If this video were correct the dating market would be booming for reliable and productive men who were traditionally desired or at least accepted out of practicality by women. It wouldn’t matter if they were alpha, beta, or anything else. Women would be desperate for them. But where does female attention actually go?
What’s this blog about? How to be or at least how to appear to be that 20% of the male population 80% of the women desire.
LikeLike
I assume by his saying “Better than a dog, anyhow,” he was referring
to the “sexy time” thing. But that aside– because with modern women that’s about the only value they have– I’ll take the dog. They’re loyal, always glad to see you, and return affection 100%.
LikeLike
How provider betas are treated today
LikeLike
Jesus H Christ, even the ch!mpanzee didn’t want the Beta’s HB4.5 BFF – he shoved her blocky whyte @ss right back at the Beta. #ch!mpsGettinUppity.
LikeLike
that is loltastic…bitch get out of my shot. She couldn’t resist putting her hand on his abs. Her bf should have slapped her but he’s probably an anti-racist cuck
LikeLike
He should have just left her there and walked away. But seeing that he chose her…well, ’nuff said. Saeed!
LikeLike
I’d go one step further – just touching the coal makes her a mudshark – I’d walk away and never again even acknowledge her existence.
LikeLike
(Don’t be fooled by the lure of a double income. Wives – and long-time cohabitating girlfriends – will just spend twice as fast and twice as much what they spent when they were single.)
LOL, just like reloading ammo. You don’t wind up saving any money doing that, you just shoot a lot more.
LikeLike
Because of the time value lost in reloading by hand?
LikeLike
@Captain Obvious
Technically, reloading is fun too, so no time lost. But if you’re making a separate analogy (cough), I’ll step back.
LikeLike
Not really. If you have an advanced press, reloading is really not that time consuming.
LikeLike
@someguy
.
LikeLike
@ ripp
?
LikeLike
double income? LOL…so your kids can grow up in daycare?
women are spending machines. I have explained this that they are like a gas- they will expand to fill whatever container your wallet provides
LikeLike
i lie about my income now, which is a pain in the ass to cover up with the girlfriend, but anything they know about they will endeavor to get spent. it’s not any sort of exaggeration to say they have ZERO ability to delay gratification
before a girl makes a major purchase, ask her what she’ll want next, she’ll indignantly claim (and maybe believe) that all she wants is this one thing (car, jewelry, house). just get her opinion on record. then count the days. seven will not pass before she is either unsatisfied with the new item ( i need new countertops) or is on to wanting yet another thing altogether
the reason a lot of old men end up as domineering boyfriends is to stay sane. if guys aren’t raised to be, they learn the hard way that women need tight reins. period. they’re children forever, and need someone willing to act like a (borderline abusive) parent
LikeLike
Random aside, but quite a few servicemen go to extreme lengths to put their wives on budgets when they get deployed. There are a number of tricks to restrict the amount of all that sweet tax-free combat pay she sees, up to excluding such a wife from all bank account, mortgage, car loan or even Netflix billing access. It’s quite common for guys to come back and find themselves thousands of dollars in debt from the spending that happens in their absence.
As I enter my thirties, I see more and more girls my age putting their babies in day care so they can continue pursuing their BS “careers.” It seems like the easier and less stressful the work is, the more likely the girl is to continue working, even if the pay only really covers daycare. (These are also the same women who, even now with toddlers, are drafting plans to “fix” their local inner city school for all students by sending their kids there and “staying involved.” As if your extracurricular helicopter parenting is going to be able to stop Carlos from slamming your little girl’s face into a locker. In reality, they don’t want to work a serious job that would cover the cost of private schooling and have deluded themselves to the realities of the urban school system.). They’d rather go play dress up at the office and contribute nothing to society than wear yoga pants to the park and watch their children’s minds develop. There are far too many of us that are allergic to responsibility these days.
LikeLike
Was just in peru to bang a 18 year old chick…nice little fun trip. It’s always best to find a ho in a place you wanna go, you will get the full local experience and have a companion for it. I bought her a bikini and regifted her some raybans that were for another chick that i broke up with before giving them. Easy, cheap. If jewelry, Tiffany is easy to get on CL for 1/3 or less the price. Just lowball, plenty of dumb hoez selling it bc they need cash or it was from a previous bf.
Yeah, trip was cool until her relatives started showing up at the hotel unannounced- yeah let’s go to the pool and order drinks and food. No gratitude from them whatsoever. Then later 4 of her friends in the lobby to go to a club. Hey maybe ask first? Not a single thanks. Expecting me to pay for their entrance, drinks, you name it. LOL.
I said “soy un banco??!?!” and gave her that look. Good thing everything is cheap otherwise I might have gotten pissed off. By the third day she was withholding sex LOL. That was the day I left.
Women…bwahahaha.
LikeLike
> “they’re children forever” ———- GET THEM TO PUSHING OUT THE LIVE B!RTHS AND THEN HOMESCH00LING THE LIVE B!RTHS. If she ain’t either pushing ’em out, or homeschooling ’em, then she has no bidness in your life.
LikeLike
PRO-TIP for cynthia: Find yourself a White Alpha Sh!tlord and then maneuver ruthlessly to have an “Oops!” pregnancy by him.
LikeLike
“the reason a lot of old men end up as domineering boyfriends is to stay sane. if guys aren’t raised to be, they learn the hard way that women need tight reins. period. they’re children forever, and need someone willing to act like a (borderline abusive) parent”
true but if she’s your girlfriend, you shouldn’t be sharing money with her in the first place so there’s no need to tell her what to do.
she screws up with her own money, that’s on her. if she’s perpetually flippant about the value of money or is impulsive/irresponsible you shouldn’t be with her. that’s not just a little personality quirk. that’s a character issue. people who can’t handle money are usually materialistic, selfish, impulsive, and irresponsible as well. that’s not girlfriend material. and it sure as hell isn’t wife/mother material.
LikeLike
Return of Kings is now organised, when is our turn?? Not only organization but networking like Eskimos. We have to start to promote our interests
http://www.returnofkings.com/78021/full-city-listing-and-meeting-points-for-international-meetup-day
LikeLike
Some of us started holding local Nationalist pool parties last summer.
LikeLike
> “Nationalist pool parties” aka Memorial Day, 4th of July, Veterans Day, etc…
LikeLike
@Captain Obvious
Independence Day is the term WE’VE always used. I’m sure you just slipped. In Mexico they have cinco de mayo. When said like that, it’s just a day of the week! I don’t really know what the 5th of May represents in Mexico, and don’t want to know. I live in the southwest too! Most of my life, in fact! I’ve used my quarterly allotment of exclamation points now. Cheers
LikeLike
mods? You no like this section?
LikeLike
The st@ck is going nuts lately, just randomly losing kkk0mments here & there.
LikeLike
Can you explain what this is about? Or maybe a link?
Thanks
RP
LikeLike
RP, the link above mentions what’s what.
Essentially, it’s a meetup for like minded RP’ers to congregate, shoot the shit, etc. You know, being men. We don’t have the spots like we once did, so, we’re taking the fucking bull by the horns and starting our own methods, means and modality. (Last word probably doesn’t fit…was trying to go with the ‘m’s and I’m typing on the fly.)
So, at 8pm, local time, the locations on that site are the meetup locales. I offered a city close to me and am h0sting.
LikeLike
Turn? Turn? M. Du Lion, you must not understand how Eskimos (or women) organize. You must not understand the license of masculinity or the limits of being the heretical underdog. Guys, do what you can where you are for yourself, cooperating where it is immediately useful, and forget the rest.
LikeLike
Also Kevin McDonald is speaking in DC at the NPI along with Richard Spencer. Full meal… $85 a ticket.
LikeLike
Just a heads up, Qwest is now CenturyLink in phoenix.
LikeLike
loneliness is specially interested if you’re a systematizer genius and you need time for your thoughts.
This comparative is more true for Drawin, Einstein and Tesla than for most of us.
LikeLike
Johann Sebastian Bach’s two wives pushed out something like 20 live births between them, with about 10 of the kids surviving to adulthood. As I understand it, there are approximately a gazillion ancestors of JSB in the world today: http://www.bachonbach.com/bach-genealogy-family-research-as-a-hobby/the-johann-sebastian-bach-genealogy/
LikeLike
Whereas, although he is rumored to have been a legendary Lothario in the beatnik 1950s & hippy 1960s, Bach’s greatest interpreter died (apparently) childless, with no known progeny:
LikeLike
Baby got Bach!
LikeLike
sorry – approximately a gazillion DESCENDANTS of JSB in the world today
LikeLike
Alas, all he can do now is decompose.
LikeLike
GE, I defy you to read the story of Glenn Gould’s death and not get a tear in your eye. His own father had to go into the neuro-ICU and give the MDs the okay to turn off the ventilator. I’m having a little trouble even typing this…
LikeLike
I was talking about J.S. Bach… alas, yet another jest fallen flat! 😡
LikeLike
@Greg Eliot
I laughed immediately. Of course, like I always say, it’s only because you went LCD again. I certainly appreciate it, but expect better. De-compose! Heh. Long time classic. Maybe captain was too distracted. Cheers
LikeLike
Damn, GE….I missed it the first time around.
LikeLike
He is the Genghis of composers. But not the Newton.
LikeLike
CH where is the permanent page for “ways in which shitlibs are women, the reference list’
LikeLike
Mildly related. Recommended:
http://www.totuusradio.fi/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Bataille-Death-and-Sensuality.pdf
LikeLike
Is that real? Darwin wrote that?
LikeLike
thought the same, no knowledge either way but so many shitty images with no basis in reality out there
LikeLike
“The verdict is out on how sustainable the Swedish method is”
Methinks the verdict is in. It’s not sustainable. Not from the direct impact of non-marital child rearing, rather the indirect ramifications that flow from such arrangements.
LikeLike
the Swedish method of giving away SWEDE-en to non swedes? They forgot that the swedes are an ethnic group, a “nation” JUST LIKE the nation of Israel?
LikeLike
A group of israelite media barons named “Bonnier” didn’t help matters, nor did an israelite shekel monger named Olof Aschberg. http://isteve.blogspot.com/2009/03/we-can-only-hope-title-of-this-2008.html
LikeLike
M filter!
LikeLike
M = dopamine, oxytocin, estrogen & progesterone…. swirl in a beaker glass. For kicks add few drops of sperm, as you would bitters… wait nine months…
a good party but you might wake up with one hell of a hangover!
LikeLike
Contrary to what the geologists would have you believe, the Rock of Gibraltar weathers the Sh!tstorm.
LikeLike
On the chemistry front, the most exquisitely excruciating pain of natural childbirth is accompanied by a biblical flood of endorphines. Are you paying attention, FeministX? Although apparently there is some research indicating that the artificial epidurals and opiates administered by the anesthesiologist tend to interfere with her body’s natural inclination to produce endorphins…
LikeLike
“as you would bitters”
Hot damn, Sents, that’s some comedic gold right there.
The above drink…is that called the McKay Coppins?
HAHA!
Now that I think of it, we need to come up with drinks based on shitlibs. The worst concoction for the worst of the worst.
LikeLike
Cap – I know you’re a well meaning tradcon, but proceed with M (for filter sake) with utmost caution… Even if you find a good one, she is still a woman and while her looks are guaranteed to fade – again even if and perhaps especially if she is hot – they will fade but hypergamy will never rest.. even when she is post wall and can’t act on it (LOL) it wont rest… the wiring is intact. So be very careful…
M only when you want to have your own kids and start paying for them within 18 months… else hold off and enjoy your free milk. If you do M, make sure she understands she is the W, she has the title and your heart, but you have some freedom to do what you wish discreetly. This wont matter at all for a long time but 15 or 20 years on it will a great deal.
LikeLike
Sentient, I totally agree, and the key to controlling her hypergamy is holding rock-solid imperturbable Alpha Sh!tlord frame, which includes keeping her knocked up & pushing out the live b!rths & homeschooling them. However, I will tell you that the relentless Eskimo anti-cultural pollution has now so badly en-pu$$ified the average male in the West that any dude who is even moderately masculine can easily attain Alpha Sh!tlord status these days, if only he has just a modicum of gumption and stick-to-it-ive-ness and drive.
LikeLike
I lol’d at “Object to be played with”.
LikeLike
Shut UP, you lying faggot.
Ban the lying Faggot rape!
LikeLike
“men must betray their masculine urge to wander and explore once they are hitched to home and wife”
Not being able to “wander and explore” is probably the toughest thing to give up. I’m not talking about a little poon on the side once in a while, I’m talking about the urge to just saying “fuck it” — take a year off and travel around the world, spend time learning new things rather than working, or go crack a few nog skulls without the burden of knowing that others (wife, kids) are counting on you to be there for them, not windsurfing in Greece or sitting in jail etc.
That being said, in my experience if you find the right girl the benefits far outweigh the the drawbacks. But I get that finding the right girl is the real trick.
LikeLike
there are some great gals out there. I met a guy in Costa Rica who built a hotel with his hot wife and three sons. he’d made a bunch of money with his construction business in the states then bought a sailboat and the two of them sailed around the world with their first child. then they got to Costa Rica and he said let’s hang out here. so they built this nice little hotel and popped out out a couple more kids. they were a great family.
Laird Hamilton is another guy who comes to mind who set up his márriáge to accommodate his lifestyle, rather than the other way around. These are solid dudes, with beautiful loyal, relatively happy wives
LikeLike
Sounds like the Platinum Rule in action.
(Damn mods. . .)
LikeLike
LikeLike
Priorities. First they had the attitude, then they had the business, THEN they got the wife. And with attitude, you can bang sloots the while.
LikeLike
Problem is most men are not Laird fucking Hamilton’s who are alpha surfers and look like models.
What most solid betas can get these days just aint worth the effort.
LikeLike
Good looking family.
Damn…have this desire, strong desire to start my own. A la Jeff Bridges, against all odds. Nah, no such thing.
Remembering the Good Book…no one’s against me!
LikeLike
i’m guessing Darwin didn’t have too many HB10s lining up at his doorstep either:
LikeLike
@mendo
i’m with you brotha
that guy had a lot of luck on his side. good looks, he was adopted into the big wave brotherhood at a young age. the right timing, etc.but he always worked very hard to be the best. that’s what each of us needs to do. nobody hands it to you
LikeLike
Darwin was part of the Wedgewood family and m’d his first cousin, who was also a Wedgewood. M’d her when she was 30. They did have 10 kids. 7 survived to adulthood.
LikeLike
Laird has no boys….I always recognized a sadness in his eyes.
LikeLike
“What most solid betas can get these days just aint worth the effort.”
Depends what you mean by solid. If you mean solidly stuck in beta mode, then you’re right. If you mean solid dudes who have what it takes to be alpha if they would learn Game, then you’re wrong.
Even this pic of Hamilton has tells – he’s leaning into her and she’s leaning away. And it’s not just one pic – image search of “Laird Hamilton family” shows it’s a regular thing with him
Hamilton is a classic conventional alpha. Talented and dedicated enough to achieve great success in the world beyond women, THEN get the successively prettier girls (oldest daughter in the pic- a pear – is the child of his pear-apple first wife, the other two are from his banana second).
Conventional alpha simply means beta who is superior at something besides womanizing. Since they are really only superior betas, not alphas in the Game sense at all, of course they are the ones with the gorgeous families. Their superior talent and work ethic gets them the hot wives, their betatude allows them to stand by those wives and raise families. Natural alphas find it almost impossible to settle that way.
Many betas have the potential to raise families as gorgeous as this if they would just learn Game. And it is one hell of a lot easier and more fun to learn than becoming a king surfer or getting into Harvard Law or MBA as an Aryan. If these betas learned Game, they could take the short cut to Laird: Game would get them the hot wife and their residual betatude would raise the gorgeous family.
LikeLike
@sean last reply got lost in mod. agree with all your points, though couple years ago when Gabby Reese was doing her book tour she caught a thermonuclear amount of heat from feminists for publicly stating that she’d had to allow herself to become soft and submissive in order to be good w!fe and mother. she made it clear that Laird definitely rules the roost.
personally I wouldn’t sign up for that level of babysitting. but by today’s standards he’s pretty close to having the best of all possible worlds
LikeLike
Mendo,
if you want kids do it. It was a life changing experience for me in a good way. You’re not really a man until you become a father. My daughter running up to see me everyday when I come home is a great feeling and it forces you to man up elsewhere in your life. I’m having more.
LikeLike
Nice!
LikeLike
Put your cash into durable goods made of metal and plastic while you still can, boys.
I don’t care if this dude is trying to sell something. I think it is likely that he is right, and the Dow will be at 7,000 by November.
http://economyandmarkets.com/exclusives/critical-warning-from-rogue-economist-harry-dent-this-is-just-the-beginning-of-a-nightmare-scenario-as-dow-crashes-to-6000-2/?z=418531
LikeLike
Can’t go wrong with a healthy portfolio of copper-jacketed lead . . .
LikeLike
Lol’ed +1
LikeLike
yeah you will…it’s too heavy to run with.
All the preppers who have lead should buy long lasting antibiotics instead.
You won’t shoot your way to prosperity.
LikeLike
Trav777, to where am I going to run? If you are talking a full blown SHTF, I don’t plan on living in the woods, as is depicted in “the Walking Dead” TV show. I will guard my home base. In any scenario in which doing that will lead to the death of me or my children (likely, eventually, but we will do the best we can), certainly going “on the run” can’t make the situation any safer, can it?
You’d rather “run” with a lot of antibiotics than have self defense tools and plenty of food to feed them? You cannot antibiotic your way to prosperity either. But you can be the Big Man and take food and antibiotics from anyone who has antibiotics but not self defense tools. I can shoot my way into having food, at least for a while.
Besides zombies and stuff, the most irritatingly fake thing about the show “The Walking Dead” is how they are always living in the woods, sitting around a fire, exposed. LOL. Even if they do know how to make a fire, why would they do that? They act as if all of the infrastructure magically disappeared (yes I know at certain times they occupy large office buildings and some single family homes, until zombies burst out of nowhere and force them to leave — LOL what they would do is clear that house and then stay there). All of the structures made of concrete, wood, and glass will still exist. It would be better to use your guns and ammo to take command of one, and then stay there and guard it with the help of concrete walls.
I live in a city in a big building. Not the best prepping, but I am stuck here for a few reasons I won’t get into. I happen to know that of the 300 units and approximately 600 people who live in my building, only about two others (maybe 4) even own a gun. lolzozozozoz. Sheeple. Everyone else is that unprepared. Me and my group, therefore, will be occupying the penthouse floor, 30 stories up, where we can see for 15 miles in every direction. It will be like a castle, and it even has a salt water moat on one side that contains edible sea life.
But even if I lived in a house in the country, I think I would want to guard my home. To where would I run and why would I be running? Not being sarcastic. I don’t think I know everything, and I’m always up for learning.
LikeLike
lol. update.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/01/20/investing/stocks-markets-dow-oil-china/index.html
Call me crazy, but I think that last week was the time to clean out your 401ks to the extent you are invested in stocks.
If the dow is not at 7,000 by election day then I will eat my hat.
