• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« A Ghastly Public Friendzoning
What Are The Biggest Obstacles To Romance That Beta Males Face? »

Is Female Masculinization Darwinian Selection For Female Slenderness?

May 15, 2017 by CH

A thought occurred to me while noticing a boy-hipped, broad-shouldered manjaw crank out a 10-rep set of man-pushups at the gym without breaking a sweat. She wasn’t half-bad in the facial area, and her body, despite its cylindricality, was thin and taut. Her lunge-carved ass broke the straight line of her figure, supplying just enough rolling landscape to keep her out of the “guess what, you’re an arab banging a prepubescent boy!” zone.

These masculinized tankgrrls are all over the big blue urban sexopolises. Their creation as a distinct subspecies of human female could have both endogenous and exogenous causes: endocrine disruption e.g. in our plastics and Pills, or sexual selection increasing their numbers in the genpop. (Sexual selection could happen genetically over a few generations by reproductive skew, or culturally by encouraging low E/high T women to go even lower E/higher T in the gym, at the office, and on the marathon circuit.)

My thought was this: now that America has had to wheeze under fifty years of obesity — and given that fatness is a bigger SMV hit for women than it is for men — maybe masculinized females are becoming sought after by men simply because masculinization protects against obesity. It’s fairly well-known by researchers that testosterone inhibits fat gain and accelerates fat loss. Female obesity is SO FUCKING REPULSIVE to the vast majority of (White & Asian) men that men may be making subconscious mate choice calculations favoring masculine women and their slender, if pre-teen tubular, bodies.

A woman with jacked T is less likely to be fat, and that could mean all the difference in our fulsome Fatopia. Masculine women are a social and male mate choice response to a food and globohomoist environment that punishes curvy feminine women. Our iPhags and iFoods have killed off our Marilyn Monroes (men hardest hit).

This is a sad state of affairs, but perfectly understandable that men would rather bang a curve-less fuck piston than suffocate in the fat folds of a flabberwocky. Given free choice, and a healthy female SMV sexual market, men would choose slender, hourglass-shaped, feminine women who could never be mistaken for men. But we don’t live in that healthy sexual market; we live in a technocarb horror spun by a girthful incubus. In this nightmare, the large swath of sub-alpha American men are increasingly offered only two choices of woman: a fatty, or a mandibular muscleslut barking into her phone at subordinates as her womb turns inhospitable to sperm and egg alike.

Bang a boyische twat or a fat blob? For many men, the shrill sergeant wins that contest.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Biomechanics is God, Culture, Girls, Goodbye America, Hungry Hungry Hippos | 150 Comments

150 Responses

  1. on May 15, 2017 at 10:43 am Damn Crackers

    Be careful. You’re entering into JayMan evolutionary reductionism here.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 15, 2017 at 2:38 pm Captain Obvious

      I saw a truly hideous Eskimo-ess at the swimming pool today, with her even more hideous mother, sporting hooknoses which would have made Telluride & Aspen envious, and she [the daughter] didn’t shave her armpits.

      But to her credit, she had nice big t!ts [maybe not quite D-Cups, but very solid C’s] and a rather flat stomach [she wore a bikini, rather than a 1-piece].

      LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 3:03 pm vfm#7634

        They have to be able to pass on their genes somehow.

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2017 at 6:49 am wolfie65

        I remember an Israeli-Ukrainian girl who had the body of a Playboy bunny and a nose like a battle axe.

        LikeLike


  2. on May 15, 2017 at 10:48 am Big-Al

    The urban crossfit fad is ruining perfectly shaped women and turning them into girls with the body of a 13 year old boy who is hitting the gym and becoming a man…Sad.

    LikeLiked by 2 people


    • on May 15, 2017 at 2:46 pm Captain Obvious

      My little fellow shrivels up inside of me and becomes a male v@gina when I see those cross-fit c*nts in their power-lycra and their oakley sunglasses and their 5-lb sports watches & the whole nine yards of that euro-ph@g insanity.

      LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 2:48 pm Captain Obvious

        BTW, when a chick’s body fat % gets that low, she stops menstruating on a regular basis, and becomes essentially worthless for m@ting purposes.

        All the NCAA Div-I scholarship chicks I knew in college almost never had periods – maybe once every three to six months.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 3:14 pm Canadian Friend

        …BTW, when a chick’s body fat % gets that low, she stops menstruating on a regular basis, and becomes essentially worthless for m@ting purposes…

        that is part of the answer.

        when women do too many manly activities like weight lifting, their body produces less of certain hormones and more of others.

        female olympic athletes as long as they train hard have almost no hips and no breasts, and once they ” retire” and go to a more normal life their hips become curvier and their breasts grow a bit bigger.

        acting like a man makes their body look more manly.

        and I suppose if a woman lifts weights for decades eventually this must change her DNA a bit.

        in other words it is both nature and nurture, and each has an effect on the other

        but of course there are many factors, we have only been exposed to all those chemicals ( from plastics to the pill and everything in between ) for a few decades, most of the things we are exposed to did not exist about 100 years ago.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2017 at 6:50 pm wolfie65

        The danger zone for women begins at about 10-12% body f@t, which is already VERY low, even swimsuit models are closer to 15-17%.
        Marathon runners and Ironman-type triathletes are the ones who are scary skinny.

        LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 3:57 pm greenmantlehoyos

      Google Elgintensity and Crossfit.

      You’re welcome.

      LikeLike


  3. on May 15, 2017 at 10:54 am BehindDoorNumber2

    Nude fascist bodybuilders from MPC are organizing a raid of the Amish community. They will abduct the unspoiled young, white womenz and create the next generation master race to overthrow ZOG.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 15, 2017 at 7:34 pm Vagina dominator

      Are they really completely nude or are they wearing those training shoes with the toes in them?

      LikeLike


  4. on May 15, 2017 at 10:55 am tomjones

    LikeLike


  5. on May 15, 2017 at 10:59 am Tipsy

    Ya know, if flabberwocky would just gyre and gimble a bit more they wouldn’t have such a frumious bandersnatch.

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 11:28 am mendo

      Hahaha…superb!

      Beyond the Looking Fat

      LikeLike


  6. on May 15, 2017 at 11:02 am Ben Shona

    Ima get me a nigga Bitch.

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 2:34 pm Captain Obvious

      LikeLike


  7. on May 15, 2017 at 11:04 am plumpjack

    one would assume that the current genetic blueprint of our species was mostly written during the sexual and survival-of-the-fittest selection that occurred in the hundreds of thousands of years before anyone heard of gyms, or indoor plumbing, or even mirrors. and old timey life was probably a lot tougher on women’s​ bodies than simply doing push-ups. that they’re pursuing this activity of their own free will probably means that their bodies crave physical work just as much as men’s bodies do. it also means that they’re aware, at least on a subconscious level, that to compete in the sexual market with abundant nubile poon going for the price of a single taco on Taco Tuesday then they have to keep their body looking y-o-u-n-g.

    the narrow hips is probably more an indication of genetic variation, and that the any-port-in-a-storm and/or beer goggles and/or r@pe-anything-that-moves angles of sexual selection have been around as long as humans, and proto-humans have.

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 11:17 am plumpjack

      landwhale-ism is what’s entirely new for our species. but is it significant enough to shift genetics significantly while there are so many other pressures? both fence-post girl and landwhale slob are on the low end of the fertility bell curve which means zero net difference overall in species fitness.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2017 at 12:48 pm plumpjack

        where this leads is that ideal beauty, with the accompanying hourglass physique, as well as their ideal masculine counterparts, are probably selected for at the very top eschelons of smv/genetic fitness, maybe 1-3% of the total human population. while the undesirable traits such as butterface-ness, hiplessness, chinless-scalzi-faced-ness, and cowardliness, are likely produced by the teeming hoards who breed indiscriminately, because they have no other choice.

        which leads one to the realization of the importance of not just inter-race conflict, but also intra-race conflict. if you’re an alpha you’re not just competing with other parasitic races that seek to undermine your genetic fitness and wipe you the fuck of the face of the earth, you’re also competing against the traitorous, low-smv members of your own clan, who would rather cross sides and produce mischling offspring than die celibate.

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on May 15, 2017 at 1:28 pm plumpjack

        …also, if hipless fencepost girl’s genes are still in the gene pool it’s because her forbears had the right combination of genetics to push out babies tiny enough to fit through her restrictive birth canal. this means pushing them out early, and/or getting impregnated by men with the genetics for small fetuses, since the genes for the placenta, which determines the size of the fetus, are inherited from the father. smaller fetuses have a lower chance of surviving into adulthood, but increase the chances of the mother’s surviving childbirth. while larger fetuses have a better chance of survival, which is good for the father, but have a higher chance of killing the mother.

        what would be interesting is if weak/less masculine men have a greater tendency to carry the genes for small fetuses, and therefore would be the type of guy that fencepost girl most likely pairs with.

        LikeLiked by 3 people


      • on May 16, 2017 at 11:07 am Oleaginous Outrager

        Landwhale-ism is simply the natural response to an (over)abundance of food from our lizard brain, which is still programmed to believe what ever crumb we eat could be our last for a very long time. No genetic shift is required, nor even likely.

        This also applies workout wenches. They can crossfit all they want, they can’t alter their genetic code. Darwin was right, not Lamarck or Lysenko. Of course, since the only operative function of evolution is reproduction, the amenorrhea courted by T-chasing females could have an impact, but only in the most negative possible way.

        LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 11:32 am mendo

      They crave the physical works that comes with rearing children. Cappy’s touched on this before with aspects that a women’s threshold for the pain of childbirth is manifesting itself into an S&M lifestyle. It’s the same with girls expending energy doing CF, marathons and the like. That energy would be best utilized raising kids, but it’s turning them into men.

      On that note, awhile back, my cousin had put on some weight with their third kid. Later, when I saw her again I noticed she had slimmed down. When she was asked how she got in shape she replied that looking after the kids, running around after them, was what did the trick.

      LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on May 15, 2017 at 12:05 pm plumpjack

        chopping wood, tending livestock, sewing clothing, mending the thatch roof, etc., are all physical work that women can and would do, that don’t directly involve “raising children”.

        your average good girl in 10,000B.C.:

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 12:24 pm plumpjack

        they would also be doing A LOT of walking, climbing, digging, pushing, pulling, cutting, thrashing, etc. life during the time when most of human evolution took place would make your average CrossFit workout look like getting a pedicure, particularly for those humans from northern latitudes. winter is coming, etc.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2017 at 12:43 pm Cracker

        people weren’t as active as you think. not every day at least.

        sure, they had household chores but they weren’t as physically active as a girl doing crossfit or running marathons every day or a few times a week would be. especially not the women.

        the proof is in the pudding. if women had been as physically active as you say, they’d have evolved to have manly bodies a long time ago, not just in the past couple of decades since our food has gone to shit and people have started freaking out thinking they need a lot of exercise.

        look back even a couple generations ago, there were men and women who didn’t do a days hard labor in their lives, but were still healthy and fit. it’s the food that’s key.

        if people eat the right amounts of protein and fats with very little or no vegetable matter, and no exercise, they can be as muscular and lean as a man who eats shit and works out every day.

        check out Shawn Baker MD on twitter. there is a whole movement of people doing heavy meat and zero plant matter diets. most of them don’t exercise at all but they are changing the structure of their bodies. thin muscular women are getting curves back but losing inches in all the right places and the men are losing fat and building muscle.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2017 at 12:51 pm plumpjack

        cracker, I don’t disagree with you, but typically when people compare modern humans with those from “traditional” societies they’re only going back a few hundred, or, at most, a few thousand years. these time frames are a drop in the bucket of the entire journey of human and pre-human evolution during which the bulk of our genetic blueprint was written.

        LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 7:40 pm Vagina dominator

      Haven’t had Malthusian aspects of natural selection working for a century or two.

      But watch the feckless & stupid rate plummet over the next ten years as Malthus returns with his scythe.

      By 2030 the population of the US will be no more than 10 million – very optimistic, are there 10 million in the US who could feed themselves? – and none of them will be either fat or black. The average IQ will soar because only long-term planners will survive.

      So from that point of view, I am not so concerned about racial issues.

      LikeLike


  8. on May 15, 2017 at 11:06 am Doktor Jeep

    “guess what, you’re an arab banging a prepubescent boy!” zone.
    ” curve-less fuck piston”

    I love you. NO HOMO

    For the crux of the matter:
    “Bang a boyische twat or a fat blob? For many men, the shrill sergeant wins that contest.”

    Sadly this has been the case. Root cause IMO: lack of social shaming. Having been to countries where fat chicks are still treated like the slobs they are, you would be amazed. The greatest check on human behavior is not some law book or some scripture, the latter only talking about how you will pay or be rewarded after you die, it’s shame.

    The leftists know exactly what they are doing with their fat acceptance movement and the creation of the term “body shaming”. They wargame this stuff in their think tanks.

    I have a theory though. The fatocalypse is a combination of cultural marxism and fuckery with the food supply and medication complex. If every fat chick who can only dream of Brad Pitt level cock, who waddles from one miserable day to the next, KNEW that this was all done to them on purpose, cities would burn.

    There’s a risk they might wake up and realize that yes, all of this was done to them on purpose for a greater multipronged strategy:
    – reduce western birth rates
    – increase the mating pool for lesbians
    – create dependency on prescription drugs and anti-depressants
    – create dependency on the medical industrial complex
    – let the food industry get away with selling total garbage
    – create a market for “celebrity culture” as the hordes of fatties can pay money to “live through” female models/celebrities/etc.
    – destroy femininity towards one-genderness (when everybody is a fat blob to a level of disgusting that transcends sex what do you have?)
    – cause more physical and learning disability/autism/retard cases because hormonal screwed up fatties spat out sickened and mentally diminished offspring. (There is a reason why the waist to hip ratio automatically catches our eye and the barrel-torso women do not register).

    Ah yes, it would would be a front of culture jamming if the fatties could be informed that this was done to them on purpose. Cities would burn.
    Hopefully.

    LikeLiked by 2 people


    • on May 15, 2017 at 7:51 pm Vagina dominator

      “They wargame this stuff in their think tanks.”

      Of course you’re right. And what would I give to have transcripts of their discussions over these last decades!

      One of the great shames of living in an age of lies is its impact on the arts and free expressions.

      For example, consider what a wonderful stage play or film could be made where the audience is given access to these meetings.

      I am thinking something equivalent to that fraudulent movie “Conspiracy” ((2001) which claimed to tell the story of secret meetings at Wannsee to approve and arrange the Holohoax. 100% Jew bullshit of course.

      But as we live in an age of Jewish lies, the story of the meetings of a TRUE conspiracy to destroy a race (whites) and people cannot be told.

      Of course, I could write it myself as a stage drama and mount it on a tour of local scout halls. It would be funny to see the reaction to that.

      LikeLike


  9. on May 15, 2017 at 11:06 am bolg

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 15, 2017 at 11:15 am Aurelio

      Feminine perfection!

      The ideal every feminists wants to destroy and replace with devilish Amy Schumer/Rachel Maddow types.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 15, 2017 at 11:20 am vfm#7634

      Not bad, but the clothes look too globohomo career-type.

      Dress her up like Jessica Rabbit, and we’re cooking with gas.

      LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on May 15, 2017 at 9:15 pm bolg

        better? 🙂

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on May 16, 2017 at 8:07 am Captain Obvious

        She was at peak nubility as “Saffron”, in Firefly, at the age of about 27 or 28:

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on May 16, 2017 at 8:07 am Captain Obvious

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2017 at 8:07 am Captain Obvious

        LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 11:27 am tomjones

      She’s married to a subcontinental.

      LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 11:30 am Greg Eliot

        And she’s probably schtupped a dozen (((tribesmen))) or more…

        … but right now, we’re just talking about physical types, Debbie Downer.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2017 at 11:43 am tomjones

        Fortunately, she has no children -no half-castes.

        Like you had a chance with a girl like her. T.S. Eliot.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 11:50 am Greg Eliot

        If you saw my wife, especially in her heyday, you’d eat your liver, boy.

        She wasn’t QUITE the Jessica Rabbit caricature as this Christina… but close… reeeeeal close…

        … and I didn’t have to worry about no casting couch, neither.

        Try again, you fairy.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 5:25 pm Greg Eliot

        If she’s got the rack to back up a little extra junk in the trunk, I’m still there.

        No steatopygia, though… I’m a White man, goddammit! 😉

        LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 11:28 am Greg Eliot

      This is my kind of gal, though many here was say she’s too fat.

      /Rod o’ iron rape!

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2017 at 11:35 am mendo

        She’s a big girl and in all the right places!

        /North By Northwest rape!

        (I always liked her body but never cared much for her face.)

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2017 at 11:37 am Greg Eliot

        When she took off her dress in Company, I was reminded of the old expression: va-va-VOOM!

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 11:38 am Greg Eliot

        Face?

        Oh, yeah… there it is.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 11:52 am mendo

        Well played!

        Reminds me of a recent categorization I’ve been developing in regards to rating a women’s face.

        Beautiful–making out whilst boning her

        Pretty–looking at her whilst boning

        Okay–looking at the boning

        [CH: ahaha you just earned yourself an honorary post.]

        LikeLiked by 6 people


      • on May 15, 2017 at 12:34 pm bolg

        “This is my kind of gal, though many here was say she’s too fat.”

        thin waist, flat belly, huge ass. won’t complain. not baboon-huge though

        LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 15, 2017 at 6:10 pm Nads

      She had a recurring role in the short lived series firefly. Puts her looks in madmen to shame.

      LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 9:14 pm bolg

        maybe it was the naive eyes back then as opposed to the sex-bot air she gave off in mad men.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 16, 2017 at 8:09 am Captain Obvious

        She was a decade younger in Firefly.

        She was menopausal by the end of Mad Men.

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2017 at 9:54 am bolg

        true. firefly was enjoyable btw. too bad it got canceled. maybe that’s why whedon went full-on gogrrrl faggottry

        LikeLike


      • on May 17, 2017 at 1:04 am Alt Right Footsoldier

        Firefly was the post civil war south set in space. It was a show about rugged, masculine individualists struggling to eke out a living against a tyrannical, centralist nanny state government. I don’t know how it got past the (((gatekeepers))) in (((Hollywood))).

        LikeLike


  10. on May 15, 2017 at 11:10 am Is Female Masculinization Darwinian Selection For Female Slenderness? | @the_arv

    […] Is Female Masculinization Darwinian Selection For Female Slenderness? […]

    LikeLike


  11. on May 15, 2017 at 11:11 am TLM

    I miss the good ole days at the gym when the women stayed on the machines & attended aerobic classes, and never ventured into the free weight area. Can’t figure out which is worse, women doing bicep curls in the squat rack, or taking up a flat bench press with the bar and two 2-1/2 lb plates on each side.

    Daily White Pill: Trump will not be sending Barron to Sidwell Friends.

    LikeLiked by 2 people


    • on May 15, 2017 at 7:55 pm Vagina dominator

      The worst is when they do the weightlifter walk, like they’re carrying satchels under their arms.

      Wait, worse than that is when they push me out of the way at the water cooler. I hate that.

      LikeLike


      • on May 17, 2017 at 6:02 am Alt Right Footsoldier

        If women push you out of the way you must come across as beta

        LikeLike


  12. on May 15, 2017 at 11:13 am vfm#7634

    My dick concurs 100% with CH’s speculation.

    Fit over fat any time.

    LikeLike


  13. on May 15, 2017 at 11:26 am Broad top

    Wat do after Crossfit grrl gets debilitating back injury?

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 6:57 pm wolfie65

      As soon as she’s healed enough so she can stand the pain of walking, I recommend LONG walks.
      Miracle cure for back injuries.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2017 at 8:07 pm Vagina dominator

        Yes, walking is a good recommendation. But not a dawdle and not a jog. The walk has to be done at a nice enough pace that we get good hip-back swing/function.

        And by the way, about Crossfit in general. It is not a fitness or health regime. It is a stressful and dangerous sport. There is nothing that humans do “in nature” – i.e., while low-tech hunting or farming – that matches what is done in Cross-fit. Much of it is in fact completely counter to good body-maintenance practice.

        Cross-fit puts your health at risk in order to serve the insatiable greed of its founder, a disgusting Jew. Surprise, surprise goy..
        http://vz.cnwimg.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Greg-Glassman-pic.jpg.

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on May 16, 2017 at 7:04 am wolfie65

        ‘Crossfit’ the brand name is, as many brand names, profit-oriented b.s.
        It is, however, very beneficial to vary your training routines for best overall fitness, health and results.
        Nothing beats running for burning calories, losing f@t and increasing cardiovascular resilience and endurance – if you overdo it, especially on asphalt, you’re damaging your joints.
        Skating (board or inline), parkour and martial arts are awesome for developing lightning-fast reflexes, limber, falling and rolling techniques, present you with alternative and very useful ways of getting around and raise your pain threshold – but the injury potential is relatively high and the learning curve steep, especially in the beginning
        Weight lifting is great for building strength and, to some degree, muscle size, but also carries a relatively high risk of injury if you fail to keep proper form and doesn’t burn many calories.
        Bicycles may be the most efficient overall means of transportation ever invented, most people – even in America – could switch from cars to bicycles as their main or only form of transport within a few months of transition time, thereby radically improving their health, lowering their cost of living, almost completely eliminating their carbon footprint and going a very long way towards saying good-bye to Big Brother – but finding a bicycle seat that is actually comfortable and doesn’t damage your nether regions isn’t so easy.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


  14. on May 15, 2017 at 11:30 am Dan in ATL

    I would much, much, much, much, much rather bang a fat chick than a tank girl. At least fat chicks can have big tits and butts and wide hips. Powerlifterettes are the most repulsive thing on earth.

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 11:49 am pdwalker

      Gross. To each their own.

      LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 1:04 pm IMGrody

      You can also be a little rougher on them.

      LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 8:20 pm Cracker

        yeah, along with the manly body, that’ll make it even easier to imagine you’re with a dude.

        what’s with all the gays on this blog lately?

        LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 15, 2017 at 1:36 pm elmertjones

      It’s like fucking uphill.

      LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 2:08 pm FuriousFerret

      ‘At least fat chicks can have big tits and butts and wide hips.’

      It seems more to me that big tits/assed women already have those features and have a natural curvy body that easily puts on fat.

      Normal women simply just get fat without tit proportionality increasing.

      Basically, extra fat over a woman’s natural chemistry is almost always bad. There are no good things that result from it.

      LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 3:26 pm Canadian Friend

      It depends how fat we are talking.

      Some overweight women still have nice proportions, and nice curves,

      I said some not all.

      To me a woman with a skinny little boy ass and an absence of curves in the hips and waist is a HUGE turn off, I’d rather be with a moderately over weight woman IF she has nice proportions and is not too fat.

      LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on May 15, 2017 at 3:33 pm Cracker

        same here

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 4:35 pm Vanamee

        “pointy elbows” time

        Going by body fat percentage around 20-25% is the sweet spot. A few girls might look good at up to 30% (this example could be benefitting from flattering lighting but still has a clear hourglass figure). I really don’t get how anyone is attracted to <15% or abs on a woman, but I also know many ubercompetitive type AAA+++ women are in it for the challenge and perceived status points.

        All things considered 17-25% is not an unrealistic goal for most women; 19-22% is the 'healthy range' for 19-29-year-olds, with 25% being the upper acceptable limit.

        LikeLiked by 3 people


      • on May 15, 2017 at 5:10 pm Lucius Somesuch

        wow nancy, your (ahem) ‘sister’ really is good at maff!

        a tee bit obsessive tho.

        is it just jealousy, or more of a repressed lesbian thing coming out?

        LikeLike


  15. on May 15, 2017 at 11:34 am Greg Eliot

    Not to rain on the parade, but I don’t think evolution works this fast.

    I mean, even that experiment with turning foxes into dogs took like 10 generations. 😉

    [CH: stray thought #2: maybe the sexual selection for masculinized women has been going on since the inception of the industrial revolution, now accelerated by the information revolution, and only now are we seeing the unfeminine fruit of that long-term selection?]

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 11:51 am Greg Eliot

      Arguably a fair point… and you’ll get no argument from me.

      LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 11:54 am tomjones

      LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 1:09 pm oink

        Is there ANYTHING ((y’all)) won’t front-run for?

        ANYTHING?

        LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 3:02 pm Captain Obvious

      “since the inception of the industrial revolution, now accelerated by the information revolution, and only now are we seeing the unfeminine fruit of that long-term selection?”

      CH, I think it’s part and parcel of the explosion in assortative mating in the last 100 years, with the rise in co-educational higher learning & easy access to modern transportation.

      It just keeps becoming easier & easier for IQ-130 dudes & IQ-130 dudettes to search out one another [either as undergrads or in grad/law/med-school or early post-graduate], and I think they’re starting to in-breed some signifying characteristics in themselves, such as masculinity of the women [but sadly maybe also effeminacy of the men?].

      [CH: it’s a possibility that deserves scrutiny (which it won’t get because mere speculation of it would give ulcers to leftoids).]

      LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 4:01 pm stevetirone

      You understand that with average maternal age of 18, 10 generations is 180 years. In other words, trivial on an evolutionary scale.

      LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 5:29 pm Greg Eliot

        That was my point… I knew if I said outright that it was too short a span, someone was going to bring up that Russian experiment where they turned foxes into tame dogs in about 10 generations by vigorously cross-breeding only the tamest ones.

        LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 5:40 pm plumpjack

      it’s an interesting point which brings to mind a further question: are the ideal man/woman specimens as we know them the result of natural selection, sexual selection, or deliberate, controlled breeding for specific traits?

      are the good looks we see hanging around to this day the result of some ancient master race that culled all members except those that met a certain beauty standard?

      LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2017 at 7:01 am Samuel T Russell

      The speed of evolutionary forces is dependent on the strength of the evolutionary force. If some trait gives you a 5% better chance of not dying in infancy, then yes, that will take a long time to become widespread through evolution. It might not even happen if that trait also has some downside. But if, for instance, every fat woman has no children, then fat women will be gone very quickly (to the extent that fatness is genetic and heritable). Of course, the preference for skinny women is somewhere between those extremes, so its hard to predict how long it takes for things to take effect.

      LikeLike


  16. on May 15, 2017 at 11:36 am Greg Eliot

    Women nowadays are swallowing a lot of aggression…

    … along with a lot o’ pizza!

    /Elbow heh-heh rape!

    LikeLike


  17. on May 15, 2017 at 11:52 am Royal

    Slenderness beats hourglass, in practice. Slavs, Asians, and your local high school hotties are all slender, and their bodies are highly coveted. Such women are in high demand from alphas. Nicely-proportioned hourglass women (eg. Jenna Jameson, Raylene in their primes) can elicit massive hard-ons, but they are rare. Slender is a safer bet.

    [CH: it’s not just slenderness tho. a lot of these slender women are also masculinized, which means narrow hips and broad shoulders, and that’s not an attractive look on a woman.]

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 12:07 pm Cracker

      CH is right. thin is one thing, built like a dude is another.

      the problem is the food that everyone eats now. so even the thin girls have to work out a ton just to stay thin. all that working out is giving them masculine bodies. females are not designed to work out a lot.

      LikeLiked by 2 people


    • on May 15, 2017 at 1:28 pm syonredux

      Heartiste covered that a while back. He classed the slender-yet-feminine girls as bananas. Less immediately stimulating than the hourglass, but better as long-term investments. I.e., the banana has a better chance of still being boffable post-40.So, good marriage material.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


  18. on May 15, 2017 at 11:53 am Pwn

    I’d rather masturbate than fuck what passes for chubby in America, let alone your fatties. Thanks God I’m eastern European. Lol

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 7:56 pm Francis

      What’s the vodka intake?

      LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 8:16 pm Vagina dominator

      And we don’t just fuck them under laboratory conditions. We have to woo, as well. Who wants to suffer the humiliation of courting a fattie?

      And they’re a lot harder to push out the door afterwards.

      LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2017 at 6:29 am Greg Eliot

        Most droll.

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2017 at 7:13 am tomjones

        “And they’re a lot harder to push out the door afterwards.”
        This is one of the few genuinely funny statements posted on this blog.

        LikeLike


  19. on May 15, 2017 at 11:56 am Dave

    Another factor is that extremely masculine men get much more play than they used to, while sweet, gentle, nice-guy betas are cut out of the mating market entirely. Which man is more likely to father a gentle, feminine daughter?

    If I were Dr. Evil, I’d find the wussiest, most feminine men I could, breed them with my curvy female slaves, use IVF to ensure she has all-girl triplets, and at age ten sell them as meek, obedient concubines.

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 12:49 pm williamk

      I’ve thought of this before, too.

      When artificial womb technology is viable… some evil people are going to get beautiful egg donor women and mix them with pretty boy wuss sperm to make hot girls, sans concerned parental units. And then enslave them.

      Its unavoidable. With the current progress of medical technology, this WILL happen. Its the next century’s pizzagate.

      LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 6:43 pm Jay Fink

      There is a very pretty, slender, feminine woman I work with. I met her parents the other day. Sure enough the father was small and gentle. I think you could be on to something.

      LikeLike


  20. on May 15, 2017 at 12:00 pm Ras al Ghul

    Slender women or “banana” ahaped women tend as a group tend to stay thin even after pregnancy.

    All the others, even the hour glasss, tend to get fat over time with our soyrich grain heavy diet.

    [CH: yes, that’s why i wrote that our globohomo culture punishes hourglass women. in the past, the feminine women would be less likely to plump out.]

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 12:27 pm Cracker

      yep, it’s the diet that’s ruining everyone. girls shouldn’t have to work out to stay thin. we only see them all doing it now because of the crap they eat.

      everyone is chunking out.

      the girls who under different circumstances would be naturally thin have become average size
      the average (most desirable) hourglass girls have gotten fat
      the girls who are still thin now have to work out to be that way. working out changes the structure of their bodies to make them masculine.

      working out is not the answer. eating differently is.

      LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 12:47 pm williamk

        I notice lots of girls who work out are fat anyway. They use yoga class as an excuse to go to brunch or binge drink.

        Most of the thin girls I see are easily exercise and nutrition focused, true fitness nuts, or they are just naturally thin and don’t eat much at all, but also hate exercise.

        Men can overcome poor diet with exercise, women just can’t.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2017 at 2:15 pm FuriousFerret

        ‘Men can overcome poor diet with exercise, women just can’t.’

        This is bullshit.

        Men can still look good in a primal sense by having muscle along with being fat however the Greek ideal can’t even remotely be attained without proper diet. Diet is the foundation.

        The only way that guys can overcome poor diet is by being some type of pro athlete type that practices a hard sport for hours a day.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2017 at 2:47 pm Cracker

        exactly. it’s all about the food. and as i said in another comment. people can be lean and fit without even working out.

        people have backward thinking about exercise, they think you need exercise to be healthy, fit, and to build muscle and that exercise is the key to weight loss and improvements in muscle tone.

        the truth is, the human body will have all of that if you simply feed it correctly. once fed correctly, your body will have extra energy and you will feel like being more active. that’s fine.

        but doing it in reverse where you think exercise is the best answer to getting fit, is a losing battle. without making the corrections that can only be done through diet, you have to keep adding more and more workouts just to maintain and even more to continue progressing.

        think of a lion. they eat only meat and are pure muscle. they are active in short spurts when they need to get food but that isn’t often and they actually lay around the majority of the time.

        same with your average dog or house cat if they are on meat only diets. they are lean and muscular even if they are housebound and lazing around for most of the day. but look at those same cats and dogs on commercial grain and vegetable filled crap. they get as fat as people.

        humans are no different than lions. they are built to be active when needed and at rest when they don’t have to be. exercise is not necessary for fitness and health and can actually be a detriment to many.

        i have countless friends who spend hours in the gym each week, hours prepping, measuring macros, and eating, then force fasting to get no better results than what i get stuffing my face with as much meat and eggs as i want and not working out at all. i technically fast for several hours each day but it’s not forced intermittent fasting like many try to do. instead i eat until i’m satiated and simply don’t get hungry more than a couple times a day.

        living like this has been a game changer for me. no longer a slave to the gym and macros but more fit than i’ve been in years.

        LikeLiked by 2 people


  21. on May 15, 2017 at 12:28 pm everlastingphelps

    r/K selection theory predicts that as a community moves more (r), the women will become more masculinized and aggressive, and men will become more feminized and conflict avoidant.

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 3:12 pm Captain Obvious

      In R-Selection, the women have to fight one another to get into the Alpha’s harem.

      LikeLike


  22. on May 15, 2017 at 12:42 pm williamk

    likely not… black women have the highest T levels, and they are also by far the fattest.

    [CH: i haven’t seen any studies that showed black women have higher T levels than nonblack women. also, you have to adjust for race. and ps, click the link i provided. the testosterone-fat loss association has been proven by the labcoats.]

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 1:13 pm tomjones

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1388313/LSE-psychologist-Satoshi-Kanazawa-claims-black-women-attractive.html

      Japanese scientist concluded black women are ugly because African women have higher levels of testosterone than other races and therefore have more masculine features.

      [CH: what i’ve read of the available evidence shows that blacks have more sensitive (or simply more) androgen receptors than other races, not that blacks have higher levels of serum T. anyhow the fact that there are fat black women doesn’t say anything about higher T or lower E causing fat loss in white women.]

      LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 3:06 pm vfm#7634

      They also:

      1) have the lowest IQs, and
      2) their men are the most tolerant of humping landwhales.

      LikeLike


    • on May 17, 2017 at 6:13 am Alt Right Footsoldier

      Having high T won’t stop you turning into a lard ass if you eat nothing but junk food.

      LikeLike


  23. on May 15, 2017 at 1:00 pm Augustus Tilton

    I’m convinced that packaged, processed food plus birth control and other medications are behind the obesity epeidemic.

    It’s pretty crazy how much effort it takes for women to get the high T body

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 3:07 pm vfm#7634

      Yeah, that’s another point: fit women prove that they have a sense of planning and self-discipline. That by themselves demonstrates they’d make better mothers of your children than landwhales.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2017 at 4:28 pm Cracker

        i’m not so sure about them being mommy material. i’m not saying fatties are good. they are not. and self-discipline and the ability to plan are obviously good things.

        but most female gym rats and runners i know are off and not very feminine or nurturing. and the florescent pink north face jackets, fake tans, and nails aren’t gonna cut it. kids need actual femininity and nurturing if they have any chance of turning out okay.

        aside from not being feminine, they also tend to be too high energy (manic), narcissistic, and self involved. your poor kids would no doubt end up neurotic, medicated, or run ragged by non-stop after school activities.

        i see lots of fitness moms around here all the time, their poor kids all look like they want to escape their mom’s psycho grip any chance they get.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 4:47 pm vfm#7634

        “i see lots of fitness moms around here all the time, their poor kids all look like they want to escape their mom’s psycho grip any chance they get.”

        Knock ’em up enough times and they’ll be forced to divide their attention.

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on May 15, 2017 at 5:05 pm Cracker

        good in theory. but the ones i see around here do have more than a few kids. hasn’t turned any of them into caroline ingalls.

        in fact, the more kids they have, the more they bitch and complain and dump on their husbands for not having enough time for themselves. themselves meaning, their careers, vacations, girls nights out, massages, manicures, working out, and tanning.

        don’t get me wrong, fatty mom’s have plenty wrong with them too but when it comes down to it, the kids need a mom who is focused on them, their dad, and their home, not on their careers, their friends, or how good they look in their workout selfies.

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 5:10 pm Cracker

        i say go for a girl who is average to thin with a good looking mom. their mom’s are a big clue to their genetics and how they are going to end up. if the mom still looks pretty good, she’ll probably look good.

        aside from the other personality drawbacks, a girl who needs to work out to look good may or may not be able to maintain that long term so you’re better off finding a girl who has good dna and doesn’t need that external factor to keep her decent in the long run.

        LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 4:40 pm awkward female commenter

      Birth control should be illegal. It harms the other women around the woman taking it. It causes every other woman’s cycle to suddenly shorten to fit the cycle of the woman on birth control. It also causes mental and physical issues in the other women. Who even knows what it does to the water.

      LikeLike


      • on May 17, 2017 at 8:33 am Vanamee

        It causes every other woman’s cycle to suddenly shorten to fit the cycle of the woman on birth control.

        This is very interesting. I’d noticed the other deleterious effects BC has on women, but being a guy this never would have occurred to me.

        LikeLike


  24. on May 15, 2017 at 1:04 pm Ben

    Petite waist always over fatness
    Poor diet is one factor in female obesity – excessive alcohol contributes.
    Especially greater beer consumption.
    And both beer and barbells emulate mens behavior

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 1:53 pm Cracker

      oh yeah, all the beer and wine is a big contributor too. everyone you meet talks non stop about microbrews, wine and sugary cocktails. even the soccer moms are proud to boast about how much they drink.

      unless you were an alcoholic, it used to be something people would do only occasionally or on special occasions. now people act like it’s as common as their morning cup of coffee.

      aside from all the carbs, i read not too long ago that hops cause all kinds of hormone problems like low T and manboobs in men. i’m sure they cause equally bad hormonal effects in women.

      LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 4:03 pm FuriousFerret

        Beer is disgusting. I never understood everyone’s fascination with it. I drank simply to fit in. It basically tastes like sour piss.

        Alcohol in general is overrated. Being drunk is a extremely overrated. I can understand a little buzz though but it’s not like it’s the heavenly experience that some people make it out to be.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2017 at 4:44 pm Vanamee

        unless you were an alcoholic, it used to be something people would do only occasionally or on special occasions. now people act like it’s as common as their morning cup of coffee.

        this was my experience growing up in the 90s, although my parents were borderline teetotalers (a reaction to their own childhood) and the family social circle was mostly church types. but from what i saw social drinking seemed more typical of blue collar gatherings (i.e., not classy). but as i said my experience was rather limited.

        today’s beer drinking has been hipster-approved, right down to the Authentic Retro Tallboy Cans. nowadays you can even get em at your favorite noncorporate coffee shop.

        Beer is disgusting

        Not gonna argue it’s bad for you, but you clearly don’t have the curse of living in the vicinity of world class breweries like Treehouse, Trillium, Nightshift, and Narragansett.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on May 15, 2017 at 5:31 pm everlastingphelps

        My observation of the successful and wealthy is different — drinking has always been part of the lifestyle, but not drunkenness. It’s ubiquitous for a husband and wife to split a bottle of wine every single evening — but they stop there every single evening (which is 2 drinks, enough to put most women juuuust over the legal limit to drive for about an hour, and not enough to get most men there.)

        Drinking a little every day was part of much of society. Drinking to get drunk was always looked down on. (Shows a lack of control.)

        LikeLike


      • on May 15, 2017 at 5:39 pm Cracker

        right, excess is the issue.

        women are bragging about drinking a whole bottle of wine by themselves each night of the week instead of a glass or two. it’s the excessiveness that’s the problem. like i said before, that used to happen occasionally or on special occasions, not as a part of your daily routine.

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2017 at 11:24 am Oleaginous Outrager

        Being a proud career drunk is the perfect metaphor for the modern American mindset: purportedly edgy and rebellious behavior, even though everybody else doing it (and posting an assload of pics to prove it), and it’s the lowest possible form of “achievement” imaginable, yet it meets with widespread approbation and emulation.

        Fuckin’ junkies, in all their myriad forms, are the most irritating people on Earth. All they’re ever on about is their pissy little addictions.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on May 15, 2017 at 4:36 pm awkward female commenter

      I think some of the food additives like casein cause addictive cycles in the brain. If you couple eating processed food with drinking, alcoholism could be exacerbated. So can behavior like sitting down and watching television marathons. It’s brain-deadness + addictive thinking that a lot of people seem to seek, probably out of boredom.

      LikeLike


      • on May 17, 2017 at 6:19 am Alt Right Footsoldier

        Watching TV has replaced fire watching. Watching a fire puts you into a reflective mental state.

        LikeLike


      • on May 17, 2017 at 6:37 am PA

        Watching a fire puts you into a reflective mental state.

        Similar with classical music, which lets your thoughts roam vs popular songs with lyrics, which turn thinking to mush.

        LikeLike


  25. on May 15, 2017 at 1:07 pm Vanamee

    Completely on topic because it’s regarding the celebration of female slenderness (despite what the organizers claim), leftoids only support diversity as long as, you know, they don’t actually think differently. Isn’t that the whole supposed benefit of diversity?

    – feminism = man-hate
    – woman are equal to men in the workplace
    – healthcare is a privilege not a right

    http://www.11alive.com/mb/news/miss-usas-ideas-on-feminism-divides-fans/439810666

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 1:16 pm oink

      watch fangs bare if the herdanimal strays ever so slightly stray … so much for priviledge (female or otherwise)

      LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2017 at 11:28 am Oleaginous Outrager

      People obsessed with their own list of inviolable rules can make no allowances, even for the things they purport to support, because then the rules could be, *gasp*, seen as wrong!

      LikeLike


  26. on May 15, 2017 at 1:46 pm Stationarity

    “mandibular muscleslut barking into her phone at subordinates as her womb turns inhospitable to sperm and egg alike.”

    I laughed my ass off. Saw one of these at the gym yesterday, with her square jaw and reverse incline eccentric something something.

    LikeLike


  27. on May 15, 2017 at 2:39 pm Is Female Masculinization Darwinian Selection For Female Slenderness? | Reaction Times

    […] Source: Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  28. on May 15, 2017 at 3:44 pm Enfant Terrible

    Some of the crossfit girls look the way they do because they are taking steroids. They look more buff and tight than Olympic athletes. One big tell is the prominent, cut shoulders, similar to what one sees in bodybuilders, or for that matter, in any guy that lifts weights and is fit. Women do not get shoulders like that naturally, they don’t have the natural testosterone levels for it.

    I used to do competitive rowing for many years, and if there is a sport that will build big shoulders is that one. There was a female team in my club, and I never saw any of the girls having big, cut shoulders, like all the guys did. And they all lifted weights like we did.

    So yeah, crossfit = lololol bs hipster faggot nonsense!!!!

    LikeLike


    • on May 15, 2017 at 3:59 pm vfm#7634

      “So yeah, crossfit = lololol bs hipster faggot nonsense!!!!”

      Add “tranny”, in the case of chicks with man-shoulders.

      LikeLike


  29. on May 15, 2017 at 6:41 pm glaivester

    As I recall, “body like a teenage boy” was the fashionable look for women in the 1920s. If you ever watch “Thoroughly Modern Millie,” Millie explicitly bemoans the fact that she is not flat-chested.

    That might be an interesting data point in determining what produces this sort of phenomenon.

    LikeLike


  30. on May 15, 2017 at 6:57 pm Johnny Redux

    White Sharia Now!

    LikeLike


  31. on May 15, 2017 at 8:16 pm Bo Jangles

    I remember reading that in viking times, they had a hard time distinguishing between male and female bones, which is usually an easy task.

    LikeLike


  32. on May 15, 2017 at 11:32 pm Vincent

    Fit in the gym means fit in the bed.

    LikeLike


  33. on May 15, 2017 at 11:38 pm Vincent

    “exactly. it’s all about the food. and as i said in another comment. people can be lean and fit without even working out.”

    I may have said this before, but if I remember correctly human skeleton size actually got smaller when we got into vegetables/grains. Shite, we are designed to hunt, kill and eat flesh/fish.

    LikeLike


  34. on May 16, 2017 at 12:12 am CulturalResilience from Mobile

    O/T Avril Lavigne being dead is more acceptable to the gynocentric femedia than the reality of the wall.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  35. on May 16, 2017 at 5:56 am Carl

    Tomboy humiliation is the most principled fetish. Oh you don’t want to wear that frilly dress? Well guess what? I’m going to make you wear that frilly dress. You’re uncomfortable? Why? You’re a girl those clothes were made for you. Do you feel awkward in that that frilly dress? Good I want you to feel awkward.

    So hot

    LikeLike


  36. on May 16, 2017 at 7:18 am Thug

    Crossfit or weights = bitches striving, fighing for better males. The rest are coasting or have given up /torpor … lollzzz

    LikeLike


    • on May 16, 2017 at 7:35 am Captain Obvious

      Exactly. In R-Selection, the women have to fight one another to get into the Alpha’s harem.

      LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2017 at 7:41 am plumpjack

        they have to fight for his attention WITHIN the harem also.

        LikeLike


      • on May 16, 2017 at 7:50 am tomjones

        “they have to fight for his attention WITHIN the harem also.”

        This why monogamy -old-fashioned arranged m@rriages like they have in hindu india- is the best (indeed the only) system that is sustainable.

        LikeLike


      • on May 17, 2017 at 6:25 am Alt Right Footsoldier

        It took an invading superpower fifty years to force Indians to use indoor plumbings instead of the street next door. Even now many of them are still unable to grasp that their left hand is not a piece of toilet paper. I’ll pass on copying anything those street shitters do.

        LikeLike


  37. on May 16, 2017 at 12:08 pm itsme

    women should stick to things like aerobics (flashback to 80’s big haired slender chicks in leg warmers), yoga, and ballet. lifting weights is unnecessary for females – calisthenics/body weight training is more than sufficient and i reckon a woman can reach aesthetically optimal muscle mass with just body weight training.

    but the real key to not getting fat as others have mentioned is what you eat. no workout can overcome a shit diet.

    LikeLike


  38. on May 16, 2017 at 1:11 pm Baldur Ás

    One is disgusting, the other repulsive. It’s lose lose.

    LikeLike


  39. on May 16, 2017 at 1:33 pm Br0kk

    Can confirm this….. “rather a stick (man) with tits than ham beast…”

    Greetings from Germany

    LikeLike


  40. on May 16, 2017 at 2:09 pm Robert

    Interesting. Robert Heinlein told me the same thing back in the ’60’s.

    LikeLike


  41. on May 16, 2017 at 2:38 pm Southern WASP

    If my only options were a fatty or a muscle-girl; I’d choose my hand.

    LikeLike


  42. on May 16, 2017 at 6:30 pm Tonan the Barbarian

    Not one poster above has got it right. The cross fit girls are injecting Primo or Test (both). Swallowing Winstrol and Anavar. There is no change in genetics, just a change in PEDs over the last 80 years. The truth is right in front of is. The muscle and fitness girls would not be buff without it. This wisdom from a former national NPC competitor.

    LikeLike


  43. on May 17, 2017 at 2:35 pm Insulent

    This report comes live to you from a very large tech conference in Orlando FL which drew quite an impressive list of international exhibitors and attendees. I guess this post is a suitable place for these observations.

    The majority of attendees – exhibitor and guest- are white men. A very strong showing of men of Dot Indian are present, followed by a distant few Asian men. Oddly enough, I have seen zero representatives from Somalia, with their trademark lightbulb-shaped heads and only a few blacks in general, other than those working security.

    But what stands out most are the women. I have seen perhaps 2 large bigguns. By far, the majority of the professional businesswomen present are thin and at least somewhat attractive. There are some older ladies who look battle-hardened and hold expressions of determination but in general the average woman here is above average in looks – and, presumably, intelligence. All carry themselves with confidence – except those who appear to be administrative assistants to female superiors – these women lack that confident stride that women of the same status have but who report to male superiors. And I’m not speaking of the “booth babes” – the hired beauties who are mostly 9’s and who are there to hand out ink pens while wearing short skirts- I’m referring to the professional women. They’re almost all attractive, thin and taller than the average woman. And most are friendly, too.

    So, there’s something to the idea of good looks and sucess, where women are concerned. As for the men – average is the word. Yet they’re surrounded ,- on some cases surrounded themselves with – pure beauties.

    Even the Dot Indian women look good, on average. The Asian girls are a mixed bag.. but of those groups I’ve observed, speaking languages from all over – Portuguese, French, Irish accents and British, Koreans most of the successful women here are beauties.

    LikeLike


  44. on May 17, 2017 at 4:24 pm awkward female commenter

    It’s a social dominance issue. The strongest female is often the most socially dominate one, because that’s the age we’re in. Social dominance isn’t arousing like looks, but it’s what gives Katy Perry an audience, for example. It’s not nothing, that’s for sure.

    LikeLike


  45. on May 21, 2017 at 1:56 pm Rodolfo Maduro

    The most likely answer is no, there is no tendency for secular selection of masculine women. An article published in 2012, “Maternal tendencies in women are associated with estrogen levels and facial femininity”, concluded that more feminine the woman (more estrogen and more feminine face), more kids she want. The difference was huge, so the more feminine wanted to have 3 children more than the more masculine ones. As for a woman to reach old age without children nowadays is no longer stigmatized, I think that if there is a selection, there is a selection for more feminine women. What explains the masculine woman in your academy? Anabolic steroids. With the evolution of synthetic anabolics, there are already drugs that promote muscle growth without altering the facial structure or promoting hair growth. I am not in the US, but in Brazil the use of steroids has grown 75% in the last 4 years and is being used almost in the same proportion by men and women!

    [CH: thanks for the article mention. i’ll look it up. however, that study’s results don’t definitively disprove the masculinized female selection theory. for instance, it’s possible that, owing to various modern influences, feminine women in principle want more children but in practice have fewer children.]

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Jack Silva on Red Tsunami?
    Jack Silva on Red Tsunami?
    Jack Silva on Red Tsunami?
    Carlos Danger on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Jack Silva on Shitlib Logic Trap!
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
    • The NPC Song: "Feel"
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: