The greatest disconnect between whom a man claims to love and whom he really loves is that produced when asking him his thoughts on the superiority of the virgin bride. You’ll hear variations of the following from him:
“Hey man, I don’t care who’s she’s slept with as long as I’m her last dick.”
“Nah don’t matter, as long as she’s spreading for me.”
“How can I ask a girl to be a virgin when I have so many notch counts?”
“I want an experienced woman, not a dead fish.”
“What’s the diff? Pussy is pussy.”
These are all male hamster rationalization droppings, intended to conceal a deep truth that most men are uncomfortable revealing to themselves, let alone to any women they’re sizing up for long-term commitment. Men prefer virgins, and the preference is universal. The gynarchic West may have made it inconvenient to satisfy that male preference, or to even announce that preference out loud without threat of job loss and social pariah status, but that doesn’t mean the preference has been abolished. The primal code isn’t trifled with.
The CH explanation for this innate male preference to be the sole pumper of a virgin (and the numberless dumper of a slut) has been to invoke the paternity certainty clause: Men don’t get pregnant and bear children, so they have to be sure the women they choose to make honest are the sort to stay sexually faithful and guarantee any children of their unions are in fact fused tissues of their own seed.
And ¡SCIENCE! has been bearing this maxim out: Slutty women are a bad bet for marriage. The likelihood of marital disruption is greater if you have hitched your sunk opportunity costs and roughhoused wallet to a veteran cock carousel rider. Cheating is a surefire way to disrupt marital harmony.
Over eons of mutually co-evolving love and romance and righteous dickings, the virgin bride was prized by men (and prized as a condition to retain by women) because men could be near-certain that a child with a virgin would be his (and virgin women could be as nearly certain the love of an alpha male was theirs). Bedding down in legal limbo with a slut whose snatch has scarfed up a scud missile’s length of schlong is asking for a cucked effacing, a divorce raping, or a dignity scraping. The slut may put out sooner, but she’ll make you pay for it later.
Tantalizingly, ¡SCIENCE! may have stumbled on another, related, reason to explain why men prefer virgins.
Male Microchimerism in the Human Female Brain
In humans, naturally acquired microchimerism has been observed in many tissues and organs. Fetal microchimerism, however, has not been investigated in the human brain. Microchimerism of fetal as well as maternal origin has recently been reported in the mouse brain. In this study, we quantified male DNA in the human female brain as a marker for microchimerism of fetal origin (i.e. acquisition of male DNA by a woman while bearing a male fetus). Targeting the Y-chromosome-specific DYS14 gene, we performed real-time quantitative PCR in autopsied brain from women without clinical or pathologic evidence of neurologic disease (n = 26), or women who had Alzheimer’s disease (n = 33). We report that 63% of the females (37 of 59) tested harbored male microchimerism in the brain. Male microchimerism was present in multiple brain regions. Results also suggested lower prevalence (p = 0.03) and concentration (p = 0.06) of male microchimerism in the brains of women with Alzheimer’s disease than the brains of women without neurologic disease. In conclusion, male microchimerism is frequent and widely distributed in the human female brain.
63% of women tested had male DNA in their brains. The primary culprit in this study appears to be male fetuses, but prior studies have found male DNA infusion from other sources, and though it’s speculative at this point the possibility exists that one source of male microchimerism is sexual intercourse.
In conclusion, data suggest that male microchimerism in young girls may originate from an older brother either full born or from a discontinued pregnancy or from transfusion during pregnancy. We speculate that sexual intercourse may be important but other sources of male cells likely exist in young girls.
If sex implants tiny cargo holds of male DNA into a woman’s body — a big if at this stage of research — then it’s plausible that the male preference for virgins ensues from a subconscious desire of men to avoid having children with a skank whose vagina has hosted a spunk parade that could festoon his precious DNA-carrying vessel with the spermtastic spangles of past dangles.
The gbfm summary:
lotsa cockas, bastard totsas.
***
FYI chimerism is one of the leading theories to explain the persistence of low levels of homosexuality despite the huge reproductive hit the condition incurs in those afflicted (pathogens and genetic susceptibility are the other contending theories). The chimerism theory states that early in pregnancy the winning fetus absorbs genetic material from the losing fetus (which is never born), and in some cases this will mean female fetus DNA embeds in the male fetus’s brain, somehow altering the sexual orientation of his brain architecture. Just putting it out there.

not to give sluts a nanometer of leeway, but the way the study is worded it sounds like the the sexual intercourse and terminated pregnancies they were referring to were those of their mothers, not of the 10-15yo girls themselves. am I reading this incorrectly?:
“The aim of the present study was to examine the presence of male microchimerism in a cohort of healthy nulliparous Danish girls aged 10-15 y using DNA extracted from cells from whole blood (buffy coats) and report the association with potential sources of male cells. A total of 154 girls were studied of which 21 (13.6%) tested positive for male microchimerism. There was a tendency that girls were more likely to test positive for male microchimerism if their mothers previously had received transfusion, had given birth to a son or had had a spontaneous abortion. Furthermore, the oldest girls were more likely to test positive for male microchimerism. However, less than half of microchimerism positivity was attributable to these factors. In conclusion, data suggest that male microchimerism in young girls may originate from an older brother either full born or from a discontinued pregnancy or from transfusion during pregnancy. We speculate that sexual intercourse may be important but other sources* of male cells likely exist in young girls.”
*one of those “other sources” could also be kissing, since saliva contains trace amounts of DNA.
LikeLiked by 1 person
if they ARE talking about the source of the make DNA coming through the girls themselves, then 21 girls is probably the exact number of non-virgins. the study’s authors needed to include that one very important piece of information.
LikeLike
*male
LikeLike
dear hearteitsz,
da gbf is a very learned man but wot is dis mysterious word you speak of “virgin”?
where might i meet one of dese of legal age in da united states circa 2017?
and perfereably da gbfm would like one under 253 lbs.
thank you sirz
lozozzzlzzozozlzozozozozo
LikeLike
Is this your first time hearing the word “virgin?”
LikeLike
Female virgins have been extinct in the west for almost a century now, although I’ve heard rumors of them reappearing in the Caliphate owned regions of the planet.
Male virgins on the other hand, are legion in the west:
View story at Medium.com
LikeLiked by 1 person
Damn, she had to have doubled up on some days to get to that total in four months.
Even if 1 out of 4 dates ended in a bang, that’s about 37 bangs in one quarter of the year.
And she’s still lonely.
LikeLike
it’s a he… blue pilled and blue balled
LikeLike
“In conclusion, male microchimerism is frequent and widely distributed in the human female brain.”
Dis is why she always days, “GBFM you’re alwysz on my mind.”???
And I always thought it was because she had her head up her ass?
zlzoozzozooozozzo
LikeLiked by 2 people
lzoozozozozozozoolozozozz
What if someone took the “Post-Modern” method and turned it against itself? THE RECKONING: THE LEGEND OF MCCOY MOUNTAIN AND THE GOLD 45 REVOLVER seems to do just that.
Imagine, if you will, a script for a movie that obviously recalls THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT. But it seems to be a parody? Ah, you say to yourself, a horror-comedy. How avant-garde! With additional references to, let’s say, the Leone/Eastwood Westerns, and Guns’n’Roses, and even maybe a little Dante? It’s pastiche, right? It’s hip, it’s funny, and it’s probably all “just a joke”, right? Harmless fun for the Sundance family!
THE RECKONING is a remarkable journey that begins by pretending it might actually be all those things and nothing more. Part of the insidious genius of its method is how it uses this cloak of “knowing appropriation” to lure its readers (or potential future viewers) into a state of trusting complacency, indulging them with a lot of knowing winks and funny asides (and this IS, quite often, excruciatingly funny) before springing upon them an incredible trap. For THE RECKONING is indeed playing for high stakes, and for keeps– yet it’s only at perhaps the half-way mark that the unwary audience finally begins to recognize, with a shiver of disturbance, that the whole thing truly is not what it seemed.
But back to the beginning. Mary McCoy is an ambitious graduate student, seeking glory as an auteur in the independent film world. We first meet her reciting the words of Abraham Lincoln into a camera operated by her nameless boyfriend. The young lovers are playful, but show signs of fraying on each other’s nerves. There are also signs they each are uncomfortable with their selves– the lack of purpose, of exalted ideals, endemic to contemporary culture. Mary in particular is given to earnest speeches and recitations, but it’s unclear how well she believes in these things. Does she take the lessons of poets and heroes from the past to heart, or are they to her just the literary flotsam of her expensive education?
The subject of their movie is the haunted legend of Mary’s Civil War-era forebear, Johnny Ranger McCoy. Mary‘s attitude is ambiguous: does she truly revere the memory of this ancestor, or is his story just a prop for her to use to make her name? Is the legendary haunting just a rural myth, or does his spectre still haunt the mountain? And was old McCoy a hero and martyr, or a hateful figure of shame?
