This study was published in 2014, so maybe it’s already been discussed at the Chateau, but if it hasn’t this post will rectify that oversight. (If it has, it’s worth revisiting.)
Criminal offending as part of an alternative reproductive strategy: investigating evolutionary hypotheses using Swedish total population data
Criminality is highly costly to victims and their relatives, but often also to offenders. From an evolutionary viewpoint, criminal behavior may persist despite adverse consequences by providing offenders with fitness benefits as part of a successful alternative mating strategy. Specifically, criminal behavior may have evolved as a reproductive strategy based on low parental investment reflected in low commitment in reproductive relationships. We linked data from nationwide total population registers in Sweden to test if criminality is associated with reproductive success. Further, we used several different measures related to monogamy to determine the relation between criminal behavior and alternative mating tactics. Convicted criminal offenders had more children than individuals never convicted of a criminal offense.
DANGER AHEAD
Criminal offenders also had more reproductive partners, were less often married, more likely to get remarried if ever married,
Because of criminal jerkboy impulsiveness, or because criminal jerkboys have more women begging them for marriage?
and had more often contracted a sexually transmitted disease than non-offenders. Importantly, the increased reproductive success of criminals was explained by a fertility increase from having children with several different partners.
So criminal jerkboys have to prove themselves worthy of more women’s pussies than do law-abiding betaboys, and it appears the criminal jerkboys have won that pussy-approval contest.
We conclude that criminality appears to be adaptive in a contemporary industrialized country, and that this association can be explained by antisocial behavior being part of an adaptive alternative reproductive strategy.
The killer line, right there. (heh)
Basically, what this research has rediscovered:
Hard men create good times.
Good times create weak men.
Weak men create hard times.
Hard times create hard men.
Why does the industrialized modern gynarchy improve the reproductive fitness of criminal jerkboys? An old CH post based on nothing but a clear-eyed LAYman’s view from the dating trenches offered an explanation: compassion creates more cads.
Bleeding heart compassion has cursed blessed the country with layers of safety nets that subvert the natural cleansing of losers from contributing to the next generation. The result of all this government largesse is the substitution of handouts for husbands. When provider males who are predisposed to marry and support a family are worth less on the market than they used to be they are slowly replaced by playboys taking advantage of the sexual climate. Women who have their security needs met by Big Government (in combination with their own economic empowerment) begin to favor their desire for sexy, noncommital alpha males at the expense of their attraction for men who will foot the bills.
Prediction: As women’s financial status rises to levels at or above the available men in their social sphere, they will have great difficulty finding an acceptable long-term partner. The men, for their part, will turn away from emphasizing their ability to provide as they discover their mediocre-paying corporate jobs are no longer effective displays of mating value. They will instead emphasize the skills of “personality dominance”.
Sex skew plays a role as well. If the natural culling of expendable men — from fetal development onward — is thwarted by human intervention and technological hazard mitigation, then perishable women have more sexual market options, which can mean that criminal cads offering something different and exciting from among the masses of mediocre betas find their star rising with economically independent women. Men navigating an unfavorable mate market saturated with male competition that concomitantly devalues beta provider traits will be under immense pressure to emphasize a caddish attitude toward women and a charming, physical presence over a dependable, agreeable personality.
Of course, mass Dirt World open borders immigration of primarily reproductive-aged swarths will exacerbate an already stressed and fracturing sexual market in the West. Women will begin to appreciate the very special charms of the native criminal jerkboy when waves upon waves of foreign jerkboys are crashing her homeland’s shores and pissing in her brunchtime mimosa.
Not that me telling you this will change anything, but I at least get the pleasure of saying I told ya so when the fires lick the gates of our encircled ruling class.

Jordan Peterson
Post modernists are the burn the house down jerkboys.
They deny the concept of value even exists.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve come to the conclusion that the female forebrain [her conscious thought] is just about completely inept at judging STRENGTH* in a man.
But the female hindbrain [her Hamster] is 110% accurate in assessing WEAKNESS in a man.
And the Hamster knows [both instinctively & probably a priori] that NICE GUYS ALWAYS FINISH LAST.
I.e. the Hamster instinctively [& likely deductively] associates NICE with WEAK which in turn is associated with LOSER.
What the Hamster wants to see is some mean & nasty & cheating & breaking the rules & doing whatever it takes to emerge on top at the end of the day.
Which, of course, if unleashed, would quickly destroy civilization & everything good & decent & worthy about the human race [as we’ve been witnessing since the late 20th Century], but then that’s why you mustn’t allow women to have any influence over your culture or your society or your government.
tl;dr == The Hamster is Machiavellian, and, as regards its assessments of you, it’s never wrong.
LikeLike
*Regarding strength: If you can play an electric guitar poorly, but still pack 250 teens/20-somethings into a dance hall to listen to your band, then the clumsy retarded female forebrain will calculate that as a STRENGTH in you.
Whereas if you can play a baroque oboe, at A=415Hz, better than Heinz Holliger or John Mack, yet only draw a mere 6 or 8 septuagenarians to the local Unitardian Hall of Death-Worship to listen to you, then the clumsy retarded female forebrain will calculate that as a WEAKNESS in you.
LikeLiked by 3 people
“…mean & nasty & cheating & breaking the rules & doing whatever it takes to emerge on top at the end of the day… Which if unleashed, would quickly destroy civilization & everything good & decent & worthy about the human race …but then that’s why you mustn’t allow women to have any influence over your culture or your society or your government.”
What’s hard for many of us to accept, and I assume you, Cap’n, are merely forgetting within the frame of praising Western men, is that “mean, nastiy, cheating, rules-breaking, whatever-it-takes to emerge on top at the end of the day” is the good and just way to live, and only a woman would tell you otherwise.
What’s missing in the above summary is the impact of tribalism (blood and fiat) which creates exceptions to the kill-or-be-killed standard which is living rather than dying, and the circumstances which break that tribal truce – betrayal or weak leadership – and lead to the natural state by which men contest with allies for the future of the tribe or for the right to form a new tribe.
PS: this is also why a man shouldn’t strike his son as punishment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
TTE, mankind is supposed to be just a little better than wild beasts.
We’re supposed to have some conscious analytical thought to us, burdened & tempered by a conscience which restrains the worst aspects of our natures.
Some appreciation of Beauty and Truth and Grace.
Not just kill or be killed like a bunch of G0d-d@mned hyenas.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“kill or be killed like a bunch of G0d-d@mned hyenas”
Which of course is precisely what the utterly Machiavellian female Hamster wants to see: “Let’s you and him fight.”
LikeLike
TTE: “only a woman would tell you otherwise”
You know, it just dawned on me that there must be a terrible raging conflict in a woman, between her conscious [forebrain] desire to be a well-mannered well-respected rules-abiding social creature of the herd, versus the desire of her Hamster [her hindbrain] to be ravaged by a Cad who ruthlessly breaks all the mores & traditions & laws in order to win.
Maybe that’s why women are nuts – because they’re foot-soldiers trapped in the trenches of a horrifying neverending all-out war between their forebrains and hindbrains.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Or maybe the Alpha women constructed & enforced the original rules, in order to enslave the Beta women, who were stuck with rules-abiding Beta Bux providers for mates, because the Alpha women were confident that they could always cheat and get Alpha seed from Dark Triad Psychopaths, so as to ensure that their children would have the DNA necessary to circumvent the rules and come out on top of the Beta women’s children.
Wow. Game Theory really is becoming GAME THEORY.
My head is starting to swim.
Once you construct any non-trivial system, there are infinitely many ways to cheat it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
If you can play oboe or anything that well, women will dig you. Women love guys that are good, really good, at shit. Being competent at something is like magic to them because, face facts, women aren’t particularly good at *anything*.
The realm of “skill” writ large is so dominated by men that’s it not terrifically inaccurate to say there are no women at all. Women drivers, pilots, musicians…it’s 100:1 men. They’re good at getting tied up and having rape fantasies, I’ll give em that, and they can bear children.
LikeLiked by 5 people
This is why the red pill is so important for women. It helps you (women) identify all of the impulses that are documented so well here and either work against them or suppress them.
Being red pilled as a woman is absolutely vital in her finding happiness and stability with a man who is not an alpha, which includes most of the decent, good, hard working men out there. You are able to recalibrate your mind, it is possible. But for Western women, it is a painful, difficult process because of the sheer amount of untruths you have to unlearn.
LikeLike
You must unlearn what you have learned. — Yoda
LikeLiked by 1 person
You keep misusing this term “hamster”. The hamster is in a woman’s fore-brain. The act of rationalizing something takes thought and effort. It’s the thing that she focus’s on afterwards, not the instinctual lizard part of her. The hamster comes up with explanations, or excuses, for the lizard’s actions.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=rationalization+hamster
LikeLike
Cap’n, everything you’ve said here is absolutely, one hundred percent correct. Even the hypotheses you’ve laid out are likely correct.
In science, we judge a model by its elegance and simplicity. We want an explanation to be as simple as possible, but no simpler.
So, when we have a perfect model of how the sexual dimorphic power struggle between males and females can transition a society from a powerful patriarchy to a helpless matriarchy, we’ve hit the jackpot. We don’t need any additional assumptions, because our model explains all human history and behavior based on all the empirical evidence we’ve gathered.
This is why the fixation with the (((frankfurt school))) is so damaging to our cause, because we have a perfectly workable understanding of our decline without invoking them or their ilk.
We are at a point in history that almost directly parallels the roaring 20s. Loose women, loose morals, rampant robber baron (((capitalists))) without a shred of altruism or dignity. Once they drive the (((economy))) into the ground, we will see the rise of a different ideology.
At this point, we have to be ready. Do we focus on (((them))), like our dearly departed Fuhr3r? Or do we take a more strategic approach?
The only way I see us rebuilding western civilization is as follows:
Repeal the 19th, or only allow men eligible for the draft to vote. There is no other way to stem the corruption.
Women’s civilizational scale shit test has brought the west to its knees. We’ve failed it, and the muzzies are passing it with flying colors.
Women are at the heart of this. They always have been, and always will be. If they have any power, they will be made into useful idiots, whether it is by muzzies or (((others))), or some new devious cult we have yet witness.
Women are the mechanism by which men are tested. This includes our ideologies, our values, our societies, and our civilizations. Women are always searching and rooting for weakness. How do you think they obtained power? By exploiting the weakness of men. Men who knew better, but caved in to women’s demands anyway. In that moment, our doom was sealed.
Women are the filter, they are the test, the gom jabbar.
Fail, and be destroyed.
LikeLike
@trav777
“….If you can play oboe or anything that well, women will dig you. Women love guys that are good, really good, at shit. Being competent at something is like magic to them because, face facts, women aren’t particularly good at *anything*….”
you’re absolutely right. this chick i’m fucking told me about her husbands’ grand skills as a mechanic. a great mechanic. he’s also a really a nice guy. great father. no car troubles
LikeLike
@jeangray
“This is why the red pill is so important for women. It helps you (women) identify all of the impulses that are documented so well here and either work against them or suppress them.
Being red pilled as a woman is absolutely vital in her fi”
a red-pilled woman is a woman that makes me a sandwich and shuts the fuck up
LikeLike
JG07: “Being red pilled as a woman is absolutely vital in her finding happiness and stability with a man who is not an alpha, which includes most of the decent, good, hard working men out there.”
Serious Question: What’s it like to be a woman, and sidle up to a man – a complete stranger – and instantly see through his soul and know all of his innermost weaknesses & insecurities?
Because women are such complete mysteries to men [at least to innocent & inexperienced men]. Such enigmas.
We don’t have a Hamster or Its sense of smell to warn us about what we’re dealing with.
LikeLike
RTR: “This is why the fixation with the (((frankfurt school))) is so damaging to our cause…”
I have long been convinced that Freud & the Frankfurt School were figuring out all of this stuff a good century ago – they were listening to their “nymphomaniac” patients lying on the couch, or under hypnosis, and taking notes on all the very worst of the raging uncontrollable passions of the Female Hindbrain, and then comparing notes, and using their discoveries to carefully craft a Master Plan for the total destruction of Christianity, Western Civilization, and the White Race – ergo the various psyops campaigns of “Feminism” [the unleashing of the Machiavellian Hamster] and “The War Against Boys” [the neutering of every last ounce of White masculinity] and “Porn” [to finish off any latent masculine impulses in White boys] and “Mandingo-Glorification & Miscegenation” [to urge White women to stray and thereby vanquish the White race biologically].
I.e. much of what we’ve accomplished in the Manosphere is simply re-discovering everything which The Frankfurt School already knew and had been already wielding against us for decades.
tl;dr == KNOW THY ENEMY.
LikeLike
In the Song of the Bell, by Schiller, we hear what is expected of a man:
The man must go out
To stern hostile life,
For power and strife,
To plant and to toil,
To gain and to foil,
To wager and dare,
His luck to ensnare.
LikeLike
“I.e. much of what we’ve accomplished in the Manosphere is simply re-discovering everything which The Frankfurt School already knew and had been already wielding against us for decades.”
bingo. reverse-engineering
LikeLike
Also, classic joke: What’s the definition of a quarter tone? Two oboes playing in unison.
LikeLike
NNH: ‘You keep misusing this term “hamster”’
The Hamster is that mysterious force in her Hindbrain which produces the conscious thoughts that drive a woman insane.
A woman can’t understand why she’s thinking the conscious thoughts which haunt her – why is he so rude? why won’t he call me? I despise those birthday cat gifs, why does he keep txting them to me? why isn’t he like any of the other guys I know? why can’t I stop daydreaming about him? when will I see him again? – she can only experience the thinking of the thoughts & the obsession fueling the thinking, an obsession which emanates from her Hamster spinning furiously in her hindbrain.
LikeLike
My reply stuck in mod:
https://pastebin.com/Mnihz8yP
LikeLike
“Serious Question: What’s it like to be a woman, and sidle up to a man – a complete stranger – and instantly see through his soul and know all of his innermost weaknesses & insecurities?”
@Cap
I don’t think I’d put it like that. My mom taught me that men aren’t complex creatures. All they want from their woman is food, sex, and loyalty. I see that truth talked about in almost every post here and confirmed daily in my home life.
Women aren’t enigmas, though. You guys pretty much have it nailed down: treat us like children. Simple as that.
LikeLike
RTR, from your Pastebin poast – I agree with pretty much everything you wrote. Just never misunderestimate the pure unadulterated Satanic evil of the Frankfurt School – they are gleefully pouring gasoline onto this conflagration.
Also, as you were describing American men giving up the keys to the kingdom when they consented to the 19th Amendment, I kept thinking to myself, NICE GUYS ALWAYS FINISH LAST, in line with my observations up above here.
Women were given all this freedom, and their Hamsters perceived the givers of the freedom to be NICE GUYS, i.e. LOSERS, and so the women [propelled by their Hamsters] promptly set off in search of Dark Triad Psychopath seed for their children, ergo the “Sexual Revolution” [the revolt against Nice Guy seed, in favor of Dark Triad Psychopath seed].
LikeLike
JG07, I dunno.
I’m thinking now that the fundamental difference between Women & Men is that a woman is born with an innate understanding of Men [or at least of the WEAKNESSES in men, if not their strengths], whereas everything a man knows about Women has to be learned empirically, through experience.
LikeLike
The hamster spins trying to answer these questions. Its not the thing that put them there. It’s not the thing that providers instinctual judgement of your strengths or weaknesses. it’s the thing that focus on them obsessively afterwards. It’s called “the rationalization hamster” for a reason. Did you even read the definition at UD???
LikeLike
@Randy The Random
all men are eligible for the draft – only HOW each man serves is in question
bring back militia duty for all men
LikeLike
CO…The Century of Self by Adam Curtis is a must watch if you’ve not seen it
Freud was distraught by the savagery of WW1 and supposedly died a broken man and penniless.
I think his daughter and nephew (((Bernays)))were far more evil.
His daughter even socially engineered a white noble family as an experiment which led to at least one suicide.
Also don’t us men have this mental mental battle ?
When we are free (of social constraints) we can kill and rape at will aka Heart of Darkness
LikeLike
Postmodernist males tend to be androgynous and faggy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
lol. remided me of that old bulgar joke.
“hello, i’m a young post-impressionist”.
“hi, i’m just a regular pederast”.
LikeLike
Alternately, criminals don’t give a hoot about the possible long term consequences of their actions and chicks who accept criminal seed have other issues.
Nah – chicks dig bad boys.
LikeLike
There’s no question that women dig bad boys, rebels and ‘different’ – as long as different doesn’t mean ugly or uncool.
The cr1m1nal element is probably incidental.
In other words, you don’t HAVE to have a pr1son record to get laid, but it doesn’t hurt your chances if you do.
[CH: wolfie, you’re wrong about this. you’ve gotta get off this DERP MALE LOOKS UBER ALLES hobbyhorse of yours, because you’re making yourself look foolish. read the linked research and consult the CH archives for similar studies. in many of them, male attractiveness was controlled for and a clear predilection for badboys was still found among women. if anything, criminality makes an ugly man LOOK BETTER to women. some death row inmates with marriage proposals out the wazoo are butt ugly. the truth is that criminal jerkboys succeed with women DESPITE their looks.
as far as coolness goes with women, well there’s nothing cooler than being a rulebreaker.]
LikeLike
CH – I’m thinking the attraction to d3@th row inmates is to a very large extent tied to the guys’ notoriety – they’re on TV, in the papers, they’re ‘famous’, of sorts.
Chicks dig fame.
Exactly why he ‘s famous is kind of irrelevant to her.
[CH: we hear about the famous cases, but plenty of lesser dark lights rotting on death row get female attention. no doubt though fame amplifies the female attraction for them.]
LikeLike
Who breaks rules? Kings. He plays by his own rules.
And the harem will flock.
LikeLike
Wolfie…i am a living example of what CH talks about.
I’m average in everything…average most boring job, average height, looks, dick size …no broad shoulders….but I have zfg..jerky humor.
I pull women out of my supposed league..ive had girls I’m with …meet guys they know ..and they are shocked and quite open “you’re with him?!”…”whose the ugly one?”.
I’ve brought dates to office parties and people who I considered friends openly said “wow..i’d never thought you’d get a girl like that”. I actually use to get really upset about it.
Then it snowballs..pre selection works…outcome independence works.
Dominance works. I’ve verbally smacked down bosses in work in front of a target and seen them get turned on instantly.
Game works …i’m the living embodiment of it.
And now I’m expecting my first child …my smv..is even higher. How fuked..up is that? Women who know I’m expecting have even more interest and since im not interested..my zfg…is even higher.
I don’t want a result… I want to fail. I’ve gotten bolder…Ive approached hotties in supermarket lots and looked deep in their eyes and said “let’s fuck” and gotten numbers and fucked.
I’ve gotten numbers at funerals.
At first it’s great but then you realize it is all wrong and it’s all going to collapse and you get disgusted at women.
LikeLike
LikeLike
The arms are folded in what we would nowadays consider a defensive posture, but that’s more than overcompensated by the world-class man-spread [where the seam in his pants looks like it’s about to rip apart].
The electric blue eyes always help, but they’re surrounded by a devil-may-care insouciant ZFG look on his face which will drive the Hamster nuts.
LikeLike
Okay, I found the URL for Elmer’s pic: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4315852/Mugshots-razor-gang-ruled-1920s-underworld.html
LikeLike
This guy reminds me of Bruce Willis in Last Man Standing. Love that movie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So “crime doesn’t pay”? I imagine pussy isn’t considered a payment in the minds of public-service ad execs tapping their pens on their desks in thought for what to do next. X.
LikeLike
Short and to the point, well done X
LikeLike
Dude, don’t set this freak off.
LikeLike
LIVES AMONG THE MISERABLE 1 by X.
Welcome to Crime Central: Dontel and Brandy were arguing again in bed. Brandy, who had lighter skin and so higher status in the community, was telling Dontel what to think. In her expertly assessed opinion, “no man’s going to make me kiss his ass. I don’t cook, and I don’t clean.”
Dontel exploded in heat. “Who the fuck you are? You came onto me, bitch. Remember bein’ at da club two nights ‘go? I’m only inna bed with you this moment cuz you an easy fuck, bitch. I mean, serious. Who the fuck are you?”
Dontel laughed suddenly, apropos of nothing. “You know what you remind me of, bitch? You the pelican or flamingo or whatever tha fuck it is, standin’ in the water goin’ for some juicy fish. I be the fish, what say?” He, laughing, spat orange juice onto Brandy’s lighter-toned face, and she recoiled in outrage and disgust. Brandy moved to punch him, but Dontel caught her girl-fist and moved it back . . . back . . . back. There. Bitch was now showing the kind of winced, please-help-me expression a man could grow to appreciate.
TO BE CONTINUED AT . . .
https://xwarper.wordpress.com/2017/07/07/xstory-lives-among-the-miserable-1-gunpoint-kursedmoan-sonec/
LikeLike
And then there’s this again.
LikeLike
lol. never hand matches to kids and retards, major
LikeLike
Got into yo’ daddy’s journal again, did ya?
LikeLike
LOLZ!
LikeLike
Is this prose what passes for a negro romance novel?
LikeLike
Not enough violence to qualify. The bi-atch has to get slapped in the first sentence.
LikeLike
jesus
LikeLike
See? Now you’ve done it…
LikeLike
The most logical explanation is r-selection.
They want cheap resources and will also get cheap pussy.
LikeLike
Who are “They”?
Or is “get” supposed to be “give”?
LikeLike
I think he means the criminals are (theoretically) r-selected rabbits who are criminals because they want free resources without putting any investment into them. As a result, they can reproduce readily, but only with low-quality r-selected female rabbits.
Not sure if I entirely agree with that, but I think that’s what “They want cheap resources and will also get cheap pussy” means.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yup. Criminality is typically r-selected, especially in modern times when life is pretty easy.
And if you look at a prime example of criminal male/female mating dynamics, which is the Black Gorillas Gang in one of the Baltimore prisons. Inmates got 6 of the female guards pregnant, but if you look at pictures of the women, you wouldn’t use their faces to scrub the white walls of your tires.
LikeLike
depends on your definition of “criminals”.
criminals defined as men who break rules (we here are mostly thought criminals), who demolish rotten structures and build new ones. or criminals in the literal sense (as in gas-station-robbin nigga).
the first kind procreate (or are even heard of) only if they succeed. the second kind populate africa.
LikeLike
Government handouts (aka beta financial rape) and female economic empowerment aren’t possible in countries where laws aren’t enforced. Related to that, cad success is directly correlated to general male powerlessness – including the powerlessness of cads. A woman can risk fleeting sexual partnership with a cad when the legal framework and practical enforcement of that framework leaves the cad powerless to enforce his malevolent motives upon the object of his sexual desire. That’s part of what explains the wide-ranging fornication of sexually successful criminals in Sweden: a man with no power over women is obliged to spread his seed among many in the hope that one of those random couplings results in a competent child.
Good times do indeed make weak men. If we were to break this cycle (hard men –> good times –> weak men –> hard times –> hard men), then we must find a way to permanently put an end to the “good times” which women leverage to destroy the societies men build. The trade-off is that many of us men won’t live long lives in exchange for full lives.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“a man with no power over women is obliged to spread his seed among many in the hope that one of those random couplings results in a competent child.”
You must be referring to his hindbrain, cuz his forebrain just wants to get laid.
Also, longer life vs. short, full life. I wonder how this would poll among the r/K groups. I vote for full, and I bet that most here would do the same.
LikeLike
But the Dark Triad jerkboy cad does have power over a woman – he en-trances her Hamster and inspires it to compulsively obsess over him [and spread its legs for him].
LikeLike
Well said tteclod, very well said.
LikeLike
A study from Sweden, you say? Swedish women really love thugs, you say? Explains much, I think.
FWIW would like to see this kind of study done in America with race controlled for (perps and mommas) and see if the Swedes have more of this in them than Anglo-Celts due.
LikeLiked by 1 person
OFF TOPIC
Iy just HAS to be noted that in the historic Trump – Putin handshake that Trump is clearly the Alpha in the pic!
Pic needs a “professional” Heartsite treatment!
LikeLike
I wouldn’t judge it like that – in the pictures I’ve seen, the two of them seem genuinely happy to finally be in one-another’s company.
Also, Putin is so much physically smaller than the EGK that almost any photo of them will make Putin seem diminutive, yet, even there, it looks to me as though the EGK is very conscious of his size advantage, and is very graciously trying not to tower over Putin.
LikeLiked by 1 person
you just know that the first topic of conversation was “can you believe how batshit insane the globalist left is?”
LikeLike
This.
LikeLike
You can see the respect they both have for each other.
Even if Putin is a killer…Trump would always have more respect for a fellow apex alpha than say a weak fag like Obama.
Thsts why Trump also respects T Rex…Ross..Kelly…lesser alphas but dudes who have a track record
LikeLike
I think there is a sample bias here. You can’t conclude from the degenerate prisoner population much about the general population. post hoc ergo propter hoc. Criminals are degenerates and if you look closely you will notice their women that stand by them are degenerates too. So it doesn’t surprise me that in the degenerate population there is more out of wedlock children, more partners, more STIs, more degeneracy, it’s what we would expect. People will say I am just bleating because I don’t want to accept the ‘dark’ truth. I don’t think that’s it.
LikeLike
You make a solid point, but that’s not the whole picture. Yeah, most of the women are damaged or degenerate, but a surprising number of them are fairly hot, some really hot. The question for me is why criminals would have any reproductive success at all, even with skanks. Women can have sex pretty much whenever they want, and have much more power of choice than men, so why would they settle, let alone get turned on, by criminals? Hypergamy answers this.
What hypergamy doesn’t answer for me is the high numbers of hot teachers hooking up with underage boys. That seems like the opposite of hypergamy.
LikeLike
Chateau,
where pretty (blue pill) lies -like martin’s- come to die
LikeLike
Check out Manson’s girlfriend for an example. CH posted about that a while back.
LikeLike
“A woman’s love is wasted when she loves a runnin’ gun” Yep. It’s an old tale.
LikeLike
major – agreed, I don’t understand the underage boys thing either although maybe it’s the media making a sensation of it, but it does make one wonder.
oik – what do you know about me? I can’t stand the pill metaphors borrowed from the matrix, but I just believe what is provably true and humans being what they are, red pill is not a 1 for 1 mapping with beliefs unto truth.
LikeLike
The Stone Putin interviews recommended…brilliant in fact
LikeLike
Lolzozozoz Trump meets Putin and 2 hours later Syrian cease fire.
Explain how that’s a bad thing, Jews.
Lolzozozoz
LikeLike
Remember if Jews had their way Trump would not be talking to Putin as POTUS.
In fact it is literally (((their))) goal that no two white men are ever allowed to associate in private (unless it’s for fag sex).
LikeLike
Trump looked directly at the Russian President during much of the conference while the Russian President often looked forward and down with the occasional glance at President Trump.
Lolzozozoz our POTUS is the most alpha of them all.
Win.
Ning.
LikeLike
Of course theey are not allowed this meet privately without deep state (((Rex))) there.
Each leader is at the mercy of many.
LikeLike
Jews lying about it.
(((Rex))) deep state #weknow
LikeLike
Trump not in charge. (((They))) won’t let him meet Putin alone. Deep state their so (((they))) can lie about it afterwards.
Trump can’t even take a dump without (((deep state))) literally watching and listening.
LikeLike
Trump literally does not even control his own schedule. His (((handlers)))) tell him where to go. Guns on him at all times.
Otherwise, obviously, he’d meet with Putin alone, just the two of them.
Neither man is free to have such a private meeting.
LikeLike
Mutty Merkel cannot stand to look EGK in the eye. And look at him, he looks flippin’ furious with her.
LikeLiked by 1 person
WTF prompted that picture?
Was that when the EGK discovered that she intended to “Kasich” him? http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3567317/posts
LikeLike
“Was that when the EGK discovered that she intended to “Kasich” him?”
To be fair, Macron is over there with Trump, so it may mean nothing.
LikeLike
Oh you KNOW she put him over there next to Macron on purpose.
Sh!t like that doesn’t happen accidentally.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It awesome
LikeLike
If I did this right, please see the attached photo from the Drudge Report.
It appears that both Putin and Our Glorious Trumpenfuhrer have a wary but amicable face to face greet here. The Trumpehfuhrer is giving Putin his knowing yet respectful countenance, and Putin is not looking at President Trump like he is a sub-human ape like he used to look at Obamohammed. President Trump even graciously offered Putin the sub-ducted hand-shake. They will get along famously as they say in the movies.
LikeLike
The truth? BOTH of them are happy to get to actually deal with a MAN for a change. It’s got to be a welcome refuge from the Microns and Trudeaus of the world, never mind the godawful Merkel.
LikeLike
Interesting I get a slightly different vibe from this pic.
The pic I was originally referring to is the one on the home page of dailystormer
LikeLike
Yes, the sub-ducted handshake. This is the critical thing in that picture.
LikeLike
He looks like a very annoyed husband dealing with his weak wife’s public break-down over something trivial.
“Christ Angela, can we please not do this here? I know you’re disappointed that Bob Evans ran out of Blueberry Brioche French Toast, but everyone’s staring!”
LikeLiked by 1 person
> “Christ Angela, can we please not do this here? I know you’re disappointed that Bob Evans ran out of Blueberry Brioche French Toast, but everyone’s staring!”
That’s Top 5 for KKKOTY.
LikeLike
“But it’s my favorite! and its the Sunday buffet!”
LikeLike
I just watched some footage it appears to be out of context.
LikeLike
I figured as much, but damn if that’s not great timing to catch that image the way it was caught.
LikeLike
I think that all men here should do a mental exercise.
Let’s suppose you have to choose between certified batshit crazy Marilyn Monroe and a very submissive and sweet plain Jane.
Well, no wonder that most women will take a murderer over John Scalzi.
The God of Biomechanics rule us all.
LikeLike
I posted my reply via Pastebin because the comment did not show up.
https://pastebin.com/ddzRgDH7
LikeLike
Can you prove to us that you’re not a witch?
LikeLike
Hey, it went through. I take it all back.
LikeLike
Whether she is a witch or not – she has nice name – that of a Byzantine Empire princess. I like old european history and people who have the names of famous europeans. Although it could be my interest in Byzantine History that changes my perception and makes me unable to see the witch in her.
But she has good comments and looks like a red pilled gRill.
LikeLike
I had an extremely funny, insightful, and bitingly sarcastic reply for her, which CH probably would have made a whole series of posts out of, but it kept disappearing. She may be cool, redpilled, and with a nice historical handle, but she hasn’t convinced me she isn’t a witch.
LikeLike
she’s gotta give us photo id
LikeLike
Let’s see if anyone else can reply to Theodora. . .
Alvin, Simon, Theodora. . . .
LikeLike
“very submissive and sweet plain Jane”
More likely to be “gordita Juanita” or “plain Jing” these days.
LikeLike
Plain Jane if it’s an absolute choice of one or the other for the long term.
Crazy wears you down over time.
Factoring in that the opposite choice is Marilyn Monroe if it’s a “Plain Jane” from her time that’s probably a hard 6 for ours, maybe even a low 7.
LikeLike
a) There’s no such thing as a ‘sweet plain Jane’, that’s a 1950s TV fantasy
b) plain Janes are boring, and so are ‘submissive’ women
c) all women are certified batsh1t crazy – even the plain ones, they’re just forced to hide it
The obvious conclusion: Marilyn wins
LikeLike
PS: this is also why a man shouldn’t strike his son as punishment.
I would like to ask the elders of the Chateau to comment on this;
on one hand it flies in the face of the wisdom of “Whoever spares the rod hates his son, but he who loves him is diligent to discipline him.”
on the other hand, maybe not
LikeLike
A father should absolutely strike his son, if he deserves it and needs it. I was surprised to read that at a place like this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Striking” needs to be tempered. Not with temper, but temperately. You start with all children as toddlers, boys benefit more in the sense that you provide corporal punishment as a toughening experience and to remind your growing shitlord that however he might see himself, until he can whoop his father 1 on 1, he is still the lesser in the pack.
I ask my son regularly who the boss is. He gets too big for his britches from time to time and says he is. Then I remind him who really is the boss, and things are good for another week or so. I’m convinced I’m doing it right, his mother often comments on how bossy he is.
LikeLike
If you get your s0n into the right kind of activities (sports, etc.), there will be no need to strike him – he’ll do it himself.
And learn from it.
LikeLike
Ok now you write more like a man.
LikeLike
I have several sons and a daughter. I very sparingly resorted to spanking my oldest son when he acted out, and it’s been years since I needed to do so. Lay down the rules and make it clear that his father’s word is to be respected, and you won’t need to use any physical reprimand very often. And the younger boys follow the lead of their oldest brother, so I’ve needed to use it even less with the younger boys. Just my experience with it; my wife pretty much has never used physical reprimand with the children.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Lol maybe just beat that ass. This is why I can’t raise children…
LikeLike
Hey, anybody seen Tom Jones lately?
LikeLike
He was banned.
LikeLike
Dammit, first we lose SorceryGod, now Jonesy. SAD
LikeLike
I guess he’s banned from commenting, but not from liking. He liked my comment about fathers beating the hell out of their sons, but he didn’t like my comment about missing Jonesy. I’m somehow not surprised.
Hey CO, how ’bout posting the Tom Jones pic, for old times sake?
LikeLike
That’s pretty impressive. I’ve never seen CH ban anybody before.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Carlos Danger
I had assumed he got bored and quit, like TSW.
@Major7
Are you sure we’ve lost him, rather than xwarper being another one of his personalities?
LikeLike
Lol. I know Tom Jones. He’s a liberal idiot who is cool in some ways but can’t quite get why this blog is so awesome. Fuck that faggot.
LikeLike
Did he pop up with a new handle? I think CH even acknowledged he had a second chance.
LikeLike
Theodora has to be a witch. I can’t reply to her, and I can’t comment separately. It disappears every time. I give up.
LikeLike
Use pastebin or an image.
LikeLike
Good tip, gracias
LikeLike
I still think she’s a witch
LikeLike
Lolzozozoz Trump and Putin discussed (((international problems))) today.
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] Source link […]
LikeLike
More to add to the topic:
“Porn featuring violence against women is also extremely popular among women. It is far more popular among women than men. I hate saying that because misogynists seem to love this fact. Fantasy life isn’t always politically correct.
The rate at which women watch violent porn is roughly the same in every part of the world. It isn’t correlated with how women are treated.”
^Interview about people’s porn viewing habits from all over the world
https://www.vox.com/conversations/2017/6/27/15873072/google-porn-addiction-america-everybody-lies?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark
[CH: how much you wanna bet the voxlet faggots hate-read CH religiously?]
LikeLike
“Among other things, Stephens-Davidowitz’s data suggests that there are more gay men in the closet than we think (YOU WISH); that many men prefer overweight women to skinny women but are afraid to act on it (MAYBE THE STUPIDEST THING I’VE EVER READ); that married women are disproportionately worried their husband is gay (SADLY, NOWADAYS, PROBABLY TRUE, BETATUDE WILL DO THAT); that a lot of straight women watch lesbian porn (APPARENTLY EVERYBODY LOVES LESBIAN PORN); and that porn featuring violence against women is more popular among women than men (THIS LAST ONE MAKES ME FEEL GOOD).”
LikeLike
Jew say what….
LikeLike
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-07/john-podesta-responds-whack-job-trump-angry-tweetstorm
LikeLike
Lolzozozoz
Guilty conscience.
Bat shit insane.
Still thinks he can tell Trump to toe the (((neocon))) role.
Piece of shit.
Obviously Trump tweeting that was sending a message.
[CH: the podesta clan are scum. john podesta is filth. I don’t even need to know that his fatass brother hangs pedo art in his home to know he’s scum. i know because he’s besties with thecunt. says it all.]
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just came across:
http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/google-researcher-porn-featuring-violence-against-women-is-more-popular-among-women-than-men/
violent porn is more popular among women according to google analytics.
and it’s indepenedent of any cultural influences:
“The rate at which women watch violent porn is roughly the same in every part of the world. It isn’t correlated with how women are treated”
Evolution rulez.
LikeLike
“first”
lol
LikeLike
well done, mate
LikeLike
How much of that effect is baked into the demographic cake of comparing the whole population of Sweden with their migrant criminal class?
LikeLike
I live in a white rural area, and a shocking high percentage of my daughter’s classmates have daddies in prison.
LikeLike
This is one one of the reasons I support castration for violent criminals. First of all it will take away their aggressiveness which they can’t control. When these primitives get released (which happens too quickly) they will be less likely to harm more innocent victims. Most importantly, they won’t be able to reproduce. This in the long run will cut down on crime significantly as we eliminate these barbarians from the gene pool.
The pathetic thing is beta males (along with all women) would go crazy if this ever would happen (not that it ever will unfortunately). Yes beta males would take the side of the criminals not realizing that women strongly prefer the criminal element over nice guys like themselves.
LikeLike
Behold the Shitlords of the Week.
LikeLike
Lolzozozoz
LikeLike
HAHA…excellent!
Putin starts cracking up when Trump tells him “yeah.”
Like two Duke lacrosse players, just shooting the shit.
LikeLike
The degree to which these shitlibs hate the Russians never ceases to astound. The comments following that clip are brimming over with huffing, puffing, sanctimonious outrage.
Clearly, by the lights of these scum, the President is supposed to start the meeting by stomping in and ordering nuclear strikes on all Russian cities for the crime of being white and nationalist.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Trumps “nationalistic ” speech was like a red rag to the shitlib bull. Have not seen them thst angry in a while.
LikeLike
So much winning
LikeLike
Then I want nothing to do with them.
LikeLike
Libertarians point out that 90+% of crimes aren’t criminal at all, but lifestyles the far right or left don’t like. Are we measuring real crime or tough people who have the vibe they don’t buy into the conformist power-structure?
Nevada just turned 1000’s of drug criminals into admirable entrepreneurs.
LikeLike
Criminals and other members of the dark triad do get laid more.
The most obvious reason aside from the “Prime Reason” of Chicks Dig Bad Boys.
Is that they have no problem with lying, manipulating and doing anything to get what they want.
Not only are they more confident with women which always helps; they will say and do whatever it takes to get them.
Real Life Story Here:
Over heard a woman talking in class in college once about how she went out with a guy for a couple years, she was religious and he respected it and even though they were engaged he never had sex with her.
Anyways they don’t get married and eventually break up; a guy who was friends with her fiancee knew about her “code” and made a bet with her fiancee he could get her to break it.
They took that bet.
The man; her current husband, managed to get her to sleep with him in under two weeks.
Beta-Boy couldn’t get it in “TWO YEARS”.
The Kicker? The whole time she’s talking about it, she’s laughing and giggling about it.
“Chicks Love Cads” indeed.
Was this woman beautiful? No, but definitely attractive, high 5 maybe a low 6.
Nothing amazing but respectable to be seen with.
LikeLike
Pretty much
LikeLike
So they like boys. Its probably because their fathers are gamma like these criminals. So thats all they know.
LikeLike
This: “had more often contracted a sexually transmitted disease than non-offenders.”
If you Google “Hot Felon”, the dude that comes up screams to me and my hindbrain:
Hepatitis C from prison/tats/prison tats
Probable other STDs
A future that includes living in apartments surrounded by particle board furniture
Children in remedial classes
Baby mama drama
Basically, yuck. And yet hundreds of thousands of women (and a billionaire’s daughter) think he is hawt.
But it’s cool, my kid with great genes and above average reading skillz looks forward to supporting his offspring with her tax dollars.
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 2 people
Who the fuck is that poz pustule behind Merkel wearing rainbow suspenders? No wonder Europe is in a demographic death spiral.
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
US, Russia disagree over what Trump and Putin actually said to each other – CNN
https://apple.news/Ai68bfe9-ToGhTSC4k1pA_w
Translation: Jewish deep state continues to humiliate itself with outrageous lies and paranoid fantasies.
LikeLike
Tillerson should be fired.
Should not talk for Trump with deep state talking points 1 minute after Trump tries to save lives.
We are busy saving lives and the Jew continues to cry about fake election interference.
LikeLike
Tillerson let the fags take over the boyscouts. He will burn in hell forever.
LikeLike
They just can’t give it up with that stupid election stuff, can they? They’re so arrogant they can’t imagine that people might not want their detestable candidate, and that they’d win forever if not for dirty Russian tricks.
Meanwhile, Mexico meddles openly and on a large scale in the elections and everyone remains mum about it.
LikeLike
Dunno but Putin respects Trump. Remember Obama bowing low like a nigger bitch.
LikeLike
This means I need to mention my criminal past more often. But how to do it in an artful manner?
[CH: funny you should ask. iirc, there is a post buried deep in the chateau archives that discusses this very topic. in short, you bring it up begrudgingly, like so: “i’ve had some scrapes with the law. i’m not proud of it, but i thought you should know up front, if that bothers you.”]
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds about right. Thanks CH. I got your back. If you need me to beat someone ass, I will try my best to make the trip and do it. White Power.
LikeLike
Different ethnicities in jail and outside
LikeLike