There’s a lot of discussion about the Hajnal Line within the HBD and Maul-Right wokeweb, and rightly so because it’s an important concept and theoretical framework which goes a long way to explaining our current scourge of pathological altruism afflicting Anglosphere Whites. That in mind, I offer a succinct primer on Hajnalianism for any readers who are unfamiliar with the idea.
Enfant Terrible asks,
What’s a East-hajnalian?
It refers to any White European born and raised outside of the Hajnal Line, a geographic boundary that roughly separates Northwest Europe from South and East Europe based on historical patterns of out-group altruism (ie cuckery) that likely evolved under selective pressure from a variety of sociocultural inputs and that has now become pathologically suicidal in the modern environment of rapid intercontinental travel and social media-fueled virtue signaling status arms races.
The Hajnal Line may be the key that explains every insane leftoid subversion of Western White nations that we see unfolding today.
Hope this helps.

The difference is that those countries west of the Hajnal line have benefited from too much prosperity, that gives people an idea that things can only get better all the time, even with a lot of immigration, it weakens men too as prosperity rarely makes a man stronger(the most alpha guys come from cultures where living is tough and street smarts must be developed.)
LikeLike
Being West of the Hajnal line doesn’t just mean higher out-group altrusim. It also means things like higher average IQ, more class flexibility, lower homicide rates, less inbreeding, etc.
Basically, less clannishness means less automatic distrust of others, which leads to all sorts of good things. It may also mean that you’re slower to react to out-group threats, of course.
[CH: Inner Hajnalianism is a poison pill, and despite all those wondrous benefits you list the West has swallowed that pill and the poison is strong enough to kill a horse.]
LikeLike
Less corruption, too.
The west-of-Hajnal society was a gift… but it doesn’t work too well under conditions of nihilistic secularism, to say the least.
It may have arisen in the first place because of Catholicism. The Franks when they first converted were disgusting, sneaky, bastardly thugs — the definite impression you get from reading Joinville’s accounts of them. It’s quite ironic that it’s precisely the west-of-Hajnal societies that have rejected Catholicism the most thoroughly.
[CH: the catholic church forbade cousin marriage in europe’s early history. that, plus manorialism, were probably the two biggest contributing factors to the emergence of a hajnal-split europe. ironically, the church banned cousin marriage for selfish reasons — it didn’t want family money escaping church coffers — which unwittingly unleashed a glorious european greatness that in the end largely discarded the catholicism which was its birth mother.]
LikeLike
A lot of great things happen unintentionally. For example the Amish have no interest in protecting German bloodlines, yet they may be the best at it.
[CH: the road to hell is paved with good intentions. conversely, the road to heaven is paved with no intentions.]
LikeLiked by 2 people
When Joinville wrote, the Franks had been Catholic for 800 years. Their real problem was feckless nobility.
LikeLike
The accounts I was reading about were discussing the Franks in the 800s, actually.
LikeLike
Irony: John Hajnal was a Jew from Hungary and “hajnal” means “dawn” in Hungarian (pronounced “haynal”). (Also a female name in Hungary.)
Let’s just hope the intra-Hajnal cuckery won’t bring the “dawn” of global Jewish dominance… lol.
[CH: haynal = anal. the verisimilitude makes sense.]
LikeLike
Lool, actually, the first “a” is pronounced like the second 😀 (Why do you guys have different sounds for the same characters :D)
LikeLike
Could you say by way of illustration of the Hajnal Line that Polacks and Magyars have met both Muslims and unrestrained leftism, and are therefore “redpilled” from experience, whereas Londoners and Parisians have only encountered Muslims who either behaved themselves or kept to their enclaves, and leftists balanced by other political elements, and are therefore falsely confident?
[CH: you’re touching upon what I call the Secular Muslim Syndrome. That is, lib whites living in expensive culture bubbles only come in contact with the 0.1% of muslims who are competent and compatible with white civilization. this distorts the white libs’ worldview and feeds their virtue signaling for open borders, but that reality distortion field will crack once the numbers of vibrants exceeds the carrying capacity of white libs’ self-delusions.]
LikeLike
This. High-IQ people tend to only interact with other high-IQ people on a regular basis. High-IQ foreigners can assimilate more easily, etc. If the world was only made up of high IQ people, there might actually be a shot at the ShitLibs dream of a Kumbaya world. Maybe. Probably not even then. But the low-IQ immigrants, which are most of them, are a totally different story. Huge numbers of them are in the “evil 80s” IQ range, high crime because they’re not smart enough to compete but just smart enough to plan basic crimes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] The Hajnal Line, Abbreviated […]
LikeLike
In the terms of the survivability of western civilization, which is the more optimal side?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Western civiliazation is a single body. East and South are a hard shell, West and North are the engine. Once the shell is penetrated, both parts are fucked.
A trojan horse of globalism and open borders did what Mongolian and Muslim hordes were unable to for a thousand years.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Western Civ never existed east of it. It was white and Christian but not very Western.
Tbh, culture is secondary to bloodlines. If we survive as a people with so sovereign soil our culture will be quite changed and likely never be high trust again
LikeLiked by 1 person
Even in shitlibistan, I can tell instantly which whites are of my tribe and which aren’t. And it’s the cautiously respectful ones that are. (Most of them bigger than me tbh, just giving respect where they expect it. And I give it.)
The low-T pajama boys appear to think they’re my tribe and Shitavious’s and Jose’s and Mohammad’s too, and they’re wrong on all counts.
LikeLike
I called to “bring back the Freikorps”. But when I suggested what needed to be done:
1. White Sharia
2. Terminate all women’s rights
3. 6 babies per woman
4. White homeland
5. Deport all of them
…all I got was “there will be a white hot vengeance”. talk talk talk blah blah blah
Plus some bullshit from CH about how Erdogan’s have-five-babies slogan is a bad idea. WTF? It’s the only idea that can save whitey.
WHEN IS THE VENGEANCE? WHEN? WHERE? WHEN THE MEDIAN AGE OF A WHITE PERSON IS FUCKING 108 YEARS OLD?
AND WHERE IS TRUMP’S WALL?
I see lone wolf whites like Dylann Roof. But loners don’t make history. One individual cannot save the world. So, I’m giving up. I will protect myself, my family and my friends. But the West? Fuggedaboutit.
Greg Eliot has the only solution and it’s a long shot: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_exploration
LikeLike
Erdogan’s babies-r-us plan is great for the Ottomans. Awful for Europe
LikeLike
In regards to the “five Babies” deal; yeah if the breeding doesn’t keep up.
Eventually immigrants will just become a larger part of the population again.
Or if we don’t start doing like Japan and getting way more automated; won’t be able to keep going as a nation or country due to feminism.
If your a conservative type; it’s about the only chance you have to fight back against liberalism.
Me I’m a liberal but yeah; especially in a world where we use immigration to bolster our voting power.
LikeLike
Hell; if Europeans had kept up with breeding like that from the start.
Most of the problems going on today wouldn’t even exist.
LikeLike
The Hajnal line runs from roughly the Caucasus to Western central China and separates the Slavonic Orthodox forest culture from Turkic Islamic horse culture. It is also known as the Vodka-Hashish line.
LikeLike
> Vodka-Hashish line.
Love the name. We should brand it. “Russians. Moving Vodka line to the East since 1533”.
LikeLike
shouldn’t you include the extreme individualism of Western Whites into the equation?
individualism plus altruism removes consideration about those around you (extended family) should your act of altruism prove noxious. after all, if an act of kindness backfires, only the individual providing it would suffer, in the bubble of the individualistic mind.
in contrast, we Eastern Whites, backward, clannish, collectivist, whatever, think of those around us (kin) first.
altruism isn’t a foreign concept East of the Hajnal line of course. it’s reserved for kin, that’s the difference.
LikeLike
My brain keeps reading it as “Vaginal Line” but the meaning does not change.
[CH: heh. yes, vaginal line and hajnal line are nearly synonymous.]
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s pronounced “haynal” 😛 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hajnal
LikeLike
More like “hy-nal” I’d think
LikeLike
Yeah, I’ve still got some English spelling to learn
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Another ethno-geographic zone that explains an awful lot is the Sotadic Zone, first coined by Sir Richard Burton: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sotadic_zone
LikeLike
Hajnal line is a bullshit concept which can be demolished by any historian in 3 minutes.E.g. explain Finland and Norway
LikeLike
Finland is occupied by Finno-Urgics, the autochthonous people that resisted the Indo-European barbarian invasion, unlike those former Norse losers that no longer exist.
LikeLike