• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Priest Game
How Not To Be The Creep That Chicks Don’t Dig »

Cuckoldry Culture

April 7, 2016 by CH

Feminists bitch and moan and lie about a mythical “rape culture” that permeates America, but if you look at the numbers instead of wallowing in poopytalk it becomes clear that, in parts of the West at any rate, a far better case can be made that we live in a Cuckoldry Culture rather than a rape culture.

Britain has a fairly accessible data set on national rape and cuckoldry statistics, so we’ll examine the UK as a proxy for the larger Anglosphere.

(For those new to the Chateau and unfamiliar with some of our terms of enshivment, “cuck” is the colloquial term for men, usually married beta males, who unwittingly raise the bastard spawn of women who have cheated on them and gotten pregnant by another man, usually a jerkboy alpha male. The term is so descriptively brutalist that it was ported to the political arena as a hard-hitting insult — cuckservative — aimed at Republican pundits, pols, and voters who surrender to leftoid race equalism premises in order to curry favor with the gatekeepers of polite discourse. Rhetorically, cuckservatives sell out their children’s and their nation’s future, and their ancestors’ pasts, on the altar of liberal dogma, in practice “raising another man’s ideology”. And they do so oblivious to the humiliations they visit upon themselves.)

New research has shown that the cuckoldry rate in Britain is 2% — 1 in 50 British fathers are unknowingly (or without prior consent) raising the offspring of another man.

Researchers at Leuven University in Belgium said that they decided to conduct the first ever in-depth study after being surprised and intrigued to learn that the issue has received little serious scientific consideration, despite being a concern felt by many men.

That’s because, contrary to dumb feminist assertions about “the patriarchaaaaaahh”, women are treated as the more valuable sex in most societies, particularly in Western societies. This instinctual social, economic, cultural, and legal favoritism toward women is a psychological phenomenon which stems from the fact that, biologically, eggs are more expensive than sperm.

2% sounds like a blessedly low number, but if you take into account the absolute meta-extinction level event that cuckoldry represents to a man’s genetic and personal interests, 1 out of 50 is a rate that should give most men a little pause, and some men a lot of pause.

It’s an especially damning statistic when we compare that 2% cuckoldry rate to the UK rape rate for women.

The 2006–07 British Crime Survey reports that 1 in every 200 women suffered from rape in that period.

A 1-in-200 rape rate for UK women is 0.5%, or four times smaller than the cuckoldry rate for UK men.

Cuckoldry Culture is four times more likely than rape culture to be the operative paradigm.

But you won’t ever hear TheCunt or feminists or their Hivemind manlet lickspittles honestly broaching this ugly truth.

And note as well that the physical violation of rape last minutes, with recurrent bouts of psychological distress, but the physical and emotional violations of cuckoldry can last eighteen years, uninterrupted.

So maybe it’s time to discuss “the matriarchy” and “the cuckistocracy”, and how these social constructions amount to a “War on Men”.

PS Sparing a moment to pontificate abstractly, it might be somewhat eugenic in the long long term to permit, or at least to ignore, a low level of cuckoldry in an advanced White society. Unfortunately, while this may have been the case in the distant past, today it seems women will “cheat down” just as often with layabout badboys as they will “cheat up” with corner office kahunas, obviating any overall eugenic effect from cuckolding their wimpy beta hubbies.

PPS And let’s not forget that however eugenic a sexual market transaction (and any attendant social stigmas or sanctions), there are individual men who get caught on the wrong side of the sexual market equation and suffer immensely.

PPPS A real rape culture is emerging in Sweden, but the blame for that rests squarely on all the swarthy migrants GoodWhite Swedes have allowed into their country. Lying, cuntfaced feminists don’t have much to say about that, unless they have an opening provided by the leftoid media to (erroneously) blame White men.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Biomechanics is God, Feminist Idiocy, Ugly Truths | 190 Comments

190 Responses

  1. on April 7, 2016 at 1:51 pm zodak

    in US hospitals, they will not tell the father if it isn’t his because technically they consider the baby to be the patient so it has doctor-patient confidentiality. get a paternity test on your own.

    they push being cuckolded everywhere, even in comic books.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  2. on April 7, 2016 at 1:59 pm FormerBeta

    Preventing cuckoldry is not an open concern for much of liberal society. Instead, society attempts to enforce the costs of cuckoldry on male victims.

    Consider, if you will, a man who learns that his 5-year ‘son’ isn’t actually his. If he attempts to divorce his wife, leaving her to her ill-gotten child, chances are good that she will still succeed in getting the husband to pay child-support, and members of society will shun and shame him for abandoning his ‘child’. “But what about the children???!!!”

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on April 7, 2016 at 4:23 pm Captain Obvious

      Until we vanquish this insanity once and for all, and make the Law both sane & moral again, dudes simply have to sit down with their fiancees and speak openly & honestly about this: “You mess around with some other dude, and the two of you will mysteriously vanish, and Missing Persons will never find so much as a single strand of what had been your DNA.”

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 7, 2016 at 11:11 pm Pwn

        Prisons are filled with delusional idiots like you.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 4:39 am Danger

        And hairy mens assholes are filled with idiots like you pwn

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 8:14 am Pwn

        Danger, I take it you’re a hairy man. I’m sorry if you feel offended about being pumped and dumped, but life is unfair, buttercup.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 9:01 am Captain Obvious

        > “Prisons are filled with delusional idiots like you.” ——— By and large, the police can only catch people who are stupider than they. And the really smart criminals simply purchase legislators & jurists & administrators & regulatory bureaucrats in order to re-write the rules & laws & case histories so that their formerly illegal behavior is no longer illegal. Or, if all else fails, they’ll bribe a governor or a president for a pardon [cf Mark Rich]. But, of course, as an Eskimo, I’m not telling you anything that you didn’t know already.

        LikeLike


  3. on April 7, 2016 at 2:00 pm Cuckoldry Culture | Neoreactive

    […] Cuckoldry Culture […]

    LikeLike


  4. on April 7, 2016 at 2:13 pm Opus

    I am being asked to believe that in one year (2006-07) out of every two hundred women one was raped. I have prime ocean front real estate in Utah to sell you (if you believe that) – anyway what do Belgians know about Britain – they are not even allowed in.

    LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 2:40 pm The Other Jim

      Belgians, perhaps not, but Pakistani Muslims are doing the rapes White Britons won’t do. Oh yeah, Paki’s are definitely welcome by the SJW elites of Britain(& Europe)

      I’m actually calling BS on that 1 in 200 UK women being raped. After Rotherham and countless other mass rape schemes by Muslims across Europe that number has to be higher. The only question is how much are the PC-authorities trying to cover it up? Even if that statistic is correct, I’d like to see it broken down by race and religion. Then we’ll see how Paki’s are overrepresented in raping British & European women.

      LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 5:03 pm long-time lurker

        Break it down by area too. A young woman in Rotherham is probably more likely to be raped than a woman in a posh area of London. Would we ever see such an interpretation of data..?

        I won’t hold my breath waiting.

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 9:12 pm LB

        Here in the US the cuckoldry rate is much higher among AAs (shocking, I know), more like 5-10%. You are far more likely to see advertising for DNA testing in predominantly black communities.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 1:19 pm Titty Cucking

        In the case of 3 year old Shequita, Darqueevious, you are NOT the father!

        LikeLike


  5. on April 7, 2016 at 2:15 pm general cha0s

    that’s 1 of 50 FATHERS, but what percentage of total british men?

    Presumably the 1 of 200 rape stat is for women total, right?

    The point still stands but its probably not true that one in 50 British men are cucked, since you have to a father or acting in that capacity.

    [CH: of course the cuck rate has to be restricted to fathers, but it hardly matters to the point, because non-fathers or men not seeking fatherhood would not be affected directly by the threat of cuckoldry. 1-in-50 is a good ratio to use as a point of reference for most men, presuming most men want to be fathers at some point in their lives.]

    LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 4:51 pm Squibby

      If you’re childfree you still get cucked to some degree by the welfare state. I’d rather not consider what percentage of my income is taken to service and maintain other men’s ejaculate. The worse part is the kids growing up in section 8 housing and eating WIC food will end up mugging us when we’re old.

      LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 5:24 pm Vincent

        Carry a pistol and shoot ’em dead. HeII, we all need one now when we’re fit and fast. 5 to 1, 6 to 1? Yeah, I ran like a track star when a bunch of ‘boos tried that on me back in my Philly dayz.

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 5:39 pm Captain Obvious

        > “you still get cucked to some degree by the welfare state” ——— Excellent Meta-Observation. This too, this meta-cuckoldry, must be vanquished.

        LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 11:23 am Ironpusher

      And now a poem…… When dad the alpha cad splits without paying a dime; the cost of raising his children will not be mine. The cuck wants to f*ck, but he’s down on his luck. So he spends his bucks to wife up slut.

      Take away: SHES NOT WORTH IT

      LikeLike


  6. on April 7, 2016 at 2:35 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    What about all the men who volunteer for cuckoldry by raising the kids spawned by the ever-increasing number of single mothers? If you add these men in, you truly have a cuck culture.

    [CH: major distinction here is that these are willing cucks, so rape culture mythologizers would argue they can’t be included in data set. but of course these willing cucks do contribute to a cuckold culture, (using a meaning of the word culture in the all-encompassing sense that feminists like to use it).]

    LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 4:07 pm Hugo Stiglitz

      That is not cucking, imo. Three successful men I know are raising kids that aren’t theirs.

      They have told me flat out that they know what will happen to these kids if they didn’t

      It also gives them massive hand in the relationship.

      Under the correct circumstances, I would raise a child that wasn’t mine.

      LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 7:06 pm Lucius Somesuch

        “Correct circumstances” would be raising an orphan nephew, or a cousin at least. At a great stretch, a “successful man” might wed some sort of worthy war widow and raise her orphans along with his own fresh brood– though already this hypothetical sounds like some weird gamma male reversal of “Rebecca”, unless we assume the man is rather older than the young mother and either has enjoyed a distinguished bachelorhood or is a widower himself.

        If these “successful men” are not provided biological heirs by their women, then they are not thus far successful.

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 7:43 pm Hugo Stiglitz

        “If these “successful men” are not provided biological heirs by their women, then they are not thus far successful.”

        In two cases they did. In the other case he already has all the kids he wanted.

        As far as your “certain circumstances ” go, you are full of shit. What are we supposed to do, just stand by and let good White children go feral because the sperm donor was an asshole?

        If the woman is worthy, and willing to put in the work, then I say go for it.

        Stay poolside if you want.

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 8:32 pm Lucius Somesuch

        First of all, Hugo, knowing right well as you should the extreme skepticism CH and most of us feel towards men who raise other men’s children, you should know to take the simple pains to clarify that your “successful men” are themselves actual fathers (as opposed to mere step-fathers). I’m gratified to hear that two at least have done as much– but that by no means casts light on how advantageous their choice of partners has been.

        Second of all, and far more important: what are you, the White Child’s Mia Farrow? Would you have us wife-up any old single mom and “save” children who are in no way our biological relations with the kind of legal, financial, and emotional commitment that childrearing or even an ad hoc, approximate sort of parenting entails?

        You call these mothers “worthy”, but all three have children by previous relationships. You neither specify whether those were marital relations nor whether they ended in divorce. You claim these friends of yours enjoy “massive hand” in these relationships, a curiously dudebrah form of overstatement which suggests to me just the opposite. Do all your male acquaintances brag about their “massive hand” or are you just prone to brag on their behalf? Either way, it sounds cucky.

        And if these White children are the products of “sperm donors”, as you put it, then there is a good chance they are rather “feral” to begin with. You claim these women are “willing to put in the work”, but again– they are all now with men they did not sire their firstborn with. Unless I am to assume all three previous Mr.s lost their lives in Iraq, I’m wondering how much “work” these women are really willing to put in.

        Helping “at-risk” White children may be a noble calling, within reason, but adopting the whippersnappers and wifeing up their homewrecker moms is not the answer.

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on April 7, 2016 at 10:21 pm Hugo Stiglitz

        “Second of all, and far more important: what are you, the White Child’s Mia Farrow?”

        No. I am somebody who knows exactly what they are talking about.

        You, however, are soft and squishy. We both know it. The try hard attempt at badassery is almost comical.

        “Would you have us wife-up any old single mom and “save” children who are in no way our biological relations with the kind of legal, financial, and emotional commitment that childrearing or even an ad hoc, approximate sort of parenting entails?”

        Well, since you used the term ” ad hoc”, I assume you know what logical fallacies are.

        “And if these White children are the products of “sperm donors”, as you put it, then there is a good chance they are rather “feral” to begin with.

        You’re right, there is a good chance. So what?

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 11:15 pm Pwn

        Yes, I don’t give a shit about the spawn of other men and I’m glad many idiots feel like you do. It decreases the burden of fatherhood for me.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 8, 2016 at 4:42 am Danger

        Ah, the old “for the children argument”.

        The hypergamists win over ALL men and civilization when they see they can get away with their hypergamy goals.

        The “for the children” men are really just a different flavor of cucks.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 8:36 am Hugo Stiglitz

        “Yes, I don’t give a shit about the spawn of other men and I’m glad many idiots feel like you do. It decreases the burden of fatherhood for me.”

        No. You are completely defeated. You mask your defeat in rhetoric, but you are gelded none the less.

        The society crumbling around you was built by Men who understood the necessity of responsibility. I liken gelds like you to someone who would stand inside a burning building – beverage in hand – mocking those manning the bucket line.

        “Ah, the old “for the children argument”.

        For the White children. Yes.

        “The hypergamists win over ALL men and civilization when they see they can get away with their hypergamy goals.”

        You think these women are “getting away with it”? Heh. You are indeed clueless. You sound just like a feminist who sees the patriarchy in her Cheerios.

        “The “for the children” men are really just a different flavor of cucks.”

        “cuck”, huh? Yeah, you remind me a of a young guy at the gym, swole like a tick on every juice imaginable.

        I go to shake his hand, and ingulf his with mine. I look down and notice his girly bone structure and small, soft , effeminate grip. But boy howdy, his muscles are Yuuuuuge!

        He will be a cancer ridden , man boobed burnout by the time he reaches my age, but oh well. For now, he gets to flex in the mirror and pretend he is tough.

        Then he has the gall to look up at me and ask” do you even lift, bro?”

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 8:53 am Corvo

        I’ve got my 4th bun in my wife’s oven, but when I see stories about the displaced Whites of South Africa living in camps, part of me wants to go volunteer to take one of those White children in and raise them under my roof. I don’t think that’s cuck either. There must be some instinct for looking out for members of your own tribe, even if they’re only distant genetic cousins.

        I’m not moved to take in a dindu from Somalia.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 9:55 am Lucius Somesuch

        Hugo: “The try hard attempt at badassery is almost comical.”

        –No, what’s comical Hugo is that you can’t decide whether you’re fucking coked-up porn models a la (our, not Russia’s President’s) “Putin” or a Presbyterian cuck trying to white knight at dalrock’s.

        So unless all your guy friends are in their mid-fifties wedded to Iraq War widows, they’re probably beta chumps underwriting diffident wall-slammers and their merry spawn, and one knows a man by his friends– which is why your gallantry on behalf of so many worthy women is so unpersuasive..

        You are neither perspicuous nor perspicacious enough to encourage your readers to take your appraisals of others’ character.

        And don’t bring logic into a match with Tarski.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 10:09 am Lucius Somesuch

        “Well, since you used the term ” ad hoc”, I assume you know what logical fallacies are.”

        –and strictly speaking, Hugo, you’re making a non sequitur. Though strictly speaking neither non sequiturs nor ad hoc arguments fail of more precise categorization– if one knows what logical fallacies are . . . .

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 10:44 am Hugo Stiglitz

        “and strictly speaking, Hugo, you’re making a non sequitur. Though strictly speaking neither non sequiturs nor ad hoc arguments fail of more precise categorization– if one knows what logical fallacies are .”

        Yes. Like begging the question, and erecting legions of straw men in order to squirt ink.

        You keep bringing up Iraq. In your mind, if some man gets himself killed in a war his “betters” had no intention of winning – his spawn are acceptable. How about if this vet blows his brains out or becomes an addict?

        Look Luscious, there are beliefs held by the plurality of Chateau readers here that I vehemently disagree with. I typically ignore them. This is their place. I would rather concentrate on the subjects we can agree on than be some dickhead concern troll.

        Having said that, Men who take it upon themselves to create a situation that can be beneficial to himself, his woman and their children is a good thing.

        Men who understand that it takes strength( true strength) and sacrifice to maintain a civilization are not “cucks”. They are in fact, worthy of respect.

        “So unless all your guy friends are in their mid-fifties wedded to Iraq War widows, they’re probably beta chumps underwriting diffident wall-slammers and their merry spawn, and one knows a man by his friends– which is why your gallantry on behalf of so many worthy women is so unpersuasive.”

        See above, squid. You bleat like a leftist. One of three you mock was a purple team leader on an aircraft carrier during a shooting war. The other was SF. The third does shit I won’t divulge, but suffice to say, you and your little bitty baby balls would be unwilling to even attempt.

        All of them work hard, can be trusted, take zero shit, and get plenty of pussy.

        “You are neither perspicuous nor perspicacious enough to encourage your readers to take your appraisals of others’ character.”

        If you want to insult people who are much, much, stronger than you, expect to be called out for your simplistic bullshit.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 11:11 am uh

        “You, however, are soft and squishy. We both know it. The try hard attempt at badassery is almost comical.”

        Five years building a blog about Japanese models and being a sperg will do that to a guy. I’m not joking about that — there’s a link to his real blog on the one his name links to. Unreal shit. But you know, he’s lying low to avoid being detected by the “Culture of Critique”. Cause alt-right weebs are important.

        Anyway, you should alI look into Trump’s new guy, Paul Manafort. He has quite a bit of experience lobbying for … less than democratic international leaders, big tobacco, Reagan, Bush, etc.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 11:15 am Corvo

        “Anyway, you should alI look into Trump’s new guy, Paul Manafort. He has quite a bit of experience lobbying for … less than democratic international leaders, big tobacco, Reagan, Bush, etc.”

        Meh – I don’t care. All I want is the fucking Wall. There’s no guarantee, but we’re most likely to get it with Trump. If he does accomplishes else, it will have been worth it.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 11:24 am uh

        https://luciussomesuch.wordpress.com

        If things like this don’t weird you out — you were probably born around 1990, directly into the internet.

        So look, in biology, cuckold has a definite meaning of a male that unwittingly invests in another male’s offspring. That is, it’s all cost. But this isn’t necessarily the case among humans: taking on an existing child could be the cost incurred to produce one’s own offspring with the same female. How many people do you know with a sibling with a different parent? That would be my rule, if I were a worthwhile mate myself, of course. A big risk in any case — but that’s life.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 11:30 am uh

        Well, I wasn’t implying that Manafort is the devil, or anymore than other pro lobbyists. Could become ammo for the Democrats later on. Knife cuts both ways as far as shady support, esp with Hillary, but the question is, will T’s team have the wits to school him in names & sums for the debates, where that shit will count. He will have to say sthg exactly like: Well she is friends with x who works at y which supported z. Because that’s what she’s going to do. The beauty is that it’s an ouroborosian game — the names and money all lead to the same people, putting Hillary and T right next to each other at the same table.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 11:33 am uh

        Four kids in New York state — white power man. I’m up for adoption if you’re the merciful type. 😂

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 3:47 pm Lucius Somesuch

        “Look Luscious, there are beliefs held by the plurality of Chateau readers here that I vehemently disagree with. I typically ignore them. This is their place. I would rather concentrate on the subjects we can agree on than be some dickhead concern troll. ”

        –Fair enough, as far as it goes. But your unnecessary AMOGing makes you, at the kindest, borderline ridiculous.

        The politics of the (vile) Iraq War is not the point at issue. The point is that, in these times, fertile women with children in tow who have lost their prior mates for HONORABLE reasons are an exception.

        And while, like the proverbial fighter pilot or Harvard graduate, you generously allow that your friends are super-ripped war heroes, this in itself proves nothing about their personal decision-making.

        And really, Hugo, quit swagging like a doofus. “I shook a guy’s hand once, it was squishy.” Thank you for your service. What do you want me to do, pin the Iron Cross to your lapel?

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 4:01 pm Lucius Somesuch

        (((“uh”))): “Five years building a blog about Japanese models and being a sperg will do that to a guy. I’m not joking about that — there’s a link to his real blog on the one his name links to. Unreal shit. But you know, he’s lying low to avoid being detected by the “Culture of Critique”. Cause alt-right weebs are important.”

        –hey thwack, let me help you out here. I mean, that must’ve been a major oversight on my part, leaving my moniker a glowing green to a link to my public blog and everything, lo these many years I’ve been commenting here with my illustrious peers like GBFM(TM), whorefinder, and such, who like me don’t possess your awesome command of tone, persona, figurative language, and– what was that big word again?–“irony.”

        I won’t bother– pearls before swine– belaboring the difference between Korea and Japan (to be sure, a Jewgroid has good cause to consider distinctions grievous), but it would be a sore thing if too many people get amused by my awesome wit and discriminating musical taste, only to encourage me to write more political garbage detrimental to disadvantaged minorities like yourself.

        So please, don’t distract yourself from trolling against Trump (he’s working for the Bohemian Grove now, is that it? Boy I’ll make sure not to vote then!) by vainly attempting disqualification. I can give you all the quotable quotes for disqualification you and yours need right here, thwack! YOUR MOMZ BUTTPLUGS TASTE DELICIOUS THWACK, U CAN QUOTE ME!!!!

        But you already knew they taste delicious, didn’t you? 🙂

        LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 8:02 pm Wrong Side of History

      Yeah. I can’t see it as cuckoldry.

      I was born to a single-mother.

      Not sure how my life would have panned out if my step-father didn’t step up.

      Lotta little white boys and white girls in the same situation right now through no fault of their own.

      LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 8:31 am Ironpusher

      I can see a little wiggle room with wifing up a single mommy (be very cautious) so long as dad was paying CS, but if he ain’t and you’re footing the bill then you’re a cuck. Doesn’t make you a bad person, but still a willing cuck.

      LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 8:48 am Hugo Stiglitz

        “I can see a little wiggle room with wifing up a single mommy (be very cautious)”

        – Ironpusher

        Of course. That was my original point. Somehow it was lost in all the simpering.

        These gelds are mirror images of those they detest. Demoralized and defeated. They do the work of the enemy.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 10:03 am Greg Eliot

        Stiglitz is right, the rest of you are, well… let’s just say not generous.

        I have no problem taking care of other White children of good stock who happen to have fallen into hard luck situations not of their own accord.

        Expense of resources? Meh… I’ll just go out and make some more… for I am a RIVER TO MY PEOPLE!

        [CH: most men with options will choose the child-less hottie over the single mom. it’s not godly, but it is self-interested.]

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 11:42 am uh

        I actually said this on the other post but it didn’t show up:

        “The weeb is actually the male analogue of the assocked-desouled modern female: as the latter is defined by her fall from potential motherhood into slutdom owing to total enfranchisement of her sexuality, the former is defined by his fall from potential fatherhood by total disenfranchisement of his sexuality, and flight into the fantasy-world of teeheeing, bobba tea-slurping gook cartoon characters.”

        And you know, that gives these alt-right dweebs the perfect illusion of a superior vantage-point from which to judge everyone else as “pointy elbows”, the world as a “Jewish psy-op” down to the smallest detail, and anyone who disagrees as an “agent”. It isn’t paranoid as much as it is pathetically sheltered, 100% symptomatic of a life spent primarily on the internet.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 11:54 am uh

        If you wanna see what happens when an actual Japanese woman goes WN, check out what remains of majorityrights.com. Minds churning endlessly upon themselves in a vacuum, impervious to anything outside their meticulously self-catering umwelt.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2016 at 10:54 am Greg Eliot

        Hey, one of my posts finally got through, whaddya know? :duckface

        And with a reply from CH, no less… although said reply goes on the “Well, DUH!” pile. lzozlozlozl

        LikeLike


  7. on April 7, 2016 at 2:42 pm CBR600RR_Rider

    i wonder how the rape stats would change if UK was “cleansed” of it’s non british subjects…

    LikeLike


  8. on April 7, 2016 at 2:49 pm Praise_CH

    CH – Please note, that this metric does not count the countless BETAs who still act as a father and provide for other men’s children. These cuckoldry numbers are strictly upon biological belief from the moment of birth.

    If you expand the definitions to include legal fatherhood, such as a step-father, the number should increase dramatically.

    Cuckoldry culture, is becoming the norm.

    LikeLike


  9. on April 7, 2016 at 3:02 pm Diversity Is Good

    And note as well that the physical violation of rape last minutes, with recurrent bouts of psychological distress, but the physical and emotional violations of cuckoldry can last eighteen years, uninterrupted.

    Or longer, maybe the rest of his life. A lot of families have one child, or only one son out of two children.

    LikeLike


  10. on April 7, 2016 at 3:35 pm Corvo

    If we’re talking eugenics, we should acknowledge that Whorefinder’s preferred means of seduction also has an arguable eugenic value.

    LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 5:47 pm Craig

      Natural selection rape!

      LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 5:50 pm Johnny Redux

      Rascally Reference Rape!

      LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 10:52 am whorefinder

      I’m Hitler rape!

      LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 11:49 am uh

      Uzbek rape rly

      LikeLike


  11. on April 7, 2016 at 3:40 pm Wrong Side of History

    Women never truly reach mental adulthood. Leaving them unsupervised and in control of their decisions is a pretty retarded idea.

    Give the sand nuggas credit for their darkly enlightened views on the opposite sex.

    LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 5:57 pm Johnny Redux

      Let’s face it, the sand dune monkeys are not the brightest bulbs in the box, and certainly are far from being enlightened (especially after umpteen generations of inbreeding and intentional dumbing down under Islam). As such, they come up with simplistic solutions to problems. They know, if let loose, the ‘bitches be crazy’, so their solution is simple – keep them under control. Sometimes the simple solution is the best. The West’s enlightenment and progressive views have also been its downfall.

      LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 11:20 pm Pwn

      Their views on women are so hilariously beta and pathetic. One must be a shit head beta to think raising a tent above each of your women is how you run society because they find you a revolting weakling.

      LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 4:44 am Danger

        And yet, they are here raping our women while everyone, except the men with balls, are yoo afraid to send them back or kill them outright.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 8:17 am Pwn

        Nice logic, danger. Because idiots from a culture move to the west and rape women means they’re view of women is pertinent. Even feminists make more sense. Lol

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 10:10 am Johnny Redux

        Pwn, I am not saying that we should emulate their beliefs or ways (including their foul treatment of women). What I am saying is that the simple, obvious solution to controlling the natural society-destroying tendencies of women is to create an overall societal framework that keeps those tendencies locked down. Such a societal framework, in the West, which struck a balance between enlightened behavior, yet a control on women, was Victorian England or even Germany under National Socialism, where the energies of women were directed in positive directions instead of unbridled implosive behaviors.

        LikeLike


  12. on April 7, 2016 at 3:43 pm RS

    We recently found out my mother-in-law and her younger sister were both products of an affair. Grandma is 91 and got away with her secret for over 60 years. Grandpa is 93, has Alzheimer’s and is oblivious. When my father-in-law called his geneticist nephew he was told that, in his experience, as much as 30% of all men are raising children not biologically their own.

    LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 5:37 pm Captain Obvious

      > “for over 60 years…” ——— That puts you back in the friggin Eisenhower Administration [maybe late Truman]. Whatever happened to “Father Knows Best” and “Leave it to Beaver” and whatnot? Back circa that era, adultery must have been vastly more difficult to pull off discretely [unless you were in a really big city like NYC]. BTW, did you learn the true identity of your wife’s biological grandfather?

      LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 8:59 pm RS

        Tried to answer- didn’t go through. So, apologies if multiple answers appear.

        We did find out that grandma had a 3 year long affair with a neighbor. We have a name but he was older than her so I’m sure he’s passed by now. He had two daughters, so my mother-in-law has a couple extra siblings out there too.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 6:00 am Captain Obvious

        > “grandma had a 3 year long affair with a neighbor” ——— Thank G0d that her poor husband has Alzheimer’s. Still, though, you need to get all of the genealogical info from all of the parties while they’re still alive – if it were I, then I’d track down all of the relatives and put together a proper family tree [although I’m well aware that most people have neither the inclination nor the strength of character to do something like that].

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 6:01 am Captain Obvious

        Also, I’d take DNA swabs on both the Old Man & the Old Woman before they pass. It’s possible that the Old Woman is wrong about this – only the DNA knows for certain.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 6:07 am Captain Obvious

        Finally, not to be a total jerk or anything, but it sounds like your Mother-in-Law is the product of {Alpha Cad} X {Hypergamous MILF}, which means that your wife is at least 50% the product of {Alpha Cad} X {Hypergamous MILF}. Ergo any daughters you have by her will be at least 25% the product of {Alpha Cad} X {Hypergamous MILF}. BOTTOM LINE: Keep a close eye on your wife & daughters. Move to a house way out in the middle of the country, with no neighbors, and keep them far away from the temptations of the Big City.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 7:24 am RS

        We found out through DNA testing. I’m the wife btw- so the cad genes are on the other side. 😉 Though, trust me, close eyes are kept on our daughter.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


  13. on April 7, 2016 at 3:44 pm itsme

    we DO live in a rape culture.

    paternity rape culture
    divorce rape culture
    rape accusation culture

    lozlzozlzozlzzolzzolzz

    it’s funny (and sad) cuz it’s true

    LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 6:00 pm Johnny Redux

      Don’t forget, “White Guilt Rape Culture”.

      LikeLike


  14. on April 7, 2016 at 3:47 pm Ponce du Lion

    I think this is a bait for beta commitment. The laboratory is Catholic as they said on the about page.

    Think for a moment: if this is true means that 99%-98% of women are satisfied with their men and want their eggs fertilised by them. This is, only the 2-1% of the bottom men are bad for women. And you know, a woman like she deserves the best always.

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 8:23 am Pwn

      Your flawed assumption is that women who are displeased with their mates must cuckold them. If only half of women who are displeased cheat and half of those get pregnant, then it’s around 10% of women whom are displeased.

      LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 12:25 pm Ponce du Lion

      This is precisely the percentage I was thinking about. Although giving the current degeneracy I don’t understand why is still so low. Means that women are much more satisfied with beta seed than thought in the manosphere, even they prefer beta seed than beta sex, what’s against all evo principles.
      CH what are your thoughts on that??
      Positive selection by our hajnal ancestors of bonobo shield white women(and ostracism for sluts)?

      LikeLike


  15. on April 7, 2016 at 3:49 pm Coldwarvet

    Cuck-mania! It’s everywhere! The whole of what western civ has devolved to what can only be expressed as a giant cuckster-phuckk! From the Cuckstain religion’s open arms/wallets to anything that bleats or bleeds, to the giant beta buzz saw of the modern “polite” hive mind swarming white corpuscle-style upon any minute fertile invasion of crime-speak by any real talker anywhere.
    I’d also say, based on the last coupla’ weeks of observing “the scene” – that Trump has about shot his wad, Hitlary has consolidated the battlefield against her erstwhile bubble gum and jack rocks for seniors “challenger,” and we’re now set for six months of the slow unrolling of “what they had planned all along.” No change, “meet the new boss, same as the old boss,” in other words.
    “If voting could change anything, it would be illegal.”

    LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 3:58 pm Captain Obvious

      One of The Donald’s big problems now is that Lyin’ Ted the Psychopath has PLAGIARIZED The Donald’s entire campaign, so that, in classical terms, it’s nearly impossible to distinguish between the two of them, at least on paper. As far as I can tell, Princeton- and Harvard-edumakated Lyin’ Ted the Psychopath has never had an original idea in his entire life – he’s a friggin intellectual parasite. G0d I hate plagiarism.

      LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 4:20 pm Corvo

        In my humble opinion, Trump needs to get back to basics and hammer home over and over and over again his main points:

        #1 – The Wall

        #2 – Deportation of illegals

        #3 – Better trade deals

        #4 – No unnecessary/stupid wars; and any wars we fight we’ll be sure to plunder the oil to pay for it

        Force Cruz to engage him on the issues. He can blast Cruz as a Lyin’ plagarist as he hammers home his points. People already associate Trump with all of the above major positions, and if Trump can frame this as “whom do you think came up with this idea and whom do you trust to build that wall?” he will win.

        Force Cruz to try to find daylight between his and Trump’s positions. The areas of disagreement are areas where Trump is more moderate than Cruz. In a normal primary that is a liability, but at this point, highlighting how Cruz is the more “right-wing” of the two on any areas of disagreement will throw a monkey-wrench in the whole “Trump is so extreme / fascist he is a disaster” narrative the media has been beating for a month now.

        Trump has winning positions and he had them first. Keep it simple. Hammer that home. Disengage from the personality issues and hammer home the reasons why people wanted Trump from the beginning.

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 4:43 pm Captain Obvious

        Corvo, I would like to see SOMEONE publicize the $500,000 which Lyin’ Ted wired to Carly in order to make the Sarah Isgur Flores problem go away, and of course the $1,000,000 that Lyin’ Ted received from Mr Establishment himself, B!tch McConnell. BTW, my understanding is that Lyin’ Ted “wrote” the TPA [the precursor to the TPP] for B!tch.

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 4:47 pm Captain Obvious

        Between submitting falsified FEC data for his TX Senate campaign [omitting the dirty money from Goldman Sachs and Citicorp] and now the $500,000 mistress payoff from his campaign coffers [which is completely unprecedented, as far as I can tell], Lyin’ Ted has committed some rather serious felonies.

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 4:48 pm Captain Obvious

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 6:05 pm Johnny Redux

        Ted: “What exactly are you saying about me, Captain Obvious?”

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 6:40 pm uh

        His team appear to be retooling at the moment. I doubt it will come out half as sensible as Corvo’s advice, but maybe they’ll hit a point or two. My guess is that he’s coasting on his northeast gimme and not planning for California.

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 7:21 pm Lucius Somesuch

        CO, I think at this point Cruz is only a stalking horse: this is a GOPe/TPTB scorched earth strategy. No more ill can be breathed against Cruz in front of non-AltRight-reading voters until Trump arrives at the convention denied his threshold of delegates, thence to this risible and obviously predestined-to-fail Ryan option.

        Cruz is just cannon fodder, a kind of Frankenstein they’ll patch together and shoot up with amphetamines until they let its ass backdrop in the moat around the convention they intend to hide behind from the will of the voters.

        At this point, handwriting angry letters to the RNC and the assorted Senate/Gubernatorial committees may do as much good as casting votes. Let them know you mean for all their careers to die, not just the little sacrificial lamb Ryan. Pick Trump or they’re finished.

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 7:38 pm Corvo

        “At this point, handwriting angry letters to the RNC and the assorted Senate/Gubernatorial committees may do as much good as casting votes. Let them know you mean for all their careers to die, not just the little sacrificial lamb Ryan. Pick Trump or they’re finished.”

        Funny you say that — just today I replied to some GOP fundraiser email I received thusly:

        “Fuck the GOP. Take me off your mailing list. Trump 2016.”

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 9:27 pm Lucius Somesuch

        @Corvo: ‘Funny you say that — just today I replied to some GOP fundraiser email I received thusly:

        “Fuck the GOP. Take me off your mailing list. Trump 2016.”’

        –I’m seriously contemplating it, though of course the wording will have to be ‘just so’ lest I get the N$A & the C0fC simultaneously making my life difficult.

        Mickey Kaus has praised the high utility of handwritten letters to Congress– the communication staffers supposedly dread the most. I believe he puts the force-multiplier effect at 12 over phone-calls. Handwritten letters are the rat that shows up in the kitchen: each angry epistle signifies to worried politicians a battalion of pissed-off voters seething between the lines.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 8:24 am Sentient

        “Cruz is just cannon fodder, a kind of Frankenstein they’ll patch together and shoot up with amphetamines until they let its ass backdrop in the moat around the convention they intend to hide behind from the will of the voters.”

        Indeed… Cruz still believes he has a chance (like the sad Mafia character in Goodfellas), but if this was ancient Rome or modern DRC, he would be hacked down with machetes before the first ballot… but still surprised.

        Gaycuck however, his actions are knowing treason.

        LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 4:10 pm Captain Obvious

      CH: “cuckservatives sell out their children’s and their nation’s future, and their ancestors’ pasts, on the altar of liberal dogma… GoodWhite Swedes…” ——— To date, pretty much the entirety of the Anti-Donald campaign has amounted to the Elites manipulating the ultra-malleable Lutherans in the Midwest [Iowa, Kansas, Wisconsin, Minnesota] and the Joseph-Smith-ians out of Salt Lake City [Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, maybe Colorado, possibly California]. It’s somewhere between appalling & terrifying to witness the extent to which The Frankfurt School has been able to turn these pseudo-Christian sects into friggin su!cide cults.

      LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 4:10 pm Captain Obvious

        PS: Thank G0d that The Donald was able to narrowly defeat the Lutheran Insanity in Missouri.

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 4:15 pm Captain Obvious

        BTW, the far-northern European Lutherans were NOT founding stock Americans – the Germans of the 13 Colonies were Anabaptist/Mennonite/Hussite immigrants from southern German & Czechoslovakia. Also, my suspicion is that core of Mormonism comes from 19th Century immigrants out of England [that’s who the Romneys are], NOT from founding stock Colonists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_Romney

        LikeLike


  16. on April 7, 2016 at 3:59 pm Hugo Stiglitz

    “The research shows that the lower a purported father’s socioeconomic status, the more likely his wife got someone else to father the child. From a Darwinian standpoint this makes perfect sense, since she wants her offspring to have the highest-caliber DNA, which may not come from the stiff she settled for at the altar.”

    http://disinfo.com/2011/02/one-out-of-ten-people-werent-fathered-by-the-man-they-believe-is-dad/

    OT: A male Norwegian politician was ass raped by a Somali Immigrant. The Somali did four years in prison, and now is to be returned to Somalia.

    The politician is highly dismayed, and racked with guilt. He started to abuse drugs because of depression due to the poor immigrant being returned to his homeland.

    Let that sink in: he was ass raped by this dude and feels guilty because he reported it.

    Fuck. These. People. They deserve every fucking thing coming to them.

    The worst thing thing about this situation is I’ll most likely be too old to travel to Europe to liquidate these savages once the continent falls.

    LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 4:08 pm Wrong Side of History

      Lol @ getting raped as a man

      I’d seriously off myself.

      As if this cuck loser faggot didn’t already have enough trouble looking at himself in the mirror.

      LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 8:29 pm pdwalker

        Maybe he liked it and pines for his lost love.

        LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 4:14 pm Corvo

      Yeah – every time some WN assclown talks about how we need to restrict immigration to “NW Europeans” I am going to point them to this story.

      NW Euros are my brethren and I’m sure there are many worth saving, but as a society they are the most fucked/cucked of all the White nations.

      LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 5:00 pm Mr Bigglesworth

        There is no greater, more evil deception that a woman can inflict on a man, than this.

        It is the Ultimate betrayal.

        http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/11730987/Racial-identity-Black-woman-raised-to-believe-she-was-white.html

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 5:42 pm Captain Obvious

        Well if it’s any consolation, it was an Eskimo who was cuck’ed in that affair. LOL’ed.

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 6:42 pm uh

        That story could not be transposed to Italy. Nor Russia.

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 8:11 pm tteclod

        How do you know a Jew is not Jewish?

        He doesn’t stone his wife for adultery.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 8:19 am The Straw

        “Well if it’s any consolation, it was an Eskimo who was cuck’ed in that affair. ”

        You mean Joseph?

        LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 4:51 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

      That’s one reason I’m hoping it sets off soon.

      If not, I’m sure we’ll have developed some advanced tactical weaponized assault wheelchairs for the old men.

      LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 5:32 pm Sean Fielding

        https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQxqVylkjHi4dFV8fGwdpQTL-SD8NzI6VZ3RNE0PTyICmFlBSk14w

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 6:43 pm uh

        i need me one a dem

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 7:46 pm plumpjack

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 8:42 pm uh

        YES

        LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 5:27 pm Vincent

      Not really OT. Was it more than 1 muzzie rapist? And not to be crude, but let’s say someone wanted to force oral pleasure for themselves on me. They’ll get an amputation for free.

      LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 6:14 pm Johnny Redux

      Well, I for one trust the descendants of those who came over for land, better jobs, and overall freedom, rather than as some religious cult (who have already proven themselves blindly loyal to teachings rather than what they can see and feel for themselves). I have to conclude at this time in my life, that religious people – especially Christians (who follow a faith of general love, weakness and passivity) – are, overall, weak minded and easily led in other matters (including politics).

      LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 5:48 am Captain Obvious

        JR, what the midwestern Lutherans and the mountain-states Smithians practice isn’t any “Chr!stianity” that I recognize. Look at a map of the states which The Donald has won, versus what Lyin’-Ted/Gheysich/Foam-Boy have won, and it’s obvious that The Donald is getting Founding Stock original 13 Colonies votes, whereas Lyin’-Ted/Gheysich/Foam-Boy are getting much more recent mid-19th Century immigrants to the country.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 8:27 am Pwn

        Christians always were weak willed. That’s why people who couldn’t give a shit about Christian doctrine promoted Christianity to the people they ruled. To be expected from a religion of and for slaves though.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 9:41 am Captain Obvious

        Pwn, you’re not describing any “Chr!stianity” with which I’m familiar. This Cuckstianity is something new, foisted upon the su!cidally obedient by the Frankfurt School and the S0d0mites.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 10:28 am Johnny Redux

        Captain, the fact remains that religion (here, Christianity) always bends to the dominant will of the people, and not vice versa. That is what is so dangerous about religion in the first place. As an example, the “Pope” today is in no way comparable to a Pope of 50 years ago, let alone 100 years ago. As a further example, the British Empire, spread by conquering and subjugating other peoples, would not have been possible under a pure interpretation of the New Testament. Absolutely no support for such behavior and one would be a fool to suggest that Jesus would advocate such things. Yet, in man’s interpretation of the bible to suit his ends (I guess, “bringing Jesus to the heathens”), such things as the subjugation of India, the killing of Boers in South Africa, killing off of the Irish in the Great Famine, and WWI/WWII would not have been possible without a twisted interpretation of the Bible. Once you give an act “God’s blessing for our side”, then there is no turning back, just blind obedience and destruction without much further thought (by the pawn pieces gettingh churned up in the meat grinder) involved.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 12:35 pm Ponce du Lion

        Well said Redux. The same is true for Islam, but inversely, you have to screw the Quran in order to stop the bombing and stoning.
        Christianity is no longer a useful religion for Europe. Merkel is Christian-Socialist. All the welfare and altruism, have their roots in Christianity. Particularly here in Europe.

        LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 7:48 pm Hugo Stiglitz

      Correction: the dude gots depressed from being raped. The rest of the post is accurate.

      LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 8:12 pm tteclod

      Father men who can.

      LikeLike


  17. on April 7, 2016 at 5:07 pm Wrong Side of History

    What is the proper punishment for cuckoldry in a non-pozzed, masculine society?

    LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 6:35 pm Johnny Redux

      Public shaming and humiliation.

      LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 8:07 pm hans

      Shunning.
      Stoning is the Ork way.

      LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2016 at 8:16 pm tteclod

        Until we restore the death penalty for adultery, any man’s wife is fair game.

        LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 9:10 pm Reb

      The problem would take care of itself.

      LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 12:38 pm Ponce du Lion

      The Hajnal method: ostracism. Is fair, is a social contract is ours. Single mothers is also cuck. They must be outlaw the sooner.

      LikeLike


  18. on April 7, 2016 at 5:39 pm fakeemail

    Considering what taxes go to, that makes 100% of men cucks.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  19. on April 7, 2016 at 7:09 pm Humans are animals

    LikeLike


  20. on April 7, 2016 at 7:49 pm hans

    I´m actually vehemently disputing this “female are the more valuable sex” assertion.
    It it is ONLY true for a short time after an extinction level event.

    When a certain number of womb-support units have been produced, then the MALE become MOST valuable. As it is HIM that is fighting and defending and building and creatively advancing civilization.

    Clear proof is found in the modern western all out attack on young boys through the invention of bogus mental illnesses and the constant brainwashing into socialism or cuckservatism.
    I can right now watch the horrible outcome of this live on the streets.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on April 7, 2016 at 9:07 pm Reb

      Reproductive value of what? Not many people on this earth are valuable at all. In fact most humans add little or even devalue humanity. And so…

      LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 8:48 am plumpjack

      good comment and reply by reb. at this stage all of humanity has a crisis of purpose. the only reason to create more humans is to fix all the problems that humans created, which are then increased again by adding more humans. it’s an accelerating self-destruction cycle.

      all this posturing and lobbying for the rights of women is simply a front to conceal the biological fact that the world, in its current state, needs more swingin dicks and fewer wombs, and that nearly ALL women are comfort women, except for those which are preserving certain valuable genetic lineages.

      LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 1:11 pm uh

        Your two statements there cancel out, plumpjack.

        Unless people are being subtracted at the rate of hundreds of millions, there isn’t much we can do to avoid the final reckoning. And at these levels the only conceivable “for what”, if some steady state were feasible, would be remodeling everything after Singapore — which isn’t even remotely possible, nor in my opinion desirable. Would (will?) look more like Rio or Dakka.

        As for Reb’s comment, Nietzsche relies on that bit of rhetoric in his writings, and it’s one I’ve never been able to accept. Value is not inherent to any human, or any group of humans. Humans are alive, life is about reproducing, and that’s the only “value” that exists — at which point the word “value” becomes meaningless, because there’s no outside evaluator to oppose another “value”. If every white person in the world decided not to reproduce, all the other races would anyway.

        Actually, Nietzsche will in one sentence say “this type is more valuable”, and literally in the next say “there is no such thing as value at all”, so the fiction or totally subjective nature of value is obvious. His solution was a) affirming that subjectivity and b) conceiving of the masses as “justifying” the “higher type” — which fails for two reasons: it implies the higher type has some purpose which transcends animality or assumes that transcending animality was ever desirable, and it ignores industrial processes which were going on regardless of whoever was at the top or conceived as deserving to be at the top, i.e. is purely idealistic.

        No argument such as “white person x invented this to improve the lives of y” is permissible if the premise that human numbers are the problem is accepted: the more things improve, the worse things get.

        More swingin’ dicks = more meat = less land = more crowding = more of the same.

        The front is to conceal that white women are open-ended metabolic systems. If the function of the female is to eventuate in offspring, not reproducing means they’re nothing but calorie-sinks. This leaves a ton of energy i.e. calories to expend in some novel, maladaptive fashion. With a highly intelligent (or morbidly over-stimulated) animal like the European-American, that fashion is fashion itself.

        And hans is wrong because he’s jumbling concepts, obviously.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 1:23 pm uh

        Actually, Singapore is both one of the smallest nations and one of the top importers, so it’s one of the farthest of all from a model of steady-statehood. Its import list boils down to “everything”, with virtually nothing to fall back on if removed from global trade — which is its entire raison d’être.

        I dimly recall looking at a list of the most self-sufficient nations. Costa Rica, Switzerland and Mauritius were some of the top names.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 1:55 pm plumpjack

        yes, uh. as usual, you’re points are well thought-out, and correct.. if I had more down time I might sit down and write a book exploring all these points and attempt to draw a useful conclusion. but I don’t have that time, so I settle for making broad, slightly hyperbolic, entertaining meta-analyses of certain problems because a) it’s fun, b) it’s cathartic, and, c) it’s more helpful than NO understanding of the problem, even if ultimately they’re unsolvable and that an indiscriminate mass die-off is inevitable

        try to lighten up a little dude. come out to California and I’ll buy you a beer

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 2:08 pm uh

        Thanks man. This is me being cathartic, lol.

        I’ve been out there quite a few times — San Diego (walked over border from San Ysidro), Oxnard, SF, Sac, Fresno, Santa Cruz, Long Beach. Probably should’ve stayed and shacked up with a Mexican girl for some Darwinian fitness.

        Always wanted to go up to Grass Valley, see that area. Trinity Alps Wilderness if I weren’t a fuckin cripple. It’s a beautiful state. Never forget driving through it the first time, passing through Salinas … Steinbeck had long been one of my favorites, but I finally understood his love of the country.

        LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 12:51 pm Ponce du Lion

      Yeah artificial wombs are going to wreck the female monopoly.
      You are seeing the worth of each sex from a rational perspective.
      The instinct that women are worthy is still DNA written here, just like the instinct to avoid sluts is here. Even “pleasure sluts”those that said sex could be for pleasure and love/reproduction independently.

      LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 3:11 pm Glengarry

        You can already do this by hiring surrogate mothers, but society for some reason frowns when single men do it. Same comment with a couple of links in moderation.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 7:38 pm Ponce du Lion

        @Glen
        In Western countries is too expensive. Russia is the key. Ten times cheaper.
        And I don’t want a female egg. I have thinking in that. In just searched and found this
        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_egg

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 7:40 pm Ponce du Lion

        Unreadable thanks to “proofreader”

        LikeLike


  21. on April 7, 2016 at 7:56 pm Barry

    Great read on this is Sperm Wars by Robin Baker. Best book I have read on female sexuality.

    LikeLike


  22. on April 7, 2016 at 8:51 pm Reb

    And race cuckoldry is as evil maybe more as in selling out your own race.

    LikeLike


  23. on April 7, 2016 at 8:53 pm lol

    I couldn’t help but think of Chateau when I happened on this http://www.girlsaskguys.com/dating/a25007-the-reality-of-nice-guys-alphas-other-self-defined-men

    Note the “often financially” part.

    LikeLike


  24. on April 7, 2016 at 10:06 pm Corvo

    OT: Today France passed a new law making it illegal to PAY for sex. Not illegal to prostitute yourself; not illegal to RECEIVE money for sex. Only illegal to PAY for sex.

    Get it? Men have to be held accountable; women need not be held accountable for their actions.

    If a woman wants to trade fux for bux, she has a right to do so. If the man happens to get busted and thrown in jail for engaging in that transaction, no skin off her back, just move onto the next one.

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/07/europe/france-prostitution/index.html

    LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 11:25 pm Moses

      Sadly, another brick in the wall.

      Women are always poor wittle victims. To wit:

      – Women not accountable for killing their babies in utero, the doctor is
      – Women not accountable for choices leading to sex if she’s had even a sip of alcohol, the man is
      – Women not accountable for selling their bodies, the male buyer is

      I’m actually ok with all of the above IF and only IF women lose voting rights. If women are so weak and foolish that they are not accountable for their choices, then clearly they are too weak and foolish to vote.

      LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 8:29 am Pwn

        I agree. The travesty is giving women political rights not these laws, although I’d keep prostitution completely legal.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 8:30 am Pwn

        Also, if women are victims of abortion, why is abortion legal? Why allow rich doctors to prey on poor pregnant women? Ban the practice. This is the rhetoric you must force on the feminists when they bring this shit up. Combined with why should they have the right to vote.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 10:48 am Corvo

        “Women not accountable for choices leading to sex if she’s had even a sip of alcohol, the man is”

        This one always blows my mind. Setting aside all the stuff about the bogus “rape culture” and outright false-rape accusations, there appears to be a legal principal at play that if a woman is intoxicated, or intoxicated to a certain degree, she cannot give “consent” to have sex.

        In nearly all of these situations, everyone is drinking and the man (i.e. the alleged “rapist”) is also intoxicated — yet in the eyes of the law the man always retains his ability to “consent” and always retains his responsibility for his actions. If the law were fairly applied, in a situation where both man and woman are intoxicated, you would either have a dual-rape (paging Whorefinder) or no rape at all.

        And it’s not as cute of an argument as you might think. While it’s true that a man has to physically get it up for sex, which some would think is evidence that he’s consented, on a physical level it’s just as true that women will get wet even during rape. So pure physical arousal seems to be invalid evidence of “consent.”

        Moreover, back in my youthful indiscretion days at college, I definitely experienced a few total “blackout” nights where I was apparently walking around partying and doing all sorts of crazy shit that I had ZERO memory of the following day. If we’re going to let women abdicate their responsibility for choices they made to have sex while intoxicated, how can a man who is blackout drunk (yet still physically capable of having sex) be said to “consent” to sex, much less be guilty of rape?

        But all of the above is “too much logic” for the womenzesz. Yes all womenz. Womenzesz are victims; men are to blame. But womenzesz are equal!!!!!

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 12:29 pm uh

        Lol logic is phallic oppression bro

        DUH

        LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 7:41 am gumdeo

      Yet another manifest injustice.

      LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 3:13 pm Glengarry

      That law was inspired by a similar one in (you guessed it) Sweden.

      LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 4:09 pm plumpjack

      is there a small chance that this law is an attempt to curtail porn? if porn-making is unaffected then it seems like an incentive for anyone who wants paid sex to get those cameras rolling

      LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 4:45 pm Corvo

        Having never employed the services of a hooker, I don’t know whether there is typically a “filming” surcharge if you want those cameras rolling.

        And having never produced porn in France, I’m not certain of the legal requirements by way of obtaining releases, copyrights, and other intellectual property issues.

        That said, plumpjack — I like the cut of your jib, sir. If you’re not a lawyer, you missed your calling.

        LikeLike


  25. on April 7, 2016 at 10:10 pm Ishamael

    you’re probably on to something CH, but if you’re gonna compare these figures, it should be % of men cucked to % of women raped in their lifetime. or % of men cucked in 2006-2007 to what you have now. apples to oranges otherwise, too easy to shoot the argument down before it gets to a larger audience.

    LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 11:32 pm Pwn

      Do you think that year was un representative? Like the next year did the rate go up or down? Because if you don’t think so, your point is moot.

      LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 8:53 pm shtatishtics

        The shtatishtics that CH reports seem feminist propaganda to me, as well as badly used as Ishamael writes.

        As a comparison The USA per-year rate of reported “robbery” is 0.110% and of “aggravated assault” is 0.241% per year, and a large majority of victims (and criminals) are male and dark skinned, and that is very likely to be very much under-reported.

        If a 0.5% per-year rape rate, where rape is 4 times more common than “robbery” and over 2 times more common than “aggravated assault”, holds for a woman’s adult life, let’s say 15-55, or 40 years, then up to 20% of women are raped at least once in their lifetime, which is a standard claim of feminist propaganda, which the linked to article repeats.

        While a 2% total non-per-year, lifetime rate of cuckoldry means that not much more than 2% of children would have a father other than expected, and is also a standard claim of feminist propaganda.

        Rather more reliable figures are that between 10-50% of children a man has in his lifetime and thinks he is the father of are not his (the lower the status of the man the higher the percentage), and that between 1% and 5% of women in their lifetime are forced (violence, threats, blackmail) to have sex with someone they don’t desire. As to the latter the official statistics are:

        en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States
        en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_the_United_States#Rate_of_victimization

        That is between 0.027% and 0.040% per year for both sexes, or over 40 years a lifetime rate of most around 1%-1.6%.

        LikeLike


  26. on April 7, 2016 at 10:24 pm Wrong Side of History

    LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2016 at 10:24 pm Wrong Side of History

      Alpha.

      LikeLike


  27. on April 7, 2016 at 11:33 pm Moses

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. If you have kids get a paternity test.

    It’s super easy. Buy a kit at Walgreen’s, swab inside the kid’s cheek and your cheek and mail it in. A week later you know.

    I did it on the down low when our son was born. Now I *know* he’s my son.

    Bear in mind, though, that an over-the-counter test has no legal value. If you do a test and it turns out the kid is not yours, keep your mouth shut and contact a lawyer pronto.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on April 8, 2016 at 12:59 pm Ponce du Lion

      It’s literally one of the best investment you can do in your life. Economically, psychological, biologically.

      LikeLike


  28. on April 8, 2016 at 1:15 am madmax1861

    Here’s Tammy Wynette singing about cuckoldry:

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  29. on April 8, 2016 at 4:46 am olivermaerk

    Those people see dangers where there are none – but on the other side they are completely blind fort he real dangers!

    From: http://freedompowerandwealth.com

    LikeLike


  30. on April 8, 2016 at 7:30 am wolfie65

    These numbers seem awfully low.
    I’m guessing that up to 2-30% of men who think they are fathers actually aren’t.

    And finding semi-attractive women who do NOT claim to have been ‘abused’ at least once by *someone* (usually before they were 20) is also not so easy….

    LikeLike


  31. on April 8, 2016 at 8:03 am plumpjack

    a decent, play-by-play prediction of how Trump can clinch the nomination:
    http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com/mish-on-how-the-donald-can-do-it-barely/

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 12:28 pm uh

      Here’s the bad news. It’s all on California. If he misses there, he’ll need all of those uncommitted delegates. And “uncommitted” just screams “stupid bitch who will fag out at the last minute”.

      He canceled his California trip. Cruz is on his way there Monday. Cruz is a successful weasel with stray delegates. This ought to be Trump’s territory, but he doesn’t small-time it like Cruz. Problem is, California’s voting structure is rigorously small-time.

      It’s ripe territory for someone like Cruz, sadly.

      LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 1:14 pm plumpjack

        I’m thinking he’ll take California (cue Propellerhead song “Take California”). yeah it’s disgustingly left out here but it’s also the 7th largest economy in the world and there are a shitload of disgusted, overtaxed, over-legislated business owners, displaced skilled workers, and WNs who want to wipe the slate clean. IF Cruz wins here it will be by a hoôker’s pubic hair, but I’m feeling Trump on this one

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 1:36 pm uh

        I’m thinking of the hayseeds in the Inland Empire, is all. While not as gullible as the kulaks up in Wisconsin and Ohio, they’re pretty fuckin’ far from the Trumpian orbit, and I worry Cruz will make just the right noises where Trump won’t.

        And again, it’s the congressional district delegate structure that’s the toughest factor here. Unless the meeja are generalizing a run of luck among stray delegates, Cruz is actually good at poaching them.

        The meeja aren’t hazarding a prediction at this point either. I’m basing mine solely on Trump canceling the trip, Cruz’s momentum among delegates, and the growing drumbeat of “it’s up to the delegates” from the RNC.

        I do believe that if he’s close to 1237, he could sew up a nice big deal before the convention. Maybe that’s what that meeting was about a few days ago.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2016 at 8:24 am Captain Obvious

        Trump’s biggest problem in Cali will be the conglomerations of Joseph Smithians [Mormons]. Also, the original 19th Century settlers who planted the citrus groves in SoCal were largely Scandinavian Lutherans, but I don’t know how many of them [genetically & culturally] still persist in SoCal.

        LikeLike


  32. on April 8, 2016 at 8:24 am chris

    Fuck racism and sexism.

    Cuckoldism is the ism we need to put a stop to.

    And Cuckoldists are those who perpetuate cuckoldism.

    LikeLike


  33. on April 8, 2016 at 8:50 am TipTipTopKek

    Serious question tho, on an island nation where everybody is pretty much each other’s sixth cousin or closer, does 2% really matter from a racial perspective (ignoring the personal perspective for the moment)?

    Matters more now than 50 years ago, now they’ve got more non-Brit White immigration than anytime since 1066 and more non-White and non-Caucasian (yeah fam there’s a difference) than anytime in world history.

    Cuckoldry was a part of Brit humor going back decades before the immigrant issue, a good portion of Benny Hill’s skits involved his character being the backdoor man and I suspect that when he was a milkman he had some personal experience along those lines …

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 10:15 am waffleironmarch

      If individual morality is of secondary/malleable importance, then what the hell are we really preserving?

      LikeLike


  34. on April 8, 2016 at 9:17 am waffleironmarch

    The word “cuck” when commonly used as an insult in these circles is most logically seen as an abbreviation for “cuckold fetishist,” meaning someone who actively participates in their own betrayal and debasement–or in this case, the overall betrayal and debasement of the people they represent–for some misbegotten sense of gain. This implication is what creates the sense of horror and outrage the “cuck” abbreviation is meant to convey, whereas just the word “cuckold” on its own, denoting a man who is unknowingly or unwillingly betrayed by his wife, can actually apply to us all because we are the parties being non-consensual betrayed by people who have sold us out with no regard for our interests or cohesion as a unit that they are part of.

    LikeLike


  35. on April 8, 2016 at 9:25 am El Cid

    I’m surprised no one has brought up this documentary which aired on PBS called “Little White Lie:”

    http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/films/little-white-lie/

    Long story short – JAP cucked her Jewish beta husband with an urban vibrant she met doing virtue signalling work. The kid was at all times undeniably black/mixed appearing but they denied it by blaming her appearance on the cucked husband’s Sicilian uncle or something.

    It’d be funny if it weren’t so sad.

    LikeLike


  36. on April 8, 2016 at 11:01 am George

    Homeless “teen” suspook caught for murder of white college coed. Of course, MSM does not mention his race or give a picture. http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/arrest-made-killing-university-texas-student-haruka-weiser-n552991

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 11:09 am Corvo

      Somehow this tragic death must be the fault of the Confederate flag.

      LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 11:18 am Vincent

        Trump too. He incited this accidental murder through his hateful speeches and his plan to build a wall.

        LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 11:48 am Vincent

      Interesting name. Jewish dad, asian (japanese?) mother? Maybe she Tiger Mom, hai? If so, why she not at Yale?! Why she not at Harvard?!

      LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 12:09 pm uh

        Austin’s in the Texas German Belt, dude. Germans had names like “Weis” and “Schwarz” before Jews did, and still do.

        Damned if she wasn’t cute af though: http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/content/ktrk/images/cms/automation/images/1282400_630x354.jpg

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 12:46 pm Marcus

        UTA is hard to get into, don’t let the huge student population fool you.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2016 at 1:58 pm Captain Obvious

        > “Why she not at Harvard?” ——— HA HA HA White Boy mis-sperr Halvald HA HA HA

        LikeLike


  37. on April 8, 2016 at 12:28 pm Anon

    According to this I’m a cuck? You guys be honest. Got with my now wife 6 years ago, she was a single mother. Her boy took to me right away. Since I’ve been with them he’s done remarkably well. Calls me dad, i have made it a point to never call him son but i do care for him immensely.I have even swayed her over the years from voting for Obama to about to vote for Trump. Had zero money when I met her but since then I’ve climbed a lot of positions upward in a very physically demanding field, I’m the very best in my entire region.

    I lift, I’m fit. But does above situation qualify me as a cuck?

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 4:22 pm everybodyhatesscott

      Sounds like a troll but I’ll take the bait. No, if she had the kid before you met her, you are not a cuck. But go knock her up and have a couple of your own anyways.

      LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2016 at 6:56 am Anon

      Yes, man.
      Sorry.

      LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2016 at 8:20 am Captain Obvious

      Six years now? How many ch!llunzes of your own do you have by her?

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2016 at 12:45 pm Anonymous

        Zero. I met her in our 40s and neither of us wanted any. My oneteregret in life is that I didnt pop out some boys when I was younger. When I was younger and considering it I never met a girl I felt worthy to be a mother to my children. I do feel like I haven’t done my part. If I didnt have a conscience I’d impregnate a few younger white hotties far from home to do my part. But couldn’t do that to a younger me, subjecting them to the whole single mom thing.

        Instead I’ll do my best in raising a shitlord. He will get the straight truth on women and dindus from me.

        LikeLike


    • on April 11, 2016 at 3:06 am George

      Yes, you are a cuckold, although knowingly so. You are spending all of your energy and resources raising offspring from another man’s genetic lineage, just like the Reed warbler does for the cuckoo bird. Your genetic Y chromosome will go extinct, as it should.

      LikeLike


  38. on April 8, 2016 at 12:31 pm themanofmystery2

    Timing could literally not be more salient:

    4 days old. Kudos to this broad for speaking the truth. ❤ SCIENCE ❤ as CH says

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on April 9, 2016 at 9:05 am plumpjack

      blatantly omitted from her “scientific” analysis of women’s partnership preferences is how a woman’s SMV affects her options. she’s a 6, on a good day. therefore the guys who would choose her as wife material are about as pathetic as the example in the video.

      a hotter girl could attract a cad/dad in the same package. the only time she gets a stud is when he’s looking for a place to scratch the itch on his côck.

      her hamster takes shelter in the all-to-common naive female delusion that she’s doing all the choosing. that’s laughably not the case. she can only choose from what she attracts, which is either being tooled by a guy with options or being pedestalized by a nerd beta

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2016 at 2:14 pm themanofmystery2

        While I agree with your assertions that she just aint that hot and that she omitted that guys can be the choosers too, generally speaking MOST women receive offers of sex more than MOST men do. Women are the “choosier” sex as CH has already mentioned. Everyday life can tell a man that.

        I don’t think anything you’re saying negates the truth of the video, and we should spend more time applauding realtalk for truthbombs, no matter how weak their accelerant. Compare this to, for example, a feminist shrike screaming about rape culture. A chasm exists between the two scenarios, and we should be COPROP’ing as much of the counterculture alt-right Realism (with a capital R) as possible.

        [CH: the maxim “women choose, men are chosen” is true in the general, but shouldn’t be taken to mean that men do no choosing at all. evo psychs tend to miss that about the male prerogative.]

        LikeLike


  39. on April 8, 2016 at 1:44 pm M. M.

    OT:

    as fag hags are (un!)popular over here, this might be of cursory interest to some

    https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fille_à_pédés

    the french intro for “fag hags” is pretty much understandable and sort of funny, also, i didn’t know they had a word for it in the first place:

    Fille à pédés est une expression qui qualifie l’attitude d’une femme, souvent hétérosexuelle, fréquentant des hommes homosexuels avec assiduité. Le diminutif « FAP » est aussi parfois utilisé.

    LikeLike


  40. on April 8, 2016 at 3:03 pm Johnny Redux

    Speaking of a cuckold culture (in the general sense, as the feminists use with their broad sweeping terms), here’s the new Honey Maid commercial:

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 4:02 pm Vincent

      And dat liddle han’ at deh end dun takin’ dat cookie be brown. Sheet….

      LikeLike


  41. on April 8, 2016 at 3:23 pm Glengarry

    A lesbian inseminated with black semen (when she wanted white for some reason) sued. Her kid is at least still half hers. But I suppose that’s very very different.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2778009/I-t-let-family-White-lesbian-mother-inseminated-black-man-s-semen-sperm-bank-mixup-says-wanted-blonde-hair-blue-eyed-baby.html

    The just solution would be reimbursement for time and money as well as damages for the fraud perpetrated upon the cuckold.

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 3:32 pm uh

      *pops another tramadol*

      LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 4:23 pm Wrong Side of History

      Biracial with a carpet eating mother.

      Ouch town

      LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2016 at 4:38 pm Vincent

      –Through tears: Jennifer Cramblett, 36, said she is suing Midwest Sperm Bank for accidentally sending her a black man’s sperm because she fears a mistake like hers could happen again.–

      Well, she does have a point. She used the word “mistake.”

      LikeLike


  42. on April 8, 2016 at 7:56 pm peppermint

    If it becomes widely known that cuckoldry is accepted, men will take mate-guarding precautions and refuse to cooperate if they think cooperating would lead to their wife viewing the other man as desirable. That would be damaging to the cooperation that is the heart of White supremacy.

    Eliminating cuckoldry and polygyny is in everyone’s long-term interests, except for utterly worthless faggots who could never reproduce without cucking someone.

    LikeLike


  43. on April 8, 2016 at 8:19 pm Johnny Redux

    They need to give her back her money, after being so niggardly with her.

    LikeLike


  44. on April 9, 2016 at 6:12 am 7darktriad3

    [url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36002621[/url]

    Quite hilarious

    LikeLike


    • on April 10, 2016 at 12:30 am artichoke

      So either dominant genetics were responsible for the Archbishop’s very successful church career, or somebody used the connection and it was kept under wraps. Based on experience, I think the second is more likely, but now the family is covering up and saying it was such a shock. The mother knew who she actually allowed to breed with her.

      LikeLike


  45. on April 9, 2016 at 5:20 pm cortesar

    Faith leaders have praised the “dignity”, “grace” and “forgiveness” with which the Archbishop of Canterbury greeted the revelation that he is the illegitimate son of Sir Winston Churchill’s last private secretary
    ———————————————————————————————————
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/09/outpouring-of-respect-for-archbishop-justin-welby-after-dna-pate/

    Des not get better than this
    Die Cucks

    LikeLike


  46. on April 10, 2016 at 12:19 am artichoke

    Bernie Sanders had one child out of wedlock between wives, then adopted his current wife’s 3 kids by another man. Those kids seem to be producing grandchildren who are, therefor, not really Bernie’s. Meanwhile his biological son Levi has 3 kids, all adopted from China, so no biological kids. In other words, Bernie’s line is cut off and he has no grandkids. So he will become hateful enough that the establishment will want him for President.

    Likewise Bill Clinton has no kids, well maybe with one of his other women, but def. not Chelsea. On the other hand, Chelsea is Hillary’s daughter and as far as we know, Chelsea is fertile and may give her grandchildren. So Hillary may seem less reliable to “them”.

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    boned on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Captain Obvious on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Ironsides on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    FastEddie on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Captain Obvious on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Captain Obvious on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    oink on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Alex the Goon on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    APL on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Sentient on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
  • Top Posts

    • Cesar Sayoc, "White Male" (& Deep State Updates)
    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
    • Tourette's Game
    • When The Jumbotron Test Is Crushed
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • "Conspiracy Theory" Conspiracy
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: