• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Shitlord Of The Month
Why Are Ad Agencies Pushing Miscegenation Propaganda? »

Your Daily Game: The Seductive Potential Of Little Words

May 15, 2016 by CH

Certain combinations of speech are optimally attractive to women. Wit, conversational fluidity, and terseness are common elements in the kind of wordplay that women most adore in men. On that subject, reader Sorcerygod explores the confluence of body language with, well, actual language.

The body language IS worth taking a closer look at, but it would be even more interesting to hear the tone of his voice and the contents of his words.

Considering that Stratham is a grunting jock figure, he probably doesn’t match his voice with his stance.

Now *I* have a good voice. Low, deep, slow, amused, intelligent, full of witty remarks . . . And I’ve been told more than once I’m a “good talker.” Supposedly words don’t matter, it’s just the auditory qualities of the voice, and the body stance, but I believe that offering skilled talk, and interesting dialogue, is CRUCIAL to seduction, and a man who can speak well and fluidly on many different topics can compensate for his poor looks . . . now when you combine looks and talk like me, you’ve got a veritable divine figure —

If I can offer a few tips.

One, start off using small words. The brain, especially the female brain, latches onto these first. These are your foundation.

Two, to show your intelligence sprinkle higher words like “epitome of something,” “nascent value,” “reductionism” . . . as long as you have a base of low level words, it doesn’t matter if she doesn’t understand all of them, you will convey that you are erudite and sharp-minded. And she *WILL* subconsciously get the meaning of at least some from context. And she will drip drip drip.

So a sample monologue of Sorcerygod talk would go something like this:

“I love the new spring weather, it’s so refreshing and rejuvenating. The wind, the air, the flowers, the strangers on the street with smiles on their faces. But are any of them sad to the point of suicide? Sometimes I catch a glimpse on their faces . . .”

Mostly simple, basic words, jacked up with point-forward braininess.

That’s the way you want to go. Practice. Oh, and being able to write well translates directly into being able to speak well. So if you’re alone, you can still practice communicating by writing, and then transfer this later to spoken dialogue with others.

Absolutely. Many SMRT men make the mistake of ladling their verbal IQ all over women, imagining that women are aroused by their linguistic prestidigitation. NO. Women are aroused by dominant men, ZFG men, clever men, impudent men…. of whom advanced verbal fluency is as much a distraction from, as an amplification of, their attractiveness to women.

The ideal verbal approach is to coax an accelerated camaraderie with the use of “power words” — which are usually mono- or bisyllabic — that girls promptly jack into via emotional pathways that electrify fastest when lubed by simpler, stronger words than by nuanced Oxfordian words stuffed with exquisite connotations. This will be your conversational base, over which you will furnish the occasional five-dollar words and ambiguous subtext, because no pickup attempt went to the bedroom without first rubbing her rationalization hamster against the grain.

In succinctness, the best verbal DHVs are those which pleasantly surprise. If you showcase your linguistic prowess like a flesh-bound thesaurus, girls will think you’re a try-hard, or too nerdy to suffer gladly. But toss out a morsel of brain-waking blingo atop an entree of jerkboy-banter, and just when a girl thinks she’s got a handle on you her assumptions are destroyed and her vagina begins flowering anew.

It’s a similar concept to insulting SJWs. If you assault an SJW with a barrage of insults right out of the gate, no matter how creative or on-the-mark, xir will turtle and shut off to any more input from you. To really excavate the SJW soul and maneuver your shiv close to xir’s id for the killing twist, you’ve got to soften your initial salvos and pretend to polite discussion. Then, when complacence has lowered the SJW’s blubber-bunkered guard, and xim thinks you may be a reasonable sort, you place one hand on the end of your shiv and drive it to the hilt into xie’s now-exposed heartmatter.

This does require some amount of time investment, though, for a nonetheless delectable payoff, so there’s nothing wrong with taking the easy route and nuking the SJW from orbit. You won’t change xit’s mind but you will trigger xox’s amygdala.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Game | 110 Comments

110 Responses

  1. on May 15, 2016 at 9:34 am judge

    Sorcerygod sounds lame and boring. Statham has a scratchy cockneyish voice and rarely says enough to show his level of intelligence, beyond Street tough commonsense.
    Brevity is your friend and women can smell a lower from a mile off.

    LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 5:14 am themanofmystery2

      “Brevity is the soul of wit”

      Yet another maxim by our wiser-than-us forefathers that hits the mark.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 16, 2016 at 6:28 am whorefinder

        Rape!

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 9:23 am Captain Obvious

        ✡✡✡ (((ESKIMO))) BALD NAKED LIES ABOUT THE DONALD ✡✡✡ “The New York Times told us several times that they would make sure that my story that I was telling came across. They promised several times that they would do it accurately. They told me several times and my manager several times that it would not be a hit piece and that my story would come across the way that I was telling it and honestly, and it absolutely was not.” http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3431001/posts

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 9:23 am Captain Obvious

        “He never offended me in any way. He was very gracious. I saw him around all types of people, all types of women. He was very kind, thoughtful, generous, you know. He was a gentleman,” Brewer said.

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 9:25 am Captain Obvious

        TAKEAWAY: 1) Every word out of an Eskimo’s mouth is a lie, including the words “and” & “the”. 2) The Donald does NOT date ugly chicks.

        LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 8:41 am trav777

      spergerygod’s shit sounded…gay. I mean WTF?

      All this spergy overanalysis on WHAT to say- it DOESN’T MATTER. It’s HOW you say it! You can talk about Doppler broadening on a date and a chick’s pupils will go pie-plate if you do it the right way. They don’t give a fuck, it’s all performance art to them. It either causes an emotional response or it doesn’t.

      So I am going for my rescue diver cert in another week and a half. Isn’t ACTUAL sort of 95+ percentile REAL competence in something pretty badass, like…MORE actually badass than trying to imitate it by wordsmithing?

      So wtf is your excuse? I have shit to talk about on dates…I might say shit about deep diving and narcosis and partial pressures of oxygen…chicks eat it up, why? Because of the delivery. They probably don’t even know what oxygen is, but shit it SOUNDS interesting.

      Do some THINGS that will give you some ACTUAL confidence instead of faking it! Find something vaguely dangerous and/or challenging and invest some time into it.

      Focus on what you can do that you’re good at and accentuate it.

      LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 7:41 pm Greg Eliot

        Do some THINGS that will give you some ACTUAL confidence instead of faking it! Find something vaguely dangerous and/or challenging and invest some time into it.

        Focus on what you can do that you’re good at and accentuate it.

        Good advice bears repeating.

        LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 9:29 am Reb

      Yes, the lower classes can only get so far with Our Women, despite what t.v. advertises.

      LikeLike


  2. on May 15, 2016 at 9:41 am Captain Obvious

    > “more interesting to hear the tone of his voice… Low, deep, slow…” ——— The sonorousness, the pacing, and the content are key. You’re trying to sound like Mario Lanzo or Elvis or Johnny Cash or some other deep baritone/basso voice. You’re at your own pace because you own yourself and you answer to no one. Hurried speech makes you sound apprehensive or even nervous, and nothing but nothing ruins it for the Hamster like apprehension & nervousness & fear.

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2016 at 9:45 am Captain Obvious

      As for the content, SEXUALIZE almost immediately, but in a clever, gentlemanly, refined manner. Not in a vulgar or crass or obscene manner. But don’t sound over-eager about the sexualization – her Hamster wants to hear it from a world-wise man in a “been there/done that” tone of voice. And the sexualization must make you sound dominant and her sound submissive. Bring up topics like “naughty girl” and “needs a nice hard spanking” as quickly as possible. But not hurriedly. At your own pace. Because you own yourself.

      LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 9:46 am Captain Obvious

        Because YOU will decide when she gets her spanking. And YOU will decide how hard the spanking will be. And YOU will decide how many 0rgasms she gets afterwards.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 9:55 am Captain Obvious

        I’ve been getting a ton of mileage lately out of Toenail Polish Game [Fingernail Polish Game if she’s wearing shoes], especially with this mainstreaming of the Goth/Jet-Black polishes. Variations on: “Does your Dad know that you painted your toenails black? Did he give you a nice hard spanking? No? Then I guess I’ll hafta do it for him. Gimme your number.” Or: “Are your toenails black?” SHE: “No, they’re dark purple!” YOU: “Well if you came home with black toenails, would your Dad spank you?” etc etc etc… If nothing else, it gets her to talking about how much she hates the Goth-tards.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 11:35 am GCM

        “I’ve been getting a ton of mileage lately out of Toenail Polish Game…”

        Hilarious. Listen, why don’t you show us on YouTube. You know, actually field testing, rather than we assuming you are employing this tactic. Teach us a thing or two about Game. This we HAVE to see…

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 11:54 am Captain Obvious

        ??? – Not sure if you’re serious. For serious readers: Chicks love Love LOVE it when you notice shizzle like new hairstyles or weird jewelry or some pattern they’ve painted on their fingernails or toenails. Don’t be all fanboy anime-tard over-eager about it – be world wise, but also a little clumsy. Pause, and then say “Did you do something to your hair?” “Who did your nails?” “Okay, what the heck is the symbolism of that thing you’re wearing around your neck?” Nothing gets the ball rolling like the intimacy of talking about her body.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 11:58 am Captain Obvious

        Chicks also LOVE to talk about their competition. YOU: “Did (((insert name of Princess Barbie here))) get some implants, or is she just wearing one of them padded push-up bras?” SHE: “Blah blah blah… rumor about getting trained in the fraternity house… blah blah blah… rumor about an ab0rtion… blah blah blah… definitely cheating on her boyfriend… blah blah blah… got busted at school for smoking weed…” If you just shut up and listen, then you’ll quickly learn all the gossip for roughly the surrounding five counties.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 12:14 pm Ripp

        @Cap

        for sure. this goes back to the foundations of mystery method.

        pretty much any little light comment about her looks is a great opener.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 12:25 pm plumpjack

        creating dissonance with her looks works really well. a girl tells me the funniest thing I said to her when we met was this:

        me: “Can I see your nails? [they were short and unpolished] Oh wow, I’m surprised….”

        her: “why???”

        me: “well it’s just that girls who are well groomed like you usually also have nice nails.”

        her: [cute frown], followed by long-winded explanation about why her nails weren’t done

        now every time she gets her nails done she sends me a picture, and we both have a good laugh.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 1:17 pm mendo

        Cappy, sounds like GCM is another JIDF operative. Guess they found a new replacement for (((uh))) as she recovers from her stress leave.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 1:34 pm Captain Obvious

        “Oh wow, I’m surprised….” ——— Right. Be a little clumsy & clue-less about it. Like if she changes her hair from jet-black to platinum-blonde, you scrunch up your face in a frown, and pause for a while [hold the pause for as long as possible], and then maybe just start to walk away. SHE: “What, what is it, what’s wrong?” YOU [turning back around]: “Gosh, I dunno. I just felt like something looked different. But I can’t quite put my finger on what it was. Huh. Well, whatever.” And then walk away. [HER HAMSTER: “OMG, HE’S SUCH A JERK!!! I HATE HIS F-ING GUTS!!!!!”]

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 8:43 am trav777

        oh ffs, use the same dumbass lines that 1000 other guys did…sure.

        I’m with GCM

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 9:14 am Captain Obvious

        > “now every time she gets her nails done she sends me a picture” ——— That’s the Frame you want right there – desperately trying to please her Master…

        LikeLike


  3. on May 15, 2016 at 9:50 am Your Daily Game: The Seductive Potential Of Little Words | Neoreactive

    […] Your Daily Game: The Seductive Potential Of Little Words […]

    LikeLike


  4. on May 15, 2016 at 10:10 am Ang Aamer

    I like the idea of using small words that are easy to understand with women.

    I have noticed that just patiently being persistent in getting a female’s attention is more work than it used to be. Women are always scatterbrained but these days with so many phone distractions it’s easy to make an approach more complicated than it needs to be.

    A woman may want to talk with you but if your first few sentences are confusing to her distracted brain… you will be dismissed.

    A steady approach with a calm voice sets the foundation for a good conversation. Before you do any routine or qualifications you have to be able to gain her attention. If you do a routine before having her attention you come off like a boy suffering from Asperger syndrome.

    LikeLike


  5. on May 15, 2016 at 10:16 am Anonymous

    I don’t believe anything captainobvious writes.

    LikeLike


  6. on May 15, 2016 at 10:27 am Ripp

    “when complacence has lowered the SJW’s blubber-bunkered guard”

    lolz

    LikeLike


  7. on May 15, 2016 at 10:27 am tspark156

    Varying the speed and wavering the pitch between medium and low register. Find an excuse to say something close right into her ear but don’t whisper, use a deep murmur. The female ear is USB port routed through the spine, directly to the snatch.

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2016 at 11:52 am Laguna Beach Fogey

      Low-talking. Keep it low, deep, indistinct, like a resonant mutter, so she’s forced to lean into you to hear what you’re saying. Mumble Game.

      LikeLike


  8. on May 15, 2016 at 12:22 pm Lost in Moderation

    Once long ago I was told, Words are to women what lingerie is to men.

    Maybe I read it here.

    Anyway, it’s always been useful to remember that. I get to a woman through her ears much easier than through her eyes.

    LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 7:43 pm Greg Eliot

      It’s an old maxim:

      Men fall in love by their eyes,
      Women by their ears.

      LikeLike


  9. on May 15, 2016 at 12:37 pm plumpjack

    useful article, cap, sentient, et al:

    https://atlanticcenturion.wordpress.com/2016/05/13/facebook-is-the-nuclear-icbm-of-metapolitical-warfare/

    LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 3:16 am Ripp

      Facebook is becoming the ultimate media platform. I bet Facebook will get streaming/broadcasting rights to the superbowl in years to come.

      I have no doubt in my mind that Zuckerjew has a hand in shaping the content that is allowed/not allowed. Its been going on for over a century its not like all of a sudden Facebook is the true honest oasis of information. Of course thats what (((they))) want you to think.

      And of course Zuckerheeb is now circling the waggons with cuck establishment republicucks to help scapegoat the truth with publicized meetings.

      Trump needs to start a media network through secret channels. Fight the Faceberg.

      LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 8:45 am trav777

        …except that nobody under say 30 is even using it anymore. Yeah, I mean, except reality.

        Fakebook is a joke. Amazon is even worse. I honestly think that their tribe cousins on Wall St exaggerate their valuations so that the tribe can acquire actual companies via stock transactions. They are a tribe of fuckin check kiters and paper ponzis. This is why they’ve been run out of every single country they’ve ever inhabited.

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 6:15 pm Colonel Hogan

        @trav777
        I agree. Suspected as much for a long time. The ENTIRE economy is just a jewpyramid scheme. Only actual things and services have real value. Not ‘futures’. Not ‘petrodollars’. Those things are just tribe trickery.

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 10:10 pm Ripp

        “…except that nobody under say 30 is even using it anymore. Yeah, I mean, except reality.”

        Trav you’re dead wrong man. Facebook’s viewership stats are insane. They’re advertising platform is legit and its raking in the bucks.

        http://www.statista.com/statistics/271258/facebooks-advertising-revenue-worldwide/

        Check your facts. Im not saying its good, but truth is that Faceberg is a monster and is growing.

        LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 9:33 am Sentient

      “Several former Facebook “news curators,” as they were known internally, also told Gizmodo that they were instructed to artificially “inject” selected stories into the trending news module, even if they weren’t popular enough to warrant inclusion—or in some cases weren’t trending at all. The former curators, all of whom worked as contractors, also said they were directed not to include news about Facebook itself in the trending module.

      In other words, Facebook’s news section operates like a traditional newsroom, reflecting the biases of its workers and the institutional imperatives of the corporation. Imposing human editorial values onto the lists of topics an algorithm spits out is by no means a bad thing—but it is in stark contrast to the company’s claims that the trending module simply lists “topics that have recently become popular on Facebook.””

      http://gizmodo.com/former-facebook-workers-we-routinely-suppressed-conser-1775461006

      LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 9:35 am Sentient

      https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/12/facebook-trending-news-leaked-documents-editor-guidelines

      Facebook news selection is in hands of editors not algorithms, documents show

      Exclusive: Leaked internal guidelines show human intervention at almost every stage of its news operation, akin to a traditional media organization

      LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 9:38 am Greg Eliot

        But don’t you dare say (((they))) control the media… and to prove that they don’t control things, you’ll never work in this town again.

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 9:39 am Sentient

        In mod…

        see number 5

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 9:41 am Sentient

        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3536586/Mark-Zuckerberg-slams-Donald-Trump-keynote-speech-thinly-veiled-dig-building-walls-warns-reduce-trade-stoke-fear-block-free-expression.html

        Why is all this faked “trending news” BS an issue?

        Zuckerberg:

        “‘As I look around and I travel around the world, I’m starting to see people and nations turning inward, against this idea of a connected world and a global community,’ he said.
        ‘I hear fearful voices calling for building walls and distancing people they label as others. For blocking free expression, for slowing immigration, reducing trade, and in some cases around the world even cutting access to the internet.'”

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 9:45 am Sentient

        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3536586/Mark-Zuckerberg-slams-Donald-Trump-keynote-speech-thinly-veiled-dig-building-walls-warns-reduce-trade-stoke-fear-block-free-expression.html#v-4593044634950548443

        Here it from Zuck hisself…

        [One of the Top 5 Most Dangerous men in the world – FB daily used now over 1 billion]

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 6:24 pm Colonel Hogan

        Surprised gaybook didn’t trend things like, ‘Fat chink women throw themselves at Zuckersperg’, or, ‘Computer geeks get more chics than rock stars.’ Hahaaa. Faggot.

        LikeLike


      • on May 17, 2016 at 12:49 am Ripp

        If Fuckerberg is so against building a wall for his own country, that he surely nust be against Israel’s walls.

        But of course we don’t hear him so anything about that.

        LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 9:38 am Sentient

      http://gizmodo.com/facebook-employees-asked-mark-zuckerberg-if-they-should-1771012990

      Facebook Employees Asked Mark Zuckerberg If They Should Try to Stop a Donald Trump Presidency

      LikeLike


  10. on May 15, 2016 at 1:25 pm plumpjack

    “Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, the 2008 VP running mate to John McCain, was one of the five Carson said was on the list. The rest are all former 2016 GOP presidential candidates: Trump’s closest competitor Sen. Ted Cruz, Ohio Gov. John Kasich, Sen. Marco Rubio, and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.”

    http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/05/15/ben-carson-reveals-five-trump-vp-list/

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 15, 2016 at 4:03 pm Greg Eliot

      If this be true, ne’er before was a crown, so nearly won, so easily lost.

      Sigh.

      I can’t believe Trump would take said list seriously.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2016 at 9:02 pm Hackett To Bits

        ‘Probably his best choice’

        – Only of those five names mentioned in the WaPo story, as told to them by Ben Carson (?)…it doesn’t pass smell test. But if those really are the only choices he’s interested in, so be it.

        Anyway the VP choice isn’t usually announced until summer and right before the convention, to maximize media buzz.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 10:16 pm vfm#7634

        It could be misinformation.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2016 at 10:31 pm plumpjack

        I’m thinking it’s bait, and a pacifier. Right now he’s trying to unify the Republican party. He’s throwing them off the scent. Once he secures the nomination he’s going to select David Duke.

        LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2016 at 4:36 pm Hackett To Bits

      This is from the Washington Compost, so take it with a grain of salt.

      Assuming it’s a true story, Lubio is probably his best choice: the ticket puts a lock on winning FL; he would be easy to mold into his Apprentice; he neutralizes anti-Latino criticisms; he becomes Trump’s inside man on Capitol Hill. Let them bury the hatchet.

      To try to top that, Hillary would have to select a LGBT mixed-race BLM activist.

      LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 6:52 pm Corvo

        “Lubio is probably his best choice: the ticket puts a lock on winning FL”

        Not sure about that — remember Rubio got spanked in Florida; he doesn’t seem that popular in Florida. Also, toward the end things got pretty nasty between Trump and Rubio (as they did with Cruz). Also, with Florida as his adopted second-state, Trump could win FL without any help.

        Of all the 2016 contenders, Kasich is probably the best pick. He was popular enough in his home state of Ohio that he beat Trump there; he would be a more reliable pick to deliver “his” key state of Ohio for Trump. Also, things never got quite so nasty between Trump and Kasich (admittedly because Kasich was never really a threat to Trump outside of Ohio).

        That said, I’m not convinced that Kasich is the right pick. Just that he’s probably the best out of that group.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 8:00 pm Lucius Somesuch

        A dumbass Spic Neo-con and Jeb! protege homosexual on poppers? So fabulous! “Probably his best choice”!

        No, wait. HELL NO!

        Oh good God, Hackett, stop sniffing the WaComPo!

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 8:09 pm Lucius Somesuch

        –Gentlemen, no disrespect to Hackett, and certainly not to Corvo, but let’s be sensible: remember, this one actually IS the most important election of our times.

        We absolutely should not indulge this sort of favorite son/who moderates the ticket type of game. This is nothing less than a recipe for Trump’s jet to go down in an unforeseen “accident”.

        Kasich is gay. Rubio is gay. They are both bought-&-paid-for NeoCon warmongers who openly speak of suckerpunching Pres. Putin, the very champion in the East we seek to gain a counterpart for in our own land.

        Trump’s absolute consideration should be a pick who is totally on his side of the ledger, personally and politically; who gives not an inch of excuse to those in Congress, the judiciary, and the media who will seek to marginalize Trump’s mandate (which by the EC and popular vote I expect to be YUGE) next January to do so; and who, if anything, is personally even more frightening (more intractable, more religious, more “demagogic”) to their timid sensibilities than Trump himself.

        He could pick Sessions, he could pick Tancredo, etc. These are people who would never in a million years have been dreamed of before but then, let us remember, Trump has changed everything. Which means we should shake ourselves free from the nightmare of even thinking we have to consider nothings like Little Rubio or Gaysich for this. We can have an “impossible” Veep because, God be praised, we already have an “impossible” nominee!

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 8:17 pm Lucius Somesuch

        –lolzolz and for honesty’s sake, I should confess I started reading this comments thread bottoms-up, having clicked on Greg E’s latest comment.

        So the preceding diatribes were penned before I even saw the breitbart link.

        Well, hell, let’s hope it’s just a troll job on Trump’s part.

        Years ago I dreamed (was this 2012 I guess?) that Palin was a nominee a second time around.

        Personally, I really like her. Camille Paglia defended her time and again. Until Women’s suffrage is abolished, I’m willing to draw on the talent pool we’ve got.

        But Commerce Sec would be a much safer perch for her.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 8:43 pm Corvo

        “Kasich is gay. Rubio is gay.”

        No argument from me there.

        I haven’t really given it much thought yet. I guess the VP speculation is inevitable, but it seems early to have a short list of < 10 names as reported.

        On the one hand, I ask myself: What influence has Joe Biden had on the Obama agenda? None that I can see. Viewing the VP as a meaningless office argues in favor of making a pure political play in an effort to achieve the real prize –Trump winning in November.

        On the other hand, there is the danger of someone taking out a President Trump and the VP taking over the job. This argues for picking a Sessions or some other nationalist patriot. I haven't yet studied the field to know who would be the most attractive option here, sadly because we have so many cucks and globalists in the GOP and so few nationalist patriots.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 8:58 pm Colonel Hogan

        @Hackett To Bits
        Most Americans don’t give half a rats ass about fag rights or black power groups like blm. (I always think ‘bowel movement’ when I see those initials) TPTB, with their near complete ownership of the media, make it SEEM like a majority of people care, but we don’t. It’s just more cultmarx trickery. As far as the VP choice, I don’t see why Trump would ask any of the losers to run with him. The man knows what he’s doing and it seems to me that Trump might win at least 48 states, crushing Hillary into dust.

        LikeLike


      • on May 17, 2016 at 12:56 am Ripp

        The @washingtonpost report on potential VP candidates is wrong. Marco Rubio and most others mentioned are NOT under consideration.

        — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 16, 2016

        LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2016 at 4:42 pm PA

      Of those, Palin and Christie are non-objectionable but Palin is polarizing so he can as well go the full yardage and get Coulter. Christie doesn’t bring any establishment support nor geographic advantage. Picking Cruz or Kasich is begging for a Hinkley. I can appreciate Hackett’s case for Lubio.

      LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2016 at 4:43 pm PA

      Of those, Palin and Christie are non-objectionable but Palin is polarizing so he can as well go the full yardage and choose Coulter. Christie doesn’t bring any establishment support nor geographic advantage. Picking Cruz or Kasich is begging for a Hinkley. I can appreciate Hackett’s case for Lubio.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2016 at 5:39 pm Greg Eliot

        Yeah, if you’re going to pick Palin, might as well go with Coulter… nobody can accuse her of being dumb, and she always counterpunches better than her opponent.

        Still, that might be too much fire on the ticket.

        Christie for AG, not VP.

        I can’t see Trump picking one of the been-there, done-that GOP pols… but who knows. If he picks Rubio or Kasich, the only message that sends is business-as-usual in DC, and puts a bigger target on Trump’s back.

        I’m hoping he’s going to surprise us all, in a big way.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2016 at 5:43 pm PA

        A few things we can be sure of: he’s not in it to do things half-ass. Not at his age, not after having done so much already.

        Also, he’s a genius strategist. One other thing… he’s spent his whole professional life partying with all kinds of well placed people, all of whom drank and talked while he smiled and listened.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 6:31 pm mendo

        I’m of the mind that this “list” is just a feeler, to get an idea of what the general consensus might be, but not the only set of VP options.

        Besides, isn’t it too early for that yet? Isn’t the best time to choose a VP either during or after the RNC?

        I’d like either Gingrich or Sessions to take the slot.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2016 at 7:44 pm Anonymous

        President Sarah Palin is not objectionable you? My God, man.

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 9:31 am Reb

        Sessions. He’s a pro and has actual experience.

        LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2016 at 11:25 pm Sean Fielding

      Top five on Predict It are Gingrich 26, Ernst 10, Sessions 9, Kasich 8, Christie 8. Then dozens below these. Seems completely up in the air to me.

      https://www.predictit.org/Market/1529/Who-will-win-the-2016-Republican-vice-presidential-nomination

      LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 6:30 am whorefinder

      Oh heck no. If he does it, he’ll lose half his support.

      Ann Coulter, Ann Coulter, and Ann Coulter.

      Think outside the box rape!

      LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 7:04 am plumpjack

        I like it. It’s the only choice that checks all the right boxes.

        fresh meat rape!

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 16, 2016 at 7:30 am whorefinder

        And prevents assassination.

        Can you imagine what a President Coulter would do in revenge if Trump got assassinated? Every leftist in America would shit themself just contemplating the reprisals. And every real American would stand up and jack off to the thought.

        Vice President Ann rapes the left rape!

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 16, 2016 at 9:43 am Greg Eliot

        We can have an “impossible” Veep because, God be praised, we already have an “impossible” nominee!

        COTW… at first I was cautious, but now I’m convinced… either Sessions or Coulter… let’s tear this mother out!

        But what a laugh, that Sharknado 3 turnout out to be so prophetic. 😉

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 16, 2016 at 10:51 am Les Saunders, Protestant

        Pardon my French, but holy fück, she’d be a riot as Vice President. I can see it now… her secret police rounding up leftist agitators and sending them to Gitmo…

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 16, 2016 at 11:39 am whorefinder

        I just jacked off to your post. Not even kidding.

        Round ’em up rape!

        LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 12:07 pm themanofmystery2

      Vegas always knows the outcome to a spooky level. Odds were 11:4 (highest) for Gingrich. I think that’s a great choice.

      LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 7:48 pm Greg Eliot

        In a sane world, Gringrich would be an excellent choice… but another old white guy on the ticket isn’t going to wet a lot of clams that ain’t wet already.

        LikeLike


  11. on May 15, 2016 at 1:26 pm Your Daily Game: The Seductive Potential Of Little Words | Reaction Times

    […] Source: Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  12. on May 15, 2016 at 1:40 pm Wrong Side of History

    Brevity, baby.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 16, 2016 at 4:42 am Sentient

      “Brevity, baby.”

      Hey, Come here, Yeh, Let’s go, Follow me, Kiss me, On your knees, Bend over…

      LikeLiked by 1 person


  13. on May 15, 2016 at 1:58 pm Haven M.

    I’ve noticed this with high IQ nerds is that they “hello m’lady” using big words and clever nerdism not as a form a seduction but as a verbal handshake. I’ve seen interviews of Rosie and she’s sort of smitten (or amused by) Statham’s apparent street level knowledge of cockney slang. He could simply be power wording through “you like me ones and twos, do you love?” and getting the result we seen in the pic.

    nerds otoh will try to Professor Frink some words together to say, “hey, gllaavin, you encromulate well with this foilage?” or some such shit, told with the male nerd equivalent of an upward inflective. The goal is an invite for the girl to speak in her own nerdism which, of course, not happening.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 15, 2016 at 2:16 pm mendo

      You can just hear the cockney in that phrase. Especially adding the “do you love?” line.

      I like CH’s meta use of big words via this line:

      imagining that women are aroused by their linguistic prestidigitation.

      And to that: some big, fancy words work better in print than they do in real life and vice versa.

      Less is always more and like CH said, you gotta sprinkle them in here and there. Like spices to a recipe…just enough to give it some flavor and spruce it up.

      This is also were be genuine/authentic comes into play. Do not use a word that you’ve just learned and don’t have a good grasp of.

      I’m sure one has a solid vocabulary full of fancy words that aren’t said in the vernacular of the masses that would impress the fine filly.

      LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 10:12 am stevetirone

        Interesting. There was a old-school Brooklyn speech trope amongst the lower middle-class that I’ve picked up from my uncle: use of big words, over-pronunciated. So, for example: vegetable, pronounced veg-GE-ta-BULL.

        Chicks dig it.

        LikeLike


  14. on May 15, 2016 at 3:17 pm JironGhrad

    I, personally, like Latin game. Aside from doctors and lawyers, Latin is about dead, so even knowing a handful of expressions outside those in general use puts you in a different class. I have a “wit and wisdom” calendar from a number of years ago with “practical” phrases like “you’re hot” in Latin. Just gazing into a woman’s eyes and uttering a simple phrase will make her drip. Then she’ll want to know what you said. Playing coy with the answer can extend a flagging conversation for a half-hour or more.

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2016 at 5:41 pm Greg Eliot

      Nothing wets her clam like learning that all of Gaul is divided into three parts.

      /first year Latin rape!

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 15, 2016 at 7:40 pm driveallnight

      Darn you, GE. I spend a while loitering on a beach in Latin America growing a chair outta my ass….and I check in for a sec and find you still painting the corner here. Well-played sir.

      LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 9:45 am Greg Eliot

        @driveallnight

        A tip o’ the ten gallon for your shout-out, sir.

        I relish the rare moment when a jest does not fall flat. 😉

        LikeLike


  15. on May 15, 2016 at 5:56 pm Michele

    “One, start off using small words. The brain, especially the female brain, latches onto these first. These are your foundation.”

    Especially.

    LikeLike


  16. on May 15, 2016 at 6:10 pm Matamoros

    If Trump has a woman for V.P. it will begin to kill his campaign. It is built on machismo and guts, and no woman can really carry that.

    He said he wanted someone who knew the political process and could help him get things through Congress. That will take a man with toughness and panache to follow Trumps lead and be loyal to him.

    A woman will bog him down. Not to mention innuendo as to whether she’s just there because he’s f**king her on the side.

    LikeLike


  17. on May 15, 2016 at 8:22 pm deez nuts

    Women. Dumb, emotional, glib.

    LikeLike


  18. on May 15, 2016 at 8:39 pm Rum

    Nowadays I just mutter, (quieter than they can be sure), “I am a hit-man for Donald Trump.” Cough, cough.
    Makes them wet as October.

    LikeLiked by 2 people


    • on May 16, 2016 at 7:34 am whorefinder

      Excellent obscure Rome reference rape!

      LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 9:47 am Greg Eliot

      Credit were due on that one, Rum.

      LikeLike


  19. on May 15, 2016 at 10:05 pm Captain Obvious

    Senior policewoman suspended after spat with female colleague over ‘who has the best breasts’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/15/senior-policewoman-suspended-after-spat-with-female-colleague-ov/

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2016 at 10:06 pm Captain Obvious

      LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 10:47 am Greg Eliot

        Useless pic.

        LikeLike


      • on May 17, 2016 at 6:40 am Canadian Friend

        Unless we can see their breasts, why should we care?

        LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 7:53 am carlos danger

      I’ll be the judge of that….

      LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2016 at 9:49 am Greg Eliot

        Beat me to it. Well-played.

        They went to Best Breasts because the Best Face wound up in a dead heat.

        LikeLike


  20. on May 16, 2016 at 5:26 am Coldwarvet

    Judge Nap ftw.

    LikeLike


  21. on May 16, 2016 at 7:49 am Experienced Father

    CH,

    From the “What we have lost” department, see this 1940’s training film on sexual relations

    LikeLike


  22. on May 16, 2016 at 8:28 am itsjx

    Reblogged this on XWorkx.

    LikeLike


  23. on May 16, 2016 at 9:13 am burke

    “One, start off using small words. The brain, especially the female brain, latches onto these first. These are your foundation.

    Two, to show your intelligence sprinkle higher words”

    trump style

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  24. on May 16, 2016 at 9:22 am Brian D'Amato

    Hi — love your blog — first time commentator —

    This is a bit off topic, but it might give you an idea. I’ve found that if you learn a bit about current fashion, it can be a great opening line. For instance, “Is that a Cynthia Rowley dress?” Chicks love it.

    LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 4:24 pm Hi, I'm a total faggot!

      Really great!

      LikeLike


  25. on May 16, 2016 at 10:42 am Sorcerygod

    I’d like to thank Heartiste, first off, for quoting me in my entirety. It sounds
    sycophantic to veer toward flattery, but that’s also the simplest way to extend the hand of friendship. So thanks Heartiste. Nothing’s better than to find a peer and to be recognized by him.

    Now, I’d like to make an interesting addendum to my arrogant posting about seducing females with simpler words. And that is using big words as *psychological weapons* against chicks.

    As Heartiste observers know, it’s critical to gain the social status edge over the woman you want to ball, in one form or another. Some criminal types gain the edge be being hard badasses where every woman knows she is really weak. Some players gain the edge by being the chasee, “flipping the script.” But I prefer to use aggressive, assaultative tactics that reduce the female to a quivering puddle of tearful jelly. Call it the habit of a god.

    One way to make yourself higher in the aggressive, divine fashion — yet a
    low-energy, fun way — is to knock your seduction target down as many pegs as you like through the use of big, flowery, insulting words.

    You can belittle, insult, catcall, and use all kinds of blunt-trauma words against a female, ONCE SHE LIKES YOU. The precondition is essential. She must be invested in you, extended a tendril into your heart, before you bring your hand down to chop it off … And then you can draw her in closer emotionally again. And then you can chop it off again. Unpredictability.

    But anyway, She has to like you and respect you for the hammer to hurt the most.

    One way to bring her down is to make her feel stupid. Since females are, of course, stupid, this isn’t that hard to do. (When was the last time you heard two females discussing the business world, or computers, or quantum mechanics? Like … NEVER.) But they understand words. From years of gabbing, females are INVESTED in words as entities. You must understand that words live for females in a way they live for few males, with the exception of polyglots like myself and Heartiste. We have the power of words … you do not. And girls don’t have the power of words, but they LUXURIATE in them, like standing in a waterfall in summertime tropics. Their cow-like breasts dangling, their broad, child-bearing hips thrust back … their vulvas slick from … imagining Sorcerygod, no doubt. *grinning*

    So bring her down by making her feel stupid. It rises you, and expedites the frequency and excitement of the sex you’ll be getting. (You can also get money from the chicks, but that’s another posting). Blunt-trauma complex word cascades are great entertainment too, if you’ve got it in you, and I, Sorcerygod, do. Call it the anti-pedestalizing finishing move.

    So in that previous posting I made that Heartiste cited, I advocate using mostly strong, straightforward words (not necessarily basic; a word like “annihilation” is effective, even though it’s higher than basic, especially when used with your tongue curled as you spit it out). But to hurt a female’s feelings, unleash a flurry of complex, syntactically linked words at her in a withering fire, as if her brains were beneath you. She’ll think you’re a high alpha and she’s a high alpha’s fvck toy. Note that you must have what’s called “congruence” with the rest of yourself … you can’t be a weakling and pull this off. I don’t really believe that wusses can do this, so it’s a platinum-gold move to show off your true domineering essence to a woman, if, once again, you’ve got the chops. But if you do, consider it.

    You’ll find her wilting from the onslaught and then, if she likes you (& this is a good test if she does) she’ll try to rush back in your arms, upset and needful. Rinse, repeat, dry, as often as necessary to wash that dumb plate of its ego.

    P.S. In conclusion, I would like to thank Heartiste for his years of good effort here. Although he is much hated by those with liberal tendencies (parasites), those without recognize Heartiste as being a superbly well-written, genuinely capable, alluring divinity like myself. Kudos, my lord. PRIMUS INTER PARES.
    — Sorcerygod

    P.P.S. I notice the haters have already started coming after me in the comments. These small-dicked men with inferior minds can come after me all they want in the virtual realm, but if I was with you in person, I would make you BOW. Bye bye. *single finger waved up at you as I leave*

    LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 7:59 pm Greg Eliot

      The war against the small-dicked, mentally inferior haters is best waged with a strong shoulder…

      … beware you don’t injure yours, patting yourself on the back like that.

      LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 8:27 pm Hi, I'm a total faggot!

      Your confidence is impressing!

      LikeLike


    • on May 17, 2016 at 7:12 am Publius 2016

      This is that faggot from a few years ago. I forget his name.

      LikeLike


  26. on May 16, 2016 at 10:50 am Trimegistus

    I wonder if it’s not so much small vs. long words as Anglo-Saxon vs. Latinate words. This was something understood by Winston Churchill: for English speakers, the Anglo-Saxon words carry more weight. They sound more true and honest. The most memorable political and commercial slogans are in plain English words. “We shall never give up!” “The real thing.” “Morning in America.”

    Utilizing Latinate terminology inevitably conveys the impression that you are psychologically insecure, and are being evasive or otherwise duplicitous.

    If you speak in plain English words you sound wise and brave.

    LikeLike


  27. on May 16, 2016 at 10:59 am Captain Obvious

    Denise Richards, 45 going on 12:

    LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 3:36 pm mendo

      That face is going on 65! Eesh.

      LikeLike


  28. on May 16, 2016 at 11:02 am Les Saunders, Protestant

    So I’m walking into the orifice today, looking particularly sharp (custom-made double-breasted navy pinstripe suit, monk straps) and a decent-looking manageress in her 40s (WB) exclaims, “my, don’t you look snappy today!”

    My response? “I know.” Smirk. Keep walking. She blushed. Didn’t expect that.

    Don’t say something beta like “oh gosh, thanks! You too!” Less is more. I’m a handsome bloke and I know it.

    As discussed previously, young, higher SMV women are stingy with compliments (so when they do give them, it’s game on). Older women, their defences are down, so know how proceed with them accordingly.

    Ps – women are easily amused and bemused with silly little baubles, be they oral, aural, or visual.

    LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2016 at 8:13 pm cortesar

      I’m walking into the orifice
      ——————————————————————————–
      Which orifice did you walked into when mangeress said
      my oh my ?

      LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Captain Obvious on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    jOHN MOSBY on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Captain Obvious on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Davy Holmes on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Amon Ra on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    guest on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Amon Ra on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    cortesar on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Dread Forman on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    cortesar on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
    • Deep State Update: Keeping It In The Family For A Reason
    • This Is What Separate Dating Markets Are For (Or: White Vs Black Thirst)
    • The NPC Song: "Feel"
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: