• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« This One Weird Trick To Overcome The Age Objection
I Could Tell You, But You Won’t Like It »

Freelance Comment Of The Week: The Project To Turn Women Into Poor Facsimiles Of Men

March 20, 2016 by CH

From a comment to a New York Beta Times article about “gender equity”.

Otis E Plainfield, Tx The College of The Permian Basin

Peter Drucker, in his famous essay Managing Oneself, advised strongly the need to understand your strengths and weaknesses, and observed that you can never win by improving your weaknesses, only by improving your strengths. In broader socio-economic terms, we have given women the opportunity to build on their weaknesses (ability to compete against men) and discouraged them from capitalizing on their strengths (youth and fertility). They compete through artifices of fairness and inclusion that are borne on the backs of an ever-dwindling pool of male supporters. We have weakened society as a whole by building on women’s weaknesses in attempts to make them the equal of men, rather than encouraging them in their natural strengths. And while this charade is going on, men are encouraged to adopt feminine attitudes and lifestyles at the expense of their own natural strengths, now deemed unnecessary in the new gender-neutral economy.

Fucking hardcore. Otis is awarded a VIP guest pass to the Chateau (if he wasn’t already a secret visitor).

This project to turn women into men and men into women won’t end well. But it will end, either in a pyre of societal disintegration or pinned under the sword of better men (and women). Nature doesn’t tolerate for long social experimentation at odds with Her directives.

Share this:

  • Click to email (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Comment Winners, Ugly Truths | 41 Comments

41 Responses

  1. on March 20, 2016 at 9:15 pm Captain Obvious

    > “if he wasn’t already a secret visitor” ——— No kidding. BTW, there actually is a “University” of The Permian Basin, but I suspect that “Otis Plainfield” might be a pseudonym. http://www.utpb.edu

    LikeLike


    • on March 21, 2016 at 7:45 pm Mkkby

      I love to mess with their tiny little minds.

      Me: Are men and women equal now?
      Her: Yes, of course.
      Me: Then there shouldn’t be separate men’s and women’s sports. Everyone competes together for who is best human.
      Her: But, but…

      Me: And half the time women should open doors for men, pay for dates, be chivalrous and defend men. Correct?
      Her: Um…

      LikeLike


  2. on March 20, 2016 at 9:31 pm Freelance Comment Of The Week: The Project To Turn Women Into Poor Facsimiles Of Men | Neoreactive

    […] Freelance Comment Of The Week: The Project To Turn Women Into Poor Facsimiles Of Men […]

    LikeLike


  3. on March 20, 2016 at 9:53 pm cortesar

    When you turn on your television this fall, you’ll be watching more women kick more ass than you can possibly imagine—physically, economically and sexually. Hard-bodied and smart, rich and aggressive, confident and independent, the chicks who populate the prime-time lineup are being cast in roles that once belonged almost exclusively to men. TV season; they rule.
    ————————————————————————————————

    http://www.salvomag.com/new/articles/salvo4/4karnick.php

    LikeLike


    • on March 21, 2016 at 4:11 am whorefinder

      “And yet they can’t find a man! Why not?”

      Obvious rape!

      LikeLike


      • on March 21, 2016 at 7:19 am wolfie65

        Who needs (white) men when you have fish, bicycles, MENSA brains, swimsuit model looks and mad martial arts- and weapons skills ?

        LikeLike


    • on March 21, 2016 at 7:28 am Harland

      Not to be pithy, but who watches network TV these days?

      LikeLike


      • on March 21, 2016 at 2:18 pm AureliusMoner

        Women. All of my female relatives are glued to it; it is the only thing they do with their lives, apart from working in pointless office jobs that would not exist if women were not in the workforce. Particularly irritating is when they all come out to the farm here on Sunday nights and insist on watching “Madame Secretary.” I used to be flabbergasted at the epic levels of oblivion and denial on display, but now I understand it for what it is: the unfathomable abyss of female narcissism.

        I was raised to think that male ego and confidence was vain and narcissistic. It has nothing on this fantasy-world that women inhabit, watching powerful grrrls on tv in between trips to the kitchen for more ice cream and fritos at every commercial break.

        LikeLike


    • on March 21, 2016 at 9:50 am cynthia

      The thing that networks never seem to consider is that women don’t really like other women all that much. A bitchy female character on a show is every bit as off putting as a bitchy female coworker. The only female character types that don’t elicit the immediate gag reflex are Mary Sues, and those are an affront to the craft of storytelling.

      LikeLike


      • on March 22, 2016 at 10:09 pm bookooball

        “The thing that networks never seem to consider is that women don’t really like other women all that much.”

        The networks are just as aware that women hate each other as they are that women love to hate.

        They know exactly what they are doing

        LikeLike


    • on March 21, 2016 at 2:48 pm Tent Mountain

      It goes to the point of whom the actual consumers are. I leave the room when this crap gets on the tube. I do tell it like it is tho, “this is a stupid show”

      LikeLike


    • on March 21, 2016 at 9:27 pm aufeis

      this has electrolytes!

      LikeLike


  4. on March 20, 2016 at 10:01 pm Mr Meaner

    Check out the hoverhand in the first pic

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3501838/Seven-Year-Switch-s-Michelle-says-husband-Jason-hadn-t-intimate-two-years-appearing-spouse-swapping-reality-show.html

    LikeLike


  5. on March 20, 2016 at 10:02 pm cortesar

    LikeLike


    • on March 21, 2016 at 12:20 am Mr Meaner

      Paul Joseph Watson. He’s good. Real good.

      LikeLike


  6. on March 20, 2016 at 10:03 pm bookooball

    Spend 5 minutes watching any nature documentary and it’s plain to see that sexual dimorphism and selective breeding isn’t exclusive to human society.

    Then you see hyenas, bonobos, anglerfish, and daddy-long-legs are the types of shit nature is warning us about living in a matriarchy.

    LikeLike


    • on March 21, 2016 at 7:31 am Harland

      The feminists will reply we’ve gone far past that and none of that applies any more. Gotta bring more if you want to win that argument.

      LikeLike


      • on March 21, 2016 at 11:21 am FuriousFerret

        Who cares about convincing feminists?

        LikeLike


      • on March 22, 2016 at 10:05 pm bookooball

        We’ve gone far past what, sweetheart? The hundreds of millions of years of evolution that got DNA to this point? Did we transcend these naturally created bodies last night and nobody told me?

        What did we get past, and how did we get past it?

        LikeLike


  7. on March 20, 2016 at 10:05 pm rugby11

    “odds with Her directives.”
    True

    LikeLike


  8. on March 20, 2016 at 10:27 pm Abundance Mentality

    “Peter Drucker, in his famous essay Managing Oneself, advised strongly the need to understand your strengths and weaknesses, and observed that you can never win by improving your weaknesses, only by improving your strengths.”

    I work as a ‘strategy consultant’ and I totally agree with Drucker’s overall assessment. If I ever told a client to pursue a strategy of ‘improving your weaknesses’ (except as an ancillary aspect of a broader ‘improve your strengths’ strategy), I’d never get another client to listen to me again. Yet, here we have a whole social movement based on the exact opposite strategy. It can ONLY be some hostile group’s misdirection (or an example of “Whom the gods would destroy, first they make crazy”).

    Men instinctively understand this, which is why there is no male equivalent of the shibboleth “Anything boys can do, girls can do better.” A boy/man doesn’t give a shit what a girl/woman can do well, in general, and he certainly isn’t going to try being better at it than she is. Let ’em fucking have it. A boy/man has better shit to do.

    For the average guy, cooking may be the one exception, and even there Nietzsche had it pegged 130 years ago (“Beyond Good and Evil”, #234):

    “Stupidity in the kitchen; woman as cook; the spine-chilling thoughtlessness in the feeding of the family and the head of the house! Women do
    not understand what food means and yet want to cook! If woman were a
    thoughtful creature, then the fact that she has been the cook for thousands
    of years would surely have led her to discover the greatest physiological
    facts, and at the same time make the art of medicine her own! Bad cooking and the complete absence of reason in the kitchen have caused the longest
    delays and the worst damage to the development of humanity: even today,
    things are hardly any better. A speech for young ladies.”

    LikeLike


    • on March 21, 2016 at 7:23 am wolfie65

      Most women I’ve known are best kept away from kitchens, for their own as well as everyone else’s health and safety.

      LikeLike


  9. on March 20, 2016 at 10:48 pm Hugo Stiglitz

    Matriarchies seem to always be absorbed by Patriarchies in the long run. Except Africa, because no one wants to absorb them.

    LikeLike


    • on March 21, 2016 at 12:27 am Colonel Hogan

      @Hugo
      Spot on

      LikeLike


  10. on March 21, 2016 at 1:04 am Freelance Comment Of The Week: The Project To Turn Women Into Poor Facsimiles Of Men | Reaction Times

    […] Source: Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  11. on March 21, 2016 at 2:33 am Thug

    Bitches be crazy. Always have, always will be. The problem is all the nutless wonders who dont keep bitches in line and a propagandising elite who want it that way. A lot of theorizing here, but how many actually back it up with the women in their day to day life?

    LikeLike


  12. on March 21, 2016 at 4:30 am Whitehall

    When the SF Giants were in a hot pennant race back in the 50s, and Willie Mays was closing in on Ruth’s home run record. a sport journalist saw him working on his fielding during warm-ups for a big game.

    The sports writer asked Mays why he wasn’t in the batting box working on his batting.

    Mays came back with “You lose games due to your weaknesses.”

    But Mays was a team player and the team needed to win the game more than Mays needed to beat Ruth.

    Drucker is probably right for an individual, but a lot of life is team play.

    LikeLike


  13. on March 21, 2016 at 4:40 am Mean Mr. Mustard

    On Trump …

    LikeLike


  14. on March 21, 2016 at 5:42 am David

    So fucking sick of the female triumphing in single combat against alleged “military veteran” male. Jesus, I’m so over Hollywood and it’s SJW agenda! Would someone just start some kind of “don’t pay to watch this shit” platform already.

    But it will end, either in a pyre of societal disintegration or pinned under the sword of better men (and women).

    We may all end up pinned under the Muslim scimitar (or their exploding chests) – but they aren’t better than us. More fanatical, yes.

    LikeLike


  15. on March 21, 2016 at 6:24 am Barry

    Election Day today in the US. Who will AIPAC select?

    LikeLike


  16. on March 21, 2016 at 6:44 am theasdgamer

    “Women who try to become men end up being second rate women and third rate men. Men who try to become women end up being second rate men and third rate women.” theasdgamer

    LikeLike


  17. on March 21, 2016 at 6:55 am elmertjones

    Once again I pull in the COTW award under the nom-de-plume “Otis Plainfield” as the name Elmer strikes fear in the hearts of the intelligentsia and drives them to ban me in all forms. This will look great on my executive credenza next to the Futrelle “We Hunted the Mammoth” awards.

    My “SJW Hitler” has yet to gain traction. He’s a kinder, gentler, and more inclusive Hitler :

    LikeLike


  18. on March 21, 2016 at 7:19 am tanabear

    This is from the book The Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study, by Robert Barro,

    “More surprisingly, female education at various levels is not significantly related to subsequent growth. For example, if years of schooling at the secondary and higher levels for females aged 25 and over is added to the system shown in column 1 of Table 1, then the estimated coefficient of this variable is +.0023 (0.0046), whereas that for males remains significantly positive, 0.0132 (0.0036). For primary schooling of women aged 25
    and over, the estimated coefficient is -0.0001 (0.0012), whereas that for men (25 and over for secondary and higher schools) is 0.0118 (0.0025). Thus, these findings do not support the hypothesis that education of women is a key to economic growth.”

    How often do you hear about this???

    ps. Anyway, you can look up the book on-line

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  19. on March 21, 2016 at 7:36 am Wrong Side of History

    @ndrogynous, $exually revolting morlocks that live to $l@ve and consume is the goal.

    Drop f3rtility rates so dangerously low that the elite is given the moral authority to control r3pr0duction.

    LikeLike


  20. on March 21, 2016 at 7:42 am Undocumented Shopper

    The problem begins in schools, where the goal is to turn boys into facsimiles of girls. And male teachers (mostly beta males) are a part of it.

    LikeLike


  21. on March 21, 2016 at 7:51 am Wrong Side of History

    It’s 2016 and you’re not a Nat Socialist?

    Get uncucked.

    LikeLike


    • on March 21, 2016 at 12:58 pm CarpeOro

      “It’s 2016 and you’re not a Nationalist?”

      Corrected it for you. Two planks of the Nat Socialist are congruent with everything else socialist and fed into the current malaise:
      1) right to vote for women
      2) gun control (registration, but you should know where that leads by now)

      Get everything else right and those would still doom you.

      LikeLike


  22. on March 21, 2016 at 9:19 am tteclod

    Drucker’s works are among the Great Books for Men. Read Peter Drucker.

    LikeLike


  23. on March 21, 2016 at 10:41 am irishsavant

    Everything said about women on this post also applies to blacks. The economic and societal ramifications of pretending blacks have the same intellectual capacity as Whites are incalculable.

    LikeLike


  24. on March 21, 2016 at 12:26 pm Bruno Padilha

    Wow, excellent comment. I hope more people read (and understand) this!

    LikeLike


  25. on March 21, 2016 at 2:00 pm Wise words | Ex Cathedra 2.0

    […] Freelance Comment Of The Week: The Project To Turn Women Into Poor Facsimiles Of Men […]

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Publius on The Essential Femaleness Of…
    Publius on The Essential Femaleness Of…
    Les Saunders, Protes… on The Essential Femaleness Of…
    plumpjack on The Essential Femaleness Of…
    martin2 on The Essential Femaleness Of…
    plumpjack on The Essential Femaleness Of…
    plumpjack on The Essential Femaleness Of…
    Roy on Shudderthought Of The Day
    Roy on Shudderthought Of The Day
    plumpjack on The Essential Femaleness Of…
  • Top Posts

    • Shudderthought Of The Day
    • The Essential Femaleness Of Leftism
    • Comment Of The Week: The Unwavering Self-Amnesty Of Leftoid Projection
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
    • Biomechanical Truth Of The Day
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • America, Then And Now
    • How To Attract Girls By Doing Almost Nothing
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: