The winner of the FCOTW is NC, leaving this gem at Sailer’s (responding to a comment from Massimo):
Who does everyone want to win the presidency? Or the nomination? I’m _guessing_ this crowd is mostly Trump fans? Some Cruz fans?
I like Trump’s personality and media savvy and ability to publicly flip liberal politically correct thinking upside down.
But on straight policy, I absolutely prefer Cruz. [….]
Worrying about free trade and healthcare is ridiculous when white children are already a minority in the US. I care about blood and soil, and Trump is the only candidate that even understands the concept. Libertarian ideological straight jackets mean nothing to me. Every quasi religious concept about liberty and freedom has been used by a parasitic elite in the name of open borders, offshoring and outsourcing and against white males. Free trade with Mexico and China has been an obvious and unmitigated disaster. Slap on the tariffs.
Libertarianism is a coward’s ideology. It’s an attempt by white males to argue in their own interest by ideological means instead of arguing plainly for what’s in the interest of their own blood and culture like every other ethnic group does. Every libertarian ideal has been turned against them by their ideological opponents. To be a libertarian you have to believe in open borders and free trade (or make some Rube Goldberg argument about why it’s more libertarian to believe otherwise) despite the fact that this is dispossessing and impoverishing white males who make up 99.9999% of all the libertarians that ever were or ever will be. To be a libertarian means to choose liberty over survival because how can you be a libertarian if you let sanity trump laissez-faire? In the future, when the last libertarian is bludgeoned to death with the last copy of Atlas Shrugs by some black panther militia man, he’ll be bitching with his dying breath about violations of his property rights and voluntary agreements.
The alpha and the omega of politics is demography. Get that wrong, and your downstream philosophies aren’t worth a pixel of screen space.
Executive Summary: WAKE UP WHITE MAN
PS Go ahead, don’t get nervous, Cheap Chalupas!
OT: Good news… this kunt was fired. Absolutely the most punchable face I’ve ever seen. Great restraint not to destroy my screen…
LikeLike
she needs a pimp slap.
LikeLike
She? OK, I’ll take your word for it 😦
Thank God that no matter how much freakery is out there, male or female can be determined from a blood sample.
Sorry Bruce Jenner, you can get it cut off, but you can’t change the chromosomes.
LikeLike
Good start, but it would take lot more attitude adjustment just to make her fit company at a kennel.
LikeLike
Isn’t that the “Let’s get some muscle over here” broad? She wanted a journalist beaten up and she’s a professor of Journalism? Shit, so many #BLM and “safe space” incidents on campuses the past year, so little memory. I have to admit it though, it’s delicious from afar to see them eat their own.
And yeah, that’s a broad that needs to be grabbed by the hair and administered a severe bitch-slapping delivered to her and along the way knocking those stupid fucking fem-glasses off her angry bitch face. Ten bucks would get you twenty though, it would make that hairy roast beef of hers slick to the knees in unbridled passion.
LikeLike
some muscle???? for what??? why didn’t she just roar?
LikeLike
libertarianism only works when everyone else plays by the same rules.
Just as SOON as anyone tribes up, your freedom/individualism bullshit gets trampled to fuck
LikeLike
She describes herself as a 6’2″ Nordic
LikeLike
droll
LikeLike
LikeLike
Never heard the name Click before… but I have heard Glick, and it’s invariably tribal. And judging by that phiz, well…
LikeLike
GE, that’s exactly what I was thinking. But I can’t prove it yet definitively. Usually the Eskimos skate on these charges, because the combined forces of the ADL & the SPLC & G0ldman S@chs & Joozney/ABC/CBS/NBC/Time-Warner start screaming “Muh H0l0caust!”
LikeLike
Hey! She’s doable….I’d let my German Shepard at least try.
LikeLike
White people rule, blacks, browns, and yellows drool.
LikeLike
Whites create, Asians imitate, and blacks desecrate.
LikeLike
As Jon told Garfield when he broke Jon’s “priceless Ming vase”: “you dumb animal, you’re so stupid you don’t even know what you just did!”
So I’d amend “desecrate” to “defecate”. Do blacks even have an awareness of the pricelessness of everything they eat, screw, and/or break?
LikeLike
SPOILER ALERT: … … … … … … This past Sunday, Rick finally began the miscegenation process with Michone. Sigh. Well, at least Carl has a white [albeit kinda olive-skinned] girlfriend. Maybe Carl will prove to be the true Sh!tlord of the series. But when I think about what Michone’s nether regions probably smell like, I don’t know whether there’d be enough {Viagra + Cialis + Caffeine} in the entire world to help me rise to the occasion.
LikeLike
Although as Noggettes go, I do think that the actress portraying Michone is doing a good job with the character. But that smell… There’s just no ignoring the smell… The Nose Knows.
LikeLike
In Zombie world, smell becomes less of a deal-breaker I supposed.
Still, that was the straw that broke the camel’s back… coupled with the inane storyline trying to work in that Jesus fellow… Rick and the hillbilly suddenly lose all sense and lose that truck of supplies… twice?
They’d been hinting strongly about the big Ginger and the other negress getting it on too.
LikeLike
Silver lining is that they are pushing oil drilling instead of mudsharking for a change on TV. Its still so forced though haha
LikeLike
Early on there was a minor couple that toed the waters… the White woman I believe was pregnant and carrying Sambo’s child… and if memory serves, they had a beta White guy orbiter in tow.
I’m actually surprised they haven’t done the front-and-center mudshark thing yet, although I guess the rice shark has been tiding them over… she’s pregnant now too, I believe.
And for awhile it looked like the now-deceased cute blonde from earlier years was going to do a lesbo mudshark act, but they didn’t take it to the logical conclusion.
Anyway, I had finished with the show last season, but made the mistake of tuning in for the new season because all and sundry were giving it raves.
I guess the latest group of all White head-case miscreants, the blue-eyed bikers, getting sent to Kingdom Come in one fell swoop wasn’t enough of the usual suspect buzz.
LikeLike
You left out the Eskimo-ess bulldyke who quit her residency because she couldn’t stand the sight of blood, and was going back to get her training in Psychiatry when all he11 broke loose.
LikeLike
Give a White man a hammer and he will build an empire.
Give a chink a hammer and he will build 10 more hammers.
Give a ni66er a hammer and he will beat a White to death with it.
Give a joo a hammer and he will give it to a ni66er.
LikeLike
I was headed to a meeting yesterday with a couple of guys I work with in the Guard, all Hispanic and senior to me, when they started joking around about some demographic stereotype. How Mexicans drive crazy. I wasn’t laughing (I grew up in a border state; I’m well aware of what shitty drivers Mexicans are, especially the illegals, and I just don’t care), when one of them looked at me and said something to the effect of “you’re the white girl with three Hispanics right now, so you know how it feels to be a minority, it’s okay.”
“Yeah, us gingers are as white as it gets. We’re only two percent of the population too. I’m more a minority than any of you have ever been.”
Shut everybody up. Didn’t even have to get into the stats about how whites are the minority worldwide, or what it feels like to be actually discriminated against because of your race/nationality, like what I’ve experienced in Asia or even parts of Europe.
I don’t mind the jokes, but at the same time, this celebration of diversity bullshit drives me up the wall. Even the self-deprecating jokes are evidence that polite society considers these people to be special. The only way to stop it is push back, which you can only do by citing your own race, and the social conditioning runs so deep that it’s a painful thing to do. It makes me feel like a racist to say stuff like that, even though it’s true, and it pisses me off that I feel like a racist for simply saying something that’s truth.
Even at that, I normally wouldn’t care, but my commander (one of the guys in that group yesterday) never stops with the identity politics talking points. He’s planning to include some massive LGBT celebration at our next official squadron event, is constantly referencing his Mexican heritage in that “I have culture and you whities don’t” way, never shuts up about all his gay friends, and is otherwise a raging liberal. If he can’t handle the reality that the actual minority in his unit is the red headed white girl, that’s his problem.
LikeLike
C, GTFO that situation. Being a papist, you’re probably Pro-L!fe [at least de jure, if not de facto], and in the current situation, you’re liable to get yourself r@pe-r@ped and end up with a half-human half-armadillo abomination in your belly.
LikeLike
And for the sake of G0d Almighty, you have got to pass on those red-headed genes – right now, before it’s too late. If your worthless papist boyfriend is too cowardly to knock you up, then give me a holler, and I’ll put some red-headed chillunz in your belly.
LikeLike
And I didn’t even get to the part about phr@gging your Gay Lettuce Bacon Tomato CO/NCO. If I said that, then the FBI would likely subpoena my IP address.
LikeLike
Cynthia: How do you know when Chinese people have moved into your neighborhood?
All of the Mexicans get car insurance.
LikeLike
Cynthia: How do you know when Chinese people have moved into your neighborhood?
All of the Mexicans get car insurance.
LOL, good one. Here’s one of my own:
How do you know when your house had been burgled by orientals? Your homework is dome, your dog is missing and they’re still trying to back out of your driveway.
LikeLike
Mexicans have culture and Whites don’t ?
Rich.
If you call torturing bulls, cooking beans 357 different ways which all taste the same, underperforming in soccer and needing several thousands of soldiers to kill 180 settlers in a ramshackle trading, post ‘culture’……sure……..
My area is about 50% Hispanic, mostly Mexican, I know their ‘culture’ pretty well……
As for your culture, as a redhead, there’s probably some Celtic, Danish, Dutch or German in there, thousands of years of culture to study and absorb if you haven’t already.
One of the very few good things about getting older is hat you learn to not give a fuck what people you don’t REALLY care about think of you, so don’t let accusations of any -isms bother you too much.
And CO is right, if you’re not hideous enough to crack mirrors and scare scorpions back under their rocks, a White redhead in a platoon of Chicanos is a recipe for disaster.
LikeLike
[…] Freelance Comment Of The Week: Priorities, White People! […]
LikeLike
To quote a lyric a childhood friend wrote when we were in the 4th or 5th grade:
Black is beautiful.
Tan is grand.
But white is the color
Of the big boss man.
LikeLike
> “a childhood friend” == BUDDING YOUNG SH!TLORD.
LikeLike
black is fuckin ugly tho. Even their own kids want to play with white dolls
LikeLike
That’s older than the hills on Granny’s chest. Heere’s another oldie but goodie :
If black is so beautiful, why are there so many ugly niggers ?
LikeLiked by 1 person
> “The alpha and the omega of politics is demography.” ——— To the colonists of the 17th & 18th century, the word “CONSTITUTION” meant “THAT WHICH CONSTITUTES US,” i.e. the “Constitution” was a description of their very NATURE. Furthermore, they very explicitly declared that the “Constitution” was designed to secure the Blessings of Liberty to THEMSELVES and to their PROGENY. Not to other peoples, nor to other peoples’ progeny.
LikeLike
So that if you import a populace of a different nature [Eskimo Sephardic & Ashkenazic Pharisees, African ch@ttel sl@ves, Mohammedeans, Buddhists, Shinto, Hindus, Central American abor!ginals, etc etc etc], then necessarily you have altered that which constitutes the nation, ergo you have altered the Constitution itself.
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
Enough with the glamour shots girl cucking you. She is stroking her hair to show how pretty she is. And she looks aroused, I guess to be in front of the camera only. The body language of wholesome motherhood. You must have a fetish, Captain Obvious Fetish. I can’t wait for you to post the same pic on the next post.
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
H. Goebells poisoned all 6 six of his kids… to death.
LikeLike
Rum
Yes JG poisoned his children, then he and his wife killed themselves, right after AH, as defeat became real. Dont leave that part out.
But you miss the fact he sired 7 kids amd worked his whole life to realize a world in which they would prosper, and failing to achieve that brought them out of it.
How much worse would it had been for all of them to go from what they built, the promise of what might be, to the horrible reality of what did follow?
His 6 girls were not on the streets of Cologne this past NYE, i’m sure he is happy about that.
Where were your girls and how happy are you about it?
LikeLike
It’s a refreshing change o’ pace when Rum varies from his usual stream-of-consciousness squid ink to show his direct shillery.
Given what would have befallen his wife and those children as Berlin fell, an argument could be made he did the most merciful think.
LikeLike
Yeah, it might not have been so bad if they were in western Germany, where the British and Americans were, but Soviet troops from central and east Asia raped damn near every woman in eastern Germany (where Berlin is). I read a post by someone who said that, travelling in Eastern Germany today, one can easily see the genetic imprint they left.
LikeLike
Retreating German units took with them or destroyed anything that the advancing Soviets might have found of use, with the noteworthy exception of liquor, with the expectation that this will slow the Russians down. The tragic outcome was that while so incapacitated, they turned their drunken savagery on the German civilians that had stayed behind.
An obscure late-war fact is the full-family mass suicides of Germans in the east as the Red Army had neared.
LikeLike
@ Some Guy
In spite of the satanic inspired rapes of the red army the beauty of the german women in the former eastern Germany is second to none. I have seen incredible babes in Dresden, Leipzig, Halle, Schwerin etc and in Berlin too (even if there are turks there). That beauty is only matched by the women of Bayern and Baden Wurtemberg and elsewhere in the west of Deutschland.
LikeLike
> “but Soviet troops from central and east Asia r@ped… one can easily see the genetic imprint they left” ——— Huh. Fascinating. I had never thought of that possibility. They also likely would have been of Mohammedean blood. Very very interesting…
LikeLike
I’m under the understanding the Germans performed a million abortions in the wake of the rape of Prussia, but I don’t have a cite for that.
Some much-feted Jewess supposedly performed innumerable abortions on the floor of their quarters and in the dark, in order to save the women from Dr. Mengele– if you believe that sort of grimm tale.
LikeLike
— that 2nd anecdote is holocaustiana, obviously, but it just popped into my head as a complementary instance of abortion in extremis, to lend some credence to the thought that the Germans may have applied rigorous interventions to stem the pollution of German blood. But who knows
LikeLike
1935. The thing speaks for itself.
LikeLike
As do you, comrade… as do you.
/res ipsa loquitur rape!
LikeLike
Nothing but nothing but nothing brings out the fury of Director Tamir Pardo’s vast army of flying monkeys quite like the question of Miscegenation. Obviously Miscegenation is at the heart of the Eskimo’s Final Solution for the White Race.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Spergertarians are retarded. How’s laissez-faire working out for Somalia?
When I can’t walk down my own damn street without getting mugged, it’s actually private crime and not the state that’s the #1 threat to my freedom. Freedom is the last thing a government has the responsibility to provide, after security, law, and order. Libertarianism is the fallacy that freedom creates peace and order when it is in fact peace and order that are the foundation of freedom.
LikeLike
@sigsawyer, you are clearly wrong. Law and order is top down. Culture and order is bottom up. Culture develops and is maintained by a free market of violence. Freedom does not mean peace except for the cream that rises to the top among itself. I think that ppl are perverting the basic concepts of libertarianism to discredit them, but they are essential to any civilized people among themselves. The problem is that sovereignty is not distributed. Those who cooperate better would be more powerful. It is already true by natural law, but useful idiots cooperate for the wrong reasons. Imagine a world where people settled their own differences and came up with ‘an understanding’. That is where culture comes from. PC is not culture. Female social norms are not culture.
LikeLike
How can sovereignty be equally distributed? You clearly have been to nothing that is committee run. It all sucks as much as as the ghetto.
LikeLike
Once law and order are imposed from the top down, people will begin behaving civilized. I’d rather live in the Dutch Congo or British Egypt than modern America.
Culture is the result of the bonds and agreements between people. Oftentimes these need to be enforced by a third party. If every man rules himself, there is no trust, no culture, aka Somalia. You are right that order is usually spontaneous, but it must be conserved and enforced. Libertarianism has no mechanism in its ideology by which it imparts its culture and values to the next generation.
If the people alone could be trusted to manage their affairs and keep their culture from degenerating, there would be no need for government. History proves that notion wrong.
LikeLike
~A, you are right that equally distributed is wrong. I mean that men (not equally women and children) should be responsible for and privileged for themselves. I posted a video below posted “Philosophy of Liberty”. I mean distribution of power per ecology but not equality of results. Equality of political ownership of self and let those who suck be fucked alone.
LikeLike
Nah. Spergetarianism IS retarded.
Government is an ARTIFACT of culture, society is a racial construct.
Africans are CLASSIC libertarians…they have no fuckin social order! Everything goes! The state is weak. Shit is handled at an individual level.
You wanna live there? Sperg shit only works with WHITE people…as does liberal social democracy. AND dictators.
LikeLike
Africans are CLASSIC libertarians…they have no fuckin social order! Everything goes! The state is weak. Shit is handled at an individual level.
LikeLike
His righteousness (777) says both “Spergetarianism IS retarded.” and “Sperg shit only works with WHITE people…as does liberal social democracy. AND dictators.” Imagine a world of male popular sovereignty and a free market of violence. Children and adults of the lower sort would be left behind. I don’t want to embrace what works for inferiors any more than I want to embrace inferiors as equals. If we impose superior standards, the natural selection process will cleanse the ugly and grow the beautiful. You practically admit it and yet oppose it. The ideological constraints on your mind are something else.
LikeLike
The propaganda of the video posted by Some Guy is clearly wrong. It assumes that individual liberty and culture are equivalent among Somalis and Europeans. Here is a hint: there were white people before there was government over white people. At some point white culture made white government. Any competent social scientist know that culture is more lasting and therefore influential than government. Why else use propaganda like in the video to change the culture? Why should government pay for propaganda if government > culture?
LikeLike
The propaganda of the video posted by Some Guy is clearly wrong.
That’s not propaganda, dude, it’s a spoof. It was totally tongue-in-cheek.
LikeLike
Definitely one of the best summaries of libertarianism I’ve seen.
I was on Facebook for about eight months, and pretty much all I did was attack Curt Doolittle and the whole devious libertarian mindset.
It’s hard for me even to believe there’s a grown man somewhere, let alone thousands of them, who hide behind something they call the “Non-Aggression Principle” in the name of “liberty”.
It’s one of the great weaknesses of white men — always retreating into ideology. In this case, pretending they live in a world where a pact of that sort is still possible.
By the way, libertarianism is popular among vaguely right-leaning Latrino Americans because of that supposed logical requirement of open borders.
LikeLike
> “It’s one of the great weaknesses of white men — always retreating into ideology” ——— Which is precisely the fatal flaw that so many Eskimos, like Karl Marx, and later Alisa AYN RAND Rosenbaum, identified in the traitors amongst us [Quakers, Unitardians, Lutherans, Methodists, Jesuits, S0d0mites & Bulldykes, etc etc etc].
LikeLike
@uh
Like how the cultmarx crowd pushes egalitarian whoreshit. They, basically, want normal White people to believe that diplomacy is possible with EVERY race/culture. The idea of an ISIL embassy in America seems reasonable to cultmarx goons. ‘Well, they’re just like us! Everybody is human, you know?’.
LikeLike
“believe that diplomacy is possible with EVERY race/culture”
they’re right if you include this as diplomacy:
LikeLike
Civilized people are reciprocally libertarian with themselves. The problem is not libertarianism but universalism. Being civilized with the civilized is just so insane. We must choose being white instead. There is no either-or choice here. Stupid characterization of libertarianism. Shall we outlaw kindness since the white race is in trouble?
LikeLike
Yes, if “kindness” proves to be some sort of a su!cide pact.
LikeLike
You just proved my point based on ‘IF’. Context is half the truth. Being libertarian universally is the problem, not libertarianism. Without kindness at all there is no chance for civilization. And no point. Does your love of habitual hate make a goal worth having impossible for you?
LikeLike
That’s another fatal flaw of libertarian dogma — it hangs on the condition that everyone recognize it. Another “perfect world” ideology.
In real life there are, have always been, shall always be defectors. In real life, too much private property creates its own “externalities” in the commons as well as for property owners in attempting to own more property. In real life, units of consumption and ownership (i.e. people and corporations) must constantly trespass on each other.
In short, libertarianism sets itself against an unavoidable fact of life: friction between exponentiating units which want more of a limited supply of stuff.
But the truth of it is in the libertarian individual’s psychology. What they’re really saying is that they hate being hemmed in by so much bullshit they can’t directly influence, and they want to be left alone to pursue contentment in their own little bourgeois bubble.
Unfortunately, in real life, government was an integral part in constructing this life they wish to pursue without it. Without government, no bubble, no pretense that it was all their own doing. It wasn’t. It was regulations to control the flow of commodities and the actions of men in acquiring them, every step of the way.
There is no fucking “liberty” in the world — only degrees of control. Below a certain degree of control, the very lifestyle most libertarians affect to defend against government would not even be possible.
This is what being a fascist is about: recognizing that the collective outweighs the individual and ordering society for that purpose. And this is why Democrats are fascists. It sucks, I don’t like it, my heart is with the old bygone America where men really did take care of their shit — but there it is: American individualism is dead. The masses are going nowhere, and no conceivable government or the planet itself can afford to encourage each of them to be more free. Rather precisely the opposite is the way of the future, whoever is in control.
LikeLike
> “your love of habitual hate” ——— mordecai, Mordecai, MORDECAI, did you not read what yer cuz in Vienna wrote about “Projection”? C’mon, muh hebe, you totally blow yer cover when you lose control like that.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Uh said, “This is what being a fascist is about: recognizing that the collective outweighs the individual and ordering society for that purpose.”
You make a good comment overall, but this is not quite right. The Libertarian fetish for the individual is a big error, but it doesn’t discredit the notion of individual people entirely anymore than the corollary error of the fetish for the group discredits the whole notion of collective organization.
This all comes down to what was through most of Western history the fundamental question of philosophy, the relationship between the One and the Many, or how to reconcile the particular with the universal. The fact is that the bedrock of human society lies upon the reality of BOTH the individual AND the group.
It was Rousseau who invented the idea that the church and the state leapt into existence through a conspiracy of cynics creating both ex nihilo. He plainly admits that his political theories hinge on ignoring all history in order to get the thought experiment off the ground. He borrows a ton from the Christian world view he first inherited, then rejected.
Libertarianism is a joke, one side of a single Marxist coin, with State Corporatism on the other side. The two ideologies are united by a mutual rejection of Christian civilization and all it entails: distinctions of property, nation, race, sex.
LikeLike
Edward,
Was writing in haste before work. I did use lower-case for fascism to indicate that I did not mean Fascism the Italian party, or broader political ideology, insomuch as there is one.
I meant it in a sense between affirmation and demonization, or as Orwell meant it: as I see it, there are too many humans, their behavior is too greedy and chaotic, and that not only must they be controlled, control will inevitably come to characterize our lives more and more in the coming decades if anything at all is to be preserved — nevermind just white people.
Thus, my argument wasn’t that the libertarian fetish for individualism should be opposed with a fetishism of the collective. Rather that it isn’t even about what you, I, or anyone may want; but about the kind of management of the great human herd that is already shaping up regardless of ideologies.
Look, shit has to happen, willy-nilly. When you set aside what you prefer, you can look at what is happening and where it’s likely to end up. I can promise you that it won’t end up in governments and institutions just expiring or anything of the sort imagined by libertarians. Whatever happens, this century won’t be advent for any single ideology — unless you’re hobnobbing at Davos or some shit, and even then, the scent of failure can’t be far off.
I’m trying not to get mixed up in the same old debate — I know you guys believe “Rousseau did it”, then Marx, then of course the Jews, and “Christianity” gave us everything. I don’t see it that way. Reality is much more complex than the ideological dominoes which the mind imposes on events to satisfy its urge for agency.
