• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Facials And The Commitment-Worthiness Of Women
Marco Roboto »

The Future You Choose

February 7, 2016 by CH

visualshiv

In the id-carving business, this is what’s known as a future vision shiv. Oracular serration.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Goodbye America, Hope and Change, Ugly Truths | 105 Comments

105 Responses

  1. on February 7, 2016 at 4:05 pm Carlos Danger

    What can you say. Too true. Why don’t millennials get this? Why are they not fit to live? Even if Sanders won, he’s such a limp noodle the Sanhedrin would just walk all over him. Besides, he’s their puppet anyway.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2016 at 5:10 pm Future Jim

      Millennials are being played. Like most people, they are followers. Like most people, they are useful idiots.

      Based on the millions of data points I’ve encountered … The players are white/Jewish and care very much about the future of the human gene pool, so they are taking a calculated risk to get more power, with which they can then do things like sterilize and/or neutralize those they see as inferior (i.e. Africans. Arabs, Mexicans) and those they see as obstacles (i.e. patriots, libertarians, Constitutionalists, gun owners, preppers).

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2016 at 5:13 pm Future Jim

        My biggest fear, which I think is unlikely, is that they want to eliminate white people because we are just to likely to revolt and because they REALLY like being in a class above everyone else, so removing the layer below them would make their superiority more clear.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2016 at 6:09 pm The Other Jim

        No, the eskimo’s dream of the ethnic cleansing of Whites from America and Europe. Of that, I have no doubt anymore. This is why they enable the orcs, goblins, faeries, and single women against Whites.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2016 at 6:30 pm FuriousFerret

        You’re like a sperg version of Zombie Shane/Captain Obvious.

        One is enough. Maybe more than enough.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2016 at 7:28 pm Future Jim

        “sperg”?

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2016 at 10:28 pm Carlos Danger

        You biggest fear is the Occam’s razor solution and the correct reason.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2016 at 10:34 pm Captain Obvious

        Zykl0n B -> Fur!ousF3rret FTW.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 12:51 am The Tingler

        >>Millennials are being played. Like most people, they are followers. Like most people, they are useful idiots.

        I don’t even blame them anymore, especially the white male variety. They’re raised to despise themselves. The radical left narrative of white/male inferiority is the the grand narrative of our time, and those poor Millennial faggots don’t stand a chance against it, not when they’re being weaned on it and raised in it.

        Think about that. The people educating *and* entertaining them all despise them, and they don’t even know what it’s like to grow up in a world where your educators and entertainers aren’t out to de-fang you. Poor fools don’t even see the train bearing down on them.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 7:12 am Some Guy

        @ The Tingler

        Think about that. The people educating *and* entertaining them all despise them, and they don’t even know what it’s like to grow up in a world where your educators and entertainers aren’t out to de-fang you. Poor fools don’t even see the train bearing down on them.

        Yes. They don’t notice it for the same reason that fish don’t notice the water. We Gen-Xers have a memory of a time when things were relatively normal, so we have some sort of perspective to put this in. They don’t. All they know is this sick society.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 6:52 am Future Jim

        @Carlos, A solution for who? What is the reason?

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 6:56 am Future Jim

        @CO, Perhaps because I am new, I don’t get what you are saying either. For example, are you are saying you want to gas FF – for the world? Or perhaps something less harsh?

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 9:40 am uh

        Some Guy,

        A+ on video. I had that cd on repeat back in the day.

        WORLD. OF. SHIT.

        Even as a young antifa, I thought the anti-racist shit vapid and heavy-handed.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 9:42 am uh

        Future Jim,

        You’re being too earnest. Moreover, nothing you’re saying is original. That’s why they’re mocking you. Keep commenting and you’ll be an agent, a Jew, or both.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 9:46 am Greg Eliot

        Well, we already know he’s a sophomoric shill for SJW “independent thinkers” who disparages the Bible and Alinsky’s his way into the chateau with verbosity and concern troll questioning.

        He might as well be either or both, assuming he’s not either… a rather LARGE assumption, from my ken.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 9:49 am Jack Rackam

        The eskimo’s dream is Brazil or Mexico. Ruling over a world of shit teeming with mongrelized vermin.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 9:55 am uh

        Greg,

        If everyone you guys ever accused of being this and that really were ……

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 10:03 am Greg Eliot

        Most of the accusations are mere venting in anger because the naive and outright disingenuous carry so much damn water for the Cathedral, whether they mean to or not… and I believe a goodly portion of them mean to.

        If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, well…

        That said, point taken that actual paid “agents” aren’t as numerous as some here want us to believe… that would mean the hydra has even more heads than possible… and there ain’t THAT many pieces of silver to go around.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 4:17 am douchebagdeluxe

      Sanders is an eskimo … ’nuff said

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 9:48 am Greg Eliot

        I miss the good ol’ days when they stayed behind the curtain and got goy stooges to front for them. At least we were spared the reptilian phizzes and the unmitigated chutzpah.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 4:59 am The Straw

      The could have just used this one from last year…

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 7:46 pm Otsuka Duojinshi

        Or better yet the wall from Lima, Peru that I think inspired the illustration. Works there pretty well!

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2016 at 8:11 am UKIP

      He speaks better for my generation and I do understand why people my age like Sanders. Even the girls are leaving Hillary behind because young women don’t see men as the enemy. that alone gives me confidence. Young men don’t repulse our women to the extent that older men repulse theirs.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2016 at 8:20 am UKIP

        And I don’t know where this millennial manlet comes from although I’ve a strong suspicion it’s from the bender class.

        Growing up in the 80s was gay as fuck, the streets are a lot meaner now than they were. Gen X and Boomers wouldn’t have lasted 5 minutes in my high school and i believe only the middle class are gayer than they used to be.

        LikeLike


  2. on February 7, 2016 at 4:06 pm Canadian Friend

    No balls, no wall.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2016 at 11:34 pm Canadian Friend

      And no wall = no more white race.

      LikeLike


  3. on February 7, 2016 at 4:42 pm Nads

    Import Mexicans. Get Mexico.

    LikeLike


  4. on February 7, 2016 at 5:03 pm Future Jim

    Regarding immigration, I would apply the same common sense principle as any other rational person. I would spend my own money to help my allies and any others who would benefit me to have easier access to me, and I would spend my own money to hinder my enemies and any others who would harm me from having easier access to me. If I weren’t sure, then I would observe whether they were being assisted by my enemies, and if so, then I would assume that a majority of them were either my enemies or were being used by my enemies to harm me.

    It is indeed the case that my enemies are bringing people across the border, which you should care about very much, because my enemies are your enemies because my principles are in your best interests.

    My principles are – everything voluntary. You own yourself and thus the fruits of your labor (your property). You have the right to defend yourself and your property. Decentralization is best because less central power means a greater proportion of the laws are only local laws, and it also means greater diversity in local laws, which means one can just move to a better town if one doesn’t like the local government, which all means local governments will be competing to be the best governments they can be … and that government is best which governs least.

    Our enemies are those who want to control us, confiscate the fruits of our labor, reduce our choices, force us to conform, make us dependent, censor us, disarm us, deceive us, play us, or otherwise neutralize us. Such people can be loosely described as progressives, which includes neocons (Republican progressives) and an army of useful idiots.

    One of the two main groups of useful idiots are those who think they are fighting against their imaginary enemy – the racists. Ironically, their frivolous accusations of racism prove that it is they who are the racists. This group of useful idiots overlaps the other main group, who think they are fighting the crony billionaires and multinational corporations by demanding more government, more taxes, more spending, more regulation, more centralization, and global government. Of course, they are furthering the agenda of those they think they oppose.

    The people whom the progressive elite are helping to come here are a new kind of useful idiot. The progressive elite actually see them as their enemy in the long term, but at the moment, they also see them as useful idiots. In the long term, the progressive elite, who are white/Jewish eugenicists, want to sterilize 99% of the people like those they are helping to come here. Therefore, they obviously think that the people they help to come here are going to help them overcome the last obstacle to their other long term agenda, which is global domination.

    The progressive elite believe the last obstacle to their global domination is the armed citizenry of America. Once they have neutralized the American people, then no one will be left to stop them.

    The progressive elite expect these particular immigrants to help them remove the last obstacle to their global domination. For example, they expect most immigrants to vote for the Democrats, who are yet another kind of useful idiot because they are pushing hard for the last two planks in the globalist agenda designed to neutralize the American people. One is the total takeover of healthcare, and the other is disarming the people. Additionally they expect these immigrants to be more willing to join the DHS and thus directly help disarm the indigenous American population once the progressive elite are ready.

    The progressive elite also expect some of the immigrants to be Islamic jihadists, which will help them strengthen the Patriot Act and perpetrate their “war on terror” against those people on American soil. Then, the transition from fighting Islamic jihadists on American soil to fighting libertarians, Tea Partiers, patriots, and any other critics labeled as domestic terrorists … would be seamless.

    Just to be clear, the only ethical policy is – everything voluntary. Therefore, nothing I would do would be an initiation of force; however, force is already justified in response to the countless ways in which our enemies have already initiated force. Nevertheless, do not respond with force just because it is justified. They are playing us. They are desperately trying to provoke the people into attacking the government or each other so that they can have their pretense for a greater police state to combat “domestic terrorists”. Remember, they control the media.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 2:26 am carlos danger

      Better to wait until they start their war with Russia and have to send the army there.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 7:03 am Future Jim

        @Carlos, You guys are really cryptic. Do you mean you think the army will be on the side of the conspirators, so we can more effectively respond to an initiation of force when they are preoccupied out of the country?

        I think it is just as likely that the army would be the side of the American people, and that is why it would out of the country in the first place – at least those members of the military who would be on our side would be out of the country. Many have already been purged from the military.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 8:50 am carlos danger

        Are you some kind of NSA stooge?

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 9:00 am mendo

        That’s my guess as well. Maybe another of the alphabet groups.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 10:00 am Future Jim

        @carlos, yeah, I get that a lot because I ask a lot of questions, especially when people are being cryptic. I could wait until I pick it up from the context, but I am not that patient.

        An agent provocateur would be promoting violence or at least trying to obfuscate or derail productive discussion. As for directly gathering intel, they already have all our emails, comments, phone calls, etc. And they have software to analyze the content, So they would not bother probing with a human unless the target were pretty high value I would guess.

        I am attracted by the anti-politically correct insights, but there’s also a lot here that seems like cognitive dissonance and/or questionable principles, so I ask a lot of questions. Also, I write a lot about these things as you can see at my blog.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 10:09 am Future Jim

        I just realized that another reason i am asking a lot of questions is there is always a 50/50 chance that a site like this is a honey pot, in which case I would want to know that as soon as possible. I suspect that if it were a honey pot, then just saying that would get me into some kind of trouble, so if this comments posts and draws no repercussions, then that would be good sign.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 10:12 am Greg Eliot

        The fact that you know about honey pots, and admit to putting out feelers as a savvy way of casing the joint, betrays your erstwhile stance of asking questions out of genuine curiosity.

        In short, your Freudian slip is showing.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 10:23 am uh

        He’s just embarrassingly deliberate. Young no doubt. Head full of libertarian claptrap. When I so much as think of the phrase “non-aggression principle”, I’m amazed that the white man can both build the atom bomb, and imagine that the world & the affairs of man can proceed without aggression in a dozen forms, from the kind that obliterates your city to the kind that requires a psychologist to detect.

        “NAP”, all preaching about not using force, is one the silliest aspects of white people. I’m often struck dumb when I encounter it, and seized by anger. A creature, a man, “renouncing violence”, and imagining this to be a sound basis for ethics anywhere but a Buddhist retreat – imagining that behavior is logically systematic – literally makes me want to kick its ass, even if I couldn’t.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 7:32 pm Future Jim

        @GE,

        “The fact that you know about honey pots …”

        So, I know about honey pots because I am an agent, and you know about honey pots because … you’re so smart? Such a double standard is pretty much the opposite of the golden rule. I am not a Christian (though I am a fan of Jesus) and I would be mortified to be caught in a such a transparent misrepresentation like yours. I stopped making that mistake back in the mid 90’s.

        I know this is not the person you want to be. I know this because the person you want to be is what every little boy wants to be when he grows up, and … in the end … what every man wishes he had been.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 7:50 pm Greg Eliot

        And so Little Miss FlapYap ties up the package with a neat little bow of usual suspect psychobabble snark attempt at Cathedral shaming.

        Hit the road, sophomore… we already have enough sub rosa shilling in the guise of “I’m-an-ally-but” concern trolling.

        A “fan of Jesus”… that’ll open them pearly gates. lzolzozlozlozlozlozlozlozl

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 7:50 pm Future Jim

        @uh, Force has already been initiated against us in so many ways, so force is justified in response, but of course, that is what they are trying to provoke right now so they can have their pretense to justify more of a police state. Remember, they control the media.

        You are correct that the NAP sounds like a total pussy thing to believe upon first hearing it. That’s what I thought too, but it allows as much force as is justified against anyone who has initiated force or who is threatening the initiation of force. What justification is there to initiate force against anyone else?

        If you are prosperous In a free-market (everything voluntary), then if someone can afford to live next to you, they must have pretty good genes and culture – right? If they still turn out to be disreputable towards you then there would be many more ways to deal with them than there are today and there would be many less things they could do to you.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2016 at 1:34 pm uh

        Future Jim,

        I haven’t “just heard” of the so-called “NAP”. I first read the phrase when I was 15, and sent away for a Libertarianism introduction packet.

        Even then I laughed at such a ludicrous idea. I could bore myself with all the many ways to refute it, but who’s reading? You people are dogmatists.

        You’re out of your depth here, so please, don’t start grandstanding so soon.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 9:10 am uh

      “everything voluntary”

      Fastest way to hit my snooze button.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 10:18 am Greg Eliot

        I hit the Next button at “the only ethical policy is”.

        The ship hit an iceberg awhile back, but he’s still worried about using the correct fork at the Captain’s table.

        White guilt gambit, version six (million).

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 10:25 am uh

        You get it. That plodding deliberateness. No dance in it, as Nietzsche might’ve said.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 1:57 pm Colonel Hogan

      @Future Jim
      Your verbose reply is longer than the point of the post. And, as many have pointed out, nothing you say is new or original. You can’t just have local laws, you need a country that is united in the goal of liberty and freedom. If one locality wants to allow unlimited invadergrants, that poses a large threat to the neighboring locality which then has to pour resources into defending itself from the inevitable spillover. This is why we need COUNTRIES with singular vision. Too much to explain. Read the archives before commenting further. Just a suggestion.

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 6:24 pm Johnny Redux

      I am always dubious of those who begin their comments/responses in blogs with:
      “So, are you saying . . . ?”
      “Just so that I am clear, do you believe . . . ?”
      “Yes, but don’t you think that it would be illegal to just . . . ?”

      These types are not interested in rational debate, but are out to ask a 1,000,000 questions in order to deconstruct your argument through attrition, where, after many, many questions, the other readers forget what the main point was all about.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 7:52 pm Greg Eliot

        Exactly.

        As I’ve already mentioned, he comes here with his Alinsky tactical tripe and thinks we can’t smell a concern troll a league off.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        LikeLike


  5. on February 7, 2016 at 5:21 pm tspark156

    Gloria Steinem says the girls are backing sanders because they are hormonal and think it will impress the boys. She has taken a beating in the twatterverse for saying it from indignant millennial females who resent being told they make their choices based on feelings and tingles. You just gotta laugh.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2016 at 7:48 pm Hesiod

      Steinem being condemned by modern SJWs is especially delicious. I imagine the act much like the Nazis’ faces melting at the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2016 at 9:51 pm Wrong Side of History

        I too take delight in Steinem getting it from the petulant idiots she helped create.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2016 at 10:44 pm Captain Obvious

        In order to complete the transition from K-Selection to R-Selection, as the means by which to destroy the White Race, Eskimo Psychiatry must now condition the idiot shiksa s1ut wh0re millenial chicks to ditch their insistence on faithfulness in their Beta Bux loser husbands, and instead to accept satyriasis in the Alpha Big Men who will head the harems. So Gloria Steinem is simply signalling to us the next big move in the Eskimo Psychiatry playbook.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 2:57 pm Tarl Cabot

        I think she must have been drunk. As if any of the pajama boys working for Sanders are even interested in girls…

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 11:49 am mendo

      How is that woman still alive? It’s like saggy skin on a skeleton.

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 1:05 pm Frank Gappa

      Even the 60’s “feminists” have enough traditional bones in their body to appreciate the male/female dynamics in life. What is new in the 21st century is the absurd notion that men and women are exactly alike and that sex is just a social construct. I actually feel sorry for this Steinman woman, she is now experiencing what the rest of us innocents experience when dealing with these females.

      LikeLike


  6. on February 7, 2016 at 5:49 pm Lushfun

    there is no future chose there is only the future you make. both sanders and trump are trying to make some version of their perception that will be carved out into the american psychi the problem is there will always be in-congruence with what others see

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 11:01 am RPinHer

      you’re next level idiot.

      LikeLike


  7. on February 7, 2016 at 6:20 pm theasdgamer

    CH, you are the Gowachin male who weeds out the unfit tadpoles. The Prophet wielding the sword against the Blue Pill hordes.

    LikeLike


  8. on February 7, 2016 at 6:31 pm whorefinder

    Get this on Twitter, state!

    Twitter trigger shiv rape!

    LikeLike


  9. on February 7, 2016 at 6:40 pm Wrong Side of History

    What realistically could either Trump or Sanders do with a bought and paid for congress

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 4:26 am whorefinder

      Executive orders….

      heck, most of Trump’s followers wouldn’t care if he stopped the farce of pretending to be bound by checks and balances, declared marshal law, and just ordered the military to enforce his dictates.

      No one really believes there are restraints on presidential action anymore.

      Realpolitik rape!

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 5:25 am Diversity Heretic

        If Donald Trump is elected, the Washington Establishment will seek to thwart him at every turn. His only counter will be to govern through executive orders and agency rulemaking by fiat. He will have to defy the courts. Ultimately, it may come down to who the military obeys and who has control over nuclear weapons. Selected declaration of martial law and suspension of the writ of habeus corpus in areas declared to be in rebellion may become real possibilities.

        And I still support him. All of the alternatives are just versions of an accelerating dispossession of the American people from their homeland.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 5:53 am whorefinder

        exactly.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 11:03 am RPinHer

      Blow the fuck out of that congress if needs be, so that a beautiful new congress may be elected from the freshly reborn America.

      Don’t hate, I’m young. That’s how I think.

      LikeLike


  10. on February 7, 2016 at 7:43 pm Kyo

    That looks like some catastrophic US population decline on the Trump side. How about a couple of giant gleaming skyscrapers reaching for the heavens, populated by hundreds of happy families, instead of one childless couple sitting poolside awaiting their genetic death?

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2016 at 8:37 pm Sal

      Don’t be so simple.

      LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2016 at 9:39 pm uh

      … it is already reality. This was decided a long time ago. Walls can be built, but overpopulation is effectively ‘World War Z’. Eventually they’ll crawl over themselves to fall over to the other side. Regardless of intention, the populist appeal Trump is riding on is an illusion in a crowded world of increasingly marginal returns. “Poolside” means those two whiteskins get to relax while two-million more impoverished whiteskins have to suffer mixed in with the “walkers”. Never in history has a nation been this mixed up, so it’s pretty absurd to imagine it can unmixed short of the Naziism of the leftist imagination.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2016 at 11:10 pm John

        +1

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2016 at 11:20 pm Bill Brasky

        Yep. Few people really dare to wrap their heads around the third world population problem. See R Spencer dreaming about a pan euro “empire”, etc.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 12:12 am Lucius Somesuch

        First Marne: 513,000 casualties
        Battle of Verdun: 755,000 to 976,000 casualties
        The Somme: 1,120,000 to 1,215,000

        White men on White men, a hundred years ago.

        “World War Z”? Not if White men don’t let go the basic structure of their society.

        White men, united, +100 years (NB: I know, I know: in so many ways we’ve declined so far from then– but not in the firepower department) against half-nekkid gibsmedats with der AayBeeTays shut off?

        Overpopulation my ass. We can underpopulate them in no time.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 6:44 am Bill Brasky

        Lucius

        A billion is a thousand million. They have our technology. These are problems.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on February 8, 2016 at 9:26 am uh

        Lucius,

        As always, that line of argument begins with the premise of united will on the part of white nations. No such will is in evidence; and even if it magically appeared, it is too late to sort out who’s who without actually murdering large numbers of people, including women and children.

        That isn’t an argumentum ad faggotum; merely reminding you that that isn’t the unlikeliest thing to happen. These people can’t be repatriated without risking skirmishes for which the will is again utterly lacking. And by the time the will magically appeared, more will have shown up and reproduced and staked their claim to being “us” … and we impoverished whiteskins among them will have accepted it.

        Every organism desires homeostasis, under all but the most agitating circumstances.

        All I’m saying is that the cartoon is misleading — it isn’t either/or; both already exist. I don’t have a thing for zombie movies, but if you think my analogy was facile, well man, you haven’t seen Mexicans actually climbing over the border control building at San Ysidro and rappelling down the other side.

        Trump isn’t a magician. You can’t sloganeer your way out of an ecological death-trap.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 9:29 am uh

        *that is the unlikeliest

        Spencer, Johnson, etc. are all just dreamers. They invest their time and egos in these intellectual projects so they can’t be talked out of it.

        Anyone who wants to avoid the worst had better already be in a very good spot, or planning to be with a group of buddies. Limp-wrists like the forementioned ain’t gonna make it.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 5:50 pm Lucius Somesuch

        Nobody had the will for the Thirty Years’ War, until there was the Thirty Years’ War.

        Bavarian isn’t full of half-Ghanans yet. Nobody here denies the concentration camps (bugspray showers or no!). And light frigates and corvettes and choppers with 20mm canon are perfectly capable of keeping any and all “refugee” boats from ever seeing the light of a European shore.

        The lowliest black shithole on earth is a sinkhole of Western charity, food, and medicine. Cut if off– heck, cut it down, and that population bomb is KAPUT.

        Never mind if we gardisil them into sterility in exchange for corn flakes . . .

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 6:18 pm Johnny Redux

        DEFCON 3

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2016 at 1:35 pm uh

        I guess you have it all figured out.

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2016 at 10:25 pm Vincent

      That’s a stupid comment.

      LikeLike


  11. on February 7, 2016 at 9:03 pm The Future You Choose | Reaction Times

    […] Source: Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  12. on February 7, 2016 at 9:20 pm sigsawyer

    There are leftists who honestly prefer the right picture. If people have to be poor, they think, let everybody be poor.

    Truly a mental illness.

    LikeLike


  13. on February 7, 2016 at 10:19 pm Dudester

    The height and barbwire of the Trump Wall is impressive yet it still seems lacking. It needs a double wall with a kill zone in between the two layers. Also, where is the crocodile moat? The mine field? The motion sensing machine guns? The drones?
    The Trump Wall has to be more bad azz than that. The Trump Wall has to compliment President Trump!

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2016 at 10:36 pm Dudester

      *complement

      LikeLike


  14. on February 7, 2016 at 10:20 pm Don's Johnson

    Who designs a garage the leads to the pool? Who also doesn’t have a driveway leading to the road?
    Nice wall though.

    LikeLike


  15. on February 7, 2016 at 10:23 pm Rum

    By all means… Take names. And By lotss uf amo… Itt wil cum round rite. Iff u cann kiip yur nerrv.

    OTOH, I am not lutheran, or a RC.

    My girl-child was named as a “Lioness of God” at her birth.

    But nowadays, everyone just calls her “Dr. Lioness Of God…MD”

    My brothers. Find your balls/do what needs to be done. Complain -No.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 3:38 am carlos danger

      How many Houston MDs are named Ariel?

      LikeLike


  16. on February 7, 2016 at 10:32 pm Jadd Lusack

    Off topic but I saw this video and was disgusted:

    I thought of some CH teachings…the desire white women have for white men to be more dominant and the corruption of western women.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 9:42 am Greg Eliot

      If you were so disgusted, why are you giving the video further legs?

      It’s just some n1gger’s orchestrated bullshit… you’re doing the Cathedral’s work for them, concern troll.

      Asshole. Don’t come ’round chere no more. 😡

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 5:22 pm Jadd Lusack

        Concern troll? Hardly. I think this video shows how white women want white men to be more dominant. And the openness with which they talk about how much they love black guys is disturbing. Your whole response is nonsensical!

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 7:58 pm Greg Eliot

        It doesn’t make sense to you because you’re too stupid to realize that, to the Cathedral, ANY publicity is good publicity.

        And too unlearned to know about the basics of agitprop… read up on “Dynamic Silence” and learn from the enemy, fool.

        We don’t need someone to lift the dog shit from the street and stick it under our nose, saying “Oh my!”… just leave it were it sits and avoid it.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 5:46 pm Johnny Redux

      Jadd, I refuse to open this YouTube video and reward its poster with more views, which could even bring income to the loser, but, by the still photo of the video, posted above, I fail to see ANY White women in the screen. They are all mixed meat (some sort of Hispanic or Asiatic mix), with highlighted hair. Please point out ONE White women in that image.

      LikeLike


  17. on February 7, 2016 at 11:54 pm Captain Morgan

    The meme that had most cut through for me – I can’t find it know – went to they same point. Basically a photo of some rotting ghetto and the caption ‘Where there are Mexicans there is Mexico / I don’t want to live in Mexico’
    What is so hard to grasp?

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 9:58 am uh

      “You don’t make anything better by adding thirty-million Mexicans to it, do you?” – Alex Linder

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 12:53 pm Nads

      Captain – The meme is from last Novemeber. Search for “COPROP Update: Realtalk™ Image Warfare”

      LikeLike


  18. on February 8, 2016 at 1:48 am olivermaerk

    Dominante white men are a blessing for the world and not only for white women. Let’s see if reason wins in November.
    http://freedompowerandwealth.com

    LikeLike


  19. on February 8, 2016 at 2:17 am Amasius

    The (mostly derelict if not outright treasonous) rich are going to live as depicted in the Trump 2016 panel regardless of what happens. Just like they do in Mexico, in Brazil, in “Elysium.”

    LikeLike


  20. on February 8, 2016 at 3:36 am carlos danger

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/02/07/neo-iran-completes-eurasian-golden-triangle/

    LikeLike


  21. on February 8, 2016 at 5:47 am Rob

    On the right hand picture you could just put “Anyone but Trump”.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 9:02 am mendo

      And the elite will live on the right side of the photo, relegating us to the left.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 9:05 am mendo

        Dammit…Bizarro mendo wrote that by accident.

        LikeLike


  22. on February 8, 2016 at 9:58 am betamaxx

    None. The wall thing is absolutely stupid. This isn’t the 1800s in which a wall could have work.
    If white people are sooooo scared make better policies to prevent people to enter through the airport.

    There are so many bigger issues to deal with then a wall.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 10:09 am Greg Eliot

      Nice try, shill… but the point is, the wall will serve a greater symbolic purpose… an overt statement that it’s gone this far, but no further, this idiotic self-immolation in which the West seems to have indulged for the past few decades (actually longer, but that’s another story).

      It’ll bring to a head which side of the fence (or wall, if you prefer) the guy next to you is on, politically-speaking… no more uncommitted fence-sitting or ignoring the issue of White survival and self-determination.

      I’ll believe you shills that a wall means nothing once you convince Israel to take hers down… deal?

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 11:09 am RPinHer

        The self immolation started in 1913 on Jekyll island.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 6:00 pm Johnny Redux

        Yes, and anyone new and overwhelmed by some of the information that they may be reading here about the Eskimos, really should spend 10-15 minutes reading about one influential family line that everyone has heard of: the Rothschilds. Dirty rotten scoundrels from the start. No allegiance to any nation, only their Tribe. And, the below flow chart is a simple, big-picture explanation of it all. Of course names, races/ethnicities, etc. are missing from it, but it is a good beginning.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 10:25 am Wrong Side of History

      Pyramid work.

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 2:46 pm everybodyhatesscott

      A wall won’t work!

      Doesn’t notice Israels wall is working

      Whatever you think of Israel and the Jews, at least their immigration policy isn’t stupid.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2016 at 5:51 pm Johnny Redux

        Israel: “Do as we say, goyim, not as we do (and that works).”

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2016 at 7:13 pm Ripp

      @betamaxx j3w/ni66er/cuck

      A wall will work. See Israel, current times. See china, histroical times. Many positive abundantly documented facts of the effectiveness of A well constrcuted border wall system.

      Regarding immigration policy: Donald Trump is the only candidate that has published detailed plans that enforce and control illegal immigration. And the roots of this problem are economic. The elite, and political left and cuck-right benefit from exploiting the american middle class and allowing poor, uneducated, r-selected 3rd worlders into the US with ease.

      Cut off the economic benefits, enforce the laws and make physical barriers to entry life threatening, problem solved.

      illegal immigration and runaway legal immigration is a YUUGE problem.

      clearly you are BETAmaxx for a reason.

      LikeLike


  23. on February 8, 2016 at 7:46 pm Billy

    @CH

    Are you fuckin gay for trump or something?

    He is just like those other politicians — getting you to believe in them so that they themselves seem better.

    [CH: if trump is “just like those other politicians”, why are all the other politicians, and their donors, frenetically trying to kill trump’s campaign?
    think, mcfly.]

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Recent Comments

    Bucky on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Greg Eliot on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    Greg Eliot on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Greg Eliot on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Greg Eliot on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Greg Eliot on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Greg Eliot on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Carlos Danger on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    LB on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
    Corinth Arkadin on Comment Of The Week: The Left…
  • Top Posts

    • Cesar Sayoc, "White Male" (& Deep State Updates)
    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Tourette's Game
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
    • When The Jumbotron Test Is Crushed
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • "Conspiracy Theory" Conspiracy
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: