• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Open Borders Update
¡SCIENCE! Sweetly Validates The Fundamental Premise »

Shiv Of The Week: Cuckservatives Left Bleeding Out Of Their Wherever

September 8, 2016 by CH

Pseudonymous author Publius Decius Mus wrote the equivalent of a pig-roast of #NeverTrump cucks. “The Flight 93 Election” is a great piece of punditry, because it doesn’t shy from the existential truths governing all human societies.

The truth is that Trump articulated, if incompletely and inconsistently, the right stances on the right issues—immigration, trade, and war—right from the beginning.

***

[I]f [cuckservatives] are right about the importance of [familiar conservative principles] to national health and even survival, then they must believe—mustn’t they?—that we are headed off a cliff.

But it’s quite obvious that conservatives don’t believe any such thing, that they feel no such sense of urgency, of an immediate necessity to change course and avoid the cliff. A recent article by Matthew Continetti may be taken as representative—indeed, almost written for the purpose of illustrating the point. Continetti inquires into the “condition of America” and finds it wanting. What does Continetti propose to do about it? The usual litany of “conservative” “solutions,” with the obligatory references to decentralization, federalization, “civic renewal,” and—of course!—Burke. Which is to say, conservatism’s typical combination of the useless and inapt with the utopian and unrealizable. Decentralization and federalism are all well and good, and as a conservative, I endorse them both without reservation. But how are they going to save, or even meaningfully improve, the America that Continetti describes? What can they do against a tidal wave of dysfunction, immorality, and corruption? “Civic renewal” would do a lot of course, but that’s like saying health will save a cancer patient.

***

The whole enterprise of Conservatism, Inc., reeks of failure. Its sole recent and ongoing success is its own self-preservation. Conservative intellectuals never tire of praising “entrepreneurs” and “creative destruction.” Dare to fail! they exhort businessmen. Let the market decide! Except, um, not with respect to us.

***

One of the Journal of American Greatness’s deeper arguments was that only in a corrupt republic, in corrupt times, could a Trump rise. It is therefore puzzling that those most horrified by Trump are the least willing to consider the possibility that the republic is dying. That possibility, apparently, seems to them so preposterous that no refutation is necessary.

***

Your [cuckservative] job is to show up and lose, but you are a necessary part of the show and you do get paid. To the extent that you are ever on the winning side of anything, it’s as sophists who help the Davoisie oligarchy rationalize open borders, lower wages, outsourcing, de-industrialization, trade giveaways, and endless, pointless, winless war.

***

First, the opinion-making elements—the universities and the media above all—are wholly corrupt and wholly opposed to everything we want, and increasingly even to our existence. (What else are the wars on “cis-genderism”—formerly known as “nature”—and on the supposed “white privilege” of broke hillbillies really about?) […]

Second, our Washington Generals self-handicap and self-censor to an absurd degree. […]

Third and most important, the ceaseless importation of Third World foreigners with no tradition of, taste for, or experience in liberty means that the electorate grows more left, more Democratic, less Republican, less republican, and less traditionally American with every cycle. As does, of course, the U.S. population, which only serves to reinforce the two other causes outlined above. This is the core reason why the Left, the Democrats, and the bipartisan junta (categories distinct but very much overlapping) think they are on the cusp of a permanent victory that will forever obviate the need to pretend to respect democratic and constitutional niceties. Because they are.

***

The sacredness of mass immigration is the mystic chord that unites America’s ruling and intellectual classes.

***

This is insane. This is the mark of a party, a society, a country, a people, a civilization that wants to die. Trump, alone among candidates for high office in this or in the last seven (at least) cycles, has stood up to say: I want to live. I want my party to live. I want my country to live. I want my people to live. I want to end the insanity.

***

The alleged buffoon [Trump] is thus more prudent—more practically wise—than all of our wise-and-good who so bitterly oppose him. This should embarrass them. That their failures instead embolden them is only further proof of their foolishness and hubris.

I like the stab of this wielder’s shiv.

Go there and read it whole. It’s a nourishing meal.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Current Events, Shiv Of The Week | 140 Comments

140 Responses

  1. on September 8, 2016 at 3:21 pm Publius

    Brad “THE FAGGOT PUSSY BOY” Pitt says he can’t imagine accepting Trump, a fellow white man, as president.

    How can a white man who has read the Fight Club script and even played the star role so we’ll be such a bleeding vagina?

    LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 3:44 pm Captain Obvious

      My understanding is that Pitt’s parents are uber-conservative fundamentalist evangelicals. Similarly, Angelina Jolie’s dad is the hugely conservative Jon Voight.

      tldr; == There MIGHT be more to Brangelina than meets the eye…

      LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 4:52 pm roberthagedorn1

        This happens. Jerry Falwell’s father was an atheist.

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 7:39 pm Ironpusher

        I was born & raised in the same rural area of Missouri as Brad Pitt. I even knew a guy who was good friends with Brad’s older brother since childhood. He said that as children & teens, they constantly picked on and bullied Brad for being a whinny little bitch. Brad has little to do with his family back in Missouri and rarely visits.

        LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 5:13 pm Dan

      If you want to see a real alpha in action, watch Charlton Heston in “Secrets of the Incas” on YouTube from 04:00 to 05:00. Take notes if you’re a beta.

      LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 5:48 pm robpaxton

        Very nice.

        LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 7:21 pm Libertardian

      Virtue signaling for elites. “How dare those filthy hoi polloi elect someone who doesn’t want them genocided. I shall have to exile myself to one of my Swiss châteaux until this nightmare is over.”

      Trump could probably score votes by promising to revoke their citizenship if elected.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


  2. on September 8, 2016 at 3:21 pm Shiv Of The Week: Cuckservatives Left Bleeding Out Of Their Wherever | Aus-Alt-Right

    […] Shiv Of The Week: Cuckservatives Left Bleeding Out Of Their Wherever […]

    LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 3:58 pm Captain Obvious

      > “the existential truths governing all human societies” ——— Julian Assange was on Sean Hannity’s radio show all afternoon, and Assange was absolutely on fire as regards this question, especially concerning the absolute contempt and loathing which the elites have for the masses beneath them.

      LikeLike


  3. on September 8, 2016 at 3:39 pm Enfant Terrible

    (((Conservative Intellectuals)))

    America does not have any true American articulating a view of what America is or could be, as a nation, from someone that could be termed conservative, in the classical sense of what that term means. All it has is paid shills babbling on about Jewnomics stuff, as if that is all that matters to the well being of a nation.

    LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 3:55 pm Captain Obvious

      “Jewnomics stuff”

      David Ricardo == Karl Marx == Alisa Rosenbaum == Emma Goldman == Milton Friedman == Daniel Kahneman.

      It’s all the same d@mned thing.

      If (((an Eskimo))) is trying to shove a theory down your throat, then the only thing you of which you can be absolutely positively 110% certain is that the theory is both beneficial to (((the Eskimos))) and detrimental to the Shkotzim.

      LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 4:26 pm Publius

        THIS

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 6:12 pm Scanman

        Don’t forget Mises and Rothbard.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 12:53 pm oink

        I have my reservations regarding such a broad brush. There was a certain ((Saul)) from Tarsus, and in my own life I had a certain ((Steinhardt)) that we owe A LOT to.

        LikeLike


  4. on September 8, 2016 at 4:01 pm Colonel Hogan

    Family Ties episode ca. 1989. One of the kids ask why they live in an all-White neighborhood and the libfag parents say something like, ‘ It wasn’t always like that. In fact, one of the reasons we moved here was because it WASN’T all White.’ I know the jews produced and wrote that shit, but it really pissed me off. The episode was about this black family that they knew who bought a house in their neighborhood and someone circulated a petition to keep blacks out because property values. Whenever I see those old shows, they always come off as written by socially maladapted jews who have never stepped foot in a regular White ANYTHING. I always wondered why the plots on most 70s and 80s shows dealt with things that never seemed close to reality. Norman Learvision certainly had a big influence on those shit shows. For all my hatred of that shit, I still enjoy looking at young Justine Bateman and Valerie Bertinelli.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on September 8, 2016 at 4:22 pm uh

      Dude, I knew you took your handle from “The Hogan Family”!

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on September 8, 2016 at 6:05 pm Colonel Hogan

        @uh
        Right medium, wrong show. Even the show that I took it from, that I still enjoy, was guilty of magic negro poz.

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 8:24 pm Lucius Somesuch

        Would you like to buy an ‘uh’
        Around, she bleets
        Jerk you like a circle,
        And don’t be fool to eat

        Cause she’ll cost your soul a shekle–
        “A SHEKLE!” Shhh, riiiiiiite . . .

        You’ve reached: SarUh Cycle One.

        1. dude brah intros

        “Hey guyz, I’m a cool fatass pill snorting tubby-bumper loser just like all y‘all, call me ‘uh’. right on, brutha. hey, where duh fattiez at, know what I‘m talkin‘?!”

        Take some weight on your feet, sweetie, and dance

        LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 4:27 pm Canadian Friend

      I only watched those show to look at Justine Bateman and Valerie Bertinelli.

      well… and also to improve my English since back then as a French Canadian my English was extremely limited.

      I knew nothing of left /right politics back then but now in hindsight, I see why they always made fun of Michael J Fox’s character and made him the bad guy in so many episodes; he represented the conservative side …

      LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 4:41 pm Captain Obvious

        OMH, CF is a friggin FROG?!?!?

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 4:49 pm Canadian Friend

        oui.

        a freakin frog

        but more like a black sheep among french frogs, some call me ” Americanized”

        gee I wonder why? haha!

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 5:05 pm vfm#7634

        OMH, CF is a friggin FROG?!?!?

        IKR? My impression is that the French Canadians are crazy hard-left Marxist whiners who make even Mexicans seem right-wing.

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 5:16 pm Dan

        Justine (((Bateman)))?

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 6:12 pm Canadian Friend

        vfm#7634

        you are mostly right

        A large portion of french quebecers are on the far left.

        quebec is also a sort of feminist haven, thus more leftist crap

        in some ways it is like California but with snow in the winter; we have hippies, vegetarians, pink and green haired tattooed up women and all sorts of left wing weirdos, they all hate Big Oil, all hate Reagan-Bush-Trump…etc etc

        at some point there were 5 left wing party and not one right wing party ( right now I don’t know , I do not follow closely quebec politics )

        yes I am in hell here swimming among a sea of leftists ( many are anti -USA of course, the USA being “the mother of all evil”…yet all those hippies love their GPS which was invented by the Pentagon…I love reminding them hehe… )

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on September 8, 2016 at 7:37 pm oldfashionedfellow

        Quebec wasn’t always that way…

        Mes Aïeux – Dégénération

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 8:14 pm Captain Obvious

        CF, I feel like that gives you a really strong angle to play on those chicks…

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 8:17 pm Dude

        Yeah, hard to believe you all used to give Maurice Duplessis and the National Union huge majorities. Once nationalism became the province of those commies in the PQ, all was lost. (Here’s a fun fact for ya. The PCs won the 1988 election, essentially a referendum on NAFTA, by trouncing the Libs and NDP in Quebec. Ha! That must piss off modern Quebecers to no end.)

        LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 4:29 pm hans

      Yup, that´s why I liked Bundy so much.

      LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 5:40 pm Johnny Redux

      Jews are like the many thousands of angry mulattos (including Obama, Jeh Johnson, Loretta Lynch, et al.): They are close to being White, but know that no matter how much money they have, how much they pretend, etc. that they will never be White. You just cannot buy genetics, and you can’t fake it either.

      LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 6:04 pm Captain Obvious

        I have long felt that Eskimoesses are so ferociously attracted to us because their hindbrains are d@mned well aware of how badly inbred they are, and are just aching for an infusion of new blood.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 1:37 am Carlos Danger

        Eskimoesses are ferociously jealous of White women. They all are.

        LikeLike


    • on September 9, 2016 at 1:46 am Carlos Danger

      I actually know a German General named Klink. When I joke he got promoted no one gets the joke anymore.

      LikeLike


  5. on September 8, 2016 at 4:04 pm Wrong Side of History

    The role of establishment conservatives is to be WWE jobbers.

    LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 8:58 pm Greg Eliot

      Taking the slapdowns that real Americans don’t want to take.

      LikeLike


  6. on September 8, 2016 at 4:24 pm Publius

    This (((criminal))) died in 2008 and the illuminati stole our money to “bail it out” while kicking millions of children out of their homes.

    Remember that.

    http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/08/investing/wells-fargo-created-phony-accounts-bank-fees/index.html

    LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 4:25 pm Publius

      Slap on the wrist fine. Everyone in management should be HANGED FROM A BRIDGE.

      LikeLike


  7. on September 8, 2016 at 4:34 pm elmertjones

    It’s not clear that Google understands the difference between news and opinion.

    LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 6:54 pm Corvo

      Elmer — is that degenerate joogle image real?

      LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 6:39 am elmertjones

        Only your photoshopper knows for sure…

        LikeLike


  8. on September 8, 2016 at 4:54 pm plumpjack

    the political parties were splitting hairs for decades over whether America should be extremely weak, or merely very, very weak. then Trump comes in and changes the whole conversation to “strong or very very strong. take your pick”. instead of being a barren, post-wall nation settling for the rescue dog of mass immigration, he says “we’re going to build a fertile nation that gives birth to strong citizens”.

    when strength shows up and starts moving things, weaklings have no words to describe it. they’re literally tongue-tied. everyone opposed to Trump is tongue tied. they’re just blabbering about small details. they don’t get that they’re simply being shoved aside like a pile of debris.

    cuckservatives and shitlibs alike feel no embarrassment, no sense of shame..they have so little self-awareness that they actually think they’re doing their best. that’s the problem with weakness. it has a life of its own. you can’t argue with it. it would just as soon lie down and die from inertia. there’s no point arguing. you just have to move them out of the way.

    LikeLiked by 2 people


    • on September 8, 2016 at 5:53 pm Johnny Redux

      Yes, and the Leftist and the Cuckservatives are arguing over whether the USA will become a majority minority nation in 2050 or 2040, depending on current immigration rates (legal and illegal) or increased rates. Then along comes Trump and says he wants to place a halt on some (read; a lot!) of legal immigration, deport the illegals, and repatriate many of the fake “refugees” living here. “Oy vey, he is trying to actually change the plan to turn this dirty, White, Christian nation into a minority one?! He must be stopped!”

      LikeLike


  9. on September 8, 2016 at 5:07 pm irishsavant

    Great piece but I do have a problem with the Flight 93 analogy in that it assumes the truth of the Arabs with box-cutters fantasy.

    LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 5:57 pm Johnny Redux

      Yes, people just learn to block things out when they do not fit their image of what they want (need) to believe. Like how the wreckage from two large jets (including engines made with titanium parts, hundreds of bodies, hundreds of pieces of luggage, etc.) just disappeared into the air when the planes supposed went down in the field in PA and crashed into the Pentagon. You really have to shut off all intelligence and logic to believe the official story of what occurred.

      LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 5:59 pm Johnny Redux

        We are supposed to believe this is a large jet plane crash in PA on 9/11:

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 6:04 pm Johnny Redux

        And we are supposed to believe a large jet plane did this to the Pentagon:

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 6:07 pm Johnny Redux

        NO F*CKING DEAD BODIES, ENGINES, LUGGAGE, CHAIRS, NAPKINS, ANYWHERE TO BE SEEN!! These bastards control the images, and the storyline, and have been doing so for the last 100 years!

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 6:10 pm Johnny Redux

        The Pentagon…probably one of the most secure buildings in the world, with dozens, if not hundreds, of video surveillance (CCTV) cameras pointing in every damn direction, but not ONE video even released of a jet crashing into the building.

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 6:12 pm Johnny Redux

        ^^^^^ This, gentlemen (and ladies, if any are reading this), is the result of cuckservative leadership, in bed with the Leftist scum in the MSM. They are ALL in on it, at the top levels, which is why they ALL hate Trump with equal passion.

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 6:24 pm Canadian Friend

        Johnny Redux,

        I do not want to open a can of worms, and I will not debate and argue till I’m blue in the face

        but could not the truth be between the two extremes?

        I think it is highly possible – especially for flight 93 – that the US air force had to shoot it down before it reached a serious target like the 3 previous planes had.

        once they had shot a couple missiles at it, what fell on the ground caused less damage, it was parts of the jet not the entire jet in one piece.

        same thing at the Pentagon, they probably shot it down before it crashed

        You say there are no dead bodies, but I have seen pics years ago of burned bodies at the Pentagon

        I think they had to shoot down those planes but did/do not want the public to know.

        and that is why some parts of their stories don’t hold water.

        but as I said I will not start a fight over this.

        I simply wanted to say the I think the truth might be between the two extremes of it was the muslims or it was an inside job by the USA.

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 7:00 pm Johnny Redux

        CF, I agree not to fight you over it, but keep in mind that 125 people died at the Pentagon (both civilian and military) who were working there when the missile struck. That is why you may have seen images of dead, burned corpses. People certainly died there! But THIS was not caused by a plane:

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 7:43 pm Amasius

        Another smoking gun. Flight attendant CeeCee Lyles “It’s a frame.”

        9/11 was a Zionist Israeli operation. Jewish PNAC neocons, Mossad operatives (who had rented office space in the towers and later celebrated at the scene), jewish moneybags like Larry Silverstein used where necessary and rewarded handsomely. My take is the arabs were patsies who thought they were taking part in some kind of terrorism and they built the attack around them. It was a complex op, but hardly carried out perfectly. The blatant demolition of the towers, especially building 7, was patently ridiculous. One’s own eyes and common sense are enough to know that, and if you needed scientific demonstration you could look at Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Plus there were numerous little absurdities like bags being sent to the wrong airports and magic passports. But the bad guys successfully employed trauma-based mind control and were able to bully and dissenters long enough until the Official Story assumed the status of religious dogma. It’s really too bad. Maybe decades from now people will be able to view it objectively.

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 7:48 pm Ironpusher

        @CF

        I can (sorta) confirm that about flt 93. I know a Air Force crew chief who was stationed at Seymore Johnson AFB on 9/11. They were order to arm and launch a flight of F-15E’s that morning……….one of them came back missing an AIM-9 sidewinder. I think we can figure out the rest.

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 8:42 pm Greg Eliot

        Sigh… here we go again.

        None other than Fred (of Fred on Everything fame) eye-witnessed the plane as it hit the Pentagon. He was nearby in a restaurant eating lunch with a colleague and wrote about it on his blog.

        If anyone wouldn’t shut his mouth about what he saw, it would be that old curmugeon and muck-raker.

        Guys, this is insanity… to say a missile hit the Pentagon, for one.

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 8:50 pm Greg Eliot

        If a missile hit the Pentagon, trying to shoot down a plane commandeered by terrorists looking to crash there, why wouldn’t the Air Force admit it?

        Especially since they wouldn’t know how many witnesses there’d be in the area, what kind of filming could have been done, etc., etc., etc.?

        I’ve said it before, to no avail, but one more try… if that many people can keep a secret and the entire MSM and other media apparatus could likewise “play along”, they we’re really fucked, aren’t we? It means TPTB can do anything they want and pull off any sort of heinous conspiracy, up to and including killing hundreds of policement and firefighters, let along 3000 of their own civilian populace.

        In a world where a fucking affair behind closed doors, and every little N word uttered at a private party, becomes front page news?

        Why anything so elaborate, if the only goal was to mobilize support for war in the Mideast? Couldn’t they easily have blown up one small building with only a few dozen people in it, or perhaps a few in various cities, and blame it on the allah akbar brigages?

        Jeez, Louise… too many things could have gone wrong with too many loose ends for something like 9/11 to be anything more than what it was… a bold military act of guerilla warfare by a small, highly motivated cadre… perhaps the boldest in the annals of warfare.

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 9:11 pm cortesar

        If it does not fit you must acquit
        Can Fred on Everything ”xplane this

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 9:27 pm Greg Eliot

        Longer replies keep getting et. 😡

        Not sure what some superimposed image is supposed to supply as proof. And some stewardess allegedly saying It’s a frame? Puh-Leeze!

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 9:32 pm cortesar

        Even a nicer rendering with the real angle
        Only 2 things could have happened
        1- Wings hit the building causing a damage before they are disintegrated
        Note there is no single damage where the wings should have hit
        including windows
        2- Wings sheared off immediately after impact
        In that case they debris should have been on the ground in front of building No single trace of them

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 9:45 pm Greg Eliot

        It’s all explained below… many other sites could be linked as well, but as in the past, folks are only going to believe what they want to believe.

        Take a shave with O-c-k-h-a-m’s R-a-z-o-r, guys.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 7:00 am Ponce du Lion

        I was a child and was very strange for me giving what happened to the towers and that weren’t fuselage remains. But really nothing strange if the plane was shot on air and lost thrust/ mass or fuel.
        At first looks like a bombing

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 8:29 am Greg Eliot

        And let me add, it wasn’t just Fred Reed who witnessed the plane hit, there were numerous eye-witnesses… probably hundreds, although I’m sure not each and every one was questioned… but many were, and aside from some minor details (which CT theorists lurv, so they can ignore the general gist of agreement) there was strong consensus.

        http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/witnesses.html

        Anyway, I don’t know why I get sucked into this debate each time it occurs, but as in the past, I’ve said my piece, and others can take from it what they will.

        LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 9:07 pm Ironpusher

      I’m not saying a missle hit the pentagon, I am saying that flt 93 was (probably) shot down by the USAF to prevent it from reaching it’s target. Shooting down a plane full of U.S. civilians is not the kind of publicity the military wants (even if it was justified). It makes perfect sense for them to hide it.

      LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 9:18 pm Greg Eliot

        No, it doesn’t make sense for them to hide it… just the opposite, because it’s something that could easily be found out… seen, even filmed, by numerous witnesses, including any hungry news talking head or blogger looking to make a name for himself.

        To admit that such collateral damage was necessary to protect the Pentagon would have been well-understood, in light of what the other two planes in NYC accomplished.

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 9:29 pm Greg Eliot

        They didn’t do a very good job of preventing the plane from reaching its target, did they? Assuming, of course, it WAS the Pentagon that was intended.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 6:12 am Johnny Redux

        Greg, I’m saying a missile was purposely shot at the Pentagon…and a particular part of the Pentagon that held the offices and files of personnel investigating millions of missing dollars. Look it up. That said, despite the other arguments mentioned above, the lack of the massive physical evidence that would be spread all over (and not just disappeared) – all things that just defy known science, explain this one simple thing:

        Pentagon outdoor-focused video cameras: Dozens
        Outdoor-focused video cameras in general vicinity of Pentagon: Dozens
        Video of anything striking Pentagon: None

        Hmmmmm…must have shut the cameras all off that day.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 9:36 am Canadian Friend

        For the buildings crumbling in what loo/ked like controlled demolition, well… again I would think it is reasonable to think the truth is between the two extremes.

        I think the attack was really done by muslim terrorists but considering how much it would cost to repair those buildings, it is possible people in high places decided to help the building crumble by adding explosives.

        That reminds me of something…it was discovered that GM had come to the conclusion it would cost less money to do nothing about the corvair car catching fire in accidents and killing its driver, and just go to court , fight, win the cases they could and pay those they would lose… than to recall all corvairs and repair them.

        Did GM know about the problem? yes

        Was it a conspiracy to let people burn in their car? no

        Did they chose one solution over another to save money? yes

        That reminds me when the USA had to shoot down an entire navy ship full of Frenchmen in WWII because if they did not the nazi were going to use that ship against the USA.

        No conspiracy there, no inside job, it was just a crazy situation where very radical solutions must be applied and quickly.

        on the morning of 9/11 a lot of crazy things happened and a lot of grave decisions had to be made and very quickly and while you do not know if worse things are going to happen in the next minutes because you do not know what else the terrorists have in store, so of course some questionable decisions were made, and of course they would want to hide that from the people.

        I think it was more cost efficient, on 9/11 to help the very badly damaged buildings fall to the ground than to spend billions on repairing them.

        This decision was probably approved by people in high places because it would make the attack look bigger…which of course has its advantages.

        but the attack was real and really done by terrorists, I am sure of that.

        Look at it this way; a robber really entered your house and stole one third of your wife’s jewelry because the other two third was too well hidden BUT….. you lie to the police and the insurance guy and say the robber stole every piece of jewelry to make sure in the end you don’t get screwed by the insurance company.

        So did the robbery really happen? yes it did.

        is part of the story about the robbery a lie and even a sort of conspiracy to make money? yes

        Did you conspire with the robber? no you did not.

        I am sure the 9/11 attack was real, and really done by terrorists

        but helping buildings crumble to the ground because it is more cost efficient, just like shooting down an airplane full of USA citizen is not something they would want people to know.

        that is why it looks like a conspiracy or an inside job.

        the truth is most likely in between the two extremes….just like when the robber stole your wife’s jewelry…you are not entirely to blame, nor is the robber innocent …..there are a few lies here and there but for the most part 9/11 was really a muslim terrorist job.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 12:56 pm Ironpusher

        @GE

        I’m not talking about the Pentagon. Flt 93 was the one that crashed in Pennsylvania after passengers supposedly tried to overtake the terrorists. The story I told earlier is well known in the USAF’s aircraft mx community where I work. There were dozens of witness’s to that missing missle, none of which were sworn to secrecy. The pilot mx debrief report (which would document expending munitions among other thing) was simply taken by a mx officer (on orders from above no doubt) and never seen again. I for one, believe the story.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 1:36 pm PA

        “Let’s roll” sounds like neocon-scripted propaganda, in retrospect. Similar to how Jessica Lynch supposedly took on an Iraqi platoon all by herself.

        As to the events in NYC, I don’t fully understand woke/WN Boomers’ dogged psychological resistance to accepting the obvious controlled demo explanation at this point in the game.

        LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 9:42 pm Greg Eliot

      http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.asp

      Snopes is your buddy.

      LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 9:53 pm cortesar

        snoop I thought it is Fred
        Let us hear Fred
        —————————————————————————————————-
        You’ll recall from the discussions above that the hijacked airliner did not “only hit the ground floor of the Pentagon’s first ring” — it struck the Pentagon between the first and second floors and blasted all the way through to the third ring. Because the plane disappeared into the building’s interior after penetrating the outer ring, it was not visible in photographs taken from outside the Pentagon. Moreover, since the airliner was full of jet fuel and was flown into thick, reinforced concrete walls at high speed, exploding in a fireball, any pieces of wreckage large enough to be identifiable in after-the-fact photographs taken from a few hundred feet away burned up in the intense fire that followed the crash (just as the planes flown into the World Trade Center towers burned up, and the intensity of their jet-fuel fires caused both towers to collapse)
        ——————————————————————————————————-
        Between first and second floor
        But what happen to the wings
        See picture between first and second floor there is no damage
        So obviously the wings did not penetrate
        But where is their debris then?
        Furthermore if the plane exploded just after heating the first wall how it could have penetrate the second ant third reinforced wall?

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 12:07 am Vagina dominator

        Why did WTC7 fall? It was hit by nothing. But it fell into its own footprint.

        And we all saw that, not just Fred Reed.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 6:31 am Greg Eliot

        Fred’s archives probably contain his eye-witness account… it has nothing to do with the snopes article I linked to, which has a much more comprehensive asked-and-answered rundown of the questions being posed here (and elsewhere).

        Like I said, we’ve been through all this before, yet every few months you guys bring up the same thing and refuse to listen to any of the explanations, but come up with yet another Byzantine piece of alleged evidence which doesn’t explain or address the innumerable facts which gainsay any possibility that a conspiracy of the size you imagine could occur.

        All the questions posed here have been answered on numerous debunking sites.

        This one issue seems to be an odd area where you normally red-pilled realists go off the deep end.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 6:33 am Greg Eliot

        Jesus Christ, vagdom… google is your friend.

        https://www.google.com/#q=why+did+wtc7+collapse

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 6:55 am Ripp

        “The blatant demolition of the towers, especially building 7”

        the building 7 collapse. lol…

        the official narrative is something like debris from one of the towers flew off and hit one of the support beams of building 7, then buildng 7 came down hours later…perfectly.

        IMO the WTC building take downs suggest some type of pre meditated plans. too precise of a collapse.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 8:23 am Greg Eliot

        I’m no structural engineer, maybe some of you guys are.

        But this sounds eminently reasonable to me:

        http://www.debunking911.com/pull.html

        It seems like the more things that are damaged, and the more people that get killed… especially police and firefighters… and the more elaborate a plan is with number of factors to the equation… it just makes sense to believe the opposite of CT.

        In all other matters, our gummit and others can’t get out of their own way, and the moment more than two people are “in” on a secret, it’s no longer secret.

        Hell, Hillary The Grand Wizard, who can get away with murder but not keep one computer secret, nor get away with missing e-mails? But thousands of people can keep their mouths shut, police get killed, billions of dollars in insurance payouts occur, and everybody just lays down? PUH-LEEZE!

        A conspiracy of such grandiose and Byzantine dimensions can be accomplished?

        Check your premises.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 8:23 am Publius

        Johnny is right. (((Snopes))))?

        WTF where did the real Greg go?

        One thing is certain: Greg is a boomer. Amirite?

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 8:34 am Greg Eliot

        Snopes was just one link I decided to use, because in the past, I found their debunking and yay-or-nay analysis pretty convincing a vast majority of the time.

        If they now happen to be discredited due to ((())), well… I’m not sure about that, but if that’s your feeling, there are plenty of other sites to go to for the same information.

        I’ve not quite seen 6 decades, so if being in that age group somehow disqualifies me from rational analysis of 9/11, I’ll defer to wiser heads than mine. :duckface

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 9:03 am mendo

        We can dissect this every which way, but at the end of the day, it happened, they let it happen and nothing’s been the same ever since.

        That shit still bugs me. The entire world saw us with our dicks in our hands and anything left of the American mystique was gone that day. The NWO smiled with glee that day and everyday since.

        But, they forgot one thing…

        US.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 10:12 am Carlos Danger

        So is Media Matters. Both are about as authoritative. Ask Snopes about the Protocols.

        LikeLike


      • on September 10, 2016 at 9:29 am Greg Eliot

        In re Snopes and The Protocols…

        … as Henry Ford once said: “They fit!”

        The Protocols of The Learned Elders Of Zion is worthy of reading because it does indeed “fit”, and was obviously written by someone who was “Jew aware”.

        But to think that some cabal of machers, back then, would actually create such a document, leaving damning evidence that could easily be tied back to them, is foolish.

        Much like, back in my day, Report From Iron Mountain (if memory serves) was a topic of study in a class I had of Warfare In The History Of The West. The gist of it was a cabal of the “Military-Industrial Complex” (thanks, Ike :duckface) meeting yearly and laying out their plans for controlled wars and political upheavals throughout the world, orchestrated by them, in order to further their power and riches.

        Half the kids in the class thought it was a “real document”, but it took me but two chapters to realize it was merely a tool for discussion, a sort of bizarro-world Protocols. And I think the only reason I sussed it out immediately was because I had already been in the Army and was two to three years older than most of the students, with a far wider range of experience and reading.

        I literally joked with the professor about: “What’s next, The Protocols?” He knew what I meant, and wasn’t at all taken aback that I made that reference… the rest of the class just stared in puzzlement.

        Point is, if Snopes says the Protocols weren’t written by any secret Jewish cabal, and was merely the work of some Jew aware (ahem) “anti-semite” (synonymous term?), then they’re correct.

        Nevertheless, they still fit… like a fucking glove.

        LikeLike


    • on September 9, 2016 at 7:05 am plumpjack

      thanks Irish. got everyone hooked on the 9/11 crack again. Lol

      LikeLike


  10. on September 8, 2016 at 5:09 pm Wrong Side of History

    Cuckservative thinkers just exist to set the boundary line for what the goyim are allowed to get away with still believing in the current year.

    I hope there’s enough rope after the shitlibs..

    LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 5:41 pm Captain Obvious

      No. Traitors FIRST. Then (((Eskimos))).

      LikeLike


  11. on September 8, 2016 at 5:27 pm Winter

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/sep/08/artificial-intelligence-beauty-contest-doesnt-like-black-people

    You couldn’t make it up.

    LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 7:16 pm Vincent

      Natural beauty contests don’t like ’em either.

      LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 9:03 pm Greg Eliot

      The relative recent big name pageants aside, I was just remarking to someone during a commercial for some hair dye on how the redhead and the blonde were such gorgeous creatures, and the so-called beautiful negresses they put up there with ’em pale by comparison (no pun intended, but you got one anyway).

      From skin color, to hair color, to eye color, to facial features, to hair texture, geez, it’s not even close.

      And yet we have to see negro winners in Miss USA, Miss America, Miss Universe, etc., etc., etc. What a damn farce.

      LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 6:20 am Johnny Redux

        Yep….they keep peddling the myth that the jackasses are equal to the race horses. Sadly, I believe many White women actually fall for some of these lies, and question their own beauty. I always tell women who think that they are “too pale”, that saying that is absolute nonsense. “Your paleness, in today’s world with several billion non-White people, is rare and beautiful. Rarity and beauty equals high value. Women in India would kill to have skin like yours.”

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 6:35 am Greg Eliot

        Nicely done, Redux.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 8:32 am Publius

        I do the same, Redux.

        The Jew has our white women convinced they should turn themselves orange.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 5:42 pm Belle Igerent

        y’allz honkee shkotzim be trippin. shiksa grrlz, up yo cage-fightin’ game and ink dat white racist skin hella back to tha nahn teeyun fiddiez. How else u gone memba allz yallz ‘anglez in hevvunz’ dat plan parenthood sent to be yallz gardjun angles ? Oy gevalt !

        LikeLike


  12. on September 8, 2016 at 5:28 pm Johnny Redux

    I liken traditional conservatives (i.e., those not willing to wake up to reality, and change with the times and growing threats) to your grandpa or father who only had four items at his disposal to try and repair any item: a hammer, a wrench, a screwdriver, and duct tape, and believed one or more of them would always fix any problem. As an example –

    Hey, inner-city public schools going down the drain, with dismissal test scores, poor attendance, and disruptive behavior? We cuckservatives can fix that! Let me reach in my tool bag…..oh….here we go. Well, you need “school choice” and “vouchers”, to create competition between “bad” schools with “bad” teachers (which just happen to always be in non-White areas), and good schools out in the suburbs (which just happen to be mostly White). We mustn’t blame the students, of course! They are helpless, interchangeable cogs, and poor black and Hispanic children just need “opportunity”….blah, blah, blah.

    Some nation does not like us interfering with their sovereignty, and trying to overthrow their government? Huh!! The audacity! Let me reach into my bag….move that around….and….oh….here we go. They hate America because they despise our freedoms! They cannot stand how open and loving we are to all ideas, and how we have a totally free and independent press! And, they actually said bad things about our greaaaaatest ally, Israel! They must be destroyed!

    LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 5:50 pm plumpjack

      tradcons came of age before the hypergamy genie was let out of the bottle. they still take women’s good behavior for granted, and that’s they’re Achilles’s heel. they couldn’t foresee, and still can’t see, how or why (liberated) women would side with the gibs parasites. they have no awareness of the post-wall, single-bitter-barren harridan vendetta lurking behind every clockwise ratchet-turn of the gibs machine.

      bless their pristine hearts (I love you, dad), but the tradcons are cluelessly ill-prepared to reign in the rotten, hypergamous debauchery that’s eating away at the civic-oriented family foundation that they took for granted. that’s a Shitlord’s job, and you can bet we’ll git ‘er done.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on September 8, 2016 at 7:06 pm Publius

        Indeed boomers should all slice lengthwise.

        LikeLike


      • on September 8, 2016 at 7:08 pm Libertardian

        This. Any Xer can probably tell you a story of trying and failing to convey the ugly truths he’s seen to his boomer relatives/coworkers.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 4:50 am Publius

        Even the boomers who have their minds in the right place, sort of (like my real life rich drunk “redneck” uncle), fail to understand just how much fucking bullshit it is that Xers did not get to grow up in the 99.9% white world in which they grew up, worrying about muscle cars and milk shakes served on rollers skates. That really was their world.

        When I call my uncle a redneck, I do so with affection. I have a rich (self made) uncle who got rich from blue collar work, simply by working his ass off 18 hours a day and owning his own company that gets shit done. He’s as pissed as I am about everything.

        Or almost. But even he is not able to make the leap into understanding just how unfair it is because not only growing up differences, but our career building years from age 25 to 50 — the meat years. We are fucked and being fucked RIGHT NOW. We are still only aged 38 to 44 or so — we are JUNIOR partners at whatever endeavor we’re in, if we’re lucky, after playing by the poz rules the last 20 years. We simply don’t have the ability to have the career the square boomers did. I’m not even talking about the hippies.

        These pissed off doomsday prepper boomers you can find on western rifle shooters et al., for example, are 70 years old, give or take, and they even subconsciously admit what I am saying — saying things like, “Well bring on a civil war ’cause I’ll be dead soon anyway — my life for one cop is a good trade.” Even if they don’t die by cop soon, they have pensions, or WELL FUNDED 401ks, RETIREMENT, land — things it will be VERY difficult for Xers to have.

        Well fuck you, boomers. Unlike you, we still have 30 working years left (assuming a “normal” not post-apocalyptic world) and our kids are 4, 8, 10, 11 years old. We are in the thick of it living with the pain, NOW, of knowing our YOUNG children are growing up in this pozzed bullshit madness world. The boomers growing up in the 1960s could get a job pumping gas at a gas station and have enough money to regularly buy and sell NEW corvettes. They all had a ’67 Stingray at one point. I’m not talking about wealthy ones either. “Oh I had a ’57 Studebaker”. They ALL say that. Their “part time jobs” at age 16 gave them the ability to buy NEW CARS.

        They grew up in a place where people did not lock their doors. That’s literally because it was 95% white then.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on September 9, 2016 at 7:03 am Ripp

        @publius.

        great post.

        just looking at a cost of living vs. avg. wages chart. its insane. it takes a dual income to even compare: mom and dad working = more consumerism = less family = poz

        the boomers really have no idea just how bad the poz is. its nearly impossible to relay it to them.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 7:08 am Tarl Cabot

        Modern Tradcon politics had the apparent rhetorical advantage of not only getting the Right off the bigotry hook, but it allowed them, at least within the precincts of their own echo chamber, not to have to really think critically about race or sex at all. This is especially true after the serial purges by William F. Buckley to “cleanse” the movement of what he termed reactionaries. Not coincidentally, this imperative was amenable to the cheap-labor donor class that largely funds Cuckservatism Inc.

        Western liberalism (broadly defined) was presumed to be accessible to all races and creeds, as well as both sexes (Only two? How quaint). The Buckleyites agreed to ignore the empirical evidence and the self-evident cranks that demonstrated otherwise. Now, thanks to the revolutions in population genetics, evolutionary biology, and the internet as a tool for dissemination of ideas, such cannot be ignored without Luddite self-indictment.

        The article by “Decius” is a distillation of the themes he explored in the now-defunct “Journal of American Greatness”. In that forum, he frequently cited, with approval, the work of the late Samuel Francis, a race realist officially erased from cuckservative history, as well as Steve Sailer, who should be familiar to everyone reading this blog. In fact, in a comment on Sailer’s own blog, Decius himself says he tried to give a shout-out to Steve for “invade the world, invite the world”, but the citation could not get past the CRB editors. No surprise there, but CRB deserves credit for publishing the article in the first place. It is masterful- hands-down the best polemic of this election cycle.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 7:41 am oink

        our kids are 4, 8, 10, 11 years old

        very close

        6,8,12,14

        …there should have been a 10 and a 4

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 10:34 am Corvo

        “We are in the thick of it living with the pain, NOW, of knowing our YOUNG children are growing up in this pozzed bullshit madness world.”

        The Xer disenchantment is spot on.

        I had a similar discussion with my father a few weeks ago. He’s one of those Republicans who doesn’t like Trump (but he’ll be voting for him anyway) and doesn’t comprehend the demographic cliff we’re going over, or the growing anti-White racial hostility. Having grown tired of his head-in-the-sand view on race, I dismissively told him “You’re not concerned about it because you’re not concerned about the future like I am. I have four children all less than 10 years old and I’m worried for them, not myself. You’re not thinking long-term”. He was sort of taken aback, but I think I left him with some food for thought.

        I am reminded of the book The Fourth Turning, which I read back in the late 1990s. It discusses the “seasonal” nature of generational character, and the cycles that societies go through over the generations. I don’t recall all of the details, but one thing that stuck with me was that GenX (my generation) exists in the part of the cycle that the authors deemed most likely to give rise to fasc!sm / authoritarian!sm, in response to the chaos and insecurity wrought by the preceding generation (in our case, Boomers). Things seem to be proceeding accordingly.

        Hail Victory.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 11:20 am Corvo

        Publius — My replies keep getting eaten by the mod, but good post.

        Mine are 9, 6, 4, and just about 3 months. But I had a similar conversation with my father not long ago. It’s the future for my children that I’m most concerned about.

        LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 10:20 pm Captain Obvious

      > “four items at his disposal” ——— JR, that’s the sort of thing that I was sensing in the Lutheran & Mormon cucks during the GOP primaries this year [and also over in Germany, with the Mud Invasion]. Their minds seem to be very rigidly obedient in nature, and they will dutifully reproduce whichever formula or algorithm or belief they had been taught during their formative indoctrination, never bothering to question e.g. whether the algorithm is actually good for them, or whether a belief reflects Reality as it actually exists.

      LikeLike


  13. on September 8, 2016 at 7:04 pm Libertardian

    ‘Dare to fail! they exhort businessmen. Let the market decide! Except, um, not with respect to us.’

    Capitalism for thee, not for me!

    LikeLike


    • on September 9, 2016 at 6:32 am Johnny Redux

      Isn’t that the Big Bankers creed? “Profits are private affairs, to be kept amongst us; whereas, losses are public affairs, to be shared by the masses.” The whole corporate/bank bailout events of several years ago made that adequately clear.

      LikeLike


    • on September 9, 2016 at 8:19 am uh

      “As much as the market will bear!” – Stefan Molyneux

      LikeLike


  14. on September 8, 2016 at 9:00 pm chris

    Best ever Christian quote I’ve ever read:

    http://biblehub.com/esv/2_samuel/12.htm

    1And the LORD sent Nathan to David. He came to him and said to him, “There were two men in a certain city, the one rich and the other poor. 2The rich man had very many flocks and herds, 3but the poor man had nothing but one little ewe lamb, which he had bought. And he brought it up, and it grew up with him and with his children. It used to eat of his morsel and drink from his cup and lie in his arms,a and it was like a daughter to him. 4Now there came a traveler to the rich man, and he was unwilling to take one of his own flock or herd to prepare for the guest who had come to him, but he took the poor man’s lamb and prepared it for the man who had come to him.” 5Then David’s anger was greatly kindled against the man, and he said to Nathan, “As the LORD lives, the man who has done this deserves to die, 6and he shall restore the lamb fourfold, because he did this thing, and because he had no pity.”

    These perfectly parallels rich elites externalising the costs of their SJW policies onto the rest of society.

    Christians, God commands you to kill these people.

    LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 9:14 pm Greg Eliot

      All accounts will be settled.

      That happens to be a foreshadowing of the rejection of Christ as well, how the arrogant Big Jews of the day would take the Lamb of God from His humble faithful and deliver Him unto the hands of Rome to do their dirty work for them… but He will be restored to complete the Will of God, at a dear cost to pitiless, rich and arrogant TPTB.

      On a side note: The number four is symbolic in Scripture for totality and completeness… just as we have maxims “four-corner alignment”, “four-square agreement”, etc.

      LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 9:26 am mendo

        Greg, I thought the number three represented completeness?

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 11:45 am Greg Eliot

        Three is perfection, which is slightly different than completeness and totality, although in certain ways you could certainly make an argument to use them as synonyms.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 12:09 pm mendo

        Guess I got my numbers mixed up, cause I though 7 was perfection, but 7 is holy, right?

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 12:17 pm Lucius Somesuch

        Speaking of numbers!:

        http://www.businessinsider.com/there-4-giraffe-species-2016-9

        “Not all giraffes are the same species, it turns out.”

        lzozlzlololzozlz

        LLZOLZZOZLZ omGZ LZLZOZLZzloZLZzlzozlzlz

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 9:35 pm Greg Eliot

        7 is pretty much the equivalent of 4 and 3, a “totality of perfection”, as wiki puts it.

        3 in and of itself also means holy.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 9:35 pm Greg Eliot

        It’s about time they admitted that not all humans are the same species.

        LikeLike


  15. on September 8, 2016 at 9:04 pm cortesar

    German Jews Worried After Far-right Party’s Electoral Success: ‘A Nightmare Come True’
    read more: http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/europe/1.740592

    I am not sure that these modern kikes know what a nightmare means
    But as we all know life is a learning process

    LikeLike


    • on September 8, 2016 at 10:23 pm Captain Obvious

      > “But as we all know life is a learning process” ——— L✡L’ed. Let’s hope so.

      LikeLike


  16. on September 9, 2016 at 3:33 am Amasius

    Jonesian conspiracy theorist turned Trump-hating asswipe Webster Tarpley is getting sued by Melania for saying she was a hooker in the 90s. The UK’s Daily Mail is getting it too.

    http://www.onenewspage.com/video/20160902/5447253/Melania-Trump-Sues-Daily-Mail-and-Tarpley.htm

    Run ’em down and blow ’em up, Trump clan!

    LikeLike


  17. on September 9, 2016 at 4:19 am Publius

    Check out the jewfro on (((that))) (((one))): http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/09/politics/facebook-cofounder-gift-democrats/index.html

    lolzozozoz.

    Here’s the thing, the Jew: as we have told you since last August (13 months ago), Trump wins in a landslide. It won’t be close. He will even win New York and potentially all 50 states.

    You did this to yourselves. It hurts us more than it hurts you.

    LikeLike


    • on September 9, 2016 at 8:15 am Ripp

      Check this out: thousands of empty chairs for Hillarys Keynote speech:

      https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/09/08/clinton-campaign-stunner-dismal-attendance-for-hillary-clinton-key-note-address-in-kansas-city/

      Shut of the MSM and hillary dies. Her entire campaign is a magic trick.

      LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 8:38 am plumpjack

        “Her entire campaign is a magic trick.”

        relevant:
        “The great twist at the end of The Usual Suspects not only reveals that Verbal Kint is Soze, but also that everything which Kint explained in the police station, everything which we as the audience thought of as ‘reality’ within the context of the film, was a lie, or if not a lie then it was certainly subject to what Soze wanted us to know. In a sense Keyser Soze was acting as our media, he was relating events and we, as the audience, were trying to understand and comprehend those events based upon what he was telling us. Soze is the only person left alive, so he has a monopoly on information regarding what happened.”

        http://nwioqeqkdf.blogspot.com/2016/07/the-usual-suspects.html?m=1

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 8:46 am Greg Eliot

        The Usual Suspects, an otherwise solid film, kinda/sorta falls apart at the end, because now the world knows Kint is Sose, due to the description of the dying man who was burned and then the police investigator who was grilling him throughout the movie.

        Remember, the gist of the whole caper was to kill the guy who could identify him… and then kill all those who had a hand in the subterfuge, they themselves who thought it was about money and drugs.

        So yeah, he got away in the end, but the whole “mission” per the film’s microcosm and suspension of disbelief was upended… so I guess the logical result was Sose heads off to a plastic surgeon for a complete face change.

        Somewhat anticlimactic, IMO.

        But a tip o’ the cap to the late great Postlethwaite.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 8:55 am Captain Obvious

        > “Her entire campaign is a magic trick.” ——— Everything now is FAKE. The money is FAKE, invented out of thin air by the (((Federal Reserve))). The economic statistics [4% unemployment???] are FAKE. The stories on the news are all FAKE. The words coming out of the candidate’s mouth, as she is fed the answers via her wireless earbud communication device, are all FAKE. The laws & the & the law enforcement agencies and the “justice” system, which require those who expose classified information to go to prison, are all FAKE. The staged muggings & murders of DNC operatives who cooperate with wikileaks are all FAKE [in that they were actually carefully crafted ass@ssinations]. Etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc…

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 8:59 am Captain Obvious

        > “he has a monopoly on information regarding what happened” ———You should read about Titus Flavius Josephus, and his forty fellow (((Eskimos))) in the cave… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titus_Flavius_Josephus

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 11:24 am Corvo

        lolzzolzozlz

        AMREN easily had 4x as many people in the middle of bumblefuck TN.

        LikeLike


  18. on September 9, 2016 at 6:50 am plumpjack

    who could’ve predicted it? civil war brewing in the negro football league. this should be interesting…smells like another soros-funded BLM-type subversion. where will all the “patriotic”, cucked, jersey-wearing, negro-worshipping fans land on this?

    “Linebacker Bobby Wagner hinted that the whole rest of the team may act as a group with all of them staying seated in protest against the country.

    After dropping the bombshell, Wagner added that “whatever we decide to do will be a big surprise.”

    http://www.breitbart.com/sports/2016/09/09/seattle-seahawks-players-plan-big-surprise-during-next-national-anthem/

    LikeLike


    • on September 9, 2016 at 7:43 am oink

      good, athletic exhibitionism was banned in the early Christian Era

      LikeLike


    • on September 9, 2016 at 8:48 am Greg Eliot

      Nuthin’ more ironic that million-dollar magic negroes bemoaning the oppression of YT.

      LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 8:59 am plumpjack

        a good bet they’re being prodded by their (((handlers)))

        LikeLike


    • on September 9, 2016 at 11:06 am Corvo

      What civil war? I’ll get interested when I hear that the White NFL players will be standing tall and raising right arms during the national anthem while the dindus sit on the ground and sulk. Until then, meh; the NFL is just a bunch of niggers and cucks.

      LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 9:32 pm Greg Eliot

        Exactly.

        LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 11:00 pm GCM

        Sounds like gamma males who don’t watch sports, but only rag on it.

        LikeLike


      • on September 10, 2016 at 9:37 am Greg Eliot

        Pick a monicker and stick with it pwn.

        If you still worship negros and their balls, then that makes you either a cuck (if you’re White), or DUH, you’re supporting your own shitskin tribal members.

        If we hit a raw nerve “ragging” on your pets, well… that’s on you.

        LikeLike


  19. on September 9, 2016 at 7:23 am CBR600RR_Rider

    OT,
    even the machines know 😉

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/sep/08/artificial-intelligence-beauty-contest-doesnt-like-black-people

    LikeLike


  20. on September 9, 2016 at 7:30 am Jim

    Absolutely beautiful. God, I hope he wins in November.

    LikeLike


  21. on September 9, 2016 at 9:32 am CEO Nikolic

    Today’s topic on my site (click on my name to go) is the decline and fall of America’s society, part 2 of a 3-parter. Perhaps Trump can halt the decline, if it is in the cards. [I would like to see Ironpusher commenting on my site, even if it’s to spew hate. That’d be nifty.]

    LikeLike


    • on September 9, 2016 at 10:04 am Ripp

      eat sh1t and die.

      stop pandering your shit blog here. ass master clown fag.

      Neeko lick sorcery ass.

      LikeLike


      • on September 9, 2016 at 1:03 pm CarpeOro

        Tries to peddle on Vox Day’s sites also. Apparently doesn’t understand you need to make worthwhile comments THEN people will be bothered to check your link. Touting yourself without evidence = weak.

        LikeLike


    • on September 9, 2016 at 12:19 pm Canadian Friend

      Maybe Nikolic is actually Annaliese Nielsen?

      She is a “social justice warrior”, an Angry feminist who attacked a very nice, very polite taxi driver simply because he had a Hawain dancer bobble head doll on the dash of his car. She called him names, swore at him, threatened him then she started acting like she was the victim.

      http://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2016/08/31/every-businesses-respond-confronted-sjw-bullies-like-lyft-driver/

      LikeLike


  22. on September 9, 2016 at 12:46 pm Publius

    https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/09/07/the-kremlin-really-believes-that-hillary-clinton-will-start-a-war-with-russia-donald-trump-vladimir-putin/

    LikeLike


  23. on September 9, 2016 at 2:19 pm Libertardian

    I saw this photo last night before going to bed, and I had a great dream. I dreamt that Trump won in a landslide, and everywhere I saw the faces of shitlibs looking just like this.

    LikeLike


    • on September 10, 2016 at 9:04 pm Johnny Redux

      LikeLike


  24. on September 10, 2016 at 12:44 pm CEO Nikolic

    In case you’re curious about me, CEO Nikolic, I have a post on my future goals and present activities on my website. Click on my name to go. I think we’re all curious about the lives of the major and important commentators.

    These are the men I particularly want to see commenting there: Ironpusher, Publius, Plumpjack, Greg Eliot, and Spirit-Within. The door opens THAT way…

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    trav777 on Revolutionary Spirals To Civil…
    trav777 on Revolutionary Spirals To Civil…
    Dirtnapninja on Revolutionary Spirals To Civil…
    Carlos Danger on Fantasy: Homeric Obama. Realit…
    bolg on Two-Faced Paul Krugman
    Carlos Danger on Fantasy: Homeric Obama. Realit…
    trav777 on Two-Faced Paul Krugman
    trav777 on Two-Faced Paul Krugman
    Revolutionary Spiral… on Revolutionary Spirals To Civil…
    trav777 on Two-Faced Paul Krugman
  • Top Posts

    • Betrayal Is A Woman's Heart
    • Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Oddly Acquainted With Western Feminist Propaganda
    • Sweden Vs Norway
    • NPC Culture, In One Meme
    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • The Three Abrahamic Religions, Abbreviated
    • Don't Help The Leftoid Media Sway Elections
    • Natural Conservatives!
    • Fantasy: Homeric Obama. Reality: Heroic Trump
    • Demography Is Destiny
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: