• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Moral Derangement Of Elizabeth Fauxcahontas Warren
Sex Differences Crop Up In The Funniest Places »

Swagger Or Brood, But Don’t Look Happy

June 24, 2016 by CH

Men love women who look happy. Women love men who look…. take a guess.

Women find happy guys significantly less sexually attractive than swaggering or brooding men, according to a new University of British Columbia study that helps to explain the enduring allure of “bad boys” and other iconic gender types.

Of course, if you were to ASK the typical woman in a public setting surrounded by her family and peers which kind of man she would rather date, she’ll say the smiling happy man. Women are loath to publicly admit romantic preferences that would expose the disturbing nature of their sexuality. But any man who’s lived a day in his life knows the special appeal that swaggering douchebags or mysterious brooding artists have to women.

In a series of studies, more than 1,000 adult

Nice N.

participants rated the sexual attractiveness of hundreds of images of the opposite sex engaged in universal displays of happiness (broad smiles), pride (raised heads, puffed-up chests) and shame (lowered heads, averted eyes).

The study found that women were least attracted to smiling, happy men, preferring those who looked proud and powerful or moody and ashamed. In contrast, male participants were most sexually attracted to women who looked happy, and least attracted to women who appeared proud and confident.

Careerist, manjawed feminists extolling the lean-in philosophy wept. Men prefer deferential, submissive, vulnerable women. I.e., feminine women.

“It is important to remember that this study explored first-impressions of sexual attraction to images of the opposite sex,” says Alec Beall, a UBC psychology graduate student and study co-author. “We were not asking participants if they thought these targets would make a good boyfriend or wife — we wanted their gut reactions on carnal, sexual attraction.”

The sexual market is the prime market because (among other reasons) it operates on the level of the human subconscious, where instinct and “gut” forge behavior before the frontal lobe pitches in to rationalize that based behavior as freely chosen and socially appropriate.

Overall, the researchers found that men ranked women more attractive than women ranked men.

Fashy coda! Affirms the “sperm is cheap, eggs are expensive” maxim. For those cucklets who insist that women only value men’s looks, remember that women are predisposed to valuing VERY LITTLE of men, even decent-looking men, BEFORE those men have approached and displayed their masculine boldness.

It’s been covered here at the Chateau many times…women are the more discriminating sex, and that extends to women’s perceptions of men’s looks. Which is implicitly good news for less Hollywoodian men, because if women only consciously value the top 5% in male looks then the reality that far more than 5% of men are dating cute girls proves that women must subconsciously value other traits in men. This study indirectly highlights a selection of those other attractive male traits: confidence, cockiness, inscrutability, danger, and dominance.

***

Nikolai adds an insightful comment about women’s seemingly weird attraction to shame-faced men.

This is the second study I’ve seen where ‘ashamed’ or ‘guilty’ was the second most popular look for men. I think I know why this is.
When I first started seeing multiple women, dates would ask me about it and I would look shamefaced. This would prove what I was up to and I was surprised to find that they reacted positively, like those female teachers who can’t help adoring the naughty boy.
Of course, haughty and nonchalant would have been even better. That’s why ashamed only comes in second.

Anything that communicates “I’ve been a bad bad boy” will fire up a woman’s libido.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Alpha, Biomechanics is God, Rules of Manhood, Science Validates Game | 65 Comments

65 Responses

  1. on June 24, 2016 at 3:24 pm Regular John

    Brexit. The Trumpening. Make America White Again Billboards. Echoes.

    Where is your current year now, faggots?

    LikeLike


    • on June 24, 2016 at 4:10 pm Corvo

      Triumph of the Madman

      LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 3:15 am Amasius

        It’s like in “Signs” where it turned out you just needed simple old water to kill the aliens. Brexit has shown the world how possible, nay easy it is to break free. Just say no.

        Water also killed the Wicked Witch, right?

        LikeLike


  2. on June 24, 2016 at 3:32 pm woman

    There is no point in trying to please a man who is happy all the time. I work hard to make my boyfriend happy. When he smiles (rarely), it’s because I’ve earned it, and it’s how I know that he’s happy with me.

    People don’t value what they don’t pay for.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on June 24, 2016 at 5:49 pm Reb

      Ahh

      LikeLike


    • on June 24, 2016 at 6:53 pm hans

      Odd and I always thought the average woman can´t stand seeing her man happy, so she does everything in her power to make him as miserable as possible.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on June 24, 2016 at 7:46 pm wolfie65

      If THIS comment doesn’t trigger y’alls troll radar, I must assume selective blindness……

      Btw, I value very much the things I don’t pay for or pay very little for.

      LikeLike


      • on June 24, 2016 at 8:48 pm Colonel Hogan

        I went to the link. It’s full of studies. One of the headers reads: She thinks friends, he thinks sex. Part way through THAT article, it says something like; ‘in all areas of psychology, men and women are the same. Intellectual achievement, problem solving, etc…’. The studies come off as feminist biased, so take it with a grain

        LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 8:15 am picowhi

        Both Hans and Woman have a point. A skilled woman would do both to lock their man in.

        LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 12:46 am Passer by

      You mean that you have no power over a man who is happy all the time.

      LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 6:06 am Reb

      Again women are weird this does not make me happy btw

      LikeLike


  3. on June 24, 2016 at 3:39 pm Swagger Or Brood, But Don’t Look Happy | Alt-Right View

    […] Swagger Or Brood, But Don’t Look Happy […]

    LikeLike


  4. on June 24, 2016 at 3:40 pm Anon

    Lolzozozoz

    The time for play is over. Save white civilization. The women will come.

    http://money.cnn.com/2016/06/23/investing/eu-referendum-markets/index.html?category=investing

    LikeLike


  5. on June 24, 2016 at 3:49 pm Canadian Friend

    Last week a cute woman at pof was telling me she has trouble finding men who will date her…

    Because she is cute and slender at first I was puzzled, but then after a 15 minutes back and forth trough email it became obvious; by the second email she was already telling me she has big important job, she buys fleets of cars for some large company, and by the third email she was telling me she knows more about cars than most men and she told me she probably knew more about cars than I do.

    She was way too proud and way too confident.

    I was completely turned off by her attitude…her attitude cancelled out her good looks.

    I stopped replying without giving her an explanation, but now I am tempted to send her a link to the study CH is talking about.

    It will not change who she is and will not change her attitude, but at least she will know what the hell is wrong with her that turns off men completely.

    LikeLike


    • on June 24, 2016 at 3:56 pm mendo

      These working girls have the ultimate smug sense of self-satisfaction that comes with thinking their job is soooo important.

      I recall a Filipina girl–maybe 6, 6.5 if she dolled herself up–was saying that no one could do her job and that she hated her job but couldn’t leave, blah blah blah.

      I realized then and there how women love drama, love to complain and if they having nothing to complain about, they’ll invent shit that makes no rational sense, but I repeat myself.

      LikeLike


    • on June 24, 2016 at 5:30 pm Vagina dominator

      This maybe an example of a woman who thinks that what she finds attractive the opposite sex also finds attractive.

      This is like all those images in women’s magazines featuring frowning beauties. Men don’t like it but women must think we find it attractive.

      Bitches be really stupid.

      LikeLike


    • on June 24, 2016 at 7:00 pm hans

      DO NOT do this!
      All you´re accomplishing is for her to be able to dupe an unsuspecting bro into investing serious resources into her.

      Nature has selected this brainwashed cunt into barren sphincter hood and things are good as they are.

      LikeLiked by 2 people


    • on June 25, 2016 at 4:59 am UKIP

      What kind of proud and confident person reels off their achievements moments within meeting?

      I don’t know about in American because you’re a bit different(read: tacky), here we’d take self-promotion as a sign of insecurity. Flaunting your success(or your wad), is not becoming. No class.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on June 25, 2016 at 5:29 pm Reb

      My lesson has been learnt about pof over the years. Those women have no soul.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


  6. on June 24, 2016 at 3:50 pm bobcoltsfan@yahoo.com

    What is the difference between swagger and looking happy? I associate swagger with a cocky smirk–is that distinct from a beta grin?

    LikeLike


  7. on June 24, 2016 at 3:52 pm Anon

    Tom (((Burgess))).

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/24/critics-fire-back-at-seattle-gun-ammo-tax-claim-is-aimed-at-killing-business.html

    Every. God. Damned. Single. Time.

    Add to Christmas list.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  8. on June 24, 2016 at 3:54 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

    Smiling like a chimp is overrated.

    I just had some publicity photographs taken. SS Officer’s haircut. Smiling kept to an absolute minimum.

    And no teeth bared.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  9. on June 24, 2016 at 3:57 pm theasdgamer

    Affirms the “sperm is cheap, eggs are expensive” maxim.

    Actually, champion horse semen is expensive and horse eggs aren’t even for sale.

    There is demand for champion horse semen from the owners of mares.

    [CH: the general principle stands, but yes an argument could be made that the sperm of top alpha males is as biomechanically valuable as the eggs of average women.]

    LikeLike


    • on June 24, 2016 at 4:30 pm Sean Fielding

      1. The horsey set is generally very resistant to artificial insemination and promotes live stallions covering live mares, especially in the most valuable breed of all. Read Wolfe’s ‘A Man in Full’ for a great literary description of this. Cattle are far more a propos.

      2. Champion bull semen corresponds to expensive alpha human semen, not cheap human beta semen. The ideal SMV hierarchy this blog is trying to move you toward is alpha>woman>beta, because by definition, alpha males are those males that women see, the way beta men see women.

      3. Champion cattle eggs are for sale, but mainly in an old-fashioned storage form: a champion cow. And champion cows are a lot more expensive than vials of bull semen. Champion bulls are more expensive still of course, but that’s because one bull can produce a lot of vials of semen. Which brings us back to alpha>female>beta.

      The maxim stands.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on June 24, 2016 at 4:36 pm theasdgamer

        Alpha semen is the most desirable, then eggs, then beta semen. The maxim is faulty because of distribution errors.

        [CH: hm. correction: alpha eggs are the most desirable, so the right-shifted desirability distribution for women is correct.]

        LikeLike


      • on June 24, 2016 at 6:50 pm Ponce du Lion

        I think Chateau list is accurate.
        This is supply and demand.

        Alpha females (HB 8s, 9s and 10s)
        Super Alpha males
        Beta females
        Alpha males
        Beta males
        Omega females
        Omega males

        LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 1:04 am Passer by

        Ponce du Lion, you are on this blog from a long time, yet do not know some simple truths. I nature, there are alpha males, but there are no alpha females, due to differences in reproduction. Histrorically, most women reproduced (80 percent, which means lots ugly and lots of average women reproduced), but fewer men reproduced.

        A quality male could have more children than a quality female, plus a quality female can not have more children than an average female. Therefore it does not make sense for nature to create exceptional woman, (women are more average, and more similar to each other compared to men), but it does make sense to create exceptional men, who will then impregnate women.

        Studies show that men are more variable than women. This is why the best human specimens are men, and men are the best in almost any human activity.

        You will find that women are only 10 percent of science professors, 10 percent of surgeons, 5 percent of nobel laureats, 5 percent of civilian pilots, 2 percent of combat pilots, 10 percent of software developers, and 95 percent of new things are invented by men. There are twice as many men with an IQ of 120-plus as there are women, there are 30 times the number of men with an IQ of 170-plus as there are women. This is caused by sexual dimorphism – most women reproduce, but not all men reproduce. Women mate mostly with quality males, while most of the weak males do not reproduce, which leads to males having better qualities than females.

        LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 1:35 pm Ponce du Lion

        Passer by

        By alpha females I understand hot hottest women.
        Is true that alpha females don’t have more children than beta but in the human species resources matter and hence physical integrity(in comparison to more R selected species). Hotter women don’t have more children but they have better children and can obtain resources initially intended for uglier women.
        Alpha women isn’t about intelligence, strength, or dominance. I never claimed that.
        I think this is pretty easy to understand. Hot women = alpha women.
        And I know well the differences of distribution for most traits and also the cause, the X chromosome.

        LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 2:16 pm Passer by

        Well, dear Ponce, there is no such thing as alpha female in nature. At least among animals who have wombs. There is no pack leaders of women, competition among females is much, much lower, (vast majority of competition and violence is male on male). Dumb women usually have more children than smart women.

        Look at the study –
        “Overall, the researchers found that men ranked women more attractive than women ranked men.”

        According to another study that was posted here in the past, women find only 20 percent of men to be attractive (hypergamy), while men find 50 percent of women to be attractive (no hypergamy among males).

        http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/your-looks-and-online-dating/

        Women are hypergamous precisely because there are few alpha men, men are not hypergamous precisely because there are no alpha women.

        LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 5:32 pm Ponce du Lion

        An alpha woman is a woman who can pretend her hypergamous directives of get more attention from alpha males. This is derived from human males can’t providing enough resources for all their prole. And alpha must be selective (out of Africa). So if alphas are selective, them there is competition among women, because all women can’t get their kids living in the cold steppes for free.
        The hotter and care giving the woman the greater the odds of being provided and be more alpha.
        Stop reply like you weren’t reading my whole comment. Because I said that for women only account beauty.
        Women are really really competitive. Their obsession with self appearance is conspicuous all over the world, maybe with the exception of sub Saharan Africa
        The woman who gets the most from the most alpha is therefore the most alpha women because all women can’t receive equal from alphas.

        LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 6:17 pm Passer by

        The normal grouping in human societies is one man – several women. Historically, 40 percent of men reproduced, while 80 percent of women reproduced. I never heard about female alpha Queens having male harems or one woman having several husbands. It does not make sense because she can only have few kids, while a single alpha man could impregnate many women.

        There is no such thing in nature (at least among mammals) as an alpha female. Women are also not very competetive as they do not kill each other, compared to men. 97 percent of same sex killings are male vs male, which shows the extreme competition between males.

        If there were alpha females, then only few women would reproduce, not most of them. Just like only 40 percent of men (the best men) reproduced. According to various studies, males are also more variable (there are more unique males), while females are more similar to each other.

        http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19031491

        It is quite simple. Women are hypergamous because there are alpha males, hence only the best males reproduce. This leads to sexual dimorphism – males having better qualities than females.

        Males are not hypergamous because there are no alpha females, hence most females reproduce. If there were alpha females, then only a few females would reproduce and men will be hypergamous just like women are.

        This is all caused by the differences in reproduction between males and females. The most important difference is the womb. A woman is limited to several kids, while a man is not. Therefore, for nature it does not make sense to make unique women with exceptional qualities, as the study above shows, since those high quality women wont be able to significantly change the genes of human race due to their womb limitations.

        LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 10:17 am Ponce du Lion

        Lololz The Harem of The Queen? When I said that? Who are you talking to?
        Alpha means individual biologically successful. From women to gram negative bacteria.
        Not aggressive or intelligent.
        Because you have such deep
        understanding I want to read from you the mechanism of why females have a narrow bell curve, why all traits are normally distributed and how the probability density function is constructed.

        LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 12:45 pm Passer by

        Well, i like to talk about these issues.

        Aggressiveness has to do with the strong male on male competition, far stronger that that among females.The competition among males is stronger because fewer males reproduce and males fight each other for alpha status. Fewer males reproduce because only the best males reproduce. Intrasex aggressiveness is lower among females due to the lower level of competition anong females and the lack of internal fight for alpha status.

        As i said, you made a serious mistake and you are spreading misconceptions and false information. There are alpha males, but there are no alpha females. Men are not the same as women. You simply saw that there are alpha men and then thought “there must be alpha women too!”. Well, things in life are not so simplistic.

        Alpha does not simply mean “biologically succesful”, because this would mean that 80 percent of women are alpha women. No dear Ponce. Alpha means an organism that is *much* more successful in reproduction, compared to other organisms. A woman who has one kid isn’t alpha, a man who impregnated several women is.

        You can not call extremely beautiful women “alpha women”, because there is no male hypergamy centered around them. Men find 50 percent of women to be attractive, while women find only 20 percent of men to be attractive (this is real hypergamy). Studies show that women are more similar to each other, while men are more variable.

        There are almost no cases of alpha Queens having male harems, or females having several husbands, the way men had harems or several wifes. Almost all women reproduced, unlike men, where fewer quality men reproduced. Having a very smart woman, or a very strong woman, or a very beautiful woman, simply does not matter, because few alpha women will have only few kids from only several men and thus will not change almost anything in the human genome. In contrast, few alpha men could impregnate many women, so they could change things in the human genome and could do that way faster than their hypothetical female equivalents.

        As i said, this is also shown by the level of same sex competition: there is extreme competition between males, 97 percent of same sex killings are men vs men. In contrast, there is much more cooperation among women, to the point that they are often called herd creatures. In is not a coincidence that women (who do not have alpha females, don’t have to fight for alpha status, and are more similar to each other) are more egalitarian and are more likely to believe in equality, while men (who have alpha males and are more variable), are more likely to believe in inequality.

        Women less conservative, less “racist”, less capitalist, more egalitarian than men
        http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1982.tb00546.x/abstract

        The real war in society is not left vs right, it is masculine vs. feminine. The female principle is egalitarianism (equality), The masculine principle is what is opposite to egalitarianism. It is differentiation/discrimination. Each side accuses the other of being evil. The masculine right wants to make distinctions and to discriminate – the female left wants to deny distinctions. This is the war eternal – making distinctions and believing in inequality (the male principle) vs. denial of distinctions and believing in equality (the female principle).

        Woman are more similar to each other, have no alphas, so they believe in equality. Men are more variable, have alphas and betas, so they believe in inequality.

        LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 2:56 pm Barry

        The world needs more Lena Gerckes not more Lena Dunhams.

        LikeLike


      • on June 27, 2016 at 1:31 am Passer by

        Yes, Barry, you discovered America. You really think what you said is something new and original? Maybe this “great discovery” of yours will impress your 15 year old friends, but this here is a serious, adult, discussion. I don’t have time for your “discoveries” of the type “Oh my Gawd the sky is Blue.”, you know.

        LikeLike


    • on June 24, 2016 at 5:04 pm plumpjack

      especially valuable is the sperm of the rare alpha who invests heavily in rearing and training his own superior offspring.

      LikeLike


      • on June 24, 2016 at 5:42 pm Captain Obvious

        We all know that, but does the Modern Woman’s Hamster sense it?

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on June 24, 2016 at 6:15 pm plumpjack

        “does the Modern Woman’s Hamster sense it?”

        only after the fact, if he deems her a worthy vessel in which to deposit it.

        LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 8:33 am Captain Obvious

        > “only after the fact” ——— That’s some seriously profound shiznat. And of utter uselessness to the prospective suitor. OTOH, for the female, talk about winning Life’s Lottery…

        LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 8:35 am Captain Obvious

        > “of utter uselessness” ——— Well, the useFULLness would be in preparing yourself emotionally for the pure living he11 of not being fully appreciated until several decades later. Cause it really is gonna be he11.

        LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 1:23 pm syonredux

      RE: Humans ova and human sperm

      Eggs are expensive because a woman has a finite supply. Plus. they have a limited shelf-life.

      For all practical purposes, sperm is unlimited. And sperm also has a lot more shelf-life (cf, among numerous other examples, Clint Eastwood)

      And one man can impregnate thousands of women. But one woman cannot bear children to thousands of men.

      So, the maxim holds: Eggs are cheap; sperm is expensive.

      LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 5:45 pm theasdgamer

        Whether eggs are available or not, pussy is available 24/7. As far as recreational sex is concerned, eggs are irrelevant.

        It takes lots of sperm to fertilize one egg. Old sperm isn’t as fertile as new sperm; replenishment is needed for optimal reproduction. Turnover every 36 hours is optimal for one attempt, so, no, sperm isn’t unlimited, even when reproductive sex is considered.

        One alpha can impregnate thousands of women; the alpha is more valuable for reproduction.

        The maxim is still shit.

        LikeLike


  10. on June 24, 2016 at 4:27 pm Clydesdale

    For years my wife has been hounding me to smile for pictures or when socializing around other people, even though my natural demeanor (mostly unintentionally) comes across as serious, aloof and slightly pissed off. When I see the results of such pictures, I look like some grinning doufus whose shorts are too tight.

    Funny thing is, around the house and when we are alone, she never complains about my scowl, never tells me to smile, and, after 30 years, has never given me reason to question her attraction to me — it appears genuine. It’s only in public.

    Is this some sort of reverse mate-guarding scheme where taken women don’t want you to appear too attractive to others? God knows, listening to women regarding “what women want” makes about as much sense as Donald Trump taking advice from Hilliary as to how to be more electable.

    LikeLiked by 2 people


    • on June 24, 2016 at 7:13 pm hans

      I think you pretty much answered it yourself.
      Between here ears she very likely hasn´t got a clue why she always nags you about cam-Donald Duck face.
      But her guts are terrified of you looking so sexy scowly, especially when ignoring the camera thus powerfully attracting other and younger gals.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on June 27, 2016 at 2:45 pm Anonymous

      I think this has to do with the implication that you are “happy” because of her in the photo.

      LikeLike


  11. on June 24, 2016 at 4:31 pm Nikolai Vladivostok

    This is the second study I’ve seen where ‘ashamed’ or ‘guilty’ was the second most popular look for men. I think I know why this is.
    When I first started seeing multiple women, dates would ask me about it and I would look shamefaced. This would prove what I was up to and I was surprised to find that they reacted positively, like those female teachers who can’t help adoring the naughty boy.
    Of course, haughty and nonchalant would have been even better. That’s why ashamed only comes in second.

    LikeLike


  12. on June 24, 2016 at 4:54 pm Vincent

    The sight, sad smile with a small shake of the head has worked for me.

    LikeLike


  13. on June 24, 2016 at 5:48 pm Reb

    Women are weird

    LikeLike


    • on June 24, 2016 at 10:49 pm Mean Mr. Mustard

      Only when you don’t truly understand their nature.

      LikeLike


      • on June 25, 2016 at 6:08 am Reb

        I don’t think I really want to.

        LikeLike


  14. on June 24, 2016 at 5:54 pm don Fefinho

    so when Cupcake goes to any length in her power to ruin your day, she’s actually trying to turn you more attractive to her?

    a strange paradox, isn’t it?
    a man is happy when her woman is happy, but a woman is happy when she can make her man unhappy
    so a man is supposed to be happy and unhappy at the same time

    LikeLike


  15. on June 24, 2016 at 9:09 pm NothingMan00

    So when women tell me I look too serious and need to smile it’s a shit test?

    LikeLike


  16. on June 25, 2016 at 2:44 am Harold

    Are there really men who don’t know this intuitively?

    LikeLike


    • on June 25, 2016 at 2:56 am Amasius

      I admit I didn’t. I thought alpha = confident = happy. I suppose it’s okay for an alpha to be happy as long as you don’t splash it around goofily all the time. Trump smiles and grins quite a bit. (But does he laugh? I just thought about it and I can’t clearly recall ever hearing him laugh.)

      LikeLiked by 1 person


  17. on June 25, 2016 at 2:57 am Passer by

    1. A woman who appears proud and confident will care about very few men, due to built- in hypergamy. She will care about maybe only 5 percent of all males. Therefore, for the most males, it does not make sense to care about her either.

    2. A woman like that will be more likely to divorse and or become a single mother, which will have a negative impact on her offspring (kids raised by single mothers have lower qualities compared to kids raised by two parents), which is not good due to evolutionary reasons.

    3. A woman like that will take more risks, and engage in more confrontations, which is not good for her offspring, as there will be higher probability of death or injury for the over confident (or aggressive) mother. This is again is not good due to evolutionary reasons.

    4. Women themselves prefer male bosses over female bosses.

    5. If you are a woman, there is no point to be proud and confident, considering the fact that women have poor understanding about global issues and especially human group relations (tribalism). A powerful woman (lets say Merkel) will make a mess all over the place, due to the fact she is blind about those issues. It does not make sense for someone who is blind to be confident and proud, don’t you think?.

    It appears that according to nature, women are to have no responsibility for important, global issues, because nature made women to think locally, while men think globally. Woman care only about close people and their relations with them, (its like they live in a bubble) while men also care about their tribe and its relations with other tribes.

    Selfish, self-obsessed people, who only care about their close ones, can not create civilization. Organised groups can.

    Among children and adolescents, female play-groups tend to emphasize close (and often dyadic) interpersonal interactions (with relatives, friends), while male play-groups emphasize coordinated teams and large groups (tribes).

    Mastering nature and the environment, something traditionally done by men, required emphasis on larger groups and coordinated teams (tribes). Finding (and keeping) a quality man and raising children, something traditionally done by women, required emphasis on close, often dyadic, interpersonal interactions. (And now you know why women (who are relational) watch soap operas, while men (who are tribal) watch football.

    LikeLiked by 2 people


    • on June 26, 2016 at 8:09 am picowhi

      Women who show weakness are much more powerful. The world wants them to feel like a princess or queen so the simplest thing to do is to allow them. It only makes sense.

      LikeLike


    • on June 26, 2016 at 11:19 am Ponce du Lion

      Men are systematizers. Women struggle handling abstract concepts. And cucks and feminine men too.
      Boost T to save Western!
      I think this blog may interest you.
      http://www.sciencevsfeminism.com/the-myth-of-equality/sex-differences-general-intelligence/

      LikeLike


      • on June 26, 2016 at 1:02 pm Passer by

        Oh, i know this site. Thanks. I already commented there before several months and gave that guy some additional information.

        That is my article on feminism.

        http://diversitymachtfrei.blogspot.bg/2016/05/the-problem-with-feminism-why.html

        LikeLike


  18. on June 25, 2016 at 5:19 am UKIP

    Sincere happiness is a good look. Smiling with your eyes is good. Looking approachable is good. Smiling politely and looking happy to “ease things along” is not a good look. Default face as stupid smile face to hide nerves or appear non-threatening is bad.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on June 27, 2016 at 2:25 pm driveallnight

      “Guys, go for the smirk.”

      (a full paragraph of brit long-wind condensed to five words. learn to brevity, faggot)

      LikeLike


  19. on June 25, 2016 at 6:48 am Kate

    Smiling is a submission signal; that’s why it works for women but not for men.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on June 25, 2016 at 5:27 pm Reb

      And women who don’t smile

      LikeLike


  20. on June 25, 2016 at 7:39 pm Anon

    Glad to see my innate thoughts have been vindicated. I’ve never thought confidence was sexy in a girl. A happy girl is very sexy but confidence and happiness are not analogous, especially for women.

    LikeLike


  21. on June 26, 2016 at 8:51 am cptnemo2013

    Reblogged this on MGTOW 2.0.

    LikeLike


  22. on June 26, 2016 at 9:46 am SFC Ton

    I wonder how this plays out with other more physically imposing men?

    My default is mean mugging the world, though I am internally happy( more yays for dark triad traits) but as I recall, I’ve done better with women I am not scowling, outwardly as up beat as I feel internally and what have you

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Amon Ra on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Ron on Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat C…
    Gershom on The Confound Of Silence
    Mabui on The Confound Of Silence
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    cortesar on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • "Conspiracy Theory" Conspiracy
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • Manifest Depravity
    • Betrayal Is A Woman's Heart
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: