• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Tingles And Treason: The Decline And Debasement Of Western White Woman
Watch For Christian Tradcons To Deny Race Realism »

The Wages Of Wage-Earning Women

May 3, 2017 by CH

Reader John Whorfin writes about the costs, conspicuous and hidden, that women in the workforce impose on families.

A bit OT, but women in the workforce has obviously been a disaster for a number of reasons, well catalogued, but briefly:

1. Lowered wages across the board; Supply and Demand 101
2. Stressed families as no one is home to take care of the place, meals are fast food or processed crap.
3. Increased family taxes.
4. Inflation (more $ chasing goods).

All of which leaves the family running in place in terms of cost of living.

There are also less visible damages and one of them is kids overall getting less sleep. Think about it. Mumsy and Dadsy both work, so state-sponsored babysitting (aka “school”) is now a must, which means that the tots must be rousted out of bed at 5:30-6:00AM so mom can get to her cubicle job at Globohomo, Inc. This lack of sleep stresses the hell out of kids, whose brain development depends on 8-10 hours of sleep a night. I submit the hellish schedule most modern families adhere to is in part responsible for declining IQs and mental aberrations among kids.

Any family men out there should seriously consider if a two-income family is worth it. We homeschool, my car is approaching 10 years old, waifu’s is 14. We do state park trips instead of jet-setting or theme parks, don’t have the latest must have iPhag accessory and don’t have cable (a twofer as that sh*t is poison, spent that $ on a gym) and yet, we couldn’t be happier.

In the coming days of privation, prioritizing will become a…priority.

Leftoids have a real aversion to discussing or even lightly speculating about the economic, social, and biological costs of dual income families. When the Left’s argument is to shout down any opposing viewpoints and threaten ostracism via slander and libel, you have a good clue that the Left knows the opposition is onto something. No matter how much data and real world observations you amass to buttress your case that women in the workforce is far from an unalloyed social good, the mere utterance of this view will get you tossed out of uptight society, and probably from your job.

But those heady days of unaccountable power are ending for the Equalist Left. Each day their power drains, and they respond with increasingly unhinged displays of insanity. It won’t be long now before the leftoid system that’s been in place for the past 70 years breaks apart in a cacophony of rhetorical and possibly real shrapnel.

***

Related: Academia is becoming more left-wing because it’s becoming more feminized. The share of women who describe themselves as liberal or far left rose to an all-time high of 41.1%, while the share of men describing themselves this way was only 28.9%, for a 12.2-point political sex gap. THE WRITING IS ON THE WALL.

Also related: Women are sexually attracted to war heroes.

Tangentially related: Lord of the Gulf Stream jokes relevantly,

Little Johnny asked the teacher, “Say, there’s three women sitting on a bench eating ice cream cones. One is licking it, one is sucking it, and one is biting it. Which one is married?”

Teacher blushed to the roots of her hair, and stammered, “Why Johnny, how dare you even ask such a thing? I never! But, well, I’d have to say, the one who’s sucking it.”

“Nah, the one with the wedding ring, but I like the way you’re thinking…”

***

Passer By has a great comment about the dead weight of working women in ARE ECONOMY.

It is not clear at all if female presence in the economy benefits the economy. Feminisation is at all time high, yet growth levels are at all time low (and debt levels at all time high).

South Korea for example uses few women but economically is in pretty good shape.

For example male scientists publish twice as many papers per capita as women, receive more citations than women, invent twice as many new things and start twice as many new businesses as women (per capita). Currently 91 percent of new things in Sweden and 92 percent of new things in the US are invented by men (this is in modern times). A female STEM worker is 45 percent more likely to quit than a male STEM worker. In other words it makes no sense to have female scientists as they are actually a drag and burden on the economy and society, since they are far less productive than men.

Same with doctors – a male doctor is 25 percent more productive than a female doctor, several times less likely to quit his job, and although there are lots of females in the medical field, most medical discoveries are made by men. Female doctors are causing large debts and inefficiencies in western medical systems – again a drag on society. Even today, in modern western societies, men pay 70 percent of taxes while women are net liability for the government – take more from the government than they pay in taxes.

So currently we have both women who have negative birth rates (not replacing the population), and women who are less productive than men. I would say that society wants women as second rate men, instead of first rate women, and the result has been a failure – both economic and demographic.

That last paragraph is iconic truth for what it reveals about the nexus of female privilege and fertility. Coddling and privileging women should come with the expectation of robust female fertility. As women, especially White women who agitate most loudly for the feminist dystopia, have abandoned their prime directive — birthing the next generation — they have continued to receive largesse from the State. This is unsustainable on both genetic and economic levels. If women turn away from their natural function but continue to receive the State privileges that come attached to an assumption of fertility and child-raising, what we’ll have is an institutionalized system that privatizes profits (female coddling) and socializes costs (mass immigration to provide an ever-exapanding base of consumers for the technoborg).

If women want the State-enforced privileges that membership in their sex provides, then women must accept the rules of membership that their sex demands of them: procreation, not careerism.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Culture, Escape, Girls, Globalization, Ugly Truths | 144 Comments

144 Responses

  1. on May 3, 2017 at 11:25 am Oliver Elkington

    Denmark has a much more sensible attitude regarding work and family, kids do not start school until they are 6 or 7 and the working day is much shorter which enables fathers to be with their kids as early as 4 in the afternoon and mothers are given enough benefits to be able to not have to work when their children are young and so they can stay at home and look after them.

    America and Britain have an unhealthy money chasing culture that has lead to a lot of family breakdown.

    LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 12:04 pm Captain Obvious

      CH: “Also related: Women are sexually attracted to war heroes.”

      I wish this hadn’t been a throwaway line. It’s Big Picture stuff, and worthy of thousands of pages of speculation, but lately I’ve been wondering whether war might be a necessary rejuvenator of fert!lity rates by way of periodically disrupting the soul-destroying ennui of stasis.

      And there’s nothing which makes a woman wet between the legs quite like knowing that her man is a k!ller.

      LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 12:09 pm Captain Obvious

        I wonder if the Jews experience sexual arousal from the incessant low-grade “soft” warfare which they wage behind the scenes against the Shkotzim?

        Certainly the Jewesses in Israel proper must be aroused by the constant bloodshed involving the Muslims & Christians in Palestine.

        But do Jews & Jewesses get the same sexual arousal from a major soft-war victory, such as the resignation of Richard Nixon? Or Larry Summers overseeing the Rape of Russia in the 1990s [at least until our man in Moscow, Vlad the Bad, put an end to it]?

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 1:01 pm Tam the Bam

        “knowing that her man is a k!ller.” of other men, that is.
        Sammy the Slaughter down at the abbatoir isn’t going to mutter his way into their fud going on about how many Hereford X’s he’s cut the arseholes out of that day, is he?

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 1:06 pm Tam the Bam

        fuck “abattoir”. The other place is where they humanely put down antique Swedish crooners.

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 1:20 pm Les Saunders, Protestant

        I know for a fact that Jewsesses in israel are major league slutz. Especially the IDF consrciptee girlz cradling an M16 on their yoga-pants’d laps.

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 1:32 pm pytski

        Absolutely. War is a biological necessity to ensure that males are valued in society, both as a function of providing protection and to increase the relative worth of sperm. When men are too plentiful, misandry and lowering general male SMV is the result. Just my hypothesis.

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 1:42 pm Enfant Terrible

        No, war is not a necessary rejuvenator. For most of history, war was the domain of a warrior class, and not for the average person. It’s primarily in the XX century that having gigantic armies, and whole nations geared for war that became a reality.

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 1:49 pm Captain Obvious

        “For most of history, war was the domain of a warrior class, and not for the average person.”

        You wanna hazard a guess as to the [male] Total Fert!lity Rate of surviving warriors versus non-combatant average dudes?

        I don’t know whether enough records exist to reconstruct the ecological dynamics of it, but I have my suspicions…

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 1:55 pm Captain Obvious

        “Especially the IDF consrciptee girlz cradling an M16 on their yoga-pants’d laps.”

        As though the Spectre of Death is triggering something deep & ancient in their hindbrains, which accelerates the urgency of procreating, before it’s too late, and the opportunity is lost forever.

        Compare: “Terror Sex; Love (or at least lust) in the ruins.” http://nymag.com/news/9-11/10th-anniversary/terror-sex/

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 1:59 pm Captain Obvious

        Obviously it’s just a complete coincidence that all of those millions upon millions of GIs came home from WWII and triggered a White Baby Boom which the early pre-War demographers would have thought biologically impossible.

        LikeLike


      • on May 4, 2017 at 7:51 am wolfie65

        Women are attracted to socially prominent men.
        Which can mean ‘w@r hero’.
        Just like with convicts, I don’t think it’s the k1ll1ng that turns them on, but the notoriety/fame. She doesn’t give a hoot why he’s famous.

        I will agree that w@r has something to do with fert1l1ty rates, it’s nature’s way of cull1ng surplus men, thereby creating scarcity in the s3xual marketplace.
        It’s also ‘exciting’ – not in a good way, but exciting nonetheless.
        Most people who lived through a w@r, a b@ttle or even just a major f1ght of some type will remember that time forever as the most or one of the most exciting times of their lives, even if they were sc@red sh1tl3ss the whole time.

        LikeLike


      • on May 4, 2017 at 9:20 am Enfant Terrible

        @Captain

        After a great die off, it’s only natural that people should have more babies. However, you seem to be implying that war promotes the making of babies, but I don’t think history shows a correlation between the two.

        The Chinese and Indians have huge populations, and for most of their history, they have not been at war with someone. On the other hand, the Japanese have a huge history of conflict, and they used to have high fertility rates.

        Then you have westerners that never had huge fertility rates, and were involved in wars forever, but still managed to maintain steady populations, with cycles of growth and shrinkage.

        But, if white people wanted to kill all the others, then having a huge army on the warpath would most likely lead to a huge baby boom for whitey afterwards, in order to fill in all the open areas.

        LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 12:18 pm Carlos Danger

      If they could keep their money in the first place, they wouldn’t need the Kindergeld.

      LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 2:08 pm Captain Obvious

        A while back, CH had an essay, with speculation as to whether sending White women to work during WWII was a giant conspiracy, on the part of some influential Alpha psychopaths, to facilitate easier access to the Betas’ wives. I seem to recall that there might have been a picture of Rosie the Riveter in the essay, but I haven’t been able to j00gle it. However, I did find “The Modern Corporate Harem”; November 19, 2013; by CH.

        LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 12:25 pm safespaceplaypen

      “…unhealthy money chasing culture”

      lol and its also enabled us to become two of the greatest super powers in history. No one gives a shit about Denmark lol. Get your socialist faggotry out of here

      LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 12:46 pm Oliver Elkington

        Thank you for that intelligent comment, Germany has a similar culture btw as does France, hardly insignificant nations.

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on May 3, 2017 at 12:55 pm Cracker

        be careful comparing the US to countries in europe. each of those countries are no bigger than the size of one of our states. not an equal comparison at all when you consider trying to operate like them on a scale that would encompass our entire country.

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 1:35 pm safespaceplaypen

        @Oliver

        lol Germany != Denmark but it was a nice goal-post moving attempt. France != Denmark either. Regardless, both Germany and France are filled with pussies who hate their own race. The Germans voted in Merkel countless fucking times after all and the French are about to vote in Macron. These countries also have very high divorce and bastardy rates, just like the USA. Looks like their socialist policies haven’t really helped children or the institution of marriage all that much lol. Find a better example.

        Also, in comparison to the USA, Russia and China, Germany and France are still fucking peanuts. Notice I wrote “superpower” not “country that makes little trinkets and toys we like to play with and eat”.

        Thirdly, Germany, France, and Denmark are composed of a white population that is docile, low-T, effeminate, and (luckily) high IQ. Naturally they will be able to do all sorts of retarded, ineffective things until everything finally collapses or another country tries to invade.

        @Cracker

        European populations are also composed of a high number of high IQ whites and a very low number of minorities, where the distribution is fairly evenly spaced throughout the countries. In the US, however, you have a high number of minorities (most of which have average or low IQs), and an average number of high IQ whites (most of which are condensed in certain areas like Massachusetts, Vermont, etc.).

        Some areas of the US are a total shit hole just due to the simple fact that too many dumb minorities populate those areas and all of the smart whites left to Boston or wherever ya gotta go to make money. Blacks are breeding off the fucking wall and a lot of high IQ minorities (think the chinese, indians, japenese, etc.) don’t even give a shit about the well-being or history of this country, so long as it has a good “economy” and they can make money.

        Trying to blame our whole children-being-raised-like-shit situation on “chasing money” is absolutely retarded. Our country is powerful due to a few individual men (Rockefeller, Carnegie, Vanderbilt) like the above working hard, “chasing money” and making it big, and a few other lucky events. Our children are being raised like shit due to a few kikes and a bunch of other unlucky events, not really due to “chasing money”.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 3, 2017 at 8:19 pm Vagina dominator

        @safespaceplaypen

        “Our country is powerful due to a few individual men (Rockefeller, Carnegie, Vanderbilt) ”

        This is not true. Rockefeller and Carnegie both made their money in oil. No oil, no success. If they had been hit by lightning, or had never been b*rn, someone else would have taken their places.

        The history of the United States is exactly the same. No oil (or coal) and there would be no success. Of course, white people were brought in to develop the country. They could not have done that with blacks, but the main point is that what is important is the existence of abundant and cheap energy *resources*.

        The energy resource play is now very deep into the endgame. Even if we could dig up and reanimate the remains of your heroes, they would be able to do nothing to change this.

        The cheap, high quality and abundant resources that made the US great are gone forever. Plan accordingly. In the future, the ability of you and your ch*ldren to obtain calories is all that will matter.

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 8:36 pm safespaceplaypen

        @Vagina Dominator

        Note that I said “a few individual men” + “a few other lucky events” (tbh its probably a lot of other lucky events). Natural resources is one of those lucky events.

        Also, this: “Rockefeller and Carnegie both made their money in oil. No oil, no success. If they had been hit by lightning, or had never been b*rn, someone else would have taken their places.”

        There is literally no way to prove or disprove this statement. Its like saying “If Hitler hadn’t been born some other German would have taken his place.” literally no way of knowing if that would be true or not. It’s a nonsensical hypothetical.

        The White Race + Hard work + other good cultural shit + luck = why America became a super power.

        Natural resources alone coupled with a white population isn’t enough. Look at Russia all of those years. Tons of natural resources yet they never reached the industrial heights of the US till years later. Sure, they had several rich oil oligarchs during the 80s and 90s, but none of these kingpins aided in the rejuvenation and greatening of Russia, nothing compared to what Rockefeller did for the US.

        Also, Rockefeller was the oil guy. Carnegie was steel, which is a material that can be built from resources found all over the world, not just in the USA. Vanderbilt was in railroads and shipping, all of which other countries were capable of building, none of which had the impact on their own respective countries like Vanderbilt did on the USA. There are tons of examples of this throughout American history.

        Hearing the argument of “but it was the resources that made yur country great!” sounds very similar to the argument I’ve heard from some minorities that goes along the lines of “but it was the domesticated animals that made the white race successful!” All of it a half-assed attempt at trying to utilize Occam’s Razor lol

        LikeLike


      • on May 4, 2017 at 7:59 am wolfie65

        You should give a sh1t about Denmark.
        It may be small, but has some of the most beautiful women on the planet, and it’s also the ancestral home of the Angles – that would be half of the ‘Anglo-Saxons’……..
        And it is currently also being overrun by Afroasia, just like the rest of Whiteland.

        LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 12:57 pm Tam the Bam

      “America and Britain have an unhealthy money chasing rack-renting and housing-deficient culture that has lead to a lot of family breakdown.”
      In Blighty, you bend over for the Rachman-classes, or you sleep in a doorway. The next biggest thing is personal transport, because the infrastructure is buggered. No car(s)=no job(s), because workplaces pop up and die like scabby mushrooms. Most people pick a cheapish town somewhere in the middle of the still-functioning zone (non-rustbelt/rural trailerpark deadzone) where it’s still possible to commute (for a few hours a day).
      Denmark? Bikes just laying around? For anyone? And loads of cheap buses/ferries? From what I see, they spend most of their disposable on beer and tobacco (they all smoke like lords’ bastards), and slap-up meals in restaurants (which are very reasonably priced, don’t blame ’em one bit). And stupid spiky flimsy furniture that tears their laminate floors up.

      LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 6:51 am Passer by

      There is very high divorce rate in Denmark and in most european countries. Denmark has negative birth rate, which means that danes do not have enough children and will disappear at some point in the future. According to Helmuth Nyborg, danes will be a minority in their own country.

      LikeLike


  2. on May 3, 2017 at 11:26 am irishsavant

    I left this comment on an earlier thread but it’s worth considering. This American bull-dyke Catherine Zappone fetched up in Ireland a few years ago with his/her “wife” and went to work in the social “sciences”. In no time at all he/she was catapulted into a key MInisterial role responsible for – wait for it – Family and Youth. Her stated primary objective is to ‘get mothers out of the home and into the work-force’.

    As I said on the earlier post, this appointment was so bizarre that I can only conclude that (((hidden hands))) were at play.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 3, 2017 at 12:47 pm vfm#7634

      One must ask who in Ireland gave that b!tch the job in the first place.

      LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 9:05 pm Vagina dominator

      As you implied in your comment on that thread, here a retarded and incompetent women with Dunning-Kruger gets Family Services but the Immigration, Justice (Internal Security, Police, Special Branch, etc), Finance, and Foreign Affairs always go to members of (((certain other groups)))

      LikeLike


  3. on May 3, 2017 at 11:26 am nads

    “and they respond with increasingly unhinged displays of insanity.”

    See Stephen Colbert…

    LikeLike


  4. on May 3, 2017 at 11:27 am mendo

    And now you’ve got women working for companies that are subsidizing or helping them freeze their eggs for later use.

    That’s some truly evil shit right there.

    LikeLike


  5. on May 3, 2017 at 11:30 am RecoveringBeta

    Silly goyim, having your women follow their programming to maintain a home is oppressive!

    LikeLike


  6. on May 3, 2017 at 11:34 am jeangray07

    It’s absolutely possible to live on one income for the wife to stay home. Live within your means. Don’t worry about keeping up with the Jones’. Place your children’s innocence and safety above getting a new vehicle or the latest tech toy.

    Unless you’re functionally retarded and sunk yourselves into six digit student loan debt. Then you’re better off with a dog and the expectation that you’ll be working until you’re dead.

    LikeLiked by 6 people


    • on May 3, 2017 at 11:36 am mendo

      Live within your means.

      This is such a foreign concept for many people. They’ve tied their identity and self-worth to materialism.

      LikeLiked by 3 people


    • on May 3, 2017 at 12:36 pm plumpjack

      one thing couples should consider is, instead of their first property the ideal single family home, buy a 2-4 unit residence. live in one of the units and rent out the other three. there’s your second income. wife can be at home with the kids a easily manage the property.

      after a few years of building collateral you can leverage it to buy a proper house. hang on to it and it’s a future nest egg and/or college residence for your kids.

      this is such a no brainer.

      LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 5:57 pm jOHN MOSBY

      Amen, jean. It’s all about instant gratification with the yoof these days.
      I remember when the weef and I were starting out . ( 1980 ) I had a ’64 Ford pick’em up truck and she had a ’72 Chevy Nova she bought while working at the T G& Y whilst in high school. We both worked then, lived in a rented trailer and ate plenty of Red Beans and Rice, mustard greens , Jambalaya and corn bread.
      Hell, gong to the local burger joint was a luxury.

      LikeLiked by 2 people


  7. on May 3, 2017 at 11:37 am elmertjonese

    A man wants a wife, not a co-worker.

    LikeLiked by 6 people


    • on May 3, 2017 at 1:09 pm elmertjonese

      This related post on my blog continues to get a lot of hits :

      Girls! The Work-Life Balance Plan the Feminists Don’t Want You to Know

      http://wp.me/p6QFjS-3B

      LikeLike


  8. on May 3, 2017 at 11:38 am Augustus Tilton

    The point about sleep is astute.

    One thing middle class white Americans won’t admit is that school is little more than gov daycare.

    I can’t speak for everyone, but the 2 income family is mostly unnecessary, even in this time of inflation. 1 income pays for what people want, the other for what they need.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 3, 2017 at 12:14 pm Carlos Danger

      Another unspoken truth is that stressed women want less sex. Less sex, more porn, booze, bratty children, angry sullen papas. Wash rinse repeat, The rat race also fuels the SSRI industry, more absence creates more family stress and the lack of critical work being backlogged also creates stress. There is a reason this was the first place that was attacked.

      LikeLiked by 4 people


      • on May 3, 2017 at 12:16 pm Augustus Tilton

        Absolutely. It all feeds back into itself like a big self licking icecream cone.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 3, 2017 at 12:20 pm Captain Obvious

        Indeed.

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 1:15 pm Tam the Bam

        You know Cap’n, I just noticed Siggy’s cigar-hand there for the first time in … decades … WTF is up with that thumb? Only time I see that is where somebody was in a hi-speed wreck and forgot to keep their thumbs on top of the wheel. Or some old farmer that got caught the same way when the old grey Fergie hit a bad furrow.
        Like it was clumsily transplanted from Harambe or something.

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 5:44 pm Days of Broken Arrows

        Women are usually people-pleasers by nature (even the nasty ones seek some sort of approval). The corporatocracy know this and seeks to employ them because they perform like trained seals for the company.

        This allows management to exploit labor in a way they never could with male employees. I contend that the massive number of females who leave the workforce and get on disability aren’t faking. They genuinely ruined their spines or wrists by being pushed into grueling repetitive office bullsh*t work to which men say “I need an assistant to do that.”

        What modern corporations have done by “recruiting”* women is largely recreated the old sweatshop conditions we had 100 years ago. Male boss with a host of dependent female slaves willing to be exploited. The fact that the workplace now seems “glamorous” is deceptive. Your immigrant grandmother once felt the sweatshop was more glamorous than the convent because it offered wages and a chance at independence.

        Bowing and scraping to management’s unrealistic demands doesn’t make you a “hard worker.” It makes you a chump, esp. if you’re on salary. Your responsibility is to yourself first. Ruin your body and you’re screwed. It’s the only one you get and most doctors can’t be bothered to actually help, esp. if they’re female docs.

        (All of the above was written from personal experience. This isn’t conjecture, people. I’ve seen this happen.)

        *Who was the sh*thead who decided to substitute the pretentious, militaristic word “recruiting” for “hiring?”

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 5:45 pm Days of Broken Arrows

        Why am I stuck in moderation AGAIN???

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 7:32 pm jOHN MOSBY

        Preach it, Carlos.

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 8:05 pm tomjones

        stressed women want less sex with husband.
        less sex=less babies -wash, rinse, repeat until the numbers of your race are too low.
        birth rate to drops to Zero. Extinction.

        That’s why all major non-Western religions (hindu, muslim, buddhism, shinto, pagan) all AGREE about some things.
        1. Women should stay at home
        2. More babies=more happiness, high birth rate
        3. The Man decides everything. A woman opens her mouth, you threaten to stone her to death.

        Whether they believe in Allah or the Bodhidharma or Ganesh, all non-Westerners have a healthier attitude (more natural) about life and lifestyles.They’re conservative as fuck.

        Only the hyper-capitalist Anglo-Britain-America (and east asian tigers, they imitating Anglo-America, after all) have this unhealthy rat race. (see carlos danger’s kkkomment)

        LikeLike


  9. on May 3, 2017 at 11:38 am Anonymous White Male

    “Unless you’re functionally retarded and sunk yourselves into six digit student loan debt. Then you’re better off with a dog and the expectation that you’ll be working until you’re dead.”

    I think the handwriting on the wall is pretty legible now. Almost ALL of us will be working until we’re dead, regardless of whether or not we are functionally retarded or have a six digit student loan debt. Eventually, pensions of all kind will be either discontinued or they won’t even pay for your home, food and energy.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 3, 2017 at 11:42 am mendo

      We’ll be working to pay for those pensions once those coffers finally go bare and they’re mighty slim right now.

      Here’s a good website on the matter: http://www.pensiontsunami.com/

      LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 12:15 pm Carlos Danger

        Cali has some hella state pensions. If the people knew…

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 9:20 pm Vagina dominator

        @mendo

        They are going to close the stock exchanges for many months and severely limit the use pf cash, as in Greece and as is happening in India today – where millions are on the edge of starvation bcs of these “anti-money laundering” shenanigans but the MSM says not a word – while banks bring in the new personalized electronic currencies cards, which you will swipe like when you get onto a bus. EBT for all. Complete surveillance for all.

        How long will that take? Six months?

        In 19i4 the London Stock Exchange closed for five months.

        https://blog.oupdotcom/2013/11/unknown-financial-crisis-1914/

        Everything will be repriced and the devalued new US dollar will be worth what internationally? A lot of America may have to be given away to foreign counties in reparations.

        But don’t worry, Putin is on our side.

        Rice. Tuna. Good cooking oil (coconut or palm oil) and cans of condensed milk for trade. Grow something green in the garden that grows like a weed. To garnish the rice.

        LikeLike


  10. on May 3, 2017 at 11:40 am The Wages Of Wage-Earning Women | @the_arv

    […] The Wages Of Wage-Earning Women […]

    LikeLike


  11. on May 3, 2017 at 11:40 am Sorcerygod

    Heartiste, I must strongly criticize you here. First, some sugar.

    You write excellent articles whose emotional force is perhaps their most resonant feature. This sometimes gets in the way of your logic. PA is the other way around: too much logic, not enough emotions.

    But anyways, a few points: America can survive the bastardization of its racial composition (even if it will be loathesome), the Left is NOWHERE NEAR dying, and there will be no DOTR to make you feel good.

    Only a superman can cut the Gordian knot at this point.

    Or a god.

    LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 1:38 pm Diversity Heretic

      See CH’s subsequent post on religion.

      LikeLike


  12. on May 3, 2017 at 11:41 am Devin Tusk

    How many kids do you guys have?

    I know heartiste doesn’t have any but what about the readers?

    LikeLike


  13. on May 3, 2017 at 11:42 am plumpjack

    the end goal of “globalism” is to separate all life-and-death matters from the hands of individuals and convert them into profitable enterprises. breaking up the family was an important step. the wasteful, quality-of-life-improving, profit-limiting efficiencies of the family unit have now been eliminated and the profits returned to their rightful *owners*.

    the next step (already underway) is breaking up the individual into shekel-extractable parts. want to have access to your intelligence? here’s a pill? want a boner? here’s a pill. wanna take a shit? here’s a pill. got terminal cancer and wanna die? nope. too wasteful gotta keep you alive an extra three months to get as much shekels as possible out of that shell of ours (not yours).

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 3, 2017 at 12:04 pm Augustus Tilton

      CH, where the comments are almost as good as the posts.

      I was thinking along these lines the other day about my friend’s parents getting divorced. The whole thing represents a wealth transfer to the state.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 3, 2017 at 7:54 pm Lord of the Gulf Stream

        Chateau Heartiste: Come for the articles, stay for the kkkommentary.

        LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 12:16 pm Carlos Danger

      Watch THX1138 for the end game. It’s old but powerful.

      LikeLiked by 2 people


    • on May 3, 2017 at 12:17 pm Captain Obvious

      “the next step (already underway) is breaking up the individual into shekel-extractable parts.”

      Firestorm brewing as scientists work to create synthetic human DNA http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3549738/posts

      LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 12:56 am Heinrich

      They are soulless demons, minions of evil. Has anybody read about that genetically engineered human-pig Chimera?

      LikeLike


  14. on May 3, 2017 at 11:42 am Sorcerygod

    The Left has more creativity and motivation than the Trad-Right does. The Alt-Right rivals it in emotivation, now that the racial dams are broken, but it seems to lack for brainiacs like Heartiste and me.

    *shrugs* Chalk it up to a lack of practice. Get crackin’ boys. Hit those entertainment buttons so you can carry your poliviews with it.

    LikeLike


  15. on May 3, 2017 at 11:42 am Greg Eliot

    It’s not merely depressed wages due to more bodies to fill available jobs…

    … it’s the fact that women will work for less than men, because often (at the white collar levels) hubby pulls in a nice income, so wifey can work what normally would be, say, a $60K job for $45K, since it’s just about all gravy.

    Which is why a lot of those jobs that were done by men, back in the day, are now pretty much all women. And as long as they don’t burn the place down, the difference between doing the job very well and merely competent is not always seen by upper management… who more and more don’t have a clue about the occupations they manage anyway.

    And at the lower income levels, hell, I see a lot of women working merely to afford the clothes and transportation they need to be in the workplace.

    LikeLiked by 3 people


    • on May 3, 2017 at 12:21 pm Sorcerygod

      Greg Eliot makes an especially good comment. Paragraph 3, Sentence 1 is impossible to refute in particular.

      LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 12:49 pm vfm#7634

      Men have to earn more because their earning more attracts women, but women earning more does not attract men.

      LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on May 3, 2017 at 12:57 pm mendo

        And what’s funny is that women think their high-paying, status-titled jobs are the way to men’s hearts.

        There’s an ethereal element to this where I work. It’s seemed to have ramped up ever since we got a female CEO. There’s this air of “aren’t you impressed” I sense from these women.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 3, 2017 at 4:00 pm Cracker

        @mendo

        yeah, they are just projecting what they find attractive in men. same as when wolfie yammers on about how much women care about men’s looks lol

        LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 3, 2017 at 6:17 pm FuriousFerret

      ‘And at the lower income levels, hell, I see a lot of women working merely to afford the clothes and transportation they need to be in the workplace.’

      They pay for their own prisons.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


  16. on May 3, 2017 at 11:46 am Hackett To Bits

    Single income?! How will you afford to send your daughters to college to get that coveted degree in Gender and Patriarchy Theory? How could you deny them the vibrant campus experiences of “Resistance” and meeting exciting, ‘diverse’ male athletes? You are cruel and cis-normative!

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 3, 2017 at 12:23 pm mendo

      Some ladies in our office have had kids over the last few years and I wonder why they’re working, when that’s the reason: for college and not only that, but probably for private school and even the “best” day cares around, to help get that leg up.

      And as a surprise to no one, none of them are happy. They all look painfully exhausted, especially one of my supervisors. Surprisingly, she’s a good worker but she shouldn’t be here. She’s got two younglings that need her.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


  17. on May 3, 2017 at 12:01 pm realgaryseven

    In the case of many couples I know, the wife’s job only pays enough to cover day care and related expenses that the family wouldn’t have if she didn’t work. The family would be better off is she were at home with her children.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  18. on May 3, 2017 at 12:17 pm Passer by

    It is not clear at all if female presence in the economy benefits the economy. Feminisation is at all time high, yet growth levels are at all time low (and debt levels at all time high).

    South Korea for example uses few women but economically is in pretty good shape.

    For example male scientists publish twice as many papers per capita as women, receive more citations than women, invent twice as many new things and start twice as many new businesses as women (per capita). Currently 91 percent of new things in Sweden and 92 percent of new things in the US are invented by men (this is in modern times). A female STEM worker is 45 percent more likely to quit than a male STEM worker. In other words it makes no sense to have female scientists as they are actually a drag and burden on the economy and society, since they are far less productive than men.

    Same with doctors – a male doctor is 25 percent more productive than a female doctor, several times less likely to quit his job, and although there are lots of females in the medical field, most medical discoveries are made by men. Female doctors are causing large debts and inefficiencies in western medical systems – again a drag on society. Even today, in mordern western societies, men pay 70 percent of taxes while women are net liability for the government – take more from the government than they pay in taxes.

    So currently we have both women who have negative birth rates (not replacing the population), and women who are less productive than men. I would say that society wants women as second rate men, instead of first rate women, and the result has been a failure – both economic and demographic.

    LikeLike


  19. on May 3, 2017 at 12:24 pm Tarrou

    Weird conspiracy theory: Female “liberation” is a tax scam.

    Homemakers generate tons of value, but get paid nothing that can be taxed. Moving women into the workforce means they now pay tax, but even more than that, they have to hire people to take care of their kids (day care, babysitters, schools) and they can be taxed too! And if the kids are poorly raised, poorly educated and society pays a terrible price, who cares?!

    LikeLiked by 5 people


    • on May 3, 2017 at 12:51 pm vfm#7634

      Eating-seed-corn short-term time preferences tainted by greed.

      It’s why we ended up being dependent upon crap from China and how “planned obsolescence” became a thing.

      LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 12:53 pm oink

      Socialize the costs, privatize the profits

      explains about 90% of the dynamics of the phenomena around us. The forces driving the dynamics; that’s a more divisive topic among Chateau guests.

      LikeLiked by 2 people


    • on May 3, 2017 at 1:22 pm Tam the Bam

      A most under-appreciated remark, Tarrou. Very percipient, thank you.

      LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 8:13 am wolfie65

      Not weird at all, you’re bang on target.
      Homemaking is basically traditional barter (‘underground’) economy at its’ finest, which may very well be one of the reasons why it is so fiercely discouraged.
      One of the best things anyone can do is to unplug themselves from the system as much as possible.
      Ditch the car, walk or ride a bike instead.
      If you’re really adventurous, skate to work.
      Try to find an alternative to banks.
      If possible, grow your own food, apartment dwellers can start with something small, like an herb garden or climbing tomato plants in a south-facing window.
      Try to find a local farm that sells free-range eggs from happy chickens and real, raw milk from happy, healthy, grass-fed cows.
      Shop at flea markets, thrift shops, yard sales Army/Navy surplus stores and similar.
      Support small, f@m1ly-owned local business as much as you can.
      Homeschool your k1ds.
      Learn about wild edible plants, natural, traditional herbal medicines and nutritional healing methods.
      Learn self-defense of some type, be ready for all eventualities you can think of and have a bug-out bag ready – as well as a plan.

      LikeLike


  20. on May 3, 2017 at 1:12 pm h. bogbinder

    Those SAHM didn’t just enhance their own children’s lives, they contributed to community institutions. I went to a great neighborhood private pre-school/K. It depended on help from parents. Now I am sending my kids, but enrollment is dwindling, and parent volunteers are harder to find. Many families pass on enrolling because “the school doesn’t provide enough hours of care for a family with two full-time working parents.” So say goodbye to a community-binding, values-inculcating, parent-driven school… off to the pozzed, human-warehouse, 7am-6pm state-run day-orphanage.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  21. on May 3, 2017 at 1:24 pm Les Saunders, Protestant

    Debate’s on now live between Patriot Le Pen and Globalist Macron. Man, that dude is a phag. Good thing I learned French in school.

    LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 1:28 pm vfm#7634

      Heh heh heh…

      LikeLike


  22. on May 3, 2017 at 1:25 pm Enfant Terrible

    As far as I’m concerned, the best model society that was tried and proven to work, was the 1950’s, social conservative, Christian based and ruled, white America.

    What can compare positively to that???

    Nothing before, or after can beat it.

    Technological progress is morally neutral, and it’s only good or bad depending on how we use it. What matters is how a people chooses to, or is capable of, creating a stable, functional, healthy society, filled with strong families, and with happy and moral people, and with a high standard of living. America, and the western world in general, had it all in the 50’s, and now they don’t.

    It wasn’t perfect before, but it’s worse now, even though we’re supposedly richer and freer and bla bla bla.

    Anyways, there is nothing wrong with women working, they have always worked. Working is a good thing. The question is what kind of work, and for what purpose, and how does it benefit the individual, and society in general.

    LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 1:44 pm Diversity Heretic

      I’ve often had thoughts along the lines of your post, but 1950s white America contained the seeds that produced the 1960s. There was a Muslim who founded the Muslim Brotherhood who observed 1950s America and was horrified by what he saw. Perhaps the outsider saw more clearly.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 3, 2017 at 2:38 pm Augustus Tilton

        The 1950s have become something in conservative minds that they are not. It was the last gasp of heritage of America, not the zenith. The materialism and other features of modernism really started to gather steam then. It’s the decade Americans told themselves they deserved the good life after the Depression and WW2. It’s as if America went on vacation and never came back.

        LikeLike


      • on May 4, 2017 at 8:19 am wolfie65

        I wasn’t alive in the 1950s, but I know many people who were, and based on what they told me, plus various movies, books, music, etc. etc. etc. from or about the ’50s, the image I got is that of a highly buttoned-up, extremely conformist and rather oppressive society, the last gasp of an ultra-conservative mindset that started after the French Reblooshun.
        They believed in Better Living Through Chemicals – many of which cause cancer and all sorts of other diseases.
        They believed in Better Living Through Technology – which makes us weak, lazy and f@t.
        They believed that you could surv1ve a nucular @tt@ck by hiding under a desk.
        They listened to Doo-Wop.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 4, 2017 at 9:05 am Enfant Terrible

        You guys are missing the point. The 1950’s are a great example of a society with a high degree of social cohesiveness. Probably the highest America has ever achieved. It promoted a disciplined society with high expectations of behavior for the people.

        No slovenliness of dressing, no fatties, no abuse of drinking, no laziness, no living off welfare, no people with bad manners or lacking in social grace. Respect for parents, high degree of trust, family was the most important thing, being patriotic, honoring God, and so on.

        In essence, a positive, mostly Christian, white society.

        Of course the Jews had to throw a wrench at it to destroy it. This was at the time the west and the east were caught up in the struggle between deciding which socioeconomically system was best suited for the happiness of men.

        So, having said that, economic growth, and prosperity can be achieved in different ways, but building a highly cohesive society is hard, very hard, and America did it, and then destroyed it.

        Now we have multiculturalism, fag marriage, feminist cunts, globalist girls, epic drug abuse, abortion, trannies, and so on. But it’s OK, as long as the stock market is booming, and the shekels are rolling in.

        LikeLike


      • on May 4, 2017 at 9:07 am Enfant Terrible

        You guys are missing the point. The 1950’s are a great example of a society with a high degree of social cohesiveness. Probably the highest America has ever achieved. It promoted a disciplined society with high expectations of behavior for the people.

        No slovenliness of dressing, no fatties, no abuse of drinking, no laziness, no living off welfare, no people with bad manners or lacking in social grace. Respect for parents, high degree of trust, family was the most important thing, being patriotic, honoring God, and so on.

        In essence, a positive, mostly Christian, white society.

        Of course the Jews had to throw a wrench at it to destroy it. This was at the time the west and the east were caught up in the struggle between deciding which socioeconomic system was best suited for the happiness of men.

        So, having said that, economic growth, and prosperity can be achieved in different ways, but building a highly cohesive society is hard, very hard, and America did it, and then destroyed it.

        Now we have multiculturalism, fag m@rriage, feminist cunts, globalist girls, epic drug abuse, abortion, trannies, and so on. But it’s OK, as long as the stock market is booming, and the shekels are rolling in.

        LikeLike


      • on May 4, 2017 at 9:10 am Enfant Terrible

        Also, it’s official, Wolfie is nothing but another mouthpiece for the Jew. Who else characterizes the 1950’s as oppressive and conformist, if not the Jew. Lol…..GTFO Wolfie, you’re an idiot.

        LikeLike


      • on May 4, 2017 at 2:31 pm Big-Al

        My dad told me in the 50s and 60s young men wore a coat and tie to go to college classes. This was in the Southern Central US so who knows about the east and west coasts…

        LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 1:58 pm tomjones

      I don’t know if “technological progress is morally neutral, and it’s only good or bad depending on how we use it.”

      Birth control has been 100% bad for Europeans. That’s a form of technology. We were foolishly worried about overpopulation in the 1950s but that was bullshit. In 2017, we need more (Western) kids, not less. Serious religions, like Islam, don’t use birth control.

      Cars are the most anti-social technology ever. A little metal hut with four wheels that you use to travel. Avoiding all human contact with others. Not good.

      the best model society that was tried and proven to work, was the 1600’s to the 1870’s. Those were the best years for whitey (and for all races too).

      LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 8:43 pm safespaceplaypen

        Technology is neutral because it is a set of materials composed together that, on their own, cannot make “right” or “wrong” decisions, hence they are unable to be “immoral”. A rock, for example, can’t be “immoral”, just like a deadly hurricane can’t be “immoral” either. There is no moral choice involved. it’s all just a result of chemical reactions and physics. There are no “moral” or “immoral” chemical reactions or laws of physics.

        Birth control is not immoral in itself. The use of it is what is immoral. Similar to guns and nuclear arms.

        LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 2:14 pm oink

      Franz Ferdinand’s Squirting Jugular smirks at your naiveté.

      LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 2:41 pm Otsuka Duojinshi

      A big problem with women in the workplace data is that it uses post WWII as its baseline. Women always worked – the first issue of Forbes magazine in 1929 had as a cover story – Women in Business. The lowest birthrate in US history was in the 1930s – pre-birth control.

      [CH: would love a cite for that. if true, it’s probably accounted for by the extreme dearth of marriageable men during the great depression, and by low premarital sex rates among women.]

      The Depression. It’s the economy stupid! The 1950s US economic strength is an outlier and a unique set of circumstances.

      The US was the only industrial country that wasn’t ravaged by WWII – completely intact. Our economy and lack of purchasing power today is largely the endgame of Nixon’s abrogation of Bretton Woods and our politicians destroying purchasing power of the dollar – repeated slow motion bankruptcies to spend, spend and spend. Kennedy (a democrat) campaigned on a platform to increase defense spending when it comprised 65% of federal expenditure. It was LBJ’s Great Society social spending that was suicidal and the bill has finally come due.

      LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 3:50 pm Otsuka Duojinshi

        The widespread poverty of the Great Depression caused dramatic changes to family life as young couples, worried about their finances, put off having children. The US fertility rate (the number of children born to women aged 15-44) declined by nearly 20% from 1928 1935. Fertility rates recovered somewhat during World War II, which brought renewed prosperity to America. However, the war created its own impediments to fertility, as millions would-be American fathers were stationed overseas in the military. After 1945, Americans made up for 15 years of long-deferred babymaking by reproducing at record rates, creating the so-called ‘Baby Boom’; from 1946-64, the average fertility rate was a sky-high 113.4 per 100,000.

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 3:51 pm Captain Obvious

        “The lowest birthrate in US history was in the 1930s – pre-birth control.”

        That’s what I’m saying way above here – the pre-War demographers had no idea what WWII was going to do to 1950s & 1960s White fert!lity rates.

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 9:38 pm Vagina dominator

        Malthus was right. The operation of resource availability and limiting factors determines ultimate fertility (not “birthrates” but adult survival rates).

        Calories, calories, calories.

        LikeLike


      • on May 4, 2017 at 4:47 am Passer by

        Its not true – the lowest TFR of all times was during the 70s – after contraceptives/the pill was imppemented, TFR tanked in most industrial societies. Today it is again very low. TFR before the 30s was quite high, and it was always high. The low TFR is a modern phenomenon, and it happened due to female “liberation” and the implementation of contraceptives.

        http://www.prb.org/publications/datasheets/2012/world-population-data-sheet/fact-sheet-us-population.aspx

        LikeLiked by 1 person


  23. on May 3, 2017 at 2:46 pm Alexander

    A bit off topic but I recently saw an article highlighting the sex differences in desired attributes in a mate. A girl got not prom dates, but was accepted by Harvard. The comments praising her were nearly as disheartening as her lack of understanding of the sexual market.

    http://www.thisisinsider.com/priscilla-samey-date-prom-harvard-acceptance-letter-2017-5

    LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 6:34 am Anonymous

      Good link. There is no affirmative action in the SMP.

      LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 6:35 am Roy

      No affirmative action in the SMP.

      LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 10:58 am tomjones

      Every Harvard guy/gal I’ve met is a fucking retard.

      LikeLike


  24. on May 3, 2017 at 3:16 pm The Wages Of Wage-Earning Women | Reaction Times

    […] Source: Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  25. on May 3, 2017 at 3:31 pm ChunkyMonkey

    Women in the work force has massively increased inflation of living costs (certainly in the UK), particularly in terms of accommodation.

    Because of the fractional reserve banking system banks are able to invent money from nowhere, it means any good or service the banking system lends heavily, will inflate a great deal.

    As such, when banks have been lending to couples to buy property, with women now in the work force, the wages of both husband and wife (or boyfriend and girlfriend) have been considered in terms of how much the bank is willing to lend.

    That is, if a bank is willing to lend 3 times income to purchase a property, a couple can now have both their wages considered in this calculation, and what would have been 3 * £40,0000 = £120,000 (when considering a single wage) in the past, can now often be doubled (3 * £80,000 = £240,000).

    And as a result, property prices, particularly in the UK, have inflated massively.

    Also, if you’re single, it becomes very difficult/expensive to purchase even low end properties (small, 2 bedroom terraced houses), unless you are able to earn more than the average couple.

    LikeLike


  26. on May 3, 2017 at 3:39 pm jeff

    More wages of equalist sin: medical and dental schools for example can only have a finite number of students in each class per year– usually between 50-100. So, you get a class that is 40% male, 40% female and 20% dindu.

    Women don’t work full-time for long, and after they have kids drop to 1/2 time. Dindus… Jesus, most aren’t qualified to be there. The white men work their asses off out of school and retire in their sixties.

    So what does this equalist shit do? Create a doctor shortage.

    LikeLike


  27. on May 3, 2017 at 3:40 pm ChunkyMonkey

    Following on from my previous comment,

    What’s even worse, is that the previous Prime Minister Tony Blair (a well known slick talking globalist and demagogue), expanded the benefits system in the UK to allow even very well earning people to access entitlement programs, particularly child benefit.

    Worse still, people were declaring money received from government entitlements as income when applying for bank loans, further inflating property prices.

    An even worse benefit was “working tax credits”, which allowed people to work part time (8, 16 or 24 hours), and then be given a government top-up to bring their salary up to full time working wages (i.e. top their wages up with government money to equal a 37 hour working week wage).

    As a result, people make up a bullshit part time business venture, work 8 hours per week, and receive nearly 30 hours of pay free from the government, which people also declare as income when applying for home loans.

    Again, for a single man, not entitled to either child benefit, or working tax credits, it becomes very difficult to compete in the housing market with couples claiming 2 times income + government entitlements (even low paid couples, but benefit handsomely from child benefit by churning out millions of babies)..

    It’s an absolute mess, costs the UK an absolute fortune, the Bank of England wonders why there’s a productivity problem, and no politician has the balls to stop this scam in its tracks.

    LikeLike


  28. on May 3, 2017 at 4:34 pm LOL

    Hello, I’ve not been here in a while (TRUMP 2K16). You’re all legends for that btw.

    .. The Wimmen are all turning into GoodLiberals in nearly every conceivable way with one very notable exception: money. While they’re all on board for “equality” (and other such platitudes) they fall short where liberalism makes its strongest case: capitalism and its propensity towards wealth inequality.
    Why is this?

    Answer: A truly fair world is a truly uncompetitive world.

    Men compete for pussy. We do this mainly through proxy of our power and/or wealth. In a truly fair world every Omega would be equal to every Alpha. These GoodLiberal chicks will never ever square that circle. Omegas and Alphas on equal footing will never ever jive with them. Meantime, to compensate for their really unequal (and maybe even racist?) mate preferences, they will do everything to *show* their liberal credentials to the world through Great Platitudes and Grandstanding Of The Most Highest Order. Equality Uber Alles… except when it comes to her vagina.

    That explains much of humanity (gender and politics at least) right now I feel.

    Congratulations again on Trump. It was tremendous. We won bigly.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  29. on May 3, 2017 at 4:37 pm Truth-hammer

    Interesting that the National Socialists placed their highest priority on their women having children. But, then again, they were “evil Nazis”.

    LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 5:13 pm jOHN MOSBY

      If only der Krauts leader would have stuck with that, instead of trying to build an empire. I’m like Wolfie, I don’t get this Hitler worship, he was a bit of a dumbass.
      You never look up to dumbasses.

      LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 8:13 pm tomjones

        About half of the Nazis just wanted the Czech territory, Poland, a bit of Ukraine and a bit of Russia. That’s it. Just some more land for German families. Not too much to ask.
        But Hitler was obsessed with building an empire (he wanted all of Europe and Russia too!). He was too greedy. so you’re right. he was a dumbass.

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 8:45 pm safespaceplaypen

        I bet if George Washington lost we’d all be viewing him as a dumb ass too

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on May 4, 2017 at 8:24 am wolfie65

        Apparently, Unca’ Adolf also believed that factory farming was ev1l, immoral and produced inferior products, he wanted to outlaw it and return to widespread small-scale f@m1ly farming.
        How ev1l of him: Happy cows and chickens and pigs running around on healthy farm run by m0m, d@d & the k1ds…….

        What’;s really….odd…is that when you read MK, he did seem to have many of the right ideas, yet somehow, most of them went out the window when his party got to power.
        Remind you of anything?

        LikeLike


  30. on May 3, 2017 at 5:29 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    Does anyone else use Yahoo finance portfolios to track their stocks? The company did a redesign that’s completely useless and a massive step down from what they had. They won’t let you use “classic view,” so they essentially alienated their userbase.

    How bad is it? Well, for starters all the important info about stocks is gone and you can’t alphabetize them! The verdict? THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WOMEN RUN COMPANIES.

    One of many complaint forums:
    https://forums.yahoo.net/t5/Manage-your-account-settings/NEW-FINANCE-PORTFOLIO-VIEW-IS-AWFUL/m-p/241322

    LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 10:06 pm mendo

      Wow. I used to go to their site to check on prices and what not, but never to track holdings.

      And remember, they also favored hiring women over men when Mayer was there.

      Funny (not!) that her downfall and the Theranos chick’s downfall have had little press, aside from just the usual news updates.

      LikeLike


      • on May 4, 2017 at 2:42 am Days of Broken Arrows

        “And remember, they also favored hiring women over men when Mayer was there.”

        Their old portfolios were actually pretty great. No longer. There are now dozens upon dozens of complaints in that link. With the way things look, I wouldn’t be surprised if women programmers were behind this.

        The new layout simply doesn’t work. In other words, they put out something that’s basically a flawed, broken, substandard version of what they previously had. It’s like bringing your car to a shop for a tune-up and having it come back with leaks, gears stripped, and the radio not working.

        This mirrors Marissa Mayer’s time at the company.

        LikeLike


      • on May 4, 2017 at 6:39 am Roy

        Marissa (((Mayer))) got a pussy pass and a $23 Million severance package.

        That’s more than most Americans will make in a lifetime of toil. For fucking up a successful company.

        Clearly what is needed is more female leaders in every leadership position, such is their track record for success. [/s]

        LikeLike


  31. on May 3, 2017 at 7:47 pm Logic

    Can someone explain the joke? I have heard it before but I don’t get it. In the version I heard the teacher asks first “Johnny, if we have a tree with 10 birds on it and a hunter shoots down 3, how many birds are left?” Johnny replies “Zero because the rest of the birds get scared and fly off” to which the teacher replies “No, the correct answer is 3 but I like the way you are thinking”. And then Johnny continues with his question.

    Anyway I would appreciate if anyone can explain the joke.

    LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 8:05 pm Lord of the Gulf Stream

      I could explain it but it would probably just confuse you.

      LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 8:47 pm Logic

        Try me. I assume it’s along the lines that she sucks dick hence a guy is willing to marry her. But this reasoning would not apply from the woman’s (the teacher’s) point of view, meaning that women would not admit to something like this even though deep down they know it’s true.

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 8:48 pm Logic

        Try me

        LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 9:32 pm Greg Eliot

      The three that are left are the birds that were shot. The others took off, the dead remain.

      LikeLike


    • on May 3, 2017 at 9:48 pm Vagina dominator

      @ Logic

      A lot of humor can be got out of language because languages are always context-interpreted so the meanings we make depend on our assumptions about other peoples’ communicative intentions.

      In this case, the wordplay is in the fact that we can variously interpret the meaning of the word “left” in this context.

      1. Teacher’s (atypical) intention: How many are left on the ground dead?

      2. Child’s understanding of teacher’s communicative intention (that the teacher is setting a math problem) : How many are left available to shoot?

      With the handle of “logic” I understand your problem. The logic here is not mathematical. It is linguistic. The logic of language is always fuzzily context-driven.

      LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 10:29 pm Logic

        Thank you for your reply but I do understand the first part (the one with the birds). It is the ice cream part that I don’t get. Is the joke that the teacher believes that a woman who sucks is more likely to be desirable by men?

        LikeLike


      • on May 3, 2017 at 10:31 pm Logic

        Also my bad but in the original question the teacher says that there are 7 left. So apologies if that confused some people.

        LikeLike


      • on May 4, 2017 at 7:08 am Greg Eliot

        Something got lost in translation, go figger.

        LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 7:15 am tomjones

      If you gotta explain it, it AIN’T a joke. Furthermore, your “joke” wouldn’t make a sane person laugh in a millions years.

      LikeLike


  32. on May 3, 2017 at 11:36 pm Alt Right Footsoldier

    Women always worked but it was different. Girls worked with their mothers around the house. Wives and mothers did housework. Single women worked in fields or factories or as milk maids etc. Work for women was very social. Women gossiped at the local well, gossiped when they washed clothes in the river, gossiped as they worked side by side in the fields or the factory or milking cows etc.

    It was only with the rise of suburbia that women stopped working and became confined to houses. Women don’t want to work per se. They want to socialise. Work for women is a group activity, a way to be around others.

    LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 6:05 am oink

      LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 6:06 am oink

      LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 6:08 am oink

      LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 6:28 am Greg Eliot

      Women don’t want to work per se. They want to socialise. Work for women is a group activity, a way to be around others.

      One of the more astute and excellent comments ever posted at the chateau, Footsoldier… and that’s saying a LOT.

      Nice visuals, oink. A tip o’ the ten gallon to you as well.

      LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 7:10 am Les Saunders, Protestant

      I even heard tell of knitting bees from my grandmother and great-grandmother’s time. The ladies would get together and knit clothing, but it obviously served a social purpose. Not unlike the ladies getting together to put on a big lunch spread when the men were raising a barn or having a ploughing match. And this is in WASP country, not just Amish/Mennonites.

      Try getting a group of girlz together for something like that today lozzlozz.

      LikeLike


  33. on May 4, 2017 at 6:41 am oink

    Snowflake minuscully transgresses the meandering boundaries of puritanoid Politikal Co’Rektness

    Hilarity Ensues.

    So much for the “priviledge” of XX-chromosomed individuals the instance they stop marching in lockstep with the poz-partei

    LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 7:11 am Greg Eliot

      “What she’s doing is essentially cultural genocide, because she’s taking his stories and retelling them, which bastardizes it down the road. Other people will see her work and they’ll lose the connection between the real stories that are attached to it,” said Soule.

      Hilarity, indeed. Imagine that… Hollyvood’s been killing US for years. kekekek

      Of course, any (ahem) artiste who using PL as a last name deserves what she gets… and this one sure got it, good and hard, amirite?

      LikeLike


      • on May 4, 2017 at 7:15 am Greg Eliot

        Hey, it’s not like she made the guardian of the Bifrost Bridge a n1gger or anything like that, amirite? kekekekekekek

        LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 7:13 am Greg Eliot

      So much for the “priviledge” of XX-chromosomed individuals the instance they stop marching in lockstep with the poz-partei

      Well, the irony is, she WAS marching in lockstep with ’em, painting in the style of a (ahem) culture not her own.

      Wake up, White womyn!

      LikeLike


      • on May 4, 2017 at 7:20 am tomjones

        LikeLike


  34. on May 4, 2017 at 8:13 am Matthew

    “1. Lowered wages across the board; Supply and Demand 101
    2. Stressed families as no one is home to take care of the place, meals are fast food or processed crap.
    3. Increased family taxes.
    4. Inflation (more $ chasing goods).”

    The economic analysis is poor. #1 imagines a world where women enter the workforce and nothing else changes in response, or indeed in anticipation. It’s like saying if you hit the ball to a certain point in center field, you are certain to get a hit because the center fielder isn’t standing there. He might just move over to catch the fly ball.

    There are more women in the workforce, but there are also more women starting businesses. Present businesses can expand in response to the increased effective demand (production pays for consumption, after all).

    A lack of capital to accommodate all the new laborers could be an initial problem, but even then, the lowered wages would encourage investment.

    #3 is correct but doesn’t mean much. If a man gets a raise at work, he is also going to pay more in taxes. The additional money coming into the family is not, per se, a bad thing.

    #4 is the exact opposite of the truth. With women in the workforce you have more goods being chased by the money. The money supply is dependent on The Fed more than anything else; women entering the workforce does not inflate the money supply.

    #2 is where you need to make your case, along with #5, which is the toxic cocktail of career women combined with instinctual hypergamy and its corrosive effects on the foundation of society. These are your strong arguments; your economic ones are not going to convince anyone who understands economics.

    LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 8:25 am oink

      very suspect analysis. I have the feeling this poast is pulling wool over my eyes (not that the originl was 100% correct as such).

      And when I feel wool is pulled over my eyes I am (almost) never wrong.

      LikeLike


  35. on May 4, 2017 at 11:29 am Passer by

    “There are more women in the workforce, but there are also more women starting businesses.”

    Actually new businesses are at an all time low – for the first time more businesses die, than start. The more women in the workforce, the less new businesses. Funny how that works!

    There is very good explanation for that, though. Women have very low creativity – whether new business wise, or invention wise. A woman is several times less likely to invent something new or start a new business, compared to a man. When you replace male workers with female workers and most university graduates are now low creativity women, when you push for women instead of men is STEM for example, then things will actually get worse – those women replacing men in STEM will be several times less likely to start a new business or invent something new, therefore you may ultimately get less new businesses than in the past.

    Then there is the issue of quality of businesses. What is the quality of female businesses? Low. 90 percent of high growth businesses are started by men.

    The average male scientist publishes twice as many papers per capita as the average female scientist, receive more citations than women, invents twice as many new things and start twice as many new businesses (per capita). In other words – women in science are drag on the economy and makes no sense to have them.

    The average female doctor is 25 percent less productive than a male doctor and is several times more likely to quit. Again, this means that having female doctors is actually a drag on the economy.

    LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 11:44 am mendo

      Since we got our female CEO roughly three years ago, this company’s been on a downward spiral. It doesn’t help that the nepotism has brought in people unqualified for the jobs, let alone their VP titles.

      LikeLike


      • on May 4, 2017 at 12:05 pm Passer by

        As far as i know women are only 5 percent of CEOs of Fortune 1000. Even in Scandinavia, the number of female CEOs is around 6 percent. Women are only 10 percent of people who make 1 million per year.

        I have two explanations for this:

        1 Female creativity is quite low (women for example invent only 8 percent of new things in the US) and start only 10 percent of high growth businesses. Most female inventions are in areas such as jewelry and apparel.

        2 There are IQ issues at top levels. According to some studies there are twice as many men as women with an IQ of 120-plus, there are 30 times the number of men with an IQ of 170-plus as there are women. IQ and earnings are correlated.

        When i see a female CEO, i have quite high confidence that:

        A She is probably not going to have IQ above 130.
        B She is probably not going to be very creative.

        LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 11:53 am oink

      Same with Negroes,

      The talented tenf should have the freedom to do it, even if at a mild cost to the others.

      But the social and economic cost of forced equality is one heck of a price paid for West’Hajnalians’ virtue signaling / peacocking

      LikeLike


  36. on May 4, 2017 at 11:48 am Exurban

    CH needs to add one more example of absolutely useless female employment, and that would be policewomen and female firefighters (known as “fire-watchers” in the trade).

    Somebody posted an excellent instructive video of Swedish policewomen the other day, showing how four of them couldn’t manage to arrest one Mohammedan troublemaker. They do, however, cost the taxpayers just as much as real police.

    LikeLike


    • on May 4, 2017 at 12:23 pm Passer by

      The problem with women in the police, as firefighters, or in the military is not only their lower physical capability, but also the fact that they get injured far more often. I think that the majority of soldiers on disability are female soldiers. Lots of women get disabled in the military, and seek medical attention/get medevaced twice as often as men. Who pays for that? The male tax payer. Not to mention the pregnancy issues (women are less deployable than men) and the issues with women who magically get pregnant while on deployment, and have to be evacuated.

      LikeLike


      • on May 4, 2017 at 2:13 pm Glengarry

        I recall this article about a black woman fire watcher who got BS injured during training or before her first call, and basically retired on disability after that. And then there was the black woman judge who got elected or selected, turned in sick before her first day or work, and hasn’t come back yet.

        OK, so that’s not all bad, because it means less blackness in important professions. But still pretty shameless.

        LikeLike


  37. on May 6, 2017 at 8:38 am theaudaciousepigone

    Despite the relentless, ubiquitous mockery and disdain for procreation and homemaking over careerism, we mostly understand that the former is preferable to the latter, at least in the quiet of our own thoughts and private conversations. From the GSS, asked in 2012 (so it’s contemporarily relevant):

    “Consider a family with a child under school age. What, in your opinion, is the best way for them to organize their family and work life?”

    Mother home, father full-time — 39.7%
    Mother part-time, father full-time — 41.6%
    Both full-time — 11.3%
    Both part-time — 6.8%
    Father part-time, mother full-time — 0.2%
    Father home, mother full-time — 0.5%

    So this, like so many other societal lies, is maintained by browbeating not by deep adherence to its validity (because it’s not valid). The emperor has no clothes. People see that, they’re just afraid to be the only ones pointing it out.

    LikeLike


  38. on May 6, 2017 at 5:57 pm Hashed

    We also have to compare the economic benefit of a housewife to the cost of the
    replacements a working woman have to use.
    The traditional housewife used to do cleaning, some gardening, (healthy) cooking, laundry, after school care, homework private tutoring, old age care(for parents), kids mental support and kids entertainment.

    Outsourcing is sometimes good and economically viable but let’s look at what we need to replace the housewife. We need a cleaner who will also do the laundry, a gardener, a restaurant or fast food joint, after school care teacher, a private tutor, an age care nurse, a psychologist + a chemist for the prescribed ADHD related pills and Hana Montana in minimal cloths for entertainment. That’s a huge amount of money going to many people salaries.

    The traditional housewife was in a unique position to do all those things in parallel and to reduce the cost comparing to outsourcing it, which is what most working women do.

    Outsourcing all those jobs cost a fortune, way more than the real economic value most people generate in their workplace, especially women. So from a pure economic balance it just make sense that being a housewife is much more beneficial to the economy and for the greater good of humanity.

    LikeLiked by 1 person



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Recent Comments

    Gershom on The Confound Of Silence
    Mabui on The Confound Of Silence
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    cortesar on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Captain John Charity… on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • "Conspiracy Theory" Conspiracy
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • Manifest Depravity
    • Betrayal Is A Woman's Heart
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: