Sex Denialism — the false belief that there are no innate psychological, cognitive, or even physical differences between the sexes.
Race Denialism — the false belief that there are no innate physical, psychological, or cognitive differences between the races.
Sex Denialism and Race Denialism are the two Foundational Lies which together provide the sustaining mythology for the false religion of Equalism, a cult of modernity that has captured almost the entirety of the Left but also has accumulated followers from the Right. Equalism’s guiding principle is the Commandment that there shall be no God but the God of Interchangeable Sexes and Interchangeable Races, and that Noticing any Differences between the Sexes and Races is Heresy. Man is Woman, Black is White, Beauty is Ugliness, Truth is Lies. Amen.
Conservatives and liberals are in thrall to Equalism, but it is predominately an ego affliction of liberals. The numbers of conservatives joining the Synathedral/Hivemind of Equalism is rising, though, and we call these conservatives “cucks”. True believers can be found on both sides, but the zealots and shock troops for Equalism are almost all from the Left, willing puppets of their Globohomo Bathhouse Alliance masters.
Sex Denialism is a myth held dear by both feminists and conventional or traditional conservatives (tradcons). The most fervent believers in Sex Equivalency are usually of the Femme Left (Antifemme), but tradcon diehard adherents aren’t uncommon. For instance, one will often hear a tradcon parrot feminist boilerplate whenever the subject turns to the sexual market and sex differences in romantic yearning, mating preference, and arousal trigger points.
Race Denialism is largely a creature of the Fake Morality Left, but which recently has had an influx of emotionally weak cucks from the Right. It is a prayerbook full of both banal and exotic incantations that when intoned serve to increase the social status of the believer and intensify religious feeling and tribal affiliation. We can see the tribal contours of Race Denialism in the fortitude and zeal with which followers chase down and burn at the stake any apostates. This animus for nonbelievers contrasts ironically with the Left’s personal avowals of belief in the equal worth of man, putting the lie to the very heart of what they claim to believe. This is how you know that the Left and Cucked Right will never be dislodged from their false religion solely with appeals to logic or reason. They must be psychologically crushed and culturally purged.
The Alt-Right — and if I may be so insolent, Chateau Heartiste from the very beginning — are a force because it is the only movement in the West today that comes close to repudiating Sex Denialism and Race Denialism, which makes it a revolutionary vanguard undermining the One, True religion of Equalism. Hence, the frantic hack jobs and smear campaigns and doxxings and boycotts and firings and blacklists and Social Justice Silencings waged by the Globohomoists and their archipelago of misfit manlets against anyone even tangentially affirming, aiding, or abetting Sex and Race Realtalk barbarians tearing down stone by stone the Palace of Pretty Lies.

Anyone who believes there are no innate differences in the races have never been outside of the US. No wait – they exist in the US too.
I guess anyone who believes there are no differences in the races is willfully ignorant, peddling something or just a liar.
LikeLike
Anyone in the States who believes there are no innate differences in the races has never been to a gas station, Walmart, or any public space with more than 3 people present.
LikeLike
THE GLOBALISTS ARE MAKING AN IMPORTANT MOVE THIS WEEK. THE MSM HAS FINALLY FIGURED OUT THEIR FUTURE IS SOLELY ONLINE, AND THEY’VE GIVEN GOOGLE LAUGHABLY TRANSPARENT MARCHING ORDERS TO WIPE OUT ANYTHING REMOTELY DISOBEDIENT TO THE NARRATIVE.
HOPEFULLY THEY’VE OVERREACHED AS THEY SO OFTEN DO. EVEN THE SEMI-WOKE YOUNG YOUTUBERS SEE WHAT’S GOING ON AND SO DO THEIR YOUNG SUBSCRIBERS.
YOUTUBE’S MONOPOLY SEEMS COMPLETE AT THE MOMENT, BUT MY $ IS ON A COMPETITOR ARISING SOONER RATHER THAN LATER.
[CH: let’s hope so. the time to fight the rising tide of leftoid gynecratic corporatocracy silencing is before it’s too late.]
LikeLike
vid.me
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read somewhere that the youngins of today are projected to be the most conservative generation we’ve seen in a very long time…
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is always the underground internet. There is underground crypto-money which spends more securely than Bitcoin (Zcoin, BitMonero for ex). On the bright side, the barrier of getting onto the darknet should help filter the sub- +1 standard deviation crowd.
Get Tor Browser Bundle and put “http://” before and “.onion” after any of these:
endchan5doxvprs5 for Endchan’s Tor gateway.
oxwugzccvk3dk6tj for 8chan’s Tor gateway.
oniichanylo2tsi4 for OniiChan NNTPchan frontend.
ucavviu7wl6azuw7 for a text-only (no cheese pizza risk) NNTPchan frontend.
Of course you should double check these URLs to make sure I’m not feeding you bad info.
LikeLike
With that handle its a risk.
LikeLike
One look at the comments sections in the social media feeds of burgeoning young Alt Right and Alt Lite media women, will instantly establish that a yuge number of young men followers have a long way to go on sex denialism.
LikeLike
Funny you say that, I’ve seen quite a bit of the opposite. I probably don’t cruise the lite sights enough though
LikeLike
The parched beta thirst is positively Saharan. Being woke to sex can’t stop at ridiculing World War T; it means being woke to the nature of women.
LikeLike
Question is how far do you want men to go? Because the reality is that you can’t be cynical enough about women.
LikeLike
Lord, it’s amazing isn’t it? As long as you learn the knack of looking amused by it instead of bitter over it, it’s basically impossible to be too misogynistic – the ‘worse’ you are the more it excites them.
Realistically most guys, including Alt Right guys, are just never going to get this and really, we wouldn’t want them to – it would be an even nastier world if they did. That’s why the civilized version of patriarchy evolved – to protect women from their own anti-civilized mate choices and to protect betas from despair about the nature of women.
So ideally, I don’t want men to go any farther than they already have – I’d rather see the restoration of patriarchy. But since that won’t happen anytime soon, woke guys are just going to have to keep pushing the buttons.
LikeLiked by 1 person
lol i’ve always wondered: why are so many alt-righters white-knight “muh white women is pure” faggots?
why can’t they step their shit up and realize 90% of the white women they see day-to-day (and prolly including their sisters) have sucked at least 1 dude’s dick?
We’re not going to have solid birth rates unless we can control our women. But with some alt-righters, even saying that “we” need to “control” our “women” is too triggering (but but but we’re not like dem muslims! the ancient anglo lass wuz free and independent!!)
it’s all solely about race and the ethno-state with them, which is important of course lol, but its like, how are you going to keep brown people from invading your country if you can’t even control how many dicks you’re daughters sucked and how many buns are in you’re wife’s oven?
idk man. there’s some kind of cognitive dissonance or something lolol.
LikeLike
when he’s not just trololing, i think this has been divine son’s point. (to be precise, i think he said sex realism > race realism, but a lie is a lie).
LikeLike
Still a long way to go on reeducation. Lauren Suthron and Tomi Lahren’s timelines are chock a block with Thirsty, fawning replies from hapless young (and old) men. Virtual orbiters, you might say.
LikeLike
AWALT
LikeLike
In a way I hate the conservative/libertarian types more than liberals because in the back of their minds they know the truth, but they must create ingenious machinations of ideoligy to be pro-masculinity and pro-white, instead of coming out ans speaking the truth.
LikeLike
Like most newbie sit-at-homes you’re not out there with the L/libertarians battling down the Islamic Conference country fascists. Your type also sat around while they brought down the commies.
You can’t even try to correctly spell. How the hell can you save the culture?
LikeLike
Stop using ‘fascist’ as a pejorative. It cuts no ice at a site like CH.
LikeLike
WTF is this subthread about?!?!?
LikeLike
You must be a baby boomer
LikeLike
Bringing down commies?? Before libertarians China was a shit hole. Now is the greatest long term threat to the White Race. We have lost global supremacy. We were Gods, with our moral and will as the only limits. Now we have to ask gookers. Do you want freedom? Hold power. Be one of those who hold power. Because power doesn’t disappear, just changes its owner. We are still owners, indeed we can take it all back, as they’re totally dependent on the West
LikeLike
WILL YOU LET US? WILL YOU JOIN AND ENJOY THE FREEDOM THAT POWER GIVES?
LikeLike
Robert, you don’t happen to have #IsraelFirst tucked in between your #1A, #2A, and #MolonLabe hashtags, do you?
LikeLike
I (probably) agree, Augustus.
What Augustus is saying, guys, is that he hates the cuckservatives and libertaricucks more than the liberals even, because unlike the liberals, who are out and out nuts, the cucks understand what’s true, but don’t do it, or try to do it indirectly and ineffectively with their useless “civic nationalism” and “pro-family” blather. At least that’s what I think he’s saying.
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] Sex Denialism And Race Denialism […]
LikeLike
I’m also baffled there are, in fact, people who believe that. However, according to a study 30% of Americans believe the Earth is flat. Duh.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Okay,, NOW I’m depressed. Ya happy?
LikeLiked by 1 person
What sort of (((study))) are we talking about?
One of those that proves how stupid and authoritarian right wing whites are?
LikeLike
There is an entire subculture of flat Earth believers. Check it out on Youtube.
LikeLike
lol debate me faggot
LikeLike
that’s a punchable face.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And that (((schnozz)))…
LikeLike
It’s sort of funny how the Left believes ‘diversity’ is a good thing but on the other hand refuses to acknowledge that there might be any difference in people/cultures. So what exactly do the migrants diversify us with if they are equal to us?
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s not intended to make sense. It is meant to be contradictory.
LikeLike
This reminds me of the few times that I watch a liberal comedian (say (((Seth Meyers))), who can be funny), I notice how they use falsehoods as facts to make their joke, and the audience is accepting it as fact. Political comedians play this angle hard, and have a misinformed audience (most of which are White people) as a result.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Reb
Yes, all humor is a reflection of truth. Or, accepted truth. Falsehoods will do just fine if they’re shared assumptions.
Twitter told me this “satire” would be wickedly funny. It’s lazy, dumb and based on the weakest of strawman. Sure, you can defeat all your opponents when you construct them of cardboard.
twitter.com/notofeminism
LikeLike
That insanity is repeated endlessly and loudly in various forms by them.
For example, “mansplaining” and “whytesplaing.” These other people (womyn and d1ndus) are so unique in their perceptions and experiences that we can’t even begin understand or comment on their situation, and should just sit down, remain silent, and await whatever pearls of wisdom fall from the lips of these higher beings. Yet, at the same time, they are precisely the same in every way as white men except for trivial exterior appearance — like a “reskinned” avatar in a video game.
So, are we exactly the same and equal, in which case “whyte-man-splaining” is logically valid across the board? Or is everyone fundamentally different, in which case sexual and racial differences are bone-deep, real, and powerfully defining?
It can’t be both ways, yet these chattering cultists claim loudly that in fact both are true simultaneously.
LikeLike
Now that the weather is getting nicer, it’s time to pull out the cutoff “Trump 2016 MAGA” shirt for walking around in my SWPL city. The stares (ranging from helpless to downright aggressive) cannot be beat. Loud and proud.
LikeLiked by 2 people
John Derbyshire was fired from the cuckservative NR due this article:
http://takimag.com/article/the_talk_nonblack_version_john_derbyshire#axzz4clA2Khqo
Indeed, the conservatives are adopting the equalist meme.
LikeLike
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-30/ny-times-outs-white-house-sources-who-provided-intel-reports-nunes
LikeLike
LikeLike
well it is prob because they don’t live where the groups intersect
and if do have no dealings at all with other groups except to wash feet
so yea would be hard to fathom it from a personal standpoint not just a philosophical one
maybe why someone came up with the great idea of importing diversity everywhere so everyone would
LikeLike
people tell me to leave where would i go in us
LikeLike
Does anyone listen to this ebonics idiot?
LikeLike
nope
LikeLike
white flight so they don’t deal with it personally too lol
LikeLike
maybe two powerful dudes made a dollar bet like in trading places
LikeLike
LikeLike
Washing my hands clean.
Do whatever you need to do.
LikeLike
It seems to be real. Vaam spasiba.
LikeLike
Lol you can’t be a Jew and be an Atheist. Well, you can, but you’re going to burn in Hell for it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLike
I fail to see how you get so many ought’s from these is’s. Honestly, if you take evolutionary biology to suggest that environmental changes as well as cultural adaptions increase the odds of certain characteristics which have created sex differences and race differences, than you’d end up having to argue we ought to do even more for woman and minorities in society.
Seriously, you’re going to have feminists and globalists agreeing with you and than saying that you then need to make a choice for denying equality or accepting it because the influence of speech acts are themselves methods of maintaining or changing sexual and racial differences. This smacks of communism and totalitarianism.
Only reading this one post, I believe you might be suggesting that you know this to be true. Perhaps you are too afraid to be honest and suggest outright that you believe in certain measures of maintaining inequality. For that to happen, you’d have to see democracy itself as a scourge. I would have a hard time believing that you are indeed suggesting this though, so I’d appreciate some feedback.
Particularly, if I am wrong, or if you’d like me to go over the details of any studies on how culture affects evolutionary traits, I’d be glad to speak with you about your beliefs about politics and culture so that you might critique my arguments and explain what might be bad reasoning on my part.
[CH: denying reality will have worse consequences than accepting reality will have, just on a longer time scale. (debt peonage can buy a lot of delay) i don’t believe in “maintaining inequality”, whatever that means (i suspect you mean by it forceful measures of segregation and discrimination). inequality is self-evident, it doesn’t need artificial maintenance to emerge and calcify, and the denial of it can only be sustained by massive wealth transfers and state-sponsored favoritism. do this enough, and the hosts WILL eventually tire of the parasites. as for culture-gene co-evolution, no one’s denying that but neither does it support your argument that strong-arming culture into equalist flight paths is the right thing to do to correct genetic inequalities… unless you’re a fan of imposing innumerable multigenerational miseries on Whites toward the quixotic quest to alter genetic profiles that won’t come to fruition until their great-great-great-nth-grandchildren walk the harrison bergeronian earth.]
LikeLike
Facts are fascist
LikeLike
“Particularly, if I am wrong, or if you’d like me to go over the details of any studies on how culture affects evolutionary traits, I’d be glad to speak with you about your beliefs about politics and culture so that you might critique my arguments and explain what might be bad reasoning on my part.”
What are your sources?
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/03/29/j-scott-armstrong-fraction-1-papers-scientific-journals-follow-scientific-method/
LikeLike
I was thinking about it the other day.
1 Once the Truth is accepted (even on religious level) we won
2 There is equally good arguments to argue that we have to fully exterminate them and that we have to keep them as parasites. In equalism only the latter happens.
3 Is your family the best? Would you change it for faster, taller and more intelligent niggers? Maybe for faster and more intelligent super cockroaches? The question is not if they are better or worse. The question is: ARE THEY PART OF US?
LikeLike
Quote: “if you take evolutionary biology to suggest that environmental changes as well as cultural adaptions increase the odds of certain characteristics which have created sex differences and race differences, than you’d end up having to argue we ought to do even more for woman and minorities in society.”
this literally makes no sense. how you derived your conclusion with your hypothesis is fucking hilarious. What’s even more hilarious is how you bash CH for deriving oughts from is’s, then you go on to do the exact same thing, WITHOUT A FUCKING ARGUMENT LOLOLOL!!! “uh oh! science says men and women, blacks and whites are different, therefore we ought to make them equal!!!” <=== if you can’t spot the logical fallacy here, then i’m sorry, but yur a gay retard.
For some gay reason you seem to assume through perhaps mental retardation that due to biological differences, we some how OUGHT to give those who are biologically “inferior” advantages in order to be equal to those who are biologically “superior”. This all assumes that those who are “inferior” should be treated in such a way in order to be “equal” to those who are “superior”. This is absolutely retarded.
it sounds to me like you’re assuming your own moral premise (that people should be treated in what you’ve already determined to be “fair”) while analyzing CH”s analysis.
Quote: “For that to happen, you’d have to see democracy itself as a scourge.”
Lol strawman faggot. There are different kinds of democracies. Not ALL democracies are equal. You can have a democracy where only men participate. You can also have a democracy where only faggots participate. It depends on whose in power, who has authority, culture, genetics and so on.
Also, its obvious through you spouting that gay line that, once again, you assume “democracy” to be somehow a morally superior form of government to that of say “monarchy” or a “theocracy”. Get over yourself bro. Quit assuming gay shit.
LikeLike
I think what he’s saying is a variation of “White Man’s Burden”.
Essentially if white people really are superior than everyone else; it’s our duty to bring them civilization and stability to their cultures.
To take care them; like a parent would a child. Because; they just can’t help it.
LikeLike
It’s more like, “Kill em all, let God sort em out”
LikeLike
fuckin gay, another comment stuck in mod lol. Anyway, you’re a contradictory little fuck and you assume a lot of retarded shit like the necessity of equality between humans, the superiority of democracy, etc. Something tells me either you’re a very clever (and gay) troll, or some sort of literal fag. regardless, gtfo
LikeLike
I am confused by the anger as I was only suggesting what a leftist would see within this sort of reasoning: a concept of sexual and race traits that are frozen. To believe evolutionary biology is true, but that sexual and race differences are suddenly fixed is contradictory and irrational. Therefore, either evolutionary biology is wrong, or it is right, and those who purport to value equality would necessarily need to apply cultural and environmental changes to certain groups until they became equal with others. So shouldn’t I be against preforming cultural acts that support equality and even against participating in any democratic institutions if I saw this as a threat to my own kind? I’m sorry but do you believe sex and race differences are suddenly static? And should I be worried that the public could be persuaded to perpetuate cultural and environmental changes to bring about equality in some manner, even through food systems or the internet?
LikeLike
Your bullshit word salad is not convincing anyone.
LikeLike
We reject your fundamental premeses out of hand. We have concluded them to be bankrupt based on their yields. Ya’ll done radicalized the Whiteman!
LikeLike
“Therefore, either evolutionary biology is wrong, or it is right, and those who purport to value equality would necessarily need to apply cultural and environmental changes to certain groups until they became equal with others”
that’s the thing though. why would they actually do this if they fully accepted the truth? There is a huge step between (a) knowing that people are inherently unequal due to evolution and biological realities and (b) fighting literally against thousands of years of evolution just to form some “kind” of equality. It’s literally impossible for this to happen or for their dream to come to fruition. Why? Because the laws of physics, and the principles of survival of the fittest, necessasrily create an enironment where people are bound to treat each other unequally.
What i think your saying is that assuming they knew the truth, they would use this truth to make white’s “inferior” and make blacks or other minorities “superior”.
But how would they do this? Kill all whites? Chop a limb off every white boy? Inject us with estrogen at birth?
In order for them to biologically change whites to be “at the same level” as blacks (lol whatever that means) they would have to literally change our dna so that every seceding generation carries on the inferiority. <=== this shit is not currently, and will not likely be, possible. This is science fiction bull shit.
you honestly believe liberals are going to try out a bunch of blantantly tyrannical bull shit, under the perported ideology of “equality”, in order to make a bunch of hypothetical science ficiton magic possible? Do you think they could get away with this? Do you actually believe this shit would last and people would just put up with it?
bro, if they ever tried that shit a revolution would occur, and if white’s truly are superior, then we all know who will win.
in essence, lol, it looks like you’re giving too much weight to how much leftists believe in “equality”. You think their belief in this ideology is so severe that if they so happened to actually believe in the scientific facts of biological differences between sexes and races, then they would restructure all of society in order to ensure equality in every single way, down to the biological-T.
the idea that they would cling on to this ideology of equality, assuming they knew the truth, is what’s absurd. If they knew it took thousands of years of finely tuned evolutionary incidences in order for the white race to appear and be as great as it is, then why would they reverse all of that just for the sake of an ideology that’s only existed for 300 years or so?
If they knew about the sexual differences between men and women and why they are important, then why would they try to undermine all of that for the sake of equality?
it only took a couple decades of forced “equality” in Russia for people to realize it was all bullshit and for things to fall apart.
LikeLike
What gets measured, gets rewarded.
If you aren’t today, start keeping count of when (((they))) use your race against you.
A job interview today, told the boss dude that I didn’t have to speak Spanish, that I was an American. He told me that “we are all Americans.” Told him that I speak English. That was that. He can hire me or not. The job is making up to four times as much as I make now, but I still need to let (((him))) know that Da Goyim Know.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Good on you sir. A no BS attitude will make you enemies, but many good friends as well.
LikeLike
I’ve never really like the term “alt-right”. We’re not an alternative right, we’re the actual right.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I would rather just be right. But triggering leftists makes me happy. So I tell ’em I am Alt-Right when it’s time to piss them off
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess it’s as good as anything as a brand name.
LikeLike
Sure as soon as a recognizable name was established and made known (which was not an easy task by any means) you tear it down because you do not like it
It is not about feelz or what you like, it is about establishing a movement of which first task is to have a name that speaks for itself
I have no doubt you right just like CuckRyan and McWarmonger are
You are just one of many who are afraid to be associated with something that leftoid Agitprop deemed to be the supreme of all evil
LikeLike
LikeLike
There is a very important point CH has mentioned in this, which needs to be reiterated. The Left is quintessentially irrational. I’ll say it again, in case it’s not getting through. Leftists are at war with reality. This is why invoking logic, facts, irrefutable proof, superlative arguments, etc., is generally futile in dealing with them. Their entire body of expression arises out of a wilful suppression of observable fact in what could be described as a mass psychosis that is fuelled by… social esteem.
They want to be popular. They want to be liked. They want to feed off Twitbook likes, friendings, and so on. That’s why they virtue-signal: to thrive on the nectar of approval. They are of the same cloth as those who vocally supported Hitler or Stalin were cut from: go-along-to-get-alongers. They have no logic-based, robustly structured, consistent argument matrix; instead, their language is rhetorical, emotive, sensual, impulsive, hysterical, accusative. But never rational.
This opens up the means to deal with them. And that is… charitable ostracisation. Sure, refute their mantras with compelling arguments; it will serve as a public testimony to their idiocy and may plant in them a seed for future recovery, but in the interim, politely cut them off. Let them know, with solemn cadences, that their views are unacceptable to you. In short, “unfriend” them.
[CH: Ridicule, Realtalk, and Rejection are the Three Rs of successfully neutering leftoids. Good comment.]
LikeLiked by 4 people
Leftists are at war with reality.
That’s because they’re satanic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“The Left is quintessentially irrational”
lol I respectfully disagree. The Left is simply driven by their perception of what is “good” and “fair” as well as self-interest, all of which change as the times change. They can be as “inconsistent” and “irrational” as they want, so long as it helps them fulfill their vision of how the world ought to be. If it means siding with murderous communist dictators, then that’s fine. If it means leaking information tactically to undermine Trump’s administration, then that’s fine too. If it means redefining what it means to be a man or a woman or a hamster, then so be it.
I guess basically, the left is more “ends justifies the means” oriented, where as those of us on the right or more focused on transcendental principles and consistency. This means the left can be “consistent” while also being “inconsistent”, so long as it helps them get what they want.
So there’s definitely some rationality behind leftist behavior – their not entirely irrational, largely because from a machiavellian ethical point of view, its OK to do a few crazy and inconsistent things if it helps you achieve your vision of what is “good” lolol.
“They have no logic-based, robustly structured, consistent argument matrix; instead, their language is rhetorical, emotive, sensual, impulsive, hysterical, accusative. But never rational”
yes, and that is why they are more convincing lol. Human beings (and I’d say even moral principles) are inherently irrational, emotive, sensual, impulsive, hysterical and accusative. Being “logical” is the exception, not the norm lolol.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Very well said.
LikeLike
“I guess basically, the left is more “ends justifies the means” oriented”
“from a machiavellian ethical point of view, its OK to do a few crazy and inconsistent things if it helps”
I am against murder or drug dealing, but like the Finnish civil war fighters, I’d kill my family or even sell heroin if that’s what it takes to free the White race. Skypes will throw other Skypes under the bus if they need to, and as CH said, we have to sink to our enemies’ level (at least temporarily) to defeat them.
LikeLike
Okay, how about substituting “hypocritical liars” for “irrational”? Their biological denialism is dropped like a hot rock when it comes to homosexuals or “people born in the wrong bodies” or even the disproportionate representation of blacks in professional sports (but NOT in crime statistics).
LikeLike
Which is why you can only let properly vetted smart people vote.
LikeLike
Equating Hitler with Stalin renders everything else you spout as nonsense.
LikeLike
Here, have this gold medal for Non Sequitor conclusion-jumping. I was equating the concept of modern leftoid go-along-to-get-alongism with the same attitude in Nazi Germany or in Stalinist Russia. i wasn’t saying Hitler and Stalin were the same.
LikeLike
Stuck in mod. Dammit, this is important. Let me retry:
LikeLike
“They must be psychologically crushed and culturally purged”.
It is hard to psychologically crush those that are irrational. I think it has gone beyond psychological crushing. It will require physical crushing.
LikeLike
That’s what I’m talking about.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
I have black gay and feminist friends.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Do you want a medal or a chest to pin it to?
LikeLike
All this stuff would be gone if we simply allowed freedom of association.
Don’t want diverse neighbors? Fine, move to this neighborhood. Want diverse neighbors, move to that neighborhood.
Want a diverse school. Go to that school. Don’t want a diverse school, go to the other school.
Don’t want to hire a particular type of person, don’t. It’s a business. Do what makes sense for you.
There, everybody gets what they want. What we have now makes nobody happy because too many people are forced to interact with people they have no interest in and would rather be anywhere else but interacting with them.
It’s not apartheid because nobody is forced to do anything.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree.
Race exists. Gender exists. But they are nowhere near the only things that exist. Standard deviation exists (a lot of the stormfront idiots are incapable of understanding this concept).
I’m not going to get all up in arms about it just because I know the truth about race and gender. In fact, the more these alt-wrong dummies tell me to get mad at Jews/Blacks/Liberals/whatever the more I’m inclined to not give a fuck about it.
LikeLike
Forced integration is as bad as forced segregation.
LikeLike
Vanamee – What do you mean by “forced segregation”?
I’m fine with forced segregation — build a wall and deport them all. Any Whites who want to go live with muh diversity are welcome to leave as well.
Perhaps that wouldn’t be considered 100% “forced” segregation, since I’m leaving the door open for Whites to go join the vibrancy. But I’m fine with using law backed by force to keep non-Whites out from a White ethnostate.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Right. I disagree. A private business owner or individual should have the legal right to decline doing business with whomever he pleases, and vice versa. This, as is already often the case, leads to voluntary segregation (e.g., black churches). I do not advocate forcibly deporting legal citizens, however, or legally barring freedom of association. Shaming and ostracization are sufficient, if that’s your game.
LikeLike
Negroes need to be sent to the wilderness. They appreciate nothing we do for them. I have had my fill. No more.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am fine with severely restricting immigration along cultural lines.
LikeLike
We’re so far away from a White ethnostate that it’s not worth arguing about so long as we’re pulling in the same direction for now.
But while we are LARPing … Before expelling “legal citizens” there are many other interim eugenic steps to take, including:
– deporting all illegal immigrants
– deporting all legal immigrants where applicable by current laws (e.g. those on welfare etc.)
– zero immigration (legal and illegal)
– mandatory sterilization as condition for welfare benefits of any kind (adults)
– mandatory parental sterilization after 1st child that requires welfare of any kind
– mandatory sterilization for violent felons (certain categories to be defined, but to include rape, murder, etc.)
– voluntary sterilization in exhange for reduced prison sentences for lesser crimes
– voluntary cash payments in exchange for permanent deportation to prearranged recipient nations (also to be bribed with cash) and renunciation of US citizenship — targeting blacks, latinos, Asians, and jews
– sever political ties with Puerto Rico
– ban on adoption of foreign non-White children
LikeLike
Attacking “Foundational Lies” [great term] is critical because arguing specifics like policy will have you spinning in circles unless you uncover the false premises they rely on. In formal debate, the first step is defining terms. I can’t discuss much of anything with one of my sibs since she doggedly hangs onto sex denialism.
I said this elsewhere but another FL is that humans are inherently “good” – a muhfeelz assumption that many accept but few question. If all are inherently good, as the thinking seems to go, then a) people won’t naturally vary much in moral constitution, b) culture will have only minimal impact on character (and can be easily resisted), and c) you need not fear importing all manner of hostile cultures…because they’re not? really?? hostile???
But if Christianity is correct and humans are inherently Self-centered, it leads to a set of entirely different conclusions. For example, opening the floodgates may, y’know, be ill-advised.
LikeLike
Attacking “Foundational Lies” [great term] is critical because arguing specifics like policy will have you spinning in circles unless you uncover the false premises they rely on. In formal debate, the first step is defining terms. I can’t discuss much of anything with one of my sibs since she doggedly hangs onto sex denialism.
I said this elsewhere but another FL is that humans are inherently “good” – a muhfeelz assumption that many accept but few question. If all are inherently good, as the thinking seems to go, then a) people won’t naturally vary much in moral constitution, b) culture will have only minimal impact on character (and can be easily res*sted), and c) you need not fear importing all manner of h*stile cultures…because they’re not? really?? h*stile???
But if Christianity is correct and humans are inherently Self-centered, it leads to a set of entirely different conclusions. For example, opening the floodgates may, y’know, be ill-advised.
LikeLike
The people are naturally good is confusing their inherent moral compass with wishful thinking.
LikeLike
How many books on developmental biology have you read?
Race is a total bullshit. There are people and mutants.
European face is a face of normally developed humanbeing. Just compare hot asian or black woman. They all have nontypical european features, not common for their “race”.
Men or women without options become fetishist, they like fatties, cougars, uglier people or whatsever
LikeLike
“Man is Woman, Black is White, Beauty is Ugliness, Truth is Lies” [CH], Cultural Marxism brought to you by (((them))). The whole world – NONE excluded – will pay a heavy prize for opening the gates of hell. How dare you think you will be spared by the demons you have unleashed, how dare you think you are able to tame that soul devouring madness? May god have mercy with you.
LikeLike
More like archi-pedo-go of misfit manlets
LikeLike
Trenchant analysis. The main thing I’d add is that many related problems stem from the same underlying dynamic—namely, that the only stable amount of Leftism is no Leftism. Otherwise, it tends to increase without bound.
In particular, democracy as a political form is intrinsically Leftist. As effective as the Alt-Right and related movements have been recently (especially Trump and Brexit), they have failed to challenge the democratic frame. Indeed, they have relied on it.
The success of those who seek to preserve and restore civilization will ultimately be limited unless we come to terms with the fundamental engineering failures of popular government. Such a recognition is an essential component of a zero-tolerance policy for Leftism—where people can believe and say whatever they want, but Leftist ideas have no influence on government policy.
LikeLike
There’s been a bit of discussion about the plight of the Whites in South Africa recently, here and in the Right in general.
The latest episode of The Daily Shoah podcast (which is always entertaining but usually just race-realist, jew-wise audio shitposting with a bit of serious discussion thrown in) has a substantive discussion with a White South African author, Jan Lamprecht.
https://radio.therightstuff.biz/2017/03/31/the-daily-shoah-143-boerposting-with-jan-lamprecht/
It includes a concise history of South Africa and updates on the current situation that Whites are facing there, as well as discussion of some of the foreshadowing that South Africa might hold for Whites in the United States.
Worth a listen.
LikeLike
There’s been a bit of discussion about the plight of the Whites in South Africa recently, here and in the Right in general.
The latest episode of The Daily Shoah podcast (which is always entertaining but usually just race-realist, jew-wise audio shitposting with a bit of serious discussion thrown in) has a substantive discussion with a White South African author, Jan Lamprecht.
It includes a concise history of South Africa and updates on the current situation that Whites are facing there, as well as discussion of some of the foreshadowing that South Africa might hold for Whites in the United States.
Worth a listen. Episode #143.
LikeLike
LikeLike
fekkin gay ass mod
https://radio.therightstuff.biz/2017/03/31/the-daily-shoah-143-boerposting-with-jan-lamprecht/
LikeLike
[…] defines two crucial (anti-)concepts: Sex Denialism And Race Denialism. And then proceeds to eviscerate […]
LikeLike