• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Swagger Or Brood, But Don’t Look Happy
Liberals Are The Real Authoritarians »

Sex Differences Crop Up In The Funniest Places

June 24, 2016 by CH

In a study of paraphilia (obsession with unusual sexual practices), a curious sex difference poked out of the findings. See if you can spot it.

masojism

That’s right, men are over-represented in every sexual perversion except one: masochism. Women are the eager beavers of sexual masojism. It is to LOL.

Any regular Chateau guest would not be surprised by the discovery that women are more sexually masochistic than men. Women are attracted to dominant men, and one way male dominance is exerted is in the bedroom. Women therefore enjoy the masochistic pleasure of submitting to a dominant, takes-what-he-wants man, or will purposely assume a masochistic sex play role to fulfill their need for submission to a dominant, takes-what-he-wants man if such a man isn’t satisfyingly forthcoming with his dominance prowess.

Also, the fact that men excel at all sorts of sexual fetishes is indicative of their inherent “cheap sperm” reproductive status. Men are constantly on the lookout for mating opportunities, and expanding the field of sexual outlets beyond normie sex with an alt-right tradwife widens (heh) men’s scope of intercourse possibility. It is therefore hypothesized by your free-thinking host that very LSMV men will be found at the margins of sexual proclivity, hoping to snag some kind of scrotal relief that they are hard-pressed to achieve the normal way.

This fact is the “is” part of the “is, not ought” equation, and its existence should not be used as justification for social engineering to make sexual freaks more accepted by the general public.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Biomechanics is God, Girls, The Id Monster, The Pleasure Principle, Ugly Truths | 136 Comments

136 Responses

  1. on June 24, 2016 at 4:54 pm Captain Obvious

    My only thought would be that the [overtly] masochistic chicks almost certainly will not be “M0ther of your Ch!ldren” material. Unless maybe you want your sons to grow up acting like Richard Simmons or Anderson Cooper or Elliot Rodger…

    LikeLike


    • on June 24, 2016 at 4:55 pm Captain Obvious

      So maybe ana1 for the masochistic chicks, and vagina1 for the chicks who’ve got a little more fight in ’em.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on June 25, 2016 at 1:12 am carlos danger

      Spanking them while they blow you goes a Long way with nice Girls. So does talking dirty to them, like they’re a harem Girl. Tell them that blowing you is a privilege and that many women seek that privilege. This works best if you’re well read.

      LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 8:28 am Captain Obvious

        But the whole idea is to NOT pervert the Nice Girls – to not sow the seeds of Darkness in their hearts. Nice Girls a perilously endangered species; they’re only good for one thing.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on June 25, 2016 at 9:47 am Captain Obvious

        Nice Girls are a perilously endangered species

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on June 25, 2016 at 11:15 am carlos danger

        CO, nice girls still need a shot of bad girl to keep them thinking you’re the man they dream of.

        LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 12:07 pm Corvo

        Keeping a nice girl nice while applying just the necessary shot of bad girl really is a tightrope. But few things worth doing are easy.

        LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 6:13 pm Captain Obvious

        Don’t ruin the nice girlz. There are so very few of them left. Either Bunz -> Oven or else DNFW. You break it, you own it.

        LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 10:47 am carlos danger

        CO, if you knew me ten years ago, you would know it is the nice girls that change you.

        LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 3:06 pm oink

        “For the unbelieving husband is sanctified through his believing wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified through her believing husband

        You, Sir, have chosen wisely.

        LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 11:21 pm carlos danger

        CO, she’s not ruined, not even close and we’re making more nice girls. Nice girls can’t exist without the security of knowing their shit lord poppa has their backs.

        LikeLike


  2. on June 24, 2016 at 4:56 pm Anonymous

    right as usual sir.

    LikeLike


  3. on June 24, 2016 at 4:59 pm Sex Differences Crop Up In The Funniest Places | Alt-Right View

    […] That’s right, men are over-represented in continue […]

    LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 11:15 am Captain Obvious

      RUH ROH: Donald Trump Recently Gave His Life to Jesus Christ as His Savior http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3443599/posts

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on June 25, 2016 at 11:16 am Captain Obvious

        Sh!t’s getting serious now…

        LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 6:08 pm Coldwarvet

        Just expanding his voter base. No harm, no foul. He doesn’t internalize these moves, methinks….

        LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 6:24 pm Captain Obvious

        LONGER THREAD HERE: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3443464/posts

        LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 4:19 pm Tarl Cabot

        This conversion is no more authentic than Ivanka’s, and done for essentially the same reason. Different constituency, though.

        Paris is worth a Mass.(Or, in this case, handling snakes)

        LikeLike


  4. on June 24, 2016 at 5:27 pm Matthew Walker

    “Sexually coercive behavior” is hardly a “paraphilia” among men. They’re saying only 18.5% of men are healthy and normal.

    Low T really is an epidemic. My God. 18.5%.

    LikeLike


    • on June 24, 2016 at 5:42 pm mendo

      Yeah, I was confused by that one as well.

      LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 3:50 am Rusvolga

      Yes but with qualification.

      Our natural state is to live in tribes where few men monopolize most of the women. Most men throughout history never procreated at all.

      LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 11:09 am Survivorman

        I read somewhere that of ALL men that ever lived.. only ~40% have successfully reproduced. It seems believable.

        LikeLike


  5. on June 24, 2016 at 6:00 pm Song For the Deaf

    From a book on male psychology I read:

    “(Some) men are masochistic in their sex lives, women are masochistic in their everyday lives.”

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on June 24, 2016 at 6:27 pm Ponce du Lion

      The degree to which women love drama isn’t healthy. And less as a lifestyle.

      LikeLike


    • on June 24, 2016 at 6:55 pm Ponce du Lion

      Would be interesting make a experiment to find how much they lie and how many of them. And then call it a fundamental constant of sociology. That would be applied to all this studies.
      Llzozlzlzolzlzolzl
      Scientific method rape!!

      LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 7:45 am JB

        Been done: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3936-fake-lie-detector-reveals-womens-sex-lies/

        LikeLike


  6. on June 24, 2016 at 6:07 pm Reb

    My curiosity is how many woman would like to see their current partner brutalized by another man then taken by the brute. Would this be an effective mating strategy

    LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 3:52 am Rusvolga

      Used to happen all the time. We are all children of rape if we go far enough back, and women are natural traitors for the same reason. Also the likely origin of stockholm syndrome.

      LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 6:01 am Reb

        This is good to know but how does this work is today’s policed world.

        LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 3:42 pm Mike Street Station

      That would explain the male rape scenes of the hero in the show ‘Outlander.” It’s basically one long romance novel, with all the usual tropes, but I could not for the life of me figure out why women would like (or write) that particular story line.

      LikeLike


      • on June 28, 2016 at 11:06 pm Spiralina

        It’s dramatic. Women love drama.

        LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 8:10 pm Vagina dominator

      “This is good to know but how does this work is today’s policed world.”

      I suppose it works today in the way that the media and government try to discourage and humiliate White men back while encouraging mud-sharking and betrayal.

      LikeLike


    • on June 26, 2016 at 5:21 pm digra31

      Heard a (black) dude I know talking about a new form of “game” evolved from the banlieues around Paris. It basically goes like this: directly approach a hottie with a manifestly beta bf in tow completely disregarding him. When she comes with “I’m with my bf”, face the guy and *rough him up* enough to shock both beta and cupcake. Then say “he’s not man enough to defend himself, how can he look after you?”

      I reckon this not only requires massive balls, but also airs of dread, intimidating physical presence, not to mention excellent situational awareness. Hard to see it play up in the field tho.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on June 26, 2016 at 7:35 pm LP

        This is biblical game. Not a “new form of game.”

        LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 7:48 pm Vagina dominator

        Ha ha ha! Dem bros sho nuff got libely majanashuns.

        So what are the ingredients for this little cuckolding fantasy?

        a) a manifest beta
        b) with a hottie
        c) a coon dreaming about what a tough-guy he is

        Coons. Kings of the world in their own heads.

        I was once walking through a subway station in Hong Kong with a very attractive girl who really liked to show off her really beautiful tits. There were a bunch of Pakistani youths hanging around – as there so often is – about six of them. One of them, playing up to his pals, came right up to my girl and bent forward as if to push his face into his cleavage. Never made it. I slapped him so hard on the side of his head he had to stagger down onto one knee. Then, with the most astonished look you can imagine, he leapt to his feet and as I walked towards his mates, he and they all fled the scene like zombies were after them.

        I can’t imagine what he thought was going to happen. Young guys. Probably treated like mommy’s boys their whole lives.

        Of course, this was Central Hong Kong, not the banlieues of Paris, where I wouldn’t have taken this girl in the first place.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on June 27, 2016 at 8:03 am wolfie65

        Not new at all.
        That’s exactly what the mostly Arab (some Black) dudes selling popsicles and soda on Mediterranean beaches used to do in the 1980’s.
        With the especially interesting twist that in some (way too many) cases, the German/Swedish/British/Dutch/other White girl would actually side with the aggressors if her bf tried to do something about it.

        LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 8:12 am Sentient

        Beautiful story VD…

        LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 2:32 pm Greg Eliot

        I don’t doubt that shitskins approached beautiful White girls…

        … it’s the “rough up the bf” bullshit that I dispute.

        Wolfie and others never fail to entertain with cuck stories and anecdotes-that-never-happened. For example: imagine a peon vendor on a swank beach in Europe back in the 1980’s going up to a Nordic hottie and attempting some lascivious display, and when she or the man she’s with balk, then roughing up the man… while all the onlookers let it pass, and the shitshin’s popsicles melt in the sun.

        Yeah, right.

        VagDominator called it… in spades.

        The rest of you clowns are dumbass trolls and/or cucks yourself for giving legs to such nonsense… even if it were true.

        You fairies.

        LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 4:36 pm Reb

        This seems rather idiotic to me. Eventually someone is going postal and killing you. This isn’t what I had in mind! Certainly a white man, even a foolhardy redneck would not brutalize with such systematic stupidity, but who knows what the latest social idiots are doing these days.

        LikeLike


    • on June 26, 2016 at 7:57 pm oink

      why would you want such woman? that is a no good dark-hearted pos that needs to be cut promptly from your life.

      LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 4:39 pm Reb

        It would then seem that if women are masochists, then her resistance is really just a call for more pain. This would only be one way of administering it. I have to agree with you that, at least the kind of brutally you have in mind, oink, would mean such a woman is only morally fit to be pimped out and gang banged by a group of ten men.

        LikeLike


    • on June 28, 2016 at 11:08 pm Spiralina

      What a horrible thought. I love my man, I want him to be healthy and safe. Women who think this way must lead very coddled lives.

      LikeLike


    • on June 28, 2016 at 11:10 pm Spiralina

      What a horrible thought. I love my man, I want him to be healthy and safe. Women who think this way must lead very coddled lives

      LikeLike


      • on June 28, 2016 at 11:11 pm Reb

        It is a general comment on brutality.

        LikeLike


  7. on June 24, 2016 at 6:11 pm Song For the Deaf

    O/T

    Congrats to any English brahs here, y’all done good.

    LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 1:09 pm Barry

      Trump has now banned the Guardian from his event in Scotland ha ha ha

      LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 6:07 pm Ripp

        🔥🔥🔥✡✡✡🔥🔥🔥

        LikeLike


  8. on June 24, 2016 at 6:16 pm Canadian Friend

    Women lie more than men even in anonymous surveys.

    I think the real numbers for women are higher.

    LikeLike


    • on June 24, 2016 at 6:29 pm Ponce du Lion

      The only variable is to what extent they are lying

      LikeLike


  9. on June 24, 2016 at 6:25 pm Ponce du Lion

    The more we push the is as the solution of the ought -be the greater success chances we have. Nature, the is, is what we are trying to impose. And after all, aren’t all this behaviors bad for civilization and civilization is basic for human success?. So if this is bad for civilization and we have the is as a solution of the ethic-empiric dilemma, we must punish the degenerate freaks… but also for all their sins against our natural rights as individuals and tribe.

    LikeLike


  10. on June 24, 2016 at 6:39 pm Blackburn

    This is basically how nerds colonized BDSM (and also guns), and why there are so gun nerds into “kink” on shitty SJW websites like thehighroad.org and armedpolitesociety.com.

    Chicks dig domination and degradation. Nerds got into that as a way to upgrade their available options for sex. I won’t lie, I did too. It was amazing for a decade and it’s still workable although the gold rush is dying out, ‘normie chads’ are flowing in for the poose at a higher and higher rate.

    Nerds flocked to guns as well, I presume because buying guns is easy and accessible and has a venn diagram with techie/nerd interests that looks like an egg.

    The end result is that we gas the nerds though because they’re continually SJWish. If you doubt me, go read thehighroad or fetlife.

    LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 6:04 am Reb

      Nerds actually do well in some surprising circumstances. Kinda hacked the alpha thing to some extent.

      LikeLike


  11. on June 24, 2016 at 7:24 pm hans

    Oh look, virtually the same number of pedos.

    That can´t be right, everybody knows only men love to rape all the children.

    LikeLike


  12. on June 24, 2016 at 7:53 pm Hackett To Bits

    Hmmm…what does this fall under?

    LikeLike


    • on June 24, 2016 at 8:44 pm Johnny Redux

      This falls under: “The type of Mexicans that American men pray would immigrate to the USA.”

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on June 24, 2016 at 8:45 pm Johnny Redux

        Instead, we this:

        LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 1:17 am carlos danger

      Smack it just like that to maximize the jiggle. Works well doggie style too.

      LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 3:22 am Amasius

      It falls under

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on June 25, 2016 at 7:15 am plumpjack

      “Hmmm…what does this fall under?”

      Trump campaign ad of why Mexico needs to pay for the wall.

      LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 5:33 pm Reb

      Yeah that “wall” is perfect for females. Shoot all the males that cross of course but a skinny bitch can easily fit through those bars.

      LikeLike


    • on June 26, 2016 at 7:59 pm oink

      a lot of Germanic blood in the one on the left

      LikeLike


  13. on June 24, 2016 at 8:42 pm Johnny Redux

    Here’s a good one: Formal government study finds that men would be less likely to use condoms with attractive women. In other news, water is wet.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27315834

    LikeLike


  14. on June 24, 2016 at 11:28 pm superslaviswife

    Self-report also plays a factor. Masochism is a “safe” paraphilia for women, yet as an audience to female gatherings of various backgrounds, I’m sure most women exhibit exhibitionistic and sadistic tendencies. Though almost no woman would call her behaviour “sexual” or “fetishistic”. And that STILL disregards the true fantasies, where the actual idea is more appealing than the reality, ie rape and voyeuristic fantasies that would invariably fall short IRL, so no woman will “own” them, instead drawing the line between fantasy and fetish.

    The only true measure would be exposure to sexual scenes via VR versus via TV, whilst a brain scanner measures attraction, relaxation, dopamine receptors, etc.

    LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 8:02 am JB

      Part of it is that women aren’t always aware of what turns them on: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/jul/05/what-do-women-want-extract

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on June 25, 2016 at 8:22 am superslaviswife

        That’s also true, though that particular article’s merits are reduced as vaginal measures are not the best way of telling. The signs of arousal inside the vagina are actually signs of preparation: lubrication to prevent tearing, blood swell to increase cushioning, retraction of the cervix and upper walls to reduce bruising, etc. A woman’s body will do this whenever there is a chance of penetration, whether it’s desired or undesired, to protect her from harm and infection. The only alternative is denying the situation, trying to ignore it, and suffering pain.

        Likewise, a woman can experience sexual arousal on an external genital level (engorged clitoris and lips] without experiencing the proper internal changes necessary for sex to take place. It’s not fully equivalent to a male erection, basically.

        I think between the measure of social appropriateness, a lack of awareness (or in most cases denial, seeing as any woman can readily find what she gets off on when it’s a porn site and not a doctor that’s asking her] about what we most desire, and a misunderstanding of which physical cues correlate most strongly with our reproductive drive and which are more reactive, it is hard to get real results on what women want the most. Hence why brain scans would be pretty interesting.

        LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 10:44 am Captain Obvious

        Reading all this chick pr0n, I am totally getting jealous of Mr Superslavis.

        LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 1:40 pm Philomathean

        Nonsense. Experience shows me women want men to take what they want, when they want, and to do so unapologetically. And the vagina will always be wettest in both volume and duration in this dynamic.

        The reverse is true too in my experience. I’ve don’t like when girls aggressively initiate sex. I’ve given in before but I’m never as hard as when nature calls and I want to hammer pussy.

        LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 6:32 pm Ripp

        “it is hard to get real results on what women want the most.”

        Mostly disagree. Hard only because to measure true findings that could be evaluated with peer review would make the academics brain melt and then even if published would terrify the masses.

        For example, the knowledge and RealTalk of this blog published on CNN would make the earth implode.

        Further to Philomathean’s point: its very clear what women ‘want’ from a man. Its very clear what women are attracted to at the onset of a new suitor and what they ‘respond’ too as most sexually gratifying.

        The issue in itself is that women are wired to not even understand this; not understand, logically, what they most desire and be forthcoming enough to admit to it no matter what the survey mechanisms used.

        The only way, is pure observation and reality from men that have actually bedded many high SMV women, and do so consistently. Not porn actors, porn producers or even beta male sociologists or academia.

        The most sluttiest of women will still proclaim “I dont normally do this, it just happened” after getting nailed hard and good by an alpha cad.

        The most purest and prudest will say the same thing, after being pounded by the same alpha cad using the same type of approach. etc…

        In aggregate terms, its clear what women want. Its documented thoroughly in the archives of this blog.

        LikeLike


  15. on June 25, 2016 at 1:03 am Glengarry

    Gosh, they forgot homosexuality for some reason.

    I wonder what behavior counts as a paraphilia if 4.6% of men have “transvestic fetishism”. Or perhaps this study was made in England? (Congrats, by the way!)

    I can recall a girl in middle school who, in retrospect, was a strong exhibitionist. Her family moved away the summer before high school; time to start her reputation anew I guess. Anyway, it seems like a quintessential modern female behavior related to attention seeking and attracting mates. I would thus think at 0.6% it was rather underreported.

    LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 7:01 pm Mofo

      Significantly more than .6 percent of the women I know have actually described themselves to me as exhibitionists. Perhaps I live a self-selective lifestyle; I don’t discount the possibility. It still strikes me as BS though.

      LikeLike


  16. on June 25, 2016 at 6:39 am martin

    lol, “men excel at all sorts of sexual fetishes”.

    LikeLike


  17. on June 25, 2016 at 8:10 am Chris

    Concerning your closing thought, CH, the Left is already doing that job:

    http://www.salon.com/2016/05/17/im_not_a_monster_a_pedophile_on_attraction_love_and_a_life_of_loneliness/

    LikeLike


  18. on June 25, 2016 at 9:19 am martin

    speaking of sex differences, a friend of mine and I had noted that young women seemed to have tattoos more often than not, and there are some subtle exceptions to this, but your average young female seems to be quite prone to getting a tattoo. I find tattoos silly because you can’t really observe them unless quite close and the colouring tends to be very ugly so even if the tattoo itself is a great work of art, which is of course never true about tattoos, it will still look like a maori warrior’s tribal markings. Why are they doing this? I have always known tattoos for men to be a symbol of menace so I apply the same to women and believe the increase may be a result of a desperate attempt to show their toughness and independence when in fact they know deep down they can’t compete with men in traditionally male roles.

    LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 2:31 pm Passer by

      I read somewhere that girls with tattoos want to signal that they are more wild, that they are more slutty, also that this is a positive signal towards criminals, etc.

      LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 4:09 pm Hackett To Bits

        We’re gonna need a bigger Venn diagram…

        LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 6:21 pm Coldwarvet

      A1 good post!

      LikeLike


    • on June 26, 2016 at 11:17 am Enfant Terrible

      The women getting tattoos, get them cause they’re stupid herd creatures.

      LikeLike


  19. on June 25, 2016 at 10:53 am Mean Mr. Mustard

    Interesting article here.

    https://blacklabellogic.wordpress.com/2016/06/23/gendernomics-how-to-avoid-buying-a-lemon/

    LikeLike


  20. on June 25, 2016 at 1:50 pm Philomathean

    On beefcurtains:

    Had a conversation with a buddy of mine and the topic came up. He said he’s fucked a lot of girls with the deformity. Luckily, I’ve only come across them once in college (I was totally turned off) but have seen many in lowbrow strip clubs. My buddy screws a lot of low class girls so I’m thinking on the whole the wizard’s sleeve must be correlated with low social and economic status.

    Thoughts?

    LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 2:10 pm plumpjack

      re: beefcurtains

      my own amateur field research suggests that girls with the optimal hip/waist ratio and a toned, well-defined pelvic landscape tend not to have them.

      it seems to be a characteristic of less genetically fertile women, ie flatter, less-toned arse, narrower hips, where gravity is generally pulling everything downward.

      it’s a turnoff for a reason. nature is saying “your kid will die in there”.

      LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 12:38 am Ripp

        lolz

        honestly though a nasty looking poon is a turn off. cant stand those beefy poons where the clit protrudes way out of the labia and looks like jaba the hut rowing in a canoe.

        LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 7:20 pm Captain Obvious

      https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&tbm=isch&q=beef+curtains

      LikeLike


    • on June 26, 2016 at 12:49 am carlos danger

      Beef curtains are not a deformity. What the fuck is up with this? No one ever even cared until a few years ago. I consider this a Topic so stupid it is unworthy of mention. Chicks with Beef curtains are less prone to infection because the pussy lips are a filter to prevent dirt and disease from entering the Body. Bigger lips are actually healthier.

      LikeLike


    • on June 26, 2016 at 11:15 am Enfant Terrible

      “Beef Curtains” are not a deformity, and whomever classifies it as so, is a prissy little faggot.

      LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 9:53 pm Philomathean

        So you’re saying you have a thing for beef curtains. Nice. More for you!

        LikeLike


    • on June 26, 2016 at 11:57 am Sean Fielding

      In Bushmen, ‘Hottentot Apron’ beef curtains may sort with steatopygia (a fat ass). Weird, because I associate beef curtains with high T and steatopygia with high E.

      LikeLike


    • on June 26, 2016 at 3:45 pm plumpjack

      actually beef curtains are a real health crisis and are considered a disability by the american slut association. there’s a new reality show coming out this fall where three girls with beef curtains share an apartment in NYC and share their day-to-day struggles trying to be world class sluts. it’s supposed to be heart wrenching.

      LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 11:06 pm carlos danger

        I will relieve all of their torment!

        LikeLike


  21. on June 25, 2016 at 3:04 pm Aeoli Pera

    Good analysis CH.

    LikeLike


  22. on June 25, 2016 at 3:32 pm Libertardian

    George Won’t shows his true colors.

    ‘George Will, television pundit and columnist at The Washington Post, said he has left the Republican Party, and he spelled out the pro-Hillary Clinton strategy he thinks will allow the establishment Republicans to regain control of the party after this presidential election.
    …
    “Make sure he loses. Grit their teeth for four years and win the White House” in 2020, Will said, referring to what Republicans should do about Trump.’

    Same old shit, pretending that losing is really some Sun Tzu strategy for winning.

    Georgie, you and your ilk are controlled opposition, and the jig is up.

    LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 3:50 pm Mike Street Station

      Unfortunately Will thinks that every 4 years each party has a 50/50 chance to win over the electorate, may the best policy argument win. He doesn’t get that our politics is tribal now and he’s in the tribe that’s shrinking.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on June 26, 2016 at 9:15 pm Amasius

        Yep. Cuckservatives are so fucking stupid. As if the Republican party will have any chance of regaining the presidency with 50 million more immigrants in this country should Hillary get in.

        LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 12:40 am Ripp

        @amasius

        thats it. whats happened in Cuckifornia is exactly what (((they))) want for the nation.

        damn I cant wait for the wall to be built and the deportstions to start.

        LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 10:29 pm Libertardian

      Hank Paulson shows his true colors (alternate title: elites have learned nothing from Brexit).

      ‘Hank Paulson, George W. Bush’s treasury secretary, who presided over both the meltdown of the U.S. economy and the subsequent bailout of his close friends and associates, has endorsed Hillary Clinton — citing his belief that she’d be more likely to enact globalist policies on trade and immigration as part of the reason for his endorsement.’

      He came out with this in an op-ed in – where else? – the Washington Post-Op.

      LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 11:06 am Captain Obvious

        (((HANK PAULSON)))

        LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 4:39 pm Tarl Cabot

        In 2008, Paulson was Bush’s Treasury Secretary. Reportedly, he met with the leaders of the five largest US commericial banks at the White House, and would not allow them to leave the room (bolstered by the Secret Service) until they all agreed to take TARP money. Who knows what what would have happened if one of them had had the balls to refuse? A suicide, I imagine.

        LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 3:23 am carlos danger

        Hank’s just window dressing. He’s from Indiana as I recall and officially a protestant but most likely a Satanist in reality.

        LikeLike


  23. on June 25, 2016 at 6:46 pm Libertardian

    “#Brexit Worrisome Fact #43: The polls were more accurate than the markets. That’s new, and scary.”

    Give me a break. Markets are wrong all the time. Especially when they’re denominated in unsound money.

    LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 7:03 pm Libertardian

      …not to mention, rigged with the complicity of corrupt regulators for the benefit of (a) connected white collar criminals and (b) State propagandists who see prices as just another means to reassure the sheep that all is well.

      LikeLike


    • on June 26, 2016 at 8:34 am martin

      the markets move based on information, and the information simply wasn’t known since there were no exit polls. This is actually the third major vote in the past few years where the outcome was unexpected; Scottish referendum, May 2015 Conservative victory, and the EU referendum all turned out different from how polls suggested they would. I talked about it with a friend and he pointed out something new to me I hadn’t heard of before, the Bradley effect, an American’s idea about how white people vote. Basically people aren’t honest about how they will vote. In fact, I read some firms tried to do their own polls to predict markets and failed at it. The pattern in these three votes was that people lied so as to skew it in a more leftward direction but they voted more conservatively. It makes sense, we wouldn’t want to reveal embarrassing conservative ideas would we?

      LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 12:46 am Ripp

        some merit to this.

        I go out all the time. and there is surely a ‘silent white majority’. you cant have open conversations about it and in brown/blue hair/femcunt mixed company youll kill your social value by sperging out on Trumpenstein and wall building talk.

        It makes sense many are silently bait and switching in poll bullsh1t vs actual votes.

        I can also easily see polls being skewed artificially to try and sway public group think. probably both factors are heavily in play.

        LikeLike


  24. on June 26, 2016 at 5:05 am Publius

    Somebody do a meme of this cucked faggot traitor with a pacifier. http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/25/politics/george-will-donald-trump-leaving-republican-party-election/index.html

    LikeLike


  25. on June 26, 2016 at 8:29 am Laguna Beach Fogey

    While enjoying some cocktails at the pool yesterday, basking in the warmth of the aftermath of the Brexit vote, a thought struck me.

    Can we expect certain (((European parties))) to step up efforts to facilitate Muslim terror attacks in Britain, as a sort of revenge or retaliatory “see we told you so” gesture for leaving the EU?

    I wouldn’t put it past them. War is coming.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on June 26, 2016 at 11:04 am Captain Obvious

      Certain (((European parties))) are already mounting revenge or retaliatory “see we told you so” gestures ON THE BRITISH POUND.

      The idea that stuff exported from England or investments made in England are suddenly worth a fraction of what they had been worth the previous day is simply ludicrous.

      It’s all (((manipulationism))).

      LikeLike


    • on June 26, 2016 at 7:38 pm Libertardian

      One downside to Brexit is, the elites just learned there is no way they can allow a remotely fair election in November. They’re deluded, yes, but they’re not dumb enough to miss that one.

      LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 7:49 pm plumpjack

        after Trump’s eviscerating speech last week I had the strong feeling that he’s pretty tuned in to the shifting winds. he clearly has the capacity to shift gears.

        if he alternates the bloodletting and humiliation with solid fatherly reassurance game there won’t be any way HRC will ever climb out from under his boot on her throat.

        my guess is that a well-coordinated election rigging is good for no more than 5, maybe 10%. he should be able to top that. i just can’t see him losing.

        LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 12:48 am Ripp

        I think Trump is going to slaughter her in the first debate.

        im curious to see how CuckNN and the other jew news outlets are going to try and rig the topics.

        LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 1:00 am Ripp

        (((Jewge Soros))) really is the antichrist.

        http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06/26/soros-eu-decline-practically-inevitable/

        LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 10:02 am plumpjack

        “…With this pivot to the general, we must recognize there will be a degree of Trump softening his tone and recalibrating his message. For you autistes out there, this does not mean Trump is cucking himself, nor does it mean that he is in the process of being neutered by Manafort. In fact, not one of Trump’s policy positions has changed. What will change is the language Trump uses to discuss these policy positions. The (((media))) has already started to use this sea change as a means of discrediting Trump by driving a wedge between him and his committed base of support. We should be vigilant of this as a strategy and not poke holes in the bottom of our own boat, which is ultimately what (((they))) want us to do….”

        http://therightstuff.biz/2016/06/27/winners-dont-think-about-losing/

        LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 10:07 am plumpjack

        also from therightstuff.biz article i linked above:

        “…As we move from one week to the next, with each successive news cycle more replete with attempts to undermine and discredit Trump than the last, try to keep one thing at the forefront of your mind at all times: Our side is winning. We’re not only winning here in America, but we’re winning in Europe too. We will keep winning so long as we have the resolve to do so.”

        LikeLike


  26. on June 26, 2016 at 11:58 am Barry

    The passive aggressive bitch that is Obama has reiterated his line that the UK …who has always stood beside the US …is last in line for trade deals. These Bolsheviks are going all out to get their one global state and nothing will stand in their way

    LikeLike


  27. on June 26, 2016 at 2:17 pm oink

    Putin called their bluffs, they are losing their grip on the narrative, a small fry like Assad survived their assaults, ((tribemembers)) will freely discuss with one the possibility of the ((Greatest Ally)) switching to the Shia side of the Middle East brawl… [BTW, as long as the copts switch, ((they))’re game]

    fun times. btw, that’s exactly how the commie crumbling unfurled.

    for a more artistic take on the process I recommend “The King is dying” of E. Ionesco.

    LikeLike


    • on June 26, 2016 at 2:51 pm oink

      And that’s not accounting for the ancient chink and bindi civilizations who are snickering at the white troglodyte getting hoist with his own petar’

      LikeLike


    • on June 26, 2016 at 3:54 pm oink

      Oh f**k

      If POZ pushes the English hard enough, they too can go to the Shia side in the ME brawl, with Old Ally Putin and the chicoms.

      Holeee Camoleee.

      LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 4:15 pm plumpjack

        what’s the deal with the chi-coms? how are they different from the (((Bolsheviks)))? why don’t they suffer the equalist/pozzed element the way the west does? or do they…?

        LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 4:24 pm plumpjack

        this is the blind spot of the left: if (((they))) are willing to go cross border to grab third world allies to undermine the nationalists then what’s to stop nationalists from doing the same thing?

        LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 6:10 pm Anonymous

        one of west-of-urals extraction should really think of chinks as folk from another planet

        LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 6:18 pm Johnny Redux

        Britain does have strong ties with China, including, Hong Kong, of course. The military regulars and noncoms are against war/hostility with Russia.

        LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 7:06 pm oink

        it is best to think of chinks as a distinct/separate humanoid species

        LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 4:22 am Carlos Danger

        In China, the party simply replaced the Mandarins and the Cultural Revolution killed any desire for further equalism.

        LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 8:12 am Captain Obvious

        Chicoms == GOOKS

        Bolsheviks == ESKIMOS

        GOOKS != ESKIMOS

        Entirely different bloodlines. Biological Calvinism therefore warns you to expect entirely different psychologies.

        LikeLike


  28. on June 26, 2016 at 6:08 pm Johnny Redux

    Some good news out of Iceland, History Professor, and political outsider (uhhhuuumm….Trump), Gudni Johannesson won the Presidencuy after riding a wave of anti-establishment sentiment, final results showed Sunday, with nearly 76% (yes, 76%….oldest Democracy in the world) voter turnout. He is anti-EU.

    He won with 39.1 percent of votes, and was trailed by businesswoman Halla Tomasdottir (thank God he beat the businesswoman), also without party affiliation, who took 29.4 percent.

    In other good news for Iceland, their soccer team (all White, all Icelandic) is in the final 16 teams for the Eurocup (soccer), facing England on Monday. Cheer them on, men!

    LikeLike


    • on June 27, 2016 at 4:00 pm Captain Obvious

      Roy Hodgson Quits as England Manager Following Shock Defeat to Iceland http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3444184/posts

      LikeLike


  29. on June 26, 2016 at 6:10 pm Johnny Redux

    Guess which one is Iceland:

    LikeLike


  30. on June 26, 2016 at 6:12 pm Johnny Redux

    LikeLike


  31. on June 26, 2016 at 7:23 pm oink

    ‘groid set to testify against The Cunt gets his larynx crushed.

    that’ll teach him to flap his gums.

    the ((lawyer)) for the other defendant is (prudently?) putting distance between himself and the case.

    LikeLike


  32. on June 26, 2016 at 7:51 pm Libertardian

    “Peter Spence
    If there’s one thing I don’t want centrally planned, it’s the movement of human beings.”

    You mean like this?

    https://mpcdot.com/forums/topic/8968-right-in-rutland-vt-one-mayors-determination-to-bring-100-syrians-to-dying-industrial-town/

    LikeLike


    • on June 27, 2016 at 7:54 am oink

      at 10k a pop that’s 1 million ripe for embezzling.

      LikeLike


  33. on June 26, 2016 at 9:10 pm Barry

    Watching Nigel Farage’s speeches in the EU Parliament and interviews. The greatest Britain of the last century. He took on Europe by himself and saved his country.

    LikeLike


  34. on June 27, 2016 at 11:29 am Anonymous

    The United States Supreme Court is a pathetic joke.

    LikeLike


  35. on June 27, 2016 at 11:47 am Anonymous

    Jews kill babies.
    http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/27/health/abortion-scotus-reactions-from-texas/index.html

    LikeLike


  36. on June 27, 2016 at 1:45 pm carlos danger

    LikeLike


  37. on June 27, 2016 at 2:20 pm Libertardian

    Breitbart:
    “Older people were far more likely to vote to leave the European Union (EU), and having lost the argument, supporters of Remain are blaming them, insult them and even arguing their democratic rights should now be curtailed.”

    ‘This is a democracy, but…’

    “In line with others, political blogger Kevin Drum attempted to dismiss the free will and rational decision making of the elderly, writing: “At its core, this is the last stand of old people who have been frightened to death by cynical right-wing media empires and the demagogues who enable them.”

    ‘This is just a dip in the poz bull market. A great buying opportunity!’

    LikeLike


    • on June 27, 2016 at 2:36 pm Libertardian

      “Wa Post-Op: Brexit is a reminder that some things just shouldn’t be decided by referendum”

      Mask slippage accelerating. Trump should hold this up and say “Hey proles, your betters think you’re too fucking dumb to vote.”

      LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 2:42 pm plumpjack

        “Hey proles, your betters think you’re too fucking dumb to vote.”

        substitute women/minorities for “proles” and you have the alt-right’s position. seems like everyone has had their fill of “democracy” these days. nature will have to settle it.

        LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 3:45 pm oink

        I’m with PJ.

        settled it will be.

        LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    CMC on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Dr.Benway on The Three Abrahamic Religions,…
    Dr.Benway on The Three Abrahamic Religions,…
    Peak Finance on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Greg Eliot on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Tam the Bam on Tourette’s Game
    CMC on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Greg Eliot on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Nads on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Peak Finance on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Cesar Sayoc, "White Male" (& Deep State Updates)
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • "Conspiracy Theory" Conspiracy
    • Tourette's Game
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • When The Jumbotron Test Is Crushed
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: