I’ve made this point before, but I think Tes tos Tyrone puts it more elegantly,
Even more fundamental Cap… it’s hidden in the two words “Invade/Invite”.
Invading is to enter, conquer, overwhelm, force to submit… to invite is to invite in, to attract, lure, entice or tempt.
At its most basic, this is in fact the precise role males and females engage in leading up to and during sexual congress.
The whole process of picking up girls, charming them, and seducing them into bed is one of action. It requires a wellspring of impudence and entitlement that feminists would balk at, but which is necessary if the human species is to continue existing.
Male seduction is, essentially, invasion. Men seduce as men invade: with purpose, triumphantly.
The process of being seduced is more complicated. There are elements of action — filtering, screening, testing — but predominantly it involves a strategic retreat and relinquishment to a greater, and more alluring, power. Women don’t wait supine for their conquerors, but neither do they push into new territory to find their conquerors. Men must invade women’s space and attention to have a shot at success. Women for their part entice this manly incursion by sending out invitations in the form of flirting, beauty, and other female lures that their “territory” is open to occupation.
Female seduction is, essentially, invitation. Women seduce as women invite: with pleasure, satisfyingly.
The dance of courtship between men and women is mirrored geopolitically in the active resistance of men to invasion and the passive submission of sexually available women to invasion.
***
Given the premise of this post, we may have a way forward to solving our shared single White woman problem and saving America from the open borders locust swarm. The issue, as I see it, is that White men have been playing defense for too long. Always appeasing, always conceding, always cucking. The rise of the Maul-Right has shown there’s a better path. If the essence of maleness is Invasion, then our sexually primed single White women can be wooed by their men going on offense; in practice this would mean adopting rhetoric that is much more potent, passionate, and prodding than what White men have succumbed to the past few generations. It means reframing the third world invasion and open borders as a temporary battlefield defeat that will only spur America’s White men to rally the troops, gather arms, and storm the shitlands of their invaders. This doesn’t have to signify literal invasion; what it should evoke in single White women (and their dirt world pets) is a virile, masculine purge of the invaders from the homelands of White men. We will purge the squatters, and we will purge the traitors, and we will purge the media accessories to the invasion. This is action. This is strength. And in the end, this is aroused White women brought back under the tutelage and direction of their White men.
It used to be normal:
This would, I’m sure, be considered “problematic” these days.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You will be reported to HR in 5, 4, 3, 2…
LikeLiked by 1 person
spread out!
LikeLike
Therefore the neocon agenda is an expression of manliness?
LikeLike
This is a great observation. Seizing initiative and being bold is the heart of my advice to allies lately, who just need to be reminded that it’s not a crime to act like a man. Boldness is the lesson of 2016 and the distillation of game into a single concept. It is the reactionary revolution summarized, the poison pill against cultmarxism, the antidote to cuck death. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything. They let you do it.
De l’audace, encore de l’audace, toujours de l’audace,,,
Matt
LikeLiked by 1 person
We are the balance. We are racist because the enemy is virulently anti-racist (anti-white). Don’t mince words about it, and don’t tiptoe. Err on the side of over-the-top.
We are the correction. We have come of age just as the enemy’s long patient march through the institutions has begun to yield deadly result. If we don’t fix it, no one will. The time is out of joint: O cursed spite / That ever [we were] born to set it right.
Therefore we are radical. Our generation’s energy must match the combined strength of the last four, which, in being misled, have invested all of their resources into destroying our inheritance.
Therefore we are a reaction. We would be happy to tend to our fieldslike Cincinnatus, but they will not leave us alone. They are expert at avoiding the stand-up fight, so their aim is to surround and starve us, smoke us out, wait for us to turn on each other. Indirectly, of course, with no chain of culpability. What is the solution to this cowardly attack by proxy? Boldness in everything.
The cold civil war is existential. Life or slow death. At some point pussyfooting around isn’t just inadequate, it is positively inimical. Don’t put up with it anywhere. Both women and men will thank you, at first quietly and then openly.
Matt
LikeLiked by 1 person
And my point was that Invade [Masculine] and Invite [Feminine] is probably being driven by a fundamental Darwinian imperative which seeks to prevent too much inbreeding.
In fact, a nihilist could make the argument that “Culture” & “Religion” arose as countervailing Darwinian strategies meant to nurture & propagate in-bred genetic qualities like intelligence & future-orientation which young people [and especially young women] don’t bother to think about in the Heat of the moment.
LikeLike
My original point being that I suspect that much of single White females’ infatuation with the fantasy of the swarthy dark invader comes from their despair at these legions of effete man-boobed lisping My-Little-Pony Betas who failed the Frankfurt School’s Mother of All Sh!t Tests, and now the hindbrains of these White females are searching desperately for some DNA which will re-introduce a little violence & criminality & psychopathy & an absence of future orientation to the women’s bloodlines.
LikeLiked by 4 people
tl;dr == If White Men are to recapture their culture from the clutches of the Frankfurt School, then White Men will have to take off their gloves and start smacking some sense into these White b!tches.
BTW, this is also why demoralization is so very, very important to the Frankfurt School & the Mossad & the JIDF: A demoralized man lacks the strength of will to throw a b!tch over his knee and go 50 Shades of Medieval on her perky pink & alabaster a$$ [which of course is precisely what a b!tch’s hamster so desperately craves her man, but what his demoralized broken-souled Beta-tude prevents him from unleashing upon her].
LikeLiked by 3 people
“comes from their despair at these legions of effete man-boobed lisping My-Little-Pony Betas”
1) depending on the quality and strength of her in-group acceptance, a woman’s libido prefers a more masculine outsider to a beta insider. they follow their tingles or they follow the herd. so until the herd problem is fixed, forget about women’s role in the 14 words.
2) it’s mostly the lower-smv women who “Mud-vasion, Now!” they’ve been getting passed over and/or pumped-n-dumped by the vanishingly few high quality white bros since junior high school, so their hindbrains are primed for jealous vengeance. I don’t know if the frankfurt school was ingenious enough to foresee that little perk, or if the general idea of empowering the downtrodden simply bears fruit in unexpected areas, but it’s here and it has to be dealt with.
all is not lost, however. the strong get stronger by overcoming the parasites that cull it’s weaker members.
LikeLike
“comes from their despair at these legions of effete man-boobed lisping My-Little-Pony Betas”
another way to look at this: liberated women have a hard time reconciling the difference between what the herd (the MSM) tells her she deserves with the type of man she’s actually able to land in the sexual marketplace.
has it ever been any different? minus the one-man, one-woman social contract, would women as a group EVER have voluntarily settled for the men they could reliably get? or did they always attempt to overplay their hand (hypergamy)? and has the invention/availability of birth control simply increased their tendency to overplay their hand?
LikeLike
Rightly so, Captain my fine fellow! Just the points I am trying to make Red Pilled men to realise.
LikeLiked by 1 person
> “what the herd (the MSM) tells her she deserves”
The Herd used to be governed by a culture called “Chr!stianity”, but then the Frankfurt School moved to town, and gutted the old culture, and started shoving a culture of miscegenation down the throats of The Herd.
> “minus the one-man, one-woman social contract, would women as a group EVER have voluntarily settled for the men they could reliably get?”
The culture is so inextricably tied to the blood that it’s very difficult to distinguish between the two. One-Man/One-Woman seems to be the foundational construct of the White Race [to the best of my knowledge, no other race, not even the jews, ever evolved beyond polygamy], so I suspect that for the near future, White women’s hamsters will continue to gravitate towards One-Man/One-Woman.
But eventually an artificial anti-culture of filth & perversion & nihilism will necessarily take its toll on White bloodlines.
And Whites have been suffering under that anti-culture for almost a century now.
LikeLike
(before I begin – yes, I know you said “Too much”, but that term is easily exploited and misunderstood, so I’m going to just address the issue as a whole)
WIth all due respect Captain (I love your work here), I would ask that you re-examine this whole “inbreeding thing.” Inbreeding is only a problem at the most extreme levels, and even then ONLY if the inbreeding has led to the maximization of deleterious attributes and the minimization of the positives. Two people of clean, healthy stock will inbreed MORE clean people of healthy stock. Genes don’t just suddenly go haywire because they’re too similar, but they DO when the genes don’t mix well (looking at you, mystery meat school shooters).*
Two people with Type 1 Diabetes will inbreed in an entire line that has a very high chance of having Type 1 Diabetes, yes. Sickly people inbreeding with sickly siblings is bad because you’re maximizing negatives.
FWIW We are far, far less inbred nowadays then we were back at the height of our civilization. It used to be scandalous to even consider breeding with an Irishman or and Italian; now we’re lucky if they’re even “white”.
Final thought: Inbreeding is the defacto standard for breeding the best horses (amongst other prize animals). I’d pay close attention to what the whole anti-inbreeding thing actually means.
It means fuck that brown/yellow/black girl, and not your own kind, goy.
*Note: I find members of my own family sexually repulsive, so I’m in no way saying that the concept is attractive to me. When the term “inbred” is almost exclusively used to slander whites in the middle of America, though, and almost openly practiced by the most powerful group on the planet…I’d say it bears closer study.
LikeLiked by 1 person
HoC, we didn’t get the distinction between Whites & Muds without inbreeding. And then we didn’t get the distinction between e.g. Northwest Europeans & Southeast Europeans without more inbreeding. And then the distinction between Icelanders & Norwegians & Danes & Dutch & Scots & Englishmen without even more inbreeding.
BTW, I have long suspected that “inbreeding” has been vastly accelerated at the top of our society in the last century, with the rise of easy transportation [the automobile] and co-edumakashunal institutions of higher learning.
When high-IQ boyz and high-IQ girlzezes can graduate from high school & trivially waltz off to the same college 1000 miles away, and seek out one-another, and get married, and have progeny, you probably start to see a huge increase of in-bred characteristics like autism, effeminacy in men, masculinity of women, etc etc etc.
[BTW, at the very tip-top of the pyramid, I am convinced that this self-selecting inbreeding of the very high-IQ is also creating a dramatic rise in psychopathy at the very highest echelons of our society.]
[CH: you might want to trawl the net for the relevant studies confirming your suspicion that high IQ is increasingly associated with psychopathy. I’m not kidding, there have been recent studies uncovering this trend.]
LikeLiked by 2 people
CH, a lot of this gets back to your “marry a secretary” initiative.
If a boss with an IQ of 130 marries a secretary with an IQ of 110, then his immediate progeny will take a massive hit in intelligence, but those progeny are also likely to have rather stable personalities.
Whereas if the IQ-130 boss marries the IQ-130 consultant from the Big Four accounting shop which is helping the boss with the audit, then there is a much greater chance of popping out some IQ-150 children, but also, I suspect, a much greater chance of getting some badly unstable personalities as a result.
These are really profoundly difficult questions to ponder, especially if you’re the boss, and you’ve got to decide what’s in the best interest of your as-yet-un-conceived [i.e still purely hypothetical] progeny.
LikeLike
‘These are really profoundly difficult questions to ponder, especially if you’re the boss, and you’ve got to decide what’s in the best interest of your as-yet-un-conceived [i.e still purely hypothetical] progeny.’
‘Mad Scientist’ character resonates for a reason.
LikeLike
“…relevant studies confirming your suspicion that high IQ is increasingly associated with psychopathy. ..”
of course there are. high iq is wrong.
ever wondered who exactly coined the phrase “there is a fine line between a genius and a madman”? i’d bet he’s closely related to the secular person that peddled the cousin-fucking-hilllbillies first
LikeLike
Genetics and intelligence don’t… really work like that…
LikeLike
My Little Ponies is hardly ever funny and only mildly interesting. There must be something appealing about the ponies to the men, because they really like something about it.
LikeLike
In terms of the fact that game clarifies, cuts through, this is a prime example.
Long ago I had realized it’s all about the invitation from women, like you said, vis a vis flirting, beauty, and other female lures, but I never did invade at that point.
Why? Didn’t have game, that’s why.
It’s all so simple now!
LikeLiked by 1 person
With Great Power comes Great Responsibility.
LikeLike
Similar experience. Long ago I realized the core principle of what women found attractive: confidence. I took stock of myself and thought “well, I’m screwed, ’cause I don’t have much to be confident about.” The thought didn’t occur to me that I could just fake it. I was being beta-rational. No game.
Now I know better.
LikeLike
Meant to reply to Mendo
LikeLike
>> I took stock of myself and thought “well, I’m screwed, ’cause I don’t have much to be confident about.” The thought didn’t occur to me that I could just fake it. I was being beta-rational. No game.
I’m waiting for part II where you say that “faking it” allows you to start walking toward actually having it. Fake-confidence is about 5% better than no confidence… but has a lot of acceleration behind it… in that fake confidence can help you find real confidence.
Game is certainly not about fake confidence.
Women hate fake. Aka biology hates fake.
LikeLiked by 1 person
daysofgame.com
It was the start. Fake it till you become it. Real confidence has to be worked for sometimes and faked when it’s not there. Now, I’m a heartwarming rags to riches story.
LikeLike
Sounds like authenticity is important…
LikeLike
[…] Invade/Invite Is Male/Female Personified […]
LikeLike
Fucking brilliant. I never truly realized just how catastrophic it was to allow women control over any politics whatsoever until it was broken down in terms as stark as this.
I just told a beta friend the other day that if I had to break picking up girls down to any one concept, it would be “Take action.” If you are waiting for something to happen (for her to call, for her to give you an approach invitation, for her to respond to your “confession”) you are failing in your mission. Men are the actors; women are the acted on, as the old saying goes.
Great shit, Tes tos Tyrone.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dynamic, Passionate and Authentic. These are the irreducible qualities of Alpha. Alpha is universally attractive to women. Game is the language of Female Seduction (verbal and physical language) that allows you to translate that attraction into sex.
LikeLike
“Are you saying a DPA guy can never turn a girl off or get rejected or lose attraction? No matter how much he authentically, dynamically, and passionately begs for sex and fails all her shit-tests? This is why your DPA thing is dumb lol You keep trying to push your “system” that’s just an oversimplification of a bunch of internal stuff with a mystical woo-woo spin added to it.”
– YaReally, The SMV and Aging Process, Rational Male
LikeLike
I never truly realized just how catastrophic it was to allow
womenthe masses control over any politics whatsoever until it was broken down in terms as stark as this.LikeLike
lol refutation of Sentient’s gay DPA system in these comments: https://therationalmale.com/2016/11/26/the-unbearable-rightness-of-being-female/comment-page-3/#comments
LikeLike
Lol… Sperg out is not refutation champ.
LikeLike
DPA = ???
LikeLike
Dynamic, Passionate and Authentic
LikeLike
It always amazes me how a biologically dictated paradigm (the insertion of P in V) is also manifested in every single other form of action that men take.
You can see it everywhere. Men want to “enter” into everything that is guarded whether it be by brute force or cunning (force of the brain).
This can be seen everywhere. It can be seen in the thirst of conquerors to enter and conquer a city/country (arguably the greatest epic ever written, the Iliad, is dealing with this. It is also illustrating the two approaches of pure force (Achilles) and cunning a.k.a Game (Odysseus via Trojan Horse).
It can be seen in the desire of Scientists and Mathematicians to access Truth that was concealed to mankind.
It can be seen in the desire of Inventors to build devices that will allow them to access untapped potential.
It can be seen in the will of the Businessman to access Wealth that it was until then out of his reach.
It can be seen in the actions of the Artist to be able to access the skill of expression that others can’t and that requires years of dedication and struggle to perfect.
Even our sports (football, soccer etc) are about putting the ball in an area guarded by opponents.
Everything is dictated by this paradigm. Or as CH likes to put it “the sexual market rules over them all”
Everything
LikeLiked by 1 person
Even our sports (football, soccer etc) are about putting the ball in an area guarded by opponents.
Hence, why when you pound a babe, you score!
LikeLiked by 1 person
For men, it’s all about penetration.
Penetrating deep thought. . .
Penetrating enemy lines . . .
Penetrating the mysteries of the universe. . .
Penetrating the soul to create art. . .
You’re right. Everything is dictated by that paradigm.
LikeLike
Ah, but now women want to enter most of these fields too, but only out of envy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
>> Ah, but now women want to enter most of these fields too, but only out of envy.
Yeah.
The “glass ceiling’ is a good example. Men INVADE, create their own companies, invade and claim a spot in the marketplace.
Women complain they are not adequately INVITED into those same positions… not understanding that the position of leadership and command that a man occupies is not one that you are “invited into.” It’s one you take.
LikeLiked by 1 person
as much as women like to pretend they have SO many options, truth is they can only choose from the guys who approach them, who may not actually be the best guys available.
a high-smv woman will almost NEVER overtly approach a high-smv man. for her to do so would be the equivalent of begging. the most you’ll get is “the display”. that’s your cue to move in:
LikeLiked by 2 people
I always felt like it was the very pinnacle of Game to lure the high SMV chicks into chasing you, the Peak Alpha.
In fact, I tended to use that as a filtering mechanism to figure out whether a chick was really into me.
Just as chicks hate fake Alpha in men, I hate artificially contrived passion in women.
LikeLike
“it was the very pinnacle of Game to lure the high SMV chicks into chasing you”
agreed. but you still have to approach them first to light the fuse, generally. then it’s on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
and yes, getting the absolute highest quality woman to chase you perpetually is the ne plus ultra of game applications, a situation which hopefully the smart man puts to productive use.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bitch of the month!!!. She thinks is too good looking for a boyfriend, she is also a single mom. lozlozolzolzlzlo
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/lifestyle/family-relationships/this-woman-says-shes-too-good-looking-to-get-a-boyfriend/ar-BBB0uI3?li=AAnZ9Ug&ocid=mailsignout
LikeLike
I picked up a girl last week on the street and took her for a drink. She was talking about how her sister met her BF at work…
I said, “I like how we met better, I walked up to you, told you I wanted to meet you.”
She said, “You’re brave.” And her eyes flashed a bit as she said it.
Guys in cold approach get this all the time. And it’s true, at some level. The invaders are brave. Girls know it… and they like it.
LikeLike
Yep. Had a girl tell me “I want you to come get me” for an old fashioned date last night.
The guy always calls round to the girl.
I grew up in a wealthy world where I was spoiled. I had everything handed to me.
So I assumed girls would fall on my lap.
Zero result.
I started approaching and it was exciting even if I was rejected. Even my failed approaching still opened doors to me, led me to discover new parts of town etc
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indicator of interest in Russia:
In Russia, every approach is cold approach!
LikeLiked by 1 person
‘Twas at the royal feast, for Persia won
By Philip’s warlike son:
Aloft, in awful state,
The godlike hero sate
On his imperial throne.
His valiant peers were placed around;
Their brows with roses and with myrtles bound:
(So should desert in arms be crowned.)
The lovely Thais, by his side,
Sate like a blooming eastern bride,
In flower of youth and beauty’s pride.
Happy, happy, happy pair!
None but the brave,
None but the brave,
None but the brave deserves the fair.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
This is a very very good piece of writing
LikeLike
LikeLike
The traitors are top on my list… by a large margin.
LikeLike
I have always preferred to have my first sex with a woman at her place. The spirit of this post is the explanation.
And now that I think about it, a woman who invites me to her house/apt is usually even hornier and eager to please than one I convince to come to mine. This is of course in the case of the first time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My supervisor is hot and she wants to fuck me. She let’s me dominate her with my language, attitudes, and eyes. She brought me my popcorn when she was asked.
LikeLike
I sense hesitation.
LikeLike
It’s saturation
LikeLike
Pretty bold then for a girl to a cold approach a guy.
[CH: it’s rare, but it happens.]
LikeLike
I think there’s something else at play. I think these “open border” women open the floodgates to sabotage whites that associate outside the race, giving their pure white kids an advantage. Immigration and diversity is a shit test.
LikeLike
Is it possible for men in the west to reassert their masculine directive without a war? A literal invasion? I’m starting to wonder….
LikeLike