Although the old trope of the undersexed husband has been around for ages, it wasn’t quite accurate, at least until recently. General Social Survey warriors like Audacious E had dug up data showing that married couples have more sex than singles. (Forgive me for not finding the relevant post, I’m a lazy SOB).
I can recall objecting to the GSS sex frequency data on the grounds that it exaggerates the sexual wantonness of married couples compared to singles because the population of singles includes all the no-sex, fap-happy incels dragging down the sex frequency average for their group. I suggested this asexual albatross would conceal the incredibly-high, curve-busting sex frequency rates of unmarried alpha male cads who are following the “girlfriend and fling” formula for happiness.
While I can’t at the moment recall any posts I may have written confirming with data any factual basis for my objection, I can report that a recent study, via our resident gold star artist Captain Obvious, finds that there was a decline in sexual frequency among married or cohabiting American adults from 1989-2014.
American adults had sex about nine fewer times per year in the early 2010s compared to the late 1990s in data from the nationally representative General Social Survey, N = 26,620, 1989–2014. This was partially due to the higher percentage of unpartnered individuals, who have sex less frequently on average. Sexual frequency declined among the partnered (married or living together) but stayed steady among the unpartnered, reducing the marital/partnered advantage for sexual frequency. Declines in sexual frequency were similar across gender, race, region, educational level, and work status and were largest among those in their 50s, those with school-age children, and those who did not watch pornography. In analyses separating the effects of age, time period, and cohort, the decline was primarily due to birth cohort (year of birth, also known as generation). With age and time period controlled, those born in the 1930s (Silent generation) had sex the most often, whereas those born in the 1990s (Millennials and iGen) had sex the least often. The decline was not linked to longer working hours or increased pornography use. Age had a strong effect on sexual frequency: Americans in their 20s had sex an average of about 80 times per year, compared to about 20 times per year for those in their 60s. The results suggest that Americans are having sex less frequently due to two primary factors: An increasing number of individuals without a steady or marital partner and a decline in sexual frequency among those with partners.
Regular guests of this brazen retreat won’t be surprised by the relative sexlessness of the Millennial generation, a screechy, androgynous, narcissistic generation which from nearly every vantage point appears to be the most useless lump of Americans to ever squib outta their mommas’ womb chutes.
Nor will readers be surprised by the finding that old farts who look like raisins with eyes have less sex than virile youts who can still flaunt their sexual dimorphism.
What’s interesting is mentioned in the last line: sex frequency is down over the period because there are more unpartnered people having no sex, and partnered couples are having less sex.
So….the incel demo is exploding. That would seem to confirm a CH observation of the sexual market; namely that the prolonged unmarried phase of courtship (aka the cock carousel) is supercharging female hypergamy. A lot of single in the city ladies are sharing HSMV men and leaving less charismatic beta males in the cold. That explains the male incels. The rise in female insols is explained by the concurrent rise in obesity (and aggro-feminism). Fat chicks and annoying chicks really do have less sex than slender, feminine babes, because men also exercise choice of mate.
The remaining mystery is why married and cohabiting sex frequency is decreasing. Captain Obvious writes,
Shitlib & Libertardian geeks and nerds at /. were sounding thoroughly Red-Pilled about this – talking about Phuckerbergbook, SSRIs, pr0n, the decline in earning power, an omnipresent sense of trepidation & cowardice & fear pervading much of the population, etc etc etc – and one dude even div0rced his wife over her iPhag Addiction: https://science.slashdot.org/story/17/03/07/2313232/americans-are-having-less-sex-than-20-years-ago-study-finds
Yes to all of that as causes for the sex frequency decline, but again I must humbly suggest that the primary causes are female obesity, female economic self-sufficiency, and the multigenerational drop in testosterone.
Female obesity: men are visually stimulated to bedroom action, and men really are disgusted by the sight of a female fatbody. Men, and especially White men with options, will fap to porn before bouncing dick-first into a fat chick’s belly brûlée. The obesity epidemic shows no signs of letting up, and that’s gotta have an effect on the national GCP (Gross Carnal Product).
Female economic self-sufficiency: women are aroused by powerful men with resources to spare on them, and they are turned off by powerless cash-strapped men. Women who are in less need of a man’s resources are also less sexually interested in men who don’t make substantially more than they make (or have other compensating traits). If husbands’ incomes have decreased relative to wives’ incomes, then there will be a shift toward wives desiring less sex from their husbands. It’s biomechanics all the way down.
Testosterone decline: this one is self-evident. Lower T means lower libido, for men but also for women. Since men are the initiators of sex (especially within the confines of a long term relationship), a low libido man will initiate less frequently, and his woman won’t take up the slack (women have a lot of pride about their ability to passively rouse their men to ardor, which is why they don’t like making the first move). If there’s lower T in women as well (a small amount of testosterone does affect female libido), then that would kill the passion just as quickly. Finally, low T men are just a plain turn-off to women. I have read studies which found women preferred the musky scent of sweaty shirts of men with high T.
All of this is leading to sex-starved husbands and the high divorce rate, because no matter how sacred your marital vows if hubby ain’t getting any his guilt about checking out of the marriage evaporates in a haze of 31 Redtube tabs.

LikeLike
From “SacredNaCl”, at Slashdot, who’s divorcing his w!fe over her iPhag Addiction:
“I blame the smart phone. I thought I had a great marriage right up until my w!fe got an Iphone. Now admittedly I do spend a little too much time with computers and music gear. So I wasn’t that worried about it when my w!fe first got her Iphone, but 6 months later I was genuinely lonely, felt ignored, felt like I could not a have a decent conversation with her… I try to have a conversation with her, she has to check this thing and wont give the courtesy of putting it away for all of it… we could be at an incredibly fancy restaurant sans kids and still has to whip this one… I have sex with her and 30 seconds later that blue light is on…
I even took the step of introducing a high voltage static discharge into her prior one. She simply bought another within hours. She is not a morning person, so to see her sprint up even before I did to rush out to the Apple store was disheartening. Coming up upon a decade and I decided to file for d!v0rce now rather than risk my retirement to it…”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Congrats to him for manning up.
LikeLike
reminds me of the 1991 movie by Win Wenders Until the End of the World. interesting film that foretold of technology addiction and even suggested a cure (lock her outside in a pen with just food and water for a month).
LikeLiked by 1 person
I feel like Luddism is about our only hope now. Cooking your own food from raw ingredients [i.e. no more prepared food]. Working outdoors: gardening [or small-scale farming], carpentry, stonemasonry, light forestry [clearing brush, cutting firewood], etc etc etc. And Homeschooling [obviously]. Finally, an ABSOLUTE BAN ON THE iPHAG is a necessary prerequisite for any m@rital courtship and discussion of Terms-of-M@rriage. If she won’t give up her iPhag for you, then move on. She’s not M0ther-of-your-Ch!ldren material.
I guess you could argue that The Perfect W0man wouldn’t even have an iPhag in the first place, because she would already be wise enough to see iPhag Addiction for what it is. But I doubt that The Perfect W0man exists.
PS: F@thers who care EXPLAIN ALL THIS SH!ZNAT to their d@ughters. Zero tolerance policy for iPhaggotry amongst your little gurlzzezes.
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLike
“I feel like Luddism is about our only hope now.”
interesting you should say that. also in the film, William Hurt’s character gets cured of his technology addiction by hanging out with some abos.
this is the frighteningly contextual and fluid nature of “survival of the fittest”. at some point extreme intelligence and curiosity becomes self-limiting, and the lowIQ troglodytes with innate immunity to fertility-freezing fads may truly inherit the earth. imagine that. 😬
LikeLike
Has anyone seen iPhag addiction on those “Alaska” reality shows [Alaskan Bush People, Railroad Alaska, Life Below Zero, etc]? Presumably they don’t have cellphone towers in the middle of nowhere, right? Watching the Alaskan shows is like going back in a time machine to circa the late Reagan Administration, before the deluge of technology started to destroy our lives.
LikeLike
> “the lowIQ troglodytes with innate immunity to fertility-freezing fads may truly inherit the earth. imagine that” ——— After I first saw Telnet/FTP switch over to HTTP in the mid-1990s, I started telling students that in 50 years, the Amish would be the only people who retained literacy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Also, the great thing about Luddism is that working outdoors, in the fresh air, moving lifting cutting placing destroying rebuilding sh!znat, totally exhausts you, slims you down, muscles you up, hardens you physically & mentally, and you wake up the next morning with renewed strength and greater “T” than ever before.
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLike
I strongly believe we should have quit while we were ahead, meaning stopping at the analog cell phone. (Those little Nokia bricks or Motorola flip phone allowed for texting but no more and got the job done just fine). We didn’t need anything more than that. I’m nostalgic for the time when you had to go home to check your emails. Constant internet is rotting our brains. It has ruined the print industry for example. Reading a newspaper or a big glossy magazine is way better than a glowing iPhag screen or tablet.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Wife has asked for a Smartphone. I refused, banned them in the house, and told her “we’ll get a divorce sooner than we’ll get a smartphone. We have laptops and a tablet, and that damn thing is bad enough.
Avoid a smartphone for yourself, or if you must for work it stays at work or locked up.
LikeLike
PD: HOLD YOUR GROUND. Never give an inch on it. For the next 50 years if necessary. Keep that poison out of your home. And tell her that if she sneaks behind your back and buys one, then you will d!vorce her. And tell your in-laws that they are not to give iPhags as birthday or Chr!stmas presents, and that if they ever even think about trying to sneak an iPhag into your home, then they will never see their grandch!ldren again.
LikeLike
No processed food, ever.
Raw whenever possible, including milk.
Make your own bread.
Chopping wood quickly is almost equal to running in terms of calorie expenditure, a fantastic way to stay in shape.
LikeLike
till the end of world turned out to be prophetic in many ways than originally anticipated
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
This must be a popular stock photo right now. It was a blond chick on a smart phone about a year ago now it’s a faggot
LikeLike
iphaggotry
LikeLike
I’d like to briefly add something to H-Bomb’s perennial wisdom:
The alphas who are seeking private, individual pleasure are changing the social landscape by making casual sex normal. But if you lack the skills to take advantage of it, then you’ll suffer from this crushing new parameter. There is no buffer anymore between successful and failure. YOU MUST SUCCEED WELL, or she will be Displeased.
LikeLike
Fuck off faggot
LikeLike
while I was gone, y’all lost whorefinder and gained this guy.
where have all the quality rapists gone? white girls need you
LikeLike
No St. Patrick’s Day Game posts? wft?
[CH: avoid guinness. not enough alcohol content. double ipas for the ladies only.]
LikeLike
Wear Orange, not green. Force them to pinch you. Then move in for serious Kino.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Seconded on the orange. Fück this papist holiday.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yep. Been wearing orange to work all week. Chicks dig it too.
LikeLike
I’ve got orangeman ancestry so its always orange for me on this day.
Most people have no clue what it is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jameson neat. That’s all you need to know.
LikeLike
That is quite the scotch
LikeLike
Jameson is an IRISH whiskey…it’s NOT a “scotch” / Scottish ‘whisky’.
Note the spelling difference, laddie-os!
LikeLike
I won’t be getting drunk. Double advantage for me to take…
LikeLike
It’s POWER’S for all Orangemen!
LikeLike
@CH: Last SPD (’16), both Guinness & Sam Adams acquiesced to the wishes of the Boston GayPedoGlobalists & sponsored their ‘inclusivist’ SPD parade.
A DARK day, indeed!
No more of THAT ilk shall I drink again!
LikeLike
Evidently not the Onion:
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
LikeLike
What did Glengarry Glen Ross teach us? ABC: Always be Copulating
LikeLike
Which leads to kids…
Good father?
[kekekek continuation here]
LikeLike
The male sexual market success rate looks like this:
Alphas on the far left, few in number scoring the most/best women. The curve rapidly drops to the vast range of Betas (fewer/lower SMV women scored) and vanishes towards Omega.
Any study that fails to point this out is misleading; this distribution is not random or normally distributed, so in this context, an average is meaningless.
LikeLike
(Refer to the Power Law graph)
LikeLike
omg i’d diee without my phone
LikeLike
social trends can subconsciously influence subjects’ tendency to under- or over-report sexual activity. the conclusion wouldn’t surprise me one bit, if true. but unless there were 3rd party-monitored cameras in all 28k bedrooms, and a control group, I’d be reluctant to come to any “scientific” conclusions about all this self-reported slamming, or lack thereof.
LikeLike
“Men, and especially White men with options, will fap to porn before bouncing dick-first into a fat chick’s belly brûlée.”
Literary artistry….
LikeLike
Doing a few weeks of R and R over in Kiev right now. First time in Ukraine.
This city is overflowing with younger, hotter, tighter talent. Remarkably beautiful girls. Very feminine and faces light up when I speak English to them in stores, etc. Took in the ballet last night: grandiose old opera house, lithe beauties prancing about on stage, and a crowd of well-heeled folks with lots of dolled up ladies thrown in. What more could one ask for? Cheap cost of living, too. In short, a wonderful place.
Cap, you should really get over here and find yourself a nice wīfé.
LikeLike
Back in the day [mid-90s to early-00s], Skype-ish human-trafficking mobsters were moving huge numbers of Ukrainian girls out to Kalifornicationia to work in the San Fernando Valley Skype-ish pr0n industry. Hopefully our man in Moscow, Vlad the Bad, has largely put an end to that.
Skypes really are the ch!ldren of Satan.
LikeLike
Les…now you’ve tasted paradise you’re at the point of no return.
I actually get angry when i come back at the shit we have to put up with in the West… the physical averageness and then the attitude…
East European women are just a different class.
LikeLike
They are a complete delight indeed. So feminine. I love the ubiquitous heels/boots, tights, and skirt look, paired with a stylish coat that fits their frames and shows their hourglass figures off to a t. Plenty of young mothers here pushing strollers, too. Western women, particularly Canadian, are just awful.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Incels will murder all of us:
LikeLike
Breaks my heart actually. If this dude had some game he’d be slaying it. He actually has some physical qualities that if presented differently would get quite a different reaction – a tough guy , bad ass vibe could be easily cultivated wit this cat.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“If there’s lower T in women as well (a small amount of testosterone does affect female libido), then that would kill the passion just as quickly.”
Lower T in women does affect their libido and sex drive. Here are some excerpts from an article I read a few years back:
One of the earliest studies that showed an association between female sexual desire and decreased testosterone was published in 1959…Luckily, the association between testosterone and female sex drive is pretty well established now. Studies have shown, for instance, that a woman’s testosterone levels rise during ovulation and there’s a corresponding rise in frequency of intercourse during this time. While ovulating women might not always initiate sex, they’re at least more receptive to sexual advances. Consider too that behavioral endocrinologists have noted that women who are ovulating often dress a little more hoochily, allegedly to attract sexual partners, but it’s probably done on a subconscious level.
…A side effect of the birth control pill (and estrogen therapy, too) is that it decreases ovarian production of testosterone, along with causing a tenfold increase in a chemical named steroid hormone binding globulin (SHBG). What SHBG does is “bind up” much of the remaining testosterone, making it unavailable for use. The result is a moribund sex drive and the possible manifestation of some of the other symptoms of low T. What’s even more worrisome is that the pill might have long-lasting effects on female libido. In a study of 125 young women participating in a sexual dysfunction clinic, women who had been off the pill for a year still had SHBG levels 7 times higher than non-users.
LikeLike
About 2011 a coworker was trying to meet women online. Whatever site had a list of “5 things I couldn’t do without” as part of the profiles. One girl had “my iPhone” on the list. It seemed funny at the time, smartphones still being fairly novel. Not funny now.
LikeLike
That’s OKCupid.
99% of them are as follows. No originality whatsoever.
1: iPhone
2: Air (hahaha)
3: Some “naughty” food (chocolate, etc).
4: Family/friends
5: Cat/dog
LikeLike
Not how “loving relationship” (their code word for sex) didn’t make the list.
I remember a poll from about ten years ago, where under 35 years of age women were asked would they rather have $10K or ten years of great sex…
… 80% said the equivalent of “Show me the money!”. I think they asked a few hundred.
LikeLike
“Lower T in women does affect their libido and sex drive”
Only when it comes to sex with betas. These same Low-T women would be screaming their lungs out for a chance at a high value sports guy or rocker.
LikeLike
Today will be hilarious.
Trump the apex alpha…brash…confident…with 5 kids…his third model wife….meeting frumpy Merkel her of no kids and a cuck husband.
LikeLike
50 Shades of Nay
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another comment of mine disappeared. Can you retrieve it? It’s about how barren spinsters are adding to the lack of overall sex in the U.S.
LikeLike
Going to quit my job on sat. 50-50 chance of asking the ten for her number.
LikeLike
Why not 100%? You only live once.
Also, don’t ask. Order. [As in, “Gimme yer number.”]
LikeLike
Because I want a good Trump chick but she is hot af though
LikeLiked by 1 person
She gives me Gatorades. I could have her write on the Gatorade with a sharpie
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Why not 100%? You only live once.
Also, don’t ask. Order. [As in, “Gimme yer number.”]”
THIS^^^
My wording… “Go ahead and give me your number”
LikeLike
skip the number formality and just set up a date for that night. “yo baby you got plans tonight? come celebrate with me.”
LikeLike
We work from 3pm-3am.
LikeLike
“you up for catching the sunrise? YOLO”
LikeLiked by 1 person
good one, pj!
LikeLike
just assume the deal. Also keep in mind: The better a woman looks the more pleasure a conversation is. In my experience beautiful women (8.5+) are much less spoiled than any other.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Going to quit my job on sat. 50-50 chance of asking the ten for her number.”
Regret is 100 times worse than rejection. Rejection means you took a swing.
LikeLike
Rejection is something you are well aqquainted with, poot.
Even the orangutans you think are 8’s won’t give you their digits.
LikeLike
100? A 1000 or more at least!
LikeLike
The low T & obesity are something I’ve really noticed. Unfortunately one example has been my millennial nephew that is a walking poster board for the ills of that generation. Lazy, no drive, stupid faggy tats with no muscle tone at all, whined like a pussy when I ordered him The Game about how manipulative and degrading it was to women, totally arrogant & entitled churchian, and just went public with a relationship with a porker girl his age (If they’re obese at 20, they’ll be worse down the road, bet on it).
The other has been the gym. Recently switched back to my old one. Besides a few rare young thin hotties, it’s mostly young pudgy ugly 4 & 5’s wearing spandex with shitty posture doing stupid exercises in the free weight area that make no sense. And the younger white guys, minus what appears to be a few aspiring sh*tlords, wear tank tops with no mass, little definition, work out with girl friends?, and some have those idiotic man buns that went out of style in the early 90’s when Steven Seagal was wearing them in Hard To Kill.
A sad thing to witness day after day.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m guessing this is one of the cheap gyms, like Planet Fitness.
LikeLike
Barbara Billingsley and Jane Wyatt… both quite thin, feminine, lovely, and yes bangable during the duration of Father Knows Best and Leave it to Beaver. And both in their mid-40s when the shows started. Obesity is for sure a thing for the women of today. Some women today in their 20s look worse than those two, and decades earlier.
LikeLiked by 2 people
June used to ask Ward not to be so rough on the Beaver.
LikeLike
If unpartnered-male involuntary celibacy is increasing, and a large swath of unpartnered-females are sharing in a small number of men, there would be a discrepancy between genders in the aggregate sex frequency. The study clearly states there was no observable change in frequency amongst unpartnered men and women, thus this hypothesis has nothing to do with the article.
LikeLike
You are the funniest blogger/blog I have had the otherworldly pleasure of perusing. PS, keep up the shiv with balls like atlas stones
LikeLike
The rise in female obesity is a direct result of female economic self-sufficiency in that females 5, 6, 7’s who naturally do not want to have sex with the omegas/betas that constitute the majority of the male population can still get the drunk alpha Tinder user to bang her out every now and then. The fact that the alpha won’t ever commit is so depressing to her that she turns to food for comfort. The
Reality is the AVERAGE woman now not dependant on a man economically has no reason to get and stay fit for anyone. The alpha will still fuck her on occasion, the omega/beta is not worth staying fit for.
LikeLiked by 1 person
http://anepigone.blogspot.com/2009/10/sex-frequency-by-age-and-marital-status.html and here.
I was antagonistic even though you descended to a much humbler virtual outpost than the one you occupy here to engage me. I’m fortunate you did. The amount of good you do for the young men who will save civilization if it can be saved is impossible to quantify, but slipping in recommendations to visit the Chateau to millennials who work for me or who I otherwise know and who I think will be receptive has made several regular readers. I’ve got one guy who went from sexless chump to LTR with a ~4 and some action on the side, through your tutelage and my parroting of it. He’s open about HBD now, too. We joke about WWHD when relationship things come up, no joke.
LikeLike
Test
LikeLike
I think the decreased relationship sex is because when women date men because said man has a great job, they are essentially dating a paycheck and not a man. This does not guarantee sexual attraction.
Also, extreme female selectivity, as you call it, HAS to be part of the explanation for the singles.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I got caught in mod, so I posted my response on my site.
LikeLike
I know someone will look askance at the science behind this, but I am positive that acceptance of homosexuality by normies is going to have its effect in heterosexual sex frequency. The two sex acts are so diametrically opposed (and I use the term “sex act” advisedly for whatever it is they do) that one has to be favored and the other disfavored. It may take 100 years but at the rate were going homosex will be king and hetero sex will be rare and infrequent.
LikeLike