Moreover, as far as “method”, or angle, I am actually a Marxist. Ooga booga, I know.
Anyway, libertarianism is gay. The one certain fact of our age is that everything our history and ancestors prepared us for is now completely gone, and is never coming back. The momentum of civilization gaveth and tooketh away; it has now totally extirpated us. Why else do you suppose white men waste so much time online parsing ideologies as though if they got it just right, the genie could be put back in the bottle and everything will be ok?
They do it because there is nothing else to do. The game is already over.
LikeLike
You seem to be contradicting yourself. On one hand, acknowledging that we must accept our Whiteness and on the other, you seem to be against any act of self-interest outside of this acknowledgement.
LikeLike
One can’t escape the feeling of “feeding the troll”, if you would attempt rational discourse with the likes of this sort. Much verbiage, lacking any sound and fury, yet still signifying nothing.
I wryly cast a glance askance at he who says “Does your love of habitual hate …” in at attempt to shame our Cap’n, yet never misses the opportunity to speak of “christfags”.
In short, there is no redolent waft of a naive young man earnestly striving for intellectual integrity in his screeds…
… rather, it’s the malodorous bloviations of day-old squid… perhaps gefiltre..
LikeLike
My massive response is at: https://realitydoug.wordpress.com/2016/02/26/true-libertarianism-defines-philosophically-sound-morality/
The horse is basically dead already, but there it is. I don’t care to fruitlessly humor closed minds defined by superstitious ids. I have addressed all criticisms I care too. I hope the discussion is useful to someone. The marginal utility is certainly negative with any more discussion.
LikeLike
You’re just a usual suspect bloviator… and if you think you live up to your ‘Reality’ monicker, you’re got another think coming, Mr. Yiddler.
Go out and earn an honest living, Schlomo… be a kosher butcher or open a deli or something… at least then you’d be performing a useful endeavor.
LikeLike
Libertarians also live in a “individualistic” world. For them, uniting as white people is tantamount to “oppressive collectivism”. What they don’t realise is that “oppressive collectivism” is the only thing that’s going to save us!
LikeLike
Preference for your own race is part of one’s self-interest though. The motivation is preferring people who are genetically similar to *you*.
LikeLike
that’s something they don’t seem to understand
LikeLike
Libertarians don’t reckon with evolutionary biology, dawg. Dogma is self-contained. Doesn’t need outside input. As long as you and I are “freely” doing our own thing, maximizing our utility and not harming anyone, why we gotta read about fitness, signalling, competition, exploitation, altruistic punishment or kin selection? Libertarians operate in their own world where beings can cut themselves off from the petty, relative actions which define organisms in the real world. Don’t be aggressive, man. The market is a magical thing that would solve aaaalll our problems, just like Not Sure, if we would just abolish government and let it.
LikeLike
All you need to know about libertardianism is that it was created by an Eskimo-ess named Alisa “Ayn Rand” Rosenbaum. QED. Any further discussion of it is a waste of precious time & calories.
LikeLike
@Captain Obviously Wrong – ‘libertardianism’ was not created by Ayn Rand. Your QED reeks of “I heard something from someone and having no thought of my own I will take the same exact stance, no need from other input. QED.”
@uh – It seems man you have a hard time grasping NAP. It simply means if you plan to use aggression against me, I will use aggression against you. It is in my right to kill you if you pose immediate threat either to me, or my family. So I imagine you’ll be surprised if you plan to beat me over with a Atlas Shrugged copy.
Open borders is not part of libertarianism. The state (or country) is like your home, your private property. Only you or someone who is a part of your family (tribe, state, country) can INVITE someone in. Would you let any stranger in your home?
I definitely feel you either read something that is plain simply wrong, or someone who was describing his stance was incorrect.
LikeLike
Except Ayn Rand repeatedly vociferously denounced Libertarians and Libertarianism for being essentially mystical in the way the “non-aggression principle” was treated as if was a commandment from God, a floating abstraction with no conditions or context out of which it was derived and delimited. The character Dagny Taggart commits straight up cold blooded murder at the climax of Atlas Shrugged, (in fact the whole community of good guys goes to war) and she is right to do so.
LikeLike
“It seems man you have a hard time grasping NAP. It simply means if you plan to use aggression against me, I will use aggression against you.”
Um, that’s called “tit for tat”. Curious how something that appears to prohibit an action (NON-aggression) is construed as permitting it. The point, however, is that an ideology isn’t necessary to establish tit-for-tat, or a mutual abeyance of hostility given equal conditions. These are just phenomena, or configurations of force, which already exist, making concepts such as “NAP”, however understood, simply redundant and unnecessary.
LikeLike
Blut und Ehre!
There is nothing else.
LikeLike
Yeah, if your definitions are accurate.
LikeLike
Tell us, Rum… what is it about all things Deutsch that brings out, and invariably at that, your more succinct side?
LikeLike
Arbeit macht frei. Speaking of which, whatever happened to “Arbiter”?
LikeLike
Arbiter liked A-rabs too much he probably joined isis.
LikeLike
How exactly does a man who sold his own daughter to an alien tribe of moneychangers and pornographers count as someone who gives a rat’s ass about blood and soil?
You guys are being played with all this trump worship. It’s straight out of their playbook – infiltrate the enemy camp, lead it.
You think the average white man is a complacent, apathetic fat fuck now, just wait till “one of us durr” is in the WH.
He supports the police state…Do you understand what it’s for yet? If that doesn’t clue you in, well, fuck it.
LikeLike
Bill – and your solution is…? Trump’s children were adults, and were free to marry anyone they wanted. One can only try to raise their children and hope that they follow your beliefs. I do not believe Donald Trump is anti-Jewish, but I bet he knows a bad Jew from a good one. I bet he vetted his daughter’s choice before the marriage occurred, you can count on it (including private detectives). Yes, it certainly would have been preferred if his beautiful daughter married a nice Gentile man, but you do NOT see any black or brown blood in that family, do you?
Somehow, even though he may be Jewish, I am not getting a “kill Whitey” vibe from him:
[CH: he looks mischling. def a far cry from the jpod caricature.]
LikeLike
Stuck in moderation rape!
Bill, in short, I do not get a “kill whitey” vibe from Ivanka’s husband:
Maybe, like you say, we are wrong. But if Trump builds that wall, and deports the illegals, he can give Netanyahu a knob job as far as I care.
LikeLike
I agree, I just see secession as the only option at this point, and trust no one who is allowed on tv.
I hope you guys are right, believe me.
LikeLike
Trump is a mega-rich businessman in an environment (NYC) where a good 60% + of his peers are likely Tribesmen.
His daughter probably didn’t go slumming it among the non-tribal plebeians of Brooklyn, Queens or Shaolinland all that much, so many of the boys she met at rich people’s parties must have been tribal also.
Yeah, he could have sent her to school in Idaho – but he didn’t.
Far as I’m concerned, even if all President Trump ever accomplishes is helping us get rid of the pestilent scourge of political correctness, that alone will be a YOOGE success.
LikeLike
“How exactly does a man who sold his own daughter to an alien tribe of moneychangers and pornographers count as someone who gives a rat’s ass about blood and soil?”
Who else does Bill? Who? Name one candidate that proposed somehting half as strong as TRUMP did?
LikeLike
Obviously he is the best candidate, but that’s like winning at the special Olympics.
He provides the illusion that the system is not beyond repair – it is.
LikeLike
Bill, my advice is: vote for Trump, pray that he is not lying, pray that the elections are not fixed, and….as insurance for all of the foregoing, buy guns and ammo, exercise and practice fighting/survival, and prepare for the worst. In short, cover all bases.
LikeLike
“Small government” will always be code for less handouts for people that don’t look like me.
Cuckservatives are like women in that they must live completely oblivious to their id monster.
LikeLike
Why any handout by government. Cull the natural moochers. If we don’t take our means of living into our own hands economically and politically, simultaneously, then the atrophy makes us weak. That is how Western men are directly emasculated. The other part of how is fiat money, infinite handouts.
LikeLike
It all comes down to race.
LikeLike
It all comes down to race economics.
FIFY
LikeLike
Race economics? You mean like how Japan with no natural resources has the 3rd largest GDP in the world and Africa which has everything can’t do shit? Because of the people? That kind of race economics?
LikeLike
Don’t worry, Tampon Within will not come back to even try and rebut your brilliant response…
LikeLike
WTF are “race economics” anyway?
Part of the I-Can-Deconstruct-All-Things-White curriculum at that community college that saw Strapon coming?
This is why the shill has to be banned… no matter how many times the yenta gets her bottom smacked when she tries to pull the “it’s all economics!” Marxist claptrap, she nevertheless comes back another day with it, hoping we’ve all forgotten the last time we tanned her hide.
LikeLike
The funny part is, I believe the yenta meant to strike out “race” and just leave “economics”.
Tell me I’m right, Strapon. 😉
LikeLike
There was some temptation earlier to engage Strapon when I thought she was a he. Debate keeps you sharp and there is always a non-trivial probability of changing a rational but misguided man’s mind.
Upon realizing that he is a she (most likely a middle-aged yenta), any engagement became pointless.
LikeLike
Reminds me of:
“The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn’t help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn’t help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn’t remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.
“Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck.
“I didn’t know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying.
“Gradually I began to hate them.”
My Eskimo ‘friend’ on fb has gone full Trump=Hitler mode.
LikeLike
> “their virtuosity at lying” ——— Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do: he… abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
LikeLike
The only reason I don’t reread that tome is that it’s too tempting to quote from it.
Besides, WN’s have to be more interested in giving birth to something new, not resurrecting the dead… that’s the aegis of a higher authority. 😉
LikeLike
Everything we are witnessing was documented 2000 years ago. Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose… http://bartleby.com/108/43/8.html#S34
LikeLike
That’s why I don’t go back to my college days and reread that tome…
… it’d be too tempting to quote from it. 😉
LikeLike
Idiot.
LikeLike
economies are a racial construct
LikeLike
Second attempt to avoid mod.
LikeLike
This whole argument disregards the expectation that either we allow our natural instincts to guide our standards (and it also disregards sex differences) and therefore live with exclusion in the first place, or that government ultimately facilitate the autonomy of each individual. The result is arguing in circles. Culture will always form among groups and if we could make a government off of this philosophy of liberty then it would only lead to woven cloth divisions among a former nation. The very thing most people on the Alt Right are expecting to happen in the first place. There is nothing realistic about Libertarianism.
LikeLike
While it is true that virtue is the product of voluntary consent, this is because virtue is the habitual action of adhering to the good, freely chosen.
Your video avoids all mention of the good, which is chosen and adhered to by virtuous persons. The implication, was that voluntary, mutual consent is the criterion of justice – probably because certain, keen libertarians are gun-shy of loaded terms like “goodness” and “justice,” and substitute “virtue” for it. But that only moves the problem one rung back. Goodness itself has nothing to do with “voluntary, mutual consent” (many wicked things are based on this). The entire problem with Western Civilization, is that it has abandoned any objective standard of righteousness, of justice; we attempt to root it in vague or amoral terms, like “fairness,” “liberty,” etc. We root it in people’s “free choice,” and “consent,” and think that all things are moral, so long as harm is excluded and consent is included. But people lie to themselves about harm and consent all the time… and, still, this fails to account for morality objectively. Without some transcendent standard, why should I even care about your Libertarian “values?” Justice is rooted in what is objectively right, and people must conform themselves to it even if it involves harm and a lack of “joyous, affirmative, eager consent.”
Slatterns may say: “But I’m not hurting anyone but myself; hey, those guys consented to sleep with me; we all got what we wanted and we’re better off for it!” To which I would reply: “Yes, you are hurting more people than you imagine; second off, what you’re doing is nefas, and an abomination, even if you weren’t hurting anyone else; third off, take your forty lashes and report to your new husband, a 50-year old accountant and widower. If you object, you can work in the labor camps for the next ten years.” I’m all for maximizing liberty and emphasizing personal responsibility – under the Divine and Natural Laws. But “liberty,” conceived of as a vague “owning of your own life,” with only consent and (initiation of) harm as moral criteria… you can stuff it.
LikeLike
The video content is a starting point. Getting to a starting point takes conquest, but if government intervention a priori were eliminated and government means were extremely limited, what kind of people would win in life? If women with children out of wedlock starved with their bastard children, would women behave better? Their survival instincts (dread) are turned off by government subsidy and protection. If taxpayers were free from beta roles, the problem would go away. Freedom for all, to fight each other too, eliminates social problems like it eliminates stone age people. You want to impose your moral controls on others, but those controls are always institutional and controlled by the few who are then epic moochers called tax farmers. You are not a rationalist that believes morality has a natural definition related to might making right and cooperative power being progressive. You are a narrative-schema sheeple. You want to control outcome rather than only the rules of the process. Principles of process make good outcomes, or there are no principles. You getting what you want is not a principle. That is a woman’s argument.
LikeLike
>”You getting what you want is not a principle. That is a woman’s argument.”
>says “I want” repeatedly in his big response to Greg
LikeLike
what is this garbage? Africans lack the empathy to understand what is right and wrong within your reference frame. They actually DO NOT conceptualize rape as anything beyond their own pleasure.
I wonder who gets to define “good” and “consent” and the rest of these subjective terms.
LikeLike
uh, you libel me by implying an equivalence of the “I want”s. The “I want”s of my post are not to fix my outcome (upon others) but the process that regulates my outcome and anyone with whom I would choose to cooperate. I don’t want to cooperate with you based on what you want because it is incompatible with what I want or you would not object. “I want” is critical to liberation as personhood but not any justification beyond one’s vitality. Obviously, what I want is not going to happen for me. I’m old. Here are all those nasty “I want”s that you made to sound so selfish but are clearly empowering to others not hopelessly hurtful by ugly nature:
(1) I want bureaucrats to fail before producers who “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government.”
(2) I want reciprocity of good and ill according to the natural agency of each man.
(3) I want the bondage of consequences for all because we are all slaves of the natural world.
uh, if your ideas (or wants) are better, show us the way. Deference to some religion is not an explanation. Scripture is a hall of mirrors so that any dumbass can custom exegesis an inconsistent logic of relative advantage at the expense of others.
LikeLike
Doug,
My “big picture” is up there in another comment. If you smoke, have one handy; it’s pretty grim.
Do you ever wonder if you might take it too seriously? You let your guard down just now — you’re old, what you want isn’t going to happen. Run with that more. Instead of pushing a system, ask why you have so much invested in it.
I do like your imperatives. 1 & 2 add up to Marx-style Communism, I must inform you, and I doubt 3 would have bothered Engels much, at least.
But hey — no one escapes the bondage of consequences of forgetting that we and the world are finite. The Big Correction is coming.
LikeLike
“Free trade with Mexico and China has been an obvious and unmitigated disaster. Slap on the tariffs.”
Free trade is not a disaster. Low IQ jobs should be filled by low IQ people who are willing to work for low wages. That brings down prices of goods and services and the money consumers save is reinvested into the economy & better jobs are created instead of white people with higher IQs wasting their potential. Our economy is fucked up because of an abundance of government regulation not because of a lack of it over trade.
“Libertarianism is a coward’s ideology. It’s an attempt by white males to argue in their own interest by ideological means instead of arguing plainly for what’s in the interest of their own blood and culture like every other ethnic group does.”
No, libertarianism is the cold hard truth about reality and in it’s true form is the most red pilled political philosophy there is. People have ethnic interests but they also have individual interests & collective ownership is nonsense because two people cannot consume the same piece of meat be they of the same race or not. The problem with modern libertarians is that most are pussies just like modern everyone else & they try to merge egalitarian principals with liberty when the two are completely at odds.
LikeLike
All of this said I still think Trump is the best candidate for sure despite wanting tariffs b/c if we don’t change immigration policy it’s going to be a permanent leftist majority & nothing else will matter.
LikeLike
Yes, exactly right on first comment, Mike. (Now classic?) libertarianism is red pill political philosophy. As far as nothing else mattering in your follow-up, that’s not true. Corruption will be cleansing failure. Yes, many of us will be cleansed with it, but evolution DGAF. We can’t escape our nature be it ours personally or our shared context. It is the collapse that will free civilized men to clear out the human garbage, though how many hundred years from now that is IDK. At least if you are wise and see the situation around you, you can act. At some point unilateral civilizing action will be naturally rewarded. We have our self-government licenses ready to go. Pass it on. Great thing about learning Game, permission is issued by the self.
LikeLike
wtf…he couldn’t have been MORE WRONG.
Low IQ? WHITE PEOPLE HAVE LOW IQs, morons. The white average is 100. That is low. They are the ones who can do menial jobs…the 50% of whites below 100 haven’t been “freed up” by fucking Mexicans averaging 90, they have been REPLACED in their own country.
Libertarianism is a utopian PIPE DREAM. You wouldn’t be here bleating about this absurd shit if it were left to the “free market.”
Libertardianism is CONTRARY to red pill…it assumes the magic market solves all interactions. Whose market? A market of Asians? The fucking dogma is so myopic and ignorant of reality, calling it red pill is a joke.
Red pill is that blacks are useless, that brown societies suck shit and that NO amount of “free market” can reverse that. Red pill is that differences between classes of humans are INTRACTABLE. Libertardians project their preferences onto others and can’t grasp why their system falls the fuck apart. The system appeared to work ONLY when a certain kind of people had the power of the State. Just like social liberalism and socialist systems ONLY WORK when certain KINDS of people do them (Scandinavians).
Either of you couldn’t be more wrong…a collapse will not allow free men to clear out anything, it will allow the browns to collectivize…did Argentina’s collapse clear anything out? Did the rural people take charge and kill all those in the city, the idiot liberal leftists? NOPE.
The opposite happened. Political power and institutional control remains with the cities. They will take water and electricity from those in the countryside, where in some cases anarchy and warlordism rules.
The idiot libertardians just can’t grasp that collectivism RULES because it provides a greater measure of physical force and violence to a political question. An army is collectivist.
LikeLike
So we charge nothing for other countries selling their products to us when this is a practice virtually unheard of by either China or Mexico? Our exports are lower than down-low Robbie and we are flooding our market with products that lead to cycling what money we already have as the bill for government rises? Even if we get rid of our current bullshit system, if we ultimately have a government that is tasked with protecting trading as a practice in their jurisdiction then it stands to reason that they charge a fee.
Libertariansim is a juvenile and presumptuous religion. What would you do if indeed right of association were restored and all of the White men who are open about their preferences for fucking White women all left with their literal booty and settled as far away from a spergosaur like you? All of a sudden, your right to command of your ethnic and procreational destiny would be violated and you would rally for the realists to send baby-factories to you. Though, I am sure you would gladly pay. The animal natures of men cannot be truly de-insentivized. You and non-Whites are still in competition with the White Alphas for the ultimate reproductive prize and this leads to very un-libertarian behavior that you would have to breach your own ethics to police it.
LikeLike
“No, libertarianism is the cold hard truth about reality”
I disagree, it disregards the psychological fact that proximal reinforcers are stronger than remote reinforcers.
You expect the mine owner to really spend money on employee safety without Gubmint meddling? Or try a day in Los Angeles without “Leftist” polluteion regulations.
My evidence? The air in any corrupt Asian city, where there is no significant
LikeLike
Ha ha ha. I KNEW that Syn@gogue M@sturbator would re-appear on a miscegenation thread. Gotta enforce that Final Solution for the Shkotzim. Mazel Tov, muh Hebe!!!!!
LikeLike
Ohhhhh, Subway Dis. You want perfect order in an unstable world falling forward per evolution. Well now. First off, obviously, all-powerful government handles distant problems better. Maybe we’d be better of with limited government closer to home. Secondly, you as a militiaman taking the law into your own hands would require both physical and mental manhood that only a government proximal reinforcer could have. With greater affluence, if people chose to be more rather than be less and have more than they deserve, there would be more and more means to get involved politically. Morality must advance wealth stewardship, which includes the quality of people at large, btw. If the economy is not rigged, people can opt out of working in unsafe mines but commensurate with the prevailing technology. Life is a risk and you are not entitled to absolute guarantee of safety. Another woman’s argument. If LA sucks, move. There is a cost to no pollution. Live in the middle of nowhere. As George Carlin said, if necessary, there will be a new paradigm: earth + plastic. You guys think you are smart enough to control the world but without taking responsibility. Let the gov. protect me, mommy. Feckless. If it was not for the pollutant oxygen, we would not have air to breath. Oxygen killed off lots of life on earth. Oh well. Evolution is a greedy algorithm and there is nothing you can do about it. Planned economies do not work. If a government strapped for cash had to limit itself to righting extreme wrongdoing, the world would be a better place. Governments kill more people than anyone, and not for the right reasons.
LikeLike
A few posts back, I asked TSW a serious and sincere question, just to see if there was any “there” there.
Essentially, since he’d said that Trump was an unsuitable choice as leader for “the modern age” – his term – I lobbed the ball back and asked him what he thought the defining characteristics if this modern age were.
I gave him a couple of suggestions – peak debt, resource limits and the challenges to our ability to maintain complexity are key in my opinion – but he ran with none of these. That’s his choice of course, but neither did he suggest anything else. He didn’t define it, characterize it, analyze it, speculate about it. Nothing.
I thought he might be able to do this as for a man with an MA these are unchallenging essay-style tasks. No research skills needed.
Instead, he abused Trump for a few paras – I didn’t ask his opinion of Trump, as we already have that – and his only even approximately relevant response to my question was to say that
“Cooperation is key in the modern interconnected world”
Of course this is a lower high school level of I-don’t-understand-the-question blather. Anyone who understood what is implied by complexity – e.g., in re globalization we have reduced redundancy and increased fragility – would understand that increased cooperation in a highly complex world may very well, e.g., by increasing supervision costs, paradoxically create the very instability it is ostensibly intended to reduce. Did the entente cordiale contribute to European stability or reduce it? Does cooperation between Nato nations increase stability or foster chaos? What of the current state of Europe?
Does a veneer of cooperation really remove the need to consider resource competition or is it just a cover for it? Does less redundancy also mean fewer routes for feedback?
Perhaps we need to retreat from complexity? How could we manage that? Wouldn’t a more autarchist United States – more self-sufficient and “free of entangling alliances” – be a safer and more stable United States?
Or must we always go along with the banker’s plans for evermore integration, ever-diminishing local influence, and totalitarian corporatism?
Okay, TSW, I’m just riffing here, just to demonstrate how you could spitball a question like this. I’m not here to lecture on these issues, or to get you to take a side, I was just giving you an opportunity to show you aren’t really the third-rater you appear to be. Yet you are.
I’m usually in my office Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday 3pm-5 pm if you want to chat more about this. You can use the form in my in-box to sign off for an appointment.
Cheers.
VD
LikeLike
Now this was a take-down worthy of the likes of Matt King, on the secular side.
The highest praise I can offer is that it was one of the few tl;dr type posts that was, in fact, not too long… and which I did read. 😉
LikeLike
VD has been on fire lately. He’s the one who noticed the Stars of David on the dress of the bearded wife of Mark Rubin [nom-de-guerre Marco Rubio]. BTW, here is what “cooperation” [versus “redundancy” & “self-sufficiency”] looks like in Strapon’s home town:
LikeLike
Funny how faith in our fellow man (woman?), no matter how many times dissuaded, fights its way back to the fore, in men of good will. 😉
That’s okay, VagDom… we’re all entitled to an occasional fool’s errand. lzozlzo
LikeLike
@ Mike
For me, one of the most basic problems of libertarianism is that it doesn’t answer the question of self-defense.
Another problem is that it proposes no anthropology, sociology, or psychology to justify its truisms. If anything it is very “blank state” in its outlook, and in my view that is simply wrong. Humans are certainly born as well as made. Anyone who ever had kids can tell you that.
As to defense, no man can defend himself alone. Therefore he must join other men to protect himself. The men of the group will agree to defend each other or even die for each other. But for that to happen there must be quid pro quo, reciprocation.
But how can we guarantee reciprocation? How do we avoid free riding? Well, we have to have to be able to make some accurate estimate of the personality characteristics of the men we bond with. That’s both an individual and a racial issue, but it seems to me that it might be an easier task to predict the behavior of those who are like us that those who are not.
Finally, libertarian arguments often strike me as just plain adolescent. Not to be insulting but for example you say “collective ownership is nonsense because two people cannot consume the same piece of meat”
Gee. That’s not up to standard. I’d ask you to think about that again and make some notes of your thoughts, on both/all sides of the issue as you see it, and please, as long as I’m on campus this month, make an appointment to see me in my office later this week.
TSW can give you the details.
LikeLike
What a condescending prick. Do you really think I’m going to give you a dissertation merely because you asked for it? Dance, monkey? No matter what I write, you were bound and determined to believe that there is no there there. You’re lucky you got a first draft from me at all.
For the spectators, here’s exactly what I wrote:
You’ve already described it. We live in an immensely complex modern world, which Trump, in his limited self-aggrandizing narcissistic way, cannot possibly comprehend. I mean, the guy’s spent seven years on a fake television show fake hiring people and fake firing them.
The true weight of the presidency never sunk in to Bush either; that’s why the presidency didn’t age him.
Cooperation is key in the modern interconnected world, and Trump is immensely uncooperative. Strongman politics works best at the local mayoral level, where things are generally much simpler. The job of the presidency requires a man with a complicated, educated, deliberative mind, willing to view all angles on a subject. It’s like playing two hundred chess games simultaneously, all of which depend on one another. Trump just isn’t up to that job. He’s too petty, too self-absorbed, and frankly not intelligent enough.
I’ll stand by it. Trump’s performance in tonight’s debate reinforces my final observation. Take away his mantras, and he’s got nothing. A shell of hairspray and alternating streams of puffery and vitriol.
LikeLike
I’m not sure making your opponent’s arguments for him… especially when he’s already made them, and far better… is the way to post here, Strapon.
Of course, it’s not like you have anything to lose… there’s that. lzozlzozlozl
LikeLike
“No matter what I write, you were bound and determined to believe that there is no there there.”
All cucks eventually make this post. “If I’d made an argument, you wouldn’t have listened! Therefore I will make no argument!”
It’s the online equivalent of “I’m not gonna fight you!” and it’s so easy to see through. You make no arguments because you’re unable to make arguments. Your analysis of Trump shows this. You’re without substance, so you accuse Trump of being without substance. You see in him what you see in yourself. Then you call him a bunch of poopy names and think that wraps it up.
TSW, you’re dumb, stupid, and one big imbecile!
LikeLike
“The job of the presidency requires a man with a complicated, educated, deliberative mind, willing to view all angles on a subject. It’s like playing two hundred chess games simultaneously, all of which depend on one another. Trump just isn’t up to that job. He’s too petty, too self-absorbed, and frankly not intelligent enough.”
Hahaha Note the insipid ((Aaron Sorkin)) West Wing liberal fantasy of the POTUS as some exquisitely cultured super genius polymath (but ONLY the democrat presidents … The conservative ones being crass backwater yokels).
Anyone who thinks Ronald Reagan or Harry Truman (or any president) was ever “playing two hundred chess games simultaneously…” is a fucking TV addled dolt with absolutely no conception of how real life organizations work let alone power politics.
… But but but gosh darn it, president Bartlett … and Hillary is really like this!!
I would love to know what TSW really does for a living.
LikeLike
> “what TSW really does for a living”
LikeLike
Interesting how TSW has been successfully trolling the entire CH readership for at least 6 months now. Nobody can figure out a strategy to shut this person down? I thought CH readership believes in group cohesion, not libertarianism, so why can’t the group shut down the infuriating party?
LikeLike
Well, when you ignore her, she declares victory… when you spank her red, she just comes back for more.
If you call getting your azz spanked red, and repeatedly at that… “successful trolling”… then I guess she’s the Cyberian equivalent of the hood ornament on a Rolls Royce.
I recommended a straight ban, but many of my fellow chateau enforcers seem to enjoy the sport of batting her around… a guilty pleasure I myself admit to, on occasion. 😉
LikeLike
When ALL donations to political parties are banned; only then will the Western World begin to see something resembling true Democracy.
I would rather see political parties funded with an allocated amount via the taxpayer’s public purse than to have politicians and parties bought and sold via political donations etc.
One of the great things about Trump is that he doesn’t need the money.
LikeLike
There’s no such thing as “true democracy”. The person who tells the proles what to think wields real political power in a democracy. And who tells them what to think? The MSM and the University, who promise them gibsmedats.
In other words, the natural endpoint of democracy is socialism, inescapably so and in every case. The Overton window is shifting constantly to the Left not because of J00ish witchery but because that is the natural state of democracy.
LikeLike
yup
LikeLike
@The Straw
Couldnt agree more. If only we could abolish the 16th amendment somehow!
LikeLike
Dammit the post got shifted somehow. Wrong reply
LikeLike
Democracy = rule by money and media = rule by Jews. We need populist Nationalism and that’s what Trump is bringing.
LikeLike
What would make populist nationalism that much different? The manipulated of today will mostly still be the manipulated of tomorrow. An organic Aristocracy from the most competent of any one locale would be the best bet. I guess that would be inevitable in a populist nationalist nation but, if it were demonized and treated as an unnatural anomaly that threatened national stability then we would be right back where we started and out would come the complaints about legacy oppression by one name or another.
LikeLike
What would make populist nationalism different?
Term limits, a balanced budget ammendment, gold standard, flat tax system and limits on campaign funding and limit to individuals.
LikeLike
“True” democracy? Who wants THAT bullshit? (((shakin’ mah haid)))
Well, let’s not let the window washers off the hook, now… they’ve taken great panes to orchestrate how said window gets opened and closed…
… and by whom.
LikeLike
“Great panes”…lovely!
LikeLike
And Trump turned the Overton Window back in to a shattered pile of Kristallnacht
LikeLike
Well, let’s not go crazy now… I’ll give The Donald credit for being that rock that flips up from the pavement and hits the Overton Windshield, starting a small crack that continues to spread wider and further down the road.
LikeLike
“We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.” (David Lane).
Every white politician running for office should be asked if he agrees with those fourteen words. Only two possible answers.
LikeLike
“I like Nikki Haley and Bobby Jindal *SLURP*” –Typical “conservative.”
LikeLike
“For ALL children” will probably be their stock answer… not taking into consideration that all other colors of children are doing quite well, numbers-wise, for the future.
… but don’t you dare contradict the BLMers with ALL Lives Matter!
LikeLike
One of the most futile activities in politics is trying to slip a pro-white agenda past the gatekeepers under libertarian colours. People might as well stop trying to disguise their efforts to ensure the survival of their race.
LikeLike
To do that, they would have to understand the hamster-wheel that passes for pro-White thinking in all but us explicit racialists.
LikeLike
The comment is good but its get one thing wrong. Libertarianism is a JEW ideology and always has been.
It is a very effective way for the Jew to convince the White not to act in his ethnic interest, while the Jews collude and work in theirs. The TOO article on this is pristine.
All the prominent founders of libertarianism were Jews, and its leaders today are still Jews. Ron Paul is an exception.
High IQ but autistic and race blind Whites are the rank and file libertarians, but they have never and will never be the thought leaders and propoganda pushers of libertarianism.
LikeLike
Well, wad’dya know?
Somebody finally shows up that sees through all the high-falutin’ gobbledy-gook and gets to the heart of the matter!
Of course, you could be wrong, and it’s merely (yet another!) well-intentioned example of that much-vaunted “light unto the nations” thingy. 😉
LikeLike
> “The TOO article” ——— ??? – URL? Thanks.
LikeLike
I’m guessing he means The Occidental Observer.
LikeLike
The ethnic Jew basis of Libertarianism is pretty obvious from a glance at the list of luminaries: Ayn Rand, Murray Rothbard, Ludwig von Mises, Milton Friedman, and on and on.
LikeLike
OK, I watched most the debate. I think D. Trump looked Presidential and the other guys looked like adolescent try hard.
But here is what depresses me the most. The other guys were so lame and adolescent.
Try on a few anachronistic scenarios like this one: D. Trumb debating D. Eisenhower on his return from his job as head of the Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force – in Europe. Eisenhower was totally on with acrimonious debate. He would have had no trouble rising to Trumpian competition. He had already been in cage matches with Churchill, Montgomery, FDR, and Patton — all the while being in a knife fight to the death with cousin Adolf.
I am saying: Glory be unto the Trumpening. Weep that it is so rare nowadays.
LikeLike
Too bad Ike and company were no match for Uncle Joe.
LikeLike
LOL’ed. Ike authorized* the Eskimo ass@ssination of General Patton.
*or at least stood by meekly and kept his mouf shut, knowing that he was The Chosen Shegetz
LikeLike
And….(((Ike))) wasn’t anglo…
LikeLike
Ike… hmmm… wasn’t he the (ahem) champion of democracy who sent the Airborne troops into Little Rock so that White children could be bullied by negroes?
That is, until said White parents could afford to move to a “nice neighborhood” with “good schools”?
LikeLike
I approve his Operation Wetback. I denounce his having arranged the vehicular homicide of George Patton. GP was getting a little too vocal about who were the good, and the true bad guys in Germany and Russia.
LikeLike
When I was younger I read ‘Atlas Shrugged’. Too wordy for my tastes (I dislike that about Steven King’s doorstops as well) but one of the most toxic things (((Ann Rosenbaum))) [AKA Ayn Rand] wrote was the idea that ”capitalism is inherently moral”.
No, it’s not. That’s just as idiotic as the phrase ”gun violence”; Large, dangerous wild animals that are originally from Africa are violent – with or without guns. Capitalism is not ‘moral’ OR ‘immoral’ it’s Amoral. Selling dope to kids (or selling kids to perverts) IS capitalism, but it’s clearly not moral.
LikeLike
The presumed morality of capitalism is that any transaction is done under the perception that our is mutually beneficial and agreed to by both parties as being in their self interest.
LikeLike
Thank you.
Nobody except a rationalizing fool or outright minion of Satan defines ANY type of buy/sell transaction as “Capitalism”, merely because there’s an exchange. That’s Al Capone logic.
LikeLike
One of the five fundamental precepts of Contract Law is “legal subject matter”… DUH!
LikeLike
I can’t believe you can even read, as you are unable to separate capitalism as a concept from an associated immoral act. That capitalism is lost on a like dullard you is no surprise.
Capitalism is the ultimate Alpha playground of modern society. It’s a pity you appear to have failed at it. Sorry for your loss.
Shrugged encapsulated the principle of this website before most here were born. It invented the concept of “poolside,” when idiots like you become too numerous. At least half the Commandments of Poon are covered in the book. You apparently missed this.
LikeLike
When Banks etc. are “too big to fail”; then Capitalism is no longer Capitalism.
It is Socialism for the Banks/Corporates funded by taxpayers.
LikeLike
Bro, the banks screwed the people and then twisted our collective arm until we bailed them out. It doesn’t get much more alpha than that.
LikeLike
A language gauge called the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Index measures sophistication by syllables per word and words per sentence.
According to the gauge, Der Trump speaks at a second grade level. A sampling:
“Oh boy.”
“We love Nevada.”
“We will be celebrating for a long time tonight. Have a good time.”
“Soon the country is going to start winning, winning, winning.”
“Now we’re going to get greedy for the United States. We’re going to grab and grab and grab.”
“We’re going to bring in so much money and so much everything.”
“We’re going to build the wall. You know that. Going to build the wall.”
“You’re going to be proud of your president. And you’re going to be even prouder of your country. OK?”
Don’t forget: He’s boasted about having the *best words*. They’re amazing words, just incredible words. See Donald run. See Donald speak. See Donald lose.
LikeLike
He’s kicking the shit out of everyone, bimbo. Thanks for mentioning Flesch-Kincaid: your dreamboat incubus Obama gives the second stupidest speeches in American Presidential history, not that he’s even capable of writing them himself:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/feb/12/state-of-the-union-reading-level
The country was smarter when it was Whiter, obviously.
LikeLike
I actually like the quotes. They are perfect summaries of his attitude and his campaign. I suppose that is what you really dislike about them. They are the words of a winner and to losers, they are like nails on a chalkboard.
LikeLike
A leftist will never understand that simple is always closer to truth, as they spend all of their time concocting verbal fictions to obscure and deny truth.
Blood and soil.
Three words… How much more truth?
Faggot
LikeLike
Words used to mean something. Language has been perverted past the point of recognition. For most Americans, language was singular when life was simpler.
LikeLike
So who wins Super Tuesday TSW? If TRUMP is such a loser?
LikeLike
President.
Trump.
Wooowhooo!
LikeLike
America is so dumbed down that they can’t understand anything very sophisticated in this day and age.
Remember the dindus and mexicans IQ are down near the retarded level. And Whites have not been educated to learn, but propagandized to not think. So he is doing a great job.
See Donald run. See Donald speak. See Donald win.
LikeLike
“Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity.”
~1984
LikeLike
Fun with Dick and Jane… and Strapon! lzozlzozlzozlzolzolzozlozlozl
LikeLike
Methinks Strapon has had a lot of fun – with dick…!
LikeLike
Strapon keeps missing the point that The Donald could pretty much sucker punch Barbara Bush and still gain votes.
Last time, yenta… nobody cares that he’s narcissistic, unpolished in rhetoric, went bankrupt and divorces several times, and made pretty blonde news talking heads cry.
LikeLike
It’s the ideas behind those words that get to you. Working class whites love their country and want to take it back. That’s where your hatred is directed.
LikeLike
Pithily put…
Much of the ire directed towards Trump is actually Cathedral indignation that Whitey is starting to get uppity.
LikeLike
There is no fundamental problem with libertarianism as a guiding framework. As others have said, it is perhaps the most red pill and self reliant of all political philosophies.
The fundamental problem with any ideological worldview is a stubborn clinging to the dogma. Ideologies should provide a basic framework of how things should be, but often getting to where things should be means doing things that run counter to the should in the immediate term. I’m generally supportive of commerce and free trade, but I’m not entirely opposed to tariffs in the present climate because they’re easier to get done than the sort of regulatory overhaul required to make domestic production competitive, especially with countries who’ve manipulated their currency down in order to gain market share.
This might be crime think here, but I’m not philosophically opposed to targeted, reasonable, and extremely limited immigration, but I’m in favor of a complete and total hiatus on all immigration (even, and perhaps especially, from nominally white European countries because that will be a back door for the middle Eastern hordes presently invading Europe) because immigration policy over the past 50 years has been displacement and incentivizes the greediest third world peasants who get state handouts for shitting out kids on our soil paid for by native whites who have such high resulting tax burdens that they cannot afford to have children themselves, while chasing other natives out of industries entirely.
What matters is that a philosophical framework, whether it be libertarianism or nationalism, be malleable and capable of deviations in response to circumstances as they presently are. This is why many libertarians I know are supportive of Trump rather than Cruz (who would appear more philosophically aligned) , because they can see how stubborn adherence to finite bits of the philosophy threatens the bigger picture.
Namely, they’ve adopted libertarianism as a broad framework rather than a rigid and inflexible dogma.
LikeLike
“Religion requires certain other vital elements, most notably unquestionable divine revelation, which ideology lacks. Matters of revelation, religious dogmas, are axiomatic (M.E. Bradford’s preferred term). That is, they are established apart from mere reason (though they are not unreasonable) and must simply be accepted. Reasonable arguments may be used to defend religious dogmas from their unbelieving detractors (call it apologetics), but mortal men do not speak dogmatic truth into existence. Ideology, on the other hand, treats abstract notions that are the product of human reason (‘American exceptionalism,’ ‘self-government,’ ‘free trade,’ ‘we must fight them over there so we don’t have to fight them over here,’ ‘nation of immigrants,’ ‘individual liberty,’ ‘religious freedom’) as if they are axiomatic and, thus, are unburdened by historical context or rhetorical nuance. If you say X, you have violated our ideology, and you must be rejected, case closed, the end.
Hence, Kirk called ideology ‘inverted religion.'”
~Aaron Wolf
LikeLike
“What matters is that a philosophical framework, whether it be libertarianism or nationalism, be malleable and capable of deviations in response to circumstances as they presently are. This is why many libertarians I know are supportive of Trump rather than Cruz (who would appear more philosophically aligned) , because they can see how stubborn adherence to finite bits of the philosophy threatens the bigger picture.”
Agreed. I consider many components of the libertarian philosophy highly compatible with my world view, and the red-pill view in general. But rigidity in any philosophy creates problems.
For example, I would have zero problem if President Trump got a bill through Congress that taxed remittances to foreign countries — staring with Mexico, where legals and illegals send $20 billion south of the border. That’s $5 billion right there. Guess what? They’re paying for the wall.
LikeLike
I think that it was Hannibal Bateman over at Radix Journal who summed it up very nicely: It’s against our principals to save our people.
LikeLike
HB is good shit.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Being Libertarian means believing that people who violate the border will respect your property rights.
LikeLike
Yes, just like illegal aliens will all run out and buy auto insurance just as soon as we get them legal. After all, they showed such respect for our immigration laws. /sarcasm
LikeLike
I will take that ideas with me into the weakend. Not getting nervous is crucial. The world may do what it does but truth always prevails – even if it takes a long time.
LikeLike
The libertarian God(dess) Ayn Rand had this to say on “racism”:
20 years ago, I remember arguing with libertarians online about immigration where they said that open borders would not bankrupt a libertarian state because such a government would not provide free handouts.
What utter claptrap. Import millions of dindus and suddenly you have that many more bloc voters for gimmedats (at the expense of whtey of course) and there will be no shortage of treasonous politicians willing to pander to them.
Getting back to Ms. Rand–I have a copy of Atlas Shrugged but I have never bothered to read it. Perhaps it has some useful things to say about the downside of altruism, but if being a libertarian or objectivist means clinging to ideology to the point of eschewing the present crisis in regards to our cultural suicide, then I have no use for them.
i would have no problem with supporting socialism or creating a more altruistic society if the end result meant preserving the whte European character of our nations. I would gladly vote for The 94% top marginal tax rate that used to exist in the 1950s if that meant that I got to live in 1950s white America.
One argument thst I like to use with Leftists is that I tell them that if they want a European style social welfare state, they need a country that resembles Europe. The reason why people in Finland support higher taxes for social programs is that they don’t mind paying those higher taxes to help out their fellow Finns. Creating a multikult polyglot will destroy social trust and csring among fellow citizens.
LikeLike
You’re wrong. Some libertarians actually believe their principles. I did.
But the ideas mostly just do not work in the real world. Free trade and open borders do not work to the benefit of the civilized.
Plus, even if your entire country became libertarian, non-libertarians can just move in and out-muscle you and by your own principles, you cannot even complain.
It’s like Communism in the “Nice theory, but it doesn’t work” sense.
I started drifting away from libertarianism when I realized it would be nearly impossible to bring most of the country into that line of thinking. Liberty seems too much work, it’s easier to take free bennies from govt. Even though the taxes eventually rape the poor too, either directly or by diminished private sector spending that would have benefited them.
Then Vox Day started ripping on trade. He has done a great job over at his blog demonstrating free trade rapes the more prosperous trading partner. I had that sense ever since NAFTA but it’s nice to have someone smarter than you bolstering your argument.
Bottom line:
Libertarians are usually very intelligent and almost always white. (Huh… coincidence? Not likely.) Convincing them that a white nation would be a more free nation is a better tactic than calling them names.
LikeLike
And it really is getting to the point where any white person that isn’t racist doesn’t pay attention to facts or the news.
LikeLike
Not into -isms but government cannot do anything right. If you are the type to run for it for protection, you will be disappointed.
LikeLike
If you see an Ayn Rand masturbator ask him this: What good is money if you’re dead? If that doesn’t clear it up, just tell him to shut up. Economics requires math skills. White + brown = Extinction. Its so easy a caveman can do it.
LikeLike
I’ll have the roast duck with the mango salsa.
LikeLike
Does anyone remember Phil who used to leave that same comment on Heartiste articles years back? “Wake Up White Man!” Well its been a long time but whitey is clearly starting to stir from his slumber. Next he needs to find his legs and stand up. Then begin the long journey home to remove the usurpers dispossessing his people.
LikeLike
How about we just go back to the principles of our Founding and force the Federal government back into it’s Constitutional cage, so that it only does what must be done nationally, like border enforcement.
Blaming Libertarians for anything is useless, they are <2% of the electorate and no more influence our culture and government than the orbit of Neptune.
LikeLike
Time to stop hiding behind the Constitution at this point.
LikeLike
The constitution means whatever the poltical hacks on the Supreme Court say it means. I’m tired of reading these conservatard/cuckservative puff pieces extolling constitutional principles or free market gobbleddygook.
If socialism and big government were pro-white, no rational white person would be opposed to them if these got us out of our current malaise.
LikeLike
My recent post, titled “Freedom,” shows how even outright Communism can be better that our present hihgjakced form of constitutional republicanism.
LikeLike
My recent post “Fredom” shows how even Coummism can be better that our hihgjakced form of cosnitutoinal reupilcainsm.
LikeLike
THAT’S what it took to get thru mod.
LikeLike
LOL’ed @ Mod.
LikeLike
PA: We’re supposed to have freedom of expression (and by extension, the right to hold political beliefs no matter how unpopular), but you have sycophants who say it’s OK for companies to fire employees for any un-PC statements they will say on their own time. Didn’t Firefox (Mozilla Foundation) get rid of it’s President because he had the temerity to have donated (privately, not representing Mozilla in this case at all) to political causes that opposed gay marriage? The sycophants say that this is perfectly fine because this is the free market (and not the government) deciding who they will do business with.
To me, it doesn’t make a difference whether the hand of PC tyranny comes from the government or the private sector. We’re supposed to accept seeing people being blackballed from gainful employment and from polite society for holding beliefs that were pretty mainstream only 20 years ago.
Leftists only believe in freedom of expression when it comes to benefit their side. They become pro-tyranny and in favor of silencing anybody they dislike once they gain the control of the institutions–whether they be government or private enterprises.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Holy shit PA. Lolz @ mod indeed
LikeLike
I think a monarchy and the nation state are the best option for a people to govern themselves.
The monarch as head of state, while being fully in control of the armed forces, police, and courts, and not bound to any faction within the nation, acts as the ultimate overseer of the people’s well-being, for the benefit of the whole nation.
LikeLike
Except that they got a monarch-ette in the UK, who stood by idly, while Tony Blair & his Eskimo Puppet Masters were flooding the UK with muds. Not even a peep outta the worthless traitorous wh0re of a b!tch.
LikeLike
Elizabeth II -> n00se -> lamp post
LikeLike
The British Monarchy was defanged a long-time ago, so you can’t really blame the current monarch for not doing much to save the nation. This is why I said, have FULL control of the military, police, and courts, which are the true instruments of state power. As such, and if need be, a monarch can then put a stop to any faction/movement that is working to undermine the nation from within.
Democracy is good for electing people to ADMINISTER the workings of the nation. But to oversee the well-being of nation, it’s better to have a Monarch, that is wedded to nobody other than to the land and the people of his/her realm.
LikeLike
Libertarians…. I remember being 15 too. But my retard phase only lasted a few weeks and then I returned room the arms of racially aware politics.
Trump ’16. Because sometimes Libertarians grow up.
LikeLike
[…] post is a comment that grew too big to post in the comment thread of “Freelance Comment Of The Week: Priorities, White People!” by Chateau Heartiste dated 25 February 2016. Specifically, this is a response to the comments […]
LikeLike
Freedom of Association is a libertarian right that can be used to tariff, to discriminate on all levels of public and private life, to close borders and reestablish Western White European Patriarchy.
Freedom of association is recognised by the Human Rights declaration and specifically sais it can’t be mandatory. Although also sais discrimination is forbidden. A little contradictory. For when compulsory rape??
After sexual intercourse it’s a form of association.
Left Faggots Rapee!!
LikeLike
What Donald Trump done for Romania: NOTHING.
And as Romanian, I am grateful for that.
Between Hoover, FDR, and Bush I, enough was done to Romania by sundry POTUSes.
LikeLike
I’m _guessing_ this crowd is mostly Trump fans? Some Cruz fans?
Personally, I’m on the fence. First, I was for Cruz, after the GOA (of which I’m a life member) endorsed him. Then, I was a die-hard Trump guy, but today I got this in my email box from the GOA:
https://www.gunowners.org/alertcruz02252016.htm
Now, I’m starting to lean back towards Cruz.
LikeLike
That the Israeli Gun Owners?
LikeLike
Gorilla Freaks for TRUMP!
LikeLike
LikeLike
No candidate is perfect, not even the Donald.
LikeLike
Doubling down on the cuckservatsm. It won’t work. Today had a Clinton supporter tell me to my face that he would rather have Rubio win if Hillary can’t beat Trump. Just looked off in the distance and told him No Shit. Then walked off.
LikeLike
That is some weak shit though Some Guy…
Two circa 2000 quotes are enough to dissuade the GOA?
“It’s often argued that the American murder rate is high because guns are more available here than in other countries. Democrats want to confiscate all guns, which is a dumb idea because only the law-abiding citizens would turn in their guns and the bad guys would be the only ones left armed. The Republicans walk the NRA line and refuse even limited restrictions.
Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.102 , Jul 2, 2000″
I mean this here isn’t even stating any real opinion… It’s an observation.
” generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. With today’s Internet technology we should be able to tell within 72-hours if a potential gun owner has a record.
Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.102 , Jul 2, 2000″
And then this a little further on…
Check out his position TODAY
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/second-amendment-rights
LikeLike
I watched some of the highlights from last night’s GOP “debate” and, while there’s not much more to add to what’s already been said . . . I wanted to punch that stupid fucking smile off of Rubio’s face. That smarmy little faggot ain’t going anywhere near the White House in 2016.
Trump’s only remaining challenger is Cruz, although Trump has him on the ropes at this point.
Ben Carson: “Can someone attack me please?” lolzldlzolzozlzozlzlzlzoxlxlxlz
I was hoping Trump would toss a gratuitous insult at Carson just for fun at that point.
LikeLike
I actually like Ben Carson – kinda like how I kinda like that actress who plays Michone, even though I thoroughly disapprove of the miscegenation between her & Rick. When Carson said that last night, I LOL’ed. Trump-Carson would be weird ticket [talk about a study in contrasts], but Carson does claim that he almost murd3red another boy while growing up on the streets of Detroit, so hopefully he’s nursing some masculinity beneath the facade of gentleness.
LikeLike
Yeah . . . I just wouldn’t trust a black VP for the reason Chris Rock pointed out years ago: you just know some black guy is going to shoot the president. And then the killer will be thrown in jail — with a bunch of black guys — and live like a hero.
LikeLike
http://www.dailystormer.com/ben-carsons-pyramid-egypt-african-power-delusions/
LikeLike
Don’t bother listening to mud. Its yada yada yada every day. Like those unseen grownups on Peanuts cartoons, they are not even relevant. Never were and never will be. This is our world not theirs. We made the World and they can’t even understand it. They want our stuff, but it comes from us. The Chinese just screw it together, we made it. Ever see that book “The Passing of the Great Race”? Stupid screwballs in ruins of shitty cities using road signs for spears. That says it all right there. The Aryans built India, and when they left time stood still. The Aryan artifacts are just ruins now. The Indiots had a small taste of Civilization again with the British Empire, but Ghandi ruined it and now they bathe in the river again. Its Holy, wholly disgusting. That’s the World without you White Man.
LikeLike
All you have to do is ask yourself what a libertarian living in South Africa today would think about his precious ideology.
LikeLike
Chris Christie just endorsed Trump.
LikeLike
I want to p&d Katrina Pierson.
LikeLike
LOL’ed. It took me a split second to realize what “p&d” meant.
LikeLike
Is she a high yeller?
LikeLike
Meh.
Shocked… shocked to learn!
LikeLike
Looks like she herself is a single mother as well.
/The Beat Goes On rape!
LikeLike
Look at the size of the Cruz homecoming crowd, where the TX Guv endorsed him, IN TX!
Small crowds… Cruz can lose TX….
LikeLike
He he – Rev Jeffress just endorsed TRUMP
LikeLike
TRUMP continues to amaze…. just came out with a goal of “the strongest Christian Lobby” and do away with risk of losing tax status…
“we are going to say Merry Christmas again in this country”
LikeLike
That’s a corner of a warehouse when Trump’s filling up arenas and stadiums.
Shit, they’re so overpacked, they gotta send people back, and even then, those fans are still sticking around outside.
This IS a movement. Rock on!
LikeLike
I watched TX Gov. Abbott chuckling at the debate behind Wolf Blitzer all night.
Id rather have Abbott run for POTUS before Cruz
LikeLike
Greg Abbot and Ted Cruz are good men. Cruz’s supporters are good people.
But they don’t understand democracy. A candidate is more that the sum of his policies.
LikeLike
With these latest endorsements coming in, if Trump does indeed dominate Super Tuesday, I believe we will see a good ol’ fashioned Juggernaut of the mythical variety.
Folks will be saying a lot more than “Merry Christmas” again. 😉
LikeLike
Trump calling Rubio a choke artist… I think he’s subliminally referring to the photos of Rubio at various homo locations in the past. And Trump was quoted today as saying Rubio should go easy on the makeup… Eerily similar to the stuff brought up here on CH. If Trump is not reading this blog then the serendipity is wild.
LikeLike
Scot Adams covered this exact topic on his blog today.
LikeLike
You know what Rubio is choking on…
LikeLike
And last night Trump said at least twice that Rubio looked like he’d “just climbed out of a swimming pool”.
Was CH the first to call Rubio the Pool Boy?
LikeLike
Redemption for Baron Harkonnen. I instantly like him.
LikeLike
Droll, but Christie strikes me more as a Falstaff.
LikeLike
Wayne Madsen: Marco Rubio Gay Homosexual Duplicity Update — with Photos
http://www.phibetaiota.net/2016/01/wayne-madsen-marco-rubio-homosexual-update-with-photos/#more-116745
LikeLike
Couldn’t agree more. I cringe every time I see white people in political debates hiding their ethnic interests behind ideologies like libertarianism.
Just grow a pair and forthrightly state your interests like everybody else.
Here’s what I’ve seen, in several places. Race discourse in this country basically consists of white people hiding their ethnic interests behind coded language. Then the liberal they’re talking to accuses them of racism. Then they get into this song and dance back-and-forth about whether or not they’re racist – every time, the white person is the quarry and the liberal is the hunter.
STOP BEING THE FUCKING QUARRY.
What I’ve found, when I talk to people about my views, and they throw their scary little labels at me, is that if I shrug it off with indifferent ambiguity, i.e. “Yeah, maybe what I said was racist. I don’t know and I don’t care. That word doesn’t mean anything to me.” When I say that, it forces them to come back with an actual argument, which they’re almost wholly incapable of doing. They’re so used to throwing around scary labels that their ability to form coherent arguments has totally atrophied. Try it and see.
LikeLike
Tingler, here’s an actual argument that your would-be debating buddies *should* make:
The United States has been a long experiment in WAVES of immigration. We’re the only nation in the world NOT founded upon blood, but upon a common IDEA. In fact, we stopped being a purely northern European colony about 400 years ago when the first Africans began to arrived. More significantly, that original stock got realllly diluted about 150 years ago when the Catholics, Jews, Russians, Italians, Greeks, etc began arriving.
To pretend that we can recapture that northern European stock in the U.S. is preposterous. The country has already absorbed generations of these other non-Protestant, non-northern European cultures. Anybody who advocates a northern European white ethnostate in the U.S. is totally detached from reality, living in a dream bubble, and would probably be better off just emigrating to northern Europe.
Respondez s’il vous plait.
LikeLike
That’s such BS. What the US needs to do is stop all immigration for the next 100 years years to allow full integration of all these different people into a unified whole, which is something only the Eskimos dread with a passion.
LikeLike
” We’re the only nation in the world NOT founded upon blood, but upon a common IDEA. ”
What BS !! The United States was founded upon a freaking revolution, you idiot. What do you think the second amendment is about ?
LikeLike
There already is migration to Northern Europe. May there be more, Inshallah. I like Koln…And like I said, you’re an idiot. Entertaining, but still an idiot.
LikeLike
One quibble with ET: no integration, unless you want your granddaughter myarring Somali immigrants’ grandsons. Evictions of undesirable post-65 immigrants and their descendants (via carrot and/or stick) and resegregation. We’re going into purification mode.
LikeLike
Strapon, you keep repeating the same nonsense month-after-month, and this is why few bother to do anything except ridicule you.
This nation was founded by Northern and Western European stock, mightily Christian, and regardless of slaves, later immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe, blah-blah-blah, the cultural values and mores were geared towards Western Civilization, dominated by European ethos, well into the 20th century.
You keep squid-inking about “northern European” but all Whites have a commonality with their kindred from the entirety of Europe, from Iceland to the Urals, from Finland to Italy.
Just because the Russians excel at literature, the Germans at music, the Italians at art, etc., etc., etc., and the languages differ, there’s a commonality of high cultural appreciation and achievement across the board, and that’s why America was so successful when all of these “diverse” types of people came over and were able to assimilate.
The difference races and mixed ethnic groups of recent vintage are not those kind of people, and ‘Murrica is starting to show the threadbareness of her seams.
So stop acting like people don’t matter, and it’s all just a matter of who had a few bucks in their pockets.
You fucking dim-witted, disingenuous, pismire of a shill. 😡
LikeLike
The answer to that is quite simple. Nobody ever said this was a purely white country. Up until 1965, whites made up a mere 92% of the population. Then Ted Kennedy and his Jew-boy lawyer Norbert Schlei drew up the Immigration Act that would dilute and undermine white political power while lying to us that American demographics wouldn’t change one bit.
America was far better off when K-selecting whites predominated. We were the goose that laid the golden eggs, and y’all faggots are crowing about replacing us with r-selecting peasants that are only good for one generation’s worth of cheap labor before all the social pathologies set in.
RSVP
LikeLike
@ Vincent
You’re correct.
@ Greg Elliot
That’s the tragedy of the American immigration experiment gone wrong. The US was doing just fine when it’s focus was on merging the different European nationalities into a common American nationality. It’s when it shifted to adding the primitives to the mix that everything started going bad.
LikeLike
And that includes our own home-grown primitives… indeed, both races were better off, spiritually and psychologically, when segregation was the law of the land.
LikeLike
Too many genies out of the bottle… this is why I say, Trump or no Trump, ‘Murrica is finished… she’s just walkin’ around now to save on funeral expenses.
Hopefully a White homeland or two will arise from the near-future Balkanized break-up.
LikeLike
@Smegma
but all Whites have a commonality with their kindred from the entirety of Europe, from Iceland to the Urals, from Finland to Italy.
How enlightened. That position was definitely not the opinion of U.S. nativists from 1870 to 1924. As a white nativist yourself, it’s funny how you forget that part of your movement’s history.
Italian newcomers, so derided even as late as the 1970s, are now seen through the haze of your memory as all part of one big happy European family. lollzlzlololzlzl Who are you kidding? The white nationalists of yore hated them as much as they hated Negroes. Read the transcripts of what the judge said during the Sacco and Vanzetti trial. Plus Italians were keen on organizing labor movements, which WASP owners of capital despised.
Remember too that the Immigration Act limited southern European immigration — but it left the doors open to northern European immigration.
Stop lying just to oppose me.
LikeLike
Once again, Strapon plays that old out of tune fiddle.
We’ve been through this already… this isn’t a question of whether Italians or Irish or Poles were welcomed with open arms by Wasps.
This is an issue of, at heart, European peoples have a common ground that allow them to achieve proper assimilation with each other, even when some are brown-eyes with black hair and others are blue-eyed with blond hair.
Note that White folks are indeed the most diverse, with hair color and texture, and eye color ranging the entire gamut of human possibilities, but I digress.
The point is/was/remains, Germans, English, Irish, Italians, etc.,etc.etc. can all assimilate quite readily into an “American” nation which upheld the basic precepts of Christian Western Civilization that was created and enjoyed in the unique and various cultures of each of the European fatherlands of those people.
It was not a place where the Oriental, Arab, Negro, or other mixtures thereof, with their various and quite disparate cultures and religions, held equal sway with White Christianity.
And America’s decline did not begin to show obvious signs until she started drifting away from the basic Northern/Western European founding stock, coupled with the latter-assimilated people of Southern and Eastern Europe, into today’s miasma of antiWhite mischling multitudes and their strange gods.
Stop regurgitating the same old claptrap every few months, you disingenuous ass.
LikeLike
Strapon is right, sadly. De facto white nation does not equal de jure white nation. Especially not with global dependencies on every side which all but guaranteed in writing that the liberated massenmensch would find his way hither to suck on the teat.
Sic semper imperium.
The difference is that we rue the line not having been drawn more effectively — while the Strapons of our race affect to celebrate it. At bottom, they’re in it for the petty, condescending thrill of jeering at Badwhites. Like Italians and Pollacks used to be.
So who cares? Let’s all kill ourselves.
LikeLike
Actually, no… and your nihilistic nonsense puts you under the suspicion that you’ve been called out for on other threads.
LikeLike
This is why TRUMP will win… nearly every other tweet by RU-BO and Rafael Cruz is a plea for money from the little guy… makes you wonder how hard they are begging for the big dollar PAC funds…
LikeLike
That’s just eye wash and rakin’ a little gravy… they’re already in the deep pockets of the PACs… signed, sealed, n’ delivered… paid for in advance.
LikeLike
Cruz betraying his skoolin’ – 20% off sale!
LikeLike
He can afford to knock 20% off… his handlers got the merchandise for him wholesale! lzozlzozlzozlzolzolzolzol
On a side note, who the f#ck would actually pay for that stuff? (((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
Weaponized psychiatry indeed…planned and researched over 10 years ago… http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15743985
LikeLike
Discourage White group identity, turn up the heat on minority racism as morally justified.
This ain’t rocket science… it’s just that Whites have been too fat n’ happy…
… notice that most are still fat n’ happy, compared to the rest of the world… but many sense reality and a comedown is right around the corner, so Whitey starts to wake up a bit the minute even a little hope of a champion shows up on the horizon.
Anyone who thinks Trump is Hitler, wait’ll times get REALLY hard on White folks… they’ll rally behind Darth Vader.
LikeLike
Jesus Christ. No wonder they’ve been pushing this so hard for the last ten years, they’re fully aware that the white privilege meme is designed to manipulate whites into giving up their power.
But you know, the trick only works if you feel guilty about being white in the first place. I don’t feel guilty about it and so I don’t have any problem with the fact that I have advantages, just like blacks and Latinos feel no compunction about whatever advantages they have. My ancestors didn’t conquer this country so that other groups would have privileges at my expense.
We have to find a way to break white guilt down and expose it for the power play that it is.
LikeLike
“We have to find a way to break white guilt down and expose it for the power play that it is.”
Just say that. I have; they dunno what to say. We’re not dealing with deep people, here. Give the thing a little depth and their eyes will go blank.
Then you realize, again, that it doesn’t even matter what you say. Their program can be interrupted, but not stopped.
LikeLike
If stated with a sarcastic look on your face, this would shut them down:
“Well of course we have privileges. My ancestors conquered the continent and founded this country, so of course they handed down privileges to their posterity. They’d be shitty ancestors not to, don’t you think?”
LikeLike
Alas I am but a lowly Welsho-Italian mutt, and may claim no such patrimony or privilege.
LikeLike
No worries, bro, we can grandfather you in. I’ll bring it up at the next meeting.
LikeLike
Dude! Last time I put you up for Honorary White Man status, you dropped the ball with some antiChristian snark and nihilistic folderol.
We’ll give it another try at next quarter’s confab… try not to muck it up again.
lzlzolzozlozlozlozlol
LikeLike
“The difference races and mixed ethnic groups of recent vintage are not those kind of people, and ‘Murrica is starting to show the threadbareness of her seams.”
.
LikeLike
On that whole Israel thing, I think Trump should just reply, after hearing yet another pol do the inevitable kowtow spiel:
“You support Israel 100%? Good… that means you’ll support the wall I build too, right?”
LikeLike
Yeah I thought he was gonna bring that up in the debate, as he has done a number of times on Twitter. It’s such a deadly meme, and it really resonates with the less neocon/evangelitard part of his base.
LikeLike
I think a lot of evangelicals are going to be hitting that Trump lever behind closed curtains…
… and then do whatever the Protestant equivalent of a mea culpa might entail. lzozlzozlozlozlozlozlozlozl
LikeLike
> “the Protestant equivalent of a mea culpa”
LikeLike
LikeLike
Cap’n O, that looks like penitence a man o’ faith can get behind and truly show a contrite heart. 😉
LikeLike
Hey GBFM — get that into Trump’s ammo bag. I know you’re on his campaign team.
LikeLike
The world seems so impossibly f****d up, sometimes the best thing is simply to relax, switch on the TV, and unwind, without having to think about race propaganda or politics.
You know… just escape it all, for a few blissful seconds.
LikeLike
And if you’ve had a really exhausting week, and can’t even be bothered to cook, that’s cool too.
Just order a takeaway. Perfect! Like I said, you can unwind now.
No need to think about politics… propaganda…outright brazen cuckoldry. Sit back and enjoy.
^^ This is Britain in 2016.
Every. Single. Day.
LikeLike
“muh Mughal” (mutters indistinctly, sucks air through teeth)
LikeLike
I see what you did there.
Then again, we already KNOW the UK is gone, so a bit of drollery is lost as well.
LikeLike
> “switch on the TV, and unwind, without having to think about race propaganda or politics” ——— That’s what I wanted outta TWD, but now they got Rick miscegenating with Michone.
LikeLike
I get what little TV I watch streaming, usually from the UK. Santander Bank has run an endless series of these commercials, black husband/father/coach, white wife, little white kids on the footie team. Pisses me off to no end.
LikeLike
They’re pushing the miscegenation on grade school girls now.
LikeLike
If you think that’s bad, the creator and writer for Bella and the Bulldogs got his start by writing and directing interracial cuckolding porn. And he’s subtly putting those themes into that show as well. Not to mention the previous show he did for Nickelodeon, something about a family white females living with a family of black male ghosts.
America in 2016 has lost its mind.
LikeLike
Libertarianism is just a a gateway philosophy for Trumpism!! Yes Atlas Shrugged made sense in a theoretical sense, but Blood and Soil is the real deal. It “Trumps” them all. And when I cast that vote for His-Most-Trump, I’ve never felt more proud, more, alive. I finally did something positive for my volk, and I plan on doing more (with the Trump Alpha swagger, of course.)
LikeLike
Spot the BS:
LikeLike
Johnny (great name, btw), here is some more bullsh*t:
They could not have a black woman or Asian woman reaching over for a handsome White man. Nooooooo…..same old formula.
LikeLike
It’s the cute HB8 lifting the upstanding vibrant gentleman’s wallet that clinched it.
100% White on black crime rate!
(I wanted to end that sentence with…”rape!” but that would have been derivative.
LikeLike
Yes, JS, that commercial that you attached (above) was like watching a ‘negative’ (in the photographic sense) of reality.
LikeLike
CAIR vows to save US from “the Trumps, the Cruzs, the Pamela Gellers, the Robert Spencers” ||| Jacob Bender… :”What CAIR can do… is to oppose the anti-Muslim ideology of the Trumps, the Cruzs, the Pamela Gellers, the Robert Spencers…” http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3402389/posts
LikeLike
Jacob Bender Is First Jew To Lead Chapter of Muslim Advocacy Group CAIR http://forward.com/news/185718/jacob-bender-is-first-jew-to-lead-chapter-of-musli/
LikeLike
LikeLike
{MOSSAD} x {HOUSE OF SAUD}
LikeLike
This is a pure unadulterated R@ce W@r which {SEM!TIC ASHKENAZIM} X {SEM!TIC SUNNI} are unleashing upon {WHITE OCCIDENTALS} X {PERSIAN-SASSANID SHIA}. The Shia seem to be well aware of it, but we White Occidentals are suic!dally ignorant about what’s being done to us.
LikeLike
Jesus, look at the face on him, and soulless eyes on her. What a pair. Does that baby have a tail?
LikeLike
The UNZ commenter is trying to smear Libertarianism into it’s opposite, a coward’s trick.
LikeLike
I;m a firm believer in “the enemy of my enemy, is my friend” so the more the liberal media and establishment types attack Trump, the more I and for him. The reason is simple – I’m tired of politically correct bull-shit, and watching the liberals destroy this once-great-nation so if Trump can post-pone it a few years – wonderful. Either way I will be outta here – this isn’t the country my forefathers died to protect, and to challenge them would be to accomplish their goals of death and destruction. I’ll just deny them my money, ability, drive, and ambition – that is what I advise all men to do.
Right now I have a lot of businesses that on pager belong to fill-in-the-blank minority or other favored group – but the money flows to me. Simple to do it – like the banks, I set them up and use their “favored nation” status to provide shit for an exorbitant price – no more does capitalism rein – so I’ll play their game till their system collapses around their ears. If Trump can destroy their hold – great, but unless you rip down the liberal indoctrination system and teach capitlism and the truth – it only prolongs the inevitable.
LikeLike
So a cuckservative who bows down to government and politicians called libertarians cowards? Oh gee I am sad now.
LikeLike
This is why libertarian philosopher Stefan Molyneux is arguing in favor of Trump, which some of his more “purist” binary followers can’t seem to understand. You can still hold anarchist principles and abide by them in your own life, yet understand they only work outside of abstraction within the confines of a free society (Consisting of those with sufficient IQ to function within it). In other words, a whole bunch of libertarian white men cannot even hope to live under libertarianism (as much as they may desire to do so) when a whole lot of anti-white authoritarians (who are desperately clambering for the gun of the state) are in their midst. Two possibilities are foreseen. 1) The world as a whole moves towards a free society, with more than just white men striving for the libertarian principles of a free (anarchist) society. 2) White men (especially Europeans right now) wake up to the fact that their enemies have been taking advantage of their philosophy for decades….and the bloodbath ensues. If I could make any prediction….#2 will be a precursor to #1.
LikeLike