Polling That Says Clinton Is Ahead Is Wrong For This Reason (Among Others)

Commenter Experienced Father links to an article explaining how polling can be badly skewed if voters are surveyed in the middle of a transitory mudslinging eruption by the sociopathic Clinton Machine.

CH: i grok the gist of it, but it turns out according to recent polling women aren’t abandoning trump…men are, i suppose to avoid being labeled supporters of a “perv”. so maybe it’s a feminist country now. or maybe, perhaps complementary, it’s a sniveling beta male country now.

CH,

Read and pay close attention to the following, clipped from the article link below.

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/13/why-those-polls-that-say-clintons-ahead-could-be-wrong-commentary.html

What happens in polling is that, if your candidate does something that makes him or her look bad, or that you don’t agree with, you’re less likely to want to answer poll questions about him – even if it’s anonymous. It doesn’t mean you still don’t support him. Just that right this minute, you really don’t want to talk about it.

and

The most important thing to note in these poll swings is that the actual voters are really not changing their minds. I think, and history has shown this, that most voters (Ken Bone notwithstanding) had their minds made up by Oct. 1. The crazy numbers are simply representative of which candidate’s supporters are responding to the polls more.

Men have a lot more to lose visibly supporting Trump than women.

Because American men have become wilting flowers.

The media campaigns are so nasty a whole hell of a lot of Trump Supporters have gone underground in the polling, just as BREXIT supporters did in the UK.

And the nastiness of the media campaign in the USA vice [sic] the UK is much larger, so the scale of this effect is much larger WRT Trump.

I agree. A lot of shitlibs are going to be shell-shocked on election night as the numbers roll in YUGE for Trump. Mass suicides are not out of the question. And if that happens I’m busting out the happy Snoopy dance gif.

The polling this year is unreliable for two other reasons as well: skewed sampling methodologies (oversampling Dems and undersampling Indies, typically) and outright collusion with thecunt campaign. It was revealed for instance that a recent NBC/WSJ poll, which was unusually favorable to Hillary, was conducted by Hart Research Associates who received a $250,000 payment in the month of September from thecunt’s Priorities USA super-PAC. Oh, and the president of Hart Research Associates, Geoff Garin, works for the Hillary campaign.