Via Mangan (Twatter link: @Mangan150), the reason why monogamy beat polygamy:
It all comes down to paternal certainty. Where (beta) men are reasonably assured the kid is theirs, civilization can flourish. Where men have no idea if the kid is theirs or some other (alpha) dude’s, chaos, dysfunction, and indigence reign supreme.
Ironically, the incredible success of the modern West portends a near future of less monogamy and more de facto polygyny, possibly reverting Western Civilization to a more primitive form:
It was not until 1943, amid world war, that penicillin was found to be an effective treatment for syphilis. This study investigated the hypothesis that a decrease in the cost of syphilis due to penicillin spurred an increase in risky non-traditional sex. Using nationally comprehensive vital statistics, this study found evidence that the era of modern sexuality originated in the mid to late 1950s. Measures of risky non-traditional sexual behavior began to rise during this period. These trends appeared to coincide with the collapse of the syphilis epidemic. Syphilis incidence reached an all-time low in 1957 and syphilis deaths fell rapidly during the 1940s and early 1950s. Regression analysis demonstrated that most measures of sexual behavior significantly increased immediately following the collapse of syphilis and most measures were significantly associated with the syphilis death rate. Together, the findings supported the notion that the discovery of penicillin decreased the cost of syphilis and thereby played an important role in shaping modern sexuality.
The mid-20th Century and 21st Century War Against the Beta Male will have profound consequences for the West, none of them good…. except for one potentially beneficial outcome.
I like Mangan and his work, but I am afraid this raises the entire question of the role of the Mistress. One wife is more than enough given the state of Western jurisprudence, but one woman. Not so much.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Playaz gonna play!
LikeLike
somewhat agree. however important to note that most men dont have the seductive talent and practical framework to maintain a wife and mistress situation these days.
it takes much more than just money. and it doesnt take much money.
LikeLike
Even alpha behavior is curbed under patriarchal monogamy. Safer and better results for all. Alpha behavior carries bigger risks although bigger payouts under matriarchial polygamy.
LikeLike
Speak for yourself.
For not that few one is entirely enough and almost too much, especially when she doesn´t get that we just want to be left alone sometimes.
Not all men are constantly dick-driven fuckmonkeys that need a new pair of tits&ass every week/month. And for those that do, civilized societies allow legal whores to earn their income.
LikeLike
Deshalb gibt’s PROXXON!
LikeLike
“Together, the findings supported the notion that the discovery of penicillin decreased the cost of syphilis and thereby played an important role in shaping modern sexuality.”
erm…birth control? (1960)
LikeLike
FYI, these events are part of a much larger trend. The West has suffered several socio-cultural revolutions over the past 100 years which have all led to the point of Western Civilization collapsing.
1) The Suffrage Revolution gave women the vote, which then allowed women create the social welfare states that reduce the risk of poverty for women.
2) The Penicillin Revolution reduced the risk of lifelong misery and death from syphilis.
3) The Birth Control Revolution, eg the Pill & Abortion reduced the risk of unwanted children.
4) The Sexual Revolution reduced the risk of slut shaming for women.
5) The Divorce Revolution reduced the risk of unwanted husbands and loss of children with CashNPrizes cf No-Fault Divorce, alimony, child support, and default custody of the children.
There is potential for more revolutions which will devastate the West and allow the Muslim/Black/Illegal Immigrant Barbarians and Orc & Goblin Hordes to run rampant over the West. Hello Dark Ages 2.0.
LikeLiked by 1 person
+1
womens suffrage was a decissive victory for the cultmarx agenda and major milestone of decay for the west.
just the fact that we have a weak mystery meat negro in the WHITE house and a crooked neurotic wench in a favorable position to succeed as president is a testament to how bad of an idea women’s suffrage was.
ironically the truth that women are increasingly unhappier every year and beta males are more frustrated in their romantic/financial pursuits precisley because of the anti-patriarch movement ushered in by female voting is also scuttled by the very same hand.
lol. the left eating its tail and lying to itself about the result. meta level projection.
LikeLike
The Sexual Revolution started in the ’20s. Popular movies back then were full of free-love messages, with men passing women around between them (via dance numbers, but the message was the same). At the same time, people were becoming newly aware of this phenomenon of female frigidity, which wasn’t actually a phenomenon at all but women’s natural hesitance to have sex at a time when it likely meant them getting pregnant.
At any rate, the culture was primed for the sexual revolution by the ’20s, it just took technology another 40 years to make the cultural ideal possible.
LikeLike
You can go back a little further, to the industrial revolution and the rise of the bourgeoisie. Women became less necessary as workers at home and started to chafe with boredom. You had the “Gibson Girl” before you had the flapper.
LikeLike
The sexual revolution started back in Rome.
Any society where the next day’s meal is already accounted for will tend towards decadence.
LikeLike
And yet there are idiots who show up on alt-right forums advocating polygamy… the track record of Islam, Africa, and other polygamous “civilizations” (such as they are) is not encouraging, to say the least.
Penicillin also, by suppressing STDs, contributed to Islam’s resurgence. The reason the Turks lost the Balkans was because of higher death rates from STDs relative to the Christians.
LikeLike
OTOH, our old friend obesity may end up ravaging the muzzies, especially their women who aren’t supposed to get out of the house and exercise.
LikeLike
on May 11, 2016 at 8:33 amCaptain Obvious
Sure. The fundamental problem with monogamy is that it removes sexual competition in general (for both men and women). Men only have a right to one woman and women don’t have to compete for the affectons of her man. Eventually resulting in massive boredom and frigidity and giving fertile ground to sexual revolution. The relation between monogamous societies and sexual revolutions is an interesting one.
LikeLike
The “boredom” of modernity is an angle that we don’t talk about nearly enough. Back in the day, when men were still slaughtering one another, the shizzle wasn’t boring at all.
LikeLike
And even as recently as Sept 11, 2001, folks were getting a lot more serious after the specter of slaughter or be slaughtered: http://nypost.com/2002/02/02/casual-sex-in-the-city-down-after-911-survey/
LikeLike
GE is in effect talking about “boredom” up above here: “Any society where the next day’s meal is already accounted for…”
LikeLike
Defacto polygamy beats matriarchial monogamy.
LikeLike
Lololozlzoozlz even parthenogenesis beats matriarchy
(Muller’s Ratchet inclusive)lizlzo
Lolzolzlzl
LikeLike
Monogamy was patriarchal. Matriarchies actually encourage polygamy.
LikeLike
Matriarchies encourage polyandry, not polygamy
LikeLike
vfm#7634
“Monogamy was patriarchal. Matriarchies actually encourage polygamy.”
No way. Monogamy like Socialism (and offshoots like Feminism) is at it’s core equalist(50/50 mindset). Patriarchy doesn’t encourage this mentality. Monogamy is sexual socialism and therefore it can’t be patriarchal.
LikeLike
> “Monogamy is sexual socialism and therefore it can’t be patriarchal.” ——— {1-Man}/{1-Woman} implies [or assumes or requires] that all men be sufficiently MASCULINE to DESERVE to have a mate. Which is one of the defining hallmarks of the Whyte Race & Western Civilization – that every man, from the infantry all the way up to the Consuls – was a man worthy of pollenating the fruit of a w0man’s womb.
LikeLike
The west sending medicines to the primitives is the primary factor for the third world to be a dysfunctional hellhole of injustice and human misery.
LikeLike
Incorrect.
What we call the ‘3rd world’ today have been dysfunctional, disease-, genocide- and war-ridden hellholes for thousands of years.
Modern European/North American medicine and aid are responsible for their numbers exploding to today’s levels.
Withdraw antibiotics and médecins sans frontiers and they die back to normality.
LikeLike
Not incorrect, and that is what I meant. Sending medicines to these backwards countries does not help them, instead it makes their situation worse because they just keep on having more and more kids that they cannot support.
LikeLike
MEASLES OUTBREAK IN MEMPHIS BEGAN AT MOSQUE
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3429559/posts
LikeLike
Over 120 languages spoken in Nashville schools; Spanish, Arabic rank highest after English
http://eagnews.org/over-120-languages-spoken-in-nashville-schools/
LikeLike
Polygamy needs slavery and castration to keep it male population in check. You don’t see stable polygamous cultures without those checks. OTOH, you don’t see culture with “matriarchy”.
Matriarchy is just the PC way of saying anarcho-gynochaos.
LikeLike
We beat Darwin then drank ourselves to death at the victory parade.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fitness is not the same as wisdom.
LikeLike
But we’ve evolved thus far with our wits far superior to beasts, orcs and goblin hordes included
LikeLike
[…] Higamous, Hogamous, Civilization Is Monogamous […]
LikeLike
On the eve of the 2016 General Conference, more than 100 United Methodist clergy and clergy candidates have come out as LGBTQ religious leaders. http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3429439/posts
LikeLike
I believe that there is a cycle of monogamy -polygamy.
-Starts with polygamy as the most common mammal sexual organisations form.
-Then due to sexual selection all males are such quality that are able to provide for women, so the polygyny threshold is very high and women start to mate in 1/1 rate.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygyny_threshold_model
-After generations of non sexual selection of only the best males and equal or less reproductive rate against average males genetic drift starts to destroy the gene pool of descendants of the ancient alphas, (who started the monogamy model because there were an alpha per female), rendering betas.
-A point will be reach in which monogamy is no longer profitable and alphas have to do their work again. The polygyny threshold is low again. Polygamy is recuperated.
LikeLike
“A point will be reach in which monogamy is no longer profitable and alphas have to do their work again.”
a major point has already been reached. question is how long until an irreversable tipping point will be reached?
LikeLike
The PUA movement is a strong sign that the inflection point is near by any side. I will think in that question and also in another: in which way will come the next step? Civil war against white betas(non territorial)making and re-entry in the cycle due to unbalanced sex ratio? Race war?
Silent replacement of white by long term polygynous negroes breaking the cycle?(by breaking the cycle condition of intelligence and cooperation)
LikeLike
Cooperation or at least non fitness importance agression levels
LikeLike
“in which way will come the next step?”
I always ponder this when reading/discussing CH political topics.
Given the unprecedented rage against Mein Trumpenfurher, it could be that a Trump Presidency ushers in a civil cold war where the elitists economically starve the populpus in order to neutralize and isolate Trump in 4 years. Then return to normal programming.
Or instead I could see how a populous victory with Trump could create a global-elitist retaliation by outright and blatant authortarianism, thus leading to a bullets and blood civil war.
I could also see a relentless fury of lies, deception and murders to keep Trump from the presidency, which could also lead to civil discourse.
One thing is certain, the current globalization trend is not good for the American middle class; monogamy, family, peace and prosperity.
I certainly hope Trump gets in and shuts down as much of the niggerfied fed govt crap as he can.
LikeLike
jew mod so annoying
LikeLike
I think civil war is improbable. The anti whites whites are by definition people who don’t care about nation and they have little to die for. Expect their rendition and self flagellation if we pull the thing. Niggers and moslems are of another kind… But they aren’t good forcomplex organization.
Your option of the elites crushing economically America sounds reasonable. The elites know that the fag army they have by supporters can’t stand against a nationalists revolt.
LikeLike
However my model only works under the next conditions:
1.-In the step 2 males obtain their fitness through increasing their absolute power, not their relative power or force against other males. Aka males obtain fitness not through territory but how much they can obtain from the territory in which they live instead of killing all other males rendering impossible and 1/1 mating ratio. They can obtain more from the same creating new things, making processes to obtain more food… And yes this condition is intelligence.
However this model no longer is aplied to the West because it has broken the clause in which males obtain fitness through exploration of the nature, instead of killing or thieving themselves rendering atavistic intracompetitive skills more useful than absolute nature mastering. So the betatization on step 3 is skiped and there are plainly a return to step 1. Or maybe can we see men giving to women the right to vote, go to men built-institutions, wealth redistribution, as sign of betatization instead of skiping the step 3?
LikeLike
LikeLike
So first world problems can, in fact, cause third world problems. Humanity is fucked.
LikeLike
The Catholic Church has been right all along.
LikeLike
About?
LikeLike
LikeLike
Marxist Frankie != Catholicism.
LikeLike
LikeLike
I wonder if this’ll male it through the filter.
LikeLike
Off topic a bit,
I often say one reason I care so much what happens in the USA is that eventually it will happen in Canada or will affect us in some way.
Well our new very liberal prime minister has decided that mexicans no longer need visas to enter Canada.
And there will be no Canadian Donald Trump here to save us from the invasion and high crime rate, Canada is done, doomed.
I hate liberals a little bit more now.
LikeLike
“Well our new very liberal prime minister has decided that mexicans no longer need visas to enter Canada.”
awful.
positve part is that they have a long way to hitchhike to get there. obvioisly this new Cucknadian PM is part of the global jewstablishment.
what you should watch for is if Canadian govt starts giving free shit to illegal mexicans and shipping them in.
LikeLike
Well our new very liberal prime minister has decided that mexicans no longer need visas to enter Canada.
Meanwhile, middle-aged white Americans are turned away at the border because of 20 year-old misdemeanor convictions. The march of anarcho-tyranny continues.
LikeLike
With China and India swallowing Canada whole already, will there be anything left for los beaners?
LikeLike
Thank your local mohawk chugs for the bulk of human trafficking around here, truly the n i ggerz of the north.
LikeLike
I brazenly swiped your quote and riffed on it here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/05/consequences-that-are-unintended.html
And I think I remember the Higamous, Hogamus quote from a H. Allen Smith book — am I right?
LikeLike
I have this fantasy of winning one of those really big lottery prizes (like a hundred-million-plus dollars) and using that money to pay the most genetically superior White women I can find to bear my children. My long- term goal would be for my Descendants to eventually form their own species and rule the entire world. To borrow the words of Martin Luther King Jr, “I have a dream!”
LikeLike
Same old same old.
The “problem” that Western monogamous democracy has always been “solving”, since the days of Agamemnon and Menelaus, basically is “how in the fuck do you bully a bunch of stone-cold psychos with spears?”, when the spear/longbow/rifle is the apex sidearm.
“Dominant Harem-Keeping Alphas” tend to have mysterious accidents up here, where nobody gives a fuck if you are remarkably charismatic or whatever. Frostbite, avalanches and drowning are no respecters of manhood, or physical prowess. The test is, “can you live utterly alone, unaided, forever?” Without crying yourself to sleep each night.
Women are (1) a ridiculous, lazy, noisy expense and (2) a requirement, if any sort of co-operation is posited. Suck my spear, bossman.
If anybody knows the answer (apart from “kill them all, and replace them with hordes of cringing retarded asiatic fellahin, who’ll suck your bawbag for a messy go on your fourteeth sub-wife” ) then answers on on a postcard please.
LikeLike
I will tell you the answer. Stop living in places where leftist women and men haters run the place. Next, open your eyes to see that not all women are as you describe. Then, move to an area where feminine women (who also like men) live. Finally, use game tactics to find and settle down with one quality woman. There are not many quality women out there, so when you do find one, it’s best to hold on to her, rather than thinking more like her will come along. I am being very serious and not snarky. Not all women are Lena Dunham. Try the Ukraine.
LikeLike
PS
I wanted to define quality woman for you as well. In my opinion a quality woman is one who respects men, who is monogamous, who doesn’t believe in divorce, who is attractive, who is NOT materialistic, and who will work with a man as part of a team rather than working against him. (The woman is not the team leader, by the way). I can assure you these women do exist. Best of luck.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Evey Act of Beauty is a Revolt Against Modern World
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLike
Happened across this superb example of Alpha posture:
LikeLike
Monogamy is also why the white race is full of faggots and cucks.
LikeLike
Let’s be fair… the darker races have their share of fags, if not moreso… and I guess an obsequious Uncle Tom or Gunga Din is the equivalent of our “cuck”, so there’s no lack thereof either on the nonwhite side.
LikeLike
Might be true but whites simply can’t afford the amount of fruitiness it has today. Caucasians only account for 7% of the world’s population…and is prognosed to dive even further.
LikeLike
That’s a fair point… every White lost hurts us to a much greater extent than the dark hordes…
… however, you-know-who seems to do just fine with even smaller numbers, so there’s that.
LikeLike
Google “whites less likely to be gay”. Also, Eskimo men have a high incidence of faggotry.
LikeLike
Monogamy puts way to much power in the hands of women. Polygamy should be allowed (not necessarily practiced but the possibility should be there). Actually the Islamic model – which puts strong conditions and limits (max. 4 wives and only if you can afford it) – is a model with potential.
LikeLike
The Islamic countries are some of the most miserable places on earth, we should not try to model ourselves after them. I would say polygamy is one reason Islam is such a breeding ground for terrorism. When a beta male is totally shut out of the sexual market the idea of 72 virgins waiting for them in the afterlife sounds quite attractive.
LikeLike
Are you kidding? Until the last century, Europeans associated faggotry with the Muslims.
LikeLike
Anyone who’s been to the Muslim lands can tell you about man love thursday. The musloid world is full of manlove, bestiality and inbreeding.
LikeLike
this time things will be different. The beta male will have sex dolls and VR Porn to distract him from reality. Might even be better than reality… Polygyny won’t be the end of civilization this time around.
LikeLike
http://inductivist.blogspot.de/2016/05/which-american-groups-are-most-race.html?spref=tw
Maybe Jews hate ethnocentric whites because Jews both despise racism and are racist and ethnocentric whites remind them of how hypocritical and full of shit they are.
LikeLike
I would be shocked if any Eskimos engaged in that sort of introspection – I’ve never sensed any such thing in them, either in person, or in reading (((their))) literature. What I get out of the Eskimos [consistently] is pure, unadulterated genetic psychopathy. If anything, I would imagine that the thought of Whites being inspired to adopt WN-ism as an ethos would simply trigger a deeply visceral biological reaction in the Eskimo-ish collective hindbrain. And the Eskimos hate Hate HATE competition – they’re all about monopolies & rent extraction – even at the cultural level of WN-ism versus Diaspora-ism and Zi0n-ism.
LikeLike
On the cultural level, there’s been a lot of talk lately about whether [or for how long] “N!gger Privilege” can continue to trump “Ph@g Privilege” [to include the entire rainbow gamut of Ghey Lettuce Bacon Tomato perversion]. It’s a fascinating study in the Darwinian Nihilism of Cultural Dynamics – watching the various amoeba in the petri dish trying to eat and/or and/or starve and/or poison one another into extinction. And of course, the Eskimos will always insist on being at the very top of the Petri Pyramid.
LikeLike
tldr; == Adios Universalism; it was nice knowin ya.
LikeLike
Cuck conservative radio was, well, cucking the other day, inviting negro women conservatives (ha!) to the table and tsk-tsking in outrage that GLBT bathroom tempest-in-a-teapotters were daring to make comparisons to the civil rights struggles of yesteryear.
LikeLike
“watching the various amoeba in the petri dish trying to eat and/or and/or starve and/or poison one another into extinction. And of course, the Eskimos will always insist on being at the very top of the Petri Pyramid.”
Thats the left. Power over balance.
LikeLike
They hate competition as they are physically weak. Which is why the Germans wanted fit and strong men….which is why the modern world has been shaped in the weak men nerd clown role.
LikeLike
“Using nationally comprehensive vital statistics, this study found evidence that the era of modern sexuality originated in the mid to late 1950s.”
Really? I thought it did in the 1920’s during “the roaring twenties”…right after the first world war when the US manifested itself as THE world power.
LikeLike
Obviously none of us are old enough to have any adult memory of the 1920s [you’d have to be about 120 years old for that], but the general consensus on this thread seems to be that many folks WANTED the 1920s to have had a Sexual* Revolution, but that there were still far too many biological & cultural restraints in place to prevent it.
LikeLike
*These “Revolutions” aren’t “Sexual” in nature – they’re actually profoundly ANTI-Sexual. “Sexual” congress requires that a ch!ld be b0rn about nine months later, whereas a “Sexual Revolution” requires that a ch!ld NOT be born at all. I.e. a “Sexual Revolution” requires that “Sex” necessarily devolves into a meaningless act of licentious perversion – a profoundly narcissistic exercise in utterly purposeless nihilism.
LikeLike
I think the difference between the alleged Roaring Twenties and the Free Love generation is that back in the ’20’s, it was only the small circle of cosmopolitans that were flapping about, and the regular folks still had to sweat for their living and held fast to dat ole time religion and its morals.
Come the 50’s and the 60’s, when damn near anybody who tried had a very comfortable middle to upper-middle class existence, and radio, TV, and Hollywood were ubiquitous in every home, THAT’S when the anything-goes rot started to gain hold over most of the population.
LikeLike
1950s: penicillin for syph!lis. 1960s: chemical ab0rtifacients [BCPs – Grisw0ld v Connecticut]. 1970s: mechanical ab0rtion [R0e v W@de]. I’d argue, though, that the Eskimo poisoning of the culture, from 1925 through 1975, was vastly more destructive than the “scientific” . And especially Sarnhoff tying up Farnsworth in court, so that the Eskimos could secure a monopoly position in television. You could make that case that Sarnhoff -v- Farnsworth is even more important than the Jekyll Island conspiracy.
LikeLike
Sarnhoff -v- Farnsworth is entirely analogous to Brin & Page stealing search from Altavista, or Phuckersperg stealing scr0tial from Winklevoss, Winklevoss & Narendra.
LikeLike
Warmest data tampering evidence and analysis here http://realclimatescience.com. Get informed and decide for yourself. This guy was also involved with the Climate Hustle movie as well.
LikeLike
word
LikeLike
Does anyone really pity the beta male? Certainly females do not. I wonder how much feeling beta males have for other beta males. When a beta male looks at a hurting beta male in a relationship, does his heart go out to him? Or is there a kind of contempt and dislike for him, a recognition of the inner beta male in the other man that mirrors what the observer feels himself?
I can no longer tolerate betas — at least abject beta males — as friends. They sicken me. It’s a whole constellation of personality traits that goes along with their pro-female, anti-self behavior that revolts me. The beta male is uncertain. He is liable to censor himself and watch his back. He holds himself closed in, his body language practically shouting that his hands are covering over his groin.
The beta male also has excessive respect for his mother, who is the cause of at least part of his problems. I have zero trust for any females, whether they’re related to me or not, and I have sisters. I remember one time one of my
younger sisters came home to our nice middle-class house during lunch and
stopped and *gazed* at me a certain way. She was trying to do something on
me, although at the time I didn’t know what. I grew uncharacteristically anger —
I was a nice boy then — and took a dangerous step down the stairs toward her,
and she scurried off. I guess she was having a fun day fvcking with boys’
eyes, as when girls “flick their eyes” at a guy and get him to jump and defend
their “honor” like a fvcking monkey.
You have to twist the knife when you’re in a relationship with a girl. PUAs will
tell you to embrace “the dark triad” for what amounts of image reasons, but
real abuse of females pays dividends in control, when you dominate her mind
and make her deeply concerned about her behavior around. You want her
watching her P’s and Q’s when relating to you. Unless you happen to like
shit tests, drama, irrational fights and tests of “how committed you are to the
relationship.” I don’t go for any of that, so I control.
LikeLike
I don’t want to hate on beta males because that’s what women do. I think they are necessary for society to function at a high level.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Consider whom women hate. Women usually don’t hate beta males, they don’t consider them human being (women typically don’t consider men as human beings but simpleton animals), and don’t consider them males. They consider them useful cattle. They are utterly revolted though by desire from beta males: the last thing that women’s genes “want” is for her to waste pregnancies having beta sons, so they give her an instinctive revulsion for betas as they given her an overpowering gina tingle for uncaring assholes.
Women however hate PUAs, they really hate them. Because women (or rather their genes) want natural alphas, so their sons also be natural alphas. They don’t want to have sex with PUAs who are natural betas that who learned to behave like alphas, and then they give them natural beta sons.
So they really hate PUAs. Because it is hateful to women to end up having a PUA’s natural beta sons, and investing nearly a year of childbearing and years of childraising to find that her son is a natural cuck and will never spread her genes around like the natural alpha son of a natural alpha player.
LikeLike
I struggle with trying to be civilized high status with a respect for people which may come across as beta. I am nice as I can afford to be. I don’t give much attention to women and they know if they act up they are ostracized.
Having an abundance of women, wealth etc allows me to be nice.
We have alot of males acting alpha who come across as thugs.
LikeLike
There are two main types of women: those with a gina tingle for pump-and-dump seductive uncaring asshole player men, and that’s the majority, and a substantial minority with a gina tingle for uncaring brutal thugs; and there is some overlap between the two types. Both are alphas, under the proper sexual market definition, which is men who turn on women.
LikeLike
This is how the sexual market works.
http://www.pnas.org/content/109/25/9923.full
Such equations do not preclude polygyny, even if they do predict a lower incidence.
LikeLike
Very important conclusions:
“The results emphasize the need for incorporating between-individual variation in theoretical and empirical studies of social dilemmas and behaviors; the commonly used simplifying assumption that individuals are identical can significantly bias the conclusions.”
Equalist dogma is an analysis error.
“As male provisioning trait p increases, female faithfulness f will evolve to higher and higher values until it stabilizes at a level controlled by a balance between selection for good genes and access to food provisioned by males.”
Female hypergamy is always operative and modulated by provisioning.
“At the end, except for a very small proportion of the top-ranked individuals, males invest exclusively in provisioning females who have evolved very high fidelity to their mates.”
High-value men who activate female hypergamy mate-selection need not provision females.
“Occasionally the model exhibits cycling behavior when both female faithfulness f and male provisioning traits p for the top-ranked males fluctuate (SI Appendix). The cycling occurs because once most males are provisioning, female faithfulness is not selected for anymore. Then selection against monogamy takes over with females evolving decreasing faithfulness, which in turn forces top-ranked males to reduce their provisioning and increase their investment in competition.”
Welcome to the modern era: too many provisioning “beta” males reduces natural selection for faithfulness, which in turn reduces provisioning among high-ranked males.
The good/bad news is that female hypergamy/promiscuity is self-correcting to fidelity as the sexual market responds to female infidelity with more bad-boys and reduced provisioning overall.
And, in my opinion, an opportunity for polygyny as a hybrid strategy to obtain multiple female mates (a hard harem) in a sexual market where females still require provisioning. but at a lower magnitude due t favorable environmental conditions (big daddy government).
High-value males are exempt from most of the provisioning requirements except as female fidelity becomes predominant. Note: male fidelity does not enter the equations: only provisioning matters. If one male can provision at a rate equal to two males (or more), then his value in a fidelity/provisioning sexual market can enable polygyny.
Who loses? Males and females that won’t push the envelope and adopt multiple mating strategies to secure the best mating opportunities.
LikeLike
Monogamy is why religion is so important to preserving society. Cultures with no monogamy such as blacks fail to understand or care about this.
LikeLike
the war against the beta male has largely already been lost. A generation of (mostly white)-guilt ridden, weak men feel that they don’t have a right, or obligation, to pass on their genes.
LikeLike
I would add that the beta males also squandered the progeny they DID have by failing to clamp down and make them honorable members of the family. by being too lenient, especially with the daughters, they were accomplices to the “fuck you dad!” zeitgeist.
the best guys/girls I know had strict fathers growing up who ruled the roost. the worst guys/girls I know had hapless betas for fathers who kowtowed to their mother
LikeLike
I would agree, except the worst people usually grow up without a father altogether. In Western Europe and most of America, the prevailing “you-go-girl” sentiment seems to be that mommy can do a better job without daddy.
a former friend of mine was raised by a single mother and would often defend it, (“I’m from a single parent home and I turned out just fine!”) while gaining massive amounts of weight, working a shitty dead end job, having no ability to talk to women, and remaining a virgin until 25.
LikeLike
I was raised by a dominant single mother and she sucked out a lot of my manhood growing up (thankfully I turned out straight). An observation I found ironic as a young man was that women that reminded me of my mother such as bar sluts (which my mom was one herself) rejected me the hardest and rudest. While the nice girls totally different than my mother liked me more.
LikeLike
That’s one thing I love about your blog. You maximize the current climate for your own personal pleasure but you can still see the big picture that Western Civilization is being destroyed.
LikeLike
Bands of maurauding invaders tend to be relatively equal and are organized around loyalty and honour (co-operation between men). Instead of competing against each other and killing each other, they killed vanquished men and fucked vanquished women. Cowardice, dishonour, or disloyalty (such as adultery within the tribe) were often punished by death. They viewed their conquests as decadent and weak. Often they arrogated whole civilizations and renewed them. The important dialectic is between male insider co-operation and outsider competition instead of competition within. Monogamy is the ultimate social contract that cements co-operation between males and allows the conquest of new frontiers.
LikeLike
Are you kidding? Until the last century, Europeans associated faggotry with the Muslims.
Not only muslims, but the heathen in general.
LikeLike
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapp_Putsch
LikeLike
[…] the Chateau: Civilization is monogamous. Even I admit this and I’m a cheerful […]
LikeLike
Polygamy would almost make perfect sense…if it weren’t for women’s inability to get along with one another and their unquestionable obsessive nature when it comes to hating one another and competing with one another.
LikeLike
“It all comes down to paternal certainty. Where (beta) men are reasonably assured the kid is theirs, civilization can flourish.”
Paternal certainty is necessary for (non-stupid) beta males to invest “financially” in women and their children.
But why would women want to be invested in “financially”? If they follow their gina tingle they can can get fertilized by sexually attractive players who pump and dump many women so that they can have sexually attractive sons that pump and dump many women too, and have lots of grandchildren without having to find a man whom invests in them. It is the other women who will invest in raising their grandchildren.
Women are only interested in being invested in, when they are past the age in which the gina tingle rules them, and realize that they are alone and poor, with their cats.
Then they want their daughters to avoid ending up like that, and so force them to get husbands and sons who are hard working and loyal, not uncaring assholes, and to treat them as livestock working them hard to make them build the assets that make women rich and powerful in their post-menopause age.
LikeLike