What is the ideal man? Twatter Agree&Amplify writes,
The ideal man combines the culture of the (sane) liberal, and the fight/masculinity of the conservative-type.
The liberal environment — or, rather, the environment created by conservative scientist and engineer Whites that attracts a lot of White liberals who then build upon the civilized foundation — has a lot of good things going for it. If only xenophilic, virtue signaling libfags would learn that fewer Whites = fewer good things. Guys with gun racks and ATVs may scoff at bike lanes, but biking around a gleaming city unspoiled by crime and grime is a pleasure in its own right, (although perhaps not on the level of watching a sunset dip below a m0untain ridge).
Twatter a.p.hill, channeling Anonymous Conservative and the r/K theory of human organization, adds,
Libs have smaller amygdalae. Learn too late enrichment is a poison pill. Warrior kept poet in line. Feminism killed warrior.
Conservatives need liberals for their creativity and (usually) aesthetic lifestyle sensibilities. Liberals need conservatives for their guardianship and wisdom. Too few liberals, and conservative society can become static and self-satisfied. Too few conservatives, and liberal society can become self-destructive.
In this view, conservatives are the more crucial linchpin to civilization. Without liberals, we might have worse movies and fewer charming coffee shops. But without conservatives, we might have no civilization at all, having handed over the keys to the White kingdom to babbling barbarians.
So there is something to this formulation that amygdalae-deficient shitlibs, poets till the consummating end, need (if not consciously want) the pimp hand of warriors with full hearts and clear eyes to stop shitlibs from blowing up the nation and taking everyone down with them.
In normal historical cycles, the warrior would ascend in times of decadence and social disconnection to bring balance to the force. But these are not normal times. Feminism, the ideological spawn of Satan and his thousand reptilian succubi, thwarts the natural ascendancy of the warrior class, allowing the shitlib devolution to continue unhindered and unchecked. Feminists must therefore be defeated in order to pave the way for the rising warrior class to defeat the platitude-drowning shitlibs. The Chateau has not been sadistically discrediting feminists for this long without good reason.
The ((( Rebbe ))) sums it up:
[White liberal utopias] cannot exist long term. Complacency > Degeneracy > Self-Destruction.
Americans may be fated to abide this dismal decivilizing loop., no matter how many Trumpenings crest the battlefield. If I’m right, then so is my prescription: Poolside, watching the conflagration complete its appointed mission. If I’m wrong, and I hope I am, then Trump is just the first trumpet blast of many more White heralds to come.

White utopia, to whatever level is possible, can exist for a long time. The moment we start giving in to our pathological altruism is the moment we start to fall apart. There must be research out there that proves this.
LikeLike
No, altruism becomes pathological when it is extended to aliens who will not reciprocate or when the political and cultural elites hate the everyman; altruism is a necessary precondition to whitopias. Whitopias are necessarily nearly homogeneous – once they become a diverse Babel with even an disproportionately small proportion of vibrants, you get the Mizzou campus. When they’re majority-minority, you get Ferguson or Los Angeles.
LikeLike
Yeah, the solution to the problem is called balance.
And it´s the hardest mofo to get right.
In personal life and downright impossible in a “democratic” environment.
At least that´s what it seems like to me.
LikeLike
Sure — it’s called confirmation bias.
LikeLike
Step one: End mixed sex state education.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Step one: End state education.
Fixed it for you.
LikeLike
The amygdala-functioning created the Renaissance.
The amygdala-deficient created Dadaism.
Real art is conservative.
LikeLike
I had wondered about this part of the post. My other thought is, is it that current artists are more prone to liberalism, or more vulnerable to rhetorical argument?
LikeLike
The problem is that most “current artists” are not artists at all. There is no real skill, no real heart or emotion other than vitriol and anger. The PTOB make sure that they are provided government funds, get glowing reviews in the MSM, and appointments at the already collapsing institutions of higher education. They represent all that is vile and ugly in mankind – you will never see them create a Sistine Chapel or Mona Lisa. You could easily trash half of the exhibits in modern museums and not lose a bit of positive inspiration. The same is true in the physical and musical works of the modern era – not all of it perhaps, but all that the government supports.
LikeLike
And yet Evola, among the most prolific and admired advocates of conservative traditionalism, started out as a dadaist painter.
The poet may need the warrior and the liberal may need the conservative to temper his suicidal instincts, but what the world needs most of all is warrior poets: renaissance men whose aesthetic creations are informed by an understanding of the critical dimension power plays in all things.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You guys need to watch this video about a Latvian guy, building a wooden house, it’s really beautiful.
LikeLike
ATTN CYNTHIA: BEHOLD THE BEAUTIFUL RED-HEADED BABEEZ YOU OUGHT TO BE MAKING

LikeLike
THIS IS WHY YOU DON’T SIT IT OUT POOLSIDE:

LikeLike
LikeLike
Well the guy I’m seeing is of blond German stock, so I’m thinking that genetic combo ought to yield some new little gingers someday.
You got kids yet?
LikeLiked by 1 person
awesome
LikeLike
Livin’ the dream that guy
LikeLike
that’s beautiful. the very opposite of nihilism, as Cap pointed out. thank you ET. a good reminder of the real reason why we’re here
LikeLike
[…] By CH […]
LikeLike
[…] The Poet Needs The Warrior […]
LikeLike
Pleasureman at MPC nailed the chasm, I think – it’s the entire dearth of middlebrow art and media in culture. Everything is either esoteric nonsense in love with itself and its opacity to the everyman (so much so that a cleaning lady misplacing her supplies in a gallery can fool the cognoscenti into believing it is intended as art) or men getting hit in the balls. The art establishment and academy having decided that their position is to be subverters/mockers of the existing and traditional culture and its adherents, the latter are rightly suspicious of any art that is not single-dimensional paintings of Thomas Kinkaid cottages or eight point bucks in the meadow. The artists and writers are now no longer either of the mainstream culture nor true outsiders, have rejected the importance of the great and eternal themes of art (e.g., God and man, religious events, epics/sagas, etc.) and therefore their art is narrowcast to exclude the mainstream while its subject is forgettable ephemera and miscellany. Art is reduced to a bad inside joke.
The migration back to cities (as opposed to “artists’ colonies”) allows the mirage of culture – that is to say that the avant garde pose and its accompanying leftist politics feel most at home now in places dominated by the architecture given names like “colonial” or “empire” and inspired by the energy of trade and conquest.
If you choose a European capital – particularly one which mediocre college students will pay exorbitant fees to claim they’ve “studied abroad” in and return to recant annoying slogans about European “quality of life” – you’ll find that the most beloved public spaces, buildings, architectural styles, etc. were constructed with the surplus of great worldwide empires produced by colonizing the third world and exploiting its human and material resources. It’s one of those weird things they don’t notice or perhaps of which they are entirely ignorant. The warrior, the colonial governor, the commodities trader is who made these places so beautiful and pleasant, and yet those who have found themselves in the bleached bones of those great empires think that they’ve created it by sitting at a cafe table and avoiding work.
LikeLike
@ Alec Leamas
For me, the central observation to be made about modernist art and literature is that it is parasitic on the emotions of the culture that it is supposedly intended to critique. After all, modernism drips with irony. Everything it does is “ironic”. Yet that ironic viewpoint could not exist without the existence of a culture of traditional, healthy sentimentality.
In a bourgeois Shakespearian comedy, for example, all is well as end’s well. And in a bourgeois war movie, a man may be alone, and he may be afraid, and ultimately he may even be defeated, but that doesn’t have to stop him being a hero.
Modernists despise such sentimentalism as representing a rosy and inauthentic picture of society and make their political living by mocking traditional healthy views and attitudes.
But what will the modernists have to say when they have achieved their goal of destroying every trace of bourgeois optimism and sentimentality?
What will they do next, these unimaginative and socially parasitic hebes?
I am hoping they turn on each other. Wouldn’t that be ironic?
LikeLike
Aw, hell… are you fucking retarded?
The Renaissance started and flourished WELL BEFORE the Age of Exploration and conquest.
And our heritage from ancient Greece didn’t arise from Alexander screwing around in India.
This whole “White achievement only occurs by exploiting the darkies” meme is tiresome at best, putrid agitprop at worst.
LikeLike
Somebody please explain the ((( word ))) thing to me.
LikeLike
Certain names echo down through history every fuckin time and it’s no cohencidence.
LikeLike
CH, the ‘Like’ stars are ghey.
LikeLike
There is a star for ; ” I like this comment” and there should be a ghey icon for; ” I dislike this comment”
That would be politically incorrect but political correctness is ghey anyway.
Make manliness great again!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I mean the whole fucking idea of ‘likes’ here is ghey.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The ghey icon should just be a small pic of pajamaboy.
LikeLike
Like is kind of feminine. Agree and Disagree would be more apropos, but are unlikely to be included in the standard kit for WordPress. It does fall in the realm of social media after all.
LikeLike
vince McMahon silly walk
pajama boy
star of david
I give your pajama boy comment a VMSW
LikeLike
If you like something enough you will be motivated to make a comment to put the weight of your handle behind the comment, even if it is only “Agreed” or “Hear, hear”.
If certain commenters thow their support behind a comment, others may read it, even if it appears tl;dr. GBFM, for example.
Anyone who isn’t motivated to make that effort, or doesn’t care to link his handle to a viewpoint, well, why bother? What’s the point?
And “likes” are female and five pointed stars are satanic.
LikeLike
One could make the case that the best artists are those with relatively open/liberal personalities, but who live in conservative societies. Liberal artists in liberal societies waste themselves on novelty and cheap effects.
The greatest art celebrates (though not uncritically) God, king and country.
LikeLike
A little liberalism can work in an all White society provided there’s consensus that White interests are sacrosanct. In essence, every cultural and political consideration must be filtered through a simple question:
Is it good for White people?
LikeLike
Good summation. A current example would be the artist Moby. Complete and utter shitlib manlet, but incredibly talented.
LikeLike
Rage Against the Machine.
LikeLike
Speaking of talented liberal artists, ( and my apologies for the long comment )
yesterday in an interview on French Canadian tv Roger Waters of Pink Floyd ranted about how it was scandalous that anyone can copy anyone’s music, that the people who wrote that music are being robbed by millions of people who take their music as if they were entitled to it.
he also blamed ” Silicon Valley” who are – he says – responsible for this. he called the people of Silicon valley *ss h*les.
yes he called them *ss h*les for making it easy to steal music.
He was that angry. And I can understand; who likes to have what is yours stolen from you?
then a couple minutes later he started a rant against Donald Trump, he was almost foaming at the mouth so much he hates Trump and his wanting to stop illegals with a wall.
and then it hit me.
it . hit. me.
Millions of people taking without permission someone else music because the people in charge make them feel entitled to it,
is the EXACT same thing as
Millions of people ( illegal Mexicans ) taking without permission someone else land because the people in charge make them feel they are entitled to it.
They are EXACTLY the same thing.
Music writers/owners are right to be very angry and to want to put a system in place ( an internet wall? ) to keep people from taking their property.
and Americans are right to be very angry and to want to put a system in place ( even a wall ) to keep people from taking their property.
Music writers/owners are right that they should take back control of their property.
Americans are right that they should be able to take back control of their land and borders.
those two things are EXACTLY the same thing.
Yet liberals such as Roger Waters are totally TOTALLY blind to it. Waters had no clue he was talking about two IDENTICAL problems.
He is fine with millions of people stealing the land ( and the hard earned dollars, those illegals cost billions of $$$ ) of Americans…
…but he is up in arms that millions of people are stealing music.
in his little liberal brain, Robbing Americans of their land is fine but robbing music is the most heinous crime.
He can not see they are the exact same thing.
Both are illegal and immoral, both are a grave injustice towards the owners of the property.
Both should and must be stopped.
but he can not see they are the same thing.
If the main stream media hated and bashed Roger Waters for wanting to stop people from taking without permission music that is not theirs as they hate and bash Donald Trump, maybe Waters’ little liberal brain would start to see the light.
Liberals no matter how intelligent or educated or successful or if they are zillionaires like Roger Waters have some strange mental defect that distorts reality.
they simply can not see the elephant in the room even if it farted in their face.
In the last few decades we have moved further and further to the left, the establishment now is the left, they control everything,
is it any wonder the world is such a mess?
I know a song and a nation are not equal things, that is not my point, the illegal and immoral taking without permission is what I say is identical.
Am I the only who can see that illegals taking what is not theirs is as wrong, as unfair, as immoral and illegal as people taking music that is not theirs?
Am I the only who can see that Waters trying to protect and defend music artists from having what is theirs stolen by millions of people is the exact same thing as Trump trying to protect and defend Americans from having their land stolen by millions of Mexicans?
Am I the only one who can see the obvious and gigantic similarity between what Waters and Trump are up in arms about?
LikeLike
Ah no, you´re completely wrong and fell for the shitlib&eskimo tale of music actually having economic worth.
Music is first and foremost “entertainment”!
It is also a major vehicle for propaganda and brainwashing.
And as Eskimo´s always try making money out of EVERYTHING, they made the means of enslavement extract actual economic resources(money) out of the Goyim.
The only real goal of a Musician should be getting actually known, so that people specifically search out HIS unique compositions.
The MORE his songs get copied, the BETTER for him. His real concern should be getting the credit for his music.
As usual this society has turned everything upside down.
LikeLike
Getting more, by force or guile, for them and theirs, is exactly what every man should be doing. The darkskins are right to be trying to take from the weak what the weak don’t deserve. It is we who are in the wrong for giving it all away.
