Reader irksome1 suggests a universally-applicable cousin to the Birthday Cat emoji sabotage of grandiose female self-perception.
CH, I came up with a troll so simple, so powerful, it’s like a cold fusion briefcase nuke. It works as a comment on posts of nearly any topic (or as a responsive text, perhaps), due to its perfect simplicity. It doesn’t matter if it’s some retarded political post, party selfies, pictures of her dinner, or whatever pop cult degeneracy she idly finds entertaining. It is best when the posts aims to be ~empowering~ to women sorts of agitprop. The comment is:
“ASKING FOR IT”
I like it. It’s sufficiently ambiguous — “asking for what?”, she wonders — yet pointedly provocative — “who does this badboy think he’s talking to!”, she tingles — that it will spur additional inquiries from the woman so addressed. Additional inquiries that could lead to nutritional intrusions.
Another ambiguously graphical emoji I’ve lately been sending to ladies is this one:
Like Birthday Cat, it’s an all-purpose response to just about anything a girl texts or posts. She yaps about Trump, or TweeVee, or fashion, or my reticence to indulge her with immediate and glowing respectful appraisals of her awesomeness, I pass along this graphic illustrating the ideal womanly “swayback” that maximally arouses men…..and she’s left in the defensive crouch, furiously hamstering what it could mean and feeling just the right amount of unease that the pic has something to say about her own sexual worth.
Meme magic is real, and it’ll get you erected just as it got Trump elected.
I like it. I’m going to try “Asking for it” today.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Beauty, simplicity, and elegance in 3 simple words.
LikeLike
“ASKING FOR IT”
LikeLike
Point being that if you start throwing out shiznat like “ASKING FOR IT”, then you better be able to deliver.
LikeLiked by 2 people
also good for shits n giggles:
‘trump will fix it’
LikeLike
LikeLike
That swayback meme is hilarious.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pat Buchanan on fire
http://www.vdare.com/articles/pat-buchanan-trump-must-break-judicial-power
“That a district judge would overrule the president of the United States on a matter of border security in wartime is absurd.”
LikeLike
“When politicians don black robes and seize powers they do not have, they should be called out for what they are–usurpers and petty tyrants.”
LikeLike
I was late to the party on the civil war 2.0 post but one area where the left is killing us is unity. The left has drawn very clear battle lines: for them it is everyone who opposes Trump vs everyone who supports him. This maximises their recruitment pool and results in prima facie absurd alliances between feminists and islamists, or anarchists and communists.
In contrast, the right (in this case meaning everyone supporting Trump) is splintered big league on the issues of who the enemy is and what should be done with them in the event of a civil war victory. For simplicity and brevity, 3 broad groups can be established although many more subgroups exist.
There are the alt-light Milo fans. They think the enemy is simply political correctness. They think everything will be OK if they can just get rid of feminism and Islam. They support Milo’s gay miscegenation degeneracy. Most buy into the ‘it’s a question of culture not race’ schtick, therefore are not race realists.
There are the merciful white nationalist types who want their white country back but would rather do it by deporting instead of killing non whites. I believe this is Richard Spencer’s general position but perhaps someone will correct me on that. Obviously race realists to an extent but most don’t seem to be Skype aware(?).
Then there are the ‘Hans, get the gas’ types. This group is primarily concerned with the (((underlying cause))) of the problems the other groups claim to oppose: political correctness, feminism, non white immigration, islamification etc. Their main end goal is eradicating Skype influence; anything else is merely foreplay resulting in existential blueballs.
The differences between these groups are extremely pronounced and would surely prevent a sort of national coalition of all Trump supporters in a civil war scenario when you have one group who just want to ban Gender Studies degrees then go home and watch trap pr0n, another who fancifully hope to either deport or subjugate non whites but without much violence, and another group who want to fire up the ovens and crack open the Zyklon B.
Even between Chateau dwellers there are chasms of difference on some issues which seem irreconcilable at times. Some would be satisfied if all Skypes just buggered off to their desert homeland and then all ties were severed with Israel forever, whereas others will accept nothing less than 6 gorillion freshly made lampshades. Some are willing to tolerate gays as long as they keep their degeneracy entirely private, STFU and stop foisting their ‘rights’ and agenda on everyone else, whereas others would see homosexuality wiped from the gene pool. Some are indifferent to the religious beliefs of their fellow shitlord as long as they agree on the essentials, whereas others will deem that if you’re on the same page on every issue but you criticise Christianity as a worthless myth then you may as well be George Soros himself.
Such differences of opinion are inevitable because everyone on the right got here BT critical thinking as we are not a hivemind like the left. But severe ideological differences could be a big problem and there doesn’t seem to be an easy solution. The simplest solution would be to black pill everybody in the other groups but that simply isn’t realistic. Most people won’t even accept the red pill and the black pill is much harder to swallow than that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Let the Left do the job of pushing us together. After 18 glorious months, bickering was inevitable in the last 6 weeks of 2016. But only 6 weeks later we have to ask ourselves, ‘why did we bother trying to shame Milo and Gavin for Liteness when the Left would be rioting over them before we knew it?’
LikeLiked by 1 person
From what I’ve seen, there are a lot of rather hot college girls at Milo events, so he’s doing a good job.
Sure, he’s not the ideal spokesperson, but neither are Geert Wilders (NL), Frauke Petry (D) or Marine Le Pen (F).
They do, however, provide a necessary bridge back to normality for the huddled masses who, after several generations of anti-everything-good propaganda are not quite ready to go full-on Viking berserker.
And I definitely agree that we need to quit savaging each other over minor quibbles
Example: Some think the Iranians are ok because they were very distantly related to the Europeans a few tens of thousands of years ago.
I think they’re the same scum as the rest of the ME, related doesn’t automatically mean ‘good’,.
No worries, let’s ban ISIS first, then proceed from there.
One step at a time.
LikeLike
“And I definitely agree that we need to quit savaging each other over minor quibbles”
My pessimistic nature informs me that whites will destroy each other and the whole race will go extinct because we fight over minor quibbles. What will remain of whites will be tiny New Zealand and a tiny province of Argentina.
Even if Le Pen, Petry, Wilders get elected to the top positions tomorrow, there will be another ridiculous war between France and Germany or between Italy and Britain. I’m not aware of any civilization that has ‘recovered’ from the historical low birth rates. We are DOOMED.
LikeLike
Excellent points. But keep in mind we all rallied around Trump as one.
Knowing the truth, and disagreeing about various aspects of it (greyish vs black pill), does not and I believe will not hinder us from rallying as one around any leader who has a legit shot at gaining real power and move laws/enforcement to the right.
The problem you’re describing (arguing about how harshly to treat the various parts of the enemy’s coalition) will only come into play when we have power over them, more than one true shitlord in power (Trump), and thus options.
Keep in mind, almost all these other people around Trump are just along for the ride, “less bad” people Trump has to work with cuz there is no one else. When we get a true shitlord coalition in power, then we argue. Til then we instinctively unite around our only option.
LikeLike
And in reply to tomjones’ pessimism, 3 things give me hope we won’t self-destruct: 1, internet makes info so easily available, including historical info, that chances are increased we’ll learn from past rather than repeat it. 2, whites are coming back from the brink of destruction and elimination. If/when we recover, we should naturally be more careful about killing each other off. 3, If/when we regain power, the class/caliber of shitlords that will have pulled it off and will be holding the reins of power will likely be wiser than any shitlords in Western history, due to having come back from the brink of losing it all, will have a greater appreciation for what is necessary to hold on to it so as not to repeat the same folly.
LikeLike
@ Tryintogetthrumod
True we did all rally around Trump. But you kind of hit upon my point. The divergence of opinion between the different right wing factions will only be a significant problem when we have more than one shitlord in a position of real power. But will we ever get enough shitlords in top positions when we cannot agree between us what kind of shitlord we want.
Milo types would never vote for a race realist like Richard Spencer or Andrew Anglin. Meanwhile Anglin fans would never vote for a jew like Milo. It’s akin to when you have too many political parties at one end of the spectrum that split the vote, allowing the one party at the other end of the spectrum to win with ease.
Hypothetically, we could end up with a Milo type, a Spencer type and an Anglin type lining up against a Hillary type. All manner of ideologically incompatible leftists would back Hillary while we split our majority into 3 pathetic minorities and get crushed.
LikeLike
Sold. I am a huge fan of any line that implies some kind of man handling. Disciplinary or otherwise.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Heartiste,
Any comment on the death of English courtesan Tara?
LikeLike
Women love drama. Create it and back it up.
LikeLike
That swayback chart could be the single finest text game component I’ve ever seen. Extraordinary. Even stillsingletho’s dude would slay with that.
LikeLiked by 1 person