It’s incredible to think that it wasn’t so long ago America was so based, and so full of heritage pride, that the US Navy could release a training film on how to succeed with brunettes (because blondes are apparently easy lays and don’t require much in the way of effort to seduce).
(For whatever reason, the video isn’t linking up in WordPress, so go here to watch.)
The advice given in the Pussy Service Announcement will sound familiar to Chateau Heartiste guests…because it’s basically The 16 Commandments of Poon commissioned for release by the US government, before the levers of power were handed over to (((social constructivists))), SJWs, tranny freaks, and the globohomo bathhouse alliance.
First of all, be late. That’ll show her you’re a busy important person, and you’re not TOO interested in her. Play hard to get…this will make a great first impression.
Game concept: Flip the seduction script. Be the chasee, not the chaser, of girls.
Laugh it off. Apologize? Aw come on, don’t be a square.
Never apologize. Contrition is as little tolerated by women as it is by the leftoid media fuggernaut.
Be masterful. Protective. Grasp her arm firmly and steer her…to the car.
Kino escalation.
Always lead your woman.
Chicks dig it.
Oh, and don’t forget to light your cig with the candle sitting in the middle of your restaurant table.
Make sure you’re seated so you can see what’s going on. Makes for a more interesting evening.
Dread game.
Good stuff. Would recommend, without hesitation.
The twist ending is that this is the dating behavior the US Navy does NOT recommend for finding, meeting, attracting, and marriage-closing mid-20th Century American women. Instead the Navy believes men should aspire to the opposite: chivalrous White Knightery, pedestalizing pussy at every opportunity, and generally being a boring, if polite, beta schlub.
I don’t know if this “ladies first”, pussy pedestalization, “be a gentleman” anti-Game advice worked in 1967 (I doubt it), but it’s interesting that the culture at the time was strongly committed to this view of the dating scene. That tells me either beta males had it very good then and could afford to “be a gentleman” without losing out to sexy cads, or that cads were ascendent and the wider culture was beginning to push gentlemanly courtship as a reaction to a growing threat to cohesive society from sexy ZFG alphas and the women who couldn’t get enough of them.
PS Anyone notice that the man playing the cad in the first part of the video who supposedly demonstrated bad dating protocol is, shall we say, a bit on the dago swarthy side? And that the man playing the “gentleman” is a Whiter shade of pale? Heh.

First!!!
LikeLike
…against the wall.
LikeLiked by 3 people
That was the moniker of the jew queer!
Wrong side of History…
LikeLike
I wonder which young officer had his date bent over the poop deck later that night?
LikeLike
Could also be the Rear Admiral giving her the captain’s mess.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ensign Pulv-her
LikeLike
I stumbled on that video a few months ago – from the mid-1960’s (?).
Pretty sure the official “advice” given in the film was *wrong* even back then; the *asshole* would “get the girl” and the “Nice Guy” would likely go back to the barracks empty handed..
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, he wouldn’t be empty handed back in the barracks now would he?
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLike
I feel like the original (Mister Roberts) was a bit better. But classic nonetheless.
LikeLike
Here’s the video
The ‘advice’ is about as god as dating advice from your aunt.
LikeLike
[…] Dispatches From Based America: How To Succeed With Brunettes […]
LikeLike
Swabbies always did need explicit instructions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Even on what to do with their “mops” after lights-out?
(No homo)
LikeLiked by 1 person
same for swabs
LikeLike
Marlo Thomas picking up some spare work before That Girl hit?
LikeLike
Possibly, gentlemanly behavior was appreciated by the girls’ fathers. On the other hand, girls’ fathers haven’t mattered in dating and marriage decisions at least since the 60’s in the US (or if they did it was in a negative way — looks like American girls do certain things on purpose to spite their fathers).
LikeLike
So long as you’re not a huge pussy, opening doors and being on time isn’t a deal breaker, especially if you’re a tall, good-looking sailor.
I think CH is right, though, that this video was filmed under very different cultural circumstances. The very existence of such a video today would be decried as sexism by cunty feminists everywhere.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yeah, it’s always best to err on the side of not being too accommodating or gentlemanly at first but once you’ve laid the ground work and you’ve established the right status with a girl, it’s perfectly okay to do some of that stuff.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Young Chad McTallHawt can do no wrong.
Has been true for 10,000 years, will be true for another 10,000.
[CH: wrong. a good-looking man can certainly do wrong and fuck up a budding seduction. anyone who’s lived a day in his life has seen the phenomenon of a paper alpha — that man who looks good to women at first but then betrays a horrible social clumsiness that turns them off just as quick.]
LikeLike
game isn’t so much about getting women as it is a set of skills and attitude that enable a guy to better negotiate things on HIS terms. sex with women is but ONE of those negotiations. even so-called PUA experts fail to grasp this.
game is universal. even dogs understand the value of jerkboy attitude.
LikeLike
It helps, to be sure. But I’ve watched plenty of attractive men fail with women; neediness and insecurity are evil, powerful forces no matter how masculine you look.
My point was that a little chivalry won’t sink your efforts if you have the right mindset.
[CH: chivalry is like any beta provider display of affection: best in small doses and only after jerkboy cred has been established.]
LikeLike
Definitely. But I remember being a newby and showing up to dates five minutes late because I was worried about looking desperate. The problem was caring what she thought. Once you get over that, everything else starts to fall into place.
LikeLike
that is true about blondes being easier than brunettes. redheads are even easier.
not sure what evolutionary reason there might be for that but it has seemed to be a pattern in my experience.
LikeLike
read somewhere (maybe the chateau?) that redheads tend towards aggressive/whorish because men generally found them to be the least attractive women when choosing a mate up until recent times.
they’ve had to adapt to be aggressive and slutty in order to get a man. that adaptation has worked. look how many men go nuts over them now because of their fiery/slutty reputations even though most of them are ugly as dogs.
i’m guessing the reason men found them unattractive was due to their poor genetics. even now they have a super low tolerance for pain making them big crybabies when they are even a little uncomfortable. they have more allergies and digestive problems than most and get sick a lot more often. they also tend towards bad eyesight and have higher risks for many kinds of cancer. overall they are a bad gamble if you want healthy strong offspring.
[CH: i’ve never come across any source claiming redheads are the least attractive of women or that they have health problems. They do have higher sensitivity to pain, but that maybe explains why redheaded women have higher sensitivity to pleasure as well. i personally find redheads — especially the crimson red with pale skin combo — very alluring.]
LikeLike
i’ll try to find some sources
i don’t disagree that there are some hot redheads. i’ve seen some real hotties myself
but in reality, most don’t look like the girl in the pic below. most of them are pretty dang homely
and when i was growing up almost every redhead i knew wore glasses, needed braces, were sick all the time or had allergies. and the whole family was like that. overall they seem like pretty weak stock to me.
it’s fine if guys don’t care and just want the bang but a lot of people want someone to settle down and have healthy kids with. odds of kids with health issues are greater when parents are redheads
aside from the historical research i read, i also came across info that said they are the least desirable white women on matchmaking sites and services
LikeLike
here’s one study from five years ago. talks about which haircolors get the most attention and why that might be true
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-raj-persaud/redheads-psychology_b_1911771.html
LikeLike
Redhead US Presidents:
George Washington
Thomas Jefferson
Andrew Jackson
US Grant
Silent Cal
Ike
Donald Trump
Other notables:
Mohammed
Queen Elizabeth
King Henry VIII
Columbus
Queen Isabella
This may explain why red-headed women are deemed a handful.
Both my niece and my secretary fit your profile: sassy and snarky.
Both fall HARD for ZFG Alpha types.
LikeLike
girl now is redhead and she did not cry when I broke my hand on her head
course I didn’t either
although she didn’t want to touch where the bone was poking the skin up cause it was gross lol
she still did though I made her touch it gently he he he
yea same one before that ran in room and jumped off the bed with the butcher knife raised high grabbed her cut my finger blood drops were everywhere although I didn’t feel anything
do a little bit fiesty
LikeLike
cold as ice they are
LikeLike
Red heads are rarest and as such th hottest… And second CH observation about sensitivity. They are also more passionate… Anger in one hand and lust on the other.
LikeLike
it was kind of insane cause after she saw blood she turned into maternal instinct girl and talking all nice lol’
before talking bout slicing my tires and all manor of bad girl acts
LikeLiked by 1 person
that’s cool. shows she at least has a heart even if she is crazy lol
LikeLike
@Sentient
i get the…rare makes them the hottest thing. people like novelty
but there’s a reason they are rare
nature is letting them fade away because they have weak dna. they are genetic dead ends
LikeLike
@toker…Your description of ‘reds’ sounds almost EXACTLY like my ex.
LikeLiked by 1 person
probably a lot of men who have had similar experiences. i have, that’s why i’ll never date another redhead
most guys are just too blinded by the unique hair to see things objectively. i believe that is by design. they need the extra flash to draw men in because they are otherwise poor mate choices ie: their reputations for sluttitude, bitchy/cold personalities and all the other reasons i mentioned
physiognomy is real like it or not, it’s stupid to ignore that fact just because you’re distracted by pretty hair.
LikeLike
have no idea why blondes would have adapted to be easy lays though
LikeLike
Chicks who bleach their hair tend to be loose.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Natural blondes are not easy lays, that’s another one of those Revenge of the Nerds wishful thinking urban myths guys like to repeat to one another to keep their spirits up and maintain The Lie That Mustn’t Perish.
If she’s a natural blonde, that means she’s of mostly (or all) Germanic bl00d, and they are, by nature, kind of reserved – regardless of what else you may have heard.
They do, on the other hand, have the tendency to cut loose on vacay, away at college, spring break, that sort of thing, freed all of a sudden from the restraints of what others might think of them.
They also, unfortunately, have some self-destructive and tribe-destructive tendencies, which come to the fore when among much darker men.
Last but not least, blondes are the ones who usually receive the most attention from men, so it’s generally easier for them to hook up.
LikeLike
not sure i get your wishful thinking reference. if anything, it’s the opposite of that. if a lot of guys say blondes are easy, that means they aren’t getting rejected meaning no need to keep any spirits up about anything
can’t speak for everyone but i’ve had less trouble getting blondes to bed quickly than any other haircolor
so if what you’re saying is true, i must just be really good at gaming them lol
LikeLike
forgot to add that redheads also have much higher risks of getting parkinsons and endometriosis than any other haircolor.
not that anyone cares but it’s something to think about if you’re wanting healthy kids
LikeLike
re: redhead limitations
hmmmmmmmmm
LikeLike
do u know my redhead midnighttoker he he he
yea kind of wild she only just started period after I knew her a year and quarter or so
LikeLiked by 1 person
yeah the data don’t lie
just like we all talk about differences between blacks and whites, germans and italians
stereotypes always have some truth to them
LikeLike
yea you do know her specifically he he he
LikeLike
haha no
she’s sounds like a hoot though lol
LikeLike
same nickname her only pregnancy when younger but miscarriage
didn’t think could have kids met greg wallah
LikeLike
This phrase is fucking HILARIOUS:
“…The 16 Commandments of Poon commissioned for release by the US government…”
Incredibly, one visualizes Washington D.C. in some alterna-world with a bevy of nubile nymphs on a flesh-colored Abe Lincoln Memorial’s erect 5-foot-member lap, the Washington Monument as a glans-topped actual phallic symbol, and the Vietnam War Memorial of all the pussy H-Bomb (Heartiste) and Xtrabeing have slayed in the pubic jungles of the Half-Breed East.
*hand over my chest* I do solemnly swear to defend the 16 Poon Amendments of the Constitution, from all enemies internal (poz) and external (game denialists) . . . *stepping up to the dais* Thank you, President Xtrabeing. You may know assume the Office . . .
LikeLiked by 1 person
A Sorceryfag by any other name . . .
LikeLike
*laughing*
The fact that you remember me says more about you than me. Actually, I’m flattered so many good men recall my earlier incarnations. I think of myself as a god of magic . . . I never did like saying “yeah, yeah, I’m the god of magic whose name is … the god of magic.” Xtrabeing will do permanently. I’m willing to talk and to listen if anyone is even slightly entertained at my antics. Maybe you??? Or you??
LikeLike
P.S. — and this is my last comment for the day — instead of sayin’ “haters gonna hate” I will remark I JUSTLY AND RICHLY DESERVED BEING SLAMMED. I am incredibly arrogant and I brought it on myself. *spreads hands* I do however believe I’m brilliant enough and immodestly pleasing enough that I can win over any and all doubters. This concludes today’s contents. If you want more, clique-vous on my name to deliver yourself into my clutches at my ‘site … heh heh heh. X.
LikeLiked by 1 person
you’re the weirdest jew/robot/fag combination, but i like how you like your own posts, faggotron.
LikeLike
Those two paragraphs, especially the second, exploded my pedodar.
tl;dr: Shut up jew.
LikeLike
The degenerate yet measly products of a frenzied yet vapid (((mind))).
LikeLiked by 1 person
My dad, a Vietnam Huey pilot, met my mom at a dance. His script was Le Chateau’s. They married in two months.
My uncle married a decade later, and worse.
My brother & I are professional men. We argued MatLab v MathCad Saturday. My cousins get wages.
LikeLike
Mathcad rocks! I remember using that when it was a mere DOS based program. Matter of fact, I used it to teach myself some finer points of Algebra during my college days.
Didn’t score me any poji though. Sad 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think the “beta twist” of the alpha-meat video is because the Navy has to adhere to Larger Principles of its Culture, which are basically timeless and based on honor; within the confines of honor, the beta worldview fits neatly, while the alpha worldview is an awkward rake’s fit. The rake of the year 1700 doesn’t fit in well with ye noble knight with lady’s token of the year 1300.
LikeLike
“I don’t know if this “ladies first”, pussy pedestalization, “be a gentleman” anti-Game advice worked in 1967…”
I just might have.
I am a big fan of watching oldies music videos on YouTube and noticed an interesting trend. Whenever there’s a female performer from the ’60s or ’70s, the talk in the comments section starts to turn to how much “nicer” and better-looking women were in the old days.
Keep in mind, these videos are way outside the manosphere’s scope, so it’s not like the commenters are from these parts. The latest video where I saw this was Mouth & McNeal’s “How Do You Do,” which was a hit in 1972. At first, people commented on the song. Then the comments turned to the woman who co-sang it, and finally the commenters starting talking about how women were more decent then but are b*tches today.
The fact that this is happening among music fans, who are usually liberal says something. And I think what it says is that women have, in fact, changed and not for the better.
So, the Navy’s advice just might have worked in 1967. After all, there were no old-time equivalents then to the obnoxious female celebrities we have now (Nicki Minaj; Miley Cyrus, Katy Perry). So it stands to reason there were few female counterparts to the kind of women we deal with today.
LikeLiked by 2 people
society still held women accountable for their behavior. they had to choose men whose association wouldn’t immediately brand them a whore. (nowadays if a women is not a whore she’s “weak” and “submissive”).
there was more pressure on them to marry (and not get divorced) so they mostly skipped over the alpha fux part. but it wasn’t as necessary because a woman could easily to find a masculine guy who was willing to “commit”.
the social contract was intact. there was no porn to fap to. guys were expected to stick around and be fathers. IOW, beta provider game ftw.
LikeLiked by 3 people
“society still held women accountable for their behavior”
Bingo! The ‘summer of love’ was also happening in 1967, but the siren song of “do whatever the fuck you want cuz feelz” hadn’t yet percolated through the culture as it would in just a few short years.
Even in ’67, a premarital pregnancy could cause the offending pair to be cast into the outer dark, so marriage was the way out (and there were fewer ways out of marriage).
LikeLike
the men and the women from those times would be hard pressed to survive in today’s world. the blue pill worldview is today the equivalent of believing in an earth centered universe. there’s simply too much data available to keep sustaining the myth.
the redpill is coming for everyone. men are the pioneers, but women are going to have their redpill moment, too. soon. i’m curious what will that look like…
LikeLike
“The men and the women from those times would be hard pressed to survive in today’s world.”
^^This is true, and I’ve seen it first hand with men in their late 40s and early 50s who get back into the dating world after coming out of long marriages. It’s a massive shock to their system, and their confidence takes a huge hit.
And these men aren’t even baby boomers, they’re gen Xs.
LikeLike
too much *contradictory* data available…
LikeLike
If it’s “contradictory”
(at a minimum) some of it ain’t data 🙂
(see Cap’n on the topic)
LikeLike
who u gonna believe, fieldni**er
me, or ur own lying eyes
LikeLike
Bobby Gentry was all the rage in 1967. I remember seeing this performance on “The Smothers Comedy Brothers Hour” :
LikeLike
It’s slightly surprising seeing all those svelte, breast-a-licious babes in that video. Compare and contrast to any of today’s Walmart parkinglots. Man. Depressing.
[CH: the obesity crisis didn’t hit america until the early 70s. before then, the fat chick was a rarity. a circus side show freak. today, she’s the norm. and the sexual market groans under the additional weight.]
LikeLike
LikeLike
Back then, even the vibrants were classier.
LikeLike
Lolzozozoz here’s a brunette who dreams of being a redhead:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/07/lynch-used-email-alias-elizabeth-carlisle-to-write-about-clinton-tarmac-meeting.amp.html
Lolzozozoz o lolzozozoz!!!!
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 4 people
I like her eyes — crazy radioactive cobalt blue eyes do it for me.
We can pretend by mutual lover’s agreement that her pubes are in fact the flaming colors of the trees outside Ireland’s Slane Castle where Bryan Adams serenaded the Gaelics to the sweet dulcet sounds of Canadiana Lite.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very Irish colouring.
LikeLike
Problem with these girls is that they’re usually some species of narcissist. Remember: rarity means she commands high market value, and that means ….
LikeLike
http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/marvelcinematicuniverse/images/f/fe/Elizabeth_J_Carlisle.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20160419213730
LikeLike
LikeLike
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK… I’M EATING HERE!
LikeLiked by 4 people
Brunettes don’t matter.
LikeLike
Gay.
http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/a748e220fd4b7ff883dace3a1d9a3459
LikeLiked by 1 person
fuck u
LikeLike
Lolzozozoz http://money.cnn.com/2017/08/06/technology/culture/google-diversity/index.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
We used to program women to resist their own natures to a degree, and punished women who gave in. So a wife material woman back then who had been raised right would expect a suitor to behave like a gentleman. Even if you were in a time of gentlemanly behavior, some zfgs would have given you the edge. See: P&P Mr. Darcy
LikeLiked by 1 person
I disagree strongly that women were ever “programmed” by mere men. Their mothers raised them along their own particular and personal lines, with certain families of women raising headstrong, bitchy oldenday cunts and other more demure moms having demure daughters. What existed then was a PUNISHMENT MECHANISM which was called Male Patriarchy. If a bitch slept around and got a bun in the oven, she was “sent away” to bear the whelp in shame. She was still the same old bitch mom raised (just like now Miley Cyrus’ mom is raising her to twerk); the diff. is the shackles of the Big P. were around.
Five cheers for P-Shacks’ — let’s bring it back
LikeLike
i think people underestimate how much influence the mom has on how kids, especially daughters end up.
i’ve known many men who are pretty good dudes. strong morals, good ethic systems, conservative, etc who m@rried not so great women thinking they could turn them into something better. then when the kids come along they realize what a mistake they made.
even the most attentive father in the world is going to have a hard time counteracting the influence the mom has on the kids. in most families, she’s the one around them the most.
so even if you keep your woman in line for the most part and she’s somewhat tolerable. and you teach them what you believe and try to mold them your way, her bad attitude poor moral base/childhood damage, etc is going rub off on them more than anything you might do because she is the person they spend the most time with.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“who married not so great women thinking they could turn them into something better. then when the kids come along they realize what a mistake they made.
even the most attentive father in the world is going to have a hard time counteracting the influence the mom has on the kids”
It isn’t just nurture, of course. Most of behavior is, quite simply, genetic, and thus inherited. 80% of everything is probably a decent benchmark.
Marry a bar tramp, have bar tramp-descended children, etc.
LikeLike
Ernst Zundel RIP.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Feel free to email Mark with any comments you have!
http://www.torontosun.com/2017/08/07/ernst-zundel-deserved-agony-not-a-quiet-exit
LikeLiked by 2 people
Two funny moments from Ernst I remember: In the Toronto court hearings in 1985 he showed up dressed as Jesus nailed to a cross to protest his persecution. Another time he showed up with polish on his face proclaiming he was an immigrant being persecuted against.
A lot of red pill truths came out in the court cases about the hoax.
LikeLike
His trial would make an awesome screen play. The prosecution got their asses handed to them, whatever the verdict.
LikeLike
Five years in the slammer for words. There really isn’t enough rope is there? Even if it is reusable.
LikeLiked by 1 person
An even “better” detail is that they imprisoned his defense lawyer in Germany for 3 years. Then, when she got out and made a speech about how free speech wasn’t allowed, they threw her back in the slammer for another 20 months. Or so I hear.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLike
A brave and honourable man.
LikeLike
To modify an earlier quote, may his honorable ashes lie softly upon him.
LikeLike
RIP, Whyte martyr.
“the truth is no defense”.
LikeLike
Oh how I yearn for heritage America
LikeLiked by 1 person
you HAVE heritage America
this IS heritage America.
the America of today is the expected spawn of the America of yesterday which was the expected spawn of America of two days ago, ad infinitum all the way to the rebellion of 1776
LikeLiked by 2 people
If that is true, then logically you have no right to complain about Jews — nor anything else.
LikeLike
many thanks to you,
O “I fap to goydeath porn” M-ohe-L
for setting straight a lowly fieldni**er like me
LikeLike
Though ML is generally a despicable demoralization agent of some type, in this rare instance it must be admitted he has a point.
Oink’s position, taken as written, is basically a repetition of the leftist hallucination that the Founding Fathers and generations of tough, independent White men — including the ones who engaged in the 1921 Tulsa battle — created the nation specifically with the idea of being replaced with a tidal wave of groids and Mexicans, while their descendants became trannies, fags, man-hating feminists, and assorted other degenerate freaks.
Probably just his Catholic hatred for Protestants showing through, though.
LikeLike
Thanks Massa Ironsides,
.
No, neither Herr Greg’s ancestral Lutheran lords, nor my beloved Habsburgs were lunatics. Both kicked your “Anabaptist” ancestors out in the cold.
.
Something can be said about the fact that you ilk is still here, atop the Global pile, while the Habsburgs and the Hohenzollerns Empires are schutt und asche. God moves in mysterious ways, says the hymne.
.
but ultimately, it shows that there’s a real chasm between the Lutherans and Catholics and those I refer to as “Anabaptists”. Incidentally, there has been no Lutheran POTUS, and the Catholic attempts at POTUS had the well-known results. Just a cohencedence, surely. Just lIke the dumping of Somalis on the Lutheran Upper Midwest cohencedence.
.
and yes, the “Anabaptist” ilk is in my POV, the ultimate arbiter of power in These United States and the rudder to this Ship of State.
.
we who are not of that persuasion (for whatever reason) can wise up to it and act accordingly, or be cucked cucks
and yes, y’all masterfully controlled the massive influx of Papists and Lutherans, I doubt you’ll have trouble with the mestizos or the Africans. And bindis will just be added in the ((middle management)) rotation
LikeLike
being a gentleman works great with women when being a gentlemen was actually a rarity. and that in turn would have been an era of highly constrained female sexuality. give them the right to vote and they’ll vote themselves in a redistribution of wealth to them. once they are “financially independent” the need for a provider is useless and they are free to fuck primitives.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Being a gentleman works great with >50 or <12.
If you consider those age groups dating options, NiceGuy away.
Be chivalrous.
If not, gentleman is the fast track to incel he11.
LikeLike
I love your writing and your take on things from dating women to the vagaries of the present day culture are almost breathtaking. But, as a proud Italian-American, I want you to know that I will hunt you down and force you to marry an Amy Schumer lookalike if you ever again use the word “dago” in public That is all.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
This alpha male’s got it down
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s utterly hilarious, especially the baboon’s smile!
LikeLike
He’s probably wondering,’why is this one bald?’
LikeLike
Do the opposite of whatever the brass tells you to do eh? Conforms with my own 6 years of navy experience.
LikeLike
Alright, Heartiste. As I sit here, sipping gin and reading the blog on my phone at local bistro, with Sinatra playing in the background and black-and-white tv clips playing on the screen in front of me; I have questions. I saw this video about a week before this post. And what I saw was a rebuke of the undeniable wisdom you dispense, from a world long gone. But nevertheless a Better world. I know that you also acknowledge (whether consciously or otherwise) that this world Is better, as evidenced by the phrase “threat to cohesive society” and the observation that “the cad in the first part of the video who supposedly demonstrated bad dating protocol is, shall we say, a bit on the dago swarthy side? And that the man playing the “gentleman” is a Whiter shade of pale”
Now maybe it’s because I was raised in the deep south, or because I was raised by a single mother with a serious case of BPD [she would stand in front of a restaurant door and stare at it blankly, clutching her purse in front of her waist, until her 8-year-old opened it for her (this, in the late ’90s)]. Maybe it’s because I still haven’t shed the ‘WHITE-knight’ of my psyche, but what I want more than pussy (I know how that sounds), is the restoration of “cohesive society”; of a world where most girls ‘Know Better’ than to to run around with “cads”. I want the world that my ancestors built, back when being a ‘gentleman’ really was the way to get a discerning brunette. I want the world where good Americans marry young and have lots of kids. You have shown us how to navigate the scorched earth, but how do we replant it? What is the path back to chivalry being correct? Is this really the exclusive world of the menonites, forevermore? Because I don’t want to become a menonite. I WANT MY CIVILIZATION BACK!!!
LikeLike
Well said.
LikeLike
Don’t be disgruntled, believe in what will be. Happiness.
LikeLike
The answer to why being a gentleman worked in the past? Everyone was broke, dressed in formal clothes, and men were assertive by default. You didn’t have to be a douchey dipshit to be alpha, and society heartily rewarded it. Being an asshole is the PUA equivalent of training wheels, which is why assertive dominance without being mean consistently scores better than typical PUA.
But it’s hard. And our culture lumps all of that, even eye contact, into some sort of “metaphysical transpersonal rape”. Back then, a gentleman wasn’t a doormat. Even the term “gentle man” is funny, since back then it evoked an image of a guy in a suit, smoking a pipe, and telling his wife to go to the kitchen while the men are talking with little concern for fee fees or ouchies.
LikeLike
Alas, it comes from a time when the woman was likely to be punctual and give a shit about the man she had agreed to meet. That script has already been flipped — on us. Both parties being flakes isn’t much fun.
LikeLike
the goyim know, ((sweet-cheeks))
lame XXth century propaganda talking points ain’t cutting it no more.
y’all need to change yer tunes, if y’all want to keep yer sinecures.
LikeLike
The part in both scenarios where she sits down in the passenger seat… both men walked to their side of the car in front of it.
Walk around the back of your car. She doesn’t need to watch you pivot twice to get there.
LikeLike
open the trunk, while you’re at it
LikeLike
He didn’t check to see if she opened his side before he walked around.
Sonny says: “Dump her”.
LikeLike
Best part of that movie!
LikeLike
[…] Source link […]
LikeLike
“Oh, and don’t forget to light your cig with the candle sitting in the middle of your restaurant table.”
Like the scene from Seinfeld where the ZFG boyfriend eats his crying girlfriend’s French fries.
LikeLike
There’s the legendary story of a drunk Errol Flynn caught taking a leak in the sink of a woman’s bathroom when some woman walked in and shrieked: “But this is for ladies!!!”
Flynn apparently turned around pointing to his shlong said: “So madam…is this.”
Can’t remember where I read it.
LikeLike
It was John Barrymore…
LikeLike
Blondes with grey eyes were the most beautiful and intelligent Aryan Women. ((They)) used propaganda to defile our Blond Beauties. During the middle ages smart beautiful women were burnt as witches to worsen white peoples genes.
Anyway Best Women are Aryan without any neanderthal, erectus or other monkey hominidi dna.
LikeLike
This is hilarious….hard to miss that the guy they portray as the clueless jerk is enlisted (although he turns into a Midshipman near the end) and the exemplary “gentleman” is an officer. They didn’t say if he was a Naval Academy Midshipman….but they do clearly emphasize his prior enlisted service when he asks the Admiral if he was on the Salem during the Korean war. I was a little skeptical about the authenticity of the video to start, but that aspect of the film has Navy written all over it.
LikeLike