LikeLike
I’ve been reading a lot on that the last few days. Seems something is going to happen in 2016. Started off with the worst stock market drop in history for the beginning of a year. I laugh at those who say, “The economy is going to collapse, so buy gold!” Ha! If the economy truly falls, gold will not be worth much, and you could not safely take it anywhere. Best to invest in guns and bullets, for with guns and bullets you can, if necessary, get more food, and other people’s gold.
Me + gun = You – gold. Simple formula they do not understand.
LikeLike
Redux, exactly. Also, “investing in gold” by accepting the Jew’s invitation — you know, you see them in the commercials on Fox telling you to be safe by buying into their Jew Gold mutual fund — to buy mutual funds that are supposedly tied to gold, is bullshit. You are not “buying gold” unless you have actual gold coins in your hand that are usable, and it is impossible to do that. It is impossible to own gold sufficiently broken up into small enough coins (like how quarters are today) to be usable. In times of economic collapse, the government literally makes it illegal for civilians to buy gold with cash and confiscates gold.
Anyway, in the first week of the barter economy, you might have to trade your $800.00 (in the old world) piece of gold for a dozen eggs. After that you don’t have any more gold, and you also don’t have eggs after 2 days.
Everything else you say is true too. Gold is also not real value, can’t be guarded even in the age of cold coins — see the train robberies of the 19th century. You will not be able to walk around safely with a bag of gold.
Can’t eat it, won’t provide energy or protection. Oil, guns, bullets, and intelligent human work (which creates the ability to turn oil into energy that powers machines and creates electricity and metals into things like guns, bullets, and refridgerators) is the only real money.
In related news: now that blacks control Detroit, brown water is coming out of the faucets. The establishment is blaming “politicians.”
LikeLike
https://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/2016/01/20/evans-pritchard-world-faces-wave-of-epic-debt-defaults-fears-central-bank-veteran/
LikeLike
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/davos/12108569/World-faces-wave-of-epic-debt-defaults-fears-central-bank-veteran.html
LikeLike
My 2 cents: Once a woman has access to your money you can count on living pay check to pay check for the rest of your days. As others have commented above, women have no – none, zero, zilch – restraints when it comes to spending. Every week I hear another thing we need. New car, new couch, new kitchen. It never stops. It’s like the tides in the ocean. It is relentless.
For those whom considering giving a female access to your money is a future possibility, just remember instead that you can give women money, but you should never give them access to your money. Never give up your 100 percent control of your income stream and its distribution. Never. It is a serious error.
LikeLike
I lived this. My one wife.
This house we HAD to have…was essential. 300k for a TH…I sold it for like 600 after the divorce and kept most of the equity, fyi.
Had to have it. Soon as we moved in…wasn’t big enough. I didn’t want this house. I wanted this other bigger house. This is too small. We can’t live here.
We don’t have enough furniture. We look stupid. “Everyone” spends 30k (which wouldn’t have even SCRATCHED her real expenses for the furniture she wanted…i know because I ended up BUYING stuff from the same stores, as I like high-end stuff too. I bought like a fuckin jew and spent 50k total but that included 5k TV and 4K hot tub lol). If we don’t spend that we don’t belong here. I bought discons, floor models, got dressers before the beds, bought what was on sale, 3k for a 7k set, 1400 for shit regular 3600…etc. Saved 40% from retail.
Nonstop BS. Crying even. “You’re oppressing me. This is abuse.”
Bc i wanted to spend 6k/mo and save 6. Oppression. Platinum amex and $200+ every other day at WFH because she was a vegetarian and shit. Talk about an overbearing husband. She didn’t work either…just had to raise the kid and keep a clean house which was beyond her.
The realtor that came into my house when I sold it in 2009…”you have exceptionally nice furniture. No, maybe only 4 or so people in this neighborhood have stuff like this.” FOUR. Not everyone. And this hood had 2 pro bakkabaw players from the Wizards there. Juan McCain kept his mistress stashed there. Vito Fosella was driving out of it drunk when his famous DUI stop exposed his second family. Tommy Thompson, Sec of HHS lived literally across the street- I did a walkthrough of his house when he sold after Obama’s election. Mike “heckuva job Brownie” had his house back to back with Tommy’s.
“Everyone” spends 30k on furniture…she had me almost believing it.
Women are delusional…
LikeLike
> “Juan McCain kept his mistress stashed there. Vito Fosella… second family… Tommy Thompson, Sec of HHS lived literally across the street…” ——— F*ck the ex-wife; could you write a tell-all about the neighbors? Preferably several hundred pages? Thanks.
LikeLike
My second wife used to come home from shopping and say,
“Am I very bad? I just bought this handbag. It cost 3,000.”
She didn’t say 3000 *what* but I was supposed to think 3000 HKD, about $US400. Of course she really meant it cost USD 3000.
She was making plenty of money, wheelbarrows of the shit, twice as much as me. But she spent the lot every year.
My money paid for the house.
When we broke up, she got half of course. Only fair.
LikeLike
I know plenty of women like that but I also know plenty who are not. I think some training early on would be greatly beneficial.
LikeLike
yep. like i said in an earlier comment. women who are materialistic like this are not girlfriend/wife/mother material. and they are not all like that.
i also know plenty who are penny pinchers, love to cook, sew, refinish furniture themselves, etc. to save money for the home. they are proud to save money and don’t get a ton of joy out of spending. those are girls to invest in. not women who need to constantly fill their empty souls with more, better, bigger. those women make for a miserable life and they will never be happy.
LikeLike
My wife spends very little and gets onto me about it. This is very true. Spendthrift women are indeed looking to compensate for a hole in their lives with trinkets and baubles.
LikeLike
Speaking of Darwin…
I wonder how many libs would start outright rejecting the theory of evolution if HBD gained mainstream acceptance.
LikeLike
Great point… I think they would just re-interpret it. Through multiple convolutions their final assessment would be that the dindus turd worlders had the genes for gibsmedat and that’s what they should get. So keep on taking care of them MightWhitey.
LikeLike
True. Then , judge man by his actions. Darwin married his only wife and had 10 children with her. Guess the pros still outweighed.
LikeLike
Wander and explore, indeed.
I’m on a solo mission combing this land by car right now. Tonight I’m in Detroit, tomorrow Canada. The next day … Wherever the fuck my cock points.
Remember, fellas: this fruited plain is ours by birthright. We will not surrender it.
TRUMP 2016!
LikeLike
Maybe we should get used to asking,”What would Donald do?
Well, The Donald squeezed most of the juice out of two 10-wives and ended up with an 11-wife for his comfort in older age. And still another strong and healthy young son.
It can be taken for granted that wives 1 and 2 speak well of him and praise his powers.
LikeLike
When you get further along in the process, you tend to care more about your kids than anything else. At all. The good news is that it is hard to feel like your life was nothing but a series of foolish mistakes when you get to watch your kids get into relations that your deep red-pill self approves of whole-heartedly and then see that they are moving purposefully towards bringing 10 on 10 quality children to meet their grandad.
My son turned out to be a natural. Its complicated. He is making serious money now. (oil company genius). For a while he drifted (Basement Geek). He cares too deeply about ethics, bullshit, and,
etc. Lives in with a 9.8. For 5 years now.
Res Ipsa loquitor.
My Daughter is engaged to a 6 ft 5in Rock star Doctor who is old school (he formally asked my permission.) She just turned 30. That sounds one way if you did not know that she is a board certified, entirely debt free, newly minted Surgeon.
How did that all happen? That is a good question, I mean, if any of you guys want to reap a similar results. *
* Fathers have this innate, very intense desire to make sure that their boy children get strong enough to survive and that their girl children can survive comes what may.
LikeLike
Men want to go and to do, women want to be (an alpha male’s wife) and to have (everything he can pay for, the rest on the credit card…).
LikeLike