• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Leading Girls Out Of The Past Tense
Comey Sent Homey »

The Childless Should Not Lead Nations

May 10, 2017 by CH

Ann Althouse notes that the leaders of Europe’s four biggest economies have zero biological children among them. (h/t reader pavetack)

Theresa May, UK, no children (unable to have them)
Angela Merkel, Germany, no biological children
Emmanuel Maricon, France, no biological children
Paolo Gentiloni, Italy, no children

May is the least cucked of these four, and it’s therefore unsurprising that her childlessness was a pained regret imposed on her instead of a lifestyle choice. (Gentiloni is wobbly on border control, to put it nicely.)

I’m sure exceptions exist in the historical record, but as a rule, it’s generally better if a democratically elected leader has children than not. The feeling of stewardship and kinship is heightened when one has a stake in the future of the nation via his or her blood-bound progeny. Merkel and Maricon have no stake in the future of Germany and France (sorry, stepchildren don’t count on a Darwinian level), and so they will be inclined to push globalist policies that expand the scope of nihilistic degeneracy at the expense of racial and cultural continuity.

This excerpt from Maricon’s platform is so revealing of the globohomoist death cult mindset,

Perhaps because he wasn’t carrying the burdens of an entire gender when accounting for his [family deformation] decisions, Macron seemed completely at ease. He was saying, less apologetically than I’ve heard it said by a politician, that his family would be what he made of it, and that this was a cause for celebration, not suspicion or pity. His platform backs up his rhetoric, making special mention of the “diversity of family configurations”—married couples, couples in civil unions, co-habitating couples, parents who are together, parents who are separated, single-parent families, blended families, and same-sex-parent families—and promising to insure them equal rights under the law.

“Blended families” is a microcosm of what Globohomoists like Maricon want to do to the entire White West. Blend it out of existence.

Maricon’s shitlib blather to the contrary notwithstanding, it’s socially responsible to cast suspicion and pity towards rejects, misfits, and freaks who accumulate dysfunctional family formations like mutational genetic loads. This includes Maricon, a closet case who’s banging dusty grandma muff and will leave no legacy beyond being France’s last peacetime leader before the Siege of Elysee by Suleiman’s gremlin heirs.

A “diversity of family configurations” is code for “death of the West”. What libfruits like Maricon are either unable to process or resistant to accept is the beautiful truth that some family formations are better than others, and that this hierarchy has its source in our very humanity, which would be snuffed out if Maricon’s deformed families were to become the norm rather than the oddity. If the Family Maricons of the world were equal in estimation and under law to fitness-maximized heterosexual families with biological children, then it should be no threat to humanity if there were more Maricons to “celebrate” and fewer normal families to blend into the tar pits of the vast Dirt World.

Except it is a threat. A Maricon France means no France at all, at least not in any historical sense. Mariconism is Mort, the squandering of seed in barren old lady womb, the disappearing of White French from their homeland to be replaced by more reproductively vigorous invaders from swarthlands.

With stakes this high, suspicion and pity of Maricon’s Unfamily Circus are tepid responses. Mockery and ostracism would be more appropriate reactions.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Biomechanics is God, Globalization, Ugly Truths | 154 Comments

154 Responses

  1. on May 10, 2017 at 12:08 pm Matthew Walker

    The ones who only have daughters aren’t much better.

    LikeLiked by 2 people


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:14 pm awkward female commenter

      Women leading is a bad sign for a country. In the Bible, it’s always a curse. In the U.S., the White House has been Kryptonite to any woman who’s set her sights on it.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:36 pm vfm#7634

      If you’re not raising a white male, you tend to see nothing wrong with quota hiring.

      LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 6:37 pm Subscriber dobro

        Unless of course you are constantly worried about your ability to provide for that white daughter.

        LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 6:35 pm Subscriber dobro

      False.

      Having a daughter will red pill any reasonable man in a hurry.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 10, 2017 at 6:40 pm Subscriber dobro

        Additionally, with daugheters you have more descendents because they are more likely to reproduce.

        LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 8:28 am wolfie65

        Having a s0n is like making 1 bu113t.
        Having a d@ught3r is like making a g_n.

        LikeLike


  2. on May 10, 2017 at 12:10 pm Artisanal Toad

    You make the case for monarchy, which by it’s nature takes the long term view of things. Like the future of their children.

    [CH: the achilles heel of monarchism is inbreeding. (well that, and its inherent un-americanism.)]

    LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 12:35 pm Artisanal Toad

      CH- Observe The Federalist Papers. They were newspaper editorials written to convince upstate New York farmers to adopt the Constitution and they demonstrate the level of literacy, reason and logic common at that time. Show me a population like that and I’ll show you a population that deserves a republic. OTOH, when I look at the “Goodbye America” photos, I see a population that needs a confident, masculine and very dominant King. The achilles heel of monarchism has been inbreeding, but it doesn’t have to be now.

      [CH: this gets to the heart of the matter. a working republic is a coherent race. i think america did as good a job as possible sustaining her republicanism under an increasing burden of diversity, but that run of luck and grit is coming to an end now.]

      LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 12:47 pm Artisanal Toad

        CH- If you changed that to “a working republic is a coherent race governed by men” then I’d be in complete agreement. Even as is, only an idiot would argue to the contrary.

        LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 1:42 pm Sorcerygod

        I beg to differ with Heartiste. A diversity-republic will maintain itself for hundreds of years. In a technical sense, the Third Worlders will pay for themselves economically and culturally.

        [CH: no they won’t.]

        They won’t be as good as the whites at all, but they’ll be a net-gain.

        [no they won’t.]

        I just think North America should be all-white and Western in culture. STRONGLY.

        [the parasites may gain over where they would be if they had stayed in their shitholes, but america loses on every metric, except perhaps the cost of an apple.]

        LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 11:54 pm safespaceplaypen

        @Sorceryfaggot

        if you believed half of the shit you just wrote, then you are retarded

        LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 12:52 pm Captain Obvious

      “You make the case for monarchy, which by it’s nature takes the long term view of things. Like the future of their children.”

      Historian and author Niall Ferguson has apologised “unreservedly” for “stupid and tactless” remarks in which he implied that John Maynard Keynes did not care about future generations – because he was childless and gay. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/may/04/niall-ferguson-apologises-gay-keynes

      LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 12:53 pm Anonymous White Male

      CH: the achilles heel of monarchism is inbreeding. (well that, and its inherent un-americanism.)

      That and the fact that power corrupts. And its not so much inbreeding as it is the development of an undeserved sense of entitlement as opposed to a sense of duty. Frankly, all forms of government depend on a certain level of morality and future orientation. Even straight mob rule (democracy) could work if it had these components and was on a small, local scale.

      LikeLike


    • on May 11, 2017 at 8:34 am wolfie65

      Monarchy works fantastically well if it does and fails horrendously when it doesn’t.
      There may be no better form of government than a wise, benevolent King who strives every day for the best of his people.
      In the early days, the 1nbr33ding was kept in check by princes and princesses m@rriy1ng ‘commoners’ – the healthy farmer’s daughter, the brave, heroic carpenter’s apprentice, fairy tales are full of such stories for a reason – the social pressure to m@rr1y only other royals didn’t appear until later.

      LikeLike


      • on May 12, 2017 at 3:42 am Artisanal Toad

        Wolfie, you’re correct, but there is another side of it. The Amish are a good example of the fact that statistically speaking, for every not-quite-drooling idiot on one side of the normal curve you also get a genius on the other side. In a closed population both positive and negative traits can and will be reinforced. I have seen this in real life, both ends of the spectrum.

        The closing of the royal population to outsiders was a result of the church’s attacks against the nobility in their single-minded pursuit of worldly power and control. The church waged a long war against the nobility by taking control of marriage. In part it was the church usurping the right of a father to determine who his daughter married, but the real damage was done by the prohibition against polygyny.

        LikeLike


      • on May 12, 2017 at 6:43 pm wolfie65

        Jeebus lovesya.

        LikeLike


  3. on May 10, 2017 at 12:17 pm LB

    Perhaps your best post ever. Liberalism truly is a death cult.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  4. on May 10, 2017 at 12:20 pm bolg

    math time. what’s the number of diverse family configurations you get combining 100+ genders?

    LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 12:30 pm Carlos Danger

      100+!

      LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 12:46 pm mendo

        With the exclamation mark serving as the mathematical notation for permutations.

        LikeLike


  5. on May 10, 2017 at 12:26 pm CulturalResilience from Mobile

    That French cunt says there must be consequences for the UK for voting to leave the EU. Just think about that for a moment and what it really means. A typically cowardly and treacherous French leader believes that the ordinary people a country that have outgrown his pet playground gang, should suffer because they don’t want play anymore.

    Little wonder that a fully grown male with that sort of attitude openly signals such glaring mummy, or worse still, granny issues. May and Merkel are probably pleased to see France being lead by a leader who is used to taking orders from old barren women. The sick French fuck will probably to bed them.

    LikeLike


    • on May 11, 2017 at 8:38 am wolfie65

      A little spat, shades of things to come.
      Maybe in 100 years (or sooner), the Khan of Little Pakistan (formerly known as Great Britain) and the Caliph of Eurabia (formerly known as the EU) will trade nucular blows…..
      Over important religious disagreements, such as did Mohammed fart to the left or to the right.

      LikeLike


  6. on May 10, 2017 at 12:26 pm Caligula

    Farage – 4 kids
    Trump – 5 kids
    Orban – 5 kids

    The nationalist figures of the west seem to be prolific breeders.

    [CH: if there’s hope for the future of white civ, this is from where it springs.]

    LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 12:32 pm tomjones

      The future=nationalism
      liberalism=no future

      LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 12:41 pm Canadian Friend

        Childless women welcome homeless refugees like they welcome homeless cats.

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on May 10, 2017 at 1:59 pm Jaded Jurist

        “Homeless cats”, AKA feral cats

        LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 2:02 pm Baked Georgia

      hollande did not get the memo and had four kids. the exception that proves the rule

      LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 3:48 pm Beautiful Truths Ignored

      Other than Orban, the only two European leaders with 5 children are Finnish Prime Minister Juha Sipila and Henri Grand Duke of Luxembourg.

      Sipila belongs to a Pietist sect and leads a coalition government including rightwing populist Finns Party.

      Henri shocked popular opinion when he exercised his ducal veto to block a law legalizing euthanasia. Soulless childless EU creature Jean-Claude Juncker led the effort to abolish the ducal veto and enact the law.

      LikeLike


  7. on May 10, 2017 at 12:29 pm Carlos Danger

    Your tolerance of degeneracy drops substantially once you have children because degeneracy becomes an existential threat rather than an abstract one.

    LikeLiked by 5 people


    • on May 10, 2017 at 12:38 pm Oleaginous Outrager

      Unless you’re one of the degenerates from the start. Most of Hollyweird seems to fit into this group.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 10, 2017 at 12:55 pm Anonymous White Male

        Yeah, but they adopt niglets from Africa so they get what they deserve.

        LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 1:03 pm bolg

        “… from Africa so they get what they deserve…”

        actually no. you get what they deserve.

        LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 1:33 pm Cracker

        ‘Unless you’re one of the degenerates from the start. Most of Hollyweird seems to fit into this group.’

        very true. degenerates will just raise degenerate children. that’s why no matter how good your game is, no man should be breeding with liberals and feminists. they are damaged at their core. that’s why they became liberals and feminists in the first place.

        LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 2:19 pm mendo

        I used to work for a studio and let me tell you, while not on display, you could feel the degeneracy in the air.

        It didn’t help that there were tons of homos and all the girls liked being chatty Cathy’s with them, giggling like high school girls, but I repeat myself.

        It’s easy to get sucked into that abyss and thankfully, I never fit in. While at times I was shallow during my time there, I was never that shallow or debased.

        You did have a handful, like small handful, of good folk out there that were able to navigate the waters. But good perks and great pay have a way of helping that.

        LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:29 pm jeangray07

      Agreed. I wasn’t pro-death penalty until I became a mother. Where before I was “death is too final to be used as punishment”, I’ve become “hang em high and let em rot”. Society was a lot safer, and more polite, when being killed was a common sentence for severe misbehavior.

      LikeLiked by 3 people


      • on May 10, 2017 at 2:02 pm Jaded Jurist

        My redneck former colleague said that his wife was anti-gun until they became parents, after which her “mama bear instinct” kicked in.

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on May 10, 2017 at 2:03 pm Jaded Jurist

        I forgot to add that she now carries a handgun

        LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 3:52 pm mendo

        Women in mama bear protection mode >>>>>> go-grrrl career cunts

        LikeLike


    • on May 11, 2017 at 11:57 pm SteveRogers42

      100%. I’m stealing this one.

      LikeLike


  8. on May 10, 2017 at 12:31 pm martin

    I think this was one of the advantages hereditary systems had in the past. it forced people in power to reckon with the fact that their children would be in the same place they are at some point. Of course, this has largely been done away with in the name of ‘modernity’ in spite of its obvious effectiveness, and it was largely done by Tony Blair in more recent times.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  9. on May 10, 2017 at 12:38 pm Augustus Tilton

    I’ve thought that only married couples with children should have a vote, 1 per family to be cast by the man. They’re the people who have voted in the only way that matters and truly care about the future.

    A friend of my sister, who has stated her intention to not have children with her husband (it would cramp their fun lifestyle) was blathering on about “our youth” and “funding” the other day. How can someone like that truly invest in the future? They have no stake in it. The “our” part also shows a particularly creepy part of the liberal way of thinking. Your children are their children.

    PS too many conservative men talk about what they will do…someday… with their guns. Meanwhile, they send their children to public schools and allow them to consume popular culture.

    LikeLiked by 2 people


    • on May 10, 2017 at 12:55 pm Captain Obvious

      Plenty of dudes are home-schooling & home-churching these days.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 10, 2017 at 12:59 pm Captain Obvious

        Sorry, didn’t mean to sound snarky – I 100% agree with your initial statement – only fathers with [biological] children get a vote.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 10, 2017 at 1:24 pm Les Saunders, Protestant

        I hope you’ve found yourself a decent woman. If not, save up your shekels and go to Kiev. 2 weeks there and a fine young cannibal like yourself can find a nice young fiancée who will be more than happy to push out children. Visa-hunters are easy to weed out.

        I’m not joking.

        LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:56 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

      Only White male property owners should have the vote.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 10, 2017 at 2:06 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

        We’re not fighting for a country where the great and the good are ruled by the white bumpkin masses.

        Any ghetto thug can have spawn. Having kids is not much of an accomplishment, certainly not something to brag about or base a political system upon.

        LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 3:04 pm Major7

      I propose a graduated franchise, based on the truth that men shouldn’t be counted, but weighed (stole that from Russell Kirk).

      It could work something like this: Let’s say every man, unless he forfeits his vote (due to criminal record, being on welfare, etc), automatically gets one vote. If he gets married, he gets two votes. Has children (not out of wedlock), three votes, Married father and a business owner, four votes, and so on and so forth. Basically you reward with extra votes those who actually do things that Trumpenland deems healthy for our nation.

      What rewards can also punish. Get divorced, lose two votes, Business goes under, lose a vote. You get the picture.

      Also, women don’t get to vote. Ever. Sorry gals, but suck it.

      LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 6:52 pm Subscriber dobro

      …and own property. They need to being that back, badly.

      LikeLike


    • on May 11, 2017 at 8:46 am wolfie65

      Public schools and pop culture can be used to show the k1ds what reality is actually like.
      You do need to stay on the ball and put all that enrichment they received into perspective as soon as they get home – plus, add home schooling to correct the teachers’ bu11sh1t.
      And contrast the pop culture with genuine culture, such as real Celtic or Nordic history, culture and religion.

      LikeLike


  10. on May 10, 2017 at 12:40 pm The Childless Should Not Lead Nations | @the_arv

    […] The Childless Should Not Lead Nations […]

    LikeLike


  11. on May 10, 2017 at 12:41 pm Damn Crackers

    Their children are all foster-children from around the globe.

    LikeLike


  12. on May 10, 2017 at 12:42 pm Augustus Tilton

    Voting is a privilege that should be reserved for married men with children.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:06 pm Carlos Danger

      Married men with children who have served in the military to be enfranchised as in Starship Troopers.

      LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:18 pm bolg

      the idea of voting itself is wrong. otherwise ((their)) efforts would’ve been directed at killing democracy instead of obliterating the elite of the White gene pool.

      successful organizations are based on leadership of the best. and the best aren’t chosen by consensus. they rise.

      LikeLiked by 3 people


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:19 pm Based Papist

      Land ownership should also be required, as the founders intended.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 11, 2017 at 8:47 am wolfie65

        You can’t own land, you can only take care of it.

        LikeLike


  13. on May 10, 2017 at 12:43 pm Augustus Tilton

    And I’m in moderation hell or something.

    LikeLike


    • on May 11, 2017 at 11:29 am bolg

      liked this one by mistake, the like was intended for your comment on voting.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


  14. on May 10, 2017 at 12:43 pm Oleaginous Outrager

    The extensive atomization and isolation of modern urban living has been a powerful impetus for the redefinition of “family” into “whatever I want it to be, damn it!!”
    I don’t believe the globalist guttersnipes invented this notion, but they certainly have adopted it as their standard. That, combined with the issue of how we are currently living, has lent the problem an intractability that seem unsolvable short of a total societal collapse.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  15. on May 10, 2017 at 12:47 pm Logic

    I knew a girl back in HS who had the attention span of a goldfish and the motivation of a sea lion. She could not be bothered to do anything and she had a constant sadness in her face indicating a perpetual state of ennui.

    Fast forward two months ago. I saw her on the street with two little boys ages approximately 3 and 6. She is around 27 now. She recognized me and said “Hey V… It’s been so long how are you yada yada…”

    She was a different person completely. She even was trying to organize a get together for all our class and asked me if I can help out. This is the same girl who had to get through a motivational playlist just to go get a glass of water.

    If more women started having families early in their lives our societies would look very different indeed.

    LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:04 pm Carlos Danger

      QFT. I have had this same thought many times since becoming a father.

      LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:20 pm tomjones

      A girl only becomes a Woman if she has kids. Otherwise, she stays stuck as an eternal 7 year old.

      LikeLiked by 2 people


  16. on May 10, 2017 at 12:55 pm chris

    His choice in wife is a complete rejection of fertility.

    LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:17 pm Based Papist

      So is being a PUA and not a father.

      LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 1:58 pm Based Papist

        As a young man – before PUA blogs mind you – I was a natural, and have stories to put up there with the best of them. But after college at 23, being a proper man I “put aside childish things” and became a father. Sadly being also an urban SWPL shitlib I stopped at two.

        My wife – suffered intense cognitive dissonance for years – was extremely angry all the time. Neither of us understood why. I was by shitlib standards a model husband – changing diapers, cooking and washing dishes. Deep inside of course she had married a natural womanizing asshole who became frustratingly beta and housebroken.

        A decade later came the inevitable divorce. I picked up where I left before – and this time with some PUA pickup advice. I found it easier than ever to pick up women – but strangely unsatisfying. I had ( and have ) no interest in banging women who don’t want my children.

        Its like how wolf pups can tussle with little sheep, but once they taste blood must kill every time.

        After a few years with some GFs who wanted children – I married again and have a bunch more children.

        I consider adult men without wives and children to be living a sort of NEETism.

        LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 12:21 am safespaceplaypen

        damn comment stuck in mod

        LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 12:25 am safespaceplaypen

        lol

        http://thermidormag.com/against-the-trad-dads/

        LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 8:54 am Greg Eliot

        I like the cut of this Papist’s jib…

        … some of his wisdom should rub off on the rest of you yeggs… including that other (alleged) papist who wanders by on occasion. 😉

        LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:20 pm bolg

      what about pua fathers?

      [CH: there’s a genus of PUAs who have racked up impressive notch counts and went on to settle down, never abandoning their game but bringing it to bear on keeping their LTRs or wives happy. (tbh, there are also puas who tried to settle down but couldn’t fully embrace the sexual restrictions imposed by monogamy).]

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 10, 2017 at 1:37 pm bolg

        there are also the former non-pua fathers you brought in from the cold. don’t be modest

        LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 1:37 pm vfm#7634

        It may be easier for Game aficionados to switch to being a satisfied husband if they’re practicing Christians.

        LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 1:57 pm mendo

        @vfm…agreed.

        LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 2:13 pm bolg

        vfm#7634, how do you “practice” something that’s supposed to be a definition of who you are?

        i am very aware i’m arguing semantics here, but why not “if they’re christian” instead of “they’re practicing christians”?

        LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 2:18 pm Jaded Jurist

        bolg, last I checked, 80% of Americans identified as Christian. Obviously there’s a gap between identity and practice.

        LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 2:28 pm bolg

        jjj, as i pointed, semantics. willing to die for something does not equate openness to practice is.

        LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 2:49 pm Jaded Jurist

        bolg, I’m not quite getting you, sorry. Do you refer to a faith vs works dichotomy?

        I don’t see how semantics (we jurists are pretty well trained in the art) enters in to things.

        One who identifies as Christian may not know or care about the tenets and requirements of the faith; perhaps he merely enjoys the nicefeelz. Another not only identifies but studies the faith and expends daily energy trying to live it out. It seems clear that the latter is “practicing” his faith as plainly as a student of a martial art practices it when he rehearses his forms and techniques.

        Given this definition, a practicing Christian will behave differently from, and have a different mindset than, a mere nominal Christian. I suspect that was what vfm intended to portray.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 10, 2017 at 3:10 pm vfm#7634

        Identity is blood. Belief systems aren’t.

        People identifying with a belief system but not actually believing its tenets leads to absurdities such as “Christians” approving of abortion, gay marriage, and Muslim immigration.

        LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 3:15 pm Major7

        “there are also the former non-pua fathers you brought in from the cold. don’t be modest”
        Damn right, bolg

        LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 1:04 am bolg

        “jjj, as i pointed, semantics. willing to die for something does not equate openness to practice is.”

        i’m sure i was trying to make some point. totally beats me what it was though. lol

        LikeLike


  17. on May 10, 2017 at 1:02 pm elmertjones

    Childless females should be banned from proffering sex advice to women. Here Amanda Marcotte (sporting a tattoo of an impaled fetus) interviews Jill Filopovic about her new blockbuster book. Executive summary : women are shamed about wanting sex for pleasure, public policies should be enacted so they can enjoy dildos going up their birth canal instead of babies coming down it.

    http://www.salon.com/2017/05/10/watch-food-and-sex-are-pleasures-women-are-shamed-for/

    [CH: who has the impaled fetus tat? marcuntte? I can’t find an image of it.]

    LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:09 pm awkward female commenter

      Yes, they do it to prevent women from doing better. Women also don’t set up other women with men hotter than their partners. Women are very territorial, in addition to having a hierarchy. That’s why they’re often in the kitchen – to control access to food.

      There was this book going around in Christian circles when I was younger “I Kissed Dating Goodbye”. It was about courtship as opposed to dating. It caused even greater confusion in the Christian dating scene. I later found out that the male author was sexually abused as a kid, in church.

      I never assume that bad dating advice is an honest mistake.

      LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 2:16 pm Jaded Jurist

        The author of said book rode his initial wave of popularity to pen his sequel “Boy Meets Girl”, an autobiographical account of his own courtship. It had an extremely cringeworthy moment in which his fiancee said “We need to talk”, followed by her sharing with him her previously-untold sordid past as a cock-hopping sorority girl. He said that they both cried (TMI, FML) and that he forgave her, etc.

        I was just thinking about this a few days ago, wondering if the two were still together. I’ll have to look into it.

        LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 2:27 pm Jaded Jurist

        Eek, modded without identifiable reason. Well, I thought it was a curious and relevant response. I hope it makes it.

        LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 2:59 pm Jaded Jurist

        (TY, Mr Mod, for the prompt response)

        To follow up: brief research indicates that author Joshua Harris is still married, but is now apologizing publicly for ruining other kids’ romances. He allegedly has left his pastorship and is attending seminary. He intends in the next year or two to address the damage he has caused from his earlier teachings.

        This may be a popcorn-worthy topic to follow. Midl!fe crisis? Red pill? Globohomo capitulation? Inquiring minds want to know!

        LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 8:53 am wolfie65

        Dating advice from anyone is 99% bu11sh1t.
        Men usually don’t do it at all, and the few who do will NEVER give even a friend advice that might actually help him get a hot girl – because they want that girls for themselves.
        And women will ALWAYS try to steer a guy towards average or below average women – “Will you dance with my friend?”

        LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:47 pm elmertjones

      Well, maybe the interpretation stretches credulity. From the linked video :

      [CH: the broad on the right has thousand cock stare.]

      LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 1:59 pm mendo

        Marcuntte looks like Eric Idle in drag.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 10, 2017 at 5:59 pm elmertjones

        That broad is Jill Filopovic, attorney and feminist intellectual. Lately she’s been tearing up the liberal media with stupid “white male” think-pieces which are really just marketing ploys to draw attention to her book :

        https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/03/22/truth-about-white-working-class-men-jill-filipovic-column/99384206/

        LikeLike


  18. on May 10, 2017 at 1:03 pm awkward female commenter

    I think women who go through menopause have an easier time if their kids have kids. They get violent when you sync periods with them, and theirs is behind younger women’s. But they sort of have to be constantly be around children, and that makes them happy and safe. Otherwise, they age more quickly and start to go crazy.

    LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:41 pm Cracker

      even better is women who have kids right up until menopause so they are still raising young ones for the ten years or so they go through the worst of it. keeps them level.

      i have cousins and aunts who had kids clear up until their late 40s. now in their 50s and 60s they still have kids at home and look and act happier than any other women their age i’ve met.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 10, 2017 at 2:00 pm bolg

        lol that reminds me, stay away from chicks whose moms are recently-post-wall and in the eat-pray-love phase. they tend to be busy when you need them to babysit and you want to go out.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 10, 2017 at 2:21 pm Cracker

        yep. better to keep them busy with their own kids as long as possible than to expect them to be content playing grandma and doing crafts with the kids. a lot of women aren’t satisfied with that anymore. they want to live it up like they are still in their 20s

        LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 8:46 pm Sentient

        Using family to babysit is too expensive. Just use that girl down the street.

        LikeLike


      • on May 12, 2017 at 4:38 pm bolg

        “Using family to babysit is too expensive. Just use that girl down the street.”

        there are some strings attached, yes

        LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 7:06 pm Subscriber dobro

      IME these women are the most likely to “want to speak with the manager.” And they are petty as all hell about it.

      Thats why I don’t really get that meme. I’ve never met a mother who has the spare energy to argue over quality of service.

      Then again, memes are created by 20-year-olds.

      LikeLike


  19. on May 10, 2017 at 1:13 pm Brian Murphy

    In Scotland there are three women leading the three main political parties, also without biological children. (Two of them are gay so…) Would be curious to see the article re-skinned for this scenario.

    LikeLike


    • on May 11, 2017 at 8:55 am wolfie65

      Braveheart gifs, anyone…?

      LikeLike


  20. on May 10, 2017 at 1:16 pm Based Papist

    You make such a strong case for children. Yet you are “poolside”. I may have fewer notches on the bedpost – but I have quite a large blood investment in the future.

    [CH: i have stated on numerous occasions that universal poolsidedness would mean doom for society.]

    LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:47 pm Sorcerygod

      Don’t worry about that, Heartiste. The betas are so numerous and timid, they wouldn’t know the difference between a pool with alligators in it and a pool with snorkeling pussy hangin’ round. They ain’t goin poolside ever in any form

      LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 2:03 pm Based Papist

      Not to be mean, but isn’t it a kind of cuckery to be encouraging other men to seed the fields of one’s own women? I’m all for men a similar background building families to be natural allies of my own children. But ultimately its because I think my own will need allies. I could never sit back satisfied while other men take the women in the only way that matters.

      LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 2:23 pm mendo

        Just to play devil’s advocate here: it takes two to tango and many of those women made that choice of what lives they’re living now a long time ago. From my vantage point, it’s merely perusing the free samples that are there before you decide on what you want to eat.

        LikeLike


    • on May 11, 2017 at 12:25 am safespaceplaypen

      http://thermidormag.com/against-the-trad-dads/

      LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 2:58 pm A.B. Prosper

        Good article but so long as immigration is controlled (i.e near zero) and sane values and biological realism are taught, two is plenty. The “bad” trads aren’t bad at all.

        There is nothing wrong with enjoying material abundance in this life either since it may be the only one we have,

        A lot of these articles sound like the usual entitlement complex whinge to me,

        Society is entitled to your children, religion is entitled to your children , businesses are entitled to cheap labor and more consumers your children , society is entitled to your children defending it

        well no. You get what you pay for , nothing more or less. And if you won’t pay but can’t be removed by force or votes, well so be it. You get a low TFR and the problem self corrects (c.f Japan)

        LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 4:06 pm safespaceplaypen

        “Good article but so long as immigration is controlled (i.e near zero) and sane values and biological realism are taught, two is plenty. The “bad” trads aren’t bad at all.”

        lol In Japan, immigration is controlled, they have sane values and i’d say most of them acknowledge the biological differences between races, yet they still have the very problem you cite in your last paragraph.

        Race-realism is important, but sex-realism is even more important, and frankly any chump advocating “you need to marry and have those white kids cuz ya know them blacks are having kids so you must have kids too!” is just as retarded as the conservatives who say “you need to marry cuz dats what real men do!” All of its totally ignorant of the shame that is modern marriage. This is manosphere knowedlge 101. And no offense to many ardent alt-rightists (which i am lol) but the knowledge on sex relations and marriage compiled by members of the manosphere is much more comprehensive and much more applicable (i.e. less theoretical and more practical) than anything compiled by the alt-right.

        Since when has support for white existence and culture supplanted common sense about marriage and sex-relations?

        Since when has it been cool in the manosphere to persuade men to take a walk into the divorce rape grinder?

        LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 4:07 pm safespaceplaypen

        damn comment in mod

        LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 4:08 pm safespaceplaypen

        @A.B. Prosper

        I don’t think you understand the article

        LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 4:09 pm safespaceplaypen

        “Good article but so long as immigration is controlled (i.e near zero) and sane values and biological realism are taught, two is plenty. The “bad” trads aren’t bad at all.”

        Japan literally does all of these and yet they are not producing “two children” per couple.

        You assume a lot about what is need to produce good family structure and formation in a nation

        LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 4:12 pm safespaceplaypen

        Also, two is not plenty. What argument do you have to support that? Arguing to the contrary is pretty easy. You can’t grow a population by only having two children per couple because a large percentage of people aren’t going to marry and have kids, therefore those couples that are marrying and having kids must have more than 2 children in order to replace the current population, otherwise you have a diminishing population. Simple mathematics lol.

        “There is nothing wrong with enjoying material abundance in this life either since it may be the only one we have,”

        Lol I agree, there is nothing wrong with [insert thing i want to justify to myself] in this life either since it may be the only one we have.

        LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 4:16 pm safespaceplaypen

        Two children per couple is not plenty. Why? Because not every person in the USA will get m@rried – a large percentage will not – therefore if you only have 2 children per couple, the children will only replace the parents and not the rest of the population that doesn’t get m@rried. Therefore if you want enough children to replace the current population, either every person must get m@rried and have children (which has never happened in history) or of those that do get m@rried and have children, they must have more than 2.

        There ya go. Refuted your claim using mathematics.

        LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 4:17 pm safespaceplaypen

        “There is nothing wrong with enjoying material abundance in this life either since it may be the only one we have,”

        lol I agree, there is nothing wrong with [insert dumb thing i’m trying to justify to myself] in this life either since it may be the only one we have,

        LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 6:47 pm A.B. Prosper

        safespaceplaypen, its quite possible I didn’t understand the article . Still we are all assuming what is required, best anyone here can say is “this worked for me”

        I’ve never married and have no kids so beyond studying natalism for some years I won’t claim to be an expert

        As for Japan, yes it does but it also has a 80 hour work week and its common enough for people to be worked to death that there is a specific word for it . Karoshi death by overwork

        On top of that, the original bargain , I’d consider it slavery myself but the Japanese were fine with it gave you life time employment at a decent wage in exchange for tolerating that

        Now that’s gone and young people have no steady job and when they have work are expected to work 80 hours in an office job. If you subject any animal to conditions like that (high cortisol levels , low male reproductive hormones from lack of health proper exercise and exhaustion) they’ll stop reproducing .

        Throw in some crowding (120 million people is dense) and you have the recipe for lower fertility. Its a natural outcome of the conditions.

        Its slightly different in the US, we have semi sane work hours but we also took a 50% pay cut measured as percent GDP since 1973 and have much less job stability as well.

        Just because people in the past put up with bad conditions because they had too, doesn’t mean modern people will. We don’t have too and for many smaller families, singledom, MGTOW or poolside looks better all the time

        Its the 21st century, technlogy has changed the way people work, what they do, how they communicate and even the relationship between sex and reproduction. Anyone who can’t deal with things as they are will fail

        Fact is the people complaining about how many kids people are having for the most part aren’t paying the bills wither and as far as I am concerned, while they aren’t wrong in many particulars they also don’t have any moral authority either.

        And as far as the maths, that’s a bit pedantic. 2.1 is enough for replacement, probably 2.05 if we count only Whites who have a lower mortality level than other groups

        In any case a shrinking population so long as the greed heads aren’t allowed immigration is of very little harm and will stabilize either by the more natal replacing them (an Evangelical/LDS/Conservative future) or the population declining to a level the job market can sustain and the main expense, housing becomes cheap again in areas where they are jobs

        We’ve exceeded social carrying capacity despite that , TFR is highly unlikely to stay ultra low for an indefinite future unless there is a collapse in which case the population will stabilize at a much lower level

        Now there is probably a way to bump US fertility a bit, maybe enough to get to 2.1 or 2.2

        What you do is

        make society homogeneous , restrict female education and employment, restrict divorce, double (as percent GDP) men’s wages while having enough work that unemployment and underemployment is quite rare

        After you do that get housing costs down to no more than 3 years typical wage while still allowing the GDP boost to size and such.

        Remember the GDP in 1950 was 1/8 the current amount and houses were around 1000 SQ Feet

        Figuring for adjustments, material costs if a person is paid enough for 3000 SQ feet to be paid off in a a few years you’ll get a baby boom

        Given there are more distractions these days even with a cultural shift it won’t be as much but a 25% or greater increase would make it stable

        You think anyone can do that?

        I strongly doubt it and as we don’t have cheap religious capital to get people to act against their own best interests and people will get poorer every year till collapse, well you reap what you sow

        LikeLike


      • on May 12, 2017 at 11:12 am safespaceplaypen

        @A.B. Prosper

        You make a lot of really good points. Definitely a lot to digest

        LikeLike


  21. on May 10, 2017 at 1:16 pm Les Saunders, Protestant

    Childless people are not to be trusted in general. This is what makes gay homosexuals particularly untrustworthy. They are by definition unable to have children (although some are allowed to recruit/adopt children into the lifestyle with the complicity of the state). Can you think of a more loathsome, spiteful, and petulant figure than the aging childless homosexual? I think some of them, despite their lifestyle CHOICES, really wish they could have a normal family life. Because they don’t or can’t, they despise traditional family. It’s not coincidence that the Globohomoist ranks are infested with homosexuals. It is a repugnant lifestyle in every way: destructive to health, family, society.

    Emmanuel Macron
    Barack Obama
    Jason Kenney, John Baird, Scott Brison (Canadian neocon gay politicians)
    Hillary Clinton
    Angela Merkel

    All queer, all childless, all Globalists.

    LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:40 pm vfm#7634

      They’re fundamentally nihilists. They hate humankind and want to wipe us out.

      LikeLike


    • on May 11, 2017 at 1:39 am A.B. Prosper

      Why are Obama and Clinton listed there? Globalists ? Yes but they both have children.

      Hillary, one which is typical for American professional women and Obama, two.

      LikeLike


  22. on May 10, 2017 at 1:23 pm mik

    American white men need to wake up to the fact that the media and porn and the nfl and
    nba is poisioning whire white women against white men and in favour of black men.
    You need to stop financially supporting all these organations.
    Showi g game and dominance i front of women will soon be of little use with your
    Women being brainwashed against you.
    if you want to show dominancr. Seize control of the mainstream mediA. Otherwise you are swimming against the tide.

    LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:30 pm Les Saunders, Protestant

      In earlier times, the (((pornographers))) offices would’ve been raided, they’d be arrested, their wares destroyed, the girlz sent to their mothers, and leagues formed in opposition to the (((industry))). In the 1800s, they’d be pogrom’d. Wasn’t it Reagan’s appointee Edwin Meese who tried to clamp down on the (((pornographers)))?

      LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 1:37 pm mik

        Hi les i dont know about us politics
        i am irish and i am ready gor war against these criminal.
        Porn is the enemy of white men.
        search the great black d ick hoax.

        We need men to stand up and not be passive

        LikeLike


  23. on May 10, 2017 at 1:49 pm Sorcerygod

    All meaningful relationships make one hesitate before launching wars, ruminate before changing economies (wage freezes, and more), and hunker down before backing off on important issues.

    LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 1:58 pm mik

      I agree. But if enough people turn up outside the headquarters of fox.. cnn.. etc
      Then the employees will stop going to work there. You people are armed and they fear you.
      they are peddling fake news constantly.
      check out ed chirini / dallas gold bug on fb.
      or well aware 1 . Com

      Or sept clues website and forum

      LikeLike


  24. on May 10, 2017 at 1:49 pm plumpjack

    older women are just miserable, period, with or without children. this alt-right trope that women are fulfilled when they have kids needs to go out with the bathwater. they be more “fulfilled” with children than with cats, but that’s like saying they feel more lively when they’re in a coma than when they’re dead. if you don’t believe me I’ll introduce you to my mother. and my grandmother. and my sisters. and all of my neighbors. shall I go on?

    that they shouldn’t be leading countries would not even be discussed except for the fact that we are already living in upside-down bizarre world, where misery is considered an acceptable way of life. no thanks.

    LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 7:09 pm Subscriber dobro

      I think you’re on your own with this.

      LikeLike


      • on May 10, 2017 at 9:29 pm plumpjack

        heh. yeah maybe. I think what I was getting at is that we can’t rely on women to choose anything. they want everything. total freedom. safe homelands. free stuff. diversity. they want it all. they follow whatever. “leading” is not in their DNA.

        LikeLike


  25. on May 10, 2017 at 1:54 pm Joke Teller

    Before being ordained 6 priests had to stand nude with a bell tied to their cocks. Anyone whose bell rang had no spiritual purity. A naked girl with big tits & a shaved fanny danced before each one. 1st priest no reaction. She went down the line with no response from them till she reached last priest Ralph. Poor Ralph. While she danced he got a stiffy & his bell rang & flew off across the room. Embarrassed he ran & bent to pick it up, then all the fucking bells rang!

    [CH: haha. the bell curse.]

    LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 2:39 pm Jaded Jurist

      Ouch! (The truth hurts)

      In all seriousness, though, celib@cy is unnatural and unhealthy for almost all men. I’m convinced not that h0m0s seek the priesth00d, but that suppressing their natural urges leads the priesth00d to express their unnatural urges.

      LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 8:59 am wolfie65

        I think pr1esthood was invented to remove g@i men from the general population and offer them a ‘safe space’.

        LikeLike


  26. on May 10, 2017 at 1:54 pm Jaded Jurist

    It’s striking to ask yourself what the word “leader” implies, then contrast it to these people. Calling them leaders is, it seems, a vestige from a time when a nation’s chief actually led his people rather than just presiding over them, ministering to their affairs, or attending their chancery.

    LikeLike


  27. on May 10, 2017 at 2:00 pm Mycroft Jones

    For some reason I can’t see the link to reply to individual comments. Anyhow:

    The achiles heel of monarchy isn’t inbreeding per se. It is the disconnect between nobility and yeomanry (note, I didn’t say peasantry). When monarchs prefer to breed among each other, rather than the proper method of the monarch letting his daughters marry his dukes, and his sons marry the daughters of his generals (and dukes. But I repeat myself) then you have the scenario where the monarch feels he is a different species from his constituency.

    The Bible Law, which Christians reject (to their soon coming sorrow, if they every wake up to it, before dying beneath the gentle waves of swarth) says that:

    a) All officials (elected, appointed, doesn’t matter) have to be men of proven virility and fertility. No children, no stake in the future, no authority.
    b) marry within the nation. No foreigners
    c) only native stock. No foreigners.

    So, the whole past 1000 years of European warfare is based on intra-class marriage, royalty to royalty, instead of “keeping it in the tribe”. And that is why Jews are kicking white butt; they understand the concept. Look at Prince Harry of England, cavorting around with his mulatto mistress, even announcing an upcoming marriage. THAT is going to be a future English princess? Hell no!

    In Israel, the greatest civil war was caused by the mulatto spawn; the one time King David married outside his own people, the daughter of a neighbor King, it was THAT son who caused more than 1/4 of the fighting men of the nation to be slaughtered in a pointless civil war. (look up the story of David and Absolom)

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 10, 2017 at 3:06 pm Jaded Jurist

      .

      LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 8:37 pm Sentient

      Nice post.

      LikeLike


  28. on May 10, 2017 at 2:42 pm Dr Caveman (@The_Dr_Caveman)

    To add to the list or childless European leaders:
    Rutte (Netherlands, bachelor)
    Sturgeon (Scotland, spinster)
    Lofven (Sweden, cuck raising another man’s kids. But hey, Sweden)
    Bettel (Luxembourg, gay)

    LikeLike


  29. on May 10, 2017 at 2:47 pm warriorhun

    Never forget, guys: it was the Cultural Marxist Jews, (Marcuse if I remember correctly) who said that the main cause of the Holocaust was that the Germans were brought up in traditional families, and not because the Jews were stabbing the Germans in the back after WW1.

    That is the reason why Cultural Marxists like Maricón are trying to destroy the traditional family.

    Do not let them!

    LikeLike


  30. on May 10, 2017 at 3:44 pm mik

    This article is good but is based on
    the myth that polititions use the real
    names and identities to run for office.
    they dont.
    They mite actually have kids

    [CH: you’re referring to bastards sired with mistresses (or misteresses). in this day and age it’d be very difficult for high ranking pols to conceal bio kids from media exposure.]

    LikeLike


    • on May 12, 2017 at 1:25 am SteveRogers42

      With the magic that the Clintons use to wriggle out from under every sword that is poised above their heads, they have managed to render irrelevant such things as Chelsea’s obvious lineage as well as this young fellow:

      http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/21/my-quest-to-find-bill-clinton-s-love-child

      It all just wafts away on a sea of shrugs.

      LikeLike


  31. on May 10, 2017 at 4:05 pm The Childless Should Not Lead Nations | Reaction Times

    […] Source: Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  32. on May 10, 2017 at 5:00 pm Dude

    Reminds me of this Nietzsche’s paragraph from Human Too Human:

    455

    Political value of paternity. If a man has no sons, he has no full right to speak about the needs of a single matter of state. He has to have risked with the others what is most precious to him; only then is he bound firmly to the state. One must consider the happiness of one’s descendants, and so, above all, have descendants, in order to take a proper, natural part in all institutions and their transformation. The development of higher morality depends on a man’s having sons: this makes him unselfish, or, more exactly, it expands his selfishness over time, and allows him seriously to pursue goals beyond his individual lifetime.

    LikeLike


    • on May 10, 2017 at 6:52 pm -B-

      And yet how many dear leaders have come and gone and wrecked things for the ordinary man? Often expressly so his son can have the wealth and power passed down to him.

      The globalist program is to keep these so-called elite families on top forever.

      LikeLike


      • on May 11, 2017 at 7:17 am oink

        “forever” is commonly much shorter than man thinks

        “when his soul departs, he returns to the earth
        ON THAT VERY DAY his plans perish”

        LikeLike


  33. on May 10, 2017 at 6:31 pm Subscriber dobro

    I agree with this. Ever since becoming a father recently (at the late age of 36) I’ve started to realize how petty my childless friends concerns are. They worry about their fucking dogs, their lawns, there careers. I found myself think, wow, these guys take these bullshit temporal concerns with them into the voting booth!

    It’s been enlightening.

    That said, i can’t quite figure out how men like Pat Buchanan and Rush Limbaugh fit into this. Do they genuinely care about the future state or are they just digging the who boost from being locked in to the (former) opposition?

    LikeLike


  34. on May 10, 2017 at 6:32 pm James Morgan

    This. I was there for all of my children’s births. My wife is looking forward to grand kids. After almost 28 years She’s still beautiful to me and classy. From a professional position in a huge field that evaluates the up and coming talent. Extremely male dominated. Give me a family man.

    LikeLike


  35. on May 10, 2017 at 6:37 pm luisman

    Reblogged this on Nicht-Linke Blogs.

    LikeLike


  36. on May 10, 2017 at 6:44 pm -B-

    There are many many people with children that believe globalism is the best thing for them and their children. They want the state conditioning their children and the rest of the program. They subject their children to the globalist diversity nonsense too.

    Those with children who privately oppose the globalist program have to go along with it for the sake of their incomes, careers, and even remaining alive.

    Then there are the people who think that their own social / political / wealth climbing is the best thing they can do for their children so they go along to get along. They do whatever is expedient for their own wealth and position.

    So no, I don’t think having children has anything to do with the self-serving nature of going along with globalists. Those that oppose the globalists and most likely to do something against them are the childless who don’t have to worry about supporting a family and are unconcerned with their own social position. The ones with the least for globalists to leverage over them. All other forms of childless people in the arena are no more or less likely to support the globalists than their counterparts with children.

    While I don’t believe Trump has the knowledge to understand globalism, not be manipulated by it at times, or fight it successfully, he is at least in an almost childless position to fight from. He doesn’t have to care about his income and most of his children are adults. This breaks a lot of the leverage.

    LikeLike


  37. on May 10, 2017 at 6:52 pm M. M.

    Childless, too:

    Scotland: Nicola Sturgeon
    Luxembourg: Xavier Bettel
    Netherlands: Mark Rutte
    EU Commision: Jean-Claude Juncker

    LikeLike


  38. on May 10, 2017 at 7:59 pm Will S.

    Reblogged this on Patriactionary.

    LikeLike


    • on May 11, 2017 at 7:20 am oink

      OTOH:

      Full name: Viktor Mihály Orbán

      Spouse: Anikó Lévai (m. 1986)

      Children: Ráhel Orbán, Gáspár Orbán, Flóra Orbán, Róza Orbán, Sára Orbán

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 11, 2017 at 7:25 am oink

      OTOH:

      Full Name: Bronisław Maria Komorowski

      Spouse: Anna Dziadzia (m. 1977)

      Children: Zofia Aleksandra, Tadeusz Jan, Maria Anna, Piotr Zygmunt, Elżbieta Jadwiga

      LikeLike


  39. on May 10, 2017 at 8:15 pm M. M.

    Childless, too:
    Sweden: Stefan Lofven (the idiot boy wonder)

    LikeLike


  40. on May 10, 2017 at 10:03 pm Jimi2x

    Nice name change CH..for those who dont know Maricon is spanish for faggot.

    LikeLike


  41. on May 11, 2017 at 2:19 am Simon

    You know “Maricon” is “GAY” in Spanish, don’t you? That cracked me up.

    LikeLike


  42. on May 11, 2017 at 3:14 am APL

    “Emmanuel Maricon, France, no biological children ”

    Maricon’s beard clearly can’t have children, even if Maricon was inclined to try.

    But I doubt it.

    LikeLike


  43. on May 11, 2017 at 10:06 am gig

    That French cunt says there must be consequences for the UK for voting to leave the EU. Just think about that for a moment and what it really means. A typically cowardly and treacherous French leader believes that the ordinary people a country that have outgrown his pet playground gang, should suffer because they don’t want play anymore.

    Little wonder that a fully grown male with that sort of attitude openly signals such glaring mummy, or worse still, granny issues. May and Merkel are probably pleased to see France being lead by a leader who is used to taking orders from old barren women. The sick French fuck will probably to bed them.

    nope. truth is different. Teh smartest IYI (Taleb definition) of Europe were all recruited by the Euro bureaucracy. the brexit precedent means that at some point in the future, they can all loose not only their jobs if the Union is broken, but also their even more important pensions

    They need the British to pay because of that. Somehow the funds to pay the Eurocrats if the Union is broken must be found.

    LikeLike


  44. on May 11, 2017 at 1:37 pm Scott Jameson

    “…Maricon are either unable to process or resistant to accept is the beautiful truth that some family formations are better than others”

    Macron has accepted this a long time ago. He knows that the nuclear family is the survival of France. That is why he seeks to destroy it.

    LikeLike


  45. on May 17, 2017 at 1:20 pm This Week In Reaction (2017/05/14) - Social Matter

    […] one big one, rather than a million small ones. Also, this shouldn’t even have to be said: The Childless Should Not Lead Nations. Spandrell agrees. This too: An update “Inharmonious irregularity” + Proximity = […]

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    g(r)eek on Revolutionary Spirals To Civil…
    g(r)eek on Revolutionary Spirals To Civil…
    cortesar on ¡SCIENCE!: The NPC Leftoid Hiv…
    cortesar on ¡SCIENCE!: The NPC Leftoid Hiv…
    g(r)eek on Revolutionary Spirals To Civil…
    cortesar on ¡SCIENCE!: The NPC Leftoid Hiv…
    cortesar on ¡SCIENCE!: The NPC Leftoid Hiv…
    cortesar on ¡SCIENCE!: The NPC Leftoid Hiv…
    markgm28 on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
    cortesar on ¡SCIENCE!: The NPC Leftoid Hiv…
  • Top Posts

    • Betrayal Is A Woman's Heart
    • Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Oddly Acquainted With Western Feminist Propaganda
    • Sweden Vs Norway
    • NPC Culture, In One Meme
    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • The Three Abrahamic Religions, Abbreviated
    • The Diminishing Returns Of Anti-White Virtue Signaling
    • Revolutionary Spirals To Civil War 2
    • Natural Conservatives!
    • Don't Help The Leftoid Media Sway Elections
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: