Yesterday, the 9th Circuit of Hell ruled that the stay of Trump’s travel ban from seven Muslim countries (a stay for which a migrant-adopting cucked Judge Robarts in WA state literally made up the basis for out of whole cloth and feelz) was legal and would continue.
The traitors who sit on the 9th Circuit of Hell (headquarters: San Francisco, CA) essentially ruled that the President and the Executive Branch have no discretion to set the nation’s immigration policies. This is the unavoidable precedence that is established by their decision.
Allow me to cut to the quick with this leetle shiv I have at the ready:
The judiciary is corrupt. The shitlib-infested courts are black robed enforcers and propagandists of Democreep legislation and Democreep executive orders, and act as a “check” only on conservative legislation or Republican President EOs.
The courts, iow, are completely biased and partial adjudicators of the law, which they now define into existence as whatever meets the anti-White shitlib standard of excellence.
Checks and balances apply to the judiciary too, and we’re well past the time when the courts need to be brought to heel. Trump was elected by the people; judges are appointed. Trump has more legitimacy than the 9th circuit court because he is a more direct conduit to the American people’s voice.
I see three post-9th Circuit of Hell options for Trump:
- Follow his ban with more Trump EOs that shitlibs have to endlessly parry. (flood the zone)
- Wait for Gorsuch confirmation, and bring the refugee ban to SCOTUS where that court will HAVE to weigh in its favor, or lose legitimacy
- Crush the judiciary
Point 3 will require a GOP Congress that Trump can rely on to strip the judiciary of power, which is far from a given. There is also the quasi-military option; aka a show of force. Trump just goes ahead and commands LEO and other border authorities to follow his EOs and ignore the judges. And finally there’s the FDR nuclear option: threaten to pack SCOTUS and reduce the power of each individual justice.
Point 2 also requires faith in the sanity and loyalty of Judge Gorsuch to the American people. (we’ve been burned before by noms turned libshit….). Frustratingly, evidence has emerged that Gorsuch may be a crypto-liberal in the mold of David Souter.
Point 1 is the easiest for Trump to succeed with in the short term, but also the least damaging to the anti-White Left in the long term, for it leaves their stranglehold on the judiciary in place, and cauterizes the Left’s framing of the citizenship and border issues.
I’m partial to number three. Blow this mother up. Pat Buchanan and Daniel Horowitz agree: It is time to dismantle the 9th Circuit of Hell. And that is only the first step to get this activist globohomo judicial tyranny to bend the knee to Heritage America.
Immigration, borders, and the National Question are the Gom Jabbar/Pain Box and the Voight-Kampff tests of humanity rolled into one. Will the nation find its core humanness, or will it withdraw to nation-wrecking instinct and embrace a lack of empathy for fellow Americans?
Demography is the Left’s source of power. If they lose on the National Question, they lose on all the other globalist initiatives they want to visit on ordinary Americans, because no amount of miseries heaped on Heritage America is too much to the anti-White Left. This is why the Left will fight to the brink of Civil War II for their “right” to spread the Constitution thin enough to cover the entire world’s ingrate indigents.
Like Love, if you indiscriminately extend US Rights to everyone in the world, then Rights mean nothing.
Pathological altruism will kill us, or we will kill it. And killing an idea has historically all too often required….well, you fill in the blank.
Anyone who hasn’t read Thomas Chittum’s Civil War II book should really do so. It was published in the early 1990s and he laid out almost exactly the ethnic and political tensions that would kick off a major conflict in the U.S. leading to a break-up.
He even gave some rough dates for the problems to start: Around 2020 based on demographic projections.
It is not a long read, but well worth the time. CH may want to do a book report on it.
[CH: i’ve heard of the book; now i’ll read it. ominously, chittum’s prediction meshes with my off-line observations of what’s happening around me. i’m hearing a hell of a lot more irreconcilable hatred from shitlibs, and once hatred reaches that boiling over point war is practically a given. my sense is that the hate cauldron has got a few more years to simmer and then the lid blows off, or something major intervenes to lower the cooking temperature.]
LikeLiked by 4 people
I read it in the early 2000s and was blown away. Read it again last year. I will say that we are definitely on the glide path still to big problems.
The thing about his book is he lays out his experiences as a mercenary in Bosnia and the ethnic conflict there. He is very detached in his analysis and his end of chapter bullet lists of warnings signs reads like today’s headlines. In the early 1990s nobody would have thought what he was saying made sense.
LikeLike
That book, which came out in in 1996 or 1997, was a big influence. He used to have a website. I used to email him.
LikeLike
Milk is the new, creamy symbol of white racial purity in Donald Trump’s America
https://mic.com/articles/168188/milk-nazis-white-supremacists-creamy-pseudo-science-trump-shia-labeouf#.TYAamVlE6
LikeLike
The milk article was hilarious.
“When the brigade of trolls at the LaBeouf installation were accused on camera of racism by Paperboy Prince, a famous Washington Wizards fan and entertainer who has since become a top target of 4chan derision, they claimed it was actually a stance against the ‘vegan agenda.’ “
LikeLiked by 1 person
You can read it for free here:
http://www.resist.com/CWII.pdf
It’s an absolute must-read.
LikeLike
I read the book not long after it first came out. It’s a good overview for beginners, but it’s also very lowbrow.
LikeLike
For those of you who would like to know more about the background of the Bosnian/Balkan issues, here’s a few key words:
Suleiman the Magnificent
John Hunyadi
Kosovo
Field of the Blackbirds
Mohacs
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Lowbrow”?
Maybe we should wait for whoever is today’s version of Saul Bellow to write something more highbrow on this topic?
I am currently reading a Mike Hammer compendium. Fast-paced. Dynamic. Expressionistic.Powerful. Crude. Fantastic. Truthful. Unpozzed.
Lowbrow as hell.
The “lowbrow” insult just means “it’s not pozzed” or “it wasn’t written by a Jew”.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Of course if you mean it is badly written, that would be something different.
LikeLike
@Vaj dom
I meant badly written. While he would know a lot about some subjects, his knowledge of others — demographics, for example — was rudimentary at best.
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve also got a thing currently for film noir. Bingeing out. Some of those old Hollywood women were really hot. Slim waists. Great legs. Feminine. Downside? Often deadly!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m just getting started on the hardboiled genre, specifically Red Harvest by Dashiell Hammett. Any recommendations? The three I was told to begin with was Harvest, Double Indemnity (Cain), and The Big Sleep (Chandler).
LikeLike
The well-traveled noir genre hits, like Big Sleep, Postman Always Rings Twice, Double Indemnity, Maltese Falcon, Out Of The Past, etc. are always recommended.
But I have a guilty pleasure for a lesser known one: Kiss Me Deadly (starred Ralph Meeker)
LikeLike
Haha nice pic VD, took me some time to see the joke.
LikeLike
Kiss Me Deadly was great, but arguably because it subverted the genre by taking the hard-boiled tropes to an extreme. Spillane was pissed they turned the Mike Hammer character into an out-and-out asshole bully…but I suppose that’s the appeal, heh.
LikeLike
@King
Sunset Boulevard.
LikeLike
http://www.thisblogisdangerous.com/conservative-save-yourself/
LikeLike
I finished reading “Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup of America, by Thomas W. Chittum”.
I want to highlight Point 11 (Civil War Two Checklist), page 153
here we go:
“Watch for real political power to continue to shift from our elected officials to the courts, and thus away from the American people.”
Book summary: All in all the president will have some busy schedule. If succesful, should get Nobel Peace Price. It is not unfair to say that if Trump succeeds he really deserves it. Obama deserved it too…well just do some surfing with your gay friends.
LikeLike
The 9th circuit has been overturned 80% of the time by the SC. Much higher than average. Give it a few years for Trump to pick the judges. The only way to dilute its influence is to split the district – I heard there are proposals ready to be introduced.
Until then: stay strong. It is a temporary issue.
Trump has an embedded bureaucracy to fight – the judicial side of things is just the most obvious today. The real battle will come from within the executive branch.
LikeLiked by 1 person
When your superiors have to fix your mistakes even one third of the time, you usually get thrown out on your ass.
If this isn’t balls-ass obvious proof that the legal system exists only to perpetuate their own busy-busy importance, then I can help you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are bills in the works to make it easier toss out “under-performing” civil servants. They will pass.
LikeLike
In a few years our demographics will be past recovery without widespread bloodshed
LikeLike
a good argument for widespread bloodshed.
LikeLike
Yep. Fire them all.
LikeLike
The left made a mistake by putting judicial reform on Trump’s radar. It was a back-burner issue, but in picking a high-profile fight with President Alpha, he now will be sure to focus on the destruction of the Ninth — adding personal reasons to the political.
Forty years in the spotlight and two under hyperscrutiny as a national politician, and these leftwing faggots still can’t figure out how this man operates.
Trump will rejigger the words now that he’s got his AG in place and defend it properly, mooting the reversals. Those who whine that he should have waited until his team was in place understand nothing about the importance of executive initiative and the need to be on permanent offense.
Closer to home: watch who buckles on our side under this mildest of pressure. Loyalty is tested when there are setbacks, so much so that it sometimes makes sense to cause a setback just to see who has the mettle for the long-term fight. Poke a cuck and he tells on himself.
I am sure Trump had a heart-to-heart with Gorsuch, and I trust the Presidentissimo until he gives me a reason not to. In the last 20 months he has not shown one sustained sign of wavering. Importantly, even when he tests out strategic appeasement, he always always comes around to the stronger position. Latest e.g., Elliott Abrams, Baker-Paulson carbon tax.
Matt
LikeLiked by 2 people
The Ninth Circuit has the third-highest reversal rate in the Supreme Court of any federal court of appeals, behind the fairly conservative Sixth and Eleventh Circuits. The average circuit is reversed more often than upheld.
Note the qualifier: “in the Supreme Court.” The Supreme Court only grants certiorari to a tiny handful of circuit cases each year, and it only bothers with those where it feels the circuit court may have made an institutional error of law. In other words, the 99% of cases the Ninth Circuit gets right end with the Ninth Circuit.
The entire purpose of the judiciary is to make sure the will of the people – which is temporary and impetuous – doesn’t violate the Constitutional foundations of Western democracy you purport to want to save.
LikeLike
Of course it’s not surprising that the 9th Circus Court has most of their rulings overturned once they are appealed.
When you’ve got Dershowitz saying their ruling was pure bollocks, you know they effed up big time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Man, when even Dershowitz says you’re full of shit, you know it’s time to take the shekels and ride off into the sunset.
Where’s that bish from the previous thread?
LikeLiked by 2 people
((( Ben Stein ))) too
Called it ludicrous.
Thanks, Ben.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dersh and Stein getting religion, are they?
Maybe (((them folks))) are shmart after all. 😉
LikeLike
Publius…
Decius Mus?
or nah
LikeLike
I’m sure at some point in time, when the EO was drafted, it was known that it would come to this, that some rogue judge would do what he did and that it would in turn be reviewed in the 9th Circus Court and that they would do what they did.
I’m sure the Trump admin was hopeful for the best, but at the same time, prepared for the worst.
This is like his campaign all over again. Just when you think, “What’s Trump doing?” a few weeks later it all comes to fruition and you’re just wondering, damn this guy’s good.
Two memorable examples: when he was hemming and hawing to the MSM about his stance on illegals and then smashes it to pieces with his Top 3 rally speech in Arizona and confirmed a wall would go up and deportations would be enforce.
The other was when he said he’d speak about the Obummer birther issue. Got everyone riled up. Made, actually made, the entire MSM cover his groundbreaking ceremony at the DC hotel, wherein many military personnel were giving their support and endorsement for Trump and at the very end he says, “Obama was born here” and walks away.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ultimately George W Bush is responsible and needs his own trial for treason. Pour encourager les autres
LikeLiked by 2 people
Don’t forget the rest of the neocons.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It would be exhausting but, couldn’t Trump in theory take all three Points? Also, has he appointed Judges yet? Has it been determined how many he will be able to appoint? Wouldn’t that make the whole thing go away? I was under the impression that 9th Circuit was just the Apellate Court of California. SCOTUS outranks.
LikeLike
Trump could solve many problems, including the 9th circuit, by appointing a broad swath of judges across the country and in defiance of the Democrat political representatives, who, while customarily able to pick judges for their circuit, presently lack the votes to oppose passage of any judge Trump appoints.
Trump should not merely pack the Supreme Court, he should pack every federal court in the country.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If he can indeed make the appointments, I agree. It might take the bulk of his term but it would be worth it in order to do what he needs to do. Reading up on the 9th, it is a Federal Appellate court (one out of 13, it has hegemony across the West Coast, Guam and Mariana Islands.) It is a part of SCOTUS. They need to be replaced.
LikeLiked by 1 person
<blockquoteTrump should not merely pack the Supreme Court, he should pack every federal court in the country.There are an unusual amount of vacancies, and the new admin can pack the court even in four years.
The real variable is, do we have the bodies to fill the seats? Can such a pozzed industry like the law yield enough matured jurists of the shitlordian bent? That robed cunt Robart, who interjected his puffy bowtied mug into national security policy, is a product of the “conservative” legal movement, appointed by GW Bush.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are an unusual amount of vacancies, and the new admin can pack the court even in four years.
The real variable is, do we have the bodies to fill the seats? Can such a pozzed industry like the law yield enough matured jurists of the shitlordian bent? That robed cunt Robart, who interjected his puffy bowtied mug into national security policy, is a product of the “conservative” legal movement, appointed by GW Bush.
LikeLike
You are misinformed.
LikeLike
Repeal the 19th.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree: Option 3. Have Jeff Sessions prepare an Attorney General’s opinion characterizing the 9th Circuit opinion as unconstitutional and unenforceable and possibly treasonble as assisting terrotist enemies to enter the United States.. Instruct all executive branch officials to disregard court orders unless specifically told to follow them by the Attorney General. Order the disarmament and arrest of any Federal Marshall attempting to enforce a court order on an executive branch official. Ask Congress to begin expedited impeachment proceedings against any judge or justice issuing an order impeding the enforcement, and to strip the federal courts of their jurisdiction to hear immigration cases. Appropriation bills can strip funding for all support staff and facilities for any judge or justice issuing an order impeding the function of the executive branch. (Constitution says you can’t reduce their salaries, although maybe they could be paid in Thai baht.)
The establishment is, fundamentally, aghast that Trump won and will now do everything to stop him from governing, including the existential question of what type of nation this will be: white or turd-world. We’re now in Mad Max world where the question is the simple one posed by Master Blaster to Auntie Entity:
Who run Batertown?
LikeLiked by 4 people
There’s a single flaw in the plan though. If you remove federal jurisdiction from immigration cases, where does it go? States do not have (and presumably do not have the right to make) laws regarding immigration; given that individuals are citizens of “America” rather than a particular state. Also, even supposing that you handed it down to a state court, you’d have massive disorder as West Coast states handed down ruling after ruling in favor of “moar culerz” along with liberal East Coast jurisdictions (Mass, and NY come to mind).
The real answer is for Trump to push it through to the SCotUS and have them definitively rule in favor of current policy. Then he can move to realign judges on Circuits.
LikeLike
I pretty sure Diversity Heretic means to remove jurisdiction of the federal courts from immigration cases.
Two of the three judges empaneled to hear the federal appeal of the nutcase’s opinion out of Washington state are semi-retired. Such retirement could be official if Trump would appoint replacements.
LikeLike
Response apparently caught in moderation.
LikeLike
I could be confusing this with something else, but I seem to recall that individual states did,at some point, at least some say over immigration.
Do they actually want to get jihaded in SF ?
LikeLike
Removing immigration cases from federal court jurisdiction would not affect the existing administrative apparatus governing immigration and naturalization–it would simply remove federal judicial review from the mix. State courts might try to get involved, but state jurisdiction is highly questionable in an area in which Congress has “occupied the field.” State court orders pertain only to that state, so they are not as pernicious as federal court orders and are easier to disregard.
But the issue here is fundamental: Who run Bartertown: elected presidents and legislators or unelected, largely unaccountable judges and justices?
LikeLike
Okay… so what nobody else seems to understand is this; jurisdiction on a federal level is NOT geographical.
LikeLike
Based on the above fact (I broke this apart due to moderation of 2 comments now), you can’t take jurisdiction away from a Federal court without allocating it somewhere else. States (since the creation of the USA) have not ever had (sorry wolfie, you’re wrong) the ability to oversee immigration.
LikeLike
This is the other catch-22 of the way the system works now. If you want a particular result, you file your federal case in a particular circuit based on how you want the judges to rule (or expect them to, based on precedence… judges love precedence). The location (in your example, those judges in Wash state), has no bearing especially on the particular legality. The case in question could have been filed in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 9th or 10th for virtually the same results. The 9th is just particularly notorious because it encompasses the most “Blue” parts of the US.
LikeLike
Federal courts may have national jurisdiction but you’re forgetting two points: (1) there is still the issue of venue–it may be the proper court but its not the proper place; and (2) court of appeals opinions have controlling precedential value only within the circuit in which they are issued. They have only persuasive precedential value in other circuits. It is not unusual for courts of appeals to divide on issues, as they did on the constitutionality of Obamacare before the erroneous ruling of the Supreme Court. But I still favor a hardline approach–the Ninth Circuit evidently thinks the First Amendment is implicated, which makes the issue the interpretation of the Constitution, and there the Supreme Court has had the final say since Marbury v. Madison. And furthermore, this is a fight for the soul of Americans to resist racial dispossession and eventual extermination.
Who run Bartertown?
LikeLike
Ok DH, I think we agree in principle, but without this ruling the case couldn’t advance to the Supreme Court. Our system doesn’t allow for cases to be filed in the Supreme Court. They have to be created in lower court, advancing past the various under-level Circuit and appeals process. It’s a “safety valve” of a sort intended to prevent abuse of power, as the Supreme Court is the final court of appeal; our founders were wisely aware of the fallibility and weakness of justice in the face of final authority (see King George III).
LikeLike
3rd comment in mod… apparently the filter is a bit snatchy today.
LikeLike
We are in a civil war. It is happening RIGHT NOW.
LikeLike
http://www.vdare.com/articles/pat-buchanan-trump-must-break-judicial-power
LikeLike
Trump understood the need to address the corrupt judiciary abstractly, but now the Ninth has forced it into sharp focus. I suspect Buchanan’s well-articulated pique is widely shared in the White House, specifically at the Resolute Desk. They poked a sleeping lion on this issue.
And the Republican Congress, at least on paper, has been looking for the momentum to use their Article I.8.9 prerogative to go after the imperial judiciary, their cultural bête noire.
Conservatives led by and fueled with Trump’s high-energy wrath finally gives a LAWFARE counterattack its best chance of success in a generation or three.
Matt
LikeLike
If this initial immigration hold on 7 ugly sisters salvo was merely a ruse to draw out the black-robed libshit enemy and have them show their ass (and make no mistake, the 9th has been wearing their pants low down for awhile now) so that everyone from Joe Public to Congress can pile on and put the judiciary back in it’s proper place, well…
… now THAT’S some 4D chess!
LikeLike
CH, you should get a kick out of this. Another Physiognomy is Real example: the three-jujj panel who refused to overturn the other shitlib jujj’s ruling:
http://www.trbimg.com/img-589a48bd/turbine/ct-9th-circuit-court-of-appeals-pic-20170207/650/650×366
LikeLiked by 1 person
Is that bitch part rat?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Is that bitch part rat?
The fellow on the left also.
Guy in the middle is part fish.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Da fug? Aliens among us.
/jetpack, not wetback rape!
LikeLike
Politics: Showbiz for the ugly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The good news is that if everyone has American rights then whites are a legally protected minority class under civil rights now. Right?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I prefer to belong to a race that acts as its own protection.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is a factor that demographic doomsayers underestimate about the white majority. The closer we get to minority status, the more we close ranks. We only got in this mess because we thought we were large enough to contain multitudes. White working-class men, larger than many minorities combined, are at loyalty levels to Trump comparable to Jews with Democrats, and approaching Basketball-American percentages.
The perfidious left’s strategy to replace the electorate made the mistake of projecting in a straight line. Further, they misunderestimated the resolve of a cornered populace sufficiently alert to their endangered status. There is no white flight from the American heartland: there is nowhere to go, no option but to beat back the mudwave. Trump is the first to generate and then take advantage of an emerging wokeness, the political manifestation of Wake Up White Man.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You know, Matt, your posts are actually pretty good when you’re not bloviating about religion.
LikeLike
Keep your left-handed compliments and faint praise, kid…
… he’s great on politics and meat world sociology… but he’s at his best when the topic is religion.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Keep your left-handed compliments and faint praise, kid…
… he’s great on politics and meat world sociology… but he’s at his best when the topic is religion.
(((YHWH)))(((Yeshua)))(((Moses)))(((Abraham)))
Just sayin’, Greg.
LikeLike
The sooner you nonbelievers get off the God is Jewish train to Nowheresville, the better off you’re gonna be. Even to an atheist, such a limiting concept would be considered beneath even a dull intellect… a disgrace to even the Aborigine race.
His ways are above Man’s, so whatever vessel He’s chosen to bring about His will is for a reason… study of Scripture and History give us some pretty good clues as to (as one pundit once wrote) “how odd of God to choose da Joos”.
But youse yeggs serve whatever gods, men, or man-made -isms you see fit.
As for me and my house, we will serve Jehovah.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“The closer we get to minority status, the more we close ranks.” also written in Civil War Two, Page 13. (affirmative action)
“Have the imperial elitists seriously considered what will follow when most white Americans actually start to agree with them [about affirmative action]?
LikeLike
Also, Trump managed to outfox the shitlibs again by putting out this travel ban as a bright shiny object for them to bark at. But the heart of the EO was actually unharmed:
1) The provision that slashes refugee admissions from 110,000 to 50,000 (of which 34,000 have already been brought in this fiscal year) is still in place. The refugee racket will be forced into painful cutbacks and shutdowns.
2) Robart’s ruling only applies to refugees that had already been approved for admission by the State Department to the United States. He has no control over whom the State Department considers for admission going forward; only Trump does.
3) The State Department is now only conducting interviews for the spouses and children of previously approved refugees, and for religious minorities (Middle Eastern Christians). In fact, reports indicate that State has even apparently stopped interviews for those asylum seekers that Australia is holding.
[CH: good comment, this is a welcome explication of what the Trump ban entails and how it is still operative.]
LikeLiked by 8 people
Good to know, vfm. Thanks for the breakdown.
LikeLike
I hope this is correct, but for now, the average schlub in the street thinks they stumped the Trump, and virtually right out of the gate.
LikeLike
In that regard, think of it like polling: they thought they had the election sown up but then reality happened. Like a subset of a Pyrrhic victory.
Average schlub is average for a reason.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The average schlub in the street is more likely to be thinking, “what the fuck is with these fucking judges?”
LikeLiked by 2 people
[…] Destroy The 9th Circuit Of Hell […]
LikeLike
you don’t have a joke “fascism forever” fanclub shout out in your yearbook unless you got nads of conservative steel.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I told the old lady last night that if I were Trump, I would dragging Goresuch on the deep shag to inform him that he can either withdraw, or I would withdraw him nomination.
LikeLike
The problem is that if Trump pulls the plug on Gorsuch, then Pence, Ryan and McConnell might decide to pull the plug on Trump.
Trump’s too smart for that. He knew that Gorsuch was just telling a Democrat senator what he wanted to hear prior to the confirmation hearings. It’s not a big deal.
LikeLike
If Trump is planning to use the nuclear option anyways, he should nominate whoever most horrifies the left. What are they going to do? Call him Hitler even more? He should just drop any pretense of compromise; the left already has.
Sorry to see his blitzkrieg fizzle this week. I was hoping he could sustain that level of constant shocking action for a lot longer. Maybe it’s just a lull, but he didn’t seem prepared for this court fight.
LikeLike
Someone posted on how the meat of the EO was still intact and active…
… but from an agitprop standpoint, the Left has won this skirmish. Most ‘Murricans only known that, at first glance, Trump has been stumped…
… and by a backwater quartet of flabby-looking hicks.
LikeLike
The temporary “stumping” is necessary to set the stage for an even more dramatic Trumping. If you want to analyze in simple showmanship terms.
Regardless, I don’t agree with your assessment of “most ‘Murricans.” We understand what being tied up in court means. And one of the reasons we hired this president was his experience in aggressive litigation, i.e., not somebody who allows technical setbacks to derail his momentum. Joe Sixpack doesn’t give a fuck about the fine judicial technicalities and evanescent “victories” that the left gets all emotional about. See the premature celebrating in Hillary’s “3-0” tweet, get the rainbow lights ready!
He will adjust some language in the order, moot the overturning, test it in a friendlier court, and get the victory after a month delay — a delay which he can now vividly characterize as the judiciary’s attempt to undermine not merely sensible immigration policy but national security itself.
More important, however, is to guard against precipitate demoralization upon every “news” event that isn’t an instant and obvious win. It’s like battered-wife syndrome, flinching every time your abuser scratches his shoulder. Go watch The Burning Bed to remind yourself what Trump is doing to the media and its addict-promulgators.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Maybe its not just up to Trump. The people have to do their bit too. The guy has taken on the media, cia, courts, neocons, academia and foreign leaders by himself. Its time the movement he keeps talking about starts to move. Some of these judges should be looking over their shoulders at night.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Visits from Dr. Tarr and Prof. Pheather are long overdue.
LikeLiked by 1 person
9th circuit decision was treason.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anyone “slightly” annoyed at Trump for dropping the ball on his most important overall decision – choosing SCOTUS nominee?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. Trump needs to make him withdraw from consideration, or withdraw the appointment.
LikeLike
Some are claiming Gorsuch’s statement was just a distraction bone thrown to the opposition to help smooth over his confirmation.
I hope they’re right.
LikeLike
so much trouble for Trump nominees, yet Ruth Bader Ginsburg was confirmed after she advocated lowering the age of consent to 12.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good grief. Panic in the foxhole at every untoward sound. Stop wetting yourselves or vacate to a rear position.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I’m ready.
LikeLike
Gorsuch did his doctoral dissertation at Oxford under the conservative and Christian legal philosopher John Finnis. The two are, or at least were, very close and reported very positively about each other. I think we should give Gorsuch some credit, a man’s friendships say a lot about his character.
An excerpt of one of Finnis’ articles (mind, this is peer-reviewed SCIENCE!)
“…a nation whose liberty minded citizens have largely given up procreating–or rather, bearing-children at a rate consistent with their community’s medium-term survival, and whose law, considered in its much-obscured implications, marks out for them a path towards, first the loss of national self-determination;” and then their own replacement, as a people, by other peoples, more or less regardless of the incomers’ compatibility of psychology, culture, religion or political ideas and ambitions, or the worth or viciousness of those ideas and ambitions; and finally to the ruinous loss of most or much that Hart worked for, or took for granted, as precious.” — John Finnis; a beacon of truth in the peer reviewed world.
Unless Gorsuch betrays his mentor he should be trustworthy.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Gorsuch is fine for the job for which he has been designated — and only the job. He sucks at politics.
I’ve long said that if we ever get another Souter (or Warren or Brennan or Blackmun or Stevens or even an O’Connor or Kennedy), then it is open war on the Third Branch, complete with impeachments, jurisdictional curtailments, and congressional restructurings. The rumblings of which we are seeing in microcosm with the Ninth Circunt overreach.
But we haven’t had a turncoat since Souter, and that was nearly 30 years ago. Ever since The Borking of Bork and Thomas, we have slowly learned how to slip past the nomination process traps, which Gorsuch’s perhaps deliberate “gaffe” is arguably an instance of. And ever since the Souter cipher, we have learned how to vet nominees properly — not with a “trust me, he’s one of us” backslap but rather via a paper trail of their judicial philosophy in action, which Gorsuch has in spades.
CJ Roberts, for all the shit he gets over the Obamacare rulings, has demonstrated he understands the threat of a politicized judiciary to its quasi-sovereign status among the balance of powers. In fact, his Obamacare concurrence is an example of restraint. From the opinion:
There is not a chance in hell he allows the highly-politicized Ninth Circus shenanigans to stand, even with the 4-4 split. There are many instances not just of USSC overturning the 9th, but of doing so unanimously when the reputation of the judiciary is at stake. Roberts has dedicated his leadership of the court to check itself before it wrecks itself. “[I]t’s [our] job to call balls and strikes and not to pitch or bat.” As the Chief Justice of the United States (not merely SCOTUS), he should be champing at the bit to take this case and demonstrate his bona fides once again against the imperial judiciary.
Matt
LikeLike
You’re having a good evening Matt (and I must say, I’m heartened by this vigorous Trumpenreich reckoning you’re building, essay by essay, with insight and enthusiasm); but Roberts, as was early pointed out by Ann Coulter and the late Larry Auster, is a very strange individual and, in my reckoning, a likely candidate in the dishonor rolls that own Princess Lindsey Graham and Timmy Kaine.
Besides his creepy-goofy demeanor and his flip-flop on Obamacare, we have the considerations that a) his children are adopted; b) he played Tinkerbell in the school play; and c) he posts selfies with his restaurant food.
Sounds like he’s into little caesars to me
LikeLike
Been trying to deprogram liberals. Putting aside Jews and minorities (special cases), I see 4 classifications of WHITE liberals. Many have qualities of more than one (status liberals can also be dreg or empathy liberals), but there is usually a dominant classification that you can focus on.
Status Liberals – They want the most status for the least cost, which is very psychologically exploitable. They’ve been convinced through a rigorous propaganda campaign at schools, work, advertising, movies, etc. that being a liberal is high status and noticing differences between races is low status. Easy choice for them… just be a liberal and presto… you are now high status. These people can be smart and successful… but they are never as smart as they think they are.
How to turn them: Forget facts. They need to be convinced liberals are low status. Without taking over Hollywood its impossible to do this alone, these people are heavily warped. But you can do it on a micro scale. Press the buttons. Liberals = losers, over and over again. Remember, they think they are above manipulation, so the more subtle you are the better (thats how the other side brainwashed them in the first place.)
Dreg Liberals – Rejects of society who would be crushingly low status under a traditional, fact-based societal order. So they turn to lies of liberalism to lower the psychological cost of how unworthy they are.
How to turn them: You can’t. If you were able to successfully convince them of facts, the hit to their ego would be so big they might off themselves. If you get them to admit a fact that counters liberalism, they will have amnesia about it the next time you talk to them. Just avoid them. (This means unfortunately lotta women are hopeless and can’t be converted away from the liberal cult. Excessive cock mileage makes budging from feminism psychologically impossible for them.)
Empathy Liberals – Usually young daddysrich white women who have lotsa empathy to give due to their station in life. Has been manipulated their entire life into directing their empathy towards groups of people with no civilizational value.
How to turn them: Visual evidence of anti-white crime. Show them how Islam treats women. A white female Trump voter got pepper sprayed by antifa? Bookmark it and show it to empathy liberals. A true empathy liberal is the easiest to turn but they are rare. Scratch what you think is an Empathy Liberal and you usually find a Status Liberal or slut Dreg Liberal underneath.
Blissful Ignorance Liberals – These are usually young. normal, sane Fucking White Males with slightly above average IQ.This is your classic liberal-who-turns-conservative later in life. Taught liberal crap and only become conservative later in life when they see the taxes in their paycheck, or when they try to start a business and get crushed by regulations, or when they get mugged, or when their daughter looks at a black guy.
How to turn them: Like I said, with the right impetus they’d eventually slide towards shitlord. Your job is to speed it up and take them deeper than they’d ever go. Burst their bubble. Red pill them hard. Visuals are best. These are your best hope for real recruits to our side. Be prepared with status visuals, too.
LikeLiked by 4 people
The only ones we need to turn are the 7+ girls.
All others will either follow or not matter.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wrong.
http://www.thisblogisdangerous.com/we-do-not-debate-with-the-left/
LikeLike
Persuasion — or to put it in game terms, seduction — has nothing to do with debate.
LikeLike
Cool blog post, but in real life talking to liberals is sometimes unavoidable.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Empathy Liberals -If you tear up a young daddysrich white woman’s twat, so good that the eyes roll back into her head, you can convert her to any religion/ideology you want. Especially if she wants your babies.
Dreg Liberals -these are pump and dump bitches. Never get her pregnant. She’s not relationship material.
LikeLike
The thing you see with shitlibs over and over again is that whatever it is they want, they want it now and they never care how they get it. Small matter what is destroyed and left in smoldering ruins if they can get some good virtue signalling out of it. Hence the corruption of the judiciary. What’s to understand? POTUS has exclusive control over foreign policy, PERIOD. He is also clearly invoking a 65 year old statute which could not be more clearly stated, and absolute. So for all the crocodile tears of ‘raciss-mo’, if any single one of the so-called reality based community could demonstrate the initiative to actually read the law, even that is not a legitimate threshold to stay the decision. The law is there in black and white, if you cannot understand what it says you’re not capable of participating in the discussion in the first place. They regulate and resort to law fare because they know their slimy Soros’ bought bullshit won’t fly with the population. Just like the degenerate fucking Bolsheviks, they are a loud minority that proclaims they speak for all based on volume alone. The Hell with the lot of them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
> “whatever it is they want, they want it now and they never care how they get it. Small matter what is destroyed and left in smoldering ruins” == PSYCHOPATHY
LikeLike
Solution: take every illegal alien arrested whose country won’t take them back and relocate them to Washington and the 9th Circuit. Prohibit their travel to other states.
LikeLike
Better solution. Build one of those circus cannons. Mount it on a frigate. Go to the coast of their country (or the closest coast).
Fire them out of it onto the shore.
Now you’ve been deported, bitch.
LikeLiked by 1 person
just place the imported ferrals’ feeding troughs near that courthouse.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Re-posting this from a previous comment::
This case is a win/win for Trump. If he wins the case, he wins. But even better, if he loses the case he is now fully loaded with all the ammo he needs to:
1. Introduce and push a bill through Congress removing Federal Court’s subject matter jurisdiction over immigration law cases. This would be a massive win for Trump and a major shot across the bow to a judiciary desperately in need of a smackdown.
2. Go nuclear on the Gorsuch nomination.
3. Push Cotton’s immigration bill through Congress.
His decision to read the plain language of the statute was masterful.
Trump is playing 3D chess here, while the Democrats are losing at tic-tac-toe.
LikeLike
Bro the democrats are playing connect 4.
LikeLike
Nah man, ball in a cup and this time, they’re almost close getting that damn ball in there.
LikeLike
Theyre playing solitaire with uno cards. Lolz.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Curious if anyone has picked up on the exploitability of the following yet:
Hillary says “They have to go back”.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2660756/Send-Hillary-says-wave-illegal-immigrant-children-reunited-families.html#ixzz34x4bO5wm
LikeLike
Maybe Trump said, “Hey bitch, you work for me now, or we will get a meeting set up between you and my FBI, and I will release a few videos of you sampling some pizzas.”
LikeLike
CH just noticed Twatter censored/suspended your account again.
#hatefacts
LikeLike
Shoahed again. (To the tune of Supertramp’s “It’s Raining Again.”)
LikeLike
LikeLike
‘The traitors who sit on the 9th Circuit of Hell (headquarters: San Francisco, CA) essentially ruled that the President and the Executive Branch have no discretion to set the nation’s immigration policies.’
They seem to be a couple of decades late in figuring this out. Such convenient timing.
LikeLike
hah!
LikeLike
Congress needs to get some balls. One of the members should propose a bill similar to the 1924 Johnson-Reed Act, which barred a lot of undesirable people from a lot of undesirable countries. It was undone by the awful Hart-Cellar Act of 1965, but there is no reason a new bill couldn’t be proposed — esp. with a Republican majority.
One of the things Johnson-Reed did was stop the influx of Italians. Sure, it’s amusing now to watch all the Hollywood films about the Mafia, but think about how awful the country must have looked to citizens who grew up in 1890s rural farmerica, only to find their country had turned to Gangsterland by 1925.
The kicker: I’m saying this as a descendant of those very Italians. The country did not need more than 2 percent of us, just like it doesn’t need more than that of anyone else. America is Richie Cunningham, not the Fonz.
LikeLike
The drollometer reads 8.5
LikeLike
“The drollometer reads 8.5”
the clutter-up-the-comments-section-with-lazy, 2D, superfluous, gratuitous, masturbatory-opinions-that-add-nothing-ometer is redlining.
LikeLike
streetsweeper with a hard right hook.
LikeLike
streetsweeper ever with the projection. I bet you and WSoH high-fived in your JIDF cubes.
LikeLike
Imagine that… dweepstreep sniffing my farts again… and WrongKike high-fiving him over the cubicle for it..
Yids of a feather, flocking together, go figger.
You boys calm down now, or we’ll have to separate your workstations.
LikeLike
Heh, heh… sez the lackey who just sent the dial spinning off’n the try-hard-ometer.
LikeLike
streetsweeper is the only SS I can get down with.
LikeLike
He just comes out of nowhere and cleans Greg’s clock.
WOW!
LikeLike
“the only SS I can get down with”
LikeLiked by 2 people
The try-hard-ometer already broke, Schlomo…
… clean my clock? One letter too many in that last word.
LikeLike
Sun’s down now, muh hebes. Yossi Cohen paying y’all overtime to break the Sabbath?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol the faggot Jew took streetsleeper’s side
LikeLike
I know for a fact that dweebstreep is someone’s sock puppy…
… maybe the faggot Jew’s?
LikeLike
What?
I’ve never sockpuppeted in my life.
LikeLike
You queer, you self-admitted to being that DivineKike clown act last month.
And now you rah-rah another sock puppy, allegedly not you, on something that wasn’t even close to a sharp rejoinder.
Clear out already… you’re stinkin’ up the joint.
LikeLike
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2016/10/07/hillary-slut-shames-trumps-past-lovers/#comment-804698
LikeLike
How could Divine Son of Kek be a sockpuppet when I made it clear from the outset that we were the same person, idiot?
Look back at articles from early October.
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2016/10/07/hillary-slut-shames-trumps-past-lovers/
You people…
LikeLike
How could Divine Son of Kek be a sockpuppet when I made it clear from the outset that we were the same person, idiot?
Look back at articles from early October.
LikeLike
reading these spats every thread
LikeLike
Lying prick, you didn’t admit it until you were called on it, and then acted all contrite… but now you’re back to your ol’ squid inking (((self))), I see.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
Never fear, for we’ve got Bronze Age Pervert on our side and he’ll personally demolish the 9th Circus
Damn this is too funny not to share.
http://www.unz.com/isteve/the-atlantic-monthly-on-bronzeagepervs-role-in-trump-administration/
LikeLike
Fuck WordPress mod
And FUCK THE JEW.
WE KNOW WHAT YOURE DOING.
LikeLike
Winning?
LikeLike
Wrong side you stupid arrogant fuck.
You always go too far.
Best case scenario for the tribe is pogrom.
LikeLike
Trump won the election you sniveling rat faced monkey ear fish lipped little pencil armed bitch.
And still your entire tribe is oblivious and unable, apparently, to sense what is coming.
You see us here? We represent 1 % of the wrath your tribe has earned.
LikeLiked by 1 person
chill bro
LikeLike
whoa
chill bro
LikeLike
Shit. The Jews side with globalism, because they think it gives them the best chance of survival (untrue, btw). But nobody wants that Jew ass around. The worst that could happen is Sharia Law in the USA. Hey at least we can have as many wives as we want then. And the Jew would be out of here for good. Your only chance of survival into the next oh 40 or so years, and I think I am being generous with that, is to blend in and adapt. Not even globalism will save you. Hahahahahahah!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Option 1 is the best. Go nuclear. He can use the deportation protest in Airzona as a cause to clamp down. Declare anyone that knowingly aides and abets an illegal a traitor of the United States.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“The judiciary is corrupt. The shitlib-infested courts are black robed enforcers and propagandists of Democreep legislation and Democreep executive orders, and act as a “check” only on conservative legislation or Republican President EOs.”
This is the picture of judiciary-executive relations in every Western country.
Not easy to explain why, but that is how it is.
LikeLike
Pizza-gate-derived files!
LikeLike
#4 Trump calls their bluff and brings in million of muslim refugees unvetted. Libs cannot push back. .Isis bombs liberal cities killing thousands….
Karma is a bitch
LikeLiked by 1 person
If Trump signs an EO that requires refugees be housed in blue states — strike that, blue COUNTIES of blue states, since the shitlibs seem to like dumping their criminals and ne’er-do-wells in the GOP-voting sections of whatever jurisdictions they run — top kek.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha ha yes! I think the Cunt only won 52 counties or something like that.
LikeLike
I love this idea. I will give you one better: House them in bastions where the wealthiest and most untouchable f*cks live….like Martha’s Vineyard, Downtown San Fransicko (in the buttf*cker districts!), etc. Let’s see them posture and preen when their house values drop 50%, rapes and other crimes increase 1,000%, and faggots start ending up dead in parks and back allies. Hmmmmm….precious.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Trump needs to beat them down, and beat them down hard! Don’t bring a knife to a gun fight, faggots. I’m the President now, and you WILL feel my wrath!
LikeLike
When dealing with an enemy like this (power, wealth, influence, control), the worst thing he could do is be predictable. In a fight, and this is a fight, a good offense always beats a good defense. Only one has the chance of eventually winning.
LikeLike
This fight will determine whether the white race will live on or disappear from earth. The disappearance of the whites comes automatically with slavery and tyranny for all other races, since it is either their normal state of governance or the collective ant mentality and the lack of creativity will make it almost impossible to break free.
LikeLiked by 1 person
this would be a supreme cosmic execution of almost unimaginable flip-the-script shitlordery.
LikeLike
#5 Trump orders all Jews out of the country by 4 PM next Friday.
LikeLike
I would go with ISIS over the Left at this point.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think Trump’s big mistake was not telling the judge to go shove it as he (the judge) has no Constitutional basis for making such a ruling.
LikeLike
It would have been nice to see feds escort the judge from his chambers for treason… and then let HIM fight it out in the courts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I bet that option is on the table for Trump. This shit really started under LBJ, pushing his unconstitutional New Deal laws…which ushered in Socialism to the USA. It really got ramped up in the early days of the Civil Rights movement, where the ‘Supreme’ Court first starting using the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution as a justification to support anti-discrimination laws (which the US Government had NO legal basis to do under the Constitution…which provided instead for freedom of association, which means freedom FROM association, too), saying that discrimination in public facilities impeded interstate commerce because travelling negroes could not eat in Whites-Only establishments, etc., etc. Total bullshit. People now just accept all of this, as if the Constitution actually says discrimination against blacks, or anyone else, is wrong. It does NOT. And Due Process only demands that you treat people similarly situated the same IN THE EYES OF THE LAW (NOT socially), so that, for example, if a black person and a White person both spit on the sidewalk, the fine should be same for each, regardless of race. You get the point. Anyhow, liberals today believe in the idea that the Constitution is a LIVING document…which means they do not have to bother to go the tedious route of amending it, instead they will just interpret it as they see fit to serve their ends, and get their buds on the Supreme Court who will see it that way, too.
LikeLiked by 2 people
^^^I meant FDR, not LBJ, in regards to the New Deal. I hate them both though, in their own way.
LikeLike
patience, loser, has Trump failed you yet? how much winning has he already delivered, in these measly 20 months?
we would have been happy with 70% of what he promised, and would have grumblingly accepted 40%.
but Trumpfuhrer, ye of little faith, is focused on delivering 100% of each and every of his promises.
to the last one.
P.S. The Trumpfuhrer has placed the portrait of the one who has said “Judge Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it.” behind his desk in the Huwhyte House.
how dense can you be?
LikeLike
Friends, ye fret without need, Big T had this won before the Judge’s ink was dry and he doesn’t need to do a damn thing.
The first Consular or State Department official violating the EO goes under the microscope. If he/she is acting in good faith, the immigration case goes to court. If he/she is deemed *not* acting in good faith, then the officer’s summary dismissal goes to court. Either way, the facts come to judicial review.
LikeLike
Assuming you have a wise, just King who wants to do right by his people and his country, monarchy is definitely superior to democracy.
The King says, “No Afroasian immiogrants.” and the borders close.
A judge says,”bu…bu…bu…RAYCISM!!!!??” and the King says,”Off to the dungeon with this fool.”
LikeLike
I have these thought myself. Democracies are for idiots really. Kings rule over people who are similar for the most part, but the Romans even did things better than America currently.
LikeLike
Cosign.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
#3 is out of the question so long as Congress is infested with traitorous moles for the Left (aka, Cuckservatives) like John McCain, Paul Ryan, et al.
I thought about this, and gave consideration to the following:
1. Use a straw man to file suit against new EOs in conservative forums (that is, after all, what the Left is doing – forum shopping), and get a positive ruling in order to proceed. However, this is playing by (((their))) rules and would be a long, drawn out process. Also, it most likely would be an actionable ethics violation against the AG and possibly a grounds (as if they need any) to try to impeach Trump if this ruse is uncovered. Unfortunately, the Left is allowed to forum shop to attach EOs and legislation, but the government is not allowed to proactively do the same.
2. Have a press conference and say, “I tried to be a little compassionate, as some have advise me to do, and only deport illegal aliens and those who have overstayed their visas, focusing on those who have committed felonies and serious misdemeanors, or otherwise present a danger to society (like gang members). But….sadly….I see that there is no working with the entrenched Left who do not have the best interests of this Nation and its citizens at heart. Many of these people sit in black robes in blue states, or are State Attorney Generals. I am scrapping that idea, and ordering 10,000 more ICE employees, and will be deporting all here illegally. I am also ordering that no more funding go to any state, especially California, that have ANY sanctuary cities or provide any legal standing to illegals (including driver’s licenses). I am also halting, indefinitely, the issuance of any NEW visas to any of the mentioned 7 nations.
3. Gut the Department of (mis)Education. Fire them all except for those few loyal to the cause, and to turn the lights off and on at HQ.
4. Withdraw all foreign aid to ALL nations, including Israel. How’s THAT for nondiscrimination (sorry, Jews, but you asked for it!).
5. Make PUBLIC arrests of top executives of corporations that have clearly and callously been flaunting US laws by hiring illegals.
6. Go on the warpath against Mark Fuckerfag.
7. Declare George Soros an Enemy of the State, and Persona Non Grata, for his clear financial and logistical support to the rioters for the past umpteen years. Forbid him to enter the USA or any US Territory under threat of arrest and imprisonment.
That’s just a start. God, I wish I were on his Cabinet!!!
LikeLike
Keep attacking CA, and maybe it will eventually move to secede from the Union. Then, let it!
LikeLike
Although I do believe that Northern, CA (north of the c*cksuckers in Sacramento and SF) should remain in the union as New California. Southern CA can be the Socialist Republic of Diversity, as far as I am concerned. When they eat each other up, we can plow if over and start afresh.
LikeLiked by 2 people
CA is on it. Moonbat sister in law out there is giddy about it. She says the state has plenty of room and will take all who want to go there. Told her we will just wrap the wall up around CA. Funny thing is all the Calexiters think if it happened they would get dual citizenship. Uh no, and no visas either. Retards.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What are they going to drink ?
Almost their entire fresh water supply comes from Nevada.
LikeLike
@wolf…No.
SoCA get its water from the ENTIRE Colorado River basin.
Turn off the CO-to-CA aqueducts (NV’s Boulder Dam, etc.) & SoCA DIES (& quickly, too!)!
GOOD times!
LikeLike
Both a Dune and Blade Runner reference in one post. Well done.
LikeLike
“South African President Jacob Zuma pledged Thursday to break up white ownership of business and land to reduce inequality, in a State of the Nation address disrupted by a fistfight, walkouts and a release of pepper spray in the parliamentary chamber.
“Misrule. Corruption. Violence. Poverty. Decline. Black Supremacy. These are the fruits of the “Rainbow Nation.” The fake news Lügenpresse doesn’t talk much about South Africa these days”
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2017/02/10/activism-contact-your-us-representative-and-senator-to-urge-them-to-support-economic-sanctions-on-south-africa/
LikeLiked by 1 person
The funny thing about this is that the vast majority of blacks in South Africa are immigrants from central Africa or their progeny.
The whites got there before they did, made the place habitable,and then the human flies descended on the picnic.
No need to mention the role of our ever-present friends in creating that entire shitshow. That goes without saying.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yes, (((they))) made sure to protect their diamond mind interests down there. Don’t see the Spearchucker-in-Charge dare touching that! No, he steals the land and businesses of the Boars, instead. I bet (((they))) are behind that, too, as a way to have the blacks steal land and businesses that they want, and buy them from the blacks for 1/10 their value.
LikeLike
lolzz….I meant “Boers”, not boars!!
“Nobody taking sh*t from me, bro!”
LikeLiked by 1 person
so it is, cracker. just remember
“when you let one of these least of mine starve, you let Me starve.”
Even Stalin sent the infant children of his enemies to orphanages. It took anglosaxons to implement starvation of infants as a tool of war.
and then you have the effrontery to blame (frontrunners)) for it. you are a liar, cracker, like your father. You WILL get your just rewards.
LikeLike
LikeLike
blaming ((frontrunners) for your sins is not true repentance, cracker
you’ll get what is coming to you (we all will).
Lord Have Mercy!
LikeLike
y’all try leave that one turd in the ((frontrunners))’ lap
Sad!
LikeLike
when you lie like that you make Lizzie van Zyl very sad,
and it is better to tie a millstone one’s gullet and throw him in the Atlantic than make Lizzie sad
so I’ve been told
LikeLike
oink, for a papist, you seem to always manfully deflect any close looks at the Christ killers…
… tell us, once and for all… why is that?
LikeLike
it is held by my elders that had Adam repented and asked for forgiveness instead of trying the known song and dance, we’d still be in Paradise.
also the beam and the mote. also personal background.
Also 88rs (I dont mean those woke to JQ) are idiots. JQ is real; but minor. Now if 88larping does attack those behind the courtain, go ahead. Also historically, Schlomo the scrap iron peddler gets it good while party honchos and the Lazaire Freres et Co sail to another shore.
LikeLike
PS.
As I said it before, the Christ killer is me; my sins alone hold Him to the Cross
LikeLike
Because he’s capable of nuance, dipshit.
LikeLike
And once again, the fag kike has to bring his own dictionary to the table in order to attempt debate with men.
“Nuance” would be if the shilling WASN’T starting to get obvious, kike. Try “dichotomy” or “suspicious” instead.
Better yet STFU and speak when you’re spoken to… and don’t hold your breath waiting to be addressed.
Or is oink one of your sock puppies as well? If so, you might warrant SOME congratulations for the sustained ruse.
LikeLike
so they finally killed your Twitter account. A damn shame
LikeLike
Like Shakespeare said, “First kill all the lawyers.” Lawyers don’t make law, they practice to break it for a price. This “law” won’t get more broken then it is now. Equality is just another lie. Double standards and favoritism is the Modus Operandi of the enemy. They use weasel words like fairness, but they block all Whites and surround themselves with dumber to follow their dumb. Make no mistake, they don’t break things by plan, they break them by stupidity. They offshore blame to others, but dumb is all they do. When the Civil Rights sham was passed it was by definition unconstitutional. That bullshit about fairness and equality is what the Lugenpresse was peddling. The language in the Act of Hate by our enemies leaves little doubt. It establishes “protected classes” that get more protections and by design attacks White people. Its not accidental. Words and lies is ALL (((THEY))) have. You will not sway this low-brow leech with words. Words for them are weapons, not an argument. Real weapons and those alone will cause this damned failed race of parasites to release their grip, and CUT & RUN. Its a pattern.
LikeLike
This.
LikeLike
You might want to read that quote in context.
LikeLike
Would it be legal for Trump to pass an EO that says: any state has the right to refuse refugees and immigrants? This would require these immigrants to have state permission to enter, not just federal. Then, if any libtard states like California bitch about it, they would have no jurisdiction over Texas, and also sets them up to say, “ok fine, we will take your refugees, or be hypocrites” This also sets the stage to give power back to the states fir future hot topics, and fill the libstates with exactly what they want: white genocide.
LikeLike
Executive Orders are not law. They are policy directives to federal public servants, who can refuse compliance if they contravene public law. The promises Trump makes are with the implicit assistance of the Republican Legislature.
And no, states cannot refuse entry to federally admitted refugees and immigrants. Where states can exert pressure is areas such as housing, welfare and policing,.
LikeLike
Missouri has very few illegals due to harsh laws concerning their treatment, e.g. police officers required to check legal status etc in interactions
LikeLike
https://www.channel4.com/news/ann-coulter-on-trump
Typical butthurt indian prick. The way he throws Bowling Green at her and ignores her facts. You have to go back Sanjay.
I love Ann Coulter btw.
LikeLike
AC has been trolling the left since I was in high school. She’s the orginal troll.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m ready to say Fuck this Constitutional bullshit. And get it on in the streets.
LikeLike
After witnessing what happened to Milo at UC Berkeley, I agree. I’d previously made a comment on this blog to the opposite of that effect, when I learned conservatives were tearing down antifa posters.
But Berkeley changed my mind. The left is shutting down speech with mob rule. This is now requires more than a “war of ideas.” This battle can’t be fought with words.
I’m an old-school journalist and big-time free speech advocate who studied Mario Savio in college. So for me to say this, things really have to be far gone. They are. What’s going on now with the regressive left can’t be allowed to run amok or it will run over us all — and we’ll end up like the countries we fear and despise.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Words words words. All we have is words on the right. The left don’t give a shit how stupid they words sound. But they will fuck you up when they get a chance. Time to fuck their shit up for a change. They you all can go back to your words words words.
LikeLike
but under what banner we fight? they fight under Satan’s (most patently)
are we fighting under God’s? What God? Is our God greater than their God?
LikeLike
plant lol
really though words matter obviously
LikeLike
but yea go to where the backpack dudes with hats are and prob be fun
LikeLike
Just been restless lately. Don’t know what it is wrong with me. Need to find a space of quiet to relax my mind. Or maybe seeing truths for the first time is doing something to me that I don’t understand. Or maybe I am not as crazy as I think?
LikeLike
Any sentient human could have foreseen the 9th would uphold the ban. The spurious conferring of “Due Process” Rights to non-citizens is a real kicker. Especially since these Lib’s are the same people who blithely looked in the other direction when Anwar al-Awlaki was denied his 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and 14th Amendment Rights as an ACTUAL citizen.
Then again….as the meme said: “I never thought war was cool until Obama did it”
Trump can “Obama” the courts and just totally disregard their ruling on his EO.
Trump can re-write the EO into a series of smaller more detailed EO’s.
Trump can wait til Gorsuch and SCOTUS it.
No matter what, Trump needs to exert primacy in this otherwise precedent is set and for the next 4-7 years EVERYTHING will go to court…which is increasingly looking the case anyway.
MAGA
LikeLike
This is the solution:
LikeLike
Gingrich is an asshole as they come yet I wish Trump would have
at least some of his eloquence
While some may argue that the essence of the message is that what counts I believe when trying to sway multitudes the form is often as important as substance
LikeLike
Famous maxim: “They won’t remember what you said, they’ll only remember how you made ’em feel.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why was convicted sex offender Brian Lee Golsby set free? Whatever the reason, he’s the one who killed the Ohio State co-ed Reagan Tokes. From the police reports, looks like there was some torture involved. Since this is black-on-white, I assume it’ll be “disappeared” from the (((news))) pretty quickly.
LikeLike
arraignment is Monday. How can he be set free, unless policemen mistook him for the one they really wanted to arrest.
She was graduating in ((psychology)), and making ends meet by doing night shifts at the seedy bar
Fathers, don’t let your daughters graduate in ((psychology))
and if they must be “strong and independent” teach them how to shoot and carry concealed and give them a 9 mm automatic
LikeLike
Need to sue those 3 judges asses for treason against country. Hope AG Sessions can do it.
LikeLike
Need to sue those 3 judges asses asap. Hope AG Sessions can do it.
LikeLike
A popular movement which lost the popular vote then annointed by the Republic only to go to war with the Republic in the name of popular democracy. What a headfuck.
LikeLike
@wolfie65,
“For those of you who would like to know more about the background of the Bosnian/Balkan issues, here’s a few key words:
Suleiman the Magnificent
John Hunyadi
Kosovo
Field of the Blackbirds
Mohacs”
I’ve been reading about this conflict yesterday and what lies were told to justify NATO’s bombing campaign of Serbia. Despicable what the western powers did against a nation trying to prevent islamic cancer from spreading.
LikeLike