These are questions the story leaves tantalizing the reader for many pages, and their relevance expands as the story continues and the cast enlarges. THE RECKONING engages in a clever game of push/pull with its audience, introducing serious themes and then dosing out shots of outrageous satire, leaving the spectator increasingly curious yet strangely dazed, as secrets from the past, conflicting accounts, and disturbing temptations start to mount for our protagonists. Yet it’s not until perhaps past the halfway mark that we truly realize we are now in terra incognita: a frightening, darkling matrix of divided loyalties, disclosed betrayals, and potentially murderous mayhem all–possibly–overlooked by a supernatural force that is testing them and finding them wanting. The Post-Modernism has, all of a sudden, stopped being a game–but without our heroes getting warned beforehand. And if they are to be saved, they will have to arm themselves with an ancient wisdom, recharging from a source they are terrified to confront.
Without giving too much away, I think I can say THE RECKONING is a story about transformation. But the transformations in question are so complex as to defy easy summary. The difficulty of redemption seems itself to be a principal theme here, and at times, in the thick of recriminations, we may wonder who the real hero is. Readers (or future viewers) are likely to come away with a lot to argue about, perhaps with questions that will demand a second read (or viewing) even to come to grips with. Yet THE RECKONING offers so many challenges to the complacent “narrative” of modern society–a society it reveals to be stricken with a plague of evils, some covert, others hidden in plain sight– that the sheer weight of its indictment forces a response. Add to that the fact it is excruciatingly funny, in a way to provoke riotous laughter sometimes before the meaning even sneaks across the threshold of consciousness, and we have in THE RECKONING a positively “dangerous” book, and a movie Hollywood would sooner burn than release. And yet, who knows?–perhaps one day it will be made.
So with that said, what can we offer as a hint to THE RECKONING’s final purpose? Homer’s ILIAD begins by invoking the righteous wrath of Achilles; Odysseus struggles to return and reclaim his hearth and home. Moses ascends the mountain to receive the law from God. And Prince Hamlet must communicate with a father’s spirit, back from the dead, in order to expose the incestuous corruption at the heart of a fallen kingdom. I cite all these, not to demonstrate I stayed awake during Great Books (in fact, I started to sleep in instead of trudging off to class once they started in on Toni Morrison novels lolz), but because I suspect all of these exalted precedents were in the back of the author’s mind and inform the story he sets forth. Come to think of it, many of them are right there on the page! And while their relevance to the story might at first seem confusing to the initial reader, by the end they should take on an alarming urgency.
zlozozozlzozozozoozo
LikeLike
men absorb dna from fluids of our women too. mostly from kissing and performing oral on them. makes sense that we be careful who we choose to sex up.
that skanky broad who has had many partners can affect you physically by passing along her bad/damaged dna and indirectly the dna of all the men she’s been with. most of whom are probably not the greatest of men or they wouldn’t have been involved with her in the first place.
as the saying goes…you become like the people you spend the most time with, choose carefully. have to believe that also applies to the people you are most physically intimate with even if it’s only over a short period of time.
i know for sure the women i’ve been involved with affect me and my personality over time. i’m sure most of that is only related to verbal interactions relationship dynamics and whatnot but i don’t doubt that there could be an underlying physiological aspect as well. we would be naive to think otherwise.
LikeLike
[…] Is This The Reason Men Adore Virgins (And Abhor Skanks)? […]
LikeLike
The biggest advantage of spousing a virgin, is that for the duration of the relation, you are her personal alpha, since she lacks any reference for relative comparison.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Can DNA be passed from jism guzzling?
Asking for a friend.
[CH: lol]
LikeLiked by 2 people
According to the article, them little squirts wriggle their way right up through your sinuses…
… you may want to swallow more hastily on future encounters.
LikeLike
I rarely attack men and almost universally smear the inferior sex instead, but in this case, I think I can safely do so.
Men are often insecure about their value, masculinity, their standing vis-à-vis other men . . . in fact, nearly everything as relates to women. This is not their fault, as women almost never compliment men or give them nice feedback that men could use to feel good about themselves. But . . . as a result, men are prone to hate the thought of a prior male lover of their current bitch being “better” than them in any way possible.
In addition, as natural competitors, men are competing against the shadow images of all her prior images down a hall of mirrors through the past, and the more fux she’s had, the more competition and jousting is going on his mind. This process is neverending, and can easily rear its head on bad days.
And finally, on a separate note, drilling a virgin’s snatch is like owning her, and I think we can agree every man wants to turn high-class ass into his sole property, whatever his loudly proclaimed liberal beliefs. A harem of virgins would be even better, so you can see the point.
— xwarper.wordpress.com
LikeLike
Which reminds me of a joke:
Snarky ex says to his former wife’s current hubby”
“So… how do you like like used pussy?”
“It’s not too bad, once you get past the used part.”
LikeLike
And then a gang of paid gansta dindus jumped out of the shadows, paid for by small-dicked Hubby #1, and beat the jokester to death with their 12″ schlongs.
LikeLike
I shoulda known you’d revert to type.
What is it with you queers and your “the more lurid, the better” negro fetishism?
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re stepping on a lot of vewwy, vewwy fragile ‘Alpha’ toes here.
Chateau posters are never insecure, never pound sunken chests and never lie about their conquests.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe I’m naïve, but I’m inclined to believe the majority of reports of men having sex. If you look at the stories on the comments section, there’s very few men acting in remotely an alpha way. This tells me (a) they’re telling the truth when they do get laid; (b) there’s damn few real seducers out there.
Just to add a little story of my own: once, on the UBC campus in Vancouver, I was in a student union building when I saw a cutie studying her biology text for a midterm. I sat down beside her without preamble and charmed her for 2 hours of nonstop conversation. Then, I got back to her scuzzy dorm house and got an out-in-public blowjob from her where anyone could have seen us. She flunked her exam because of the head she gave me.
True story. Anyone like to top that with an abuse-the-cunt-and-get-a-sex-win tale? Love to hear it.
LikeLike
I have ended every relationship I have ever been in because I cannot fathom the thought of marrying a non-virgin. I knew this from a very young age, and I always put women into two categories: virgin or slut.
If a female gives up her most precious resource cost free to a “boyfriend”, she is a careless slut. If any man marries her, he deserves what he gets.
I will never marry a non-virgin woman. It is a slight against my integrity, not to mention my civilization.
Our ancestors didn’t die brutal deaths so that we could entertain vain sluts.
The path to salvation for the west is to:
1) Repeal the 19th
2) Only marry and reproduce with virgins
The complete destruction of the globohomo-industrial poz complex will take time, but these are the critical steps for surviving the rebirth of western civilization.
LikeLiked by 4 people
@Randy
Ultimately the test is going to be if a girl will sleep with you, or not. Controlling for beta orbiter syndrome and skankishness of the girl, a virgin you’d prefer to marry will be happy to make you a sandwich, do your laundry, get you a beer, but not fuck you till your wedding night.
Nuke the site from orbit; it’s the only way to be sure.
LikeLike
XWarper – When the first caveman first said ‘Ooga-booga’ to the second caveman, he was probably lying about his s3x life.
I tend not to believe anything or anyone unless I can see the proof with my own eyes in real life.
The encounter you’re describing was and probably still is possible in HS or college environments – i.e. among young people – but becomes EXCEEDINGLY RARE to downright impossible after 30.
Randy – Only m@rry an reproduce with v1rg1ns ?
That’s it, no more White ch1ldr3n will be born, ever.
LikeLike
and yet CO will be down here in no time telling men to impregnat.e girls regardless of their notch counts just because they are young and huwhyte.
LikeLike
Well, CO’s not telling you to impregnate a skank. It’s pretty much implied based on the writing’s here that no one is wanting anyone to put a bun in a used oven
Even CO will make mention of how he finds so many women out there revolting for their whorish nature.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There’s not enough virgins out there for every guy, even every alpha. There’s a grey area between virgin and skank
LikeLike
The game is afoot.
Survival of the smoothest.
Time’s a wasting!
LikeLike
QDA, this is war – (((an all-out war to drive the White Race into extinction))).
And you go to war with the army you have, not the army you wished you had.
LikeLike
White Knight Ryan does his job and at the God Emperor’s urging, gets Kate’s law and denial of Sanctuary City funds through Cuckgress.
LikeLike
LikeLike
like these thots?

LikeLike
Slight correction: The gynarchic West have made it near impossible to satisfy the male preference for v1rg1ns.
At least for those who started ‘dating’ in the late 70s or 80s, in other words Gens X, Y & M.
For them, finding a v1rg1n past 13 or so is like winning the lottery.
Microchimerism sounds like clickbait pseudo-science junk.
Sperm that does not fertilize goes ded and gets eliminated.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Different study: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592
Even in cases of autopsied women who had never been pregnant they found male DNA. Theory is via sexual intercourse.
TELEGONY IS REAL.
LikeLike
Well, I still think there’s a bit of Lysenkoism at play here… but for the sake of argument, all the MORE reason to especially abhor mudsharks, amiriite?
LikeLike
For any sort of long-term prospect for a serious relationship, a virgin is better than a non-virgin, anytime. This only changes when the guy has been marryed before, and for whatever reason is now single, and older, then a non-virgin should be the expectation.
Even though banging as many women as possible is every men’s desire, I think in truth, having a society where most women will put out only if they are marryed is probably better for the well being of everyone.
All we need to do is look at the state of our world…the more liberal we have become, the more degenerate and dysfunctional it has become.
It’s a complex issue become it entails so many different aspects of society, and it’s one it’s not possible to have a clear discussion on it because (((secular people)))…..
What’s the problem goyim, have sex and enjoy life, society is so boring when you have rules and discipline…
LikeLike
“What’s the problem goyim, have sex and enjoy life, society is so boring when you have rules and discipline…”
Hey, wait, that’s my line.
LikeLike
Indeed.
LikeLike
More terrifying realization:
You get brain-influencing micro-organisms from your partners. Hyper-promiscuous women and gays likely have micro-organisms triggering their unusual lack of restraint. So, interaction with them spreads their disorder. Why you should avoid skanky women at all costs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
absolutely
LikeLike
Based on 48 yrs experience I can say that if she is not a virgin then there is a 99.9% certainty she will not be faithful. Of course my sampling is limited to experience with only 200 women. Your results may vary.
LikeLike
Virgins also just appreciate you more… and isn’t that the name of the game? Finding a sweet, feminine beauty that appreciates and compliments what you bring to the table, rather than competing with you.
I mean yeah, virgins are inexperienced, and it comes with the territory and all… but god damn, the amount of baggage the average girl has after only three past cocks is palpable these days.
LikeLike
Hell CH has a post talking about how women who’ve gotten laid twice are as hard to keep as men who have been laid 20 times.
LikeLike
The problem isn’t just the used pussies, it is a lack of loyalty. In those old days when men died young, their wives had to remarry to have support for the kids. So it may have been a hard ridden pussy, but she was committed and loyal to her husband(s).
Even whores found husbands and stuck with them.
Now there is no loyalty.
LikeLike
“The spermtastic spangles of past dangles” . . . .
I almost choked on that one, with laughter!
LikeLike
Anton LeVey used to claim this is why long married couples start to look alike: the woman is absorbing his DNA.
LikeLike
Anton was correct.
LikeLike
Well, then… that sword would cut BOTH ways, amiritie?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Men don’t absorb women’s DNA; only their STD’s.
LikeLiked by 1 person
keep telling yourself that Tob. makes it easier to feel better about settling for hoes instead of doing the work to get better quality girls.
LikeLike
You need to get your head straight and then do your research. I don’t settle for hoes the last 30 yrs. If I did I could have them every day all day long. You can have them if you like. You will remember what I have said this day and for the rest of your life.
LikeLike
yeah okay…lol
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
The ideal for heritage White men is to obtain a virgin, wifey her up, knock her up repeatedly, live a good life. The more men a woman has, the less loyal she will be. At some point, the slut count overtakes and irreparably breaks loyalty dam.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yep, that’s become each man and failed relationship she has impacts her ability to bond in a healthy way to a man. she’s not going to be loyal or happy with a man she isn’t fully bonded with.
LikeLike
*because each man…
LikeLike
Another possible reason for male number being low: too many whipped husbands unwilling to actually admit to the desire to bed a random woman. Likewise, with women, too many that are unwilling to admit to their biological desires and behavior. We CH readers would expect that 4% number to be higher given what we know about the female prerogative.
LikeLike
Men value loyalty and tend to take a more fixed opinion of themselves, the fear of another man being better than him could cripple his emotions and his interest and peace of mind is best served by having the monopoly over the woman.
Women are different with a greater and yet more fluid self-esteem. In her world the rival woman is a spur to work harder in a sexualised keeping up with the Joneses. The vagina is a capitalist.
LikeLike
https://www.facebook.com/NOvirginidadNOmatrimonio/
LikeLike