What other conclusion are we to draw when the voting behavior and opinions of single White women corroborates exactly what this post’s title asserts? From Bigly E, another id-buster post that reveals a leetle too much about the vagoconductive currents that emanate from single White women’s hindbrains.

Single white women are more opposed to a big, beautiful wall than Asians, blacks, or even Hispanics are.
*twatpalm*
Single White women are, presumably for those of them who still have a bit of bloom on the rose, actively trawling the sexual market for cad and cavalier. Thus, they are in their stage of life when all faculties, mental, emotional, libidinal, are focused to a pinpoint of estrogenic vitality, with the familiar shit-testing behavioral profile that vitality presupposes.
This means, single White women are limbically primed to be aroused by dominance and a ZFG attitude in men, and those men who fall short in these traits are dumped into the beta orbiter/friendzone with a quickness, when they aren’t rejected outright. The dumping can be literal, or metaphorical, as in a political friendzoning that weakens the electoral power of White men.
As a social phenomenon, a large chunk of America’s White men have spectacularly failed the dominance/ZFG test. America the Shitlib Feminist Shrike has effectively neutered White men, and unmasked them for romantically unappealing doormats to single White women. As women are wont by the essence of their sex to spread their legs for the dominant tribe’s men, they will wish to see tribal battles play out so that they may enjoy the luxury of choosing winners and their winning seed. The single White woman desire for open borders is nothing less than a desire for alpha male interlopers to test the mettle of their betatized male loafers. A massive civilizational shit test, if you will.
For this reason, it was always a mistake to entrust the nation’s future to its native daughters, especially while in their pulchritudinous primes. Women are more xenophilic than men and this difference goes deep, all the way to the Darwinian pulses in the primal part of the brain that regulate reproductive algorithms. No logic, reason, accountability, or basic common sense can defeat such a primitive force.
There aren’t many solutions to this intractable cognitive block in women’s hindbrains that don’t require serious divestment from the recently operative political and social calculus. Off the top of my head, here are solutions that would work (but just try hurdling the independent variables on your way to a solvable equation):
- rescind suffrage and disenfranchise single White women
- get more White women married off and pregnant at younger ages
- break America into regional entities, diluting the single White woman vote
- convince married White women to socially ostracize single White women by any means necessary
- make divorce harder for women
- economically and socially incentivize early marriage (e.g., conduct a massive draw-down of women from the workforce and cease glorifying single momhood and tankgrrl careerism)
- ban abortion and contraceptives (good luck with that)
- execute a vast, mass propaganda psy ops involving reframing of contentious national question issues and other rhetorical gambits that constitute the heart of Game to reorient the acceptable opinion avenues by which single White women gain social status rewards so that they find value in claiming the opposite of the self-defeating open borders beliefs they comfortingly regurgitate for now. (whether he knows it or not, this is the Trump Option.)
I welcome further suggestions from the commentariat.
An “overfeed the beast” strategy that I sometimes see entertained by crueler elements in the Exasperated-Right won’t work; if you dump millions of Dirt World trashkin into single White women playgrounds, all that will accomplish is an increase in the murder, rape… and miscegenation rates. The bleeding heart politics of these dumb bunnies won’t move an iota. No, the way forward is for White men to retake control of their homeland and scoff at the precious political boilerplate their women solipsistically indulge.
I can tell you that if we refuse to tackle our shared single White women problem, the nonWhite invaders will tackle the problem for us. And the way they solve it won’t abide feminist SWPL rules of conduct.
PS Cough up your black pills, because Trump’s firing of Comey may have opened the way to renew the investigation of thecunt’s email case while at State. I told you guys Comey was a lackey for thecunt. Get rid of him, and thecunt will start thinking about getaway plans to safe havens.
***
PA suggests motives for the single White woman signaling for open borders.
— The single White woman desire for open borders is nothing less than a desire for alpha male interlopers to test the mettle of their betatized male loafers.
Yes, I agree. Other reasons why normal young single White females (as opposed to gutter-grade trigglypuffs) think they want open borders, along with my estimate of the likelihood of that being one of their motives:
To enjoy brown d_ck: 5%
To have a mixed baby: 0%
To be on the top of an even taller female SMV pyramid: 90%
To increase the likelihood of *other* White women getting r_ped, k_lled, or kn_cked up by browns: a sobering 75%
To virtue-signal (read: follow a fashion) that they don’t yet know is about to go out of style: 100%
Female Suffrage. A mistake that will not be made again.
I meant to bring up this point in the body of the post, but PA’s #3 reason — to enjoy the instant social status ladder climb from importing a vast bottomfeeder population of lower SMV women and men — is probably the most subconsciously pertinent (and least remarked upon) motivation to single White women.

Myself? I think that there is no solution and we’re just screwed.
I can’t give up the struggle, but at the same time, there’s no perceptible way to win it. History is littered with extinct species; it appears it’s our turn.
LikeLike
There’s a character in the historical novel A Struggle For Rome… he’s a Gothic chieftain based upon an actual historical hero who fought like a lion for hours against the Byzantine/Roman Army sent to drive the Goths out of Italy. Strabo wrote about it all, if memory serves.
Anyway, this Teja, early on at a meeting of chieftains, was the lone voice of doom when others were considering the strength of their position on the Italian peninsula… yet all knew that he would be the one who fought the most valiantly, to the last, despite his pessimism.
There are many, some even here at the chateau, who can identify with that weight of sadness… and resolve.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I misspoke, I meant the historian Procopius,not Strabo. The author of the historical novel is Felix Dahn, for those of curiosity.
LikeLike
Check that… Procopius, not Strabo.
LikeLike
@Greg Eliot: The Roman Empire’s pro-enslavement policy did not cause captive women to be mistreated. Modern Islam is more discriminatory than the Romans ever were. Do you feel that the U.S. should dial back the clock on women’s rights?
LikeLike
Who are you and what have you done with the Church Lady ?
Good post.
LikeLike
Greg you waste your talents duking it out with other readers. This is good shit.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Never give up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I appreciate the kind words, and I would rather not have to deal with the shills, believe you me.
But somebody’s gotta take out the trash. 😉
LikeLike
“somebody’s gotta take out the trash”
Way down below here, there’s a G0d-d@mned Tel Aviv yeshiva puke from the JIDF talking about (((Mel Brooks Kaminsky’s Space Balls))). Or maybe it’s a retired j00niversity professor from the psychology department? Of course, WTF would be the difference…
G0d in Heaven, what I wouldn’t give to see some ghey snuff p0rn with one of these 800lb feral boars in Texas s0d0mizing Yossi Cohen off to he11 to meet his maker.
LikeLike
My take is nothing to fear. Whites are already a minority — only 15% of the world.
Intelligence ALWAYS WINS. In a mud future, no matter how many whites there are, they will always dominate the rest. Niggs/spics/muzzies will be the manual labor grunts, while whites invent important things. Numbers never mattered in war. Think about a few hundred conquistadors defeating hordes of natives and taking their gold.
Winners will be Russia, Israel and Japan.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Whites have always been a minority -true, but if the enemy get their way (which right now they are), there won’t be ANY White people left.
There are Semito-African ‘immigrants’ even in Iceland and the very north of Norway.
Guess what they’re doing there.
Chasing White tail, just like Coudenhove-Kalergi-Morgenthau-Giscrad d’Estaing-Kohl-Merkel-Macron want them to.
Russia already has a larger Moslem population than all of western Europe put together, that’s been like that for hundreds of years.
Stop looking to them for salvation, we have to clean up our own damn yards and it’s gonna get M E S S Y.
Japan is aging and well below replacement level just like Europe.
Isra3l can go back to he11.
LikeLiked by 2 people
@wolfie65
Can you share your info about african migrants in Iceland?
LikeLike
Passerby – Not sure about Africans, but they now have Arabs:
Keep in mind that Iceland has a population of about 300,000 people…..
LikeLike
>Intelligence ALWAYS WINS. In a mud future, no matter how many whites there are, they will always dominate the rest. Niggs/spics/muzzies will be the manual labor grunts, while whites invent important things. Numbers never mattered in war. Think about a few hundred conquistadors defeating hordes of natives and taking their gold.
In other words, Latin America. Take a look at the rulers, billionaires, and other masters who live in the region.
I doubt Europe will end up this way some centuries from now. I expect new Reconquista movements to steamroll hordes of foreigns until Europe settles into shiny borders.
>Winners will be Russia, Israel and Japan.
Russia’s economy is lower than Italy’s, Israel’s non-Ashkenazi Jew population is growing while the AJ’s are stagnant, and Japan is only better off than Europe in that it’s not so keen on migrants.
LikeLike
I can’t agree the outlook is completely bleak. A quick search of “online dating is racist” reveals White Women still strongly prefer White Men and discriminate against googles and Asians (even more so). How to reconcile? Virtue signaling?
LikeLike
Online ‘dating’ consists of about 99.9999999% l1es and sc@ms.
Why should White women’s supposed ‘preferences’ be any different ?
LikeLike
Interesting point. I’ll answer it. It’s because white women want “Immigrants and minorities for thee, but not for me.” It’s typical liberal hypocrisy.
In other words, they want to flood the country with foreigners because of some ill-formed idea of “equality” or charity, yet when it comes to their own lives, they’ll only go for “tall, skinny white boys.” And then they work the men they marry to death so they can live in the “exurbs” and raise their own kids around only white people.
But when it comes to you and me? These women sit back in their lily-white neighborhoods and say “Eff you, LOSER!” and vote the minorities into all our towns.
Keep in mind that these female voters we’re discussing are the grown-up versions of the snotty, self-absorbed cheerleaders and student government snots we used to deal with in high school. These women didn’t change. They just got older and now they vote.
LikeLike
Read PA’s post again. It’s not about how attractive the migrant men are. Or not solely.
There’s an element of intrasexual competition to this. Lower SMV White women support mass immigration since it raises their SMV by either letting them get courted by foreign men or making them look better to men in their ethnicity by dumping in lower SMV foreign women and presenting themselves as virtous.
Women getting raped and murder from this is a casualty at best, deleting competition at worse.
LikeLike
My dick is way less racist than my brain is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“My dick is way less racist than my brain is.”
dick => concerns itself with the needs of the individual
brain => concerns itself with the needs of the group
individual reproductive fitness vs. the reproductive fitness of the group. aka, great t&a, and great personality vs. acceptable to mom and dad.
LikeLike
Sample bias.
It would stand to reason that “online daters” are mostly past their alpha cad stage and are looking for beta dads.
There are a hell of a lot more white women fucking swarthoids than there are “dating” them.
LikeLike
No Sir, I do not accept that. I do not accept the possibility of defeat. I simply don’t!
It will be our decision, and our decision only. Let us get back to basics.
We are stronger than women, period. They can do what they do because we let them. Our ancestors were fully aware of the true nature of women, and they could control it. Are we less then them? Let us put them back to their place, they are practically begging us for it.
As for the remaining enemies? Jewboys who do not even lift, prancing fags and trannies, and colored savages? Give me a fucking break. Nobody does ethnic cleansing like we, White men do.
We fucking KNOW the solution, do not tell me otherwise. If you tell me you have no clue what the solution might be, I will call you a liar.
Deep down you know. Deep down you always knew. Tell me you don’t, I dare you, I double dare you!
YOU KNOW!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Is it true that Jews don’t lift? I am Jewish and have never lifted a weight in my life. Why don’t Jews like to get physically fit? Please answer without being mean.
LikeLike
Jay Fink
Jews concentrate on brains and education in 100%, I think that is the reason why they do not lift, and also the reason why they rule the world now. with their money they can buy the women they want, they do not have to look sexy to fuck, they have the shekels for the shiksas. that is the only idea I can come up with.
You tell me why Jews don’t lift? Also I am sure the Israeli army guys do lift.
LikeLike
Damn right, warrior Hun! I agree with you 100% on this.
LikeLike
Oh, that’s definitely the solution; getting our women back under control, and evicting all the foreign invaders, mudsharks, and mystery meat en masse. You won’t find any argument from me there.
The problem is that there are like 50 million white guys with f1re@rms in between us and regaining control over our nations. Mind you, I’m kind of a 2nd Amendment fellow myself, but I also realize that most of the unofficial and ALL of the official w@rri0rs in our countries are dedicated to keeping anything like that from happening.
The only way out I can see is total collapse of the system followed by a quasi Mad Max period, minus the deserts and tiny population.
LikeLike
@warriorhun
I guess that’s all there is to it but this goes way back. I was reading an article about the historic mating patterns of Ashkenazi Jews. Jews were so physically weak a couple hundred years ago that a full 50% of Jewish men were rejected by the Russian army. Apparently back then the Russians were outraged at how “puny” Jewish men were. Interestingly I don’t feel any outrage today. I’m a pretty small guy and no one seems to care.
LikeLike
@ Jay Fink
It is not as if Askhenazi Jews really wanted to fight for Russia, right?
Maybe it was a clever choice by them back then, not to lift or excercise their bodies, so as they could avoid conscription and having to go to war for interests other than that of their own tribe.
Later on, in the Bolshevik Revolution, and even later when Israel was born, that attitude changed, and Jewish warriors emerged.
But in the majority of present day Jewish men, the old school of thinking about physical excercise still have its hold.
LikeLike
@ Ironsides
It all starts with our own lives. We lead and influence others by example.
We treat the women in our lives according to our standards, and we reject all Feminist influences.
And we all speak our minds without PC self-cenzorship.
We work, we train, we read, we learn.
We raise families, and we instill in our children our values.
And when we will hear the drums, we will go to war.
There are more of us than you would believe. Remember before Trump? Every one of us thought we are all alone, and everybody else is crazy and stupid. Just a few individuals fighting a hopeless battle lost long ago, and others are so brainwashed that they do not even notice.
It was not so.
Most of the people were just playing along, paying lip service, wanting to get by, earn a living to make ends meet.
Everybody was all-PC, because nobody wanted to lose money because of bitches, fags, kikes and jigaboos.
But when the chance came to express their true thoughts and feelings, oh boy did the Earth tremble?
From the silence, the enemy read their brainwashing was complete, that the status quo is based on unshakable consensus.
Most of the Liberal-Bolsheviks still do not understand what hit them.
This will get better and better. We are living historical times. The patriarchy of the straight, white male will return with a vengeance. We were good for too long. Time to be bad again and conquer the world.
LikeLike
Dylan Roof seems at peace with his own certain death. He wants the death penalty over being deemed autistic by the courts. Just putting that out there for mass consumption.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-south-carolina-dylan-roof-201711-story.html
LikeLike
“…Why don’t Jews like to get physically fit? Please answer without being mean….”
lol
LikeLike
@warriorhun
Noble sentiments, sir, and until a few days ago, I felt the same. However, in New Orleans, the Oath Keepers, the Trump supporters, etc. rejected the people trying to save the Confederate monuments and fraternized with Black Lives Matter and the communist googles who say they also want to tear down the statue of George of Washington.
I hope you’re correct, but that massive New Orleans cucking and the loud shrieks of “we’re not racist! Down with white heritage!” by Trump supporters has deeply shaken my faith that most Trump voters view us as anything but pests to be exterminated, while embracing the googles and Aztecs who want to wipe them off the face of the earth.
LikeLike
@ Ironsides
Cucks gonna cuck. That is why they are called cucks.
There are two types of men. Those who accept being a cuck, maybe revelling in it, and those who will have none of that shit. Those who are content to be slaves, and those who yearn for liberty, and cry “give me liberty or give me death”.
The Red Pill (or White Pill, or whatever we call it) is not for everybody. What we can offer is to choose. Those who choose the Blue Pill can not be force-fed with the Red. What we must not allow is them to have power over us.
The war is not really on the streets, no matter how much I rejoiced seeing Antifa Girl punched at Berkeley. and it is not on the battlefield just yet. It is a war on the soul and on the mind. We must win the souls and minds of our people. We must influence thinking, building identity, to know who we are and what we are fighting for. If we only start do so when the real battle has already started, it is already lost.
Did I promise you a guaranteed winning? Easy battle? Divine intervention?
I can promise you none of that.
I can only offer to take a risk for the chance of winning.
The people of old had nothing more to proceed on, either.
Who knows? Maybe we will be the vanquished rebels, the doomed heroes who fought against impossible odds and lost. The ones being remembered as the examples of keeping the rebellious spirit of men alive in much darker times to come. Who knows? One thing I know, from the history of my people, is that noble defeat, on the long run, is the stuff of legends that builds a nation and inspires generations of future young men to greatness.The other thing I know, is that winning is even better. But either outcome happens only if we try.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Cucks gonna cuck. That is why they are called cucks.”
my black pill moment came when I saw the alt-right turn on Trump at the very first sign he wasn’t going to follow their simple, binary prescription for saving white civilization by purging the entire country of muds and throwing all the Jews in gas chambers.
here they wanted a strong leader to overcome deeply entrenched adversaries, and when he comes along but isn’t able to win the battle in one giant, video game fantasy swoop, they’re ready to send him to the gallows. that’s when I realized the alt-right, while ideologically pure, is living in just as much a self-interested fantasy world as the far left, and cannot be relied upon to have your back. it’s your people, your family, your community that you can trust. the ones who have a stake in yours and theirs actual survival. period.
the hot air fantasy merchants of BOTH sides are simply an information source at best, a distraction at their most neutral, and on a suicide mission at worst.
as Carlos Danger here said, there is no pure source of information. so until I see boots on the ground in my own community, and I can be absolutely certain which side represents MY interests, if any, then I’m staying on the sidelines and looking after my own people first.
LikeLiked by 1 person
One thing I know, from the history of my people, is that noble defeat, on the long run, is the stuff of legends that builds a nation and inspires generations of future young men to greatness.The other thing I know, is that winning is even better. But either outcome happens only if we try.
Well said.
Lengyel, magyar – két jó barát,
együtt harcol s issza borát.
LikeLike
Good point my fellow goyim. We should all just take the blackpill, like good goys and let (((them))) have (((their))) world since it is our town to go extinct apparently.
LikeLike
The JIDF/Mossad invests enormous resources in demoralization campaigns.
LikeLike
Prepare, go poolside, and pray.
LikeLike
As a “nation” we are screwed, but as a tribe we can have a long and prosperous future. https://fifthpolitical.wordpress.com/2017/05/05/the-de-nationalization-of-the-global-european-diaspora/
LikeLike
(re)learning to think in terms of millenia cures existential despair.
LikeLike
We don’t have millennia. This is either resolved in a decade or two, or the white countries are simply gone. Unless, of course, we’re thinking in terms of accepting white extinction, and and looking forward to the evolution of another human race that is capable of the same civilization, accomplishments, etc.
LikeLike
of course we do have millenia. we have till the end of times and beyond.
if we believe we’re done, we’re done. we don’t despair.
we don’t accept shit, we do what must be done now to make sure the ones roaming the stars in 10000 years look like us (or that someone roams the stars at all.)
i can even imagine my great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grand-son. he’s one mean fuck. White (non-tinted).
LikeLike
Easy. 1. Kick out all brown and Jewish people. 2. Return to controlling our own women and culture.
LikeLike
Slap the women, gas the muds. Either socially/financially or the literal way.
LikeLiked by 2 people
CH: “Women are more xenophilic than men and this difference goes deep, all they way to the Darwinian pulses in the primal part of the brain that regulate reproductive algorithms.”
Just the other day, it dawned on me that this Invade/Invite Masculine/Feminine dichotomy has a pretty obvious explanation in biology, namely as a Darwinian survival mechanism to compensate for inbreeding within the [respective] native populations.
For instance, I’ve long thought that jewesses are so open to us [White Alpha Cads] because their hamsters [hindbrains] are being driven neurotic & schizophrenic & psychotic from worrying to death about how badly inbred their jew bloodlines have become.
We in the West once had a civilization & a culture in which FATHERS helped screen their daughters’ suitors so as to make certain that their daughters’ innate hypergamy [and desire for new DNA in the bloodlines] was being steered towards breeding UP, rather than breeding DOWN.
But of course The Frankfurt School has long since destroyed those cultural bulwarks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
PS: An indefatigable Darwinian Nihilist [like John Cuckbyshire] would argue that the Darwinian definition of breeding “up” is precisely that the progeny survive to create progeny of their own, and that the Darwinian definition of breeding “down” would necessarily imply that the progeny tend to drift into extinction.
But of course Darwinian Nihilism makes no room for concepts such as Beauty or Truth or Grace.
LikeLike
Would you want to have to look at this during s3x ?
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse3.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.UTC_-JW5v23En6zxXY3umQDIEs%26pid%3D15.1&f=1
LikeLike
Even more fundamental Cap… it’s hidden in the two words “Invade/Invite”.
Invading is to enter, conquer, overwhelm, force to submit… to invite is to invite in, to attract, lure, entice or tempt.
At its most basic, this is in fact the precise role males and females engage in leading up to and during sexual congress.
LikeLike
American blacks have to be the stupidest creatures on earth. Here’s a policy (the wall) that would demonstrably improve their lives by raising wages on shitty work and easing the cleansing of Compton and other areas where blacks have been shoved out by Mexicans.
And yet, they vote against their interests, because they’re 1) stupid and 2) indoctrinated with so much hate for whites that they’re incapable of seeing layers of complexity, which is precisely what the American ethnic situation is right now.
LikeLiked by 4 people
The hallmark… Big Tell, if you will… of evil is that it will cut off it’s own nose to spite its face, so long as the blood messes up everything else in the area.
LikeLike
“And yet, they vote against their interests, because they’re 1) stupid and 2) indoctrinated with so much hate for whites that they’re incapable of seeing layers of complexity, which is precisely what the American ethnic situation is right now.”
Sounds like white women
LikeLiked by 2 people
“improve their lives by raising wages on shitty work”
What work would that be, exactly?
LikeLike
Cleanin’ dem bedpanz in da White Man hospital.
LikeLike
Black man be wantin’ twelve dollah uh hour fo dat sh!t.
Mexican be doin’ it fo’ seben dollah uh hour.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think they’re still clinging to the outdated assumption trumpeted by the likes of Jesse Jackson, of a “rainbow coalition” – or basically all the races of the earth united to take down and extract resources from whitey (with a few useful idiot qhite quislings thrown in for optics), fronted by themselves, natch. They are still waking up to the fact that the browns aren’t too keen on them, as the well-documented ethnic cleansing in LA demonstrates.
LikeLike
Ironically enough considering black people have effectively done it to the other races a time or two over the years in the US.
People forget what they did to the koreans during the LA riots.
LikeLike
Dey donts want to work.
LikeLike
Even if they don’t, they still have to do something. Deal drugs? Mexicans hurt their profits there too, by flooding the market with cheap junk and muscling in on their turf. Again, NOT voting their interests.
LikeLike
Data reveal that about 8% of Black males voted pro-Trump. If you think about overlapping Bell Curves, with the average White I.Q. being defined at 100 (like the Prime Meridian in Greenwich) and the average Black American I.Q. being 85, about 10% of American Blacks are smarter than the average White. That’s the group W.E.B. DuBois called the “talented tenth” (that’s when Black leaders were allowed to speak Realtalk to “their” people). That’s the group of Blacks who grasp that the Mexicans are their economic, social, and cultural competitors. That translates to about 8% for Trump. I know lots of Blacks, and they aren’t all stupid, as many Whites like to think. That’s why I’m a Race Realist rather than a Racist. So, I don’t dislike or disparage them all, only the n!666ers.
3% of Black females also voted Trump. I’m surprised it was that many.
LikeLike
The 3% of she-googles voting for Trump probably marked the wrong circle on a paper ballot due to being unable to read it.
LikeLike
who cares about wages and work when you can get welfare, obamacare, medicaid, globohomo diversity goodies and light jail sentences for chimpouts by voting Democrat?
LikeLike
I’m a foreign born black person that grew up in America. I’m on board with Trump when it comes to certain topics, and this is one of them. I always tell people this, those people will come to America, and kiss yt peoples a$$e$, and treat blacks like sh%t.lol
LikeLike
Certainly a continual battle.. as there are never-ending structural efforts to encourage their welcome of assimilation, especially in Europe, e.g. https://fluechtlinge-mitnehmen.de (in German)
LikeLike
The problem with modern societies is they lack a central nexus point. Think of the French Academy that regulates language for France. That’s a C.N.P.
To take care of women and put them in their place, you need a central nexus point for all of modern society making the decisions and fixed in place for long periods of time. Its only expiration date should be when it makes way for a later strong nexus.
LikeLike
“Its only expiration date should be when it makes way for a later strong nexus.”
Kinda like how The Frankfurt School moved in and replaced the Christian clergy.
LikeLike
I guess “freedom” and a “central nexus point” can’t coexist.
LikeLike
you know what’d be a nice central nexus point, honey?
one world government.
LikeLike
Every damn newspaper on the stand this morning was trumpeting the muh Russian influence tale as the impetus for Trump’s action… and making noises about “questions that MUST be answered”, “special prosecutors”, muh Nixon resignation, etc., etc., etc.
The time to put the hammer down on these yellow journalists is LONG overdue. 😡
Curious to see who gets tagged as Comey’s replacement.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amaze-balls, as I’m sure those newspapers back in October/November were agreeing with the Dems that Comey needed to go since he had “reopened” that Hillary email investigation.
For those of us who’s eyes are wide open, it’s clear as day to see the blatant hypocrisy on stage. For those who might be a bit bleary eyed, I’m sure it’s starting to come into focus for them. And if it ain’t, not much help for those poor bastards who can’t see the writing on the wall.
LikeLike
As to Comey’s replacement: My pick would be Giuliani or Andy McCarthy, and then sit back and enjoy the lamentations of the left.
LikeLike
I can’t see Guiliani as FBI Director. Is he qualified for the position?
I mean, not that Comey did a bang up job.
LikeLike
Give Christie the job.
LikeLike
My boy Rowdy Gowdy
LikeLike
If Trump can put Hillary in jail and build the wall, he will get reelected and America will avoid a White uprising. If not, plans are in the works…
LikeLike
On teh Facebook, I’ve noticed that women are much more likely to accept friends requests from me than men are if we have no (or one, or two) mutual friends. With men, you have to be in the same circle (tribe?) in some way. For women, though, it appears to be unnecessary.
LikeLike
For women, collecting friends and likes on Faceborg is like kids collecting baseball cards or marbles.
Whoever has the most, wins.
LikeLike
Sure, but you still have to be hawt.
LikeLike
“You mean you want to sleep with a woman just because she’s beautiful?”
“Naw, we pretty much want to nail the ugly ones, too.”
LikeLike
You can’t even friend based stickman. He reached his friends limit.
LikeLike
Interesting.Thanks for sharing.
There is a study about that, men are more suspicious of strangers, women are more trusting.
http://faculty.insead.edu/william-maddux/documents/GPIR-trust-paper.pdf
LikeLike
Sexual shaming is probably the most effective legal means at our disposal, aimed at both numales and globowhores. It’s easy to come up with different ways to shame their choices, because they are…shameful.
The problem is that shaming falls flat if the shamer is seen as weak, inferior, or worst of all jealous & bitter. If you are fat, skinny, or skinny-fat, it won’t work.
So our mission is to get in the best shape of our lives, dress like winners, make a lot of cash, and then shame the hell out of these pathetic losers of the Sexual Marketplace. Along the way you can sharpen your shivs at the Chateau.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sexual shaming is an intra-woman phenomenon. It’s not men who attack women for easy sex, by and large — it’s competing women who don’t want their prudish pussy value devalued.
It only takes a few slutty women to destroy the bottleneck on sex that the vast majority of women represent. When I fucked a girl in her bedroom on UBC campus, I was very careful that her “friends” on the same floor never found out. She would have been ostracized and burnt and that might have taken out the future sex flow.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Completely agree. Recent example. At a bar (or anywhere for that matter) I always ping for mud shark sensitivity by picking any physical characteristic and then remarking, “I bet the black guys are all over you.”
Recently said something similar at a table with two young white chicks. The friend (unattractive) shot back with indoctrinated platitude, “Who are you to judge who she’s been with?!”
I just shrugged, smiled, and locked eye contact. “No judgement. Just a quick way for me to lose interest.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
“The friend (unattractive)” == the c0ck bl0cker
LikeLike
Except that her c0ck-bl0cking-fu was pwned by your Game-fu.
[Although, technically speaking, she DID bl0ck your c0ck. Hmmm. I’m gonna hafta ponder that one.]
LikeLike
Yeah, that kind of thing. Also saying things like ‘You just want more immigrants so you can get laid,huh?’ in a joking-but-not-really tone, while looking her up and down with a smirk. Implying that they are not worthy of a good white man and have to go slumming to get anyone interested in them. It’s all true and it hits them hard because they know it.
With men it’s almost too easy. Just point out their horrific sex life and all the tatted fatties and smug fuglies they’ve been banging, and tell them it’s because they’re a beta simp. Again, it hits like a ton of bricks because it’s true.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Captain – I’m a new poster, so in the spirit of full disclosure, yes. All true. Lost that one.
@Freeman – hahahahah. I am going to steal that line and pretend I came up with it.
LikeLike
But what’s so bizarre about this interaction iss that usually the c0ck-bl0cker wins by proving you unworthy of her mistress, but here the c0ck-bl0cker won by proving her mistress unworthy of you.
My head is kinda spinning from thinking about this.
LikeLike
I wonder what occurred in the c0ck-bl0cker’s forebrain or her hindbrain to allow her to transform from disqualifying you to disqualifying her mistress?
And WTF is the evolutionary purpose of the c0ck-bl0cker in the first place? It feels like the behavior of social insects, with the worker drone throwing down its own life to save the life of its queen.
Or maybe the C0ck-Bl0cker is the female equivalent of the male Beta Orbiter, only she’s trying to get close enough to Alpha Seed to be able to steal [from her mistress] a mercy ph*ck every once in while?
LikeLike
“Who are you to judge [blah blah blah]?”
Women (of both sexes) just love to use that as a verbal shaming weapon to neuter men. This might be a good response to that (quoting Paul Waggener, AKA “Grimnir”): “This is not a judgment-free acceptance zone – this is an acceptance-free judgment zone!”
LikeLike
Well, in Soviet Russia……
LikeLike
One of many things you American dudes have going for you is the physicals.
American white men from my experience are generally taller with broad shoulders than non American whites.
I think only Russians and Serbs can compete.
6’0 in socks seems a minimum requirement.
I’m 5’11” and my American buddy is 6’4″ and damn…gets checked out on the street everywhere he goes.
From my experience thats the first thing hot American women check out.
LikeLike
Seriously, though..
What the fuck is wrong with blacks? Are they really that retarded? A porous border is a bad deal for them.
[CH: i think for blacks it basically comes down to “what will screw whitey the most? we want more of that!”]
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s true. They call the Vibrant Sun People their “brown brothers and sisters”, and it’s not just the politicians who say that at election time.
Remember, blacks as a group are not future oriented (which they call “acting white” because it confounds their limited group cognitive ability); there is only screw whitey now, and then blame whitey for what they do to each other and their own neighborhoods.
LikeLike
Nah blacks aren’t out for anyone but themselves and yes they are that retarded. Their only role in this democracy has always been as warm bodies to vote for liberals.
LikeLike
“[CH: i think for blacks it basically comes down to “what will screw whitey the most? we want more of that!”]”
Ever run into some submissive dork who looks upon you as the greatest thing for whatever reason, and you just instinctively hate him?
I suspect that’s how blacks view whites. The fact that they are most like this toward white shitlibs is perhaps the biggest reason I suspect this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
insightful.
LikeLike
I think it’s “first they came for the Mexicans..”
LikeLike
They don’t think long term. Apartheid was a good deal for them, too. Now they’re ruining South Africa. Haiti was a prosperous colony. Now look at ’em.
They can’t think 5 minutes into the future, let alone 5 months or 5 years.
LikeLike
Nope, I agree with Trump on borders.
LikeLike
I believe in strong borders. I just don’t believe in empowering a Trump or his supporters in order to do it. A quick read of this blog is all the evidence you need that they don’t like my black ass either.
[CH: the truth can feel like personal dislike. (it often is)]
LikeLike
I might be optimistic in my viewpoint about this, but I think #8 is underway, what with this site, some maul-right twatter feeds, 4chan and DS to name a few.
Likewise, we need to make men manly again, instead of these pansy assed manginas, with their low-T, pussy worshipping.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I try to write articles on my website (click my name to visit) that fit this description. One thing I find that works is when you concentrate on your darker emotions. This releases a flow in your works and articles unbeatable.
LikeLike
[…] Single White Women Want To Spread Their Legs For The World […]
LikeLike
Fascinating video on this topic. I think readers here would appreciate it.
— https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow… great video.
Should be re-named “red pill primer”.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes! That video is spot-on about the destructive effect that uncontrolled women have on civilization! It’s well worth the time to watch.
LikeLike
— The single White woman desire for open borders is nothing less than a desire for alpha male interlopers to test the mettle of their betatized male loafers.
Yes, I agree. Other reasons why normal young single White females (as opposed to gutter-grade trigglypuffs) think they want open borders, along with my estimate of the likelihood of that being one of their motives:
To enjoy brown d_ck: 5%
To have a mixed baby: 0%
To be on the top of an even taller female SMV pyramid: 90%
To increase the likelihood of *other* White women getting r_ped, k_lled, or kn_cked up by browns: a sobering 75%
To virtue-signal (read: follow a fashion) that they don’t yet know is about to go out of style: 100%
Female Suffrage. A mistake that will not be made again.
[CH: i meant to bring up this point in the body of the post, but your #3 reason — to enjoy the instant social status ladder climb from importing a vast bottomfeeder population of lower SMV women and men — is probably the most subconsciously pertinent (and least remarked upon) motivation to single White women.]
LikeLiked by 3 people
Up above here, I’m postulating that the Invade/Invite phenomenon is probably associated with a desire to refresh the bloodlines from too much inbreeding.
[CH: white gentiles have never really had an inbreeding problem outside of rarefied royal lines. “inbreeding” is sometimes exaggerated for effect by rhetorical shysters trying to justify mass nonwhite immigration. real inbreeding problems bedevil jews, arabs, gypsies, and perhaps a long time ago some small hillbilly communities.]
LikeLiked by 1 person
For instance, if a White girl successfully gets away with mudsharkery, then her hindbrain/hamster can be congratulated for having correctly sensed that her White father was a cuck & a pu$$y & a loser, because if he had been a real man, then he would have k!lled both her & the n!gger. So the hindbrain/hamster is sensing [again correctly] that it needs to introduce some primordial violence back into the bloodlines of the family [at the obvious expense of losing about 150,000 years of breeding for intelligence, but no one ever said that the female hindbrain/hamster was future-oriented – in that sense, mudsharks & n!ggers have a lot in common].
LikeLike
CH: “white gentiles have never really had an inbreeding problem outside of rarefied royal lines.”
I don’t disagree with that. But The Frankfurt School introduced “Cultural Marxism” [sexual degeneracy, miscegenation, drug abuse, destruction of the family, an all-out war on the fledgling masculinity of young White boys, etc etc etc] as what amounted to the M0ther of All Sh!t Tests for the White Man, and many of our [ostensible] White Men buckled under the pressure of it, and failed the test, and gave up, and grew manboobs, and became glued to their couches, and started speaking in affectations & worshipping at the altar of “My Little Pony”.
And in seeing that failure [of the M0ther of All Sh!t Tests], it strikes me that many White women may have gone off in search of n!gger c0ck in order to breed some violence & psychopathy & lack-of-future-orientation back into their bloodlines.
LikeLike
I really suspect that women are most likely to invite in strangers if their men are a bunch of pansies. If the men are real men, they won’t.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“I really suspect that women are most likely to invite in strangers if their men are a bunch of pansies. If the men are real men, they won’t.”
Right, that’s my feeling, that too many of their hindbrains are sensing a need for bloodline “rejuvenation” [even if it’s devolution down at the expense of evolution up].
Because too many of their would-be [White] mates failed the M0ther of All Sh!t Tests [as posed by The Frankfurt School].
LikeLiked by 1 person
You need really small breeding pools before you worry about inbreeding. The reason it is a problem for Jews and Arabs is because they practice incest.
LikeLike
But imagine if you were a White g!rl with a fat man-b00bed cuck father like Karl Rove, and your choices for dating were either a fat man-b00bed cuck boyfriend like John Scalzi, or a thug gangsta bada$$ n!gger like Cam Newton or Jameis Winston – honestly, given those choices, I can imagine how an at-risk White hamster might choose to introduce some n!gger DNA into her family bl00dlines in order to jumpstart her progeny’s propensities for viciousness & violence & criminality & psychopathy.
LikeLike
tl;dr: If
{N!gger Game} + {Frankfurt School Poisoning} > {White Boy Game}
then
A) White Boyz need to up their Game, and
B) White Men need to start sprinkling some Zyklon B all over The Frankfurt School.
LikeLike
I have to say, White women who vote away our security, prosperity, and heritage is an abomination but understandable. That’s why we denied them suffrage for so long.
But White men who vote Trudeau, Hilldog, and Macron? Utterly contemptible muthafuckàs.
LikeLike
If the families in your village are becoming too in-bred from generations of marrying only within those same few families, then this problem is easily remedied by finding mates from the next village, or maybe one or two villages beyond that. The modern would-be executioners of the White Race, however, push this idea that the in-bred villagers should seek mates from the other side of the globe who are as genetically and aesthetically distant from those villagers as possible.
LikeLike
shit
man-boobed
nigger
mother
cock
LikeLike
I don’t buy the “importing alpha males” line of thinking. Women aren’t tripping over themselves to fuck Mexicans. I suspect it’s the same in Europe vis a vis Arabs.
There’s probably a much stupider, emotional reason like there is with everything women do.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Same here.
What comes across the border at Juarez, Mexicali or Brownsville aren’t ‘Alpha Males’ , they’re mostly little brown chicharritos who’ve been squeezed out of every peso by the coyotes and don’t even have tattoos yet.
Not exactly the type of man that jingles the cashbox of your average Norteamericana.
What drifts – or is ferried by the Norwegian, German, Greek or Italian ‘coast guard’ – across the Med consists to a very large extent of omega-ragey mama’s boys from Inbredistan or ooga-booga primitives who could be outsmarted by your average chimp.
I think the trigger mechanism are TV or magazine pictures of dark ch1ldr3n with big brown eyes – nothing opens White borders, doors and legs faster.
Why ?
Beats me, ask the women.
LikeLike
You’re right. I used to be friends with one of these weepy SWFs but she’s all but refused to speak with me since I told her (proudly) that I was for Trump. She thinks our immigration policy is fine and nothing needs to be changed. I reminded her of some salient facts — the crime, the dependency, Kate Steinle. (It’s funny how the Steinle murder really does clarify things) After which she admitted that she really “didn’t know all the details.” This is all SWF theater, a public posture done to impress their Facebook and Twatter friends. She wouldn’t date, let alone fuck, any Takfiri wife beaters or Mexican ass grabbers. But I say if they vote this way, let them experience some vibrancy.
LikeLike
A lot of European women used to go for sex holidays in North Africa, especially Egypt and Tunisia. Not so much now because of the risk of terrorism.
Illegal immigrants, mostly young men, camp out near the French port of Calais, hoping to cross the English Channel. Their poor living conditions attract charities and their “aid workers”. But 25% of the female “aid workers” are not affiliated with any charity! They, and even some of the real charity workers, are there for the exotic cock.
LikeLike
A woman with options isn’t going on sex holiday to Tunisia or volunteering at a migrant camp. This whole line of thought is kind of cucky.
LikeLike
“Women aren’t tripping over themselves to fuck Mexicans.”
yeah, I agree on this. so 73.5% of single women oppose the wall. this includes spinsters, sluts, whores, cat ladies, fuglies, lesbians, fatties, tards, negresses, and butterfaces. basically all your defective female rejects. of course they need something to fill them up, like a “good cause”.
the upside of this is that 26.5% of single females still oppose it, which is far more than the actual number of attractive females. I don’t have stats on what percentage of women are bang- or commitment-worthy, but I’d put that number at 5-10%. so these stats actually look pretty good.
also, those 46.9% of m@rried women who oppose are a different breed altogether. EITHER, they were “smart” and married in their SMV range, and didn’t hold out for the alpha provider, OR they were part of the small fraction of high-SMV women who could snag the man they really wanted. their perception and characteristics were different from the “single women” group to start with. they’re also a more homogenous group than the reject group.
long story short, women as a group are unreliable (because feelz) and compiling statistics about them is of limited utility because they’re basically followers. these statistics probably reflect less their priorities and more what their immediate herd’s priorities are.
LikeLike
“Women aren’t tripping over themselves to fuck Mexicans.”
yeah, I agree on this. so 73.5% of single women oppose the wall. this includes spinsters, sluts, whores, cat ladies, fuglies, lesbians, fatties, tards, negresses, and butterfaces. basically all your defective female rejects. of course they need something to fill them up, like a “good cause”.
the upside of this is that 26.5% of single females still oppose it, which is far more than the actual number of attractive females. I don’t have stats on what percentage of women are bang- or comm1tment-worthy, but I’d put that number at 5-10%. so these stats actually look pretty good.
also, those 46.9% of m@rried women who oppose are a different breed altogether. EITHER, they were “smart” and m@rried in their SMV range, and didn’t hold out for the alpha provider, OR they were part of the small fraction of high-SMV women who could snag the man they really wanted. their perception and characteristics were different from the “single women” group to start with. they’re also a more homogenous group than the reject group.
long story short, women as a group are unreliable (because feelz) and compiling statistics about them is of limited utility because they’re basically followers. these statistics probably reflect less their priorities and more what their immediate herd’s priorities are.
LikeLike
the upside of this is that 26.5% of single females *are in favor*.
LikeLike
“26.5% of single females still oppose it, which is far more than the actual number of attractive females.”
Jesus Christ; you’re right. “FAR” fewer than a 1/4 of single women are attractive. And I’m just talking about the fertile ones.
I live in D.C. so this may be skewed.
The boomer generation destroyed the social/sexual/racial contracts that had been keeping an equilibrium. I hope they live to experience the consequences.
My parents both have generous pensions, 401Ks, SS, Medicare, no debt, and massive housing equity. And they were both just middling workers.
Yet they don’t care that I will never have these things. They are focused on the welfare of muslims and blacks.
They feel guilty about whatever perceived advantages they enjoyed; and stuck future generations with the bill, plus 1000% interest.
LikeLiked by 1 person
*knocked
LikeLike
*raped
LikeLike
killed
LikeLike
i don’t understand why you changed r_pe, k_ll and kn_ck. wtf?
LikeLike
Inflated SMV is what’s it about.
Every non white male wants to fuk a white girl so in shitlib areas it can add +2 onto a 5 or 6’s SMV.
I think it’s white American women trying to rouse white American men and yes American men gave the height but really need to sgrd the fat.
I rarely meet any white male over 50 who does not have a belly.
LikeLike
Bears repeating yet again : If your washboard abs are harder than Achmed’s or K’wesi’s, she won’t mind so much that you’re a r@y-ciss chauvin1st h0m0ph0bic Nah-tzee p1g.
LikeLike
My opinion is that women’s motherly instinct for empathy has been (perverted) politicized.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcEJr8h_yGM&feature=youtu.be {relevant discussion starts at ~39 min. mark}.
This seems to be confirmed by the media’s propaganda (e.g. Syrian beach baby).
I agree that social status climbing is a motivation and that it is subconscious. (Warning armchair psychology incoming) Women raise their social status among their peers by displaying motherly qualities, which is especially important for single women, and they get an instant raise by outranking the imported bottomfeeders in the same way a mother outranks a child.
It also doesn’t hurt that the immigrants provide little to no sexual competition, just like a child doesn’t sexually compete with its mother.
LikeLike
None of the above are needed. Just abolish alimony in all its forms. Alimony and Individual Child Support enforce broken contracts and reward poor choices.
“.. but he beat me!” You chose him.
“.. but we built a business together!” You chose him.
“…but the children!” You took them away from him.
“…I gave the best years of my life!” By your own choice.
“…but I cannot support myself!” In an economy fashioned by your own votes.
Until then, gentlemen
Have the snip, don’t marry, don’t date single moms.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Have the snip”
JIDF demoralization agent
LikeLiked by 5 people
But to get to the point where you could abolish alimony, you’d first have to repeal the 19th. And to repeal the 19th, you’d first need to spill a lot of cuck & traitor blood. A better option is getting the prenuptial agreement enshrined in law by trojan horsing in on a rich dyke or something. A bitch like Rosie or Ellen gets “divorced” and she could lose a lot of cash. Gays too – lots of rich fags that were pressured to get married but don’t want to give up half their shit. Get women and gays to fight alimony for us.
LikeLike
‘Don’t date single moms’
Easier said than done, everything else is j@il bait.
Around here, even many of the single moms are j@il bait.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“many of the single moms are j@il bait”
B-b-but your honor, she’s already a friggin mudduh. Da fuq a n!gga to do?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Too bad ah ain’t no n1ggah – wouldn’t work for me.
LikeLike
I understand your pain (and some SMs are admittedly tasty).
My game plan here is: exceptions will be made for SMs who behave as if unencumbered ie turn up on time and stay late without checking watches and phones, don’t talk about the kids, etc etc.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In my experience, SMs who care about their k1ds have, understandably, ZERO time for dating and those who don’t care are 100% trash.
The only exceptions to the No Single Moms rule I’m willing to make if she is SMOKING HOT.
LikeLike
i dated a single mom like that for about year. she had a decent relationship with her ex. the kids were with him as much as they were with her so she didn’t expect me to be a dad to them. we planned our time together when the kids were with him or busy with friends most times so i hardly spent any time with them the whole year we were together.
things didn’t work out for some reasons unrelated to the kids but she was a cool lady and i give her props for handling things the way she did.
LikeLike
I would worry about a single mother who didn’t think about her kids all the time. That’s what good mothers do.
LikeLike
“The only exceptions to the No Single Moms rule I’m willing to make if she is SMOKING HOT.”
Double-plus Good if she’s SMOKING HOT and it’s a Tuesday!
LikeLiked by 1 person
i get what you’re saying carlos but thinking about them isn’t the same thing as spending every waking minute with them. that’s not healthy either.
in my case they weren’t toddlers who needed mom around 24/7. they were old enough to need time with their dad doing dad things without mom butting in. they also needed time in activities and with friends without mom around.
kids who have clingy moms are wimpy kids who grow up to be weirdo adults because they don’t know how to function without mommy around all the time.
and all couples need some time without kids around or they will crash and burn. even the m@rried ones.
lastly, it’s way better in my opinion for a single mom to keep a distance between the guy she’s seeing and the kids until she is sure he’s going to be around long term. in my case, we didn’t last so it’s good she did that. i’ve seen too many whore moms who let every new guy get to know her kids and they get attached. that really messes them up.
LikeLike
Laugh Dept:
Woman virtue signals hard because of Confederate Flag in a store. No one cares and in fact tell her to get lost. Woman has hysterical weeping meltdown.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Geez, Louise, what a drama queen!
The irony is she’d be the first to argue for allowing immigrants in, no questions asked, the more vibrant, the better.
Yeah, lady… these guys are “evil” and “monsters”… wait’ll you see what happens when you shoot off your mouth to Abdullah about the way he treats his w-i-f-e or the flags he displays or some such thing.
Oh, that’s right… THEN you’ll keep your yap shut be a good little Stepford citizen, amirite?
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLiked by 2 people
I laughed at the name of the store: Extreme Deals
LikeLike
Shitlords in Oregon, who knew?
LikeLiked by 2 people
And in Portland, no less!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Next time I’m in the area, I’m shopping there
LikeLiked by 3 people
And the sun was shining! WTF?!
LikeLike
Haha, i saw this earlier today, hilarious.
LikeLike
Two things:
1. Amazing how she transforms from being in attack mode when she was in the store to a sobbing, blubbering pile of excrement in the parking lot.
2. Beyond amazing how the story unfolded in her mind, with her as the victim and the men as the assailants, as opposed to the reality of what the video shows.
Her poor kids. They don’t stand a chance at having a normal life.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah, it didn’t take long for the go-grrl activist to become start playing the mewling victim card.
And then to keep repeating the curse words in front of the kids.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLiked by 2 people
item: le Problem Glasses (for looking over the top of, in selfies, to demonstrate profound intellectual superiority).
It was only ever going to go one way, with a red flag like The Glasses (ordinary specs are Ok, it’s that particular style; Nana Mouskouri type oval goggles are even more of a repeated double submarine klaxon)
LikeLike
Guess there are some shitlords left in Portland.
LikeLike
https://twitter.com/heatherreb?lang=en
LikeLiked by 1 person
Remember several posts back, CH did a post on my comment about male vs. female handwriting, and how it is an expression of the differences in male and female brains? Well, on this silly liberal bitches’ twatter feed, she posted this (among the other disgusting liberal garbage on there), which just bolsters my argument:
Low-IQ, emotionally immature, female handwriting at its best. Even though this woman is late 20s, early 30s, you can clearly see that she never mentally matured past the 7th grade (which also explains her crying for attention – from another ‘sister’ – when she does not get her way).
LikeLiked by 2 people
And speaking of danger glasses, there is nothing about her appearance that says, “I voted Trump”. Bangable, but certified Leftist Looney.
LikeLike
LikeLike
good observation on the handwriting. she writes like a kid not like a woman.
LikeLike
every tweet is a complaint about a school district, racism, or police misconduct. something is seriously wrong with this lady.
LikeLike
Her Twitter is sad, if you think about it. She’s an example of the atomization of society. No real friends, even on Twitter, mostly just “causes” and other transactional relationships. When she made her video, it looks like she was trying to LARP the SJW fantasies she identifies with into reality.
The fact that she has two young children raises the “who bitch this is” question. No doubt, she’s either a single mother or “in a relationship” with a manlet. Either way, it does not bode well for the future of white Americans.
The men who made fun of her in the store, on the other hand, are solid.
Interesting that the newspaper that posted the video disabled comments. The manager of that channel knows she’d have her ass handed to her if comments were allowed.
Any meme artists here? She’s ripe for a public mocking.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Her Twitter is sad, if you think about it. She’s an example of the atomization of society. No real friends, even on Twitter, mostly just “causes” and other transactional relationships.”
There’s a terrible emptiness in her heart. In her soul. Too bad we still don’t have enough Alpha Sh!tlords to go around. Like all women, she desperately needs one in her life.
LikeLike
lolololozzzzzzzzzzz…..”They’re assaulting me!!” Hurts when your bubble is burst, eh? lolololololololzzzzzzzzzz!!! All those pent up ‘Hillary lost’ tears coming out. Mmmmmmm…..they are refresing! Go find a safe space, bitch!
LikeLiked by 1 person
yeah, ‘assaulting her’
then attacking her in the parking lot too lol
LikeLike
I’d encourage everyone to head over to the yelp page of that grocery store and leave a good review of support for those heroic shitlords.
https://www.yelp.com/biz/everyday-deals-extreme-portland-2
LikeLiked by 3 people
Link brings you to a page on Yelp saying this business recently made it into the news and if you post something about it, it will get deleted. I looked through it and found no good reviews about what the guys did, but found several Huwhyte nyghts and sjws with their one star reviews condemning the place. And no way to rate the review bad, just ‘helpful’, ‘funny’ or ‘cool’…..
LikeLike
Speaking of the Confederacy…I’m sure you guys have been following how part of Southern Heritage is being erased by the removal of statues of Davis, Lee, Beauregard etc. Predictably, now there is actually jig talk of removing all founding father statues.
What I didn’t know is that there is actually a statue of Tupac Shakur now up in Georgia, smh. A statue of Biggie Smalls is planned for Brooklyn. I’m sure there are other black entertainer, sports star memorials popping up all over the cuntry.
Oh well, file under Goodbye America.
LikeLike
Let’s manufacture (i.e. troll) the removal of a non-existent Biggie Smalls stature (sic) because his killers are still at large (sic).
Because Lincoln did northing wrong…
LikeLike
That is some Idiocracy shit right there. A mob of blacks and assorted muds tearing down a statue of George Washington, and erecting one of Biggie Smalls in its place. Would have made a great scene in the movie.
LikeLike
“there were three of them and they were following me.”
More wishful thinking, if you ask me.
LikeLike
That woman is a mentally ill.
LikeLike
she lives in a state that is 1.8% black. she loves her abstract negroes.
LikeLike
Would be illuminating to see the age breakouts of the various groups here. Perhaps any wall reminds of The Wall too much?
LikeLike
9. End welfare. That will simultaneously hault mudsharking and third world invasion when the monetary incentives are removed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
HAHAHAH OMG
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ah, classic Trump is back.
I wonder if he push-pulled all of us, from the Syrian bombing to the firing of Comey.
His tweets as of late have been up to his usual standard of bite and shiv.
LikeLike
These single white women would not by any chance be those women who have corporate jobs, salary to match and live in white-flight-condo-land?
[CH: heh. the very same.]
LikeLike
“a political friendzoning that weakens the electoral power of White men.”
Brilliant synopsis.
LikeLike
9. Ban the fucking dating apps.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Alpha or beta?
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5913907ce4b00b643ebb12e5
[CH: well i gotta hand it to the guy, he has a flair for the dramatic. also…nine kids with four women? alpha, if the women aren’t cigstaches..]
LikeLiked by 1 person
Worships Hitler too much; part of being “Alpha” is being your own man so to speak.
He should want to replace Hitler and not just emulate him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“alpha, if the women aren’t cigstaches..]”
Super-alpha, if the women were ex-Moldylockses.
LikeLike
She’s the one who got b!tch slapped at the Second Battle of Berkeley?
LikeLike
She acts like she enjoyed it.
LikeLike
She’s probably drank piss before. Being hit by a White man with balls is more exciting to any woman than ten thousand black dicks. Wake the fuck up White betas. Pimp your women if you can’t love them. Beat and rape them if you have to.
LikeLike
I imagine Goldilock’s hair flowing through my fingers, the perfume of her femininity reaches my nostrils and her innocent 7.5 face makes me think: maybe you will get more than just a fuck, maybe I will keep you.
I imagine Moldylock’s unkempt appearance, the vine-like, hard and stinky hair, the ridden vagina, the stretched a$$höle and it makes me say: There is nothing that I want. What tragedy, what crime! Has everything your grandmother told you been washed away? Combing your hair twice a day? Being feminine and soft so that a good suitor will ask your father for your hand? How can your soul not crumble when you deny the very nature of your life – being feminine, becoming a beloved wife and mother? The living hell awaits you.
* courtesy of the Frankfurt School.
LikeLike
@Heinrich
The funny thing is, chicks will often suddenly decide to work on their grooming and appearance once they get a crush on a dude.
LikeLike
…some even lose their blubber.
LikeLike
I didn’t realize the percentage of men bundling sticks who want to slurp on foreign chorizo is 48.4%
[CH: it’ll be 0% when this blog goes national.]
LikeLiked by 1 person
[CH: it’ll be 0% when this blog goes national.]
When that happens, that’ll be the type of winning I won’t tire of.
LikeLike
Tonight on Tucker Carlson, Charles Krauthammer dropped the “outpost” code word for the alt-media.
[CH: veeery eenteresting.]
LikeLike
Makes a lot of sense. Here two barren women raise awareness of how white men are depriving them of orgasms and why government intervention may be necessary to ensure equal sexual pleasure for all.
I pirated a copy of her book but it was some damn tedious reading, worse than a romance novel. Mostly about herself or her conversations with other women talking about themselves. In the epilogue “a call for action” laments that she did not include immigrant voices, such as Muzzie women who had their clits sliced off one wonders.
LikeLike
These types of women need to be turned out for profit and power. Too many of these are brainwashed by the Jew media. Too lost to be drawn into true Christianity, which is broken in the West anyway. White pimps up, whores down.
LikeLike
As very weird as Canada is in many ways – there is this one thing, that does occur in Canada that can works towards solution of the outlined quandary. And that is – the idea of freedom to choose one’s own way, freedom to choose one’s own brand of personal expression, freedom to make up one’s own mind free from the tyranny of coercion – is something that is valued in real pragmatic terms in Canada. The key pragmatic expression of that means a man (any man) should be free to go wherever he chooses within the commons (which in Canada are vast), within the areas of public domain, without cowering in response to tribal territorial dominance hierarchies (except by way of territories especially protected by the state, such as military installations, police stations, courthouses and the like, for which clear rules of engagement are known to all – so engagement within such state protected areas doesn’t really equate to cowering, and the impetus for state protection of said areas certainly are not tribal). For most areas of the commons, – the public domain of streets, roadways, and common grounds within neighbourhoods, this freedom for a man to go wherever he chooses without cowering in response to territorial dominance hierarchies – means 24 hours day. Ditto for all neighbourhood retail businesses (respecting the business’ operating hours of course).
Canadian men do not tolerate limits on masculine freedom of movement due to tribal territorial dominance hierarchies. There is big pushback on that whenever it is insinuated here. Want to get your average Canadian man angry? – if the tribalism that is always present in any event, rises to the level of limiting freedom of masculine movement – that be grounds for major freak-out in Canada.
Of course there are tribal enclaves in Canada (care of multiculturalism), but ….. that no-go zone shit that occurs in parts of Europe hasn’t happen in Canada, and the pretentiousness of gated communities is ridiculed in Canada, as are the coercive elements of ghetto lifestyle. Generally, people who come to Canada have gotten and acquiesced to that aspect of the Canadian mindset up to now. With weird Trudeau – not clear if it will remain that way (what an idiot – an immigration policy contingent on heavy vetting, which has been the case in Canada for a very long while now, is absolutely necessary).
Now – the point with respect to the outlined quandary about the “let you and him fight” dynamic unattached white women tend towards unconsciously supporting, …… the win on that, Canadian-masculine-sentiment-wise, is – “fuck-off beatch, and anybody that wants to play that game can fuck-off too, and that is what is worth standing my ground on and fighting for, but I’m certainly not fighting for what you may or may not otherwise want in that respect”. The sentiment boils down to – confidence in one’s own ability around ‘may the best man win’, by the graces of merit, not tribalism, and fuck-off on anything else.
Now – some will say the jury is still out with respect to Canada on these matters (this leftoid brain-washing among the younger set is of course alive and well and particularly stinky in Canada too), and I don’t disagree, but nevertheless, from a universal western perspective, there is something to be said for the attitude – “fuck-off beatch, and anybody that wants to play that game can fuck-off too, and that is what is worth standing my ground on and fighting for, but I’m not fighting for what you may or may not otherwise want in that respect.” With regards to Trump’s civic nationalist stance – is this not his root sentiment as well? As well, anecdotally, I notice that leftoid white women have no issue whatsoever with this stance (probably because it is enforcing a certain confident dominant frame, but in a way that is palatable to them). Now – talk about ethnic quotas on immigration, as a necessary part of the discussion with respect to cultural dilution, especially given the differences in birth rates, demographically, and what that ultimately may mean to the mindset that upholds promoting valuations around merit instead of tribalism – well – leftoid white women get very emotional around that – and mostly refuse to engage on that tissue (denial), so ……. ultimately I could be wrong (as I guess is the message here at CH). But I think it is probably a question of how wrong and how right each position is – i.e. – there is a place for recognizing some potential for universal appreciation of certain ideological truths that underpin western culture, but on the other hand – probably harder for some ethnic groups to grok this – they need alot of cultural reinforcements, so as not to go off the rails towards more tribalism (but right now it seems we have been mostly providing anti-reinforcement around that – fucking Obama and the like).
My main point – the way forward may be an intra, and inter-masculine re-emphasis on the underpinnings of western ideals – western women are never gonna get some of this – but will appreciate the re-emphasis nevertheless, when and if it occurs.
From the long-term perspective, ultimately, what choice do we have anyways? It is best for everybody if we don’t have world wide conflagration. So …… what can we salvage with respect to the new realities? Western ideals man – that is what is ultimately of value in any event.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Masculine freedom of movement” is a very interesting concept, and correlates well with the early history of the United States. One reason why government governed lightly in early America was because until about 1890, if you didn’t like your leaders you could literally vote with your feet and go west. Politicians who wanted to hold on to their tax base simply couldn’t afford to piss off too many people.
After the closing of the frontier, however (see F.J. Turner), and the ensuing scarcity of unincorporated land, government began to turn the screw. That was the beginning of the “Progressive” Era and the the twin calamities of direct taxation and female suffrage, which led directly to New Deal/Great Society socialism, and Hart-Cellar population replacement.
Canada still has lots of unincorporated land, and much of its climate is uncongenial to those from the global south.
Manifest Destiny, anyone?
LikeLike
It’s funny you should refer to “freedom of movement”, which is similar to the fallback defense my friend used for open borders (the difference being your freedom of movement is only within a State or territory). We were at a restaurant the other day and I made the argument that there’s nothing inherently immoral about a people governing their own borders (and, by extension, shutting down any immigration if they so chose), saying that a people have a right to control their own property, the people own the country collectively, the people vote democratically to control the country property collectively, etc. He made the counterclaim there’s a “natural right” to be “free of all coercive force” and that this extended to property owners choosing to contract with individuals outside the arbitrarily decided State.
At the time I recall him referring to some specifically adopted statute — I may be incorrect, though, honestly, I strongly suspect he’s a little unstable — which spurred the below conversation. I’ve been at work or tied up, so I haven’t had time to respond with much thought to his lengthy replies; e.g., “word salad” was an intentional trigger (I deleted my initial reply). I freely admit he is far more well-read and “smarter” than I, not that it makes him right necessarily. He is also agnostic/Buddhist (making natural law, which depends on a higher authority than the State, very tenuous).
How would refute this “natural right” to be free of coercive force, other than denying it exists at all? I don’t think it equates to denying “natural law” in totality; the framers of the Declaration depended on it, not that they had superhuman godlike insight about everything (I’m no Mormon). But as a Christian, I would agree there are certain natural rights. I would accept this “natural right to be free from coercive force” in the libertarian view, per my reading, that it’s only from initiatory force not retaliatory, but Friend denies it applies to border enforcement. What sayeth the Chateau?
LikeLike
tangentially related to a comment stuck in mod: been debating (privately) a friend that people controlling their own borders is inherently immoral – same Friend then posted this on FB. here I’ve omitted the (mostly supportive) messages before mine at bottom.
LikeLike
clarification *** my position is that a people controlling their own borders is NOT inherently immoral
LikeLike
oh shet, my mindnumbingly long post got umodded twice. apologies all. this morning i gave an actual, thought-out reply, FWIW.
ok not very polished but here we go
People have the natural right to life, liberty, and to be able to obtain property. People have the natural right to enter into contracts with each other and eath other’s property. People have the natural right to assemble and incorporate, into a state, colony, commonwealth, etc., with “contracts” as laws and a constitution, and govern themselves, as an individual would, including on admission or potential inadmission to the community. Like a condo, you may own the unit but not the grounds as a whole. Those who do not like the arrangement of their community do have a (natural) right to petition for change; if they wish to leave and opt out of said state they have a right to do so as well. People also have the right to choose who governs them, or not; if they allowed a subclass to dwell within in their midst who could not participate in self-governing, wouldn’t that denying be their right to self-govern? Wouldn’t that be de facto involuntary servitude?
There is no natural right to be free of all coercive forces, at all times everywhere, no more than a natural right to be disease free, or the ‘natural law’ of might makes right. If there were, and there were such a right to freely travel wherever, then a people or community have no moral grounds to deny anyone entrance ever; e.g., allowing a large peaceful-looking group (..or invading army) entrance, if it so chose (it hasn’t shot anyone, they say they are peaceful and simply want to pass, squat, loiter, etc). Note how the Founding Fathers said there was a right to the PURSUIT of happiness, not happiness itself; how could a government ensure that? If anything, people have the right to pursue freedom from coercive forces.
You say people have a natural right to contract with whomever. Controlling the border doesn’t preclude this — they still can do this outside the community. But if the community contract prohibits hiring outside workers, an individual doing so is violating the community contract. Do you deny there are ever naturally lawful curbs to natural rights, or just this one? Group rights can at times supercede individual rights, yes?
And you yourself said the definitions of this right differ, because no State anywhere rejects entirely its sovereign right to control its border (it may not choose to, but it reserves the right) — I cannot see a scenario in which a people wouldn’t oppose doing so. No State should, either; even if every nation agreed to do so as well, it’s still not an even trade across the global board. Not that this paragraph is a moral defense per se, but an observation that no society that I’m aware of has completely adopted this concept, as you have cited it.
I’m not arguing it’s an inherently GOOD or wise act to control the border, but that it’s not inherently IMMORAL to do so. If there are reasons to do so that would be ‘good’, like a people protecting itself from marauders or limiting disease outbreak, then the act itself is merely neutral. It’s the motivation or reasons that would make it ‘bad’ (a la Aquinian moral philosophy). You might argue that in a hypothetical purely libertarian world open borders is the moral last step, but in a quasi socialist world like most of the West, it is morally unfair to the taxpayers who put in more than they get out.
LikeLike
Vanamme – there is no “natural right” to be free of coercive force. There is no such thing. Because the principle of self-preservation, upon which all life is contingent, implies that an organism is always and forever completely surrounded by coercive forces. A person only has natural rights with respect to choosing how to meet and confront said coercive forces (bur don’t get me wrong – cooperative strategies, as a way to defer for some future resolution, the more immediate drive for dominance implied by competitive strategies, by way of risk mitigation, are among the available choices).
Your friend is a basic idiot. You should probably tell this person to fuck-off, because said person’s pretending to live in upside-down world, is coercive to the rational liberties implied by “a person only has natural rights with respect to choosing how to meet and confront said coercive forces”, and so said person is in fact deeply subversive to basic first principles of self-preservation that all of life is subject to. As such, I would tend to think that such a person is toxic, in the way the dumbness is especially toxic, and so “fuck-off” is probably the correct response in terms of refusing the toxic, and as well, such a person will probably not be capable of understanding anything else in any event.
You do display alot of fortitude around patience. Perhaps the patience is now misplaced.
LikeLike
Thanks for your thoughts, Wild Man. I agree there is no “natural right to be free of coercive forces”, certainly not when individuals give up various claims on natural rights when they relinquish self-government (to be part of a country). His claim to such a right rests on a purist libertarian premise… but he also is down with taxation and forms of income redistribution like welfare, slavery reparations, and single payer healthcare — all of which are quite “coercive”. (Humorously he thinks “qualitative” immigration restrictions are ethical, but not “quantitative” — the very one that’s judgment-free.)
I will spare everyone the headache-inducing, 30-point, 2000 word response I got to my above reply, which I’m still trying to parse.
Interesting you called him “toxic” – it’s the quality I’ve privately assigned him for years. Perfect example of the dark triad, he’s great at pickups and hookups, LTRs not so much (he has them but the girls seem f*cked up too). I suspect anyone who gets to know the “real” him are repulsed. I’ve learned to not take nothing personally and everything skeptically. Unfortunately among my social circle he is the most down to do anything, go anywhere, talk intellectually or pop culture, and travel; most of the rest of my social circle are homebodies. Whatcha gonna do. (Humorously, we practically got kicked out of a restaurant and then a café (the latter by an SJW), because he lacks an indoor voice or any sense of propriety.)
But to tie it all back to your original comment — I fully agree with your Canadian sense of freedoms, of will, movement, and expression, because you were careful to distinguish it as within the commons. A rational person would intuit that’s rational. Who wouldn’t? (Again, while my friend is very “smart”, he’s tacitly admitted to mental instability, hates his mother and brother… and yup, is something like 1/4 Jewish (but identifies north Italian (lol).) Sure, I can admit arbitrarily decided borders in third world countries might suck (where natural resources may not be equally apportioned), but who said life’s fair? Now’s now, past is the past.
LikeLike
It’s funny you should refer to “freedom of movement”, which is similar to the fallback def*ense my friend used for open borders (the difference being your freedom of movement is only within a State or territory). We were at a restaurant the other day and I made the argument that there’s nothing inherently imm*oral about a people governing their own borders (and, by extension, shutting down any immigration if they so chose), saying that a people have a right to control their own property, the people own the country collectively, the people vote democratically to control the country property collectively, etc. He made the counterclaim there’s a “natural right” to be “free of all coercive f0rce” and that this extended to property owners choosing to contract with individuals outside the arbitrarily decided State.
At the time I recall him referring to some specifically adopted statute — I may be incorrect, though, honestly, I strongly suspect he’s a little unst*able — which spurred the below conversation. I’ve been at work or tied up, so I haven’t had time to respond with much thought to his lengthy replies; e.g., “word salad” was an intentional trigger (I deleted my initial reply). I freely admit he is far more well-read and “smarter” than I, not that it makes him right necessarily. He is also agnostic/Buddhist (making natural law, which depends on a higher authority than the State, very tenuous).
How would refute this “natural right” to be free of coercive f0rce, other than denying it exists at all? I don’t think it equates to denying “natural law” in totality; the framers of the Declaration depended on it, not that they had superhuman g0dlike insight about everything (I’m no Mormon). But as a Christian, I would agree there are certain natural rights. I would accept this “natural right to be free from coercive f0rce” in the libertarian view, per my reading, that it’s only from initiatory f0rce not reta*liatory, but Friend denies it applies to border enforcement. What sayeth the Chateau?
LikeLike
All of that only works because Canada is larger than the United States but has the population of Belgium + Netherlands.
Because most of it is frozen solid most of the time and not fit for human habitation, that’s nature putting a very, very solid limit on freedom of movement.
No one moves anywhere when it’s 60 below with 50 mph winds.
Give it a while, you’ll have no-go zones in Torontobad, Al-Montcaliph and Vancovong soon enough.
LikeLike
wolfie65 – I meant the masculine freedom of movement, free from the tyranny of accepting disrespect by way of cowering, (which is akin to self-disrespect), in response to tribal territorial dominance hierarchies, within populated areas (Canadian cities), where the majority of the Canadian population resides (though I see your point about the vastness of the Canadian landscape, that both you and Tarl Cabot make, and about what that reality does to the Canadian psyche – and I for one believe that the way this informs the Canadian psyche truly is a blessing).
But so far we do not have the tyranny of disrespect by way of tribal territorial dominance hierarchies occurring in the Canadian cities. I believe this is because of the heavy vetting inherent in the Canadian immigration policy, but I agree may well also be because we have not reached certain saturations for certain demographics (African and middle eastern Sunnis for instance) that have occurred in Europe. Canada needs to be more careful, go-forward, around that. It is also worth noting the the immigration experience in some European countries seem to carry with it, the relic of colonialism (Algerians in France for instance), and the non-set-aside animosities (on both sides) in that respect (something that hasn’t occurred in Canada – Canada has never been a colonial power in it’s own right – but instead a formation as a colonial extension of Britain and France). So as I said …. I agree the jury is still out with respect to Canada.
But I don’t think that necessarily discounts my point that enforcing a confident dominant masculine frame around western ideals is a worthy go-forward strategy. Western women would then get what the yearn for – a dominant masculine frame + more choice among men (i.e. – limited diversity but of western mindset) who share said frame.
And as such, western men can get out of the demeaning game of this fucked-up modern form of chivalry (fucking virtue-signaling around which man, or type of man, satisfies the woman’s natural prerogative around female choice in these matters). The western man should be saying fuck-off to the female wish for this type of twisted chivalry. The confident dominant masculine western mindset around this?: There is only one type of such man that fits the bill – and that is a western man (ideology-wise).
Of course ultimately, women choose, but there should be consequence to said choices. Currently women are being blinded to those consequences. Telling women that I shall not be limited in my masculine freedom of movement, and shall not tolerate such …. is well accepted by even leftist leaning white women, on the face of it. But they seem not capable of figuring out what rationally follows from that (border protections), and they don’t really need to figure that out rationally, because instead they should feel it at the limbic level (because: womenz), which shall be delivered by way of the other part of said masculine message …… that I will not fight for you per se, western woman, but only for my masculine right of freedom of movement (which benefit women do not really enjoy to anywhere near the same degree, so they simply acquiesce to the dominant masculine ordering in this respect), the message therefore delivered to the woman’s hindbrain is …… “western women …. you are not special ….. the limited diversity brings other worthy women as well (two-way-street-wise)”. Now it is contingent upon immigration policy that this in fact is delivered (I don’t really see how the African Sunni and middle eastern Sunni demographics deliver on this – and that is a problem nobody want to talk about).
As weird as this all seems, enforcing a confident dominant masculine frame around western ideals is precisely the dynamic that will keep white people breeding with white people (which isn’t happening enough even among white co-habitators, partly because of the current dynamic of selfishness among western women). Enforcing a confident dominant masculine frame around western ideals would actually be akin to calling western women on their giant shit test.
LikeLike
Not to be flippant, but I suggest less writing and more karate- and target practice.
Gonna come in handy.
The one really big problem is that western women ARE, unfortunately, very special and boy, do they know it.
I’d gladly 10,000 Iraqi or Somali girls for 1 Swedish girl (of the type I remember).
LikeLike
Wolfie65 – keeping oneself fighting fit is advisable, I agree. I keep myself that way. The benefit in this is that it wards against letting self-disrespect to creep in, by way of soft body => soft mind.
The point I was attempting to make about the African Sunni or middle eastern Sunni demographics is that these immigrant populations, in particular, take but don’t give. And who would want such a woman anyways?, even in the event you could score an extremely physically hot such woman?, which of course there are examples of, ….. because such woman’s demeanor will suck, because: Islam. These immigrant populations, by default, fundamentally, are set-up to take but not give. By way of comparison, you don’t see this among immigrants of southeast Asian ethnic groups, and you don’t see this among Christian immigrants of almost any demographic. The only way you gonna get with an orthodox Sunni woman is if you, as the western man, convert to Islam, and that is the whole fucking point about what Islam is (i.e. – it’s set-up to be like a disease vector by way of design).
Now we can argue till the cows come home about the virtues of the various strains of European women, and I will mostly agree with you in any event. But it is also true that western women are not without their own peculiar vices as well. And this cunt-like attitude that stems from the weird pedestalization dynamic that is occurring needs a swift correction right about now. A lot of this weird leftoid shite that is promulgating through western culture amounts to the following covert, hidden dynamic: Western women put themselves at the apex of human superiority by way of deslrability, and truth is – that demeanor makes them fucking undesirable. They need to get that message. And talking about it won’t do much good. As western women are womenz after all, they need to be shown. Western-ideology-wise, ultimately, what is good for the goose is good for the gander too. Merit is what is of highest value. If a woman is a cunt, don’t matter how hot she is physically (white of otherwise) – she still be a worthless cunt.
At a global level, sexual-marketplace-wise, men of orthodox Sunni culture, and western women, are gaming every other demographic group, to their own advantage. This is the way of life itself of course, but life also tends to produce corrections to these types of dynamics. We are now in the midst of said correction.
LikeLike
Not to worry, my pedestalizing days are FAR behind me.
It still turns my stomach when I see an attractive White girl with a non-White guy – which happens uncomfortably often – but I guess they can’t all be saved.
It does help to remember that this world should have belonged to the dinosaurs, but something went wrong.
LikeLike
Meh, pols!! Most of them are bs sponsored by someone that wants to promote some agenda.
But….if this pol is somewhat accurate, even more reason for that Wall to be built.
Gotta have something tangible to help destroy the (((narratives))) poisoning the American consciousness.
The building of the wall IS the key issue for Donald Trump’s presidency. I hope he does it.
LikeLike
BS. Fake news and fake stats. Just like HItlary had 99% chance to win. The aim is just to instill the differences between White men and women ,since the Heritage America flashed a middle finger to the marxist electorate.
LikeLike
We need to find several instances of white men marrying fairly good looking illegal immigrants, and produce as many stories in the media as possible emphasizing how happy they were to find a beautiful traditional woman.
LikeLike
+++
LikeLike
Is it the wall and the swarths or, could it be any issue on the political right?
As a demographic, single women are reflexively against anything conservative. There is some logic to it, social conservatism being their natural enemy. The hate is much deeper than a moral conflict. Social conservatives (or more accurately their public faces) tend to signal the opposite of ZFG. They GAF about everything. Social conservatives could concede the issue of abortion and single women would still despise them.
I say they are against the wall because conservatives are (seen) as wanting it. If conservatives asked for open borders, single women would demand closed borders.
I’m cautiously optimistic that the rise of the alt-right may change the dynamic. I can imagine a future political landscape where right-wing is not synonymous with conservative. An alt-right shitlord is not perceived as a threat to free love. Even though he may broadly agree with the conservative, the optics are totally different.
I’ve always thought the conservative hostility of Trump increased his appeal to unmarried women. Unmarried women underperformed for thecunt.
[CH: good comment squib]
LikeLike
Black congresswoman full of corruption: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/corrine-brown-former-florida-congresswoman-found-guilty-sham-charity/
LikeLike
Here’s a bit of optimism for everyone, or at least a “light at the end of the tunnel”
First, there’s more white people alive now than at any point in history. While I do worry about a massive war paring those numbers down, there are a lot of whites out there.
Vast populations of nonwhites depend on white technology and work to survive, arguably even China and India.
The pie in first world countries is shrinking. That will erode some of the feminism and other degeneracy, I believe.
Right now, theres a selction process happening for people who reject modernity. The low birthrates will find a floor eventually.
LikeLike
That’s what I’ve been hoping & praying for, for more than a decade now: That there is an immutable kernel of fert!lity buried deep in Our Race, which will survive the Frankfurt School Poisoning, and eventually begin re-asserting itself, and finally burst forth more powerful than ever before.
Mathematically, it feels like a sound idea, but realistically, I don’t yet know whether it’s a pipedream.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The part that worries me most is that in many, if not all, European countries, Whites are already a minority in the under-30 age groups.
Thanks, Boomers.
LikeLike
Then get some buns in your oven wolfie. The replacement rate is 2.1, so three White babies per a woman is the minimum.
LikeLike
Non-self-inflicted damage kept me from actively looking for ovens for several months (online is nothing but scams), but I should be able to start again this coming Tuesday, if all goes well.
LikeLike
I guess if Tuesday is as good as any other day of the week.
So Tuesday it is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s Tuesday because there’s an event on Tuesdays that attracts the currently largest percentage of hotties.
LikeLike
There are still more Whites than ever in history. Keep that in mind, gentlemen. All we need is some drastic thinning of the herd of undesirables, i.e. shitskins. Also around half of the White men are beyond saving.
Let the culling begin.
LikeLike
Africa’s also got about triple the population they’ve ever had before, so does SW Asia.
LikeLike
The college years, which was not always the rite of passage it now is, only prolongs adolescence. College kids tend to have relatively little real-world experience, only what’s in their artificial little university bubbles. (This goes double for girls and anyone with a “work” study job.)
Up the voting age to 21; with today’s increased life expectancy I’d say 25, but 21 evens out for the folks who skipped college, and was the historical age of suffrage.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Shoot, why not 30? But even going back to 21 would be of at least some help. That, plus mandatory voter ID, English-only ballots, and bringing back literacy tests would go a long way toward cleaning this mess up.
LikeLike
There’s a whole subculture of young men who are still pouting and using their baby fat to get by. It’s more important that they see themselves as a certain class than take a low-grade job and get laid.
LikeLike
Go ahead and rescind suffrage for married white women too. They (okay, we) are emotional voters and even the “conservative” can’t hold the line against all the feelings they have about the poor sick children who need to immigrate to the US/ Have Obamacare/ need to be adopted by gay dads.
I’ll cheerfully sacrifice my vote to keep these pests from wrecking what’s left of America.
Also, men, shun your brethren who marry RINO women.
LikeLike
“America the Shitlib Feminist Shrike”
Is that a Hyperion reference?
LikeLike
You wanna talk about inbreds? Today’s Mexicans – “La Raza Cosmica” they call themselves – are all descended from at most a few hundred of Cortes’ men, who each probably impregnated a half a dozen or more native women each.
LikeLike
Many of us have already surmised that if the majority of illegal and legal immigrants, as well as so-called ‘refugees’, were young, single (and thin) women (especially light browns and Asians), then single White women (whose SMV would drop precipitously – especially any woman who is a 6 or below) would be opposed to immigration in all forms by a 4-1 margin. It would be higher except for the fact that the many vocal lesbians would still be in favor of it. I would love to see old liberal baby-boomer men leave their old, fat, short-haired liberal wives for a nice young Asian girl.
LikeLike
A man who marries an Asian is equal to (worse event) than a Pussy Hat Wearing FemCunt (she may still marry white)
LikeLike
I agree. White men should not be doing that, i would say too much feminism and divorces/alimony caused some of them to give up on white women. If white women are not feminist i guarantee that the vast majority of white men would go for white women, just like in the past.
A woman going for a black or muslim (those are the two biggest groups white women are going for) is even dumber though, as blacks have the highest rates of STDs and the risk of rape, violence and death is the highest with blacks and muslims.
LikeLike
They would be manning (…) the borders, shoulder to shoulder, @rm3d to the teeth and mercilessly @nn1h1late any Asian, African or Latin g1rl who dares come closer.
LikeLike
Lol only a bitch would write this
LikeLike
I agree. White men should not be doing that, i would say too much feminism and divorces/alimony caused some of them to give up on white women. If white women are not feminist i guarantee that the vast majority of white men would go for white women, just like in the past.
A woman going for a black or muslim (those are the two biggest groups white women are going for) is even dumber though, as blacks have the highest rates of STDs and the risk of rape, violence and death is the highest with blacks and muslims.
LikeLike
For more info on this topic – my article here:
http://diversitymachtfrei.blogspot.bg/2016/05/the-problem-with-feminism-why.html
LikeLike
How do I get my boyfriend to read this website? Now that’s a question you’re not used to getting.
LikeLike
Maybe you can tell him that he has a duty towards his people, woman, and future kids, to become a red pilled white patriot. This site could help him to become more red pilled.
LikeLike
Maybe you need a new boyfriend, who can supply you with some Peak Alpha Sh!tlord seed.
What part of the country are you in?
LikeLike
Assuming you’re a girl (girls love cutesily narcissistic “me/meee!/itsme” handles), it’s easy. Forward him any CH article on male/female relations and just write “LOL”. He will read it trying to figure out why you LOL’d, but he’ll still have read it. And if he has any brains or balls at all, he’ll keep reading.
LikeLike
The same way you get him to do everything else you want him to do, gnomesayin’?
LikeLike
I think that the reason is simpler. women have a big heart and want to save the world. they apply their nurturing instincts to political situations. their biology is familiar with forcing the older children to help the younger children and they apply this logic to “white men”
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think that’s it. Men see things in terms of potential mating opportunities, not women. Put a woman in a room full of men, and she’ll forget who was in the room later on.
It’s very difficult to not see people from a nurturing perspective, as a woman. It’s psychologically difficult to be tough during a sob story, regardless of how honest the story isn’t. I will give the exception to slutty women, who either start-off with bad brain chemistry or get it from riding the cock carousel.
It’s quite possible that those married women were influenced by their husbands. Women are easy to influence.
LikeLike
I issue a great big fart at your comment
LikeLike
I, too, fornicate in your general direction.
LikeLike
Could it be that Whyte Women Are Scared?
…that the cudgel of political Correctness is now stalking THEM in the form of ‘whyte privilege’ – and not just whyte men they threw under the bus two generations ago.
Out of fear, they did/are doing two seemingly contradictory things:
1) voting for Trump (by a small majority)
2) favoring illegal immigration in polls and socially
How to reconcile? Easy. Ever the crafty creatures, they are:
PRIVATELY turning to Trump for alpha protection against the cudgel
PUBLICLY playing defense with empty virtue signaling.
[CH: single white women voted overwhelmingly for thecunt.]
LikeLike
Women are herd animals. If you break the lead buffalo or the jewish media pied piper they will reorientate to whatever ‘feels’ conventional that replaces it.
This is the crucial point:
Women find the Narrative to be conventional wisdom. We here think its extreme, degenerate, illogical, even evil. But they think its normal cos ‘everyone is thinking it’.
Women aren’t rebels like that. The only rebelling they do is what jew professors and psychologists in college tell them is the new conventional wisdom against the white man.
Women are conventional wisdom more than men. Look at the record book. When Christianity was big, they were the most ardent. Saying rosaries, bible study, church dinners. When Hitler was big in Germany, there were probably more women nagging their kids to wear the right uniforms and read the right books etc etc than guys who just wanted to play poker or go fishing.
Women are not cognitively developed enough in many ways. And certainly have a much higher empathy well to outsiders, weirdos and so on. Its not really rocket science to work out the jews would target women first on the basis of their empathy.
LikeLike
Off Topic:
Hey Heartiste, could you tell me if my answer is good, or how to deal with this kind of banter?
I have a female coworker which is somewhat attractive, but I don’t want anything with her (I am married). That said, I enjoy some playful banter, but I dont want to come across as hitting on her, while also not looking like an AFC.
Chat through work chat system:
Me: oops
Her: what?
Me: accidently called you; guess it didnt go through
Her: missing me? 😉
Me: phat fingers
I feel my answer was subpar. What do you say? Thanks!
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Absolutely essential first step is to overhaul divorce laws – that will change the power dynamic, which is what really needs to happen.
LikeLike
I welcome further suggestions from the commentariat.
———————————————————–
they need to rebuild the family as an economic unit. Maybe exempt everyone making less than 500k from paying income tax to allow family businesses.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reason 972: to have enough nannies and housekeepers in the wings to have cheap childcare whilst maintaining gogirrll careers.
LikeLike
Women may believe that they are going to get to be in a 50 shades of grey relationship with a dominant alpha male, but the reality will actually be this:
The Maslow hierarchy puts food and shelter above sex for men. Once these immigrants have gotten used to 1st world accommodation in their new homes they will want to keep it. They don’t have the means to keep it up once they collapse their new homes after they become the ethnic majority. Unless they do one thing:
PIMP THEIR NEW SEX SLAVES OUT.
If the Koran does not expressly say that it is OK to live off of the proceeds of a non-muslim sex worker then there are probably a few lines in different chapters which loosely interpreted would say it was OK.
Therefore in countries like Sweden which will fall first the women there will not end up sharing the alpha male dominant in his harem as they planned but instead being shared among the Omega male denizens of other countries that couldn’t get any where they lived. At this point the women of Sweden will realize that they may have made a huge mistake. However, it will be too late for them, but it should be enough to make the liberal women in the other countries that aren’t quite at the point of no return to switch sides.
LikeLike
Sweden will be the first country to collapse.
LikeLike
when you are a worthless “beign” but they still let you walk around and pollute
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C_SZMSRVoAAhx8e.jpg:large
LikeLike
LikeLike
I’m not sure when the Texas legislature actually passed that bill and presented it to the Governor for his signature, but I would have waited until May 5th to sign it into law. Cinco de Bye Bye.
LikeLike
Someone really needs to mess with these asshats by creating big signs that read, “No Alien is Human”.
LikeLike
We’ve only just beugn.
LikeLike
Well, that IS a bit harsh, and puts the public sympathy meter on the wrong side… not to mention that vibrants will literally get away with murder just because someone once called them a n1gger.
Maybe something like, “Pepe says: Illegal is as illegal does.”, with the usual smiling frog pic? Pictures seem to resonate with the hoi polloi. 😉
LikeLike
Beaners can’t even spell their own name right….
LikeLike
Heh, heh… human beans.
LikeLike
#5 “Make divorce harder for women.”
You will never pry no fault divorce from their cold, dead souls but a few reasonable changes that will profoundly curb divorce are: (1) true equal 50-50 custody as a presumption; (2) No child support — each parent funds their own life with the kids; and (3) No alimony without proving fault.
This will immediately remove the largest economic incentive for women to divorce.
LikeLike
I’d shutdown faceberg and instawhoré. That’d go a long way.
LikeLike
muh big happy globofamily
LikeLike
A love latter to ADL
I labeled that speech three years ago “a love letter to the ADL.” Three years later I can say, from the perspective of the FBI: we are still in love with you.
————————————————————————————————–
Subhuman levels of spinelessness that should not even exist
LikeLike
9. No man may be held liable for the maintenance of any child for which his paternity has not been conclusively established by DNA evidence.
LikeLike
We have to start impeding and, where possible, reversing this seemingly inexorable flow of resources from men to single/divorced women that (((they))) have been promoting for the last 60 years.
Things that can’t continue won’t. The go grrl gravy train is one of those things.
LikeLike
“Thus, they are in their stage of life when all faculties, mental, emotional, libidinal, are focused to a pinpoint of estrogenic vitality”
yeah, those legions of 40+ divorced white chicks and their “estrogenic vitality”…oh, wait, you mean most single women aren’t 20-30 y.o.?
LikeLike
Let’s look at voter participation statistics for single women:
30 and under: 32.7%
30-59: 24.7%
60+: 42.7%
found this at voterparticipation dot org
LikeLike
LikeLike
Among married white men who have kids and own property (measured by whether or not they own their own homes in this poll, as opposed to renting), it’s 25% in opposition to the wall and 75% in support.
This more-or-less represents the entirety of the electorate as the founders envisioned it.
LikeLike
Who the hell are those 25% married to?
Or are those the (ahem) (((white men))) we’ve been hearing so much about?
LikeLike
The future of Europeans and Eurocolonials is to become a diaspora. We’ll be a minority everywhere by 2100 and we need to start acting like it, not wasting our time handwringing about what’s been lost. Simply put, nowhere outside of Eastern Europe is there a “white” society that actually wants to be “white” in the future. There are only individuals who desire this, not nations. Those individuals must form a tribe. More on the consequences of that here: https://fifthpolitical.wordpress.com/2017/05/05/the-de-nationalization-of-the-global-european-diaspora/
LikeLike
On a related note of social degeneration, CH can add this to pile of “mounting” evidence for our society’s brazenly open embrace of alpha f***s beta bucks as common practice.
Read with care, or use as an ipecac substitute.
“Conventional wisdom has it that men are more likely than women to crave, even need, variety in their sex lives. But of the 25 couples I encountered, a majority of the relationships were opened at the initiation of the women; only in six cases had it been the men. Even when the decision was mutual, the woman was usually the more sexually active outside the marriage. A suburban married man on OkCupid told me he had yet to date anyone, in contrast to his wife, whom he called “an intimacy vampire.” There was a woman in Portland whose husband had lost interest in sex with anyone, not just her. A 36-year-old woman in Seattle said she opened her marriage after she heard about the concept from another young mom at her book club.
Perhaps the women in the couples I encountered were more willing to tell their stories because they did not fit into predictable unflattering stereotypes about the male sex drive. But it was nonetheless striking to hear so many wives risk so much on behalf of their sexual happiness.”
LikeLike
This is fantasyland. They’re trying to do with relationships what Marx did with economics: Invent a system that doesn’t take into account the human element.
When I was a young reporter, a cop told me the vast majority of domestic incidents he dealt with were over jealousy. Women furious that men cheated. Men livid over their women flirting. And so on. If these moron SWJs think they’re somehow going to make open marriage “a thing” and jealous rage isn’t going to pop up, they’re living in dreamland.
Open marriages won’t work because humans says “MINE!” Communism didn’t work because humans say “MINE!” It’s human nature to be possessive and I wonder what the EFF is up with libs that they can’t accept human nature. They’re getting worse than Catholics (kidding, sort of).
LikeLike
See: Helen of Troy
The Trojan War was waged against the city of Troy by the Achaeans (Greeks) after Paris of Troy took Helen from her husband Menelaus, king of Sparta.
http://www.history.com/topics/ancient-history/trojan-war
“Jealousy is conceptualized as a cognitive, emotional, and behavioral response to a relationship threat. In the case of sexual jealousy, this threat emanates from knowing or suspecting that one’s partner has had (or desires to have) sexual activity with a third party. In the case of emotional jealousy, an individual feels threatened by her or his partner’s emotional involvement with and/or love for a third party.” (Guerrero, Spitzberg, & Yoshimura, 2004, page 311)
“MINE!”
LikeLike
Talmudic law-giq does not grok with goyspeak which has its own logic.
try again
LikeLike
Consider the story of Sammy Jankis to understand White Women’s motives for open borders.
LikeLike
My comment disappeared.
LikeLike
lol insecure white dudes
[CH: getting more secure by the day….and that frightens you.]
LikeLike
“white dudes” lol
LikeLike
That’s WHITE MEN to you, boy.
LikeLike
I would bet 100$ that boys are a tiny minority on this blog. This blog is made of veterans, ice road truckers, plumbers, oil-drillers, professional athletes, intellectuals and some mossad agents. The grunts we have stand in awe of the elders writing here. They know that we speak true, they know that this blog is life-giving to men (and by this to women as well).
Future shitlord presidents, prime ministers and chancellors will happily recall the time of their youth when they were reading the Chateau.
LikeLike
OT: Here’s your beloved hungarians cucking themselves at Eurovision
LikeLike
Ach du lieber! 😡
So much for that Eastern front bulwark we were counting on.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
“If you think artists from a nation somehow define/represent their entire nation, you are an IMBECILE.”
This comment was directed at Rman. Not you, Gregie.
But fuck you anyway.
LikeLike
I called rman an imbecile, not you.
LikeLike
Not everything revolves around you faggot
LikeLike
Next time try to be smart enough to hit the right reply level then, Butthaid.
And get out of the house once in awhile and see what happens when you flap your yap like that in meat world… right before you find yourself spittin’ teeth..
LikeLike
Besides, the original poster’s point still applies… if that’s what they’re sending to the world stage of the Eurovision Song Contest, the message is loud and clear… they’ve got worms in the apple barrel, more’s the pity.
LikeLike
If you think artists from a nation somehow define/represent their entire nation, you are an IMBECILE.
LikeLike
No, asshole, I know one artist doesn’t represent the entire nation.
But I do know the symbolic effect of demoralization agitprop, like allowing a non-heritage type to represent your country on the world stage… ESPECIALLY in something as important as music. Not forgetting the visuals here peppered with beautiful White women.
You snide fuckwit… you thimble… you thread.
You fairy.
LikeLike
Leaving this link for the wolfies out there who think that game can’t ever trump height.
http://www.maxim.com/sports/matt-harvey-upset-about-adriana-lima-julian-edelman-2017-5
LikeLike
First off, celebs don’t count, they inhabit a completely different universe.
Second, Mr. Edelman is WAY better looking than Mr. Harvey, no idea what their respective financial portfolios look like, maybe Miss Model is just one of those who get bored easily and hop from boyfriend to boyfriend – see ‘celebs’, above.
I don’t think ‘Game’ had anything to do with this.
LikeLike
Lima is 35 years old, which is ANCIENT in by New York standards.She might as well as be Helen Mirren. Edelman also has that ‘face’ that all American broads love.
Think (young) Robert Redford. This isn’t ‘game’
LikeLike
Don’t get it either. She was a 10 when I was coming up and still very much very beautiful but she is coasting past her prime. If she was being honest and really did save herself for bball playa ex then the cheating and divorce obviously did a number on her psyche (model thin personality to begin with), explaining her current single millionaire mama cockhopping. And, yeah, Edelman has much more alpha cred. Harvey looks such a tool now even if the Maxim article is fake.
LikeLike
She was a hard 9. Perfect body. Her face, though, a little…off. Her face is a little too schoolgirl-y for my taste. It always looks like she’s squinting.
I’m not crazy about Brazilians.
LikeLike
Touch of the tar brush.
LikeLike
I tossed out 10 as shorthand, 9-10 starts to be quibbling preferences to me. Yeah, Lima is typically Brazilian as Gulf Stream Lord says, slight bit of Afro in there.
An interesting comparison would be that other brasileira, Alessandra Ambrosio, similar rank lookswise but more of an angular, boyish face. (Forget Gisele.)
LikeLike
She’s old and has been run through. Harvey is a bitch for getting emotional about her.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My point exactly.
LikeLike
The 8-point list is one-sided, except maybe 2&6. You solve problems by bringing Yin and Yang in equilibrium, not by restricting Yin to a lower level Yang.
[CH: the problem with your worldview is that it’s ignorant of the 70+ year reality of social change and government policy that have steadily shifted the playing field in favor of yin. my 8 point list, while not by any means the final word on the subject of solutions to our shared single white woman crisis, is a much-needed reshifting that brings balance to the force.]
MGTOWs, PUAs, nerdy&polite&feeble betas, uncommitted players chasing solely notch counts so they can elevate their (self)perceived alpha status. From an evolutionary point of view these are all dead ends and nature doesn’t give a flying ^@#$ about deviations, no matter how bright and articulate. The solitary&artsy Neanderthal had a 1600 cc brain and still became extinct.
[alpha males (that is, men who have higher number of life partners) have more kids than beta males. seriously. the studies are out there.]
In my estimation the easy way out won’t work. Lying back with a devil might care hedonistic attitude and blaming the other half for all the misery might be a bliss at the individual level, but it will also spell the doom of the white race.
[neither will blamelessness for single white women and the assumption of their missing moral agency work. it’s time to accept reality of female nature for what it is and stop quasi-white knighting like dupes, prudes, and toolbags.]
So here’s my list:
1. Be a man. Protect, nurture, teach, guide. With an iron hand.
[it takes two to tango. women also have to step up and be a woman.]
2. Invest in a family. Time, resources, forgiveness, patience. Patience.
[nice sentiment. but the social trends haven’t been promising. we need new thinking.]
3. 3 white children. Anything less won’t cut it.
[breeding wars are beta. and unwinnable, for everyone.]
4. Form like-minded groups. Sacrifice for them and they will sacrifice for you if they hold the same values. In these times one is none out there. Having 500 friends on FB won’t cut it.
[no quarrel with this.]
5. Become active politically. Only with enough leverage bad laws can be changed. Peacefully.
[ditto.]
6. Acquire knowledge. Spread it to your group.
[what do you think this blog is?]
7. Avoid violence but prepare your body and especially your mind for it. When your back is against the wall and your values and your loved ones are in danger, go down hard. It’s good to have something to fight for until the end and a group to protect your flanks.
[iron pill and red pill are co-prescribed.]
8. Be a man. Worth repeating.
[be a woman. even more worth repeating.]
LikeLike
“5. Become active politically. Only with enough leverage bad laws can be changed. Peacefully.”
Name a single law which is fundamental to the survival of white Christian culture that you have helped change by becoming politically active. One.
That’s what I thought…
Those who lecture about changing things through the political system have a tenuous grasp on reality at best, and at worst are intentionally leading people down a dead end road while their country is stolen from them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s exactly my point. One means nothing. But a few months ago when our politicians wanted to enact a law to free their corrupt stooges from prisons we gathered half a million people in front of the Parliament. Day after day until they had to rescind that law.
LikeLike
http://imgur.com/fiDYljV
LikeLike
“The solitary&artsy Neanderthal had a 1600 cc brain and still became extinct.”
no. they were bred out. get a DNA test. if you’re not a subsaharan african chances are you have 2-5% Neanderthal DNA. is there a lesson for us in there…?
LikeLike
Yes. That if we continue business as usual our grand-grand-children will have 2-5% white DNA in their blood and they’ll use it as an feeble statement of superiority. “Remember those white people with a 3-digit IQ that sent a man to the moon? They were my ancestors.”
LikeLike
CH: the problem with your worldview is that it’s ignorant of the 70+ year reality of social change and government policy that have steadily shifted the playing field in favor of yin. my 8 point list, while not by any means the final word on the subject of solutions to our shared single white woman crisis, is a much-needed reshifting that brings balance to the force.
– totally agree (except with the ignorant part). Laws in the West are skewed heavily in favor of women and they must be reversed gradually by men. Who must bear their share – it takes 2 to tango. Absent a world-wide pandemic/nuclear exchange/famine/EM storm that brings the brute force needed for survival again in high demand, rescinding the vote of women won’t happen.
alpha males (that is, men who have higher number of life partners) have more kids than beta males. seriously. the studies are out there
– agree again. Genghis-Han, Donald Trump. However, how many readers of this blog have 3 or more children?
nice sentiment. but the social trends haven’t been promising. we need new thinking
– until a huge social revolution or future brain rewiring, marriage is the best evil we could come up so the society can linger on without destroying itself. Kinda like democracy. This whole 3rd wave feminism and its natural corresponding adverse reaction are just playwright material in the hands of the globos. divide&impera&breed out of existence the only force that can put up some semblance of resistance.
breeding wars are beta. and unwinnable, for everyone
– everything under 2.1 replacement means extinction irrespective of our opinions or protective walls. “are beta” is just a convenient definition but won’t change nature’s mathematics one iota.
what do you think this blog is?
-much appreciated. Been reading the archives for the last 3 years.
LikeLike
‘8. Be a man. Worth repeating.’
“Be a man”? Why not go all in on the bullshit and use the standard greazy cunt call of “Man UP!”? or accept the fact that “Be a man” can all too easily become “Be a martyr”.
‘5. Become active politically. Only with enough leverage bad laws can be changed. Peacefully.’
The time for peaceful change is long gone. No number of bullet points will change this. Even the division of the nation will be accompanied by great paroxysms of violence, unless white males roll over (again) like bitches in heat and give away all the prime real estate, for ‘fairness’ (and end up paying for the upkeep of it, one way or the other).
LikeLike
My comment got stuck in moderation. Basically women are conventional wisdom herd animals.
The jews create the conventional wisdom.
What people don’t undertsand is that women are more conservative than men and take less risks.
You can’t see it because the conventional wisdom today is a bizarre jewish concoction of sophistry. But when Chhristianity was strong, women were the most ardent followers, said the most rosaries and raised the most money for the church in terms of physical charity drives and such.
Same when the Nazis were big, the german women would have made sure the kids rote learned the approved answers and wore the right uniforms.
Women are herd animals. Break the herd necromancer. Get the cows back to the reservation.
LikeLike
This is what I mean when I say morality is an illusion. There is no such thing as ‘conservativism’ unless you mean a personality trait. In the same way, every religion believes its god or gods are the most legit and think others are stupid. Your conservativism is my liberalism. And so on. Its herding de facto.
LikeLike
Before the 1950s nuclear family which we think of today as conservative there was the Victorian standard. They would think the 50s family were liberal. Likewise people with medieval values e.g. muslims. And goth barbarians or viking raiders and so on. The key is to control conventional wisdom. The jews have worked out there is no morality centuries ago. Thats why they keep inverting conventional wisdom and inventing new morality e.g. christianity. And women follow.
LikeLike
“The jews have worked out there is no morality centuries ago”
there is A Morality
The Jews Know.
Their punishment for misusing their talent is always ʘ^ʘ!! ʘ^ʘ!! never small.
LikeLike
Herd animals is right.
In bars and restaurants, they can’t even go potty by themselves.
LikeLike
In essence, the media replaced the church, putting Hollywood in charge of women instead of church leaders. How to change that?
The only way I see is if more and more “unplugged” subculture grow, such as Mormons and the Amish. Not sure if Evangelicals fit in here. Muslims probably do, which won’t be good for the (white) future.
LikeLike
Re: motives for the single White woman signaling for open borders.
Not mutually exclusive to any of the other motives, but couldn’t another part of it be simply keeping options open? What’s their cost to merely signaling? Nearly zero in this cultural environment, or probably a benefit. What’s their skin in the game for the policy being put into effect? Probably not zero but it’s also probably difficult to calculate. Even if they are not in a gated community, even if their head or outlook on life isn’t in a gated community, it’s still probably difficult to factor. On the other hand, what’s their possible upside? Why wouldn’t a girl want to keep her options open? There are fairy tales are filled with noble-spirited poor boy from other side of the tracks makes good wins princess: The Lady and the Tramp; Han Solo and Princess Leia; Space Balls. And hard times make good men so in the back of her head is probably the idea that why should she be cut off from this population of men who have been through hard times; maybe there’s a diamond in the rough (virtue wise, etc. etc.) in these foreigners? What was the effeminate prince’s name in Space Balls? Why wouldn’t the girl want to keep her options open if looked at in a cost/benefit way? I mean if the cost of saying/voting to keep her options open is nearly zero (and/or diffuse or mostly borne by others), even if the chances of a diamond in the fought coming through for her are very long odds, still, why wouldn’t they indulge in wishful thinking and vote/signal that way? Especially today? Given today’s culture? Seems to me similar to the abortion thing. Even if the overwhelming majority of women who say they ‘would never’ have an abortion really will end up never having an abortion, if there’s basically no cost to them voting to keep that option available, why wouldn’t they vote/speak/signal that way?
So in terms of culture, we have to bring back the idea that one can sin not only in their acts and omissions, but in their thoughts and in their words. We have to continue to bring the pain (memetic pain, rhetorical hurt) to the signalers; make them pay for that option.
tldr: No, on some level i think they partly really do think some Han al bin Soloski might come through for them.
LikeLike
Yeah, just like they love collecting ‘friends’ on Facebook, they love reveling in their role as the Blonde Goddess of the Jungle, surrounded by thousands of worshiping darkies.
Except sometimes, the darkies get a little carried away and it’s not always the tallest, hawttest or richest among them.
Which irks her to no end.
(insert Italian journalist scream here)
LikeLiked by 1 person
AGE matters. With less and less marriage happening, “single white female” is not longer code for “young cute female”.
Most will be under 30s, but you’ll have plenty of bitter post wall spinsters to bake in to those numbers.
The question then is do women become more globohomoist as they age into spinsterhood?
Best as I can tell, single women are always liberal, but they trend more apolitical when they are younger and get more militantly liberal as their egg reserve erodes.
LikeLike
I think (quality) foreign men in general.
My accent makes women wet I have been told.
I take no joy in this and have never taken an attached white American woman.
Btw…im doing a little vacation around some small college towns and am pleased to report that I have seen lots of attractive white women…few non whites and few tattoos and fewer slut signals like gawdy hair coloring.
Flagstaff, Arizona my favorite. My buddy in his first time traveling here has remarked how friendly and down to earth people are and glad to be away from identity obsessed snobby shitlib corrupt uptight areas.
LikeLike
but, but
…
you sed you were not a God-Damned BND plant
.
.
.
Likoff, God-Damned BND plant, lick my popish habsburg anus!
LikeLike
How stupid must blacks be to not see that the Wall, literally and figuratively, is in their best interest. Hispanic illegals are the people that compete most directly with them for jobs, housing, turf, political power, mates, etc. In a world where they actually looked after their own best interest, black support of the Wall should be the highest of all demographics.
LikeLike
The Negro is the chaotic violence arm of the Anabaptist State,
just as popo pigs are the organized arm of the Anabaptist State,
and
((frontrunners)) the intermediary class; insulating The Anabaptist State’s TPTB from the huwhyte hoi polloi. (as an aside TPTB attempt to replace (frontrunners)) with bindis appears to have backfired, with hilarious results. A ((frontrunner)) president?)
Back to original question The Negro will do what told by Massa obviously.
LikeLike
Awfully nice of them (((runners))) to be protecting the gentile upper classes, don’cha think?
/duckface with eyes spinning around in opposite directions rape!
LikeLike
so Isn’t this a tremendous good a job ((they))’re doing?
you can’t even see the Anabaptist behind the courtain; without being sensitized to it by being raised in a different kultur and doing some response-provoking maneuvers.
otoh, I’d be pissed too if Massa would repay muh faithful service by replacing me with bindis.
LikeLike
I do support the wall, and know several other black people that do also. Blacks get treated the worst here, so an illegal immigrant doing odd handyman jobs will see himself as better than someone like Dr. Ben Carson just because he’s not black, and closer to white in physical appearance. That’s what i deal with, so i need Trump and your boys to handle this.
LikeLike
a registry of white women who date/fuck vibrants would go a long way.
LikeLike
muh rights, muh freedomz, muh churchianity!
muh liberte egalite fraternite
(kindly disregard the “ou la mort” coda)
LikeLike
Female Suffrage. A mistake that will not be made again..
.
Suffrage. A mistake that will not be made again.
.
FTFY
LikeLike
LikeLike
Late to comment on this one, but the CH post is spot on. The Overton Window on the status of women will, however, be moved ony by dynamite.
LikeLike
Tough
LikeLike
[…] We should note though that this policy would have probably just included high-skilled non-Athenian Greeks, and maybe the occasional Egyptian or whoever. It would not have destroyed Athens, and is worlds apart from the policies that progressive White women like the authoress want for the United States and Western Europe, which is open borders with third world countries. […]
LikeLike
[…] We should note though that this policy would have probably just included high-skilled non-Athenian Greeks, and maybe the occasional Egyptian or whoever. It would not have destroyed Athens, and is worlds apart from the policies that progressive White women like the authoress want for the United States and Western Europe, which is open borders with third world countries. […]
LikeLike
White nationalists are the real cucks. They WANT to control the female bodies but can’t. They have let liberal women and liberal men to take control. They have let liberals push them underground, hiding behind internet anonymity. White nationalists are just WATCHING and commenting as liberals do whatever they please. How cuck is that?
[CH: speaking from experience?]
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Maverick Morality.
LikeLike