Recently, I had box seats to a brief lovers’ spat on the sidewalk. The couple starring in the show crossed my path perpendicularly. It was a telling scene, flush with unspoken truths about the differences between men and women. She’s following him, begging for his attention. The girl has that frantic look like her baby is floating down the river in a basket and she’s chasing after it.
All the while (not a long while, maybe twenty seconds total), he’s striding purposefully ahead of her, oblivious, or affecting an air thereof, to her fevered pleadings. He stands tall, a confident posture and a neutral facial expression leading his way. He looks kind of like a dick.
I couldn’t make out what the drama was about, but it didn’t matter. There was a larger message in this theatrical release. I thought:
“This is the direction love should go. It’s natural. Woman to man. Woman gives love, man receives love. (Man gives desire, woman receives desire.) No matter what happens next, this woman desperately chasing down her man will eventually fall into his post-coital arms, the both of them happy with their respective statuses in the relationship.”
I tried to imagine by way of thought experiment how my perception of the scene would have changed if the roles had been swapped. If instead he had been pleading with his girlfriend to slow down, and she kept walking ahead of him. I twitched at the thought with instinctive revulsion. There was only one-way love in that reverse scenario, him to her. Submissive Male to Dominant Female. A guarantee of relationship extinction.
No one loves a needy man, not even himself.
How will you know your relationship is on solid ground? If she’s running after you, red-faced and trembling with love and yearning and desperation and desire and, yes, fear. The sexual polarity is aligned. The love amplified.
If you’re running after her, afraid to lose her love? You already have.
A good, if abstractedly imperfect, test of a woman’s love for you is to ask if she would she die for you. You can ask yourself this question, and if you’re honest you’ll know the answer.
Would she die for you?
Because most women wouldn’t.
I watched TED talks today and a woman there defined love as you would give your life for that person. I would die for my son without question..but for my husband probably not. I do love him, but I wouldn’t die for him..would I die for my husband when we first started dating when I was CRAZY in love with him? Nah..
You’ll know you own your woman if she’s so in love she’d at least claim in online scribblings that she’d die for you.
[…] By CH […]
LikeLike
It is all good. Assuming you want that one to love you.
LikeLike
Exactly.
LikeLike
Love is an action, not a sentiment. Not feels. Love requires sacrifice. We all understand this irreducible illogic, which is why we honor it as the greatest good even in this age of peasant darwinism. See: jumping on a grenade.
Slaves are preoccupied with survival and are confounded by the very idea of sacrifice. Nobility does not hesitate to offer itself to preserve a principle.
Hegel’s master-slave dialectic: In a conflict of equals, the one who prefers submission to death redefines the relationship as unequal, or slave and master. John Lennon’s “Imagine” is the ne plus ultra expression of demotic slave morality.
“The Love which moves the sun and the other stars” (Dante) is the fundamental human power. Only slaves — the submissive and powerless — think a power can exist independent of love. The low class spend a life down looking up, fixated on the power over them which they only understand as oppressive. Hence the adolescent neckbearded buffoonery of worshiping evil, thinking submission to this greatest of weaknesses can ever result in one’s aggrandizement. “Dark” triad faggotry falls under this category. Justifying cowardice with “science” is another mark of the age..
LikeLike
Very clever of you to write another Trump themed post without mentioning names
LikeLike
Perceptive.
LikeLike
I thought it was about Moses. :duckface
LikeLike
tomcuck2:
You’re right! The woman chasing the man is America, lost and in desperate need of masculine guidance and love, chasing Trump.
LikeLike
Here I was thinking it was Megcunt Kelly.
LikeLike
The obsession is real: The Trumpcut.
LikeLike
She’s the Close Encounters alien:
LikeLike
God, Kelly looks bad in that pic. There is a world of signficance – feminist dogma, aging, unadmitted self-loathing – in that haircut. At the very least, openness to bad advice. We know her second husband is her beta-comforter, but I’d give 50-50 odds that we’ll hear a separation or divorce announcement from that quarter in 2016.
LikeLike
Trump ruined her.
LikeLike
> “Trump ruined her.” ——— Greatest Kkkomment Evah?!? I used to try to emphasize how pump-n-dump sowed the seeds of The Darkness in our womynz’s hearts, but The Donald didn’t even actually dip it in the beey0tch; his was a purely intellectual/spiritual pump-n-dump of her. Enjoy what’s left of K-Selection, while it lasts…
LikeLike
I can see an 85-y.o. senile Megyn Kelly, circa 2045, in her Sunset Blvd mansion, arranging the china at the dining table for the state visit of Vladimir Putin to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, in a recreation of her ongoing dream of having been the 4th Mrs Donald…
LikeLike
5 Minutes of Verbal Humiliation at the Hands of Peak Alpha > A Lifetime of Beta
LikeLike
CO, you are right – it was a psychological pump-n-dump. A mindfuck. She loved it, and now she hates herself.
LikeLike
[…] Sidewalk Love Affair […]
LikeLike
My ex was a borderline and said that shit all the time.
LikeLike
“No one loves a needy man, not even himself.”
Words to live by
LikeLike
Bigger question is do you love yourself first? How can you appreciate love from others (women), if you never loved yourself.
And yes we love you CH…
LikeLike
She doesn’t love you, no matter who you are. She loves the idea of you, her perception of you – and that’s what love means for women. Nobody loves you for who you are except yourself, and maybe some of your buddies if you’re lucky enough to have developed some close friendships. So love yourself first.
LikeLike
Whoever loves himself embarks upon a lifetime affair.
LikeLike
Maintaining a pure Alpha Sh!tlord ZFG Inner Frame starts and ends with losing not just the narcissism, but also any possible hope for narcissism. If you’re a narcissist, then you still “Give a F*ck” about yourself, which is constitutionally incompatible with ZFG.
LikeLike
Whitney in da house!
LikeLike
… or were you were talking about that other kind of “self-love“?
LikeLike
True. But it takes discipline to actually stop and walk away rather than chase a hysterical girl make her chase you.
Just had one of my plates try something like this. Was supposed to me up suggested we meet up. “May need to meet my friends.” she replied. OK. I’m not the priority so made other plans. True to form, she started texting me madly. I took my time not mentioning anything about a meet up. Then she reached out: “My friends are busy so I can meet up.”
“Oh. Made other plans. Thought you were busy.”
I could feel the heaviness at the other end…”ok…then.” she replied.
Some guys here have been asking about what to do when a girl doesn’t text back. If it’s a girl I’m gaming, I usually give it a few days then ping text. If she doesn’t reply, I’m gone. If she eventually does reply but like a week or two later…then I have to decide the content and timing on how to respond.
LikeLike
Boring and it didnt happen anyway.
LikeLike
+1
not directed at you wala but my thoughts on this very common situation:
if she’s hot and young the more fickle and flakey she’ll be, and the more intense and frequent the sh1t testing will be. these women are bombarded with male attention and have lots of options.
the 1st time you supplicate and fall into her control, even with one meetup txt exchange, she’ll devalue you and peg you down a notch or two, or even shut off any attraction she may have had.
The conscious vs unconscious source of sh1t testing is irrelvant; she may or may not know. doesn’t matter.
best course is to maintain control and roll through it, don’t accomodate. don’t apologize. ever.
if I even sense a flake like that, I crank up the uncarring assholery and confusion game. be vague, unpredictable in responses than go cold for a few days…then repeat meetup txt cycle like you just got her number.
example: you talked in person about hanging out, built good attraction and got her #, you’re now in txt/phone game until 1st meet:
(after txt convo is good and she is responding quickly, compliant.)
ripp: let’s meet at xyz around 9ish we’ll dig to china
her: hahs ok sounds good! blah blah xoxo
(hour before meet)
her: I think I need to meetup with my friends
(a few options here, but I never respond right away, and always let the evening progress at least 2 hours or so)
1) no response. sometimes the best response is no response.
2) ripp: hey at xyz w my friend sarah txt later
(this is random and confusing. it makes no sense but can work depending on the girl. she won’t be able to get a read on you but she’ll invest thought about “why is he saying that and responding 2 or 3 hours later and not even caring that I was going to hang out with my friends)”
3) ripp: dork/pffft/lol/gheyy or “nah” or “no”
(again depends on how your rapport and attraction building was at the initial contact, and this is also vague and random. sending this hours later is confusing to her. it’s even better if she responds within the same night, then you go cold for three days or so)
typically no response is always good if u dont know what is the best way to go. then wait at least 2 or 3 days and reopen with a cocky/funny txt and don’t acknowledge the past or ask about her weekend or night or anything. make a statement.
(3 days later in the early morning)
ripp: morning sunshine I’m hungry
I use random food statements often, it works. if she’s still compliant and interested she’ll respond with something neutral “me too I’m getting coffee” or something…
this also sets her up for a logic trap. she can’t come at you with “you didn’t txt me back blah blah friday” and you can play dumb. if she does come at you with that, she likes you. but still play dumb “huh? sorry I had plans”
what’s funny is that SMV 7s and below get butt hurt quick with this kind of evasive aloofness. lol…but they still sh1t test just the same.
LikeLike
@Ripp Going radio silent for a week or two only works if you’ve banged the girl and she’s shit-testing.
If in at least two recent cases I text the girl, she’s enthusiastic, but then suddenly doesn’t text back. I drop it. No sense beating a dead horse. If I see the girl, then I gauge whether to escalate or not based on the IOI’s and sub communication i’m getting and the way I feel at that particular moment. If I”m unmotivated I don’t escalate.
LikeLike
used to put a lot of thought into these types of text interactions, thinking I could stack the deck and use that stupid device in my hand to persuade a girl that it was in her best interests to drop her other ten million distractions and come out and fuck me instead
at some point I just decided it was statistically improbable and not the best use of my time. what that means is a) I literally don’t worry about where the interaction is going. might respond in two hours, three days, a month, or never. if you wait long enough she’ll often ping you with “heyyyy!” and you respond with two texts only 1) “hey how’ve you been?” followed by “come meet me for a drink tonight”. then you drop the conversation and move on, responding only intermittently, if at all
the real takeaway from this is this: don’t substitute digital seduction for in-person seduction. if you’re struggling to lock her down on the phone then you’re meat time didn’t make enough impact
you’ll know you gamed a girl properly if she’s trying to lock YOU down for a meetup, not vice versa
LikeLike
There was a dude on here a while back who went full-on Taylor Swift meme with a city bitch. I did this recently with a 19 year old stoner bitch doing “women’s studies online” – DON’T LAUGH – and within a day was jizzing on her feministing little mug.
Sometimes being a nihilist is a lot of fun, man.
LikeLike
Ps – what really locked it was when she said she still hadn’t seen Star Wars (neither have I of course) but was going that weekend so naturally I say
HAN SOLOLOLLZ DIES
LikeLike
a smart plate of mine (who’s texts I rarely respond to) sent me this the other day:
lmao
LikeLike
aye
i did this last night with my regular … whining about her 19 year old fucking cat …
“look, put it down. it’s time.”
silence
“off your period yet?”
“yes, come over”
LikeLike
> “a smart plate of mine” ——— WHYTE BUN -> WHYTE OVEN like yesterday, PJ. Sheesh. You moron.
LikeLike
don’t worry cap. already handled. you’re the godfather
LikeLike
@plump
agreed: always be closing for face to face meets. less is more with txt game…
@wala
for sure. literally put as least amount of time possible if she’s not compliant. the better time investment is always in pulling a new # or meeting up with a another on the
—
I also forgot to mention random cat memes are also great txt bait.
LikeLike
@ripp “random cat memes are also great txt bait”
yes. in fact, almost anything animal or stuffed animal related is a great trigger
example:
morning!
LikeLike
David Amran. Townes Van Zandt. H.S. Thompson. Suzy Rotolo. Bowie. The Cowboy Junkies…
The world is growing darker day by day.
LikeLike
This post is a great example of reality realized. Nature vs nurture. Nature being the way of reality, nurture being the laser beam POZ trying to dissolve that which is real, to be replaced with an purely nurture resultant society. When ‘betaboys’ bitch about looks and money being the reason certain men have an easier path with chics, I point out the posted scenario. Then counterpoint it with: Imagine bradpittclooneycaprio chasing after chics the way the chic in the post is chasing the man. Bradpittclooneycaprios money and fame just magnified his chumpitude. The fact that males who can’t make the connection are lost if they don’t wake up soon. I can’t save everyone. Meet up day, 8 pm gents. Lets see what’s up. Never back down. Will be posting a recap.
LikeLike
Excellent. I’m still showing up….see if anyone else does. If not, get a rub-n-tug at an AMP….haha….stress reliever.
LikeLike
Please let us know how it goes, men.
LikeLike
Well, you’re always saying make the girl chase after you.
LikeLike
I have 2 who want to wife me up…having them chase you is a PITA. I’d really rather control the interaction.
TRUST ME…you don’t want chicks really chasing you. They sometimes show the fuck up at your house unannounced.
When I tell stories, people say sometimes “you drove her to it”…it was a REALLY SHORT TRIP mfers.
LikeLike
> “2 who want to wife me up” ——— WHYTE BUNZ -> WHYTE OVENZes
LikeLike
I hear that. When a bitch actually wants you, she brings all women’s borderline sociopathic lack of sense to bear on you. I WANT IT AND I WANT IT NOW!
LikeLike
“I’ve got seven women on my mind,
Four that wanna own me,
Two that wanna stone me,
One says she’s a friend of mine”
LikeLike
Come on babeee don’t say maybeee I got the Sound of These old wheels drivin me crazeee
LikeLike
It’s quite unusual (if even possible) for the woman to remain that way to her husband after she has his kids. Because her whole life is for those kids. Therefore everything else including husband is in distant second place. This is the evolutionary psychology of the situation.
At this point, the man is really not supposed to be around any more. It’s his time to leave that nest, go slay another mammoth, moisten another pussy and make a new nest for his next brood.
But up until that “seven year itch” where she attaches to the kids and you can go on your merry way (if you’re a caveman) yes she’s supposed to be that attached to you.
LikeLike
I think you’re speaking to some truth, here. But why is it that some men are able to maintain the fierce devotion of their wives even after they’ve given birth to several kids? They’re probably doing something the other men aren’t, no? I guess it just becomes harder after the wife has given birth (her hormones change). But it’s hardly impossible to cultivate and maintain a woman’s devotion after she’s had your children. The problem, I think, is more men today think that when you become a father it means you have to become a soft pussy. Look at your average young alphaish frat dude-looking father. They look like men who could possibly knock you out. But they act like total pussies raising their children.
LikeLike
Much truth… I’ve always said the worst thing about ‘Murrica is that we worship children and negroes.
LikeLike
@Chuck Steak
you are exactly right about this.
too many people believe that being neglected by their girl after kids come along is normal and acceptable. they also believe that women are not truly capable of loving and devoting and themselves to their men. that’s not true either.
this happens for way too many men but part of ensuring that you don’t have a life like that yourself is denying the possibility of it. acceptance in this case is the first step to defeat.
you gotta assume the sale just like in every other situation. you assume she loves you. you set the expectation that she will put you first and devote herself to you. on top of that, you do things that inspire her devotion and passion for you and she will never even consider doing anything else.
LikeLike
Any woman who is secure of her spouse’s affection will neglect him. If she thinks you’ll start fucking your secretary, she’ll give it up nightly. Just like us won’t commit to girls who give up sex for little in return.
LikeLike
For me, the problem has been dipshititis. New babies make them air heads and she can’t focus on anything for longer than two seconds until she gets distracted again, usually by the baby making goo goo noises and she gets all sappy over it. The baby gets in the way of intimacy sometimes but its tolerable and my wife always has a good attitude. In my case, it was more a question of making room for the baby, which needs most of her time and attention until it’s old enough to be self sufficient a little bit. If anything, her loyalty to me is greater.
LikeLike
I also use dread game.
LikeLike
“I’ve always said the worst thing about ‘Murrica is that we worship children and negroes.”
Yeah. It reminds me of Julius Evola writing how it was unfortunate that America had adopted a negro soul and that if it wanted to look to a non-white soul for itself that the Amerindian soul would have been far more noble and preferable.
“too many people believe that being neglected by their girl after kids come along is normal and acceptable. they also believe that women are not truly capable of loving and devoting and themselves to their men. that’s not true either.”
It honestly sounds like the male playboy hamster to me. Standard Return Of Kings commentariat nonsense.
“this happens for way too many men but part of ensuring that you don’t have a life like that yourself is denying the possibility of it. acceptance in this case is the first step to defeat.”
People are used to instant gratification. They don’t put in the maintenance necessary to reap the long term benefits. They’re good enough about this when it comes to their 401ks or pensions, I guess. But they don’t see how this applies to immaterial aspects as well. You have to make yourself believe that there is no way she could love another man or desire another man other than you and really believe that. And to really believe that, you can’t be lazy and watch nignog ball six hours every Sunday.
To the point about fathers, it’s like men have forgotten that they’re the adults and children are stupid. They don’t get that they’re supposed to talk down to children, not “level” with them. You don’t level with a five year old. You playfully condescend if you want to be their buddy.
LikeLike
>quotes Evola as authority
>mocks RoK comments
LikeLike
@chucksteak: “why is it that some men are able to maintain the fierce devotion of their wives even after they’ve given birth to several kids?”
in my family the catholic church very efficiently and on a pretty tight budget provides the weekly blue pill dose to otherwise virile fathers like mine to spend their few remaining years doting on an aging, nagging, neurotic spouse who will likely outlive them and be passed on to his children, instead of doing the things that would reinvigorate him, and/or invest that time instead in his grandchildren (a much better investment)
it’s an incredible feat of brainwashing, for any who doubt the power of the church, and IMO, one of the bugs in k selection
LikeLike
Look to the bible for that kind of advice. You will never get good advice from the church of any denomination unless its SSPX. The best solution for you young men is to wait until you are in your 40s and get a much younger woman, at least 15 years of age difference.
LikeLike
CD, I know I can do a google search, but what is SSPX?
LikeLike
I decided this past weekend to extract my kids from any influence of the Catholic Church for now.
I was raised Catholic and have a sympathetic view toward Christianity, but I’m not religious. I see Christianity as an important cultural foundation of the West, however, so I have been on-board with letting my kids get at least minor exposure to the Catholic Church (also works out well since my wife is Catholic too).
We don’t attend church regularly, but my oldest, who goes to public school, goes to a “Sunday school” type of thing for an hour or two once a week after school (it’s called CCD; it’s required to go through the rites like First Communion, etc.).
We happened to be spending this past weekend with my parents and attended church with them. I almost got up and walked out when the “pray for the refugees” nonsense came up.
It got me thinking — any exposure to such race-cuck views being espoused by the libtard-commie-idiot-Pope Francis is too much exposure. I don’t that much by way of the “refugee” nonsense is making its way into CCD classes, but I’m drawing a line.
Not one red cent will go to the Catholic Church so long as it maintains its genocidal views on White and European civilization. My kids will be allowed to do the bare minimum to make the Sacraments up to at least Communion, but after that, no more exposure to the Catholic race-cuck mentality until the Church is set to rights.
LikeLike
@corvo you must understand that the Catholic Church has been subverted. Why not do something about it?
LikeLike
“corvo you must understand that the Catholic Church has been subverted. Why not do something about it?”
Fair question.
But the answer is because I’m too busy raising my kids, working hard, and focusing on more important hard-skills to bother wasting hours and hours of my life jaw-jawing with a bunch of race-cuck fags running the Catholic Church now; in addition to the fact that any effort I put forward is only a drop in the bucket and unlikely to result in any improvement.
A solution like what would have been done in the days of yore would land me in jail, of no benefit to my family, so alas I can’t solve it that way.
Sometimes, a man just has to cut himself off from a poisonous influence. Which is what the Catholic Church has become.
LikeLike
@David
I believe you are wrong. Women, generally, are there to nurture the child for the first few years, then the father becomes the disciplinarian and instructor. And protector. From poz, sloth, distraction, etc. It’s glaringly apparent that females fail (in America, it’s the only culture I know) when it comes to raising children once they reach school age. The man with his will and spirit is supposed to provide direction.
LikeLike
exactly.
women are not supposed to be so unhealthily devoted to their children the way they are now. the end goal is to raise kids to be functioning healthy adults, not lifetime companions, ego-boosters, and hobbies for their mothers.
moms who act like their lives revolve around their children are the most unhealthy of women. they typically have no hobbies or strong relationships with friends and/or with their husbands. as the kids get older and need them less, they feel lost and miserable because they aren’t needed. that’s how it’s supposed to work though. and it’s pure selfishness when women prevent that from happening. kids aren’t designed to meet a broken person’s need to be needed.
LikeLike
Funnily enough, I would die for my two boys…
LikeLike
Most women wouldnt die for their kids. Most women wouldnt put their kids before the AlphaFux they receive for the first time after divorcing their BetaBux husband.
LikeLike
Of course women love to appear to be the kind of person who would die/kill/endure any hardship etc. for their kids. You see crap like this on Facebook all the time — back patting stuff about how much moms love blah blah blah….
Watch what they do. Not what they say. Many would skimp on healthy food for their kids to buy a pair of shoes. Many more murder one or more in the womb before they’re ready to be those wonderful self-sacrificing saints. A huge number deprive their kids of their fathers through divorce for another shot at romance/happiness etc.
Don’t believe the hype. Treat women how they really are. Both of you will be happier for it.
LikeLike
This.
LikeLike
kids are PROPERTY to a woman.
LikeLike
Exactly. Women would butcher their children for a new man in their life, and do it with a smile.
cuz…. tingles.
LikeLike
I don’t want my relationship to be the equivalent of the CEO and his talentless underling kissass. I want to take criticism from her and I want to be able to feel vulnerable sometimes because something in life matters to me more than promoting my self-image.
I want to at least try to be a better man because of her and that will never happen with a pathetic sycophant in tow.
LikeLike
More of my relationships than not have been her endlessly running around after me and all it’s given me is a sense of ingratitude tinged with regret.
Take everything for granted and it is a shit life. My philosophy is that everybody is shit only some people are more shit than others. I need a woman who knows that no matter how high up in her eyes I am still a bit shit. Nobody is perfect and I get so bored of women treating me like I am.
LikeLike
All you Brits do anymore is whine about how shit everything is.
Alas – you’re right.
LikeLike
UKIP, you limey ass… you make Eeyore sound like Richard Simmons.
LikeLike
Be a better man for your own reasons, not for a woman.
But by your posts you’ve shown yourself to be a fucking limp-wristed douchebag so of course you need to be pussy-whipped by some fat cow into being a “better man.”
LikeLike
Would she die for you?
….well, there was this one time I put too much in her drink……
just kidding!
whorefinder takes it there rape!
LikeLike
Woman gives love, man receives love. (Man gives desire, woman receives desire.)
Could someone clarify this last part “Man gives desire, woman receives desire”?
LikeLike
Women seek to be desired by attractive men. It’s biology. That goes along with women’s general social strategy: 1) to be admired by everybody, 2) to get the attention of men (betas will do for this), 3) to be desired by attractive men.
LikeLike
Attention Whoring
LikeLike
http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2014/12/26/khazars/
Israel admits they are Khazarian
LikeLike
this is apparently a misdirection
LikeLike
Truth about a woman dying for you. after retiring from a very successful player career, I finally got myself a good wife. When we found out shew as pregnant, I said, wow its weird knowing there will be someone in this world I would die for. She looked at my blankly and says, What do you mean? I would die for you in an instant.
good woman
LikeLike
As much as they piss each other off–in a the good way–I know my mom would die for my dad.
LikeLike
Even my sister would die for her hubby. She’s devoted to that man like crazy.
LikeLike
“This is the direction love should go. It’s natural. Woman to man. Woman gives love, man receives love. (Man gives desire, woman receives desire.) ”
That is fucking perfect.
LikeLike
“Would you die for me?”
“I’m dying a little right now.”
LikeLike
LOL
LikeLike
Well done!
LikeLike
“No one loves a needy man”
Please Clap… LOLz
LikeLike
Lord, if that don’t produce a douche chill, nuthin’ will.
I’m embarrassed for the man. 😡
LikeLike
For the eskimo , or Yeb ? Enquireing minds want to know.
LikeLike
!Jeb! get your mexican-replacement citizens to vote you in, you cuck-ass faggot.
!Jeb! rape!
LikeLike
!Jeb! get your mexican-replacement citizens to vote you in, you cuck-ass faggot.
!Jeb! rape!
i really don’t think It could be put better than this.
LikeLike
A man can be 1 of 3 things to a woman: Sperm donor, friend or ATM.
In the hugely overwhelming majority of cases, she gets to pick which one you are.
I can think of only 2 things a woman can give me that I cannot get (and better) elsewhere: sex and children.
For activities, sports, hobbies, conversation, work, etc. , I’m much better off with guys, for love, friendship, devotion, companionship, nothing beats a dog.
Cats, horses, some birds will also work.
I am not sure women are even capable of actually LOVING anyone other than themselves.
Maybe their own biological children – if the kids are lucky.
LikeLike
Very perceptive, wolfie65.
Stage1 of red pill awareness: When you fully internalize that no woman will ever love you like your mother does (or did).
LikeLike
Very perceptive, Mel Gibson.
Stage2 of red pill awareness: When you fully internalize that your mother never loved you and never will.
A real man knows he is better than his mother and her ‘love’. Look at every woman you would like to impregnate. How do they choose sperm? But your mommy is different? The mental difference in women other than IQ is transiently circumstantial. Your mother lusts her DNA immortality but within the confines of her status whoring. It takes a stable patriarchy to corral survival instincts into a loyal helpmate. Bros before hoes is no lie.
LikeLike
I disagree to an extent.
A loving mother is the only person on earth who is capable of loving you unconditionally.
That’s the huge problem with beta men. They seek the love of their mother in their girlfriends and wives, and don’t realize that those women are incapable of loving them like that.
LikeLike
Love is not unconditional. That’s chick propaganda. The most profitable submission is. An abstract idea without standards is not an abstract idea: it’s a feeling. Emotional imperatives of control are feelings and do have standards, of self-maintenance and other-control. Reality principle vs. pleasure principle. If by unconditional love every mother’s child is ‘good’ and good enough, we have no standards and no culture and no civilization. No child left behind = cultural death. We live more and more like animals.
LikeLike
“sex and children”
My wife is also a terrific cook — don’t forget that skill!
LikeLike
Most women I’ve known are best kept away from kitchens – for their own as well as everyone else’s health & safety.
I’m not demanding and perfectly capable of feeding myself (and others).
Looking for their mother’s love in girlfriends, are they ?
Ouch.
That would really blow.
LikeLike
Wolfie, that is not true in Germany. Even today, women can still cook a little bit. Local fests always have, by US standards, elaborate cake baked by the local women for sale. Our women heat up TV dinners and Dominos Pizza.
LikeLike
“Most women I’ve known are best kept away from kitchens – for their own as well as everyone else’s health & safety.”
I encourage you to seek out better women. Who will be feeding and nuturing those White children?
LikeLike
Most top chefs are male. Wonder why? It’s the same with STEM degrees; the gals just don’t really cut it.
LikeLike
When will people learn the truth: Neediness is no attractive trait in guys.
http://freedompowerandwealth.com
LikeLike
Off-topic, but…
Holy shit @ Roosh being featured on Russia Today.
LikeLike
Has there been any word yet as to why it was cancelled? Lots of chatter in the comments but nothing from Roosh central.
What was the threat???
LikeLike
He cancelled it to protect the members that might have other wised faced the wrath of the SJWs, the state, establishment, etc.
He figured it wasn’t worth the risk of losing jobs or getting threats. The cost-benefit wasn’t in our favor.
I’m still going through with it, as are others.
LikeLike
Hmm, don’t know at this point.
LikeLike
Damn..comment lost in mod….
LikeLike
Roosh is a self-promoter. Whatever PUA skills he has are dwarfed by the size of his reputation. I have only seen one infield clip where the chick was already with him and no escalation. You blue pill guys want to take back the country by winning the popular support of a degenerate public. Roosh might be able to cash in as a cult leader, but you can’t make a decent country out of shit people. Start your own ingroup and don’t advertise. The politics is weather you can’t control. Just deal with it and accrue power and enjoy living the best you can. If the we is pruned to better quality, the government we deserve is a better quality. Nature will provide.
LikeLike
You’ll be seeing some pruning alright.
LikeLike
Dying for anyone except your biological children is imbecilic anyway.
LikeLike
dying for your children is biologically imbecilic. It’s a modern phenomenon. You can always have more of them
LikeLike
You think like a woman, i.e. an animal. It takes a patriarchy. Nuclear family is a byproduct of patriarchy. Since we have no patriarchy, your statement is true enough. Policing my patriarchy would be worth killing for and with bad luck dying for. Who wants to live like a coward? If red pill is not ultimately about reestablishing a free man’s patriarchy, we are only competing to be better at the woman’s game of pack animal relative rank.
LikeLike
#FatherKnowsBest – – pining away for what we’ve lost since the 50’s. But, wth, we can only face forwards. Let’s recapture our Eskimo-ized culture. Trump is a good start.
LikeLike
As noted many times, if they didn’t have the vay-jay, we’d have nothing to do with them. Learned Charisma, (aka game) even internalized takes energy. Its damn exhausting and a requirement, unless you’re a true ZFG sociopath and completely detached. To be sure, all the meme’s and tropes (and worthless books) we were raised on are akin to an emperor with no clothes for the lot of thinking. “People are more likely to feel the shadow of the future if you bring the future closer.” I had to nuke what was most likely a BPD histrionic 2x a day SSRI, tatted-up, Jackie-O wearing 2000 cock stare intruder over at Roosh’s house: the sphere is the feedback loop to the cultural malaise that is both persistent and pervasive…now where’s my motorcycle, I think I’ll take the long way down until I hit Chile…
LikeLike
You should have seen what a rat faced, Jew goggles wearing, Jew bitch rodent just did to me in the parking lot. Fucking disgusting, miserable, ugly (both inside and out) lizards. And they _still_ don’t understand why Hitler happened or why Trump is happening (not that I agree with the Jew’s attempt to say Trump is Hitler). Besides everything we know about the Jew controlling the media, government, and Hollywood (the elites) and pushing miscegenation and hip hop “culture” on our white women 24/7, even in daily one on one interactions with “lowly” Jews who “earn” only $250,000 per year and are not famous, you will notice that the Jew is just plain aggressive, nasty, and rude. Especially the women. Disgusting vermin.
By the way, the parking lot of which I speak is the one outside the hospital where I just saw an ultrasound of my future son with my beautiful, sweet, white fiance. Inside the examining room is a photo of a beautiful white mother with a black as Africa baby. (The woman is a 10 and the baby does not even look mixed; looks like it had two 100% African parents.) I’m talking about a poster sized, framed photo — this is the decoration for this room. They. Will. Not. Stop.
Anyway, in the parking lot this Jew rat nearly physically attacked my _pregnant_ fiance. This is not beta white knighting that makes me do this comment. I know that it literally makes a Jew rat woman mad to see a white woman pregnant with a white baby. I would have confronted her but I would have risked her getting me arrested for “threatening” her, I’m sure.
LikeLike
And yes, it is a Jew-run, Jew-owned hospital. Where I live and in any major city, one essentially has no choice. I can’t wait to put the doctor in his place when he tries to tell my white woman that breast feeding is worse for the baby than Jew-created lab formula. As if God Himself did not know what the baby needs and what kind of nutrition to put into a loving mother’s milk.
lolzozozozoz.
LikeLike
Hey I just realized my comment is sorta on topic with “sidewalk love affair.” Except my story does not involve my woman being pissed at me or vice versa. Didn’t even notice that, honestly. You gotta put the last comment through mod. Folks will get a laugh out of it. I’ll try to hold to no more comments today.
LikeLike
Congrats on the great news.
I missed it – what did the Jew woman do to you in the parking lot? What was her motive to approach you and nearly physically assault your pregnant fiance? The way you write it makes it seem unprovoked, as if she came up to you like the nogs do during their polar bear hunts.
LikeLike
in mod. It didn’t like that we were taking too long to leave. It wanted parking spot. We were making out by the side of my fiance’s car. Whenever I kiss my fiance she wants to keep going and going. The reptile was jealous, I’m sure. lolzozozozozoz
LikeLike
To be fair, I would have been pissed off too.
LikeLike
@anon
Honestly, a public make out session between two adults can be a little offputting, especially if you are waiting for their parking spot. It’s not worth getting into an altercation over, though.
LikeLike
When we took the baby classes, breast feeding was presented as pretty much the best and only option. They said formula should only be used if the woman can’t breast feed for some reason. It is by far the best way to feed a Baby for a variety of reasons. She will also drop the weight fast.
LikeLike
Good to hear that you got that (correct) message. Of course breast feeding is the best for both mother and baby.
LikeLike
My own dear mom (may she RIP) told me about how she was advised by expert medical opinion – back in the old days before I was born – that modern science knew how to make better “formula” for her baby than her own body could.
She was raised in an old German/Southern family who did not encourage their daughters to say things like “Eat shit and die, m-fukkers!!!”
But she gently led me to understand that this was her exact sentiment at the time.
LikeLike
Rum
those same doctors were advising gentiles to get circumcized too. We are the only nation that did that. Please explain.
LikeLike
Universal circumcision was popularized in the US in the late 19th century as a “cure” for the observed tendency of young lads to wank. Wanking was regarded by expert medical opinion in the late Victorian era as a very bad thing. Hygiene, per se, was not the goal.
This was the same era that invented the mechanical vibrator to help Medical Doctors efficiently masturbate women to orgasm to treat/relieve their neurotic complaints. I mean, the fingers get tired after the first 3 or so and the waiting room is packed…
For what its worth, the American Pediatric Association does not take a stand on circs, and as far as I know, never has.
Circ rates have been falling steeply in the US for several decades.
LikeLike
Congrats on the bun. Just had the 20 week ultrasound too, amazing what new technology can do with the 3D images and stuff.
We showed our other little kids the 3D pics from the ultrasound and of course they were amazed. By 9 year-old asked how the ultrasound photo was possible, so I briefly explained the concept of ultrasound and how it works.
And then I asked him: “And who do you think invented the ultrasound?”
And his response was a smirk and the response: “A White man.”
My little shitlord got a high-five for that.
LikeLike
Expecting that a woman would die for her man is a forlorn hope. They do not have it in them.
It would be nice to know, that in a nanosecond of emotional rage, your woman might expose herself to danger on your behalf. But to expect her to do so as even a slightly conscious thought, no. They do not have the capacity.
One of the many, many reasons they can never be effective soldiers, or even cops or firefighters.
With most of them, it is touch an go even risking their lives for their child.
A man will, even in a momentary rage, be conscious that he is risking death in a defense of another. His ability to pair reason with emotion in those moments is a big part of what makes him effective.
If a woman has an instant of thought to pair with her emotional response, her will to risk and defend diminishes rapidly.
All the desire of her heart is to submit, not to defend.
So when asked in the calm that question, she answers as expected. I agree with CH that it would be nice to have her tell the pretty lie though.
LikeLike
bwahahahahahahahaha
LikeLike
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/02/04/iowa/
Rubio owned by the Lansky Mafia for gay past
LikeLike
http://espn.go.com/espnw/news-commentary/article/14714784/roger-goodell-says-nfl-establish-rooney-rule-women-executive-positions
The feminization of the National Football League continues. In fact, this is the lowest point for said feminization thus far.
LikeLike
I was already at a breaking point this year with the female refs. It’s even infected the college game too. Naturally. Then AZ and the big to-do about the female assistants.
I’m switching to hockey. They haven’t been infected yet, right?
LikeLike
“I’m switching to hockey. They haven’t been infected yet, right?”
Behold… Patient Zero.
LikeLike
It would be great if the NFL and NBA go out of business.
LikeLike
She says she would not die for her husband but later on in the same discussion she says:
“That’s the tricky thing..because fully expect my husband to die for me..he’s our protector of the family.”
She’s got entitlement issues. lol
LikeLike
“Would you sacrifice your life to save a drowning brother?”
“No, but I would to save two brothers or eight cousins.” (JBS Haldane)
LikeLike
!Jeb! get your mexican-replacement citizens to vote you in, you cuck-ass faggot.
!Jeb! rape!i really don’t think It could be put better than this.
LikeLike
The Rational Male has written much about “love”.
http://therationalmale.com/category/love/
The only woman that can ever or will ever love you unconditionally is your mother.
The love of every other woman will be entirely conditional.
LikeLike
Rollo is painfully stupid. Worse, he hides it under a mountain range of words. Unless you have the time and the inclination to go spelunking for miles, people like you have no chance to spot it. Sad!
LikeLike
Don’t fuck with the Russians, they are not as big of fans of vibrant diversity as zee Gerrmenz:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/04/refugees-go-clubbing-in-russia-harass-girls-wake-up-in-hospital-the-next-morning/
“A group of 51 refugees were brutally assaulted outside a night club in Murmansk, Russia, after they groped and molested women at a night club Saturday.
The refugees had previously been ordered to leave Norway for “bad behavior” and tried their luck in Russia. What they didn’t realize when they went out clubbing in Murmansk is that Russians have less tolerance when it comes to sexual assault on local women than other European countries.
The refugees allegedly groped and harassed women in a similar manner as the assaults in Cologne on New Year’s Eve. A group of male Russian took them aside to “educate” them that “Cologne is 2,500 kilometers south of here.”
The refugees tried to flee but were quickly captured by the Russians. They then took them out to the street and gave them a beating they will remember. Police arrived to break up the fight but locals report that they threw a few punches at the refugees before arresting 33 of them. Eighteen refugees were in such bad condition they had to be take to the hospital.”
Happy Friday boys
LikeLike
Beautiful story! I have been to Russia, and those boys are not to be messed with. They will throw down the gauntlet, and escalate quickly. Too bad they did not end up below a the cold waters of Murmansk port, or given a one way trip to the North Pole.
LikeLike
[…] Recently, I had box seats to a brief lovers' spat on the sidewalk. The couple starring in the show crossed my path perpendicularly. It was a telling scene, flush with unspoken truths about the differences between men and women. […]
LikeLike
If a woman does not follow you (literally) as the head of the relationship, then she will NOT die for you, and probably leave you if times get rough. Looking back at past relationships, it is easy to put each girl/woman on one side of the list or the other.
LikeLike
Of course, a man who does not lead may not have the internal fortitude, honor, and courage to die for his woman. Woman internally recognize that, I think, more than men realize the reverse, as the Natural order is for the man to die for his woman if need be (and the woman die for her children if need be).
LikeLike
Monsieur Le Château** :
You know, one of the many amazing things I like about this blog is the near absolute, total absence of typos and spelling errors.
The New York Times publishes errors on a regular basis, including in front page bold face titles !
But you Sir, not hardly ever.
That’s why this :
<>
Just saying ! (I bet it won’t be there in the morning).
Sincerely,
– Arturo
**PS : Not sure if you or your readers saw this, but the Académie Française in Paris ruled yesterday that the “circonflexe” – the little “hat” on top of vowels in words such as “château”, is to be removed from official school textbooks.
A mere reflection of the wrong-sided trajectory of our sorry Ship Of State.
Here’s the NYT article on the subject :
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/06/world/europe/french-spelling-changes-26-years-in-the-making-cause-a-fracas.html?_r=0
LikeLike
oops, sorry, the error in question didn’t publish when I copy-pasted it.
Here it’s again :
A good, if abstractedly imperfect, test of a woman’s love for you is to ask if she would she die for you. You can ask yourself this question, and if you’re honest.
LikeLike