LikeLike
is it the communist idea of ‘shared’ property? everything must be shared as long as it’s your stuff being shared, not mine
the occupy mindset is the same hypocrisy. they’re against the idea of private property as long as it’s taking someone else’s accumulated wealth, but god forbid someone break into their apartment and steal their ipad
LikeLike
What you have found, in the case of Mr. Waters and his ilk, is the truth of the maxim: “No back is so tender as one’s own.”
Like most shitlibs, it’s not the principle of any issue… it’s whether or not it’s THEIR ox getting gored.
LikeLike
No it is NOT “exactly the same thing”. Your song is “yours” as long as you keep it to yourself. Once you share it to the world, it’s only “yours” because of a government-enforced monopoly.
LikeLike
“Music is first and foremost “entertainment”!”
Maybe to you. For me, it is as necessary as food.
Listening to this song almost makes me feel…human.
LikeLike
To no one’s surprise, my slow Canadian Friend, you missed the obvious:
Roger Waters wrote “The Wall”. Trump is promising to build one.
Anger explained.
LikeLike
Bullshit! We don’t need liberalism for any reasin except to guide what NOT to do. That is, anything libtards suggest, we need to do the opposite as dramatically and dogmatically as the fervour of the libtards pitch.
LikeLike
The type of people that lean liberal are also the type that produce beauty through art, fashion, film, decoration, novels, etc.
The issue today is that even art is beginning to stagnate because they are putting a muzzle on artistic expression by demanding that all art have the phony liberal worldview. So once again the stuffy prude lefties are the eating the fun libertine ones.
A good example of this is that stand up comedy is basically being banned on college campuses with the comedians not wanting to perform there even if they are allowed because the audience gets triggered.
Liberal types definitely have a place in society. They simply need be held in check from destroying themselves by their more sensible conservative counterparts. When this happens you get Bridget Bardot and Marlon Brando not Lena Dunham and Jon Stewart.
LikeLike
Artistic temperaments generally probably tend to something akin to “openness” in the sense of being fixated upon contemplative and/or sensuous states of being which the majority find largely incomprehensible. In many aspiring or perhaps quite good artists, and in SOME artists of real greatness, this may coincide with real profligacy or voluptuousness, including (as we are familiar with the roster from 19th Century bohemianism to today) drugs, sexual kink and ‘experimentation’, gender-bending, and an ostentatious philosophy of devil-may-care defiance of society’s rules and even its very survival– at least as the pose struck by rebels from Rimbaud to the Rolling Stones.
However, at the incontrovertible heights of Art, we almost always find that, whatever the spiritual or psychological turmoil of the artist, there is an intensive sense of vocation that usually circumscribes the artist’s conduct within respectable, if not outright monastic, bounds. Yes, Pericles once chose to warn Sophocles that “A general requires clean eyes as well as clean hands”– and this was well-thought of. And yet, it presumes that Sophocles at least thought well enough to keep his hands from temptation anyway.
Most great art– indeed, entire genres (tragedy, cantata, landscape painting, the cathedral) has been defined by ideals of piety, patriotism, craftsmanship, and tradition– all the best of what we’re supposed to understand by “conservatism”.
LikeLike
Lucius Somesuch has got it.
the greatest art in our world doesn’t happen haphazardly or out of weakness in brain power. i don’t buy that we need liberal minds to have great art and beauty in our world.
what many think of as ‘art’ today does come from liberalism. but it is lazy sloppy simplistic garbage that people call art just because they know others will believe it is since they said so.
the greatest art, architecture, music, etc. has all come from people who were talented but also have the drive and passion to keep working at it until they get it exactly right. they have a mission they want to accomplish and they do what it takes to get it done. they strive for quality and perfection over personal gain. they set extremely high standards on their art because they want to. not because someone else told them to. those are all conservative traits.
LikeLike
“Liberalism” doesn’t produce art. People produce art. Most of them these days tend towards liberalism.
This is actually one of the biggest problems conservatives have. We don’t produce much art. Frankly, we stand on the sidelines and criticize the liberals who do create it (and there’s much to criticize), but the way to beat them is not by criticizing them like an old fuddy-duddy, it’s to create an alternative discourse. There are exceptions but for the most part, we don’t do that. I suppose country music counts as conservative? I don’t know, I don’t listen to it. Something tells me most country musicians muzzle their conservative views, though, because the liberals control the channels through which their product is mediated.
Yes, in the past, art was often a conservative product. That’s because the patrons were conservative – nobles, the Church, etc. That doesn’t necessarily mean the artists themselves were conservative, though like Lucius says, the vocational aspect of it does or at least did often lead to a quasi-monastic existence (for short periods, at least). I’m thinking the Renaissance here: da Vinci and Michelangelo may have led monastic lives but they weren’t exactly conservatives.
The truth is, we don’t need more people writing into blogs like this about how feminism and BLM suck. We need people who hate feminism and BLM to go out and write good music, or novels, and present their feelings in artistically compelling ways. That’s what liberals do. Start a band. Put up an ad on Craigslist for likeminded people. Start a scene. Get creating.
LikeLike
> “the type that produce beauty through art, fashion, film, decoration, novels, etc” ——— Can you give any concrete examples of this “beauty” in recent history? Cause all I see is filth and despair and nihilism. Even the very best “entertainment” – like Breaking Bad & The Walking Dead – has no beauty in it whatsoever. And the average entertainment these days is nothing but anti-intellectual flatulence & diarrhea of the mind.
LikeLike
Which, in turn, is surely a reflection [or, pace Freud, a PROJECTION] of the nightmare-ishly anti-human motivations of the Eskimo or the S0d0mite which produces the filth.
LikeLike
–in other news, I see that the former Wachowski Brothers, then siblings, are now “Sisters”– the other one has ‘transitioned’.
We’re gonna need bigger red pills . . . .
LikeLike
Right on. 70 years ago when movies weren’t retarded at least half of the Hollywood actors and directors such as John Wayne, Gary Cooper, James Stewart, Maureen O’Hara, John Ford, Cecil B DeMille and many others were conservative. Today none would find work in Hollywood if they let it be known what their politics were.
A few years ago while hosting the Oscars Steve Martin said that in Hollywood you can be either a democrat or a democrat.
Once liberals get control of anything it’s nearly impossible for a non-butt kisser conservative to get ahead even if he is more talented than all the rest combined.
Decades ago I use to know a few old artists and they were extremely talented and very conservative. Now fine art is mostly a con. A black square or a stripe is great art? Only a phony or an academic would think such a thing.
One last thing, most liberals are only liberal because everyone else is, their only moral is to run with the herd which is actually an ultra conservative thing to do.
LikeLike
I’ve often said that the best place to live would be a liberal city inside a conservative state & country.
Good coffee, new restaurants, some nightlife & arts…. All safely swaddled in an overarching sanity, order & prosperity.
Maybe that combo is what has made Austin so great for so long. If Texas ever flips, though, watch out.
To see what living in a liberal city in a liberal state looks like, take a look anywhere in California but the OC.
LikeLike
There would be a lot less beauty in our lives without the work of liberal writers, musicians, etc. Maybe a naivety about politics is characteristic of the artistic temperament. Or maybe it’s just an accident of history that these artists happen to be liberal and under different circumstances they’d have turned out conservative.
LikeLike
A modern day warrior mean, Mean stride, today’s Tom Sawyer mean, Mean pride. Any trailblazer is going to take the lone hand without the approval, understanding or support from anyone, hence warrior.
LikeLike
Yup. Liberal hobbits, conservative Rangers.
But at least hobbits had the good sense to dislike outsiders.
LikeLike
Oh the other hand, the best writers and artists had more or less conservative worldviews. Hence CH’s “Great men on…” posts.
LikeLike
> “Feminism killed warrior… Feminism, the ideological spawn of Satan and his thousand reptilian succubi, thwarts the natural ascendancy of the warrior class…” All by design. Eskimos, S0d0mites, and, as we are now learning, Cuckservatives, are mortally afraid of MASCULINE White men. Ergo the all-out war to destroy masculinity in White boys, and, of course, to obliterate any man [like The Donald] who would deign to re-ignite the spark of masculinity in White boys.

LikeLike
On a related note, we’re also learning, much to our shock & chagrin, that the DEMs were the party of masculine men [or at least satyrs who couldn’t keep their d!cks in their pants] whereas the GOP has secretly become the party of friggin S0D0MITES and child-m0lesters [Greg Gutfeld, Dennis Hastert, Foam Boy, etc].
LikeLike
In 1980’s Europe, if a girl caught even the faintest whiff of pro-Reagan sentiments from you, you did NOT get laid.
Quite possibly the biggest joke the GOP played on their voters in recent memory was the nomination of Bob Dole – a guy with 1 arm and ED – against super-slick horndog zoo-preme Bill The Bubba Clinton.
Not sure I would equate ‘conservative’ with ‘warrior’, out here in the real world, most people equate ‘conservative’ with senior citizen golf course patricians who live behind walls in palaces at the country club.
Which sums up the GOP establishment leadership of at least the past 30 years pretty well.
LikeLike
Yeah, I remember being taken aback when a chick of my acquaintance said, “But don’t you think Bob Dole looks OLD?!?” It was one of my first experiences in realizing that chicks are like n!ggerz in that they lack any ability to analyze shiznat extra-temporally – they can only act on their feelzezes in the here & now – they can’t think abstractly and realize, “Okay, he’s old now, but fifty years ago, he was young & handsome & virile when the Jerries blew apart half his body in the mountains of Italy.”
LikeLike
The whole problem with TRUMP is his hair. The GOP is traditionally the party of the “right” kind of hair. Vetting of the preferred candidate is based in 1) length of service and 2) hair…
This season the whole thing is fucked… RU-BO has the hair, but not the service, Jeb fucked his hair up. Kasich – I can’t even understand what the fuck he is doing with his hair… he changes it based on location it seems… Raffa Cruz… too oily…
TRUMP’s wild mane… they have NO IDEA what to do with that…
Super omnes pilos! cry the faithful… then take it in the rear.
Sad!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mittens is still sad, and the party stewing… he had PERFECT hair god dammit!!!
LikeLike
“But don’t you think Bob Dole looks OLD?!?” It was one of my first experiences in realizing that chicks are like n!ggerz in that they lack any ability to analyze shiznat extra-temporally – they can only act on their feelzezes in the here & now”
_________________________
I figure it’s more that women and particularly young women are much more susceptible to suggestion and social pressure. So an old, gruff, bald red diaper baby is transformed into a lovable curmudgeon, while an old, nasty dykey crone is transformed into an empowerful earth-grandmother fighting for the rights of every uterus.
Obama always struck me as a Roger Thomas type – a fussy gay nerd with simmering resentments toting around a beard that looked like Nate Thurmond in drag. But he was stage-managed to the point that he was able to be sold as “cool” and his wife as “beautiful” while a weird, third world style political cult of personality built up around him that swept lots of young women up.
LikeLike
May your wild shitlord mane see you to victory this next 8 days… TRUMP2016
#FuckyouandyourfuckinghairRU-BO
LikeLike
Question – if TRUMP donned a Mohawk at the debate Thursday… would he then run the table?
LikeLike
the perfect VP haircut?http://i.imgur.com/fUjwi9K.jpg
LikeLike
again try

LikeLike
I saw Trump drinking a pina colada at Trailor Vics.
LikeLike
Do you know his tailor?
LikeLike
I’d like to meet him.
LikeLike
This thread wins for the Werewolves of London plug
Ahhh-hooooo….
LikeLike
If the warriors are so strong, and the poets so weak, then how did we reach our current state where the poets have been running the show for years?
LikeLike
The poets are running shit.
The moneylenders are.
LikeLike
Good post. This is exactly right. Liberals need conservatives (cops, military, revenue-producing private enterprise), but conservatives don’t need liberals at all. Sure, libs produce art and entertainment, some of it amusing. They can be fun to have around. But they aren’t necessary to survival. Without conservatives to protect them and pay for their slack, liberals would get slaughtered.
LikeLike
Like colored immigrants, as long as they are a very tiny percentage of the population liberals have some usefulness.
LikeLike
If all you care about is survival, then yes, liberals are not required. However, a richer tapestry of life requires many different threads. Art inspires and quickens the soul.
LikeLike
Re: “Leftist admits he has “allies” inside Facebook who protect him from being banned when he spouts racism.”
LOL, listen to Wise pound his chest about successfully hiding behind mommy’s skirt. Only on the internet…
LikeLike
Ted Hughes, John Milton and Lord Macauley are probably the best first poets for people who don’t want to be English majors. Hughes was the best English poet of his lifetime but was crucified by early SJWs: his talentless esquimeaux wife Sylvia Plath turned being unHAAAAAPPY into a brief career (with her meaningless “Bell Jar”) before suiciding, which certified in the minds of the public that Hughes really was as bad as she claimed. Hughes, by the way, was as big an alpha as an English department can have, and was cheating on Sylvia every chance he got. His Crow cycle is about Robert Bly, young man coming-of-age stuff.
Milton wrote about Lucifer the Rebel being three-quarters right in “Paradise Lost” and Macauley wrote “Horatius At The Gate,” quoted with unexpected import in the surprisingly redpilled movie “Oblivion.” Spoiler, the antagonist in “Oblivion” is an eye in a pyramid who wants to destroy meaningful human relationships with high technology and perverted dharma. If you miss that, then yeah, it’s a pretty interchangeable two-hour Twilight Zone episode. Macauley’s Horatius boils down to: you will die, you can choose how, and the best death is a man’s death. (The actual poem that comes from is book-length.) Something to think about for when the Soros employees realize that they are not going to get remunerative government employment under the looming administration.
The essay at the website link explains modern art as an anti-human scam.
LikeLike
A book length poem if you don’t want to be an English major…
way TL;DR. Try Kipling instead, far more accessible.
LikeLike
The West was run for 2500 years by local landed aristocrats who were former warriors. (So, Tarsus in the Roman Empire, or Liverpool in England 1790 were pretty much run in the same style). The local ShitLord elite ran the show. They were generally of local stock, unless a conqueror moved in. Because they were landed, they respected the needs of the local people (their money was not portable Romney/Bush-style, but baked into the land, Trump-style). Because they were of the same stock, they had a natural affinity for the locals. Often a ShitLord aristocratic family would exist in one county for 1,000 or more years. The land was in their Soul; the people an extended family.
They would often bring in Jews (Court Jews to support the Monarch), banking, trading connections, commerce, etc (and tossed them if they got out of control — as we have been known to do– see the #NeverTrump chaos of the last week). The system worked pretty marvelously until the debacle of WWI/WWII.
The issue is now restoring a similar system of ShitLords who are bound to the land by legacy, blood, and soil. Trump is such a ruler. The Trumps have lorded over NYC/Queens for 70 years. We need more of his kind.
LikeLike
The system worked pretty marvelously until the debacle of WWI/WWII.
Dunno if it worked marvelously, but feudalism is the word you’re looking for.
The system of noblesse oblige actually began to fall apart much earlier than what you indicated, specifically in the mid-eighteenth-century when the arrival of clover to England showed that common lands didn’t have to be loaned to the peasants, but could instead be turned into continually growing cash crops, pure profit for the noble. That was the beginning of the end of the upper classes pretending to look after the lower classes, at least in England. The upper classes never even bothered pretending in other countries (cough::RUSSIA::cough).
Anyways, you’d like to ditch social democracy and return to feudalism? Sure buddy. No problem. Be sure that you also ditch penicillin, vaccines, oncology, flush toilets, modern heating and cooling, refrigeration, systems of checks and balances, and about a thousand other advances the West has made since it realized that the whole lord/peasants schematic was stifling to progress.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Shut up,shimbo. Libtards such as yourself are self-destructive creatures.
Conservatives have to reign your stupid asses in .
Got it ?
LikeLike
Boy that Gennifer Flowers is some looker Cappy…
LikeLike
Some nigger is going to rob your dumb ass.
LikeLike
strapon for fucks sake, you’ve now won another handle. You are hereby jew-female knighted as:
The Strawman Within
LikeLike
That’s Morgan Fairchild.
LikeLike
To the Strapons of the world, it’s all explained by economics.
Were it not for clover, we’d all still be shitting in the jungle like Pygmies. lzozlzolzolzozlozlozlozlozl
LikeLike
Smegma mocks that which he doesn’t understand. History of economics, class warfare in ages gone by — it’s all over his head.
I’m in a generous mood today: The middle class. Learn its history, specifically its effects upon British politics in the nineteenth century. You might understand our current predicament a bit better.
LikeLike
Of course, those that don’t fall for your simplistic Guns-Germs-Steel brand of folderol are merely unlearned.
Girl, I forgot more about History than you’ll ever remember from your Coloured Peoples Studies curriculum at community college.
LikeLike
Funny, I’ve never seen you use your GRAND and SWEEPING knowledge of history. Mostly, it’s lame attempts at jokes and snark.
Please demonstrate, Smegma. I’ll give you a few prompts. Choose one:
1) Discuss the reaction of German nobility to rising rates of Protestantism amongst the lower classes in sixteenth-century Prussia.
2) Analyze the Catholic church’s response to the Reformation.
3) How enlightened were the enlightened despots of the eighteenth century? Use Russia, Prussia, and Austria-Hungary in your response.
4) To what extent did the Revolutions of 1848 represent a break between nationalism and liberalism?
Looking forward to it.
LikeLike
LOZLZOZLZOLZOZLOZLOZLOZLOZLOZLOZLOZL
You think your old level 200 and 300 course finals are of interest here?
Before I got wise and made a living in STEM, my undergraduate degree was in History… and that was before the Internet cut-n-paste era.
Don’t try to snow the snowman, toots.
LikeLike
Ain’t no cut and paste here, old man. I can throw that shit all day long. You keep saying crap like South Park and community college and woman and Joo, and like Drumpf you don’t care if any of it’s true. You don’t know who pays me for my historical knowledge (it ain’t Joos, so don’t even bother with your knee-jerk libel), but I’ll give you a clue – one of them is a well-known national organization whose products may very well be in your home. lozllzolzlzollozozlo
Well, have at it. What was the papal tripartite response to the Reformation? Describe the decision of the Peace of Augsburg. Did you associate Catherine the Great with one of the prompts? Come on, old man, let ‘er rip. Let me have some of that century-old knowledge moldering in your cranial cavity.
Or you could just admit that you don’t know anything about history after a lifetime of being paid for STEM, in which case STFU.
LikeLike
That explains a lot… you done told on yo’self again, yenta.
And I’ve already done my share of writing 100 page term papers and 3 hour finals essays on everything from how the 2nd Punic War was pivotal in transforming Rome from a Republic into an Empire to every political, social, and economic jot and tittle that led up to the French Revolution, so spare us your pseudo-intellectual posturing here.
The fact that you even think this tactic carries sway just solidifies your standing as village idiot on this blog.
LikeLike
I think society would benefit from always maintaining a larger class of warriors than poets. Like stated in the article. Poets are nice and all but warriors are essential. Without warriors no poets. Like difference between having a gun that fires properly and one that looks pretty. Looking pretty might be nice but I’ll take the one that fires properly any day.
LikeLike
What, no post on the Girlbusters debacle?
Oh wait I did that.
Self-promotion rape!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I can’t think of anything witty to say about this. it’s just too depressing
LikeLike
They forgot to include an Asian or Hispanic chick. Why the bigotry? This is 2016.
Literally worse than rape, rape!
LikeLike
All popular movies from the 70s and 80s must be remade with a strong sassy female/black cast. Because then we can forget about the old versions.
LikeLike
I’ve seen a couple of SNL sketches featuring that giant nigger thing (I watched the Trump episode) and I still literally have no idea whether it’s a tranny or a woman.
LikeLike
“I can’t think of anything witty to say about this. it’s just too depressing”
Fuck wit. I love this. “Why” you ask?
1. It will hemorrhage money.
2. It sucked.
3. It is one more nail in the Equity! coffin.
LikeLike
Shitlib media have figured out how deeply normal humans despise them but apparently never think to question why.
http://gawker.com/ted-cruz-please-help-us-we-have-no-idea-how-to-stop-d-1763284642
“God, Ted, we’ve been trying! It’s not like we haven’t tried. Over the past year Gawker has posted:
The Time Donald Trump’s Ex-Wife Accused Him of Brutally Raping Her
The Best Theory of 1992: Donald Trump Took Amphetamine-Like Diet Pills
Does Donald Trump Want to Have Sex With His Daughter?
Voicemails Reveal Donald Trump’s Cozy Relationship With the Liberal Media
Donald Trump Spun a 9/11 Conspiracy Scenario So Loony It Ended Up Almost True
How We Fooled Donald Trump Into Retweeting Benito Mussolini
Donald Trump Brags About Fucking Another Guy’s Girlfriend in Old Howard Stern Interview
We’re at a complete loss. We’re out of ideas. I honestly can’t even imagine something at this point that would scuttle the Trump campaign given how perfectly calibrated his core following is to reject anything and everything they see in the media. I could publish a recording of Donald Trump screaming “ISIS IS GOOD! ISIS IS GREAT!” during sex and he would brush it off in one tweet—Gawker, a loser website. … What the media loathes about Trump is what endears him to voters.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
When you’ve righteously and selflessly built a career around imparting your wisdom to other people so they can think all the right and good things too, it’s pretty damn difficult to understand why those idiots aren’t listening to you.
LikeLike
Congratulations, baby… you’re the first woman at the chateau to merit a COTW… perhaps even COTM.
Well-done, m’lady.
LikeLike
“In the Year of our Lord 1314, patriots of Scotland, starving and outnumbered, charged the fields of Bannockburn. They fought like warrior-poets, they fought like Scotsmen, and they won their freedom.”
What is Homer, without Achilles?
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
“Trump. In the game of whist, a trump card has a greater value than the best card in any other suit; hence, figuratively, a man who is very expert in his profession, or in any way great, is said to be a trump.”
(John Russell Bartlett, Dictionary of Americanisms, 1877, p. 721)
LikeLike
One way to understand the artistic process, as I described it elsewhere:
“The artist is a passive conduit to a higher truth, which he transmits through the filter of his personality, and then shapes its representation into material form. The more receptive to the transcendent, the more original in his filtering of it, and the more skilled with his medium, the greater the artist. The artist’s peril: his receptive, judgment-suspending disposition makes him vulnerable to liars with jangling coins who flatter his womanish vanity — that’s the career of the talented band U2 in a nutshell, with their channeling the Celt’s earnest spirit while squirting Moloch-globalist soundbites into each of their great songs.”
LikeLike
In that same thread, I also allowed for the possibility that I’ve been selling U2 short with regards to at least some of their superficially leftie lyrics:
“songs from “The Joshua Tree” are more enigmatic than meets the eye. “we’re one, but we’re not the same.” What does that mean — we are one in God, but He wants us to remain distinct in this life? Then in another song, the words “I believe in Kingdom come / then all the colors will bleed into one” — if Kingdom Come mean’s Christ’s return, then that’s when humanity will be made as one. The inference could be that rushing the process ahead of God’s timetable is contrary to His will.”
LikeLike
Early U2 were great, I wish they’d stuck to something they actually knew first-hand, like The Troobles, Belfast, Derry, Bobby Sands, IRA vs.RUC and so on.
I also wish people would stop looking to actors or singers for opinions on world affairs.
LikeLike
Right now watching the movie version of The Agony and the Ecstasy which is about Michelangelo’s painting of the Sistine Chapel as commissioned by the Warrior Pope Julius II.
“You dare to dicker with your pontiff?” – Julius II
LikeLike
Great film – Heston and Harrison each had the chops to equal and best the other.
LikeLike
Heston epic flicks in general stnd head and shoulders above current dreck. I own the above, Ben Hur, and of course El Cid.
LikeLike
“Poolside” quite literally in NYC:
http://nypost.com/2016/03/06/inside-the-sleezy-spa-where-everyone-has-underwater-sex/
LikeLike
“Conservative” means nothing anymore.
Let’s make it real simple: you can have a healthy society or you can have ((())). You can’t have both.
LikeLike
I’m perplexed by this notion that libs are this font of creativity, beauty, poetry and art and conservatives are uncultured brutes who need gentle hippies to show them the way of art.
Are most most Leftists beautiful?
Someone posted a photo of the monstrous Andrea Dworkin (without the trigger warning required in such cases, I might add). Beauty much?
How about your average lefty hipster with ear gauges, tattoos, and purple mohawk?
John Milius, although a Jew, is conservative and quite creative.
Although raised in a hotbed of self-righteous liberalism, I converted to conservatism in my teens and I am also creative; e.g. artist, writer, filmmaker, male model, etc.
Conservatives can be quite artistic and creative without leftards.
I believe conservative art is better because art benefits from creators who have more life experience and, generally speaking, conservatives have more life experience, (I was in the US military, for instance) while leftys are strictly creatures of the campus who know only theory.
Regarding ear gauges:
https://fuhrerious88blog.wordpress.com/2016/03/04/degenerate-left-fuming-after-someone-sneaked-up-behind-him-and-locked-a-padlock-on-his-earlobe/
LikeLike
What if whites are currently the poet class and the muslim/hispanic immigrants are the rising warrior class?
LikeLike
Ah yes, the world-renowned Arab military prowess. Funny though how all these so-called white poets are kept from being warriors by their governments’ boots on their necks.
R-selected parasites shielded by K-selected police are not warriors. Muds fold when challenged by similar -sized opponent.
LikeLike
Read Colonel Tom Kratman regarding Arabs and fighting. They are not warriors at heart, they are simply horse thieves and brigands (which is why stealing the property of others is a selling point for Islam. That and bestiality).
LikeLike
This dichotomy has long been solved and institutionalized by western civilization, and it has name: Patronage
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patronage
LikeLike
Eskimos are going crazy with full front attacks on Trump
Here is Louis CK
“The guy is Hitler. And by that I mean that we are being Germany in the 30s
http://www.vox.com/2016/3/7/11173384/louis-ck-donald-trump
So let us see Germany in the 30s
The year is 1933 precisely March 24th
The paper is <<>> Daily Express
Cucks may say it is only 1933, what war?
Now the year is 2015, precisely December 8th
<<>> Daily Post
And finally the year is 2016 and judea declares full frontal war on Trump
Does he know who are his mortal enemies?
LikeLike
Is furor a deliberate misspelling? It doesn’t make much sense as a pun, except a very lame one. Beware of people whose name begins with Zucker-.
LikeLike
I don’t like using Nazi analogies, but the parallels between Drumpf and Hitler are beginning to pile up:
1) Calls for banishing minorities
2) Disregard for international law
3) Disregard for national law
4) Raising right hand and swearing oath to demagogue at public rallies
5) Weird floppy hair
You Trump voters continue bending over and lubing up for this prick’s prick. Y’all aren’t independent thinkers, just sheeple.
Meanwhile, I’ll be prepping to defend myself during the neoKristallnacht.
LikeLike
We don’t care.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Who would you like to see as the next president?
LikeLike
You don’t care about preserving our Western socio/economic/political system?
Sorry, PA, I’d forgotten: You’re a race-aware RADICAL. Any system is fine as long as it’s all white. All white is all right. Nothing else matters. Nope.
Ask the lily-white Russians how their twentieth century worked out, Einstein.
LikeLike
I tried talking intelligently with you once before I knew that you are a woman and you couldnt keep up. Therefore: we don’t care.
LikeLike
Whatever. Look up the phrase “poisoning the well” and report back what you find.
LikeLike
Well, after several attempts to get an item-by-item deconstruction of Strapon’s latest blather past the WordPress filter, I give up.
Fuck this gay mod.
LikeLike
Ah, a mention of the “lily-white” Russians and their 20th century short-comings by our yenta-in-residence.
… without, of course, a mention of that little ol’ tribe who had a lion’s share representation in bringing about the revolution and subsequent mass murder… which MAY have had a little to do with it.
(((can’t shake it enough)))
LikeLike
“Meanwhile, I’ll be prepping to defend myself during the neoKristallnacht.”
Heh. You are quite the spicy dish, Missy.
Spirit, whenever I read your comments, all I can picture is some horn -rimmed, blue haired chubster. Complete with permascowl.
I bet , despite how rotund you are, you still possess small, flabby breasts.
Like moobs.
I give this post, four problematics!
http://everythingsaproblem.tumblr.com/
LikeLike
One of these days, I pray, there will be a substantive and reasoned response to my criticisms of Drumpf.
Until then, all I see here are preschoolers with crayons.
LikeLike
“One of these days, I pray, there will be a substantive and reasoned response to my criticisms of Drumpf.”
How bout this?
LikeLiked by 1 person
“One of these days, I pray, there will be a substantive and reasoned response to my criticisms of Drumpf.”
What criticism? This?
“1) Calls for banishing minorities”
He wants legal, practical border enforcement.
“2) Disregard for international law.”
Heh. Oh, mercy…he isn’t even sworn in yet. For fun, Google “Obama flouts international law”. Oh, never mind. Here ya go, you little rascal:
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Obama+flouts+international+law%22&rlz=1C1KMZB_enUS587US587&oq=%22Obama+flouts+international+law%22&aqs=chrome..69i57.590j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
“4) Raising right hand and swearing oath to demagogue at public rallies”
That is just retarded.
“5) Weird floppy hair”
Just one more datapoint proving you were born with a vagina.
Your infatuation for Premiere Trump is bordering on obsession, Apprachik.
I am finished with you. You may go.
LikeLike
“I read an absolutely astonishing account of Trump arriving for a political speech, somewhere out West I think, and his audience was gathered in an airplane hangar, and he landed his plane at the field and taxied up to the hangar and got out. That is exactly what they did in 1932 for Hitler’s first election victory. I suppose it was accidental, but wow, that is an almost letter-perfect replay of a Hitler election tactic. And the capacity of Trump to enlist working-class voters against the left is exactly what Hitler and Mussolini were able to do.
“One of the reasons I wrote my book was that I was so tired of people interpreting fascism as the application of a program. When you read Hitler’s program, his 21 points, when the party was founded in 1920, and when you read Mussolini’s first program in 1919, it had very little to do with what they eventually did. They are full of inconsistencies, they were very opportunistic, totally opportunistic, and there was a high degree of change in their programs.”
— Robert Paxton, leading historian and expert on European fascism
LikeLike
” And the capacity of Trump to enlist working-class voters against the left is exactly what Hitler and Mussolini were able to do.”
‘Parallels’, you say? A political outsider draws his support from the disaffected, underemployed populace who feel their voices aren’t heard and their beloved homeland is going to shit.
No matter who they’d vote for, no matter how much they rallied, their concerns were brushed aside. In fact, laws were put in place (by their rulers) to economically and politically disenfranchise them.
This particular country is broken, and in disarray due to chronic mismanagement. Which was solely the responsibility of said ruling class.
The saddest part is; the country in question is Glorious, and under the right leadership would be prosperous and safe. Hell, under the right leadership, they could rule the planet.
Those parallels?
Get used to it, Spirit: Achtung! President Trump!
LikeLike
Silly and untrue.
LikeLike
My response was a bit more detailed than Hugo’s, but the mod kept eating it.
Basically, all of your points were ridiculous shitlib knee-jerkery and didn’t even merit the deconstruction, except I always fear there are a few of the silent peanut gallery who might need some ammo for when they get the balls to speak up.
And just the fact that you keep saying Drumpf shows your hand… not to mention the crickets we all hear when your alleged points are gainsaid, as in Exhibit 2834 above, where you snark on lily-white Russians and look the other way on the role of your tribesmen in fucking up that country in the early 20th century, the effect of which were felt well-beyond.
From now on, you have to say Schickelgruber instead of Hitler, you dweeb. lzozlzozlzozlozl
LikeLike
We can thank fag-voiced kike-looking pussy John Oliver for the retarded “Drumpf” meme. Molyneux’s takedown is worth watching:
LikeLike
Meh. You give shitlibs too much credit. Hollywood was conservative during its Golden Age. And the worst coffee chain – Starbucks – is run by a liberal jew.
LikeLike
Prior to the post WW2 era,” “Hollywood” ” was totally not interested in multikult and open borders.
LikeLike
Hollywood was kept in line by the production code until the late 1950s.
LikeLike
I love how we’re all operating on this simple equation of liberals = art and conservatives = survivalism.
There used to be a thing called a “warrior-poet.” It’s not like they’re mutually exclusive. Tolstoy. Hemingway. Montaigne. D’Annunzio. Mailer. Ernst Junger.
Sadly, the only people I see pursuing this ideal today are rappers, even if it’s in a debased, nihilistic form.
LikeLike
I think votes are being manipulated. Its the only way they can stop the Donald.
Look at Cruz’ margin in Kansas:
LikeLike
i meant Oaklahoma. now look at the aggregate polls leading up to the vote:
LikeLike
were supposed to believe all of the undecided voters go for Cruz, and Cruz takes votes away from Donald. bullsh1t.
the trajectory doesnt add up. way too big of a polling margin for those end results.
LikeLike
Ripp
Caucus states – KS was a Caucus, ME a caucus etc.
Totally fixed. KS had less than 100k voters for the whole field!
It is very clear the process is rigged to guide the party’s preferred candidates to the nomination. SC was designed to be the firewall to stop any unsavory characters… TRUMP smashed that so they have been working double hard at the caucuses…
LikeLike
100%. The cuckstablishment’s plan is so obvious. CruzCuck, RubiCuck and KasichCuck are simply sand bags to deter votes from Trump so they can push things into a BrokeredCuck convention.
What’s also interesting is J3WThirtyEight for all it’s pitch to try and be some data mining transparent math calculation is clearly bending and twisting as best they can to hedge against Trump.
The reality by now is that the “Republican party people”, the voters, want Trump to win the bid.
god damn cucks. The best metric of them all is the fact Trump has spent the least…lolz…what a slap in the face to the elite fraudsters.
LikeLike
So Cruz won 48% of the whopping 73k total votes cast in the KS caucus… and they point to this as an anointing… ME had 18K total votes cast… 18K!
Caucus system is a sham.
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P16/events.phtml?s=c
keep track here…
LikeLike
“Cuckases” lolz
LikeLike
“Conservatives need liberals for their creativity”. Wtf lolzolzozlzl
It’s not scientifical, architectonic, or artistic creativity, what they have?
Right is creation, life, fight. Left is death, suicide, rendition.
The only leftoid scientist that comes to mind now is Einstein and Bertrand Russell
When you love music, architecture, science, philosophy, military history, law and economics is difficult to don’t love also the genome that make it possible. Because each of this things haven’t happened alone or in combination out of europe. That should be a natural step.
LikeLike
Off-topic but today, according to the Huffington Post, is the International Day of the Woman. Christine LaGarde has a nauseating article about how much progress women have been making in getting out of their roles as wives and mothers and becoming soulless dessicated-womb cubicle drones, before getting groped at the Cologne train station by rapefugees–but hey, it’s good for the economy, so what else matters?
My reaction to Christine LaGarde: “Woman, fetch me beer!”
Remember the Sean Connery interview with Barbara Walters about how sometimes striking a woman is justified?
Any thoughts, Dark Lord, or other Junior Shitlords?
LikeLike
“Women” in 2016: Christine Lagarde and Caitlyn Jenner.
LikeLike
my only thought is how correct huxley’s brave new world was in predicting the future. everything that makes us human is gradually being taken over by the ‘system’. everything we do will be mediated so the system can extract some margin of profit from us. in the future breeding itself will be handled by the ‘system’. and women call this ‘progress’.
LikeLike
Can you link the article? I haven’t found it
LikeLike
There’s creative-destruction, then there’s the liberal artist who is purely destructive.
Liberal art is the anti-art of a child who struggles to color inside the lines.
Superior art requires the clear eyes of a conservative firmly grounded in reality. Only a conservative can recreate nature’s symmetries in a way that is both inspiring and cathartic.
We need the rebirth of the warrior-poet with a more thorough experience of the human condition.
LikeLike
What we need are more poets who lift. No, that’s not a joke. As Nietzsche understood, a man who leads an active life, keeps in shape, eats healthy and fucks attractive women, will produce a different kind of art from an intellectual who sits at home consuming culture all the time. One will produce healthy art, the other will produce sickly, self-loathing art, of the kind the left valorizes today.
It’s the difference between 50 Cent and Weezer.
LikeLike
Picasso was a shitlord. There is a tale that he was in his studio working. His mistress was there. His wife arrives. The mistress and the wife get into an argument.
Picasso just went on working.
LikeLike
“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.”
– Sinclair Lewis
LikeLike
Whoa, some guy 100 years ago said something about fascism, it must be true!
Considering how gauche patriotism is these days, and considering that Obama has permanently broken the back of political Christianity, I think it’s safer to say when fascism comes to America, it will be wearing pajamas and driving a Prius with a COEXIST sticker.
LikeLike
No problem, Strapon… just get Woody Guthrie’s guitar and you can kill all them fascists hiding under your bed.
/This Machine Kills Fascists Yeah Right Rape!
LikeLike
http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/simpsons/images/3/33/Sideshow_Bob_Roberts_Top_Episode.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20140101144742
LikeLike
You pushed the left wing crap too hard and too fast, asshole. Better luck next time.
LikeLike
Fascism comes in two flavors, left and right. I’m centrist.
LikeLike
There will always be winners and losers. If you hold power and you compromise more than you effect fear, then you will lose respect and eventually power.
LikeLike
“Fascism comes in two flavors, left and right. I’m centrist”
Lefties always say that.
LikeLike
Michigan – fuck yeah!
LikeLike
Idaho — what the fuck!?
Goddamn breadhead evangelical morons.
LikeLike
Liberals plant the seed. Conservatives do the deed.
LikeLike
“The bells which toll for mankind are—most of them, anyway—like the bells of Alpine cattle; they are attached to our own necks, and it must be our fault if they do not make a cheerful and harmonious sound.” Sir Peter Medawar. The future of Man ….
This above all is the chiefest of concerns of the poet-warrior. Neither degeneracy, nor fraught, neither complacency or wrought, will take you towards the promise land of harmonious sounds. The poet-warrior arrived under duress and struggle, fight and might, using the tools nature bestowed (or commanded): the perceptual gestalts only a sentient understands. Once harnessed, the poet-warrior, or New World Man shapes cognition by building not on the shoulders of the best poets, but by building on the shoulders of the best poems and the arrow of emotions, thoughts and words that elevate man. For example, Plato’s know thyself through Jefferson’s life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Guiding you out of exile and towards your proper human estate, and the next plateau is the poet-warrior’s life mission. Having scaled his own Everest, he’s the Hillary Step, dropping the ropes, obsessed with the symbols that help to uplift and guide the way out of misery (see Danger & Play). Alas, the dichotomy is solved: there is neither a battle between the heart and mind, they are reconciled. Like a lonely rider along a 400 mile stretch of highway, the Dark Horse or unexpected competition is barreling down and will overtake evil (heck 2000 years in cosmic time is a non-starter, in bio-time no big deal)
Back of the beating hammer
By which the steel is wrought,
Back of the workshop’s clamor
The seeker may find the Thought,
The Thought that is ever master
Of iron and steam and steel,
That rises above disaster
And tramples it under heel!
Somewhere the Saint John’s alum da GBFM is jerking off….
LikeLiked by 1 person
In normal historic cycles late civilisation is overwhelmed by warriors from somewhere brutish and backward. What remains to be seen is whether we end like Rome or Athens. Do we fall to barbarians and end in a dark age or do we submit to a strongman and end in imperialism?
Are these the ends times of civilisation in total or the end times of democracy and high culture? We could survive for centuries yet under a dwindling and culturally inferior yet technically able imperial system like Athens under Alexander the Great.
What never happens is a homegrown bunch of hard men arising in the midst of decadence. Once the vitality of a culture is spent you don’t have it anymore. And I would say that conservatives today are not warriors they’re just not intelligent or creative. Would Trump supporters last 5 minutes against the men who voted for FDR and stormed the beaches of Normandy? Of course not.It’s play-acting. Trumpists are the Ross Kemps of the hard men world.
LikeLike