COTW winner Jack Ragnar does a 180 on cuckventional wisdom and as a result grazes a deep and abiding truth about the sexes.
I had a conversation about flirting with my sister. This came up. Women at their core want to find out who the better man is. They would by default go with the winner of “you and him fight”. However men are not all on board with this idea. Such games are anti-civilization, and the costs are high. If men refuse, and choose to work out their differences in a more civilized and subtle way, women have to gain the information about men in a more covert fashion. So we get shit-tests, status seeking, etc.
Women are literally anti-civilizational. Their instincts if left unchecked (ala modern women), will bring out the most violent aspects of men. Men despite their capability for violence and destruction are not on average destructive. Women, if left to their devices would have us living in grass huts.
The white kight/cuck aphorism they love to cling to is that women are the civilizers of men, by dint of being the gatekeepers to sex and therefore having the leverage to demand men behave themselves.
But what if the civilizing force runs the other way? Any man who has experience with women has seen that the fair sex can entertain malice and destructiveness the equal of any man, but without the sensationalist physical violence that grabs headlines and puts the spotlight on male wickedness. There’s a better case to make that men are the sex with the drive to civilize, and that women, constrained as their sex is by the hypergamous need to identify the strongest man in the tribe, exert de-civilizing forces on the sexual market that if left unregulated can and do lead to cultural collapse.
Jack is onto something yuge, and we here at CH have toyed with the same idea of unrestricted female sexuality as a herald of national decline. The entire story may be more nuanced than this, but it’s a necessary and useful widening of the discourse to at least begin to cast suspicion on the shibboleth that women civilize men and not the other way around. When all is said and done, CH will have pushed open the Ovaton Window so wide the sunlight will scorch dying feminist wombs from Berkeley to Bonn.
Women are anti civilizational for several reasons. They are inherently weak physically and have a naked fascination with and love for brute strength and unbridled will. They are drawn to it because it is both protective and will provide strong offspring and the added bonus of sons who will protect her from both the brute father and the lions outside. This plus many grandchildren to provide further security in old age.
They also lack the ability to view rules and laws abstractly in terms of the greater good and see them as inherently biased to favor the group that made them. As children, they are incapable of evaluating rules in terms of value to the herd and feel entitled to circumvent them. They can also circumvent them if the man they mate with can break the law with impunity. Finally they expect it because sperm is cheap and eggs are dear.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Women confuse comfort with civilization. Comfort is merely a byproduct of civilization. Civilization is the repository of all the cultural knowledge that makes up that civilization.
LikeLiked by 3 people
What better way to lay waste to an entire civilization than to destroy the cultural bulwarks which temper & restrain the worst impulses of The Darkness in the female heart?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Indeed.
LikeLike
Freud is our philosopher. He more than anyone in the modern era encouraged us to follow instinct above civility, justifying this destructive impulse with a patina of social “science” that was more an expression of his personal desire to fuck his mother than it was anything approaching the objective. See his “Civilization and Its Discontents.”
His kikey-sperg Will to “Truth” — which is merely a scheming coward’s version of Will to Power — has undermined the west as much as anything has in the last hundred years.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Women confuse comfort with civilization.”
Women don’t give a sh!t about comfort, as a litany of sad rich beta males will tell you.
LikeLiked by 2 people
‘Women don’t give a sh!t about comfort, as a litany of sad rich beta males will tell you.
Yes. Women -especially from 16 to 24- love love LOVE danger. thugs, drug dealers, pimps, bad boys, ex-military guys…
LikeLike
vfm said:
Women don’t give a sh!t about comfort, as a litany of sad rich beta males will tell you.
Anyone that walks around in high heels, an underwire bra, a dress they have to be careful how they move in or jeans tight enough to display their camel toes, starving themselves so they will be able to attract a sperm donor, spending inordinate amount of time removing hairs, applying cosmetics, getting their hair done, I think we can agree. Women don’t give a shit about comfort compared to looking better.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maternal women care about comfort. And bad-boy chasers chase because they are ultimately seeking maternity. They want to envelop and domesticate the thrill. They’ll go on a camping trip until they need maxipads.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well, there’s comfort and then there’s comfort… I find most women are sensitive to an annoying whiny point about temperature (summer heat, winter cold) and positional convenience (especially seating).
I call it the Princess and the Pea effect.
Plucking hairs, support garments, high heels, meh… minor inconveniences when it comes to them thinking they’re looking hot.
LikeLiked by 2 people
the only women who complain about pain and discomfort from plucking, waxing, undergarments, heels, etc. are the ones who aren’t naturally feminine and they don’t think looking good for a man should be important or necessary.
they are just making excuses so they can justify continuing to be slovenly and not put out the effort to be feminine and attractive for you. or they will go ahead and do all that stuff then tell you that she is somehow doing you a favor for doing it. suffering for you. like you owe her something for being presentable for you.
that’s messed up because i know plenty of girls who maintain their appearance and wear heels every day without a single complaint. they actually seem happier and more upbeat than their unkempt counterparts. my girl even says her feet feel better in heels than flat shoes. she also wears pretty bras and panties every day because she likes the way they feel compared to dowdy mom style undergarments.
LikeLiked by 2 people
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piss_Christ
jud.geme*nt will come
LikeLike
It’s time to stop thinking of civilization as something good.
It makes you weak and allows the weak to rule.
Example: Nerds, geeks and fats write wall after wall of text online and pat themselves on the head if they think they’ve ‘bested’ another nerd.
In real life, they would never even say peep to anyone outside their little inbr3d group.
Un-civilize yourself as much as you can.
Women are herd animals and EVERY cow in the herd wants to be tupped by the same (LEAD) bull.
They couldn’t care less if all the other bulls perished.
They are loyal to one thing and one thing only – their womb.
If the offspring are lucky, this loyalty will extend to them.
Sometimes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bollocks. I’m a nerd and I routinely talk to jocks and even started to refer to non-nerds as being high on retard stuff. In defense of nerds being made fun of as high on need stuff. He’ll, I even made fun of a 10 bartender for being too Tan. I then told her never to use melanoma because itll make her skin look like a nigger. Alpha Jock bashing is one of my favorite pastimes.
LikeLike
This is such blackpill phaggotry. Civilization is a natural extension of Darwinism: have you seen how “fantastic” tribal peoples are faring all over the world?
Other than the half simian Aborigines and some 70 IQ niggs in Mozambique, no one prefers being uncivilized. Only the most retarded of the retarded would rather live in that lifestyle.
Women want to ride the strong bull. No shit, this is day 1 of life 101. But the strong bull isn’t the dimwit meatbag anymore. Society has changed. We lock gorillas in cages for spectacle, and do the human equivalent to gorilla-like humans.
Hell, civilization may make the whole sex game change completely… As in we may be able to change our own genes altogether within the decade time scale.
LikeLike
Your defense of civilization sounds like the honking of a pig defensive about its mud-bath.
Which is pretty much all we are, at this point.
LikeLike
Are you seriously saying that civilization isn’t the future of humanity? What possible indication is there that this is the case?
LikeLike
Of course not.
I am saying that to castigate the remnants of pre-civilized humanity as “half-simian” and “retarded” for not having attained the high estate of processed foods, drug addiction, piss porn, abortion clinics, and being chained to the internet all day for years on end, — is uncharitable and kind of disgusting attitude.
I am saying that you’re a pig warm in its blanket, and that’s why you’re offended by the notion of de-civilizing.
No offense.
LikeLike
I’m not saying prehumans were retarded. I’m saying that Aborigines and lots of blacks are, because they literally are. Assuming you base IQ as a measure of retardation.
I’m someone who works in the hard science research and development industry. And I can tell you that a lot of people resent science for shit that is actually good.
For example, you and your myopic jab at modern society.
First, let me address the internet: The internet is largely abused by losers who would have been losers anyway. The great thing is that now losers jack off to internet sluts instead of peeping into the girls bathroom for their jollies and being a public pervert. Also, instead of omegas being constantly rejected from socializing based on looks, they can find each other through the internet and have some sort of social escape from the outside world where they’re constantly reminded of their abysmally low social rank.
As for processed foods, you can thank lawyer-type boomers who run our bloated bureaucracy. Politics can weaponize technology in a very destructive capacity: look at the USSR for details. In fact, scientists are the ones who actually are trying to make cheap shit soy foods somewhat healthy.
I am just saying that throwing out civilization is 1) not possible and 2) throwing away some of humanity’s greatest achievements and sabotaging our proliferation
LikeLike
Women don’t give a sh!t about comfort, as a litany of sad rich beta males will tell you.
Soggy pizza cold and chewy and moldy mattresses will not work well beyond a couple of years at most. Chicks in Hippie pads will give you at least some Kind of Special gift.
LikeLike
Soggy pizza, moldy mattresses and drug dilla lurv work well enough for several pr3gn@ncies.
After that – Plenty Of Fish, OKCupid, et.al. for Betaschlubs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s when they get traded in for a newer model.
LikeLike
What exactly is happening in Tom Jones photo with the jewish star and the chick?
He’s holding a woman’s legs? Why is he underneath her? Someone please explain the context. Every time I see, it makes me laugh.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Humans are anti-civilizational
Because civilization isn’t natural.
Civilization is dehumanizing and soul-sapping.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And here you are, using your smartphone, connected to the Internet, posting a comment on a blog.
But Civilization sucks…
LikeLike
These sorts of generalizations are tired old canards, sounding like warm-over pap from the same generations that the posters claim to abhor.
A walk through old Vienna or Paris from yesteryear, for two small examples… try to make the same argument about humans being “anti-civilizational” or that such environs are “dehumanizing and soul-sapping”.
For the European human, civilization is quite natural and soul enriching.
It’s when you let diverse racial elements into the mix that Babel arises and it all turns to spirit-curdling shite.
Learn to think in three dimensions, all of you who would share your all-too-often sophomoric thoughts..
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah, I love these toughguys who make pronunciamentos from within civilization, assuming they would be the hearty .01% who would kill moose with their bare teeth for dinner. They are no better than the left which believes civil society is the default status and therefore can be experimented on and vivisected. L A R P – D E R P
LikeLiked by 1 person
I happen to be one of those who kill moose with their bare teeth for dinner, but I still appreciate being able to take a hot bath afterwards and climb into bed with my girl on my memory foam mattress with 600 thread count sheets and hypoallergenic down comforter.
nonetheless, there’s a point that needs to be addressed on the alt-right, and it’s all this trail of tears, “save muh civilization” talk, as if civilization, in and of itself, with all of it’s built-in flaws, indulgences, and failures, is something worth saving.
we can build any kind of civilization we want. ANY. KIND. WE WANT. we can also burn the existing (and failing) one down to ashes, and start completely over, building the new one to our very own shitlord specs. civilization-building is in our DNA.
and why WOULDN’T wouldn’t we do a new and improved version? is there ANY civilization that we can go back to that’s worth emulating? is there a single one that didn’t have the seeds of its own destruction embedded into it’s very foundation? there is nothing to go back to. we’re living in a whole new world and we need to start acting like it.
it’s time to stop fantasizing about putting Humpty Dumpty back together again, and just take everything we’ve learned about how not to fuck up a perfectly good civilization, everything we’ve learned about technology, and start completely fresh…and the first step to building anything is…demolition, and/or “clearing the land”.
the people who get the jump on this next stage of human evolution are going to be the ones who see opportunity where others only see loss. that’s the white entrepreneurial spirit that we like to preen ourselves over. it’s still in there. DJT has it.
evolution helps those who help themselves.
LikeLiked by 8 people
Plumpjack’s long comment is
THE — BEST — COMMENT — I’VE — EVER — READ, out of thousands.
*raises a glass of champagne* Salutes, and complete agreement — and more.
If you missed it, scroll up and read.
LikeLike
Ask the Jacobins how that fantasy worked out.
This is the fundamental divide between right and left. The left believes we can declare Year Zero and fashion man into anything we imagine. The right understands that man, and therefore civilization, is limited by man’s nature, which cannot be shaped by the will of tinkerers and meddlers and bien-pensant ideologues.
Naturam expellas furca, tamen usque recurret is the fundamental precept of this site, and it is the connective tissue between game and ¡SCIENCE! and the politics of the right. It is no coincidence that the practical inquiry into woman’s nature has led to broader realtalk truths which must not be spoken aloud.
We can artfully adjust the civilization we inherited, at best. And even then the best artists can only work with the materials available.
LikeLiked by 5 people
King: X X X and the wrong kind of X at that. Allow me, Xwarper to explain.
The problem with revolutionary utopians, up to now, has been the calibre of their high command structure. Lenin and Castro were lawyers, and the pre-Napoleonic Directorate were philosophes in salon-chatting garb.
I would suggest a strong leadership of brilliant men (“anjels”) linked together by the best corporate and agile-small-group technologies and mechanisms could overcome the limits and defects of the revolutionary past.
Cordially yours,
Xwarper
LikeLike
The truth probably lies somewhere between plumpjack and a determinist. Human nature can’t be fundamentally changed, but at the same time, we obviously don’t want precisely the same system we have now, because this system is killing us.
So we do need a new civilizational approach — but it also has to be one that’s consonant with our nature. Sounds tough, doesn’t it? Well, yes, it is — but we’ve got to try.
LikeLike
“The left believes we can declare Year Zero and fashion man into anything we imagine.”
the left wants to return to year zero, while keeping everything the right built that sustains them. IOW, keep the civilization but remake the man, in parasite-friendly form.
“The right understands that man, and therefore civilization, is limited by man’s nature, which cannot be shaped by the will of tinkerers and meddlers and bien-pensant ideologues.”
I suppose that depends on which “man” and whose “nature” we’re talking about. does civilization absolutely require the presence if cucks and betas, and their accomplices, the parasites and shitlibs?
those now-maladaptive characters didn’t just appear out of thin air. they’re part of the “man’s nature” that you say it’s immutable, and they were an essential component of the very civilization the “muh civilization” crowd wants to preserve. are we science! fans now saying that “man’s nature” is incapable of evolving, and, by extension, civilization isn’t either?
…
“And even then the best artists can only work with the materials available.”
the best “artists” now have better materials to work with. one word: redpill
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think Ironsides is referring to the fact that children are like their parents, who are like their grandparents.
But actually the reality of human living has changed a lot. The religious men of medieval Europe (there were dissenters, but most were seriously hardcore) would be totally out of place in MTV-McPorn World we live in. You can dismiss that as “culture” and say “human nature doesn’t change,” but in practical effects, the Puritan of Salem, Mass., is light-years away from the effete lisping Professor of English at Harvard in Cambridge, Mass. They may as well be different creatures in different species.
So the “human nature” of jealousy and need to digest food and fuck — yes, those things remain. But the mind is a vast, broad canvas which can be painted in many ways. You could have cannibalism in an advanced technological culture (super-Aztecs) or prayer on a space station (Quaker rocket pilots). It really is up to you.
— xwarper.wordpress.com
LikeLike
There is only one type of “man” who possesses a single nature. All the rest …
… are imperfect instances of that nature. As is every man, to greater and lesser degrees against the natural standard. “We all fall short of the glory of God.”
Strongly disagree that they are “an essential component.” This is an enduring falsehood of dork-enlightenment/manosphere types, that beta males built and sustain civilization just because a place has been made for them among the division of labor.
A place in civilization has been made for the weak because — get this — we are all a mixture of weakness and strength, depending on circumstance, age, bailiwick, and natural ability. That’s a far cry from imagining noodle-armed slaves could conceive of and organize the building of the Great Pyramids, or were not interchangeable compared to the essential role of natural leaders (alpha males).
Pretty soon you’re going to tell me niggers deserve reparations because their descendants’ labor built the United States of America.
LikeLike
“This is an enduring falsehood of dork-enlightenment/manosphere types, that beta males built and sustain civilization just because a place has been made for them among the division of labor.”
I’ve known a lot of engineers and computer scientists — in my charming stud days I tried to recruit bitches to service them sexually so I could get P$A$I$D — and, frankly, they’re all betas, except for the barest handful. And yet they designed and built almost everything we’ll keep for the next 1,000 years, from thermostats to thermonuclear reactors. They’re losers, but they’re keepers.
“A place in civilization has been made for the weak because — get this — we are all a mixture of weakness and strength, depending on circumstance, age, bailiwick, and natural ability.”
Mmmmmm. No. I have no weakness in me. You’ve already conceded your right to belong to any high command group by virtue of your moderation/surrrenderism.
“That’s a far cry from imagining noodle-armed slaves could conceive of and organize the building of the Great Pyramids, or were not interchangeable compared to the essential role of natural leaders (alpha males).”
Here, at least, Matt, we agree.
Pretty soon you’re going to tell me niggers deserve reparations because their descendants’ labor built the United States of America.
And yet I feel so bad calling them that after that nice young black man who tried to help me cross the border to the United States to get to a girl. *flashing a grin, twinkling eyes* Nigger nigger nigger.
LikeLike
Will somebody take over on retard detail for me? Hot potato. You’re it!
LikeLike
“that beta males built and sustain civilization just because a place has been made for them among the division of labor.”
all of the “civilization” is discussed was built PRE-birth control, when the social contract was still intact. they may not have been beta THEN, but they certainly would be now. it’s true that doesn’t mean that the builders of civilization were all betas, but perhaps you can explain how the average man’s, ie. the average civilization builder, behavior will hold up in the post-it culling era?
…
“Pretty soon you’re going to tell me niggers deserve reparations because their descendants’ labor built the United States of America.”
wut?
LikeLike
Didn’t think I’d have to belabor the obvious, but much of what passes for civilization these days would be anathema to those aforementioned societies of which I spoke, and inspire the same “burn it down” attitude that we men of the chateau share.
On a side note, we used to DREAM of 600 thread counts… we had to tape together brown paper bags from the grocery store in order to have sheets.
And we were THANKFUL for ’em. 😉
LikeLike
Heh, heh… never thought I’d get to throw this one back on you, Matt, but here it is:
“Forget it, Jake… it’s Chinatown.”
😉
LikeLike
Birth control and abortion (and for that matter, no-fault divorce, normalizing sodomy, and women’s lib) are big deals but — priapist pua hype notwithstanding — they haven’t changed the calculus of civilization or the basic alpha/beta dynamic. Devolving the impetus of civilization into Freudian fictions is part of the modern degeneracy. Men desire to fuck and procreate, and even if it is one of the elementary motivations, it is far from the only or overriding one.
In fact, the base impulses are best thought of as inconveniences to be managed, like the sewer system manages our urge to shit and food delivery our urge to eat. They are very important, they precede the greater accomplishments of humanity, sure, but they also require efficient disposal so that we might get on to our sublime purposes — which are the real motivations to create civilization. We want to do great things, and nobody can accomplish them alone while fighting off danger and hunger and a perpetual hard on.
Freud took these impulses we all share in common and called upon us to sublimate them. Hence “anal retention,” or comparing one’s desire for unity with perfection to the hygiene of one’s asshole. (Many might be able to invent such a perverse connection, but only a Jew could popularize it the way Rabbi Sigmund did.) He taught us to worship our genitals like ghetto kids.
So it’s not the technology of birth control that has changed the calculus. It is our muh-dikk fixation on the one act of sublimity all animals share as somehow explaining the stupendous achievements of civilization, or the power relationship among men, or our ability to appreciate beauty without sexualizing it. We can appreciate civilization without sexualizing it. We have to — or else we will interpret simple phenomena like Freudian perverts and find ourselves inevitably nodding along with self-destructive cultmarx conclusions.
LikeLike
I happen to be one of those who kill moose with their bare teeth for dinner
Not me,
I wear´a penis sheath and hunt monkeysin the jungle with a blow gun and poison Darts.
LikeLike
This is the one I wear when I’m out picking up the headhunter women.
LikeLike
lol who gives shit if it’s “natural”. Natural != Good. Spiders sucking blood from helpless flies is natural lol. F@gs wanting to suck each others dicks is natural too lol.
think yur shit through bro
LikeLike
earthquakes are natural. natural does not equal good.
LikeLike
Natural is good when jewish artifice is suffocating man’s soul (in mala fide). Like all virtues it is a corrective along the continuum in pursuit of the golden mean, between the vicious poles of The State of Nature and technotyranny.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rape and molestation are both natural.
LikeLiked by 1 person
REPARATIONS! Yes, there should be reparations from the Civil War. At least 650,000 white men died to free moon crickets (even though we all know that’s not what it was really about), so ‘groids owe the descendants of these white men reparations. And they should pay up, now. Otherwise, as one last magnanimous gesture, white men will pay the fare to Liberia. That’s where they all should have gone in the first place.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Bringing Africans to the Americas was one of the biggest mistakes Whitey ever made.
LikeLiked by 2 people
@wolfie — yep.
Not sending them back immediately after the cessation of hostilities was the second biggest.
That’s what Lincoln wanted, but (((somebody))) had other ideas I reckon.
LikeLike
Something I agree with wolfie on. That one mistake was, in its way, the initial chink in the dike through which the waters of poz would ultimately burst in all their sewer-like reek.
LikeLike
“Bringing Africans to the Americas was one of the biggest mistakes Whitey ever made.”
that wasn’t no mistake. poisoning this new white man’s Eden was (((intentional))), just like it is now.
pulling a few moneylender levers to rig the market and then exploiting the cracks in the competition would’ve made that koolaid pretty easy to swallow, just as it is now. it was population displacement being sold as a cost-saving solution in order to compete in a rigged market.
it wasn’t no mistake.
LikeLiked by 1 person
maybe it was a “mistake”, but it bweren’t no accident any more than burdening the marketplace with regulation so that businesses are forced to hire cheap, democrat-voting, white-hating, third world labor in order to compete today is an accident.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Give them all penis sheaths so they can stand out in their new continent. That’s the least we owe them.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on parallelplace.
LikeLiked by 1 person
nominee for Shitlord Of The Week
LikeLiked by 2 people
sad the dude got arrested. THIS is what needs to be done though: get right back in their faces.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lets take a lesson from how the IDF treated Rachel Corrie.
LikeLike
nice. wish he would have lit up the back tire on his way thru though.
LikeLike
What a disgusting lot of human detritus.
LikeLike
Ragnar says, “Women are literally anti-civilizational. Their instincts if left unchecked (ala modern women), will bring out the most violent aspects of men. Men despite their capability for violence and destruction are not on average destructive. Women, if left to their devices would have us living in grass huts.”
Rousseau answers:
Men restrain their “unchecked instincts” by reason (civilization), women by the naturally occurring culture of modesty. Why? Because women are outwardly weaker and therefore must rely on the “strength” of cunning:
This isn’t cuck traditionalism or m’lady white-knighting or an artificial construct, it is a law of nature:
As we were discussing a few posts back about the supercivilizational, primal power of beauty (which is youth, which is young women 15-25), women stimulate “man’s passions in excess of” the ability to satisfy those passions, not by doing anything in particular, but simply by being their vulnerable coquettish selves. A woman’s “judgment” as “civilizers of men” has nothing to do with it; they are hardly aware of the dynamic themselves:
Matt
LikeLike
Translation is being held captive by the stingy mod jew! I’ll give him a chocolate coin if he releases it.
LikeLike
Jews don’t care about money. What they love is Reason.
LikeLike
I have noticed this:
1) social occurrence
2) seen through the lens of one’s moral aesthetic (i.e. – convictions)
3) informs one’s outlook, gestalt, perspective, or sentiment
4) leads to an output of one’s actual emotion, in response to said social occurrence, be it the affinity of love or respect; or alternatively contempt; or anger, or the melancholic feeling of sadness – as in paying tribute to what has been lost; etc. etc.
I have also noticed the women by and large do not seem to understand that (4) is contingent, not on just (1), but on (2) and (3) as well. Women seem to have a blindspot about this, perhaps due to a blind-spot around self-awareness about (2) and (3), but I’m not really sure of the root cause of this female condition.
What is not clear to me is what looks like a lack of self-awareness about (2) and (3) is perhaps because they tend to undervalue (2) and (3) vis-a-vis (4), perhaps because they know they are quite adept and changing their (2) and (3), in the provision of women’s natural adaptability in these matters, thus (2) and (3) taking on a superficial character, lacking any real depth, and very much prone to the backwardsization of rationalization. Or alternatively, are women actually just straight-up so self-unaware with regards to (2) and (3), that attributing to them, the self-agency (as contingent on self-knowledge or self-awareness) of naming it as a “ploy” in these matters, is over-reaching? At times, it seems to be one or the other. As these matters arise, if one pushes through, and engages more deeply, so as to try to uncover the woman’s actual psychic dynamic, one is met with obfuscation, then the woman’s rising anxiety, and then finally the female imperative to excuse themselves from any further interaction along those lines, by way of their implication of your inquiry as overbearing. So ….. I still really don’t know, but my guess is that it is both (both a self-aware manipulative ploy, mixed in with a good deal of self-unawareness in these matters, probably rooted in denial).
But, what is clear, is that though people by and large cannot be trusted with much, women as a group tend to be particularly untrustworthy (i.e – one is more-so unable to count on their consistent behavior within changing circumstances).
As such, from the society-wide standpoint, it is obvious that women’s group and individual perspectives should be somewhat discounted, if one is interested in preserving civilization (civilization is contingent on some modicum of counting on individual’s consistent behavior within changing circumstances).
Interestingly, the jewish mindset is also more-so untrustworthy in this same way. Perhaps both the western women’s deep psychic perspective, as well as the jew’s, is based on a hidden psychic emphasis on paranoia.
LikeLike
But what about delicious chocolate money he can eat? That would be a great Reason to unkike my komment.
LikeLike
Niggers don’t care about pussy; what they love is Reason.
LikeLike
Very good writing, King. I also appreciate the quotes-within-comments, which I have no idea how to do.
In reply:
Women have no idea what they want. To be truly destructive, you need a one-direction arrow, a linear focus, a direction, a momentum. Women are like pinwheels, stationary and spinning in place.
As for men, they can probably be divided into 5 or 6 broad classes, with the lowest being the anti-civilizational criminals who pop up generation after generation (eugenics, anyone?) and the top class, divided equally between its protectors like Abraham Lincoln (“Save the Union!”) and its techno-barbarians like Adolf Hitler (“Spread lebenstraum east, and ignore all weak impulses to build a Greater Reich.”)
I prefer the techno-barbarians. By far.
— xwarper.wordpress.com
LikeLiked by 2 people
The kiss of death. Fuuuck.
mod plz delet
LikeLike
To refer to another movie, in re a compliment from SaucyQueer:
King, you just got mushed.
/A Bronx cheer to go along with the tale rape!
LikeLike
May I suggest as an alternative ‘divided equally between its protectors like Adolf Hitler and its techno-barbarians like Abraham Lincoln’ ?
LikeLike
Dude… if everything Rousseau ever said or wrote was burned and wiped from mankind’s memory, the world would be a lot better off.
LikeLike
Understanding Rousseau is the only way to understand modernity. He wasn’t wrong about everything. Just the important things.
/winkyfacesmiley
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rousseau is more faggety than King!
exaggeration rape!
LikeLike
In 1755 Rousseau had written a Prize Essay for the Academy of Dijon called The Discourse on the Origin of Inequality among Men but renamed by his friends as The Essay against Civilization, which he sent to Voltaire. Voltaire replied in the following letter
——————————————————————————————————-
I have received, sir, your new book against the human race, and I thank you for it. You will please people by your manner of telling them the truth about themselves, but you will not alter them. The horrors of that human society–from which in our feebleness and ignorance we expect so many consolations–have never been painted in more striking colors: no one has ever been so witty as you are in trying to turn us into brutes: to read your book makes one long to go about all fours. Since, however, it is now some sixty years since I gave up the practice, I feel that it is unfortunately impossible for me to resume it
tbc
LikeLiked by 1 person
I leave this natural habit to those more fit for it than are you and I. Nor can I set sail to discover the aborigines of Canada, in the first place because my ill-health ties me to the side of the greatest doctor [1] in Europe, and I should not find the same professional assistance among the Missouris: and secondly because war is going on in that country, and the example of the civilized nations has made the barbarians almost as wicked as we are ourselves. I must confine myself to being a peaceful savage in the retreat I have chosen–close to your country, where you yourself should be.
I agree with you that science and literature have sometimes done a great deal of harm. Tasso’s [2] enemies made his life a long series of misfortunes: Galileo’s enemies kept him languishing in prison, at seventy years of age, for the crime of understanding the revolution of the earth: and, what is still more shameful, obliged him to forswear his discovery. Since your friends began the Encyclopedia, their rivals attack them as deists, atheists–even Jansenists.[3]
If I might venture to include myself among those whose works have brought them persecution as their sole recompense, I could tell you of men set on ruining me from the day I produced my tragedy Oedipus… I have no right to complain: Alexander Pope, Descartes, Bayle –a hundred others–have been subjected to the same, or greater, injustice: and my destiny is that of nearly everyone who has loved letters too well.
Confess, sir, that all these things are, after all, but little personal pin-pricks, which society scarcely notices. What matter to humankind that a few drones steal the honey of a few bees? Literary men make a great fuss of their petty quarrels: the rest of the world ignores them, or laughs at them.
They are, perhaps, the least serious of all the ills attendant on human life. …Confess that Italy owed none of her troubles to Petrarch or to Boccaccio: that Marot’s jests were not responsible for the massacre of St. Bartholomew: or Racine’s tragedy. of the Cid for the wars of the Fronde. Great crimes are always committed by great ignoramuses. What makes, and will always make, this world a vale of tears is the insatiable greediness and the indomitable pride of men… Letters support, refine, and comfort the soul: they are serving you, sir, at the very moment you decry them: you are like Achilles declaiming against fame, and Father Malebranche using his brilliant imagination to belittle imagination.
If anyone has a right to complain of letters, I am that person, for in all times and in all places they have led to my being persecuted: still, we must needs love them in spite of the way they are abused–as we cling to society, though the wicked spoil its pleasantness: as we must love our country, though it treats us unjustly: and as we must love and serve the Supreme Being, despite the superstition and fanaticism which too often dishonor His service.
M. Chappus tells me your health [4] is very unsatisfactory: you must come and recover here in your native place, enjoy its freedom, drink (with me) the milk of its cows, and browse on its grass. I am yours most philosophically and with sincere esteem.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rousseau was SJW 300 years before there was one, he was a lunatic leftie
in the age where leftie meant left handed
He was an quintessential beta male
If you read his “Confessions” you will have stop at one point almost feeling the shame for that “noble savage” You will be left in wonder what in the hell compels a human being to strip himself naked in front multitude
There we come to the another essential trait of every single leftie that has walked the earth
Just like Andre Breton who was calling for humans to live in the glass houses Rousseau and his ilk do not understand that we backward people do not want to see their nakedness, that we are repelled by it and that the civilization means among other many things developing that inner decency which prevents you from revealing your nakedness in front of others
But what would you expect form lunatics who think the worlds start with them that a civilization can be built from the scratch
What would you expect from Rousseau and Breton who are nothing but quintessential attention whores
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thank you King and Cortesar… I want more of the above, I am a student soaking in intelligent discourse. Please ignore the loonies and keep posting the goodies… A recommended reading list would also be appreciated (avoid the GBFM cliches though please). Good day.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Women are anti-civilizational even to their own detriment. Men would rather not argue let alone make things physical, but deep down women would rather see a man get violent with them than for him to submit to their shit.
LikeLiked by 2 people
that’s true. i have a perfect example. about a year ago i was chatting up this girl on fagbook.
i didn’t know she had a boyfriend when it first started off. then she mentioned him but was still flirting up a storm and answered immediately any time i messaged her so i know she was into it anyway. at one point, i pushed too far on something and she backed off.
her boyfriend found out about it but didn’t do a damn thing. as far as i know, he is still with her. still with this skank who is flirts with other dudes behind his back and shows off her tits in almost all her selfies. she even amped things up right after our messaging exchange by posting pics of shirtless dudes and shiz. clearly she knew her boyfriend wasn’t going to do anything about her bad behaviors so she pushed the envelope even more. sad shame that there are guys who will LTR girls like that and she was no better than a 6. what a sad sack that guy must be.
LikeLike
Caveat: WHITE men…
LikeLike
I prefer reclaiming the proper definition of a word — “conservative,” m-arri-age” — rather than giving in to the leftist principle of linguistic sabotage and division that employs noun modifiers. White man is simply “man.” Anything else is subhuman. We used to have a serviceable word for them too: “savages.” HBD is doing yeoman’s work coming at this from the genetic angle.
Language is important. More than half of the war is won at the level of what we call things.
LikeLike
I prefer “anjels” for whites and “humanoids” for the rest. Also, “Ant Hill” for China/Japan, “The Insane Asylum” for Arabia, et cetera. They’re meant to be powerful imagery that sticks.
I’m still working out a vocabulary/cosmology. I’ll stick it on my site when I have time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Man, Savages, and Orientals. That’s just about all you need.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Even when it proclaims itself to be atheist, the socialism of Marx, of Trotsky, of Ernst Bloch, is directly rooted in messianic eschatology. Nothing is more religious, nothing is closer to the ecstatic rage for justice in the prophets, than the socialist vision of the destruction of the bourgeois Gomorrah and the creation of a new, clean city for man.”
LikeLike
np-bones, if you’re trying to make some sort of connection between the zeal people show for man-made -isms being, Ipso facto, a reason to lay that egg at the doorstep of belief in God, well… I can’t help you.
How many times have I pointed to Scripture: “Believe in whatever gods or man-made -isms you see fit… as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.”
LikeLike
I’m currently using “lower primates” for non-whites.
LikeLike
I still think P.J. O’Rourke said it best.
“Without men, civilization would last until the next oil change.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s genius…to communicate such a deep truth in 10 words.
My folks used to tell me that women civilize men. And I would counter, ‘then we’re in great shape with the army of single moms raising boyz in the hood’.
LikeLike
Wrong. Women would not bother remembering to change the oil. Civilization would last until the last engine blew apart from disuse.
LikeLike
Read the P.J. O’Rourke quotation again.
LikeLike
I can read fine, thank you. The quote is attributing responsibility (remembering to change the oil) to women that they simply won’t use. No woman is going to panic at mile 3001. But they will once stranded.
LikeLike
Can’t tell if you’re splitting hairs or simply missed the boat Mr Magnificient
LikeLike
As I write this I am sitting in a rented condo with a mixed group with four women three men. The other two men are paired up with two of the four.
As I read about the de – civilizing nature of women, three prancing lassies came out into the living room. Singing snatches of song and doing each other’s hair.
LikeLike
Actually, lesbians built civilization. Ask Camille Paglia.
LikeLike
Actually, Camille Paglia said:
“If civilization had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts.”
She does say some retarded feminist bullshit, too. But, she has some of the dialectics right.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha. You finally said something funny.
LikeLike
Ro, we need a field report no later than Monday morning.
Any hope for a threesome?
Strong Pimp Hand, muh man, Strong Pimp Hand.
LikeLike
Well, the long and short of it is some partial success with the taller thinner single gal.
I like time with the group so I don’t want to burn bridges. I spent some time building the guys up in front of their girlfriends. I Flirted with women outside the group when we were out and about.
I targeted the better looking single and worked to isolate at times and have some inside jokes and initiate casual touching. On the second night we all stayed in, played some cards, told stories etc. I found an opportunity when my target left to go to the bathroom, timed and got up before she walked back.
“Hey check out the souvenir I picked up” we went to the room. I put my hand in the small of her back and guided her in. Before she could speak I put my finger to her lips and said “shhhh” then kissed her. We made out for a while and I went to accelerate by taking her hand and putting it on my Johnson.
We got interrupted by other single girl coming down the hall ” where are you [tall girl]” that broke the magic and she left quickly. I waited a minute and went back out too. I didn’t work in a further moment than that.
Lots of mistakes were made. I had trouble navigating with such a large group of friends.
LikeLike
Unrestricted female sexuality is the herald of civilizational decline.
It’s NOT much more complicated than this.
“Men despite their capability for violence and destruction are not on average destructive.”
It follows that the best men, those most capable of inflicting violence when roused, are slow to rouse – one reason firebrand intellectuals get frustrated.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Once roused, death follows.
LikeLiked by 1 person
E.G. DJT choosing to run for prez
LikeLike
A ‘lost age of gynocracy is feminist dogma.
(((Gloria Steinem))):
“Once upon a time, the many cultures of this world were all part of the gynocratic age. Paternity had not yet been discovered, and it was thought … that women bore fruit like trees – when they were ripe. Childbirth was mysterious. It was vital. And it was envied. Women were worshipped because of it, were considered superior because of it…. Men were on the periphery – an interchangeable body of workers for, and worshippers of, the female center, the principle of life.
“The discovery of paternity, of sexual cause and childbirth effect, was as cataclysmic for society as, say, the discovery of fire or the shattering of the atom. Gradually, the idea of male ownership of children took hold…”
(nytimes .com/books, The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory)
Yep, there was never any need for hunting, repelling enemies, making treaties, planning, etc., never any real sexual dimorphism. It was gyno-Eden before those patriarchs came along.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“…there was never any need for… repelling enemies…”
All of the arguments for a matriarchal society fall apart right there.
You know where you can steal an unguarded virgin? Next door in the matriarchy!
The wars would stop only after the unguarded women were all gone. It’s this that Western women cannot grasp. They’re mouthy whores because we allow it.
Damn, I think I just blamed Men for the weakness of women. Eff it, I’ll stand by it. We won’t have a decent society again until Western women are afraid to be mouthy whores in public, knowing Men won’t protect them.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Everything ultimately is man’s fault. On that we can agree with the feminists. (And can tell MGTOW/MRA victimologists to truly GTOW, GTFO, and BTFO.)
The weaker sex could not have attempted to become men if the stronger sex — on a lark — hadn’t permitted them the opportunity. It was an amusing joke until proto-nümales, utterly bereft of the generous Dionysian spirit, began taking the hatchet-faced suffragettes seriously.
“I know! Let’s put women in pants and make them strut around like men, it’ll be a gas!”
It was like a fraternity prank. But then the whole house started going up …
LikeLike
*pawing at King’s feet*
Can I be your friend?
*laughing darkly and walking away* Goodbye, group! I’m outta here. Set my arson bombs and left, but soon you’ll be my friend! (Well, those I want, anyway.)
LikeLike
“We won’t have a decent society again until Western women are afraid to be mouthy whores in public, knowing Men won’t protect them.”
truth
LikeLike
You know that song from “Nursery Crime,” “The Fountain of Salmacis?” Steinem’s writing has as much basis in reality as the narrative of that song.
Feminism is more about myths and fantasies than it is about facts and reality. At least she knew enough to put the word “myth” in her title. If she could set this stuff to music using those complicated Tony Banks chords maybe it would have a chance. I like Laura Nyro even though I don’t agree with her feminist politics. At least she could write a melody — which takes more talent than inventing imaginary theories about how we evolved.
LikeLike
Thank you for the Genesis reference. We’re all waiting for Supper to be Ready here.
LikeLike
I’ll throw in my thanks as well. (And suggest, if you haven’t watched it, Steve Hackett’s 2013 concert of Genesis songs at the Royal Albert Hall is on Youtube in its entirety!)
And damn, the lyrics to that song are disturbing…
LikeLike
Follow you, Follow me to the table… and bring the Carpet Crawlers.
LikeLike
We dislike the current order, but we’re a part of a larger cycle over which we have no control. Unless the rigidity of human nature is instilled young, Man cannot grasp the inevitability of the failure of softness.
But what appears soft to Men is success to others; women cannot grasp what Strength brings to a Man. Savages cannot grasp what self-denial brings to Man. Merchants cannot grasp what building things with your own hands brings to Man.
Hardness brings respect for other hard Men. But this is itself part of the cycle. If Man does not challenge other Men, Man cannot know who is hard and who is a Merchant. The Merchant knows. He also knows he can manipulate women and savages far easier than he can manipulate Men.
If I were to speculate, I’d say that the best societies are those in which only the Men fit for combat get a voice. But we’re inside the cycle. Eventually, all “civilizations” fail, as eventually even a citizen-soldier society will dwindle. Success breeds failure, as failure breeds success.
Or death. It all depends on whether or not you’re willing to fight.
Ironically, that willingness to fight is part-and – parcel in making wet panties.
LikeLike
Cosign
LikeLike
King is the King of faggets. A fagget is someone who is so gay, they exceed the limits of the word faggot.
LikeLike
STFU, no-bones… men are talking.
You fairy.
LikeLike
Even when I was a kid people called me an old soul…or old school.
In my teenage years of be disgusted st the childish antics of my peers …the drinking, clownish behavior, the promiscuity, the disorder..
I sound like a teenager angster but I was born in the wrong era. I appreciate the modern conveniences but this era does nothing for my soul.
LikeLike
Normal healthy young boys will always drink and clown and Chase skirts if possible regardless if they’re living in 2017 or Renaissance italy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As a merchant, Greg in Aurora, I’ll have you know that your statement hurt my ego a bit, but I get your point in general.
In regards to you saying that we are stuck in a vicious cycle where strength breeds weakness etc etc… I think we need to decide if we want to believe that we can keep getting better, making the cycles of strength last longer and the cycles of weakness shorter, or if we want to resign ourselves to nihilistic “the world keeps on turning” thoughts, in which case we might as well all just embrace nihilism, go smoke a fat joint, and give up on life, because who wants to see the same exact repetitive cycles without some form of improvement over time.
LikeLike
@Mob Barley
Re: nihilism
Success, or failure, or death, all depending on your willingness to fight. The reward for choosing the fight is wet pussy.
Women love Men who choose the fight.
LikeLike
The primary “civilizing” force is group selection.
http://longnow.org/seminars/02012/apr/20/social-conquest-earth/
Note how E. O. Wilson, toward the end, talks about the danger of us all becoming “wimps”.
The “problem” with Europeans is we went through several thousand years, at least, of individual selection in which Everyman was an alpha by virtue of coevolution with canines replacing betas in the hunting pack. Two such Alphas encountering each other in overlapping hunting grounds would, if necessary, end up hunting each other to the death. This is the evolutionary origin of the “duel”. This is what produced Euroman’s individualistic character — or rather, reawakened in Euroman the individualistic character of virtually all sexual species going back to the dawn of sexual selection at least 600 million years ago. This individualistic character of sexual selection was submerged in part of the primate line, including both chimps and humans, by group selection or gang warfare. The civilizing impact of perpetual, large scale gang warfare arises with agriculture during the neolithic, and due to the fact that effective war-making requires abrogation of individual agency (hence individual combat that had arisen in the prior 20 thousand years in Euroman with his beta dogs).
Perpetual war means perpetual abrogation, by Euromen, of their evolved tendency toward natural duel as the appeal of last resort in dispute processing. This puts in place the role of perpetual command hierarchy upon which civilization depends for protection of property rights based on accumulation of fixed assets.
Once Euromen have so-abrogated natural duel, three enormously important cornerstones of civilization are put in place:
1) Territorial defense against invasion by outside men becomes the responsibility of the command hierarchy calling upon the collective.
2) Women must be indoctrinated to see their mates as their superiors, rather than the superiors in civilization’s command hierarchy.
3) Men must be guaranteed at least the resources required for replacement reproduction (meaning not just numbers of children but also quality of mate)
Our current “civilization” has violated all 3. It no longer exists.
If you want to understand “The 60s”, just think of it as freeing women to their pagan sexual state without freeing men to challenge guys like Herbert Macuse to natural duel to the death in a state of nature.
What’s really destroying Western civilization is the failure to recognize that a so-called “peace” including immigration of cultures of group integrity, is a one-sided State of War.
LikeLiked by 1 person
All civilizations of just about any kind up until very recently have been warrior civilizations. The current one is not, though in the U.S. it retains certain elements of that in a diffuse manner (the 2nd).
Given that we’ve created a non-warrior civilization and it’s being overrun reveals why all the others back through history have NOT organized themselves along these lines.
(In other words, I kind of agree with you at first glance, though I’ll have to think this over a bit more, too.)
LikeLike
And one (((group))) of people ..kicked out of the Middle East, lived on the outskirts of European society especially in the Middle Ages.
Europe then was a closed off parochial society with generations of families living in the same towns with the same trades.
The Miller would barter with the Cobbler etc.
This (((group))) of people made nothing but desperately wanted to fit in and be accepted. They also desired to conquer the ultimate prize…the European blonde female.
The only time Europeans would acknowledge them was to ask for money. The money creators figured usury was a power lever and a way in but to become fully immersed into European society and to even control it they had to destroy it. ” Save those Europeans right for ignoring us!”
The defenders of this society were warrior men who shared similar tribal traits.
They and their Christian God had to destroyed.
Encourage women to rise up against their men…tell them they are oppressed. Tell the same to minorities and openly promote gay sex. Destroy their religion..like other liberal cultures..when the weak factions gain more power (women, gays, minorities) ..and matriarchal upbringings make feminine men ..addrd with sedationary tools like drugs..music..porn…the defenders of this culture will be conquered…especially if they are not allowed to form warrior groups with similar traits.
And through porn, the blonde European female being degraded will be fulfilled
LikeLiked by 1 person
3) Men must be guaranteed at least the resources required for replacement reproduction (meaning not just numbers of children but also quality of mate)
Guarantee …. How? (I mean without recourse to something akin to sexual socialism)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good question and one that points to the critical phrase “required for”. This is like the dangerous word “need” that is abused in socialism’s “to each according to his needs” — so it requires clarification: Prior to men coming together to form a collective — which is the adoption of a State other than Nature — men fight, one on one in Nature for the resources they “need”. A civilization that tells men they may no longer resort to Nature to settle disputes must offer some material guarantee in compensation for this — not just a pig-in-a-poke “opportunity”. Prior to feudal law, a man’s allodium fulfilled this need to a large degree. But territory goes up as the square of the length of the border while the cost of the border is proportional to its length. So the economics of perpetual war drives the centralization of allodial property into the hands of feudal lords. The feudal lords and their tenants had mutual obligations. Chief among these was that the tenants would have access to land sufficient for “replacement reproduction”.
As society has departed from agrarian subsistence, “replacement reproduction” is dependent not so much on land tenancy as on rent streams. In this respect, a reasonable approach would be Lysander Spooner’s notion of legitimate government as a mutual insurance company in which each member is a military aged man holding a voting share and that receives a dividend stream in exchange for obligations to protect the property rights of the wealthy, who pay higher premiums due to their greater insurance liabilities.
Social goods are then delivered to the public via the military aged men rather than government programs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Two points:
1). It’s easy to see how anti-civilization women are. Just look at the cities and towns where single mothers live. The places are Third World h*ll holes. It’s men who keep things up and running and enforce law and order. Remove the men and you remove the civilizing influence. This should have been long obvious, but sometimes we can’t see what’s right in front of our eyes.
2). The same kind of cuckservatives who think women “civilize” men, cannot for the life of them understand the popularity of “50 Shades.” It’s both hilarious and disturbing to read their takes on this. Recently, Dalrock observed that even though the book was written by a woman and bought by women, preachers still needed to find a way to blame men for women’s “sins,” so they blamed the fictional leading man in the book for leading women “astray.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Women have been led astray from day one in Eden… no surprise there.
The Devil doesn’t get a pass… and beta Adam paid the price too.
LikeLike
if we all descended from beta Adam, then aren’t we ALL beta males???
after all, we got the beta genes from Adam. (of course, Satan doesn’t get a pass)
The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex by Mr. Darwin rape!
LikeLike
SUCK MY COCK NIGGA. I’M COMING TO NYC AND KILLING YOUR SORRY ASS. This November, yeah!
Yeah!!!!
LikeLike
Ok CH, I’ll up it to $150 if you ban tomjones
LikeLiked by 1 person
He sired Cain as well (who likewise sired a mighty hunter or two, if you remember your Bible), dumbass, so your cockamamie, usual one-dimensional sort of thinking strikes again, go figger.
Just STFU for once until you know what you’re talking about… which should give us peace for a goodly spell.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
“Horses ain’t like people, man, they can’t make themselves better than they’re born.”
LikeLike
Let me know the specific date and I’ll make a reservation at the nearest Emergency Room for both of us… so they can extricate my size 12 foot from yo’ azz.
LikeLike
After a while, there’s something almost relaxing about Jonestein and Greg having at it. Reassures you that the sun will be coming up tomorrow, as it were.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Greg, brilliant point about Adam. Your post inspired me to text the following to a good friend of mine:
If Adam would have been TOUGHER with Eve, if he would’ve been more ASSERTIVE and MEAN, we would still be in paradise…
LikeLike
Adam was beta. Not as beta as Gregie.
LikeLike
“Having at it”? Is THAT what you call pulling the wings off of flies?
Meh… I’ll let youse yeggs know when a real fight with a worthy opponent comes along.
LikeLike
Victorianism brilliantly tricked every woman into thinking her own husband the world’s one and only true alpha male, and other women paragons of morality, thus reigning in the destructiveness of female sexuality.
Men lived by an obsequious code of chivalry in public, tricking all women into thinking them betas. Husbands, in private, acted entitled, making their wives think them alpha.
In addition, the myth of virtuous female nature made each women think her own hypergamous urges deviant.
It has been called “structural alpha”, and it was the bedrock of European Christian civilization until Freud came along and ruined everything.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Read Lady Chatterley..
On rich men..the sisters say something like “they are in our lives…but they are not really in our lives are they?”
Then she encourages the Lady to have an affair as she has had with her servants.
In Victorian times men were the money supply for women as they had nothing else.
LikeLike
Plus men back then were more alpha.
Everyday life was harder but also Britain conquered the world. Good old fashioned face to face wars were everywhere. British men fought in…Crimea…Boer…Ireland….WW1.
The Empire was lead by brilliant alphas.
The noble class were expected to lead armies and fight with valour.
They also brought back the spoils of war for their adoring women.
War particularly WW1 allowed all the classes to mix, in fighting in unity on the battlefield and they respected each other.
The working class respected the upper class leaders for their leadership and bravery.
James Bond is modelled on this hero class as is hilariously funny Lord Flashheart in Blackadder.
Enemy killer…drink some brandy.with a smirk .in celebration with a lady on your arm.
It is not like today were our Western leaders are all hated for being cowardly faggots.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The ‘Ovaton’ window.
heh
LikeLiked by 1 person
Civilization, culture, religion. etc. are male things – an expression of male genes. Women choose civilizations just like they choose males.
Tribalism is a male thing. The tribe, or the nation, is simply an extended family. Ethnicities are genetic clusters fighting and competing with each other, just like males fight each other for whose genes will go into the future.
Tribal conflict is the same as male lions fighting each other for the females. In chimps, that conflict was enlarged from individuals to groups and tribes. In humans – it was further enlarged to ethnicities, cultures, and civilizations competing with each other.
Males are the tribe and the culture and the nation – the critical genes. Males are a genetic filter and females chose from that filter. When one tribe conquers another, it usually kills or castrates the males and takes the females. The way for females to know who has the better genes is to let the competition between the males go through.
Studies show that females are less xenophobic, less group oriented, and care less about their own group compared to males. That makes sense – as it is not the females job to interfere in the fight between the males, (or between the ethnicities) just like female lions do not interfere in the male fight, but simply wait for the winner.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Disagree. Fighting is for children and women. Men are rational and settle differences in other ways. All the men who have attempted to fight me in my adult life where operating from fear. The issue they were having could have been resolved another way. They were simply furious like a gamma that I called them on their bullshit. Or were not following there mental model of me as a beta.
LikeLike
Plumpjack is mostly right
We can build whatever civilization we like subject to out true human and dare I say racial nature and material constraints if we have the will to do it
The current overproducing, atomized bullshit artist Neo-Cuck civilization isn’t however worth saving . A few bits here and there but we’d be better off without a lot of it including probably eventually the Internet I’m using right now.
LikeLike
Without the Internet I’d still be going to AA meetings thinking the only thing I need to do in life was “be nice”. There’s nothing wrong with the internet as a communication tool, it’s just that 99.75% of content on the internet is trash.
LikeLike
Oh, but that precious 0.25%.
Where you learn that NICE GUYS ALWAYS FINISH LAST.
And then you vow not to be a nice guy anymore.
LikeLike
Fighting for the status quo ante bellum is always a losing proposition, but it’s also usually the best motivator, because fighting for the future (a future the fighters’ might not even see) is a leap into the unknown.
That’s what we’re looking at right now, right here.
LikeLike
I suggest to adjust your viewpoint a bit
know that you like a god riff
LikeLike
Why’s she holding some weird device, blocking the view of the bewbs?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I heard that song on the radio this past weekend, and, so help me, they bleeped out the word “faggot” all three times it came up.
LikeLike
Yeah, they started that censoring of Money For Nothing awhile back… I have to laugh at all the old school “edgy” clowns of “rock and rock, man” who showed just how renegade they are, that something like “faggot” has to be quashed.
On a related note, I’ve even seen versions of Gladiator on TV where they bleeped out “queer” when Oliver Reed was dealing with that slaver and said
“Those giraffes you sold me last time, they won’t mate. They just walk around eating… and not mating. You sold me queer giraffes… I want my money back.”
Who’da thunk it?
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
A woman does not care if everyone lives in a grass hut as long as she has the best grass hut.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Haaaa
LikeLike
that’s right nigga, WE ARE DOOMED!!!
LikeLike
women like that are superficial and status whores. not LTR wifey material.
good decent women are happy with very little and don’t compare or envy what others have.
LikeLike
lol
ALL women are the same. ALL women are status whores.
LikeLike
to some extent sure. but like i said, many women are happy with very little.
my mother, my girl, and others i’ve known are happy to have small modest homes, be frugal with money, not into brand name crap, etc.
for example, my mother and my girl actually enjoy saving money for the household and think buying things for the brand name or to show off is vulgar and shallow. and that it’s their job to get the best value for the family dollar.
they both buy things on sale, make a lot of things themselves, mend clothes instead of replacing them, etc. they make food from scratch, want small simple homes instead of big places in the suburbs etc.
depends on the social circle you’re in. people have different value systems i suppose.
LikeLiked by 1 person
‘to some extent sure. but like i said, many women are happy with very little. ‘
I highly disagree with this statement.
Women are the main spenders and consumers. If it wasn’t for girls, most guys would be fine living in some glorified closet. It’s not men that pay thousands of dollars for a fucking bag. We made big purchases for shit we actually need.
LikeLike
i suppose that’s true for some or maybe a lot of women. but again, it depends on your social circle and the value systems of the people you are dealing with.
good quality women don’t need or want to waste your hard earned money on things. they value their man, their family, and their home and find happiness in simple pleasures not material possessions.
the women i know who spend money on name brand clothes, that much money on a bag, or demand a house that’s bigger than they need have empty shallow souls and aren’t LTR material to begin with.
LikeLike
FuriousFerret said:
“Women are the main spenders and consumers. If it wasn’t for girls, most guys would be fine living in some glorified closet. It’s not men that pay thousands of dollars for a fucking bag. We made big purchases for shit we actually need.”
The entire debt-ridden, disposable society we inhabit is based on female gullibility in making purchases. Do you think there is really that much difference in the most expensive shampoos or in cosmetics? Do men spend $150 on a haircut? Do women really need 100 different pairs of shoes? OK, maybe some fags do, but I’m talking about real males. However, don’t forget that males will spend more than necessary on a car, a boat, a country club membership, etc. The difference is that men learn from going into debt. They realize that debt is slavery. So, eventually they only get what they need and simplify their lives. With women, that rarely happens. They think spending that much is their entitlement. No wonder fathers used to have to provide a dowery to get rid of their daughters.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well behaved women
means
The pimp hand is strong
LikeLiked by 1 person
C, thank your lucky stars that you have women like that in your life, and PUTT MOAR WHITE BUNZ -> WHITE OVENZZZEZES
LikeLiked by 2 people
thanks oink and captain.
i am grateful for what i have and my pimp hand is as strong as it needs to be.
helps when you get better at picking good women who don’t require as much pimp hand though.
my mom set the standard so i always knew what i was looking for. it did take awhile for me to get to a place where i wasn’t going to waste any more of my time on women who didn’t measure up though. also, took time to become the kind of man i needed to be so i could get and keep a good one.
LikeLike
Fucking hell that should be COTW XD
LikeLike
Alex Jones goes full Nahzeee
Studio specially decorated for the occasion
lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
LikeLike
https://www.dailystormer.com/alex-jones-goes-full-nazi-while-threatening-infowars-staff-with-a-tomahawk-axe/
LikeLike
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-24/bernie-sanders-wife-under-fbi-investigation-bank-fraud
LikeLike
Fucking heh. Speaking of COTW, I found this gem in the comments section of a Maureen Dowd column at the NYT:
“Watching Donald Trump cause the complete meltdown of liberals and destruction of the political dynasties on both sides, along with turning the mainstream media into nothing more than a glorified National Enquirer, has been the greatest political event of my life so far.
[….]
With Trump, we have somebody who is finally fighting for us. It’s been a long time since we had a President who cared about our country. We are revolting against our Democrat/Socialist over-lords. And it feels good 🙂
Nobody bothered to reply but a fellow Trump supporter.
Steady, constant demoralization of the enemy is beauuutiful sight to behold.
LikeLike
James Garner’s character in “The Americanization of Emily” rightfully put the cause of war on cheerleaders. Those are largely women. The white feathers of the WW1 for instance.
LikeLike
Liberal, America-hating, bull dyke college professor hates white males and says Otto deserved to die: http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/06/24/otto-warmbier-college-professor-blasted-got-what-he-deserved
LikeLike
I kinda wish men were on board with the idea, I think I’d get a lot more pussy… At least till someone caved my head in 😛
LikeLike
LikeLike
There is a better world
LikeLike
This is how we JEW it!!!!!
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
Lobster sex with Rebecca Goyette, NYU ‘Professor’
http://www.rebogallery.com/lobsta-rollin.html
https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2017/02/05/unhinged-nyu-professor-whose-hissy-fit-went-viral-turns-out-to-be-lobster-porn-artist/
The time of judgement is coming and this time we will fight together and bring order
LikeLike
Lobster se x with Rebecca Goyette, NYU ‘Professor’
http://www.rebogallery.com/lobsta-rollin.html
The time of judg ement is coming and this time we will fig*ht together and bring Örder
LikeLike
When I first learned of how (((Simon & Garfunkel))) had squirted anti-Civilizational diarrhea all over the lyrics of Scarborough Fair, it was a huge slap upside the head on my journey to realizing that (((their race))) is tribe of genetic psychopaths, he11 bent on destroying everything which is beautiful and good and True.
LikeLike
I was not aware that Simon & Garfunkel were defilers. I ask myself what is (((their))) problem? Is it envy? Is it genetically? How can there be a Itzak Perlman on one hand and on the other the foulest garbage you can imagine.
Just help me: who controls the porn-business?
LikeLike
And she’s Catholic too. Does lots of religious music as well as classical and Japanese.
LikeLike
Check this out Carlos:
https://www.jpc.de/jpcng/classic/detail/-/art/Louis-Le-Prince-Missa-Macula-non-est-in-te-1663/hnum/3343136?iampartner=spon6&awc=150&awa=1261&gclid=CNOJ5Ljm3dQCFc-w7Qod1v0BXw
LikeLike
Louis Le Prince
LikeLike
White people in Europe and their ancestors in America have one obvious biological shortage (but advantage to civilisation) they are conformists. The history of Europe is full of executions and torchure. That is how they were selected to be obedient, and follow non-biologicals goals in science and pure art.
Facism is a part of Europe, it is like a killing machine created merely for protection. Very brutal and heartless. Because conformism of white people makes them vulnerable to biologically driven asians, blacks and women to some extent. You just can not delve into mathematics, you have special brain for, and at the same time straggle with people driven only by biological goals of domination, sex, food and brain laziness. You just need smth artificial to shield yourself from those forces of primate evolution.
LikeLike
Only problem with that theory is that all the other races were big on executions and torture too. Torture of prisoners was pretty much an Indian pastime, and they’ve found fairly extensive pre-Columbian archaeological evidence of appalling mutilation to large numbers of people.
Don’t even get me started on African tribes, which Burton aptly termed “murderous despotisms.”
Myself, I think it’s a combination of IQ and behavioral flexibility that gave the Europeans their edge. The Asians have the IQ but lack the same level of behavioral flexibility, so, for example, they make gunpowder then let it remain as a few fireworks for centuries until the Europeans come rolling in and sell them some guns.
IQ+imagination let us dominate the world for a while. Unfortunately, it also made us susceptible to being (((hacked)))…
LikeLike
No one on this Earth is more conformist than East Asians.
They are THE Hive Mind.
Islamized peeps are very conformist, too, out of necessity.
Even the tiniest step out of line could mean d3@th.
Africans are very conformist – out of an inability to be otherwise.
Latin Americans are pretty conformist, it’s a relatively monolithic culture from Tijuana to Tierra del Fuego, they don;’t have anywhere near as many variants and subcultures as North America or Europe do.
If anything, NW and Central Euros – and their descendants overseas – are the least conformist people on Earth.
LikeLike
As one can see by this very site — we’re probably more like-minded compared to each other than we are compared to the general population, yet we disagree intensely — sometimes bitterly and verbal groin-kicking and eye-gouging — over a large number of pretty important topics, too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wouldn’t be so bad if assholes like you could cool with the Jew-hunting.
LikeLike
Most of the ass-kicking entails (ahem) discussion amongst those of us who are not actually like-minded, nor allies to The Cause…
… rather, it’s beating down the shills who are purposely trying to disrupt the band o’ brothers, eeyores and Debbie Downers, and loser dweebs who want to hang around with the cool guys, but also want to spout off wherever and whenever they feel like it.
LikeLike
‘If anything, NW and Central Euros – and their descendants overseas – are the least conformist people on Earth.’
I think the future BELONGS to conformist peoples. In particular, east asians and their asiany conformism. If anything, lack of conformity is Death on this planet.
LikeLike
Think of all the TIME wasted when whites have fought each other -least conformist people indeed
protestant vs. catholic, catholic vs. eastern orthodox, lutheran vs. baptist. jesuits vs. mainstream catholic. Manchester United vs. Liverpool, Red Sox vs. Yankees. -all those pointless civil wars…
LikeLike
“As one can see by this very site — we’re probably more like-minded compared to each other than we are compared to the general population, yet we disagree intensely — sometimes bitterly and verbal groin-kicking and eye-gouging — over a large number of pretty important topics, too.”
Yea, you guys are a bunch of assholes. What if you just tried being civil and not accusing everyone else of being a Jew every time they disagree with you?
God forbid, I know.
LikeLike
Hey, ML, muh Jew, how’s it goin’ this morning?
Talk about low-hanging fruit.
LikeLike
Listen, ML… the chateau is pestered over-long by disruptive shills, (((usual suspect))) agitprop apparatchiks, and plain old South Park dweebs.
So when someone new comes along with Debbie Downer messages of gloom and doom, how the FUCK do you expect us to react?
You want civil, join a social club.
You want to step up and secure a future for White children, then get with the program and quit posting discouragement with a disingenuous protest of making RealTalk..
LikeLike
Asians have higher IQs than whites. So your argument is null and void. The problem with whites is simply a lack of honor.
LikeLike
Translation: ” I’m a dweeb no Blonde wants”
IQ ?
Honor?
lolzlzolzlzol
LikeLiked by 1 person
stuff you will never see on bbc
LikeLike
nor this
LikeLike
Well that’s about the most encouraging sight I’ve seen since the wee hours of the morning of Wednesday, November 9th, 2016.
LikeLike
Watchers of BBC World will be familiar with their little “This Week in History” vignettes featuring old footage which they shew in between broadcasts. Well, what do you know, this week they’re featuring that day in 1993 when, according to the BBC, “Neo-Nazis storm peace negotiations in Johannesburg.” Yes, that’s the exact phrase they use. There was nothing Neo-Nazi at all about Eugene Terreblanche and his protest against traitors who were signing his country away, but the BBC wants to make sure brains are sufficiently washed.
Rope!
LikeLike
Decent turnout in DC today.
LikeLike
What group is this? I don’t think I’ve ever seen that symbol.
LikeLike
Identity Evropa. Damigo’s group. That’s Spencer in the middle.
LikeLike
Identity Europa, I believe.
LikeLike
many symbols. zero white babeez.
Epic. Failure.
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
Why are they eating themselves to death?
The boredom of modernity is causing people to lose their minds [maybe even without any nudging from The Frankfurt School].
LikeLike
Belgium Health Minister
LikeLike
Don’t take an Olympic Athlete for this Job. Don’t take a Veteran as head of the Army. Don’t take the brightest mind as head of education. Don’t dream of a society based on merits, don’t think about meritocracy. We are all equal…
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
#dagoyimknow
LikeLiked by 1 person
C, can you explain the bird picture to me?
I don’t get the symbolism.
LikeLike
not symbolism – a parallel between those who want to prohibit birds to fly and
(((those))) who want to forbid thinking people to think
In long term both are futile exercises
That bird by accident defiling the prohibition sign is equivalent to that CA shitlord who was the first to come with #dagoyimknow sign
LikeLike
Not so sure about this. Moslems subjugate their women and are still strife wridden. Women shittesting men is as old a time itself. Women trending towards fat, ugly, noisy and annoying cuntholes has hardly improved their lot.
Certainly it has been observed that male chimps become more violent and aggressive when female chimps are present. Moral is, don’t be a chimp.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Because they are Muslim. Islam has never built a civilization.
LikeLike
As steel sharpens steel, (wo)man sharpens man.
LikeLike
Nonsens
Praising the Lord and Passing the Ammunition sharpens the man.
LikeLike
OT, Poland gets it:
http://teoinfo.com/2017/06/25/tens-of-thousands-of-christians-in-poland-take-over-the-streets-to-fight-islam-and-leftism/
LikeLiked by 1 person
https://twitter.com/hashtag/OpenBordersForIsrael?src=hash
LikeLike
Civilizations and empires are built on co-operation among men. This is only possible if men make absolute laws about who the women belong to. Whether it is the Romans or the Mongols, anybody who messes with another warrior’s woman is a dead man, as is the woman. When society gets weak, they hire the tribal Goths who still know that their strength lies in bands of men, not in institutions, wealth, or display. It’s all about loyalty between men.
LikeLike
Which reminds me again about that article I read recently about carnivory in chimps.
Not only are most chimps who hunt male, they share the meat they take with other male chimps, thus creating alliances that give them a dominant position in their primitive society.
Thus the warband begins its appearance in another species — while giving us a clear indication of the basis on which the strength of our own societies depends. Constructive alliances between aggressive men which enables creation of a strong, well-defended structure that endures over time.
LikeLike
LikeLike
It’s always the most cunty manjawed academia womyn that act like they have discovered the cure for cancer for stating the obvious, Then everyone fawns over them like they some mystical unicorn.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aaah Miss Paglia. Notice how feminine her face is compared to most feminist cunts.
LikeLike
I notice how she has a haircut modeled after one of the male executives of ‘Mad Men’.
LikeLike
So ah goes up to Ms. Paglia and ah sez:
“Hey there, Camille honey… why the long face?”
LikeLike
Hey Rum. What is it with you dating a 15 year old? Dude… you should have seen her 3 years ago..
LikeLike
Roosh chronicled the results of the Dutch survivor (Expeditie Robinson) episode where men and women we put on separate islands:
Here is what happened: initially both groups were dropped on their respective islands, given some supplies to get started and left to fend for themselves. In both groups there was some initial squabbling as people tried to figure out a local hierarchy. The men pretty much did whatever they felt was necessary – there was no leader giving orders. Men who felt like hunting, foraging or fishing did so. Another guy decided he was fed up with sitting on sand and started making benches. Others built a hut that gradually grew and evolved. Another guy cooked every night. Within days a neat little civilization was thriving, each day being slightly more prosperous than the previous one.
The women settled into a routine as well. The hung up a clothesline to dry their towels, then proceeded to sunbathe and squabble. Because unlike men, women were unable to do anything without consensus of the whole group. And because it was a group of at least a dozen women, consensus was never reached. During the next few episodes, the women ate all their initial supplies, got drenched by tropical storms several times, were eaten alive by sand fleas and were generally miserable. The men on the other hand, were quite content. There were disagreements of course, but they were generally resolved.
Eventually, the people running the program decided something had to change. In order to help the women out, three men would be selected to go to their island. In return, three women would take their place at the men’s island. The look on my feminist roommates face during this episode was priceless.
Initially, the three men selected for the women’s island were ecstatic, for obvious reason. But then they arrived at the island and were greeted by the women.
‘Where is your hut?’, they asked.
‘We have no hut’
‘Where are your supplies?’ they asked, dismayed
‘We ate all the rice’
And so on. The three men ended up working like dogs, using all the skills developed by trial and error in their first few weeks – building a hut, fish, trying to get the women to forage. The women continued to bitch and sunbathe. The three women who were sent to the men’s island were delighted – food, shelter and plenty of male attention was freely available. They too continued to sunbathe.
LikeLike
I’m expecting my first this Fall and women I know are aware of this. Don’t know what it is..maybe they live fertile men or my increased zfg now but a few have come on to me.
Now that’s fucked up.
LikeLike
The problem with whites is overthinking. Sitting around philo-soph-izing (like CH and King) while abdullah is banging and producing 15 kids.
muh dik and muh Allah will win. Simple. Easy. No thinking required.
Now, you MIGHT be right and the Christian God will save us but I’m not holding my breath. Miracles do happen…
LikeLike
They really don’t happen. Which is why people sit around praying for them. You were right up to that line.
LikeLike
ML == (((Muh Labia)))
LikeLike
Damn, Cap’n… that latest meme of yours is actually starting to peel my wall paper.
LikeLike
Good Christ.
IT’S US.
LikeLike
And there you have it – human ‘civilization’, encapsuled in 1 episode of a ‘reality’ show.
LikeLike
It makes it a lot harder to get motivated to fight the ZOG when you realize that kind of thing. They also pick full blown retards for those shows. Those regions are full of bamboo. You can eat that and especially the shoots. It’s actually kind of hard to starve in the jungle. That show Naked and Afraid was the worst of all in this genre.
LikeLike
2 Thessalonians 3:10
The wisdom of Scripture applies everywhere: you don’t work, you don’t eat.
Had these men been good Christians, they would have known how to keep the women on the path to righteousness. 😉
LikeLike
Instead, the women lifted their skirts and said it first.,
LikeLike
Avaunt, impious jackanapes!
LikeLike
But Greg, how to get a girl to send nudes of herself is the #Number 1# post again!!!!
2 Thessalonians has been defeated by beta thirst!
LikeLike
Thirsty betas gonna thirst… this is why we lose. Said it dozens of times already, here at the chateau.
But before you do your happy dance, (((no-bones))), know this: Scripture doesn’t get defeated, and God reserves stripes for the backs of fools who think HE can be mocked.
You got no bones… no Scripture… no case… no dick.
LikeLike
Lolzozozoz
Women with Star of David flags told to leave Chicago gay pride march – Fox News
https://apple.news/AVgmdGejMTE6w8Xfl1JXKEA
Clueless faggot left eating their own (((backers))).
LikeLike
EVERYONE hates Jews.
LikeLike
Pretty pathetic when even the LGTB community won’t have you. kekekekek
LikeLike
the messers become the messies!
LikeLike
Unless you can have multiple hot sex loving wives, all below 25, and they leave you alone, its just not worth it. They have your kids, get all messed up, bodies garbage by 35, they become total cunts, and tske all your money, the kids grow up to be fags and whores and you can even beat them or disown them, or youll be exposed on social media.
Just play warcraft or whatever.
LikeLike
I wonder how much what we are seeing of the degeneracy is only more amplified because of social media, cultural indoctrination, and population growth.
LikeLike
And a happy Monday to you too, Joe Btfsplk.
LikeLike
? the pimp hand is week with this one
LikeLike
Then God looked over all he had made, and he saw that it was very good!
LikeLike
It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.
Helper, oh weak minded one, HELPER
LikeLike
Well, whatever you’re the judge of, you’re sure not Judge Roy Bean. One of these modern overweight diarrhea-squirting lezzy feminist judges, mayhaps?
LikeLike
Eeyore couldn’t judge a can o’ corn fly ball on a Little League field.
LikeLike
In that sleep and in sleeps to follow the judge did visit. Who would come other? A great shambling mutant, silent and serene. Whatever his antecedents he was something wholly other than their sum, nor was there system by which to divide him back into his origins for he would not go. Whoever would seek out his history through what unraveling of loins and ledgerbooks must stand at last darkened and dumb at the shore of a void without terminus or origin and whatever science he might bring to bear upon the dusty primal matter blowing down out of the millennia will discover no trace of any ultimate atavistic egg by which to reckon his commencing. In the white and empty room he stood in his bespoken suit with his hat in his hand and he peered down with his small and lashless pig’s eyes wherein this child just sixteen years on earth could read whole bodies of decisions not accountable to the courts of men and he saw his own name which nowhere else could he have ciphered out at all logged into the records as a thing already accomplished, a traveler known in jurisdictions existing only in the claims of certain pensioners or on old dated maps.
In his delirium he ransacked the linens of his pallet for arms but there were none. The judge smiled. The fool was no longer there but another man and this other man he could never see in his entirety but he seemed an artisan and a worker in metal. The judge enshadowed him where he crouched at his trade but he was a coldforger who worked with hammer and die, perhaps under some indictment and an exile from men’s fires, hammering out like his own conjectural destiny all through the night of his becoming some coinage for a dawn that would not be. It is this false moneyer with his gravers and burins who seeks favor with the judge and he is at contriving from cold slag brute in the crucible a face that will pass, an image that will render this residual specie current in the markets where men barter. Of this is the judge judge and the night does not end.
LikeLike
Blackpillers: (((They))) want you to take the blackpill to be discouraged and disenfranchised.
LikeLike
Shut up filthy goy liar.
LikeLike
Ha tongue in cheek I suppose. Don’t get loose with these Cap, reserve the shiv for the demoralizers. Post “election-high” moral among the troops is low, as it will be during limbo. It’s been 6 months blackpillers, chill.
LikeLike
Windows 10 is (((propagandizing))) 80 million office workers today with the message that only 6% of female degrees are STEM.
OUT OF CONTROL.
FUCK THIS JEW EARTH.
LikeLike
When?
We go the way of Rome or not?
LikeLike
poor women
LikeLike
http://www.theoccidentalobserver%5B.%5Dnet/authors/Darkmoon-ArtII.html
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 1 person
Germany’s rising soccer star 21 year old Niklas Sule
Right now 1930s haircuts are all the rage in Germany
Maybe there’s hope yet
LikeLike
still doing the rounds, saupreiss? I protest this incompetent waste of MY euro-tax!
&
Kiss my Habsburg Popish anus, God Damned BND plant
LikeLike
1930’s haircuts trumped by n1gger mural in the background?
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
Did the Ulmer Münster and/or the Kölner Dom have to schedule double service to accommodate the throng of youngsters clamoring to attend Mass?!?
THAT would be hope.
LikeLike
Greg – I’m not saying it’s an ideal situation!
LikeLike
Anyway Greg the point is with that physiognomy a young kid in Germany now has a 6’4” shitlord to have as a hero instead of the usual non whites or white faggots.
LikeLike
and Trump is having that affect here in the US in my circle. Seen a few examples of shitlib parents with shitlib daughter 18 – 25 years but shitlord son 12-18 years who likes Trump.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Greg is feeling ornery today. Pay him no mind on this one, we know he digs the shitlord look.
LikeLike
No question, I’m glad when young Whites have other Whites to look up to…
… but as long as things like that abomination behind them decorate the walls of their hang-outs, well… still (((shakin’ mah haid))).
Next time have Detlef and his cougar pose elsewhere, if you’re lookin’ to lift spirits.
Otherwise, the subliminal agitprop taints the effort. That WAS accidental, wasn’t it? :duckface
Also: what oink said about them cathedrals. ;-).
LikeLike
Who’s the cougar digging her claws into this alleged shitloard? She looks like she might even be a decade or so older than he.
LikeLike
The cougar is my first ex-girlfriend (10 years ago). I don’t mind if this dude has my leftovers…
LikeLike
Who’s the cougar digging her claws into this alleged shitloard? She looks like she might even be a decade or so older than he.
It’s good to know SOME people have standards around here. Why I bet she has a stinky pussy and hairy arm pits too! Why, I wouldn’t fuck that with Oink’s dick wrapped in Tom Jones mouth.
LikeLike
Okay, wise guy… enlighten me. Thus far, all the touting of “shitlord” I hear ’round chere says a girl should be not only younger/hotter/tighter, but MUCH younger than the man.
Look at the bags under this cooze’s eyes, and that plow of a jaw, and then tell me THAT’S what a 21 year old shitlord should be parading around town.
If he were 41, then I’d say “shitlord”. Right now, it looks like he’s got an Oedipal complex.
Can’t have it BOTH ways on separate days, mates.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
only a cath-cuck could rationalize committing a deadly sin and messing his own family for a shot at a skanks’ barren womb … not even an Anabaptist could stoop so low.
otoh, you murdered fellow Christians for a fistful of fiat shekels,
so there’s that
LikeLike
Men will sacrifice themselves for the group, women will sacrifice the group for themselves.
LikeLike
[…] Source link […]
LikeLike
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-25/report-democrats-are-about-hang-debunked-trump-dossier
LikeLike
Well, it’s good to see that there are at least SOME (((MSM))) sources also reporting on this…
But as far as hanging Dems go, I’ll stick by my usual Missouri outlook when it comes to ZH.
As usual, “hope they’re right, but not gonna believe it ’til I see it” rape!
LikeLike
Yes, definitely “it would be nice if it happened” territory. Along with Udo Voigt replacing Merkel as leader of Germany…
LikeLike
It’s an editorial speculating on the future of the Democrats, like all the other Zero Hedge articles Greg thinks are made up.
LikeLike
If it’s speculation, then it should be reported as if fact.
The only time ZH gets it right is when it’s already happened.
This isn’t rocket surgery, Danger. (((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
It wasn’t reported as fact; it was extrapolating on recent events and speculating on the likelihood of them occurring. Don’t be a dumbshit know it all who is covering for not reading the article but trash talking it anyway. It isn’t rocket science. You of all people here, have zero business critiquing the media others suggest. Don’t make me tell you this again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ten point to Carlos Danger: Greg is a ‘dumbshit know it all’.
lol
LikeLike
Try to backpedal all you want, the very title of the article starts with Report:, not to mention the link is subcategorized under news..
This isn’t how an editorial or :”speculation” get introduced… nice try, but dumbshit yourself.
.You can’t get out of your own way.
More importantly, you just can’t admit when you’re wrong, and then get petulant when you get called on your fake news.
Next time, wait for the orange jumpsuits to show up, or tell your buddies over at ZH to label an editorial as such, like journalism is supposed to work.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
Heh, heh… the fact that no-bones is rushing in to congratulate you should tell you something, Danger…
… especially since he’s so gleeful and awarding 10 points that Report: means Editorial.
I expect such wadism and assholery from the likes of him… beware that his ilk doesn’t become your sole cheerleaders here.
LikeLike
What I do is to be the best I can…strong, in shape, intelligent, well dressed, dominant
Walk around like we own the Western World and when we start to take it back, the non whites I believe will abandon their coalition and fight between themselves as to who gets on our ship.
They know we are superior. Their women want us…and all talk about white privilege or equality will be tossed aside as they scramble to get on.
LikeLike
Jewish leaders rethink ties with Netanyahu, Israeli government
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/06/26/jewish-leaders-rethink-ties-with-israeli-government.html
LikeLike
It’s on Fox News, so it must be true.
Amongst their own, it’s “two Jews, three opinions”…
… but don’t count on any meaningful schisms when it comes to “Us First. Always.”
LikeLike
The key point is that 40% of all articles on (((CNN))) and (((Cux News))) explicitly concern Jews, which supposedly affects only 2% of readership, and (((the oblivious ones))) think we don’t notice.
LikeLike
**on the shibboleth that women civilize men and not the other way around. **
We see more and more evidence every day that that is simply not the case.
LikeLike
Why is this guy flirting with his sister? Eeeeew.
LikeLike
Off topic but good news,
Trump`s travel ban mostly reinstated,
http://www.dailywire.com/news/17942/trump-wins-supreme-court-tosses-most-injunctions-ben-shapiro
its also on Breitbart
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great news! But in ten years President Malia Obama will deport Donald Trump and the entire Trump clan…
LikeLike
in 10 years Malia Obama will be 28.
LikeLike
“in 10 years Malia Obama will be 28.”
Not if they can’t find her Birth Certificate or school transcripts she won’t be.
LikeLike
Pay no mind to (((no-bones))). His rent is due soon and he’s gotta fulfill his quota.
LikeLike
I first read that as Malik Obama. Now that’s a candidacy I could get behind.
LikeLike
…But in ten years President Malia Obama will deport Donald Trump and the entire Trump clan…
You mean that is what you are wishing will happen.
LikeLike
I don’t think this could ever be off topic. It’s a small win, but we’ll take it. Assuming the frog doesn’t jump out of the pot first, its going to be cooled very slowly from now on, just like its been boiled very slowly for the past 50 years.
LikeLike
This is comforting to the erstwhile protesters as well…
… you know, the ones who touted “rule of law” so highly when the bush league courts were making their 180 degree decisions.
LikeLike
oh no he didn’t just so that!
“So, yes.
President Trump just casually accused Obama of treason on Twitter this morning.
The Trump Train, it seems, has merely been chugging at a brisk pace for the last two years.
We’re now speeding up a bit.
This is the President of the United States accusing the former President of treason.
That is a thing that just happened this morning.”
https://www.dailystormer.com/this-morning-the-president-of-the-united-states-accused-his-predecessor-of-treason-on-twitter/
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
I thoaight cucktrump said Hillary would be in jail?
LikeLike
*
LikeLike
Went to the link, then made a poor decision and went to a link at that link, about the Supreme Court Anal Cake decision. I hope SCOTUS rules against the fags, and that I never read “anal cakes” ever again.
LikeLike
That’s Moochelle’s pet name for Obummer.
LikeLike
ok, I can tolerate it now, thanks. OT, but this starter to a movie review from Anglin: “Well, it turns out people who enjoy watching gigantic robots fight each other are not the same sort of people who like being lectured by uppity little spic skanks.”
M7 approved.
LikeLiked by 1 person
i searched for that line and found the article. good stuff.
LikeLike
LikeLike
good for a couple guffaws;
2005-“edgy” in 2017
but it turned quick to sjw’isms and ((kvetching))
The (()) be showing
LikeLike
not to mention that a blonde infant is the butt of the joke
LikeLike
Ew.
LikeLike