In honor of Hillary’s schoolmarm harangue against the alt-right today, I’ll jot down a few of my thoughts on the idea of White Nationalism (as a principle and as it would work in practice).
First, a word on vanilla (heh) nationalism.
Nationalism ultimately distills to racial nationalism, though the latter isn’t required to prompt the former (or to sustain it for a while). A polyglot, Babelized citizenry corrodes nationalist principles and practices. A multicultural nationalism is an oxymoron over a long enough timeline. This is self-evident once we take it as a given that culture (aka nation) is inherited from the genetic legacy of its people.
So in principle, White Nationalism is effectively a synonym for garden-variety nationalism, because a numerical onslaught of nonWhites would irretrievably alter the characteristics of a White-majority nation that followed a theoretically race-blind nationalist ideology (similar to Steve Sailer’s Citizenism).
In practice, though, avowed White Nationalism is a non-starter. Whites aren’t a monolith. Italy looks and operates differently than England which looks and operates differently than Ukraine. There are four primary continental scale races — White, asian, amerind, black — and a nationalism ideology that attempted to place those races under an all-encompassing umbrella term would be viciously mocked and rebuked by popular revolt. There can be no Black Nationalism or Asian Nationalism or Amerind Nationalism. Try telling a Mexican he’s indistinguishable from an El Salvadoran.
Likewise, a White Nationalism movement will fail.
Although I will say this in contradiction: If White Nationalism can work anywhere, it’s most likely to find purchase in a Euro-mixed nation like America, and at a point when American Whites fall below 50% of the total population. (Spot the irony.)
I’ll have more to say on this subject in future posts, but for now my conclusion is to leave White Nationalism alone in favor of regular Nationalism. The White part will work itself out organically as the nation becomes less globalist and more nationalist.
That’s a fair evaluation.
Whites don’t “stick together” as a whole, and barely within their own ethnic subtypes… we still have that romantic notion of rugged individualism and own bootstrap success.
With one caveat… for now.
As you say, maybe in a balkanized ‘Murrica ready to split apart, with Whites a hard-pressed minority, a sorta/kinda “White” nationalism can come about when it’s truly a matter of survival for disparate Whites to find a way to hang together, lest they hang alone.
LikeLike
a sorta/kinda “White” nationalism can come about
Otherwise known as a defensive alliance, of which many have existed through history.
Although the idea that there is no such thing as a “white American” is not really that tenable any more. A “white American” is a British-Irish-German mongrel, sometimes with some Italian, other Germanic, or Slav thrown in.
LikeLike
I can say that, overall, CH is correct, when one lumps all Whites together. I really do not favor the term, “White Nationalism”. The problem with White Nationalism is that, even if you remove the non-Whites from your midst, you can still end up with a high likelihood of nasty little fights like WWI and WWII, where nationalistic Whites (choosing their nations over the commonality that should have bound them together) decided to slaughter each other.
Instead, I prefer the term “Racially Conscious Whites”, or some related term, to point out our common genes and culture, instead of the differences that separate us due to indiscriminate boundary lines on some map.
As such, when I meet racially proud White brothers and sisters, anywhere in the world, who are not blinded, or held back, by national boundaries, I have more in common with them than the middle-of-the-road White neighbors on my street.
Nationalism made these White brothers fight each other (and likely die). Let’s not raise flags blindly.
LikeLike
That photo is late in the war. The German is a stormtrooper. They weren’t introduced until late 1917.
LikeLike
That man has enormous Hands. They look like they could break a jaw or two.
LikeLike
Is obvious that all whites are not equal. More in behavior than in intelligence, (except germans/north italians) very creative people luckily I have fresh blood of both.
Nationalism can’t back to Europe. Not only the 2 WWs but a lot of big pre world wars conflicts. I guess what you don’t like from other whites because is the same I don’t like:
Spaniards: collectivism/ difficulties with abstract thought
Italians: corrupt,low law abiding
EE: extremely violent/collectivism
Irish: don’t know, anti individualism?
Scots : ?
Let me tell now what the rest europeans don’t like of you:
Hardcore capitalism, loser/winner mindset and the most important puritan moral collectivism/too much rule abiding far away from the logical point.
LikeLike
American nationalism without WN will lean toward dangerous possible fratricidal globalization again even if not are Jews. Cosmopolitan Globalism is just a Jewish derivation of American Globalism that is itself moderm American Imperialism or at least was the modern way to practice it, because the other no longer works.
LikeLike
@Ponce du Lion
Sure, but you have to keep in mind that white Americans are not simply a sample of all Europeans. The British Isles and the Germanic peoples are overrepresented, and the Romance and Slavic peoples underrepresented. The developing white American ethnic group will be a new Germanic ethnic group with a heavy Celtic admixture.
And in Europe, Europeans are being forced to band together because of the invasion from quite literally the world’s worst people: Africans and Muslims.
LikeLike
> “Whites don’t “stick together” as a whole…” ——— Boy I’d like to be a fly on the wall in the halls of power, during the summer of 1914, and figure out who really engineered the insanity of that war. The consequences are too horrific to have been purely random. Of course, I suppose the very same thing could be said about the spring of 1861.
LikeLike
Captain, you and I were typing at the same time, it appears, and clearly on the same wavelength, brother.
LikeLike
The outcomes of the War – from the Bolshevik takeover in Russia, to the degeneracy of Weimar Germany, to the solidification of the Jekyll Island Conspiracy during the convalescence of a brain-dead Woodrow Wilson – are just too perfectly advantageous to, gosh, gee whiz, I wonder (((whom))).
LikeLike
Let’s not forget 1920 and the 19th Amendment that followed closely…
LikeLike
Free Masonry is the common vehicle. It was all planned by Albert Pike in 1871.
LikeLike
“Boy I’d like to be a fly on the wall in the halls of power, during the summer of 1914, and figure out who really engineered the insanity of that war. The consequences are too horrific to have been purely random.”
Though it doesn’t fully answer those questions, Franklin J. (director of “Patton) Schaffner’s adaptation of “Nicholas and Alexandra” provides a sympathetic panorama of the long sweep toward cataclysm; I think you’d find the beguiling naivete of the princesses most affecting. Also of interest is the bitchy portrayal of Lenin.
Oh, and the way Rasputin games the hell out of the Czarina. Though discreetly agnostic on the question of whether the Empress were ever unfaithful to the Tsar, the film details the crazed emotional high she got from submitting to the dominance of this wily, lecherous psychopath.
LikeLike
That is a great film and well done. The only problem is it dodges the YKW question and perpetuates the myth that the Bolsheviks were Russians. Rasputin bagged enough aristocrats’ wives to get him killed. They poisoned him with enough poison to kill several horses and they had to shoot him to finally do him in. The man never bathed either. He stank to high heaven.
LikeLike
Betas behind a desk sending alphas to their death?
LikeLike
I don’t think that the problem is the “romantic notion of rugged individualism and own bootstrap success.” I think that the whites have been sold a bill of goods that the only racists are White, and that white cohesion would be rayciss.
If a black person at your job goes to a BLM meeting, whites would be sympathetic, and say “blah, blah, white cops, slavery…” If a white person went to a White anything meeting, they would be accused of being a Klansman/neo-Nazi.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It is worse than you describe.
If a black man abandons Christianity for Islam, he is praised.
If a black man associates with the Black Panthers, Nation of Islam, or NAACP, he may be promoted for his community participation.
If a white man, a descendent of a Confederate soldier, joins Sons of the Confederacy, he may be fired for hate speech.
LikeLiked by 1 person
God is cursing America for turning away from him.
Decadence, Feminism, anti-natalism, pro-sodomy, divorce, endless war. These are signs of a deeply sick society. Only God heals those wounds.
LikeLike
Respectfully, what CH is missing is that, what is unique about America, is it was the first nation or even first political organization of people NOT built on race or ethnicity, but on an ideal. Alt-Right/ethno-racial nationalism is based on European political thinking. The latter is a way of thinking that goes back to the beginning of Human history. America made a break from this. It showed that it was possible, even ideal.
Leftism, another European ideological import, exploits ethnic and racial groups for it’s benefit, seeking to be in power. The Alt-Right, being an ethno-racial ideology also, reacts to such, and fights back, also seeking to be in power. Both however are ethno-racial based, even more so the latter however.
America doesn’t deny the influences of bio-mechanics and race and ethnicity. It developed a new way to organize and benefit from such influences. We need Constitutionalism more than we need White Nationalism. The latter is just a European leftist ideology based on race, ethnicity and bio-mechanics. It’s a watered down Nazi Germany.
LikeLike
“it was the first nation or even first political organization of people NOT built on race or ethnicity, but on an ideal.”
–What ‘ideal’ is this? A set of “self-evident truths”? Truths are not, as such, ideals. The thrust of the Declaration’s argument is an appeal to English Common Law traditions and agreed moral notions, which the Colonists claimed had been egregiously usurped by arbitrary abuse of power. In none of this is a call to remake mankind, as the French Revolutionaries would attempt. Never mind the considerably more circumscribed rhetoric of the Constitution itself– where the ideal is to deliver to “our posterity” a functioning republic.
“America doesn’t deny the influences of bio-mechanics and race and ethnicity. It developed a new way to organize and benefit from such influences.”
–If this is so, what was this new way and when/why did it fail? 1965? 1865? Or do you contend it never failed at all? Anyway, which “America” are you talking about? It appears Lincoln was somewhat less realistic than Jefferson on certain questions of what we call bio-mechanics, and his successors even less so. In any event, circa the Founding it would seem that the questions of race and ethnicity were considered quite more harshly than you are willing to.
“It’s a watered down Nazi Germany.”
–Serious question: what’s not to love?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Racism arises from our need for self defense. We cannot defend ourselves as individuals, that’s basic, so we have to join a group. Then, by defending the group we defend ourselves.
But what group should we join? The problem is that of reciprocation. If we are going to join a group and risk our lives for it, other group members must also be willing to sacrifice for us or what’s the point?
But how can we know if others in the group will reciprocate? Well, to judge that we can only try to understand the mentality of others in our group, to know, in particular, how reliable they are or if they tend to be free riders.
Every member of a racial/family group expects others in the group to broadly think and act like himself. I broadly understand other North West European whites. They are generally kind of like me. So I am willing to take the chance of standing by them. A black, a Chinaman, or an Indian? By experience I know they are all free riders, see me as an outsider, and will never show loyalty to me or do their duty towards me.
So I must side with my closest racial relatives.
LikeLike
@ con halitosis
This is the idea that the US is a “proposition nation”, that it is not based on race but on certain ideals. This is an idea that the poz really likes to push. For a brief discussion, see http://isteve.blogspot.co.id/2012/12/proposition-nation-v-preposition-nation.html
The hole in the argument of course is that the ideals sound nice but the reality is that it is only whites who will ever uphold those ideals. The blacks and browns are just along to ride on the whites’ backs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Founding Fathers granted present and future citizens to figure out their plan of action moving forward as a nation. That future is predicated on Congressional acts, Constitutional Amendments, and Supreme Court decisions that deal with citizenship and nationhood issues. “We hold these truths…”, that one sentence, signifies definitively what is an American and who is able to become an American.
The Naturalization Act was a starting point, NOT the end all-be all as who is a “true” American. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is a universal principle–ALL people are able to comprehend its meaning and apply it in our nation. Exactly why Congress enabled future citizens the means to expand upon the notion of “We The People”.
LikeLike
“With one caveat… for now.”
Talk about romantic notion, Greg Idiot. Here’s the issue–when you have dimwits calling out that America is the Posterity of the English Founding Fathers, whose rights the U.S. Constitution was written to secure for only those whose ancestors are from the British Isles, and that the non-English, in particular the Irish, Germans, and Slavs, are utterly incapable of comprehending the blessings of liberty, then white nationalism and the Alt-Right becomes impotent.
LikeLike
All whites definitely aren’t the same in terms of values and demeanor.
If there should be a ruling culture in America is should go back to the original English Germanic one that the nation is founded on. Going by last names I would be Swede/Scottish and I still say the template should be based on the English variety rather than the outbreed Swedish society or the clannish stubborn Scots.
You should respect what made the place great to begin with and what inspired my ancestors to move here to being with.
It could argued that the beginning of the end for America began when white Western European Catholics immigrated here and imposed the dumb beliefs of their home countries that were shitholes that ultimately resulted in the Prometheus of modern day Crooked politician families, the Kennedys.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“white Western European Catholics”
Beating up on Irish, Italians, and Polacks, but no mention of the Lutheran cucks in Minnesota, the Mormon cucks in Utah, the Yankee universalists descended from the Puritans… or, most of all, the (((tribe))).
(shakin’ mah haid)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes Ireland was a shithole despite the heroic efforts of the dear English Germanics to help!
LikeLike
Furious FAGGOT more apropos!
LikeLike
Cromwell was owned by the Dutch Jews. They funded his New Army and revolution lock, stock and barrel.
LikeLike
I have always wanted to place two nooses around the statue of Cromwell in front of Parliament.
LikeLike
The NMA was mostly Continental mercenaries. There is a special place in Hell for Cromwell.
LikeLiked by 1 person
James Hoban
LikeLike
“If there should be a ruling culture in America is should go back to the original English Germanic one that the nation is founded on.”
Good luck with that pie in the sky notion. Seriously, who died and made you King Shitlord?
LikeLike
Time for you to hit the door Buddy.
LikeLike
I agree with the post. White Nationalism is best and most reliable when it’s situational: like during Katrina when lower class White locals and Euro tourists all circled together at the Superdome. Let our idealism follow the notion that we’d better hang together or hang separately.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is what happens when you push the white guys a bit too far.
LikeLiked by 3 people
LikeLike
Presently, one can only find this kind of display in China, and to a far lesser extent Russia. How far the mighty have fallen.
LikeLike
For all intents and purposes, way back when, the usa was a generic White Nationalists country. Non Whites where here, but had very limited rights and roles.
What happened? Damnyankees.
White Nationalism will never work in the usa. Damnyankees will sell out other Whites in a fucking heart beat. And they did so way before jews showed up in any numbers
Regional nationalism would be more workable. Unlikely as it is
LikeLike
100%
Franz Ferdinand’s Squirting Jugular approves this message
what I was trying to state from my first poast on this respectable blog
LikeLike
And Yugoslavia… Very sad. Balkans are the biggest white shit. They would be far greater as one country.
This is why white nationalism is better than different whites ethnicities fighting themselves over unpractical tribalism.
Racial nationalism is extremely necessary for whites with weak countries and people, they can join themselves or join to a greater interested party. Most EE is better with Russia. We can’t poisson their minds with individualistic local ruling, and romantic identitarian ideals. That would be like being the jews for that people. We should make them growth so we can have as partners whites and no chinks, gooks and ottoman terrorists.
LikeLike
Interesting documentary on how and why the Yugoslavian breakup and war was managed.
LikeLike
“regional nationalism”
Alright, let’s try it. And if we are going to be fair, I suppose the darkies must get their own slice of the country, but where? 13% of the population. 13% of the landmass. And who would live next to this New Nigronia?
Oh what a tangled weave we create,
When we dare miscegenate!
And then there’s the problem of where to put the Jews…
LikeLike
“weave” should be “web” of course, but I think “weave” works too; the cloth of society and all that.
LikeLike
Oh I don’t think either of those would be difficult problems to become
Nations guard their borders and deport undesirables every day. Hell use to even do that in the usa and other Western nations
LikeLike
If you include all 50 states in a land mass calculation, then you must include all of the South: Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina.
If you exclude Alaska and Hawaii, you might save one or two of those states, of which I’d take Louisiana first, for the port, and then Arkansas, to keep one side of the Mississippi along it’s whole length. A better option would be to give them Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, and DC for Arkansas and Louisiana.
That is a price worth paying.
LikeLike
I say give them New England and New York. They brought this about in the first place and should pay.
LikeLike
That’s easy. With the darkies.
LikeLike
What do you mean, the problem of where to put the Jews? We remove them.
“Purely emotional antisemitism finds its final expression in the form of pogroms. Rational antisemitism, by contrast, must lead to a systematic and legal struggle against, and eradication of, the privileges the Jews enjoy over the other foreigners living among us. Its final objective, however, must be the total removal of all Jews from our midst. Both objectives can only be achieved by a government of national strength and not one of national impotence.”
LikeLike
> And then there’s the problem of where to put the Jews…
the ones who stay in the USA if Hillary wins?
You have my permission to enslave them. I don’t want them in Afula. It’s bad enough that they’re allowed to buy property in TelAviv.
LikeLike
SFC,
how many of your boys will fight the ZOG?
LikeLike
Will depend on the propaganda driving the event
LikeLike
Don’t you, as the rock solid backbone of our nation’s forces have some input there? What about your fellow NCOs? Officers are useless. NCOs not so much. You can’t have a good army without them.
LikeLike
War-wise, what you are going to see in the US is going to be like the cartel wars in Mexico, yet worse, and will no doubt include their armies as well, zetas, aztecas, MS-13 and similar will flood into the country and, as with the cartels, the US deep state will fund and arm every side but give the advantage now to this side and then to that.
The goal will be to exhaust and splinter all potential opposition as well as to crush the will of the people, so that they are so terrorized and hopeless that their better human programming is wiped and they have no aspirations left but to survive, at any price.
People will be so poor and without hope that they will accept that only fighting pays and that every side is so vicious and insane that it matters not what side one joins.
Then, when all hope and human spirit is crushed, the Black Nobility, the Deep State, will emerge from behind the curtain to save it all, once again, as they do after every war – in which they have neither risked nor lost – and there will be a great clamor to appoint them all over us once more as kings and rulers.
The King is dead! Long live the King!
LikeLike
That’s the Albert Pike Plan. VD, are you a fan of David Icke?
LikeLike
@ carlos
I can’t say I am a fan of Icke or of Pike. I come to this view simply by looking at the history of war. We are told that wars are horizontal affairs, between nations, but it seems to me that they are much more often vertical, with the top against the rest.
There are no patriots among rulers, just incredibly greedy sociopaths. They really do believe that l’etat c’est moi.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s about where I am. I think Icke is at least worth listening to and Lord knows I used to laugh at much of it but not anymore. I want to visit Glenwood Cemetary and piss on Pike’s grave next time in Washington. He’s a traitor to the Confederacy too.
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 1 person
‘white’ nationalism will come to function in a fashion very similar to ‘white’ flight.
The minor differences between various european subcultures are irrelevant compared with the cultural gulf with latin-americans and african-americans.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLike
“A polyglot, Babelized citizenry corrodes nationalist principles and practices. A multicultural nationalism is an oxymoron over a long enough timeline.”
LikeLike
> “This is self-evident once we take it as a given that culture (aka nation) is inherited from the genetic legacy of its people.” ——— Which is a foundational tautology of Biological Calvinism that will get you sent to the Lubyanka under a Shrillary Rotten Cl!tless presidency.
LikeLike
“I’m a nationalist.”
I’m going to start using this. Its actually a shitlib nuke if you think about it.
LikeLike
America First, baby, America First.
LikeLike
I outright laughed at a neighbor a couple of weeks ago when he asked me if I was going to watch the Olympics. I said no, I was not, to which he replied, “What? Come on. Aren’t you going to cheer on ‘merica?” I laughed and said, “I don’t care to watch anymore politically-correct coverage of that women’s gymnastics team, and certainly not the US basketball team. Just because they are born here doesn’t make me want to associate with them, or makes me obligated to cheer them on. I support individuals, not flags. I am glad that Phelps is getting more gold, though.” Being somewhat red-pill, he knew exactly what I meant.
LikeLike
” … Just because they are born here doesn’t make me want to associate with them, or makes me obligated to cheer them on…”
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Oy vey! I do not like this Misho. He is too white, fluffy, and cute. His existence insults poor Hasan! He is racist!”
LikeLiked by 3 people
I watched zero
basketn!ggerball in 2016 [NCAA, NBA, or Olympics]. Watched zero womynz jism-nastics for the first time ever. Watched zero affletics [track & field]. But I had my eyeballs glued to the screen when huWhyte People were swimming for the USA. Especially The Michael.LikeLiked by 1 person
@johnny redux: Fail. You should have told him directly: your skin color is your uniform. It’s time to form groups. Be a leader.
LikeLike
Grew up playing high school basketball in Hoosier land. Bball was life. Now I live in a multi-cult city. Like you, I cannot watch basketball on tv anymore, but I have taken up playing at my gym on lifting off days. My gym is probably 60-70% whyte, but the bball court is 95% basketball-american yutes.
Feels good, though, getting a T boost from competing, getting a meat world reminder that they are pretty soft despite what (((they))) want you to believe, and reminding them this is still a game gifted by old whyte men.
LikeLike
A nationalist and a race realist works…
LikeLike
I tell people this sometimes as well. Depending on their reaction, if I need to give them further hysterics, I tell them that my race is my nation.
LikeLike
Ripp, nationalism enrages all the right people. Not just shitlibs, but transnational cosmopolitans of all stripes. Hyphenated-Americans and (((nomads))), including the conservatives. None of them can stand it, which just makes me like it more.
LikeLike
Difference between racial nationalism and plain nationalism:
Racial nationalism – The state exists for the explicit benefit of a particular racial or ethnic group.
Plain nationalism – The state exists for the benefit of all of its citizens, but still takes steps to prevent its core ethnic group from becoming diluted or outnumbered, because it relies on that group to function well.
American nationalists should consider the old-school multi-ethnic empire model represented by Russia. A core ethnic group and various “confederated” minority groups that are subordinated to it. The United States actually has a similar relationship with its Native American population. I think one of the tragedies of US history is that the African-American model for race relations has dominated while the Native American model is all but forgotten.
LikeLike
“I think one of the tragedies of US history is that the African-Americans have been artificially propped up subverting the civic structure of America.”
FTFY
LikeLike
The current state of native Indians in the USA is hardly a model that should be replicated. They’re a bunch of degenerate alcoholics living off the profits of local casinos.
LikeLike
The problem with White Nationalism is that White people basically don’t care about being White. “People are people.” This is our tendency because of our genetic heritage, individualism borne of evolving with low population density, and relentless jewish propaganda that tamps down any possible racialist reaction even in the face of blatant genocide.
For White Nationalism to take off would require two things: 1) serious fucking economic pain. Like having to go hungry, not just being demoralized and 2) a religious awakening that has a racial component. Ben Klassen tried, but despite his well-thought-out arguments, it went precisely nowhere. You need 1 in order to have 2.
Look at Islam, especially in the early days– “I wish I could fight and die and be brought back again so I could fight and die and be brought back again, etc.” Vikings and Valhalla. Crusades Era Christianity. The Empire of Japan– Emperor worship and kamikazes. The Third Reich– Aryans, Blut und Boden, Blut und Ehre. (((judaism))).
Ideologies are weak. “Conservatism” is weak. Communism was weak; it lasted barely 70 years in Russia. Even White Nationalism is weak. The intellectual arguments of Dr. Pierce, Dr. Duke, and Dr. MacDonald don’t mean a thing to the vast majority of Whites. It’s sad and I hate it, but it’s true.
The White race needs a transcendental spiritual awakening of some kind.
LikeLike
I do not know if you are familiar with Maistre
…………………………..
If stability is what is wanted – and stability is indeed wanted, for without stability society cannot exist – then the worst possible foundation upon which society could conceivably rest is what our eighteenth-century philosophers urge upon us, namely reason. Reason means argument, reason means some kind of construction on the part of rational beings of such a kind as other rational beings are able to criticize using exactly the same weapons: what man makes, man can mar. If you really want a stable foundation for society then the most shaky foundation upon which you can place is that of unaided human reason, because even though you may prove that one particular kind of institution is good or even the best, another man cleverer than you will disprove it tomorrow. Anything which argument puts up, argument will pull down, and therefore nothing is less stable than things which rely upon such so precarious a foundation as reason, because one reason is constantly toppled by another. The only foundation which is ultimately stable is something which cannot be reached by destructive forces. Reasoning, analysis, pulverizes.
———————————————————————————————-
LikeLiked by 1 person
more
————————————————————————————————–
All known nations have been happy and powerful to the extent that they have more faithfully obeyed this national reason, which is nothing other than the annihilation of individual dogmas and the absolute and general reign of national dogmas, that is to say, of useful prejudices. Let each man call upon his individual reason in the matter of religion, and immediately you will see the birth of an anarchy of belief or the annihilation of religious sovereignty. Likewise, if each man makes himself judge of the principles of government, you will at once see the birth of civil anarchy or the annihilation of political sovereignty. Government is a true religion: it has its dogmas, its mysteries, and its ministers. To annihilate it or submit it to the discussion of each individual is the same thing; it lives only through national reason, that is to say through political faith, which is a creed. Man’s first need is that his nascent reason be curbed under this double yoke, that it be abased and lose itself in the national reason, so that it changes its individual existence into another common existence, just as a river that flows into the ocean always continues to exist in the mass of water, but without a name and without a distinct reality.”
LikeLike
“Now, there is no such thing as ‘man’ in this world. In my life I have seen Frenchmen, Italians, Russians, and so on. I even know, thanks to Montesquieu, that one can be Persian. But as for man, I declare I’ve never encountered him.”
LikeLike
True, Amasius, Ben Klassen put a lot of work into his new White religion, and the idea of RaHoWa (Racial Holy War), but it did not go anywhere. It was too much reading, quite frankly, for most Whites to begin to even understand; Whites were not willing (en masse, at least) to just pick up a new religion in the late 80s and early 90s when Klassen was active; and, basically, times were still pretty damn good for most Whites in those days to think about rocking the boat like that. And, of course, there was still too much faith in the System, and the Bush or somebody would sort it all our for us. Too many distractions, too, with all the new video game technology, cable channel numbers exploding (so you can watch da sports 24/7), cocaine and other drugs hitting the markets, etc. Force, counter-force…but not many actually saw that fact. Too much faith in the System…which brings us back to Trump. Many of us view him as the Nations last chance. And if he gets elected, he’d better not water down all of his promised, especially about building that wall, deporting the illegals, and making peace with Russia. We aren’t going to play the game anymore, if the cards do not fall our way this time. Too many eyes have been opened…and they are watching.
LikeLiked by 2 people
And, of course, many anti-government and/or racially conscious Whites learned the “Branch Davidians” lesson: Gathering together with like-minded, outspoken opponents of ZOG in a fortified compound will only make you an easy target, and dead.
Look at what they do to those hard-core religious folks out West, Mormons and others, who live in their own (White) communities and shun the modern world and the government, and have lots and lots of White babies. The government, through its shills in the media, simply label them as pedophiles, or abusive towards their wives, etc. as an excuse to invade and arrest the leaders, and send the White children offer to ‘children’s services’ where they can experience vibrancy and diversity, and proper indoctrination into the NWO.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“For White Nationalism to take off would require two things: 1) serious fucking economic pain. Like having to go hungry, not just being demoralized”
Well, you’re going to get it.
LikeLike
Get it good and hard.
LikeLike
http://www.thisblogisdangerous.com/conservative-save-yourself/
LikeLike
Wyndham Lewis wrote a travelogue of his time in America called “America and Cosmic Man” in which he observed how well the same people who were at each others’ throats in Europe got along in America, so it can be done.
LikeLike
Cruella de Pends (not my coinage) called out White Genoicde by name in today’s speech. This is the most prominent instance of that phrase’s propagation. Her alt-Right speech was fantastic… if you’re us!
LikeLike
They agree with you
The Alt-Right’s Dark Army of Racist Trolls Just Had a Great Day
http://www.wired.com/2016/08/alt-rights-dark-army-racist-trolls-just-great-day/
LikeLiked by 1 person
And this is what you get when you google
alt right-news
Glorious day indeed
https://www.google.ca/search?q=alt+right&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=ILO_V7ClH5DneLH6oDg#q=alt+right&tbm=nws
LikeLike
As Hitler said, “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” Maybe it was Gandhi who said it. I get the two mixed up all the time.
LikeLiked by 4 people
No wonder they resemble each other much
It was Gandhi
Here is one from Hitler
Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I cant link here but youtube Hitler on Jews…one if my favorite speeches the clip is about 4 minutes long.
Someone in the crowd shouts “Juden”!
Hitler speaks with such power and clarity then after his outburst reaching a crescendo…silence…and he wipes his brow. Brilliant.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I keep thinking this is what 1850 [1770, pick a date] must have felt like…
LikeLike
And not a word about Trump’s total 180 on immigration.
He attacked Jeb, Marco, and Ted for MONTHS for being soft on immigration. Now he’s doing what they did.
What a fraud.
LikeLike
Note how The Faggot Within isn’t saying a word about Crooked Hillary’s failed attempt to attack the alt-right today.
I’m betting Sick Hill’s attack was her idea. Godzilla advised her against it, but she set her mind to it (probably on the advice of her Feminist Harridans), wanting to expose the Enemies of the People. So he buffed up her speech somewhat, but then she (in her famous way) took his best lines and reworded them in a horrid way. As a result, the speech fell flat—it failed both strategically and tactically.
And the Faggot Within has been assigned damage control. Change the subject, spin spin spin, says Mr Brock!
Faggot Within as Sick Hillary’s shill rape!
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 1 person
This adaptation of Christopher Walken’s Poolhall Junkies monologue is great, except it excluded the very last line: “It’s time to kill.”
Nobody wants to openly state the simple fact that civilization requires brutal enforcement.
“A Civilization is a dominant community that imposes its beliefs upon all other communities by violence, which must involve the use of genocide; so any community that recoils from inflicting genocide will suffer genocide.”
–Philip Atkinson
http://www.ourcivilisation.com/
But no, nicehwites still wants to cling to what they learned in Sunday school, that “Red and yellow, Black and white, They are precious in (((His))) sight.” Christian Democrat Angela Merkel, a Lutheran pastor’s kid, still believes that. And she still believes that Christcuck bullshit to “Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. If someone slaps you on one cheek, turn to them the other also. If someone takes your coat, do not withhold your shirt from them. Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back.”
LikeLike
CO you made me crack up with the dildo thing at Univ of Texas. Most ridiculous libtard protest ever. Austin is the weird hippie liberal stain on this state
LikeLike
The last Quote from Hitler is a bit mistranslated. It should be we will never show mercy rather than never slacken. I like that a bit better myself.
LikeLike
We already told you, Becca: it’s not about Trump. It’s about the 150 million woke whites who are behind him.
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
TSW:
its telling you cant for once stay on topic and discuss the post. strange given that you are a 6’2″ nordic, ah hem, eastern european,….white man…
no commentary about the OP?
right.
again, I thank you for helping expose the shilling and truth to the normies and newly red pilled. your purpose has the opposite effect.
yet id like to give you an opportunity: can you comment on why Hillary has not had a press conference all year?
TSW: 🔥✡🔥
LikeLike
and a Catholic… don’t forget that…
LikeLike
Hey d!psh!t
He still will built a wall, he will enable self deportation and deport those who won’t go, and make them get back in line. What’s new?
LikeLike
TSW, please die soon.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Old Faggots never die; they just get AIDS and demand the government pay for their medication and rent boys.
Faggot within rape!
LikeLike
White nationalism is really just Germano-Celtic/Anglo-Celtic nationalism. I’m sure all the forms of government and culture most white nationalists would want would be Anglo in origin and most of those supporting it would be of Anglo-Celtic descent (Anglo-Celtic = British Isles) or if not Anglo Celtic than Germano-Celtic (think the northwestern part of europe.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
None of it will do us any good unless we get our boots well and truly on the necks of the bankers and keep them there. Banks are utilities. End of story.
Oh, and a real pipedream, end limited liability. What, you can own a company, or a share of it, and it can carry out all kinds of frauds and social atrocities that you personally profit from, but you have no fucking liability?
What the fuck?
So fix those two things, then white culture can flourish.
LikeLike
Those crimes can be prosecuted by piercing the corporate veil as the legal term goes. The problem is finding someone who will prosecute since they all seem to be bought off.
LikeLike
“You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the eternal God, I will rout you out.” –Andrew Jackson on bankers, 1832
Hell, (((bankers))) openly boast about being thieves, as evolutionary psychologist Dr. Kevin MacDonald interprets the Tanakh. Merchants expect you to provide them “great and goodly cities, which (((thou))) buildedst not, and houses full of all good things, which (((thou))) filledst not, and wells digged, which (((thou))) diggedst not, vineyards and olive trees, which (((thou))) plantedst not; when (((thou))) shalt have eaten and be full. (((Deuteronomy 6:10-11)))
“Ye shall possess greater nations and mightier than yourselves.” (((Deuteronomy 11:23)))
LikeLike
Yes true enough Carlos, but in the time before LLP’s for example, partners held unlimited liability for their and their partners actions… big difference in behaviors.
LikeLike
They still do in a General partnership. A corporation or LLP is a fair vehicle for the most part. I don’t have any problem with the liability structure. Its the big Boys who break the law and only pay if DoJ wants to make a Point. I was just letting VD know there are legal remedies to the corporate veil if the case is compelling enough.
LikeLike
Thought you guys would appreciate this:
Shitlord/red pill humor is starting to break through into the mainstream. Makes sense that it would begin on Adult Swim where it can be passed off as ironic and edgy. Million Dollar Extreme: World Peace has biting social commentary, I highly recommend watching it.
LikeLike
Nationalism is simply another word for patriotism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Which is why blacks and Hispanics don’t care about, or show up for, 4th of July celebrations. Their absence speaks volumes about their true allegiances.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nah, the Hisps come to the parade with grocery sacks to collect all the free candy thrown from the floats.
LikeLike
That’s true, UYM. The blacks and Hispanics come out of the woodwork, like cockroaches at a cheap hotel in Mexico at 3 AM, when there is any free shit being handed out (even cheap free shit). They have radar for it, or, more accurately, they have antennae like ants and pass on the “free shit thissa way” message very quickly to all the other hood ants. The same with fights, or the police showing up…first there are 2-3, then there are 20, all within a 10-minute period.
LikeLike
I’ve never seen a non white face at Gettysburg
LikeLiked by 1 person
whatever the WN reflex becomes, I hope it’s something more enduring than what it replaces. as some of the commenters noted above, a spiritual foundation is essential. otherwise our lower human nature will ensure that whatever lives are spent in the pursuit of something better will inevitably be wasted, and the fruits of our labor will be taken for granted again by our children and grandchildren.
(even if it’s all one giant cosmic folly, it still beats accepting your fate lying down and feeling like shit.)
LikeLike
“our lower human nature”
Who told you that?
“…the White Race are mainly White Christians filled with religious guilt…” -Dr. William Pierce, 1989
LikeLike
I told myself that, faggot, after watching my parents’ generation take their white nationalist nation for granted. guilt is nothing compared to complacency.
LikeLike
or maybe guilt and complacency are yet sides of the same coin.
father oregano, shooting his fuckn patronizing herbal mouth off
LikeLike
*two* sides…dammit
LikeLike
He attempted to replace Christianity. That is not, in itself, a bad thing.
LikeLike
PJ: “his fuckn patronizing”
Got some Patronymos (Gr: Daddy) issues?
TT: “replace Christianity”
Indeed. Only because Cuckianity is a parasite on European nationalism, kowtowing to the self-chosenites. “To the Jews first.” (Romans 16:1) Only then may the goy dogs get the seconds, the “the crumbs which fall from their masters’ table.” (Matthew 15:27)
LikeLike
talking about backstabbing damnyankees
listen, imbecile
… and we shall return it all to the last shekhel
and worse:
‘This is the heir,’ they said. ‘Let’s kill him, and the inheritance will be ours.’ So they threw him out of the vineyard and killed him. What then will the owner of the vineyard do to them? He will come and kill those tenants and give the vineyard to others.’
LikeLike
Yes, unfortunately, to be a Xtian these days in any mainline religion, one has to worship a Jew as their savior, and accept his message of weakness. The price of admission. Xtians in offshoot branches are only fooling themselves about the foundation of Xtianity.
LikeLike
The message is weak? F*ckin’ message is weak?
YOU’RE weak. 😡
LikeLiked by 2 people
I can take that message out on a sit tonight and convert 15 soldiers for Christ…
Can you? Can any of you?
You children… you company men… you fairies.
LikeLike
“I can take that message out on a sit tonight and convert 15 soldiers for Christ…”
and what will you reward those soldiers with when they return home, after risking their lives in battle? a tatted up hypergamous slut and a house with a white picket barbed wire fence next to section 8 housing?
LikeLike
even soldiers for Christ expect their earthly rewards for doing their duty. how’s that supposed to work in the post-birth control world where sluttery is considered a woman’s birthright?
LikeLike
First prize is a Cadillac… runner up gets a set of steak knives.
All seriousness aside, like all worthy endeavors in life, you do ’em ’cause it’s right… just right… and you have to look at yourself in the mirror each morning.
Rewards are a collateral occurrence… not a raison d’etre.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t do much for a man whose only outlook is what happens in matters material.
Further, if the outlook is as bleak as you describe, then what philosophy, belief, or goal would ANYONE have for carrying on… let alone keep waging the good fight?
LikeLiked by 1 person
“you do ’em ’cause it’s right… just right… and you have to look at yourself in the mirror each morning.”
for those of us of strong moral fiber, doing what’s right is reward in itself. I’m just not sure you can build an army of 18-20 year olds with that carrot.
I don’t think you could find 15 good, pretty, m@rriage worthy girls in this entire country, which means your soldiers for Christ will either have to share or fight each other for the meager spoils.
LikeLike
in a world where ALL the consequences of female sluttitude have been surgically removed, things like troop morale and the will to fight are not as cut-and-dried as they were in the old days.
LikeLike
Greg, by raising your army for Christ, just as the Crusaders did, you are violating the tenets of Christianity. No where in the Jew (errrr….I mean New) Testament did Christ even hint at fight an occupying army (the Romans), let alone going abroad and fighting/conquering other ‘in His name’. So, your Christianity is a bastardized form of it, to suit your purposes. When you think about it, the mainstream cucktarded churches, including the Catholic Church and the Lutherans, are probably more closely following the teachings of Christ in their insane open-door policy, diversity is good, and other far out Leftist ideologies. Just a fact, Jack! So, instead of warriors for Christ, how about warriors for race.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not so. Catholicism has very specific critera for a Just War.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That canard about not fighting is just that… Christ didn’t say to the money changers “Gee, fellas, it’s not nice what you’re doing and could you please leave the temple… pretty please?”:
He threw them out bodily, headforemost.
The behavior criteria of The Elect, or how we are to treat our own fellow believers and forget petty slights and jealousies, have nothing to do with the Big Picture of facing down true enemies of God.
Revelation tells us a war is coming… the tools God uses to wage His war are not explicitly listed by name and number.
In the future, don’t tell me about what Christianity entails… especially as a nonbeliever yourself. You’re just carrying water for the Cathedral when you do that, and I KNOW you don’t what to be their useful stooge.
LikeLike
The Old Testament is largely about killing off the perveyors of the Moloch cult, which kept creeping back into Judasim and continues to do so to this day. That it keeps returning despite Babylon being gone since the 13th century should give you pause.
LikeLike
plumpjack, white conservative instincts include the five moral spheres and Jacksonian code of honor. And white girls are magic and so motivating, but also of the Earth and do not belong on pedestals. And Christianity built Western Civ, since by definition what we have now was made by winners, like the Crusaders. Deus vult!
LikeLike
I think for the US to re-engineer itself it has to start by freezing all immigration for the next 100 years, or more. Old world nations were not build in a day, it took centuries of developing in “isolation” for their unique characters to be established. The US had this dynamic going for a while, but then (((they))) threw a wrench into the process, and modern day US is what it is.
Next, there will be a need to reform the educational system to actually once again educate kids on how think critically, behave in a civil society, and develop virtues and positive morality (God, Family, Cuntry).
It should also find a way to elevate Christianity, in its different forms, as the common religious glue that holds the people together.
Censorship of some kind may also have to be brought back to destroy the (((ability))) to spread porn, and images of degenerate lifestyles as some sort of glamours, exciting way of living life. Mens Sana in Corpore Sano.
There is a whole range of things that can be done to create a strong sense of identity among different people, that go beyond just sharing skin tone. However, for that to work, the (((Eskimo))) power to influence US society has to be either contained, or altogether eliminated.
LikeLike
I meant to say Country, not cuntry. It would be nice to have a way to edit posts to correct errors.
LikeLike
seconded
LikeLike
(((Christianity))) cannot be cut from its root without killing the branch. We must recognize the sunk cost for what it is, a loss, and invest elsewhere.
LikeLike
It’s a mistake to overstate a religion’s impact on a culture. It’s certainly not absent but the overall direction is racial temperament -> expression of faith in practice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Which is why I think we’d do better to let our religion express itself naturally.
This is also my argument against Catholicism, which enforces a descendent of Roman religion on non-Roman people.
LikeLike
the fact that nearly all the sacred texts of old Europe were destroyed save for the one largely promoting a certain (((tribe))) which was not even FROM Europe should give anyone pause. not saying that the sacred spirit of Christianity is suspect. just that the spirit is probably written into our genetic code and likely predates judeo-christianity by tens of thousands of years.
before they cut down all the trees, dammed all the rivers, killed all the wildlife, and basically made it impossible for people to survive indifferently without constant warfare and a large, state-sponsored army, i highly doubt everyone following the same good book seemed like an attractive option. but once interdependence became an inescapable fact of life, everyone following the same good book was probably preferable to watching your entire village (parents, children, aunts, uncles, children, grandchildren) perish.
how can it be denied, though, that christianity, if taken at face value, ultimately leads to globalism? or is it more like “golden rule for thee but not for me?” I’m okay with the latter, but we need a religion free of hypocrisy. either some individuals and groups are better than others, or they’re not. we can’t have it both ways. I just don’t see how the teachings of Christianity can still be credible and also be sufficiently twisted to justify a thorough ethnic cleansing, which is the logical goal of WN. unless we use good shepherd analogy, looking after the flock (on the other side of the dammed wall!)…
LikeLike
The people who hope to tear down Christianity and replace it with debauchery and Islam (or is that the same thing?) have provided to those of us willing to question the foundations of our fathers’ faith an opportunity they did not intend, which is the opportunity to mine Christianity and our more ancient religions for those elements most likely to ensure the perpetuity of our nation far into the future.
I explained this premise in detail to many leaders in the New Atheist / Atheism+ movement, but they, like most Christians, are too enamored of details – salvation/equality/love – to comprehend the larger purpose of religion, which is to unite and support a nation against external cultural threats that cannot be overcome by force.
We need religious inoculation with power similar to what the Amish discovered: pure, uncompromising, and conspicuous.
LikeLike
survive “independently”…
LikeLike
PJ: “they cut down all the trees”
True. Donar’s Oak (or Thor’s Oak) was chopped by “Saint” Boniface as a symbol of Cuckianity’s hatred for the natural. According to Cuckianity, “you do not belong to the world” (John 15:19) and you must be one who “hateth his life in this world” (John 12:25). An arid desert cult hoping for an afterlife in an ostentatious city with gold streets and constant harping cannot long abide Waldeinsamkeit.
“Christianity is a rebellion against natural law, a protest against nature.” — Norman Cameron and R.H. Stevens, trans., (Oxford, 1953), Hitler’s Table-Talk, p. 51
LikeLiked by 1 person
father oregano: “you do not belong to the world”
having a continual a sense of place is the original “religìon”. few alive today realize it, but so many of our problems are caused by the neurosis that comes from being locked in a state of perpetual landless insecurity. the first rule of killing a peoples’ desire to fight is to cut them off from their land. put shopping malls on top of the burial grounds of their ancestors. drop boatloads of brown refugees into their pristine neighborhoods. cut down all their sacred trees and turn them into the pages of books that they have to go to schools and churches to read.
white nationalists as a group may not be fully aware of it, but they’re absolutely correct that having a sense of place is at the core of our humanity. the (((globalists))) would have us all follow their shitty lot: to be a wandering horde of rootless, landless, soulless refugees. they intend take a giant shit on everything we hold sacred.
if we lose America, there aren’t any new edens for a fresh start this time around.
LikeLiked by 1 person
PJ: “the first rule of killing a peoples’ desire to fight is to cut them off from their land.”
True, true. Being a Jim Goad-esqe redneck myself, I’ve often repeated the sage Delmar O’Donnell’s aphorism: “You ain’t no kind of man if you ain’t got land.”
Along the same vein, James Howard Kunstler writes, “A land full of places that are not worth caring about will soon be a nation and a way of life that is not worth defending.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
…and land owned by “everybody” is land owned by “nobody,” and about which nobody cares to preserve or protect.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is a silly conversation between people who do not understand Christianity. TT Clod, we are in the predicament we are in because we have abandoned muscular Christianity. Europe is under attack because of Christianity. No where else is under attack but Christian nations. And you want to return to the same fallen angels that are causing this shit in the first place. That should tell you something in and of itself. This is a set of rules we don’t have any choice about obeying.
LikeLike
Christianity is a set of rules we don’t have any choice about obeying?
“…primitive Christianity is Bolshevism.” –Ludwig von Mises (Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis, p. 413)
Let’s see how well the Austrian economist knew his New Testament.
(1.) Bolshevists hate the successful:
• “But woe unto you that are rich!” Luke 6:24
• “Sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor.” Matthew 19:21, Mark 10:21, Luke 18:22
• “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” Matthew 19:24, Mark 10:25, Luke 18:25
“…guard against all kinds of greed, life does not consist in abundance…fool…” (Parable of the Rich Fool) Luke 12:13-21
• “There was a rich man…in torment…agony…remember that in your lifetime you received your good things…” (The Rich Man and Lazarus) Luke 16:19-31
(2.) Bolshevists are collectivists:
• “…each according to his ability.” Matthew 25:15
• “…not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them.” Acts 4:32
• “…and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.” Acts 4:35
• “…the daily distribution.” Acts 6:1
• “…your liberal distribution…” 2 Corinthians 9:13
(3.) Bolshevists use murder and coercion to control money flows:
• “…money…money…money…great fear seized the whole church…” Acts 5:2,3,4,11
“Muscular” Christianity is a well-intentioned attempt to reform the shortcomings of a silly middle-eastern mystical book, but unfortunately, such whitewash never sticks too well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
PA, Christianity turned out to be a great, widespread religion BECAUSE it was adopted by Europeans. If it had not, it probably would have died a natural death in the Middle East and North Africa, especially after the Muslims got finished with them. As I noted before, Europe would have been great without Christianity, and was not great because of it. WE made Europe great, not Christianity.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Charlemagne was one of the original cucks, forcing his jewish religion on the Saxons. And the movie never ends (it goes on and on and on and on).
LikeLiked by 1 person
I repeat, Father Thyme, you think you understand Christianity well but understand nothing.
LikeLike
FT, using Satan’s minions, the Bolsheviks, who studied Catholicism and deliberately modeled their theology on it to both mock and destroy Christianity is a fail. Quoting the Bible out of context to make a point just makes you a sophist. What all of you seem to want in this world is what God wants for us too. Let his power fill your veins. When the time comes you will be worth ten men. The Knights Templar considered 6 to one even odds.
LikeLike
Which means the Knights Templar weren’t worth 10 men.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hey smartass TTClod, lets see you kick the ass of six heavily armed Turks and get back to me.
LikeLike
You’re not good at maths are you? There is a difference in what I said and six to ones being even Odds and being worth ten men are not mutually exclusive. This is what happens when sophists think too hard.
LikeLike
You’re cute.
LikeLike
ET: “freezing all immigration for the next 100 years”
Jared Taylor suggests approaching such a policy from an environmental viewpoint, as the environmentalists are constantly haranguing about overpopulation anyway. How is adding more and more population going to help our environment in North America?
It’s time for a Convergence, this time by the Alt-Right into the environmental movement, just like the SJWs took over science fiction publishing. What goes around, comes around.
Aborting immigration is a treehugger’s right!
How Immigration May Affect Environmental Stability
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/immigrations-effect-on-evironment/
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Sierra Club used to be opposed to immigration, until an (((Eskimo))) named (((David Gelbaum))) bribed them to support immigration. https://www.google.com/search?q=sierra+club+gelbaum+site:isteve.blogspot.com
LikeLike
Y’all so slick with y’all high-falluting disdain for stoopid Christians and their redikulos supar-steetions.
Listen good, cretins:
Truly, I say to you, you will never get out until you have paid the last penny.
LikeLike
oink: “Truly, I say to you, you will never get out until you have paid the last penny.”
will you please explain this, if you would deign to bring light to us benighted cretins? (I was kicked out of catechism for asking too many dumb questions.)
LikeLike
whatever gifts we received from God, we will assuredly give back, to the last shekhel.
But then you delude (with many others) that if we kill/expunge the Son (from our hearts), the vineyard (of Reason) will remain ours.
not so
LikeLike
OINK: “if we kill/expunge the Son (from our hearts)”
Got any objective evidence of this cardiac event you describe?
Transgenders reject the objective reality about their bodies; in the same vein, the whole New Testament bangs on and on about a magical “new body” that is anything but what a biological body actually is.
Why can’t transgender queers and religious fanatics accept the biological reality of their bodies?
LikeLike
Environmental protection shows how disjointed the brains of liberals are. On the one hand many (rightfully so, as do many right-wing conservatives) want to protect the environment, including endangered species. At the same time, the Left (and not us right-wing conservatives) have no problem sending money and aid (including insane christard missionaries) to Africa and other third world nations that result in their birth rates going up, and death rates going down, resulting in incredible death and destruction of the environment and animal species. Such is the disjointed working of the liberal mind!
LikeLike
Liberals: Can’t Connect the Dots Rape!
LikeLike
The enemy is willing to die because he thinks God is on his side…
You’re going to fight that with tree-hugging and a mjolner pendant around your neck?
You guys think Christ is immaterial, then choose this day who or what you would worship…
… as for me and my house, we will serve Jehovah.
Get wise, and read up on how He delivers His (and your) enemies under your foot. We conquered peoples and continents in the name of Christ, and became the envy of the world.
Now that we’ve driven Him from the schools, the town squares, and indeed, our very national fabric, well… how’s THAT going for ya?
LikeLike
Shout out to GE and the Cavalry
LikeLike
Back at ya, Carlos:
Ephesians 6:11 – 11 Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes.
LikeLike
http://www.beliefnet.com/faiths/catholic/interview-with-an-exorcist.aspx
LikeLike
Deus Vult
LikeLike
There’s an interesting little war of innuendo going on via Jimmie Kimmel between Hillary and Alex Jones. Jimmie shot a pickle jar and said the NWO was out for AJ in a comedy skit. This is how they warn you. Alex just told Hillary she could still save her soul if she repents. Its classic trolling. Alex must have good security. That one ex SF man he hired is probably their Team Chief.
LikeLike
re Alex Jones video:
He makes an interesting point. If you consider social media views and traffic, Hillary doesnt have shit.
Its anothet testament to how fabricated her appeal is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m sympathetic to Christanity and I won’t criticize any religious Christians who are on board with the 14 words, but I get tired of hearing how we “need” to come to Jesus to defend our race and culture.
Come talk to me about it when there’s any semblance of an organized group of Christians with spine and backbone for a militant Christian resistance to Jews and shitskins. Every single Christian church of any size is cucked worse than the average non-religious White.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s a fair point, corvo… and I don’t think anyone is being told they “need to come to Jesus”, in the words of those lukewarm and cucked churches.
What we Christians ARE saying is that without a true faith in God, the fight just isn’t in the hearts of the men of the West anymore… and Islam and others still think God is on THEIR side.
Which side, at this junction, appears to have the upper hand?
LikeLike
“What we Christians ARE saying is that without a true faith in God, the fight just isn’t in the hearts of the men of the West anymore… and Islam and others still think God is on THEIR side.
Which side, at this junction, appears to have the upper hand?”
Greg,
Let’s consider Jews — I suspect most of them, and the most malignant of them, are more tribal than religious; similar to how I feel about Christianity.
Then there are large numbers of godless cultural Marxists, degenerates, and virulent anti-Whites on the left, including the dindus, who are also primarily tribal (whether they define their tribe by race or by anal sex).
Only one small facet of the left, the shock troop idiot kebabs, are religious. But their religion is not giving them the upper hand — they’re merely zealous pawns being used by the irreligious forces mentioned above. And there’s a strong force of racial tribalism at work in them as well.
I don’t see belief in a particular God as the reason the left has had success recently. One can just as easily conclude that the anti-Whites have the upper hand because Christianity has cuckified too many Whites, and left them vulnerable to irreligious fiends.
Speaking as a White who lacks what you would call a true faith in a Christian God, I can assure you that the fight is just as strong in my heart as in that of any other man. I will take he sign of the Cross and cast my lot with the Christians because that is my culture, but I will fight and die for my children and my people, not because I think God is on my side. As I see it, the godspoke men these days are preaching passivity and poison.
We’re White brothers in this fight, and we can keep God in our own ways, or not at all, so long as we’re fighting to defend our people.
LikeLike
The moral posturing and alleged highground taken by today’s Cathedral minions is what I speak of when I say they believe god is on their side… it’s just that their god happens to be the Self on one level, or some amorphous idea of a “brotherhood of Man”, so long as that Man is not White.
God, in His time, has used even nonbelievers (at the time) to further His will, and I have no doubt the ranks of those who side with Michael The Archangel, when the time comes, will be of varied and sundry stripe.
But we have to guard against making the same mistake as the enemy, thinking only that pride in Self and Man (albeit only our own kind) as enough to win the day.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Corvo, what you atheists never realize about those of us with real faith is that it is something you feel constantly and very powerfully. I am literally high with a sense of euphoria 24 hours a day. Stonewall Jackson used to hold his arm up high in battle as antennae. I never understood why until I became born again. That is literally true. I didn’t feel it when I was 16 and continued to doubt God then but I feel it now. This isn’t something you make up, its somethign that fills your veins with a sense of electricity like no other.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Corvo, what you atheists never realize about those of us with real faith is that it is something you feel constantly and very powerfully.”
Carlos — I’m not an atheist. I alternate between believing that there is a higher power and hoping, you might even say praying, that there is.
“I am literally high with a sense of euphoria 24 hours a day. Stonewall Jackson used to hold his arm up high in battle as antennae. I never understood why until I became born again. That is literally true. I didn’t feel it when I was 16 and continued to doubt God then but I feel it now.”
I’m glad we’re fighting on the same side.
“This isn’t something you make up, its somethign that fills your veins with a sense of electricity like no other.”
I understand. Likewise, I can’t make up a belief in Christian faith either, so you know where I am at.
LikeLike
I’ll settle for American Nationalist for now.
Halt all immigration except for the barest trickle of legitimately talented individuals under special circumstances.
Deport all illegals.
Eliminate the incentives/subsidies that result in unsustainably high birthrates among the muds. (e.g. welfare = mandatory sterilization)
American Nationalim will turn into something close enough to White Nationalism before long.
LikeLiked by 1 person
100%.
this.
subverting the inflow and gibs to the r-selected is a yuge step in the right/white direction.
LikeLike
“American Nationalim will turn into something close enough to White Nationalism before long.”
No, it won’t, because you and Greg Idiot are clearly perverting Christianity.
Romans 16:18–For such persons do not serve our Lord Christ, but their own appetites, and by smooth talk and flattery they deceive the hearts of the naive.
You don’t pick and chose how you can keep God in your own way. There is only one way…His way. Chose not to follow Him and suffer His wrath.
LikeLike
ghey
LikeLike
Corvo, for an alleged Christian male, you ain’t so Christian.
LikeLike
Says the clown who calls another “Idiot” witlessly from the safety of his keyboard.
Don’t tell others about Christianity when you don’t believe in it yourself… as evinced by the cherry-picked verse that has nothing to do with the discussion at hand… unless of course you wish to point out any actual “smooth talk and flattery” that actually occurred.
As usual, your attempt at making a point is easily gainsaid by taking further verses in the context… scripture explains scripture.
The previous verse speaks of those that “cause divisions and put obstacles in the way”… sounds a lot like the Cathedral shills, such as yourself, who try to tell Christians about their own beliefs, but without any faith in Scripture themselves that they attempt to use as a neener-neener.
You’re the type of disingenuous ass that would have called Christ Himself a hypocrite for doing violence to the money-changers, or speaking harshly to the Sanhedrin and Pharisees of His day.
Avaunt, you pismire.
Proverbs 19:29 – Judgments are prepared for scorners, and stripes for the back of fools.
LikeLike
Tell that to Joshua and Gideon.
LikeLike
“Says the clown who calls another “Idiot” witlessly from the safety of his keyboard.”
So, what are you doing, performing fellatio underneath CH’s desk?
“Don’t tell others about Christianity when you don’t believe in it yourself… as evinced by the cherry-picked verse that has nothing to do with the discussion at hand… unless of course you wish to point out any actual “smooth talk and flattery” that actually occurred.”
Actually, the verse I cited is relevant to the topic. Do you not see how your own statements demonstrate clear deception?
“The previous verse speaks of those that “cause divisions and put obstacles in the way”… sounds a lot like the Cathedral shills, such as yourself, who try to tell Christians about their own beliefs, but without any faith in Scripture themselves that they attempt to use as a neener-neener.”
See, you have label me as part of the Cathedral to justify your own brand of perverted faith.
“You’re the type of disingenuous ass that would have called Christ Himself a hypocrite for doing violence to the money-changers, or speaking harshly to the Sanhedrin and Pharisees of His day.”
Well, there are thousands of hypocritical verses in the Bible. But Christ Himself is perfect.
“Proverbs 19:29 – Judgments are prepared for scorners, and stripes for the back of fools.”
Are you not judging yourself and being scornful? Tsk, tsk, tsk.
LikeLike
Never known it to fail… the homoerotic projections always arise from the trolls attempting to use Cathedral shaming tactics.
Yet again, you done told on yo’self, Schlomo.
You branded yourself by using the same-ol’, lame ol’ Alinsky attempts that we’ve seen so often on internet forums, and especially here at the chateau. Your shilling doesn’t require much gainsaying, ‘though you make nonsensical and grandiose attempts at labeling it as justification on my part. Again, cookie-cutter Cathedral internet debate tactics that have been shot through so many times it makes Swiss chess appear nonporous.
Squid ink deflection noted, especially in re the violence that Christ Himself performed… and spoken like the usual suspect sophomore-level of Scripture knowledge shill.
If you’re going to debate, try not to make the opponent’s points for him.
What I see is more deflection and avoidance, rather than addressing the question as to where the “smooth talk and flattery” appeared. In short, no dearie, the verse you cited was NOT relevant to the topic.
And yet again, you attempt to neener-neener using Scripture out of context… knowing damn well that verse pertains to those being scornful and mocking of God and His faithful… and NOT the well-deserved scorn that the disingenuous receive… indeed, have received from Christ Himself.
Give it up, troll… you’re outmanned… or is that “tsk tsk tsk” a yenta tell?
LikeLike
What’s the difference between nationalism that doesn’t exclude based on race and a propositional nation?
LikeLike
Bingo!
LikeLike
LOL… Drudge is funny…
LikeLike
Is the SSA on the left doing a dance from the 1980s?
LikeLike
My guess: “Can’t touch this!” (Hammer time)
LikeLike
I know a former SSA. Her Reputation within the SSA is terrible. He said most are scared if she becomes the president.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Likewise, a White Nationalism movement will fail.”
It’s a mistake to assess the prospects by looking backward, though (in history).
Does the average Scotsman today consider himself more Scottish, or more MacDougall, MacDonald, Campbell? (and what did they do to each other when the answer was ‘MacDougall, MacDonald, or Campbell’?)
Does a German feel more German, or Bavarian, Prussian, or Saxon? Chinese or Fujianese, Cantonese, Manchu? Does the average African American have any idea which of the mulltitude of West African tribes his ancestors were pulled out of?
(or for that matter, does a Jew feel more Jewish, or Ashkenazi, Sephardi, Mizrahi? (a weaker example)).
Of course, the answer in most cases is some of both, but which is dominant, and why?.
The driving forces here are not really even under our conscious control. They’re basically twofold: the fact that natural selection acts on the individual, not the group (sorry, but true), and the equally true condition that we’re fundamentally wired to form groups in which to compete with each other (to maximize the chances our ‘selfish genes’ will propagate). There’s no contradiction between the two.
We group up (and will ultimately do virtually anything to the ‘out-group’ for victory) because it improves our chances vs going it alone.
But, undeniably, the boundaries between ‘us’ vs ‘them’ have been pretty fluid, historically. The common denominator seems to be – smaller than whatever is ‘the whole’. Because if our group is ‘the whole’, while victory is assured, it’s over-assured, and our share of the spoils is diluted more than it needs to be. Too small, of course, and we may lose.
It runs in both directions. When our perception of ‘the whole’ expands, so do the boundaries of what we consider our group (eventually). We unite, and convince ourselves that we’re Scottish nationalists (vs those nasty English). And when it contracts, we break apart into squabbling, even warring, factions.
Such as we see happening before our eyes in America. The country truly is devolving into increasingly bitter, mutually antagonistic teams. It’s a re-drawing downward of the boundaries of ‘in’ vs ‘out’ group, and it was a natural, even inevitable outcome of America emerging undisputed world champion – from the Cold War, the ‘Japan-as-number-1’ bubble, etc.
No serious rivals, culturally, militarily, economically = ‘look out below’.
This is what SWPLs are really doing, by the way. Their seemingly ridiculous posturing is simply the proximate means (of shrinking the in-group). But it doesn’t matter what the means are. They’re not wrong. They’re not ‘stupid, self-hating, or pathologically altruistic (sorry, but true). They’re just pushing you out of the dominant in-group, to maximise the spoils.
The same dynamic is everywhere, at all levels of human groups. In families (Isolate a large family and watch them factionalise, squabble, even worse. Attack from the outside, and they close ranks). In politics (Labour trounces Conservatives = Labour splits apart. Blair and Brown couldn’t be in the same room together in the end.)
History is full of this process. History is a (very dynamic) optimization process.
So, serious white nationalism in America (in large numbers) will come when and only when the selfish, individual prospects for most whites clearly suffer for being white. (Obviously, we’re moving in that direction, but it’s early days).
If it continues, the response will be literally inevitable. And if it doesn’t, all but impossible.
And American nationalism and national cohesion will return when and only when Americans perceive a clear and pressing threat ‘from without’.
China? Muslims? (Or for that matter, AI and robots)?
If that doesn’t come, though – look out below!
LikeLike
You sound like you might be a member of that threat.
LikeLike
N✡ KIDDING.
LikeLike
Polish Nationalists torch the Rainbow of Tolerance
LikeLike
“Biało-czerwone! To barwy niezwyciężone”
That horrid wire-and-plastic-flowers construction has torched and reconstructed several times. It was designed by a female “artist” (she is not hot) who said “Poland was seen as a homophobic country. I wanted to show that we’re not closed, but open-minded.” That’s so sweet. Some lefties really are sincere in wanting what they think is best for their people, in this case to be seen as aligned with the Brussels ministries.
One of her portfolio features is a performance “art” at a gallery in which she peels potatoes in rural garb and engages visitors in discussion about the confinement of women to housewife roles.
Man, the video is like cold water to a syrup-clogged throat.
LikeLike
The next crossroad for whites: are we stronger together?
LikeLike
Oh that kind of defeatism is what I would expect from fags or women. Really, haven’t you seen White genocide go viral? Its all over for civics and Murika.
White Nationalism is just a boogeyman of the Left. National Socialism and Fascism are the way. The bad years are coming to The End. Men of the West Rise! Face the Orcs and their Nose Goblin enablers.
This is Sparta! We win or we will dine in Valhalla! Join the Mobile Infantry, get Citizenship. Remember what is Best in Life.
DESTROY YOUR ENEMIES, SEE THEM FLEE BEFORE YOU, AND LISTEN TO THE LAMENTATIONS OF THEIR WOMEN!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Listen to their women moan in pleasure as your mighty shiv is thrusting their entrails right out of their ears. And then listen to them beg for more.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Socialism is a system in which women can have children without men or women just need stupid men to have children. Socialism mimics the evolutionary pressures of Africa. What of complex difficult changing environment keep up intelligence don’t you the “national” socialists get? No eugenic program can emulate that complexity. Capitalist overabundance also is deeply dysgenic. Whites are dumber each year.
LikeLike
National Socialism is not the same as Soviet Socialism. Eugenics is built into the system. Dysgenic unions are discouraged and the natural hierarchy of Natural Selection is applied to Man. Man may not be just an animal, but breeding works for horses and dogs, and there is no reason such breeding cannot lead to better Men. Ubermensch is the goal of Fascism. That sad sack charity nonsense that breed the Untermensch and lead to Idiocracy must be outlawed and crushed. Sentimentality is for women or girly men. Fascists have hearts but believe in Tough Love. We want our sons to be Men. We want them to succeed and thrive and make us proud. To wear wings on their chests and Triumph through Their Will. One Nation, One People, One Leader. Western Civilization was not built by Capitalism, It Was Built on Industry. Henry Ford, Nicola Tesla, Thomas Edison: yes. Greed is good: NO, HELL NO!
LikeLiked by 1 person
WW2 was a white civil war
Himmler wanted all whites to live in Germania.
You yanks and Brits certainly fucked that up.
LikeLike
I’d say the Krauts pretty much effed themselves. No reason to attack Russia, bomb England or follow the nips in fighting the US.
LikeLike
USSR was going to invade anyway. It was preemptive in nature.
LikeLike
My own theory was that Hitler took a Rothschild bribe or was on their payroll all along when he stopped the Panzers for six weeks and rested them for maintenance while he had the Soviets in complete disarray. Both Moscow and Leningrad were low hanging fruit waiting to be plucked at that juncture. He did a similarly stupid thing in Operation Citadel when he pulled out the 1st and 2nd SS Divisions and sent them to Italy just as they were encircling the Soviets by Kursk. The same at Dunkirk. Read Lost Victories some time. Von Mannstein, whom I deeply admire as a leader, did not think highly of the GrFHAZ. Now that I know what I know about the Free Masons and Rothschilds that explanation is both plausible and connects the dots. Hitler’s grandmother was a Amid in their Vienna estate and was fired for getting pregnant from one of the Rothschild men and paid off. That would explain why his father hated him.
LikeLike
Amid = maid.
LikeLike
We all have honors degrees in hindsight. As the drunk Churchill said up to Stalingrad they hardly lost a battle …after Stalingrad they hardly won. They got within 11 miles of Moscow.
Victims of their own successes. Guy Sajer in his brilliant book recalls his sheer disbelief when he heard Stalingrad was lost.
Frontsoldaten is another good read. Lots of good men lost …CH was right…the alphas killed off. We live in a world of faggotry.
LikeLike
My own theory was that Hitler took a Rothschild bribe or was on their payroll all along when he stopped the Panzers for six weeks and rested them for maintenance while he had the Soviets in complete disarray
—————————————————————————————————-
Yes they found hundred of millions on his Swiss bank accounts
No wonder you admire Alex Jones
LikeLike
WRT to the Irish discussion on MPC- Kiss my ass. Its the WASPS that suck the jew cock and can’t swill enough of his sperm while they sell out their brethren for a few pennies.
LikeLike
From Russia with love
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pravilna
LikeLike
Trump campaign CEO, Stephen Bannon, is a wife-beater and a………
………drum roll please………
ANTI-SEMITE!!!
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3463409/posts
LikeLike
Mary Louise Piccard
‘nouf said.
LikeLike
I would have never guessed that “Piccard” was an Eskimo nom-de-guerre. https://www.google.com/search?q=Piccard+Temple+Beth-El+Cemetery+site:billiongraves.com
LikeLike
A Piccard was a French or Swiss Pikeman around the 16th century.
LikeLike
A skilled pikeman could cut a man in two with a single stroke.
LikeLike
It’s fascinating to watch (((them))) pass through a nation, adopting its localized naming conventions as (((their))) own noms-de-guerre, and then carry those adopted noms-de-guerre on into a new nation. For instance, (((they))) adopted noms-de-guerre, like “Strauss” and “Schwarz” and “Grun/this-or-that” and “Wein/this-or-that”, as (((they))) were infecting German lands, but then (((they))) continued to deploy those noms-de-guerre as (((they))) moved on to invade the United States.
LikeLike
Then sometimes (((they))) modify the noms-de-guerre as (((they))) invade new countries: Fuchs becomes Fox, Bruch becomes Brooks, Stein becomes Stone, etc etc etc.
LikeLike
LikeLike
How stupid are really (((Eskimos)))?
6 Media Pillars of the ‘Alt-Right’
http://forward.com/news/national/348580/6-media-pillars-of-the-alt-right/
Unfortunately this blog was not mentioned and there are some other notable pillars not missed
We are witnessing meteoric rise of alt right and consequently this the most dangerous period for the movement
More than a few (((usual suspects))) are on mission to subvert it
Be aware
LikeLike
Duck and cover…
LikeLike
CH new post material Lolzozozoz
Teenager on the run responds to police on FB, asks them to use better picture of her | fox8.com
http://fox8.com/2016/08/27/teenager-on-the-run-responds-to-police-on-fb-asks-them-to-use-better-picture-of-her/
LikeLike
(((Ari Feldman)))
LikeLike
A Farmers market…somewhere near Seattle. Washington.The weirdest thing was, there was a complete absence of two things…dindus and Cops. Without the one , apparently, there is no need for the other. Wow, who could have guessed.
LikeLike
White nationalism vs “regular” nationalism
Is there a “diet” nationalism ?
Word nationalism has its root in nation therefore if you consider US to be a nation I guess that what would you call “regular” nationalism
However it is increasingly clear that such thing as a nation does not exist in today US What exists are whites on one side vs every nuance of shitskin plus leftoids and Eskimos on the other
If there is any chance for whites to win in this struggle they have to fight for their national interest as a cohesive national group of which white nationalism is a natural extension and expression
And there will be no other time as you suggest when the word will be less scary
or more acceptable
LikeLike
Another good one from Alex Jones. The man is on fire these days. No one, but no one goes to bat for DT as he does. His exposes of HRC and Soros are enough to get most people killed. He might be captive opposition but he doesn’t behave very well. Kimmel really made a death threat. It was pretty obvious too. So its either for real or it has entered the absurd soap opera theater level of comportment between the actors.
LikeLike
still not mentioning (((civilization destroyers)))
J-E-W-S Alex try it is not that hard
LikeLike
It’ll never happen. I hear his lawyer is a jew.
LikeLike
He likes them and has a lot of them as friends. He hates the ones who hate him and can tolerate the others who aren’t Communist. That’s pretty much where I am. Even GE eats at Carnegies’ deli with corned Beef sandwiches as big as your face. That is the way it is in the South. There is no friction between Jews and Christians in most of the deep South because theý shared the common culture and both groups held slaves. It’s a reasonable truce and it remains enforced by good faith. The biggest friction is no pork at the BBQ. Rum points this out all the time and gets ignored but he dos it from this perspective.
LikeLike
White nationalism, per se, is a dead end, but there is more than one way to skin a cat. A secessionist successor nation, dedicated explicitly to the ancient principles and liberties of Western Civilization would accomplish pretty much the same thing, without an overt racial demarche. Get rid of welfare and central banking and you would largely get rid of the urban dependency class and other (((undesirables))), as they migrated back to the old US rump state in search of their lost subsidies.
Also, a franchise tied to military service, pace Heinlein, as a way of essentially repealing the 19th Amendment, and the creeping socialism that inevitably flows from it.
Of course, it would mean war, but there is at least a reasonable prospect of victory. How many millennial hipsters will die for Hillary? The military would probably split, just like the last time. Foreign mercenaries would, no doubt, be deployed against us, but the propaganda value of that would be huge, and I’ll take my chances against the orcs.
LikeLike
I don’t agree. Anytime I meet an Italian or Russian I sense a feeling of ease there. I always get on well with them.
I don’t get that with Asians in particular quite the opposite actually.
LikeLiked by 1 person
True enough. But how do we effect the separation without it looking like the coming of the Fourth Reich? I realize there are some around here who might like that, but that’s a dead end, too. Propaganda matters. Goebbels and Riefenstahl would agree.
LikeLike
The degree of change you’re talking about would necessitate the creation of an entirely new government.
LikeLike
Lol. I’m building a group of badass Hungarian steroid abusers. Hard working, good people. All woke whites are brothers and we know what (((they))) did. Look up what (((Soviets))) did to Hungary.
All Hungarians and Poles know. You just have to let them know that you know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How many millennial hipsters will die for Hillary? The military would probably split, just like the last time. Foreign mercenaries would, no doubt, be deployed against us
That sounds familiar.
LikeLike
Great minds often run in the same direction, but if we always agree, then only one of us is thinking.
LikeLike
There is a similar Patton quote:
“If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn’t thinking.”
LikeLike
Foreign mercenaries are even bigger pussies. Shooting Nigerians, Pakis and Bangladeshis would be fun. You could have a nice looking Girl as bait and ambush them, They would fall for it every time.
LikeLike
European Identity transcends nationalism.
LikeLike
When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing in anything.
G.K. Chesterton
LikeLike
Most of the alt-right are the libertarian economics of Jewish intellectuals combined with a virulent strain of anti-semitism. It’s a treat to watch.
A nationalist would be a pragmatist who limits the pace of progress to preserve communal and national stability.
LikeLike
The nationalist affirms the nation through a Bonaparte figure.
Nationalism is based on the self-confidence not to define itself which leaves an incredible amount of leeway.
LikeLike
To the liberal the nationalist is a dictate, to a communist he is a reactionary, and to the reactionary he is a statist. It’s better to define nationalism by its opponents.
LikeLike
As usual, this is where the limey shill pulled his bone apart.
Claptrap, thy name is UKIP.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans-Hermann_Hoppe
The alt-right is most like him.
LikeLike